The JI PBL Intereron Source
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toh, M.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Morand, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toh, M.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Morand, E. F.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 177: 4818-4825.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Regulation of IL-1 and TNF Receptor Expression and Function by Endogenous Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor1

Myew-Ling Toh2,*, Daniel Aeberli2,*, Derek Lacey*, Yuan Yang*, Leilani L. Santos*, Michael Clarkson{dagger}, Laveena Sharma*, Colin Clyne{dagger} and Eric F. Morand3,*

* Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Melbourne, Australia; and {dagger} Prince Henry’s Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria, Australia


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has a key role in regulation of innate and adaptive immunity and is implicated in sepsis, tumorigenesis, and autoimmune disease. MIF deficiency or immunoneutralization leads to protection against fatal endotoxic, exotoxic, and infective shock, and anti-inflammatory effects in other experimental models of inflammatory disease. We report a novel regulatory role of MIF in type 1 IL-1R and p55 TNFR expression and function. Compared with wild-type cells, MIF-deficient cells were hyporesponsive to IL-1- and TNF-induced MAPK activity, AP-1 activity, and cellular proliferation, while NF-{kappa}B function was preserved. Hyporesponsiveness of MIF-deficient cells was associated with down-regulation of cytokine receptor expression, which was restored by reconstitution of either an upstream kinase of MAPK, MAPK/ERK kinase, or MIF. These data suggest that endogenous MIF is required for cytokine activation of MAPK/AP-1 and cytokine receptor expression. This autocrine regulatory pathway defines an important amplifying role of endogenous MIF in cytokine-mediated immune and inflammatory diseases and provides further molecular evidence for the critical role of MIF in cellular activation.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF)4 is a pleiotropic cytokine with a crucial role in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity (1). MIF is implicated in multiple autoimmune and inflammatory states, including sepsis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), tumorigenesis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, glomerulonephritis, and enterocolitis (2). MIF immunoneutralization or MIF deficiency is associated with protection against endotoxic shock and lethality, and marked anti-inflammatory effects in several experimental models of autoimmune disease.

The underlying molecular mechanisms of these observed biological effects are less well-understood. MIF-induced cellular activation is mediated via MAPK and the AP-1 transcription factor. MIF is thought to signal through classical receptor-dependent activation of MAPK through binding to CD74, the cell surface form of the MHC class-II-associated invariant chain (3). In NIH3T3 cells, MIF induces sustained ERK MAPK activation associated with increased cellular proliferation and phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity (4). In these same cells, MIF was shown to modulate adhesion-dependent sustained ERK MAPK activation and regulate cyclin D1 expression and cell cycle progression (5, 6). MIF activates MAPK and AP-1 pathways in neuroblastoma cell lines (7), osteoblasts, dermal fibroblasts (8), and RA fibroblast like-synoviocytes (FLS) (9, 10, 11). In contrast, at supraphysiological concentrations, MIF also signals through nonreceptor-based pathways, via intracellular binding and activation of JAB1 leading to selective down-regulation of AP-1 activation (12).

MIF, unlike other cytokines such as TNF, has a widespread tissue and cellular distribution including large preformed stores in immune cells and fibroblasts. This places MIF in an ideal position for regulation of immune and inflammatory events entrained by other factors such as endotoxin and cytokines. For example, endogenous MIF regulates TLR-4 expression to permit macrophage responses to endotoxin (13). Whereas the role of endogenous MIF in responses to endotoxin is well-documented, the role of endogenous MIF in regulating responses to proinflammatory cytokines implicated in autoimmune diseases is poorly understood. The hypothesis that endogenous MIF does play a role in regulating cellular responses to other cytokines is supported by several observations. For example, immunoneutralization of MIF with anti-MIF mAb inhibits IL-1- and TNF-induced proliferation and IL-1-induced PLA2 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in RA FLS (9, 14). MIF is known to exert autocrine and paracrine effects on immune cell activation, inducing IL-1 and TNF, leading in turn to further MIF production (15, 16). We report here that endogenous MIF is required for IL-1- and TNF-induced MAPK activation and regulates the expression of receptors for these cytokines. These data provide a novel mechanism of action of MIF in the amplification of the immune response.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Cells

MIF–/– mice were provided by Dr. J. R. David (Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA) (17, 18), crossed for two generations with MIF wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice and experiments were performed with littermate MIF–/– and WT controls. Murine dermal fibroblasts (MDF) were isolated as described (18). Mouse embryonal fibroblasts (MEF) were generated from WT and MIF–/– embryos at day 14.5. Cells were propagated in RPMI 1640/10% FCS (ICN Biomedicals) and passages 4–6 used.

Plasmid constructs

The MIF coding region was amplified by PCR by using the following primers: 5-CACCATGCCGATGTTCATCGTAAAC-3 and 5-GGCGAAGGTGGAGTTGTTCC-3 (19). The MIF open reading frame was verified by sequencing and cloned into a eukaryotic expression vector pcDNA 3.1+ (Invitrogen Life Technologies). The following plasmid vectors were used: NF{kappa}B-Luc, AP-1-Luc, pFC-MEKK, pPUC, pFA2-Elk1, pFA2-c-jun, or pFA2-ChOP (Promega).

Flow cytometry

The type 1 IL-1R (IL-1R) was detected following incubation with mAb against IL-1R. The p55 TNFR (p55 TNFR1) was detected following incubation with mAb against TNFR1, followed by biotin-conjugated Ab and allophycocyanin streptavidin compared with isotype control Abs (BD Pharmingen). For MIF reconstitution experiments, MIF–/– cells were transfected with 1 µg of pcDNA 3.1+ or pcDNA3.1+MIF and 0.5 µg of pEGFP using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies) or Amaxa nucleofactor technology for 48 h. Transfection efficiency was 10–15%. To investigate the effects of MAPK/ERK kinase (MEKK) transfection on p55 TNFR expression, MIF–/– cells were nucleofected (Amaxa) with 50 ng of an irrelevant vector pPUC as a control or pFC-MEKK and 0.5 µg of pEGFP. Following nucleofection, p55 TNFR expression was detected as above and measured in enhanced GFP (EGFP)-positive cells relative to control.

Western blot

Cells treated with 0.1 ng/ml IL-1beta (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 ng/ml TNF-{alpha} (BioSource International) or 0.3 M sorbitol (Sigma-Aldrich) were examined for MAPK activation using Abs against I{kappa}B{alpha}, phospho-p38, phospho-ERK, phospho-JNK, phospho-MKK3/6 (MAPK kinase 3 and 6) or total p38, ERK, JNK MAPK (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Cell Signaling Laboratories) as described previously (20). Densitometry ratios of phospho-MAPKs normalized to total MAPK content were calculated and expressed as arbitrary units (AU) using Image Gauge software (version 3.46). MIF was measured by Western blot using Abs against MIF (R&D Systems) or beta-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

EMSA

Nuclear extracts were prepared from cells treated with 0.1 or 5 ng/ml IL-1 for 1 h. Complementary oligonucleotides representing the consensus NF-{kappa}B (5'-AGTTGA GGG GAC TTT CCC AGG C-3') and AP-1 (5'-CGC TTGATG ACT CAGCCG GAA-3') binding sites were annealed and labeled with 32P. The NF-{kappa}B or AP-1 nucleotide motifs are underlined. Sequence-specific binding was determined by incubation with nonradiolabeled WT or mutated probe, and supershift was detected with Abs against p50, p65, or c-fos and c-jun (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Bands were analyzed using a PhosphoImager (Molecular Dynamics) and Image Gauge software (version 3.46).

Luciferase reporter assays

For AP-1 Luc assays, cells were transfected for 24 h with 1 µg of AP-1-Luc reporter plasmid (Promega), and 50 ng of pCMV5-beta-GAL (Promega) using Fugene 6 (Roche), stimulated with 0.1 or 5 ng/ml IL-1beta for 8 h. To investigate the effects of MEKK transfection on the transcriptional activity of AP-1, MIF–/– cells were cotransfected in DMEM/0.5% FCS with 50 ng of a negative control plasmid pFC-dbd and pFA2-Elk1, pFA2-c-jun, or pFA2-ChOP. Cells were simultaneously transfected with 50 ng of pFR-luc (Promega) for 16 h. Luciferase activity was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) and normalized to beta-galactosidase.

Cellular proliferation assay

DNA synthesis was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation, as described (21). Cells were treated with IL-1beta or TNF-{alpha} for 48 h, pulsed for 18 h with 1 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine (Amersham Biosciences) and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting.

ELISA

Cells were treated with 0.1 or 5 ng/ml IL-1beta for 24 h, in the presence or absence of the I{kappa}B phosphorylation inhibitor BAY-11-70-82 (10 µM; Calbiochem) (22) and IL-6 was measured by ELISA.

Real-time PCR

WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with 0.1 or 5 ng/ml IL-1 for 3 h. RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies). One microgram of RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and PCR amplification was performed on a Rotor-Gene 3000 (Corbett Research) using LightCycler DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche). Murine IL-6 (23), IL-1R1 (forward, 5'-TGCGGGACACTAAGGAGAAA-3'; reverse, 5'-CTCTTCCCAATCCAGTTCCA-3'), p55 TNFR (24), and beta-actin (23) primers were used. mRNA was normalized to beta-actin expression, and results were presented as the fold induction of mRNA expression relative to control samples.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Analysis was performed using the Student t test, and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data are the result of at least three separate experiments.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Endogenous MIF is required for IL-1-induced MAPK, AP-1 activation, and cell proliferation

We examined IL-1-induced MAPK activation in WT and MIF–/– cells. A total of 0.1 ng/ml IL-1 induced robust MAPK activation in WT cells (Fig. 1A, left panel). In contrast, MIF–/– cells were markedly hyporesponsive to IL-1 activation of all three MAPK (p38, ERK, and JNK) phosphorylation at all time points. In dose response experiments, IL-1 induced dose-dependent phosphorylation of p38 in WT cells but this was impaired in MIF–/– cells (Fig. 1A, right panel).


Figure 1
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Endogenous MIF is required in IL-1-induced MAPK, AP-1 activation, and cell proliferation. A, WT and MIF–/– MDF were treated with 0.1 ng/ml IL-1 over 60 min (left panel). MAPK phosphorylation was measured by Western blot, and total ERK used as a loading control. The result is representative of three separate experiments. Hyporesponsiveness of MIF–/– cells to IL-1 is dose responsive (right panel). WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with IL-1 for 30 min, phosphorylated p38 was measured by Western blot, and total p38 was used as loading control (representative of n = 3). B, MIF WT MDF nuclear extracts bind AP-1 (left panel). Extracts were incubated with radiolabeled probe encompassing the AP-1 nucleotide motifs (ATG ACT CAG) (40,000 cpm) in the presence or absence of nonradiolabeled competitor WT (x100) or mutated (mut) probe (x100). For Ab supershift analysis, extracts were incubated with anti-c-fos or c-jun before addition of probe. DNA/protein complexes were separated from free probe by gel electrophoresis. MIF–/– cells are hyporesponsive to IL-1-induced AP-1 DNA binding by EMSA (right panel). Nuclear extracts from cells treated with IL-1 were incubated with the AP-1-radiolabeled probe, and DNA/protein complexes were separated from free probe by gel electrophoresis. Densitometry of AP-1 values were expressed as AU (mean ± SEM; n = 3; p < 0.05). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. C, AP-1 transactivation is reduced in MIF–/– cells. MIF WT and MIF–/– cells were transfected with 1 µg of AP-1-Luc reporter plasmid, and 50 ng of pCMV5-beta-GAL for 24 h. Luciferase activity was normalized to beta-galactosidase activity (mean ± SEM; n = 3 in triplicate). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. D, MIF WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with 0.1 ng/ml IL-1 for 48 h, labeled with 1 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine for 18 h, and cell proliferation was determined in duplicate cultures and expressed as [3H]thymidine incorporation (cpm) (mean ± SEM; n = 6). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. E, MIF WT and MIF–/– cells (MDF, left panel; MEF, right panel) were treated in the absence or presence of 10–7 M dexamethasone for 24 h. MIF expression was measured by Western blot and beta-actin was used as a loading control (representative of n = 3).

 
We next examined downstream effects on AP-1 activation, using EMSA and reporter gene assays. For EMSA, cells were treated with 0.1 or 5 ng/ml IL-1 for 1 h and nuclear protein was extracted. Specific binding was shown using a radiolabeled AP-1 probe, and nonspecific binding with a mutated (mut) probe (Fig. 1B, left panel). Supershift was demonstrated with anti-fos or anti-jun Abs. Compared with WT cells, constitutive and IL-1-induced AP-1 DNA-binding activity was significantly reduced in MIF–/– cells (Fig. 1B, right panel; p < 0.05). Similarly, AP-1 luciferase activity was reduced in MIF–/– compared with WT cells (Fig. 1C; p < 0.05).

MIF has a key role in regulation of cell growth and proliferation via activation of MAPK in various cell types (3, 4, 9). To determine the functional significance of the observed MIF-dependent alterations in cytokine-induced signal transduction, we examined cell proliferation using [3H]thymidine incorporation in WT and MIF–/– cells. Both baseline and IL-1-induced proliferation were significantly reduced in MIF–/– fibroblasts compared with WT cells (Fig. 1D; p < 0.05). Thus, endogenous MIF was required for both basal and cytokine-induced cell proliferation. To ensure that MIF was indeed expressed by these cells, MIF expression in cell lysates was measured by Western blotting (Fig. 1E). MIF protein was readily detected in WT, but not MIF–/–, cells. Expression of MIF was also confirmed in WT MEF. Confirmation of the normal regulation of MIF expression in both cell types was confirmed by the observation of increased MIF expression in response to the glucocorticoid dexamethasone in WT but not MIF–/– cells (Fig. 1E).

Endogenous MIF is not essential for IL-1-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and IL-6 expression

We next investigated IL-1-induced NF-{kappa}B activation by analysis of I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation by Western blotting and NF-{kappa}B EMSA. IL-1-induced I{kappa}B{alpha} degradation was similar in WT and MIF–/– cells (Fig. 2A). For EMSA, specific binding was shown using a radiolabeled NF-{kappa}B probe, and nonspecific binding with a mutated (mut) probe (Fig. 2B, left panel). Supershift was demonstrated with anti-p50, anti-p65 Abs. There was no difference detected in IL-1-induced NF-{kappa}B DNA binding between MIF–/– and WT cells (Fig. 2B, right panel). These data indicate that endogenous MIF does not influence NF-{kappa}B signaling in response to IL-1.


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Endogenous MIF is not required in IL-1-induced NF-{kappa}B activation and IL-6 expression. A, I{kappa}B degradation is identical in WT and MIF–/– MDF. Cells were treated with IL-1 for 30 min. I{kappa}B expression was measured by Western blot, and total p38 was used as a loading control (representative of n = 3). B, MIF WT MDF nuclear extracts bind NF-{kappa}B (left panel). MIF WT MDF nuclear extracts were incubated with radiolabeled probe encompassing the NF-{kappa}B nucleotide motifs TGA GGG GAC TTT CCC (40,000 cpm) in the presence or absence of nonradiolabeled competitor WT (x100) or mutated (mut) probe (x100). For Ab supershift analysis, extracts were incubated with Abs directed against p55 or p65 before addition of probe. DNA/protein complexes were separated from free probe by gel electrophoresis. WT and MIF–/– cells show similar NF-{kappa}B DNA binding by EMSA (right panel). Nuclear extracts from cells treated with IL-1 were incubated with the NF-{kappa}B-radiolabeled probe, and DNA/protein complexes were separated from free probe by gel electrophoresis. Densitometry of NF-{kappa}B values were expressed as AU (mean ± SEM; n = 6). C, MIF is not required in IL-1-induced IL-6 expression. MIF WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with IL-1 for 24 h and IL-6 production was measured by ELISA (mean ± SEM; n = 6). D, WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with 0.1 ng/ml IL-1 for 24 h, in the presence or absence of 10 µM BAY-11-70-82 and IL-6 was measured by ELISA (mean ± SEM; n = 3). *, p < 0.05 compared with IL-1-treated cells.

 
We next sought to determine whether endogenous MIF is required in cytokine-induced proinflammatory cytokine production such as IL-6. IL-1-induced IL-6 expression was no different in MIF–/– and WT fibroblasts at either the transcriptional (data not shown) or posttranscriptional level (Fig. 2C). In addition, IL-1-induced COX-2 expression was also comparable in MIF–/– and WT fibroblasts (data not shown). IL-1-induced IL-6 production is mediated predominantly by NF-{kappa}B, and MAPK activation has been reported to contribute (10, 25). We examined the NF-{kappa}B dependence of IL-1-induced IL-6 production in WT and MIF–/– fibroblasts using an inhibitor of I{kappa}B phosphorylation, BAY-11-70-82 (22). In the presence of BAY-11-70-82, IL-1-induced IL-6 production was significantly inhibited in both WT and MIF–/– cells (Fig. 2D). In MIF–/– cells, NF-{kappa}B inhibition was associated with a near total (96%) inhibition of IL-1-induced IL-6. These data confirmed that IL-1-induced IL-6 expression in MIF–/– cells was NF-{kappa}B dependent, and that endogenous MIF is not required for IL-1-induced NF-{kappa}B-dependent IL-6 expression.

Impairment of IL-1-induced signaling occurs upstream of MAPK activation

To determine whether hyporesponsiveness to IL-1-induced p38 phosphorylation occurred at the level of p38 MAPK or upstream in the MAPK activation cascade, we next examined IL-1-induced activation of MKK3/6, the kinase upstream of p38 (26, 27) (Fig. 3A). Compared with WT cells, MIF–/– fibroblasts were hyporesponsive to IL-1-induced MKK3/6 phosphorylation. These data demonstrated that in the absence of endogenous MIF, impairment of IL-1-induced signaling events occurred upstream of MAPK activation. To examine whether this defect was specific to cytokine receptor-induced signaling, cells were treated with the osmotic stress agent sorbitol (0.5 M) for 30 min (Fig. 3B). In contrast to the impairment of p38 phosphorylation in IL-1-treated MIF–/– cells, phosphorylation of p38 induced by sorbitol was similar in MIF–/– and WT fibroblasts. This suggested that hyporesponsiveness of MIF–/– cell MAPK activation was stimulus specific, and that a reduction in endogenous MIF may impede MAPK signaling at some point between binding of IL-1 to the IL-1R complex and upstream of MEKK3/6 activation.


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Down-regulation of IL-1R1 and p55 TNFR expression in MIF–/– cells. A, Hyporesponsiveness of MIF–/– cells is cytokine specific. MIF WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with 5 ng/ml IL-1 or 0.5 M sorbitol for 30 min, phospho-p38 was measured by Western blot, and total p38 was used as a loading control (representative of n = 3). B, Hyporesponsiveness of MIF–/– cells to IL-1 occurs upstream of MAPK activation. WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with IL-1 for 30 min, MKK3/6 phosphorylation was measured by Western blot, the membrane was serially stripped, reprobed for phosphorylated p38 (phospho-p38), and total p38 was used as loading control (representative of n = 3). C, IL-1R1 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in WT and MIF–/– cells. A representative histogram shows background staining in gray (left panel). The percentage of IL-1R1-positive cells was analyzed (right panel; mean ± SEM; n = 11). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. D, IL-1R1 mRNA expression was also measured in WT and MIF–/– cells by real-time PCR. The results, based on a ratio of IL-1R1 mRNA/beta-actin amplification, are presented as the fold induction in IL-1R1 mRNA expression relative to control samples (mean ± SEM; n = 3). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. E, p55 TNFR expression was analyzed by flow cytometry in MIF WT and MIF–/– cells. A representative histogram is shown (left panel) with background staining in gray. The percentage of p55 TNFR-positive cells was analyzed (right panel; mean ± SEM; n = 6). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. F, p55 TNFR expression was also measured in WT and MIF–/– cells by real-time PCR. The results, based on a ratio of p55 TNFR mRNA/beta-actin amplification, are presented as the fold induction in p55 TNFR mRNA expression relative to control samples (mean ± SEM; n = 3). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells.

 
Decreased type 1 IL-1R expression in MIF–/– cells

To determine whether the changes in IL-1 responsiveness in MIF–/– cells related to alterations in cytokine receptor expression, expression of the IL-1R1 was analyzed by flow cytometry and real-time PCR in WT and MIF–/– cells. As measured by flow cytometric analysis of IL-1R-positive cells, cell surface expression of IL-1R1 was 4-fold lower in MIF–/– compared with WT cells (Fig. 3C; p < 0.05). Similarly, expression of IL-1R as measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), was 6.7-fold lower in MIF–/– compared with WT cells (p = 0.01) (Table I). Correspondingly, expression of the IL-1R1 mRNA was 10-fold lower in MIF–/– cells compared with WT cells (Fig. 3D; p < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table I. IL-1R1 and p55 TNFR expressiona

 
Decreased p55 TNFR expression in MIF–/– cells

To investigate whether these effects were restricted to the IL-1R, we examined receptor expression of TNF. Cell surface p55 TNFR expression, as measured by flow cytometric analysis of TNFR-positive cells, was 3-fold lower in MIF–/– cells compared with WT cells (Fig. 3E; p < 0.05). The expression of p55 TNFR, as measured by MFI, was 2.7-fold lower in MIF–/– compared with WT cells (Table I; p = 0.0006). Expression of p55 TNFR mRNA was similarly 2.5-fold lower in MIF–/– cells compared with WT cells (Fig. 3F; p < 0.05).

Endogenous MIF is required for TNF-induced MAPK phosphorylation and cell proliferation

To confirm the functional significance of the observed reduction in TNFR expression in the absence of MIF, we examined TNF-induced MAPK activation and proliferation. A total of 1 ng/ml TNF induced robust MAPK activation in WT fibroblasts (Fig. 4A). In contrast, TNF-induced ERK and JNK phosphorylation was impaired in MIF–/– cells, but in contrast to the results observed for IL-1 stimulation, p38 phosphorylation was intact. This indicates differential requirements for endogenous MIF in IL-1- compared with TNF-induced p38 MAPK activation. The role of endogenous MIF in MAPK-dependent TNF-induced cell activation was examined by cell proliferation. Similar to the results observed with IL-1 treatment, TNF-induced proliferation was significantly impaired in MIF–/–, compared with WT cells (Fig. 4B). Our data indicated that up-regulation of cytokine receptor expression and receptor-dependent signaling events by endogenous MIF were not specific to the IL-1R1, but included regulation of TNFR1 expression and function.


Figure 4
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. A, Endogenous MIF is required for p55 TNFR-induced MAPK activation. WT and MIF–/– MDF were treated with 1 ng/ml TNF over 60 min. MAPK phosphorylation was measured by Western blot. Membranes were serially stripped and reprobed for phospho-MAPK and total ERK was used as a loading control. The result is representative of three separate experiments. B, Endogenous MIF is required in TNF-induced cell proliferation. MIF WT and MIF–/– cells were treated with 1 ng/ml TNF for 48 h and labeled with 1 µCi/ml [3H]thymidine for 18 h. Cell proliferation was determined from duplicate cultures and expressed as [3H]thymidine incorporation (cpm) (mean ± SEM; n = 6). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT cells. C, Down-regulation of p55 TNFR expression in MIF–/– MEF. p55 TNFR expression was measured in WT and MIF–/– MEF by real-time PCR. The results, based on a ratio of p55 TNFR mRNA/beta-actin amplification, are presented as the fold induction in p55 TNFR mRNA expression relative to control samples (mean ± SEM; n = 3). *, p < 0.05 compared with MIF WT MEF. D and E, Reconstitution of MIF restores p55 TNFR expression. For MIF reconstitution experiments, MIF–/– cells were transfected with 1 µg of empty vector (pcDNA 3.1+) or 1 µg of pcDNA3.1+MIF together with 0.5 µg of pEGFP using Lipofectamine 2000 (MEF) (D) or Amaxa nucleofactor technology (MDF) (E) for 48 h. *, p < 0.05 compared with empty vector, pcDNA3.1+. F, Reconstitution of MEKK restores p55 TNFR expression and MAPK/AP-1 activation. MIF–/– MDF were transfected with 50 ng of an irrelevant vector pPUC as a control or pFC-MEKK and cotransfected with 0.5 µg of pEGFP using Amaxa nucleofactor technology for 48 h. Cells were then incubated with mAb against p55 TNFR and EGFP-positive cells analyzed by flow cytometry. Representative histograms are shown with background isotype control staining in gray. The percentage of p55 TNFR-positive cells is shown adjusted for isotope control staining (mean ± SEM; n = 3). *, p < 0.01 compared with empty vector, pcDNA3.1+. {dagger}, p < 0.05 compared with pPUC-transfected cells. G, Effects of MEKK transfection on the transcriptional activity of downstream components of the MAPK/AP-1 cascade. MIF–/– cells were cotransfected with 50 ng of pFC-dbd, FA2-Elk1, pFA2-c-jun, or pFA2-ChOP, and pFR-luc (Promega). Results are expressed as fold increase, mean ± SEM, n = 3 of luciferase activity relative to beta-galactosidase activity of three separate experiments performed in triplicate.

 
Reconstitution of MIF in MIF–/– cells restores p55 TNFR expression

To confirm the regulation of cytokine receptors by MIF, we next investigated whether reconstitution of MIF in MIF–/– cells could restore cytokine receptor expression. We examined the effects of MIF transfection on p55 TNFR expression in studies using MIF–/– MEF. Reduced expression of p55 TNFR was confirmed in MIF–/– MEF compared with WT MEF by real-time PCR (Fig. 4C). MIF–/– MEF were cotransfected with an EGFP reporter plasmid (pEGFP) together with an empty vector (pcDNA3.1+) or an MIF-expressing vector (pcDNA3.1+MIF) for 48 h, then p55 TNFR expression was determined using flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods. MIF transfection significantly increased p55 TNFR expression in MIF–/– MEF (Fig. 4D). These findings were also confirmed in MDFs (Fig. 4E). Expression of p55 TNFR was increased in both transfected (EGFP+) and untransfected (EGFP–) cells, indicating autocrine-paracrine effects of MIF.

p55 TNFR expression is regulated via MAPK/AP-1 activation

We next investigated the molecular mechanism by which MIF modulates p55 TNFR expression. We hypothesized that down-regulation of cytokine receptor expression in the absence of MIF is dependent on reduced MAPK/AP-1 transcriptional activity. The upstream kinase MEKK is known to be a strong activator of the MAPK/AP-1 pathway (28, 29, 30). We examined whether activation of the MAPK/AP-1 pathway via MEKK could up-regulate TNFR expression in MIF–/– dermal fibroblasts. pFC-MEKK, or a control plasmid, were cotransfected with pEGFP in MIF–/– cells and p55 TNFR expression analyzed in transfected cells by flow cytometry. MEKK transfection of MIF–/– cells was associated with increased p55 TNFR expression (Fig. 4F), suggesting the involvement of the MAPK/AP-1 pathway in the reduced TNFR expression observed in MIF–/– cells. MEKK transfection was confirmed to induce activation of downstream components of the MAPK cascade Elk 1, CHOP, and c-jun, compared with control transfected cells.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Disclosures
 References
 
Unlike other cytokines, abundant preformed and renewable stores of MIF are present in multiple immune and nonimmune cell types (4, 16, 31, 32, 33). Constitutively expressed MIF has immunoregulatory functions in sepsis, inflammatory diseases, and tumorigenesis (4, 12, 13, 34, 35). Thus, MIF is well-placed to potentially mediate facilitatory effects on the actions of other cytokines. MIF, TNF, and IL-1 have established roles in the pathogenesis of multiple immunopathologies, however, the mechanism(s) underlying their interactions is unknown. MIF is released as early as or earlier than IL-1 or TNF from cellular stores. In vivo, MIF deficiency or neutralization leads to protection against lethal bacterial sepsis and septic shock induced by Gram-negative endotoxin (17, 36) or Gram-positive exotoxin (37), and amelioration of other chronic inflammatory diseases in the context of reduced MIF is associated with reduced circulating or local TNF and IL-1 production (17, 38, 39). In vitro, MIF-deficient cells exhibit impaired TNF production in response to LPS, an effect mediated via MIF regulation of TLR-4-dependent cellular responses. Herein, we demonstrate that MIF regulates cellular receptor-dependent MAPK/AP-1 activation responses to key proinflammatory cytokines independent of NF-{kappa}B.

We observed an essential role for endogenous MIF in cytokine-induced MAPK activation and basal and cytokine-induced MAPK-dependent proliferation. This is consistent with the action of exogenous MIF on MAPK/AP-1 activation (3, 4, 8, 9, 40, 41), and MAPK-dependent control of cell growth and tumorigenesis (7, 42, 43). In NIH3T3 cells, MIF was required for ERK-induced cell proliferation (3, 4, 6). In these same cells, both exogenous and endogenous MIF modulated adhesion-dependent sustained ERK activation, cyclin D1 expression, and cell cycle progression (5). Similarly, MIF induces ERK-dependent RA FLS proliferation (9, 14), whereas MIF immunoneutralization prevents cytokine-induced RA FLS proliferation (9). MIF immunoneutralization also prevents IL-1-induced ERK-dependent PLA2 and p38-dependent COX-2 expression (9), further supporting a permissive role of MIF in cytokine-induced MAPK-dependent cellular activation.

In contrast, in our study, MIF was not required for cytokine-induced NF-{kappa}B activation or NF-{kappa}B-dependent IL-6 expression. This finding is in keeping with several previous reports. In RA FLS, for example, MIF does not induce NF-{kappa}B at concentrations that activate ERK (21). Moreover, anti-MIF mAb inhibits IL-1-induced cell activation, without effects on NF-{kappa}B, and NF-{kappa}B inhibition does not inhibit the biological effects of MIF (21). Up-regulation of NF-{kappa}B DNA binding by MIF has been reported in RA FLS, but only at supraphysiologic concentrations (1 µg/ml) (44), whereas induction of AP-1 DNA binding occurred at a more physiological concentration. MIF has been reported not to directly affect I{kappa}B kinase activity (45) TNF-induced NF-{kappa}B was identical in control and MIF antisense-transfected cells (46). In contrast, in the context of reduced TLR-4 expression, MIF-deficient macrophages were hyporesponsive to LPS-induced NF-{kappa}B activity (13). Both p38 MAPK and NF-{kappa}B have been reported to be implicated in the regulation of IL-6 expression (10, 25). However, NF-{kappa}B is essential as NF-{kappa}B p50/p65-deficient fibroblasts do not express IL-6 in response to IL-1 (47). In our study, IL-1-induced IL-6 remained intact despite a profound reduction in IL-1-induced p38 phosphorylation in MIF–/– cells, and NF-{kappa}B antagonism lead to near complete abrogation of IL-1-induced IL-6. This suggests that NF-{kappa}B is essential for IL-1-dependent IL-6 expression, and that this is independent of MIF. This is supported by data demonstrating no difference in LPS-induced IL-6 expression in MIF–/– or WT peritoneal macrophages (17), and increased IL-6 expression in MIF–/– macrophages following cutaneous Leishmania major infection (48).

MIF deficiency was associated with a marked reduction in TNF and IL-1R expression. An upstream defect in cytokine receptor-induced MAPK pathway activation was supported by impairment of cytokine-induced MKK3/6 phosphorylation in MIF–/– cells, whereas osmotic stress-induced p38 phosphorylation was intact. Reduced MAPK/AP-1 activation in MIF-deficient cells could be explained by, or alternately be the explanation for, reduced cytokine receptor expression. MIF up-regulates macrophage TLR-4 expression via the transcription factor PU.1 (13). The IL-1R shares homology with TLR-4, and the promoter region contains binding sites for the PU.1 and AP-1 transcription factors (49, 50). PU.1 is, however, only expressed in cells of myeloid differentiation lineage, and hence was not a candidate for regulation of IL-1R expression in fibroblasts (51). Although little is known about the transcriptional regulation of p55 TNFR, the p75 TNFR is known to contain binding sites for AP-1 (52). Transfection of MIF–/– cells with the upstream activator of MAPK, MEKK, was associated with activation of Elk 1, CHOP, and c-jun, and up-regulation of p55 TNFR expression. This suggests that MIF deficiency may impair proinflammatory cytokine receptor expression via the effects observed here on the MAPK/AP-1 pathway.

In addition to the role of endogenous MIF in regulating IL-1R1 and TNFR1 expression, we observed uncoupling of cytokine-induced MAPK-dependent cell proliferation from NF-{kappa}B-dependent IL-6 expression. Binding of TNF to the p55 TNFR leads to activation of a multiprotein signaling complex with release of silencer of death domains, recruitment of TNFR-associated death domain protein, and the adaptor proteins TNFR-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) and receptor-interacting protein, which ultimately activate MAPK and NF-{kappa}B pathways involved in inflammation, proliferation, and apoptosis (53). Uncoupled receptor-dependent MAPK and NF-{kappa}B signaling has been previously described for other TNFR superfamily members and TLR-4, either at the receptor level or through recruitment of other downstream components (54, 55). Recent studies suggest that regulation of p55 TNFR and downstream components such as TRAF2 may also lead to divergent effects on MAPK and NF-{kappa}B signaling. For example, down-regulation of p55 TNFR by phosphorylation has been shown to selectively decrease MAPK activation in the presence of preserved NF-{kappa}B function (56). In contrast, preferential activation of MAPK but not NF-{kappa}B has been reported to be determined by the location of the p55 TNFR in lipid or nonlipid raft components of the plasma membrane (57). Upon activation by TNF, p55 TNFR is segregated to predominantly lipid rafts in the plasma membrane. In parallel, ERK MAPK localizes to the same compartment whereas I{kappa}B remains in the nonlipid compartment. In addition, downstream components of the p55 TNFR complex such as TRAF2 recruited by silencer of death domains display similar diversity in regulation of MAPK independent of NF-{kappa}B (58, 59).

In conclusion, endogenous MIF has been shown here to exert a permissive regulatory role in cellular responsiveness to key proinflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-1 via up-regulation of cytokine receptor-dependent MAPK signaling independent of NF-{kappa}B. Autocrine up-regulation of cytokine-mediated MAPK-dependent events by endogenous MIF may provide a previously unrecognized mechanism for the amplifying role of MIF in immunity, and tumorigenesis, and the observed benefits of MIF deficiency in experimental models of inflammatory disease. Due to the widespread expression of endogenous MIF, IL-1R1, and the p55 TNFR in both immune and nonimmune cells, anti-MIF therapies would be anticipated to have significant anti-inflammatory effects. These data emphasize the role of MIF in regulating the set-point of the cytokine activation response and the potential impact of anti-MIF strategies in inflammatory disease.


   Disclosures
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 M.-L.T. was supported by a grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, and D.A. was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (PBBEA-103004) and the Albert Böni Foundation. Back

2 M.-L.T. and D.A. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Eric F. Morand, Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Monash Medical Centre, Locked Bag No. 29, Clayton, Melbourne, 3168 Australia. E-mail address: eric.morand{at}med.monash.edu.au Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: MIF, macrophage migration inhibitory factor; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; PLA2, phospholipase A2; FLS, fibroblast like-synoviocyte; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; WT, wild type; MDF, murine dermal fibroblast; MEF, mouse embryonal fibroblast; MEKK, MAPK/ERK kinase; EGFP, enhanced GFP; MKK3/6, MAPK kinase 3 and 6; AU, arbitrary unit; TRAF2, TNFR-associated factor 2; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. Back

Received for publication January 13, 2006. Accepted for publication July 5, 2006.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Calandra, T., T. Roger. 2003. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor: a regulator of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3: 791-800. [Medline]
  2. Lue, H., R. Kleemann, T. Calandra, T. Roger, J. Bernhagen. 2002. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): mechanisms of action and role in disease. Microbes Infect. 4: 449-460. [Medline]
  3. Leng, L., C. Metz, Y. Fang, J. Xu, S. Donnelly, J. Baugh, T. Delohery, Y. Chen, R. Mitchell, R. Bucala. 2003. MIF signal transduction initiated by binding to CD74. J. Exp. Med. 197: 1467-1476. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mitchell, R., C. Metz, T. Peng, R. Bucala. 1999. Sustained mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 activation by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF): regulatory role in cell proliferation and glucocorticoid action. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 18100-18106. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Liao, H., R. Bucala, R. Mitchell. 2003. Adhesion dependent signaling by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF). J. Biol. Chem. 278: 76-81. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Swant, J., E. Beatriz, M. Symons, R. Mitchell. 2005. Rho GTPase-dependent signaling is required for macrophage migration inhibitory factor-mediated expression of cyclin D1. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 23066-23072. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Ren, Y., H. Chan, Z. Li, C. Lin, J. Nicholls, C. Chen, P. Lee, V. Lui, M. Bacher, P. Tam. 2004. Upregulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor contributes to induced N-myc expression by the activation of ERK signaling pathway and increased expression of interleukin-8 and VEGF in neuroblastoma. Oncogene 23: 4146-4154. [Medline]
  8. Watanabe, H., T. Shimizu, J. Nishihira, R. Abe, N. Toshinori, M. Taniguchi, H. Sabe, T. Ishibashi, H. Shimizu. 2003. Ultraviolet A-induced production of matrix mettalloproteinase-1 is mediated by macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in human dermal fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 1676-1683. [Medline]
  9. Lacey, D., A. Sampey, R. Mitchell, R. Bucala, L. Santos, M. Leech, E. Morand. 2003. Control of fibroblast-like synoviocyte proliferation by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Arthritis Rheum. 48: 103-109. [Medline]
  10. Santos, L., D. Lacey, Y. Yang, M. Leech, E. Morand. 2004. Activation of synovial cell p38 mitogen activated protein kinase by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J. Rheumatol. 31: 1038-1043. [Medline]
  11. Onodera, S., J. Nishihira, Y. Koyama, T. Majima, Y. Aoki, H. Ichiyama, T. Ishibashi, A. Minami. 2004. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor up-regulates the expression of interleukin-8 messenger RNA in synovial fibroblasts of rheumatoid arthritis patients: common transcriptional regulatory mechanism between interleukin-8 and interleukin-1beta. Arthritis Rheum. 50: 1437-1447. [Medline]
  12. Kleemann, R., A. Hausser, G. Geiger, R. Mischke, A. Burger-Kentischer, O. Flieger, F.-J. Johannes, T. Roger, T. Calandra, A. Kapurniotu, et al 2000. Intracellular action of the cytokine MIF to modulate AP-1 activity and the cell cycle through Jab1. Nature 408: 211-216. [Medline]
  13. Roger, T., J. David, M. Glauser, T. Calandra. 2001. MIF regulates innate immune responses through modulation of Toll-like receptor 4. Nature 414: 920-924. [Medline]
  14. Sampey, A., P. Hall, R. Mitchell, C. Metz, E. Morand. 2001. Regulation of synoviocyte phospholipase A2 and cyclooxygenase 2 by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Arthritis Rheum. 44: 1273-1280. [Medline]
  15. Calandra, T., J. Bernhagen, C. Metz, L. Spiegel, M. Bacher, T. Donnelly, A. Cerami, R. Bucala. 1995. MIF as a glucocorticoid-induced modulator of cytokine production. Nature 377: 68-71. [Medline]
  16. Leech, M., C. Metz, P. Hall, P. Hutchinson, K. Gianis, M. Smith, H. Weedon, S. Holdsworth, R. Bucala, E. Morand. 1999. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in rheumatoid arthritis: evidence for pro-inflammatory function and regulation by glucocorticoids. Arthritis Rheum. 42: 1601-1608. [Medline]
  17. Bozza, M., A. Satoskar, G. Lin, B. Lu, A. Humbles, C. Gerard, J. David. 1999. Targeted disruption of migration inhibitory factor gene reveals its critical role in sepsis. J. Exp. Med. 189: 341-346. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Leech, M., D. Lacey, J. Xue, L. Santos, P. Hutchinson, E. Wolvetang, J. David, R. Bucala, E. Morand. 2003. Regulation of p53 by macrophage migration inhibitory factor in inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 48: 1881-1889. [Medline]
  19. Mitchell, R., H. Liao, J. Chesney, G. Fingerle-Rowson, J. Baugh, J. David, R. Bucala. 2002. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) sustains macrophage proinflammatory function by inhibiting p53: regulatory role in the innate immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 345-350. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Toh, M., Y. Yang, M. Leech, S. Santos, E. F. Morand. 2004. Expression of MAP kinase phosphatase-1, a negative regulator of MAP kinases, in rheumatoid arthritis: upregulation by IL-1 and glucocorticoids. Arthritis Rheum. 50: 3118-3128. [Medline]
  21. Lacey, D., A. Sampey, R. Mitchell, R. Bucala, L. Santos, M. Leech, E. Morand. 2003. Control of fibroblast-like synoviocyte proliferation by macrophage migration inhibitory factor. Arthritis Rheum. 48: 103-109. [Medline]
  22. Pierce, J., R. Schoenleber, G. Jesmok, J. Best, S. Moore, T. Collins, M. Gerritsen. 1997. Novel inhibitors of cytokine-induced I{kappa}B{alpha} phosphorylation and endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression show anti-inflammatory effects in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 21096-21103. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Yang, Y., E. Morand, S. Getting, M. Paul-Clark, D. Liu, S. Yona, R. Hannon, J. Buckingham, M. Perretti, R. Flower. 2004. Modulation of inflammation and response to dexamethasone by annexin 1 in antigen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 50: 976-984. [Medline]
  24. Overbergh, L., A. Giulietti, D. Valckx, R. Decallonne, R. Bouillon, C. Mathieu. 2003. The use of real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for the quantification of cytokine gene expression. J. Biomol. Tech. 14: 33-43. [Medline]
  25. Vanden Berghe, W., L. Vermeulen, G. De Wilde, K. De Bosscher, E. Boone, G. Haegeman. 2000. Signal transduction by tumour necrosis factor and gene regulation of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6. Biochem. Pharmacol. 60: 1185-1195. [Medline]
  26. Derijard, B., J. Raingeaud, T. Barrett, I. Wu, J. Han, R. Ulevitch, R. Davis. 1995. Independent human MAP-kinase signal transduction pathways defined by MEK and MKK isoforms. Science 267: 682-685. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Raingeaud, J., A. Whitmarsh, T. Barrett, B. Derijard, R. Davis. 1996. MKK3- and MKK6-regulated gene expression is mediated by the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 1247-1255. [Abstract]
  28. Karin, M., M. Delhase. 1998. JNK or IKK, AP-1 or NF{kappa}B, which are the targets for MEK kinase 1 action?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 9067-9069. [Free Full Text]
  29. Schlesinger, T., G. Fanger, T. Yujin, G. Johnson. 1998. The Tao of MEKK. Front. Biosci. 3: 1182-1186.
  30. Garrington, T., G. Johnson. 1999. Organisation and regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 11: 211-218. [Medline]
  31. Calandra, T., J. Bernhagen, R. Mitchell, R. Bucala. 1994. The macrophage is an important and previously unrecognized source of macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J. Exp. Med. 179: 1895-1902. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bacher, M., C. Metz, T. Calandra, K. Mayer, J. Chesney, M. Lohoff, D. Gemsa, T. Donnelly, R. Bucala. 1996. An essential regulatory role for macrophage migration inhibitory factor in T-cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 7849-7854. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Lehmann, L., S. Weher, D. Fuchs, S. Klaschik, J. Christian Schewe, M. Book, A. Hoeft, F. Stuber. 2005. Intracellular detection of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in peripheral blood leucocytes. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 38: 1170-1179. [Medline]
  34. Rosengren, E., P. Aman, S. Thelin, C. Hansson, S. Ahlfors, P. Bjork, L. Jacobsson, H. Rorsman. 1997. The macrophage migration inhibitory factor MIF is a phenylpyruvate tautomerase. FEBS Lett. 417: 85-88. [Medline]
  35. Nguyen, M. T., J.B. Lue, H. Funfzig, R. Kleemann, P. Koolwijk, A. Kapurniotu, J. Bernhagen. 2003. A 16-residue peptide fragment of macrophage migration inhibitory factor, MIF-(50–65), exhibits redox activity and has MIF-like biological functions. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 33654-33671. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bernhagen, J., T. Calandra, R. A. Mitchell, S. B. Martin, K. J. Tracey, W. Voelter, K. R. Manogue, A. Cerami, R. Bucala. 1993. MIF is a pituitary-derived cytokine that potentiates lethal endotoxaemia. Nature 365: 756-759. [Medline]
  37. Calandra, T., L. Spiegel, C. Metz, R. Bucala. 1998. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor is a critical mediator of the activation of immune cells by exotoxins of Gram-positive bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 11383-11388. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lan, H., M. Bacher, N. Yang, W. Mu, D. Nikolic-Paterson, C. Metz, A. Meinhardt, R. Bucala, R. Atkins. 1997. The pathogenic role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in immunologically induced kidney disease in the rat. J. Exp. Med. 185: 1455-1465. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ohkawara, T., J. Nishihira, H. Takeda, S. Hige, M. Kato, T. Sugiyama, T. Iwanaga, H. Nakamura, Y. Mizue, M. Asaka. 2002. Amelioration of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis by anti-macrophage migration inhibitory factor antibody in mice. Gastroenterology 123: 256-270. [Medline]
  40. Onodera, S., K. Kaneda, Y. Mizue, Y. Koyama, M. Fujinaga, J. Nishihira. 2000. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor up-regulates expression of matrix metalloproteinases in synovial fibroblasts of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 444-450. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Onodera, S., J. Nishihira, K. Iwabuchi, Y. Koyami, K. Yoshida, S. Tanaka, A. Minami. 2001. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor up-regulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 and -13 in rat osteoblasts: relevance to intracellular signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 7865-7874. [Medline]
  42. Mitchell, R.. 2004. Mechanisms and effectors of MIF-dependent promotion of tumourigenesis. Cell Signal. 16: 13-19. [Medline]
  43. Takahashi, N., J. Nishihira, Y. Sato, M. Kondo, H. Ogawa, T. Ohshima, Y. Une, S. Todo. 1998. Involvement of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the mechanism of tumour cell growth. Mol. Med. 4: 707-714. [Medline]
  44. Onodera, S., J. Nishihira, Y. Koyama, T. Majima, Y. Aoki, H. Ichiyama, T. Ishibashi, A. Minami. 2004. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor up-regulates the expression of interleukin-8 messenger RNA in synovial fibroblasts of rheumatoid arthritis patients: common transcriptional regulatory mechanism between interleukin-8 and interleukin-1beta. Arthritis Rheum. 50: 1437-1447. [Medline]
  45. Daun, J., J. Cannon. 2000. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor antagonizes hydrocortisone-induced increases in cytosolic I{kappa}B{alpha}. Am. J. Physiol. 279: R1043-R1049.
  46. Kleemann, R., A. Hausser, G. Geiger, R. Mischke, A. Burger-Kentischer, O. Flieger, F. J. Johannes, T. Roger, T. Calandra, A. Kapurniotu, et al 2000. Intracellular action of the cytokine MIF to modulate AP-1 activity and the cell cycle through Jab1. Nature 408: 211-216. [Medline]
  47. Georganas, C., H. Liu, H. Perlman, A. Hoffmann, B. Thimmapaya, R. Pope. 2000. Regulation of IL-6 and IL-8 expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts: the dominant role for NF-{kappa}B but not C/EBPbeta or c-Jun. J. Immunol. 165: 7199-7206. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Satoskar, A., M. Bozza, M. Rodiguez Sosa, G. Lin, J. David. 2001. Migration-inhibitory factor gene-deficient mice are susceptible to cutaneous Leishmania major infection. Infect. Immun. 69: 906-911. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Dunne, A., L. O’Neill. 2003. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal transduction during inflammation and host defense. Sci. STKE 171: re3
  50. Ye, K., C. Dinarello, B. Clark. 1993. Identification of the promoter region of human interleukin 1 type 1 receptor gene: multiple initiation sites, high G+C content, and constitutive expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 2295-2299. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Lloberas, J., C. Soler, A. Celada. 1999. The key role of PU.1/SPI-1 in B cells, myeloid cells and macrophages. Immunol. Today 20: 184-189. [Medline]
  52. Liz-Grana, M., J. Gomez-Reino Carnota. 2001. Tumour necrosis factor: genetics, cell action mechanism and involvement in inflammation. Allergy Immunol. Clin. 16: 140-149.
  53. Chen, G., D. Goeddel. 2002. TNF-R1 signaling: a beautiful pathway. Science 296: 1634-1635. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Leo, E., K. Welsh, S. Matsuzawa, J. Zapata, S. Kitada, R. Mitchell, K. Ely, J. Reed. 1999. Differential requirements of tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated factor family proteins in CD40-mediated induction of NF-{kappa}B and jun N-terminal kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 22414-22422. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Fan, H., O. Peck, G. Tempel, P. Halushka, J. Cook. 2004. Toll-like receptor 4 coupled G1 protein signaling pathways regulate extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation and AP-1 activation independent of NF{kappa}B activation. Shock 22: 57-62. [Medline]
  56. Cottin, V., A. Van Linden, D. Riches. 2001. Phosphorylation of the tumour necrosis factor receptor CD120a (p55) recruits Bcl-2 and protects against apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 17252-17260. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Doan, J., D. Windmiller, D. Riches. 2004. Differential regulation of TNF-R1 signaling: lipid raft dependency of p42mapk/erk2 activation, but not NF-{kappa}B activation. J. Immunol. 172: 7654-7660. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Habelhah, H., S. Takahashi, S. Cho, T. Kadoya, T. Watanabe, Z. Ronai. 2004. Ubiquitination and translocation of TRAF2 is required for activation of JNK but not of p38 or NF-{kappa}B. EMBO J. 23: 322-332. [Medline]
  59. Yeh, W., A. Shahinian, D. Speiser, J. Kraunus, F. Billia, A. Wakeham, J. de la Pompa, D. Ferrick, B. Hum, N. Iscove, et al 1997. Early lethality, functional NF-{kappa}B activation, and increased sensitivity to TNF-induced cell death in TRAF2-deficient mice. Immunity 7: 715-725. [Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
T. Atsumi, Y.-R. Cho, L. Leng, C. McDonald, T. Yu, C. Danton, E.-G. Hong, R. A. Mitchell, C. Metz, H. Niwa, et al.
The Proinflammatory Cytokine Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Regulates Glucose Metabolism during Systemic Inflammation
J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5399 - 5406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toh, M.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Morand, E. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toh, M.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Morand, E. F.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS