The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jahrsdörfer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jahrsdörfer, B.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 177: 5920-5927.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Function: Inhibition of IFN-{alpha} Secretion and Modulation of Immune Phenotype by Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide1

Dorit Fabricius*,{dagger}, M. Sue O’Dorisio2,*,{dagger}, Sue Blackwell{dagger},{ddagger} and Bernd Jahrsdörfer{dagger},{ddagger}

* Department of Pediatrics, {dagger} Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, and {ddagger} Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) are considered the main sentinels against viral infections and play a major role in immune tolerance. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) is a potent immunomodulator, whose role in PDC function is unknown. The present study was designed to investigate whether human PDC express VIP receptors and whether VIP has immunological effects on PDC. Using real-time RT-PCR and immunofluorescence, we demonstrated that VIP receptors VPAC1 and VPAC2 are expressed on PDC. After culturing PDC with VIP and CpG oligodeoxynucleotides for 48 h, expression of surface molecules with significance for PDC-T cell interactions as well as IFN-{alpha} secretion were quantified using FACS analysis and ELISA, respectively. For functional assays, CFSE-stained CD4+ T cells were coincubated with differentially treated PDC. T cell proliferation and production of various cytokines were determined by FACS analysis and ELISA. VIP enhanced PDC expression of CD86, MHC II, and CCR7. In contrast, VIP inhibited PDC secretion of IFN-{alpha} and expression of Neuropilin-1 and MHC I. The potential of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide-activated PDC to induce proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells was impaired when VIP was present during activation. Furthermore, pretreatment of PDC with VIP resulted in a decrease of the IFN-{gamma}:IL-4 ratio in cocultured T cells, suggesting a modulation of the immune response toward Th2. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that VIP regulates the immunological function of human PDC. VIP may thus be involved in the modulation of immune responses to viral infections as well as in the maintenance of immune tolerance.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP),3 traditionally defined as a neuropeptide, is involved in the modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses (1, 2, 3). VIP can be considered a cytokine because it is produced and secreted by immune cells including lymphocytes and granulocytes in response to various immune signals (2), exhibits a broad spectrum of immunological functions, and exerts them, in a paracrine and/or autocrine way, through three different specific receptors, VPAC1, VPAC2, and PAC1 (4, 5). Although VIP has been classically considered an immunosuppressive agent, several studies suggest this peptide is rather a modulator of the homeostasis of the immune system (5, 6). Although the immunological effects of VIP have been studied in mice (7), its role in the human immune system is less clear.

Dendritic cells (DC) are a heterogeneous population of APCs, which are crucial for the initiation of a primary immune response (8). In addition to this classical description, DC play an important role in maintaining peripheral tolerance through the induction of regulatory T cells (Treg) (9). Two naturally occurring DC types have been described in peripheral blood so far, plasmacytoid DCs (PDC) and myeloid DCs (mDC). PDC represent only 0.2–0.8% of PBMC (10), and yet are considered to be primarily responsible for IFN-{alpha} secretion in response to viral infection and for the establishment of an adaptive immune response against the virus (10). Importantly, PDC have also been shown to be critically involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune processes including lupus erythematosus and may therefore play a major role in the maintenance of immune tolerance in healthy individuals (11, 12, 13).

Because VIP receptors are found ubiquitously in human epithelial tissues (14), the main portals of potential microbial invasion, its effects on DC, which are also present at these sites in larger numbers, are of notable interest for the understanding of the immune modulatory functions of VIP. Recent studies point to the involvement of VIP in the regulation of DC using either in vitro-generated human monocyte-derived DC (15, 16, 17) or murine bone marrow-derived DC (15, 18, 19). Although VIP studies on the function of in vitro-generated DC are highly suggestive of in vivo regulation, the effects of VIP on human peripheral blood DC subsets including PDC have not yet been examined.

We therefore characterized VPAC1 and VPAC2 expression on human PDC. We then investigated whether or not VIP has an impact on phenotype and cytokine secretion of PDC and whether VIP treatment of PDC modulates their effect on T cells.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
PDC precursor isolation and cell culture

This study was reviewed and approved by the University of Iowa Institutional Review Board. Buffy coats of 20 healthy subjects were received from the Blood Bank at the University of Iowa. PBMC were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient density centrifugation (Sigma-Aldrich) and RBC lysed with ACK (ammonium-chloride-potassium) (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 7.3)) lysing buffer. PDC precursors were isolated from PBMC with anti-BDCA-4 magnetic beads or the PDC isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec). The purified fraction was >90% BDCA-2+ and <5% CD3+ or CD14+. For PCR and some additional experiments, a combined negative and positive selection kit was used (Diamond PDC isolation kit; Miltenyi Biotec), where the purified fraction was >98% BDCA-2+.

PDC were cultured for 2 days in AIM-V medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies), supplemented with 10 ng/ml recombinant human IL-3 (R&D Systems) in a flat-bottom 96-well plate (Corning) at a density of 1 x 105 cells/well. Purity at day 2 was >99% BDCA-2+ cells. PDC were treated with 1 µg/ml CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) (Coley Pharmaceutical Group) and 10–6 M VIP (Bachem) after testing various concentrations. VIP was dissolved in 0.05 M acetic acid, neutralized before use with 2 M Tris buffer (pH 8), and diluted 1/30 in ice-cold siliconized tubes with AIM-V medium directly before use to get a 10 µM working dilution. The vehicle control consisted of acetic acid, Tris buffer, and medium alone. Two classes of CpG ODN are distinguished. Although class B CpG ODN have a major impact on the differentiation and the phenotype of PDC, class A CpG ODN induce the secretion of large amounts of IFN-{alpha} by PDC. If not stated otherwise, we used the class B CpG ODN 2006, which we will henceforth call CpG ODN.

The following ODN sequences were used: class B CpG ODN 2006, 5'-TCG TCG TTT TGT CGT TTT GTC GTT-3'; class A CpG ODN 2216, 5'-GG GGG ACG ATCG GGG GGG-3'; control ODN 2243, 5'-GGG GGA GCA TGC TGG GGG GG-3'. Underlined nucleotides have phosphorothioate linkages. All others have phosphodiester linkages. The human lymphoblast cell line Molt-4b and the human colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 were cultured as described previously (20).

Immunofluorescence

The PDC precursor cell suspensions were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) for 30 min at room temperature, spun down, and resuspended in PBS. A drop of suspended cells was applied to poly-L-lysine-coated coverslips. Before VPAC1 staining, protein blocking was performed with 10% normal goat serum and 3% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were incubated in primary Ab mouse anti-human VIPR1 (Exalpha Biologicals) diluted 1/250 for 1 h at room temperature followed by incubation in the secondary Ab goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen Life Technologies) diluted 1/200 for 30 min at room temperature. Before VPAC2 staining, protein blocking was performed with 5% normal rabbit serum in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. PDC were incubated in primary Ab goat anti-human VPAC2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1/50 for 1 h at room temperature followed by incubation in the secondary Ab rabbit anti-goat Alexa Fluor 568 (Invitrogen Life Technologies) diluted 1/200 for 30 min at room temperature. Labeling with mouse anti-human BDCA-2 FITC (BD Biosciences), dilution 1/11, was then performed to demonstrate specificity for DCs. The coverslips were then counterstained with To-Pro-3 (Invitrogen Life Technologies) for 5 min to stain nuclei. The coverslips were attached to slides with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) mounting medium. The cells were examined and imaged using a Bio-Rad MRC1024 laser scanning confocal microscope.

Real-time RT-PCR

RNA was isolated using RNAlater (Ambion) followed by the RNeasy Kit (Qiagen) from purified PDC (> 98% BDCA-2+, CD3, CD14) and control cell lines Molt-4b and HT-29. The lymphoblast cell line Molt-4b served as negative control for VPAC1 and positive control for VPAC2; the colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 served as positive control for VPAC1 and negative control for VPAC2 (20). The RNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry and RNA stored at –80°C. RNA was reverse transcribed using SuperScript III RNase H Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Generated cDNA was quantified in PCR conducted with the Platinum Quantitative PCR SuperMix-UDG kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Primers and probes were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies. Primer and probe sequences were as follows: hVPAC1 5', ACA AGG CAG CGA GTT TGG AT; hVPAC1 3', GTG CAG TGG AGC TTC CTG AAC; hVPAC1 probe, 5'-/56-FAM/CCA CCC TTC TGG TCG CCA CAG CTA T/36-TAMNph/-3' (amplicon size 142 bp); hVPAC2 5', CGT GAA CAG CAT TCA CCC AGA AT; hVPAC2 3', CGT GAC GGT CTC TCC CAC AT; hVPAC2 probe, 5'-/56-FAM/AAC ACA AAG CCT GCA GTG GCG TCT G/36-TAMNph/-3' (amplicon size 166 bp). rRNA5', CGG-CTA-CCA-CAT-CCA-AGG-AA; rRNA3', GCT-GGA-ATT-ACC-GCG-GCT; rRNA probe, 5'-VIC-TGCTGGCACCAGACTTGCCCTC TAMRA-3'. {Delta}CT (cycle threshold) was determined by subtracting the average rRNA CT value from the average VPAC CT value. {Delta}{Delta}CT values were calculated by subtraction of {Delta}CT values from controls Molt-4b (for VPAC1) and HT-29 (for VPAC2), and the final value was determined as 2{Delta}{Delta}CT (PE Applied Biosystems).

Phenotypic determination

Using FACS analysis, we evaluated PDC expression profiles of surface molecules with significance for T cell-PDC interactions including the costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86, and OX40 ligand, the Ag-presenting molecules MHC class I and II, the chemokine receptor CCR7, the immunological synapse-establishing molecule Neuropilin-1 (BDCA-4) (21), and the DC activation marker CD83. FITC-, PE-, and PECy5-labeled mAbs to CD80, CD83, CD86, HLA-ABC, HLA-DR, CCR7, BDCA-4, and BDCA-2 were used to stain PDC. CD3 and CD14 were used to exclude contaminating T cells and monocytes, respectively. All Abs as well as isotype controls were purchased from BD Biosciences, except for anti-BDCA-4 and BDCA-2 (Miltenyi Biotec). Stained PDC were analyzed on a FACScan (BD Biosciences), and data were expressed as median fluorescence intensities (MFI) of treated cells relative to the MFI of untreated cells.

ELISAs

PDC were isolated as described previously and cultured in IL-3-containing (10 ng/ml) AIM-V medium in the presence of CpG ODN (1 µg/ml) and VIP (10–6 M) after testing various concentrations. After 2 days, supernatants were harvested, and IFN-{alpha}, TGF-beta, or IL-10 concentrations were determined by a sandwich immunoassay using human ELISA kits for IFN-{alpha} MultiSubtype (PBL Biomedical Laboratories), for TGF-beta1 (Cell Sciences) and IL-10 (eBioscience). Supernatants (100 µl) or standards were placed in 96-well precoated ELISA plates and incubated at 24°C for 1 h (IFN-{alpha}) or 2 h (IL-10). After washing, plates were incubated with equal volumes of biotinylated anti-IFN-{alpha} or anti-IL-10 secondary Ab for 1 h at 24°C. Plates were washed and incubated at 24°C for 1 h with HRP-conjugated avidin. For TGF-beta detection, samples were incubated at 24°C for 4 h with HRP-conjugated anti-TGF-beta1 Ab in a precoated plate. After addition of the substrate tetramethyl-benzidine, plates were read in an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices). The lower limit of IFN-{alpha} detection was 156 pg/ml, of IL-10 detection 2 pg/ml, and of TGF-beta1 23.76 pg/ml.

T cell/PDC-cocultures and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFDA-SE) staining

CD4+ T cells from healthy donors were isolated via positive selection (Miltenyi Biotec) and resuspended in PBS (1 x 107 cells/ml) containing 5-(and 6-) CFDA-SE (Molecular Probes) at a final concentration of 1 µM, incubated at 37°C for 10 min, and washed three times. CD4+ T cells were then coincubated with allogeneic PDC pretreated with CpG ODN with and without VIP for 5 days at different ratios on a 96-well plate in AIM-V medium in a 200-µl volume, as described previously. Cells were harvested and analyzed by FACS. Data analysis was performed using FlowJo Software (Tree Star).

IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 secretion

Pan T cells were isolated from healthy donors using a negative selection kit (Miltenyi Biotec) and coincubated at a 1:50 DC:T cell ratio with PDC, which had been pretreated for 2 days as described previously. Brefeldin A with a final concentration of 10 µg/ml (Epicentre Biotechnologies) and PMA (50 ng/ml) plus Ionomycin (1 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) were added during the last 4 h of culture. Intracellular staining was performed using a Fix and Perm kit (Caltag Laboratories) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, cells were treated with fixation buffer for 6 min and washed with PBS. After centrifugation, cells were counterstained with CyChrome-labeled anti-CD4 Abs and washed again. Cells were then resuspended in permeabilization buffer and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the presence of FITC-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} and PE-conjugated anti-IL-4 Abs. All Abs and isotype controls as well as buffers were purchased from BD Biosciences. Stained T cells were run on a FACScan (BD Immunocytometry Systems), and data were analyzed using the program FlowJo (Tree Star). Data are expressed as ratios between the MFI of IFN-{gamma} and IL-4.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance was assessed by Student’s t test and mixed linear regression analysis as appropriate. Differences were considered significant at a p value ≤0.05 and highly significant at a p value ≤0.01.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
VPAC1 and VPAC2 are expressed on human PDC precursors

Recently, we demonstrated that VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors are expressed on human monocytes and T cells (3). The present study was designed to delineate the significance of VIP for PDC. Therefore, we first investigated whether or not PDC express the VIP receptors VPAC1 or VPAC2. To test the expression of the respective receptor proteins, isolated PDC were fixed in paraformaldehyde, stained with Abs to human VPAC1 and VPAC2, and subsequently analyzed by confocal microscopy. As illustrated in Fig. 1, PDC precursors show expression of both VPAC1 and VPAC2 in a pattern characteristic of membrane-bound proteins. Human cell lines HT-29 and Molt-4b served as negative and positive controls (Fig. 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Human PDC express VPAC1 and VPAC2 protein on their cell surface. PDC were isolated as described and stained with anti-BDCA-2 FITC (green stain in A, C, D, and F) and anti-VPAC1 (red stain in B and C) or anti-VPAC2 (red stain in E and F) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. A and D show BDCA-2 expression, which served as specific counterstain for PDC. B and E show PDC expression of VPAC1 (B) and VPAC2 (E). C and F show the merged images. To-Pro-3 (blue) was used to stain nuclei. Representative results from one of three independent experiments are shown. The lymphoblast cell line Molt-4b served as negative control for VPAC1 and positive control for VPAC2, the colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 served as positive control for VPAC1 and negative control for VPAC2. HT-29 and Molt-4b were stained with anti-VPAC1 (red stain in G, negative in H) or anti-VPAC2 (red stain in J, negative in I). To-Pro-3 (blue) was used to stain nuclei. Representative results from one of three independent experiments are shown.

 
To confirm results obtained with immunofluorescence, PDC were highly purified and total RNA immediately extracted for quantitative analysis of VPAC1 and VPAC2 transcripts by real-time RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2, PDC precursors express RNA for both VPAC1 and VPAC2. RNA extracted from cell lines HT-29 and Molt-4b served as control. These data demonstrate that VPAC1 and VPAC2 are coexpressed in freshly isolated PDC precursors, as has been shown for human T cells and monocytes (5).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Human PDCs express VPAC1 and VPAC2 mRNA. PDC were purified as described and RNA immediately isolated. Then real-time RT-PCR was performed to quantify the presence of VIP receptors VPAC1 and VPAC2. To determine the relative quantity of VPAC1 and VPAC2 mRNA, the comparative CT method was used. The lymphoblast cell line Molt-4b served as negative control for VPAC1 and positive control for VPAC2, the colon carcinoma cell line HT-29 served as positive control for VPAC1 and negative control for VPAC2. A, Bar graphs represent relative mRNA quantity. Error bars indicate SD. B, PCR products were fractionated in 1% agarose gels. The expected amplicon sizes were 142 bp for hVPAC1, 166 bp for hVPAC2, and 187 bp for 18S ribosomal RNA fragment.

 
VIP inhibits PDC secretion of IFN-{alpha}

A main feature of PDC is their strong secretion of IFN-{alpha} in response to viral stimuli as well as to synthetic CpG ODN, which is the reason why they were formerly referred to as natural IFN-{alpha}-producing cells (10). We therefore investigated the effect of VIP on IFN-{alpha} production in response to class A and B CpG ODN. PDC were incubated in IL-3-containing AIM-V medium for 48 h in the presence or absence of VIP and/or CpG ODN, and the culture supernatants were subsequently harvested. The supernatants were then tested for IFN-{alpha} levels using ELISA. VIP inhibited PDC secretion of IFN-{alpha} in a dose-dependent manner with a maximum decrease at 10–6 M. Using this optimum dose, VIP decreased IFN-{alpha} secretion in four donors in the range of 20 and 90% for class B CpG ODN and in the range of 18 and 55% class A CpG ODN. The average decrease was 29% in the ODN class B-stimulated samples and 31% in ODN class A-stimulated samples (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. VIP inhibits IFN-{alpha} secretion by PDCs. PDC were isolated as described and cultured in IL-3-containing (10 ng/ml) AIM-V medium in the presence of various concentrations of VIP and different ODN (1 µg/ml), as indicated. After 48 h, supernatants were harvested and IFN-{alpha} concentrations determined by ELISA. A, Bar graphs represent mean IFN-{alpha} concentrations from four different donors in the presence of VIP (10–6 M). Error bars indicate SEM. The effect of control ODN on PDC was comparable to that of medium (data not shown). B, VIP-dose response is shown as line graphs representative of two independent experiments. IFN-{alpha} concentrations were determined by ELISA after incubation of PDC for 48 h with various concentrations of VIP (x-axis) alone (diamonds) or in combination with CpG ODN (squares) class B (1 µg/ml).

 
VIP modulates human PDC phenotype

The observation that PDC express receptors for VIP prompted us to test the effects of VIP on PDC phenotype. Human primary PDC were matured in vitro via the IL-3-dependent pathway in the presence or absence of VIP and CpG ODN. CpG ODN are synthetic ODNs containing CpG motifs, which mimic viral or bacterial DNA and are potent PDC activators (22). To determine the VIP-dose response, PDC were incubated for 48 h with increasing concentrations of VIP in combination with CpG ODN (Fig. 4C). The vehicle consisted of acetic acid, Tris buffer, and medium alone and had no effect (data not shown). Expression of CD86, BDCA-4, MHC class I, and MHC class II was determined by FACS analysis. The impact of VIP on PDC was most prominent at a concentration of 10–6 M, which was subsequently used in all experiments. PDC viability was not affected at this concentration (data not shown). As has been shown by others (23), CpG ODN class B strongly up-regulate CD80 and CD86 in PDC. VIP enhanced this effect for the costimulatory molecule CD86 in a dose-dependent manner, whereas it had no effect on CpG ODN-mediated up-regulation of CD80 (Fig. 4, A and B). Expression of Ag-presenting molecules MHC class I and II is up-regulated by CpG ODN in mDC (24), and as shown in Fig. 4, this is in part true in human PDC. However, VIP on PDC oppositely regulated MHC class I and MHC class II. Although VIP down-modulated MHC class I expression, it up-regulated MHC class II expression. Both effects were dose-dependent and were observed in the presence and the absence of CpG ODN. Fig. 4 also demonstrates dose-dependent down-regulation of BDCA-4 expression by VIP, both in the presence and the absence of CpG ODN. The chemokine receptor CCR7, previously shown to be up-regulated by CpG ODN (25), is also up-regulated in the presence of VIP, but VIP does not further stimulate CpG ODN induction of CCR7 (Fig. 4). Likewise, in two experiments, we observed a tendency of CD83 up-regulation, a DC activation marker, which together with CCR7 expression characterizes mature DC (26). CD83 is up-regulated by VIP in the absence, but not further enhanced in the presence of CpG ODN (Fig. 4).


Figure 4
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. VIP induces phenotypic changes in PDC. PDC were isolated as described and incubated for 48 h in the presence or absence of VIP (10–6 M) alone or in combination with CpG ODN (1 µg/ml). Then cells were harvested, and expression of CD86, CD80, CD83, BDCA-4, MHC class I, MHC class II, and CCR7 was determined by FACS analysis. A, Histograms show original data representative for at least four independent experiments. Surface marker expression without VIP (dotted line) vs with VIP (red line) is shown as MFI. B, Bar graphs represent average MFI values of VIP treated vs untreated cells relative to medium from 15 (CD86), 8 (CD80), 2 (CD83), 4 (BDCA-4), 11 (MHCI), 15 (MHCII), and 6 (CCR7) independent experiments. Error bars indicate SEM. Note the different axes for medium and CpG in the CCR7 panel. The effect of control ODN on PDC was comparable to that of medium (data not shown). C, VIP-dose response is shown as line graphs representative of two independent experiments. PDC were incubated for 48 h with various concentrations of VIP (x-axes) in combination with CpG ODN (1 µg/ml). Expression of CD86, BDCA-4, MHC class I, and MHC class II was determined by FACS analysis (MFI on y-axes).

 
VIP-primed PDC have a decreased potential to induce allogeneic CD4+ T cell proliferation

To investigate the effect of VIP on PDC-T cell interactions, CD4+ T cells were isolated, stained with CFDA-SE, and coincubated with PDC, which had been cultured in IL-3-containing AIM-V medium in the presence of CpG ODN and/or VIP for 48 h. After 5 days, cocultures were harvested, and the percentage of proliferated T cells was determined by FACS analysis. Fig. 5A demonstrates that PDC matured in the presence of VIP, and CpG ODN have a reduced capability to induce allogeneic CD4+ T cell proliferation as compared with PDC matured with CpG ODN alone. In experiments using six human PDC donors, the inhibitory effect of VIP pretreatment was apparent at PDC:T cell ratios of 1:50 and 1:500, whereas VIP alone had no significant effect on PDC stimulation of CD4+ T cell proliferation (Fig. 5B).


Figure 5
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. VIP inhibits the potential of PDC to induce proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells. Proliferation of allogeneic CD4+ T cells after 5-day coculture with PDCs preincubated with different stimuli for 48 h is shown. PDC were isolated as described and cultured in IL-3-containing (10 ng/ml) AIM-V medium in the presence of CpG ODN (1 µg/ml) and VIP (10–6 M) for 48 h. Allogeneic CD4+ T cells from healthy donors were isolated, stained with CFDA-SE, and coincubated with precultured PDC at different ratios as indicated. T cells in the absence of PDC or in the presence of anti-CD3/CD28 Abs served as negative and positive controls. After 5 days, cocultures were harvested, and the percentage of proliferated (i.e., CFDA-SElow) T cells was determined by FACS analysis. A, Histograms from one of six representative experiments are shown. Gray lines represent T cell proliferation in response to PDC not stimulated with VIP, and red lines represent T cell proliferation in response to PDC stimulated with VIP. B, Line graphs represent average T cell response of six different donors. Error bars indicate SEM. *, p values <0.05 indicate significant differences at a PDC:T ratio 1:50 and 1:500.

 
VIP-primed PDC shift IFN-{gamma}:IL-4 ratio of allogeneic CD4+ T cells toward IL-4

Depending on the maturation signals they receive, PDC guide T cell differentiation into either IFN-{gamma} or IL-4-producing cells (27). To examine the effect of VIP during PDC maturation, we isolated pan T cells and coincubated them for 48 h with PDC, which had been pretreated with VIP and/or CpG ODN for 48 h. PDC primed in the presence of VIP alone induced a shift of the IFN-{gamma}:IL-4 ratio toward IL-4 in the responding CD4+ T cell population as compared with unprimed PDC. This effect was mainly due to increased IL-4 production with unaffected IFN-{gamma}. In contrast, PDC primed in the presence of CpG ODN generally induced higher levels of IL-4 and IFN-{gamma} in the responding CD4+ T cell population; VIP had no significant effect on this response (Fig. 6, A and B).


Figure 6
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. VIP-treated PDC decrease the ratio of IFN-{gamma}:IL-4 secreted by CD4+ T cells and reduce TGF-beta secretion. PDCs were cultured in IL-3-containing (10 ng/ml) AIM-V medium in the presence or absence of VIP (10–6 M) and CpG ODN (1 µg/ml) as described. Pan T cells were isolated by negative magnetic selection and coincubated for 48 h with differently pretreated PDC. Brefeldin A (10 µg/ml), PMA (50 ng/ml), and Ionomycin (1 µg/ml) were added during the last 4 h of culture. Counterstaining with anti-CD4 and intracellular staining with FITC-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} and PE-conjugated anti-IL-4 Abs was performed as described. A, Zebra plots of one representative experiment of seven are shown. CD4+ T cells are gated. Numbers in quadrants indicate percentages of positive cells. B, The average IFN-{gamma}:IL-4 MFI ratios from seven independent experiments are shown. Error bars indicate SEM. C and D, IL-10 (C) and TGF-beta (D) contents in CD4+ T cell/PDC coculture supernatants were determined by ELISA. Error bars indicate SEM of seven independent experiments.

 
VIP-primed PDC decrease TGF-beta secretion of allogeneic CD4+ T cells

To further study the T cell phenotype in the presence of VIP-primed PDC, we coincubated isolated CD4+ T cells for 48 h with PDC, which had been pretreated with VIP and/or CpG ODN for 48 h. Subsequently, we determined IL-10 and TGF-beta contents in CD4+ T cell/PDC coculture supernatants by ELISA. We found no significant impact on IL-10 secretion. However, TGF-beta levels were significantly lower in the presence of VIP-primed PDC than in the presence of untreated PDC. This effect was absent when PDC had been pretreated with CpG ODN (Fig. 6C).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
PDCs represent one of the two currently known peripheral blood DC subsets. Depending on the conditions present when they are matured in vitro, they induce T cell activation or anergy. Consequently, PDC and DC are considered to be both the main sentinels for viral infections, and also critically involved in the induction and maintenance of immune tolerance (28). In vitro-generated monocyte-derived human DC as well as murine bone marrow-derived DC have recently been shown to be modulated by the neuropeptide VIP (15, 16, 19). The effects of VIP on freshly isolated human peripheral blood PDC have so far not been investigated. The present study is the first to delineate expression of VPAC1 and VPAC2 on human PDC and to characterize the biological response of PDC to VIP.

These results demonstrate transcriptional expression of VPAC1 and VPAC2 RNA as well as functional VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptor protein. VIP-induced inhibition of IFN-{alpha} secretion by PDC following stimulation with CpG ODN is potentially a clinically relevant observation. IFN-{alpha} is a pleiotropic cytokine with a broad spectrum of effects on cells of the immune system and also on tumor or virus-infected cells. The effects on the immune system include induction of cytotoxic activity in NK and T cells as well as maturation and differentiation of monocytes, macrophages, and DCs (29). IFN-{alpha} is considered a promising therapeutic agent because of its strong antiviral and antiproliferative activity. In contrast, IFN-{alpha} is pathophysiologically involved in the maintenance of autoimmune processes such as in systemic lupus erythematosus, where it induces monocytes to differentiate into DCs able to take up apoptotic cell debris and present it as self-Ag, thereby further enhancing and perpetuating the autoimmune response (11, 12, 13). Because of the variety of differential effects on the immune system, IFN-{alpha} synthesis and secretion requires tight control. Our study suggests that VIP may be one of the factors involved in this process, thereby contributing to the general regulation of the immune response.

In general, DC maturation is associated with strong up-regulation of costimulatory and Ag-presenting molecules (28, 30, 31). In PDC, this effect can be observed when the maturation occurs in the presence of CpG ODN (24). We found that VIP was able to further enhance this effect for CD86 and MHC class II but not for CD80. Similar results were obtained from another group in immature murine bone marrow-derived DC, where VIP treatment up-regulated CD86 but not CD80 expression (32). The same group observed a lack of up-regulation of costimulatory molecules when treating LPS-matured human monocyte-derived DC or murine bone marrow-derived DC with VIP (17, 32, 33). In contrast to the enhancement of CpG ODN-induced MHC class II up-regulation on PDC, we observed that VIP inhibited CpG ODN-induced MHC class I up-regulation, suggesting that VIP promotes the interaction of PDC with CD4+ T cells rather than with CD8+ CTLs. Furthermore, we found that in MLRs with differentially primed PDC and allogeneic CD4+ T cells, VIP-primed PDC supported a Th2-weighted cytokine profile by inducing IL-4 rather than IFN-{gamma} production by T cells. These data support the general perception of VIP as an immunomodulatory cytokine. We further show that VIP by itself is able to induce activation of PDC, as reflected by the up-regulation of MHC class I and of the chemokine receptor CCR7. VIP-induced modulation of CCR7 is of particular interest because CCR7 interacts with CCL19/CCL21 and may be relevant for mature PDC to enter afferent lymph vessels to reach lymph nodes (34). Therefore, one effect of VIP on PDC in tissues could be to facilitate maturation and transport to regional lymph nodes. The fact that VIP alone has an effect on this molecule suggests that VIP is not just an inhibitor of PDC function. It rather appears to be an immune modulator that changes PDC phenotype at distant sites in a way that supports migration to secondary lymphoid organs, where they can encounter and interact with specific T cells, even in the absence of more potent stimuli like viral DNA.

In contrast, our results indicate that VIP inhibits parts of the immunological function of PDC. First, the neuronal receptor Neuropilin-1 (identical with BDCA-4 (35)) is down-modulated by VIP. Neuropilin-1 has been demonstrated to be essential for establishing the initial contact between DCs and resting T cells and thus the initiation of the primary immune response (21). Second, in MLRs performed with differentially treated PDC and allogeneic CD4+ T cells, we found that VIP-treated PDC are less active in inducing T cell proliferation as compared with PDC matured in the absence of VIP. Comparable results were found by Delgado et al. (6, 33), who demonstrated that VIP-primed bone marrow-derived DC or resting macrophages had a reduced capacity to stimulate T cell proliferation.

Another critical point where VIP has been proposed to interfere with immune regulation is in the induction of Treg by DC. Delgado et al. (32) have proposed that monocyte-derived DCs treated with VIP become tolerogenic and give rise to an increased frequency of Treg (17). We therefore evaluated the typical cytokines Treg produce, either predominantly IL-10 (Treg1) or TGF-beta (Treg2/Th3) (36). Surprisingly, we found no significant impact of VIP-primed PDC on IL-10 secretion by T cells. However, unexpectedly, TGF-beta levels were significantly lower in the presence of VIP-primed PDC than in the presence of untreated PDC. CpG ODN had a similar effect that was not further affected by VIP. CTLA-4 surface expression on cocultured CD4+ T cells was not altered by VIP pretreated PDC (data not shown). It may be relevant that VIP did not prevent PDC maturation, unlike in studies with other DC types describing that VIP induced a stable immature phenotype (17, 32). Our findings suggest that the effects of VIP on DCs strongly depend on the DC type and the maturation stimuli present at the time of priming. Our data do not support the hypothesis that VIP-treated PDC may acquire the capacity to induce Treg in vitro. It remains to be further elucidated whether or not VIP-treated PDC can shape the character of encountering T cells in a different way in the presence of other maturation stimuli.

The DC type we have characterized in this study is substantially different from the ones used by Delgado et al. (15, 17, 33). Human mDCs as opposed to PDCs might be closer to the monocyte-derived or bone-marrow-derived DC model systems used by Delgado et al. (15, 17, 33) and should be studied in more detail in the future.

In conclusion, our study demonstrates for the first time that human PDCs express receptors for and show biological responses to VIP. VIP significantly inhibits CpG ODN-induced secretion of IFN-{alpha} by PDC and changes their immune phenotype in such a way that their interaction with CD4+ T cells is facilitated and a Th2 response is promoted, whereas T cell proliferation is inhibited. VIP may therefore be involved in the modulation of immune responses to viral infections, thereby helping to prevent immunological overdrive. Although independent of IL-10 or TGF-beta, VIP might contribute to the development and the maintenance of immune tolerance, which could have substantial implications for the treatment of Th1-dominated autoimmune diseases such as lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Jean Ross for excellent assistance with immunofluorescence staining and confocal microscopy and Justin Fishbaugh and Gene Hess for excellent technical assistance with flow cytometry.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the Carver Research Program of Excellence, the Children’s Miracle Network, and National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 CA82691 (to M.S.O.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. M. Sue O’Dorisio, Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, 375 Newton Road, 4235 Medical Education Building Research Facility, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address: sue-odorisio{at}uiowa.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide; DC, dendritic cell; PDC, plasmacytoid DC; Treg, regulatory T cell; mDC, myeloid DC; ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; CT, cycle threshold; MFI, median fluorescence intensity; CFDA-SE, carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester. Back

Received for publication April 18, 2006. Accepted for publication August 1, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. O’Dorisio, M. S., C. L. Wood, T. M. O’Dorisio. 1985. Vasoactive intestinal peptide and neuropeptide modulation of the immune response. J. Immunol. 135: 792S-796S. [Medline]
  2. Delgado, M., D. Pozo, D. Ganea. 2004. The significance of vasoactive intestinal peptide in immunomodulation. Pharmacol. Rev. 56: 249-290. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lara-Marquez, M., M. O’Dorisio, T. O’Dorisio, M. Shah, B. Karacay. 2001. Selective gene expression and activation-dependent regulation of vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 1 and type 2 in human T cells. J. Immunol. 166: 2522-2530. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Pozo, D., M. Delgado. 2004. The many faces of VIP in neuroimmunology: a cytokine rather a neuropeptide?. FASEB J. 18: 1325-1334. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gomariz, R. P., C. Martinez, C. Abad, J. Leceta, M. Delgado. 2001. Immunology of VIP: a review and therapeutical perspectives. Curr. Pharm. Des. 7: 89-111. [Medline]
  6. Delgado, M., W. Sun, J. Leceta, D. Ganea. 1999. VIP and PACAP differentially regulate the costimulatory activity of resting and activated macrophages through the modulation of B7.1 and B7.2 expression. J. Immunol. 163: 4213-4223. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Teresi, S., F. Boudard, M. Bastide. 1996. Effect of calcitonin gene-related peptide and vasoactive intestinal peptide on murine CD4 and CD8 T cell proliferation. Immunol. Lett. 50: 105-113. [Medline]
  8. Banchereau, J., F. Briere, C. Caux, J. Davoust, S. Lebecque, Y. J. Liu, B. Pulendran, K. Palucka. 2000. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18: 767-811. [Medline]
  9. Banchereau, J., S. Paczesny, P. Blanco, L. Bennett, V. Pascual, J. Fay, A. K. Palucka. 2003. Dendritic cells: controllers of the immune system and a new promise for immunotherapy. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 987: 180-187. [Medline]
  10. Liu, Y. J.. 2005. IPC: professional type 1 interferon-producing cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23: 275-306. [Medline]
  11. Blanco, P., A. K. Palucka, M. Gill, V. Pascual, J. Banchereau. 2001. Induction of dendritic cell differentiation by IFN-{alpha} in systemic lupus erythematosus. Science 294: 1540-1543. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ronnblom, L., M. L. Eloranta, G. V. Alm. 2003. Role of natural interferon-{alpha} producing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells) in autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 36: 463-472. [Medline]
  13. Dall’era, M. C., P. M. Cardarelli, B. T. Preston, A. Witte, J. C. Davis, Jr. 2005. Type I interferon correlates with serological and clinical manifestations of SLE. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 64: 1692-1697. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Reubi, J. C.. 2000. In vitro evaluation of VIP/PACAP receptors in healthy and diseased human tissues: clinical implications. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 921: 1-25. [Medline]
  15. Chorny, A., E. Gonzalez-Rey, A. Fernandez-Martin, D. Ganea, M. Delgado. 2006. Vasoactive intestinal peptide induces regulatory dendritic cells that can prevent acute graft-versus-host disease while maintain graft-versus-tumor. Blood 107: 3787-3794. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Delneste, Y., N. Herbault, B. Galea, G. Magistrelli, I. Bazin, J. Y. Bonnefoy, P. Jeannin. 1999. Vasoactive intestinal peptide synergizes with TNF-{alpha} in inducing human dendritic cell maturation. J. Immunol. 163: 3071-3075. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gonzalez-Rey, E., A. Chorny, A. Fernandez-Martin, D. Ganea, M. Delgado. 2006. Vasoactive intestinal peptide generates human tolerogenic dendritic cells that induce CD4 and CD8 regulatory T cells. Blood 107: 3632-3638. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Delgado, M., E. Gonzalez-Rey, D. Ganea. 2004. VIP/PACAP preferentially attract Th2 effectors through differential regulation of chemokine production by dendritic cells. FASEB J. 18: 1453-1455. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chorny, A., E. Gonzalez-Rey, A. Fernandez-Martin, D. Pozo, D. Ganea, M. Delgado. 2005. Vasoactive intestinal peptide induces regulatory dendritic cells with therapeutic effects on autoimmune disorders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 13562-13567. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Summers, M. A., M. S. O’Dorisio, M. O. Cox, M. Lara-Marquez, E. J. Goetzl. 2003. A lymphocyte-generated fragment of vasoactive intestinal peptide with VPAC1 agonist activity and VPAC2 antagonist effects. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 306: 638-645. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Tordjman, R., Y. Lepelletier, V. Lemarchandel, M. Cambot, P. Gaulard, O. Hermine, P. H. Romeo. 2002. A neuronal receptor, neuropilin-1, is essential for the initiation of the primary immune response. Nat. Immunol. 3: 477-482. [Medline]
  22. Rothenfusser, S., E. Tuma, M. Wagner, S. Endres, G. Hartmann. 2003. Recent advances in immunostimulatory CpG oligonucleotides. Curr. Opin. Mol. Ther. 5: 98-106. [Medline]
  23. Krug, A., S. Rothenfusser, V. Hornung, B. Jahrsdorfer, S. Blackwell, Z. K. Ballas, S. Endres, A. M. Krieg, G. Hartmann. 2001. Identification of CpG oligonucleotide sequences with high induction of IFN-{alpha}beta in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 31: 2154-2163. [Medline]
  24. Hartmann, G., G. J. Weiner, A. M. Krieg. 1999. CpG DNA: a potent signal for growth, activation, and maturation of human dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9305-9310. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Jarrossay, D., G. Napolitani, M. Colonna, F. Sallusto, A. Lanzavecchia. 2001. Specialization and complementarity in microbial molecule recognition by human myeloid and plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 31: 3388-3393. [Medline]
  26. Chaperot, L., A. Blum, O. Manches, G. Lui, J. Angel, J. P. Molens, J. Plumas. 2006. Virus or TLR agonists induce TRAIL-mediated cytotoxic activity of plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 176: 248-255. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kadowaki, N., S. Antonenko, J. Y. Lau, Y. J. Liu. 2000. Natural interferon {alpha}beta-producing cells link innate and adaptive immunity. J. Exp. Med. 192: 219-226. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Banchereau, J., R. M. Steinman. 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392: 245-252. [Medline]
  29. Pestka, S., C. D. Krause, M. R. Walter. 2004. Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol. Rev. 202: 8-32. [Medline]
  30. Steinman, R. M., M. Pack, K. Inaba. 1997. Dendritic cells in the T-cell areas of lymphoid organs. Immunol. Rev. 156: 25-37. [Medline]
  31. Cella, M., A. Engering, V. Pinet, J. Pieters, A. Lanzavecchia. 1997. Inflammatory stimuli induce accumulation of MHC class II complexes on dendritic cells. Nature 388: 782-787. [Medline]
  32. Delgado, M., E. Gonzalez-Rey, D. Ganea. 2005. The neuropeptide vasoactive intestinal peptide generates tolerogenic dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 175: 7311-7324. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Delgado, M., A. Reduta, V. Sharma, D. Ganea. 2004. VIP/PACAP oppositely affects immature and mature dendritic cell expression of CD80/CD86 and the stimulatory activity for CD4+ T cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 75: 1122-1130. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Penna, G., S. Sozzani, L. Adorini. 2001. Cutting edge: selective usage of chemokine receptors by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 167: 1862-1866. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dzionek, A., Y. Inagaki, K. Okawa, J. Nagafune, J. Rock, Y. Sohma, G. Winkels, M. Zysk, Y. Yamaguchi, J. Schmitz. 2002. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells: from specific surface markers to specific cellular functions. Hum. Immunol. 63: 1133-1148. [Medline]
  36. Jonuleit, H., E. Schmitt. 2003. The regulatory T cell family: distinct subsets and their interrelations. J. Immunol. 171: 6323-6327. [Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. Yuan, X. Liu, A. W. Wu, P. W. McGonagill, M. J. Keller, C. S. Galle, and J. L. Meier
Breaking Human Cytomegalovirus Major Immediate-Early Gene Silence by Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Stimulation of the Protein Kinase A-CREB-TORC2 Signaling Cascade in Human Pluripotent Embryonal NTera2 Cells
J. Virol., July 1, 2009; 83(13): 6391 - 6403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
C. P. A. Ivory, L. E. Wallace, D.-M. McCafferty, and D. L. Sigalet
Interleukin-10-independent anti-inflammatory actions of glucagon-like peptide 2
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): G1202 - G1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Shin, T. Toy, S. Rothenfusser, N. Robson, J. Vorac, M. Dauer, M. Stuplich, S. Endres, J. Cebon, E. Maraskovsky, et al.
P2Y receptor signaling regulates phenotype and IFN-{alpha} secretion of human plasmacytoid dendritic cells
Blood, March 15, 2008; 111(6): 3062 - 3069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jahrsdörfer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, D.
Right arrow Articles by Jahrsdörfer, B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS