|
|
||||||||
MAPK in Cytokine-Dependent, but Not Antigen Receptor-Dependent, Th1 Responses1


* Department of Pathology and Center for Immunology, and
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production in CD4+ T cells. Uncertainties regarding the specificity of pharmacologic inhibition or p38 dominant negative mutants diminish the strength of conclusions about the role of the p38
isoform in Th1 development. Also, the effects of some upstream p38 activators, such as MAPK kinase 3, on Th1 development are not as strong as the effects of other manipulations, such as the expression of a dominant negative p38 mutant. Finally, embryonic lethality has prevented a direct examination of p38
-deficient T cells. To test the requirement for p38
in Th1 differentiation, we generated Ag-specific p38
+/ and p38
/ CD4+ T cells using RAG2/ blastocyst complementation and retroviral expression of the DO11.10 TCR. IFN-
production in response to TCR signaling is normal in p38
/ T cells cultured in Th1 conditions, implying normal Th1 development. However, p38
/ Th1 cells have a much greater defect in IFN-
secretion stimulated by IL-12/IL-18 compared with TCR-induced IFN-
secretion. These results suggest that the activity of p38
in Th1 cells is relatively restricted to acting in one of two alternative pathways (i.e., cytokine induced) that can induce the production of IFN-
in differentiated Th1 cells, but that p38
is not required for the process of Th1 commitment and development itself. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-12 and the transcription factors T-bet and STAT4 (1, 2, 3, 4). Differentiated Th1 cells can produce large amounts of IFN-
in response to at least two distinct stimuli, being induced either by signaling through the TCR or by the combination of cytokines IL-12 and IL-18 (5, 6). These stimuli appear to use independent pathways for inducing IFN-
, based on the differential action of pharmacological inhibitors. First, treatment of Th1 cells with cyclosporin A (CsA)5 blocks IFN-
production in response to TCR signaling, but not IL-12/IL-18 stimulation (5). In contrast, treatment of Th1 cells with the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 blocks IFN-
production in response to IL-12/IL-18 (7, 8, 9), but not TCR stimulation.
Previous studies of p38
in Th1 development and IFN-
production have used indirect means of examination. Of the four p38 isoforms,
,
,
, and
, all are expressed in T lymphocytes except p38
(10). The major isoform in T cells is p38
, and it has been the focus of previous studies regarding regulation of IFN-
production (8, 9). p38
is activated by three upstream MAPK kinases (MKKs), MKK3, MKK4, and MKK6, which are activated by MKK kinase 4 (MEKK4) (11, 12, 13). MEKK4 can be regulated by growth arrest and DNA damage 45 (GADD45)
and GADD45
, which have been proposed to act in cytokine-induced and TCR-induced IFN-
production, respectively (7, 14, 15). A dominant negative p38
(9), p38-specific inhibitors (7, 8), and murine deficiencies in MKK3 (16), MEKK4 (17), GADD45
(18), and GADD45
(15) have suggested a role for p38
in either IFN-
production or Th1 development, but have not distinguished between an effect on Th1 differentiation or regulation of one of the pathways leading to acute IFN-
production. Moreover, an actual requirement for p38
has not been demonstrated for either Th1 development or IFN-
production due to the embryonic lethality caused by homozygous p38
disruption (19, 20, 21, 22).
To test whether p38
is required for either Th1 development or acute induction of IFN-
, we used RAG2/ blastocyst complementation coupled with retroviral expression of 
TCR subunits to generate p38
/ CD4+ T cells. Our results indicate that p38
is not required for Th1 development per se or for TCR-induced IFN-
production, but appears to be largely involved in the ability of differentiated Th1 cells to secrete large amounts of IFN-
in response to IL-12 and IL-18.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c, DO11.10 transgenic (23), and p38
+/ and p38
/ mice (24) were previously described. All animal studies were approved by the Washington University animal studies committee.
Abs and reagents
PE-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-
, allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-mouse IFN-
, PE-Cy5-conjugated anti-mouse CD4, allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-mouse CD4, and purified anti-CD3
were purchased from BD Biosciences. PE-conjugated anti-human CD4, Tri-Color-conjugated anti-human CD4, and PE-conjugated KJ126 were purchased from Caltag Laboratories.
Cell purifications and activation
Purified splenic CD4+ DO11.10 T cells were stimulated with irradiated BALB/c splenocytes and 0.3 µM OVA. Purified splenic CD4+ p38
+/ and p38
/ T cells were plated onto anti-CD3-coated plates (5 µg/ml) with anti-CD28 (2 µg/ml) at 1 x 106 cells/ml. All cultures received IFN-
(200 U/ml; gift from R. D. Schreiber, Washington University, St. Louis, MO), anti-IL-4 (11B11 hybridoma supernatant), IL-12 (10 U/ml), and IL-2 (40 U/ml; Takeda). All cells were restimulated on day 7 with irradiated BALB/c splenocytes, 0.3 µM OVA, IL-2, and Th1-inducing cytokines. After 2 wk of Th1 differentiation, cells were assayed for IFN-
production and passed weekly with irradiated BALB/c splenocytes, 0.3 µM OVA, IL-2, and anti-IL-4.
Retroviral constructs and infection
The
- and
-chains of DO11.10 TCR were cloned by PCR from DO11.10 splenic cDNA. DO
-internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-human (h) CD4-retrovirus (RV) was generated through cloning the DO11.10
-chain using the primers Xho-DO
, 5'-CCG CTC GAG AGA GCA ATG AAA ACA TAC GCT C and 3'-CCG CTC GAG TCA ACT GGA CCA CAG CCT CA, and digestion of the PCR product and IRES-hCD4-RV (25) with XhoI. The
-chain was cloned by removing the insert from mouse IL-12R
2-IRES-green fluorescence protein (GFP)-RV by BglII and XhoI digestion and subsequent ligation of a similarly digested insert using the primers BglII-DO
(5'-GAA GAT CTC CCA AGA TGG GCT CCA GGC T) and Xho-DO
(3'-CCG CTC GAG TCA TGA ATT CTT TCT TTT GAC CAT A) to create DO
-IRES-GFP-RV. After 36 h of stimulation with anti-CD3, the cells were infected with retroviral supernatant in the presence of polybrene (2 µg/ml) by spin infection. At 60 h, cells were harvested from anti-CD3-coated plates and expanded in the presence of IL-2 (40 U/ml) before a second infection. Cells were passaged weekly as described above and sorted by MoFlo (DakoCytomation) to >85% DO
-IRES-hCD4+, DO
-IRES-GFP+ before analysis.
Cytokine quantification
Resting T cells (days 1012 after stimulation) were stimulated at 1 x 106 cells/ml in 48-well plates for 8 h unless otherwise indicated. Cells were pretreated for 30 min with SB203580 (10 µM) or CsA (100 ng/ml) before addition of cytokines or transfer to anti-CD3 (5 µg/ml)-coated plates. For intracellular cytokine staining (ICS), brefeldin A (1 µg/ml; Epicentre Technology) was added for the final 4 h. For Ag stimulation, 5 x 106 irradiated BALB/c APCs/ml were used with either OVA or hemagglutinin (HA)518528; when indicated that IL-12 was neutralized, anti-IL-12 (TOSH hybridoma supernatant) was used. ICS and ELISA were performed as previously described (26). For ICS, cells were gated on live CD4+ populations; p38
lines were also gated on DO
-IRES-GFP and DO
-IRES-hCD4 expression.
Polymerase chain reaction
PCR was performed on p38
+/, p38
/, and BALB/c genomic DNA using the primers p38-forward (TGA TAA GCA GGT GTT GTG GC), p38-reverse (AGA TTC ACT CAC ACG TCA ATT G), and Neo2 (TAT CAG GAC ATA GCG TTG GC).
Western blotting
Cellular lysates of p38
+/, p38
/, and DO11.10 Th1 cells were analyzed by 10% acrylamide gel, blotted with anti-p38 (1/1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and reprobed with anti-actin (1/1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (1/50,000; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) was used as a secondary Ab for both Abs.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production compared with TCR-induced IFN-
production in differentiated Th1 cells
We and others have found p38
to be selectively required for cytokine-induced IFN-
production in Th1 cells, but not for TCR-induced IFN-
production (7, 8). Because we previously examined only the effects of p38 inhibitors on IFN-
secretion as measured by ELISA, we began in this study by comparing IFN-
production measured by both ELISA and ICS (Fig. 1). The secretion of IFN-
in DO11.10 Th1 cells induced by IL-12 and IL-18 was inhibited by the p38 inhibitor SB203580, but not by CsA (Fig. 1, A and B, left panels), as found previously (7). Secretion of IFN-
induced by anti-CD3 stimulation was not inhibited by SB203580, but was strongly inhibited by CsA (Fig. 1), also consistent with our previous analysis based on IFN-
ELISA. ICS analysis confirmed the selective action of the p38 inhibitor SB203580 on IL-12/IL-18-induced IFN-
production (Fig. 1B). Treatment of Th1 cells with SB203580 led to a large reduction in the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of ICS for IFN-
induced by IL-12/IL-18. Interestingly, a slight reduction in the MFI of ICS for IFN-
induced by TCR signaling was observed, but this was less dramatic than the reduction seen with IL-12/IL-18 stimulation and was not associated with a reduction in secreted IFN-
measured by ELISA.
|
or p38
(27), the results of these and previous studies cannot identify which p38 isoform might be involved. Also, SB203580 blocks cellular proliferation by a non-p38
-dependent mechanism (8, 24) and thus cannot be used to examine Th1 development, which requires cellular expansion (28). Therefore, we wanted to generate Ag-specific T cells that were either heterozygous for p38
or deficient in p38
to allow analysis of the role of p38
in Th1 development.
Generation of p38
+/ and p38
/ T cell lines expressing DO11.10 TCR
Briefly, p38
+/ or p38
/ CD4+ T cells generated by RAG2/ blastocyst complementation were stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in vitro for 3 days under Th1-inducing conditions and infected with retroviruses, DO
-IRES-hCD4 and DO
-IRES-GFP, expressing the
- and
-chains of DO11.10 TCR, after 36 and 60 h of stimulation, as recently described (29) (Fig. 2A). We assessed retroviral infection by FACS before restimulation with irradiated APCs and OVA323339 peptide (OVA; Fig. 2B). Initially,
4% of T cells expressed both viral markers, and an additional 9% each expressed only one of the markers (Fig. 2B, first panel). After 1 wk of Ag-specific stimulation,
40% of T cells expressed both viral markers (Fig. 2B, second panel), and an additional week of passage with OVA and APCs led to 87% of T cells expressing both markers (Fig. 2B, third panel). Finally, we purified these cells by cell sorting (Fig. 2B, fourth panel).
|
+/ and p38
/ T cell lines was equivalent, but was lower than the level expressed by DO11.10 CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3A). We also verified that each line expressed the expected pattern of p38
alleles (Fig. 3B) and confirmed the presence or absence of p38 protein by Western analysis (Fig. 3C). Finally, we verified that these cell lines were each responsive to OVA by stimulating Th1 cell lines with APCs and OVA or an irrelevant cognate peptide, HA518528 (Fig. 3D). Both p38
+/ and p38
/ Th1 cell lines produced IFN-
in response to OVA, but not in response to HA518528 (Fig. 3D, upper rows). As a positive control, wild-type DO11.10 Th1 cells were selectively OVA responsive (Fig. 3D, bottom row). Wild-type DO11.10 Th1 cells produced slightly higher levels of IFN-
in response to OVA/APCs than p38
+/ or p38
/ cells (Fig. 3D). This small difference might be due to the higher level of DO11.10 TCR expressed by the wild-type cells (Fig. 3A). In addition, we observed that p38
+/ cells exhibited slightly higher IFN-
production than p38
/ cells, but because this condition contains APCs, which can secrete IL-12 and IL-18, this difference could be due to differences in either the TCR-induced or the cytokine-dependent pathway of IFN-
production. In subsequent analysis, we therefore used anti-CD3 stimulation to selectively activate the TCR pathway without introducing cytokines produced by APCs. These results demonstrate that retroviral expression of the DO11.10 TCR can sustain both T cell passage by OVA/APCs in culture and confer selective Ag-specific cytokine production.
|
MAPK deficiency does not block Th1 development
This system allowed us to address the role of p38
in Th1 differentiation. Using lines derived under Th1-inducing conditions, we assessed the ability of p38
+/ and p38
/ T cells to acquire a Th1 phenotype (Fig. 4). First, both p38
+/ and p38
/ T cells were able to produce IFN-
in response to PMA/ionomycin stimulation. Additionally, p38
+/ and p38
/ cell lines were equally capable of inducing Ag-specific IFN-
production (Fig. 3D). Both p38
+/ and p38
/ Th1 cells were <5% positive for production of IL-4 by ICS (data not shown), indicating that p38
is not required to prevent Th2 development under these conditions. In summary, these results indicate that p38
is not required for Th1 development in CD4+ T cells.
|
MAPK is preferentially involved in cytokine-induced IFN-
production compared with TCR-induced IFN-
production
Finally, we examined the requirements for p38
in differential IFN-
production induced by IL-12/IL-18 compared with that produced by TCR signaling. Our use of the DO11.10 TCR in the derivation of these cell lines provided us with the ability to stimulate cells with OVA/APCs to evaluate the role of p38
in TCR-induced IFN-
production. Thus, we first compared p38
+/ and p38
/ cells for IFN-
production in response to APCs and several concentrations of the OVA peptide Ag to which DO11.10 cells react (Fig. 5, A and D). We found that p38
+/ and p38
/ cells produced equivalent amounts of IFN-
at each concentration of OVA peptide, as measured by both ELISA (Fig. 5A) and ICS (Fig. 5D). These results suggest that p38
is not a critical component of the pathway linking TCR signaling to the production of IFN-
.
|
+/ and p38
/ cells for IFN-
production in response to stimulation with IL-12 and IL-18. In this study, p38
/ T cells secreted 10-fold less IFN-
than p38
+/ cells (Fig. 5B). After IL-12/IL-18 stimulation, CsA treatment did not inhibit IFN-
secretion by p38
+/ T cells, but SB203580 abolished IFN-
secretion, consistent with the pattern of inhibition described for wild-type Th1 cells. As a final control, we examined these same cells for their response to TCR signaling induced by anti-CD3 treatment. Again, similar to stimulation using OVA/APCs, we found that p38
/ T cells secreted an equivalent amount of IFN-
as that secreted by p38
+/ cells. IFN-
production induced by anti-CD3 treatment in both p38
/ and p38
+/ cells was abolished by CsA treatment, but was unaffected by SB203580 treatment (Fig. 5C). Thus, results based on ELISA measurements indicate a selective requirement for p38
activity in IL-12/IL-18-induced, but not TCR-induced, IFN-
secretion.
Similar conclusions were supported by ICS analysis of IFN-
production. First, in response to IL-12/IL-18 treatment, the MFI of IFN-
was greatly reduced in p38
/ cells compared with p38
+/ cells (Fig. 5E, left panels). After IL-12/IL-18 stimulation, SB203580 greatly decreased the MFI of IFN-
in p38
+/ T cells, whereas CsA treatment did not reduce the MFI of IFN-
in these cells. Second, in response to TCR signaling, the MFI of IFN-
was slightly decreased in p38
/ compared with p38
+/ cells, consistent with the change in MFI seen previously in SB203580-treated wild-type Th1 cells (Fig. 1B). However, the MFI of IFN-
induced by TCR signaling in p38
/ cells (Fig. 5F) was substantially greater than that induced by IL-12/IL-18 treatment (Fig. 5E), again supporting a selective role for p38
in IL-12/IL-18-induced IFN-
production. The effects of CsA and SB203580 were similar to those determined by ELISA. In summary, both ELISA and ICS analyses support a selective requirement for p38
activity in IL-12/IL-18-induced, but not TCR-induced, IFN-
production.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in Th1 differentiation. Because no previous study has directly examined p38
/ T cells for Th1 development, our results are consistent with reports that have inferred a potential role for p38
based on the effects of MEKK4 or GADD45 proteins (7, 15, 17), but suggest a tempering of their interpretations. A possible explanation for the discrepancies between our study and others is their use of Con A to nonspecifically activate or restimulate cells (9, 16), a pitfall we avoided through the use of Ag-specific T cell lines and anti-CD3 stimulation.
Additionally, our production of p38
/ Ag-specific T cell lines allowed us to re-examine the role of p38
in the two pathways for IFN-
induction. We found that p38
/ T cells have nearly absent IFN-
secretion in response to IL-12/IL-18, but normal IFN-
secretion in response to TCR signaling, consistent with previous observations based on inhibitor studies (7). These studies do not, however, rule out the possibility of the involvement of other p38 isoforms in IFN-
production in response to TCR signaling. p38
/ T cells also show drastically reduced MFI of intracellular IFN-
in response to IL-12/IL-18. We observed a slight reduction in the MFI of intracellular IFN-
in response to TCR signaling in p38
/ T cells and wild-type T cells treated with SB203580 compared with controls, suggesting that p38
might have some role in IFN-
production independent of cytokine secretion.
A recent study suggests that p38 may participate in both transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes in IFN-
production, leading to selective stabilization of IFN-
mRNA when stimulated by IL-12/IL-18 in human PBLs and NK cells (30). Although our results indicate that p38
is required for cytokine-induced IFN-
production in Th1 cells, our study does not distinguish whether this effect is acting at the level of transcription or at some subsequent step in cytokine production. Consistent with previous findings based on pharmacologic inhibitors, we confirm a selective requirement for p38
in IFN-
production induced by IL-12 and IL-18 compared with induction via TCR signaling.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to K.M.M.) and National Institutes of Health Grants PO1AI31238 and P50HL54619 (to K.M.M.). ![]()
2 Current address: Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, CT 06877. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kenneth M. Murphy, Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail address: murphy{at}pathbox.wustl.edu ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: CsA, cyclosporin A; GAAD45, growth arrest and DNA damage 45; RV, retrovirus; h, human; HA, hemagglutinin; ICS, intracellular cytokine staining; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; MKK, MAPK kinase; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. ![]()
Received for publication October 14, 2005. Accepted for publication January 30, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production in Th1 CD4+ T cells: evidence for two distinct pathways for promoter activation. Eur. J. Immunol. 29: 548-555. [Medline]
production and activates IRAK and NF
B. Immunity 7: 571-581. [Medline]
required in cytokine-induced, but not TCR-induced, IFN-
production. Nat. Immunol. 2: 157-164. [Medline]
expression by Th1 effector T cells mediated by the p38 MAP kinase signaling pathway. EMBO J. 17: 2817-2829. [Medline]
,
,
, and
in inflammatory cell lineages. J. Immunol. 162: 4246-4252.
mediates the activation of the p38 and JNK MAP kinase pathways and cytokine production in effector TH1 cells. Immunity 14: 583-590. [Medline]
/GADD45
and MEKK4 comprise a genetic pathway mediating STAT4-independent IFN
production in T cells. EMBO J. 23: 1576-1586. [Medline]
is important for perpetuating cognate and inflammatory signals in T cells. Nat. Immunol. 5: 38-44. [Medline]
MAP kinase in placental but not embryonic cardiovascular development. Mol. Cell 6: 109-116. [Medline]
results in embryonic lethality: characterization of the kinase dependence of stress responses of enzyme-deficient embryonic stem cells. J. Exp. Med. 191: 859-869.
mitogen-activated protein kinase in placental angiogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 10454-10459.
in erythropoietin expression: a role for stress kinases in erythropoiesis. Cell 102: 221-231. [Medline]
is dispensable for lymphocyte development and proliferation. J. Immunol. 174: 1239-1244.
. Eur. J. Immunol. 34: 2365-2374. [Medline]
mRNA by MAPK p38 in IL-12- and IL-18-stimulated human NK cells. Blood 105: 282-288. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Jirmanova, D. Jankovic, A. J. Fornace Jr., and J. D. Ashwell Gadd45{alpha} Regulates p38-Dependent Dendritic Cell Cytokine Production and Th1 Differentiation J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4153 - 4158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Murray The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway: Input and Output Integration J. Immunol., March 1, 2007; 178(5): 2623 - 2629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Hedrick, C. M. Olson Jr., D. B. Conze, T. C. Bates, M. Rincon, and J. Anguita Control of Borrelia burgdorferi-Specific CD4+-T-Cell Effector Function by Interleukin-12- and T-Cell Receptor-Induced p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity. Infect. Immun., October 1, 2006; 74(10): 5713 - 5717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |