The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofinger, E.
Right arrow Articles by Viola, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofinger, E.
Right arrow Articles by Viola, A.
The Journal of Immunology, 2005, 174: 3839-3840.
Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists


LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Multiple Modes of Interaction between Lck and CD28

Edith Hofinger and Heinrich Sticht

Institut für Biochemie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

In a recent paper, Tavano et al. (1) reported the essential role of a C-terminal 208PXXPP212 motif in CD28 for the recruitment of Lck to the immunological synapse, and we would like to comment on their results in the light of the affinity of different CD28-Lck interactions that we have studied in vitro by biophysical methods.

Peptides comprising residues 206–220 of human CD28 and 205–215 of murine CD28, respectively, bind to the SH3 domain of Lck only with very low affinity (Kd > 1 mM). Although we agree that this interaction can nevertheless be of physiological relevance in a situation in which both proteins are membrane associated and located in lipid rafts, we want to draw attention to an alternative CD28 interaction that can be formed after phosphorylation of Tyr209 of human CD28 with the Lck SH2 domain (Fig. 1). This interaction (Kd = 2.13 µM) is in vitro at least three orders of magnitude stronger than the SH3 interaction and is in the range of those observed for other SH2-ligand interactions (2).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Affinity of phosphorylated hCD28206–220 ({circ}) for the Lck SH2 domain: Changes of the relative fluorescence were measured in a competitive binding study that was performed as described in Ref. 2 . hCD28206–220 binds with a Kd of 2.13 µM and thus with higher affinity to the SH2 domain than the phosphorylated autoinhibitory Lck C terminus ({blacktriangledown}) (Kd = 8.99 µM). Titration curves for a high-affinity SH2 ligand (•) containing a YEEI binding motif (Kd = 0.10 µM) and for the Lck C terminus were reprinted with permission from Ref. 2 and are shown for comparison.

 
Evidence that such a CD28-Lck interaction may also play a role in vivo comes from previous studies of Sadra et al. (3), who showed that the corresponding tyrosine (Tyr188 in their study) becomes phosphorylated after stimulation of murine CD28 expressed in Jurkat cells. Moreover, a Tyr->Phe mutation at this position severely impaired the ability of mCD28 to deliver a costimulus for the expression of CD69 and the production of IL-2 (3). Although tyrosine phosphorylation at this position could not be associated with any specific signaling event up to now, our data suggest that this residue is likely involved in Lck SH2 binding. We feel that this finding has important implications for the design of new experiments that should also take into account the existence of a second mode of CD28-Lck interaction involving the SH2 domain in addition to the SH3 interaction reported by Tavano et al. (1).

References

  1. Tavano, R., G. Gri, B. Molon, B. Marinari, C. E. Rudd, L. Tuosto, A. Viola. 2004. CD28 and lipid rafts coordinate recruitment of Lck to the immunological synapse of human T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 173:5392.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bauer, F., E. Hofinger, S. Hoffmann, P. Rösch, K. Schweimer, H. Sticht. 2004. Characterization of Lck-binding elements in the herpesviral regulatory Tip-protein. Biochemistry 43:14932.[Medline]
  3. Sadra, A., T. Cinek, J. L. Arellano, J. Shi, K. E. Truitt, J. B. Imboden. 1999. Identification of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the CD28 cytoplasmic domain and their role in the costimulation of Jurkat T cells. J. Immunol. 162:1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

The Authors Respond: Multiple Models of Interaction between Lck and CD28

Regina Tavano and Antonella Viola

Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

In our recent paper titled "CD28 and Lipid Rafts Coordinate Recruitment of Lck to the Immunological Synapse of Human T Lymphocytes," we demonstrated the essential role of the C-terminal 208PXXPP212 motif in CD28 for the recruitment of lipid rafts, and therefore of the raft-associated protein Lck, to the immunological synapse (IS) (R1 ). We do not believe that the lower recruitment of Lck to the IS of T cells expressing the CD28-3A mutant is the consequence of a lower affinity of the CD28-Lck interaction. First, we demonstrated that not only Lck but also a myristoylated and palmitoylated fluorescent protein, used as raft marker, is less recruited to the IS of CD28-3A-expressing T cells (Fig. 2 of our paper). Second, in agreement with the model proposed by Hofinger and Sticht, we have data indicating that the direct interaction between CD28 and Lck does not require the CD28 C-terminal 208PXXPP212 motif (our manuscript in preparation).

Our paper indicates that a large fraction of Lck is recruited to the IS of T cells engaging a B7+ APC as a result of lipid rafts mobilization, an event requiring CD28 signaling through its C-terminal 208PXXPP212 motif.

References

  1. Tavano, R., G. Gri, B. Molon, B. Marinari, C. E. Rudd, L. Tuosto, A. Viola. 2004. CD28 and lipid rafts coordinate recruitment of Lck to the immunological synapse of human T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 173:5392.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Libra, A. Gloghini, P. M. Navolanic, A. L. Zignego, V. De Re, A. Carbone, and E. H. Sasso
JH6 Gene Usage among HCV-Associated MALT Lymphomas Harboring t(14;18) Translocation
J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 3839 - 3839.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hofinger, E.
Right arrow Articles by Viola, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hofinger, E.
Right arrow Articles by Viola, A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS