|
|
||||||||

* Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611; and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Midwestern University, Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Downers Grove, IL 60515
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6. Using peripheral blood (PB) monocytes, RANTES decreased LPS-induced IL-6 transcriptionally, whereas TNF-
was suppressed at the posttranscriptional level. RANTES signaled through p38 MAPK, and this signaling was further enhanced by LPS stimulation in PB monocytes, resulting in the earlier and increased secretion of IL-10. Inhibition of p38 by short-interfering RNA or a chemical inhibitor, as well as neutralization of IL-10, reversed the RANTES-mediated suppression of LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
. Further, when rheumatoid arthritis synovial fluid was added to PB monocytes, the neutralization of RANTES in fluid reduced the LPS-induced IL-10 and increased TNF-
. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that RANTES down-regulates TLR4 ligation-induced IL-6 and TNF-
secretion by enhancing IL-10 production in PB monocytes. These observations suggest that the therapeutic neutralization of RANTES, in addition to decreasing the trafficking of leukocytes, may have a proinflammatory effect at the site of established chronic inflammation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of experiments targeting chemokines in experimental arthritis suggest that the effects of chemokines may extend beyond chemotaxis. We have shown that the treatment of adjuvant-induced arthritis before the onset of clinically detectable disease by the inhibition of RANTES with methionylated RANTES (Met-RANTES) decreases joint inflammation, proinflammatory cytokines, bone destruction, and cell recruitment into the ankles (7). In contrast, our unpublished data show that the inhibition of RANTES after disease onset in adjuvant-induced arthritis did not alleviate the disease. Additionally, blockade of CCR2 in the initial phase of collagen-induced arthritis ameliorates the disease, whereas inhibition of CCR2 after disease onset aggravates the arthritis (8). Further, collagen-induced arthritis is increased in CCR2-null mice compared with wild-type controls (9). These findings suggest that chemokine inhibition may differentially affect inflammatory responses in rodent models of RA depending on the time of intervention, suggesting a potential biological role for chemokines beyond their effects on leukocyte trafficking.
Supporting this possibility, RANTES and MCP-1/CCL2 induce RA synovial tissue fibroblasts to produce IL-6 and IL-8 (10). RANTES can also promote IL-2 and IL-5 expression in human T cells (11, 12). MIP-1/CCL3 stimulates the synthesis of IL-1, TNF-
, and IL-6 by murine macrophages (13). Studies examining the effects of RANTES on monocytes are important, because it is possible that the exposure of monocytes to RANTES before entering the site of inflammation may affect subsequent function, which may be important for understanding the pathogenesis of RA as well as the effects of therapeutic intervention aimed at the inhibition of chemokines.
In this study, LPS was used as a surrogate for endogenous TLR4 ligands such as heat shock proteins and extra domain A fibronectin, which are highly expressed in the joints of patients with RA (14, 15, 16). Pretreatment of peripheral blood (PB) monocytes with RANTES decreased the LPS-induced expression of IL-6 mRNA and protein, whereas RANTES reduced LPS-induced TNF-
at the posttranscriptional level. Inhibition of p38 MAPK signaling or neutralization of IL-10 reversed the effects of RANTES on LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
production. Using RA synovial fibroblasts, RANTES failed to suppress LPS-induced IL-6, and IL-10 was not secreted. Further, when PB monocytes were cultured in rheumatoid synovial fluid, neutralization of RANTES increased LPS-induced TNF-
and reduced IL-10. These results indicate that RANTES may be capable of modulating the inflammatory response via the induction of IL-10 in a cell type-specific manner. These effects may be critical for understanding the therapeutic consequences of chemokine inhibition for chronic inflammation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monocytes were separated from the buffy coat (Lifesource), which was obtained from healthy donors. Mononuclear cells, isolated by Histopaque (Sigma-Aldrich) gradient centrifugation, were separated by countercurrent centrifugal elutriation (JE-6B; Beckman Coulter) in the presence of 10 mg/ml polymyxin B sulfate as previously described (17, 18, 19, 20). Monocyte purity was >90% as determined by morphology and CD14 staining. Monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS plus 1 µg/ml polymyxin B sulfate (Sigma-Aldrich).
RA synovial tissue fibroblasts and synovial fluid
Synovial tissue fibroblasts were isolated from fresh synovial tissues by mincing and digestion in a solution of dispase, collagenase, and DNase (21, 22). Cells were used between passages 3 and 9. Synovial fluids from the patients with RA were collected and immediately centrifuged at 800 x g at room temperature for 10 min and then stored frozen until use. These studies have been reviewed and approved by an appropriate institutional review committee.
Reagents
Actinomycin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-CCR1 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, anti-CCR5 (2D7) from BD Pharmingen, Met-RANTES from Serono, SB203580 (10 µM) from Calbiochem, LPS from Sigma-Aldrich, and RANTES and monoclonal anti-human IL-10 from R&D Systems.
Inhibition of p38 MAPK by short-interfering RNA (siRNA)
Human p38 MAPK (MAPK14; siGenome SMARTpool) specific and nonspecific control (nontargeting siRNA pool) silence RNA oligonucleotides (siRNA) (Dharmacon) were transfected into PB monocytes (cultured in 6-well plates) by Lipofectamine 2000 (4 µl/well; Invitrogen Life Technologies) following the manufacturers protocol with several modifications. Immediately before transfection, the monocytes were replaced by 2 ml/well fresh RPMI 1640 (no additives). The p38 MAPK or control siRNA was transfected at a final concentration of 100 nM. The transfection reactions were supplemented with 250 µl of FBS after 2 h and 2250 µl of 10% FBS in RPMI 1640 after 5 h. After 48 h, the cells were treated with control medium or RANTES at the indicated time points and used in the experiments described in Results.
RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and real-time RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from PB monocytes using the TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturers protocol (Invitrogen Life Technologies). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed as previously described (23) according to the manufacturers specifications (Promega). For the TaqMan assay, the TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems) was used. The human IL-6, TNF-
, and IL-10 primer and probe sets were labeled with the 5' reporter dye FAM and the 3' quencher TAMRA (Applied Biosystems). The GAPDH primer and probe set was labeled with the 5' reporter dye VIC and the 3' quencher TAMRA (Applied Biosystems). The thermocycling reaction contained 6 µl of H2O, 10 µl of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix, 1 µl of primer and probe set, and 3 µl of cDNA. The reactions were run on the ABI PRISM 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). The amplification program was 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. The efficiency of the TaqMan assays was determined by assaying serial 10-fold dilutions of target cDNA ranging from 100 to 106. With standard analysis parameters of the baseline set between cycle thresholds of 3 and 15 and the
Rn threshold set at 0.1, a standard curve of mean cycle threshold for three replicates at each dilution vs the log10 amount of cDNA was determined (R2 = 0.9985) (24). The relative concentration of the mRNA was based on three triplicates normalized to their GAPDH values. Finally, the data is shown as fold increase compared with the control.
Cytokine quantification
Commercial kits for human IL-6, TNF-
, and IL-10 (DuoSet ELISA; R&D Systems), were used for cytokine quantification as per the manufacturers instructions.
Flow cytometric analysis of TLR expression
Cell surface expression of TLR2 and TLR4 from PB monocytes was analyzed by Ab cell surface staining and two-color flow cytometry as described previously (25). PB monocytes were blocked for 1 h in 50% human serum at room temperature. After blocking, cells were stained with the following FITC-conjugated Abs: anti-TLR2 mAb (eBioscience), anti-TLR4 mAb (Imgenex), and isotype-matched control IgG (eBioscience). After a second washing, cells were labeled with PE-conjugated anti-CD14 mAb (BD Pharmingen) for 30 min to recognize CD14 markers on monocytes. After staining, cells were fixed for flow cytometric analysis performed at the Northwestern Universitys Flow Cytometry Core Facility (Chicago, IL) using Beckman Coulter Epics XL-MCL System II. Cells were gated by the combination of forward and side scatters, and the fluorescence intensity of CD14-positive cells (PE staining) was normalized to that of unstained cells. The level of monocyte surface TLR expression was indicated by the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the FITC-positive cells in the PE-positive cell population (double-positive cells).
Western blot analysis
As shown in Fig. 3A, PB monocytes were pretreated for 1 h with either PBS or Met-RANTES, and thereafter cells were stimulated with RANTES from 0 to 30 min. In Fig. 3C, monocytes were untreated or treated with RANTES for 0.2524 h. In Fig. 7B, RA fibroblasts were either untreated or treated with RANTES for 0.255 h. In Fig. 3C, PB monocytes were either untreated or treated with RANTES from 0.25 to 24 h. In Fig. 7C, RA fibroblasts were treated with PBS or RANTES for 24 h and thereafter cells were treated with LPS for 0-3 h. Western blot analysis was conducted as previously described (23). Blots were probed with phosphorylated p38 MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology) at 1/1000 overnight and, after stripping, were reprobed with either p38 MAPK (Cell Signaling Technology) at 1/1000 and/or tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 1/3000 for 60 min. Blots were scanned and analyzed for measurement of the band intensities with UN-SCAN-IT version 5.1 software. Band intensity corresponded to the sum of all pixel values in the segment selected minus the background pixel value in that segment.
|
|
The data were analyzed using Students t tests for paired samples. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by monocytes
To determine the effect of RANTES on LPS-induced cytokine production, human PB monocytes were incubated with PBS or RANTES (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were treated with LPS (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. The supernatants were harvested, and the levels of IL-6 and TNF-
were measured. RANTES suppressed the LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
secretion by 40% (p < 0.05; Fig. 1, A and B). The LPS-induced expression of IL-6 and TNF-
mRNA peaked at 4 h, and RANTES suppressed (p < 0.01) IL-6 mRNA levels at each time point examined (Fig. 1C). In contrast, RANTES had no effect on LPS-induced TNF-
mRNA expression (Fig. 1D). To determine whether RANTES affected mRNA stability, PB monocytes were pretreated with RANTES and then with LPS for 2 h, treated next with actinomycin D, and the cells were harvested from 0 to 120 min. RANTES had no effect on the decay of LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
(Fig. 1, E and F). These observations demonstrate that, with monocytes, RANTES decreased LPS-induced IL-6 at the transcriptional level and TNF-
at the posttranscriptional level.
|
Studies were performed to determine whether the effects of RANTES were mediated through CCR1 or CCR5. The addition of Abs to CCR1 (p < 0.01) or CCR5 (p < 0.05) each partially reversed the effects of RANTES on the LPS induction of IL-6 (Fig. 2A) and TNF-
(Fig. 2B). Blockade with Abs to both CCR1 and CCR5 or with Met-RANTES completely reversed (p < 0.01) the effects of RANTES (Fig. 2, A and B). These results demonstrate that the effect of RANTES on LPS-induced cytokine production in monocytes is mediated through ligation to CCR1 and CCR5.
|
was shown to reduce CCR1 on monocytic cells (26), experiments were performed to determine whether the effects of RANTES were mediated through the expression of TLR4. The treatment of PB monocytes with RANTES had no effect on the cell surface expression of either TLR4 or TLR2 (Fig. 2C). Therefore, the effects of RANTES were not mediated by the effects of TLR4 expression. The effect of RANTES is mediated through p38 MAPK
Because monocyte chemotaxis induced by RANTES is dependent on activation of p38 MAPK (27), experiments were performed to determine whether the suppression of cytokine production was mediated through this pathway. RANTES-induced activation of p38 MAPK was determined by examining the phosphorylation of p38 (Fig. 3, A and B). The RANTES-mediated activation of p38 was suppressed (p < 0.01) by preincubation of the monocytes with Met-RANTES (Fig. 3, A and B). Our results show that RANTES signals through p38 and that the effects are still apparent after 24 h of stimulation (Fig. 3C). The effect of RANTES on LPS-induced p38 activation was also examined. Pretreatment of monocytes with RANTES increased (p < 0.05) LPS-induced p38 activation (Fig. 3, C and D). These observations demonstrate that RANTES induced the activation of p38 and that the pretreatment of monocytes with RANTES resulted in increased LPS-induced p38 activation.
IL-10 mediates the effects of RANTES
Because p38 regulates IL-10 in monocytic cells (28) following the treatment of monocytes with RANTES, control IgG or Abs specific for IL-10 were added together with LPS. Anti-IL-10 Ab dose-dependently reversed the effects of RANTES on LPS-induced IL-6 secretion (Fig. 4A) and the expression of IL-6 mRNA (Fig 4B). The addition of Abs to IL-10 also abrogated the effects of RANTES on LPS-induced TNF-
secretion (Fig 4C), whereas no effect was observed on the level of LPS-induced TNF-
mRNA (Fig. 4D). These observations suggest that the effects of RANTES were mediated through the expression of IL-10.
|
Because Abs to IL-10 reversed the effects of RANTES, studies were performed to determine the effect of RANTES on the expression of IL-10. The treatment of monocytes with RANTES increased IL-10 mRNA observed after 24 h and before the addition of LPS (Fig. 5A). In contrast, in response to RANTES alone no IL-10 was detected in the monocyte culture supernatants (Fig. 5B). The addition of LPS to RANTES-pretreated monocytes resulted in up to 4-fold increase of IL-10 mRNA (Fig. 5A). Additionally, RANTES resulted in a 34-fold increase of LPS-induced secretion of IL-10 (p < 0.01; Fig. 5B). When examined 1 h after the addition of LPS, IL-10 was detected in the culture supernatants of monocytes preincubated with RANTES, whereas no IL-10 was detectable in the supernatants of PBS control-treated cells (data not shown). To determine whether the effects of RANTES on IL-10 were mediated by p38, the expression of p38 was suppressed. The transfection of monocytes with p38 MAPK, but not with nonspecific control siRNA, resulted in the reduction of total and activated p38 (Fig. 5D). Inhibition of p38 MAPK by SB20380 (data not shown) or siRNA abrogated (p < 0.01) the effect of RANTES on LPS-induced IL-10 secretion (Fig. 5E) and mRNA expression (Fig. 5E). These observations indicate that RANTES augments LPS-induced IL-10 production through activation of the p38 MAPK pathway.
|
is mediated through p38
Experiments were performed to determine whether the effects of RANTES on IL-6 and TNF-
were mediated by p38. The forced reduction of p38 MAPK reversed the RANTES-mediated suppression of the secretion of IL-6 (p < 0.05; Fig. 6A) and the expression of IL-6 mRNA (p < 0.05; Fig. 6B). Further, although the knockdown of p38 suppressed TNF-
secretion (p < 0.05; Fig. 6C), no effect on TNF-
mRNA levels was observed (Fig. 6D). At the outset of our study, p38 was inhibited by two different doses of SB203580, namely 5 and 10 µM. However, because neither concentration may be specific for p38 inhibition, the data presented focused primarily on the use of siRNA knockdown of p38. The inhibition of p38 with the inhibitor SB203580 had the same effect on IL-6 and TNF-
as did the forced reduction of p38 (data not shown). These observations indicate that p38 MAPK mediates the effects of RANTES on the LPS-induced expression of IL-6 and TNF-
.
|
Experiments were performed to determine whether RANTES suppressed the LPS-induced cytokine production by another cell type. LPS induced the secretion of IL-6
3-fold (p < 0.01) using RA synovial fibroblasts (Fig. 7A). In contrast to monocytes, pretreatment of the synovial fibroblasts with RANTES failed to suppress the secretion of IL-6. Therefore, experiments were performed to examine the effects of RANTES and LPS on the expression of IL-10 and the activation of p38. RA synovial fibroblasts did not secrete IL-10 in response to LPS in the presence or absence of RANTES. Nonetheless, RANTES induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation (Fig. 7B) and increased (p < 0.05) LPS-induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation in RA synovial fibroblasts (Fig. 7, C and D). These observations demonstrate that RANTES does not suppress LPS-induced IL-6 secretion in RA synovial fibroblasts and suggest that this was not due to the inability to activate p38, but to the inability to secrete IL-10.
Neutralization of RANTES in RA synovial fluid increases LPS-induced TNF-
secretion from PB monocytes
Because RANTES is highly expressed in the rheumatoid joint (5, 29, 30) experiments were performed to determine whether neutralization of RANTES in RA synovial fluids could induce TNF-
secretion by normal monocytes. RA synovial fluids were incubated with mouse anti-RANTES (10 µg/ml) or control IgG for 1 h and then added to monocytes, which were then incubated with control medium or LPS. When control IgG was added, the RA synovial fluids did not induce the secretion of TNF-
after 24 h. In contrast, when RANTES was neutralized the RA synovial fluids induced TNF-
secretion in the absence of LPS (p < 0.01; Fig. 8A). Human anti-RANTES Ab alone did not induce TNF-
secretion in the absence of RA synovial fluid (data not shown). Consistent with our observations using recombinant RANTES, neutralization of RANTES increased the LPS-induced TNF-
(p < 0.05; Fig. 8B) and suppressed LPS-induced IL-10 (p < 0.05; Fig. 8C). These observations suggest that RANTES in RA synovial fluid is capable of suppressing activation mediated through TLR4 activation. Low concentrations of TNF-
and no IL-10 were detected in the synovial fluids (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B (32). These studies were performed to determine whether RANTES or the therapeutic neutralization of RANTES might result in unanticipated consequences to the inflammatory response. We demonstrate with normal monocytes that, although RANTES did not directly induce TNF-
or IL-6, it did activate p38 MAPK (Fig. 9). Subsequent TLR4 ligation with LPS resulted in enhanced p38 activation and an earlier and increased expression of IL-10. The enhanced secretion of IL-10 suppressed the LPS-induced expression of IL-6 transcriptionally and that of TNF-
at the posttranscriptional level. Further, using RA synovial fluids we demonstrate that neutralization of RANTES resulted in reduced LPS-induced IL-10 and increased TNF-
.
|
(26). RANTES did not work by affecting TLR expression, because RANTES had no effect on surface TLR4 expression in monocytes.
The effects of RANTES were mediated through p38. Reduction of p38 by siRNA or inhibition with SB203580 (data not shown) before the addition of RANTES abrogated the suppression of LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
. Additionally, pretreatment with RANTES increased the activation of p38 induced by LPS. However, it is unlikely that the increased p38 activation directly suppressed cytokine production, because p38 activation promotes the expression of IL-6 and TNF-
(34, 35). Numerous studies have documented the role of p38 in stabilizing IL-6 mRNA (36, 37) via the activation of its downstream target MAPK-activated protein kinase-2 (MK2) that is mediated through AU-rich elements of IL-6 (36). The activation of p38 may also regulate the transcription of IL-6 by increasing transcription (38). The activation of p38 promotes LPS-induced IL-6 transcription by enhancing the accessibility of the cryptic NF-
B binding site of the IL-6 promoter, but not the TNF-
promoter (38). In contrast, p38 promotes the translation of LPS-induced TNF-
with little or no effect on mRNA stability, and this effect is mediated through the AU-rich elements of TNF-
(37, 39, 40). In our study the activation of p38 by RANTES resulted in the reduction of both TNF-
and IL-6, suggesting that p38 was not directly involved.
The effects of RANTES on LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
were mediated by IL-10, which was secreted by the monocytes following the addition of LPS. Consistent with earlier results (41), RANTES alone did not induce IL-6 and TNF-
in monocytes. Additionally, RANTES alone did not result in the secretion of IL-10, although IL-10 mRNA was readily detected in monocytes following incubation with RANTES. The discrepancy between the effects of RANTES on the transcription and secretion of IL-10 may be due to a number of factors. Our assay may not have detected low levels of IL-10 that may have been secreted, even though our assay was sensitive to 15 pg/ml. It is possible that the signal induced by RANTES was not strong enough to induce IL-10 secretion or that a signal in addition to p38 was required to promote IL-10 translation or secretion. When LPS was added to monocytes that had been preincubated with RANTES, the expression of IL-10 mRNA was increased at all of the time points examined. Additionally, in monocytes pretreated with RANTES, IL-10 was detected in the culture supernatants 1 h after LPS stimulation, whereas, in the case of cells preincubated with the control PBS, IL-10 was first detected 2 h after stimulation (data not shown). The LPS-induced secretion of IL-10 was increased up to 4-fold following incubation with RANTES. The activation of p38 was necessary for the expression of IL-10, because p38 siRNA or chemical inhibition with SB203580 (data not shown) prevented the RANTES-induced expression of IL-10. This observation supports the data demonstrating that the inhibition of p38 suppresses LPS-induced IL-10 production in THP-1 cells (28). The same study demonstrated that p38 activates transcription of the human IL-10 gene through the transcription factor SP1 (28). In summary, pretreatment with RANTES induced the expression of IL-10 mRNA and resulted in the earlier and enhanced LPS-induced IL-10 secretion by monocytes.
The knockdown of p38 in monocytes resulted in reduced LPS-induced TNF-
and IL-6. When the cells were treated with nonspecific control siRNA plus RANTES, LPS-mediated TNF-
and IL-6 secretion were also reduced. However, when p38 was knocked down and RANTES was added, the suppressive effects of each treatment were reversed. There are a number of potential explanations for these observations. For example, p38 siRNA likely did not totally deplete the monocytes of p38. It is possible that because the expression of IL-10 was reduced following the addition of LPS to the RANTES, sufficient p38 may have been activated to permit the full expression of TNF-
and IL-6. Another potential explanation may be related to the observation that RANTES activated other pathways, including NF-
B and JNK (data not shown). It is possible that activation of these pathways by both RANTES and LPS may have contributed to the reduced suppression of TNF-
and IL-6 expression when p38 was knocked down (Fig. 9).
Secreted IL-10 was responsible for the effects of RANTES on LPS-induced cytokine production in monocytes. Abs to IL-10 completely reversed the effects of RANTES, demonstrating that the suppression of LPS-induced IL-6 and TNF-
by RANTES was mediated through IL-10. Although RANTES signaled through p38 MAPK and increased LPS-induced p38 MAPK phosphorylation in RA synovial fibroblasts, RANTES failed to reduce LPS-induced IL-6 secretion in this cell type. The fact that IL-10 was not induced by RANTES in the presence or absence of LPS by RA synovial fibroblasts supports the importance of IL-10 in mediating the effects of RANTES. Therefore, p38 MAPK activation by RANTES was not sufficient to decrease LPS-induced cytokine expression.
The mechanisms contributing to the regulation of cytokine gene expression by enhanced production of IL-10 were not characterized in this study other than to document that the effects on IL-6 were transcriptional, whereas those on TNF-
were posttranscriptional. Previous studies have demonstrated that IL-10 enhances IL-6 mRNA degradation in PB mononuclear cells (42, 43). In contrast, we saw no effect on the decay of IL-6 mRNA. These differences may be due to the concentrations of IL-10, because the concentration secreted by our monocytes was much lower than that added exogenously in the earlier studies (43, 44). It is possible that STAT3 or NF-
B may be responsible for the effects of IL-10. In STAT3-null mice or in human macrophages transfected with a dominant negative STAT3, IL-10 is unable to reduce LPS-induced IL-6 production (45, 46). However, others have shown that IL-10 inhibits LPS-induced IL-6 transcription by inhibiting NF-
B activation in human monocytes (44). These observations suggest that the effects of IL-10 on the expression of IL-6 may be mediated through STAT3 or NF-
B.
In murine macrophages, IL-10 inhibits TNF-
posttranscriptionally by blocking LPS-induced p38 activation (47). However, in human monocytes IL-10 did not suppress LPS-mediated phosphorylation of p38 MAPK (48). Similarly, with human macrophages the suppression of TNF-
by IL-10 was not through p38 but was mediated through the STAT3 pathway (46, 49). Consistent with these observations, we did not see a reduction of p38 activation at any time point examined. It is possible that the activation of STAT3 may interfere with events downstream of p38, perhaps interfering with the action of MK2 or producing other effects independently of p38 and MK2. It is possible that there are differences between species and cell types in the way that IL-10 exerts its anti-inflammatory effect.
The biological relevance of our observations is suggested by studies using synovial fluids from patients with RA. The neutralization of RANTES in RA synovial fluid resulted in the significantly increased induction of LPS-mediated TNF-
and reduced IL-10 level in PB monocytes. These results suggest that synovial fluids contain concentrations of RANTES sufficient to modulate activation through TLR4. Potential TLR4 ligands such as heat shock protein and extra domain A fibronectin are abundant in the rheumatoid joint (14, 15, 16, 50, 51). Therefore, it is possible that RANTES, in addition to recruiting leukocytes to the RA joint, may also ameliorate the local inflammatory response by suppressing activation by endogenous TLR ligands. Consistent with this possibility, following the neutralization of RANTES, RA synovial fluid induced monocyte secretion of TNF-
. These observations suggest that therapeutic intervention of chronic inflammation may not result in the expected effect because of the potential effects of RANTES in suppressing the inflammatory response.
This possibility is supported by our observations in adjuvant-induced arthritis. We previously reported that treatment with the RANTES antagonist Met-RANTES ameliorates adjuvant-induced arthritis (7). In contrast, unpublished data from our laboratory demonstrate that the inhibition of RANTES after disease onset in adjuvant-induced arthritis did not alleviate the disease (data not shown). Although these results may indicate that the inhibition of RANTES may simply not be sufficient to treat established disease, it also possible that, in addition to suppressing leukocyte traffic into the joint, the inhibition of RANTES may actually enhance the ongoing inflammatory process. Although further studies will be required to discern these possibilities, these observations suggest that RANTES, and possibly other chemokines such as MCP-1 (52, 53), may have previously unrecognized mechanisms that are important in modulating chronic inflammation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institutes Health Grants AR049353 (to S.S.) and AR049217 and AR048269 (to R.M.P.). ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Shiva Shahrara, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Rheumatology, McGaw Pavilion, 240 East Huron, Suite 2220, Chicago, IL 60611. E-mail address: s-shahrara{at}northwestern.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PB, peripheral blood; siRNA, short-interfering RNA; Met-RANTES, methionylated RANTES; MK2, MAPK-activated protein kinase. ![]()
Received for publication April 10, 2006. Accepted for publication July 28, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production by synovial T cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 101: 398-407. [Medline]
B, Bad, or caspase activation. J. Exp. Med. 194: 113-126.
-induced apoptosis of macrophages following inhibition of NF-
B: a central role for disruption of mitochondria. J. Immunol. 172: 1907-1915.
B but not C/EBP
or c-Jun. J. Immunol. 165: 7199-7206.
B activation to maintain A1 expression and mitochondrial homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 8855-8865.
-regulated genes in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 50: 420-431. [Medline]
during differentiation of human monocytes to macrophages. J. Leukocyte Biol. 69: 248-252.
during in vitro differentiation of human monocytes/macrophages in primary culture. J. Leukocyte Biol. 71: 1026-1032.
B recruitment. Nat. Immunol. 3: 69-75. [Medline]
biosynthesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 1: 94-97. [Medline]
mRNA remains unstable and hypoadenylated upon stimulation of macrophages by lipopolysaccharides. Eur. J. Biochem. 267: 6004-6012. [Medline]
B (NF-
B) activation in human monocytes. IL-10 and IL-4 suppress cytokine synthesis by different mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 9558-9816.
and
have unique and specific functions. Nat. Immunol. 5: 401-409. [Medline]
production that does not involve inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase or NF-
B in primary human macrophages. J. Immunol. 168: 4837-4845.
and heat-shock protein 70-2 gene polymorphisms in a family with rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 51: 263-269. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Terao, G. Yilmaz, K. Y. Stokes, J. Russell, M. Ishikawa, T. Kawase, and D. N. Granger Blood Cell-Derived RANTES Mediates Cerebral Microvascular Dysfunction, Inflammation, and Tissue Injury After Focal Ischemia-Reperfusion Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2560 - 2570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Pasini, M. Anselmi, U. Garbin, E. Franchi, C. Stranieri, M.C. Nava, V. Boccioletti, C. Vassanelli, and L. Cominacini Enhanced Levels of Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Prime Monocytes to Cytokine Overproduction via Upregulation of CD14 and Toll-Like Receptor 4 in Unstable Angina Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(9): 1991 - 1997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||