|
|
||||||||




* Medical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom;
Division of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom;
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya;
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada;
¶ Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and
|| Academic Department of HIV/GUM, Guys, Kings, and St. Thomas School of Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London, United Kingdom
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and V
chain usage, and throughout the hypervariable region. Collectively, our findings highlight unusual features of the B*5701/B*5703-KF11-specific immune responses which could influence disease progression and that might be important to consider when designing future vaccine regimens. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The influence of the MHC class I loci on clinical outcome warrants further investigation to further our understanding of disease pathogenesis and to direct the generation of effective vaccines. The heterozygous advantage at the MHC class I locus probably reflects the availability of distinct MHC class I molecules to present diverse epitopes to T lymphocytes, resulting in broader immune responses, and delaying the incidence of viral immune evasion. The preference for individual MHC class I alleles might reflect their ability to present conserved viral epitopes to CD8+ T cells; the conservation of a single immunodominant epitope, namely the gag-derived KRWIILGLNK (KK10) peptide, appears to account for the association of B*27 with prolonged AIDS-free survival in infection. KK10 requires a series of complex mutations, both internal and external to the epitope, to enable the emergence of a successfully mutated epitope that evades immune recognition with eventual onset of AIDS (2). The HLA class I subtype B*57 is consistently associated with slower disease progression in HIV-1 infection, particularly the B*5701 and B*5703 alleles which relate to better clinical outcome in Caucasian and African patients, respectively (3, 4, 5, 6). The mechanism(s) by which B*57 confers favorable outcome are not fully understood. In contrast to B*27, a large number of potent B*5701/03-restricted HIV-1 epitopes have been described, most notably the gag epitopes ISPRTLNAW (IW9), TSTLQEQIGW (TW10), and KAFSPEVIPMF (KF11), which are immunodominant, and map to the p24 capsid protein (7) (5, 8). Previously, it was assumed these p24-derived epitopes were highly conserved, however, the loss of B*57 epitope recognition through escape mutation has recently been described. First, a single point mutation arising in the TW10 epitope (T242N) during the acute phase of HIV-1 infection results in escape from CD8+ T cell recognition (9). Second, an epitope-flanking mutation adjacent to the IW9 epitope (A to P mutation) abrogates processing of the IW9 epitope in B and C clade infections. Although not associated with an increase in viral load, it has been suggested that the TW10 mutation impacts on viral fitness as it is lost upon transmission to B*57-negative individuals. The IW9 flanking mutation is associated with a 20-fold increase in viral load, although it is unclear whether this mutation precipitates clinical progression.
The focus of our study is the B*5701/03-restricted KF11 immune response which prevails during chronic HIV-1 infection (10, 11). Importantly, we now show this to be the immunodominant B*57-restricted response in a cross-sectional study of chronically infected B*5701+ slow progressors harboring both TW10- and IW9-mutated viruses.
KF11 is also interesting from a structural perspective. We have recently solved the crystal structure of B*5703 in complex with the KF11 epitope (12). KF11 adopts a distinctive conformation that differs significantly from previously published human peptide-MHC class I complexes. The central region of the epitope encompassing the position (p) 5 to p9 amino acids buckles high above the peptide-binding groove. Proline residues at p5 and p9 form the corner stones of the "bulge" structure, and stabilize the hairpin-like conformation. Together with peptide residues F3 and I8, they form a network of hydrophobic contacts at the core of the central bulge structure. As epitope residues E6 and V7 are located at the crest of the bulge, their side chains are solvent-exposed and accessible to responding TCRs.
Although KF11 is highly conserved in B clade viruses, diverse KF11 clade variants are documented in the Los Alamos Database. Previously, we assessed cross-reactivity to these variants, and observed broad but differential recognition of the epitopes (10). Interestingly, much of our functional data are readily explained by our structure analysis; mutations involving the p5 proline (P to Q mutation, (P5Q)) and the p3 phenylalanine (F to L mutation, (F3L)), for example, resulted in diminished T cell recognition, most likely due to destabilization of the central bulge structure. However, the common clade variant KGFNPEVIPMF ([A2G,S4N]), produced an inconsistent pattern of cross-recognition, a result open to interpretation in terms of our B*5703-KF11 structural analysis. Although KF11 represents the dominant A and B clade virus sequence, [A2G,S4N] is categorized as A/C clade virus and is the second most common variant in the database, where it accounts for 7% KF11 clade variant sequence entries (April 2006). To date, the [A2G,S4N] variant has only been isolated from B*5703+ donors, and it is not clear whether this epitope originally emerged as an escape variant of KF11.
If the KF11 immune response is also associated with better immune control, it is important that we also consider the immune response to [A2G,S4N] particularly given the association of B*5703 with slow disease progression, and the prevalence of this viral clade in African cohorts. Determining the degree of KF11 and [A2G,S4N] cross-reactivity in B*5703+ patients is also important to evaluate, particularly from the perspective of vaccine development. Consequently, in this study, we investigate the recognition of KF11 and [A2G,S4N] using a number of strategies. First, we performed functional studies of KF11 and [A2G,S4N] to determine whether CD8+ T cell recognition patterns vary according to the prevailing virus sequence in B*5701+ and B*5703+ patients. Second, we performed structural studies to ascertain whether the peptide variants adopt different conformations when in complex with HLA-B*5703 and are differentially presented to CD8+ T lymphocytes. Finally, we assessed TCR usage and CDR3 loop sequence analysis to determine whether recognition of these epitopes is a function of similar or distinct TCR clonotypes.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eleven B*57+ subjects were enrolled in this study (Table I). Ethical approval was obtained from the relevant ethical committees, and all patients gave consent to donate blood. HLA class I typing was performed by the amplification refractory mutation systems PCR using sequence specific primers.
|
PBMCs were isolated from heparinized venous blood by Ficoll-Hypaque (Nycomed) density gradient centrifugation. Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% human serum 100 IU of penicillin/L, 100 mg of streptomycin/L (Invitrogen Life Technologies), referred to herein as H10.
Peptide synthesis
B*57-restricted peptides were synthesized by F-moc chemistry using a Zinnser analytical synthesizer (Advanced Chemtech) and purity was determined by HPLC (Table II).
|
The generation of HLA-B*57 tetramers was performed according to previously described protocols (13, 14). Avidin-PE (Sigma-Aldrich) and streptavidin allophycocyanin (BD Biosciences) were used as fluorochromes.
Establishment of CTL lines
A total of 5 x 106 PBMCs were incubated with 50 µM peptide at 37°C for 1 h, before resuspension in H10 supplemented with 25 ng/ml IL-7. Cells were fed on day 3 with rIL-2 at a concentration of 100 U/ml (10, 15).
Generation of CD8+ T cell clones.
Tetramer staining and magnetic (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec) bead selection was used to generate CD8+ T cell clones. A total of 1 x 106 cells (day 14 CTL line) were stained with B*57-PE-conjugated tetramers and 20 µl of anti-PE microbeads before purification using MS+/MR+ MACS columns (10). Purified cells were cloned at frequencies of 1, 2, and 3 cells/well into U-bottom 96-well places containing 1.5 x 104 peptide-pulsed irradiated autologous B cells (BCL),5 1 x 105 irradiated mixed allogeneic PBMCs, and a 20 µg/ml PHA. Clones were supplemented with 100 IU/ml rIl-2 on day 3. Specificity was assessed by tetramer staining after 2 wk.
Peptide-based IFN-
ELISPOT assay
A standard ELISPOT assay was used to detect IFN-
release by PBMCs (16). Responses are reported as spot-forming units (SFUs) per million PBMCs. SFUs double that observed with medium alone, and in excess of 20 per million PBMCs, were considered positive.
Intracellular cytokine staining.
A total of 200,000 T cell clones was incubated with 100,000 BCLs either pulsed with 10 µM peptide or medium alone at 37°C. A total of 10 µg/ml brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) was added during the second hour of incubation. After 6 h, cells were washed in BD Perm/Wash buffer before fixation/permeabilization in Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (BD Biosciences). Staining was performed for 30 min on ice using the following panel of mAbs: anti-human (h) IFN-
FITC, anti-hTNF-
PE (Dako), and anti-hCD8 PerCP (BD Biosciences). Cells were washed and stored in PBS-5% formaldehyde (17).
CD107a and CD107b expression
A total of 200,000 T cell clones was incubated either 100,000 autologous BCLs pulsed with 10 µM peptide or with medium alone, plus 5 µl of both CD107a- and CD107b-FITC-labeled mAbs at 37°C (BD Biosciences). Golgi-Stop (BD Biosciences) was added to each sample after the first hour of incubation (18). Following 6 h, cells stained with anti-hCD8 PerCP (BD Biosciences) and fixed in 5% formaldehyde-PBS before analysis.
Tetramer decay analysis
To test whether B*57KF11 and B*57A2G,S4N tetramers bound [A2G,S4N]-specific T cell clones with similar affinities, a tetramer decay analysis was performed (19). A total of 2 x 106 T cells from clone ML525 p510 was incubated with B*5703KF11 and B*5703A2G,S4N PE tetramers at 4°C for 45 min.
Following extensive washing in PBA-0.1% BSA, cells were resuspended and aliquot t = 0 was removed. A 5-fold excess of allophycocyanin-conjugated B*5703A2G,S4N tetramer was added to each tube, and samples were incubated on ice. At 20-min intervals, aliquots corresponding to t = 1, t = 2, etc., were removed, washed, and fixed in PBS-5% formaldehyde. Tetramer binding was analyzed by flow cytometry, and the natural log of the mean geometric intensity of FL-2 immunofluorescence for each samples were plotted against sampling time.
Sequencing of p24 epitopes
gDNA (proviral DNA) was isolated from PBMCs using the PureGene DNA Isolation kit (Gentra Systems) from which p24 was amplified by seminested PCR (10). The p24 5' and 3' outer primers include primer-GAGATA(A/C)(A/G)AGACACCAA(A/G)GAAGC and CATGCTGTCATCATTTCTTCTA were used during the first round of PCR amplifications, and 5' primer CAGCCAAAATTACCCTATAGTGC plus 3' outer from the first-round amplifications were used during second-round PCRs. Nested p24 PCR products were cloned into TOPO TA vectors (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Ampicillin-resistant (AmpR) colonies were expanded and plasmid DNA was isolated for sequence analysis.
Staining of tetramer-reactive T cells with V region-specific TCR mAbs
Staining of B*57-reactive T cells using V region-specific mAbs and tetramer was performed as described previously (20). A total of 5 x 105 fresh PBMCs or 5 x 104 CTL lines were stained with a panel of TCR-specific Abs and rabbit anti-mouse Ab conjugated to FITC before labeling with B*57 tetramers and anti-CD8 PerCP (BD Biosciences). Cells were fixed in PBS-5% formaldehyde solution.
Sequencing of TCR V
and V
segments
mRNA was isolated from 1 x 106 CD8+ T cell clones using TriReagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and cDNA was synthesized using the cDNA Cycle kit for RT-PCR (Invitrogen Life Technologies). A panel of V
- and V
-specific primers were used to screen for TCR usage by PCR analysis (21). PCR amplification was conducted using Red Taq Ready Mix PCR Mix (Sigma-Aldrich). Control reactions included V region primers and H2O. TCR PCR products were cloned by TOPO TA cloning (Invitrogen Reaction), and plasmid DNA was isolated for sequencing analysis.
Protein crystallization and data collection
Crystallizations were done by the sitting drop vapor diffusion technique. After equilibration, and cross-seeding from wild-type HLA-B*5703-KF11 crystals, single crystals of HLA-B*5703-peptide complexes were obtained from a reservoir condition of 16% Peg 8000, 50 mM MES (pH 6.5). The largest crystals were soaked briefly and sequentially in mother liquor solutions supplemented with 10% and 20% glycerol, then flash-cooled and maintained at 100 K in a cryostream (Oxford Cryosystems). The HLA B*5703-KGFNPEVIPMF [A2G,S4N] and HLA B*5703-KAFNPEIIPMF [S4N,V7I] data sets were collected at station ID14 EH1 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) (Grenoble, France) with an ADSC-Q4 (Area Detector Systems) CCD detector. Both B*5703-peptide complexes belonged to the orthorhombic space group P212121. Diffraction data were autoindexed with the program DENZO and scaled with the program SCALEPACK (22). Statistics are summarized in Table III.
|
Crystal structures were determined by molecular replacement using the program EPMR (23). The H chain and
2m domains from the HLA B*5703-KF11 structure (12) were used as the search probe (peptide and bound water coordinates omitted). This model yielded unambiguous solutions for both variant B*5703-peptide complexes with correlation coefficients of
0.7 and R factors of
35% for data between 30 and 4Å. Using CNS (24), the models were subjected to several rounds of rigid body refinement of individual domains (a1/a2, a3,
2m) after which Fo Fc difference maps calculated for both complexes revealed the presence of the 11-mer peptides when displayed in the graphics program O (25).
The peptides were modeled into the Fo Fc difference density maps and further rounds of refinement were conducted using standard CNS protocols for bulk solvent correction and overall anisotropic B-factor scaling, positional refinement, simulated annealing and individual B-factor refinement. Manual refitting of the models was conducted using O. Conjugate gradient minimization refinement was performed at the final stages of crystallographic refinements after water picking with ARPw/ARP (26), using a restrained refinement algorithm in REFMAC5 (27). Structural superpositions were conducted using program SHP (28) and the figures were generated in Bobscript (29)
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
First, we assessed which of the previously mapped B*57 epitopes were immunodominant during chronic HIV-1 infection. We used the standard ELISPOT assay to evaluate IFN-
secretion in response to B*57-restricted epitopes including gag, nef, integrase, rev, vpr, vpu, and vif (Table II, "Previously defined B*57-restricted epitopes" section) in 9 of the 11 patients. Our results demonstrate that the p24 gag epitopes KAFSPEVIPMF (KF11) and ISPRTLNAW (IW9) were immunodominant both in terms of frequency and magnitude of recognition (Table IV).
|
Previously, we observed that the common A/C clade variant [A2G,S4N], and a second harboring a position 4 (p4) S to N mutation ([S4N,V7I]), were differentially recognized in B*5701+ and B*5703+ patients infected with the KF11 virus; in patients where [A2G,S4N] represented the dominant viral quasispecies, [A2G,S4N] and [S4N,V7I] were almost exclusively recognized with minimal recognition of other variants (10). Therefore, we questioned whether the amino acid change common to both variants, namely, the p4 residue, induced differential recognition. We generated KF11 variants with p4 mutations including A, D, I, Q, and T (Table II, "KF11 p4 variants" section), and used the standard ELISPOT assay to quantify IFN-
secretion in response to the p4 variant epitopes in patients PBMCs where either KF11 or [A2G,S4N] represented the dominant viral species. Our results demonstrate the differential recognition of the p4 KF11 variants, which varied according to the dominant viral sequence in individual patients (Fig. 1). In B*5703+ donor ML005 where the predominant viral isolate represented the [A2G,S4N] variant, only the p4 D variant in addition to [A2G,S4N] generated strong responses. We observed similarly restricted recognition of p4 variants in B*5703+ donor ML525 although we were unable to test the entire p4 panel due to sample limitation. These results are in sharp contrast to p4 variant recognition in B*5701+ patients where KF11 represented the dominant virus: here D and N substitutions were poorly recognized whereas the p4 variants containing A, I, Q, T, and KF11 induced high levels of IFN-
secretion.
|
and TNF-
in response to [A2G,S4N], KF11, and the p4 peptide variants by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS). Interestingly, all [A2G,S4N]-specific T cell clones preferentially produced cytokines in response to [A2G,S4N], with minimal responses induced by KF11 or the p4 variants (Fig. 2).
|
in response to [A2G,S4N], with limited recognition of KF11 (Fig. 3b). We also generated T cell clones from the individual CTL lines, and as demonstrated by tetramer staining, these were exclusively 100% cross-reactive irrespective of the epitope used to propagate them (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, however, tetramer decay analysis revealed that the B*5703KF11 tetramer displayed weaker binding kinetics as compared with the B*5703A2G,S4N tetramer when tested on KF11-propaged clone p5-10 (Fig. 4B). We also assessed the ability of KF11- and [A2G,S4N]-derived clones to secrete IFN-
, and to up-regulate the degranulation markers CD107a and b in response to KF11 and [A2G,S4N] epitopes. All KF11- and [A2G,S4N]-derived clones behaved identically in that [A2N,S4N] preferentially induced IFN-
and CD107ab up-regulation with minimal recognition of KF11 (Fig. 5).
|
|
|
Our crystal structure of HLA-B*5703-KF11 shows that the unusual length of the 11-mer peptide is accommodated in the peptide-binding groove by the formation of a central peptide bulge. Peptide residues E6 and V7 are solvent exposed, project high above the peptide-binding groove, and are readily accessible for TCR recognition. The side chain of the p4 residue is also solvent exposed and on the basis of our cellular data, we predict that this is sufficient to be involved in TCR recognition. However, there may be a larger scale structural impact of p4 amino acid variation on the main chain bulge conformation. Therefore, to access whether any such conformational differences in the exposure of peptide residues could be responsible for the altered pattern of TCR recognition, we determined the structures of the [A2G,S4N] and [S4N,V7I] epitopes. Both structures were determined from crystals of the orthorhombic space group P212121 which shared almost identical unit cell dimensions, with one HLA-B*5703-peptide complex per crystallographic asymmetric unit (Table III). The resolution of the x-ray diffraction data for the [A2G,S4N]- and [S4N,V7I]-B*5703 complexes (1.85 and 1.5 Å, respectively) allowed the atomic coordinates for the variant peptide residues (and associated bound water molecules) to be defined accurately permitting a detailed comparison with the KF11 peptide in HLA-B*5703 (12). Superimposition of the HLA-B*5703-KF11, -[A2G,S4N], and -[S4N,V7I] structures (based on their peptide-binding
1/
2 domain) reveals that the overall bulge conformation found in the main chain of the KF11 peptide is conserved with only minor adjustments in the conformations of some-solvent exposed side chains (Fig. 6). Although the A2G mutation is buried at the B pocket, the S4N and V7I mutations are exposed within the region of the pMHC surface commonly observed to engage with TCRs (30) and thus may alter interactions with specific TCRs.
|
To elucidate the nature of the responding B*57-KF11 T cell repertoire, we evaluated the TCR selection in terms of the pattern of TCR V region usage and CDR3 sequence analysis. We focused on B*5701+ and B*5703+ patients infected with KF11- and [A2G,S4N] viruses. We used a combination of B*57-KF11/B*57-[A2G,S4N] tetramers and mAbs specific for TCR V region segments to determine TCR usage of B*KF11- and [A2G,S4N]-specific T cells, and this resulted in the identification of TCR V region usage for four of the patients studied. We also generated CTL lines, and cell clones specific for KF11/[A2G,S4N] from which the sequence of TCR V
and V
gene segments were identified by PCR using a panel of predefined TCR V
and V
primers. Using mAbs specific for TCR V region segments, we observed that three of the five B*5701+ KF11-infected donors used a V
17 TCR. This receptor was expressed on 5770% of PBMC-derived B*57-KF11-specific T lymphocytes in two donors (not assessed in OXAG). PCR analysis of T cell clones generated from these donors (LON005, OXAG, and LON201) used a V
17/V
15 TCR pair (sequence nomenclature as defined by Arden et al. (31), which is equivalent to a TRBV19/TRAV5 TCR complex as defined by the international ImMunoGeneTics (IMGT) database (32)), and sequence analysis revealed almost complete conservation of the amino acid usage in both the V
and V
CDR3 regions in all 3 donors, despite variation in nucleotide sequences (Fig. 7). The CDR3 V
and V
regions were of average length and donors displayed conservation of glycine and tyrosine residues. B*5701+ donor MS used a V
22 TCR (IMGT-TRBV2) and PCR analysis revealed this to comprise a V
22/V
6 (IMGT-TRBV2/TRAV6) TCR pair; the V
22 CDR3 was short and the amino acids comprising the CDR3b loop were distinct from the conserved V
17 CDR3 sequence (data not shown). In B*5703+ donor ML525 where [A2G,S4N] represented the dominant viral sequence, a V
15/V
15 TCR (IMGT-TRBV241/TRAV5) combination was used, but the amino acid composition of this V
15 CDR3 loop was highly distinct from the conserved V
15/V
17 TCR (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, escape mutations influencing the recognition of the dominant p24-derived epitopes IW9 and TW10 have been described (9, 33), and while both studies help define important correlates of B*57-mediated immunity it is likely that additional factors relate B*57 to prolonged survival. Previously, we focused on the B*57-KF11-specific CD8+ T cell response which prevails during chronic HIV-1 infection. Here, we demonstrate that the HLA-B*57-KF11-specific immune response is consistently dominant during chronic disease in B*57+ slow progressors. Formerly, we also demonstrated broad CD8+ T cell-mediated recognition of diverse KF11 clade variants in B*57+ slow progressors, and our recent crystallographic analysis of B*5703 in complex with the KF11 epitope (10, 12) provides an explanation for the inability of certain KF11 clade variants to induce CD8+ T cell responses. However, differential recognition of the [A2G,S4N] and [S4N,V7I] clade variant harboring the same p4 mutation was less apparent; [A2G,S4N] represents important A/C clade variant viruses, and as such, warrants further investigation. We have now combined both structural and function analyses to define factors dictating the differential recognition of [A2G,S4N] and KF11. We specifically include B*5703+ patients where the [A2G,S4N] virus represents a dominant infecting virus, as we previously observed preferential recognition of [A2G,S4N] and [S4N,V71] with minimal recognition of other KF11 clade variants in such donors (10) and our findings have recently been reiterated by others (34). Despite the small sample population, we observed distinct patterns of cross-reactivity, which varied according to the prevalent viral sequence B*5703+ patients, where [A2G,S4N] represented the dominant viral species, displayed limited cross-reactivity, which was in sharp contrast to the broad pattern of p4 recognition in KF11-infected B*5701+ individuals. These results were further exemplified in clones derived from [A2G,S4N]-infected patients; here, [A2G,S4N] induced preferential secretion of IFN-
, TNF-
, and up-regulated the LAMP proteins CD107a and b. Collectively, these data imply that the subtle difference at p4 in the K11 epitope may lead to the selection of diverse TCR repertoires, with distinct cross-reactive potential.
B*5703+ patient ML525 harbored both KF11 and [A2G,S4N] viruses, and attempts to grow T cell clones with distinct specificity for KF11 and [A2G,S4N] yielded unusual results. As assessed by tetramer staining all KF11- and [A2G,S4N]-derived T cell clones were 100% cross-reactive. Yet, despite this apparent cross-reactivity, all clones demonstrated functional specificity for the [A2G,S4N] epitope only, irrespective of the epitope used to propagate them. This disparity between tetramer staining analysis and functional studies is difficult to reconcile, however, the strong pattern of KF11-tetramer binding to [A2G,S4N]-specific T cells might result from increased pMHC-TCR avidity imposed by the artificially constructed tetrameric pMHC complex. These results reciprocate our previous findings where a B*5701A2G,S4N tetramer reacted with 100% of PBMC-derived KF11-reactive T cells, yet [A2G,S4N] induced minimal IFN-
secretion (10). Our preliminary tetramer-decay assay reveals that B*5703KF11 tetramers form less stable interactions with [A2G,S4N]-specific T cell clones when compared with B*5703A2G,S4N tetramers. Hence, the interaction of KF11 tetrameric complexes with [A2G,S4N]-specific T cells ex vivo may represent an extended picture of the actual physiological interaction in vivo. Although N and S are both amino acids with polar side chains, they differ in size and hydrogen-bonding potential, which might alter the specificity of the p4-mediated interactions with TCRs in vivo.
In donor ML525, the KF11 epitope behaved like an altered peptide ligand and supported [A2G,S4N]-specific T cell division without inducing immune effector functions. In the context of chronic HIV-1 infection, this scenario might adversely influence the immune response: if, as in patient ML525, for example, KF11 represents the emerging virus, it is possible that in addition to priming KF11-specific T cells, this epitope would support the expansion of T cells specific for the index epitope, namely, [A2G,S4N]. As a result of prior activation, we would predict that [A2G,S4N]-specific memory T cell precursors are present at higher frequencies, and that KF11 priming might lead to the competitive outgrowth of [A2G,S4N]-reactive T cells with functional specificity for the [A2G,S4N] epitope only. Although we did observe the preferential expansion of donor ML525-derived [A2G,S4N]-specific T cell clones reflecting the prevalence of the [A2G,S4N] viral sequence, we were unable to establish whether [A2G,S4N]-specific T cells were present at higher frequencies due to sample limitation. We are also unaware whether our patient was coinfected with both viral stains simultaneously, singularly on separate occasions, or developed either variant endogenously. Nonetheless, given our findings and as suggested by recent studies in mice (35), it may be crucial that clade variant epitopes, however similar, are incorporated into vaccines and administered simultaneously to ensure that distinct CD8+ T populations are optimally primed. This approach may limit the biased expansion of T cells with restricted cross-reactive effector potential.
We performed a high-resolution structural analysis of B*5703 in complex with the [A2G,S4N] and [S4N,V7I] variant peptides to determine whether there was significant change in the structures of these epitopes compared with the B*5703-KF11 complex. Compared with KF11, the structures of the two variant peptides are broadly conserved by the formation of the bulged hairpin loop in the central portion of the peptide. The variant epitopes p4 and p7 remain solvent exposed within the standard TCR-binding footprint, making these side chains candidates for interaction with cognate TCRs. Given the large number of structural features, and in particular the extensive main chain surface area exposed by this pMHC complex, a given TCR may engage with multiple structural components; thus, the effects of the conservative alterations such as the S4N and V7I may not prevent TCR binding altogether. However, subtle differences in TCR-binding parameters have been shown to affect T cell activation/effector functions and variations in TCR-binding kinetics or thermodynamic parameters may result from minor alterations in peptide structure (36).
We also analyzed the nature of the TCR repertoire recognizing the highly unusual B*57KF11 complex and compared this to the TCR usage of B*57-[A2G,S4N]-specific T cells. Interestingly, three HLA-B*5701+ donors infected with KF11 viruses, used a conserved V
15 and V
17 TCR (or TRAV5/TRBV19 TCR (IMGT)), with striking conservation of CDR3
and
amino acids, and interestingly, these T cells display greatest cross-reactivity ex vivo. Although Dong et al. (37) recently described the usage of the V
13.2 chain bearing a conserved CDR3 loop in response to a B*0801-restricted nef epitope, this is the first report of a bias in usage of both TCR
and
chains in human HIV-1 infection. The best-documented examples of conserved TCR 
chain usage have come from the study of influenza infection in humans, where the CD8+ T cell responses to A*0201 complexed with the matrix peptide epitope, GILGFVFTL is dominated by a V
17/V
10 TCR pair in most individuals (15). The V
17 CDR3 region is highly conserved and comprises an IRSSY motif (aa 97101). The crystallographic structure of V
10/V
17 in complex with A*0201-GILGFVFTL provides a structural explanation for the conserved TCR V
chain usage (38). In this TCR-pMHC complex residues D32 and Q52, unique to the V
17 CDR1 and CDR2 loops, respectively, hydrogen bond the epitope and may define the specific orientation of the TCR onto the pMHC such that the conserved CDR3
residue R98 inserts into a notch between the epitope and the HLA-A*0201 a2 helix. The R98 and S99 side chains create a dense hydrogen-bonding network between the TCR and pMHC. Similarly, CD8+ T cell responses to the EBV EBNA3 epitope, FLRGRAYGL, are dominated by a common V
6.1/V
4.1 TCR (LC13) with conserved CDR3
and
regions in B*0801+ individuals (39) and recent crystallographic analysis of LC13 in complex with B*0801-FLRGRAYGL offers an explanation for the selection of the V and CDR3
and
sequences comprising LC13 (40). Another striking example of TCR
,
, and CDR3 sequence conservation was recently documented in the study of TCR usage in SIV infection in macaques; here, the authors observed that the majority of macaques infected with SIVmac251 used conserved TCR V
chains when responding to the Mamu-A*01-restricted TL8 (Tat) and CM9 (gag) T cell epitopes and that many TL8- and CM9-specific TCR V
CDR3 regions were conserved at the amino acid level. Additionally, there was evidence for preferred TCR V
chain usage in a small number of macaques responding to the TL8 epitope (41).
Given that the main chain conformation of the peptide epitope in B*5703-K11 is highly unusual it seems plausible that the available TCR repertoire may be limited in comparison to that capable of interacting with more conventional peptide-MHC complexes, hence the conserved pattern of TCR usage in B*5701+ donors. However, B*5701 and B*5703 differ at amino acid positions (p) 114 and 116 which are situated near the F pocket; in B*5701, the p114 N and p116 S residues are replace by a D and Y in the B*5703 subtype, respectively. Based solely on our B*5703 crystallographic complexes, we predict that as p114 nor p116 side chains contribute few contact to peptide binding, KF11 and [A2G,S4N] should adopt similar conformations in B*5701 and B*5703. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the overall orientation of KF11 or [A2G,S4N] in complex with B*5701 and B*5703 are dissimilar. For example, HLA-B2705 and 2709 differ only in residue 116 of the H chain (Asp in B*2705 and His in B(*)2709), yet display differential disease association with ankylosing spondylitis. Recently, Fiorillo et al. (42) demonstrated that the viral peptide, RRRWRRLTV (aa 236244 of EBV, pLMP2), is presented by the B*2705 and B*2709 molecules in two drastically deviating conformations. In the absence of a B*5701-KF11 complex, we are unable to evaluate whether a similarly subtle difference between B*5701 and B*5703 profoundly impact upon the orientation of the KF11 clade variant epitope.
In summary, we have shown that although [A2G,S4N] and KF11 when in complex with B*5703 appear similar from a structural perspective, they behave differently in terms of the functional outcome they induce. In terms of TCR cross-reactivity, KF11 seems to support the outgrowth of CD8+ T cells with a greater capacity for cross-reactivity in B*5701+ donors, whereas in B*5703+ patients the [A2G,S4N]-derived TCR repertoire are limited, particularly in terms amino acid recognition at p4. Interestingly, B*5701+ patients infected with KF11 variants used a conserved TCR that cross-reacted with the majority of p4 variants; it is tempting to speculate that this receptor might select against the emergence of a p4 variant, although it displayed limited cross-reactivity to the most common database variant, [A2G,S4N]. Finally, whether our overall findings relate to the subtle p4 differences between KF11 and [A2G,S4N] or to the minor differences in the orientation of these peptide when presented by HLA-B*5701 and B*5703 that, in turn, dictate differential TCR repertoire selection are unknown. The TCR repertoire availability in different ethnic groups might also impact on TCR repertoire selection and TCR cross-reactivity. In-depth studies of larger B*5701+/B*5703+ cohorts, and if possible, B*5701+ patients infected with [A2G,S4N], are necessary to evaluate these hypotheses.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation Grant No. 77474-28-PF, and funding from the Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, and Cancer Research U.K. ![]()
2 Atomic coordinates and structure factor amplitudes for the HLA-B*5703-A2G,S4N and the HLA-B*5703-S4N,V7I complexes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 2HJK and 2HJL, respectively. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Geraldine M. A. Gillespie, Medical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DS, U.K. E-mail address: ggillesp{at}hammer.imm.ox.ac.uk ![]()
4 G.M.A.G. and G.S.-J. contributed equally to this study. ![]()
5 Abbreviations used in this paper: BCL, autologous B cell; SFU, spot-forming unit; h, human; ICS, intracellular cytokine staining; FSC, forward scatter; SSC, side scatter. ![]()
Received for publication March 30, 2006. Accepted for publication June 16, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
17 gene segment. J. Exp. Med. 181: 79-91. 
T cell receptors in antiviral immunity. Immunity 18: 53-64. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. McKinnon, R. Capina, H. Peters, M. Mendoza, J. Kimani, C. Wachihi, A. Kariri, M. Kimani, M. Richmond, S. K. Kiazyk, et al. Clade-Specific Evolution Mediated by HLA-B*57/5801 in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Clade A1 p24 J. Virol., December 1, 2009; 83(23): 12636 - 12642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wieckowski, P. Baumgaertner, P. Corthesy, V. Voelter, P. Romero, D. E. Speiser, and N. Rufer Fine Structural Variations of {alpha}{beta}TCRs Selected by Vaccination with Natural versus Altered Self-Antigen in Melanoma Patients J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 5397 - 5406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Simons, S. E. VanCompernolle, R. M. Smith, J. Wei, L. Barnett, S. L. Lorey, D. Meyer-Olson, and S. A. Kalams Despite Biased TRBV Gene Usage against a Dominant HLA B57-Restricted Epitope, TCR Diversity Can Provide Recognition of Circulating Epitope Variants J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 5137 - 5146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Venturi, H. Y. Chin, D. A. Price, D. C. Douek, and M. P. Davenport The Role of Production Frequency in the Sharing of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Specific CD8+ TCRs between Macaques J. Immunol., August 15, 2008; 181(4): 2597 - 2609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |