The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durand, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Farges, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durand, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Farges, J.-C.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 176: 2880-2887.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

Lipoteichoic Acid Increases TLR and Functional Chemokine Expression while Reducing Dentin Formation in In Vitro Differentiated Human Odontoblasts

Stéphanie H. Durand*, Vincent Flacher{ddagger}, Annick Roméas*, Florence Carrouel*, Evelyne Colomb{dagger}, Claude Vincent{dagger}, Henry Magloire*, Marie-Lise Couble*, Françoise Bleicher*, Marie-Jeanne Staquet*, Serge Lebecque{ddagger} and Jean-Christophe Farges1,*

* Laboratory "Development and Regeneration of Dental Tissues," University Lyon 1, Faculty of Odontology, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) ERi76 Equipe d’Accueil 1892, Institut Fédératif de Recherche 62, Lyon, France; {dagger} Equipe d’Accueil 3732, University Lyon 1, E. Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France; and {ddagger} INSERM Unité 503, IFR 128, University Lyon 1, Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches en Virologie et Immunologie, Lyon, France


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Gram-positive bacteria entering the dentinal tissue during the carious process are suspected to influence the immune response in human dental pulp. Odontoblasts situated at the pulp/dentin interface are the first cells encountered by these bacteria and therefore could play a crucial role in this response. In the present study, we found that in vitro-differentiated odontoblasts constitutively expressed the pattern recognition receptor TLR1–6 and 9 genes but not TLR7, 8, and 10. Furthermore, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), a wall component of Gram-positive bacteria, triggered the activation of the odontoblasts. LTA up-regulated the expression of its own receptor TLR2, as well as the production of several chemokines. In particular, an increased amount of CCL2 and CXCL10 was detected in supernatants from LTA-stimulated odontoblasts, and those supernatants augmented the migration of immature dendritic cells in vitro compared with controls. Clinical relevance of these observations came from immunohistochemical analysis showing that CCL2 was expressed in vivo by odontoblasts and blood vessels present under active carious lesions but not in healthy dental pulps. In contrast with this inflammatory response, gene expression of major dentin matrix components (type I collagen, dentin sialophosphoprotein) and TGF-beta1 was sharply down-regulated in odontoblasts by LTA. Taken together, these data suggest that odontoblasts activated through TLR2 by Gram-positive bacteria LTA are able to initiate an innate immune response by secreting chemokines that recruit immature dendritic cells while down-regulating their specialized functions of dentin matrix synthesis and mineralization.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The human tooth is the target of a substantial number of oral bacterial agents that are responsible for the development of carious lesions. These agents induce demineralization of enamel that normally constitutes an impermeable barrier that protects the underlying dentin and the connective tissue situated in the center of the tooth, the dental pulp (1). When the enamel barrier is disrupted, the dentin exposed to the oral environment is degraded by Gram-positive bacteria, including streptococci, lactobacilli, and actinomyces, that largely dominate the carious lesion microflora (2). This leads to the development of inflammatory and immune events in the dental pulp, the molecular and cellular determinants of which remain unknown (3).

Odontoblasts are neural crest-derived mesenchymal cells organized as a densely packed layer at the dentin-pulp interface. Their main functions are synthesis and extracellular deposition of a type I collagen-rich matrix referred to as predentin, and the mineralization of this matrix to form dentin (4). They send long cytoplasmic processes into dentinal tissue. Thus, during dentin demineralization, bacteria and/or components released from their wall such as lipoteichoic acid (LTA)2 (5, 6) can gain access to odontoblasts (3). Therefore, they are the first cells encountered by bacteria entering dentin from the oral cavity. Their peripheral situation in the dental pulp makes the tooth a unique example where neural crest-derived mesenchymal cells, instead of epithelial cells, may represent the first line of defense for the host. For these reasons, we hypothesized that odontoblasts could play a central role in the dental pulp innate and adaptive immune responses.

The initial step of an innate immune response is the detection of pathogens through specialized pattern recognition receptors present in the cell membrane of immune and nonimmune cells, among which TLRs are key participants (7, 8). To date, 10 TLR family members (TLR1–10) have been identified in the human genome, and different TLRs appear to play crucial roles in the early activation of the innate immune response by different pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). TLRs trigger the effector phase of the innate immune response, mainly through the activation of the NF-{kappa}B pathway (9). This includes the secretion of proinflammatory chemokines and cytokines that recruit and activate blood borne inflammatory cells (10, 11). In the dental pulp, when dentin is being destroyed by caries, immature dendritic cells (iDCss) accumulate into the odontoblast layer close to the lesion in strategic location to sample foreign Ags (3, 12). Factors favoring this accumulation are unknown, but chemokines may be involved (13).

In the present study, we used odontoblasts generated in vitro from cultures of human dental pulp explants (14). In these conditions, dental pulp cells give rise to highly differentiated cells that exhibit many odontoblast features such as cell body polarization, formation of a typical process at the cell pole opposite to the nucleus, and strong expression of specific markers, including type I collagen, dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP), TGF-beta1, phosphate regulating gene with homologies to endopeptidases on the X chromosome, osteoadherin, and reelin (14, 15, 16, 17). Although some differences may exist with in vivo cells, in vitro-differentiated odontoblasts are referred to as odontoblasts from herein.

Our aim here was to determine the TLR gene profile of odontoblasts and their innate immune response to LTA, a PAMP from Gram-positive bacteria and a ligand for TLR2. We stimulated odontoblasts with LTA and analyzed consequences on their phenotype in terms of TLR and chemokine expression, induction of iDCs migration, dentin matrix synthesis, and mineralization.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Cell culture

Odontoblasts were generated in vitro from human dental pulp explants as described by Couble et al. (14). Briefly, 20 healthy nonerupted third molars were collected with informed consent of the patients, in accordance with the French Public Health Code and following a protocol approved by the local ethics committee. The pulp tissue was separated from the dentin/enamel mineralized complex, and its apical end was removed to prevent periodontal cell contamination. Pulp explants (~2 mm3) were grown in Eagle’s basal medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS (Eurobio), 50 µg/ml acid ascorbic, 10 mM beta-glycerophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 100 IU/ml penicillin-50 mg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen Life Technologies). After 4 wk to allow odontoblast differentiation, half the cultures were stimulated with 1 µg/ml Bacillus subtilis LTA (InvivoGen) for 8 h. LTA was tested for LPS content using the Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. Aliquots showed a LPS contamination that did not exceed 0.12 ng/µg LTA. Control experiments using 0.12 ng/ml LPS (InvivoGen) failed to show signs of odontoblast activation (data not shown), so that we considered LPS as not responsible for the observed biological phenomena.

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from LTA-stimulated or control odontoblast cultures with the Nucleospin RNA II kit (Macherey-Nagel), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples (1 µg) were then converted to first-strand cDNAs using 500 ng oligo (dT)15 primers (Roche Diagnostics) and Power Script Reverse Transcriptase (BD Clontech). Real-time PCR was performed in a Light Cycler instrument (Roche) with the Fast Start DNA Master SYBR Green I kit, according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Primer sets and annealing temperatures are listed in Table I. The real-time PCR conditions were as follows: 10 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, annealing temperature for 5 s, 72°C for 20 s. The increase in PCR product was monitored for each amplification cycle by measuring the increase in fluorescence caused by the binding of SYBR Green dye to dsDNA. Amplicon specificity was confirmed by analysis of melting curves. Standard curves for target and cyclophilin A housekeeping genes were constructed with serial dilutions of reverse transcription samples. For each target gene, mRNA levels were normalized to the cyclophilin A housekeeping gene with the RelQuant software (Roche). Results were expressed as fold change values relative to control odontoblast samples nonstimulated with LTA. All runs were performed in duplicates and included a negative control without template. PCR amplification was also verified for expected products, mispairing, and primer dimer formation on 2% agarose gels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table I. Primers used for real-time PCR analysis

 
Flow cytometry

Odontoblasts were obtained following trypsin/EDTA treatment of cultures and incubated for 30 min with anti-TLR2 mouse mAb (clone TL2.1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or isotype-matched mouse IgG2a (clone UPC 10; Sigma-Aldrich) at the same concentration. After washing, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 goat anti-mouse Ab (Caltag Laboratories) for 30 min. Cells were washed and resuspended in PBS containing 1% formaldehyde. Data were acquired on a DakoCytomation cytometer (DakoCytomation) and analyzed using the WinMDI 2.8 software (The Scripps Institute).

Gene arrays

RNA samples (1 µg each) from LTA-stimulated and control odontoblast cultures were amplified with the MessageAmp aRNA kit (Ambion), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplified RNAs (500 ng) were then used as a template to generate {alpha}32P-dCTP-labeled cDNA probes with use of the AmpoLabeling-LPR kit (SuperArray Bioscience). Nylon membrane arrays containing cDNA fragments from human chemokine and receptor genes (GEArray Q Series, catalog no. HS-005.2) were purchased from SuperArray. Detailed information about these arrays is available online (<www.superarray.com/>). After prehybridization with GEAhyb Hybridization Solution (SuperArray) containing 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h at 60°C, membranes were hybridized at 60°C for 15 h with radioactive probes (50–200 x 106 cpm each) previously denaturated at 95°C for 4 min. Membranes were washed twice with 2x SSC—1% SDS for 15 min and twice with 0.1x SSC—0.5% SDS for 15 min, then aligned on a PhosphorImaging screen (Molecular Dynamics) and exposed for 72 h at room temperature. Array images were obtained by scanning the screen, then files were converted into numerical data using the ScanAlyze software (<www.microarrays.org/software.html>) and analyzed with the GEArray Analyzer software (<www.superarray.com/>). Hybridization signals were normalized for each gene to the cyclophilin A signals observed on the same membrane. Background was given by the mean value of the hybridization signals recorded for pUC18 plasmid. Results were expressed as a percentage of cyclophilin A gene expression. Data were reported for genes whose expression level was >5% of the cyclophilin A gene (this threshold corresponding approximately to the visual detection of the spot) and that exhibited at least a 2-fold change of expression between LTA-stimulated and control samples. Only the matched positive and negative results of three experiments are presented.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean values ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis was determined with Student’s t test.

Protein array

A Human Chemokine Ab Array I kit was purchased from Raybiotech and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, membranes were blocked for 30 min at room temperature before being incubated for 16 h at 4°C with supernatants recovered from odontoblasts cultured with or without LTA. They were then washed, incubated with biotin-conjugated primary Abs, HRP-conjugated streptavidin, and finally developed by using ECL-type solution. Membranes were scanned with a VersaDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad), and semiquantitative analysis of the comparative intensity of the spots was performed with the Quantity One 4.4.1 software (Bio-Rad).

Immunohistochemistry

Three healthy and seven carious human third molars were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde-PBS solution for 16 h, rinsed, and cut into 750-µm-thick slices. After demineralization in acetic acid or EDTA for 25 days, slices were routinely treated for paraffin embedding (18). Five-micrometer serial sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and treated with an Ag unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories) for 15 min. They were then incubated with 20 µg/ml anti-CCL2 goat polyclonal Ab (R&D Systems). Ab detection was performed using the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sections were slightly counterstained with toluidine blue.

Generation of iDCss

iDCss were generated from human CD34+ hemopoietic progenitors isolated from human umbilical cord blood mononuclear fraction by immunomagnetic selection with miniMACS (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified progenitors (90–98% purity) were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS (Myoclone super plus), 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (all from Invitrogen Life Technologies), 5 x 10–5 M 2-ME (Sigma-Aldrich), 200 U/ml recombinant human GM-CSF (kindly provided by Schering-Plough Laboratories), and 50 U/ml recombinant human TNF-{alpha} (Genzyme) for 7 days. Under these conditions, cells remain poorly differentiated and display features of iDCs (19).

Chemotaxis assay

Cell migration was assessed using Costar Transwell devices with an 8-µm pore size. Supernatants recovered from odontoblasts cultured with or without LTA were diluted (1/4) in RPMI 1640–5% FBS and added to 24-well plates. iDCss (1.5 x 105) suspended in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% FBS were applied to Transwell inserts. Plates were incubated for 4 h at 37°C. After removal of the Transwell inserts, migrated cells were recovered and counted. Supernatants of three different control and LTA-stimulated odontoblast cultures were analyzed in duplicate. Buffer alone and buffer + LTA were used as controls. Results were expressed as the number of migrated iDCs in percentage of the input cell number introduced into the upper compartment.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
TLR expression in resting and LTA-activated odontoblasts

We first set out to determine the expression of TLR mRNAs in resting odontoblasts and in response to LTA, a ligand for TLR2. Real-time PCR investigation of the TLR profile of odontoblasts showed that these cells constitutively expressed genes coding for TLR1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 (Fig. 1A). TLR7, 8, and 10 mRNA could not be amplified in odontoblasts, although easily detected in plasmacytoid or myeloid DCs (data not shown). Upon LTA activation, an increase in gene expression level was observed for TLR2 (4.1-fold; p = 0.004), TLR3 (2.4-fold; p = 0.001), TLR5 (2.1-fold; p = 0.02), and TLR9 (2.1-fold; p = 0.03). Other TLR genes remained unchanged. TLR2 was then selected for protein analysis given its crucial role in LTA signaling. Flow cytometry revealed that LTA up-regulated TLR2 in odontoblasts (Fig. 1B).


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. TLR expression in resting and LTA-activated odontoblasts. A, Real-time PCR analysis of TLR gene expression in human odontoblasts stimulated or not with LTA. Results were normalized to cyclophilin A gene expression and expressed as fold change values relative to control nonstimulated samples. Data represent the mean ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. Odontoblasts in culture constitutively expressed TLR1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 but not TLR7, 8, and 10. A significant increase of gene expression for TLR2 (4.1-fold; p = 0.004), TLR3 (2.4-fold; p = 0.001), TLR5 (2.1-fold; p = 0.02), and TLR9 (2.1-fold; p = 0.03) was observed in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts (Od + LTA) compared with controls (Od). B, Flow cytometry analysis of TLR2 protein expression in human odontoblasts stimulated or not with LTA. Isotype controls are shown as open histograms. TLR2 was induced in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts (Od + LTA) compared with controls (Od). Results are representative of two independent experiments.

 
LTA treatment of odontoblasts modulates chemokine gene and protein expression

Given that one major consequence of TLR activation is the up-regulation of chemokine synthesis, we then examined the chemokine expression profile of odontoblasts by cDNA array analysis (Table II and Fig. 2A). Data revealed that odontoblasts constitutively expressed 17 genes related to the chemokine pathway, including genes encoding for the chemokines CCL2, CCL26, CXCL4, CXCL12, and CXCL14. The remainder of genes include chemokine receptors (CXCR2, CCRL1, and CCRL2), leukotriene B4 receptor, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, endothelial monocyte-activating protein 2, stromal cell-derived factor 2, hypoxia-inducible factor 1{alpha}, and genes of still unknown function. The other genes spotted on the membrane were not expressed by odontoblasts or at a level < 5% of the cyclophilin A gene and/or in a nonreproducible manner between the three tested samples. Of note, neither TLR2 nor TLR4 expression was detected on the gene array in contrast with their easy amplification by PCR (Fig. 1A). Such a negative result is likely due to the lower sensitivity resulting from the generation of the probes for the gene array, as reported previously (20, 21).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table II. Expression profile of chemokine-related genes in odontoblasts as determined by gene array analysisa

 

Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Gene expression profile of odontoblasts determined by array analysis and changes induced by LTA treatment. Complete list of genes spotted on the Q Series Human Chemokines and Receptors Gene Array nylon membrane (catalog no. HS-005.2) is available online (<www.superarray.com/>). A, Odontoblasts (Od) constitutively expressed 17 chemokine-related genes (listed in Table II), including CCL2 (position 6G on the membrane), CCL26 (7F), CXCL4 (5C), CXCL12 (10A), and CXCL14 (9B) chemokine genes. B, After LTA stimulation (Od + LTA), hybridization signals were significantly increased for CCL2 (6G), CCL7 (8E), CXCL2 (4C), CXCL10 (8G), CCRL1 (10E), and CCRL2 (2E) genes. Cyclophilin A tetraspots (position 14A-D) were used for normalization. The three pUC18 tetraspots used for background subtraction are in the position 13A-C. The autoradiograms shown are representative of three independent experiments. (C) Quantification of hybridization signals on gene arrays. Statistical analysis of three independent experiments showed that six genes were up-regulated >2-fold: three genes whose expression was detected in nonstimulated odontoblasts and three genes whose expression was only detected in LTA-stimulated samples. The former were CCL2 (2.4-fold; p = 0.01), CCRL1 (10.7-fold; p = 0.002) and CCRL2 (3.9-fold; p = 0.02), the latter were CCL7, CXCL10, and CXCL2. Other genes exhibited no change or low changes that were statistically not significant.

 
After LTA stimulation, three genes expressed in nonstimulated odontoblasts were found to be up-regulated >2-fold: CCL2 (2.4-fold; p = 0.01), CCRL1, (10.7-fold; p = 0.002), and CCRL2 (3.9-fold; p = 0.02). CCL7, CXCL2, and CXCL10 were only found to be expressed in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts (Fig. 2, B and C). Other genes exhibited no change or low changes that were not significant statistically. The four chemokine genes up-regulated by LTA were selected for verification by real-time PCR with the same cultured samples. Stimulation of genes encoding CCL2 (3-fold; p = 0.01), CCL7 (7.6-fold; p = 0.02), CXCL2 (10.3-fold; p = 0.006), and CXCL10 (6-fold; p = 0.04) in LTA-treated cultures was confirmed (Fig. 3). Protein array analysis of culture supernatants showed an increase of 2.3- and 2.7-fold for CCL2 and CXCL10, respectively. The CCL7 level was very low and showed no significant modification (Fig. 4). CXCL2 could not be assessed because of the absence of a specific Ab on the membrane.


Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Real-time PCR analysis of CCL2, CCL7, CXCL2, and CXCL10 chemokine gene expression in human odontoblasts stimulated or not with LTA. Results were normalized to cyclophilin A expression and expressed as fold change values relative to control odontoblasts nonstimulated with LTA (Od). Data represent the mean ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis confirmed the significant up-regulation of gene expression for CCL2 (3-fold; p = 0.01), CCL7 (7.6-fold; p = 0.02), CXCL2 (10.3-fold; p = 0.006), and CXCL10 (6-fold; p = 0.04) in LTA-stimulated cultures (Od + LTA).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Protein array analysis of chemokine release from odontoblasts stimulated or not with LTA. Each anti-chemokine Ab is present on the membrane in duplicate. Chemokines whose gene expression was found to be up-regulated in gene array and real-time PCR experiments are shown, except CXCL2, which could not be assessed because of the absence of a specific Ab on the membrane. After background subtraction (Blank), values were adjusted based on the intensity of control spots on the filters (Pos). CCL2 and CXCL10 showed a protein level increase of 2.3- and 2.7-fold, respectively. The CCL7 level was very low and showed no significant modification (N.S.). Data are representative of two independent experiments.

 
CCL2 is expressed in vivo in carious teeth

Data from the literature indicating that CCL2 was able to stimulate iDCs migration in vitro (11), and our results showing that CCL2 was up-regulated at the mRNA and protein levels in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts, prompted us to examine expression of this molecule in vivo in tooth specimens. Analysis of healthy (Fig. 5A) and carious (Fig. 5B) third molars with an anti-CCL2 polyclonal Ab showed an absence of staining in healthy teeth (Fig. 5C), whereas a moderate staining was observed in odontoblasts under active carious lesions (Fig. 5D). Endothelial cells present in the underlying inflammatory tissue were also stained (Fig. 5E), as was previously shown in various inflammatory conditions (22).


Figure 5
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. In vivo immunohistochemical analysis of third molars with an anti-CCL2 polyclonal Ab. A and B, A healthy tooth and a carious one with an active dentinal lesion (dark brown aspect, black arrow). White arrows indicate the precise localization, at the dentin-pulp interface, of the odontoblasts (Od) shown in C and D. No staining was observed with the anti-CCL2 Ab in the healthy tissue (C). In the carious tooth, a moderate cytoplasmic staining was observed in odontoblasts (Od) (D), as well as in endothelial cells from blood vessels (BV) present in the underlying inflammatory pulp tissue (E). E, enamel; D, dentin; P, pulp.

 
LTA-stimulated odontoblasts attract iDCss

To further assess the biological relevance of LTA-induced chemokine response of odontoblasts, LTA-conditioned culture supernatants were tested for their chemotactic effect on iDCs in a Transwell migration assay. In experiments with buffer alone, buffer + LTA (data not shown), and supernatants from nonstimulated odontoblasts, a mean number of 37 ± 9% iDCs migrated (Fig. 6). The migratory response was enhanced significantly (69 ± 11.8%, p = 0.001) when supernatants from LTA-stimulated odontoblasts were added in the lower compartment. Checkerboard analysis established that cells attracted by LTA-stimulated odontoblasts migrated in a directional rather than a random fashion (data not shown).


Figure 6
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Migration assay of iDCss in the presence of LTA-activated odontoblast supernatants. CD34+ cells were cultured in the presence of GM-CSF and TNF-{alpha}. At day 7, their response to supernatants from odontoblasts treated or not with LTA was determined by migration assays in Transwell chambers. The migratory response was significantly enhanced when supernatants from the LTA-treated odontoblasts (Od + LTA) were added in the lower compartment compared with those of nonstimulated odontoblasts (Od). Results are expressed as the number of migrated cells in percentage of the input cell number and are the mean ± SD of duplicates from three independent experiments.

 
Down-regulation of dentin matrix protein genes by LTA

Since the main steady functions of odontoblasts are the secretion of the extracellular matrix of dentin and its mineralization, and that this matrix is strongly reduced under active dentin carious lesions, we determined whether LTA stimulation influences these odontoblast specialized functions. Thus, we analyzed gene expression of two dentin matrix components and of TGF-beta1, considered to be a crucial regulatory element for dentinogenesis, by real-time PCR. A significant down-regulation of expression was observed for type I collagen {alpha}1 chain (3.4-fold; p = 0.001), DSPP (98-fold; p ≤ 0.0001), and TGF-beta1 (3.5-fold; p = 0.02) genes in LTA-stimulated cells (Fig. 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7. Real-time PCR analysis of gene expression of dentin matrix components (type I collagen {alpha}1 chain, DSPP, and TGF-beta1) in human odontoblasts stimulated or not with LTA. Results were normalized to cyclophilin A expression and expressed as fold change values relative to nonstimulated odontoblasts (Od). Data represent the mean ± SD obtained from three independent experiments. Statistical analysis indicated a significant decrease of gene expression for the two dentin matrix components (type I collagen {alpha}1 chain (3.4-fold; p = 0.001), DSPP (98-fold; p ≤ 0.0001)) and TGF-beta1 (3.5-fold; p = 0.02) in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts (Od + LTA).

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Disclosures
 References
 
The interface between human teeth and oral cavity presents several unique features that must be balanced to maintain dental pulp sterility. The dentin-pulp complex is protected by an impermeable cap of enamel and confronted to the oral microflora predominantly composed of Gram-positive saprophyte bacteria that are usually well tolerated. However, these bacteria release products that can destroy the enamel and the underlying dentin during the carious process. Dentin-producing odontoblasts then become the first cells run into by pathogens penetrating the living dental tissue. Hence, these cells represent a unique example where neural crest-derived mesenchymal cells must fulfill the role devoted elsewhere to epithelial cells (8). The recent localization of beta-defensins 1 and 2 in healthy odontoblasts (23) also argues in favor of this hypothesis.

To study the expression of TLRs by odontoblasts, we used a pure population of cells generated in vitro that are similar in many aspects to in vivo odontoblasts (14, 16). We observed the constitutive expression of TLR1–6 and 9 genes but not TLR7, 8, and 10 genes. This large range of TLRs expressed by odontoblasts appears comparable to what has been reported for cultured epithelial cells, including keratinocytes (24), intestinal epithelial cells (25), bronchial epithelial cells (26), and gingival epithelial cells (27). Interestingly, the pattern of TLRs expressed by odontoblasts was similar to the one reported for gingival fibroblasts in primary cultures (27). Whether a common TLR expression profile exists for all oral mesenchymal cell types remains to be determined.

Thus, odontoblasts might be involved in the recognition of bacterial products such as triacetylated lipoproteins (TLR1+TLR2), LTA (TLR2), diacetylated lipoproteins, peptidoglycans (TLR2+TLR6), LPS (TLR4), flagellin (TLR5), and unmethylated CpG motif-containing DNA (TLR9), and also of viral dsRNA through TLR3 (7, 8). Indeed, we found in the present work that odontoblasts responded in vitro to the TLR2 ligand LTA but also to TLR3 and TLR4 ligands (our preliminary data). It remains to be determined whether these cells can actually detect and react to TLR5 and 9 ligands.

Given the predominant role of Gram-positive bacteria in dental caries, we analyzed further the odontoblast response to LTA. LTA was found to strongly up-regulate the expression of its own receptor, TLR2, and to a lesser extent, of TLR3, 5, and 9. The up-regulation of TLR2 by its ligand may increase the sensitivity of odontoblasts, as previously reported in hemopoietic cells (28). The absence of TLR2 detection in resting odontoblasts is probably because the protein is present at a level below the sensitivity threshold of flow cytometry, as reported for iDCs (29).

One well-recognized consequence of TLR2 activation is the up-regulation of chemokine synthesis (30). Using gene arrays, we compared the expression of chemokines by resting vs TLR2-activated odontoblasts. We observed the expression by resting odontoblasts of CCL2, CXCL12, and CXCL14, three chemokines known to drive iDCs recruitment in vitro (11, 31, 32, 33). However, the chemokine the most strongly expressed by resting odontoblasts was CCL26, a natural antagonist for CCR1, CCR2, and CCR5 (34). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that the balance of odontoblast-derived chemokines may control the homing of iDCs in the human dental pulp in normal conditions. Whether CCL2 could also contribute to iDCs recruitment remains uncertain because we could not detect this protein in the healthy dental pulp by immunohistochemistry.

Following LTA stimulation, four chemokine genes (CCL2, CCL7, CXCL2, and CXCL10) and two corresponding proteins (CCL2 and CXCL10) were clearly up-regulated. Furthermore, odontoblasts present under active dentin carious lesions were found to express the CCL2 protein by immunohistochemistry. CCL2 is a key inflammatory chemokine produced during microbial infection that attracts iDCs and also monocytes, activated T cells, NK cells, and basophils through CCR1 and CCR2 (11). This chemokine might be responsible for iDCs recruitment into the odontoblast layer, thereby facilitating their interaction with invading Gram-positive bacteria. The detection in vitro of a strong chemotactic activity for iDCs in the supernatant of LTA-stimulated odontoblasts supports this hypothesis. Experiments are going on to identify the chemokines responsible for this migration. Moreover, through the up-regulation of CXCL2 and CXCL10 expression, odontoblasts are likely to contribute to the recruitment of neutrophils and lymphocytes, respectively, during infection (11). CXCR2, a chemokine receptor primarily present on hemopoietic cells (35), was expressed at a high level by odontoblasts. Strikingly, CXCL2, for which the only known receptor is CXCR2, was also expressed by odontoblasts and strongly increased after LTA stimulation. Although this increase remains to be confirmed at the protein level, an autocrine control might occur in odontoblasts via CXCL2 regarding the expression of genes involved in predentin remodeling, as CXCR2 activation was shown to induce matrix metalloprotease-3 release in human chondrocytes (36).

Chemokines not only induce cell locomotion but also influence angiogenesis (37, 38). Among chemokines expressed by odontoblasts, CCL2, CXCL2, and CXCL12 are proangiogenic (11, 39), whereas CXCL4, CXCL10, and CXCL14 are angiostatic (40, 41). In vivo, the production of angiostatic chemokines in the healthy dental pulp might be involved in the maintenance of blood vessels out of the odontoblast layer. During inflammation of carious origin, the number of capillaries augments in the pulp under the lesion, and some of them penetrate into the odontoblast layer (42). Regarding the proangiogenic chemokine CXCL2, its expression was strongly up-regulated in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts, and this chemokine might thus contribute to the increased vascularization by binding to CXCR2 that is highly expressed on endothelial cells (41). Altogether, these data suggest that TLR2-activated odontoblasts play a key role in the recruitment of iDCs and inflammatory leukocytes and in the neoangiogenesis featured by the dental pulp during the carious infection.

The main steady functions of odontoblasts are the secretion of the extracellular matrix of dentin, i.e., predentin, and its mineralization (4). Predentin is deposited by odontoblasts at a relatively constant rate throughout the tooth life, but it is strongly reduced in active dentin carious lesions (43). We found that the major predentin structural component, type I collagen, was down-regulated by LTA. This finding is in agreement with the fact that NF-{kappa}B pathway activation decreases expression of {alpha}1(I) and {alpha}2(I) collagen genes (44, 45). It also indicates that our model of odontoblast stimulation by LTA is relevant to the in vivo situation of active carious lesions. Events could be similar to what occurs in inflamed joints where matrix synthesis by chondrocytes was also shown to be down-regulated (46). We also observed an almost complete abolition of gene expression of DSPP, a glycoprotein that has a crucial role in the predentin mineralization process (47). Thus, it is possible that coordinated regulatory mechanisms are activated to decrease both predentin matrix synthesis and mineralization during the initial phase of the dental pulp immune response. In parallel, we observed a clear diminution of TGF-beta1 gene expression in odontoblasts. This might result in a decrease of TGF-beta1 amount in the odontoblast microenvironment in vivo. As TGF-beta1 is known to attenuate TLR signaling (48, 49, 50, 51), the TGF-beta1 decrease observed in LTA-stimulated odontoblasts might be necessary for an effective innate immune response to take place. Also, as TGF-beta1 inhibits Th1 and Th2 cell responses (52) and B cell activation (50), its reduction would allow a protective adaptive immune response to happen within the infected dental pulp.

In summary, the present work provides insights about the role of neural crest-derived odontoblasts in the initiation of immune responses that occur in the human dental pulp in response to cariogenic bacteria. Our results suggest that, upon TLR2 activation, odontoblasts undergo a functional switch to decrease their specialized functions of dentin matrix synthesis and mineralization while orienting their metabolic activity toward the production of molecules responsible for the triggering and the development of innate and adaptive immune responses. The signaling pathways driving this switch remain to be identified.


   Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the staff of the Stomatology Department, Saint Joseph Hospital; we also thank Dr. P. Exbrayat, Faculty of Odontology, Lyon, France, for collecting tooth samples. Flow cytometry was performed at the Centre Commun d’Imagerie de Laennec (Institut Fédératif de Recherche 62, Lyon, France).


   Disclosures
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


   Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jean-Christophe Farges, Laboratory "Development and Regeneration of Dental Tissues," University Lyon 1, Faculty of Odontology, 11 G. Paradin Street, F-69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. E-mail address: Jean-Christophe.Farges{at}sante.univ-lyon1.fr Back

2 Abbreviations used in this paper: LTA, lipoteichoic acid; PAMP, pathogen-associated molecular pattern; iDC, immature dendritic cell; DSPP, dentin sialophosphoprotein. Back

Received for publication July 27, 2005. Accepted for publication December 13, 2005.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Hamilton, I. R.. 2000. Ecological basis for dental caries. Oral Bacterial Ecology: The Molecular Basis 219-274. Horizon Scientific Press, Wymondham, U.K.
  2. Love, R. M., H. F. Jenkinson. 2002. Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 13: 171-183. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Jontell, M., T. Okiji, U. Dahlgren, G. Bergenholtz. 1998. Immune defense mechanisms of the dental pulp. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 9: 179-200. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Qin, C., O. Baba, W. T. Butler. 2004. Post-translational modifications of sibling proteins and their roles in osteogenesis and dentinogenesis. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 15: 126-136. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rolla, G., R. V. Oppermann, W. H. Bowen, J. E. Ciardi, K. W. Knox. 1980. High amounts of lipoteichoic acid in sucrose-induced plaque in vivo. Caries Res. 14: 235-238. [Medline]
  6. Telles, P. D. S., C. T. Hanks, M. A. A. M. Machado, J. E. Nör. 2003. Lipoteichoic acid up-regulates VEGF expression in macrophages and pulp cells. J. Dent. Res. 82: 466-470. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Takeda, K. T., T. Kaisho, S. Akira. 2003. Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21: 335-376. [Medline]
  8. Iwasaki, A., R. Medzhitov. 2004. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 5: 987-995. [Medline]
  9. Li, Q., I. M. Verma. 2002. NF-{kappa}B regulation in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2: 725-734. [Medline]
  10. Yoshie, O., T. Imai, H. Nomiyama. 2001. Chemokines in immunity. Adv. Immunol. 78: 57-110. [Medline]
  11. Mantovani, A., A. Sica, S. Sozzani, P. Allavena, A. Vecchi, M. Locati. 2004. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 25: 677-686. [Medline]
  12. Yoshiba, N., K. Yoshiba, H. Nakamura, M. Iwaku, H. Ozawa. 1996. Immunohistochemical localization of HLA-DR-positive cells in unerupted and erupted normal and carious human teeth. J. Dent. Res. 75: 1585-1589. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Farges, J.-C., A. Romeas, M. Melin, J.-J. Pin, S. Lebecque, M. Lucchini, F. Bleicher, H. Magloire. 2003. TGF-beta1 induces accumulation of dendritic cells in the odontoblast layer. J. Dent. Res. 82: 652-656. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Couble, M.-L., J.-C. Farges, F. Bleicher, B. Perrat-Mabillon, M. Boudeulle, H. Magloire. 2000. Odontoblast differentiation of human dental pulp cells in explant cultures. Calcified Tissue Int. 66: 129-138. [Medline]
  15. Buchaille, R., M.-L. Couble, H. Magloire, F. Bleicher. 2000. A substractive PCR-based cDNA library from human odontoblast cells: identification of novel genes expressed in tooth forming cells. Matrix Biol. 19: 421-430. [Medline]
  16. Lucchini, M., A. Roméas, M.-L. Couble, F. Bleicher, H. Magloire, J.-C. Farges. 2002. TGF-beta1 signaling and stimulation of osteoadherin in human odontoblasts in vitro. Connect. Tissue Res. 43: 345-353. [Medline]
  17. Maurin, J.-C., M.-L. Couble, M. Didier-Bazes, C. Brisson, H. Magloire, F. Bleicher. 2004. Expression and localization of reelin in human odontoblasts. Matrix Biol. 23: 277-285. [Medline]
  18. Lucchini, M., M.-L. Couble, A. Roméas, M.-J. Staquet, F. Bleicher, H. Magloire, J.-C. Farges. 2004. {alpha}vbeta3 integrin expression in human odontoblasts and co-localization with osteoadherin. J. Dent. Res. 83: 552-556. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Noirey, N., M.-J. Staquet, M.-J. Gariazzo, M. Serres, C. Dezutter-Dambuyant, C. André, D. Schmitt, C. Vincent. 2003. Withdrawal of TNF-{alpha} after the fifth day of differentiation of CD34+ cord blood progenitors generates a homogeneous population of Langerhans cells and delays their maturation. Exp. Dermatol. 12: 96-105. [Medline]
  20. Luo, Y., J. Cai, Y. Liu, H. Xue, F. J. Chrest, R. P. Wersto, M. Rao. 2002. Microarray analysis of selected genes in neural stem and progenitor cells. J. Neurochem. 83: 1481-1497. [Medline]
  21. Fuke, S., T. Betsuyaku, Y. Nasuhara, T. Morikawa, H. Katoh, M. Nishimura. 2004. Chemokines in bronchiolar epithelium in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 31: 405-412. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Charo, I. F., M. B. Taubman. 2004. Chemokines in the pathogenesis of vascular disease. Circ. Res. 95: 858-866. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dommisch, H., J. Winter, Y. Acil, A. Dunsche, M. Tiemann, S. Jepsen. 2005. Human beta-defensin (hBD-1, -2) expression in human dental pulp. Oral Microbiol. Immun. 20: 163-166. [Medline]
  24. Köllisch, G., B. N. Kalali, V. Voelcker, R. Wallich, H. Behrendt, J. Ring, S. Bauer, T. Jakob, M. Mempel, M. Ollert. 2005. Various members of the toll-like receptor family contribute to the innate immune response of human epidermal keratinocytes. Immunology 114: 531-541. [Medline]
  25. Cario, E., D. K. Podolsky. 2005. Intestinal epithelial TOLLerance versus inTOLLerance of commensals. Mol. Immunol. 42: 887-893. [Medline]
  26. Sha, Q., A. Q. Truong-Tran, J. R. Plitt, L. A. Beck, R. P. Schleimer. 2004. Activation of airway epithelial cells by Toll-like receptor agonists. Am. J. Resp. Cell Mol. 31: 358-364. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kusumoto, Y., H. Hirano, K. Saitoh, S. Yamada, M. Takedachi, T. Nozaki, Y. Ozawa, Y. Nakahira, T. Saho, H. Ogo, et al 2004. Human gingival epithelial cells produce chemotactic factors interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 after stimulation with Porphyromonas gingivalis via Toll-like receptor 2. J. Periodontol. 75: 370-379. [Medline]
  28. Ray, A., N. S. Chatterjee, S. K. Bhattacharya, T. Biswas. 2003. Porin of Shigella dysenteriae enhances mRNA levels for Toll-like receptor 2 and MyD88, up-regulates CD80 of murine macrophage, and induces the release of interleukin-12. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 39: 213-219. [Medline]
  29. Visintin, A., A. Mazzoni, J. H. Spitzer, D. H. Wyllie, S. K. Dower, D. M. Segal. 2001. Regulation of Toll-like receptors in human monocytes and dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 166: 249-255. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Cook, D. N., D. S. Pisetsky, D. A. Schwartz. 2004. Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis of human disease. Nat. Immunol. 5: 975-979. [Medline]
  31. Cao, X., W. Zhang, T. Wan, L. He, T. Chen, Z. Yuan, S. Ma, Y. Yu, G. Chen. 2000. Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel CXC chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein-2 {gamma} chemoattractant for human neutrophils and dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 165: 2588-2595. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Shellenberger, T. D., M. Wang, M. Gujrati, A. Jayakumar, R. M. Strieter, M. D. Burdick, C. G. Ioannides, C. L. Efferson, A. K. El-Naggar, D. Roberts, et al 2004. BRAK/CXCL14 is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis and a chemotactic factor for immature dendritic cells. Cancer Res. 64: 8262-8270. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Shurin, G. V., R. Ferris, I. L. Tourkova, L. Perez, A. Lokshin, L. Balkir, B. Collins, G. S. Chatta, M. R. Shurin. 2005. Loss of new chemokine CXCL14 in tumor tissue is associated with low infiltration by dendritic cells (DC), while restoration of human CXCL14 expression in tumor cells causes attraction of DC both in vitro and in vivo. J. Immunol. 174: 5490-5498. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Petkovic, V., C. Moghini, S. Paoletti, M. Uguccioni, B. Gerber. 2004. Eotaxin-3/CCL26 is a natural antagonist for CC chemokine receptors 1 and 5. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 23357-23363. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Pelus, L. M., D. Horowitz, S. C. Cooper, A. G. King. 2002. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization: a role for CXC chemokines. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hemat. 43: 257-275. [Medline]
  36. Baggiolini, M.. 2001. Chemokines in pathology and medicine. J. Intern. Med. 250: 91-104. [Medline]
  37. Rollins, B. J.. 1998. Chemokines. Blood 90: 909-904.
  38. Rosenkilde, M. M., T. W. Schwartz. 2004. The chemokine system: a major regulation of angiogenesis in health and disease. APMIS 112: 481-495. [Medline]
  39. Belperio, J. A., M. P. Keane, M. D. Burdick, B. Gomperts, Y. Y. Xue, K. Hong, J. Mestas, A. Ardehali, B. Mehrad, R. Saggar, et al 2005. Role of CXCR2/CXCR2 ligands in vascular remodeling during bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 115: 1150-1162. [Medline]
  40. Bikfalvi, A., G. Gimenez-Gallego. 2004. The control of angiogenesis and tumor invasion by platelet factor-4 and platelet factor-4-derived molecules. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 30: 137-144. [Medline]
  41. Schwarze, S. R., J. Luo, W. B. Isaacs, D. F. Jarrard. 2005. Modulation of CXCL14 (BRAK) expression in prostate cancer. Prostate 59: 1-8.
  42. Heyeraas, K. J., I. A Mjör. 2001. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 3: pulpal inflammation and its sequelae. Quintessence Int. 32: 611-625. [Medline]
  43. Bjorndal, L., I. A. Mjör. 2001. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 4: dental caries—characteristics of lesions and pulpal reactions. Quintessence Int. 32: 717-736. [Medline]
  44. Kouba, D. J., K. Y. Chung, T. Nishiyama, L. Vindevoghel, A. Kon, J. F. Klement, J. Uitto, A. Mauviel. 1999. Nuclear factor-{kappa}B mediates TNF-{alpha} inhibitory effect on {alpha}2(I) collagen (COL1A2) gene transcription in human dermal fibroblasts. J. Immunol. 162: 4226-4234. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Rippe, R. A., L. W. Schrum, B. Stefanovic, J. A. Solis Herruzo, D. A. Brenner. 1999. NF-{kappa}B inhibits expression of the {alpha}1(I) collagen gene. DNA Cell Biol. 10: 751-761.
  46. Deschner, J. H., C. R. Hofman, N. P. Piesco, S. Agarwal. 2003. Signal transduction by mechanical strain in chondrocytes. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. 6: 289-293.
  47. Sreenath, T., T. Thyagarajan, B. Hall, G. Longenecker, R. D’Souza, S. Hong, J. T. Wright, M. MacDougall, J. Sauk, A. B. Kulkarni. 2003. Dentin sialophosphoprotein knockout mouse teeth display widened predentin zone and develop defective dentin mineralization similar to human dentinogenesis imperfecta type III. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 24874-24880. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Arsura, M., M. Wu, G. E. Sonenshein. 1996. TGF-beta1 inhibits NF-{kappa}B /Rel activity inducing apoptosis of B cells: transcriptional activation of I{kappa}B{alpha}. Immunity 5: 31-40. [Medline]
  49. Nagarajan, R. P., F. Chen, W. Li, E. Vig, M. A. Harrington, H. Nakshatri, Y. Chen. 2000. Repression of transforming growth factor beta-mediated transcription by nuclear factor {kappa}B. Biochem. J. 348: 591-596.
  50. Roes, J., B. K. Choi, B. B. Cazac. 2003. Redirection of B cell responsiveness by transforming growth factor beta receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 7241-7246. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Naiki, Y., K. S. Michelsen, W. Zhang, S. Chen, T. M. Doherty, M. Arditi. 2004. TGF-beta differentially inhibits MyD88-dependent but not TRAM- and TRIF-dependent LPS-induced TLR4 signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 5491-5495.
  52. Wahl, S. M., N. Vasquez, W. Chen. 2004. Regulatory T cells and transcription factors: gatekeepers in allergic inflammation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16: 768-774. [Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
M.-J. Staquet, S.H. Durand, E. Colomb, A. Romeas, C. Vincent, F. Bleicher, S. Lebecque, and J.-C. Farges
Different Roles of Odontoblasts and Fibroblasts in Immunity
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2008; 87(3): 256 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
F. Carrouel, M.-L. Couble, C. Vanbelle, M.-J. Staquet, H. Magloire, and F. Bleicher
HUGO (FNDC3A): a New Gene Overexpressed in Human Odontoblasts
J. Dent. Res., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 131 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Dent. Res.Home page
T. Adachi, T. Nakanishi, H. Yumoto, K. Hirao, K. Takahashi, K. Mukai, H. Nakae, and T. Matsuo
Caries-related Bacteria and Cytokines Induce CXCL10 in Dental Pulp
J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2007; 86(12): 1217 - 1222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int ImmunolHome page
J. Zhang, N. Kawashima, H. Suda, Y. Nakano, Y. Takano, and M. Azuma
The existence of CD11c+ sentinel and F4/80+ interstitial dendritic cells in dental pulp and their dynamics and functional properties
Int. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 18(9): 1375 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Durand, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Farges, J.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Durand, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Farges, J.-C.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS