The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lartigue, A.
Right arrow Articles by Musette, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lartigue, A.
Right arrow Articles by Musette, P.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 177: 1349-1354.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

Role of TLR9 in Anti-Nucleosome and Anti-DNA Antibody Production in lpr Mutation-Induced Murine Lupus1

Aurelia Lartigue*, Philippe Courville*,{dagger}, Isabelle Auquit*, Arnaud François{dagger}, Christophe Arnoult*, Francois Tron*,{ddagger}, Daniele Gilbert*,{ddagger} and Philippe Musette2,*,§

* Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 519 and Institut Fédératif de Recherche Multidisciplinaire sur les Peptides, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, Rouen, France; and {dagger} Laboratoire d’Anatomie-Pathologique, {ddagger} Laboratoire d’Immunopathologie Clinique et Expérimentale, and § Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Systemic lupus erythematosus is characterized by the production of autoantibodies directed against nuclear Ags, including nucleosome and DNA. TLR9 is thought to play a role in the production of these autoantibodies through the capacity of nuclear immunogenic particles to interact both with BCR and TLR9. To determine the role of TLR9 in SLE, C57BL/6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and TLR9+/+ mice were analyzed. The abrogation of TLR9 totally impaired the production of anti-nucleosome Abs, whereas no difference was observed in the frequency of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies whose titer was strikingly higher in TLR9–/– mice. In addition a higher rate of mesangial proliferation was observed in the kidney of TLR9-deficient animals. These results indicate that in C57BL/6-lpr/lpr mice, TLR9 is absolutely required for the anti-nucleosome Ab response but not for anti-dsDNA Ab production which is involved in mesangial proliferation.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)3 is a nonorgan-specific autoimmune disease characterized by the production of autoantibodies directed against self-nuclear Ags among which anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA Abs are thought to play a major role in disease pathogenesis, in particular nephritis (1, 2). The molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the production of these autoantibodies still remain unprecised. It is well established that B (3) and T lymphocytes (4, 5) participate in disease pathogenesis, but the sustained activation of autoreactive B cells constitutes the common and major characteristic of lupus diseases observed in both humans and mice. The activation of lupus-associated autoreactive B cells is Ag driven and some studies suggest that nucleosome, an ubiquitous endogenous product of cell apoptosis, could be the primary and major immunogen leading to the production of both anti-nucleosome and anti-dsDNA Abs (6). Others also showed that exogenous Ags such as bacterial DNA, could induce an anti-dsDNA Ab response (7). It is also demonstrated that pathogen-associated molecular patterns can costimulate autoreactive B cells through their interaction with TLR and participate in the breakage of B cell tolerance. Indeed, TLR9, which binds bacterial DNA via unmethylated CpG sequences, is thought to play a role in the B cell response to DNA (8, 9, 10) and the pathogenesis of SLE (11, 12, 13). Apoptotic-generated DNA fragments can also bind to TLR9 and activate B cells by dual engagement of BCR and TLR9 (14, 15). These observations invited us to determine the role of TLR9 in the production of lupus-related autoantibodies and the spontaneous development of murine lupus. For this purpose, we compared the phenotype, i.e., lymphadenopathy, splenomegaly, autoantibody production and renal injury, of C57BL/6 (B6) mice which do not spontaneously develop lupus, C57BL/6-lpr/lpr (B6-lpr/lpr) mice which present a mild type of lupus related to Fas deficiency and C57BL/6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– (B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/–) mice.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Mice

C57BL/6 (B6) mice bearing homozygous Faslpr/lpr mutation (B6-lpr/lpr) and C57BL/6-TLR9–/– (B6-TLR9–/–) mice were obtained from the Centre de Distribution Typage et Archivage Animal and bred in our animal facilities. C57BL/6-lpr/lpr- TLR9–/– (B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/–) mice were obtained from crosses between B6-lpr/lpr and B6-TLR9–/– mice. C57BL/6-lpr/lpr were used as controls.

CpG immunization protocol

Two-month-old B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice were immunized i.p. with 10 µg of phosphorothioate-CpG-oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) (5'-tcc atg acg ttc ctg acg tt-3') endotoxin-free (InvivoGen) followed by five booster injections 2 wk apart. Two-month-old B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– were used as unimmunized control groups and received distilled water at each injection.

Flow cytometry analysis and mAbs

Splenocytes and lymph node (LN) cells from the inguinal sites were purified using Lympholyte-M (Cliniscience). Cells at the interface were washed with PBS and incubated for 20 min on ice with optimal amounts of FITC- or PE-conjugated primary Abs diluted in PBS. The following Abs were obtained from BD PharMingen: CD3{epsilon} (CD3 {epsilon}-chain), CD4 (L3T4), CD8a (Ly-2), CD19, and CD45R/B220 (RA3-6B2) and used at pretitrated dilutions. After washes, cell staining was analyzed using an Epics XL (Beckman Coulter).

Anti-nuclear Ab and anti-dsDNA immunofluorescence

For indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (BMD), sera were diluted 1/10 and incubated for 20 min. For indirect immunofluorescence assay on Crithidia luciliae (MBL), sera were diluted 1/5–1:320. After washing, bound IgG were detected using a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Fc specific; Sigma-Aldrich).

ELISAs

Anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome Abs were detected by ELISAs using plasmid dsDNA-precoated plates (Varelisa; Pharmacia Diagnostics) or DNA-stripped nucleosome (Euroimmun) as the Ags on the solid phase. For anti-cardiolipin (CL), anti-ssDNA Ab and rheumatoid factor detection, plates were incubated, respectively, with 10 µg/ml bovine heart CL, 1 µg/ml calf thymus ssDNA (Sigma-Aldrich), or 10 µg/ml rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Mouse sera were diluted 1/100 and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. Bound IgG or IgM were detected either with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG or anti-mouse IgM (Rockland). The cutoff values were 0.5 for anti-ssDNA, 0.276 for anti-dsDNA, 0.22 for anti-nucleosome, 0.109 for anti-CL Abs, and 0.268 for rheumatoid factor.

Proteinuria and histopathology

Urine was collected for proteinuria determination at different ages using reagent strips (Multistix; Bayer). Mice were sacrificed at 6 mo of age and renal examination was performed. Half kidneys were fixed in 4% neutral formaldehyde, sectioned, and stained with trichrome green. We analyzed the presence of interstitial lymphoid infiltration and glomerulonephritis including mesangial cell proliferation. A nephritis index was determined based on the mesangial proliferation (0, <3 cells per glomeruli; 1, mild with 3–10 cells per glomeruli; 2, moderate with 10–15 cells per glomeruli; and 3, severe with >15 cells per glomeruli). Frozen kidney sections were stained with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). The topography and intensity of glomerular Ig deposits were assessed by two renal pathologists (P.C. and A.F.).

Statistical analysis

Weight of lymphoid organ and OD measured in mouse sera were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Mesangial proliferation and proteinuria observed in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9+/+ mice were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Comparison of OD measured in mouse sera at different age was performed using the Friedman test.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Clinical signs of SLE in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice

The phenotype of B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice was analyzed from birth to 6 mo of age. As reported previously (16), the most apparent clinical sign of lpr-induced SLE was splenomegaly and generalized lymphadenopathy (Fig. 1A). In B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice, axillary and inguinal LN weights were significantly greater (n = 12; mean = 366 ± 316 mg) than in B6-lpr/lpr (n = 11; mean = 52 ± 85.3 mg; p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test) (Fig. 1B). Likewise and as expected, all spleens in the lpr/lpr strain were enlarged; B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– spleens were 5-fold heavier than those from B6-lpr/lpr mice (p < 0.01). However survival rates of B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– (66%) vs B6-lpr/lpr mice (64%) at 24 wk of age were not different.


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice present a massive lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly. A, Spleen and axillary LN of B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr mice were enlarged as early as 3 mo of age compared with control strain B6. B, Axillary and inguinal LN weights were significantly heavier in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice than in B6-lpr/lpr (p < 0,01) using the Mann-Whitney U test. Horizontal lines represent mean value.

 
T and B cell phenotypes in TLR9-deficient mice

One of the major phenotype characteristic of lpr/lpr mice is an increased number of CD4–CD8– double-negative (DN) T cells in enlarged lymphoid organs (16, 17). Thus, we performed a phenotype analysis of cells that accumulated in LN and spleens from B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr mice. No difference in single-positive T cell and B cell population percentages was observed between B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr mice, whereas DN T cells were dramatically increased in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice (Fig. 2). The massive lymphadenopathy and splenomegaly observed in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice were accompanied by increased levels of total IgG which were significantly higher than in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9+/+ mice (mean = 30.7 ± 7 vs 5.4 ± 1.4 mg/ml; p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). In contrast, total IgM were lower in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– than in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9+/+ mice (mean = 3.6 ± 1.6 mg/ml vs mean = 5.8 ± 0.7; p < 0.05).


Figure 2
View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. T and B cell phenotypes in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr mice. Splenocytes from 3-mo-old mice were subjected to flow cytometry analysis to determine the percentage of DN T cells, T, and B cells.

 
Anti-chromatin autoantibodies in TLR9-deficient mice

Sera from B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr mice were collected from 1 to 6 mo of age and examined by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) analysis on HEp-2 cells. Although 10 of 11 B6-lpr/lpr sera exhibited an homogenous staining of the nucleus, none of 14 B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– sera presented this IIF pattern (Fig. 3A) since 11 of 14 bound to nucleoli (p < 0.01). The dramatic change of the nuclear staining pattern in TLR9–/– mice indicates that the abrogation of TLR9 expression either impaired the production of the autoantibody population giving the homogenous nuclear staining, demasking an antinucleolar activity, or eventually changed the autoantigen binding properties of autoantibodies. Since a homogenous nuclear staining is given by autoantibodies directed against chromatin and/or its components, we performed an autoantibody analysis of wild-type and TLR9-deficient B6-lpr/lpr mouse sera by using dsDNA- and DNA-stripped nucleosome ELISAs. No significant difference in the frequency of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies was observed between B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice: they were detected in 7 of 11 B6-lpr/lpr and 13 of 16 B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice at 3 mo of age (Fig. 3B; p = 0.160) and in 9 of 11 B6-lpr/lpr and 11 of 12 B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9-deficient mice at 6 mo of age (p = 0.466). Interestingly, the titer of IgG anti-dsDNA Abs was higher in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– (p < 0.0021; Fig. 4, A and B), whereas the titer of IgM anti-dsDNA Abs was not significantly different between these two strains of mice (p = 0.46). To confirm these results, sera were tested by IIF on Crithidia luciliae, a substrate commonly used for the detection of anti-dsDNA in SLE (18). Among 11 sera collected from 6-mo-old B6-lpr/lpr mice, 8 contained Abs staining the C luciliae kinetoplast. Similarly, 9 of 12 six-mo-old B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice displayed the same IIF pattern (Fig. 4C) at dilutions 1/5–1/320 (Fig. 4D). In contrast, when the nucleosome-binding activity was examined, none of the 3-mo-old B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice had anti-nucleosome Abs (n = 16) that were detected at high levels in 10 of 11 B6-lpr/lpr mice (Fig. 3B; p < 0.0001). Although two sera from 6-mo-old TLR9-deficient mice weakly bound to nucleosome, the difference in nucleosome-binding activity between the two groups was again highly significant (p < 0.0001). Moreover, anti-histone Abs were not detected in TLR9-deficient sera (data not shown). Thus, in B6-lpr/lpr mice, TLR9 deficiency dramatically impaired anti-chromatin Ab production and dissociated the anti-dsDNA from the anti-nucleosome Ab response. These results indicate that TLR9 plays an essential role in the B cell response against nucleosome-associated proteins.


Figure 3
View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Autoantibodies detected in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– sera and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9+/+. A, Sera from 3-mo-old mice were tested by IIF analysis on HEp-2 cells. B6-lpr/lpr sera gave an homogenous nuclear staining pattern and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– a nucleolar pattern (original magnification, x400). B, B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mouse sera were analyzed at 3 mo of age and tested by ELISAs for anti-ssDNA, anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome, anti-CL Abs, and FR. {blacksquare}, B6-lpr/lpr sera (n = 11 at 3 and 6 mo) and {square}, B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– sera (n = 16 at 3 mo and n = 12 at 6 mo). The statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Anti-dsDNA Abs in sera from B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9+/+ and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice. Sera were analyzed at 3 (A) and 6 mo of age (B). Titers were significantly higher in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– (white losanges) than in B6-lpr/lpr mice (black losanges) at both times of sampling. The statistical comparisons were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. C, detection of anti-dsDNA by C. luciliae immunofluorescence. B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice sera were analyzed at 6 mo of age. Sera were considered positive for anti-dsDNA Abs when specific fluorescence was seen in the kinetoplast, a mitochondrion which exclusively contains dsDNA (original magnification, x400). White arrows indicate the kinetoplast. Anti-dsDNA Ab titers were measured by a solid-phase ELISA using plasmid DNA as the Ag in sera from B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9+/+ and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice (cutoff value: OD = 0.276). D, Detection of anti-dsDNA by C. luciliae immunofluorescence at different dilutions of sera from B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice.

 
Rheumatoid factor, anti-ssDNA, and anti-CL in TLR9-deficient mice

We also looked for the presence of other autoantibody populations frequently detected in lupus mice (Fig. 3B). Rheumatoid factors were present in 93% of 3-mo-old B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and 90% of B6-lpr/lpr mice, and their titers were not different between the two groups. Anti-CL were detected in 37.5 and 18%, respectively, of B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr sera (p = 0.405), indicating that anti-phospholipid Ab production is not controlled by TLR9 as reported by others (19). Similarly, TLR9 deficiency did not affect the production of anti-ssDNA Abs that were present in 81 and 72.7% of sera from B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– and B6-lpr/lpr, respectively. Thus, in contrast to the anti-nucleosome Ab response, the production of autoantibodies directed against IgG, CL, and ssDNA was not impaired in TLR9-deficient mice.

Activation of TLR9 with CpG in lpr/lpr mice

To determine the role of TLR9 stimulation in autoantibody production, we immunized B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice from 2 mo of age (before the appearance of IgG autoantibodies) with hypomethylated CpG-DNA, twice a month and determined the levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome Abs. Fig. 5 shows the time course of anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome Ab production in B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– immunized mice. Anti-nucleosome Ab response did not significantly differ from that observed during the spontaneous development of the disease of TLR9+/+mice but was blocked in TLR9-deficient mice (Fig. 5A). Thus, direct activation of TLR9 with hypomethylated CpG is not able per se to induce an anti-nucleosome Ab response in TLR9+/+ or TLR9–/– mice, as has been demonstrated in normal mice (20). We found that the absence of TLR9 did not impair the production of anti-DNA autoantibodies and immunization with CpG even induced a slight but not significant (p = 0.46) increase of anti-DNA in B6-lpr/lpr TLR9+/+ and in B6-lpr/lpr TLR9–/– mice (Fig. 5B). Thus, TLR9 may not be the unique receptor of CpG able to induce anti-DNA response.


Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Immunization with CpG does not induce the production of anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome Abs. B6-lpr/lpr (n = 6) and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice (n = 6) were immunized with 10 µg of CpG followed by five booster injections. B6-lpr/lpr (n = 6) and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice (n = 6) were used as controls. Means of OD given by anti-nucleosome (A) and anti-dsDNA Abs (B) present in sera of B6-lpr/lpr and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice were measured by ELISA. For anti-dsDNA Ab detection, sera with OD >0.276 (cutoff value = mean OD of 18 controls ± 2 SD) were considered positive. For anti-nucleosome Ab detection, sera with OD >0.117 were considered positive. The arrows indicate the time of first injection and bars represent SD. WT, wild type; KO, knockout.

 
Kidney disease in the absence of anti-nucleosome Abs

Proteinuria was increased in more B6-lpr/lpr TLR9–/–mice from 13 to 24 wk of age than in B6-lpr/lpr TLR9+/+ mice, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.062 at 13 wk, data not shown). Mice were killed at 6 mo of age and histological and immunochemical analyses of the kidneys were performed. In both groups, a similar interstitial lymphoid infiltration was observed. Glomerular IgG deposits that were exclusively mesangial were more intense in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– than in B6-lpr/lpr mice (Fig. 6A). A higher rate of mesangial proliferation was observed in these animals. Indeed, 11 of 12 B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice vs 5 of 11 B6-lpr/lpr mice had mesangial cell proliferation (p = 0.024, Fisher’s exact test; Fig. 6, B and C). Our observation indicates that glomerular IgG deposits and mesangial glomerulonephritis can occur in TLR9-deficient mice in the absence of anti-nucleosome Abs (21, 22).


Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Histological (A) and immunofluorescence (B) analysis of kidney sections of 6-mo-old mice stained with trichrome green (TG) or with anti-mouse IgG (original magnification, x40). C, The nephritis index indicates that renal lesions were more severe in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice. Histological renal disease was assessed in B6-lpr/lpr (n = 11) and B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice (n = 12) at 6 mo of age. Glomerular disease was scored from 0 to 3 for each mouse. The statistical comparison was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Disclosures
 References
 
Our study shows that B6-lpr/lpr mice develop a lupus-like autoimmune disease characterized by a massive lymphoproliferation, anti-DNA autoantibodies, immune complex deposition, and glomerulonephritis and that TLR9 deficiency does not dramatically affect this phenotype. TLR9-deficient B6-lpr/lpr mice exhibited increased immune activation, as demonstrated by an augmentation of LN and splenic weights and hypergammaglobulinemia that is in agreement with previous results obtained in (TLR9–/– x MRL/Mplpr/lpr) mice (19, 23). These observations indicate that the TLR9 signaling pathway could also exert a negative control of lymphocyte proliferation and accumulation in the context of sustained cell activation by endogenous TLR9 ligands (24, 25).

Another important observation is the change of the autoantibody specificity characterized by the loss anti-nucleosome/histone Abs despite the persistence of anti-dsDNA. These findings are in agreement with those recently observed by Wu and Peng (23) but are different from that previously reported in (TLR9–/– x MRL/Mplpr/lpr) mice whose anti-nuclear Ab profile switched from a homogenous to a speckled pattern and corresponded to the abrogation of both anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome Abs (19). An explanation for the discrepancy between Christensen’s data and ours, might be the different genetic background of TLR9-deficient mice (lupus-prone MRL/Mp vs C57BL/6) used in the two studies. Lupus is a polygenic disease and different lupus susceptibility loci have been described to be involved in the development of the disease (26), among them the Sle1 locus triggered the formation of anti-histone/DNA Abs (27). In lupus-prone mice of the MRL/lpr background, anti-nucleosome autoantibodies appear early in disease and precede the emergence of anti-dsDNA Abs, suggesting that anti-dsDNA are produced in response to nucleosome (6, 28). This transition does not occur in the B6.Sle1 strain, suggesting that other additional mechanisms are responsible for the activation of anti-dsDNA B cells in these mice (27). Our results clearly demonstrate that the autoimmune response against dsDNA in B6-lpr/lpr mice could emerge from a TLR9-independent mechanism. Nucleosomes released from apoptotic cells in lupus are somehow enriched in self-hypomethylated DNA sequences (29), suggesting that the anti-nucleosome response could be strictly dependent on TLR9, whereas the anti-DNA could not. The existence of the TLR9-independent pathways in the anti-DNA response has been suggested in several studies. DNA or ODN that do not contain CpG motifs and vertebrate genomic DNA can effectively synergize with specific Ag to costimulate murine B cells, probably via a TLR9-independent way (30, 31). Mammalian DNA-Ig complexes, that provide a potent activation of B cells via TLR9, can activate dendritic cells by both TLR9-dependent and -independent pathways (32). Moreover, macrophage activation by endogenous DNA, escaping to lysosomal degradation, requires TLR9-dependent and -independent pathways (33) and is not abrogated in MyD88-deficient mice (34). Other TLR, such as TLR3, TLR7, and TLR8, involved in the recognition of nucleic acids of viral origin (dsRNA and ssRNA) (35, 36) have been shown to play an important role in the development of autoantibodies present in lupus (37, 38). In the absence of TLR9, these receptors or others that also recognized nucleic acids, could be involved in anti-DNA Ab production. In any case, the common feature of TLR9–/–-deficient lupus mice expressing different genetic backgrounds is the impairment of the anti-nucleosome Ab response that clearly shows the specific requirement of TLR9 for this response.

The assessment of the renal disease in B6-lpr/lpr-TLR9–/– mice showed glomerular deposits and mesangial proliferation similarly to TLR9-deficient MRL-lpr/lpr mice that also developed substantial glomerular protein deposition (19), despite the absence of anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome Abs. The authors suggest that other specificities, anti-Sm for example, may play a pathogenic role in their models. In our study, the persistence and even the increased production of anti-dsDNA Abs could explain the elevated mesangial proliferation in TLR9-deficient mice since it has been clearly demonstrated that the level of anti-DNA Abs is associated with the importance of nephritis (21, 22).

Our data, as do the other recent reports concerning TLR9-deficient lupus mice (23), provide clear evidence for a protective role of TLR9 in the development of the lupus disease since all TLR9–/– lupus mice present more intense renal deposits, proteinuria, and lymphadenopathy than their normal counterparts. Paradoxically, TLR9 inhibition by synthetic ODN can also have beneficial effects on the disease progression in lupus nephritis (39, 40). Whereas the mechanisms responsible for this ambivalent role of TLR9 remain unclear, it should be noted that TLR9 activation could modulate the immune response from a Th1 to a Th2 pattern. Indeed, CpG-ODN have been demonstrated to induce IL-10 in lupus B cells, particularly those with the marginal zone B cell phenotype (41, 42) and then to down-regulate proinflammatory cytokines (42). IL-10-producing B cells are known to regulate autoimmunity (43) and IL-10-deficient MRL-Faslpr mice developed severe lupus (44). Interestingly, these mice present an exacerbated disease phenotype with early appearance of skin lesions, more severe renal disease and augmented production of IgG2a anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, a phenotype resembling that observed in our TLR9-deficient lupus mice.

Taken together, our results indicate that the engagement of TLR expressed at the surface of B cells (or other cells of the immune system) by endogenous or exogenous ligands participate in the expression of systemic autoimmunity by selectively inducing certain autoantibody populations and lymphocyte proliferation. Interestingly, TLR engagement may also lead to receptor inhibition (39, 40), which, along with our observations and those previously reported by others (19, 23), allows us to consider TLR as a potential target of new therapeutic agents of SLE (10).


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank S. Akira for the authorization to use C57BL/6-lpr/lpr- TLR9–/– mice.


   Disclosures
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the French Society of Dermatological Research. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philippe Musette, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 519, Faculté de Médecine et Pharmacie, 22, bd Gambetta, 76183 Rouen, Cedex, France. E-mail address: Philippe.Musette{at}chu-rouen.fr Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; DN, double negative; LN, lymph node; CL, cardiolipin; IIF, indirect immunofluorescence. Back

Received for publication January 5, 2006. Accepted for publication April 27, 2006.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Kotzin, B. L.. 1996. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell 85: 303-306. [Medline]
  2. Berden, J. H.. 1997. Lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 52: 538-558. [Medline]
  3. Jacobi, A. M., B. Diamond. 2005. Balancing diversity and tolerance: lessons from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med. 202: 341-344. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Musette, P., C. Pannetier, G. Gachelin, P. Kourilsky. 1994. The expansion of a CD4+ T cell population bearing a distinctive beta chain in MRL lpr/lpr mice suggests a role for the Fas protein in peripheral T cell selection. Eur. J. Immunol. 24: 2761-2766. [Medline]
  5. Musette, P., A. Galelli, H. Chabre, P. Callard, W. Peumans, P. Truffa-Bachi, P. Kourilsky, G. Gachelin. 1996. Urtica dioica agglutinin, a Vbeta8.3-specific superantigen, prevents the development of the systemic lupus erythematosus-like pathology of MRL lpr/lpr mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 26: 1707-1711. [Medline]
  6. Amoura, Z., H. Chabre, S. Koutouzov, C. Lotton, A. Cabrespines, J. F. Bach, L. Jacob. 1994. Nucleosome-restricted antibodies are detected before anti-dsDNA and/or antihistone antibodies in serum of MRL-Mp lpr/lpr and +/+ mice, and are present in kidney eluates of lupus mice with proteinuria. Arthritis. Rheum. 37: 1684-1688. [Medline]
  7. Gilkeson, G. S., A. M. Pippen, D. S. Pisetsky. 1995. Induction of cross-reactive anti-dsDNA antibodies in preautoimmune NZB/NZW mice by immunization with bacterial DNA. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 1398-1402. [Medline]
  8. Rifkin, I. R., E. A. Leadbetter, L. Busconi, G. Viglianti, A. Marshak-Rothstein. 2005. Toll-like receptors, endogenous ligands, and systemic autoimmune disease. Immunol. Rev. 205: 27-42.
  9. Anders, H. J.. 2005. A Toll for lupus. Lupus 14: 417-422. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lenert, P. S.. 2006. Targeting Toll-like receptor signalling in plasmacytoid dendritic cells and autoreactive B cells as a therapy for lupus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 8: 203[Medline]
  11. Viglianti, G. A., C. M. Lau, T. M. Hanley, B. A. Miko, M. J. Shlomchik, A. Marshak-Rothstein. 2003. Activation of autoreactive B cells by CpG dsDNA. Immunity 19: 837-847. [Medline]
  12. Anders, H. J., V. Vielhauer, V. Eis, Y. Linde, M. Kretzler, G. Perez de Lema, F. Strutz, S. Bauer, M. Rutz, H. Wagner, H. J. Grone, D. Schlondorff. 2004. Activation of Toll-like receptor-9 induces progression of renal disease in MRL-Faslpr mice. FASEB J. 18: 534-536. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Anders, H. J., B. Banas, D. Schlondorff. 2004. Signaling danger: Toll-like receptors and their potential roles in kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15: 854-867. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Leadbetter, E. A., I. R. Rifkin, A. M. Hohlbaum, B. C. Beaudette, M. J. Shlomchik, A. Marshak-Rothstein. 2002. Chromatin-IgG complexes activate B cells by dual engagement of IgM and Toll-like receptors. Nature 416: 603-607. [Medline]
  15. Means, T. K., E. Latz, F. Hayashi, M. R. Murali, D. T. Golenbock, A. D. Luster. 2005. Human lupus autoantibody-DNA complexes activate DCs through cooperation of CD32 and TLR9. J. Clin. Invest. 115: 407-417. [Medline]
  16. Shi, X., C. Xie, D. Kreska, J. A. Richardson, C. Mohan. 2002. Genetic dissection of SLE: SLE1 and FAS impact alternate pathways leading to lymphoproliferative autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 196: 281-292. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Matsuzawa, A., M. Kimura, T. Muraiso, R. Kominami, T. Katagiri. 1991. Genotype-restricted lymphoproliferation in autoimmune lpr mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 21: 1535-1542. [Medline]
  18. Aarden, L. A., E. R. de Groot, T. E. Feltkamp. 1975. Immunology of DNA: III. Crithidia luciliae, a simple substrate for the determination of anti-dsDNA with the immunofluorescence technique. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 254: 505-515. [Medline]
  19. Christensen, S. R., M. Kashgarian, L. Alexopoulou, R. A. Flavell, S. Akira, M. J. Shlomchik. 2005. Toll-like receptor 9 controls anti-DNA autoantibody production in murine lupus. J. Exp. Med. 202: 321-331. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Tran, T. T., C. F. Reich, III, M. Alam, D. S. Pisetsky. 2003. Specificity and immunochemical properties of anti-DNA antibodies induced in normal mice by immunization with mammalian DNA with a CpG oligonucleotide as adjuvant. Clin. Immunol. 109: 278-287. [Medline]
  21. Chan, T. M., G. Frampton, N. A. Staines, P. Hobby, G. J. Perry, J. S. Cameron. 1992. Different mechanisms by which anti-DNA MoAbs bind to human endothelial cells and glomerular mesangial cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 88: 68-74. [Medline]
  22. Chan, T. M., J. K. Leung, S. K. Ho, S. Yung. 2002. Mesangial cell-binding anti-DNA antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 13: 1219-1229. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Wu, X., S. L. Peng. 2006. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling protects against murine lupus. Arthritis Rheum. 54: 336-342. [Medline]
  24. Sato, S., O. Takeuchi, T. Fujita, H. Tomizawa, K. Takeda, S. Akira. 2002. A variety of microbial components induce tolerance to lipopolysaccharide by differentially affecting MyD88-dependent and -independent pathways. Int. Immunol. 14: 783-791. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Heikenwalder, M., M. Polymenidou, T. Junt, C. Sigurdson, H. Wagner, S. Akira, R. Zinkernagel, A. Aguzzi. 2004. Lymphoid follicle destruction and immunosuppression after repeated CpG oligodeoxynucleotide administration. Nat. Med. 10: 187-192. [Medline]
  26. Morel, L., U. H. Rudofsky, J. A. Longmate, J. Schiffenbauer, E. K. Wakeland. 1994. Polygenic control of susceptibility to murine systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity 1: 219-229. [Medline]
  27. Mohan, C., E. Alas, L. Morel, P. Yang, E. K. Wakeland. 1998. Genetic dissection of SLE pathogenesis: Sle1 on murine chromosome 1 leads to a selective loss of tolerance to H2A/H2B/DNA subnucleosomes. J. Clin. Invest. 101: 1362-1372. [Medline]
  28. Burlingame, R. W., M. L. Boey, G. Starkebaum, R. L. Rubin. 1994. The central role of chromatin in autoimmune responses to histones and DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Clin. Invest. 94: 184-192. [Medline]
  29. Richardson, B., L. Scheinbart, J. Strahler, L. Gross, S. Hanash, M. Johnson. 1990. Evidence of impaired T cell DNA methylation in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 33: 1665-1673. [Medline]
  30. Goeckeritz, B. E., M. Flora, K. Witherspoon, Q. Vos, A. Lees, G. J. Dennis, D. S. Pisetsky, D. M. Klinman, C. M. Snapper, J. J. Mond. 1999. Multivalent cross-linking of membrane Ig sensitizes murine B cells to a broader spectrum of CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide motifs, including their methylated counterparts, for stimulation of proliferation and Ig secretion. Int. Immunol. 11: 1693-1700. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wang, Y., A. M. Krieg. 2003. Synergy between CpG- or non-CpG DNA and specific antigen for B cell activation. Int. Immunol. 15: 223-231. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Boule, M. W., C. Broughton, F. Mackay, S. Akira, A. Marshak-Rothstein, I. R. Rifkin. 2004. Toll-like receptor 9-dependent and -independent dendritic cell activation by chromatin-immunoglobulin G complexes. J. Exp. Med. 199: 1631-1640. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Yasuda, K., P. Yu, C. J. Kirschning, B. Schlatter, F. Schmitz, A. Heit, S. Bauer, H. Hochrein, H. Wagner. 2005. Endosomal translocation of vertebrate DNA activates dendritic cells via TLR9-dependent and -independent pathways. J. Immunol. 174: 6129-6136. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Okabe, Y., K. Kawane, S. Akira, T. Taniguchi, S. Nagata. 2005. Toll-like receptor-independent gene induction program activated by mammalian DNA escaped from apoptotic DNA degradation. J. Exp. Med. 202: 1333-1339. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Alexopoulou, L., A. C. Holt, R. Medzhitov, R. A. Flavell. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-{kappa}B by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413: 732-738. [Medline]
  36. Diebold, S. S., T. Kaisho, H. Hemmi, S. Akira, C. Reis e Sousa. 2004. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 303: 1529-1531. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Andrzejewski, C., Jr, J. Rauch, E. Lafer, B. D. Stollar, R. S. Schwartz. 1981. Antigen-binding diversity and idiotypic cross-reactions among hybridoma autoantibodies to DNA. J. Immunol. 126: 226-231. [Abstract]
  38. Lau, C. M., C. Broughton, A. S. Tabor, S. Akira, R. A. Flavell, M. J. Mamula, S. R. Christensen, M. J. Shlomchik, G. A. Viglianti, I. R. Rifkin, A. Marshak-Rothstein. 2005. RNA-associated autoantigens activate B cells by combined B cell antigen receptor/Toll-like receptor 7 engagement. J. Exp. Med. 202: 1171-1177. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Patole, P. S., D. Zecher, R. D. Pawar, H. J. Grone, D. Schlondorff, H. J. Anders. 2005. G-rich DNA suppresses systemic lupus. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 16: 3273-3280. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Dong, L., S. Ito, K. J. Ishii, D. M. Klinman. 2005. Suppressive oligodeoxynucleotides delay the onset of glomerulonephritis and prolong survival in lupus-prone NZB x NZW mice. Arthritis Rheum. 52: 651-658. [Medline]
  41. Brummel, R., P. Lenert. 2005. Activation of marginal zone B cells from lupus mice with type A(D) CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides. J. Immunol. 174: 2429-2434. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lenert, P., R. Brummel, E. H. Field, R. F. Ashman. 2005. TLR-9 activation of marginal zone B cells in lupus mice regulates immunity through increased IL-10 production. J. Clin. Immunol. 25: 29-40. [Medline]
  43. Fillatreau, S., C. H. Sweenie, M. J. McGeachy, D. Gray, S. M. Anderton. 2002. B cells regulate autoimmunity by provision of IL-10. Nat. Immunol. 3: 944-950. [Medline]
  44. Yin, Z., G. Bahtiyar, N. Zhang, L. Liu, P. Zhu, M. E. Robert, J. McNiff, M. P. Madaio, J. Craft. 2002. IL-10 regulates murine lupus. J. Immunol. 169: 2148-2155. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
A. Lartigue, N. Colliou, S. Calbo, A. Francois, S. Jacquot, C. Arnoult, F. Tron, D. Gilbert, and P. Musette
Critical Role of TLR2 and TLR4 in Autoantibody Production and Glomerulonephritis in lpr Mutation-Induced Mouse Lupus
J. Immunol., November 15, 2009; 183(10): 6207 - 6216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
K. Hannestad and H. Scott
The MHC Haplotype H2b Converts Two Pure Nonlupus Mouse Strains to Producers of Antinuclear Antibodies
J. Immunol., September 1, 2009; 183(5): 3542 - 3550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. H. Kono, M. K. Haraldsson, B. R. Lawson, K. M. Pollard, Y. T. Koh, X. Du, C. N. Arnold, R. Baccala, G. J. Silverman, B. A. Beutler, et al.
Endosomal TLR signaling is required for anti-nucleic acid and rheumatoid factor autoantibodies in lupus
PNAS, July 21, 2009; 106(29): 12061 - 12066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JEMHome page
M. Lech, O. P. Kulkarni, S. Pfeiffer, E. Savarese, A. Krug, C. Garlanda, A. Mantovani, and H.-J. Anders
Tir8/Sigirr prevents murine lupus by suppressing the immunostimulatory effects of lupus autoantigens
J. Exp. Med., August 4, 2008; 205(8): 1879 - 1888.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
R. D. Pawar, A. Ramanjaneyulu, O. P. Kulkarni, M. Lech, S. Segerer, and H.-J. Anders
Inhibition of Toll-Like Receptor-7 (TLR-7) or TLR-7 plus TLR-9 Attenuates Glomerulonephritis and Lung Injury in Experimental Lupus
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1721 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. D. Smith
Lupus Nephritis: Toll the Trigger!
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12): 3273 - 3275.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
J. A. Deane and S. Bolland
Nucleic Acid-Sensing TLRs as Modifiers of Autoimmunity
J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 6573 - 6578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
Z. Ma, F. Chen, M. P. Madaio, P. L. Cohen, and R. A. Eisenberg
Modulation of Autoimmunity by TLR9 in the Chronic Graft-vs-Host Model of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 7444 - 7450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lartigue, A.
Right arrow Articles by Musette, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lartigue, A.
Right arrow Articles by Musette, P.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS