The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carding, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andrew, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Carding, S. R.
The Journal of Immunology, 2005, 175: 1741-1750.
Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists

Delineation of the Function of a Major {gamma}{delta} T Cell Subset during Infection1

Elizabeth M. Andrew2,*, Darren J. Newton2,*, Jane E. Dalton*, Charlotte E. Egan*, Stewart J. Goodwin*, Daniela Tramonti*, Philip Scott{dagger} and Simon R. Carding3,*

* School of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; and {dagger} Department of Pathobiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
{gamma}{delta} T cells play important but poorly defined roles in pathogen-induced immune responses and in preventing chronic inflammation and pathology. A major obstacle to defining their function is establishing the degree of functional redundancy and heterogeneity among {gamma}{delta} T cells. Using mice deficient in V{gamma}1+ T cells which are a major component of the {gamma}{delta} T cell response to microbial infection, a specific immunoregulatory role for V{gamma}1+ T cells in macrophage and {gamma}{delta} T cell homeostasis during infection has been established. By contrast, V{gamma}1+ T cells play no significant role in pathogen containment or eradication and cannot protect mice from immune-mediated pathology. Pathogen-elicited V{gamma}1+ T cells also display different functional characteristics at different stages of the host response to infection that involves unique and different populations of V{gamma}1+ T cells. These findings, therefore, identify distinct and nonoverlapping roles for {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets in infection and establish the complexity and adaptability of a single population of {gamma}{delta} T cells in the host response to infection that is not predetermined, but is, instead, shaped by environmental factors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The essential role played by {gamma}{delta} T cells in protective immunity to infection has been demonstrated in studies using {gamma}{delta} T cell-deficient mice. These mice are more susceptible than their wild-type (WT)4 counterparts to infection with low doses of viruses (1, 2, 3), bacteria (4, 5, 6), and parasites (7, 8, 9), leading to the development of accelerated and exacerbated inflammatory responses that can result in necrosis, pathology, and even death (reviewed in Ref. 10). In response to microbial infection, {gamma}{delta} T cell responses are staged, accumulating at the site of infection early, before, or concurrent with the involvement of {alpha}{beta} T cells and again later, at the time of pathogen clearance (2, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Although reports of the biological role of {gamma}{delta} T cells have been conflicting, models of infectious disease indicate that they may perform different functions at different stages of the immune response. In the early stage of infection {gamma}{delta} T cells appear to be proinflammatory; their absence results in increased pathogen burden (6, 14), and they secrete IFN-{gamma} (3, 8, 17, 18) and up-regulate its production by other lymphocytes and NK cells (19, 20). They can also direct adaptive ({alpha}{beta} T cell) responses (21, 22, 23). During the later stages of the immune response to microbial infection, {gamma}{delta} T cells kill bacteria-elicited, activated macrophages, coincident with or after bacterial clearance (24), indicative of the involvement of {gamma}{delta} T cells in preventing chronic inflammation. A similar staging of the {gamma}{delta} T cell response has also been demonstrated in autoimmune disorders. For example, in a mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis, depletion of {gamma}{delta} T cells before collagen immunization reduces disease severity, putatively through removal of a proinflammatory stimulus, whereas their depletion late in the course of disease increases its severity through a lack of regulatory {gamma}{delta} T cells (25).

What is not clear is whether the pro- and anti-inflammatory functions of {gamma}{delta} T cells are mediated by distinct subpopulations of {gamma}{delta} T cells or by the same cells whose functional phenotype is influenced by the microenvironment in which they are activated. The differential expression of TCR variable (V) genes has been widely used to distinguish between different populations (reviewed in Ref. 26) and has been used to assign specific functions to different subsets of {gamma}{delta} T cells (27, 28). The immune response to certain viral (13, 17) and bacterial (29, 30) infections is dominated by a single subset of {gamma}{delta} T cells expressing TCRs encoded by the GV5S1 (V{gamma}1; TCR-V{gamma} nomenclature used is that of Heilig and Tonegawa (31)) and TRADV15 (V{delta}6) gene families (32) that accumulate in sites of infection coincident with or after pathogen clearance. The ability to kill Listeria monocytogenes (Lm)-elicited, activated macrophages has also been shown to be a property of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}6+ subset (33) consistent with a role for these cells in macrophage homeostasis and in preventing chronic inflammatory responses after pathogen removal. The degree of functional heterogeneity of this subset is not clear, however, with both pro- and anti-inflammatory activities and with beneficial as well as detrimental effects on host responses having been described (reviewed in Ref. 34). V{gamma}1+ T cells are prominent during the early stages of Lm infection, in which they have been shown to constitutively express IL-12Rs (30) and to be major producers of IFN-{gamma} (17, 30), consistent with an early proinflammatory role and with acting as a bridge between the innate and adaptive immune systems. However, studies of the overall protective role of V{gamma}1+ T cells in Lm infection are inconclusive, with in vivo depletion studies resulting in either increased (35) or decreased (36) bacterial numbers, leaving it unclear whether bacterial containment and protection are properties of the V{gamma}1+ or other {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets.

A major obstacle in defining the function of V{gamma}1+ T cells is therefore establishing the degree of functional redundancy and heterogeneity of this population during the course of infection. To resolve the conflicting evidence relating to the function of V{gamma}1+ T cells, TCRV{gamma}1-deficient (V{gamma}1–/–) mice have been used to determine the requirement for V{gamma}1+ T cells in the host response to infection and the extent of functional redundancy among {gamma}{delta} T cells during pathogen-induced immune responses. We show in this study that V{gamma}1+ T cells have an essential, nonredundant function in macrophage homeostasis and may play a novel role in regulating {gamma}{delta} T cell homeostasis. They cannot, however, protect TCR{delta}–/– mice from immune-mediated tissue injury. In addition, V{gamma}1+ T cells exhibit a considerable degree of functional plasticity and heterogeneity, and V{gamma}1+ T cells involved in the early vs late stages of pathogen-induced immune responses comprise nonoverlapping populations that appear to be selectively expanded on the basis of their ability to produce cytokines appropriate to the pervading environmental conditions and the stage of the immune response.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Mice and infection

Male and female mice were used at 6–8 wk of age, with three to five mice per group. C57BL/6 TCRV{gamma}1–/– mice were generated in our laboratory, C57BL/6 TCR{delta}–/– were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory, C57BL/6 mice were obtained from Harlan Laboratories, and all were housed in the animal facility at University of Leeds. For the generation of TCR-V{gamma}1–/– mice, fragments of the murine TCR-V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4-C{gamma}4 gene were cloned from a bacterial artificial chromosome murine ES-129/SvJ library, and sequences were checked with those obtained from C57BL/6 genomic DNA. A targeting vector was designed to replace a genomic fragment containing V{gamma}1, J{gamma}4, and exon 1 of C{gamma}4 sequences with a neomycin resistance cassette. The targeting vector was linearized and electroporated into ES cells (Incyte Genetics). After G418 selection, homologous recombinants were identified by Southern blot hybridization using a 5' probe consisting of an ~0.3-kb HindII-SacI genomic DNA fragment located ~0.4 kb 5' of V{gamma}2 and a 3' probe comprising an ~1.3-kb EcoRV-XbaI genomic DNA fragment encompassing exon 4 of the C{gamma}4 gene. Two clones heterozygous for the targeted mutation were injected into C57BL/6 blastocysts, which were subsequently transferred into pseudopregnant foster mothers. Chimeric mice were crossed with C57BL/6 mice to produce heterozygous TCR-V{gamma}1+/– mice. Germline transmission of the mutation was verified by PCR and Southern blot analysis of tail DNA. Heterozygotes were intercrossed to generate homozygous TCR-V{gamma}1–/– mice. Homozygous and heterozygous mutant mice were backcrossed into C57BL/6 mice more than seven times before use in experiments. WT and TCR{delta}–/–, and TCRV{gamma}1–/– mice were infected i.p. with 1.5 x 104 CFU of Lm (strain 10403S). Between 2 and 8 days after infection, spleens and livers were weighed and homogenized in distilled water, and 10 µl of the homogenate was plated onto brain-heart infusion agar (Oxoid). Colonies were counted after 24-h incubation at 37°C, and the numbers of CFU per spleen and per gram of tissue were calculated.

Assessment of liver damage

Liver damage in Lm-infected mice was assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and histology. Serum ALT was measured on an ADVIA 2400 chemistry system analyzer (Bayer) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For histology, Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 5-µm tissue sections from the livers of infected and control noninfected mice were stained with H&E and examined with an Axiovert 200M microscope (Zeiss) and Axiovison image analysis software (Imaging Associates).

Cellular phenotypic analysis by flow cytometry

Standard protocols were followed for preparing cell suspensions (37). Briefly, for splenocytes, the tissues were homogenized, contaminating erythrocytes lysed with 0.84% (w/v) ammonium chloride solution, and the cell suspension was passed through a 0.7-µm pore size nylon filter and washed before Ab staining. Small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (iIELs) were isolated from Peyer’s patch-excised small intestines by 37°C incubation in 50 ml of HBSS containing 10% (v/v) FBS, 5 mM EDTA, and 3 mg/ml dithioerythritol, followed by density gradient separation on Percoll (Amersham Biosciences) (38). Peritoneal exudate cells were collected in HBSS containing 10 U/ml heparin. All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. For surface staining, the Abs included F(ab')2 of mAbs specific for TCR-V{gamma}1 (clone 2.11) (39), TCR V{delta}6.3 (clone 17C) (16), and TCR-{delta} (GL3) and intact Ab specific for TCR-V{gamma}7 (F2.67). The 2.11 and F2.67 hybridoma cell lines were provided by Dr. P. Pereira (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France). The commercial anti-mouse mAbs used were TCR{gamma}{delta} (GL3), CD3 (145-2C11), TCRV{gamma}4 (V{gamma}2; UC3-10A6), TCRV{gamma}5 (V{gamma}3; 536), and F4/80, conjugated to biotin or fluorochromes purchased from Caltag-Medsystems or BD Pharmingen. Streptavidin conjugates of PE, FITC, (Caltag Laboratories), or Alexa Fluor 633 (Molecular Probes) were used as secondary reagents. To block nonspecific Ab binding, cells were incubated with anti-FcR Ab mixture, anti-CD16/32 (20 µg/ml; Caltag Laboratories). Isotype-matched Abs of irrelevant specificity were used to determine the level of nonspecific staining. Stained cells were analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

{gamma}{delta} T cell enrichment and adoptive transfer

{gamma}{delta} T cells were enriched from splenocytes of C57BL/6 mice by positive immunomagnetic selection after labeling with either FITC-F(ab')2 of anti-TCR-V{gamma}1 (2.11)- or anti-TCR-{delta} (GL3)-specific mAbs, followed by anti-FITC magnetic microbeads and selection on MACS LS columns (Miltenyi Biotec). The resulting cell populations routinely contained >80% {gamma}{delta} T cells of >95% viability, and 2–4 x 105 cells were then transferred i.v. into C57BL/6 TCR{delta}–/– and TCRV{gamma}1–/– mice immediately before bacterial infection.

Macrophage-T cell coculture

Plastic-adherent peritoneal exudate cells (5 x 105) from day 8 Lm-infected TCR{delta}–/– mice were incubated with splenocytes (1 x 106) from WT or V{gamma}1–/– mice on eight-well chamber slides (ICN Pharmaceuticals) and cultured at 37°C in RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) with 10% FBS for 1 h as previously described (33). To evaluate macrophage killing by T cells, adherent macrophages were incubated with the Live/Dead cell reagent (Molecular Probes) containing fluorescent dyes that identify the intracellular esterase activity of viable cells (calcein AM) or that are incorporated in the nuclei of dead cells (ethidium bromide homodimer-1) and were examined by UV microscopy using an Axiovert 200M microscope (Zeiss) and Axiovison image analysis software (Imaging Associates). At least 100 live and/or dead cells were counted in four separate fields.

Cytokine analysis

Intracellular cytokines were detected by cytoplasmic staining of splenocytes recovered from Lm-infected WT mice after culture in vitro for 5 h with 10 µg/ml brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were then surface-stained with anti-CD3, -TCR-{gamma}{delta}, and -TCR-V{gamma}1 mAbs; fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde; and permeabilized with 0.5% saponin (Sigma-Aldrich) before cytoplasmic staining with PE-conjugated anti-mouse cytokine mAbs to IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-{gamma}, and TNF-{alpha} (Caltag-Medsystems or BD Pharmingen) or FITC-conjugated polyclonal Abs to MIP-1{beta} and MCP-1 (Sigma-Aldrich). Anti-TGF-{beta} and anti-latency-associated peptide bound to latent TGF-{beta} (anti-LAP) mAbs (R&D Systems) were conjugated to FITC and used for surface staining. PE- and FITC-conjugated isotype-matched mAbs of irrelevant specificity were used to determine levels of nonspecific staining of anti-cytokine mAbs.

TCR-V{gamma}/V{delta} profiling and structural analyses

RNA was extracted from {gamma}{delta} T cell-enriched splenocytes from Lm-infected C57BL/6 mice using Tri-reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was reverse transcribed using an oligo(dT)-primed ImpromII RT kit (Promega), and the resulting cDNA was amplified using Reddy-Mix (Abgene) under the following reaction conditions; denaturation at 94°C, annealing at 55°C, and extension at 72°C for 38 cycles. The primers used (5'-3') were V{gamma}1CCGGCAAAAAGCAAAAAAGT, C{gamma}4AAGGAGACAAAGGTAGGTCCCAGC, V{gamma}2TTGGTACCGGCAAAAAACAAATCA, C{gamma}2CAATACACCCTTATGACATCG, V{gamma}4CTTGCAACCCCTACCCATAT, V{gamma}5GAGGATCCCGCTTGGAAATGGATGAGA, V{gamma}6GATCCAAGAGGAAAGGAAAGACGGC, V{gamma}7GATCCAACTTCGTCAGTTCCACAAC,C{gamma}1CCACCACTCGTTTCTTTAGG, V{delta}1AATAGCAATTCTACTGATGGTGG, V{delta}2AGTCCTCAGTCTCTGACAATC, V{delta}3CCAGATTCAATGGAAAGTAC, V{delta}4GTACAAACAGCAAGGAGGGCAGG, V{delta}5CCAGACAGTGGCAAGCGGCACTG, V{delta}6TCAAGTCCATCAGCCTTGTC, C{delta}1CGAATTCCACAATCTTCTTG, GCTTCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTTG ({beta}-actin forward), and TTCTCCATGTCGTCCCAGTTGG ({beta}-actin reverse). Products were visualized on 2% ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels. Structural analyses of PCR-amplified TCR cDNAs was conducted by direct sequencing of pGEM-T (Promega)-cloned cDNAs and by spectratyping (Lark DNA Technologies). For spectratype analysis, 2 µl of PCR product was amplified in a 10-cycle run-off reaction using fluorescently labeled, J-region-specific primers (J{gamma}1, CTTAGTTCCTTCTGCAAATACC; J{gamma}4, TACGAGCTTTGTCCCTTTG), and the amplicons were analyzed on sequencing gels using GenescanView4 software (CRIBI).

Statistical analysis

Differences in mean values between two groups were evaluated by Mann-Whitney U tests using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Phenotypic characteristics of V{gamma}1–/– mice

V{gamma}1-deficient (V{gamma}1–/–) mice were generated to define V{gamma}1+ T cell function and determine the extent of functional redundancy among {gamma}{delta} T cells during pathogen-induced immune responses. Mice homozygous for the V{gamma}1 null allele were created by mutating the V{gamma}1 gene as well as the J{gamma}4 and exons 1 and 2 of the C{gamma}4 gene to prevent any rearrangement and the possibility of pairing of other V{gamma} genes with an otherwise intact C{gamma}4 gene. Founder animals heterozygous for the mutation were bred to obtain homozygous mice, which were identified by Southern blotting (Fig. 1A). The absence of V{gamma}1 mRNA expression in V{gamma}1–/– spleen and thymus confirmed that these mice were deficient in TCRV{gamma}1-expressing T cells (Fig. 1B). Homozygous mice were backcrossed at least seven generations onto the C57BL/6 background before experimentation. Homozygous mice were healthy, able to mate, and had a normal life span. The only observed physiological differences between V{gamma}1–/– and WT mice was an enlargement of the primary lymphoid organs in adult (>6 wk old) V{gamma}1–/– mice resulting in an ~1.5-fold increase in the cellularity of the thymus (average of 1.1 x 108 in WT and 1.6 x 108 in V{gamma}1–/– mice) and spleen (average of 4 x 107 in WT and 6 x 107 in V{gamma}1–/– mice). This increase in cellularity was not attributable to any one population of leukocytes and resulted in increased numbers of {gamma}{delta} T cells in these tissues. A comparison of the splenic TCR-V{gamma} and -V{delta} mRNA profiles in noninfected adult WT and V{gamma}1–/– mice showed no qualitative differences in the profile of expression of V{gamma}2-, V{gamma}4-, and V{delta}6-encoded TCRs in the absence of V{gamma}1+ T cells (Fig. 1B). The expression of V{delta}6 in these mice, which is the major {delta}-chain paired with V{gamma}1 in WT mice (33, 40), shows that V{gamma}1 is not required for the expression of this {delta}-chain and that it can be used by other V{gamma} receptors, such as V{gamma}2 and V{gamma}4 (41).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. TCRV{gamma}1-deficient (V{gamma}1–/–) mouse phenotype. A, Southern blot analysis of V{gamma}1 alleles in genomic DNA extracted from tail tips of homozygous WT (+/+), heterozygous (+/–), and homozygous V{gamma}1–/– (–/–) littermates. B, RT-PCR of V{gamma} and V{delta}6 gene expression in the thymus and/or spleen of V{gamma}1–/– and C57BL/6 (WT) mice. C and D, The distribution of {gamma}{delta} T cells among splenocytes and iIELs of V{gamma}1–/– and WT mice. Histograms, which are representative of >10 mice of each genotype, show the proportions of CD3+ cells stained with anti-{gamma}{delta} (filled plots) and isotype control (open plots) Abs. The percentage of V{gamma}7+ iIELs (D) was determined by gating on {gamma}{delta}+ cells.

 
In WT mice, V{gamma}1+ T cells are a major {gamma}{delta} T cell subset in the spleen (20–50%) and among iIELs (15–30%) (39). The effect of V{gamma}1+ T cell deficiency on the splenic and IEL {gamma}{delta} T cell repertoires was assessed by comparing the distribution and number of {gamma}{delta} T cells between adult WT and V{gamma}1–/– mice. In the spleen, the percentages of {gamma}{delta} T cells were similar (Fig. 1C), although their absolute numbers were increased by 30–40% due to the enlargement of the spleen in V{gamma}1–/– mice, indicating that V{gamma}1+ T cell deficiency in V{gamma}1–/– was compensated for by the expansion of other {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets. Based on the TCRV{gamma} mRNA profiles (Fig. 1B), these were mainly V{gamma}4+ and V{gamma}2+ T cells. A similar pattern was seen among iIELs, which were ~1.5-fold higher in number in V{gamma}1–/– compared with WT animals, with an increased frequency of {gamma}{delta}+ T cells from 30% in the WT to 52% (Fig. 1C). There was also a corresponding increase in the size of the major, V{gamma}7+, iIEL subset, which accounted for almost 90% of all TCR{gamma}{delta}+ iIELs (Fig. 1D). These findings suggest that V{gamma}1+ T cells may exert some influence on iIEL homeostasis in the small intestine.

{gamma}{delta} T cell recruitment during Lm infection is regulated by V{gamma}1+ T cells

The {gamma}{delta} T cell response to Lm infection in C57BL/6 mice is biphasic, with increased numbers of cells seen early (day 2), before the {alpha}{beta} T cell response, and later (days 6–8), coincident with or after bacterial clearance (16, 42). The {gamma}{delta} T cells present at both the early and late stages of the response are dominated by a single subset that coexpresses V{gamma}1 and V{delta}6.3 (V{gamma}1/V{delta}6) TCRs (16). The {gamma}{delta} T cell response to infection in the absence of this subset was determined by comparing splenocyte TCR-V{gamma} and -V{delta} receptor expression in both the early and late responses in WT and V{gamma}1–/– mice.

Up to 2 days after infection, TCR-V{gamma} and -V{delta} expression in both strains of mice was similar (Fig. 2A), with the exception of a lack of V{gamma}1 expression in V{gamma}1–/– mice. There was also no change in TCR-V{delta} expression from the noninfected state, in which only TCR-V{delta}6 mRNA was detected (data not shown). Unexpectedly, TCR-V{gamma}7 mRNA, which was not detected in the spleen of noninfected mice of either strain, was present in the spleen of both V{gamma}1–/– and WT mice on day 2 after infection.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. V{gamma}1+ T cells control recruitment of other {gamma}{delta} T cells to the site of infection. A and B, RT-PCR of the TCR-V{gamma} and -V{delta} genes expressed by {gamma}{delta} T cells enriched from splenocytes of WT (+/+) and V{gamma}1–/– (–/–) mice obtained at 2 (A) and 8 (B) days after infection with Lm. C, The distribution of TCRV{gamma}+ subsets of {gamma}{delta} T cells in Lm-infected WT (n = 5) and V{gamma}1–/– (n = 6) mice and V{gamma}1–/– mice reconstituted with 2 x 105 V{gamma}1+ T cells immediately before infection (AT-V{gamma}1–/–; n = 6), determined by staining splenocytes from day 8 infected mice with anti-CD3-, -{gamma}{delta}-, and -V{gamma}/{delta}-specific Abs. AT-V{gamma}1–/– mice were tested for the V{gamma}5 and V{gamma}7 subsets only (p ≤ 0.05). D, TCRV{gamma} spectratype analysis was conducted on V{gamma}5 and V{gamma}7 RT-PCR products amplified from skin and iIELs respectively, of noninfected WT (d0) mice and from {gamma}{delta} T cell-enriched splenocytes from day 8 Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice (d8).

 
During the late response to Lm infection, striking differences were seen in TCR-V{gamma} and -V{delta} expression (Fig. 2B). In WT mice, the profile of TCR-V{gamma} expression was similar to that on day 2 after infection, although TCR-V{gamma}7 mRNA was no longer detected. By contrast, in V{gamma}1–/– mice, TCR-V{gamma}5 and -V{gamma}6 mRNA were detected in addition to TCR-V{gamma}7 mRNA, which was unexpected because V{gamma}5 and V{gamma}6 expressions normally define monomorphic, oligoclonal populations restricted to the skin (V{gamma}5+ dendritic epidermal T cells (DETC)) (43) and mucosal epithelia of the reproductive tract (V{gamma}6) (44). There were also differences in TCR-V{delta} expression during the late stage of the response to Lm infection. Although TCR-V{delta}2 and -V{delta}3 mRNA were present in both WT and V{gamma}1–/– mice, additional TCR-V{delta}1 and -V{delta}5 mRNA were detectable in V{gamma}1–/– mice. The presence of these unusual subsets of {gamma}{delta} T cells in Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice was confirmed by Ab staining and flow cytometry. The spleen of V{gamma}1–/– mice at 8 days after infection contained significant proportions of V{gamma}5+ (~25%) and V{gamma}7+ (~20%) {gamma}{delta} T cells (Fig. 2C), consistent with the TCR-V{gamma} mRNA analysis (Fig. 2B). Abs specific for the V{gamma}6 receptor chain were not available. By contrast, the levels of staining of splenocytes of WT mice and TCRV{gamma}1–/– mice reconstituted with V{gamma}1+ T cells immediately before infection with anti-V{gamma}5/7 Abs (<5%) were no higher than those seen with isotype-matched control Abs. The size of the V{gamma}4+ subset in both strains of mice was, however, comparable (35% in V{gamma}1–/– and 40% in WT). To attempt to establish the origin and relationship of V{gamma}5+ and V{gamma}7+ T cells in the spleens of Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice with, respectively, DETC and iIELs of WT mice, TCR-CDR3 spectratype analysis was conducted on RT-PCR-amplified TCRV{gamma}5/7 cDNAs of skin and small intestinal RNA from noninfected adult C57BL/6 mice and compared with that of day 8 Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice. The spectratype profiles in Fig. 2D show that the V{gamma}5 and V{gamma}7 TCRS from V{gamma}1–/– mice were similar to those expressed in the skin and small intestine of WT mice, with the same peak predominating among V{gamma}5 and V{gamma}7 receptors of WT and V{gamma}1–/– mice. The profiles seen in V{gamma}1–/– samples could be distinguished from those in WT mice by the presence of one or more minor peaks absent in WT mice (V{gamma}5) or increased representation of individual peaks common to both WT and V{gamma}1–/– mice (V{gamma}7). These profiles suggested a commonality in the structure and possibly origin of V{gamma}5+ and V{gamma}7+ T cells in the spleens of Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– and the DETC and IELs of WT mice. However, the finding that only ~10% of V{gamma}5+ T cells in Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice were reactive with the DETC anti-TCRV{gamma}5/V{delta}1 clonotype Ab, 17D.1 (45) (E. M. Andrew and S. R. Carding, unpublished observations) suggests that the majority of these cells are not skin derived, and/or that the V{gamma}5 receptor chain expressed in the spleens of V{gamma}1–/– mice pairs with other V{delta}-chains. Collectively, these results suggest that V{gamma}1+ T cells are immunoregulatory and involved in the homeostatic regulation of other {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets in response to infection.

V{gamma}1+ T cells are both necessary and sufficient for {gamma}{delta} T cell involvement in macrophage homeostasis

Previously we have shown that {gamma}{delta} and V{gamma}1/V{delta}6+ T cells kill populations of activated macrophages (33, 42). Peak cytocidal activity occurs during the late {gamma}{delta} T cell response coincident with the appearance of large numbers of terminally differentiated macrophages and with bacteria clearance. V{gamma}1–/– mice were used therefore to establish whether macrophage killing is a nonredundant function of V{gamma}1+ T cells and what the consequences of their absence is on the response and fate of macrophages during infection. Similar to those in Lm-infected TCR{delta}–/– mice, the percentage and absolute number of macrophages were increased in V{gamma}1–/– mice in the primary sites of infection, with a 3- to 4-fold increase in the spleen (Fig. 3A) and a 2-fold or more increase in the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 3B) late during the course of infection. This increase in macrophage numbers in TCRV{gamma}1–/– mice was similar to or greater than that seen in TCR{delta}–/– mice and was reduced to levels comparable with those in WT individuals by reconstitution with V{gamma}1+ T cells before infection. Most significant was the absence of any macrophage cytotoxic activity among splenocytes from V{gamma}1–/– mice (Fig. 3C). As shown in this study and previously (33), macrophage cytotoxicity was only evident among effector cells obtained from either noninfected or Lm-infected mice with intact {gamma}{delta} T cell populations (WT and TCR{beta}–/– mice) and was restricted to the macrophage-adherent V{gamma}1+ subset of {gamma}{delta} T cells. Thus, V{gamma}1+ T cells are both necessary and sufficient to kill Lm-activated macrophages and play an important and nonredundant role in macrophage homeostasis during pathogen-induced immune responses.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. V{gamma}1+ T cells are necessary and sufficient to control macrophage (M{phi}) homeostasis. A and B, The distribution and number of macrophages recovered from spleen (A) and peritoneal cavity (B) of noninfected C57BL/6, V{gamma}1–/– mice, TCR{delta}–/– mice, and V{gamma}1–/– mice reconstituted with 2 x 105 V{gamma}1+ T cells immediately before infection (AT-V{gamma}1–/–). Histograms, representative of six to eight mice in each group, show the profile of staining with the macrophage-specific Ab, F4/80 (filled plots), and isotype-matched control Ab (open plots). C, Macrophage cytocidal activity among splenocytes from noninfected C57BL/6, V{gamma}1–/–, and TCR{delta}–/– mice determined by coculture with pathogen-elicited macrophages from peritoneal exudate cells from TCR{delta}–/– mice obtained 8 days after Lm infection. Macrophage death was evaluated using a live/dead cell assay, with the frequency of dead cells determined by UV microscopy. Levels of spontaneous macrophage death were determined by culturing macrophages in the absence of spleen cells (M{phi} alone). Results shown were collated from three experiments of four to six mice per experiment.

 
V{gamma}1+ T cells do not protect mice from immune-mediated tissue injury

Exaggerated inflammation and extensive tissue (liver) necrosis are hallmark features of microbial and Lm infection in {gamma}{delta} T cell-deficient mice (4, 5). Although the identity and means by which specific populations of {gamma}{delta} T cells normally protect the host from immune-mediated tissue injury as a consequence of infection have not been identified, the reported anti-inflammatory and antibacterial activities of V{gamma}1+ T cells (24, 36) suggest that they may perform such a role. This possibility was investigated further in this study by determining whether V{gamma}1+ T cells contribute to pathogen containment and eradication and/or can prevent the liver necrosis seen in Lm-infected TCR{delta}–/– mice.

V{gamma}1–/– mice were able to contain bacterial infection to the same extent as WT animals (Fig. 4A). With the exception of day 2 after infection, there was no significant difference in bacterial numbers in the livers of V{gamma}1–/– mice and WT mice throughout infection, although there was a fairly wide distribution in bacterial numbers between individuals in the same group on all days after infection. At 2 days after infection, there were significantly more bacteria in the livers of V{gamma}1–/– compared with TCR{delta}–/– mice (p = 0.03). By 4 days after infection, however, which is before or coincident with the onset of liver necrosis, the pattern had reversed, with TCR{delta}–/– mice containing significantly (p = 0.05) more bacteria than either V{gamma}1–/– or WT mice. Because the total weight of the liver of each mouse strain was similar and did not change throughout the course of infection, the bacterial CFU per gram values obtained were representative of the total bacterial load in the liver. The difference observed in bacterial burden between V{gamma}1–/– and TCR{delta}–/– mice may reflect the slower migration of bacteria in TCR{delta}–/– mice from the initial site of infection (peritoneal cavity) to the liver and then more rapid bacterial growth due to a complete lack of {gamma}{delta} T cells.



View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. V{gamma}1+ T cells do not contribute to bacterial containment or protection from liver damage in murine listeriosis. a, Number of bacterial CFU per gram of liver in WT, V{gamma}1–/–, and TCR{delta}–/– mice infected i.p. with 1.5 x 104 CFU of Lm. Total liver mass was similar in all strains. b, Serum ALT levels, indicative of liver damage, before and 6 days after Lm infection. c and d, H&E-stained paraffin sections of livers 6 days after infection to show necrotic lesions (arrows; magnification, x250). c, Appearance of liver in WT (i), TCR{delta}–/– (ii), and V{gamma}1–/– (iii) mice was typical of that seen in at least nine mice per group. d, Livers of TCR{delta}–/– mice transfused with 2–4 x 105 {gamma}{delta} (i) or V{gamma}1+ (ii) T cells immediately before infection, representative of four or five mice per group. e, Number of bacteria per gram of liver 6 days after infection of TCR{delta}–/– mice transfused with {gamma}{delta} T cells, V{gamma}1+- or V{gamma}1-enriched {gamma}{delta} T cells, or saline alone (no cells). Each dot represents the CFU of an individual mouse, and horizontal bars represent mean CFU per group.

 
There was no evidence of any liver lesion in the V{gamma}1–/– mice during Lm infection (Fig. 4C and data not shown). This was substantiated by serum ALT measurements, which, as seen in infected TCR{delta}–/– mice (Fig. 4B), increase as a result of liver damage (46), but remained unchanged in infected V{gamma}1–/– and WT mice (Fig. 4B). The inability of V{gamma}1+ T cells to prevent immune-mediated liver injury during listeriosis in TCR{delta}–/– mice was confirmed in {gamma}{delta} T cell adoptive transfer experiments. The adoptive transfer of enriched V{gamma}1+ T cells (>80% TCRV{gamma}1+) into TCR{delta}–/– recipients before Lm infection failed to prevent the development of necrotic liver lesions (Fig. 4D). In contrast, {gamma}{delta} (V{gamma}1) T cells from V{gamma}1–/– mice were able to provide protection to TCR{delta}–/– mice from developing liver necrosis after Lm infection, and they also slightly improved bacterial containment (Fig. 4E). These findings show that the function of V{gamma}1+ T cells in pathogen-induced immune responses is restricted to the homeostatic control of macrophage and perhaps {gamma}{delta} T cell activity, and that they play no role in preventing chronic inflammation and tissue injury.

V{gamma}1+ T cells show stage-dependent functional differences during Lm infection

That {gamma}{delta} T cells are functionally heterogeneous and their involvement in certain pathogen-induced immune responses is staged are well established (3, 6, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 21, 47, 48). Important questions, however, are: what is the extent of functional plasticity among cells that express TCRs encoded by the same V{gamma}/{delta} gene segments, and are the same or different populations of T cells involved in different stages of the host response to infection? To address these issues, the functional attributes and structure of the CDR3 regions of the TCRs expressed by V{gamma}1+ T cells during the early and late stages of the immune response to Lm infection in WT mice were compared.

Intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry were used to profile the cytokine response of V{gamma}1+ T cells at 2 and 8 days after infection, corresponding to the peaks of their response to Lm in C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 5A) and mirroring the waves of {gamma}{delta} T cells that form the early and late responses (10, 16). At both stages of the immune response to Lm infection, V{gamma}1+ T cells were the major source of the cytokines produced by {gamma}{delta} T cells as a whole; with the exception of IL-6 production at 2 days after infection, the frequency of V{gamma}1+ cells that produced any of the cytokines tested was at least equivalent to and in some cases higher than that produced by all other (V{gamma}1) {gamma}{delta} T cells (Fig. 5, C and D). In general, the highest number of cytokine-producing V{gamma}1+ T cells was present during the late stage (day 8) of the immune response (Fig. 5, C vs D), with significantly more (p < 0.01) V{gamma}1+ T cells producing the anti-inflammatory cytokines, TGF-{beta}, LAP, and IL-10, during the late vs the early stage of the host response to infection (Fig. 5B). There were also significant increases in the frequency of V{gamma}1+ T cells producing IL-6 and IL-2 during the late stage of the immune response to Lm (Fig. 5B) and in IL-5 production by V{gamma}1+ at the early stage of the response (Fig. 5C). In contrast, during the early stage of the anti-Lm response, V{gamma}1+ T cells produced only one cytokine, IL-4, at significantly higher levels (p ≤ 0.01) than at the late stage of the response (Fig. 5B). In the early stages the production of IL-4, which is a strong promoter of IL-12 (49) and of neutrophil recruitment to the liver (50), suggests a more proinflammatory role for V{gamma}1+ T cells early in infection. There were essentially no differences in the frequency of cells producing the other cytokines and chemokines examined (IL-5, IFN-{gamma}, TNF-{alpha}, MCP-1, and MIP-1{beta}), which were all produced to a similar extent by V{gamma}1+ T cells at both time points after infection. On day 8 after infection, the vast majority of LAP- and TGF-{beta}-positive {gamma}{delta} T cells were V{gamma}1+ (Fig. 5D). Because this was detected on the cell surface, it is not clear whether it was produced by the cells or was bound to the cell surface, although high levels of TGF-{beta} mRNA expression were detected among FACS-purified, late-stage V{gamma}1+ T cells by microarray analysis (data not shown). The presence of TGF-{beta} in both its latent and active forms, in conjunction with the production by these cells of IL-10 and IL-2, is reminiscent of the functional phenotype of {alpha}{beta} CD4+ T regulatory cells, suggestive of a role for V{gamma}1+ T cells in down-modulating the late-stage {alpha}{beta} T cell response either directly or perhaps via induction of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (51). This analysis of cytokine production by V{gamma}1+ T cells clearly demonstrates their functional heterogeneity, which is appropriate to the stage of infection at which they become involved.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. The functional phenotype of V{gamma}1+ T cells is influenced by the stage of infection. A, Temporal response of splenic V{gamma}1+ T cells to Lm infection in C57BL/6 mice before and up to 12 days after infection, showing a significant increase (p < 0.05) in V{gamma}1+ T cell number between days 0 and 2 and between days 4 and 8. B, Frequency of cytokine-synthesizing V{gamma}1+ T cells during the early and late stages of Lm infection, determined by four-color flow cytometric analysis. Splenic V{gamma}1+ T cells (FACS-gated on CD3+,{gamma}{delta}+ cells) from C57BL/6 WT mice 2 (early) and 8 (late) days after infection showed significant differences in the synthesis of IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-{beta}, and LAP between days 2 and 8: *, p ≤ 0.01; **, p ≤ 0.05. C and D, Comparative analysis of the number of cytokine-producing V{gamma}1+ and V{gamma}1 {gamma}{delta} T cells (per 103 {gamma}{delta} T cells) at 2 days (C) and 8 days (D) after infection. The mean ± SEM shown are of six to 12 individual mice from three independent experiments.

 
The structure of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}6 TCRs expressed during the early and late stages of the immune response to Lm was examined by spectratyping and DNA sequencing of RT-PCR-amplified and cloned cDNAs. Spectratype analyses of V{gamma}1-TCRs expressed before and during the early and late stages of infection were strikingly similar, with all of the prominent peaks representing productive rearrangements of V{gamma}1-J{gamma}4-C{gamma}4 receptor chains (Fig. 6A). In addition, a single peak corresponding to 231 bp was predominant in each of the three samples, representing ~50% of all productive rearrangements (Fig. 6D). Although these spectratype profiles imply commonality in the structure of the V{gamma}1 TCRs expressed at different times during the response to infection, sequencing of individual V{gamma}1 and V{delta}6 TCR cDNAs showed very little or no similarity in the CDR3 junctional regions of these TCRs (Fig. 6, B and C). Although there was evidence of restricted gene segment usage by V{delta}6 (TRDV15-1 and 15-2)-D{delta}(2)-J{delta}(1) receptors and that some TCR sequences were over-represented at the different time points analyzed, particularly among V{gamma}1 receptors expressed before infection, there was minimal or no overlap between the V{gamma}1 and V{delta}6 TCR sequences. These findings imply the existence of a large number of V{gamma}1+ T cell clones involved in the early and later stages of the host response to infection. Although V{delta}6-encoded receptors do not exclusively pair with V{gamma}1 TCRs (41), the differences in all V{delta}6 sequences analyzed makes it likely that those that do pair with V{gamma}1 are also different. A striking feature of the V{delta}6 TCR analysis was the change in the overall charge of the CDR3 regions of the TCR cDNAs from being uniformly positive before infection to almost exclusively negative after infection, suggestive of the selective expansion of V{delta}6 TCRs with particular structural features and presumably Ag specificities.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Structural diversity of V{gamma}1/V{delta}6 TCRs expressed during infection. TCR spectratype analysis (A and D) and DNA sequencing (B and C) of V{gamma}1 and V{delta}6 TCR cDNAs from RT-PCR-amplified mRNA, expressed by {gamma}{delta} T cells isolated from C57BL/6 WT mice before (day 0) and at 2 days (early) and 8 days (late) after Lm infection. Profiles in A represent V{gamma}1 CDR3 spectratypes from more than six mice for each sample set from which the distribution of individual peaks was plotted on the bar graph. D, Individual TCR-V{gamma}1 and V{delta}6 cDNAs were cloned and individually sequenced to obtain nucleotide V-(D)-J junctional sequences that were translated into amino acid sequences. B and C, Values in column labeled "no" indicate sequences occurring more than once. Values listed under the heading Net Charge represent net charge in TCRV{delta}6-D{delta}-J{delta} sequences determined using Protean analysis software (DNASTAR).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The ability of {gamma}{delta} T cells to interact with and alter the activity of other immune cells provides them with the opportunity and means to influence the course and outcome of inflammatory immune responses. Understanding how they do this, however, is made difficult by the conflicting effector functions that have been ascribed to pathogen-elicited {gamma}{delta} T cells, and whether different populations of {gamma}{delta} T cells perform specific functions at different stages of the immune response. The response of V{gamma}1+ T cells, a ubiquitous and motile population of {gamma}{delta} T cells, to infection with Lm is staged, occurring both before initiation of the {alpha}{beta} T cell response and after the bulk of the infection has been cleared (10). What controls this staged involvement and what the relationship is between early- and late-responding T cells are not fully understood, although both pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms that may be beneficial or deleterious to the host have been implicated (reviewed in Ref. 34). Using V{gamma}1-deficient mice, we have shown that they possess immunoregulatory properties and have obtained evidence for the segregation of function among {gamma}{delta} T cells in response to infection. Our findings demonstrate that V{gamma}1+ T cells are both necessary and sufficient for macrophage homeostasis and the elimination of activated macrophages, and identify an unexpected role in {gamma}{delta} T cell homeostasis during infection. Protection from immune-mediated pathology, however, was a property of another, as yet unidentified, {gamma}{delta} T cell subset(s). Our findings also provide evidence of functional diversity among a single subset of {gamma}{delta} T cells. Based upon their cytokine profiles, the early- and late-responding V{gamma}1+ T cells are functionally diverse, which appears to be attributable to the activation and staged involvement of specific V{gamma}1+ clones distinguished by the expression of structurally distinct TCRs. Despite this structural diversity, all the V{gamma}1 TCRs expressed share some important features. In particular, there is a striking conservation of the distribution of the size of V{gamma}1 CRD3 regions, which are virtually identical regardless of the stage of infection at which they are expressed. All TCRs, regardless of their CDR3 sequences and the stage of infection at which they are expressed, confer the ability to interact with activated macrophages. This could therefore be interpreted as evidence of strong selective pressures acting to maintain a repertoire of structurally constrained TCRs that confer functional diversity and enable V{gamma}1+ T cells to adapt and contribute to different stages of the immune response to infection. The selection of V{gamma}1+ T cells’ effector functions executed during the early and late stages of the immune response may therefore be influenced and directed by the prevailing microenvironmental conditions at the time of activation.

Previously it was shown that V{gamma}1/V{delta}6.3+ T cells kill activated macrophages during the late stage of Lm infection (33, 42), an activity that is dependent on specific activation of the macrophages, but not of the V{gamma}1/V{delta}6.3+ T cells, and is TCR mediated (33) and Fas-Fas ligand dependent (52). This study extends these findings by demonstrating that macrophage cytocidal activity is unique to V{gamma}1+ T cells and that these T cells are essential for eliminating activated macrophages and regulating activated macrophage numbers. The readiness of V{gamma}1/V{delta}6.3+ T cells from noninfected mice to kill activated macrophages may be explained by their constitutive state of activation; in the spleen, they have been shown to constitutively express IL-12Rs (30) and markers of a memory/activation phenotype (53), consistent with their being poised for a rapid response. The inability to detect pathogen specificity among responding {gamma}{delta} T cells, their reactivity with macrophages activated in response to different infectious and noninfectious stimuli (33), and the reactivity of {gamma}{delta} T cell clones and hybridomas with unknown autologous Ags (reviewed in Ref. 10) suggest that V{gamma}1/V{delta}6.3+ T cells are innately autoreactive (54) and that activated macrophages express an array of (self) Ags that can be recognized by large numbers of structurally diverse V{gamma}1/V{delta}6 TCRs.

The absence in Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice of the immune-mediated liver necrosis that is a hallmark feature of listeriosis in TCR{delta}–/– mice and the inability to transfer this protection to TCR{delta}–/– mice with splenic V{gamma}1+ T cells provide strong evidence for nonoverlapping function of {gamma}{delta} T cell subsets during pathogen-induced immune responses. This does not, however, entirely exclude the possibility that in the absence of the V{gamma}1+ subset of {gamma}{delta} T cells any protective effect they might have is compensated for by other {gamma}{delta} T cells. It is likely, however, that populations of {gamma}{delta} T cells other than V{gamma}1+ T cells contained within the V{gamma}1 fraction of splenic {gamma}{delta} T cells (Fig. 4) are responsible for providing protection against immune cell-mediated tissue injury. Although the mechanism(s) of tissue injury in infected TCR{delta}–/– mice remains unclear, the phenotype of Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice excludes the involvement of activated macrophages that occurs as a result of a breakdown in macrophage homeostasis due to the absence of V{gamma}1+ T cells. A requirement for the presence of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells in the development of inflammatory lesions, however, has been demonstrated in Ab depletion studies (23). In contrast to previous studies in which Ab-mediated depletion of V{gamma}1+ T cells enhanced bacterial clearance (36), we found no evidence for a requirement for V{gamma}1+ T cells to limit or control bacterial growth in the primary sites of Lm infection beyond the first 2 days of infection. This apparent discrepancy may be related to differences in the efficiency and specificity of the Abs used for cell ablation vs gene targeting and differences in the strain of Lm used (regarding virulence and infectious dose), the route and site of infection, and the strain of mouse used, all of which influence the magnitude and kinetics of {gamma}{delta} T cell and V{gamma}1+ T cell responses (16, 34).

An unexpected role for V{gamma}1+ T cells in the homeostatic regulation of other {gamma}{delta} T cell populations in response to infection has been identified in this study. The appearance in the spleen of Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice of V{gamma}5+ and V{gamma}7+ T cells bearing TCRs that structurally resemble those of V{gamma}5+ DETC and V{gamma}7+ iIEL suggests a role for V{gamma}1+ T cells in the homeostatic regulation of {gamma}{delta} T cells. The fact that reconstitution of V{gamma}1+ T cells in TCRV{gamma}1–/– mice restores normal immune cell regulation (splenic {gamma}{delta} T cell repertoires and macrophage homeostasis) effectively defines V{gamma}1+ T cells as an immunoregulatory T cell subset (26). The presence of invariant V{gamma}6 TCRs (D. J. Newton and S. R. Carding, unpublished observations) in the spleens of Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice was also unexpected. Although it was not possible to establish the origin and relationship of the cells in the periphery of infected V{gamma}1–/– mice and the epithelial tissues of WT animals, they may be distinct. The vast majority (~90%) of V{gamma}5+ T cells in Lm-infected V{gamma}1–/– mice were not reactive with the DETC anti-TCRV{gamma}5/V{delta}1 clonotype Ab, 17D.1 (45) (E. M. Andrew and S. R. Carding, unpublished observations), suggesting that the majority of these T cells are not skin derived and that the V{gamma}5 receptor chain expressed in the spleen of V{gamma}1–/– mice may pair with other V{delta}-chains. The coincident expression of V{delta}4- and V{delta}5-chains in addition to V{delta}1 in the spleens of infected V{gamma}1–/–, but not WT, mice suggests that some of the V{gamma}5+ (and V{gamma}6+) cells may use these alternative V{delta}-chains (41), and may confer specificities and functions on these cells different from their epithelia-associated counterparts. At this time it is not clear what, if any, is the functional significance of the unusual V{gamma}5+, V{gamma}6+, and V{gamma}7+ T cells in the spleens of V{gamma}1–/– mice late in the course of infection. The inherent anti-inflammatory and cytotoxic activities of mucosa-associated {gamma}{delta} T cells that use the same V{gamma}-encoded TCRs and their appearance late in the course of infection suggest that they might play a similar role in the spleens of infected V{gamma}1–/– mice, compensating, perhaps, for the absence of anti-inflammatory V{gamma}1+ T cells. What stimulates these nonresident T cells to locate to the spleen, and the regulatory mechanism by which V{gamma}1+ T cells control or prevent this, are not clear, although they may be attracted by chemotactic signals, such as MCP-1 (55), from activated macrophages that have not been down-modulated in the absence of anti-inflammatory V{gamma}1+ T cells. Future studies addressing the novel homeostatic properties of V{gamma}1+ T cells should resolve these issues.

Analysis of the cytokine profile of V{gamma}1+ T cells accumulating during the early and late stages of the immune response to Lm demonstrates that this population of {gamma}{delta} T cells is functionally heterogeneous. Differences in V{gamma}1 (and V{delta}6) CDR3 sequences expressed at the early and late stages of the immune response to Lm implies the existence of unique V1{gamma}+ T cell clones at both time points that could confer and account for the different functional characteristics of early- and late-responding V{gamma}1+ T cells. This functional plasticity among pathogen-elicited V{gamma}1/V{delta}6 T cells does not fit well, however, with the idea that {gamma}{delta} T cell function is determined or dictated by TCRV{gamma} usage (27, 28). Indeed, although this may be more applicable to the restricted and invariant epithelia-associated populations of {gamma}{delta} T cells, the data presented in this study argue for the functional heterogeneity of systemic V{gamma}1+ T cell responses to infection are most likely influenced by their microenvironment and conditions of activation and, therefore, by the stage of infection.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods