|
|
||||||||

* Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel; and
Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by the responding T cells. The effects of HSP60 were found to be largely dependent on TLR4 and MyD88 signaling; B cells from TLR4-mutant mice or from MyD88 knockout mice showed decreased responses to HSP60. Care was taken to rule out contamination of the HSP60 with LPS as a causative factor. These findings add B cells to the complex web of interactions by which HSP60 can regulate immune responses. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 60-kDa heat shock protein (HSP60) is a dominant immunogen in both foreign immunity and autoimmunity (7). HSP60 has also been identified as a ligand for the innate immune system. We reported recently that human T cells can directly respond to soluble HSP60 via TLR2; HSP60 activation increased T cell adhesion to fibronectin and inhibited T cell chemotaxis to stromal cell-derived factor-1
(8), and HSP60 treatment down-regulated IFN-
and TNF-
and enhanced IL-10 secretion from activated T cells (9). Recently it was shown that T cells can respond innately to recombinant HSP60 produced in a eukaryotic system free of LPS and other bacterial contaminants (10).
The present study was undertaken to test whether soluble HSP60 might exert innate immune effects on B cell physiology. In this study we report the effects of HSP60 on B cell proliferation, activation, and cytokine secretion. We also tested the effects of HSP60 activation on the ability of B cells to stimulate allogeneic T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion. We found that signaling via TLR4 and MyD88 was critical in the response of B cells to HSP60. Contamination of HSP60 with LPS or other bacterial molecules did not appear to be involved in these innate immune effects.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Female C57BL/6J and BALB/c mice were purchased from Harlan Olac. C3HeB/FeJ, C3H/HeJ, and NOD mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. MyD88-knockout mice and TLR2-knockout mice were provided by Prof. S. Akira (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) (11, 12). The mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility and were used at the age of 58 wk.
Purification of naive B cells
Spleen cell suspensions were depleted of RBC by treatment with red blood lysis buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). B cells were then purified by negative selection with a B cell isolation kit containing biotin-conjugated mAbs to CD43, CD4, and Ter-119 (Miltenyi Biotec). This procedure routinely yielded B cell preparations that were >95% positive for the B220 marker, as determined by FACS analysis.
HSP60 preparation and reagents
Human HSP60 was prepared as previously described (13). Endotoxin contamination of the preparations was determined using the kinetic-turbidmetric Limulus amebocyte lysate assay, performed by an independent laboratory; the endotoxin content was <0.0001 endotoxin units/µg protein, corresponding to <0.01 pg of LPS equivalents/µg recombinant HSP60. We used LPS of the Escherichia coli strain 055:B5 (chromatographically purified and phenol extracted; Sigma-Aldrich) or LPS of Salmonella minnesota Re595. PGL of Staphylococcus aureus, polymyxin B (PmB), PmB agarose beads, and maganin II amide were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Mycobacterium bovis HSP65 (MB-HSP65) and E. coli GroEL were purchased from StressGen Biotechnologies, and a preparation of recombinant histamine-tagged GroEL purified from E. coli was provided by Prof. A. Horovitz (Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel) (14).
Inhibition of HSP60 or LPS
HSP60 (5 µg/ml) or LPS (0.1 µg/ml) was preincubated for 1 h with anti-HSP60 mAb 8C6 or control IgG, both at 10 µg/ml, or with PmB (10 µg/ml) at 37°C and then used to activate B cells. Heat treatment of HSP60 or LPS (both at 1 mg/ml) was performed by boiling for 20 min. The treated preparations were then diluted (HSP60 to 5 µg/ml; LPS to 0.1 µg/ml) and tested for their ability to activate B cells. Inhibition of HSP60 or LPS by maganin II amide was performed as previously described (15). Briefly, B cells were preincubated with increasing concentrations of maganin II amide at 37°C. After 30 min, 0.01 µg/ml LPS or 0.5 µg/ml HSP60 was added. B cell proliferation was followed after 72 h, as described below. Removal of LPS and LPS-associated molecules from HSP60 using PmB agarose was performed as previously described (16). Briefly, aliquots of 1 ml of PmB agarose were poured into disposable columns (Pierce) and washed three times in 20 vol of PBS. HSP60 (500 µl) at 500 µg/ml was loaded onto each 1-ml column, the columns were shaken for 1 min, incubated at room temperature for 60 min, and eluted with PBS in 250-µl fractions. The concentration of HSP60 in the fractions collected from PmB agarose columns was determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein kit (Pierce).
B cell proliferation
Proliferation assays of B cells were performed using 96-well, round-bottom microtiter plates; 2.5 x 105 purified B cells were incubated in triplicate at 37°C in 5% CO2 in 200 µl of RPMI 1640 mixed with DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS (HyClone), 5 x 105 M
-ME, 10 mM L-glutamate 12.5 mM HEPES, sodium pyruvate, nonessential amino acids, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. HSP60 was added at concentrations of 0.150 µg/ml. After 48 or 72 h, the cells were pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine for 6 h, and [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured using a 96-well plate beta counter. The mean cpm ± SD were calculated for each triplicate.
Cytokine and IgG3 determinations
Cytokines in culture medium were determined by ELISA for IL-10, IL-6, IFN-
, TNF-
, and IL-4 (OptiEIA kits; BD Pharmingen) following the manufacturers instructions. Standard curves were established using mouse recombinant cytokines; the assay detection limit was 1632 pg/ml. The amount of IgG3 in culture supernatants was determined by capture ELISA using goat anti-mouse IgG3 at 2 µg/ml and goat anti-mouse IgG3-alkaline phosphatase at 0.5 µg/ml; both Abs were obtained from Southern Biotechnology Associates.
Flow cytometric analysis
B cell expression of surface activation and costimulatory molecules was determined by flow cytometry. Briefly, purified B cells were seeded in 96-well plates (2.5 x 105/well) and stimulated in triplicate for 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. The cells were then collected, washed with PBS/0.5% BSA, and incubated for 30 min with Ab to the anti-Fc
RIII/II 2.4G2 (BD Pharmingen) to block nonspecific binding. After washing, the cells were incubated for 45 min with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse CD86, CD80, or CD69 (Serotec) or with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IA/IE, PE-conjugated CD40, or isotype control Ab (eBioscience). The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACSort (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
Allogeneic T cell response
T cells were isolated from C57BL/6J mice by negative selection of non-T cells using the Pan T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturers instructions. B cells were isolated from C3HeB/FeJ or C3H/HeJ mice, and treated for 14 h with HSP60 (25 µg/ml). The cells were washed three times with 50 ml of HBSS containing 2% FBS, counted, and gamma irradiated at 2500 rad before coculture with the allogeneic C57BL/6J T cells. Proliferation assays were performed in triplicates of 1.5 x 105 T cells/well seeded together with titrated numbers of irradiated B cells in a total volume of 200 µl in round-bottom, 96-well plates for 72 h. The proliferation of T cells was measured using [3H]thymidine (Amersham Biosciences) at 1 µCi/well for the last 8 h of culture. Cytokines were measured in the culture medium as described above.
Statistical analysis
The InStat 2.01 program (GraphPad) was used for statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using the two-sided Welch t test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Splenic B cells were isolated from naive C57BL/6J mice and purified by negative selection. The purified B cells were then incubated with HSP60 or E. coli LPS at different concentrations (0.150 µg/ml) for 48 h. B cell proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation for the last 7 h of culture. Fig. 1 shows that HSP60 and E. coli LPS, at similar concentrations (weight per volume), induced proliferation of the mouse B cells in a dose-dependent manner.
|
In this study we used recombinant HSP60, so we tested whether the effects of HSP60 might be due to contamination with bacterial mitogens such as LPS. The endotoxin level detected in the recombinant protein was <0.0001 endotoxin units/µg, which corresponds to <0.01 pg of LPS in 1 µg of recombinant protein, a concentration probably less than that needed for significant B cell activation. In addition, several lines of experimental evidence support the conclusion that the effects we observed were due to HSP60 and not to LPS or other bacterial contaminants (Fig. 2).
|
. Fig. 2B shows that HSP60 eluted from the PmB agarose column was fully active. Fifthly, maganin II amide totally inhibited the effect of E. coli LPS, but did not inhibit the effect of our HSP60 preparation on B cells (Fig. 2C). It was recently reported that HSP60 binds LPS (15); in that article the authors used maganin II amide, which inhibited the activity of LPS and/or structurally related molecules tightly bound to HSP60. Finally, MB-HSP65 or E. coli GroEL, bacterial homologues of HSP60, failed to induce B cells to proliferate or to secrete IL-10 (Fig. 3). These bacterial HSP60 molecules were reported to induce the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by human monocytes or mouse macrophages (17, 18). It is noteworthy, therefore, that the innate response of B cells, unlike that of macrophages or dendritic cells, was specific to the mammalian HSP60. Moreover, because MB-HSP65 and the E. coli GroEL were also isolated from bacteria, the failure of these recombinant preparations to activate B cells is compatible with the conclusion that the effects of HSP60 were not due to contamination with bacterial molecules.
|
One of the consequences of B cell activation is the enhanced expression of costimulatory molecules. To test whether HSP60 induces the expression of B cell activation markers, purified B cells from C57BL/6 mice were cultured in the presence of HSP60 (20 µg/ml). After 16 h, the cells were harvested, stained with anti-mouse FcR for blocking nonspecific binding sites, and incubated with Abs specific to MHC II, CD86 (B7-2), CD40, CD69, or CD80 (B7-1). Cell surface expression was analyzed by FACS. HSP60 induced up-regulation of MHC II, CD86 (B7-2), CD40, and the early activation marker CD69 (Fig. 4, AD). No up-regulation of CD80 (B7-1) was observed (Fig. 4E).
|
Cytokines are capable of regulating the development of T cell subsets; for example, IFN-
and IL-2 induce Th1 responses, whereas IL-6 and IL-10 induce Th2 responses (19, 20). We investigated the effects of HSP60 on the induction of cytokine secretion by B cells. B cells were incubated with HSP60 (525 µg/ml) for 72 h, and the culture supernatants were tested for cytokine content by ELISA. Untreated B cells did not release any detectable cytokines. However, B cells stimulated with HSP60 produced significant quantities of IL-10 and IL-6 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5, B and D). IL-10 became detectable after 2 days in culture and accumulated rapidly between days 2 and 3 (Fig. 5A); IL-6 was detected as early as after 10 h in culture (Fig. 5C). We could not detect IL-4, IL-5, IFN-
, or TNF-
in the culture medium. B cells from BALB/c and NOD mice also produced IL-10 and IL-6 in response to HSP60 (data not shown).
|
HSP60 induces an isotype switch to IgG3
We tested whether HSP60 might also stimulate B cells to secrete Abs and found that HSP60 triggered Ig switching to IgG3 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5F). IgG3 became detectable after 3 days in culture and accumulated rapidly between days 3 and 5 (Fig. 5E). These results show that, similar to other known B cell stimulants, HSP60 induces both proliferation and activation of B cells and is capable of activating the Ig switch machinery.
HSP60 activates B cells via TLR4
Soluble HSP60 was shown to activate T cells via the innate receptor TLR2 (8). To study the role of TLR2 in HSP60 signaling of B cells, we tested whether HSP60 could activate B cells from TLR2-knockout mice. TLR2-knockout mouse B cells responded well to HSP60; as expected, these B cells failed to respond to the TLR2 ligand PGL. In addition, B cells from TLR2/ mice responded to HSP60 by IL-6 and IL-10 secretion and up-regulation of B7-2, CD40, CD69, and MHC II (not shown). Thus, TLR2 signaling does not appear to be involved in the activation of B cells by HSP60.
A TLR4 mutation in C3H/HeJ mice renders these mice resistant to the effects of bacterial LPS (22). To determine whether TLR4 signaling might be involved in B cell activation induced by HSP60, we compared the responses of B cells isolated from C3HeB/FeJ (wild-type TLR4) and C3H/HeJ (mutant TLR4) mice. We found that HSP60 induced B cells from the C3HeB/FeJ mice to proliferate; secrete IL-10, IL-6, and IgG3; and up-regulate their expression of costimulatory molecules (Fig. 6). In contrast, B cells from C3H/HeJ mice were low responders to stimulation with HSP60; the TLR4-mutant B cells were hyporesponsive to HSP60 in proliferation (Fig. 6A), and produced significantly less IL-10 (Fig. 6B), IL-6, and IgG3 (Fig. 6, C and D). The TLR4-mutant B cells also expressed significantly less of the accessory molecules CD86 and CD69 in response to HSP60 (Fig. 5E). Surprisingly, the up-regulation of MHC II induced by HSP60 was not dependent on the presence of functional TLR4 and was also observed in C3H/HeJ B cells (Fig. 6E, lower panel). Note, also, that B cells bearing the mutated TLR4 could still respond weakly to HSP60 by proliferation and cytokine secretion (Fig. 6).
|
MyD88 is a general adaptor protein that plays an important role in TLR family signaling; it was shown that LPS signals B cells via TLR4 and MyD88 (4, 23). However, a pathway for TLR4 activation by LPS independent of MyD88 has also been reported (24). Therefore, we tested the ability of HSP60 to activate B cells from MyD88-deficient mice. Both wild-type MyD88+/+ B cells and B cells from MyD88+/ mice (not shown) showed an increased proliferative response to HSP60 in a dose-dependent manner. However, MyD88-deficient B cells did not proliferate in response to HSP60, even when cultured with high concentrations of HSP60 (Fig. 7A). IL-10 production in response to HSP60 was also absent in B cells lacking MyD88 (Fig. 7B). Finally, up-regulation of the surface activation markers CD69, B7-2, and MHC II were also dependent on the presence of MyD88 (Fig. 7C). Thus, MyD88 signaling is required for the activation of B cells by HSP60.
|
To learn whether B cell activation by HSP60 might have functional consequences, we studied the ability of B cells, treated or not with HSP60, to stimulate allogeneic T cells in vitro. Resting B cells possess little or no costimulatory activity and have been reported to be ineffective APCs for naive T cells (25). We found that B cells treated with HSP60 induced a greater degree of allogeneic T cell proliferation than did the untreated B cells (Fig. 8A). To learn whether TLR4 is involved in the enhanced allogeneic stimulation induced by HSP60-treated B cells, we compared the allogeneic T cell response to HSP60-activated B cells from C3HeB/FeJ (wild-type TLR4) with that of C3H/HeJ (mutated TLR4) mice. B cells from C3HeB/FeJ and C3H/HeJ mice were treated with HSP60 for 16 h, washed, irradiated with 2500 rad, and then cocultured with allogeneic C57BL/6J T cells. B cells from TLR4-mutant C3H/HeJ were much less able to induce T cell proliferation (Fig. 8, compare A and B).
|
compared with untreated B cells (Fig. 8C). The ability of HSP60-activated B cells to induce T cell secretion of IFN-
was also dependent on the presence of functional TLR4; HSP60-activated B cells from C3H/HeJ mice induced lower levels of IFN-
secretion than those from C3HeB/FeJ mice (Fig. 8, compare C and D). Analysis of the presence of the Th2 cytokine IL-10 in the allogeneic response showed that activated B cells from C3HeB/FeJ mice, but not B cells from TLR4-mutant C3H/HeJ mice, induced significant levels of IL-10 secretion (Fig. 8, compare E and F). Irradiated B cells, cultured alone, secreted only low levels of IL-10 and undetectable levels of IFN-
(not shown). Thus, most cytokines detected in the supernatants of the allogenic T cell response probably did not come from the irradiated B cells, but, rather, from the responding T cells. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because our HSP60 was produced in E. coli, we were also concerned that the effects of HSP60 might be due to contamination with other bacterial products, such as lipoproteins, which were recently identified as the major factors responsible for the TLR2-mediated cell activation in commercial LPS (27). To exclude this possibility, we tested the ability of HSP60 to activate B cells from TLR2-deficient mice; such B cells responded to HSP60, whereas no response to the TLR2 ligand, PGL, was observed (not shown). Thus, the effects of HSP60 on B cells are not likely to be due to contamination by bacterial lipoproteins that act via TLR2. Taken together, these results argue against the likelihood that the B cell effects of HSP60 were really due to LPS contamination or to other TLR2 ligands, such as lipoproteins; the observed responses appear to be specific to HSP60.
HSP60 has been reported to act as an innate activator of T cells (8, 10), whereas HSP60 (or an HSP60/LPS complex) has been found to activate the innate immune systems of dendritic cells and macrophages (28, 29, 30). Table I summarizes the effects of HSP60 we report in this study on B cells compared with the effects of HSP60 or HSP60/LPS reported for other cell types. The present results show for the first time that self-HSP60 can act as a mitogen; we found that HSP60 can induce the proliferation of B cells, whereas macrophages, dendritic cells, and T cells were not reported to proliferate in response to HSP60/LPS.
|
, or TNF-
. Note that IL-6 was recently found to control Th1/Th2 differentiation; IL-6 promotes Th2 differentiation and simultaneously inhibits Th1 polarization through two independent molecular mechanisms (20). We show in this study that HSP60-treated B cells shifted the allogeneic T cell response to a Th0 type, characterized by secretion of both IFN-
and IL-10. In contrast to B cells, dendritic cells activated by HSP60/LPS promoted the secretion by allogeneic T cells of high levels of IFN-
and IL-12 and low levels of IL-10, which is a Th1-promoting phenotype (28).
Regarding the regulation of surface markers, HSP60/LPS was shown to induce maturation of dendritic cells characterized by up-regulation of the costimulatory molecules CD40, MHC II, B7-2, and CD54 (28). B cells responding to HSP60 also up-regulate their expression of CD40, MHC II, B7-2, and CD69, although the B cells did not up-regulate the expression of CD54 (not shown). The effect of HSP60/LPS on dendritic cells and the effect of HSP60 on B cells therefore can enhance the ability of these cells to act as APCs. B7-2 is a costimulatory molecule important for Th2 responses; its binding to CD28 and CTLA-4 on T cells is involved in the generation of IL-4-producing cells that contribute to Th2-type responses (32). In contrast, B7-1 binding to CD28 on T cells has been shown to promote a Th1 phenotype (32). We found that B cells up-regulated the surface expression of B7-2 in response to HSP60; however, B7-1 expression was unchanged. The regulation of B7 molecule expression in response to HSP60 might be part of the mechanism by which B cells promote a Th0 allogeneic T cell response (see Fig. 8). The cytokine microenvironment in which the Ag is presented strongly influences the polarization of Th cells toward Th1, Th2, or Th0 in response to antigenic stimulation (33, 34). To date there is no information available about the effects of HSP60 on the expression of surface markers on macrophages. T cells, however, respond to HSP60 by down-regulation of the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR7, and this inhibits their ability to migrate to stromal cell-derived factor-1
and Epstein-Barr virus-induced molecule 1 ligand chemokine (CCL19/ELC) (8).
TLR4 and TLR2 have been shown to be involved in signal transduction by HSP60 or HSP60/LPS complexes. Macrophages and dendritic cells use TLR4 signaling (28, 30); dendritic cells were also shown to respond via TLR2 (35). Human T cells respond to HSP60 via TLR2; no involvement of TLR4 was found (8). We show in this study that the B cell response to HSP60 is via TLR4. The responses of TLR4 mutants were significantly decreased, but not totally abolished; this might suggest the involvement of another receptor(s) or pathway(s) in B cells in response to HSP60. One interesting candidate might be RP105 (CD180). B cells, in addition to TLR4, express another member of the TLR family, the RP105 protein (36). Ogata et al. (36) reported an important role of RP105 in the regulation of LPS responsiveness. It is possible that the residual effect of HSP60 in TLR4-mutant cells might be due to activation of RP105. Up-regulation of MHC II was induced by HSP60 in the absence of functional TLR4; nevertheless, HSP60 could not induce the up-regulation of MHC II in MyD88-deficient B cells (Fig. 7C). The RP105 pathway was recently shown to act independently of MyD88 expression (37); therefore, we suspect that the MHC II up-regulation in the absence of TLR4 may not act through RP105. However, it is conceivable that RP105 might also use a MyD88-dependent pathway in B cell activation.
MyD88 is an adaptor molecule associated with TLR-mediated responses and was reported to be involved in the signaling pathway of HSP60 in dendritic cells (35). LPS was recently shown to induce maturation of dendritic cells via a pathway independent of MyD88 (24). In this study we show that B cell proliferation, up-regulation of surface molecules including MHC II, and cytokine secretion all depend on MyD88 activation by HSP60.
The E. coli HSP60 homologue GroEL and mycobacterial HSP65 were reported to induce the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages via TLR4 (17, 18), but neither bacterial HSP60 molecule could interfere with the binding of human HSP60 to macrophages (17). Thus, different variants of HSP60 might bind to different receptors yet still act via TLR4 as a coreceptor for signaling. In this study we show that neither GroEL nor mycobacterial HSP65 could activate B cells (Fig. 3).
The administration of HSP60 and its variants was found to arrest the destructive inflammation responsible for various models of autoimmune diseases (9, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44). These beneficial effects of HSP60 were marked by a shift in the autoimmune response from a damaging Th1 phenotype to a healing Th2 phenotype. Some explanation may be found in our recent discovery that HSP60 can directly affect T cells via TLR2 to down-regulate T cell chemotaxis (8). HSP60 was also found to significantly down-regulate the secretion of IFN-
and TNF-
and enhance the secretion of IL-10 upon activation by mitogenic anti-CD3 (9). Another possible explanation for the ability of HSP60 to down-regulate autoimmune inflammation, as we show in this study, could be by way of the IL-10 produced by HSP60-activated B cells. It has become apparent that B cells mediate a variety of functions within the immune system in addition to Ab production, which could play a regulatory role in inflammation and autoimmunity. B cells were shown to down-regulate inflammatory bowel disease (45), arthritis (46), diabetes (47), and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (46, 48). In most cases, IL-10 secreted from B cells was shown to be critical for the regulatory effect. It is conceivable that the effects of HSP60 on B cells could enhance, in part, such regulation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the European Union and he Center for the Study of Emerging Diseases. I.R.C. is the incumbent of the Mauerberger Chair in Immunology at the Weizmann Institute, the Director of the Center for the Study of Emerging Diseases, Jerusalem, and the Director of the National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Irun R. Cohen, Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. E-mail address: irun.cohen{at}weizmann.ac.il ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: PGL, peptidoglycan; HSP60, 60-kDa heat shock protein; MB, Mycobacterium bovis; MHC II, MHC class II; PmB, polymyxin B. ![]()
Received for publication November 9, 2004. Accepted for publication June 30, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ser destabilizes intersubunit interactions in the molecular chaperone GroEL. J. Mol. Biol. 231:58.-64. [Medline]
from murine macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 278:22523.-22529.
in monocyte-derived macrophage: possible role in chronic inflammatory periodontal disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 127:72.-77. [Medline]
+ and CD8
dendritic cells to prime Th1/Th2 cells in vivo. J. Immunol. 167:4345.-4350. This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Lartigue, N. Colliou, S. Calbo, A. Francois, S. Jacquot, C. Arnoult, F. Tron, D. Gilbert, and P. Musette Critical Role of TLR2 and TLR4 in Autoantibody Production and Glomerulonephritis in lpr Mutation-Induced Mouse Lupus J. Immunol., November 15, 2009; 183(10): 6207 - 6216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Iwata, A. Yoshizaki, K. Komura, K. Shimizu, F. Ogawa, T. Hara, E. Muroi, S. Bae, M. Takenaka, T. Yukami, et al. CD19, a Response Regulator of B Lymphocytes, Regulates Wound Healing through Hyaluronan-Induced TLR4 Signaling Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2009; 175(2): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Cohen-Sfady, M. Pevsner-Fischer, R. Margalit, and I. R. Cohen Heat Shock Protein 60, via MyD88 Innate Signaling, Protects B Cells from Apoptosis, Spontaneous and Induced J. Immunol., July 15, 2009; 183(2): 890 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Ashtekar, P. Zhang, J. Katz, C. C. S. Deivanayagam, P. Rallabhandi, S. N. Vogel, and S. M. Michalek TLR4-mediated activation of dendritic cells by the heat shock protein DnaK from Francisella tularensis J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 84(6): 1434 - 1446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cohen, M. Stolarsky-Bennun, H. Amir-Kroll, R. Margalit, G. Nussbaum, M. Cohen-Sfady, M. Pevsner-Fischer, M. Fridkin, H. Bercovier, L. Eisenbach, et al. Pneumococcal Capsular Polysaccharide Is Immunogenic When Present on the Surface of Macrophages and Dendritic Cells: TLR4 Signaling Induced by a Conjugate Vaccine or by Lipopolysaccharide Is Conducive J. Immunol., February 15, 2008; 180(4): 2409 - 2418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Jin, A. Zhu, Y. Wang, Q. Chen, Q. Xiong, J. Li, Y. Sun, T. Li, R. Cao, J. Wu, et al. A Th1-Recognized Peptide P277, When Tandemly Repeated, Enhances a Th2 Immune Response toward Effective Vaccines against Autoimmune Diabetes in Nonobese Diabetic Mice J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 58 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zanin-Zhorov, G. Tal-Lapidot, L. Cahalon, M. Cohen-Sfady, M. Pevsner-Fischer, O. Lider, and I. R. Cohen Cutting Edge: T Cells Respond to Lipopolysaccharide Innately via TLR4 Signaling J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 41 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Osterloh, U. Kalinke, S. Weiss, B. Fleischer, and M. Breloer Synergistic and Differential Modulation of Immune Responses by Hsp60 and Lipopolysaccharide J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4669 - 4680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Ye and Y.-H. Gan Flagellin Contamination of Recombinant Heat Shock Protein 70 Is Responsible for Its Activity on T Cells J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4479 - 4484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pevsner-Fischer, V. Morad, M. Cohen-Sfady, L. Rousso-Noori, A. Zanin-Zhorov, S. Cohen, I. R. Cohen, and D. Zipori Toll-like receptors and their ligands control mesenchymal stem cell functions Blood, February 15, 2007; 109(4): 1422 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Steptoe, A. Shamaei-Tousi, A. Gylfe, L. Bailey, S. Bergstrom, A. R. Coates, and B. Henderson Protective Effect of Human Heat Shock Protein 60 Suggested by Its Association with Decreased Seropositivity to Pathogens Clin. Vaccine Immunol., February 1, 2007; 14(2): 204 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Gee, A. Kalil, C. Shea, and K. J. Becker Lymphocytes: Potential Mediators of Postischemic Injury and Neuroprotection Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 783 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. McFarlin, M. G. Flynn, W. W. Campbell, B. A. Craig, J. P. Robinson, L. K. Stewart, K. L. Timmerman, and P. M. Coen Physical activity status, but not age, influences inflammatory biomarkers and toll-like receptor 4. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., April 1, 2006; 61(4): 388 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |