HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brimnes, J. Articles by Mayer, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brimnes, J. Articles by Mayer, L.

Defects in CD8⁺ Regulatory T Cells in the Lamina Propria of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease ¹

Immunobiology Center, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

 
Mucosal tolerance is believed to be partly mediated by regulatory T cells. Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) may play an important role in the generation of such regulatory cells, because they are able to process and present Ag to T cells. Furthermore, we have previously demonstrated that IECs are able to generate regulatory CD8⁺ T cells in vitro. In the present study, we have analyzed lamina propria (LP) lymphocytes for the presence of such regulatory CD8⁺ T cells in normal individuals as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The results of the present study show that LP CD8⁺ T cells derived from normal controls possess regulatory activity, whereas both unfractionated LP lymphocytes and purified LP CD4⁺ T cells do not. The LP CD8⁺ T cells suppress Ig production by pokeweed mitogen-stimulated PBMCs by 31–80%, in a cell contact-dependent manner. No significant difference in suppression between CD28⁺ and CD28^–CD8⁺ LP T cells was observed. In contrast to CD8⁺ T cells from normal LP, CD8⁺ T cells isolated from LP of IBD patients, did not suppress Ig production by pokeweed mitogen-stimulated PBMC (five of six ulcerative colitis specimens; six of six Crohn’s disease specimens). Furthermore, we demonstrate that the frequency of TCR V5.1-positive CD8⁺ T cells, which we previously have demonstrated to be regulatory and to be expanded by IECs in vitro, is decreased in IBD LP compared with normal LP. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity are present in the LP of normal healthy individuals, but not in patients with IBD, suggesting that these cells might play an active role in mucosal tolerance.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

 
The intestine harbors a complex microflora composed of a large variety of indigenous aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (1). These bacteria are in close proximity to a vast number of intestinal lymphocytes, yet it is unclear how the mucosal immune system is able to mount a rapid and effective response against pathogenic bacteria, viruses, and parasites, while remaining tolerant to the resident enteric microflora and dietary Ags. The importance of maintaining this tolerance is illustrated in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), ³ because these diseases are believed to be the result of a breakdown of tolerance to resident enteric bacteria (2, 3).

Accumulated data suggest that regulatory T cells play a central role in maintaining tolerance in the mucosal immune system (4). Several subsets of both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells have been shown to act as regulatory cells. In both humans and rodents, it has been demonstrated that naive CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells possess regulatory activity (5, 6, 7). The CD4⁺CD25⁺ cells are anergic, but after TCR triggering, these cells are able to inhibit immune responses both in vitro and in vivo (5, 8, 9). In vitro, the suppression seems to be mediated via cell contact-dependent mechanisms (5, 10, 11, 12), whereas in vivo studies suggest that cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF- might play a role (13, 14). Other subsets of murine CD4⁺ regulatory T cells, such as the Th3 cells generated during low-dose oral tolerance regimens and the in vitro-generated Tr1 cells, also seem to act via secretion of regulatory cytokines (15, 16). Although the field of regulatory cells has been focused on CD4⁺ T cells, regulatory CD8⁺ T cells have been described in oral tolerance (17, 18), and recently a population of human regulatory cells, characterized by their CD8⁺CD28^– phenotype, has also been described (19, 20).

In the context of the mucosal immune system, regulatory cells have primarily been demonstrated in rodents. Both the above-mentioned Tr1 cells and the CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells from normal mice have been shown to be capable of preventing the development of experimental colitis in SCID mice (14, 16, 21). Recently, it has also been demonstrated that CD4⁺ T cells with regulatory activity can be isolated from the intestinal lamina propria (LP) of normal mice (22, 23). The induction of low-dose oral tolerance mediated by the above-mentioned Th3 cells is another example of the generation of regulatory cells in the intestinal mucosa.

Little is known about the mechanisms by which regulatory cells are generated in vivo in the mucosa. It has been suggested that immature dendritic cells located in the subepithelial dome region of the Peyer’s patch are able to induce regulatory T cells (24, 25). However, intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) may also play an important role in the generation of regulatory cells, because these cells are able to process and present luminal Ags to T cells in the LP (26, 27, 28). Using an allogeneic in vitro coculture system, we have previously demonstrated that interactions between IECs and peripheral blood T cells (PBTs) leads to the preferential expansion of CD8⁺CD28^– T cells with regulatory activity (27, 29). We have recently shown that a subset of the expanding CD8⁺ T cells is characterized by the biased usage of the TCR V5.1 chain. ⁴ The expansion of these regulatory cells is dependent on the expression of the nonclassical MHC class I molecule, CD1d, and the carcinoembryonic Ag subfamily member, gp180, on the surface of the IEC (29, 30, 31, 32). We have termed these cells TrE cells. In contrast to normal IECs, IECs from patients with IBD have an aberrant expression of gp180 and cannot expand these regulatory CD8⁺ T cells in vitro (33) (I. Dotan, manuscript in preparation). Taken together, these data suggest that defects, which interfere with the normal IEC-mediated generation or expansion of regulatory CD8⁺ TrE cells, may play a role in the pathogenesis of IBD.

In the present work, we have investigated whether such regulatory CD8⁺ TrE cells are present in vivo in the LP. Our results show that CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity are present in the LP of healthy individuals, but not in the LP of patients with IBD, suggesting that these cells—activated by IECs—might play a central role in maintaining controlled inflammation in the intestinal mucosa.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

 
Patients and tissues

Surgical specimens from patients undergoing bowel resection for cancer or IBD at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were used as the source for IECs and LP mononuclear cells (LPMCs). Colonic tissue was always used. The group termed "normals" consisted of patients undergoing bowel resection for cancer, noncancerous polyps, or diverticulitis. In this group, cells were always isolated from normal tissue >10 cm from the tumor. The IBD patient group consisted of both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients with moderate-to-severe colitis. The characteristics of these patients are listed in Table I.

IECs were isolated as described earlier (27). In brief, colon specimens were washed extensively in PBS, followed by stripping of the mucosa from the underlying submucosa. The mucosa was cut into small pieces and treated with 1 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min to remove mucus. The tissue was then washed in PBS and incubated twice for 30 min in medium containing 3 mg/ml Dispase II (Roche Diagnostics) at 37°C, 5% CO₂. The supernatant (released IECs) was collected and washed in medium twice. The viability of the isolated IECs was >95%.

LPMCs were isolated from the tissue remaining after the dispase treatments. The tissue was incubated for 1 h at 37°C in medium containing 1 mg/ml collagenase (clostridiopeptidase A) and 5 µg/ml DNase I (both Sigma-Aldrich). The supernatant was collected and centrifuged on a Percoll (Amersham Biosciences) density gradient and the LPMCs were harvested from the 40–60% interface. Viability was >90%.

LP CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were purified after culturing the isolated LPMC with 20 ng/ml IL-15 overnight followed by staining with allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD3, PE-conjugated anti-CD4, and FITC-conjugated anti-CD8 mAbs (all BD Pharmingen). The cells were then isolated by sorting using a MoFlo Sorter (DakoCytomation). Purity of the sorted cells was >98%.

IEC:LPL coculture and cytokine stimulation of LPLs

LPMCs were labeled with CFSE and cocultured with gamma-irradiated IECs (3000 rad). Both LPMC and IEC were adjusted to 1 x 10⁶ cells/ml and cocultured in serum-free AIM-V medium containing 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen Life Technologies) for 5–8 days at 37°C, 5% CO₂. At different time points, aliquots of the coculture were harvested, stained for surface markers, and analyzed for proliferation by flow cytometry. No surviving IECs were detected at 48 h or later.

For cytokine stimulation, IL-2 (100 U/ml), IL-4 (100 ng/ml), IL-7 (10 ng/ml), IL-10 (10 ng/ml), or IL-15 (20 ng/ml) (all R&D Systems) were added to the CFSE-labeled LPMCs at day 1 of the culture, and aliquots of the culture were analyzed as described above. These concentrations were determined to be optimal in preliminary studies.

Flow cytometry

Cells were resuspended in PBS and stained with Abs recognizing different cell surface markers: FITC-, PE-, PerCP-, or allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD28, anti-CD45RA, and anti-CD45RO Abs were all from BD Pharmingen. Abs recognizing 17 different V families of the TCR were from Immunotech (Beckman-Coulter). Anti-CD101 (18F7) and CD103 (28C12) Abs were a kind gift from Drs. M. Brenner and G. Russell (Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA). Specificity of the Abs was confirmed by isotype-matched control Abs. After staining, cells were washed in PBS, and surface staining was analyzed using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Intracellular staining for perforin was done by staining the cells for surface markers (CD3, CD4, CD8) followed by fixation of the cells in 3.5% formaldehyde solution. The cells were then permeabilized by 0.2% saponin for 15 min and stained for intracellular perforin using a PE-conjugated anti-perforin Ab (BD Pharmingen). The cells were then washed in 0.2% saponin and PBS before flow-cytometric analysis.

Pokeweed mitogen (PWM) regulatory assay

PBMC were adjusted to 1 x 10⁶ cells/ml in culture medium (RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 50 U/ml penicillin, 50 µg/ml streptomycin, and 2 mM L-glutamine; all Invitrogen Life Technologies) and stimulated with 1% PWM. To evaluate the regulatory potential of different cell populations, sorted cells were added at varying concentrations (1:1 to 1:5 PBMC:LP or PB intact or CD8⁺ T cells) into the culture of PWM-stimulated PBMCs. A ratio of 1:2 resulted in optimal suppression in all experiments and allowed us to use greater number of LPLs. After 7 days of culture, the supernatant was harvested, and the levels of total Ig were analyzed by ELISA. In some cases, the potential regulatory cells were separated from the PWM-stimulated PBMCs by a Transwell membrane with 0.4-µm pores (Costar). Percent suppression or enhancement of Ig secretion was determined by dividing the Ig secretion of PWM-stimulated PBMC by the Ig secretion of PBMC into which the T cell subpopulation was added and multiplying this by 100. Percent suppression of Ig secretion was used due to the inherent variability in Ig secretion by PWM-stimulated PBMC from donor to donor. The range of Ig secretion was 0.1–0.4 µg/ml in unstimulated cultures and 1.5–14 µg/ml in PWM-stimulated cultures. The range of fold increase in Ig secretion (stimulated/nonstimulated) was 6- to 26-fold.

Ig ELISA

Nunc Maxisorp 96-well plates were coated overnight at 4°C with anti-human Ig (BioSource) diluted 1/400 in 0.1 M carbonate buffer. Plates were washed and blocked with ELISA buffer (PBS/0.05% Tween 20) containing 1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 h at room temperature. Samples and standards were diluted in ELISA buffer, added to the plate and incubated for 1–2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-human and L chain Abs diluted 1/1000 in ELISA buffer for 1 h. The plates were washed, p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate was added, and plates were read at 405 nm.

Statistical analysis

Differences in Ig production in the PWM regulatory assay were compared using Student’s t test.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

 
Stimulation of LPMC by IECs

Using an allogeneic in vitro mixed coculture system consisting of IECs and PBTs (IEC:PBT), we have previously shown that IECs are able to induce PBTs to proliferate (27, 29). In the present work, we investigated whether LPMCs can be similarly activated by autologous or allogeneic IECs in an IEC:LPL coculture system. As seen in Fig. 1, A and B, only a small fraction of CD3⁺ T cells from the LP was induced to proliferate in IEC:LPMC cocultures. In four independent experiments, the proliferating (CFSE^low) CD3⁺ LP T cells represented only 2–5% of all T cells after 7 days of coculture. No difference in the proliferation of LPLs was observed between cocultures using allogeneic vs autologous IECs as stimulator cells. The limited number of cells seen in Fig. 1A reflects the spontaneous apoptosis of LPL cultures in medium alone (gating on live cells only). The small fraction of proliferating cells observed in the LPMC:IEC cocultures contrast the much higher fraction of proliferating T cells seen in IEC:PBT cocultures (Fig. 1, C and D). In such cultures, we have previously demonstrated that 5–35% of PBTs are proliferating at day 7. Cells proliferating in these normal IEC:PBT cocultures were predominantly CD8⁺ T cells (29). However, this was not true for the IEC:LPMC cocultures, in which a similar percentage of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells expanded.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 1. LP T cells are only marginally activated by IECs. T cells from either LP or peripheral blood were labeled with CFSE before coculture with irradiated IECs. At day 7, cells were harvested and stained with an anti-CD3 Ab. The analysis was gated on CD3+ cells, and the percentages of proliferating cells (CFSE low) are shown in the upper left panel. A, LPMCs alone. B, LPMCs cocultured with IECs. C, PBTs alone. D, PBTs cocultured with IECs. These data are representative of four independent experiments.

Because the failure of LPLs to become activated by IECs (presumed restimulation) may reflect an anergic state of the LPL, we attempted to rescue the cells with cytokines. Several different cytokines, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-7, IL-10, and IL-15, were able to induce proliferation of LP T cells in vitro. As shown in Table II, IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15 were most effective, leading to proliferation of 20, 17, and 22% of the LP T cells, respectively. However, only stimulation by IL-15 led to the preferential expansion of CD8⁺ LP T cells, because the proportion of proliferating CD8⁺ LP T cells was between 1.3 and 2 times higher than the proliferating CD4⁺ LP T cells. In contrast, IL-10 preferentially expanded CD4⁺ LP T cells, whereas the results for IL-2, IL-4, and IL-7 were more variable. Thus, the failure to restimulate LPL with IECs may indeed reflect an anergized state. The cytokine microenvironment in the LP is quite complex. We therefore further assessed the effects of combinations of cytokines on LPL proliferation. As seen in Table II, neither the combination of IL-2, IL-7, and IL-15, nor IL-4, IL-10, and IL-15, enhanced proliferation of CD8⁺ LPL significantly above that seen with IL-15 alone (1.5-fold each). In contrast, there was a modest inconsistent increase in CD4⁺ T cells when either IL-2 or IL-4 were added in the cultures (data not shown).

If LP CD8⁺ T cells are the result of interactions of precursor CD8⁺ regulatory T cells with Ag presented by IECs, we should be able to define these cells in vivo. Previous studies have demonstrated that intact LPLs only provided help for T and B cell functions (34, 35). We assessed the regulatory potential of different cell populations isolated from the LP by adding the cells of interest into a culture of PBMCs stimulated by PWM. This system has been used as a standard assay to assess regulatory activity by our group as well as by others (27, 29, 34). In this assay, stimulation of PBMC by PWM led to a 10- to 20-fold increase in Ig production compared with unstimulated PBMC, as seen in Fig. 2A. The addition of unfractionated LPMCs into these cultures did not result in the reduction of Ig production by the PBMCs. Rather, as previously described, these cells provided help, leading to 2-fold increase in Ig production.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 2. A, Suppressive activity of freshly isolated LPMCs, LP CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. PBMCs were either left alone or stimulated by PWM for 7 days, followed by analysis of the supernatant for the presence of secreted Igs by ELISA. The suppressive activity of different cell populations from the LP was evaluated by adding 5 x 104 of the cells of interest into a culture of 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMCs. PBMCs + PWM was set as 100%. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate cultures. *, p < 0.05 vs PWM-stimulated PBMCs. These data are representative of six independent experiments. B, Suppression mediated by regulatory LP CD8+ T cells is dose dependent. PBMCs were either left alone or stimulated by PWM. LP CD8+ T cells were added to 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMCs at different ratios at the start of the culture. Each bar represents the mean of quadruplicate cultures. **, p < 0.05; and ***, p < 0.001 vs PWM-stimulated PBMCs. These data are representative of three independent experiments. C, Suppressive potential of CD28-positive and CD28-negative LP CD8+ T cells. PBMCs were either left alone or stimulated by PWM. 3 x 104 CD28-positive or CD28-negative LP CD8+ T cells were added to 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMCs at the start of the culture. After 7 days of culture, the supernatant was harvested and analyzed for the presence of Igs. Each bar represents the mean of triplicate cultures. **, p < 0.01 vs PWM-stimulated PBMCs. These data are representative of three independent experiments. D, Suppressive activity of LPMCs, LP CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after coculture with IECs. LPMCs were cocultured for 7 days with normal IECs. After coculture, LPMCs were either added directly to cultures of PWM-stimulated PBMCs or sorted into CD4+ or CD8+ T cell populations before addition into the stimulated PBMCs. PBMCs were either left alone or stimulated by PWM. The following cell populations were added into the culture of 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMCs: 5 x 104 unfractionated LPMC; 5 x 104 LP CD8+ T cells; 5 x 104 LP CD4+ T cells. After 7 days of culture the supernatant was harvested and analyzed for the presence of Igs. Each bar represents mean of triplicate cultures. *, p < 0.05 vs PWM-stimulated PBMCs. These data are representative of four independent experiments.

We have previously observed that in vitro stimulation of PBTs by IECs leads to an increase in the proportion of CD28-negative CD8⁺ T cells among the proliferating T cells compared with the nonproliferating T cells (29). Furthermore, other groups have described a CD8⁺CD28⁺ regulatory T cell population. As determined by flow cytometry, 62–75% of the LP CD8⁺ T cells were CD28⁺. However, as seen in Fig. 2C, in the case of T cells from the LP, there was no significant difference in the regulatory activity of CD28-positive vs CD28-negative LP CD8⁺ T cells.

We further investigated whether LP T cells purified after coculture with IECs were able to suppress Ig secretion. As seen in Fig. 1D, coculture with IECs for 7 days did not change the regulatory activity of any of the cell populations: LP CD8⁺ T cells still suppressed the Ig production after coculture with IECs, whereas none of the other cell populations were capable of mediating suppression. Similar results were obtained regardless of whether the LPMCs were cocultured with IECs in the presence or absence of IL-15. These results demonstrate that CD8⁺ T cells with suppressive activity are present in the LP, and that this activity is not further altered by subsequent coculture with IECs in vitro.

LP CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity are confined to the LP

To investigate whether the observed inhibitory activity of the LP CD8⁺ T cells was confined to the LP, we compared the suppression mediated by LP CD8⁺ T cells to that of CD8⁺ T cells from peripheral blood. As seen in Fig. 3, CD8⁺ T cells isolated from peripheral blood are not able to down-regulate Ig production by PWM-stimulated PBMC, indicating that the regulatory activity is unique to LP CD8⁺ T cells. Because we cultured the LP CD8⁺ T cells in IL-15 overnight before sorting to gain re-expression of surface CD8, we also assessed the regulatory potential of CD8⁺ T cells with and without IL-15 treatment. Although the IL-15 treatment increased the yield of CD8⁺ T cells after sorting due to the higher expression of CD8, this treatment did not alter the regulatory activity of LP or PB CD8⁺ T cells (Fig. 3).

View larger version (19K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 3. The suppressive activity of CD8+ T cells is confined to the LP and not altered by IL-15. LPMC and PBMC were incubated overnight in AIM-V medium alone or in medium containing 20 ng/ml IL-15 before purification of CD8+ T cells by flow-cytometric sorting. The suppressive activity of the purified cells was evaluated by adding 50,000 CD8+ T cells from either peripheral blood or LP to 100,000 PWM-stimulated PBMCs. As depicted in Fig. 2, unstimulated PBMCs and PWM-stimulated PBMC are represented. After 7 days of culture, the supernatant was analyzed for Ig by ELISA. Each column represents the mean of quadruplicate cultures. **, p < 0.01 vs PWM-stimulated PBMCs. These data are representative of three independent experiments.

We have previously observed that in vitro-generated TrE cells mediate their suppressive effect by a contact-dependent mechanism (29). To investigate the mechanisms by which the LP CD8⁺ T cells mediate suppression, we separated these cells from the PWM-stimulated PBMCs by use of a Transwell culture system. As shown in Fig. 4, prevention of cell-cell contact between PBMCs and CD8⁺ T cells, almost completely abolished the suppression mediated by the latter cell population. Although a trend toward suppression was seen in the absence of cell-cell contact, this was not significant, indicating that the dominant mechanism of suppression requires contact. Next, we examined whether the LP CD8⁺ T cells mediated their suppression by killing their targets by perforin. However, as determined by intracellular staining and flow cytometry, only a small percentage (<7%) of the LP CD8⁺ T cells stained positive for perforin (data not shown), indicating that the cell contact-dependent mechanism of suppression was not likely to be mediated by cytotoxicity.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 4. LP CD8+ T cells need cell contact to mediate suppression. PBMCs were either left alone or stimulated with 1% PWM for 7 days, followed by the analysis of the supernatant for the presence of secreted Igs by ELISA. A total of 5 x 104 LP CD8+ T cells or CD4+ T cells were added to 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMCs either physically separated by a Transwell or in contact with the PBMCs (single well). Each bar represents the mean of triplicate cultures. *, p < 0.05 vs PWM-stimulated PBMCs. These data are representative of three independent experiments.

Because IBD is believed to be the result of a breakdown in the regulatory mechanisms of the mucosal immune system, we investigated whether the CD8⁺ T cells from LP of IBD patients had lost their regulatory activity. LP CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells were purified from noninvolved or mildly involved segments of resection specimens from patients with either UC or CD, and these were then added into cultures of PWM-stimulated PBMC as described above. As shown in Fig. 5A, neither CD4⁺ nor CD8⁺ LP T cells from patients with CD were able to suppress the PWM-induced Ig production of PBMC. The absence of CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity was observed in six of six specimens from patients with CD. Similarly, in five of six specimens from patients with UC, CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity were absent (Fig. 5B). These findings did not correlate with disease activity, site of disease, or medication use (Table I).

View larger version (33K): [in this window] [in a new window]   FIGURE 5. Suppressive activity of LP CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from IBD patients. A, Representative example of the suppressive activity of CD4+ and CD8+ LP T cells from CD patients (n = 4). PBMC were either left alone or stimulated with 1% PWM. A total of 5 x 104 LP CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were added to 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMC. Supernatants were collected after 7 days of culture and analyzed for Ig levels by ELISA. Each column represents the mean of quadruplicate cultures. In six of six CD specimens, no suppression was observed. B, Representative example of the suppressive activity of CD4+ and CD8+ LP T cells from UC patients (n = 6). PBMC were either left alone or stimulated with 1% PWM. A total of 5 x 104 LP CD4+ or CD8+ T cells were added to 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMC. Supernatants were collected after 7 days of culture and analyzed for Ig secretion by ELISA. Each column represents the mean of quadruplicate cultures. In five of six UC specimens, no suppressive activity was observed. C and D, Representative examples (one CD and one UC) of dose titration study of CD8+ LPL cells from IBD patients (CD = 2; UC = 2). Addition of 5 x 104–10 x 105 LP CD8+ T cells to 1 x 105 PWM-stimulated PBMC in triplicate microwell cultures not only failed to mediate suppression but in some cases actually enhanced Ig secretion in these cocultures.

The frequency of V5.1⁺CD8⁺ T cells is decreased in IBD LP

In a separate study, we have analyzed the TCR repertoire of the proliferating CD8⁺ T cells in IEC:PBT cocultures and observed an expansion of a subpopulation of the CD8⁺ T cells expressing the TCR V5.1 chain.⁴ These cells possess regulatory activity, and their expansion is dependent on interaction with the gp180-CD1d complex expressed on the surface of IECs. We also observed that, when IECs from IBD patients are used in the IEC:PBT cocultures, the frequency of V5.1⁺ cells among the proliferating CD8⁺ T cells was significantly decreased, most likely due to the aberrant expression of gp180 on IBD IECs.

In the present study, we investigated whether the frequency of the regulatory V5.1⁺CD8⁺ T cells also was reduced in vivo in the LP of IBD patients. To this end, we analyzed the TCR repertoire of LP CD8⁺ T cells from IBD patients and compared it to that of normal individuals. Consistent with our previous results in vitro, the frequency of V5.1⁺ cells among LP CD8⁺ T cells from IBD patients (three UC; three CD) was significantly decreased (p = 0.0018) compared with LP CD8⁺ T cells from normal individuals (Table III). The low frequency of V5.1⁺ cells among CD8⁺ LP T cells in IBD patients did not appear to be related to nonspecific inflammation, because the frequency of V5.1⁺ cells among CD8⁺ LPLs isolated from noninflamed areas of IBD specimens (n = 3) remained low. In contrast, the frequency of V5.1⁺ cells among CD8⁺ LPLs isolated from non-IBD inflammatory controls (diverticulitis; n = 3) was higher and comparable to normal specimens (data not shown). This indicates that IBD IECs are less effective in expanding this regulatory population of CD8⁺ T cells in vitro as well as in vivo.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table III. Frequency of V5.1+ cells among LP CD8+ T cells

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

Furthermore, we demonstrate that, in contrast to LP CD8⁺ T cells, neither unfractionated LPMCs nor purified LP CD4⁺ T cells displayed any regulatory activity. Rather, these cells provided additional help resulting in increased Ig secretion by the PWM-stimulated PBMCs. The finding that unfractionated LPLs and CD4⁺ LPLs provide help rather than suppression is in accordance with the above-mentioned studies (as well as others (36, 37)), in which it was shown that mononuclear cells from both peripheral blood and LP provided help for Ig production in a similar assay (34, 35).

If the CD8⁺ T cells, at the numbers present in situ, are mediating suppression in vivo, why do we need to fractionate LPL (i.e., isolate CD8⁺ T cells) to see suppression in vitro? The failure of unfractionated LPL to mediate suppression in vitro may reflect one of several possibilities. First, in the microenvironment in vivo there may be niches where CD8⁺ T cells interact with either CD4⁺ T cells or APCs. This would be lost following in vitro isolation. Second (related to the first possibility), there may be a need for cell contact, which may be limiting in in vitro cultures (we show that suppression is cell contact dependent). Third, this may still represent a numerical where the numbers of CD8⁺ T cells are insufficient to mediate suppression of equivalent numbers of PBMC. This latter possibility could also explain the seemingly limited potency of CD8⁺ regulatory T cells in in vitro cocultures.

We show in this study that, in contrast to peripheral blood CD8⁺ T cells, CD8⁺ T cells from the LP can only be marginally activated by in vitro coculture with IECs. This is in agreement with the fact that LP T cells are difficult to activate in vitro through their TCR, because these cells are refractory to mitogenic and anti-CD3 stimulation, although they can be activated by stimulation through CD2 and CD28 (38, 39, 40). It is tempting to speculate that the LP CD8⁺ T cells have already been stimulated by IECs in vivo leading to the generation of regulatory cells, which may be anergic and therefore refractory to a second stimulation by IECs. This is supported by results from our laboratory showing that regulatory CD8⁺ T cells generated in vitro by interactions with IECs do not proliferate when they are restimulated by IECs a second time (data not shown). Furthermore, we show that the regulatory activity of LP CD8⁺ T cells is not further altered by in vitro coculture with IECs. In line with this, several groups have demonstrated that T cells rendered anergic by stimulation with immature dendritic cells or in the presence of regulatory cytokines develop regulatory properties (16, 41, 42). Consistent with a potentially anergic state, several cytokines, including IL-2 and IL-15, were able to stimulate LP T cells to proliferate. However, only IL-15 consistently expanded CD8⁺ T cells more than CD4⁺ T cells. Because IECs have previously been demonstrated to produce IL-15 (43), this molecule may play a role in the initial activation of regulatory CD8⁺ T cells in the LP.

The generation of regulatory cells in the intestine has mostly been studied by induction of oral tolerance. It is generally accepted that feeding a low dose of Ag leads to the generation of regulatory cells specific for that same Ag (44, 45). Several subsets of regulatory cells have been described in oral tolerance, including both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells (46, 47, 48), and most of these cells seem to mediate their suppression via secretion of regulatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10, and TGF-. Contrary to the regulatory cells generated in oral tolerance, the regulatory LP CD8⁺ T cells described in the present study mediate their suppression in a cell contact-dependent, but perforin-independent, manner. In this sense, these cells resemble both the CD4⁺CD25⁺ and the recently described CD28-negative CD8⁺ regulatory T cells (19, 20). The latter cells are generated by repeated allogeneic stimulation, and are class I restricted in contrast to TrE cells, and they also mediate suppression by a cell contact-dependent mechanism. It was recently demonstrated that these cells act on APCs, rendering them tolerogenic (49).

Our results suggest that the CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity present in the normal colonic LP may represent the in vivo counterpart of the in vitro-generated TrE cells that we have described earlier (29). Both populations express the surface molecules CD8, CD101, and CD103, and both are able to suppress the production of Ig by PWM-stimulated PBMCs in a cell contact-dependent, perforin-independent manner. The fact that the frequency of V5.1⁺CD8⁺ T cells is increased both among the IEC-activated TrE cells in vitro as well as in normal LP compared with peripheral blood further underscores the similarities between these two cell populations. The only difference we observed between the regulatory CD8⁺ T cells generated in vitro and those found in the LP, was that the in vitro-activated TrE cells have down-regulated CD28 compared with the nonactivated CD8⁺ T cells (29), whereas roughly two-thirds of the LP CD8⁺ T cells express CD28. Furthermore, when we compared the regulatory potential of CD28-negative to CD28-positive LP CD8⁺ T cells, we did not see any significant difference. Whether this is due to the fact that the in vitro regulatory TrE cells are generated by stimulation with allogeneic IECs is presently unknown.

Our results showing that CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory activity could not be detected in the LP of patients with IBD underline the relevance of these cells in the maintenance of mucosal tolerance. These results are not in accordance with the results of James et al. (34), who found that LP CD8⁺ T cells from both normal individuals and patients with IBD had a nonsignificant trend toward suppression in a PWM assay. Similar data for normal LPL were obtained in a primate model (50). CD8⁺ suppressor inducer as well as suppressor cells were reduced (phenotypically) in the LP of patients with CD (51). Although not directly comparable, several studies have shown that peripheral blood CD8⁺ T cells from CD patients possessed regulatory activity (52, 53).

The absence of regulatory cells in the LP of IBD patients, described in the present study, might be linked to the epithelial cell glycoprotein gp180. This molecule is a member of the carcinoembryonic Ag subfamily and expressed by all normal IECs (29, 31). The in vitro generation of TrE cells by IECs is dependent on both gp180 and the nonclassical class I molecule CD1d, because blocking Abs against these molecules prevents expansion of the TrE cells (29, 30, 31, 32). In contrast to normal IECs, IECs from IBD patients have an aberrant expression of gp180 (54), and when such IECs are used as stimulators in the in vitro coculture system, potentially pathogenic, IFN--producing CD4⁺ T cells are expanded rather than the regulatory CD8⁺ TrE cells (33) (I. Dotan, manuscript in preparation). The failure to expand this population was also observed in vivo, because the frequency of the V5.1⁺CD8⁺ T cells were significantly reduced in the LP of IBD patients compared with normal individuals. Taken together, these data suggest the following scenario: In the normal LP, IECs generate or expand regulatory CD8⁺ TrE cells via CD1d and gp180. These TrE cells contribute to the maintenance of mucosal tolerance and prevention of IBD. In patients with IBD, the absence of gp180 prevents the generation/expansion of TrE cells, and the increased expression of MHC class II on IECs allows for the expansion of potentially pathogenic CD4⁺ T cells.

In summary, the results of the present study indicate that the IEC might play a central role in maintaining the normal state of tolerance in the mucosal immune system, due to their ability to generate/expand regulatory CD8⁺ T cells. The defective expression of gp180 in IBD and the resulting absence of regulatory CD8⁺ T cells may be an important contributor to the pathogenesis of IBD.

	Disclosures

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

	Footnotes

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ J.B. was supported by the Danish Medical Research Agency. L.M. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI23504, AI24671, and AI44236. M.A. and I.D. were supported by a Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation fellowship award.

² Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Lloyd Mayer, Immunobiology Center, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029. E-mail address: lloyd.mayer{at}mssm.edu

³ Abbreviations used in this paper: IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; LP, lamina propria; IEC, intestinal epithelial cell; UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease; LPMC, LP mononuclear cell; PWM, pokeweed mitogen; PBT, peripheral blood T cell.

⁴ M. Allez., J. Brimnes, L. Shao, L. Dotan, A. Nakazawa, and L. Mayer. Mucosal expression of CD8⁺ T regulatory cells by CD1d and a CEA family member. Submitted for publication.

Received for publication February 20, 2004. Accepted for publication February 18, 2005.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Disclosures References

 

1. Savage, D. C.. 1999. Mucosal microbiota. P. L. Ogra, and J. Mestecky, and M. E. Lamm, and W. Strober, and J. Bienenstock, and J. R. McGhee, eds. Mucosal Immunology 19. Academic, San Diego.
2. Fiocchi, C.. 1998. Inflammatory bowel disease: etiology and pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 115:182.[Medline]
3. Duchmann, R., I. Kaiser, E. Hermann, W. Mayet, K. Ewe, K. H. Meyer-zum Buschenfelde. 1995. Tolerance exists towards resident intestinal flora but is broken in active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Clin. Exp. Immunol. 102:448.[Medline]
4. Singh, B., S. Read, C. Asseman, V. Malmstrom, C. Mottet, L. A. Stephens, R. Stepankova, H. Tlaskalova, F. Powrie. 2001. Control of intestinal inflammation by regulatory T cells. Immunol. Rev. 182:190.[Medline]
5. Thornton, A. M., E. M. Shevach. 1998. CD4⁺CD25⁺ immunoregulatory T cells suppress polyclonal T cell activation in vitro by inhibiting interleukin 2 production. J. Exp. Med. 188:287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Taams, L. S., J. Smith, M. H. Rustin, M. Salmon, L. W. Poulter, A. N. Akbar. 2001. Human anergic/suppressive CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells: a highly differentiated and apoptosis-prone population. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1122.[Medline]
7. Shevach, E. M.. 2001. Certified professionals: CD4⁺CD25⁺ suppressor T cells. J. Exp. Med. 193:F41.[Free Full Text]
8. Thornton, A. M., E. M. Shevach. 2000. Suppressor effector function of CD4⁺CD25⁺ immunoregulatory T cells is antigen nonspecific. J. Immunol. 164:183.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Takahashi, T., Y. Kuniyasu, M. Toda, N. Sakaguchi, M. Itoh, M. Iwata, J. Shimizu, S. Sakaguchi. 1998. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25⁺CD4⁺ naturally anergic and suppressive T cells: induction of autoimmune disease by breaking their anergic/suppressive state. Int. Immunol. 10:1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Stephens, L. A., C. Mottet, D. Mason, F. Powrie. 2001. Human CD4⁺CD25⁺ thymocytes and peripheral T cells have immune suppressive activity in vitro. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1247.[Medline]
11. Levings, M. K., R. Sangregorio, M. G. Roncarolo. 2001. Human CD25⁺CD4⁺ T regulatory cells suppress naive and memory T cell proliferation and can be expanded in vitro without loss of function. J. Exp. Med. 193:1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Jonuleit, H., E. Schmitt, M. Stassen, A. Tuettenberg, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 2001. Identification and functional characterization of human CD4⁺CD25⁺ T cells with regulatory properties isolated from peripheral blood. J. Exp. Med. 193:1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Asseman, C., S. Mauze, M. W. Leach, R. L. Coffman, F. Powrie. 1999. An essential role for interleukin 10 in the function of regulatory T cells that inhibit intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 190:995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Read, S., V. Malmstrom, F. Powrie. 2000. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25⁺CD4⁺ regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 192:295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Chen, Y., V. K. Kuchroo, J. Inobe, D. A. Hafler, H. L. Weiner. 1994. Regulatory T cell clones induced by oral tolerance: suppression of autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Science 265:1237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Groux, H., A. O’Garra, M. Bigler, M. Rouleau, S. Antonenko, J. E. deVries, M. G. Roncarolo. 1997. A CD4⁺ T-cell subset inhibits antigen-specific T-cell responses and prevents colitis. Nature 389:737.[Medline]
17. Guimaraes, V. C., J. Quintans, M. E. Fisfalen, F. H. Straus, P. E. Fields, G. Medeiros-Neto, L. J. DeGroot. 1996. Immunosuppression of thyroiditis. Endocrinology 137:2199.[Abstract]
18. Chen, Y., J. Inobe, H. L. Weiner. 1995. Induction of oral tolerance to myelin basic protein in CD8-depleted mice: both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells mediate active suppression. J. Immunol. 155:910.[Abstract]
19. Cortesini, R., J. LeMaoult, R. Ciubotariu, N. S. Cortesini. 2001. CD8⁺CD28^– T suppressor cells and the induction of antigen-specific, antigen-presenting cell-mediated suppression of Th reactivity. Immunol. Rev. 182:201.[Medline]
20. Liu, Z., S. Tugulea, R. Cortesini, N. Suciu-Foca. 1998. Specific suppression of T helper alloreactivity by allo-MHC class I- restricted CD8⁺CD28^– T cells. Int. Immunol. 10:775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Maloy, K. J., F. Powrie. 2001. Regulatory T cells in the control of immune pathology. Nat. Immunol. 2:816.[Medline]
22. Cong, Y., C. T. Weaver, A. Lazenby, C. O. Elson. 2002. Bacterial-reactive T regulatory cells inhibit pathogenic immune responses to the enteric flora. J. Immunol. 169:6112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Gad, M., J. Brimnes, M. H. Claesson. 2003. CD4⁺ regulatory cells from the colonic lamina propria of normal mice inhibit proliferation of enterobacteria-reactive, disease-inducing Th1-cells from scid mice with colitis. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 131:34.[Medline]
24. Kelsall, B. L., W. Strober. 1996. Distinct populations of dendritic cells are present in the subepithelial dome and T cell regions of the murine Peyer’s patch. J. Exp. Med. 183:237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Iwasaki, A., B. L. Kelsall. 1999. Mucosal immunity and inflammation. I. Mucosal dendritic cells: their specialized role in initiating T cell responses. Am. J. Physiol. 276:G1074.
26. Hershberg, R. M., L. Mayer. 2000. Antigen processing and presentation by intestinal epithelial cells: polarity and complexity. Immunol. Today 21:123.[Medline]
27. Mayer, L., R. Shlien. 1987. Evidence for function of Ia molecules on gut epithelial cells in man. J. Exp. Med. 166:1471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Hershberg, R. M., P. E. Framson, D. H. Cho, L. Y. Lee, S. Kovats, J. Beitz, J. S. Blum, G. T. Nepom. 1997. Intestinal epithelial cells use two distinct pathways for HLA class II antigen processing. J. Clin. Invest. 100:204.[Medline]
29. Allez, M., J. Brimnes, I. Dotan, L. Mayer. 2002. Expansion of CD8⁺ T cells with regulatory function after interaction with intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 123:1516.[Medline]
30. Panja, A., R. S. Blumberg, S. P. Balk, L. Mayer. 1993. CD1d is involved in T cell-intestinal epithelial cell interactions. J. Exp. Med. 178:1115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Yio, X. Y., L. Mayer. 1997. Characterization of a 180-kDa intestinal epithelial cell membrane glycoprotein, gp180: a candidate molecule mediating T cell-epithelial cell interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 272:12786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Panja, A., A. Barone, L. Mayer. 1994. Stimulation of lamina propria lymphocytes by intestinal epithelial cells: evidence for recognition of nonclassical restriction elements. J. Exp. Med. 179:943.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Mayer, L., D. Eisenhardt. 1990. Lack of induction of suppressor T cells by intestinal epithelial cells from patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Invest. 86:1255.
34. James, S. P., C. Fiocchi, A. S. Graeff, W. Strober. 1985. Immunoregulatory function of lamina propria T cells in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 88:1143.[Medline]
35. Lee, A., H. Sugerman, C. O. Elson. 1988. Regulatory activity of the human CD8⁺ cell subset: a comparison of CD8⁺ cells from the intestinal lamina propria and blood. Eur. J. Immunol. 18:21.[Medline]
36. Kanof, M. E., W. Strober, C. Fiocchi, M. Zeitz, S. P. James. 1991. CD4 positive Leu-8 negative helper-inducer T cells predominate in the human intestinal lamina propria. Gastroenterology 101:90.[Medline]
37. Elson, C. O., E. Machelski, D. B. Weiserbs. 1988. T cell-B cell regulation in the intestinal lamina propria in Crohn’s disease. J. Immunol. 141:3029.[Abstract]
38. Qiao, L., G. Schurmann, M. Betzler, S. C. Meuer. 1991. Functional properties of human lamina propria T lymphocytes assessed with mitogenic monoclonal antibodies. Immunol. Res. 10:218.[Medline]
39. Targan, S. R., R. L. Deem, M. Liu, S. Wang, A. Nel. 1995. Definition of a lamina propria T cell responsive state: enhanced cytokine responsiveness of T cells stimulated through the CD2 pathway. J. Immunol. 154:664.[Abstract]
40. Qiao, L., G. Schurmann, M. Betzler, S. C. Meuer. 1991. Activation and signaling status of human lamina propria T lymphocytes. Gastroenterology 101:1529.[Medline]
41. Jonuleit, H., E. Schmitt, G. Schuler, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 2000. Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproliferating CD4⁺ T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:1213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Chai, J. G., I. Bartok, P. Chandler, S. Vendetti, A. Antoniou, J. Dyson, R. Lechler. 1999. Anergic T cells act as suppressor cells in vitro and in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:686.[Medline]
43. Reinecker, H. C., R. P. MacDermott, S. Mirau, A. Dignass, D. K. Podolsky. 1996. Intestinal epithelial cells both express and respond to interleukin 15. Gastroenterology 111:1706.[Medline]
44. Garside, P., A. M. Mowat. 2001. Oral tolerance. Semin. Immunol. 13:177.[Medline]
45. Golovkina, T. V., M. Shlomchik, L. Hannum, A. Chervonsky. 1999. Organogenic role of B lymphocytes in mucosal immunity. Science 286:1965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Garside, P., A. M. Mowat, A. Khoruts. 1999. Oral tolerance in disease. Gut 44:137.[Free Full Text]
47. Gardine, C. A., T. Kouki, L. DeGroot. 2001. Characterization of the T lymphocyte subsets and lymphoid populations involved in the induction of low-dose oral tolerance to human thyroglobulin. Cell. Immunol. 212:1.[Medline]
48. Desvignes, C., H. Bour, J. F. Nicolas, D. Kaiserlian. 1996. Lack of oral tolerance but oral priming for contact sensitivity to dinitrofluorobenzene in major histocompatibility complex class II-deficient mice and in CD4⁺ T cell-depleted mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:1756.[Medline]
49. Chang, C. C., R. Ciubotariu, J. S. Manavalan, J. Yuan, A. I. Colovai, F. Piazza, S. Lederman, M. Colonna, R. Cortesini, R. Dalla-Favera, N. Suciu-Foca. 2002. Tolerization of dendritic cells by T(S) cells: the crucial role of inhibitory receptors ILT3 and ILT4. Nat. Immunol. 3:237.[Medline]
50. James, S. P., A. S. Graeff. 1986. Effect of IL-2 on immunoregulatory function of intestinal lamina propria T cells in normal non-human primates. Gastroenterology 91:1483.[Medline]
51. James, S. P., C. Fiocchi, A. S. Graeff, W. Strober. 1988. Phenotypic analysis of lamina propria lymphocytes: predominance of helper-inducer and cytolytic T-cell phenotypes and deficiency of suppressor-inducer phenotypes in Crohn’s disease and control patients. Gastroenterology 91:1483.
52. James, S. P., L. M. Neckers, A. S. Graeff, J. Cossman, C. M. Balch, W. Strober. 1984. Suppression of immunoglobulin synthesis by lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 86:1510.[Medline]
53. Elson, C. O., A. S. Graeff, S. P. James, W. Strober. 1981. Covert suppressor T cells in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 80:1513.[Medline]
54. Toy, L. S., X. Y. Yio, A. Lin, S. Honig, L. Mayer. 1997. Defective expression of gp180, a novel CD8 ligand on intestinal epithelial cells, in inflammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Invest. 100:2062.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Ho, C. C. Kurtz, M. Naganuma, P. B. Ernst, F. Cominelli, and J. Rivera-Nieves A CD8+/CD103high T Cell Subset Regulates TNF-Mediated Chronic Murine Ileitis J. Immunol., February 15, 2008; 180(4): 2573 - 2580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Hundorfean, K.-P. Zimmer, S. Strobel, A. Gebert, D. Ludwig, and J. Buning Luminal antigens access late endosomes of intestinal epithelial cells enriched in MHC I and MHC II molecules: in vivo study in Crohn's ileitis Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): G798 - G808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Dotan, M. Allez, A. Nakazawa, J. Brimnes, M. Schulder-Katz, and L. Mayer Intestinal epithelial cells from inflammatory bowel disease patients preferentially stimulate CD4+ T cells to proliferate and secrete interferon-{gamma} Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): G1630 - G1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I L Huibregtse, A U van Lent, and S J H van Deventer Immunopathogenesis of IBD: insufficient suppressor function in the gut? Gut, April 1, 2007; 56(4): 584 - 592. [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Tang, I. Maricic, N. Purohit, B. Bakamjian, L. M. Reed-Loisel, T. Beeston, P. Jensen, and V. Kumar Regulation of Immunity by a Novel Population of Qa-1-Restricted CD8{alpha}{alpha}+TCR{alpha}beta+ T Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 7645 - 7655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ulziibat, K. Ejima, Y. Shibata, Y. Hishikawa, M. Kitajima, A. Fujishita, T. Ishimaru, and T. Koji Identification of estrogen receptor beta-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes and their possible roles in normal and tubal pregnancy oviducts Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2281 - 2289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. NAGAISHI, H. IIJIMA, A. NAKAJIMA, D. CHEN, and R. S BLUMBERG Role of CEACAM1 as a Regulator of T Cells. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., August 1, 2006; 1072: 155 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Mizoguchi and A. K. Bhan A Case for Regulatory B Cells J. Immunol., January 15, 2006; 176(2): 705 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF)