|
|
||||||||


* Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and
Division of Tumor Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pioneering studies of protein degradation revealed the existence of two general substrate pools whose average t1/2 differ by >2 orders of magnitude (4, 5). It is now clear that proteasomes dispose of both pools. In cultured cells, polypeptides with an average t1/2 of
10 min (rapidly degraded polypeptides (RDPs)) constitute
70% of proteasome substrates, while polypeptides with an average t1/2 of >1000 min (slowly degraded polypeptides (SDPs)) provide the remaining substrates (6, 7).
RDPs have been implicated in providing the bulk of peptides that interact with TAP (8). TAP is an ER-localized heterodimer that functions to deliver peptides from the cytosol to class I molecules. The translocating activity of TAP can be measured by decreased TAP mobility in the ER membrane as determined by photobleaching techniques using cells expressing TAP genetically coupled to GFP. Exposing cells to the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) for 15 min reduces TAP-GFP peptide occupancy to levels achieved with proteasome inhibitors (8), implying a t1/2 of
8 min for the progenitor substrates of TAP-binding peptides (two t1/2 to achieve 75% depletion of the peptide-generating pool). Similarly, export of class I molecules from the ER is retarded by CHX, presumably due to its effects on the supply of peptide ligands (9).
An increasing number of reports indicate that defined antigenic peptides derive from defective ribosomal products (DRiPs). These are rapidly degraded forms of otherwise metabolically stable proteins that are presumably defective due to errors in transcription, translation, intracellular targeting, or folding (6, 10, 11, 12). The key concept is that any given gene product contributes substrates to both the rapidly and slowly degraded pools: the former are DRiPs, while the latter represent native molecules that exhibit classical turnover (13). A critical experimental strategy used to determine the contribution of DRiPs to Ag presentation is the dependence of peptide generation on ongoing protein synthesis, as determined by incubating cells with protein synthesis inhibitors such as CHX (6, 8, 11, 12). This approach is limited by the possibility that protein synthesis is not required to provide substrates, but for other factors needed to generate TAP-binding peptides or to facilitate class I assembly and transport from the ER.
In this study, we provide evidence that strengthens the conclusion that the intimate relationship between protein synthesis and peptide generation is due to the existence of a short-lived substrate pool of DRiPs, and not to other CHX-sensitive factors needed for peptide generation or the formation or transport of peptide class I complexes.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
L-Kb and MelJuSo cells were maintained in DMEM with 10% FBS. Recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) expressing SIINFEKL-containing protein (nucleoprotein (NP)-GFP) has been described (6). Cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 10 or 20 PFU at 37°C in BSS/BSA, and then incubated at 37°C in complete growth medium for the remainder of the assay. The reversible proteasome inhibitor MG132 (cbz-Leu-Leu-Leucinal) and CHX were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Polyclonal Ab against GFP was purchased from BD Clontech. Purified 25-D1.16 mAb conjugated to AlexaFluor 647 has been described previously (6)
Metabolic radiolabeling
L-Kb cells were radiolabeled in suspension at 37°C with [35S]Met (500 µCi/ml; Amersham Biosciences) for 5 min in Met-deficient DMEM without prior Met starvation. Labeling was terminated by adding ice-cold PBS containing excess (1 mg/ml) Met. After washing twice, cells were chased for various times at 37°C in DMEM/10% FBS supplemented with 20 mM HEPES and 1 mg/ml Met. Whole cell extracts were precipitated with TCA or resolved in 10% SDS-PAGE gels, as described previously (14). Gels were fixed in 10% acetic acid, dried, and scanned by a Typhoon 8600 (Amersham Biosciences). Images were generated and data analyzed using ImageQuant software (Amersham Biosciences).
Cytofluorography
Kb-SIINFEKL complex levels were measured by incubating cells for 30 min on ice with 25-D1.16 Ab conjugated to Alexafluor 647. Cellular GFP and Alexafluor 647 levels were determined on a FACSCalibur cytofluorograph (BD Biosciences).
Immunoblotting
Cell lysates were prepared by heating for 10 min in SDS-PAGE sample buffer (50 mM Tris Cl (pH 6.8), 100 mM DTT, 2% SDS, 0.1% bromphenol blue, and 10% glycerol). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Membranes were blocked for 1 h in TBS (50 mM Tris Cl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl) containing 5% BSA, followed by incubation with Abs, as indicated. After incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary Abs (Roche), immunoblots were developed using ECL (Pierce).
Acid strip assay
L-Kb (
5 x 106 cells) were pelleted and resuspended in 0.5 ml of 0.2 M citric acid/Na2HPO4 buffer (pH 3.0). After incubation on ice for 2 min, the sample was neutralized by adding excess of cold 0.1% BSA in PBS (pH 7.2) and cells were immediately collected by brief centrifugation. Cell surface Kb molecules were measured by flow cytometry after staining with HB176 and FITC-labeled anti-mouse IgG.
TAP-fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP)
Confocal microscopy of living cells was performed using a Leica TCS NT (Leica Microsystems) confocal system, equipped with an Ar/Kr laser (8). MelJuSo cells stably expressing TAP1-GFP were used to visualize lateral mobility of TAP complexes using FRAP. GFP-positive clones were selected for low to moderate fluorescence to ensure optimal assembly of TAP1-GFP into TAP1-TAP2 complexes. FRAP experiments were performed, as described previously (8). In brief, a circular spot in the ER was bleached at full intensity, and an attenuated laser beam was used to monitor recovery of fluorescence. The t1/2 for recovery was calculated from each recovery curve after correction for loss of fluorescence due to imaging (usually <4%). The diffusion coefficient D was determined from at least two independent FRAP experiments (generally at least eight cells per experiment). The calculated D, assuming two-dimensional diffusion in the ER, is probably an underestimation of the actual D due to a time window between bleaching and the first recovery measurement of 1.2 s and the architecture of the ER.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One possible confounding effect of CHX on Ag presentation is that it might inhibit protein degradation. Indeed, this assumption was built into recent mathematical modeling (15) of the effect of CHX on generation of Kb-SIINFEKL from NP-SIINFEKL-GFP constructs (6). We examined this possibility by pulse radiolabeling L-Kb cells (L929 cells transfected with a cDNA encoding H-2Kb) for 5 min with [35S]Met and chasing for up to 2 h in the presence or absence of CHX. Protein degradation was measured by loss of TCA-precipitable radioactivity in total cell lysates. Control experiments established that CHX blocks protein synthesis within seconds of its addition to cells under these conditions (data not shown). As previously described (5, 10),
25% of proteins (RDPs) are degraded within 30 min of their synthesis (t1/2 of
10 min (Fig. 1A)). Remaining stable proteins (SDPs) are degraded with a t1/2 of >1000 min. Addition of CHX to the chase medium had no significant effect on the degradation of RDPs or SDPs.
|
70 min (16). Cells were radiolabeled for 5 min with [35S]Met and chased in the presence or absence of CHX. Total cell lysates were directly analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the NP(KEKE)-S-GFP band was quantitated by phosphor imager analysis. This revealed that CHX had no significant effect on proteasome-mediated degradation of NP(KEKE)-S-GFP (Fig. 1B). These findings are consistent with numerous prior studies using a variety of cell types showing that CHX does not interfere with the degradation of SDPs unless cells are in a catabolic state induced by nutrient deprivation (reviewed in Ref. 17).
Generation of Kb-SIINFEKL complexes from NP-S-GFP DRiPs
We next studied the effect of CHX on Ag presentation from a defined Ag. We used a rVV that expresses wild-type NP genetically fused with the chicken OVA-derived Kb-binding peptide (SIINFEKL) and GFP at the COOH terminus. Like NP and GFP themselves, the fusion protein (NP-S-GFP) is highly stable, demonstrating negligible degradation within 4 h of its synthesis in L-Kb cells, as determined by pulse-chase labeling with [35S]Met and monitoring degradation by SDS-PAGE of total cell lysates (see Fig. 4A). Consistent with this finding, levels of GFP fluorescence were constant for 4 h following the addition of CHX to VV-NP-S-GFP-infected cells (6) (see Figs. 2C and 4C).
|
|
)4 = 6.25% remaining substrate).
Now for the crux of this experiment: if CHX blocks presentation solely by preventing the generation of NP-S-GFP DRiPs, then its action should be overcome if a pool of DRiPs has been created by transiently treating cells with MG132. We established that MG132 treatment does not significantly interfere with NP-S-GFP expression as determined by immunoblotting (Fig. 2B) or GFP fluorescence (Fig. 2C, left panel). To create a pool of NP-S-GFP DRiPs, we treated cells with MG132 between 180 and 300 min postinfection. We then removed MG132 and simultaneously added CHX (the drug treatment scheme is outlined in Fig. 2A). As seen in Fig. 2C (right panel), after a 60-min lag period, the generation of Kb-SIINFEKL complexes resumed. The 60-min delay cannot be attributed to delayed recovery of proteasome activity following MG132 removal, which commences within a few minutes, at most, after removing the drug (S. Qian, J. Bennink, and J. Yewdell, manuscript in preparation). Rather, the 60-min lag represents the time required for DRiP degradation, peptide loading, and transport of Kb-SIINFEKL complexes to the cell surface. Complex delivery continued for 100 min and reached
50% the level achieved by cells that had not been exposed to MG132. The partial recovery of Kb-SIINFEKL expression after MG132 reversal relative to cells treated only with CHX is probably related, at least in part, to the observation that after removal of MG132, cells degrade only a fraction of the RDPs rescued from degradation by MG132 treatment (Qian et al., manuscript in preparation).
This experiment demonstrates that cells are capable of generating SIINFEKL from NP-S-GFP in the presence of CHX as long as the pool of DRiPs is expanded by temporarily blocking proteasome activity. Thus, in this system, the rapid inhibitory effect of CHX on the generation of Kb-SIINFEKL from NP-S-GFP indicates that peptides are generated from the relatively small pool of rapidly degraded DRiPs and not from the turnover of the much larger pool of native NP-S-GFP.
Generation of cellular Kb peptide ligands from RDPs
To generalize these findings to overall peptide ligand generation, we repeated this experiment using the HB-176 mAb, which recognizes conformed H-2Kb molecules independently of the nature of their peptide ligand. Cells were pretreated with MG132 or DMSO for 2 h and then acid stripped to reduce the levels of Kb staining and thereby increase the sensitivity of detecting newly arriving Kb molecules. Note that after acid stripping the residual level of Kb molecules was slightly decreased in cells treated with MG132 relative to control cells (Fig. 3A). Addition of CHX to cells resulted in steadily decreasing levels of Kb, which is most likely due to a combination of shedding, unfolding, and internalization of cell surface Kb. Including MG132 with CHX had little effect on the rate of cell surface Kb loss. By contrast, transiently treating cells with MG132 for 2 h before adding CHX decreased the rate of Kb loss. The net effect of MG132-induced accumulation of RDPs on Kb delivery to the cell surface can be more clearly seen by transforming the data to account for the Kb cell surface loss resulting from the protein synthesis blockade alone (Fig. 3B). This reveals that after a lag period of 60 min following the removal of MG132, accelerated Kb delivery to the cell surface occurs at a constant rate for next 120 min.
|
Generation of TAP-peptide substrates from RDPs
To more directly measure the generation of cytosolic peptides that are relevant to Ag presentation, TAP activity was determined by FRAP analysis using MelJuSo cells expressing TAP1-GFP (see Materials and Methods). As previously reported (8), cells treated with MG132 (Fig. 3C, top dashed line) demonstrated increased TAP diffusion (D) in the ER membrane relative to untreated cells ("control," bottom dashed line) due to the decrease in cytosolic peptide supply. An effect of the same magnitude is achieved by incubating cells with a mixture of CHX and MG132 (data not shown). Removal of MG132 or MG132/CHX after 2-h pretreatment of cells results in full restoration of TAP D within 510 min (data not shown). Remarkably, pretreating cells for 2 h with MG132 and then removing MG132 simultaneously with adding CHX alone results in a burst of TAP activity (Fig. 3C, squares). This persists for between 10 and 15 min before returning to baseline levels, consistent with a t1/2 of
7 min or less (three t1/2 in 20 min) for degradation of the RDP pool created by the MG132 blockade. By contrast, no such burst of peptide generation is seen if cells are incubated with both CHX and MG132 before the MG132 reversal in the presence of CHX (triangles). Thus, as with Kb-SIINFEKL generation from NP-S-GFP, cytosolic antigenic peptide generation occurs in the presence of CHX as long as a pool of RDPs is preserved from degradation by MG132 blockade of proteasomal degradation.
These data demonstrate that the effects of CHX on TAP mobility are due to the absence of RDPs and not downstream effects of blocking protein synthesis. Importantly, this means that the prior observation (repeated in this study) that blocking protein synthesis achieves a similar level of peptide depletion as blocking proteasome degradation (8) implies that SDPs are an inefficient source of antigenic cytosolic peptides relative to RDPs.
Selected peptide generation from RDPs following deliberate DRiP generation
We next examined the capacity of cells to generate peptides from SDPs created from NP-S-GFP by incubating rVV-infected L-Kb cells with 15 mM canavanine. Canavanine is an Arg analog in which the
-methylene group is replaced by oxygen. Canavanine replaces Arg on tRNAArg and is incorporated into proteins, where it induces misfolding and degradation (16, 19). Incorporation of canavanine into NP-S-GFP-destabilizes the protein, which now is degraded with a t1/2 of 4 h as determined by pulse-chase analysis using whole cell lysates resolved by SDS-PAGE to measure levels of NP-S-GFP (Fig. 4A). Degradation is mediated by proteasomes, as inferred by MG132 stabilization of NP-S-GFP. Canavanine does not affect the degradation of (R)NP-S-GFP (6), the N-end rule targeted form of NP-S-GFP (Fig. 4A), but does have a generalized destabilizing effect on viral and cellular proteins (Fig. 4A, right panel).
Addition of canavanine to cells 115 min postinfection results in decreased rate of synthesis of folded (i.e., fluorescent) NP-S-GFP, and a corresponding increase in Kb-SIINFEKL complex formation (Fig. 4B). The latter cannot be attributed to canavanine-induced alterations in the efficiency of SIINFEKL liberation from NP or on general cell metabolism, because canavanine has little effect on Kb-SIINFEKL generation from (R)NP-S-GFP (Fig. 4B).
We next examined the effect of CHX on Kb-SIINFEKL generation by cells incubated with canavanine from the start of infection with VV-NP-S-GFP. CHX caused an immediate cessation of GFP accumulation in both canavanine-treated and untreated cells. Interestingly, canavanine treatment did not result in destabilization of fluorescent NP-S-GFP, whose levels remained constant over the 3-h CHX incubation (Fig. 4C). This indicates that the destabilized canavanine-NP-S-GFP detected biochemically represents misfolded molecules that are nonfluorescent, reminiscent of a similar discrepancy we previously reported in the biochemical vs fluorescent stability of NP(KEKE)-S-GFP (6). Fluorescent NP-S-GFP synthesized in the presence of canavanine presumably lacks canavanine residues in the positions critical to induce misfolding sufficiently severe to result in degradation.
Most importantly, the effect of CHX on the generation of Kb-SIINFEKL complex formation is remarkably similar in canavanine-treated and untreated cells, with both attaining plateau values 120 min post-CHX addition. This can be most clearly seen by normalizing the data to account for the greater efficiency of peptide generation from canavanine-induced misfolded NP-S-GFP (Fig. 4D). Note that at the 120-min post-CHX addition time point there should still be a healthy pool of canavanine-misfolded, nonfluorescent NP-S-GFP as well as unloaded Kb in the ER to maintain complex generation (the latter as inferred from the data in Fig. 2C, right panel, which demonstrates that complexes can be delivered to the cell surface for at least 180 min following CHX). Thus, the highly similar kinetics observed following CHX treatment of canavanine-treated and untreated L-Kb cells is consistent with the idea that the nonfluorescent pool of misfolded canavanine-NP-S-GFP that is degraded with a t1/2 of 4 h is an inefficient source of SIINFEKL.
This leads us to conclude that not all DRiPs are equal as sources of antigenic peptides. For NP-S-GFP, the canavanine-induced increase in Kb-SIINFEKL generation appears to be due not to the slowly degraded DRiP pool evident in Fig. 4A, but to an increase in the pool of rapidly degraded NP-S-GFP DRiPs. This population is not apparent in the pulse-chase experiment, due either to: 1) low abundance (it would be difficult to detect a RDP population amounting to a few percent of the total); 2) migration at a different (and possibly heterogeneous) molecular weight due to downstream initiation or premature termination; or 3) a combination of 1 and 2.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data in Fig. 3 provide clear evidence that overall peptide ligand generation from SDPs is limited in L-Kb and MelJuSo cells. This cannot be attributed to the number of SDP substrates degraded per unit time, because this represents
50% of the number of RDPs degraded per unit time in L-Kb cells (6). The logical implication is that peptide ligands are generated at much higher efficiency from RDPs than SDPs in MelJuSo cells.
There is published evidence for differences in efficiency of peptide ligand generation from different proteasome substrates. We previously reported that the efficiency of generating Kb-SIINFEKL from two highly similar forms of NP-S-GFP differed by >2-fold (6). There is a 100-fold difference in the published efficiencies of peptide generation from biosynthesized viral proteins (1 complex generated for
2000 proteins degraded) and bacterial proteins secreted into the cytosol (1 complex generated for
20 proteins degraded) (6, 20). It is difficult to understand how cross-presentation of viral and cellular Ags could function at the inefficiency associated with endogenous Ag processing given the limited amounts of Ag delivered to the cytosol from endosomes/phagosomes (21).
We propose that the processing of SDPs into peptide ligands is highly inefficient to enable class I molecules to sample what is being translated rather than on what has been translated. This mechanism would enable TCD8 to monitor the acute expression of viral genes with minimal competition from the turnover of SDPs. In rapidly dividing cultured cells, SDPs constitute
30% of proteasome substrates (6), and possibly more if the fraction of RDPs is lower than previously estimated, as has been recently suggested (22). In nondividing cells, however, long-lived proteins probably comprise more than half the proteasome substrates, because the rate of protein synthesis will be decreased by
40%, which represents the fraction of proteins synthesized by cultured cells to enable division every 24 h (6). By largely ignoring the turnover of SDPs, the immune system could potentially double its sensitivity in detecting a virus infection. This may seem like a marginal advantage, but given that some viruses can begin to release progeny within 4 h of infection, a doubling in the speed of detection may be critically important to control rapidly replicating viruses.
There is evidence that SDPs are not always a poor source of peptide ligands. We previously reported that NP-S-GFP itself and NP(KEKE)-S-GFP provide peptides from both rapidly and slowly degraded pools in L-Kb cells (6). For unknown reasons, using L-Kb cells derived from the same original clone, we now do not typically observe the continued generation of Kb-SIINFEKL complexes at a reduced rate at the tail end of CHX treatment that was apparent in Fig. 3C in reference (6). Mature dendritic cells infected with influenza A virus have been reported to delay peptide generation from NP (23), presumably due to the storage of DRiPs in dendritic cell aggresome-like-induced structures (24). These findings suggest that cells possess the capacity to modulate peptide generation from RDP and SDP pools. In the case of dendritic cells, this appears to be accomplished by storing RDPs in dendritic cell aggresome-like-induced structure. The purpose of this, however, may not be to skew presentation toward SDPs, but rather to allow the dendritic cell Ag processing machinery to focus on exogenous Ags delivered to the cytosol for cross-presentation.
It would be a mistake to consider RDP and SDP pools as homogeneous, or to consign all DRiPs to the RDP pool. With a t1/2 of 4 h, the major population of canavanyl-NP DRiPs falls into the SDP pool. The SDP pool of NP-S-GFP giving rise to the delayed Ag presentation in reference (6) is still probably DRiPs, because the t1/2 of full-length NP is on the order of days, not hours. Regarding RDP heterogeneity, we recently reported that
20% of RDPs are degraded by proteasomes independently of ubiquitin or 19S regulators (7). Importantly, it appeared that such RDPs are a preferred source of antigenic peptides from NP-S-GFP. Alternative targeting signals might be used to deliver such RDPs to proteasomes particularly adept at generating antigenic peptides. One possibility is FAT10, a MHC-encoded ubiquitin-like protein (25) recently shown to function as a proteasome-targeting signal (26).
Alternatively, the intimate relationship between translation and Ag presentation might represent a physical linkage among ribosomes, proteasomes, and TAP to enable direct channeling of proteasome products to class I molecules in the loading complex (27). This would protect these peptides from highly active cytosolic endopeptidases and aminopeptidases (28) and would also limit competition from other peptides for binding to class I molecules. A direct linkage between ribosomes and class I molecules would provide some potential advantages. First, it could maximize the rapidity of detecting virus-infected cells. Second, it would be more difficult for viruses to block Ag presentation by overexpressing nonimmunogenic peptides with high affinity for class I molecules. Third, cells would broaden their repertoire of self peptide ligands by minimizing the monopolizing effects of cellular peptides of unusual abundance or class I binding affinity. This would be useful for thymic selection and for recognition of tumor cells.
What might such immunoribosomes look like? In response to multiple stress signals, including viral infections, cells block cap-dependent translation by phosphorylating translation eukaryotic initiation factor 2
. Cap-independent translation continues, however, and intriguingly, Shastri and colleagues (29) have found that translation of a CUG-initiated antigenic peptide might even be enhanced under these conditions. Nicchitta and colleagues (30, 31) recently reported that under conditions of eukaryotic initiation factor 2
phosphorylation induced by ER stress, translation of ER-bound ribosomes continued, while free ribosome translation was inhibited. Intriguingly, a subset of ER-bound ribosomes was found to be translating mRNA of cytosolic/nuclear proteins.
These findings demonstrate that translation is more heterogeneous than is generally appreciated. Another fact consistent with this conclusion is the presence of
500 tRNA genes in mammals. To some extent, this large number probably reflects the requirement to generate sufficient amounts of tRNAs needed to support translation (
108 copies per cell). There is an amazingly high degree of heterogeneity, however, among the tRNA genes, suggesting that tRNAs may be used on a selective basis for translation of certain mRNAs in specific locales under specific conditions. Remarkably, approximately one-third of all tRNAs reside in the MHC (32, 33), raising the possibility that these tRNAs are selectively used for some immune function, perhaps including the generation of RDPs dedicated for Ag processing.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jonathan W. Yewdell, Laboratory of Viral Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-0440. E-mail address: jyewdell{at}nih.gov ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ER, endoplasmic reticulum; CHX, cycloheximide; D, diffusion; DRiP, defective ribosomal product; FRAP, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching; NP, nucleoprotein; RDP, rapidly degraded polypeptide; SDP, slowly degraded polypeptide; VV, vaccinia virus. ![]()
Received for publication January 17, 2006. Accepted for publication April 7, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.-H. Fortier, E. Caron, M.-P. Hardy, G. Voisin, S. Lemieux, C. Perreault, and P. Thibault The MHC class I peptide repertoire is molded by the transcriptome J. Exp. Med., March 17, 2008; 205(3): 595 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zuo, W. Thomas, D. van Leeuwen, J. M. Middeldorp, E. J. H. J. Wiertz, M. E. Ressing, and M. Rowe The DNase of Gammaherpesviruses Impairs Recognition by Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells through an Additional Host Shutoff Function J. Virol., March 1, 2008; 82(5): 2385 - 2393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Goldwich, S. S. C. Hahn, S. Schreiber, S. Meier, E. Kampgen, R. Wagner, M. B. Lutz, and U. Schubert Targeting HIV-1 Gag into the Defective Ribosomal Product Pathway Enhances MHC Class I Antigen Presentation and CD8+ T Cell Activation J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 372 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lelouard, E. K. Schmidt, V. Camosseto, G. Clavarino, M. Ceppi, H.-T. Hsu, and P. Pierre Regulation of translation is required for dendritic cell function and survival during activation J. Cell Biol., December 31, 2007; 179(7): 1427 - 1439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |