|
|
||||||||





* Graduate Program in Immunology, Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University,
Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling, Rockefeller University, and
Arthritis and Tissue Degeneration Program, and Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and internalization of IL-10R, and was independent of TLR2 and phagocytosis. Inhibition of IL-10 signaling and function required direct contact with zymosan, and cells in an inflammatory environment that had not contacted zymosan remained responsive to the paracrine activity of zymosan-induced IL-10. These results reveal a mechanism that regulates IL-10 function such that antimicrobial functions of infected macrophages are not suppressed, but the activation of surrounding noninfected cells and subsequent tissue damage are limited. The fate of individual cells in an inflammatory microenvironment is thus specified by dynamic interactions among host cells, microbes, and cytokines that determine the balance between protection and pathology. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
are important for host defense, whereas anti-inflammatory factors such as IL-10 are produced as part of a feedback inhibition loop that limits inflammation and thereby limits tissue damage and the emergence of autoimmunity. However, IL-10 can also impair microbial clearance and facilitates the local outgrowth of microorganisms (1). Therefore, an important issue is how the expression and function of IL-10 are regulated to achieve a balance that ensures effective immunity but limits tissue damage.
Historically, the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines has been considered to be determined primarily by regulation of the expression of cytokines and their receptors (2). IL-10 is a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine that is very effective at suppressing TNF-
production in response to individual macrophage activators, such as the TLR4 ligand LPS. However, emerging evidence suggests that in more complex inflammatory settings IL-10, even when expressed at high levels, may not be effective in suppressing TNF-
production. For example, TNF-
and IL-10 are coexpressed during inflammation (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) and, following infection, the production of IL-10 appears to correlate both with the severity of the inflammatory insult and the plasma concentration of TNF-
(6, 8). Moreover, human trials of IL-10 therapy have shown lack of efficacy in suppressing TNF-
-dependent inflammation (9, 10). These observations suggest that there are mechanisms that compromise the anti-inflammatory function of IL-10 during inflammation. To explore this phenomenon, we used zymosan stimulation of macrophages as a model system to study the effects of PAMPs on the function of IL-10.
Zymosan is a cell wall preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that has been used for over 50 years as a model phagocytic and inflammatory stimulus both in vivo and in vitro (11, 12, 13). Zymosan is composed of
-glucans, mannans, chitins, and activates several macrophage receptors, including TLR2, dectin-1, the mannose receptor, and CD11b/CD18 (complement receptor 3). Recent reports have advanced the notion that simultaneous engagement of different macrophage receptors, such as TLR2 and dectin-1, by zymosan synergistically activates inflammatory pathways leading to increased TNF-
production and an oxidative burst (11, 14). Dectin-1, a C type lectin that recognizes
-glucans, also signals independently of TLR2 by activating Syk kinase via an ITAM, leading to induction of IL-2 and IL-10 production (15). An important role for zymosan and dectin-1 in inducing chronic autoimmune arthritis via activation of innate immune mechanisms and cytokine production has been demonstrated (16). In this study, we investigated whether zymosan regulates cytokine function by modulating signal transduction. We found that although zymosan induces both TNF-
and IL-10, the function of IL-10 is blocked at the signaling level by a protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent mechanism that requires direct contact of cells with zymosan.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary human macrophages and murine thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages were obtained as previously described (17, 18). IL-10 and IFN-
were purchased from PeproTech, zymosan from Molecular Probes, and Pam3CysSer(Lys)4 from EMC Microcollections. Abs against Stat1, Stat3, Jak1, and Tyk2 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology or BD Transduction Laboratories. GF109203X, SB203580, PD98059, actinomycin D, PKC
-specific C2-4 inhibitory peptide (SLNPEWNET), and PKC
-specific inhibitory peptide (EAVSLKPT) were purchased from Calbiochem. Cytochalasin D was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Immunoblotting, EMSA, and immunoprecipitation
Whole cell extract preparation, immunoblotting, immunoprecipitation, and EMSA were performed as previously described (17).
Immunofluorescence microscopy
Cells were cultured in LabTek chamber slides (Nalge Nunc International) and processed for immunofluorescence studies. Briefly, cells were fixed and permeabilized with cold methanol, and stained with primary rabbit anti-Stat3 or rabbit IgG as control, and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary Abs (Molecular Probes). Cells were imaged using a Leica DC 200 digital camera (Leica, Switzerland) attached to a Zeiss Axioplan microscope. Images were imported into Adobe Photoshop 7.0.
Cell surface biotinylation
The assay was performed as described (19). Cells were washed three times in PBS at 4°C and labeled with 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-biotin (N-hyroxysulfosuccinimide biotin; Pierce) in PBS for 30 min on ice. Lysis buffer was added for 30 min on ice and clarified lysates were then precipitated with avidin-agarose beads.
ELISA and flow cytometry
For ELISA, paired TNF-
, IL-10, and IL-6 capture and detection Abs were purchased from R&D Systems and used in a sandwich ELISA, according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
FACS analysis of IL-10R levels at the cell surface was conducted using the FLUOROKINE kit according to the instructions of the manufacturer (R&D Systems). A total of 105 human primary macrophages were washed twice with 1x RDF1 (R&D flow specific-1) wash buffer, resuspended in 25 µl of PBS, and incubated with 30 ng of biotinylated IL-10 at 4°C for 1 h. As a negative staining control, an identical sample of cells was stained with 50 ng of a biotinylated negative control protein (soybean trypsin inhibitor) provided by the manufacturer. As a specificity control, anti-human IL-10 Ab was used to block the interaction of biotinylated IL-10 with its receptor. Cells were then washed three times in RDF1 buffer, and incubated with avidin-conjugated FITC (2.2 µg/ml) at 4°C for 30 min. The cells were then washed twice and analyzed with a FACScan cytometer and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Cells present in the macrophage gate as defined by forward and side light scatter were analyzed, and dead cells were excluded by propidium iodide staining.
For phagocytosis experiments, human primary macrophages were preincubated with or without 4 µM cytochalasin D for 1 h followed by stimulation with Texas Red-labeled zymosan (Molecular Probes) for 1 h at 37°C. A weak but specific signal was obtained by exciting the Texas Red fluorochrome by a standard argon laser emitting at 488 nm and detection by the 650 nm FL2 filters on a FACScan cytometer and data were analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Gene expression analysis
The 1 µg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using oligo(dT) primers and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. Real-time PCR was performed as previously described (18). mRNA amounts were normalized relative to GAPDH mRNA.
Transfection of inhibitory peptides
Peptides were transfected into primary human macrophages using the Amaxa Nucleofector apparatus according to the manufacturers specifications. Briefly, peptides (50 µM) were incubated with 107 human primary macrophages in 100 µl of Human Monocyte Nucleofector Solution provided in the Amaxa Human Monocyte Nucleofector kit and electroporated using nucleofector program Y-01. Cells were then transferred into 0.5-ml Human Monocyte Nucleofector medium (Amaxa) and zymosan and IL-10 were added 1 h later.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IL-10 is induced by PAMPs and can mediate a feedback inhibition loop that limits inflammatory cytokine production. The suppressive effects of IL-10 on TLR-induced cytokine production are well documented (1). We compared the regulation of TNF-
and IL-10 production and IL-10 function by the purified TLR2 ligand Pam3CysSer(Lys)4 and by zymosan, which activates TNF-
production via TLR2 but also engages additional pattern recognition receptors. Primary human blood-derived macrophages were stimulated with zymosan or with the soluble TLR2 ligand Pam3CysSer(Lys)4 at concentrations that activated similar levels of TLR2-induced signal transduction (data not shown), and cytokine production was measured. Zymosan induced higher levels of TNF-
and IL-10 than did Pam3CysSer(Lys)4 (Fig. 1A). Next, we examined whether the IL-10 expressed in these cultures signaled in an autocrine manner. IL-10 activates the tyrosine phosphorylation and DNA binding activity of Stat3, which is required for its anti-inflammatory activity (20, 21). Stat3 activation was consistently observed 6 h after stimulation with Pam3CysSer(Lys)4 (Fig. 1B, lanes 68), and the kinetics of Stat3 activation were consistent with the kinetics of IL-10 production (Fig. 1A). Endogenous IL-10 was mainly responsible for Stat3 activation in Pam3CysSer(Lys)4-stimulated macrophages, as Stat3 activation was almost completely blocked by anti-IL-10 but not by control Abs (Fig. 1C). In marked contrast to Pam3CysSer(Lys)4-stimulated macrophages, Stat3 activation was completely absent in zymosan-stimulated macrophages (Fig. 1B, lanes 24). This result suggested that either the IL-10 present in culture supernatants of zymosan-stimulated macrophages was not biologically active, or that the macrophages had become refractory to IL-10.
|
produced by macrophages stimulated with zymosan (Fig. 1A). Inhibition of IL-10 signaling
To investigate the mechanism of inhibition of IL-10 signaling by zymosan, we first tested the effects of zymosan on signaling by exogenous IL-10 that was added to macrophage cultures. As expected, stimulation of macrophages with IL-10 induced Stat3 tyrosine phosphorylation, nuclear localization, and DNA binding activity, whereas preincubation with zymosan effectively blocked all these effects (Fig. 2, AD). Inhibition of IL-10 signaling by zymosan was concentration-dependent (Fig. 2B). Inhibition of IL-10 signaling was not observed even with saturating concentrations of the TLR2 ligand Pam3CysSer(Lys)4 (Fig. 2A and data not shown), indicating that activation of TLR2 is not sufficient to suppress IL-10 signaling. Lack of suppression of IL-10 signaling by TLR2 is consistent with the established ability of IL-10 to suppress TLR function (1). A kinetic experiment showed that inhibition of IL-10 signaling by zymosan was time-dependent. Addition of zymosan at the same time, or 5 min before addition of IL-10 had minimal effect on IL-10 signaling (Fig. 2C). Suppression of IL-10 signaling by zymosan was readily apparent after 15 min of pretreatment with zymosan, and sustained even after prolonged exposure of macrophages to zymosan for 16 h (Fig. 2C); comparable viability of macrophages with or without zymosan was verified using cell counts and trypan blue exclusion (data not shown). IL-10 signaling was blocked at every time point when the incubation with IL-10 was varied from 5 to 90 min (data not shown), indicating that zymosan did not alter the kinetics of IL-10-induced Stat3 activation, but inhibited activation. The strong and long lasting effect of zymosan on IL-10 signaling suggested that zymosan would have significant functional consequences in terms of inhibiting IL-10 induction of gene expression. Indeed, zymosan inhibited the expression of IL-10-inducible genes concomitantly with suppression of signaling (Fig. 2E). These results demonstrate that zymosan suppressed IL-10 function concomitant with suppression of IL-10 signaling.
|
is a strong activator of macrophages that also activates Jak-STAT signaling. We investigated the specificity of zymosan-induced inhibition of signaling by determining the effects of zymosan on IFN-
-induced signaling and gene expression. Zymosan had minimal effect on activation of Stat1 by IFN-
(Fig. 2F) and did not suppress activation of gene expression by IFN-
(Fig. 2G). Thus, zymosan preferentially suppressed signaling by the deactivating cytokine IL-10. Inhibition of IL-10 signaling by zymosan is a direct effect
Zymosan induces many proinflammatory cytokines, mediators, and reactive oxygen intermediates that could potentially suppress IL-10 signaling (22). We addressed a potential role for zymosan-induced soluble mediators in inhibition of IL-10 signaling by using Transwell cultures (Fig. 3A). Zymosan was added to only the top chamber for 30 min and IL-10 or IL-6 was then added to both chambers. IL-6 signaling was inhibited in macrophages in both top and bottom chambers, consistent with the previously reported inhibition of IL-6 signaling by inflammatory factors such as IL-1 and reactive oxygen intermediates (23). In contrast, IL-10 signaling was inhibited in cells in the top chamber that directly contacted zymosan, but not cells in the bottom chamber that were exposed only to zymosan-induced secreted factors. In addition, IL-10 signaling was not inhibited by IL-1 or TNF-
(Fig. 3B), inflammatory factors that are induced by zymosan and strongly inhibit IL-6 signaling (23, 24). These results indicate that zymosan-induced inhibition of IL-10 signaling is not mediated by soluble factors and suggest that zymosan may suppress IL-10 signaling by a direct pathway.
|
Zymosan inhibits of IL-10 signaling through a PKC-dependent pathway
We wished to identify the zymosan-induced signaling pathway that inhibited IL-10 signaling. Our group and others have described rapid inhibition of Jak-STAT signaling that is dependent upon PKC, ERK, or p38 kinases and is mediated by posttranslational modification of signaling molecules (17, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31). We used specific kinase inhibitors to investigate the role of these kinases in zymosan-induced inhibition of IL-10 signaling. As shown in Fig. 4A, inhibitors of ERKs and p38 had no effect on IL-10 signaling. In contrast, the PKC inhibitor GF109203X reversed zymosan-mediated inhibition of STAT DNA binding and tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 4A), indicating that zymosan inhibits IL-10 signaling by a direct pathway that uses PKC. The requirement for PKC in zymosan-mediated inhibition of IL-10 signaling was further investigated using elicited peritoneal macrophages from PKC
- and PKC
-deficient mice (18, 32, 33). Zymosan-mediated inhibition of IL-10 signaling that was apparent in macrophages from control genetically matched mice (Fig. 4B, lanes 2 and 3) was almost completely abrogated in macrophages deficient in PKC
(Fig. 4B, lanes 5 and 6). This demonstrates a major role for PKC
in zymosan-induced inhibition of IL-10 signaling in murine elicited peritoneal macrophages. In PKC
-deficient macrophages, zymosan inhibited IL-10 signaling almost as strongly as in control macrophages (Fig. 4B, lanes 8 and 9). This partial effect of PKC
deficiency, which was weak but reproducible, suggests that PKC
can contribute to inhibition of IL-10 signaling by zymosan, consistent with the reported role for PKC
in mediating inhibition of IL-10 signaling by Fc
R in IFN-
-preactivated macrophages (18).
|
in suppression of IL-10 signaling by zymosan in human macrophages. Several approaches to RNA interference-mediated suppression of PKC
expression in primary human macrophages were not successful at the protein level, and instead we used a specific peptide inhibitor of PKC
that blocks PKC
translocation to membranes and thus inhibits its interaction with substrates. Inhibition of PKC
by a specific peptide inhibitor abrogated the ability of zymosan to inhibit IL-10 signaling in human macrophages, whereas a peptide inhibitor of PKC
had no effect (Fig. 4C). These results, taken together with the results obtained using murine PKC
-deficient macrophages (Fig. 4B), support a role for PKC
in the regulation of IL-10 responses by zymosan. Phagocytosis, opsonization, TLR2, and CD11b are dispensable for zymosan-mediated inhibition of IL-10 signaling
Zymosan is rapidly phagocytosed and directly activates several macrophage receptors that can potentially activate PKC
and thereby inhibit IL-10 signaling, including TLR2, CD11b/CD18 (CR3), dectin-1, and the mannose receptor. In addition, zymosan can be opsonized by serum proteins such as Abs and complement, thus activating Fc and complement receptors that also activate PKC
and might inhibit IL-10 signaling. We wished to address the role of phagocytosis, opsonization, and known zymosan receptors in mediating inhibition of IL-10 signaling. Latex beads of a size similar to zymosan that were phagocytosed to a comparable extent as zymosan, and larger Ab-coated erythrocytes that were effectively phagocytosed, had no effect on IL-10-induced activation of Stat3 (18) (Fig. 5A). Thus, phagocytosis alone was not sufficient to inhibit IL-10 signaling. To address whether phagocytosis was necessary for inhibition of IL-10 signaling, we used cytochalasin D to block phagocytosis. As shown in Fig. 5B, cytochalasin D effectively blocked phagocytosis of zymosan, but had no effect on zymosan-mediated inhibition on IL-10 signaling. Inhibition of IL-10 signaling by zymosan also did not require opsonization by serum proteins (such as complement or Abs), as IL-10 signaling was effectively inhibited under serum-free conditions (Fig. 5C).
|
Down-regulation of cell surface IL-10 receptor levels by zymosan
PKC has been shown to induce internalization of cell surface receptors mediated by phosphorylation-dependent activation of internalization motifs present in receptor cytoplasmic domains (37). We investigated the effects of zymosan on macrophage cell surface IL-10R levels. Stimulation with zymosan led to a rapid decrease of cell surface IL-10 binding sites, as assessed using biotinylated IL-10 that primarily binds to IL-10R1 (Fig. 6A). Cell surface expression of IL-10R2, a signaling component of the IL-10R that plays a less important role in ligand binding, was nearly completely absent after zymosan treatment, as assessed by immunoblotting of precipitated plasma membrane proteins (Fig. 6B). In contrast, total cellular IL-10R2 levels did not change (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that zymosan induces internalization of the IL-10R, and are consistent with previous work demonstrating rapid cycling of IL-10R between the cell surface and intracellular compartments (22). Decreased cell surface expression of IL-10R would suppress proximal steps in IL-10 signal transduction. Indeed, activation of IL-10R-associated Jak1 and Tyk2 was suppressed after treatment with zymosan (Fig. 6C). These results demonstrate that zymosan inhibits IL-10 signaling at a proximal step, upstream of STATs.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TLRs are a critical link in recognition of microorganisms and the initiation of innate host defense, and are also potent inducers of both TNF-
and IL-10. However, we have demonstrated in this study that TLR2, the major TLR activated by zymosan, is not essential for zymosan-mediated inhibition on IL-10 signaling. Thus, signaling pathways different from the MyD88/TIRAP-dependent NF-
B and MAPK pathways downstream of TLR2 are involved in inhibition of IL-10 (Fig. 6D). In addition, IL-10 signaling was not inhibited by the TLR4 activator LPS (Z. Du, unpublished observation), therefore MyD88-independent pathways downstream of TLRs are not sufficient to inhibit IL-10 signaling. It follows that ligation of macrophage receptors other than TLRs by zymosan is required for inhibition of IL-10 signaling.
Of several zymosan receptors that are likely ligated in our system, we have ruled out a role for Fc receptors and complement receptors, including CD11b/CD18. The identity of the zymosan receptor that mediates inhibition of IL-10 signaling remains unknown, but such a receptor must be capable of activating PKC
. One intriguing possibility is the
-glucan receptor dectin-1. Similar to other receptors previously shown to inhibit Jak-STAT signaling that activates kinases of the Zap70/Syk family (18, 29, 30), dectin-1 activates Syk, but whether dectin-1 activates PKC
is not known. Our attempts to date to block dectin-1 have been only partially successful, and the effects of blocking dectin-1 on IL-10 signaling have been modest and donor-dependent. Thus, the definitive resolution as to whether dectin-1 suppresses IL-10 signaling awaits the generation of dectin-1-deficient mice. It is possible that several zymosan receptors that activate Syk and PKC
work synergistically in the inhibition of IL-10 signaling, and the contribution of any individual receptor will be minor.
Taken together, our data indicate that the interplay between microbes, host cells, and cytokines plays an important role in the early innate immune response. The combination of rapid expression of IL-10 and regulation of IL-10 signaling may permit a rapid induction of a homeostatic response to inflammation while at the same time fine tuning this response to avoid excessive immunosuppression. Also, the preferential inhibition of IL-10 on zymosan-interacting cells, but not on zymosan-free cells, could in part explain how individual cell fate is determined at local sites of infection and may provide insight into the therapeutic failure of IL-10 in autoimmune/inflammatory diseases. The model we propose (Fig. 6D) with multiple functional interactions among zymosan, cells, and cytokines is that multiple, sequential interactions contribute to cell fate determination. We presume that this kind of complex regulation of cytokine signaling exists in part to permit a broad range of regulatory capabilities.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Lionel B. Ivashkiv, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address: ivashkivl{at}hss.edu ![]()
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; PKC, protein kinase C; SOCS, suppressors of cytokine signaling. ![]()
Received for publication May 18, 2005. Accepted for publication January 30, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-10 production by primed human monocytes following interaction with oxidatively modified autologous erythrocytes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 70: 289-296.
and cAMP elevating drugs. Int. Immunol. 7: 517-523.
. Gut 50: 191-195.
-glucans. J. Exp. Med. 197: 1119-1124.
-glucans and their receptor Dectin-1 in the induction of autoimmune arthritis in genetically susceptible mice. J. Exp. Med. 201: 949-960.
in whole blood. Eur. Cytokine Netw. 9: 633-638. [Medline]
interferon but not
interferon signal transduction by phorbol esters is mediated by a tyrosine phosphatase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 1419-1424. [Abstract]
controls self-antigen-induced B-cell tolerance. Nature 416: 860-865. [Medline]
-deficient mice. Science 273: 788-791. [Abstract]
chemotaxis and promotes protein kinase C (PKC)-induced internalization of CXCR4. J. Exp. Med. 189: 1461-1466.
priming results in a gain of proinflammatory function by IL-10: implications for systemic lupus erythematosus pathogenesis. J. Immunol. 172: 6476-6481.
signaling by glucocorticoids. J. Immunol. 170: 4833-4839.
-induced STAT1 activation and inflammatory function by Syk and ITAM-containing adaptors. Nat. Immunol. 5: 1181-1189. [Medline]
. J. Immunol. 171: 5034-5041.
protein kinase C in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 24180-24187.
cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 1417-1420. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Hu, J. Chen, L. Wang, and L. B. Ivashkiv Crosstalk among Jak-STAT, Toll-like receptor, and ITAM-dependent pathways in macrophage activation J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2007; 82(2): 237 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F. Weber, S. Schlautkotter, S. Kaiser-Moore, F. Altmayr, B. Holzmann, and H. Weighardt Inhibition of Interleukin-22 Attenuates Bacterial Load and Organ Failure during Acute Polymicrobial Sepsis Infect. Immun., April 1, 2007; 75(4): 1690 - 1697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |