|
|
||||||||
CUTTING EDGE |
Expression and Memory CD8 T Cell Development1
Department of Immunology, Center for Integrative Immunology and Vaccine Research, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on a subset of Ag-specific effector CD8 T cells is believed to identify memory cell precursors. However, whether IL-7 regulates IL-7R
expression in vivo and is responsible for selective survival of IL-7R
+ effector cells is unknown. Our results show that in the absence of IL-7, IL-7R
expression was extinguished on the majority of CD8 T cells responding to virus infection, sustained on a subset of effector cells transitioning to memory, and expressed at high levels by memory cells. Additionally, an IL-7-deficient environment was capable of supporting bcl-2 up-regulation and memory cell development in response to virus infection. Thus, IL-7R
regulation occurs independently of IL-7 in responding CD8 T cells, indicating that CD8 memory T cell precursors are not selected by IL-7/IL-7R
interactions. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
block the development of the T cell lineage (1) and IL-7 signaling is required for the survival of naive T cells and their homeostatic proliferation in immunodeficient hosts (2, 3, 4). The regulation of survival of CD8 T cells is due in part to bcl-2 induction through IL-7R signaling (5, 6). Although IL-7R
is highly expressed by naive and memory CD8 T cells, most responding effector cells transiently down-regulate IL-7R
(2). Also, a small population of effector CD8 T cells retain or re-express IL-7R
(7), and this population is thought to represent memory T cell precursors. In support of this concept are studies showing that when early inflammation is blocked following infection, the contraction phase of the immune response is bypassed by IL-7R
-expressing cells (8). However, immunization with peptides in adjuvant or peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DCs)4 induces increased numbers of IL-7R
+ effector cells that do not transit to the memory compartment. Thus, IL-7R expression does not necessarily identify CD8 memory T cell precursors.
The potential survival advantage for IL-7R
+ memory CD8 T cell precursors implies that IL-7 binding to IL-7R
modulates the receptor. Although the inclusion of IL-7 as an adjuvant in vaccination protocols has been proposed to selectively expand memory cells (9), this notion implies that IL-7 selects IL-7R
+ cells into the memory pool. Indeed, IL-7 has been shown to regulate IL-7R
expression in vitro (10, 11). However, whether IL-7 regulates IL-7R
expression following CD8 T cell activation in vivo is unknown. We now show that regulation of IL-7R
expression is IL-7 independent, calling into question the notion that IL-7 selects IL-7R
+ CD8 T cells into the memory population.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B6.129P-IL-7tm1 mice (IL-7/) were obtained from DNAX and backcrossed to C57BL/6J (Ptprcb = CD45.2). Wild-type controls were generated from IL-7/+ littermates. CD8 T cell responses were monitored following i.v. infection with 105 PFU of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). For adoptive transfers, 0.51 x 105 B6.SJL-Ptprca Pepcb/BoyJ-Tg(TcraTcrb)1100Mjb/J-B6.129S7-Rag1tm1Mom (CD45.1 OT-I-RAG/) CD8 lymph node (LN) T cells were injected into IL7+/, IL-7/, or B6.129S7-Il7rtm1Imx/J mice (IL-7R
/) and infected with 105 PFU rVSV expressing OVA (VSV-OVA).
Tissue isolation and flow cytometry
Lymphocytes were isolated from tissues as previously described (12). VSV-specific CD8 T cells were detected by staining with an H-2Kb tetramer containing the VSV N protein derived peptide for 1 h at room temperature with anti-CD8, CD11a (BD Pharmingen) and IL-7R
mAbs (eBioscience). For adoptive transfers, cells were stained with Abs specific for CD45.1 (BD Pharmingen), CD8, CD11a, and IL-7R
, fixed overnight, and stained with an anti-bcl-2 or isotype control mAb (BD Pharmingen). Relative fluorescence intensities were measured using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences).
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
expression following VSV infection
Previous studies demonstrate that following infection with VSV or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), the majority of Ag-specific effector CD8 T cells down-regulate IL-7R
(2, 7). In the case of LCMV-specific CD8 T cells, the total number of effector cells which either maintain or rapidly re-express IL-7R
correlates with the number of memory cells generated (7). To address whether a similar phenomenon occurred following VSV infection, IL-7R
expression was monitored on responding Ag-specific CD8 T cells (Fig. 1A). Five days postinfection, 21% of the Ag-specific CD8 T cells expressed IL-7R
and by day 8, 31% of the cells expressed IL-7R
. Through the contraction phase, the percentage of IL-7R
+ Ag-specific cells gradually increased, with 91% of the cells IL-7R
high 17 days postinfection. Moreover, a steady-state number of IL-7R
+ Ag-specific cells was maintained throughout the response (Fig. 1B), suggesting that this population of IL-7R
+ cells was selected to seed the memory cell pool.
|
expression on responding cells, presumably due to the interaction of IL-7 with its cognate receptor (10, 11, 13). However, it is difficult to compare these studies with in vivo analyses because local IL-7 concentrations cannot be accurately measured because serum levels of IL-7 are low (14) and the primary reservoir of IL-7 in vivo is thought to be bound to extracellular matrices (15). To determine whether IL-7 modulated IL-7R
expression on effector CD8 T cells during a virus infection, we infected IL-7/ and control IL-7+/ littermates with VSV and monitored IL-7R
expression on the Ag-specific CD8 T cells in the spleen and lung (Fig. 2). Seven days postinfection, 44 and 20% of CD8 T cells in normal or IL-7/ mice, respectively, were tetramer+ (Fig. 2A). The splenic response at this time was blunted in the IL-7/ mice as compared with controls. Interestingly, IL-7R
down-regulation had occurred on Ag-specific CD8 T cells from both IL-7+/ or IL-7/ mice (Fig. 2A), with IL-7/ CD8 T cells expressing somewhat more IL-7R
than controls. On day 14 after infection, the CD8 T cell response had increased in the IL-7/ mice from day 7 values, while the response in the normal mice had declined (Fig. 2B). At this time,
7090% of the Ag-specific CD8 T cells expressed high levels of IL-7R
in both control and IL-7/ mice (Fig. 2B). Forty-four days postinfection, memory cells were present in both normal and IL-7/ mice (Fig. 2C) and similar levels of IL-7R
were maintained whether or not IL-7 was present (Fig. 2C). Indeed, as compared with naive CD8 T cells, an increased level of IL-7R
was noted on memory CD8 T cells even in the absence of IL-7. These results indicated that IL-7 was dispensable not only for down-regulation of IL-7R but that IL-7 was also not required for IL-7R
re-expression or for selection of IL-7R
+ CD8 T cells into the memory population. Although TSLP also uses IL-7R
as a component of its receptor, treatment with an anti-TSLP-R mAb failed to impact IL-7R
expression kinetics on Ag-specific CD8 T cells in both wild-type and IL-7/ mice, although the efficacy of such treatment has not been determined (data not shown).
|
Because the expression pattern of IL-7R
on Ag-specific CD8 T cells was not altered in IL-7/ mice, we wished to determine whether memory cells could be generated in these animals. To this end, the total number of IL-7R
+ effector and memory cells generated in the spleen and lung of IL-7/ and IL-7+/ mice was calculated (Fig. 3). Although the frequency of Ag-specific CD8 T cells expressing IL-7R
at the peak of the response was greater in IL-7/ mice (Fig. 2A), the total number of cells expressing IL-7R
in IL-7/ mice was less than in control mice (Fig. 3), perhaps due to the lymphopenic environment of IL-7/ mice, resulting in a delayed proliferative peak of the CD8 T cell response. Nonetheless, 14 days after infection, the number of Ag-specific CD8 T cells in the lung and spleen was equivalent in both groups and remained similar into the memory phase of the response (day 44). Therefore, both the regulation of IL-7R
expression on effector CD8 T cells and the generation of the resultant memory cell pool occurred independently of IL-7 signaling. These findings suggested that regulation of IL-7R
expression was controlled by factors other than IL-7, and that IL-7 did not provide a selective survival advantage to cells expressing IL-7R
.
|
expression kinetics and memory cell generation
Because endogenous responding T cells in IL-7/ animals may be defective in terms of their long-term stability due to a deficiency in homeostatic proliferation (2), we adoptively transferred OT-I TCR CD8 T cells from a normal host into an IL-7 or IL-7R
null environment. Following infection with VSV-OVA, the kinetics of the proliferative response of the donor OT-I cells in the blood of all recipients was assessed. Although the expansion of the OT-I T cells in the IL-7+/ and IL-7/ mice was parallel until day 7, from day 11 onward the percentage of OT-I cells was greater in both the IL-7/ and IL-7R
/ mice than in control mice (Fig. 4A). This increased frequency may be due to the lymphopenic environments of IL-7/ and IL-7R
/ mice, although other factors such as increased availability of other growth factors may also play a role. However, when the mice were sacrificed 38 days postinfection, the total number of OT-I memory cells isolated from the spleen of all recipients was similar (Fig. 4B).
|
by responding OT-I cells (Fig. 4C). Early after infection (day 3), nearly all OT-I cells in either the IL-7+/, IL-7/, or IL-7R
/ mice had down-regulated IL-7R
. By day 5, the peak of the OT-I CD8 T cell response to VSV-OVA, 3540% of the OT-I cells expressed IL-7R
irrespective of host type (Fig. 4C). The percentage of IL-7R
+ OT-I cells gradually increased over time in both groups and by day 38, the OT-I memory cells transferred into both the IL-7+/ and IL-7/ mice expressed levels of IL-7R
slightly greater than the level expressed by naive CD8 T cells (Fig. 4C). IL-7 is produced primarily by stromal cells, intestinal epithelial cells, and some subsets of human dendritic cells, it is not produced by T cells (16, 17, 18), thus, autonomous IL-7 produced by the transferred cells is not responsible for the generation of memory in IL-7/ mice. Taken together, these data further demonstrated that regulation of IL-7R
expression and memory CD8 T cell generation occurred in the absence of IL-7.
The proposed selective survival advantage imposed on those effector CD8 T cells maintaining IL-7R
expression has been linked to the IL-7-mediated induction of the antiapoptotic molecule bcl-2. Indeed, work from our laboratory previously demonstrated that activated OT-I IL-7R
/ T cells survived poorly in recipient mice, presumably due to the inability of these cells to express bcl-2 (2). Thus, we decided to assess the status of bcl-2 expression by transferred OT-I T cells in normal and IL-7-deficient environments following VSV-OVA infection. Although naive OT-I T cells expressed bcl-2 directly ex vivo (Fig. 5A), after activation the responding effector cells in both the spleen and lung down-regulated bcl-2 and sustained this low level expression through the contraction phase (Fig. 5B). By day 30 postinfection, although levels had not yet returned to that of the starting population, 2535% of the responding T cells expressed bcl-2 in both tissues of either the IL-7+/ or IL-7/ recipients. Thus, because the kinetics of bcl-2 expression in IL-7+/ and IL-7/ recipients was similar (Fig. 5C), the parallel down-modulation and reacquisition of IL-7R
/bcl-2 before and during the transition to memory was IL-7 independent.
|
a bona-fide identifier of effector cells destined to enter the memory cell pool? And if so, what molecule(s) other than IL-7 regulate the expression of IL-7R
by responding effector CD8 T cells? Several studies have analyzed the relationship between IL-7R
expression and memory cell development with conflicting results. Acute infections with VSV and LCMV induce robust immune responses, preceded by concomitant TCR and IL-7R
down-regulation (2, 7). Stimulation using anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in vitro also results in IL-7R
repression (19). Following acute infection, IL-7R
is maintained or re-expressed by a subset of CD8 T cells. However, in models of persistent viral infection, Ag-specific CD8 T cells fail to re-express IL-7R
, likely due to their continual stimulation via the TCR, and remain as IL-7R
low"pseudo-effector" T cells (20, 21, 22, 23). At the other end of the spectrum, weaker Ag stimuli such as peptide-pulsed DCs do not efficiently induce IL-7R
down-regulation (24). Thus, there appears to be a link between the strength of signal through the TCR, IL-7R
suppression, and memory development, as opposed to an IL-7-directed survival advantage. It has been shown that as effector cells transition to memory, a distinct program is initiated altering gene expression (25). Perhaps strong TCR stimulation induces this program for memory cell generation and alters IL-7R
expression, whereas those effectors receiving suboptimal TCR signaling from a weak stimulus or brief Ag encounter fail or inefficiently initiate memory development. An alternate hypothesis is that the level of inflammation affects IL-7R
expression. This possibility is supported by the findings that either under noninflammatory priming conditions using either peptide-pulsed DCs (24) or when animals were pretreated with antibiotics before Listeria monocytogenes infection (8), IL-7R
down-regulation is limited. However, in both cases memory development proceeds normally while in acute inflammatory infections, IL-7R
is down-regulated and memory is generated (Ref. 7 , Fig. 2).
Our data suggested that IL-7 expression was irrelevant for delivery of the appropriate survival signals to effector cells transitioning to memory cells. In addition, dying Ag-specific CD8 T cells express more IL-7R
than their viable counterparts during the contraction phase of the immune response (24). To account for this discrepancy, it has been suggested that the limited supply of IL-7 in vivo is tightly regulated such that those cells which have received a signal via IL-7R
down-regulate IL-7R
, thereby increasing the bioavailability of IL-7 (11). However, our data indicated that engagement of IL-7R
by IL-7 was not required for receptor down-regulation (Figs. 2 and 3). Additionally, compensatory molecules involved in long-term survival may exist which are capable of signaling via IL-7R
or alternate receptors after TCR triggering. Indeed this may be likely because IL-7R
-deficient CD8 T cells express less bcl-2 following activation and fail to survive long-term, presumably due to intrinsic defects in IL-7R
signaling (2). However, our results suggested that this was an IL-7-independent phenomenon (Fig. 5). Mice deficient in another
c cytokine, IL-15, generate memory cells, albeit at a lower frequency (26), but with similar IL-7R
expression kinetics (data not shown). Considering both IL-7 and IL-15 are required for the homeostatic proliferation of memory and memory-phenotype CD8 T cells in lymphopenic environments (3, 4), it is possible that IL-15/IL-15R
signaling may provide compensatory survival signals in the absence of IL-7. Along similar lines, IL-7/ mice are lymphopenic, thus perhaps resulting in increased basal levels of IL-15 which may affect memory CD8 T cell development. The lymphopenic environment could also increase the bioavailability of other cytokines such as IL-2 which have been shown to regulate IL-7R
expression in vitro (19). Alternatively, the absence of a large portion of the lymphocyte pool could also alter the stoichiometry of APCs available to present Ag to the responding CD8 T cells, thus enhancing memory generation in the IL-7/ mice. Finally, IL-7R
can form heterodimers with the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) that specifically binds TSLP (27, 28), a cytokine important for CD4 development and homeostasis (29, 30). Signaling through the TSLPR, however, does not appear to influence IL-7R
expression as in vivo blocking studies using an anti-TSLP-R mAb failed to impact IL-7R
expression kinetics on Ag-specific CD8 T cells in both wild-type and IL-7/ mice following infection (data not shown).
Together, our data suggested that stimulation of IL-7R
with IL-7 is dispensable for the selection and maintenance of memory CD8 T cells and that perhaps stimulation of other receptors, such as the TCR, initially regulates IL-7R
expression. Therefore, the current paradigm that implicates IL-7 signaling via IL-7R
as a master regulator of both IL-7R
expression and memory cell generation requires re-evaluation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grants AI41576, DK5260, and AI51583 (to L.L.). K.D.K. was supported by an NIH postdoctoral fellowship (AI053970). ![]()
2 Current address: Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Leo Lefrançois, Department of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, M/C 1319, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030-1319. E-mail address: llefranc{at}neuron.uchc.edu ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; VSV-OVA, VSV expressing OVA; LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin. ![]()
Received for publication May 19, 2006. Accepted for publication July 21, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription by IL-7 and other prosurvival cytokines: a novel mechanism for maximizing IL-7-dependent T cell survival. Immunity 21: 289-302. [Medline]
chain expression in activated T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 13759-13764.
chain expression distinguishes functional subsets of virus-specific human CD8+ T cells. Blood 106: 2091-2098. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. L. Alves, E. M. M. van Leeuwen, I. A. M. Derks, and R. A. W. van Lier Differential Regulation of Human IL-7 Receptor {alpha} Expression by IL-7 and TCR Signaling J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5201 - 5210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Chandele, N. S. Joshi, J. Zhu, W. E. Paul, W. J. Leonard, and S. M. Kaech Formation of IL-7R{alpha}high and IL-7R{alpha}low CD8 T Cells during Infection Is Regulated by the Opposing Functions of GABP{alpha} and Gfi-1 J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5309 - 5319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sarkar, V. Kalia, W. N. Haining, B. T. Konieczny, S. Subramaniam, and R. Ahmed Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets with distinct memory fates J. Exp. Med., March 17, 2008; 205(3): 625 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Haring, X. Jing, J. Bollenbacher-Reilley, H.-H. Xue, W. J. Leonard, and J. T. Harty Constitutive Expression of IL-7 Receptor {alpha} Does Not Support Increased Expansion or Prevent Contraction of Antigen-Specific CD4 or CD8 T Cells following Listeria monocytogenes Infection J. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 180(5): 2855 - 2862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Hammerbeck and M. F. Mescher Antigen Controls IL-7R{alpha} Expression Levels on CD8 T Cells during Full Activation or Tolerance Induction J. Immunol., February 15, 2008; 180(4): 2107 - 2116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quigley, X. Huang, and Y. Yang Extent of Stimulation Controls the Formation of Memory CD8 T Cells J. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 179(9): 5768 - 5777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Blair and L. Lefrancois Increased competition for antigen during priming negatively impacts the generation of memory CD4 T cells PNAS, September 18, 2007; 104(38): 15045 - 15050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-J. Lee, R. J. Rossi, S.-K. Lee, M. Croft, B. S. Kwon, R. S. Mittler, and A. T. Vella CD134 Costimulation Couples the CD137 Pathway to Induce Production of Supereffector CD8 T Cells That Become IL-7 Dependent J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2203 - 2214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Hand, M. Morre, and S. M. Kaech Expression of IL-7 receptor {alpha} is necessary but not sufficient for the formation of memory CD8 T cells during viral infection PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11730 - 11735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |