The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pecora, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, C. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pecora, N. D.
Right arrow Articles by Harding, C. V.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 177: 422-429.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

Mycobacterium tuberculosis LprA Is a Lipoprotein Agonist of TLR2 That Regulates Innate Immunity and APC Function1

Nicole D. Pecora*, Adam J. Gehring2,*,{dagger}, David H. Canaday{dagger}, W. Henry Boom3,*,{dagger} and Clifford V. Harding3,4,*

* Department of Pathology and {dagger} Division of Infectious Diseases, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
TLR2 recognizes components of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and initiates responses by APCs that influence both innate and adaptive immunity. Mtb lipoproteins are an important class of TLR2 ligand, but only two, LpqH and LprG, have been characterized to date. In this study, we characterize a third Mtb lipoprotein, LprA, and determine its effects on host macrophages and dendritic cells. LprA is a cell wall-associated lipoprotein with no homologs outside the slow-growing mycobacteria. Using Mycobacterium smegmatis as an expression host, we purified 6x His-tagged LprA both with and without its acyl modifications. Acylated LprA had agonist activity for both human and murine TLR2 and induced expression of TNF-{alpha}, IL-10, and IL-12. LprA also induced dendritic cell maturation as shown by increased expression of CD40, CD80, and class II MHC (MHC-II). In macrophages, prolonged (24 h) incubation with LprA decreased IFN-{gamma}-induced MHC-II Ag processing and presentation, consistent with an observed decrease in MHC-II expression (macrophage viability was not affected and apoptosis was not induced by LprA). Reduced MHC-II Ag presentation may represent a negative feedback mechanism for control of inflammation that may be subverted by Mtb for immune evasion. Thus, Mtb LprA is a TLR2 agonist that induces cytokine responses and regulates APC function.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb)5 remains a significant cause of mortality worldwide, especially in the context of antibiotic resistant strains and coinfection with HIV. Host resistance depends on both innate and adaptive immunity. CD4 T cells dominate the adaptive response, but CD8 T cells are also involved. TLRs, which recognize microbial molecules, are major triggers of innate responses (e.g., cytokine production) and modulate adaptive immunity by influencing APCs (1). For example, TLR signaling by Mtb causes dendritic cell maturation and migration to lymph nodes (critical steps for T cell priming) (2, 3, 4).

TLRs are important for host responses to Mtb (5, 6, 7, 8). Mice deficient in MyD88, an adaptor protein for signaling by many TLRs, have increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). TLR2, in particular, appears to be critical for sensing mycobacteria (6). Polymorphisms in human TLR2 are associated with enhanced susceptibility to leprosy and tuberculosis (14, 15, 16), and TLR2 deficiency increases the susceptibility of mice to mycobacterial infection (17, 18). Several mycobacterial TLR2 ligands have been identified, including lipomannan (19), certain lipoarabinomannan (LAM) species (5, 20), phosphatidyl-myo-inositol mannoside (20, 21), and two lipoproteins, LpqH (19-kDa lipoprotein, Rv3763) (22, 23, 24) and LprG (Rv1411c) (25).

In their mature form, bacterial lipoproteins are characterized by an N-terminal, triacylated cysteine. They are first synthesized as a preprolipoprotein (with an N-terminal signal sequence) that is consecutively processed by prolipoprotein diacylglycerol transferase (Lgt) (26), lipoprotein signal peptidase (LspA) (27, 28) and Lnt, an acyl transferase (28). Lgt catalyzes the thioether linkage of a diacylglycerol moiety to the cysteine immediately C-terminal to the signal sequence, LspA cleaves the signal sequence, and a final N-linked acyl chain is added by Lnt concurrently with transport across the inner membrane (28). Although most of the work characterizing the lipoprotein biosynthetic pathway has focused on Escherichia coli, mycobacterial homologs of both Lgt and LspA have been identified (27, 29). Acyl modification of bacterial lipoproteins and lipopeptides is thought to be important for their ability to signal though TLR2 (4, 22, 24, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34), although peptide sequence can also affect TLR2 agonist activity (35, 36, 37, 38) and a nonacylated (NA) TLR2 ligand has been reported (36).

In addition to modification with lipids, there is growing evidence that many mycobacterial lipoproteins are also glycosylated. For example, LpqH has been shown to contain carbohydrate modifications on several threonine residues close to the N terminus of the protein (39). It has been proposed that glycosylation of LpqH may be important for regulating proteolytic cleavage of the lipoprotein (39). Glycosylation of bacterial proteins may play multiple roles in bacterial pathogenesis (40), but it is unknown how glycosylation affects interactions between pathogens and TLRs.

Mtb lipoproteins LpqH and LprG have both stimulatory and inhibitory effects on host APCs, all of which are TLR2 dependent. Stimulatory activities include induction of cytokine expression by macrophages and dendritic cells (3, 24, 25), and enhancement of dendritic cell maturation (4). In contrast, prolonged exposure (>18 h) to LpqH inhibits IFN-{gamma}-induced class II MHC (MHC-II) expression and Ag presentation by macrophages (22, 23, 25, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45). This response may reflect a homeostatic feedback inhibition mechanism that limits macrophage activation of effector T cells to prevent excessive inflammation. As a consequence, a subset of infected macrophages with decreased APC function may hypothetically be unable to present Mtb Ags to CD4+ T cells, providing niches in which Mtb persists, evading immune surveillance.

During our characterization of LprG (25), mass spectrometry indicated the presence of LprA (Rv1270c) in Mtb fractions with immunoregulatory activity, but we were unable to purify LprA to assess its activity. The current study was designed to purify Mtb LprA, test whether it is a TLR2 agonist and determine its ability to induce innate immune responses and regulate APC function. LprA, a putative lipoprotein of unknown function, is related to LprG with a similar molecular mass and 34% sequence identity. Like LprG, LprA has no homologs outside of the mycobacteria. Purification of LprA was facilitated by expression of 6x His-tagged LprA in Mycobacterium smegmatis and purification of recombinant LprA by affinity chromatography. To explore the role of lipid structures in TLR2 agonist activity, recombinant LprA was expressed in both acylated and NA forms. Acylated LprA was found to signal through TLR2, but NA-LprA lacked activity. LprA was a potent inducer of cytokine expression by both macrophages and dendritic cells. In addition, LprA modulated APC function either positively in dendritic cells (by inducing dendritic cell maturation) or negatively in macrophages (by inhibiting IFN-{gamma} induced MHC-II expression and Ag presentation). These results demonstrate that LprA is a potent mycobacterial TLR2 agonist that induces cytokine responses and modulates APC function.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Bacterial strains and cloning of recombinant LprA

Cloning was done in E. coli DH5{alpha} (Invitrogen Life Technologies). LprA was expressed in M. smegmatis MC2 1-2C (from R. Wilkinson, Imperial College, London, U.K.) cultivated in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 1% casamino acids, 0.2% glycerol, 0.2% glucose, and 0.05% Tween 80. Kanamycin was used for selections in both E. coli and M. smegmatis at 30 µg/ml. Full-length lprA (Rv1270c) was amplified from Mtb H37Rv genomic DNA by PCR using the following 5' primer: 5'-GCA TAT CCA TAT GAA GCA TCC ACC TTG TTC CGT TGT TG-3'. For the production of NA-LprA, a different 5' primer was used: 5'-GCA ATT CCA TAT GTC AAC CGA AGG GGA CGC CGG CAA AGC-3'. For both LprA constructs, the same 3' primer was used: 5'-GTA CAA GCT TGA CCG GTT TGG TGG CGG TG-3'. The 5' primers included an NdeI site and the 3' primer included a HindIII site. PCR products were digested with NdeI and HindIII (NEB) and ligated into the shuttle vector pVV16 (provided by J. Belisle, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO) behind the mycobacterial hsp60 promoter and in-frame with a C-terminal 6x His tag. The pVV16 vector contains origins of replication for use in both E. coli and mycobacteria. All constructs were verified by sequencing. Chemically competent E. coli (Invitrogen Life Technologies) was transformed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. M. smegmatis was transformed by electroporation with a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad) set at 2.5 kV, 25 µF, and 800 Ohms.

Purification of LprA

To purify LprA or NA-LprA, a 4-L culture of M. smegmatis expressing the 6x His-tagged protein or the pVV16 vector control was grown to late log phase and harvested by centrifugation. The pellet was resuspended in 40 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole (pH 8.0), 2.5% protease inhibitor mixture for His-tagged proteins (Sigma-Aldrich) and 75 U/ml benzonase (Sigma-Aldrich)). The suspension was passed through a French press four times, and centrifuged for 60 min at 100,000 x g to remove cell wall material and unlysed bacteria. In some analyses, a portion of the pellet was solubilized in SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the supernatant and solubilized pellet were subjected to Western analysis. The supernatant was incubated with nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) agarose beads (Qiagen) for 2 h at 4°C. After washing with wash buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 1 M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 10% v/v glycerol (pH 8.0)), 6x His-tagged LprA was disassociated from the resin in elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 450 mM imidazole (pH 8.0)). PD-10 columns (Amersham Biosciences) were used to exchange the buffer to 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0). Both LprA and NA-LprA were further purified by ion-exchange chromatography with a 1-ml QFF anion exchange column (Amersham Biosciences) and elution in 20 mM Tris (pH 8.0) with 50 mM NaCl. Eluted proteins were concentrated in Amicon Ultra-4 spin columns with 10-kDa cutoff (Millipore). Protein concentration was determined by the BCA assay (Pierce).

Western blots and SDS-PAGE

Samples were boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer under reducing conditions, electrophoresed on 12% polyacrylamide gels, and stained using Bio-safe Coomassie blue stain (Bio-Rad). For Western blotting, proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore), blocked in 5% nonfat milk for 30 min at room temperature, and incubated overnight at 4°C with 200 ng/ml mouse anti-6x His primary Ab (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in PBS with 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat milk. Blots were washed extensively, incubated with 125 ng/ml HRP-labeled horse anti-mouse IgG (Cell Signaling Technology) for 2 h at room temperature, and developed with ECL detection reagents (Amersham Biosciences). Western analysis to rule out ARALAM contamination was similarly performed with 1 µg of LprA or NA-LprA, and blots were stained with 906.4321 (rabbit IgG3 monoclonal anti-arabinofuranosyl-terminated LAM (ARALAM) Ab, Colorado State University TB Vaccine Research and Research Materials Contract NIH N01-AI40091, culture supernatant used at 1/20 dilution) and 0.2 µg/ml HRP-linked goat-anti-rabbit secondary Ab (Cell Signaling Technology). For detection of protein glycosylation, blots were blocked overnight at 4°C in PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 4% BSA, washed five times in PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with Con A-HRP (Sigma-Aldrich) at 0.2 purpurogallin units/ml in PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, 2% BSA, washed several times and developed with ECL reagents.

Mass spectrometry

To identify proteins, bands were cut from a Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel, and washed and destained in 50% ethanol, 5% acetic acid. Gel pieces were dehydrated in acetonitrile, washed in 0.1 M ammonium bicarbonate, dehydrated in acetonitrile, and dried. Trypsin was introduced into gel pieces by rehydrating for 10 min at 4°C in 30 µl of 20 ng/µl trypsin in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate. Any excess trypsin solution was removed, and 20 µl of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate was added. Samples were digested overnight at room temperature. Resulting peptides were extracted from polyacrylamide in two 30-µl aliquots of 50% acetonitrile, 5% formic acid. These extracts were combined and evaporated to <20 µl for liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis on a Finnigan LTQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer system.

Eukaryotic cells and mice

C57BL/6J mice were 8- to 16-wk-old females (The Jackson Laboratory) housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. Unless otherwise specified, incubations with eukaryotic cells were performed at 37°C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. HEK293 cells transfected with TLR2 (HEK.TLR2) or TLR4 and MD-2 (HEK.TLR4) were provided by D. Golenbock (University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA) (46, 47) and maintained in DMEM (BioWhittaker) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (HyClone), ciprofloxacin (10 µg/ml), and geneticin (500 µg/ml). Murine macrophages were derived from bone marrow precursors cultured for 7–12 days in medium composed of DMEM (BioWhittaker) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (HyClone), 50 µM 2-ME, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES buffer, and antibiotics (standard D10F) supplemented with 25% LADMAC cell-conditioned medium (48). Murine dendritic cells were generated by culturing bone marrow precursors in RPMI 1640 (BioWhittaker) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (HyClone) 50 µM 2-ME, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10 mM HEPES buffer, and antibiotics (standard R10F) with 100 µg/ml Flt-3-ligand (BioExpress). One half of the medium was replaced every 3 days and cells were used on day 9.

Cytokine ELISAs

HEK293 cells were plated overnight (20,000 cells/well in 96-well plates) and then incubated with TLR ligand for 24 h. Supernatants were tested for IL-8 by ELISA (R&D Systems). Macrophages (800,000 cells/well in 24-well plates) were incubated overnight in D10F and then for 12 h with LprA or a positive control TLR2 agonist peptide, N-palmitoyl-S-[2,3-bis(palmitoyloxy)-(2RS)-propyl]-[R]-cysteinyl-[S]-seryl-[S]-lysyl-[S]-lysyl-[S]-lysyl-[S]-lysine x 3 HCl (P3C) (EMC Microcollections). Alternatively, dendritic cells (130,000 cells/well in 24-well plate) were incubated with LprA or P3C for 24 h. Supernatants were harvested for ELISA for TNF-{alpha}, IL-12p70, and IL-10 with OPTEIA ELISA kits (BD Biosciences).

Flow cytometry

Dendritic cells (500,000 cells/well in 24-well plates) were incubated in R10F for 24 h with or without LprA. Bone marrow-derived macrophages (2 x 106 cells/well in a 6-well plate) were treated with LprA or NA-LprA for 48 h with 2 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} present for the last 24 h. Cells were harvested by vigorous pipetting and trypsinization, incubated for 30 min on ice with FcBlock (BD Pharmingen) at 1/100 in PBS with 0.1% BSA and for 1 h on ice with anti-MHC-II-FITC (eBioscience), anti-CD86-PE (BD Pharmingen), anti-CD40-PE-CY5) (eBioscience) or appropriate isotype-matched negative control Ab. Cells were washed three times in PBS with 0.1% BSA, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed with a BD FACScan flow cytometer.

Ag-processing assay

Macrophages (100,000 cells/well in 96-well plates) were incubated overnight in D10F, for 24 h with or without LprA, and for 24 h with 2 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} with or without fresh LprA. Soluble OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) or OVA (323–339) peptide was added for 2 h. Cells were washed in DMEM and fixed in 0.5% paraformaldehyde. DOBW T hybridoma cells, which recognize OVA (323–339) peptide sequence presented by I-Ab, were added at 100,000 cells/well for 24 h. IL-2 was measured in the supernatant by a colorimetric CTLL-2 bioassay. Supernatants were incubated with 5000 CTLL-2 cells for 24 h, Alamar Blue (Trek Diagnostic Systems) was added for 24–48 h, and a Bio-Rad Model 550 microplate reader was used to determine OD550-OD595.

Assays for apoptosis and necrosis

Macrophages were treated with LprA and NA-LprA as described for the Ag processing assay and then stained with annexin V-biotin (BD Pharmingen) and propidium iodide (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Streptavidin-FITC (BD Pharmingen) was used as a secondary Ab at 1/100 to detect annexin V. Fluorescence was measured on a BD Biosciences FACScan flow cytometer.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Purification of LprA

LprA was produced as a recombinant protein (Fig. 1) expressed in M. smegmatis (basic local alignment search tool searches of the M. smegmatis genome have not revealed LprG, LpqH, or LprA homologs). The full-length lprA gene (including signal sequence) was cloned from Mtb H37Rv and expressed with a 6x His tag on the C terminus to facilitate purification. M. smegmatis was chosen as an expression host because it grows faster and is easier to manipulate than slow-growing mycobacteria, yet it is phylogenetically closer to Mtb than other potential bacterial hosts, such as E. coli. As such, it is predicted to use correct codon usage and use proper secretion and acylation machinery for expression of LprA derived from Mtb (49, 50, 51). M. smegmatis does not produce any endogenous LprA.


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Cloning and expression of LprA and NA-LprA. A, Cloning and expression strategy. Mtb H37Rv DNA was used as a template to amplify lprA, which was cloned into the pVV16 shuttle vector to encode a fusion protein with a 6x His tag at the C terminus. This construct was used to transform E. coli, verified by sequencing, and used to transform M. smegmatis for expression of LprA. A similar approach was used to clone and express NA-LprA. B, Peptide sequence of LprA and NA-LprA. The additional C-terminal KLHHHHHH sequence containing a HindIII site and the 6x His tag is shown in italics. NA-LprA lacks the signal sequence (underlined), and the cysteine that is targeted for acylation in LprA is replaced by methionine.

 
M. smegmatis lysate was prepared with a French press and centrifuged to separate insoluble cell wall and membrane material (pellet) from soluble proteins (supernatant). Western blots with anti-6x His Ab indicated that LprA was present in the insoluble fraction (Fig. 2A), consistent with the expected behavior of a lipoprotein. However, a substantial amount of LprA was also present in the soluble fraction (Fig. 2A). To avoid the use of detergents with risks of carryover toxicity or increased release of other contaminating TLR2 ligands, the soluble fraction was used for further purification of LprA by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography, yielding a semipure preparation. Because several contaminants were still present (data not shown), subsequent purification by ion exchange chromatography was performed to yield pure LprA without contaminating proteins detectable by Coomassie staining (Fig. 2B). The average yield from a 4-L culture was 150 µg of purified LprA. Western blot analysis with Abs to LAM and ARALAM demonstrated that the preparations were free from detectable contamination by those species (data not shown). Purified LprA appeared as a main band of ~24 kDa; a fainter band of slightly lower apparent molecular mass was also present to a variable degree (Fig. 2B). The distinction between these bands remains obscure, but both represent LprA, since analysis by mass spectrometry revealed Mtb LprA sequences from both bands, and sequences from other contaminating proteins were not detected. The lower band may be a cleavage product of the full-length protein. LprA was also found to be glycosylated, as evidenced by binding of Con A to the main upper band (Fig. 2C). The lower molecular mass band, however, may represent a nonglycosylated form of LprA, as it showed little or no binding by Con A (Fig. 2C). As proposed for LpqH (39), it is possible that glycosylation prevents proteolytic cleavage of LprA, and nonglycosylated LprA is preferentially cleaved to form a lower molecular mass species, but this remains speculative. In conclusion, the combination of affinity and ion exchange chromatography allowed preparation of highly pure recombinant 6x His-tagged LprA for subsequent analysis.


Figure 2
View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Purification and analysis of recombinant LprA-6x His from M. smegmatis. M. smegmatis containing either LprA, NA-LprA, or pVV16 control vector was pelleted from a 4-L culture and lysed with a French press. The lysate was centrifuged to pellet insoluble cell wall debris and unlysed bacteria, leaving soluble species in the supernatant. A, Western analysis of supernatant (Supt.) or detergent solubilized pellet with anti-6x His Ab to detect LprA. B, LprA and NA-LprA were purified from the supernatant by Ni-NTA affinity and ion exchange chromatography, and 1 µg of each was analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie blue staining. C, LprA and NA-LprA were purified by Ni-NTA affinity and ion exchange chromatography, and 1 µg of each was subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and probed with either Con A-HRP or anti-6x His Ab.

 
To produce NA protein, LprA was also cloned without its signal sequence and with its target cysteine residue replaced by methionine (Cys27->Met) to produce NA-LprA (Fig. 1). As there is no signal sequence to direct its export, this protein remains cytosolic, and very little was detected in the insoluble cell wall fraction (data not shown). NA-LprA was purified from the soluble fraction of M. smegmatis lysate by Ni-NTA affinity and ion exchange chromatography to yield a pure preparation without detectable contamination by Coomassie staining (Fig. 2B) or Western analysis for LAM and ARALAM (data not shown). In some gels, NA-LprA appeared slightly larger than LprA, but this was not always observed. Like LprA, NA-LprA appeared as a doublet with a main upper band and a fainter lower band (Fig. 2B) that sometimes appeared more prominent than observed with LprA. Mass spectrometry again revealed Mtb LprA peptide sequences from both bands, and sequences from other contaminating proteins were not detected. Unlike LprA, NA-LprA does not react with Con A and does not, therefore, appear to be glycosylated (Fig. 2C). This may reflect its cytosolic localization, because mycobacterial protein glycosylation is linked to secretion (52). We speculate that lack of NA-LprA glycosylation may allow increased proteolytic production of the smaller species. The average yield of purified NA-LprA was 1 mg from a 4-L culture, higher than the yield for LprA. We conclude that M. smegmatis serves as an effective host for expression of 6x His-tagged LprA and NA-LprA, which can then be prepared to high purity.

Acylated LprA is a ligand for human TLR2

LprA has not been studied for TLR agonist activity, although other mycobacterial lipoproteins (LpqH and LprG) are known to signal through TLR2 and MyD88 (22, 23, 24, 25). HEK293 cells lack TLRs yet retain downstream components used for TLR signaling. HEK293 cells transfected to express specific TLRs can be used to assess TLR recognition of potential ligands; these cells secrete IL-8 in response to TLR signaling and consequent activation of NF-{kappa}B. To test whether LprA can signal through TLR2, we used HEK293 cells transfected with human TLR2 (HEK293.TLR2). Cells were incubated with LprA for 24 h, and supernatants were assessed by ELISA for IL-8. LprA induced IL-8 production by HEK293.TLR2 cells (Fig. 3A) but not untransfected HEK293 cells (Fig. 3B). Significant responses were observed with as low as 5 nM LprA (data not shown), while 2 nM LprA did not produce significant responses and 20 nM LprA produced strong responses (Fig. 3A). A negative control preparation, isolated in parallel by the LprA purification protocol from M. smegmatis containing the control vector (pVV16), showed no TLR2 agonist activity (data not shown).


Figure 3
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Acylated LprA signals through TLR2. HEK293.TLR2 (A) and HEK293 (B) cells were incubated for 24 h with or without LprA or NA-LprA. Culture supernatants were analyzed for IL-8 by ELISA. Means of triplicate wells are shown with SD values.

 
The acyl chains of some other lipoproteins or lipopeptides are important determinants of TLR2 agonist activity (22, 24, 30, 31). However, in some cases the peptide portion of a lipoprotein is also able to signal through TLR2 (36). To determine the role of acyl chains in TLR2 signaling by LprA, we tested the ability of NA-LprA to induce IL-8 production by HEK293.TLR2 cells. We found that NA-LprA was not able to signal through TLR2 (Fig. 3A), even at doses of up to 1 µM (data not shown). Thus, TLR2-signaling activity of LprA is acylation dependent.

Acylated LprA induces cytokine production by macrophages in a TLR2-dependent fashion

We tested the ability of LprA to induce responses by macrophages and dendritic cells. First, we tested the ability of LprA to stimulate cytokine production by murine macrophages. Macrophages were incubated for 12 h with or without 50 nM LprA or NA-LprA, and supernatants were analyzed for IL-10 and TNF-{alpha} by ELISA. Both cytokines were induced by acylated LprA and the synthetic lipopeptide P3C (a positive control TLR2 agonist) but not by NA-LprA or control medium (Fig. 4). In contrast, macrophages from TLR2–/– mice did not respond to LprA or P3C (Fig. 4). Therefore, LprA is an agonist for murine TLR2 as well as human TLR2, and its ability to induce macrophage production of IL-10 and TNF-{alpha} is dependent on TLR2 and requires LprA acylation.


Figure 4
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Acylated LprA induces TNF-{alpha} and IL-10 from macrophages in a TLR2-dependent fashion. Wild-type ({square}) or TLR2–/– ({blacksquare}) macrophages were incubated with control medium, 50 nM LprA, 50 nM NA-LprA or 50 nM P3C for 12 h. ELISA was used to assess supernatants for TNF-{alpha} (A) or IL-10 (B). Means of triplicate wells are shown with SD values.

 
Acylated LprA induces dendritic cells to mature and produce cytokines

Maturation of dendritic cells involves increased expression of surface markers such as MHC-II, CD86, and CD40, and the production of cytokines such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-10, and IL-12. To determine whether LprA can induce dendritic cell maturation, Flt3 ligand-derived murine dendritic cells were incubated for 24 h with LprA, NA-LprA, or P3C at a final concentration of 50–500 nM. Expression of surface markers was studied by flow cytometry, and cytokine production was examined by ELISA. LprA induced dendritic cell maturation as indicated by increased expression of CD40, CD86, and MHC-II (Fig. 5, A–C), as observed with P3C (data not shown). Nonacylated LprA, however, did not enhance expression of any of these maturation markers (Fig. 5, D–F). LprA also induced production of TNF-{alpha}, IL-12, and IL-10 by dendritic cells, whereas NA-LprA was unable to stimulate any cytokine production from dendritic cells (Fig. 6). We conclude that LprA induces maturation of dendritic cells, and this activity is dependent on its acylation.


Figure 5
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Dendritic cell expression of MHC-II, CD86, and CD40 is enhanced by LprA in an acylation-dependent fashion. Dendritic cells were incubated with medium, 500 nM LprA (A–C) or 500 nM NA-LprA (D–F) for 24 h ("protein" indicates LprA or NA-LprA). Cells were stained with Abs to MHC-II (A and D), CD86 (B and E), or CD40 (C and F) and analyzed by flow cytometry.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Acylated LprA induces TNF-{alpha}, IL-12, and IL-10 from dendritic cells. Dendritic cells were incubated with control medium, 50 nM LprA, 50 nM NA-LprA, or 50 nM P3C for 24 h. ELISA was used to assess supernatants for TNF-{alpha} (A), IL-10 (B), or IL-12 p70 (C). Means of triplicate wells are shown with SD values. Results for control medium and NA-LprA are graphed but are too low to be visible.

 
Acylated LprA is able to inhibit Ag processing in macrophages

In contrast to dendritic cell responses, prolonged incubation of macrophages with TLR2 agonists (e.g., LpqH and LprG) inhibits IFN-{gamma}-dependent MHC-II expression and Ag-processing activity (22, 23, 25, 42, 44). To determine whether LprA can similarly inhibit these functions, macrophages were incubated with LprA for 48 h, the last 24 of which were in the presence of IFN-{gamma} (2 ng/ml). To assess MHC-II expression, cells were stained with anti-I-Ab or isotype-matched control Ab and analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 7A). Induction of MHC-II by IFN-{gamma} was inhibited by LprA but not NA-LprA. To assess Ag processing and presentation, cells were incubated with OVA protein or OVA (323–339) peptide for 2 h and then fixed. The degree of OVA processing and presentation was determined by incubating fixed macrophages with DOBW T hybridoma cells and measuring the amount of IL-2 production by a CTLL-2 bioassay. In accordance with decreased MHC-II expression, LprA inhibited the ability of macrophages to present OVA (323–339) peptide to T cells (Fig. 7B), whereas NA-LprA had no effect. Furthermore, MHC-II processing and presentation of OVA protein was inhibited by LprA but not NA-LprA (Fig. 7C), and this effect was dependent on TLR2 (Fig. 7D).


Figure 7
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Acylated LprA inhibits IFN-{gamma}-induced MHC-II expression and associated TLR2-dependent Ag processing and presentation. Wild-type (A–C) or TLR2–/– (D) macrophages were incubated for 48 h with control medium, 50 nM LprA or 50 nM NA-LprA, with IFN-{gamma} (2 ng/ml) present for the last 24 h. A, Cells were stained with anti-I-Ab or isotype-matched control Ab. B–D, Cells were exposed to either OVA (323–339) peptide (B) or OVA protein (C and D) for 2 h, fixed, and incubated with DOBW T hybridoma cells. IL-2 was assessed in supernatants by a colorimetric CTLL-2 bioassay to determine presentation of processed OVA. Results are expressed as means of triplicate wells ± SD. When error bars are not visible, they are smaller than the symbol width. The lines for medium and NA-LprA are closely overlapping.

 
LprA does not induce macrophage apoptosis or necrosis

TLR signaling has been reported to cause apoptosis in some systems. We have examined this issue extensively with LpqH and LprG in the past, and these TLR2 agonists do not induce detectable apoptosis in the murine bone marrow-derived macrophages (or murine peritoneal or alveolar macrophages, or human THP-1 cells or monocyte-derived macrophages) as indicated by our following unpublished observations. First, viability is consistently as good with MTB-infected or lipoprotein-treated macrophages as with controls. Second, yield of macrophages from MTB-infected cultures is as high or higher than the yield from matched uninfected control cultures. Third, TUNEL assays show no apoptosis in macrophages treated with up to 25 nM LpqH (more than required for the inhibitory effect). Fourth, other active physiological functions of macrophages (e.g., phagocytic uptake) are not inhibited. Fifth, expression of MHC-I (as opposed to MHC-II) is not decreased and the ability to present exogenous MHC-I-restricted peptides to CD8 T hybridoma cells is unchanged or slightly increased. Sixth, RNA yield is not inhibited by LpqH, and expression of many genes is unaltered or increased, not inhibited. These results with LpqH and LprG indicate that apoptosis does not occur in response to lipoprotein-induced TLR2 signaling, and we have confirmed this conclusion specifically with LprA. LprA and NA-LprA both failed to induce apoptosis (by staining with annexin V) or necrosis (by staining with propidium iodide) when used at the same concentrations that were used in the Ag-processing experiments (Fig. 8). In addition, LprA did not reduce macrophage viability or yield in culture (data not shown). These data show that LprA does not induce macrophage apoptosis or necrosis in the system used for our experiments.


Figure 8
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. LprA does not induce macrophage apoptosis or necrosis. Macrophages were incubated with 50 nM LprA, 50 nM NA-LprA, or control medium for 48 h with IFN-{gamma} (2 ng/ml) present for the final 24 h. Cells were stained with annexin V to assess apoptosis (A and B) or propidium iodide to assess necrosis (B). A positive control for apoptosis/necrosis was provided by macrophages that were exposed to UV light. A, Flow cytometry staining with annexin V. B, Percent of macrophages with positive annexin V staining or positive labeling with propidium iodide.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
TLRs play an important role in the course of mycobacterial infection. Macrophages and dendritic cells, both known to harbor Mtb, express TLR2, which appears to be one of the major pattern recognition receptors for detecting this organism. The identification and characterization of mycobacterial TLR2 ligands is, therefore, important for understanding the capacity of the bacillus to interact with APCs in which it resides. Mtb lipoproteins (LpqH and LprG) have been identified previously as TLR2 agonists (22, 24, 25), but the potential TLR agonist activities of other Mtb lipoproteins have not been tested.

Prokaryotic lipoproteins may have diverse functions ranging from roles in bacterial physiology to regulation of host-pathogen interactions and immune responses. For example, prokaryotic lipoproteins serve as solute binding proteins in ATP-binding cassette transport systems or enzymes involved in cell wall synthesis, adhesion, and signaling (29). Lipoproteins are exported outside of the cytoplasmic membrane and, in some cases, are shed into the environment. Thus, they are accessible by receptors on leukocytes that may regulate immune responses. In both Staphylococcus aureus and Mtb, genetic defects that cause global lipoprotein disruptions result in reduced virulence (27), although this may reflect impairments in general bacterial physiology as well as potential alterations in host-pathogen interactions. In a study targeting a specific lipoprotein, deletion of LprG (a close homolog of LprA) was shown to attenuate the virulence of Mtb H37Rv in a mouse model (53). These observations suggest that further study of Mtb lipoproteins and their activities is important to our understanding of Mtb virulence and host-pathogen interactions in Mtb infection.

The Mtb genome encodes ~100 putative lipoproteins (29). In studies to date with screening of detergent-partitioned, electrophoretically separated Mtb molecules, however, we have identified only four species with sufficient expression and activity to significantly modulate macrophage or dendritic cell function: LpqH (19-kDa lipoprotein) (22), LprG (25), LprA (this study and Ref. 25) and a species of~38 kDa that is probably PhoS1 (Psts1, 38-kDa lipoprotein) (M. Drage, N. Pecora, and C. Harding, unpublished observations). Therefore, this limited set of Mtb lipoproteins represents high priority targets for further study. LpqH and LprG have been shown to signal through TLR2 (22, 25). Due to difficulty in purification of native LprA, this lipoprotein has not been purified or characterized previously with regard to its TLR2 agonist activity and ability to induce innate immune responses. In this study, we prepared 6x His-tagged LprA to facilitate its purification and characterization.

Activity of LprA was studied in three cell systems, including HEK293.TLR2 cells, murine macrophages, and murine dendritic cells. HEK293.TLR2 cells (expressing human TLR2) responded to LprA concentrations as low as 5 nM by producing IL-8, whereas control HEK293 cells that lack TLR2 did not respond. These results demonstrate that LprA is a potent agonist for signaling through human TLR2. Consistent with observations of other lipoproteins, e.g., Mtb LpqH (24) and the Borrelia burgdorferi lipoprotein, OspA (4, 24), the TLR2 agonist activity of LprA was dependent upon acylation of the protein. To test LprA activity in physiologically relevant leukocytes, we studied murine bone marrow-derived macrophages and dendritic cells. TLR2 agonists, including microbial lipoproteins, have the ability to induce dendritic cell maturation and production of proinflammatory cytokines (3, 4). Our results demonstrate that LprA is an effective TLR2 agonist for induction of dendritic cell maturation (as evidenced by up-regulation of MHC-II, CD40, and CD86) and production of cytokines (TNF-{alpha}, IL-10, and IL-12) by dendritic cells. Macrophages also play critical roles during Mtb infection. They have microbicidal functions, and they produce proinflammatory cytokines in response to Mtb. Our studies establish LprA as a potent TLR2-dependent inducer of macrophage cytokine production. Thus, TLR2 recognition of LprA may contribute to both induction of dendritic cell maturation by Mtb, an important step in initiation of protective T cell responses, and the induction of innate immunity during infection with Mtb.

The primary function of TLRs is to help drive immune responses to infectious agents. There is a risk, however, of producing excessive inflammation that could damage host tissues. Negative regulatory pathways exist to down-regulate TLR signaling itself or to induce anti-inflammatory effects upon prolonged stimulation (54, 55, 56). Prolonged TLR2 signaling by mycobacterial lipoproteins can inhibit MHC-II expression and Ag processing in macrophages (22, 23, 25, 42, 44). We have proposed that this reflects a homeostatic program that limits potentially excessive and damaging responses, but at the same time, this down-regulation of APC function may be a means by which mycobacteria are able to evade immune surveillance. In this study, we have shown that prolonged (24 h) exposure to LprA can inhibit macrophage MHC-II Ag processing, similar to results observed previously with LpqH and LprG.

In conclusion, LprA is a glycosylated lipoprotein with potent TLR2 agonist activity. LprA induces innate immunity (e.g., cytokine responses) and regulates APC functions of dendritic cells and macrophages. Like other TLR agonists, its primary effect may be to help drive immune responses, but it may also induce homeostatic down-regulatory mechanisms, e.g., reduction of macrophage APC function that may allow evasion of immune surveillance by organisms that survive initial microbicidal mechanisms.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Douglas Golenbock and Amy Hise for HEK293 cell lines, Robert Wilkinson for M. smegmatis, and Mike Kinter for mass spectrometry analyses. John Belisle provided important advice and reagents through the Colorado State University TB Vaccine Research and Research Materials Contract NIH N01-AI40091.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI35726 and AI34343 (to C.V.H.) and AI27243 and HL55967 (to W.H.B.). Back

2 Current address: Institute of Hepatology, University College London, London, U.K. Back

3 W.H.B. and C.V.H. share joint senior authorship. Back

4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Clifford V. Harding, Department of Pathology, Wolstein 5534, Case Western Reserve University, 2103 Cornell Road, Cleveland, OH 44106-7288. E-mail address: cvh3{at}case.edu Back

5 Abbreviations used in this paper: Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; LAM, lipoarabinomannan; MHC-II, class II MHC; NA, nonacylated; Ni-NTA, nickel nitrilotriacetic acid; ARALAM, arabinofuranosyl-terminated LAM. Back

Received for publication December 14, 2005. Accepted for publication April 6, 2006.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Takeda, K., T. Kaisho, S. Akira. 2003. Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21: 335-376. [Medline]
  2. Tsuji, S., M. Matsumoto, O. Takeuchi, S. Akira, I. Azuma, A. Hayashi, K. Toyoshima, T. Seya. 2000. Maturation of human dendritic cells by cell wall skeleton of Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin: involvement of Toll-like receptors. Infect. Immun. 68: 6883-6890. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Thoma-Uszynski, S., S. M. Kiertscher, M. T. Ochoa, D. A. Bouis, M. V. Norgard, K. Miyake, P. J. Godowski, M. D. Roth, R. L. Modlin. 2000. Activation of Toll-like receptor 2 on human dendritic cells triggers induction of IL-12, but not IL-10. J. Immunol. 165: 3804-3810. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hertz, C., S. Kiertscher, P. Godowski, D. Bouis, M. Norgard, M. Roth, R. Modlin. 2001. Microbial lipopeptides stimulate dendritic cell maturation via Toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 166: 2444-2450. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Means, T. K., S. Wang, E. Lien, A. Yoshimura, D. T. Golenbock, M. J. Fenton. 1999. Human Toll-like receptors mediate cellular activation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 163: 3920-3927. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Underhill, D. M., A. Ozinsky, K. D. Smith, A. Aderem. 1999. Toll-like receptor-2 mediates mycobacteria-induced proinflammatory signaling in macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 14459-14463. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Krutzik, S. R., R. L. Modlin. 2004. The role of Toll-like receptors in combating mycobacteria. Semin. Immunol. 16: 35-41. [Medline]
  8. Quesniaux, V., C. Fremond, M. Jacobs, S. Parida, D. Nicolle, V. Yeremeev, F. Bihl, F. Erard, T. Botha, M. Drennan, et al 2004. Toll-like receptor pathways in the immune responses to mycobacteria. Microbes Infect. 6: 946-959. [Medline]
  9. Feng, C. G., C. A. Scanga, C. M. Collazo-Custodio, A. W. Cheever, S. Hieny, P. Caspar, A. Sher. 2003. Mice lacking myeloid differentiation factor 88 display profound defects in host resistance and immune responses to Mycobacterium avium infection not exhibited by Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)- and TLR4-deficient animals. J. Immunol. 171: 4758-4764. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fremond, C. M., V. Yeremeev, D. M. Nicolle, M. Jacobs, V. F. Quesniaux, B. Ryffel. 2004. Fatal Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection despite adaptive immune response in the absence of MyD88. J. Clin. Invest. 114: 1790-1799. [Medline]
  11. Nicolle, D. M., X. Pichon, A. Bouchot, I. Maillet, F. Erard, S. Akira, B. Ryffel, V. F. Quesniaux. 2004. Chronic pneumonia despite adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium bovis BCG in MyD88-deficient mice. Lab. Invest. 84: 1305-1321.
  12. Scanga, C. A., A. Bafica, C. G. Feng, A. W. Cheever, S. Hieny, A. Sher. 2004. MyD88-deficient mice display a profound loss in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis associated with partially impaired Th1 cytokine and nitric oxide synthase 2 expression. Infect. Immun. 72: 2400-2404. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sugawara, I., H. Yamada, S. Mizuno, K. Takeda, S. Akira. 2003. Mycobacterial infection in MyD88-deficient mice. Microbiol. Immunol. 47: 841-847. [Medline]
  14. Ben-Ali, M., M. R. Barbouche, S. Bousnina, A. Chabbou, K. Dellagi. 2004. Toll-like receptor 2 Arg677Trp polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis in Tunisian patients. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 11: 625-626. [Medline]
  15. Bochud, P. Y., T. R. Hawn, A. Aderem. 2003. Cutting edge: a Toll-like receptor 2 polymorphism that is associated with lepromatous leprosy is unable to mediate mycobacterial signaling. J. Immunol. 170: 3451-3454. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ogus, A. C., B. Yoldas, T. Ozdemir, A. Uguz, S. Olcen, I. Keser, M. Coskun, A. Cilli, O. Yegin. 2004. The Arg753GLn polymorphism of the human Toll-like receptor 2 gene in tuberculosis disease. Eur. Respir. J. 23: 219-223. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Reiling, N., C. Holscher, A. Fehrenbach, S. Kroger, C. J. Kirschning, S. Goyert, S. Ehlers. 2002. Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor (TLR)2- and TLR4-mediated pathogen recognition in resistance to airborne infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 169: 3480-3484. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gomes, M. S., M. Florido, J. V. Cordeiro, C. M. Teixeira, O. Takeuchi, S. Akira, R. Appelberg. 2004. Limited role of the Toll-like receptor-2 in resistance to Mycobacterium avium. Immunology 111: 179-185. [Medline]
  19. Quesniaux, V. J., D. M. Nicolle, D. Torres, L. Kremer, Y. Guerardel, J. Nigou, G. Puzo, F. Erard, B. Ryffel. 2004. Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2)-dependent-positive and TLR2-independent-negative regulation of proinflammatory cytokines by mycobacterial lipomannans. J. Immunol. 172: 4425-4434. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jones, B. W., T. K. Means, K. A. Heldwein, M. A. Keen, P. J. Hill, J. T. Belisle, M. J. Fenton. 2001. Different Toll-like receptor agonists induce distinct macrophage responses. J. Leukocyte Biol. 69: 1036-1044. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gilleron, M., V. F. Quesniaux, G. Puzo. 2003. Acylation state of the phosphatidyl inositol hexamannosides from Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and its implication in TLR response. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 29880-29889. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Noss, E. H., R. K. Pai, T. J. Sellati, J. D. Radolf, J. Belisle, D. T. Golenbock, W. H. Boom, C. V. Harding. 2001. Toll-like receptor 2-dependent inhibition of macrophage class II MHC expression and antigen processing by 19 kD lipoprotein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 167: 910-918. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Pai, R. K., M. Convery, T. A. Hamilton, W. H. Boom, C. V. Harding. 2003. Inhibition of IFN-{gamma}-induced class II transactivator expression by a 19-kDa lipoprotein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a potential mechanism for immune evasion. J. Immunol. 171: 175-184. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Brightbill, H. D., D. H. Libraty, S. R. Krutzik, R. B. Yang, J. T. Belisle, J. R. Bleharski, M. Maitland, M. V. Norgard, S. E. Plevy, S. T. Smale, et al 1999. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through Toll-like receptors. Science 285: 732-736. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gehring, A. J., K. M. Dobos, J. T. Belisle, C. V. Harding, W. H. Boom. 2004. Mycobacterium tuberculosis LprG (Rv1411c): a novel TLR-2 ligand that inhibits human macrophage class II MHC antigen processing. J. Immunol. 173: 2660-2668. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sankaran, K., H. C. Wu. 1994. Lipid modification of bacterial prolipoprotein: transfer of diacylglyceryl moiety from phosphatidylglycerol. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 19701-19706. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sander, P., M. Rezwan, B. Walker, S. K. Rampini, R. M. Kroppenstedt, S. Ehlers, C. Keller, J. R. Keeble, M. Hagemeier, M. J. Colston, et al 2004. Lipoprotein processing is required for virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 52: 1543-1552. [Medline]
  28. Hussain, M., S. Ichihara, S. Mizushima. 1982. Mechanism of signal peptide cleavage in the biosynthesis of the major lipoprotein of the Escherichia coli outer membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 257: 5177-5182. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Sutcliffe, I. C., D. J. Harrington. 2004. Lipoproteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: an abundant and functionally diverse class of cell envelope components. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 28: 645-659. [Medline]
  30. Giambartolomei, G. H., A. Zwerdling, J. Cassataro, L. Bruno, C. A. Fossati, M. T. Philipp. 2004. Lipoproteins, not lipopolysaccharide, are the key mediators of the proinflammatory response elicited by heat-killed Brucella abortus. J. Immunol. 173: 4635-4642. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Lee, H. K., J. Lee, P. S. Tobias. 2002. Two lipoproteins extracted from Escherichia coli K-12 LCD25 lipopolysaccharide are the major components responsible for Toll-like receptor 2-mediated signaling. J. Immunol. 168: 4012-4017. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Morr, M., O. Takeuchi, S. Akira, M. M. Simon, P. F. Muhlradt. 2002. Differential recognition of structural details of bacterial lipopeptides by Toll-like receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 32: 3337-3347. [Medline]
  33. Aliprantis, A. O., R. B. Yang, M. R. Mark, S. Suggett, B. Devaux, J. D. Radolf, G. R. Klimpel, P. Godowski, A. Zychlinsky. 1999. Cell activation and apoptosis by bacterial lipoproteins through Toll-like receptor-2. Science 285: 736-739. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Takeuchi, O., A. Kaufmann, K. Grote, T. Kawai, K. Hoshino, M. Morr, P. F. Muhlradt, S. Akira. 2000. Cutting edge: preferentially the R-stereoisomer of the mycoplasmal lipopeptide macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2 activates immune cells through a Toll-like receptor 2- and MyD88-dependent signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 164: 554-557. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Epelman, S., D. Stack, C. Bell, E. Wong, G. G. Neely, S. Krutzik, K. Miyake, P. Kubes, L. D. Zbytnuik, L. L. Ma, et al 2004. Different domains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S activate distinct TLRs. J. Immunol. 173: 2031-2040. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Yamashita, Y., Y. Maeda, F. Takeshita, P. J. Brennan, M. Makino. 2004. Role of the polypeptide region of a 33 kDa mycobacterial lipoprotein for efficient IL-12 production. Cell. Immunol. 229: 13-20. [Medline]
  37. Buwitt-Beckmann, U., H. Heine, K. H. Wiesmuller, G. Jung, R. Brock, S. Akira, A. J. Ulmer. 2005. Toll-like receptor 6-independent signaling by diacylated lipopeptides. Eur. J. Immunol. 35: 282-289. [Medline]
  38. Spohn, R., U. Buwitt-Beckmann, R. Brock, G. Jung, A. J. Ulmer, K. H. Wiesmuller. 2004. Synthetic lipopeptide adjuvants and Toll-like receptor 2-structure-activity relationships. Vaccine 22: 2494-2499. [Medline]
  39. Herrmann, J. L., P. O’Gaora, A. Gallagher, J. E. Thole, D. B. Young. 1996. Bacterial glycoproteins: a link between glycosylation and proteolytic cleavage of a 19 kDa antigen from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. EMBO J. 15: 3547-3554. [Medline]
  40. Schmidt, M. A., L. W. Riley, I. Benz. 2003. Sweet new world: glycoproteins in bacterial pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 11: 554-561. [Medline]
  41. Kincaid, E. Z., J. D. Ernst. 2003. Mycobacterium tuberculosis exerts gene-selective inhibition of transcriptional responses to IFN-{gamma} without inhibiting STAT1 function. J. Immunol. 171: 2042-2049. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Pai, R. K., M. E. Pennini, A. A. Tobian, D. H. Canaday, W. H. Boom, C. V. Harding. 2004. Prolonged Toll-like receptor signaling by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its 19-kilodalton lipoprotein inhibits {gamma} interferon-induced regulation of selected genes in macrophages. Infect. Immun. 72: 6603-6614. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Gehring, A. J., R. E. Rojas, D. H. Canaday, D. L. Lakey, C. V. Harding, W. H. Boom. 2003. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19-kilodalton lipoprotein inhibits {gamma} interferon-regulated HLA-DR and Fc{gamma}R1 on human macrophages through Toll-like receptor 2. Infect. Immun. 71: 4487-4497. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Fulton, S. A., S. M. Reba, R. K. Pai, M. Pennini, M. Torres, C. V. Harding, W. H. Boom. 2004. Inhibition of major histocompatibility complex II expression and antigen processing in murine alveolar macrophages by Mycobacterium bovis BCG and the 19-kilodalton mycobacterial lipoprotein. Infect. Immun. 72: 2101-2110. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Wang, Y., H. M. Curry, B. S. Zwilling, W. P. Lafuse. 2005. Mycobacteria inhibition of IFN-{gamma} induced HLA-DR gene expression by up-regulating histone deacetylation at the promoter region in human THP-1 monocytic cells. J. Immunol. 174: 5687-5694. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Flo, T. H., L. Ryan, E. Latz, O. Takeuchi, B. G. Monks, E. Lien, O. Halaas, S. Akira, G. Skjak-Braek, D. T. Golenbock, T. Espevik. 2002. Involvement of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 in cell activation by mannuronic acid polymers. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 35489-35495. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Latz, E., A. Visintin, E. Lien, K. A. Fitzgerald, B. G. Monks, E. A. Kurt-Jones, D. T. Golenbock, T. Espevik. 2002. Lipopolysaccharide rapidly traffics to and from the Golgi apparatus with the Toll-like receptor 4-MD-2-CD14 complex in a process that is distinct from the initiation of signal transduction. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 47834-47843. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Sklar, M. D., A. Tereba, B. D. Chen, W. S. Walker. 1985. Transformation of mouse bone marrow cells by transfection with a human oncogene related to c-myc is associated with the endogenous production of macrophage colony stimulating factor 1. J. Cell. Physiol. 125: 403-412. [Medline]
  49. Lakey, D. L., R. K. Voladri, K. M. Edwards, C. Hager, B. Samten, R. S. Wallis, P. F. Barnes, D. S. Kernodle. 2000. Enhanced production of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in Escherichia coli by replacement of low-usage codons. Infect. Immun. 68: 233-238. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Harth, G., B. Y. Lee, M. A. Horwitz. 1997. High-level heterologous expression and secretion in rapidly growing nonpathogenic mycobacteria of four major Mycobacterium tuberculosis extracellular proteins considered to be leading vaccine candidates and drug targets. Infect. Immun. 65: 2321-2328. [Abstract]
  51. Garbe, T., D. Harris, M. Vordermeier, R. Lathigra, J. Ivanyi, D. Young. 1993. Expression of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19-kilodalton antigen in Mycobacterium smegmatis: immunological analysis and evidence of glycosylation. Infect. Immun. 61: 260-267. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. VanderVen, B. C., J. D. Harder, D. C. Crick, J. T. Belisle. 2005. Export-mediated assembly of mycobacterial glycoproteins parallels eukaryotic pathways. Science 309: 941-943. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Bigi, F., A. Gioffre, L. Klepp, M. de la Paz Santangelo, A. Alito, K. Caimi, V. Meikle, M. Zumarraga, O. Taboga, M. I. Romano, A. Cataldi. 2004. The knockout of the lprG-Rv1410 operon produces strong attenuation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbes Infect. 6: 182-187. [Medline]
  54. Fan, H., J. A. Cook. 2004. Molecular mechanisms of endotoxin tolerance. J. Endotoxin Res. 10: 71-84. [Medline]
  55. Brint, E. K., D. Xu, H. Liu, A. Dunne, A. N. McKenzie, L. A. O’Neill, F. Y. Liew. 2004. ST2 is an inhibitor of interleukin 1 receptor and Toll-like receptor 4 signaling and maintains endotoxin tolerance. Nat. Immunol. 5: 373-379. [Medline]
  56. LeBouder, E., J. E. Rey-Nores, N. K. Rushmere, M. Grigorov, S. D. Lawn, M. Affolter, G. E. Griffin, P. Ferrara, E. J. Schiffrin, B. P. Morgan, M. O. Labeta. 2003. Soluble forms of Toll-like receptor (TLR)2 capable of modulating TLR2 signaling are present in human plasma and breast milk. J. Immunol. 171: 6680-6689. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. M. Anis, S. A. Fulton, S. M. Reba, Y. Liu, C. V. Harding, and W. H. Boom
Modulation of Pulmonary Dendritic Cell Function during Mycobacterial Infection
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2008; 76(2): 671 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
P. Barrionuevo, J. Cassataro, M. V. Delpino, A. Zwerdling, K. A. Pasquevich, C. G. Samartino, J. C. Wallach, C. A. Fossati, and G. H. Giambartolomei
Brucella abortus Inhibits Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Expression and Antigen Processing through Interleukin-6 Secretion via Toll-Like Receptor 2
Infect. Immun., January 1, 2008; 76(1): 250 - 262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Young Goo, Y. S. Han, W. H. Kim, K.-H. Lee, and S.-J. Park
Vibrio vulnificus IlpA-induced Cytokine Production Is Mediated by Toll-like Receptor 2
J. Biol. Chem., September 21, 2007; 282(38): 27647 - 27658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
S. Chang, A. Dolganiuc, and G. Szabo
Toll-like receptors 1 and 6 are involved in TLR2-mediated macrophage activation by hepatitis C virus core and NS3 proteins
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 479 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager