| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; and Walther Cancer Institute, Indianapolis, IN 46208
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
was relatively unaffected by modulations in AP-1 activity. These data indicate that we have identified a novel regulatory element that can specifically activate transcription of the IL-10 gene in Th2 cells via the AP-1/Jun pathway. |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-12, as well as IL-2 and IFN-. The critical role for IL-10 in controlling inflammation is exemplified by IL-10–/– mice, which develop inflammatory bowel disease (2). Additionally, multiple studies have shown roles for IL-10 in suppressing the immune response to infectious disease and suppressing the development of autoimmune disease (1). Overall, the role of IL-10 appears to be to limit the effect of proinflammatory cytokines to prevent damage to the host and to maintain self-tolerance. IL-10 was initially described as a product of Th2 cells; however, subsequent work has shown that IL-10 is produced by multiple cell types of hemopoietic and nonhemopoietic origin, including Th1 cells, Tr1 cells, NKT cells, B cells, macrophages, keratinocytes, and carcinoma cell lines (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Despite the fact that Th2 cells can produce high levels of IL-10, little is known about the control of IL-10 transcription and gene expression specifically in Th2 cells. IL-10 expression is controlled at both the transcriptional and the post-transcriptional levels (10, 11, 12), yet neither mode of regulation has been examined in Th2 cells. Transcriptional regulation of the IL-10 promoter has been examined primarily in the mouse macrophage cell line RAW264.7 and the mouse thymoma cell line EL4 (10, 11). Two separate studies have shown that the only essential element of the mouse IL-10 promoter is a single Sp1/Sp3 site (10, 11). Because Sp1/Sp3 proteins are ubiquitous, the mechanism controlling IL-10 expression in different cell types is not clear. Moreover, it is not clear whether a single Sp1/Sp3 site in the IL-10 promoter is sufficient for driving high level IL-10 expression in Th2 cells. Aside from the IL-10 promoter, distal control regions, such as enhancers, have not been described for IL-10.
In this study we have investigated the expression and regulation of IL-10 in conventional Th2 cells as well as in NKT cells, which also produce Th2 cytokines. We have found little evidence for post-transcriptional regulation of IL-10 mRNA, and we found that the IL-10 promoter is not inducible in Th2 cells. We have identified a novel regulatory region, the conserved noncoding sequence-3 (CNS-3)4 region, which can confer PMA plus ionomycin (P/I) inducibility to the IL-10 promoter. This element binds Jun proteins specifically in Th2 cells. Our study therefore reveals that the CNS-3 element connects transcriptional activation by Jun/AP-1 proteins to the regulation of IL-10 in Th2 cells.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The D10.G4.1 Th2 clone and RAW264.7 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection. The Th1 clone AE7 was obtained from Dr. G. Siu (Columbia University, New York, NY). The EL4 thymoma and NIH-3T3 cells were derived from the laboratory of Dr. L. Staudt, National Cancer Institute. Primary Th1 and Th2 cells were derived as previously described (13). Primary NKT cells were obtained by sorting NK1.1+TCR
+ cells from liver mononuclear cells as previously described (14). Freshly isolated NKT cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 Ab and expanded as previously described (15).
Analysis of IL-10 expression and mRNA stability
RNA and cDNA were prepared as previously described (16) from cells either left untreated or stimulated with PMA (10 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) plus ionomycin (0.3 µM; Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h. RT-PCRs were run for 25 cycles to ensure linear amplification. All oligonucleotides (oligos) were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technologies.
The following are primer sequences for RT-PCRs: IL-10, 5'-CTATGCTGCCTGCTCTTACTGAC-3' and 5'-CGGAGAGAGGTACAAACGAGG-3'; -tubulin, 5'-CAGGCCGGACAGTGTGGCAAC –3' and 5'-GGCTTCATTATAGTACACAGAGATTCG –3'; and IFN-, 5'-TAGCCAAGACTGTGATTGCGG-3' and 5'-AGCAGATTATTTGTCATTCGG-3'.
For mRNA stability, actinomycin D (10 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) was added to cells either left untreated or stimulated with PMA (20 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (0.3 µM) for 4 h. RNA was prepared from the cells at various time points after actinomycin D treatment, and cDNA was synthesized and analyzed for IL-10 and GAPDH mRNA levels by real-time PCR. Quantitative real-time RT-PCRs were conducted on an ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using a SuperScript III Two-Step qRT-PCR Kit with SYBR Green (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and following the manufacturer’s protocols.
The primers for IL-10 were 5'-ATGCTCCTAGAGCTGCGGACT-3' and 5'-CCTGCATTAAGGAGTCGGTTAG-3'. The primers for GAPDH were 5'-CCAGGTTGTCTCCTGCGACT-3' and 5'-ATACCAGGAAATGAGCTTGACAAAGT-3'.
IL-10 and GAPDH PCRs were performed in separate wells in triplicate, and the data were averaged. The levels of IL-10 mRNAs were normalized to the levels of GAPDH mRNA.
Luciferase assays and constructs
Luciferase assays were performed on cell lysates from cells electroporated with plasmid constructs as previously described (17). The full-length IL-10 promoter (–1538 to +64) luciferase construct (10) was a gift from Dr. S. Smale (University of California, Los Angeles, CA). The IL-4 promoter luciferase construct was obtained from Dr. M. Kaplan (Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN) and contains 250 bp of the proximal mouse IL-4 promoter. The CNS-3-IL-10 promoter construct was prepared by inserting the CNS-3 DNA fragment into the full-length IL-10 promoter luciferase construct via MluI and XhoI. The CNS-3 fragment was prepared by PCR from mouse genomic DNA and cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen Life Technologies). MluI and XhoI sites were derived from the pCR2.1-TOPO vector. The following primer sequences were used for generation of the mouse CNS-3 element (100 bp in length) by PCR: 5'-GTGGTCATTTTTTCAGTAAGACC-3' and 5'-CCTAACCTTTCATCTCACAG-3'. The AP-1 site (TGACTCA) in the B site of the CNS-3 element was mutated via PCR using the above flanking oligos plus the following internal oligos: sense, 5'-AGTAAGACC-AAGCTTA-CTTCAGTT-3'; and antisense, 5'-AACTGAAG-TAAGCTT-GGTCTTACT-3' (the region of the AP-1 site is separated by dashes, and the mutated AP-1 site bases are indicated by underlining). Electroporation of cell lines for transient expression of luciferase was performed as previously described (17). Electroporation was performed in triplicate, and each experiment was repeated at least once with similar results.
DNase I hypersensitivity assay
The assays for DNase I-hypersensitive sites (DHSSs) on genomic DNA were performed essentially as previously reported (18). Briefly, cells were collected and either left unstimulated or stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 Ab (10 µg/ml; BD Pharmingen; Th1, Th2, and NKT cells) for 3 h or with PMA (20 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (0.3 µM; D10, AE7, and NIH-3T3 cells) for 6 h. After stimulation, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and resuspended in ice-cold reticulocyte standard buffer (RSB; 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, and 5 mM MgCl2). After an equal volume of RSB containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40 was added, cells were homogenized (Dounce; Kontes), then washed in ice-cold RSB and divided into 100-µl aliquots. Each aliquot was treated with 0, 2.5, and 5.0 µg/ml DNase I (Worthington Biochemical) at 37°C for 12 min. Then, an equal volume of 2x stop solution (1% SDS, 20 mM Tris-Cl, 600 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, and 100 µg/ml proteinase K) was added, and cells were incubated at 37°C overnight. Genomic DNA was extracted and purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and digested with SwaI plus XhoI or with EcoRI (all from Roche). Each digest (10 µg/lane) was separated on a 0.8% agarose gel, blotted, and probed with 32P-labeled probes. The probes were designed from the mouse IL-10 gene genomic sequence (GenBank accession no. AL513351 and M84340), generated by PCR, and subcloned using pCR2.1-TOPO vector. Primers for the Eco probe (273 bp) were 5'-TAAGACTTTCCGCTCTAAGACC-3' and 5'-TGCCTATGTCCTCCTTCTCATC-3'. Primers for the 3'-probe (482 bp) were 5'-GCAAGCAAAGACAGAAGCAAAC-3' and 5'-CTGAGGTTTAGGGATCTGAAATG-3'. DHSS assays were repeated several times, and representative experiments are shown in the figure.
CNS analysis
Comparison of CNSs between mouse and human IL-10 genes was performed using the VISTA program (19), located at www-gsd.lbl.gov/vista/.
Gel shifts and oligonucleotides
EMSAs were performed as previously described (16), using 32P-labeled blunt-ended DNA probes formed by annealing two complementary oligos or by PCR from mouse genomic DNA. Polyclonal Abs to c-Jun and JunB as well as control rabbit IgG were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
The CNS-3 number 2 probe used in Fig. 5 is the same 100-bp fragment used for cloning into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector, as described above. The primer sequences used for the generation of other probes in Fig. 5 (via PCR from the cloned CNS-3 probe) are: 
1 (75 bp) probe, 5'-ACTCACTTCAGTTAAAGTAACC-3' and 5'-CCTAACCTTTCATCTCACAG-3'; 2 (50 bp) probe, 5'-GGAAGGAAGTGGGAAGCACC-3' and 5'-CCTAACCTTTCATCTCACAG-3'; 3 (75 bp) probe, 5'-GTGGTCATTTTTTCAGTAAGACC-3' and 5'-GCTTTGGTGCTTCCCACTTCC-3'; 4 (50 bp) probe, 5'-GTGGTCATTTTTTCAGTAAGACC-3' and 5'-GATGGTTACTTTAACTGAAG-3'; and 5 (50 bp) probe, 5'-ACTCACTTCAGTTAAAGTAACC-3' and 5'-GCTTTGGTGCTTCCCACTTCC-3'. The oligo competitors used in Fig. 6 (sense strands alone shown) are: AP-1 consensus (12.5, 25, and 50 ng), 5'-CGCTTGATGACTCAGCCGGAA-3'; and AP-1 mutant (12.5, 25, and 50 ng), 5'-CGCTTGATGACTTGGCCGGAA-3'. Each gel shift assay was repeated at least once; representative results are shown in the figure.
|
|
The CHIP assay was performed essentially as previously described (20), with the same Abs used for supershift analysis above. CNS-3 DNA was detected by PCR with the same primers as used to prepare the CNS-3 number 2 probe in Fig. 5. PCR products (100 bp) were analyzed on a 3% agarose gel. CNS-1 DNA (a 100-bp product) was detected by PCR with the following primers: 5'-AATTCCACATTGGCTGTCCAGC-3' and 5'-AGGATTATGCAAACCGGATTG-3'.
Retrovirus infection
The c-Jun- and JunB-expressing retroviruses were constructed by inserting c-Jun and JunB cDNAs (17) into the retroviral vector pMIEG3 (16) via NotI and XhoI sites. The Jun dominant negative vector was made by first preparing a version of c-Jun with the first 122 aa deleted. This cDNA was amplified by PCR from human c-Jun (17) with the following primers: sense, 5'-AAAAAA-GAATTC-ATGACTAGCCAGAACACGCTGCCCAGCGTC-3'; and antisense, 5'-AAAAAA-GAATTTC-TCAGCTGGCATAGTCAGGCACGTCATAAGGATAGCTAAATGTTTGCAAC-3'. The antisense primer adds an hemagglutinin tag to the C terminus of c-Jun. The PCR product was then cut with EcoRI and cloned into the retroviral vector pMIEG3.
Mouse T cells were infected and sorted for GFP expression as previously described (21). Each individual retrovirus infection was performed with 20 million Con A-infected T cells, and the percent infection was 5–10%. At least one million retrovirus-infected cells of each type were sorted for analysis. The sorted T cells were activated with anti-CD3 Ab, and supernatants were measured for IL-10 and IFN- levels by ELISA as previously described (21).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Previous studies of the regulation of IL-10 expression in T cells have used EL4 thymoma cells, which are considerably different from mature CD4 Th cells (10, 11). We therefore compared the expression of IL-10 mRNA in a cloned Th2 cell line, D10, with IL-10 mRNA produced by EL4 cells and the cloned Th1 cell line AE7. Before and after stimulation of the cells with P/I, IL-10 mRNA expression was assayed by RT-PCR (Fig. 1A). After stimulation, D10 Th2 cells produced abundant levels of IL-10 mRNA, whereas IL-10 mRNA was barely detected in EL4 cells. The AE7 Th1 cell line did not produce detectable IL-10 mRNA. Both EL4 and AE7 produced elevated IFN- mRNA after P/I stimulation. These data show that IL-10 is expressed in Th2 cells at very high levels compared with other types of T cells. To verify that the pattern of IL-10 expression seen in the cloned Th1 (AE7) and Th2 (D10) cell lines is representative of normal Th1 and Th2 cells, we assayed for IL-10 mRNA expression in primary T cells that were cultured under Th1 or Th2 skewing conditions. Because IL-10 is also produced by NKT cells, we examined IL-10 expression in primary NKT cells isolated from liver. We found that IL-10 was produced at very high levels by primary Th2 cells, at even higher levels by NKT cells, and not at all by primary Th1 cells (Fig. 1A). Both primary Th1 and NKT cells produced elevated IFN- mRNA after CD3 stimulation. We concluded from these data that the D10 cell line, primary Th2 cells, and NKT cells all express similar high levels of IL-10 mRNA after stimulation.
|
Because P/I stimulation increases IL-10 transcription in Th2 cells, we analyzed the ability of P/I stimulation to activate transcription from the IL-10 promoter. For this analysis, we used the full-length (1538-bp) IL-10 promoter previously found to have full activity in EL4 and RAW264.7 cells (10, 11). When a luciferase construct driven by this IL-10 promoter was electroporated into D10 cells, we found that P/I treatment did not stimulate transcription from the full-length IL-10 promoter; rather, P/I treatment repressed the promoter activity to a significant degree (Fig. 2). In contrast, the IL-4 promoter was activated over 10-fold after P/I stimulation of D10 cells. These data indicate that the IL-10 promoter is not activated by P/I stimulation, and that the induction of IL-10 mRNA after P/I stimulation requires regulatory elements outside the IL-10 promoter. We therefore decided to look for distal regulatory regions in the IL-10 gene that could drive the high level of IL-10 transcription in Th2 cells.
|
To locate distal regulatory regions in the IL-10 gene, we analyzed the IL-10 gene locus for the presence of DHSSs, because these sites typically denote the altered chromatin found at regulatory regions of a gene. We initially characterized the presence of IL-10 DHSSs in D10 cells and found one strong DHSS, DHSS I, in unstimulated D10 cells and a second DHSS, DHSS II, that was induced in P/I-stimulated cells (Fig. 3). Both IL-10 DHSSs I and II were also observed in AE7 Th1 cells and primary NKT cells, but were not found in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts, indicating that the IL-10 DHSSs are cell type specific and possibly restricted to T cells. The IL-10 DHSS II showed a variable level of expression; it was induced in D10 cells after P/I stimulation, but was present in both unstimulated and stimulated AE7 and NKT cells. These data indicate that the IL-10 gene chromatin is modified in cells that transcribe IL-10, and that this modification can be induced by cellular activation in the case of DHSS II. These two DHSSs in the IL-10 gene mark potential regulatory regions for control of IL-10 gene transcription.
|
With the availability of the complete sequences of the mouse and human genomes, novel regulatory regions can be found by the identification of CNSs. CNSs are regions of high sequence identity between mouse and human DNA found outside of gene-coding regions. CNS analysis has been successful in the identification of an important regulatory region, CNS-1, that controls expression of the Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 (22, 23). We therefore wondered whether the identification of CNS regions in the mouse and human IL-10 genes would lead to the discovery of novel IL-10 regulatory elements. With the VISTA computer program (19), we aligned the mouse and human IL-10 genes to find highly conserved regions of DNA (Fig. 4). Using a cut-off of 75% sequence identity or higher, we identified four CNS regions in the IL-10 gene excluding the promoter region. CNS-3, located 
1 kb downstream of the IL-10-transcribed region, showed the greatest homology between mouse and human IL-10 genes, with 84% sequence identity (Fig. 4). Strikingly, CNS-3 localizes to approximately the same region of DNA (within 200 bp) as the DHSS I site we observed in the IL-10 gene.
|
From our previous data, we hypothesized that CNS-3 participated in the control of IL-10 expression in Th2 cells. We therefore tested whether CNS-3 DNA could bind to nuclear factors expressed in Th2 cells using a gel-shift assay (Fig. 5). We found three protein complexes (A, B, an C) in D10 Th2 cell extracts that bound strongly to the CNS-3 probe. We next characterized these CNS-3 binding factors A, B, and C by systematically deleting the CNS-3 probe to localize which regions of DNA bound the different factors. Using nuclear extracts from D10 cells, we localized factors A, B, and C to discrete regions of CNS-3 (Fig. 5). Factor B was of particular interest, because its expression increased after P/I stimulation. We then identified a canonical AP-1 site in the middle of the CNS-3B binding region (Fig. 6). Using a gel-shift competition assay, we assessed whether the AP-1 site is important for binding of factor CNS-3B. We were able to strongly compete away CNS-3B binding with an unlabeled consensus AP-1 binding site probe, but not an unlabeled probe containing a mutated AP-1 site (Fig. 6, lanes 1–7). These data strongly suggested that the CNS-3B binding factors were AP-1 or AP-1-like proteins. Next, we used Abs to c-Jun and JunB, AP-1 proteins expressed in activated T cells, to determine whether the CNS-3B DNA binding complex contained c-Jun or JunB (Fig. 6, lanes 8–11). We found that the CNS-3B complex contained both c-Jun and JunB. Although anti-c-Jun Ab strongly augmented the CNS-3B gel-shift band, this effect appeared to be nonspecific, because control IgG caused the same effect (Fig. 6, lanes 10 and 11). Because Abs to c-Jun and JunB only shifted a fraction of the CNS-3B band, it is likely that the CNS-3B complex contains other AP-1 or AP-1-like proteins as well.
Next we tested whether c-Jun and JunB bind to the CNS-3 region in vivo. We therefore performed CHIP from primary Th2 and primary Th1 cells with control IgG, anti-c-Jun, and JunB Abs (Fig. 7). We found that both c-Jun and JunB bind to the CNS-3 region in Th2 cells, but not in Th1 cells. Although binding of c-Jun and JunB was weakly observed in unstimulated Th2 cells, the binding was greatly enhanced by P/I stimulation, consistent with the idea that the levels of these factors increase upon P/I stimulation. CHIP of c-Jun and JunB did not bring down the IL-10 CNS-1 region, which does not contain an AP-1 site, showing specificity to the binding of these proteins. Because Th1 cells express both c-Jun and JunB (data not shown), the fact that these proteins do not bind to the CNS-3 region in Th1 cells suggests there is a Th2 cell-specific mechanism that controls binding of Jun proteins to CNS-3 DNA in vivo.
|
We next tested whether the CNS-3 element we characterized was capable of activating transcription. We constructed a luciferase construct with the CNS-3 element cloned upstream of the 1.5-kb IL-10 promoter. When electroporated into D10, cells we found that in contrast to the IL-10 promoter alone, the CNS-3-IL-10 promoter construct was able to stimulate transcription in response to P/I by >2-fold (Fig. 8A). These data indicate that the CNS-3 element can mediate activation of IL-10 expression in Th2 cells after P/I stimulation. Mutating the AP-1 site in the CNS-3 element destroyed the ability of this element to activate transcription, showing the key nature of the AP-1 site. We next tested the ability of Jun proteins to activate the IL-10 promoter, with and without the CNS-3 element (Fig. 8B). Luciferase expression plasmids were electroporated into D10 cells along with either c-Jun or JunB expression plasmids in the absence of P/I stimulation. Similar to what we observed with the IL-10 promoter alone after P/I stimulation, the IL-10 promoter alone was repressed significantly by both c-Jun and JunB proteins. In contrast, the CNS-3-IL-10 promoter construct was activated significantly by the expression of c-Jun and JunB. The expression of JunB led to greater activation than that of c-Jun, which is consistent with the greater binding of JunB to the CNS-3 element detected by CHIP. JunB therefore either may bind to the CNS-3 AP-1 site more efficiently than c-Jun or may cooperate with other factors more effectively in terms of transcriptional activation.
|
by ELISA (Fig. 9A). We found that overexpression of either c-Jun or JunB in primary T cells increased IL-10 expression by several-fold, whereas IFN- expression was increased <2-fold. When the increase in IL-10 was calculated relative to IFN-, c-Jun and JunB proteins were able to activate IL-10 expression by 4-fold (Fig. 9B). We could not detect IL-4 expression from any of the retrovirus-infected T cells (data not shown), suggesting that the increase in IL-10 expression was not secondary to increased Th2 differentiation driven by the Jun proteins. Although JunB can promote Th2 differentiation in a transgenic system (24), JunB does not have this function in our retrovirus system. This may be due to the fact that IL-4 expression activated by JunB is particularly important during the earliest stages of T cell activation, whereas JunB is introduced at a later stage of T cell activation with the retrovirus system. In addition, in the retrovirus infection system, any IL-4 expression induced by JunB in the small percentage of retrovirus-infected cells may be diluted out among noninfected cells, thus greatly lowering the functional level of IL-4 to which the JunB retrovirus is exposed. Thus, we can conclude that c-Jun and JunB do not activate IL-10 expression by promoting Th2 differentiation.
|
expression was not significantly affected by inhibiting AP-1 activity.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Jun/AP-1 proteins have been implicated as important regulators of Th2 cytokine expression and differentiation (24, 27). AP-1 transcriptional activity is increased in Th2 cells compared with Th1 cells, and the AP-1 protein JunB is expressed at higher levels in Th2 cells than Th1 cells (24, 27). Moreover, JunB has been shown to cooperate with c-Maf in promoting IL-4 transcription in T cells (24). Transgenic expression of JunB could promote IL-4 expression in T cells even in the presence of Th1-polarizing conditions (24). The same study also showed that transgenic JunB increased IL-10 expression in T cells in the presence of Th1-polarizing conditions (24). Thus, these data on JunB and IL-10 fit well with our findings that Jun/AP-1 proteins can promote the expression of IL-10. Moreover, because JunB is up-regulated in Th2 cells, this helps to explain why IL-10 is expressed at much higher levels in Th2 cells than in Th1 cells. Jun/AP-1 proteins can therefore be seen as critical positive regulators of two key Th2 cytokines: IL-4 and IL-10.
Our results also show that the identification of DHSSs and CNS elements has strong utility in finding regulatory regions of cytokine genes. Transcriptional regulation of the key cytokine, IL-4, has benefited greatly from analysis of DHSS (18, 28, 29). Studies of IL-4 gene regulation also led to the identification of a critical CNS between the IL-4 and IL-13 genes, CNS-1, which was identified as a coordinate regulator of Th2 cytokines (22, 23). In this study we have identified two previously unknown DHSS in the mouse IL-10 gene that are likely to participate in the control of IL-10 transcription. We have also identified four CNS regions in the IL-10 gene. Similar to the CNS-1 region in the IL-4/IL-13 locus (22, 23), the IL-10 CNS-3 overlaps with the site of a strong DHSS. By analogy with the IL-4/IL-13 CNS-1, the IL-10 CNS-3 region is likely to participate in the control of IL-10 transcription. Although the IL-4/IL-13 CNS-1 element did not activate transcription in a transient transfection assay (22), the CNS-1 is extremely important in the context of genomic DNA, as revealed by both transgenic and knockout approaches. CNS-1 probably plays an important role in controlling the structure of chromatin around the IL-4 and IL-13 genes. In contrast to the IL-4/IL-13 CNS-1, the IL-10 CNS-3 element is able to activate transcription in a transient transfection assay. We have found that the isolated CNS-3B element can activate transcription in a transient transfection assay, whereas the isolated CNS-3A and CNS-3C elements cannot (data not shown). Thus, the transcriptional activity of the CNS-3 element is most likely due to the canonical AP-1 binding site localized to the CNS-3B binding region. However, the CNS-3A and CNS-3C elements may still contribute to CNS-3 function, such as through modification of chromatin, similar to the IL-4/IL-13 CNS-1 element. A full analysis of CNS-3 function will therefore require identification of the CNS-3A and CNS-3C binding factors as well as transgenic and knockout experiments.
Previously we found that the transcriptional repressor BCL-6 regulates IL-10 in T cells (21). IL-10 is increased in BCL-6–/– T cells, and BCL-6 can repress IL-10 expression when expressed by retrovirus in primary T cells. However, little was known about the regulation of IL-10 expression in T cells, and we did not understand the mechanism for repression of IL-10 by BCL-6. With the results of this study, however, we have a potential mechanism for the regulation of IL-10 expression by BCL-6 in T cells. In a separate study we found that BCL-6 inhibits transcriptional activation by AP-1 proteins (17). Thus, BCL-6 may inhibit IL-10 expression by dampening AP-1-mediated activation of IL-10 transcription. This idea is strengthened by the finding that IL-10 is up-regulated even in BCL-6–/–Stat6–/– T cells (21), which implies that BCL-6 regulates IL-10 by a mechanism independent of the Th2 regulatory factor Stat6.
Although this study has revealed new mechanisms for the control of IL-10 by Th2 cells, much work remains for understanding how IL-10 transcription is regulated. Specifically, future work will focus on the in vivo function of the CNS-3 element as well as other CNS elements in the IL-10 gene.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant AI46410. A.L.D. receives support from the Indiana Genomics Initiative (INGEN) of Indiana University. INGEN is supported in part by Lilly Endowment, Inc. 
2 Z.-Y.W. and H.S. contributed equally to this work and therefore share joint-authorship.
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alexander L. Dent, Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Walther Oncology Center, 950 West Walnut Street, R2 302, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202. E-mail: adent2{at}iupui.edu
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: CNS, conserved noncoding sequence; CHIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; DHSS, DNase I-hypersensitive site; P/I, PMA plus ionomycin; oligo, oligonucleotide; RSB, reticulocyte standard buffer.
Received for publication June 28, 2004. Accepted for publication December 2, 2004.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
-galactosylceramide polarizes CD1-reactive NK T cells towards Th2 cytokine synthesis. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:2014.[Medline]
T cells with potent cytotoxicity in the liver of mice via production of IL-12 from Kupffer cells. J. Immunol. 156:2436.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Xu, Y. Yang, G. Qiu, G. Lal, Z. Wu, D. E. Levy, J. C. Ochando, J. S. Bromberg, and Y. Ding c-Maf Regulates IL-10 Expression during Th17 Polarization J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6226 - 6236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Tsuji-Takayama, M. Suzuki, M. Yamamoto, A. Harashima, A. Okochi, T. Otani, T. Inoue, A. Sugimoto, T. Toraya, M. Takeuchi, et al. The Production of IL-10 by Human Regulatory T Cells Is Enhanced by IL-2 through a STAT5-Responsive Intronic Enhancer in the IL-10 Locus J. Immunol., September 15, 2008; 181(6): 3897 - 3905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Chakrabarti, A. J. Sadler, N. Kar, H. A. Young, R. H. Silverman, and B. R. G. Williams Protein Kinase R-dependent Regulation of Interleukin-10 in Response to Double-stranded RNA J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2008; 283(37): 25132 - 25139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Kube, T.-D. Hua, F. von Bonin, N. Schoof, S. Zeynalova, M. Kloss, D. Gocht, B. Potthoff, M. Tzvetkov, J. Brockmoller, et al. Effect of Interleukin-10 Gene Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcome of Patients with Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: An Exploratory Study Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2008; 14(12): 3777 - 3784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. D. Sloan and K. R. Jerome Herpes Simplex Virus Remodels T-Cell Receptor Signaling, Resulting in p38-Dependent Selective Synthesis of Interleukin-10 J. Virol., November 15, 2007; 81(22): 12504 - 12514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Norkina, A. Dolganiuc, T. Shapiro, K. Kodys, P. Mandrekar, and G. Szabo Acute alcohol activates STAT3, AP-1, and Sp-1 transcription factors via the family of Src kinases to promote IL-10 production in human monocytes J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 752 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Dong, C. Ivascu, H.-D. Chang, P. Wu, R. Angeli, L. Maggi, F. Eckhardt, L. Tykocinski, C. Haefliger, B. Mowes, et al. IL-10 Is Excluded from the Functional Cytokine Memory of Human CD4+ Memory T Lymphocytes J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2389 - 2396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Trinchieri Interleukin-10 production by effector T cells: Th1 cells show self control J. Exp. Med., February 19, 2007; 204(2): 239 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. N. Kremer, A. Kumar, and K. E. Hedin Haplotype-Independent Costimulation of IL-10 Secretion by SDF-1/CXCL12 Proceeds via AP-1 Binding to the Human IL-10 Promoter J. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 178(3): 1581 - 1588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. W. Schmidt, V. T. Thieu, B. A. Mann, A.-N. N. Ahyi, and M. H. Kaplan Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Is Required for TLR-Induced IL-10 Production J. Immunol., November 15, 2006; 177(10): 7203 - 7210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. P. Calado, T. Paixao, D. Holmberg, and M. Haury Stochastic Monoallelic Expression of IL-10 in T Cells J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5358 - 5364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Shoemaker, M. Saraiva, and A. O'Garra GATA-3 Directly Remodels the IL-10 Locus Independently of IL-4 in CD4+ T Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3470 - 3479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Chi, S. P. Barry, R. J. Roth, J. J. Wu, E. A. Jones, A. M. Bennett, and R. A. Flavell Dynamic regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines by MAPK phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) in innate immune responses PNAS, February 14, 2006; 103(7): 2274 - 2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Wu, A. Ootani, R. Iwakiri, Y. Sakata, T. Fujise, S. Amemori, F. Yokoyama, S. Tsunada, S. Toda, and K. Fujimoto T Cell Deficiency Leads to Liver Carcinogenesis in Azoxymethane-Treated Rats Experimental Biology and Medicine, January 1, 2006; 231(1): 91 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Jones and R. A. Flavell Distal Enhancer Elements Transcribe Intergenic RNA in the IL-10 Family Gene Cluster J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7437 - 7446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Saraiva{paragraph}, J. R. Christensen, A. V. Tsytsykova, A. E. Goldfeld, S. C. Ley, D. Kioussis, and A. O'Garra Identification of a Macrophage-Specific Chromatin Signature in the IL-10 Locus J. Immunol., July 15, 2005; 175(2): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
4, indicated in Fig. 5
, Titrated levels of the AP-1 and AP-1 mutant competitor probes at 10-, 20-, and 40-fold the amount of labeled AP-1 probe. Lanes 8–11 are supershift analysis with Abs to JunB (lane 9) and c-Jun (lane 10), compared with no Ab (lane 8) and with purified rabbit IgG (lane 11). For unknown reasons, certain IgG preparations nonspecifically augment the AP-1 gel shift.
) or the full-length IL-10 promoter plus the CNS-3B element (lower graph, 
). Luciferase activity was measured after 24 h without P/I stimulation.
