|
|
||||||||
,
,¶,**,







,
,¶,

* Laboratory of Cellular Immunobiology,
Laboratory of Tumor Immunology,
Allogeneic Blood and Marrow Transplantation and
Clinical Immunology Services,
¶
Division of Hematologic Oncology, Department of Medicine,
||
Biostatistics Service, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,
#
Laboratory of Gene Transfer and Gene Expression, Gene Transfer and Somatic Cell Engineering Facility,
**
Immunology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, and

Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
secretion. LCs expressing full-length Ag stimulated greater lytic activity than either peptide-transduced or peptide-pulsed LCs (p < 0.05), all in the absence of exogenous cytokines. pp65-transduced LCs presenting class I and II MHC-restricted epitopes expanded IFN-
-secreting CD4+ T cells, whereas pp65495503-transduced LCs did not. CD4+ T cell numbers even declined after stimulation by pp65495503 peptide-pulsed LCs. CD4+ T cell depletion confirmed their contribution to the more robust CTL responses. LCs, transduced with a retroviral vector encoding full-length Ag, stimulate potent CTLs directed against multiple epitopes in a CD4+ Th cell-dependent manner. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the defined types of conventional human DCs, we have demonstrated that peptide-pulsed LCs are more potent than dermal-interstitial DCs or blood monocyte-derived DCs in stimulating CTL against a recall viral Ag in vitro (4). Monocyte precursors of monocyte-derived DCs also do not undergo further cell division and thus do not expand like CD34+ HPCs. We have recently developed a reproducible system for the oncoretroviral transduction of CD34+ HPCs-derived human LCs in vitro in the absence of FCS (1), as FCS would otherwise mitigate their clinical application as cell-based vaccines. Using an influenza viral recall Ag, we have additionally demonstrated that LCs, genetically modified to express influenza matrix peptide, are more potent stimulators of Ag-specific CD8+ T cell responses than are peptide-pulsed LCs.
Optimal manipulation of cellular immunity in vivo will most likely require an approach that encompasses multiple Ags restricted to class I and class II MHC. CD4+ T lymphocyte responses can play an important role, not only in generating more robust CTL responses, but also in maintaining those responses and generating immunologic memory (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). We have therefore evaluated their role in enhancing the immune response stimulated by LCs transduced to express class II as well as class I MHC-restricted Ags derived from the full-length immunogenic CMVpp65 (10).
The goal was to define parameters for the eventual expression of cancer Ags by LCs for active immunization against tumors, using human CMV as the model. Our intention was not to expand large numbers of T cells ex vivo for adoptive immunotherapy, where the role of CD4+ T cells in such expansion has been difficult to distinguish from the role of exogenous cytokines (11, 12, 13, 14). Furthermore, even though most tumor Ags are either self or self-differentiation Ags, we considered recall responses against an immunogenic viral Ag useful for establishing the principal parameters of Ag presentation by gene-transduced LCs.
Most investigators have used monocyte-derived DCs for preclinical and clinical immunotherapy studies, but the blood monocyte precursors are no longer cycling and hence lack susceptibility to retroviral transduction. The breadth of the CTL response stimulated by CD34+ HPCs-derived LCs transduced with full-length Ag was therefore compared with that stimulated by LCs expressing only a single class I MHC-restricted epitope. Among the latter group of LCs, we compared those transduced with a vector encoding only the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted CMVpp65495503 peptide with LCs pulsed by the same peptide, thereby assessing the contribution of more sustained Ag expression after gene transduction.
Overall, these experiments yield proof-of-principle data regarding the afferent or sensitization arm of cellular immunity against Ags encoded by oncoretroviral transduction. This approach should in turn provide a means of broadening the range of MHC alleles that could present immunogenic but undefined peptide Ags and should prove applicable to active immunotherapies against tumors and pathogens.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
X-VIVO 15 (BioWhittaker) without serum or plasma was used to culture CD34+ HPCs for generating LCs. Functional assays for stimulating and assessing T cell responses used complete RPMI 1640 (containing 10 mM HEPES (Invitrogen Life Technologies), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Media Lab, Sloan-Kettering Institute, New York, NY), 50 µM 2-ME (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and 1% L-glutamine (Invitrogen Life Technologies)), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated (56°C for 30 min) autologous or single donor human plasma or serum. PG13 viral packaging cells were cultured in DMEM (Invitrogen Life Technologies) with penicillin/streptomycin, L-glutamine, and 2-ME as described, but supplemented with 10% FCS (Gemini Bio-Products). Packaging cells were thoroughly washed free of FCS and recultured in X-VIVO 15 for collection of retroviral stocks.
Cytokines
Sterile recombinant, LPS-, pyrogen-, and mycoplasma-free human cytokines included GM-CSF (sargramostim, Leukine; Berlex); FLT-3 ligand, TNF-
, TGF-
1, thrombopoietin, c-kit ligand or stem cell factor, IL-1
, IL-6 (all R&D Systems); and PGE2 (Calbiochem). All cytokines were supplied carrier-free by the manufacturer but were reconstituted using HSA (1% final HSA, 25% HSA, NDCs 63546-251-05 pharmaceutical grade, manufactured by Swiss Red Cross, distributed by Alpine Biologics) in PBS. Cytokine doses are specified below or as recently published (4) for the generation and maturation of CD34+ HPCs-derived human LCs.
Oncoretroviral vectors, packaging cell lines, and titration of retroviral supernatants
The SFG retroviral vector (15) encoded the Ag of interest, expressed under the transcriptional control of the Moloney murine leukemia virus long-terminal repeat. Constructs were designed that carried the gene encoding either enhanced GFP (eGFP); an HLA-A*0201-restricted immunodominant 9mer peptide of the CMVpp65 structural protein, NLVPMVATV (aa 495503); or the full-length CMVpp65 structural protein itself (16) (Fig. 1, retroviral vectors eGFP, p495, and pp65 as indicated). Each of these genes was linked through an internal ribosomal entry site to a gene that encoded puromycin-N-acetyltransferase resistance yielding bicistronic vectors (17). High titer PG13 packaging cell lines were generated and selected for resistance to puromycin (0.5 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) (18).
|
Retroviral vector titers were determined using indicator HeLa cells (CCL-2; American Type Culture Collection). HeLa cells were transduced with serial dilutions of cell-free (0.45-µm filtration, Acrodisc; Pall Gelman Laboratory) retroviral stocks over 16 h in the presence of polybrene (8 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich). Target cells had already been plated overnight, and one replicate well was used at the time of infection to measure the exact viable target T cell number. At 7296 h from the start of the transduction, the HeLa cells were analyzed. Enhanced GFP expression was assessed by flow cytometry. Puromycin resistance was determined by enumeration of viable colonies. The fraction of HeLa cells that yielded 1050% eGFP-positive cells or viable puromycin-resistant colonies was used to calculate the titer using the percentage of eGFP-positive or the percentage of puromycin-resistant/viable cells multiplied by the HeLa cell number multiplied by dilution factor, resulting in the number of infectious particles per milliliter.
Collection of human material for research
All use of human specimens adhered to protocols reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review and Privacy Board of Memorial Hospital, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. All investigators were trained and certified in the protection of research rights in human research.
Retroviral transduction and differentiation of CD34+ HPCs-derived DCs
Bone marrow or G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells were obtained as excess cells from donors already undergoing collection for other therapeutic protocols. CD34+ HPCs were isolated using positive immunomagnetic selection (CD34+ isolation and LS separation columns; Miltenyi Biotec) as previously reported (4).
CD34+ HPCs were initially cultured at 2 x 105 cells/3 ml/well in a six-well tissue culture plate (Costar; Corning) in the presence of thrombopoietin (50 ng/ml; R&D Systems), c-kit ligand (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems), and FLT-3 ligand (50 ng/ml; R&D Systems) (1). Twenty-four hours from the initial start of culture, the cycling CD34+ HPCs were transferred to nontissue culture-treated plates coated with RetroNectin (Takara Bio) (1). The cells in X-VIVO 15 and in thrombopoietin, FLT-3 ligand, and c-kit ligand were then exposed at a 1:1 volume ratio to FCS-free and packaging cell-free (0.45 µm filtration, Acrodisc; Pall Gelman Laboratory) retroviral stocks encoding the Ag of interest from 24 to 48 h and again from 48 to 72 h (1). Thereafter, the expanding CD34+ HPCs were washed free of retroviral supernatants, cytokines, and medium, and then replated in new tissue culture-treated six-well plates (Costar; Corning). These cells were cultured in serum/plasma-free X-VIVO 15 medium and cytokines, followed by cytokine-induced terminal maturation, to generate LCs exactly as reported (4).
T lymphocytes and CD4+ T cell depletion
T cells were obtained from tissue culture plastic (BD Falcon brand tissue culture plates no. 35-3003; BD Labware) nonadherent PBMCs. T cells were further purified by nonadherence and elution from nylon wool columns (Polysciences). CD3+ purity was at least 95%. Where CD4+ T cell depletion was required, the bulk T cells were opsonized with anti-CD4 magnetic beads (Dynal Biotech) at a final concentration of 4 x 107 beads per 1 x 107 T cells/ml. Bead-opsonized cells were incubated for 30 min at 4°C, followed by magnetic depletion and washing of the remaining cells. Flow cytometry confirmed purity to be at least 95% CD3+CD8+ T cells.
Human CMV peptide (CMVpp65495503) and HLA-A*0201-CMVpp65495503 tetramer synthesis
The CMV structural protein pp65 includes an HLA-A*0201-restricted, immunodominant 9mer peptide, NLVPMVATV, from aa 495 to 503, which was commercially synthesized (ResGen; Invitrogen Life Technologies). The peptide sequence and m.w. were confirmed upon receipt, resuspended in 50% (v/v) RPMI-DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich), and stored frozen at 20°C. Peptides were thawed once for dilution and use.
The HLA-A*0201-CMVpp65495503 peptide tetramer was synthesized using the described synthetic peptide and conjugated with streptavidin-PE (Tetramer Core Facility, Sloan-Kettering Institute). Positive tetramer reactivity required a distinct population
1 log above the mean fluorescent intensity of the negative population.
Induction of CMV-specific T cell responses
Mature LCs, which had been transduced during pre-expansion in thrombopoietin, FLT-3 ligand, and c-kit ligand with retroviral vectors encoding either the CMVpp65495503 peptide (p495-LCs) or the full-length CMVpp65 (pp65-LCs), were washed free of cytokines and resuspended in complete RPMI 164010% autologous heat-inactivated serum or plasma. For peptide loading in lieu of gene transduction, mature LCs (10 x 106/ml) were separately cultured with 10 µM HLA-A*0201-restricted CMVpp65495503 peptide for 1 h at room temperature (CMV-pulsed LCs). Each of the three types of CMV Ag-loaded LCs were then cocultured with 2 x 106 purified autologous HLA-A*0201 T cells from human CMV-seropositive donors in 24-well tissue culture plates (Costar; Corning) at a ratio of 1:30 LCs to T cells. After an initial 67 days stimulation, the responder T cells were harvested, washed, and restimulated by the same type of LCs for a second round of stimulation over another 57 days. Although it was not critical to restimulate T cells using a potent viral Ag-like CMV, differences between experimental groups were more definitive after the second stimulation.
Phenotypic analyses by flow cytometry
Fluorescein (FITC), PE, CyChrome, and allophycocyanin-conjugated mouse anti-human mAbs included anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD45RA, anti-CD27, anti-CD62 ligand, anti-CCR7 (all from BD Biosciences), and anti-IFN-
(Miltenyi Biotec). Isotype controls included IgG1-FITC, IgG1-PE, and IgG2a-FITC (DakoCytomation). Flow cytometry assessment used three- and four-color analyses on a FACSCalibur (BD Immunocytometry Systems), gating for collection and analysis of live events. Up to 100,000 events were collected, depending on the rarity of the event being analyzed, after live gating on lymphocytes by forward and side scatter.
IFN-
ELISPOT assay
Multiscreen Immobilon-P plates (Millipore) were coated with 10 µg/ml anti-human IFN-
(1-D1K; DiaPharma Group) in PBS overnight at 4°C. Unbound Ab was removed by three washings with PBS. After blocking the plates with 10% heat-inactivated autologous plasma/RPMI 1640 medium (1 h, 37°C), 105 cells/well were seeded in triplicates. Targets for restimulation of T cells in the ELISPOT assays were either CMVpp65495503 peptide-pulsed K562-HLA-A*0201 transfectants (a gift of Dr. T. Wölfel, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany) (19) or mature transduced or peptide-pulsed LCs, as had been used for initial sensitization, all at 1 x 104 cells/well. CD8+ T cell responders were purified by positive immunomagnetic selection (Miltenyi Biotec). Replicate control wells contained CD8+ T cells with unloaded targets or CD8+ T cells that had been stimulated by eGFP-transduced LCs. Medium was complete RPMI 1640 with 10% heat-inactivated autologous plasma, all in a final volume of 200 µl per well. Cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 in a water-saturated incubator for 20 h. IFN-
production was then detected by addition of 1/500 dilution of biotinylated mouse anti-human IFN-
Ab (clone 7-B6-1; Mabtech). After washing the wells five to six times with PBS/0.05% Tween 20, peroxidase-labeled streptavidin was added. The spots were developed with AEC substrate (3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole, Vector ABC kit; Vector Laboratories). Spot development was stopped after 4 min by washing with running distilled water. The plates were examined under a stereomicroscope, and spots were evaluated with an Automated ELISPOT Reader System with KS 4.3 software (Carl Zeiss).
IFN-
secretion assay
Measurement of IFN-
secretion by Ag-specific T cells was performed using a flow cytometry based assay (IFN-
Secretion kit; Miltenyi Biotec). Targets for restimulation of T cells were either CMVpp65495503 peptide-pulsed K562-HLA-A*0201 transfectants (a gift of Dr. Thomas Wölfel, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany) (19) or the same mature transduced or peptide-pulsed LCs as had been used for initial sensitization. The tetramer-labeled T cells and the target cells for restimulation were cocultured overnight for 18 h at 37°C. Secreted IFN-
was then detected on the T cell surface by opsonizing cells for 5 min at 4°C with an IFN-
-specific, high affinity capture matrix, which is a bispecific Ab-Ab conjugate directed against both CD45 and IFN-
. Cells were then transferred to warm medium at 37°C for 45 min to permit secretion of IFN-
. Thereafter, the cells were washed and stained for 30 min at 4°C with Abs to any additional epitopes of interest, washed again, and immediately analyzed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) using CellQuest software.
Chromium release CTL assay
Cytolytic activity exerted by T lymphocytes responding to initial LCs sensitization but tested as effectors against radiolabeled targets was measured in a standard 51Cr release assay. Targets were K562-HLA-A*0201-transfected cells that were pulsed at 10 x 106 cells/ml with 10 µM CMVpp65495503 peptide for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 2 x 106 cells/ml with 1 µM CMVpp65495503 peptide at 37°C. Target cells were labeled with 75 µCi of 51Cr (Na51CrO4; New England Nuclear) per 2 x 106 cells/ml at 37°C for 1 h. A total of 2 x 103 radiolabeled target cells was plated per round-bottom well of a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar; Corning). Graded doses of responder T cells, acting as effectors in this CTL assay, were added in triplicates to the microwells. T cell counts were based on total viable cells, not just T cell blasts or CD8+ T cells, so that total cytolytic activity generated per initial sensitization condition would be measured. A 30-µl supernatant was removed from each microwell after 46 h, transferred to a LumaPlate-96 (Yttrium Silicate Scintillator-coated white microplate, TopSeal-A; Packard BioScience) and counted in a gamma counter (Topcount NXT, Microplate Scintillation and Luminescence Counter; Packard BioScience). Cytolytic activity was calculated in the typical manner, using triplicate means to obtain the quotient of the experimental 51Cr release less the spontaneous 51Cr release, divided by the total 51Cr release less the spontaneous 51Cr release, and then multiplied by 100 to give a percentage. The percentage of lysis of K562 or empty K562 HLA-A*0201-transfected cells was subtracted from the lysis of CMVpp65495503 peptide-pulsed targets to yield a final percentage of specific lysis.
Statistics
The test of equality of means between groups was based on the two-sample t statistic. A stratified t test was used for group comparisons in functional assays, in which the stratification variable was dose level.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We first focused on class I MHC-restricted CD8+ T cell responses. We asked whether CD34+ HPCs-derived LCs expressing a transgene encoding CMV Ags, especially the full-length structural protein pp65, were more potent in promoting CD8+ T cell responses over LCs pulsed with a single immunodominant peptide derived from that same protein. The frequency of CD8+ T cells reactive with HLA-A*0201-CMVpp65495503 peptide tetramers was determined by flow cytometry after two rounds of stimulation by each of the LCs populations (Fig. 2A). The transduced LCs stimulated a higher proportion of tetramer-reactive cells among the total CD8+ T cells than did the peptide-pulsed LCs. LCs transduced with the full-length pp65 also stimulated a higher proportion of tetramer-reactive CD8+ T cells than did LCs transduced only with the pp65495503 peptide. The expansion of HLA-A*0201 CMV tetramer-positive cells after stimulation with eGFP-LCs was negligible.
|
IFN-
-secreting CD4+ T cells comprise a larger proportion of the T cell response stimulated by gene-modified LCs, compared with peptide-pulsed LCs, especially when the transgene encodes the full-length CMVpp65
We evaluated the expansion of CD4+ T cells after two rounds of stimulation by CMVpp65-transduced, CMVpp65495503-transduced, or CMVpp65495503-pulsed LCs. Autologous T cells from CMV-seropositive donors were stimulated by each type of LCs at an LCs to T cell ratio of 1:30 without exogenous cytokines. The total number of CD4+ T cells recovered after two stimulations was greatest in response to the full-length CMVpp65-transduced LCs, was relatively static in response to the CMVpp65495503-transduced LCs, and declined after stimulation by LCs pulsed only with the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted 9mer CMV peptide (Fig. 3A).
|
-secreting T cells responding to each type of LCs stimulator, using a flow cytometry-based cytokine secretion assay (Fig. 3B). Target cells used to rechallenge lymphocytes were the same LCs used for initial sensitization (pp65-transduced LCs) (Fig. 3B, left). Rechallenge of responder T cells from the other conditions by the respective LCs used for their initial stimulation gave IFN-
secretion profiles (data not shown) that were qualitatively similar to that in Fig. 3B (left), but with relative percentages of total IFN-
-positive cells as shown in Fig. 3C (upper row). Controls included responder T cells that were not rechallenged (Fig. 3B, middle) and T cells stimulated by control LCs without Ag (Fig. 3B, right).
We restricted subsequent analyses to IFN-
-positive cells only. This gating enriched for Ag-specific T cells, in contrast to the analyses of total responder T cells in Fig. 2. The same LCs used for primary sensitization (Fig. 3C, pp65, p495, CMV-peptide) were used as the targets for overnight rechallenge of each population of responding T cells in ELISPOT assays. The percentages of IFN-
-secreting lymphocytes among the entire responder populations are indicated for each gate (Fig. 3C, inset, upper row). CD4+ T cell expansion was greater after stimulation by transduced LCs than by peptide-pulsed LCs (Fig. 3C, middle row). This was especially true upon stimulation by LCs expressing the full-length CMVpp65 (pp65-LCs), and hence class II MHC-restricted Ags derived from same. Given the fact that even the CMVpp65495503 peptide-transduced LCs (p495-LCs) could stimulate IFN-
-secreting CD4+ T cells, we reasoned that the vector itself provided nonspecific helper epitopes presented by class II MHC. As for the trace number of IFN-
-secreting CD4+ T cells responding to stimulation by the peptide-pulsed LCs (CMV-pep-LCs; range from 2.4 to 5% among IFN-
-secreting cells and from 0.11 to 0.52% among total viable cells, n = 3 independent experiments), we inferred a low level of nonspecific bystander activation of CD4+ T cells within the bulk T cell responder population.
Although the peptide-pulsed LCs stimulated the fewest IFN-
-secreting cells among the three LCs conditions tested (Fig. 3C, upper row), these cells included a larger proportion of HLA-A*0201-CMVpp65495503 tetramer-reactive CD8+ T cells than did the responder T cells stimulated by transduced LCs (Fig. 3C, lower row). LCs transduced to express only the peptide also stimulated proportionally more tetramer-reactive CD8+ T cells than did the LCs transduced to express the full-length CMVpp65. This pattern of CD8+ T cell responses within the IFN-
-secreting responders (Fig. 3C, lower row) was the reverse of that seen for CD4+ T cell responses (Fig. 3C, middle row). Note also that each condition included an additional subpopulation of reactive IFN-
-secreting CD8+ T cells that did not bind the HLA-A*0201-CMVpp65495503 tetramer. This result was especially true for those T cells stimulated by transduced LCs and in particular by the LCs expressing the full-length CMVpp65.
Human CD34+ HPCs-derived LCs stimulate greater functional T cell responses after retroviral gene transfer of CMV Ags, especially full-length pp65, than after CMV peptide pulsing
We next turned to an evaluation of the functional activity of the responding CD8+ T cells. Autologous T lymphocytes from CMV-seropositive donors were sensitized by CMVpp65-transduced LCs (pp65-LCs), CMVpp65495503 peptide-transduced LCs (p495-LCs), or CMVpp65495503 peptide-pulsed LCs (CMV-pep-LCs) at a 1:30 ratio of LCs to T cells without exogenous cytokines.
After two rounds of stimulation, CD8+ T cells were re-exposed either to K562-HLA-A*0201 transfectant targets pulsed with the CMVpp65495503 peptide or to the same LCs stimulators used for initial sensitization (respective LCs). The resulting IFN-
secretion was measured in ELISPOT assays from 100,000 input CD8+ T cells plated in triplicate in flat-bottom 96-well plates (Fig. 4A). A representative well from each condition is shown after development of the enzyme substrate linked to the anti-IFN-
Ab (Fig. 4B). When the target could present only class I HLA-restricted Ag, i.e., K562-HLA-A*0201 transfectants, the responder-effector T cells exhibited similar IFN-
secretion regardless of which transduced LCs population had been used as the initial stimulator (Fig. 4A). Both transduced LCs populations, however, were significantly more immunogenic than the peptide-pulsed LCs (p < 0.01, two-sample t statistic) (Fig. 4A).
|
response against the same eGFP-transduced LCs targets used for initial sensitization. The broader CD8+ T cell response against additional CMV Ags presented by the respective LCs but not by the K562-HLA-A*0201 targets, and the apparent contribution of CD4+ T cell help in boosting the Ag-specific CD8+ T cell responses, was further confirmed in these ELISPOT assays, especially when using the transduced LCs. Finally, we confirmed relative potency between the different LCs stimulators in a standard 51Cr release assay from targets killed by CTL (Fig. 4C). Effectors for this CTL assay were derived from the responder lymphocytes generated after two rounds of stimulation. Total cells, not just CD8+ T cells or blasts, were added to achieve the indicated E:T ratios. This procedure provided a readout of total cytolytic activity generated per initial sensitizing LCs condition. These data further confirmed the superiority of the LCs transduced with the full-length CMVpp65 (p < 0.01 compared with all other conditions). In turn, and as expected from prior studies using influenza Ags, the peptide-transduced LCs were superior to the peptide-pulsed LCs just as in the ELISPOT assay (p < 0.01).
CD4+ T cell help during afferent sensitization by CMV Ag-bearing LCs supports a more robust CD8+ T cell response
Although we had already characterized the proportional CD4+ T cell contribution to the responder or efferent side of the response to LCs sensitization against CMV (see also Fig. 3), the data presented in Fig. 4 indicated a role for CD4+ T cells during the afferent arm as well. We investigated this further by stimulating T cells with the different CMV Ag-bearing LCs, with and without CD4+ T cell depletion, before each of the two rounds of stimulation. Using the percentage of tetramer-reactive lymphocytes detected among the total CD8+ T cell responders, we found a negative effect of CD4+ T cell depletion on the sensitizing or afferent arm of the stimulated responses (Fig. 5A). This effect achieved statistical significance over two rounds of stimulation for both of the transduced LCs stimulators, but not for the peptide-pulsed LCs despite some decrease in the proportion of tetramer-reactive cells (Fig. 5B, mean ± SD from three independent experiments similar to the results shown in Fig. 5A). These results demonstrate that CD4+ T cells not only constitute part of the response against transduced LCs-presenting CMV Ags, especially those carrying the transgene encoding full-length CMVpp65, but also support a more robust CD8+, tetramer-reactive T cell response. The sensitizing class II MHC-restricted Ags are again presumed to be those encoded by the full-length CMVpp65 as well as some nonspecific Ags associated with the retroviral vector itself.
|
After two stimulations by the three types of CMV Ag-bearing LCs, the autologous T cell responders from seropositive donors were analyzed for markers of activation or lymphoid homing (Fig. 6). Analysis was limited to CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6A) and to both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6B). None of the CD8+ T cells that were also HLA-A*0201-CMVpp65495503 peptide tetramer-reactive, nor any of the IFN-
-secreting lymphocytes, expressed the lymphoid homing receptors, L-selectin (CD62 ligand), CD27, or CCR7, or the naive T cell epitope, CD45RA. This phenotype is characteristic of the effector memory phenotype (20). Data shown are T cells responding to LCs transduced with the vector encoding the full-length CMVpp65, but T cell responders to the peptide-transduced or peptide-pulsed LCs displayed the same effector memory phenotype (data not shown).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data demonstrate that gene-modified LCs expressing full-length Ag also present class II MHC-restricted epitopes that provide T cell help. We confirmed this in two ways, with respect to both the afferent or sensitization arm, as well as the effector arm of the lymphocyte responses. CD4+ T cell depletion had the greatest effect on stimulation by LCs transduced to express full-length Ag, the least effect on stimulation by peptide-pulsed LCs, and an intermediate effect on LCs transduced with the peptide construct.
Regarding the effector arm, LCs bearing the transgene encoding full-length CMVpp65 stimulated robust CD4+ responses, which we detected in IFN-
secretion assays upon re-exposure to targets also expressing the full-length Ag. We additionally noted that LCs transduced with the vector expressing only the immunodominant peptide provided some nonspecific help, most likely derived from other components of the vector construct. Even the peptide-pulsed LCs stimulated a background CD4+ T cell response (
5%), presumably due to a bystander effect from cytokines secreted during the initial stimulatory culture. Importantly, the CD4+ T cell responses that we detected were not confounded by the introduction of exogenous cytokines that are often used to expand T cells for adoptive immunotherapy (11, 12, 13, 14, 21).
We also identified a tetramer nonreactive subpopulation among the IFN-
secreting CD8+ T cells, especially after stimulation by transduced LCs. This finding suggested that either 1) transduced LCs provided stronger Ag-signaling compared with peptide-pulsed LCs, resulting in down-modulation of TCR (22, 23, 24) and inaccessibility to tetramer binding, or 2) responses developed against additional class I MHC-presented epitopes derived from CMV or from the vector itself, which the available tetramer could not detect. The fact that the proportion of tetramer nonreactive CD8+ T cells was roughly similar after stimulation and rechallenge by each of the transduced LCs would favor the first explanation. That the peptide-pulsed LCs, which could not present additional class I MHC-restricted epitopes, also generated a small population of tetramer nonreactive CD8+ T cells would further support the first explanation. In contrast, our data do not exclude broader responses against additional class I MHC-restricted epitopes presented by the transduced LCs, which were not detected by the HLA-A*0201/CMVp495503 tetramers.
We have focused on the LCs for these studies because we have previously demonstrated that peptide-pulsed LCs are much more potent than other DCs types, including the commonly used blood monocyte-derived DCs, in stimulating Ag-specific CTLs (4). LCs also develop ex vivo from cycling CD34+ HPCs and are thus amenable to retroviral transduction that can only target dividing cells (4). The alternative differentiation pathway from cycling CD34+ HPCs yields dermal-interstitial DCs (4, 25, 26, 27); and although these could be modified by retroviral transduction, they remained less potent stimulators for these CD8+ CTL responses than did their LCs counterparts (data not shown and Ref.4).
Monocyte-derived DCs differentiate from nondividing precursors and would therefore be susceptible to genetic modification only by constructs that do not require cycling targets, e.g., adenoviral or adenoviral-associated lentiviral or fowlpox vectors (12, 14, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32). Immunogenicity of the constructs themselves, however, has often limited the efficacy of these approaches. In some cases infection has also interfered with normal DCs immunogenicity (32), which we have not observed with retroviral vectors (1, 33). Lentiviral vectors have been used to genetically modify monocyte-derived DCs (34, 35). Although these and the other aforementioned vectors have the potential advantage of targeting noncycling cells like monocyte precursors, durable expression can prove more challenging than with retroviral constructs (1). Other methods like uptake of inactivated CMVs or inactivated CMV-infected cell lysates (11) have not been addressed by these studies. All conventional DCs can take up exogenous Ag for cross-presentation on class I MHC (4). LCs, however, cross-present Ag more effectively than do monocyte-derived DCs, which by inference must sequester and degrade a greater proportion of phagocytosed Ag than they process and present (4).
Methods of loading complete Ag onto DCs are critical to simultaneous stimulation of CD4+ T cells, which are important to the maintenance of CD8+ CTL responsiveness and memory (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). In this respect it will be important to compare the DCs-based approach defined in this study with that using artificial APCs (16). An important unknown is the relative efficacy of artificial APCs vs DCs, the latter of which typically do not require additional cytokine adjuvants to elicit T cell responses, perhaps even in seronegative individuals and possibly by extension to tumor-bearing patients. Artificial APCs can be generated in single defined lots, however, which are then available for immediate and potentially broad use, bypassing the need for autologous cells. There may nevertheless be issues about the immunogenicity of mouse fibroblast-derived artificial APCs used in humans, which are irrelevant to the use of autologous DCs.
Finally, recent data indicate that vaccine approaches will need to target multiple viral Ags to restore sufficiently broad immunity (36). DCs may prove advantageous in this respect as well, owing to their excess capacity for MHC-bound Ags (37) and their panoply of surface costimulators and secreted cytokine and chemokine molecules (38, 39). The extent to which retroviral vectors can sustain protein expression through multiple divisions of CD34+ progenitors en route to fully differentiated DCs, however, compared with lentiviral-transduced proteins in nondividing cells, is an important unknown that merits further assessment.
We have used CMVs as the model Ag for these studies and tested the capacity of gene-modified LCs to stimulate adaptive T cell immune responses in vitro from CMV-seropositive individuals. The rationale was to define parameters for the eventual expression of cancer Ags by LCs for active immunization against tumors. The goal was not to apply this approach to the cytokine-supported expansion ex vivo of DCs-stimulated, Ag-specific T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. CMV responses from seropositive donors provided a system with a known immunodominant Ag, its corresponding immunodominant peptide, and restriction to a commonly expressed HLA allele.
These results have thus established an important proof-of-principle, which we are now pursuing in the context of antitumor immunity. Any approach that allows DCs to process and present antigenic epitopes from the complete Ag, tailored to their own MHC molecules, obviates the need for prior knowledge of immunodominant Ags and their restricting MHC alleles. The additional advantage of retroviral transduction, however, is that Ag presentation is sustained for at least 28 days, and normal immunogenicity of transduced DCs is maintained (1, 33). The sustained presentation of both class I and II MHC-restricted antigenic epitopes should also prove very effective in overcoming the apparent tolerance toward tumor Ags, most of which are self or altered-self Ags, as well as in maintaining immunologic memory.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work is supported by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Grants P01 CA 59350 and R01 CA-83070 (to J.W.Y.), by William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin of the Commonwealth Cancer Foundation for Research and The Experimental Therapeutics Center of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (to J.W.Y.). ![]()
2 Current address: Laboratoire de Génétique Moléculaire, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 614, Institut Fédératif de Recherches Multidisciplinaires sur les Peptides, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, 22 boulevard Gambetta, 76183 Rouen, France. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. James W. Young, Box 553, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address: youngjw{at}mskcc.org ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: HPCs, hemopoietic progenitor cell; LCs, Langerhans-type dendritic cell; DCs, dendritic cell; eGFP, enhanced GFP. ![]()
Received for publication August 8, 2005. Accepted for publication December 9, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. J. Immunol. 154: 5851-5861. [Abstract]
. J. Exp. Med. 182: 1111-1119.
ELISPOT assays. J. Immunol. Methods 259: 95-110. [Medline]
. J. Exp. Med. 184: 695-706.
. II. Functional analysis. Blood 90: 1458-1470.
secretion. J. Virol. 74: 11329-11338. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. A. Colleton, X.-L. Huang, N. M. Melhem, Z. Fan, L. Borowski, G. Rappocciolo, and C. R. Rinaldo Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Responses Induced by Myeloid Dendritic Cells J. Virol., June 15, 2009; 83(12): 6288 - 6299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |