|
|
||||||||
Department of Microbiology, Division of Developmental and Clinical Immunology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Of the conserved members in the TREM gene cluster, the best characterized is TREM-1. TREM-1 is expressed on neutrophils and a subset of monocytes and macrophages. Ligation of TREM-1 with anti-TREM-1 mAb results in the expression of cell surface activation markers and inflammatory cytokine production (2). Exposure to extracellular pathogens or the bacterial product LPS in vitro promotes up-regulation of TREM-1 expression on neutrophils and monocytes, and in vivo TREM-1 is strongly expressed at sites of inflammation (3). TREM-1 blockade using a soluble TREM-1:Fc fusion protein was observed to protect mice from LPS-induced septic shock and bacterial sepsis (3). Interestingly, alternative splicing of TREM-1 produces a soluble form of this receptor that has been shown to be secreted in response to inflammatory stimuli and to modulate the biological effects of inflammatory cytokines (4). These observations offer an elegant model for the regulation of TREM-1 signaling and provide physiological context for the receptor blockade studies. Thus, TREM-1 has emerged as not only an activating receptor, but as a central component in the process leading to amplification and/or maintenance of the inflammatory response.
Like TREM-1, the function of TREM-2 is dependent on its association with the adaptor molecule DAP-12. Unlike TREM-1, TREM-2 is not constitutively expressed on granulocytes or monocytes, and is expressed instead on immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells, osteoclasts, and microglia (5, 6, 7). In contrast to TREM-1, agonists that promote dendritic cell activation and maturation result in the down-regulation of TREM-2 expression (5). Signaling through TREM-2 has been shown to promote dendritic cell survival and the expression of the chemokine receptor CCR7 (5). Thus, it has been suggested that signaling through TREM-2 may be critical for dendritic cell maturation and migration to lymph nodes, thereby promoting Ag presentation to T cells. It has been reported that humans deficient in TREM-2 display symptoms of Nasu-Hakola disease (8, 9). Nasu-Hakola disease is marked by the presence of cystic bone lesions and loss of white matter in the brain, which lead to spontaneous bone fractures and presenile dementia, respectively. An identical disease phenotype is caused by a deficiency in DAP-12 expression, indicating that loss of TREM-2-mediated signal transduction via DAP-12 is responsible for the disease (8).
TLT1, unlike the other characterized TREM molecules, does not contain a charged residue within its transmembrane domain that would mediate the interaction of this receptor with DAP-12 (1). The cytoplasmic tail of TLT-1, however, contains an ITIM allowing for the interaction with Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase 1 (SHP1), suggesting an inhibitory role for this receptor (10). Interestingly, TLT1 is expressed exclusively in megakaryocytes and platelets (10, 11). TLT1 is stored in the
-granules of platelets and is quickly redistributed to their surface upon activation. It has also been reported that ligation of this receptor promotes rather than inhibits Ca2+ mobilization through an interaction with SHP2, although the physiological relevance of this, as well as the natural ligand responsible, have yet to be determined (12).
Of the conserved TREM gene cluster molecules, the last to be characterized is TLT2. Using mAbs raised against TLT2, we have analyzed its expression on murine hemopoietic cells. TLT2 is the only TREM molecule to be found on lymphocytes. TLT2 is expressed early in B cell development, appearing on the cell surface in concert with the B lineage marker B220. Within the B cell compartment, TLT2 expression is higher on marginal zone (MZ) and transitional subsets than on follicular (FO) B cells, and the highest level of expression is observed on B1 B cells. Although monocytes in the bone marrow or peripheral blood do not express detectable levels of TLT2, its expression is up-regulated in conjunction with differentiation into macrophages. Finally, TLT2 is present on neutrophils in the bone marrow as well as the periphery, and inflammatory stimuli result in a dramatic increase in the expression of TLT2 on these cells in vivo.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human tlt2 gene was amplified from cDNA generated from the human Daudi B cell line using primers: 5'-CCTTGGATCTCCAGGCCTGACACTGCC and 3'-TCAGATCAAGTAGACTTCCACATAGGG. The sequence of the human tlt2 gene was identical with the sequence provided in GenBank. At the time, the complete mouse gene sequence was not available in the public database. To identify the mouse tlt2 gene, a reverse blast search was conducted of mouse expressed sequence tag (EST) libraries using the human TLT2 sequence. This search revealed seven ESTs displaying homology to the Ig region of the human TLT2 protein with accession numbers: AV140744, AV142748, AV143551, AV145466, AV146020, BB611200, and BB630804. The consensus sequence derived from these ESTs was used to generate primers for mouse tlt2, which were used to obtain the complete sequence of mouse tlt2 using RACE-PCR. RACE-PCR was conducted on RACE ready cDNA generated from the K46 murine B cell lymphoma using the Smart RACE system (BD Clontech) with the primers: 5'-GCCGTGTACGCATACACCAGTATCGTCCG and 3'-CTGCTGTCCAACCCTGGGAGGTCAGG. The full-length transcript for mouse tlt2, including the 5' and 3' untranslated regions, was subsequently amplified using primers: 5'-GACTGTGAGCAGGAGTGACTGAAG and 3'-GTCGCACATGTTTATGTCATCCATTGCATCC. The GenBank accession number for the mouse tlt2 nucleotide sequence is DQ341272 (
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank/index.html
).
RT-PCR
RNA was isolated using the RNAeasy isolation kit and protocols (Qiagen). For RT-PCR, cDNA was generated using the Thermoscript II system (Invitrogen Life Technologies). For RACE-PCR, cDNA was generated using the polymerase and primers provided with the Smart RACE system (BD Clontech). All PCR were performed using the KOD high fidelity polymerase system (Novagen).
Ab production
The extracellular region of mouse TLT2 (mTLT2) was expressed as a fusion with the Fc portion of human IgG1. The hinge, CH2, and CH3 portion of the human IgG1 gene was cloned into the pShuttle CMV expression vector (Qbiogene). The extracellular region of mTLT2 was then cloned into the resulting vector. This construct was used to generate recombinant adenovirus expressing a soluble mTLT2-Fc fusion protein using the AdEasy system (Qbiogene). The recombinant virus was used to infect the HEK293 cell line, resulting in the secretion of mTLT2-Fc into the culture medium. Purification of the TLT2-Fc recombinant protein was performed using protein A chromatography following protocols for purification of mouse Abs that involve the removal of bovine Ig.
To generate Abs against mTLT2, Sprague-Dawley rats 10 wk of age were immunized in a hind footpad with 100 µg of rat TLT2-Fc protein in 50 µl of PBS mixed with 50 µl of Titermax adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). Four injections were performed: once every 2 wk, followed by a final immunization without adjuvant 1 wk after this series. The following day, lymphocytes from the popliteal lymph node of the immunized limb were harvested and fused to the Ag8.653 fusion partner (American Type Culture Collection) following standard protocols.
Screening of the resulting hybridomas was performed by staining cells expressing mTLT2 fused to GFP in place of the cytoplasmic domain. The extracellular and transmembrane regions of mTLT2 were cloned into pGFPN1 (BD Clontech). The 293T cells were transiently transfected with this construct and stained with supernatants harvested from hybridoma clones. The samples were then stained with a secondary anti-rat Ig Ab conjugated to PE, and the samples were analyzed by flow cytometry. Hybridomas displaying specific reactivity against the TLT2-GFP-positive cells were isolated and expanded.
Cell culture
The HEK293 cell line was cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone), 2 µM L-glutamine, 50 µM 2-ME, 100 µg/ml streptomycin-penicillin, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C under 5% CO2. Hybridomas were expanded in RPMI 1640 complete medium supplemented with Hybridoma Cloning and Fusion Supplement (Roche). After expansion, hybridomas were cultured in complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% ultra low FBS (Invitrogen Life Technologies). Transient transfection of HEK293 cells was conducted using LipofectAMINE 2000 following the manufacturers suggested protocols (Invitrogen Life Technologies).
Cell isolation
C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory) 810 wk of age were used for isolation of tissues and cells. All mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions in University of Alabama at Birmingham animal facilities, and all procedures were approved by an institutional review committee. Peritoneal cells were isolated by peritoneal lavage with 7 ml of HBSS. Peripheral blood was isolated by cardiac puncture. Splenocytes were isolated by gentle dissociation of the spleen using frosted glass slides. Bone marrow cells were isolated by flushing femurs with HBSS. RBCs were lysed by incubating cells in RBC lysis buffer (10 mM KHCO3, 150 mM NH4Cl, and 0.1 mM EDTA) for 3 min on ice.
For experiments involving elicited macrophages, mice were injected i.p. with 1 ml of thioglycolate broth (BCI). Seventy-two hours after i.p. injection, mice were sacrificed and peritoneal cells were harvested, as described above.
For studies involving experimentally induced inflammatory responses, mice were injected i.p. with 50 µg or i.v. with 25 µg of LPS serotype 0111:B4 or 25 µg of staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) (Sigma-Aldrich).
For B cell stimulation experiments, splenocyte preparations were enriched for B cells by Thy-1-mediated complement depletion of T cells. Complement-mediated T cell depletion was performed, as described, using hybridoma supernatants from clones HO13 and T24, followed by incubation for 40 min at 37°C with low toxicity rabbit complement (Cedarlane Laboratories).
Abs and reagents
For flow cytometry, anti-B220 PerCP/allophycocyanin, CD5 PerCP/FITC, CD11b FITC/allophycocyanin, Gr1 allophycocyanin, CD11c FITC, CD21 FITC, and CD23 FITC were purchased from BD Biosciences. Anti-IgM FITC/allophycocyanin, anti-IgD FITC, and streptavidin-PE/allophycocyanin were purchased form Southern Biotechnology Associates. Abs to mTLT2 1H4 and 1C5 were biotinylated using EZ-Link succinimidyl-2-(biotinamide)-ethyl-1,3'-dithiopropionate biotin (Pierce).
Flow cytometry
Cells (1 x 106/sample) were washed twice in FACS buffer (PBS, 0.01% NaN3+, and 0.5% FBS) and then incubated with the appropriate Ab mixture in 96-well microtiter plates for 30 min on ice. The Ab-labeling mixture contained l µg/sample of 24G2 mAb (BD Biosciences) to block FcR binding. After this incubation, the cells were washed twice in FACS buffer. When necessary, the samples were incubated with secondary reagents for an additional 30 min, followed by two additional washes in FACS buffer. Samples were either analyzed immediately or resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde. All steps were performed on ice. Samples were run on either a FACScan or FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using CellQuest or WinMidi software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A search of human public EST databases was conducted to identify genes of unknown function that are expressed in lymphocytes. Based on the results of this screen, tlt2, a gene encoding a transmembrane protein resembling the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp44, was chosen as a gene of interest. EST expression data suggested that TLT2 is expressed in B cells, as over half of the ESTs listed were derived from either a lymphoid organ or purified B cell sources. Primers generated to screen for the expression of the human tlt2 transcript revealed the presence of tlt2 mRNA in cell lines representing pro-, pre-, and mature B cell subsets in humans (data not shown). The tlt2 transcript was not detected, however, in cell lines representing human T lymphocytes or monocytes (data not shown). These data were consistent with the expression profile generated from EST entries in the database.
Using the predicted sequence for human tlt2, a tblastn search was conducted of murine EST databases. This search generated several ESTs encoding proteins with homology to the Ig region of human TLT2. The consensus sequence of these ESTs was used to generate primers to amplify a region of the putative mouse homolog of the human tlt2 gene. These primers were used to probe for the tlt2 transcript, and the expression of this transcript was detected in cDNA derived from murine B cell lines as well as total splenic cDNA (data not shown). Following this initial screen, cDNA derived from the murine B lymphoma cell line K46 was used as a source for RACE-PCR. The resulting 2704-bp transcript encoding the mouse homolog of the human tlt2 gene was subsequently amplified from total splenic cDNA (Fig. 1). Comparison of the mouse tlt2 transcript with the mouse genome revealed that mouse tlt2 is encoded by six exons spanning 11 kb of mouse chromosome 17C within the TREM gene cluster.
|
28) O-linked glycosylation sites that are predicted within a serine/threonine-rich region. Western blot analysis of mTLT2 overexpressed in HEK293 cells reveals a diffuse band pattern suggesting that this receptor is indeed heavily glycosylated (data not shown). Whereas many members of the TREM gene cluster possess a transmembrane lysine residue, which mediates association with the ITAM-containing transmembrane adaptor DAP-12, TLT2 does not contain such a charged transmembrane residue and is therefore not predicted to interact with DAP-12. Although the cytoplasmic tail of TLT2 is not highly conserved between human and mouse and exhibits relatively low homology, both human and mouse intracellular domains are unusually proline rich, containing 15 and 12% proline, respectively. In contrast to other molecules encoded within the TREM gene cluster, TLT2 does not contain either an ITAM or ITIM associated with phosphotyrosine-based signaling. Finally, two potential signaling motifs have been reported in the cytoplasmic tail of human TLT2, a YxxV endocytosis motif and a consensus +xxPxxP SH3-binding motif (1).
|
To determine the expression pattern for TLT2 in the mouse, a panel of mAbs was generated against the extracellular domain of mTLT2. The mAbs were screened against transfected HEK293 cells that expressed a TLT2:GFP fusion protein, and clone 1C5 was selected for analysis of TLT2 expression in hemopoietic cells based on the observation that the intensity of staining with 1C5 was directly proportional to the relative expression of TLT2:GFP by HEK293 cells (Fig. 3A). To further validate the specificity of anti-TLT2 mAb clone 1C5, bone marrow cells were isolated and stained with purified mAb preincubated in the presence (open histogram) or absence (solid histogram) of a 10-fold excess of the soluble TLT2:Fc recombinant protein. As can be seen in Fig. 3A, the soluble TLT2-Fc recombinant protein effectively blocked staining of bone marrow cells, demonstrating that clone 1C5 is specific for TLT2 and does not cross-react with other TREM gene cluster receptors. Using this reagent, we analyzed the expression of TLT2 on hemopoietic cells isolated from a variety of immunological organs. Single channel histograms depicting TLT2 staining of hemopoietic cells revealed that a large percentage of the cells in the spleen, lymph nodes, blood, bone marrow, and peritoneal cavity,
55, 30, 35, 69, and 71% of cells, respectively, express TLT2 (Fig. 3B). In contrast, TLT2 expression was undetectable on cells of thymic origin. The 1C5 anti-TLT2 mAb was next used in combination with Abs specific for additional cell surface markers to further characterize the TLT2+ cell types within the different anatomical locations. Within the lymphocyte population, cells exhibiting a small forward and side scatter profile, it was determined that TLT2+ cells were predominantly B220+ (Fig. 3C). In contrast, splenocytes stained with the T lymphocyte markers CD3, CD4, CD8, or the 
TCR were uniformly TLT2 negative (data not shown). Thus, it is apparent from the results that within the lymphoid lineage, TLT2 expression is restricted to B lymphocytes. These results were corroborated using a second anti-TLT2 mAb, clone 1H4, as are all of the results depicted in the subsequent figures (data not shown).
|
As the site of hemopoiesis in the adult, the bone marrow contains populations of both mature recirculating B lymphocytes as well as a continuum of developing B cells. These developing B cells have been classified into distinct populations based on surface marker expression and critical checkpoints in their development. The earliest stage of progenitor commitment to the B cell lineage correlates with the expression of B220 on their cell surface. In the Hardy scheme of B cell development, fractions A-D express B220, but do not express IgM or IgD (13). Cells that express IgM, but not IgD, comprise fraction E, the immature B cell population, and mature B lymphocytes express both IgM and IgD.
To determine at what point during their development B lymphocytes express TLT2, we analyzed the expression of TLT2 on these subsets. By discriminating between IgD+ and IgD cells, we could compare the expression of TLT2 on fractions A-E, developing B cells, with that of fraction F, mature B cells. Whereas all B220+ cells express TLT2, its expression is slightly higher on developing cells compared with mature B cells (Fig. 4). This finding is consistent with the data below describing higher expression of TLT2 on transitional cells within the spleen compared with mature FO B cells (Fig. 5). Moreover, the expression of TLT2 within the heterogeneous population of developing B cells is uniform when comparing cells that express IgM on their surface (immature) vs those that do not (pro-B and pre-B). Thus, TLT2 is expressed in concert with the B lineage marker B220 at an early stage of development before expression of the BCR.
|
|
The peripheral B lymphocyte compartment is not a homogeneous population of cells; rather it is comprised of functionally and phenotypically distinct subpopulations (13). The most notable distinction with respect to the B cell compartment relates to functional/phenotypic differences between the B1 and B2 class of B lymphocytes. These two populations of B cells differ in Ag receptor gene usage, cell surface marker expression, and anatomical location. Within the B2 population, there exist functionally distinct subsets of B cells, which can be subdivided into two distinct transitional populations, transitional 1 (T1) and T2 cells, as well as FO and MZ based on differential expression of cell surface markers (13).
Based on flow cytometric analysis, it was determined that B lymphocytes present in the spleen and bone marrow that are phenotypically TLT2high, are IgMhigh and IgDlow (Fig. 5). The IgMhigh and IgDlow cell surface phenotype on splenic B cells is generally indicative of either transitional or MZ populations. Consistent with this hypothesis, TLT2 expression is higher in the spleen than in the lymph nodes, which contain no MZ cells and from which transitional populations are excluded (Fig. 3). B lymphocytes in the spleen can be identified as T1, T2, MZ, or FO B cells based on the expression of the B cell marker B220, membrane IgM, and the low affinity IgE receptor CD21 (14). When the relative expression of TLT2 within these groups was analyzed, it was determined that T2/MZ cells exhibit the highest levels of TLT2 on their surface. T1 B cells express less TLT2 than do the T2/MZ populations, but more than FO B cells (Fig. 5). Thus, the hierarchy of TLT2 expression correlates with that of cell surface IgM expression, T2/MZ > T1 > FO.
B cells in the peritoneal cavity also differed in their expression of TLT2. Although the peritoneal cavity is the primary location of B1 cells, it contains B2 lymphocytes as well. B1 cells express the T cell Ag CD5 as well as the CD11b integrin on their surface, two features that readily distinguish them from their B2 counterparts. The B1 B cell population can be further subdivided into B1a (CD5+,CD11b+) and B1b cells (CD5,CD11b+) (13). When the expression of TLT2 was analyzed on cells within the peritoneal cavity, it was determined that B1a and B1b B cells express comparable levels of TLT2 that are considerably higher than that observed on B2 cells within the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 6).
|
Previous studies to characterize expression of proteins encoded within the TREM gene cluster have demonstrated their expression on cells of the myeloid lineage (7). Therefore, experiments were performed to determine whether TLT2 is expressed on monocytes or macrophages. Analysis of bone marrow demonstrated that the B220, Gr1, CD11b+ population representing developing and mature monocytes was negative for TLT2 expression (Fig. 7A). Similarly, analysis of circulating monocytes in the blood revealed that they too are negative for TLT2 expression (Fig. 7A). In contrast, resident macrophages isolated from the lung or peritoneal cavity exhibit significant levels of TLT2 expression, as depicted in Fig. 7, B and C. These data support the conclusion that TLT2 expression is up-regulated in conjunction with emigration of monocytes from the blood into tissues, where they differentiate into resident tissue macrophages.
|
In addition to the TLT2+,B220+ B cell and TLT2+,CD11b+,Gr1 macrophage populations described above, it was noted that cells exhibiting a side scatter profile larger than that of lymphocytes or monocytes/macrophages also express TLT2. Although this population is present in the spleen and peripheral blood, it was observed at a considerably greater frequency in the bone marrow. When stained with Abs against the cell surface markers CD11b and Gr1, these cells in the bone marrow and peripheral blood were positive for both, identifying them as neutrophils (Fig. 8). As can be seen in Fig. 8, neutrophils isolated from either site are uniformly positive for TLT2 expression. Analysis of Gr1+,CD11b+ neutrophils in the spleen revealed that they also express TLT2, whereas cells expressing the dendritic cell marker CD11c are negative for TLT2 (data not shown).
|
Previous studies have demonstrated that the expression of TREM gene cluster receptors, including TREM-1, TREM-2, and TLT1, is altered in response to cellular activation. To determine whether cellular activation alters TLT2 expression, experiments were performed both in vitro as well as in vivo to monitor TLT2 expression on B cells, macrophages, and neutrophils in response to activating stimuli. The expression of TLT2 is unique among the TREM molecules in that it is the only TREM receptor expressed on lymphocytes. To determine whether B cells alter their expression of TLT2 in response to activating stimuli, splenocytes were enriched for B lymphocytes by complement-mediated depletion of T cells. B cells were then incubated in the presence of various stimuli individually or in combination, including polyclonal anti-IgM F(ab')2 Ab, anti-CD40 mAb (1C10), LPS, CpG DNA, PMA, or ionomycin; however, none of the stimuli tested altered the expression of TLT2 in vitro (data not shown). Given that the expression of TLT2 within the B cell compartment is highest on the B1 and MZ populations, which are predominantly responsible for the rapid recognition of bacterial pathogens in vivo, experiments were performed to determine whether exposure to the bacterial product LPS results in modulation of TLT2 expression on B cells in vivo. As depicted in Fig. 9, administration of LPS caused potent B cell activation based on up-regulation of the activation marker CD69. However, as was the case with in vitro stimulation, there was no change in TLT2 expression within the B cell compartment in response to endotoxin exposure. To further examine this, TLT2 expression on MZ B cells from the spleen and B1 B cells from the peritoneum was monitored in response to administration of LPS. Once again, there was no detectable increase in TLT2 expression on these B cell subpopulations, although there was a consistent, albeit minor decrease in TLT2 expression observed on MZ B cells isolated from mice injected with LPS when compared with cells from control animals. In summary, it appears that expression of TLT2 on B cells is not altered significantly in response to activation either in vitro or in vivo.
|
3, 7, 8, and 17 TCRs, as well as cells that express MHC class II (16, 17, 18, 19). Administration of SEB results in an acute inflammatory response in mice, which is mediated by the production of a variety of proinflammatory cytokines predominantly by mononuclear cells (16, 17, 18, 19). Systemic administration of SEB by i.v. injection was not observed to cause a significant increase in the number of neutrophils in the blood or peritoneal cavity and did not promote increased TLT2 receptor expression on neutrophils isolated from these mice. In contrast, i.p. injection of SEB into mice resulted in an influx of neutrophils into the peritoneal cavity, consistent with previous reports (20). Under these conditions, neutrophil recruitment into the peritoneal cavity was comparable to that observed following i.v. or i.p. administration of LPS. Whereas neutrophils in the periphery did not exhibit increased TLT2 expression in response to i.p. injection of SEB, those cells recruited to the peritoneal cavity did exhibit a dramatic up-regulation of TLT2 similar to that observed in mice treated with LPS. Moreover, the increased expression of TLT2 was observed in concert with up-regulation of the CD11b
integrin subunit (Fig. 10). Thus, recruitment and activation of neutrophils in response to i.p. administration of SEB result in the up-regulation of TLT2, presumably through the action of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines. These data support the conclusion that up-regulation of TLT2 expression on neutrophils is an integral component of the response to inflammatory stimuli.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies concerning the function of receptors encoded within the TREM gene cluster have revealed that members of this cluster are indeed involved in cellular activation and play a role in innate as well as adaptive immunity (7). TREM-1 is expressed on monocytes and neutrophils, and ligation of this receptor has been shown to promote the production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (2, 3). Moreover, TREM-1 has been shown to amplify inflammatory responses in conjunction with signaling via TLRs. TREM-2 is expressed on immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells, osteoclasts, and microglial cells. Ligation of TREM-2 has been shown to play a role in activation and migration of dendritic cells (5). Additionally, TREM-2 plays an important role in brain function and bone remodeling (6, 8, 9). A common feature of the TREM receptors is the presence of a charged lysine residue in the transmembrane domain that mediates the noncovalent interaction with the DAP-12 transmembrane homodimer that contains ITAMs within its cytoplasmic domain (7). By virtue of the interaction with DAP-12, TREM molecules, as well as the related NKp44 receptor, are able to initiate tyrosine-based signaling leading to cellular activation (1, 2, 22). Other receptors encoded within the TREM gene cluster such as TLT1 lack the conserved transmembrane lysine residue, but contain within their own cytoplasmic domain tyrosine-based signaling motifs (11). In the case of TLT1, there is an ITIM, which mediates recruitment of SHP1 and SHP2 (11, 12).
TLT2 is unique in that it lacks either the conserved transmembrane lysine residue or ITAM/ITIMs within its own cytoplasmic domain. Thus, TLT2 does not exhibit any of the features associated with classical tyrosine-based signaling. This raises the question of whether TLT2 transduces a signal in response to ligand binding and, if so, how. Indeed, there is relatively little conservation between mouse and human TLT2 with regard to the amino acids contained in their respective cytoplasmic domains. Although a previous report suggested that the cytoplasmic domain of human TLT2 contains a YxxV motif that may play a role in endocytosis as well as recruitment of STAT3 and a second motif YxxC that might also recruit STAT3, comparison of the human and mouse sequences for TLT2 reveals that neither motif is conserved (1). Nevertheless, it has also been suggested that the cytoplasmic domain of human TLT2 contains a potential type I SH3-binding motif with the consensus sequence +xxPxxP, in which the + represents positively charged arginine (1). Alignment of mouse and human TLT2 reveals that there is an analogous +xPxxP sequence in the mouse. Thus, TLT2 may interact with one or more SH3 or WW domain-containing effector proteins either constitutively or in response to ligand binding. Studies have been performed using anti-TLT2 mAb in an attempt to determine whether TLT2 functions as an activating receptor in macrophages and B cells. Stimulation of peritoneal macrophages with soluble or plate-bound anti-TLT2 mAb was not observed to induce secretion of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 or TNF-
nor was anti-TLT2 mAb observed to potentiate proinflammatory cytokine production in response to LPS (data not shown). Stimulation of splenic B cells with anti-TLT2 mAb in soluble or plate-bound form was not observed to potentiate survival, induce proliferation, or up-regulate expression of activation markers, including CD69 and CD86. Moreover, anti-TLT2 mAb was not observed to potentiate or to attenuate any of these functional responses when added to B cell cultures in the presence of polyclonal anti-IgM (Fab')2 Ab (data not shown). These results must be viewed with some degree of caution, however, as it is possible that the mAb used (clone 1C5) may not mimic binding of the natural ligand(s) for TLT2 and therefore may not induce the physiological response associated with ligand binding.
Although it remains to be determined whether TLT2 functions as an activating receptor similar to TREM-1 and TREM-2, data presented in this study support the conclusion that TLT2 may be important during the innate immune response triggered by inflammatory stimuli. TLT2 expression is increased on neutrophils in response to in vivo administration of LPS and SEB. A consistent finding related to this is the fact that increased expression of TLT2 on neutrophils directly correlates with up-regulation of CD11b, a known activation marker (15). In the case of LPS stimulation, it is possible that up-regulation of TLT2 is a direct consequence of TLR4-mediated signal transduction. Alternatively, it is equally possible that LPS indirectly affects TLT2 expression through the production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-
. In support of the latter possibility, i.p. administration of SEB was observed to promote an influx of neutrophils within 24 h and these cells exhibited significant up-regulation of TLT2 in concert with CD11b. In vivo administration of SEB promotes the production of proinflammatory cytokines through its ability to bind to T cells that express specific TCR V
subunits, or by binding to MHC class II on APCs (16, 17, 18, 19). It is formally possible that the inflammatory response caused by administration of SEB could induce MHC class II expression on neutrophils, thereby promoting direct activation of neutrophils through binding of SEB to MHC class II. However, it is more likely that SEB induces up-regulation of TLT2 on neutrophils via an indirect process that involves the production of proinflammatory cytokines, which in turn activate the neutrophils. Nevertheless, it remains to be determined whether TLT2 expression is modulated in response to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, or by direct stimulation of cells via activating receptors (e.g., TLRs), or both.
That TLT2 is involved in the inflammatory response is further supported by experiments demonstrating that thioglycolate-elicited macrophages exhibit increased TLT2 expression when compared with resident macrophages. Thus, inflammatory stimuli that promote recruitment and priming of macrophages induce expression of TLT2 as well. In contrast to neutrophils and macrophages, which increase TLT2 expression in response to inflammatory stimuli, B cells do not. In vivo administration of LPS, which is a potent B cell agonist that promotes polyclonal B cell activation, was not observed to alter TLT2 expression despite the fact that B cells were activated based on analysis of CD69 expression. Indeed, incubation of splenic B cells in vitro with a range of stimuli was not observed to induce up-regulation of TLT2. Thus, it remains to be determined whether B cells actually up-regulate TLT2 expression under any condition regardless of whether the response is associated with inflammation or the adaptive immune response.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that TLT2 is expressed on cells of the innate immune system, including neutrophils and macrophages. Additionally, it was shown that expression of TLT2 is up-regulated on neutrophils and macrophages in response to inflammatory stimuli. Taken together, these findings suggest that TLT2 may play a role in the innate immune response. Moreover, the fact that TLT2 is expressed on cells of the B lineage, with the highest level of expression found on B1 and MZ B cells, raises the possibility that TLT2 is involved in the initial humoral immune response to bacterial pathogens and the development of autoimmune disease associated with these B cell subpopulations.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Louis B. Justement, Department of Microbiology, Division of Developmental and Clinical Immunology, 389 Wallace Tumor Institute, 1824 6th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-3300. E-mail address: lbjust{at}uab.edu ![]()
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: TREM, triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell; EST, expressed sequence tag; FO, follicular; mTLT, mouse TREM-like transcript; MZ, marginal zone; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B; SHP, Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase; T1, transitional 1; T2, transitional 2; TLT, TREM-like transcript. ![]()
Received for publication December 29, 2005. Accepted for publication March 1, 2006.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-granules of megakaryocytes and platelets. Blood 104: 1042-1047. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Hashiguchi, H. Kobori, P. Ritprajak, Y. Kamimura, H. Kozono, and M. Azuma From the Cover: Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-like transcript 2 (TLT-2) is a counter-receptor for B7-H3 and enhances T cell responses PNAS, July 29, 2008; 105(30): 10495 - 10500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Hofmeyer, A. Ray, and X. Zang The contrasting role of B7-H3 PNAS, July 29, 2008; 105(30): 10277 - 10278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Izawa, J. Kitaura, Y. Yamanishi, T. Matsuoka, T. Oki, F. Shibata, H. Kumagai, H. Nakajima, M. Maeda-Yamamoto, J. P. Hauchins, et al. Functional Analysis of Activating Receptor LMIR4 as a Counterpart of Inhibitory Receptor LMIR3 J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2007; 282(25): 17997 - 18008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Johnson, M. E. Boyer, J.-A. Kang, A. Wickrema, A. B. Cantor, and E. H. Bresnick Friend of GATA-1-independent transcriptional repression: a novel mode of GATA-1 function Blood, June 15, 2007; 109(12): 5230 - 5233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||