The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schenk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schenk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, R. L.
The Journal of Immunology, 2005, 174: 3741-3748.
Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists

Alloreactive T Cell Responses and Acute Rejection of Single Class II MHC-Disparate Heart Allografts Are under Strict Regulation by CD4+CD25+ T Cells1

Soren Schenk*, Danielle D. Kish{dagger}, Chunshui He{dagger}, Tarek El-Sawy{dagger},§, Eise Chiffoleau, Chuangqui Chen, Zihao Wu, Sigrid Sandner||, Anton V. Gorbachev{dagger}, Kiyotaka Fukamachi*, Peter S. Heeger{dagger},{ddagger},§, Mohamed H. Sayegh||, Laurence A. Turka2 and Robert L. Fairchild2,3,{dagger},{ddagger},§

Departments of * Biomedical Engineering and {dagger} Immunology, and {ddagger} The Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195; § Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106; Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and || Transplant Research Center, Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Skin but not vascularized cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 mice are acutely rejected by C57BL/6 recipients in response to the single class II MHC disparity. The underlying mechanisms preventing acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients were investigated. B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts induced low levels of alloreactive effector T cell priming in C57BL/6 recipients, and this priming was accompanied by low-level cellular infiltration into the allograft that quickly resolved. Recipients with long-term-surviving heart allografts were unable to reject B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts, suggesting potential down-regulatory mechanisms induced by the cardiac allografts. Depletion of CD25+ cells from C57BL/6 recipients resulted in 15-fold increases in alloreactive T cell priming and in acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts. Similarly, reconstitution of B6.Rag–/– recipients with wild-type C57BL/6 splenocytes resulted in acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts only if CD25+ cells were depleted. These results indicate that acute rejection of single class II MHC-disparate B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients is inhibited by the emergence of CD25+ regulatory cells that restrict the clonal expansion of alloreactive T cells.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
In the absence of immunosuppressive cover, transplantation of complete MHC-mismatched skin and solid organ grafts induces strong alloreactive T cell responses that mediate rapid graft destruction (1, 2). MHC-matched skin grafts expressing multiple minor Ag disparities are also quickly rejected, but interestingly, heart grafts in the same donor-recipient combinations are often accepted (2, 3). In an analogous fashion, cardiac grafts transplanted across single class I or class II MHC mismatches are commonly accepted despite the fact that skin grafts of these donors are rejected (4, 5).

B6.H-2bm12 is a spontaneous mutation of the I-Ab molecule resulting in a 3-aa substitution in the third hypervariable region of the A{beta} chain (6, 7). B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts induce reactive T cells in C57BL/6 recipients and are acutely rejected. In contrast, C57BL/6 mice do not acutely reject B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts, although many of the grafts develop transplant-associated vasculopathy, indicating the induction of a donor-reactive immune response to the graft (5). Mechanisms accounting for the absence of B6.H-2bm12 heart allograft acute rejection despite the development of a potentially pathogenic alloimmune response remain unknown. Such mechanistic insights could prove to be fundamental in the design of therapies aimed at prolonging survival of solid-organ transplants that would otherwise reject.

The number of alloantigens presented to a recipient of a B6.H-2bm12 heart graft is certainly less than that presented to recipients of complete MHC-disparate heart grafts. As a consequence, the T cell repertoire reactive to B6.H-2bm12 alloantigens is less than that reactive to fully MHC-disparate allografts. Nevertheless, the number of anti-B6.H-2bm12 T cell precursors present in the C57BL/6 mouse is sufficient to lead to skin graft rejection. Recent work by our laboratory and by others showed that the frequency of induced effector T cells, rather than the number of naive T cell precursors, can largely determine rejection vs acceptance of a graft (8, 9, 10). Moreover, these studies showed that the threshold number of T cells required to destroy a transplant is dependent on the tissue mass of the transplanted organ. Larger numbers of graft-reactive T cells are needed to reject a heart vs a skin graft, providing an explanation for the preferential rejection of skin vs heart grafts in situations in which low numbers of effector T cells are induced posttransplant.

It therefore becomes essential to understand those factors that determine the size of the effector T cell pool following a given transplant stimulus. The peak size of the effector T cell pool is influenced by the ability of the responding precursor cells to optimally expand during Ag priming. For example, studies performed in infectious disease models have shown that extremely low precursor frequencies can expand to up to 30% of the T cell compartment in response to certain stimuli (11, 12, 13). Such clonal expansion is influenced by the number of Ag-expressing dendritic cells (DC),4 the presence of effective costimulatory signals, the presence of amplifying signals/cytokines (i.e., IFN{alpha} and/or IL-12) produced by the innate immune system, and potentially, by inhibitory signals that could lead to apoptosis or clonal exhaustion. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between priming and regulation of alloreactive T cells to B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts in C57BL/6 recipients. We provide evidence that regulatory T cells play an important inhibitory role in controlling the size of the effector T cell pool following transplantation of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts into C57BL/6 recipients. The findings have important implications for therapies aimed at prolonging allograft survival in other model systems.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Animals

B6.C-H-2bm12 (B6.H-2bm12) and C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were obtained through Dr. C. Reeder at the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). Adult males, 7–12 wk of age, were used throughout this study.

Skin transplantation

Full-thickness trunk skin transplantation was performed using a modification of the protocol of Billingham and Medawar (14). Briefly, trunk skin was excised from B6.H-2bm12 donor mice, the s.c. fat was removed, and 12-mm-diameter circles of full-thickness skin were prepared using a punch. The skin allograft was placed in a slightly larger graft bed prepared over the chest of the recipient and secured with Vaseline gauze and adhesive bandage. After 7 days, the bandage was removed, and each graft was examined daily and was considered rejected when 70% or more of the graft tissue was destroyed as assessed by visual examination.

Heterotopic cardiac transplant

Cardiac transplants were performed using the method of Corry et al. (15). Briefly, donor and recipient mice were anesthetized with phenobarbital. Donor hearts were harvested and placed in chilled lactated Ringer’s solution while the recipient mice were prepared. The donor heart was anastomosed to the recipient abdominal aorta and vena cava using microsurgical techniques. Upon completion of the anastomoses and organ reperfusion, the heart grafts resumed spontaneous contraction. The strength and quality of cardiac impulses were graded daily by palpation as previously described (9). Rejection of cardiac grafts was considered complete by the cessation of impulse and was confirmed visually by laparotomy for each graft. Cardiac isografts in C57BL/6 recipients functioned for >100 days. The significance in allograft survival between recipient groups was analyzed by log-rank test, and p < 0.01 was considered a significant difference between groups. Heart allografts were harvested, snap frozen, and stored at –80°C until use.

Antibodies

The following Abs were used for immunohistology of graft tissue: rat anti-mouse CD4+ (GK1.5) mAb, rat anti-mouse CD8+ (53-6.7) mAb, and biotinylated goat anti-rat polyclonal Ab (BD Pharmingen). ELISPOT assays were performed using IFN-{gamma}-specific mAb (BD Pharmingen) and biotinylated anti-IFN-{gamma} mAb (Vector Laboratories). Rat anti-mouse CD25 mAb PC61 and hamster anti-CTLA-4 mAb UC10-4F10-11 were purified from spent culture supernatant by protein G chromatography. Cardiac allograft recipients were treated with 0.5 mg of PC61 i.p. on day –1, followed by 0.25 mg every other day on days 1–9 or with 0.5 mg of UC10-4F10-11 on day 0 followed by 0.25 mg every other day on days 2–10 posttransplant. In some experiments, mice were thymectomized on day –14 followed by treatment with 0.25 mg of PC61 on days 0, 2, 4, 6, and 9 posttransplant.

DC isolation and expansion

DC were isolated and cultured as previously described (16). Briefly, bone marrow cells were flushed from the femurs and tibia of B6.H-2bm12 mice and cultured for 5 days in medium containing 10 ng/ml GM-CSF and 10 ng/ml IL-4. After the culture, the cells were washed and centrifuged through a 14.5% metrizamide gradient at room temperature for 30 min. The interface cells were harvested and washed three times, and 2.5 x 106 cells were injected i.v. into C57BL/6 recipients 3 days before heart transplantation with a B6.H-2bm12 graft.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Heart grafts were retrieved from recipients at various times posttransplant, embedded in OCT compound (Sakura Finetek), and frozen at –80°C. Sections were cut at 8 µm and mounted onto slides. For immunohistochemistry, sections were fixed in acetone for 10 min and air-dried. Slides were immersed in PBS for 10 min and then in 0.03% H2O2 for 10 min to eliminate endogenous peroxidase activity. The slides were then stained for 1 h with 5 µg/ml anti-CD4 mAb (GK1.5) or anti-CD8 mAb (53-6.7) in 0.05 Tris-HCl with 1% BSA. Control slides were incubated with rat IgG as the primary Ab. After three washes in PBS for 5 min each, slides were incubated for 20 min with biotinylated goat anti-rat IgG diluted 1/300 in PBS. After three washes in PBS, slides were incubated with streptavidin-HRP (DakoCytomation) for 20 min and washed another three times. To prepare the substrate-chromagen solution, a 10-mg tablet of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in 15 ml of PBS plus 12 µl of 30% H2O2. The solution was applied to the slides, which were incubated for 3–7 min and then rinsed in dH2O to stop the reaction. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin for 3 min and rinsed with tap water. The slides were dehydrated, viewed under light microscopy, and the images were captured using ImagePro Plus (Media Cybernetics).

Flow cytometry

Spleen cells were obtained from anti-CD25 mAb-treated or control B6 recipients on day +17 or +18 posttransplantation of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts. The cells were washed twice with staining buffer (Dulbecco’s PBS with 2% FCS/0.2% NaN3), and 1 x 106 cell aliquots were incubated on ice in 150 µl of rat serum (Rockland). After 30 min, the cells were washed twice and stained with fluorochrome-labeled mAb at 10 µg/ml. After 30 min on ice, the cells were washed five times, resuspended in staining buffer, and analyzed by two-color flow cytometry using a FACScan and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Sample data were collected on 20,000 gated cells, and cells staining positive for CD4+CD25+ and CD4+rat IgG+ were expressed as the percentage of CD4+ cells.

ELISPOT assays

Priming of donor-specific T cells to IFN-{gamma}-producing cells was quantified by ELISPOT assays as previously described (8, 10). Briefly, ELISA spot plates (Unifilter 350; Whatman) were coated with 2 µg/ml IFN-{gamma}-specific mAb and incubated overnight at 4°C. The plates were blocked with 1% BSA/PBS and then washed four times with PBS. Spleen cell suspensions from graft recipients were prepared on day 7 posttransplant and used as responder cells. Spleen cells from C57BL/6 and B6.H-2bm12 mice were prepared and treated with mitomycin C for use as stimulator cells in the assay as described above. Responder and stimulator cells (1:2) were cultured in serum-free HL-1 medium (BioWhittaker) supplemented with 1 mM L-glutamine. After 24 h of cell culture at 37°C in 5% CO2, cells were removed from the plate by extensive washing with PBS. Biotinylated anti-IFN-{gamma} (2 µg/ml) or anti-IL-4 (4 µg/ml) mAb was added, and the plate was incubated for 6 h at room temperature. The plate was washed three times with PBS/0.05% Tween 20, and streptavidin-conjugated alkaline phosphatase was added to each well. After 2 h at room temperature, the plates were washed with PBS, and NBT-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry) was added for the detection of IFN-{gamma}-producing cells. The resulting spots were counted with an ImmunoSpot Series I analyzer (Cellular Technology) that was designed to detect ELISA spots with predetermined criteria for spot size, shape, and colorimetric density.

CD25+ cell depletion and adoptive transfer

For adoptive transfers experiments, CD25+ cells were depleted from spleen cell suspensions by magnetic cell sorting using a CD4+CD25+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, splenocytes were isolated from naive B6 mice and washed in buffer (PBS, 0.5% BSA, 2 mM EDTA) after lysis of remaining erythrocytes. The cells were incubated with PE-labeled anti-CD25 mAb (Biotech; 10 µl/107 cells) for 15 min at 4–8°C. The cells were washed and resuspended, and 10 µl of anti-PE microbeads were added. Following another 15 min of incubation at 4°C, the cells were washed, resuspended in 500 µl of buffer, and loaded onto the MACS columns. Cells passing through the column were collected as the CD25 fraction. The CD25+ depleted and nondepleted cells were adoptively transferred into RAG–/– recipients of B6.H-2bm12 heart grafts (20 x 106 cells/mouse) on day 3 posttransplantation.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
Rejection of B6.H-2bm12 skin and heart allografts

The acute rejection of single class II MHC-mismatched skin and cardiac B6.H-2bm12 allografts by C57BL/6 recipients was compared. All skin allografts were rejected between days 15 and 19 posttransplant (Fig. 1). In contrast, all cardiac allografts were maintained past day 25 posttransplant, and after day 30, 80% of the grafts continued to survive beyond day 100, with median survival time (MST) >100 days (Fig. 1). Histological inspection of long-term-surviving heart allografts indicated little-to-no cellular infiltration when examined at day 80 posttransplant (Fig. 2).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Acute rejection of class II MHC-mismatched B6.H-2bm12 skin but not heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients. Groups of six C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice received full-thickness skin ({square}) or vascularized cardiac ({blacksquare}) allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors. One group of C57BL/6 mice was primed with 2.5 x 106 bone marrow-derived DC from B6.H-2bm12 mice and 3 days later received a B6.H-2bm12 heart allograft (•). Cardiac allograft rejection was confirmed visually in all recipients by laparotomy. MST was not significantly different between both groups of heart allograft recipients.

 


View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Cellular infiltration into B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts in C57BL/6 recipients. Allografts were retrieved on the indicated day posttransplant from control or DC-primed recipients. Sections were prepared and stained with H&E. Magnification, x200.

 
Skin grafts contain many DC that may promote a stronger alloreactive immune response than the response to cardiac allografts (17, 18). Previous studies have shown that donor-specific priming with DC can accelerate acute rejection of complete MHC-mismatched heart allografts (16). The ability of DC priming to provoke acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts was tested. C57BL/6 mice were primed with B6.H-2bm12 DC 3 days before heart graft transplantation. This priming resulted in a slight increase in heart allograft rejection, with a 50% loss of cardiac allografts by day 42, but no allografts were rejected beyond this time point (Fig. 1). When compared with nonprimed recipients, the decrease in allograft survival in DC-primed recipients did not reach statistical significance. Similar results in heart allograft survival were observed when C57BL/6 mice received B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts 14 days before B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts (data not shown).

Cardiac allografts retrieved from recipients that were not primed with DC had little cellular infiltration at day 7 posttransplant, and on day 21 this infiltration increased in some but not all allografts (Fig. 2). In contrast, cardiac allografts retrieved from DC-primed cardiac-grafted recipients on day 7 were heavily infiltrated with mononuclear cells, and this infiltrate was associated with marked myocyte necrosis. By day 21 posttransplant, however, the intensity of this cell infiltration into allografts was absent in most of the heart allografts analyzed.

In parallel to histological analyses, T cell development to effector cells in unprimed and DC-primed recipients of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts was compared by enumerating the number of alloreactive T cells producing IFN-{gamma} on day 7 posttransplant in ELISPOT assays (Fig. 3). The number of alloreactive cells producing IFN-{gamma} in cardiac allograft recipients that were not primed with DC was increased ~3-fold over the background response observed in naive mice (74 IFN-{gamma}-producing cells per 6 x 105 cells vs 22 per 6 x 105 cells). Priming with donor DC before receiving the cardiac allograft increased this 1.5-fold further on day 7 posttransplantation (110 IFN-{gamma}-producing cells per 6 x 105 cells; p < 0.01). As expected with a response to a single class II MHC disparity, the number of primed alloreactive T cells producing IFN-{gamma} was considerably lower than observed in recipients of complete MHC-mismatched heart allografts at the time of rejection, typically >1000 per 6 x 105 cells. On day 21 posttransplantation, the numbers of alloreactive T cells producing IFN-{gamma} were slightly lower in cardiac allograft recipients not primed with DC (61 per 6 x 105) and were detected at even lower frequencies (21 per 6 x 105; p < 0.05) in DC-primed allograft recipients. Overall, these results indicated a low-level T cell response to a single allogeneic class II MHC determinant that is poorly sustained over time posttransplant and is reflected by low-level cellular infiltration into the heart allografts that also subsides with time posttransplant.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Frequency of allograft-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in spleens of C57BL/6 recipients of B6.H-2bm12heart allografts. On days 7 and 21 posttransplant, spleen cells from control or DC-primed recipients and from naive C57BL/6 mice were analyzed by ELISPOT assay to enumerate the number of alloantigen-specific T cells producing IFN-{gamma}. The results indicate the mean number of spots in four animals in each group and are representative of three individual experiments. *, p < 0.01; **, p < 0.05.

 
Regulation of alloreactive T cell responses and rejection of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts

We next investigated whether negative signals might be restraining acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts. One obvious candidate was CTLA-4, which is implicated both as a negative regulator of naive and effector T cells as well as an effector mechanism expressed by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (19, 20, 21, 22). Thus, we tested the effects of a blocking anti-CTLA-4 mAb on the survival of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts. C57BL/6 mice were treated with control Ig or anti-CTLA-4 mAb every other day from days 0 to 10 posttransplant (Fig. 4). Blockade of CTLA-4 induced acute rejection of all B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts by day 15 posttransplant, demonstrating a role for CTLA-4 in tempering rejection in this allogeneic response.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Treatment with anti-CTLA-4 mAb promotes acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts. Groups of five C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were treated with 0.5 mg of control rat IgG ({blacksquare}) or anti-CTLA-4 mAb ({square}) i.p. and received vascularized cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors. Recipients were treated with 0.25 mg of Ab on days 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 posttransplant. Cardiac allograft rejection was confirmed visually in all recipients by laparotomy.

 
The rapid rejection of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts by blocking CTLA-4 suggested a role for CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells but could also be explained by the known intrinsic inhibitory functions of CTLA-4 on nonregulatory T cells. The next sets of experiments were designed to discriminate between these two possibilities and to specifically address the hypothesis that T cell responses to B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts failed to lead to rejection as a consequence of the induction of CD25+ regulatory cell activity.

First, groups of C57BL/6 recipients of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts were treated with control rat IgG or with rat anti-CD25 mAb from day –1 to day 9 posttransplant. When spleen cells were examined at day 17 posttransplant, treatment with anti-CD25 mAb led to an almost 75% decrease in CD4+CD25+ T cells (Fig. 5). There was no increase in CD4+ T cells staining positively with anti-rat IgG, indicating that the decrease was due to deletion of CD25+ T cells and not to blocking of CD25 by the Ab treatment.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Treatment with anti-CD25 mAb deletes CD4+ T cells expressing CD25. C57BL/6 mice were treated with 0.50 mg anti-CD25 mAb or control rat IgG i.p. on day –1 followed by treatment with 0.25 mg on days +1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 posttransplant. On day +17, spleen cell suspensions were prepared and stained to detect the presence of CD25 and rat IgG on CD4+ T cells. Cells from representative animals are shown, and the percentages of CD4+ cells staining positively for CD25 and rat IgG in the CD4+ T cell populations are indicated in the upper-right quadrant.

 
Recipient treatment with anti-CD25 mAb led to a 70% loss of the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts by day 25 (p < 0.001 vs control) (Fig. 6A). All grafts of anti-CD25 mAb-treated recipients were severely infiltrated with mononuclear cells on days 14, and this increased on day 21 posttransplantation (International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 3B–4), with CD4+ T cells constituting the majority of the infiltrating cells (Fig. 7). At day 21 posttransplant, three of four cardiac allografts of anti-CD25 mAb-treated animals had high-grade acute cellular rejection, whereas allografts from control IgG-treated recipients showed minimal perivascular and interstitial cellular infiltrates and were similar to syngeneic grafts. Recall assays to compare levels of T cell priming on day 21 posttransplantation revealed a 15-fold increase of alloreactive T cells producing IFN-{gamma} when compared with untreated B6 recipients (750 per 6 x 105 vs 41 per 6 x 105; p < 0.01) (Fig. 8). The increased alloreactive T cell response to B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts in recipients treated with anti-CD25 mAb was not accompanied by an increase in self-reactive T cells, because low numbers of spots (<8 per 6 x 105 cells) were observed when recipient cells were cultured with C57BL/6 spleen cells as stimulators in the ELISPOT assay (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by C57BL/6 recipients treated with anti-CD25 mAb. A, Groups of eight C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were treated with 0.5 mg of control rat IgG ({blacksquare}) or anti-CD25 mAb ({square}) i.p., received vascularized cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors 1 day later, and were treated with 0.25 mg of Ab on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 posttransplant. Cardiac allograft rejection was confirmed visually in all recipients by laparotomy. MST was 100 days in control-treated recipients vs 26 days in anti-CD25 mAb-treated recipients (p < 0.0025). B, Groups of eight C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice were thymectomized, and 14 days later were treated with 0.25 mg of control rat IgG ({square}) or anti-CD25 mAb (•) i.p. every other day for a total of four Ab treatments. Ten days after the final Ab treatment, the thymectomized mice and a group of nonthymectomized C57BL/6 mice ({blacksquare}) received vascularized cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors. Cardiac allograft rejection was confirmed visually in all recipients by laparotomy.

 


View larger version (155K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Cellular infiltration into B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts in C57BL/6 recipients treated with anti-CD25 mAb. Allografts were retrieved on the indicated day posttransplant. Sections were stained with H&E (A and C) or for immunohistochemistry (B and D) with anti-CD4 mAb GK1.5. Magnification, x200.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Frequency of allograft-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing cells in spleens of C57BL/6 recipients of B6.H-2bm12heart allografts. Recipients treated with control rat IgG or with anti-CD25 mAb received heart allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors. On day 21 posttransplant, spleen cells were analyzed by ELISPOT assay to enumerate the number of alloantigen-specific T cells producing IFN-{gamma}. The results indicate the mean number of spots in four animals in each group. **, p < 0.01.

 
To eliminate the reconstitution of the CD4+CD25+ T cell compartment by newly developed thymic emigrants, adult mice were thymectomized, and then 2 wk later, the mice were treated with anti-CD25 mAb every other day for a total of four doses of the Ab. This treatment resulted in a similar depletion of CD4+CD25+ T cells as observed above in nonthymectomized mice. Ten days after the last Ab treatment, control thymectomized and anti-CD25 mAb-treated thymectomized mice received B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts. In nonthymectomized recipients, 80% of the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts survived longer than 100 days posttransplant, and in adult thymectomized recipients, 65% of the allografts survived longer than 100 days posttransplant (Fig. 6B). Depletion of CD25+ cells from the thymectomized recipients resulted in rejection of >70% of the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts by day 38 posttransplant, and all were rejected by day 80.

Next, adoptive transfer experiments were conducted to further test the role of CD25+ cells in promoting acceptance of single class II MHC-mismatched grafts. B6.RAG–/– mice were transplanted with B6.H-2bm12 hearts, and 3 days later, the recipients were reconstituted with naive B6 splenocytes, which did or did not contain CD25+ cells. Adoptive transfer of CD25+ depleted cells precipitated acute rejection of all grafts by day 20 posttransplantation, whereas only one of five grafts was rejected in recipients reconstituted with undepleted B6 splenocytes (p < 0.01) (Fig. 9). At the time of rejection, cardiac allografts from recipients reconstituted with CD25-depleted spleen cells were heavily infiltrated with CD4+ T cells, whereas allografts from recipients reconstituted with whole spleen cells had little cell infiltration at all times examined (data not shown). Thus, the presence or absence of CD25+ cells influences the intensity of cellular infiltration and the acceptance vs rejection of vascularized allografts expressing a single class II MHC disparity.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. Acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts by B6.RAG-1–/– recipients reconstituted with C57BL/6 spleen cells depleted of CD25+ cells. Groups of five B6.RAG-1–/– mice received B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts and 3 days later received 20 x 106 whole spleen cells ({blacksquare}) or CD25-depleted spleen cells ({square}) from C57BL/6 mice. Cardiac allograft rejection was confirmed visually in all recipients by laparotomy. MST of heart allografts was >50 days in recipients reconstituted with whole spleen cells and was 12 days in recipients reconstituted with CD25-depleted spleen cells; p < 0.0025.

 
Finally, we investigated the consequence of the inability to reject B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts on the subsequent acute rejection of B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts. Our results to this point had demonstrated that CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells were responsible for the failure to reject the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts. Given the known ability of Ag stimulation of these cells to lead to expansion and increased potency of regulation, we postulated that enhanced regulatory capacity in the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allograft recipients might lead to skin allograft acceptance. Groups of naive C57BL/6 mice and B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allograft recipients were challenged with B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts 100 days after the cardiac allograft transplantation. Whereas naive C57BL/6 mice acutely rejected B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts, recipients of the long-term-surviving cardiac allografts were unable to reject the B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts (Fig. 10).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 10. Acceptance of B6.H-2bm12 skin allografts in recipients with long-term-surviving B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts. A group of 14 C57BL/6 (H-2b) mice received cardiac allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors. After 100 days, the heart allograft recipients ({square}) and a group of 10 naive C57BL/6 mice ({blacksquare}) were challenged with full-thickness trunk skin grafts from B6.H-2bm12 donors. After removal of the bandage on day 7 posttransplant, skin allografts were inspected daily for rejection.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The underlying mechanisms that result in failure to reject heart allografts when skin grafts from the same donor are rejected include both graft- and recipient-derived factors. Similar to the rejection of B6.H-2bm12 allografts, recipients reject MHC-matched/minor Ag-mismatched skin grafts but fail to reject heart allografts in most instances. When compared with the effector T cell response induced to complete MHC-mismatched cardiac and skin allografts, the response induced to minor Ag and single MHC-mismatched disparities is considerably smaller. Studies from this and other groups have indicated that a threshold number of effector T cells is required for the rejection of allografts and that the required number of cells is higher for the acute rejection of cardiac allografts than for skin allografts (8, 9, 10). Furthermore, increasing the tissue mass of single minor histocompatibility-disparate skin allografts abrogates acute rejection, and decreasing the tissue mass of heart allografts promotes acute rejection. These studies predict that cardiac allografts of large tissue mass will not be acutely rejected unless a threshold number of effector T cells develop in response to the allograft. The current report indicates that removal of regulatory constraints on the expansion of the alloreactive effector T cell pool overcomes the inability to reject heart allografts with a single class II MHC disparity.

The short duration of the T cell response in recipients of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts with or without donor DC priming suggested the presence of a highly regulated alloreactive response to the single class II-disparate grafts. Recent studies in rodent models have indicated the ability of CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells to inhibit allograft rejection (23, 24, 25, 26). The function of these regulatory T cells is inhibited by Abs to CD25 or to IL-2 (27, 28, 29). However, CD25 is also expressed by activated T cells during Ag priming including alloreactive T cells responding to allografts, and under specific conditions IL-2 binding to its receptor on activated T cells induces cell death (30). Recent studies by Sho et al. (2) have indicated that acute rejection of complete MHC-disparate heart allografts was inhibited by treatment with anti-CD25 mAb. In contrast, MHC-matched/multiple minor histocompatibility-disparate heart allografts normally accepted were rejected when recipients were treated with anti-CD25 mAb. Although it is unclear whether the Ab inhibited the activity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells or acted directly on minor histocompatibility-reactive effector T cells, the Ab treatment was associated with decreased T cell apoptosis and sustained alloreactive T cell responses to the allograft.

In the current studies, treatment of C57BL/6 recipients of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts with anti-CD25 mAb also promoted acute rejection of the grafts. This rejection was accompanied by a substantial increase in the number of alloreactive T cells primed to the allograft and intense and sustained T cell infiltration into the grafts. The removal of CD25+ T cells before transfer to RAG-deficient recipients of B6.H-2bm12 heart allografts resulted in the ability of the wild-type T cells to reject the grafts. Thus, CD4+CD25+ regulatory cells constrain the clonal expansion of B6.H-2bm12-reactive T cells, resulting in low alloreactive T cell responses and low grades of cellular infiltration into the allografts that is not sustained over time. Several recent studies have reported the expansion of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells in response to self and exogenous Ags and the restriction of the Ag-specific effector T cell response by the emergence of the regulatory T cells (31, 32, 33, 34, 35). Similarly, both CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells and pathogenic effector CD4+ T cells are likely to be activated and expand in response to the B6.H-2bm12 alloantigen. The regulatory cells halt or attenuate clonal expansion of the effector CD4+ T cells during the course of the immune response to the allograft so that the numbers of effector T cells are not sufficient to mediate rejection of the cardiac grafts. The realization that a controlled balance between alloreactive effector and regulatory T cells will promote allograft survival has prompted the recent design of a novel strategy that decreases the effector compartment while maintaining the regulatory compartment and successfully establishes tolerance to MHC-mismatched allografts in murine models (36).

If discrepancies in the numbers of allograft-derived DC accounted for the difference in rejection vs survival of skin vs heart allografts from B6.H-2bm12 donors, then recipient priming with donor DC should have increased the size of the effector T cell response and overcome the failure to acutely reject the heart allografts. In the current studies, priming of C57BL/6 mice with B6.H-2bm12 DC did result in a modest increase in primed alloreactive T cells but did not significantly increase acute rejection of the heart allografts. Furthermore, similar numbers of alloreactive T cells are primed in response to both skin and heart allografts expressing single class I MHC or single minor histocompatibility disparities, arguing against differences in graft-derived DC as a factor influencing acute rejection vs acceptance (9, 10). The current results emphasize the strict control imposed on the expansion of alloreactive effector T cells in response to the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts with or without additional alloantigen priming by DC. The rapid decrease in alloreactive effector T cell numbers observed from days 7 to 21 posttransplant in the spleens of B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allograft recipients primed with donor DC may be indicative of the potency of this regulation in response to the early increase in the effector T cell pool induced in the DC-primed recipients. Another aspect of these studies that warrants consideration and further investigation is that the interstitial DC in the B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allograft, but not DC from skin allografts or the bone marrow-derived DC used to prime the allograft recipients, may express tolerogenic properties that induce or promote this regulation. This regulation was expressed in DC-primed cardiac allograft recipients as well as in cardiac allograft recipients subsequently challenged with a donor skin graft, indicating the dominant nature of this regulation in response to B6.H-2bm12 cardiac allografts. Acute rejection of the cardiac allografts was only quickly and consistently observed when this regulation was removed.

An additional factor that may facilitate the acute rejection of allografts is the induction of an alloreactive Ab response. The close homology of the I-Ab and I-Abm12 molecules is reflected by the reactivity of most anti-I-Ab Abs with I-Abm12 (37). This cross-reactivity suggests that, if induced, a humoral response to B6.H-2bm12 allografts by C57BL/6 recipients would result in autoreactivity. The absence of an Ab response to B6.H-2bm12 allografts may also be indicative of the absence of T cells activated through the indirect alloantigen presentation pathway, which is proposed to be a major factor initiating alloantigen-specific Ab responses (38, 39). Consistent with this, we have been unable to detect an indirect T cell response in C57BL/6 recipients of B6.H-2bm12 heart or skin allografts to peptides incorporating the 3-aa substitutions of I-Abm12 or by immunizing C57BL/6 mice with the peptides (S. Schenk, unpublished results). The response to B6.H-2bm12 allografts by C57BL/6 recipients appears to be stimulated entirely through the direct alloantigen presentation pathway, which may also limit the number of effector T cells primed in response to the allograft. The low-level T cell response to B6.H-2bm12 skin and cardiac allografts might be indicative of a restricted repertoire of alloreactive T cells to the I-Abm12 alloantigen. However, rigorous investigation of the TCR repertoires expressed by B6.H-2bm12-reactive T cells indicates a diverse population of T cells generated in response to the single class II MHC disparity (40).

Collectively, the data of the current report provide new insights into factors that control the size of the T cell repertoire posttransplant. The effector T cell response induced to B6.H-2bm12 grafts under normal conditions is relatively low in number, well below that required to reject heart allografts but high enough to reject a smaller skin allograft. The B6.H-2bm12-reactive T cells are primed to express a pathogenic phenotype but cannot be amplified effectively, and the development of these effector T cells is not sustained. The number of induced effector cells posttransplant is theoretically dependent on the precursor frequency, the proinflammatory signals that activate the innate immune system subsequently amplifying the adaptive response, and the presence or absence of factors that regulate T cell expansion and function. The low precursor frequency cannot solely account for the lack of rejection because the number of alloreactive T cells can be increased significantly. Our data clearly show that naturally developing regulatory T cells are capable of limiting the expansion of transplant-reactive T cells in this strain combination. Interference with the presence or function of CD4+CD25+ T cells leads to a significant expansion of proinflammatory antidonor T cells and precipitates rejection of the heart allografts. These results suggest that, following transplantation, both pathogenic and regulatory T cells are activated. If the alloreactive T cell repertoire is not too large, the regulatory T cells have the capability to control the expansion of the pathogenic effector T cells and limit the extent and duration of T cell infiltration into the allograft.


    Disclosures
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 
The authors have no financial conflict of interest.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI40459 and AI51620 (to R.L.F.), AI37691, AI41521, and AI43626 (to L.A.T.), and AI43578 (to P.S.H.). Back

2 L.A.T. and R.L.F. share senior authorship of this work. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Robert L. Fairchild, NB3-79, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195-0001. E-mail address: fairchr{at}ccf.org Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; MST, median survival time. Back

Received for publication August 31, 2004. Accepted for publication November 24, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosures
 References
 

  1. Rosenberg, A. S., A. Singer. 1993. Cellular basis of skin allograft rejection: an in vivo model of immune-mediated tissue destruction. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:333.
  2. Sho, M., A. Yamada, N. Najafian, A. D. Salama, H. Harada, S. E. Sandner, A. Sanchez-Fueyo, X. X. Zheng, T. B. Strom, M. H. Sayegh. 2002. Physiological mechanisms of regulating alloimmunity: cytokines, CTLA-4, CD25+ cells, and the alloreactive T cell clone size. J. Immunol. 169:3744.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Watarai, Y., S. Koga, D. R. Paolone, R. M. Engeman, C. Tannenbaum, T. A. Hamilton, R. L. Fairchild. 2000. Intra-allograft chemokine RNA and protein during rejection of MHC-matched/multiple minor histocompatibility-disparate skin grafts. J. Immunol. 164:6027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Koga, S., M. B. Auerbach, T. M. Engeman, A. C. Novick, H. Toma, R. L. Fairchild. 1999. T cell infiltration into class II MHC-disparate allografts and acute rejection is dependent on the IFN-{gamma} induced chemokine Mig. J. Immunol. 163:4878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Yun, J. J., M. P. Fischbein, D. Whiting, Y. Irie, M. C. Fishbein, M. A. Burdick, J. A. Belperio, R. M. Strieter, H. Laks, J. A. Berliner, A. Ardehali. 2002. The role of MIG/CXCL9 in cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 161:1307.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. McKenzie, I. F. C., G. M. Morgan, M. S. Sanderin, M. M. Michaelides, R. W. Melvold, H. I. Kohn. 1979. B6.C.H-2bm12: a new H-2 mutation in the I region in the mouse. J. Exp. Med. 150:1323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Mengle-Gaw, L., S. Conner, H. O. McDevitt, C. G. Fathman. 1984. Gene conversion between murine class II major histocompatibility complex loci: functional and molecular evidence from the bm12 mutant. J. Exp. Med. 160:1184.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Benichou, G., A. Valujskikh, P. S. Heeger. 1999. Contributions of direct and indirect alloreactivity during allograft rejection in mice. J. Immunol. 162:352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jones, N. D., S. E. Turvey, A. van Maurik, M. Hara, C. I. Kingsley, C. H. Smith, A. L. Mellor, P. J. Morris, K. J. Wood. 2001. Differential susceptibility of heart, skin, and islet allografts to T cell-mediated rejection. J. Immunol. 166:2824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. He, C., S. Schenk, Q.-W. Zhang, A. Valujskikh, J. Bayer, R. L. Fairchild, P. S. Heeger. 2004. Effects of T cell frequency and graft size on transplant outcome in mice. J. Immunol. 172:240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Busch, D. H., I. M. Pilip, S. Vijh, E. G. Pamer. 1998. Coordinate regulation of complex T cell populations responding to bacterial infection. Immunity 8:353.[Medline]
  12. Blattman, J. N., R. Antia, D. J. Sourdive, X. Wang, S. M. Kaech, K. Murali-Krishna, J. D. Altman, R. Ahmed. 2002. Estimating the precursor frequency of naive antigen-specific CD8 T cells. J. Exp. Med. 195:657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wong, P., E. G. Pamer. 2003. CD8 T cell responses to infectious pathogens. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21:29.[Medline]
  14. Billingham, R. E., P. B. Medawar. 1951. The technique of free skin grafting in mammals. J. Exp. Biol. 28:385.[Abstract]
  15. Corry, R. J., H. J. Winn, P. S. Russell. 1973. Primarily vascularized allografts of hearts in mice. Transplantation 16:343.[Medline]
  16. Zhang, Q.-W., D. D. Kish, R. L. Fairchild. 2003. Absence of allograft ICAM-1 attenuates alloantigen-specific T cell priming, but not primed T cell trafficking into the graft, to mediate acute rejection. J. Immunol. 170:5530.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Larsen, C. P., R. M. Steinman, M. Witmer-Pack, D. F. Hankins, P. J. Morris, J. M. Austyn. 1990. Migration and maturation of Langerhans cells in skin transplants and explants. J. Exp. Med. 172:1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Richters, C. D., E. van Gelderop, J. S. du Pont, M. J. Hoekstra, R. W. Kreis, E. W. Kamperdijk. 1999. Migration of dendritic cells to the draining lymph node after allogeneic or congenic rat skin transplantation. Transplantation 67:828.[Medline]
  19. Read, S., V. Malmstrom, F. Powrie. 2000. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25+CD4+ regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J. Exp. Med. 192:295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Takahashi, T., T. Tagami, S. Yamazaki, T. Uede, J. Shimizu, N. Sakaguchi, T. W. Mak, S. Sakaguchi. 2000. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells constitutively expressing cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. J. Exp. Med. 192:303.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Chambers, C. A., M. S. Kuhns, J. G. Egen, J. P. Allison. 2001. CTLA-4-mediated inhibition in regulation of T cell responses: mechanisms and manipulation in tumor immunotherapy. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19:565.[Medline]
  22. Salomon, B., J. A. Bluestone. 2001. Complexities of CD28/B7:CTLA-4 costimulatory pathways in autoimmunity and transplantation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19:225.[Medline]
  23. Hall, B. M., N. W. Pearce, K. E. Gurley, S. E. Dorsch. 1990. Specific unresponsiveness in rats with prolonged cardiac allograft survival after treatment with cyclosporine. III. Further characterization of the CD4+ suppressor cells and its mechanism of action. J. Exp. Med. 171:141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Graca, L., S. Thompson, C. Y. Lin, E. Adams, S. P. Cobbold, H. Waldmann. 2002. Both CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25 regulatory cells mediate dominant transplantation tolerance. J. Immunol. 168:5558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kingsley, C. I., M. Karim, A. Bushell, K. J. Wood. 2002. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells prevent graft rejection: CTLA-4- and IL-10-dependent immunoregulation of alloresponses. J. Immunol. 168:1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sanchez-Fueyo, A., M. Weber, C. Domenig, T. B. Strom, X. X. Zheng. 2002. Tracking the immunoregulatory mechanisms active during allograft tolerance. J. Immunol. 168:2274.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sakaguchi, S., N. Sakaguchi, M. Asano, M. Itoh, M. Toda. 1995. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor {alpha}-chains (CD25): breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155:1151.[Abstract]
  28. Furtado, G. C., M. A. C. de Lafaille, N. Kutchukhidze, J. J. Lafaille. 2002. Interleukin 2 signaling is required for CD4+ regulatory T cell function. J. Exp. Med. 196:851.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Murakami, M., A. Sakamoto, J. Bender, J. Kappler, P. Marrack. 2002. CD25+CD4+ T cells contribute to the control of memory CD8+ T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:8832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Refaeli, Y., L. Van Parijs, C. A. London, J. Tschopp, A. K. Abbas. 1998. Biochemical mechanisms of IL-2-regulated Fas-mediated T cell apoptosis. Immunity 8:615.[Medline]
  31. Cozzo, C., J. I. Larkin, A. J. Caton. 2003. Self-peptides drive the peripheral expansion of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 171:5678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Klein, L., K. Khazaie, H. von Boehmer. 2003. In vivo dynamics of antigen-specific regulatory T cells not predicted from behavior in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:8886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Suvas, S., U. Kumaraguru, C. D. Pack, S. Lee, B. T. Rouse. 2003. CD4+CD25+ T cells regulate virus-specific primary and memory CD8+ T cell responses. J. Exp. Med. 198:889.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Walker, L. S. K., A. Chodos, M. Eggena, H. Dooms, A. K. Abbas. 2003. Antigen-dependent proliferation of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 198:249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yamazaki, S., T. Iyoda, K. Tarbell, K. Olson, K. Velinzon, K. Inaba, R. M. Steinman. 2003. Direct expansion of functional CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells by antigen-processing dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 198:235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zheng, X. X., A. Sanchez-Fueyo, M. Sho, C. Domenig, M. H. Sayegh, T. B. Strom. 2003. Favorably tipping the balance between cytopathic and regulatory T cells to create transplantation tolerance. Immunity 19:503.[Medline]
  37. Lafuse, W. P., J. F. McCormick, R. W. Melvold, C. S. David. 1981. Serological and biochemical analysis of Ia molecules in the I-A mutant B6.C-H2bm12. Transplantation 31:434.[Medline]
  38. Steele, D. J., T. M. Laufer, S. T. Smiley, Y. Ando, M. J. Grusby, L. H. Glimcher, H. Auchincloss. 1996. Two levels of help for B cell alloantibody production. J. Exp. Med. 183:699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Sauve, D., M. Bratin, C. Leduc, K. Bonin, C. Daniel. 2004. Alloantibody production is regulated by CD4+ T cells’ alloreactive pathway, rather than precursor frequency or Th1/Th2 differentiation. Am. J. Transplant. 4:1237.[Medline]
  40. Bill, J., J. Yague, V. B. Appel, J. White, G. Horn, H. A. Erlich, E. Palmer. 1989. Molecular genetic analysis of 178 I-Abm12 reactive T cells. J. Exp. Med. 169:115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. Shimizu and R. N. Mitchell
The Role of Chemokines in Transplant Graft Arterial Disease
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2008; 28(11): 1937 - 1949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Nozaki, J. M. Rosenblum, D. Ishii, K. Tanabe, and R. L. Fairchild
CD4 T Cell-Mediated Rejection of Cardiac Allografts in B Cell-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol., October 15, 2008; 181(8): 5257 - 5263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. M. Porrett, X. Yuan, D. F. LaRosa, P. T. Walsh, J. Yang, W. Gao, P. Li, J. Zhang, J. M. Ansari, W. W. Hancock, et al.
Mechanisms Underlying Blockade of Allograft Acceptance by TLR Ligands
J. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 181(3): 1692 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. T. Schnickel, S. Bastani, G. R. Hsieh, A. Shefizadeh, R. Bhatia, M. C. Fishbein, J. Belperio, and A. Ardehali
Combined CXCR3/CCR5 Blockade Attenuates Acute and Chronic Rejection
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4714 - 4721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
L. Codarri, L. Vallotton, D. Ciuffreda, J.-P. Venetz, M. Garcia, K. Hadaya, L. Buhler, S. Rotman, M. Pascual, and G. Pantaleo
Expansion and tissue infiltration of an allospecific CD4+CD25+CD45RO+IL-7R{alpha}high cell population in solid organ transplant recipients
J. Exp. Med., July 9, 2007; 204(7): 1533 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
D. D. Kish, A. V. Gorbachev, and R. L. Fairchild
Regulatory function of CD4+CD25+ T cells from Class II MHC-deficient mice in contact hypersensitivity responses
J. Leukoc. Biol., July 1, 2007; 82(1): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. J. A. Coenen, H. J. P. M. Koenen, E. van Rijssen, L. Boon, I. Joosten, and L. B. Hilbrands
CTLA-4 Engagement and Regulatory CD4+CD25+ T Cells Independently Control CD8+-Mediated Responses under Costimulation Blockade
J. Immunol., May 1, 2006; 176(9): 5240 - 5246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S. G. Zheng, L. Meng, J. H. Wang, M. Watanabe, M. L. Barr, D. V. Cramer, J. D. Gray, and D. A. Horwitz
Transfer of regulatory T cells generated ex vivo modifies graft rejection through induction of tolerogenic CD4+CD25+ cells in the recipient
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 18(2): 279 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. J. A. Coenen, H. J. P. M. Koenen, E. van Rijssen, L. B. Hilbrands, and I. Joosten
Rapamycin, and not cyclosporin A, preserves the highly suppressive CD27+ subset of human CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells
Blood, February 1, 2006; 107(3): 1018 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Sanchez-Fueyo, S. Sandner, A. Habicht, C. Mariat, J. Kenny, N. Degauque, X. X. Zheng, T. B. Strom, L. A. Turka, and M. H. Sayegh
Specificity of CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T Cell Function in Alloimmunity
J. Immunol., January 1, 2006; 176(1): 329 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schenk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schenk, S.
Right arrow Articles by Fairchild, R. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS