The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


Correction for Mehrad et al., J Immunol 176 (5) 3233-3239.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehrad, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mohan, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mehrad, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mohan, C.
The Journal of Immunology, 2006, 176: 7788.
Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists


Corrections

The lupus-susceptibility locus, Sle3, mediates enhanced resistance to bacterial infections

B. Mehrad, S. J. Park, G. Akangire, T. J. Standiford, T. Wu, J. Zhu and C. Mohan

Mehrad, B., S. J. Park, G. Akangire, T. J. Standiford, T. Wu, J. Zhu, and C. Mohan. 2006. The lupus-susceptibility locus, Sle3, mediates enhanced resistance to bacterial infections. J. Immunol. 176: 3233–3239.

In Results, in the second paragraph under the heading Role of delayed neutrophil apoptosis, reference to supplemental data and the respective footnote (4) are incorrect. The corrected sentence and data added as Figure 7 are shown below.

We also examined the role of this locus in another bacterial infection: in a model of intra-abdominal sepsis, we found greater number of i.p. neutrophils in B6.Sle3 as compared with B6 mice associated with fewer viable bacteria in the peritoneal cavity and bloodstream on day 1 of infection (Fig. 7), suggesting that the microbicidal and neutrophil phenotype conferred by the Sle3 locus is not restricted to a single organ or pathogen.


Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effect of Sle3 locus in intra-abdominal sepsis. a and b, Bacterial burden and number of intra-peritoneal neutrophils on day 1 after cecal ligation and puncture, performed as described (1). Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 6–9 mice/group; representative of 2 experiments). CFU, colony-forming unit; ND, none detected; *, p < 0.05 compared to wildtypes. c, Survival in mice with cecal ligation and puncture (n = 10 mice/group); representative of 2 experiments).

 





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mehrad, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mohan, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mehrad, B.
Right arrow Articles by Mohan, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS