|
|
||||||||


* McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, WI 53706; and
Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We recently identified TLR2 as a host factor that activates inflammatory cytokine secretion in response to HCMV (17). The TLRs are a family of pathogen-recognition receptors that initiate innate immune responses to a myriad of invading microbes, including viruses (18, 19). Eleven mammalian TLRs have been identified, and they are predominantly expressed on phagocytic cells such as dendritic cells and macrophages; however, most cells express at least a subset of TLRs (19). The primary consequences of TLR activation include NF-
B activation, inflammatory cytokine secretion, dendritic cell maturation, up-regulation of immune costimulatory molecules, and for a subset of TLRs, the production of type I IFN (19, 20, 21, 22). TLRs detect microorganisms on the basis of unique molecular structures termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Analysis of the innate response to bacterial PAMPs such as LPS, peptidoglycan, and unmethylated CpG DNA are a cornerstone of TLR research, and great strides have been made in our understanding of the relationship between bacteria and the innate immune system (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). In contrast, the mechanisms by which the TLR system recognizes and responds to viruses have only begun to be explored. Viral genomic nucleic acids are one major class of PAMP. TLR3 (dsRNA), TLR7 (ssRNA), TLR8 (ssRNA), and TLR9 (CpG DNA) (29, 30, 31, 32, 33) signal from the endosome (34, 35, 36, 37, 38) where degradation of virus particles exposes the viral genome for detection by this panel of TLRs (29, 31, 32). Although significantly less well studied, envelope gps that decorate the exterior of the virion are an emerging class of TLR activators (18). To date, three envelope gp have been identified as TLR agonists. The fusion protein from respiratory syncytial virus and the mouse mammary tumor virus envelope protein activate TLR4, while the hemagglutinin protein from measles virus activates TLR2 (39, 40, 41, 42). Interestingly, a shared feature of these gp is that they play critical roles in the entry of their respective viruses, and this shared feature suggests that the molecular machinery used by viruses for entry is also targeted by the innate immune system (43, 44).
Although we demonstrated previously that TLR2 is activated by HCMV, the molecular trigger for TLR2 has not been determined (17). In contrast with the RNA viruses listed above, HCMV displays as many as 12 envelope gp, four of which are required for entry. gp B (gB) works in concert with a tripartite complex comprised of gp H (gH), gp L (gL), and gp O (gO) to mediate the binding and entry of HCMV virons into host cells (45, 46, 47, 48). In addition to their roles in entry, there is a growing body of evidence that gB and gH elicit responses from cells that are reminiscent of TLR activation. Abs against gB and gH block the induction of various innate markers, including NF-
B (49, 50), and cells exposed to soluble forms of gB activate NF-
B and the type I IFN (49, 50, 51, 52, 53). Additionally, an anti-Id bearing the image of gH activates NF-
B (50). Based on these observations, we hypothesized that gB and gH are the target of innate sensing by the host cell. In this study, we show that HCMV gB and gH activate TLR2 and associate with TLR1 and TLR2. Abs against gB and gH, but not gL, inhibit the inflammatory cytokine response to HCMV, and both gB and gH coimmunoprecipitate with TLR2 and TLR1, indicating that the functional sensor for HCMV is a TLR2/TLR1 heterodimer. We also extend our initial studies to HCMV permissive human fibroblast cells and show that TLR2 mediates NF-
B activation and inflammatory cytokine responses in cells that support productive HCMV infection.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells (American Type Culture Collection) and normal human dermal fibroblast (NHDF) (Cambrex) cells were grown in 5% CO2 in DMEM (Invitrogen Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin-amphotericin B-fungizone (PSF; BioWhittaker). Monomac-6 cells were maintained in Hams F12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% PSF in a 5% CO2 environment. LPS (from Escherichia coli 0111:B4) was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and repurified by phenol extraction as described previously (54). Recombinant human IL-1β was obtained from R&D Systems, Pam3CSK4 was obtained from EMC Microcollections, and soluble CD14 (sCD14) was from Biometec. The AD169 strain of HCMV was propagated in NHDF cells. Virion particles were purified from infected supernatants by density-gradient centrifugation (55, 56, 57), and titers were determined as described previously on NHDF cell monolayers (58).
RT-PCR
Total RNA was harvested from NHDF, HEK/CD14, or Monomac 6 cells using RNA-STAT 60 (Tel-Test B) according to the manufacturers instructions. RNA was quantitated, and 1 µg of RNA was used for RT-PCR analysis with TLR2 and GAPDH-specific primers. RNA was quantitated, and 1 µg of RNA was used for RT-PCR analysis using the rTth DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) with TLR2 (5'-GCC AAA GTC TTG ATT GAT TGG-3' and 5'-TTG AAG TTC TCC AGC TCC TG-3') and GAPDH (5'-GAG CCA AAA GGG TCA TC-3' and 5'-GTG GTC ATG AGT CCT TC-3')-specific primers.
Cloning and purification of recombinant gBs-GFP
gBs-GFP was constructed by fusing the ectodomain of gB (strain AD169) ending at aa 750 to the enhanced GFP (eGFP). The ectodomain of gB was amplified with the upstream primer (5'-CTC GAG CTC GAG ATG GAA TCC AGG ATC-3') incorporating a XhoI site and the downstream primer (5'-TCT AGA TCT AGA GGG GTT TTT GAG GAA-3') incorporating an XbaI site. The eGFP sequence was amplified using the upstream primer (5'-TCT AGA TCT AGA ATG GTG AGC AAG-3') incorporating an XbaI site and the downstream primer (5'-CGC GGC CGC GGC TCA CTT GTA CAG CTC-3') incorporating a NotI site. The gB fragment was inserted into the pCI-Neo vector (Promega) using XhoI/XbaI. The eGFP fragment was subsequently inserted using XbaI/NotI. A 6x histidine tag was added to the 3' end of eGFP upstream of the stop codon using the downstream primer (5'-TCA GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG CTT GTA CAG CTC-3'). Oligonucleotide primers were synthesized at the University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center. The construct was transfected into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) pgsD 677 cells for the generation of a stable gBs-GFP-expressing cell line. At 48 h posttransfection, GFP-positive cells were collected by FACS (University of Wisconsin Flow Cytometry Facility) and subjected to geneticin (Invitrogen Life Technologies) selection at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. The cells were subsequently adapted to suspension in chemically defined CHO medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) supplemented with 1% PSF and geneticin at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. For protein isolation, cells were pelleted and lysed by sonication in lysis buffer (50 mM NaPO4, 300 mM NaCl, 0.5% Tween 20, 10 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 27,000 x g for 30 min. The supernatants were incubated for 2 h at 4°C under rotation with Ni-NTA-agarose beads (Qiagen). The beads were transferred to a chromatography column and washed with 10-column volumes of lysis buffer, followed by 10-column volumes of wash buffer (50 mM NaPO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)). gBs-GFP was eluted in 4 ml of elution buffer (50 mM NaPO4, 300 mM NaCl, 300 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)) and dialyzed overnight in PBS (50 mM NaPO4, 150 mM NaCl (pH 8.0)) at 4°C. Dialyzed protein was separated from low m.w. contaminants by size-exclusion chromatography. Samples were loaded onto a 50-ml column containing Sephacryl S-200 substrate (Amersham Biosciences) in 1x PBS (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and run through by gravity flow at 4°C. Collected fractions were stored at –80°C.
Construction and generation of TLR2
C and TLR4
C-encoding retroviruses
The mutants were constructed using full-length FLAG epitope-tagged TLR2 and TLR4 provided by B. Williams (Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH). The TLR2 and TLR4 cytoplasmic tails were deleted by PCR mutagenesis using a common upstream primer (5'-TAA TAT ACC GGT GCC ACC ATG TCT GCA CTT CTG ATC C-3') incorporating an AgeI restriction site and TLR2-specific (5'-TTA AAT GCG GCC GCT TAT GTA TTT CAT ATA CCA CAG GCC-3') and TLR4-specific (5'-TTA AAT GCG GCC GCT TAT GTA GCA GCC AGC AAG AAG C-3') downstream primers incorporating NotI restriction sites. The fragments were digested and cloned into the retroviral transfer vector pCMMP.MCS.IRES-GFP (a gift from B. Sugden, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI). The constructs were confirmed by sequencing (University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center), and recombinant retroviruses were generated as described previously (59). NHDF cells were transduced with retroviruses encoding TLR2
C, TLR4
C, or an empty vector control in a minimal volume for 1 h in the presence of 5 µg/ml polybrene. At 96 h posttransduction, GFP-positive cells were collected by FACS and used as indicated.
Cytokine ELISAs
Ninety-six-well plates were seeded with cells at a density of 5000 cells per well. At 24 h postplating, the growth medium was removed and replaced with serum-free DMEM. After 24 h serum starvation, the cells were challenged as indicated. At 18 h postchallenge, the supernatants were harvested and IL-6 or IL-8 levels were determined by ELISA. OptEIA IL-6 or IL-8 dual Ab detection assay (BD Pharmingen) was used according to the manufacturers instructions. For blocking Ab studies, virions were preincubated for 15 min with isotype control (eBioscience), anti-gB 27-78 or 9-3 (60), or anti-gH 14-4b (61) mouse mAbs at 100 µg/ml. For gL, a rabbit polyclonal anti-gL 6394 (62) or rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) were used at 100 µg/ml. For TLR2 blocking, Ab studies the cells were preincubated for 30 min with isotype control or anti-TLR2 Abs (eBioscience) at 1 µg/ml.
Coimmunoprecipitations and immunoblotting
The gB, gH, and gL coding sequences from HCMV strain AD169 were cloned previously into the pCAGGS expression vector (63). The vector pCVSVG encoding vesicular stomatitis virus G (VSV-G) was a gift from Y. Kawaoka (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI). pFLAG-TLR1, pFLAG-TLR2, and pFLAG-TLR6 plasmids were donated by B. Williams (Cleveland Clinic Foundation). For coimmunoprecipitation experiments, 293T cells were cotransfected with plasmids encoding gB, gH, gL, VSV-G pFLAG-TLR1, pFLAG-TLR2, or pFLAG-TLR6 as indicated. Transfections were performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturers directions. Dose-response precipitations were performed in 6-well plates, with total DNA concentrations ranging from 0 to 2 µg/ml. For radiolabeled immunoprecipitation assays, cells were incubated for 24 h in DMEM supplemented with 150 µCi/ml 35S-express label (NEN-DuPont). Cells were harvested at 48 h posttransfection in lysis buffer (TBS plus 2% TX-100 (pH 8.8)). Lysates were clarified twice by high-speed microcentrifugation (13,000 rpm, 5 min, 4°C), diluted 2-fold in lysis buffer, and incubated with 30 µl of anti-FLAG-conjugated bead slurry (M2; Sigma-Aldrich) for 12 h with continuous rocking at 4°C. The beads were pelleted under low-speed microcentrifugation (2500 rpm, 2 min, 4°C) and washed five times in lysis buffer. Products were eluted by competition with 3x FLAG peptide (Sigma-Aldrich) and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE gel followed by immunoblotting using the following Abs: anti-gB 27-78 (60), anti-gH 6824 (62), anti-gL 6394 (62), anti-VSV-G 15F9 (Sigma-Aldrich), or anti-FLAG M2 (Sigma-Aldrich). For the radiolabeled immunoprecipitation assay, the cells were transfected with gB and FLAG-TLR2 expression constructs individually or in combination. At 24 h posttransfection, the medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented 10% FBS, 1% PSF, and 150 µCi/ml 35S-express label (NEN-DuPont). The cells were harvested at 48 h posttransfection and processed as described above. The immunoprecipitation products were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, the gel was dried to Whatman paper, and exposed to film. Images were collected using a Typhoon phosphor imager.
I
B
degradation assay
Cells were serum starved for 24 h before infection and pretreated with cycloheximide (100 µg/ml) for 1 h before infection. The cells were treated with IL-1β (100 pg/ml), Pam3CSK4 (20 µg/ml), LPS (1 µg/ml) plus 4 (1 µg/ml), or infected with UV-HCMV (multiplicity of infection (MOI) = 10) as measured before UV treatment. At 3 h posttreatment,the cells were harvested by scraping in Nonidet P-40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 30 mM NaF, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 40 mM 2-glycerophosphate; Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM Na3VO4 (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.1 mm of PMSF, protease inhibitor mixture (56), and 1% Nonidet P-40). The cells were subjected to two freeze-thaw cycles, and insoluble material was removed by microcentrifugation (13,000 rpm, 5 min, 4°C). The total protein content of each sample was quantitated using the Bio-Rad protein assay reagent. Equivalent amounts of total protein for each sample were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE. I
B
and actin levels were analyzed by immunoblotting as described previously (56) using anti-I
B
(sc-371; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) and anti-actin Abs. Densitometry was performed using the ImageQuant software system (Amersham Biosciences).
Statistical analysis
The means of triplicate samples were compared using an unpaired Students t test with GraphPad Prism software (version 4.00; GraphPad).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To assess the ability of envelope gp to elicit inflammatory cytokine responses we used a panel of neutralizing Abs to block interactions between gB and gH and receptors on the surface of the cell (Fig. 1A). Transcriptionally inert UV-inactivated HCMV virions (UV-HCMV) were incubated with Abs for 15 min before infection, and IL-6 levels were measured by ELISA at 18 h postinfection as a marker of inflammatory cytokine activation. IL-6 levels were diminished by pretreatment of virions with gB (27-78 and 9-3) and gH-specific (14-4b) Abs, whereas the isotype control Ab had a modest effect on the IL-6 response. Furthermore, a rabbit polyclonal Ab against gL did not affect the IL-6 response (data not shown). These data suggest that gB and gH, but not gL, are interacting with cell surface receptors that elicit inflammatory cytokine secretion.
|
gB and gH physically associate with TLR2 and TLR1
TLR ectodomains are composed of varying numbers of leucine-rich repeats, a motif that is commonly involved in protein–protein interactions (64). Based on the preceding data, we hypothesized that gB and gH directly interact with TLR2. To test this hypothesis, we performed coimmunoprecipitation experiments from 293T cells cotransfected with gB and FLAG-TLR2 expression constructs. FLAG-TLR2 was immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG Ab-conjugated agarose beads, the proteins resolved by SDS-PAGE, and products detected by immunoblotting for FLAG-TLR2 or gB (Fig. 2A). A dose-dependent pulldown of gB was observed from cells cotransfected with a constant amount of gB-expression plasmid and increasing levels of FLAG-TLR2-expression plasmid. The amount of gB precipitated increased in proportion to the level of FLAG-TLR2 input. Immunoprecipitations from 35S-labeled cells confirmed that coexpression of both gB and FLAG-TLR2 is required for this interaction (Fig. 2B). gH also coprecipitated with TLR2 indicating that both gB and gH physically interact with TLR2 (Fig. 2E). The envelope gp from VSV-G was included as a specificity control and did not coprecipitate with any of the TLRs tested (Fig. 2G).
|
HCMV activates TLR2 in permissive fibroblasts
To appreciate the relationship between TLR2 and HCMV in a context that is physiologically relevant to the life cycle of HCMV, it is critical to use cells that are fully permissive for HCMV infection. The initial studies that identified TLR2 as a host factor mediating innate responses to HCMV used cell types that do not support HCMV replication (17). Thus, we endeavored to translate our findings into HCMV permissive human fibroblast cells, the best-characterized cell culture system for the study of HCMV. The TLR repertoire of NHDF cells has not been reported, and it is not known whether these cells express TLR2. RT-PCR analysis of total RNA from NHDF cells revealed the presence of TLR2 (Fig. 3), as well as TLR1, TLR6, and TLR4 (data not shown). RNA harvested from Monomac-6 and 293T cells were included as positive and negative controls for TLR2 expression, respectively (Fig. 3). Efforts to detect TLR2 protein expression in NHDF cells have been unsuccessful; however, the presence of the TLR2 transcript, coupled with the ability of NHDF cells to respond to the synthetic TLR2 ligand Pam3CSK4 (Fig. 4), indicates that these cells express TLR2. Additionally, TLR1, TLR6, and TLR4 transcripts were detected in NHDF cells by RT-PCR (data not shown). NHDF cells secrete IL-6 in response to zymosan (data not shown).
|
|
To further address the role of TLR2 in NHDF cells, we constructed dominant-negative versions of TLR2 and TLR4 by removing their cytoplasmic tails (TLR2
C and TLR4
C, respectively) (Fig. 5A). These signaling-defective constructs lack the TLR1 domain common to all TLRs and cannot recruit the cytoplasmic adaptor molecules that propagate downstream signaling events (67). NHDF cells were transduced with recombinant retroviruses that coexpress FLAG epitope-tagged TLR2
C or TLR4
C in combination with eGFP (59). A control population expressing a GFP vector was also generated. GFP-positive cells were collected by FACS and expression of the dominant-negative constructs was confirmed by immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting (Fig. 5B).
|
C-expressing cells responded normally to IL-1β and LPS + sCD14, the TLR4 ligand. However, these cells displayed a reduced response to UV-HCMV and the TLR2 control ligand Pam3CSK4, confirming that TLR2 mediates inflammatory cytokine responses to HCMV in permissive NHDF cells. The IL-6 response from TLR4
C-expressing cells to IL-1β and Pam3CSK4 were unaffected, and as predicted, the response to LPS + sCD14 was completely eliminated. Interestingly, the response to UV-HCMV was partially diminished in these cells. No role for TLR4 was found in previous studies (17); however, these experiments were performed in nonpermissive cells. It is possible that TLR4 is involved in the innate response to HCMV in permissive cells and this possibility is currently under consideration.
|
B activation in response to HCMV infection
Another signature TLR response is activation of the pleiotropic transcription factor NF-
B (19). Previous studies have shown that HCMV activates NF-
B within minutes after infection, kinetics that are suggestive of receptor-induced signaling (50, 68, 69). To determine whether TLR2 mediates NF-
B activation upon HCMV infection, we used our dominant-negative TLR cell panel to assess the degradation of I
B
as a marker of NF-
B activation (Fig. 7). I
B
binds and sequesters NF-
B in the cytoplasm as part of a transcriptionally inactive complex (70). Many stimuli, including TLRs, induce I
B
degradation thereby releasing NF-
B to translocate to the nucleus where it complexes with numerous other factors to modulate transcription. Thus, the loss of I
B
though degradation correlates with the activation of NF-
B. In GFP control cells IL-1β caused complete I
B
degradation, whereas Pam3CSK4 and LPS + sCD14 induced a lesser degree of degradation. Furthermore, I
B
degradation is blocked in response to Pam3CSK4 and LPS + sCD14 in TLR2
C and TLR4
C-expressing cells, respectively. Similar results were observed in a second experiment. In response to UV-HCMV near-complete degradation of I
B
is observed in GFP vector control and TLR4
C-expressing cells. However, in cells expressing TLR2
C, the level of I
B
degradation is reduced. Densitometric analysis of the blots indicates that, although dominant-negative TLR2 completely prevents I
B
degradation in response to the TLR2 control ligand Pam3CSK4, I
B
degradation in response to HCMV infection is not completely blocked (Fig. 7, lower panel). This observation suggests that TLR2 is not the only mechanism by which HCMV can activate NF-
B. Together, these observations indicate that TLR2 mediates a portion of NF-
B activation in response to HCMV infection and further support the hypothesis that TLR2 is a key cellular factor for the innate immune response to HCMV.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation and inflammatory cytokine responses to HCMV in these cells. Together, these data add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that HCMV can activate innate immunity during binding and entry into host cells. We propose that envelope gp gB and gH, already well appreciated for their roles as mediators of virus entry, also interact directly with TLR2 and TLR1 during entry to initiate a signaling cascade that results in the activation of NF-
B and secretion of inflammatory cytokines. HCMV gB and gH brings the number of viral envelope gp that are detected by TLRs to five (39, 40, 41, 42). Notably, a shared feature of all of these gp is that they play critical roles in the binding and entry of their respective viruses (43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 60, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79). Viral envelope proteins are a compelling target for the TLR system, as they are the first component of the virus to come into contact with the cell. Consequently, detection of viral envelope gp would allow the cell to set the innate response in motion at the earliest stages of infection, perhaps even before the virus entering the cell. The rapid recognition and response could provide a temporal advantage for the host immune response, which would be extremely beneficial for combating a viral infection.
Activation of TLRs by envelope gp also suggests that the processes of virus entry and innate immune activation are coordinated. The viral envelope is studded with numerous copies of each gp, and each copy is able to interact with one or more cellular receptors. Multiple interactions between viral envelope proteins and different types of cellular receptors may induce the formation of an organized structure reminiscent of the immunological synapse (80). This type of receptor clustering would allow the cell to synchronize innate immune activation with the process of viral entry. Cellular integrins have been identified as receptors for HCMV gB and gH (46, 47) and have also been linked to TLRs (81, 82). It is possible that HCMV binding to integrins could facilitate interaction with TLR2/TLR1 heterodimers. Furthermore, receptor clustering may provide a mechanism by with integrin and TLR signaling can be coordinated. Fig. 7 indicates that HCMV-mediated NF-
B activation is only partially attributable to TLR2. As NF-
B activation is also a downstream consequence of integrin usage, it is possible that TLR2 and integrins both contribute to the activation of NF-
B upon HCMV infection (83). However, it remains to be determined whether NF-
B activation by TLR2 and integrins is coordinated or coincidental.
In addition to HCMV, several other members of the Herpesviridae activate innate immunity through TLRs. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2 and mouse CMV harbor CpG-rich genomes that activate TLR9 (32, 33, 84, 85), and HSV-1 and varicella-zoster virus activate TLR2 (86, 87). An emerging possibility is that herpesviruses are subject to innate detection by multiple TLRs, with each TLR providing a distinct contribution to the overall response. For instance, TLR2 is associated with inflammatory cytokine responses, whereas TLR9 elicits the secretion of type I IFNs. Using multiple TLRs would allow the host to tailor its response to fit the pathogen through the combined actions of each TLR. In addition, HCMV infects a variety of cell types in vivo, including fibroblasts, endothelial cells, epithelial cells, monocytes/macrophages, smooth muscle cells, stromal cells, neuronal cells, and hepatocytes (4, 5), and each of these cell types may express a unique subset of TLRs and respond differently to HCMV infection. Thus, it is possible that the cell type infected and the different combinations of TLRs activated may have a profound influence on the outcome of infection. Experiments addressing the role of multiple TLRs simultaneously will provide valuable insights into how each TLR influences the global immune response to herpesviruses.
HCMV, like all herpesviruses, establishes a lifelong association with the host as a latent infection. To accomplish this goal, HCMV maintains a particularly close relationship with the host immune system and employs multiple immune modulation strategies that allow it to avoid detection by the host and persist in the face of a potent immune response (3). Because of this close relationship, it is tempting to speculate that HCMV may have adapted to use TLR responses to its advantage. HCMV disseminates in neutrophils and monocytes, and CD14-positive cells are hypothesized as a reservoir for latent virus (88). Each of these cell types are either activated by TLRs or are subject to recruitment by the mixture of cytokines and chemokines that result from TLR activation. Thus, HCMV may have evolved to use TLR responses as a means of recruit its dissemination and latency vehicles to the site of infection, where these cells could then become infected. Further examination of the role that TLRs play at both the cellular and organismal levels may provide further clues toward understanding the complex relationship between herpesviruses and their hosts.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1AI34998 and R21A154915 (to T.C.) and National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32GM07215 (to K.W.B. and M.G.). ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Teresa Compton, 100 Technology Square, Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail address: teresa.compton{at}novartis.com ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HCMV, human CMV; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; gB, gp B; gH, gp H; gL, gp L; gO, gp O; NHDF, normal human dermal fibroblast; HEK, human embryonic kidney; MOI, multiplicity of infection; eGFP, enhanced GFP; VSV-G, vesicular stomatitis virus G; HSV-1, herpes simplex virus type 1; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary. ![]()
Received for publication April 17, 2006. Accepted for publication August 29, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
vβ3 is a coreceptor for human cytomegalovirus. Nat. Med. 11: 515-521. [Medline]
B during infection. J. Virol. 71: 5051-5059. [Abstract]
B promoters. J. Virol. 71: 4638-4648. [Abstract]
B activity by transactivating the NF-
B p105/p50 and p65 promoters. J. Virol. 69: 5391-5400. [Abstract]
B and I
B proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14: 649-683. [Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. N. Harman, M. Kraus, C. R. Bye, K. Byth, S. G. Turville, O. Tang, S. K. Mercier, N. Nasr, J. L. Stern, B. Slobedman, et al. HIV-1-infected dendritic cells show 2 phases of gene expression changes, with lysosomal enzyme activity decreased during the second phase Blood, July 2, 2009; 114(1): 85 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Isaacson and T. Compton Human Cytomegalovirus Glycoprotein B Is Required for Virus Entry and Cell-to-Cell Spread but Not for Virion Attachment, Assembly, or Egress J. Virol., April 15, 2009; 83(8): 3891 - 3903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-E. Ariza, R. Glaser, P. T. P. Kaumaya, C. Jones, and M. V. Williams The EBV-Encoded dUTPase Activates NF-{kappa}B through the TLR2 and MyD88-Dependent Signaling Pathway J. Immunol., January 15, 2009; 182(2): 851 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Crough and R. Khanna Immunobiology of Human Cytomegalovirus: from Bench to Bedside Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2009; 22(1): 76 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Rasmussen, S. B. Jensen, C. Nielsen, E. Quartin, H. Kato, Z. J. Chen, R. H. Silverman, S. Akira, and S. R. Paludan Herpes simplex virus infection is sensed by both Toll-like receptors and retinoic acid-inducible gene- like receptors, which synergize to induce type I interferon production J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2009; 90(1): 74 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. West and B. Damania Upregulation of the TLR3 Pathway by Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus during Primary Infection J. Virol., June 1, 2008; 82(11): 5440 - 5449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Bentz and A. D. Yurochko Human CMV infection of endothelial cells induces an angiogenic response through viral binding to EGF receptor and {beta}1 and {beta}3 integrins PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5531 - 5536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Juckem, K. W. Boehme, A. L. Feire, and T. Compton Differential Initiation of Innate Immune Responses Induced by Human Cytomegalovirus Entry into Fibroblast Cells J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4965 - 4977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mandron, H. Martin, B. Bonjean, J. Lule, E. Tartour, and C. Davrinche Dendritic cell-induced apoptosis of human cytomegalovirus-infected fibroblasts promotes cross-presentation of pp65 to CD8+ T cells J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2008; 89(1): 78 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bozza, R. Gaziano, P. Bonifazi, T. Zelante, L. Pitzurra, C. Montagnoli, S. Moretti, R. Castronari, P. Sinibaldi, G. Rasi, et al. Thymosin {alpha}1 activates the TLR9/MyD88/IRF7-dependent murine cytomegalovirus sensing for induction of anti-viral responses in vivo Int. Immunol., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 1261 - 1270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Patrone, M. Secchi, E. Bonaparte, G. Milanesi, and A. Gallina Cytomegalovirus UL131-128 Products Promote gB Conformational Transition and gB-gH Interaction during Entry into Endothelial Cells J. Virol., October 15, 2007; 81(20): 11479 - 11488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Martin, J. M. Lee, D. Walls, and S. D. Hayward Manipulation of the Toll-Like Receptor 7 Signaling Pathway by Epstein-Barr Virus J. Virol., September 15, 2007; 81(18): 9748 - 9758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chang, A. Dolganiuc, and G. Szabo Toll-like receptors 1 and 6 are involved in TLR2-mediated macrophage activation by hepatitis C virus core and NS3 proteins J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 479 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gaudreault, S. Fiola, M. Olivier, and J. Gosselin Epstein-Barr Virus Induces MCP-1 Secretion by Human Monocytes via TLR2 J. Virol., August 1, 2007; 81(15): 8016 - 8024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Smith, E. R. Bivins-Smith, A. M. Tilley, G. L. Bentz, G. Chan, J. Minard, and A. D. Yurochko Roles of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase and NF-{kappa}B in Human Cytomegalovirus-Mediated Monocyte Diapedesis and Adhesion: Strategy for Viral Persistence J. Virol., July 15, 2007; 81(14): 7683 - 7694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |