|
|
||||||||


* Cancer Immunology Program, Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia; and
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-dependent mechanism and independently of IL-10. Adoptively transferred Treg suppressed NK cell antimetastatic function in RAG-1-deficient mice. Depletion of Treg before NK cell activation via NKG2D and the activating IL-12 cytokine, dramatically enhanced NK cell-mediated suppression of tumor growth and metastases. Our data illustrate at least one mechanism by which Treg can suppress NK cell antitumor activity and highlight the effectiveness of combining Treg inhibition with subsequent NK cell activation to promote strong innate antitumor immunity. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tumor immunity is not only T cell dependent; recently, a number of studies in leukemia (12), lymphoma (13), and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (14) revealed that NK cell activation and cytotoxicity influence patient outcome. NK cells are regulated by cytokines in the environment, and when interacting with tumor directly, there is a delicate balance between inhibitory signals mediated by MHC class I molecules and activating signals triggered by specific ligands (15, 16, 17). In particular, the activating NKG2D receptor expressed by NK cells is an important mechanism of tumor recognition and suppression (18, 19, 20). Tumors possess many mechanisms by which they might evade NK cell-mediated suppression (16), such as shedding of soluble ligands for activation receptors (21, 22) and secretion of inhibitory cytokines such as TGF-
(23, 24, 25); however, to date, the role that Treg might play in hampering NK cell activation has been largely ignored. In this study we present a series of experiments that convincingly demonstrate that Treg directly suppress NK cell cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo, thus providing a novel rational approach to stimulating more powerful innate antitumor immunity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inbred C57BL/6 (B6) and BALB/c wild-type (WT) mice were purchased from the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research. The B6 RAG-1-gene-targeted mice were 10 generations backcrossed to B6 and were bred at the Peter MacCallum Cancer Center. Mice, 612 wk of age, were used in all experiments that were performed according to animal experimental ethics committee guidelines.
Isolation of spleen NK cells, Treg, and cytotoxicity assay
Spleen cells were depleted of B cells by labeling with anti-B220 (clone RA3-6B2), followed by incubation with sheep anti-rat IgG-conjugated immunomagnetic Dynabeads M-450 (Dynal Biotech). Bead-labeled cells were magnetically removed using a Dynal MPC-1 magnetic particle concentrator. Remaining cells were subsequently labeled with anti-FcR mAb (clone 2.4G2 grown in-house), CD4-FITC (clone RM4-5), anti-CD25-PE (clone PC61), anti-NK1.1-PE-Cy7 (clone PK136), and anti-TCR
-APC (clone H57-597; all purchased from BD Pharmingen), and specific cell populations were sorted using a FACSAria (BD Biosciences). Spleen NK cells were sorted as NK1.1+TCR
cells, Treg were sorted as TCR
highCD4+CD25high cells, and conventional CD4 T cells were sorted as TCR
highCD4+CD25 cells. The purities were standard (CD4+ T cells, >99%; NK cells, >98%; Treg, >97%). The cytolytic activity of NK cells from PC61- or control Ig-treated mice was tested against tumor target cells at a number of E:T cell ratios against NK cell-sensitive targets in a standard 6-h 51Cr release assay as previously described (26). Where indicated, NK cells were cocultured at a 3:1, 1:1, or 1:3 ratio with CD4+CD25high or CD4+CD25 T cells. Before coculture, in some groups CD4+CD25high or CD4+CD25 T cells were preactivated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 bound to plastic plates for 3 h or with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 on plastic for 48 h with 500 U/ml IL-2 as previously described (27). In some experiments NK cells and activated CD4+CD25high T cells were cocultured or separated by Transwells, with targets and NK cells incubated together. In the same experiments the supernatants from 48-h activated T cells were cocultured with NK cells and tumor target cells. The coculture assay was performed in the presence of neutralizing purified anti-mouse TGF-
(anti-mTGF-
; 1D11.16), anti-mIL-10 (JES-2A5), or control Ig (30 µg/ml).
Flow cytometric analysis
NK cells and Treg were assessed after PC61 treatment for activation and depletion, using the following reagents from BE Pharmingen: anti-
TCR-FITC or -allophycocyanin (H57-597), NK1.1-PE (PK136), anti-CD4 (GK1.5), and anti-CD25 (7D4). The stained cells were analyzed on a FACScan (BD Biosciences), and the data were processed using the CellQuest program (BD Biosciences).
Tumor cell lines
The following standard experimental mouse tumor cell lines were used in vitro and in vivo: matched B16 melanoma (H-2b) and B16-Rae-1
melanoma (provided by Dr. L. Lanier, University of California, San Francisco, CA), matched RMA-S lymphoma (H-2b) and RMA-S-Rae-1
lymphoma, and the 3LL Lewis lung carcinoma (H-2b). The maintenance of all tumor cell lines has been previously described (28).
Tumor models in vivo
3LL, B16, and B16-Rae1
tumor cells were inoculated i.v. at the doses indicated, and on day 14, the surface metastases were counted with the aid of a dissecting microscope. Recombinant mouse IL-12 was provided by Genetics Institute, and the preparation of IL-12 was diluted in PBS immediately before use. RMA-S-Rae1
and RMA-S were inoculated s.c. at the doses indicated. Tumor growth was measured every second day with a caliper square as the product of two diameters.
NK and CD8 cell depletion
To determine the effector subsets mediating tumor suppression, some groups of B6 and BALB/c mice were additionally depleted of NK cells or CD8+ cells using 100 µg of rabbit anti-asialoGM1 Ab i.p. (Wako Chemicals) or anti-CD8 (53-6.7) on days 0, 1, and 7 (after tumor inoculation), respectively, or both together as described previously (29). Specific NK cell and CD8+ T cell depletion was validated as previously described (29, 30).
Statistical analysis
Significant differences in the number of metastases and tumor size were determined by unpaired Mann-Whitney U test, whereas significant differences in NK cell cytotoxicity were determined by Students t test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To examine the importance of Treg in controlling NK cell-mediated immunity to tumors, we initially chose to examine the Rae-1+ 3LL experimental metastases model (31). Using a standard protocol for effectively depleting Treg using the anti-CD25 mAb (data not shown), we demonstrated that at lower tumor doses inoculated, groups of mice depleted of Treg displayed significantly lower numbers of 3LL lung metastases than mice receiving a control Ig (Fig. 1A). At the highest dose of 3LL inoculated, Treg depletion alone was without effect, suggesting that the natural host response was completely overwhelmed at this point. The enhanced rejection associated with Treg depletion was NK cell dependent, as illustrated by the loss of all host control of metastases with concomitant depletion of NK cells using either anti-asGM1 (Fig. 1A) or anti-NK1.1 (data not shown).
|
tumor cells were injected at two different doses that grew effectively in mice receiving control Ig (Fig. 1B). Depletion of Treg cells strikingly enabled host immunity to control and in some mice completely suppress the lung metastases of B16-Rae1
tumor cells (Fig. 1B). Again, this suppression enabled by Treg depletion was NK cell dependent (data not shown). Suppression required NKG2D ligand on the tumor cells, because at these doses B16 tumor cells grew in B6 mice regardless of whether Treg had been depleted (Fig. 1C). To examine the effect of Treg depletion on tumor growth in a s.c. site and in a model system where tumor cells lack MHC class I expression and are rejected by NK cells using perforin, we used the RMA-S-Rae-1
tumor model (19). To examine the effects of Treg depletion, RMA-S-Rae1
tumor cells were injected at two different high doses that grew effectively in mice receiving control Ig (Fig. 1C). By contrast, depletion Treg cells strikingly enabled host immunity to control and in some mice reject the growth of large numbers of RMA-S-Rae1
tumor cells (Fig. 1C). At least some of the suppression was mediated by NKG2D ligand on the tumor cells at these doses, because RMA-S tumor cells grew just as effectively in B6 mice regardless of whether Treg cells had been depleted (data not shown). NKG2D-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity is suppressed by Treg cells
We next examined whether Treg may directly inhibit NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. We first compared the abilities of naive and activated CD4+CD25high (Treg) and conventional CD4+CD25 T cells to affect NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. By sorting both NK and T cells from B6 mice and coculturing them at a ratio of 1:1, we were able to demonstrate the specific ability of in vitro 3-h activated Treg to suppress NK cell-mediated cytolysis of RMA-S-Rae1
target cells (Fig. 2A). Similar data were obtained at a ratio of 3:1, and consistent with the importance of cell density, at a 1:3 ratio of Treg:NK cells, the suppression of Treg began to diminish (data not shown). Neither unstimulated Treg nor unstimulated or stimulated conventional CD4+ T cells had any effect on NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity in this assay (Fig. 2A). Surprisingly, 3-h activated Treg did not suppress NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity of RMA-S target cells to any detectable extent (Fig. 2B). In support of a specific effect of 3-h activated Treg on the NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity of target cells, comparative data were obtained using B16-Rae1
and B16 target cells (Fig. 2, C and D). In both RMA-S-Rae1
and B16-Rae-1
experiments, the release from suppression of the NKG2D-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity was almost complete, given the residual non-NKG2D-mediated cytolysis (i.e., vs RMA-S or B16) displayed by NK cells against these targets. To examine whether additional activation of Treg might enhance and broaden Treg suppression of NK cell cytotoxicity, Treg were activated with anti-CD3/CD28 and IL-2 for 48 h before coculture (Fig. 2, E and F). Very similar data were obtained with Treg able to significantly and specifically suppress NK cell-mediated cytolysis of RMA-S-Rae1
target cells.
|
dependent
Given the reported ability of TGF-
to inhibit lymphocyte cytotoxicity (23, 24), we next examined whether TGF-
produced by coculturing NK cells and 48-h activated Treg might be responsible for the suppression of NKG2D-mediated NK cell cytotoxicity of ligand-expressing tumor targets (Fig. 3A). Clearly, an anti-TGF-
mAb was able to restore NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity of RMA-Rae-1
tumor cells, whereas IL-10, which is also produced by activated Treg (32), was without effect (Fig. 3A). Importantly, neutralization of TGF-
did not increase the NK cell cytotoxicity of these target cells in the absence of activated Treg or in the presence of activated conventional CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3B), suggesting that neither TGF-
production by NK cells or tumor cells was contributing to the suppression of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Attempts to transfer suppression on NK cell cytotoxicity by using the supernatants of activated Treg were unsuccessful, suggesting that the functional TGF-
may be surface bound, rather than secreted by Treg (Fig. 3C). In concert with this supposition, when activated Treg were separated by Transwells from NK cells and tumor targets, suppression was not detected (Fig. 3C). Consistent with a need for continual direct exposure of Treg to NK cells to mediate suppression of cytotoxicity, spleen cells examined ex vivo from Treg-depleted and cIg-treated B6 mice displayed equivalent levels of cytotoxicity toward each of the target cells, RMA-S-Rae-1
and RMA-S (Fig. 3D), B16-Rae-1
, and B16 (data not shown). We did not detect any other alterations in spleen, liver, bone marrow, peripheral blood, or lymph node NK cell numbers, activation status (as determined by Mac-1 and CD69), or homeostatic proliferative capacity in naive B6 mice depleted of Treg (data not shown).
|
Because depletion with anti-CD25 mAb has been reported to lead to significant activation of CD4+ T cells (6), it was possible that such activated CD4+ T cells might be indirectly activating NK cells via their IL-2 production. To address whether Treg might directly inhibit NK cell-mediated tumor suppression of metastases, 48-h activated Treg or activated CD4+CD25 T cells were adoptively transferred into B6 RAG-1-deficient mice 6 h after receiving i.v. B16-Rae-1
tumor cells (Fig. 4). Strikingly, transfer of activated Treg, but not resting Treg or activated CD4+CD25 T cells, enhanced B16-Rae-1
tumor metastases, but was without effect upon B16 tumor metastasis in the lung (Fig. 4). Mice depleted of NK cells did not effectively control B16-Rae-1
tumor metastases in RAG-1-deficient mice that had or had not received activated Treg (Fig. 4B). These data support the ability of activated Treg to directly suppress NK cell function both in vitro and in vivo.
|
Recently, we have shown that cytokines such as IL-2 and IL-12 can mediate their antimetastatic activity via NK cells in large part via the NKG2D-NKG2D ligand pathway (31). Although IL-12 has been shown in some model systems to overcome the effects of Treg suppression of T cell responses, our data in this study raised the possibility that IL-12 therapy may be more effective against NKG2D ligand-expressing tumors in a setting where Treg were depleted. Thus, we examined the effect of Treg depletion on IL-12 therapy at a dose of 3LL tumor cells at which Treg depletion alone was of no effect and the efficacy of IL-12 was limited. A combination of IL-12 and Treg depletion significantly reduced 3LL lung metastases compared with Treg depletion or IL-12 therapy alone (Fig. 5A). The combined effect of IL-12 and Treg depletion was completely dependent on NK cells and was independent of CD8+ cells (Fig. 5B). The combination of IL-12 and Treg depletion was shown to also be more effective than Treg depletion or IL-12 alone in BALB/c mice injected s.c. or when orthotopically implanted with the 4T1 mammary carcinoma that spontaneously metastasizes to lung and liver (data not shown). In this case the combination treatment suppressed s.c. tumors and distant metastases, but, again, the combined effect was NK cell dependent. In summary, these data from several different tumor models in two different inbred strains of mice indicated that Treg depletion can greatly sensitize NK cells to the therapeutic activity of the NK cell-activating cytokine, IL-12.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on NK cell cytotoxicity is not surprising given the previously reported ability of soluble TGF-
to reduce NK cell cytotoxicity and perforin gene transcription (24) and the role of perforin downstream of NKG2D receptor function (31). However, most consideration has previously been given to a likely scenario where tumor secretes TGF-
to suppress NK cell activation and effector functions, rather than a direct effect of Treg on NK cell cytotoxicity. Although we were unable to detect surface TGF-
on activated Treg (data not shown), functional Transwell and supernatant experiments suggested that activated Treg producing membrane-associated TGF-
suppressed the NKG2D-mediated cytotoxicity displayed by NK cells. Alternatively, because high E:T cell ratios were required to observe Treg suppression of NK cell cytotoxicity, a labile form of TGF-
may have been secreted by activated Treg, and this was not active enough for supernatants to suppress NK cell function. However, in vivo, even relatively few transferred activated Treg (compared with host NK cells) suppressed NK cell-mediated control of tumor metastases.
We do not want to suggest that the effect of Treg on NK cell function may be simplistic; indeed, to the contrary, Treg may suppress NK cell function by a number of different mechanisms. Interestingly, we were unable to detect any down-regulation of NKG2D on NK cells when exposed to activated Treg (data not shown). These data are somewhat in contrast with previous reports that showed that NKG2D expression on human NK cells was down-regulated by soluble TGF-
produced by tumor cells (25, 34). It remains to be determined whether Treg-expressed TGF-
might interfere with NKG2D signaling or NKG2D ligand expression on tumor cells. Treg may have direct, and possibly indirect, effects on NK cell homeostasis, activation, proliferation, migration, and function in the context of tumor challenge, and many additional experiments will be required to explore the consequences of depleting Treg cells on NK cell antitumor activity in vivo. Recent data also suggest that functional TGF-
can be provided by a non-Treg source (35), and thus, additional cell types that regulate NK cell antitumor activity must also be considered carefully when designing effective immunotherapies. NK cell function in cancer patients is often severely impaired, and it will be of interest to determine whether an inverse relationship between NK cell activation and cytotoxicity and Treg expansion is detected in these patients.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
tumor cells. | Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by program grant funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. M.J.S. and D.I.G. are currently supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Research Fellowships, J.S. by a University of Melbourne Australian Postgraduate Award, and Y.H. by a Cancer Research Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mark Smyth, Cancer Immunology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Locked Bag 1, ABeckett Street, 8006 Victoria, Australia. E-mail address: mark.smyth{at}petermac.org ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Treg, regulatory T cell; m, mouse; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication August 8, 2005. Accepted for publication November 12, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) monoclonal antibody. Cancer Res. 59: 3128-3133.
-induced, CD8+ T-cell-dependent immune defense of B16 melanoma. Cancer Res. 61: 8643-8646.
. J. Immunol. 146: 3289-3297. [Abstract]
1 secretion and down-modulation of NKG2D underlies impaired NK cytotoxicity in cancer patients. J. Immunol. 172: 7335-7340.
by NK1.1 + T cells and natural killer cells is essential for the antimetastatic effect of
-galactosylceramide. Blood 99: 1259-1266.
1 inhibits expression of NKp30 and NKG2D receptors: consequences for the NK-mediated killing of dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 4120-4125.
escape control by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 201: 737-746. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Fujita, K. Teramoto, Y. Ozaki, J. Hanaoka, N. Tezuka, Y. Itoh, T. Asai, S. Fujino, K. Kontani, and K. Ogasawara Inhibition of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Mediated Immunosuppression in Tumor-Draining Lymph Nodes Augments Antitumor Responses by Various Immunologic Cell Types Cancer Res., June 15, 2009; 69(12): 5142 - 5150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lundqvist, H. Yokoyama, A. Smith, M. Berg, and R. Childs Bortezomib treatment and regulatory T-cell depletion enhance the antitumor effects of adoptively infused NK cells Blood, June 11, 2009; 113(24): 6120 - 6127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-O. Ahn, J.-C. Lee, M.-W. Sung, and D. S. Heo Presence of Membrane-Bound TGF-{beta}1 and Its Regulation by IL-2-Activated Immune Cell-Derived IFN-{gamma} in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6114 - 6120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Michaeli, G. Denkberg, K. Sinik, L. Lantzy, C. Chih-Sheng, C. Beauverd, T. Ziv, P. Romero, and Y. Reiter Expression Hierarchy of T Cell Epitopes from Melanoma Differentiation Antigens: Unexpected High Level Presentation of Tyrosinase-HLA-A2 Complexes Revealed by Peptide-Specific, MHC-Restricted, TCR-Like Antibodies J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6328 - 6341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Mailloux and M. R. I. Young NK-Dependent Increases in CCL22 Secretion Selectively Recruits Regulatory T Cells to the Tumor Microenvironment J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2753 - 2765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. HIGASHIJIMA, M. SHIMADA, M. CHIKAKIYO, T. MIYATANI, K. YOSHIKAWA, M. NISHIOKA, T. IWATA, and N. KURITA Effect of Splenectomy on Antitumor Immune System in Mice Anticancer Res, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 385 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Bos, S. van Duikeren, H. Morreau, K. Franken, T. N.M. Schumacher, J. B. Haanen, S. H. van der Burg, C. J.M. Melief, and R. Offringa Balancing between Antitumor Efficacy and Autoimmune Pathology in T-Cell-Mediated Targeting of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 68(20): 8446 - 8455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Pegram, J. T. Jackson, M. J. Smyth, M. H. Kershaw, and P. K. Darcy Adoptive Transfer of Gene-Modified Primary NK Cells Can Specifically Inhibit Tumor Progression In Vivo J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3449 - 3455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mignot, E. Ullrich, M. Bonmort, C. Menard, L. Apetoh, J. Taieb, D. Bosisio, S. Sozzani, M. Ferrantini, J. Schmitz, et al. The Critical Role of IL-15 in the Antitumor Effects Mediated by the Combination Therapy Imatinib and IL-2 J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6477 - 6483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Terme, N. Chaput, B. Combadiere, A. Ma, T. Ohteki, and L. Zitvogel Regulatory T Cells Control Dendritic Cell/NK Cell Cross-Talk in Lymph Nodes at the Steady State by Inhibiting CD4+ Self-Reactive T Cells J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4679 - 4686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Roy, P. F. Barnes, A. Garg, S. Wu, D. Cosman, and R. Vankayalapati NK Cells Lyse T Regulatory Cells That Expand in Response to an Intracellular Pathogen J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1729 - 1736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Elpek, E. S. Yolcu, D. D. H. Franke, C. Lacelle, R.-H. Schabowsky, and H. Shirwan Ex Vivo Expansion of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ T Regulatory Cells Based on Synergy between IL-2 and 4-1BB Signaling J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7295 - 7304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zhou, L. L'italien, D. Hodges, and X. M. Schebye Pivotal Roles of CD4+ Effector T cells in Mediating Agonistic Anti-GITR mAb-Induced-Immune Activation and Tumor Immunity in CT26 Tumors J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7365 - 7375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yano, T. Ishida, A. Inagaki, T. Ishii, J. Ding, S. Kusumoto, H. Komatsu, S. Iida, H. Inagaki, and R. Ueda Defucosylated Anti CC Chemokine Receptor 4 Monoclonal Antibody Combined with Immunomodulatory Cytokines: A Novel Immunotherapy for Aggressive/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 13(21): 6494 - 6500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Whitmore, A. Iparraguirre, L. Kubelka, W. Weninger, T. Hai, and B. R. G. Williams Negative Regulation of TLR-Signaling Pathways by Activating Transcription Factor-3 J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3622 - 3630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hyka-Nouspikel, L. Lucian, E. Murphy, T. McClanahan, and J. H. Phillips DAP10 Deficiency Breaks the Immune Tolerance against Transplantable Syngeneic Melanoma J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3763 - 3771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E.A. Street, N. Zerafa, M. Iezzi, J. A. Westwood, J. Stagg, P. Musiani, and M. J. Smyth Host Perforin Reduces Tumor Number but Does Not Increase Survival in Oncogene-Driven Mammary Adenocarcinoma Cancer Res., June 1, 2007; 67(11): 5454 - 5460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zamai, C. Ponti, P. Mirandola, G. Gobbi, S. Papa, L. Galeotti, L. Cocco, and M. Vitale NK Cells and Cancer J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4011 - 4016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Rudge, S. P. Barrett, B. Scott, and I. R. van Driel Infiltration of a Mesothelioma by IFN-{gamma}-Producing Cells and Tumor Rejection after Depletion of Regulatory T Cells J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4089 - 4096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Yang, A. Liu, Q. Xie, T. B. Guo, B. Wan, B. Zhou, and J. Z. Zhang Association of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells with chronic activity and viral clearance in patients with hepatitis B Int. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 133 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ralainirina, A. Poli, T. Michel, L. Poos, E. Andres, F. Hentges, and J. Zimmer Control of NK cell functions by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells J. Leukoc. Biol., January 1, 2007; 81(1): 144 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Bui, R. Uppaluri, C.-S. Hsieh, and R. D. Schreiber Comparative Analysis of Regulatory and Effector T Cells in Progressively Growing versus Rejecting Tumors of Similar Origins. Cancer Res., July 15, 2006; 66(14): 7301 - 7309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Wing, Z. Fehervari, and S. Sakaguchi Emerging possibilities in the development and function of regulatory T cells Int. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 991 - 1000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Barao, A. M. Hanash, W. Hallett, L. A. Welniak, K. Sun, D. Redelman, B. R. Blazar, R. B. Levy, and W. J. Murphy Suppression of natural killer cell-mediated bone marrow cell rejection by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells PNAS, April 4, 2006; 103(14): 5460 - 5465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |