|
|
||||||||



* Department of Pathology, Section of Immunology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; and
Schering-Plough Research Institute, Laboratory for Immunological Research, Dardilly, France
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
through a mechanism dependent on both IL-12 secretion and cell contact between NK cells and myeloid DC, but independent of type I IFN. IL-2-activated NK cells have little to no cytolytic activity for immature myeloid DC and pDC, but are able to induce maturation of these cells. Moreover, IL-2-activated NK cells induce, in the presence of a suboptimal concentration of CpG-containing oligonucleotides, a strong IFN-
and TNF production. These data suggest that the reciprocal functional interaction between NK cells and either pDC or myeloid DC may play an important physiological role in the regulation of both innate resistance and adaptive immunity to infections. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in response to different CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (CpG ODN) and to viruses (4).
NK cells contribute to innate immunity because they can lyse tumor and virus-infected cells (5). Cytolytic activity of NK cells has long been known to be enhanced by IFN-
(6), and type I IFN natural-producing cells (7), now known as pDC (8), have been shown to be required for NK cell-mediated lysis of virus-infected target cells (9). Mouse NK cells have also been shown to be activated by a DC cell line or by in vitro generated bone marrow-derived DC and human NK cells by mature monocyte-derived DC (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15). Recently, it was found that the interaction between NK cells and DC is reciprocal. NK cells are able to induce maturation and functional activation of monocyte-derived DC indicating a complex cross-talk between NK cells and DC that could play an important regulatory role both in innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Depending on the level of activation of NK cells and the ratio of NK cells to DC, NK cells directly induce maturation of monocyte-derived DC or, alternatively, lysis of immature but not mature DC (13, 14). Most of the studies on the NK-DC interaction have, however, been performed using, in human or in the mouse, DC generated in vitro from monocytes or bone marrow precursors in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 and not with freshly isolated DC subsets; thus the ability to speculate on the physiologic significance of these observations has been limited.
In this study we characterized the ability of freshly isolated human peripheral blood pDC and myeloid DC to activate NK cells in response to different microbial stimuli or compounds mimicking them and, reciprocally, the effect of activated NK cells on viability, maturation, and functional activity of pDC and myeloid DC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
PBMC obtained from healthy human donors (provided by Centro Trasfusionale, Policlinico GB Rossi, Verona, Italy) were separated by Ficoll-Paque density gradient centrifugation. pDC were obtained from PBMC by positive magnetic selection with blood DC Ag (BDCA)-4 beads (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified cells were >98% pDC, as evaluated by immunofluorescence with BDCA-2-FITC mAb. Myeloid DC were obtained from PBMC by depletion of CD19+ B lymphocytes and of CD14+ cells with anti-CD19 and anti-CD14 microbeads followed by positive selection with CD1c biotin and antibiotin microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified cells were >98% CD1c+ as evaluated labeling cells with Streptavidin-PE. Monocyte-derived DC were obtained by 5-day culture of plastic adherent PBMC in medium with 12 ng/ml IL-4 (108 U/mg; Schering Plough) and 50 ng/ml GM-CSF (1.1 x 107 U/mg; Schering Plough). NK cells were purified by negative magnetic depletion using anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD19, anti-CD14, anti-CD45RO, and anti-HLA-DR mAb, and goat anti-mouse IgG microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) plus BDCA-4 microbeads. Purified cells were >90% CD16+CD56+ cells. For experiments of cytolytic activity of NK cells cultured with pDC or myeloid DC in the presence of the different stimuli, NK cell preparations were further purified by positive selection using anti-CD56 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified CD4+ T lymphocytes were obtained from PBMC by negative magnetic depletion using anti-CD19, anti-CD14, anti-CD16, anti-CD8 mAb, goat anti-mouse IgG microbeads, and anti-CD56 microbeads. NK cells (0.18 x 106/well) and pDC or myeloid DC (12.5% or as indicated) were cultured in round-bottom microwells with or without the following stimuli: formaldehyde-inactivated human influenza virus (strain Beijing/262/95 kindly provided by N. Kuehn, Aventis Pasteur, Val de Reuil, France) at a final concentration of 40 hemagglutinating U/ml; CpG2216 (GGGGGACGATCGTCGGGGGG) at 10 µg/ml or as indicated (MWG Biotech); CpG2006 (TCGTCGTTTTGTCGTTTTGTCGTT) 10 µg/ml (MWG Biotech); or poly(I:C) at 10 µg/ml (InvivoGen). All these compounds were endotoxin-free (<0.05 IU/mg).
Where indicated pDC were treated with virus for 18 h or pulsed with virus for 1 h and further incubated for additional 18 h. Untreated pDC were kept on ice in 100% FCS. Cells or their supernatant were cultured with NK cells for 18 h. Cultures were set up in the presence or in the absence of the following neutralizing Abs: anti-IFN-
, composed by a mixture of sheep anti-IFN-
and anti-IFN-
abs, plus anti-IFN-
receptor mAb (1.5, 1.5, and 2.5%, respectively, of the commercial preparation; PBL Biomedical Laboratories), anti-TNF (B154.2, ascites 1:200), and anti-IL-12 (C8.6, 20 µg/ml).
IL-2-treated or untreated NK cells or CD4+ T lymphocytes were obtained by 18 h treatment with or without IL-2 (500 U/ml; Chiron), and washed before culture for additional 18 h, with untreated pDC, myeloid DC, monocyte-derived DC or monocyte-derived DC treated for 18 h with LPS (1 µg/ml), at the NK to DC ratio of 2:1, or as indicated. Autologous pDC and myeloid DC were kept for 18 h at 4°C before coculture with NK cells, whereas, where indicated, allogeneic pDC and myeloid DC were used immediately after purification.
To evaluate requirement for direct cell-cell contacts, NK cells and pDC or myeloid DC were cultured together or separated by a 0.4-µm porous membrane (Corning).
Cell-mediated cytotoxicity assay
At the end of an 18-h culture, NK cells cultured alone or with pDC or myeloid DC in the presence or in the absence of the different stimuli, or with virus-treated pDC were incubated at different E:T ratios in U-bottom microtiter plates, with 6 x 103 Daudi cells loaded with 5 µM carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester CFDA-SE (Molecular Probes) for 15 min. After 4 h each sample was resuspended in a final volume of 500 µl of PBS, to which 50 µl of Flow Check fluorospheres (Beckman Coulter) were added. Using the cytofluorimeter, events were acquired for a fixed time and the percentage of killing was calculated using the following equation: [(the number of CFDA-SE+ cells acquired in the control without NK cells) (the number of CFDA-SE+ cells in the sample)]/[(the number of CFDA-SE+ cells in the control)] x 100 (14). The regularity of cytometer flow was checked by the constancy of the Flow Check fluorospheres.
Immunofluorescence
Expression of the Ags CD83, CD80, and CD86 was detected on pDC and on myeloid DC by direct double immunofluorescence and flow cytometry using PE-conjugated anti-CD86 and anti-CD80 mAb (Immunotech; Beckman Coulter) with FITC-conjugated BDCA-2 for pDC or FITC-conjugated anti-DR for myeloid DC, and FITC-conjugated anti-CD83 mAb with PE-conjugated BDCA-2 for pDC or PE-conjugated anti-DR for myeloid DC. Because CD83 and CD86 Ags were spontaneously up-regulated in myeloid DC in culture (data not shown), their evaluation was not included in this study. CD69 Ag expression was detected on CD16+ or CD3+ purified T lymphocytes after 18-h coculture with pDC or myeloid DC in the presence or in the absence of stimuli, or with virus-treated pDC or pDC kept on ice, by double staining with PE-Cy5-conjugated anti-CD69 (Immunotech; Beckman Coulter) mAb and FITC-conjugated anti-CD3 or anti-CD16 mAb.
DC recovery after an 18-h coculture with IL-2-activated NK cells was evaluated as a percentage of DC cultured in the absence of NK cells and in the presence of virus or medium, respectively, for pDC and myeloid DC or monocyte-derived DC, counting the number of BDCA-4+ for pDC, HLA-DR-FITChigh for untreated and GM-CSF + LPS-treated myeloid DC, and by cytometry side scatter and forward scatter parameters for untreated and LPS-treated monocyte-derived DC, in a time unit, in the region of viable cells, as confirmed by propidium iodide incorporation.
Detection of IFN-
, IFN-
, and TNF production
These cytokines were quantitated in cell culture supernatants by ELISA kits (Duoset for IFN-
(R&D Systems); module set for IFN-
(Bender MedSystems); and PeliKine Compact (CLB Systems) for TNF).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although inactivated influenza virus, poly(I:C), CpG2216, or CpG2006 strongly enhanced NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against the NK-resistant Daudi cell line when added to PBMC (Refs.6, 16, 17 and data not shown), culture for 18 h in the presence of these stimuli did not endow purified human peripheral blood NK cells with cytolytic activity (Fig. 1A, left panel). Also, no cytolytic activity was induced in NK cells cocultured with up to 5% pDC or myeloid DC in the absence of other stimuli. However, NK cells cocultured with as few as 0.2% of autologous pDC in the presence of virus (Fig. 1A, middle panel) or of myeloid DC in the presence of poly(I:C) (Fig. 1A, right panel) acquired a strong cytolytic activity. At a concentration of pDC of 5%, poly(I:C), CpG2216, and CpG2006 also induced strong NK cell cytolytic activity. Unlike what was observed with pDC, coculture of NK with up to 5% myeloid DC in the presence of virus, CpG2216, or CpG2006 did not induce lytic activity.
|
(data not shown). High IFN-
production was observed in the supernatant fluid of NK cells cocultured with
1% myeloid DC in the presence of poly(I:C) but not of virus, CpG2216, CpG2006, or in the absence of any stimulus (Fig. 1, B and C). In contrast, IFN-
was almost undetectable in supernatants of NK cells cultured with pDC independently of the stimulus used (Fig. 1B). Activation of NK cells by virus-stimulated pDC depends on type I IFN production
Plasmacytoid DC either cultured for 18 h in the presence of virus and washed (virus-preactivated pDC) or continuously cultured in the presence of virus (Fig. 2, AC) were similarly effective in inducing cytolytic activity in cocultured NK cells. Virus-preactivated pDC also induced a strong CD69 expression in NK cells (Fig. 2E), but not in T lymphocytes (data not shown).
|
We evaluated the role of type I IFN in the induction of CD69 expression and cytolytic activity in NK cells cultured with virus-activated pDC or with their supernatant fluids. A mixture of Abs neutralizing IFN-
, IFN-
, and IFN-
receptor reduced the cytolytic activity induced in NK cells by pDC in the presence of virus (Fig. 2C) and by virus-pretreated pDC (Fig. 2B), and completely inhibited the cytolytic activity induced by the supernatant fluid derived from virus-activated pDC (Fig. 2B). The Abs also completely abrogated CD69 expression induced in NK cells by IFN-
(Fig. 2H), but only reduced CD69 expression induced in NK cells by virus-activated pDC (Fig. 2F) and by their supernatant fluid (Fig. 2G). Whereas TNF by itself did not induce cytolytic activity in NK cells, it increased the cytolytic activity (data not shown) and CD69 expression (Fig. 2I) induced by recombinant IFN-
. The increased cytolytic activity induced by TNF was abrogated by a TNF-neutralizing mAb (data not shown). pDC produced TNF when activated by different stimuli (see Fig. 4) (18). Addition of the TNF-neutralizing mAb to the mixture of type I IFN-neutralizing Abs, however, did not further reduce the cytolytic activity induced by virus-pretreated pDC or by their supernatant fluid (data not shown). In contrast, the anti-TNF mAb, added to the mixture of type I IFN-neutralizing Abs, strongly reduced CD69 expression induced by virus-pretreated pDC (Fig. 2F) and by their supernatant fluid (Fig. 2G). A neutralizing anti-IL-12 mAb had no effect on the augmentation of cytolytic activity (Fig. 2C) or on CD69 expression (data not shown).
|
production depends on IL-12 and cell-to-cell contactMyeloid DC in the presence of poly(I:C) induced a strong CD69 expression in NK cells (Fig. 3A) in addition to increasing their cytolytic activity (Figs. 1A and 3B). Both activating effects were observed when NK cells and myeloid DC were either cultured together or separated by a porous membrane (Fig. 3, A and B, left panels), indicating that soluble factors mediated the activation.
|
The IFN-
production induced in NK cells by coculture with myeloid DC plus poly(I:C) was drastically reduced by the IL-12-neutralizing mAb, whereas the type I IFN-neutralizing Abs had almost no effect (Fig. 3C, right panel). IFN-
production was completely inhibited when NK cells and myeloid DC, in the presence of poly(I:C), were separated by a porous membrane in a transwell plate (Fig. 3C, left panel) indicating that both soluble factors such as IL-12 and cell-to-cell interactions were required for IFN-
induction by poly(I:C).
IL-2-activated NK cells interact with pDC and myeloid DC
As previously reported (13, 19, 20), IL-2-activated NK cells were cytolytic for immature, but not mature monocyte-derived DC (Fig. 4A). However, IL-2-activated NK cells did not lead to any loss in the recovery of autologous or allogeneic pDC cocultured with them (Fig. 4A), indicating that pDC, unlike immature monocyte-derived DC, are resistant to NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity.
Upon culture together with IL-2-activated, but not with untreated NK cells, pDC strongly increased CD83 expression (Fig. 4B, left panel). This increased expression was not observed when cells were cultured separately by porous membrane in a transwell plate (Fig. 4B, right panel). No significant increase in CD86 or CD80 expression was observed (data not shown).
IFN-
production was undetectable in supernatant fluids of pDC cultured alone or with untreated NK cells, and almost undetectable in supernatants of pDC cultured with IL-2-activated NK cells (Fig. 4, C and D). The class A CpG ODN CpG2216 added to purified pDC strongly induced IFN-
production at 10 µg/ml, as expected, but not at submicrogram concentrations. However, IFN-
production was strongly enhanced when pDC were cultured with IL-2-activated NK cells in the presence of suboptimal concentrations of CpG2216 that did not induce any detectable IFN-
in pDC alone (Fig. 4, C and D). IFN-
production in response CpG2216 was only slightly increased when pDC were cultured with resting NK cells or with IL-2-treated T lymphocytes. The class B CpG ODN CpG2006 added to pDC induced a very modest IFN-
production at all the concentrations used. Interestingly, in the presence of IL-2-activated NK, pDC stimulated by 0.20.75 µg/ml CpG2006 produced high levels of IFN-
(Fig. 4C). A strong TNF production was also observed in supernatants of pDC cocultured with IL-2-activated NK cells in the presence of suboptimal amounts of CpG2216 (Fig. 4D). When IL-2-activated NK cells were cultured with pDC separated by a porous membrane, IFN-
(Fig. 4E) and TNF (data not shown) were no longer detected in supernatant fluids.
The presence in culture of IL-2-activated NK cells only reduced slightly the recovery of freshly separated peripheral blood allogeneic myeloid DC at the highest NK cell to DC ratio (Fig. 5A). A loss of both autologous and allogeneic immature myeloid DC, however, was observed when DC were maintained for 18 h at 4°C, and the cytotoxic effect of NK cells was more pronounced on allogeneic than autologous myeloid DC (data not shown). Coculture with IL-2-activated NK cells induced a strong expression of CD80 maturation Ag in myeloid DC (Fig. 5, AC), comparable to the CD80 expression induced by treatment of myeloid DC with GM-CSF and LPS (Fig. 5B, left panel) or poly(I:C) (data not shown). CD80 expression was not increased when myeloid DC were cultured with IL-2-activated NK cells separated by a porous membrane in a transwell plate (Fig. 5B, right panel). NK cells exposed to virus-preactivated pDC were able to induce CD80 expression on myeloid DC similarly to IL-2-activated NK cells (data not shown). Untreated NK cells or either untreated or IL-2-activated CD4+CD56 T lymphocytes did not induce CD80 expression (Fig. 5, B and C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As low as 0.2% pDC, in the presence of inactivated influenza virus or pre-exposed to it, induces in NK cells a strong cytolytic activity against the NK cell-resistant Daudi target cells. This enhancement of NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity is dependent on secretion of type I IFN. In addition to their increased cytotoxic activity against target cell lines, NK cells activated by pDC up-regulated the expression of the CD69 activation Ag and were also able either to lyse or to induce maturation of monocyte-derived DC and peripheral blood myeloid DC. pDC have been shown to be identical with the natural type I IFN producing cells, the rare HLA-DR-positive accessory cells that in human peripheral blood are responsible for type I IFN production in response to most viruses (7, 8). The essential role of IFN-
produced by these HLA-DR-positive accessory cells for the cytolytic activity of NK cells against virus-infected target has been previously demonstrated (9) and these accessory cells have been differentiated from classical peripheral blood DC by conventional gradient separation methods. In this study we definitely discriminate the unique role of highly purified pDC in induction of cytolytic activity of NK cells in response to viral stimulation because the other population of HLA-DR-positive accessory cells in peripheral blood, myeloid DC, although very efficient in inducing cytolytic activity in cocultured NK cells in response to poly(I:C), do not induce cytolytic activity in response to virus.
A requirement for secreted type I IFN was also observed for induction of CD69 expression in NK cells by both pDC and myeloid DC, although for optimal induction TNF also was required. Type I IFN secreted by both pDC and myeloid DC in response to selected stimuli (CpG ODN and poly(I:C), respectively) is required for induction of cytolytic activity of NK cells. A possible role for other cytokines augmenting NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity and potentially produced by DC, such as IL-2, IL-12, IL-15, and TNF was ruled out by the use of neutralizing mAbs (data not shown). No evidence for a major role of direct NK cell-to-DC contact in NK cell activation was found, indicating that pDC and myeloid DC may induce cytolytic activity of NK cells by mechanisms different from those observed in mouse and human monocyte-derived DC that have been reported to require direct cell-to-cell contacts (10, 13, 14, 15). In addition to cellular contacts, cytokines including IL-12 and IL-18, but not type I IFN, have also been suggested to play a role in the generation of the lytic activity of NK cells by monocyte-derived DC (11, 12, 21).
The capacity of pDC and myeloid DC to activate NK cell functions depends on the selectivity of the stimulus for receptors expressed on the DC population. The ability of pDC to produce type I IFN in response to virus is presently attributed to their high expression of TLR9 recognizing DNA viruses and TLR7 recognizing RNA viruses such as influenza virus (4, 22, 23, 24, 25). Productive infection is not required for IFN production by pDC and inactivated virus is effective (26). Both the TLR9 ligands CpG2216 and CpG2006, which have been reported to induce IFN-
and IFN-
production by pDC, although at different amounts and with different kinetics (27), endow these cells with the ability to activate NK cells. The maximal amounts of IFN-
produced by high concentrations of pDC stimulated by CpG2216 are comparable to those produced by pDC stimulated by virus but it is much lower in culture with low pDC concentration (data not shown). Accordingly, in the presence of CpG2216, the number of pDC required to stimulate NK cytolytic activity is higher than in the presence of virus.
Myeloid DC express TLR3, but not TLR9 (4). Indeed, we found that myeloid DC, even at a very low DC to NK cell ratio, induce cytolytic activity and IFN-
production in NK cells when stimulated by the TLR3 ligand poly(I:C), but not by TLR9 ligands. Thus, in the presence of a selective stimulus, myeloid DC efficiently activate NK cells. pDC, which have been reported to be TLR3-negative (4), in the presence of poly(I:C), consistently produced a very low amount of IFN-
, up-regulated CD83 expression (data not shown) and, at high concentration, induced NK cell cytolytic activity. Although it cannot be excluded that a residual presence of a small contamination with other accessory cells could account for this finding, it is possible that TLR3 is up-regulated on pDC upon activation or that a TLR-independent stimulatory pathway mediates the poly(I:C) effect on pDC (26, 28).
Activation of NK cells required the presence of either pDC or myeloid DC, depending on the stimulus, whereas purified NK cells alone could not respond to any of the stimuli used. However, activation of purified NK cells by poly(I:C) has been previously reported (29). The explanation of these contrasting results might rest in the NK purification procedure used in this study that includes a careful depletion of HLA-DR+ cells before enrichment of CD56+ cells: indeed, we observed that even a minimal contamination with accessory cells renders the NK cell preparations responsive to poly(I:C).
The ability of myeloid DC in the presence of poly(I:C) to induce in NK cells a strong IFN-
production that is drastically reduced by an IL-12-neutralizing mAb is consistent with the capacity of myeloid DC to produce IL-12 p70 when cultured with poly(I:C) (Ref.30 and data not shown). However, in addition to secreted IL-12, IFN-
production required direct cell contact between myeloid DC and NK cells. IFN-
was almost undetectable in supernatant fluid from NK cells cultured with freshly isolated pDC that, at least in response to the stimuli used in the present study, do no produce IL-12 (Ref.31 and data not shown). In other studies, it has been shown that several days culture in IL-3 may endow pDC with the ability to produce IL-2 and to promote IFN-
production (31, 32).
NK cells did not produce IFN-
when cultured with pDC in the presence of stimuli such as virus or CpG2216 that induce very high levels of type I IFN. Neutralizing anti-IFN-
Abs also did not affect IFN-
produced by NK cells cultured with myeloid DC in the presence of poly(I:C). Thus, type I IFN does not appear to play a major role in inducing IFN-
production by human NK cells either alone or in combination with IL-12, even in the presence of pDC or myeloid DC.
The capacity of activated NK cells to interact with in vitro generated human monocyte-derived DC inducing their functional maturation has been reported (13, 14, 33). In this study we show that IL-2-activated NK cells profoundly affect the maturation and functions of pDC and myeloid DC, freshly isolated from peripheral blood.
The functional maturation of pDC cultured with IL-2-activated NK cells was revealed by increased expression of CD83 and by a dramatic up-regulation of IFN-
and TNF production in the presence of suboptimal CpG ODN concentrations. The maturation of myeloid DC was revealed by increased expression of CD80 Ag. The maturation of both pDC and myeloid DC was induced by IL-2-activated NK cells in the absence of any detectable cell lysis. The low myeloid DC lysis observed after culture only with elevated numbers of NK cells might suggest a possible regulatory role depending on the level of activation and the number of NK cells, in analogy to previous reported results with immature monocyte-derived DC (13, 14).
The reason of the different susceptibility to NK cell-mediated lysis of immature monocyte-derived DC compared with freshly isolated pDC and myeloid DC is not clear at the moment. It is possible that peripheral blood myeloid DC are in a more mature stage than monocyte-derived DC and, thus, resistant to lysis. However, blood DC are likely precursor of tissue-associated DC and, physiologically, in an immature state. In addition to an intrinsic susceptibility to lysis, differential expression of certain MHC class I alleles, as in the case of the different resistance between immature and mature monocyte-derived DC, as well as the expression of adhesion molecules or of target molecules for activating NK cell receptors, for example the ligand for the NKp30 receptor that has been shown to be involved in NK cell-mediated lysis of monocyte-derived DC (15), may be possible candidates as mechanisms for myeloid DC resistance to NK cell-mediated lysis.
Direct DC-to-NK cell contact is necessary for CD83 expression and IFN-
production from pDC, and for CD80 expression in myeloid DC. The surface molecules and possibly soluble factors involved in the cellular interaction between DC and IL-2-activated NK cells are at present unknown and preliminary experiments with Ab against a few candidate molecules have not yet provided definitive results.
pDC cultured with IL-2-activated NK cells up-regulated the expression of CD83 maturation Ag and synergized with microbial stimuli for IFN-
production, but did not up-regulated CD80 or CD86 expression. It would be suggestive to explain the activation pattern of pDC exposed to IL-2-activated NK cells by the existence of different stimulatory pathways leading to differential induction of pDC maturation and/or IFN-
production. Indeed, pDC treated with optimal concentration of the class A CpG ODN CpG2216, a strong IFN-
inducer, increase the expression of CD83, but not CD80 or CD86 maturation Ags, whereas pDC treated with the class B CpG ODN CpG2006, a poor IFN-
inducer, up-regulate expression of all the three maturation Ags (Ref.27 and data not shown). The molecular mechanisms underlying the different activity of class A and class B CpG ODN remain obscure, but it is intriguing that in the presence of IL-2-activated NK cells both class of ODN become equivalent in their ability to induce production of IFN-
at very low concentrations.
IL-2-activated NK cells up-regulated CD80 expression on myeloid DC, but did not lead to detectable production of IL-12 (data not shown). IL-12 p70 production is induced in myeloid DC by poly(I:C). In preliminary experiments, IL-12 production observed when myeloid DC are stimulated by poly(I:C) was not increased by coculture with IL-2-activated NK cells, and this result might be consistent with our finding that IL-12 p70 production in PBMC stimulated by poly(I:C) does not require exogenous IFN-
, differently from other stimuli, such as R848 or LPS (G. Carra, unpublished observations). In the same experiments, in cocultures of IL-2-activated NK cells and myeloid DC stimulated by poly(I:C), increased IFN-
production was observed. Evaluation of the production of IL-12 p70, IFN-
as well as TNF after stimulation with different doses of stimuli such as R848 or LPS, other than poly(I:C), will be necessary to clarify the role of IL-2-activated NK cells on cytokine production by myeloid DC.
There are several lines of experimental evidence indicating that NK cells may have an important role not only in the early innate resistance to pathogens but also in favoring an effective immune response, particularly Th1-type response. Mouse NK cells produce IFN-
early in Leishmania major, Listeria monocytogenes, and Chlamydia trachomatis infection and are needed both for innate resistance and for generation of a protective Th1 response (34, 35, 36). The ability of IL-12 to induce a Th1 response in vivo in the mouse and in vitro in humans has been shown to be optimal if NK cells are present (37, 38). Although other studies have not always confirmed an absolute requirement for NK cells in Th1 responses (39), in some cases, for example in NK cell-deficient mice immunized with keyhole limpet hemocyanin, the Th1-dependent IgG2a response was deficient even if T cell production of IFN-
was elevated (40). In murine models has been demonstrated in vivo that NK cells activated by MHC class Ilow tumor cells prime DC to induce a protective CD8+ T cell response and NK cells are required for CD8
+ DC survival during murine cytomegalovirus infection (41, 42). Because NK cells have been identified primarily as circulating cells and DC as cells present in tissue or secondary lymphoid organs, the site of possible interaction between the two cells has been an unresolved issue raising doubts on the physiologic relevance of DC-NK cell interaction. It is becoming evident, however, that NK cell and DC in vivo migration may be similarly regulated and in particular DC and pDC have similar regulation of chemokine responsiveness (43). Thus, DC and NK cells may meet in inflamed or stressed tissues (44) and colocalization and direct contact between NK cells and DC was directly demonstrated in atopic skin lesions infected by the yeast Malassezia (45). NK cells are now known to be present in large number in secondary lymphoid organ parafollicular T cell zone, particularly as immature or CD56brightCD16 cells with low cytotoxic activity and high ability to produce cytokines (46, 47), indicating the secondary lymphoid organs in addition to inflammed tissues as a site of interaction for DC and NK cells (48).
Our results on the differential reciprocal interactions between human NK cells and ex vivo derived peripheral blood pDC or myeloid DC have by necessity been obtained using in vitro experimental conditions that may not fully reproduce the actual in vivo context. However, the use of freshly ex vivo isolated DC subsets rather than in vitro differentiated DC might contribute to clarify mechanisms underlying an immune response to infection by viruses or other pathogen in humans. In the first stages of an immune response, type I IFN produced by pDC, activated by viral or bacterial stimuli, may augment NK cell cytotoxic activity endowing them with the ability to lyse infected cells, tumor cells. NK cells may further be activated by activation molecules, e.g., NKG2D ligands, expressed on infected cells or by down-modulation of HLA class I Ags (41, 49). Activated NK cells may lyse-infected cells providing antigenic material for a specific immune response but also may induce maturation of myeloid DC favoring naive T lymphocytes priming. The enhanced type I IFN production by pDC, induced by activated NK cells, may increase myeloid DC recruitment, survival, and cross-presentation of Ag to CD8+ T lymphocytes further contributing to the engagement of an acquired immune response (50, 51, 52). In response to TLR ligands including poly(I:C), a mimetic of viral double-stranded RNA, produced by virally infected cells and released after their lysis, myeloid DC produce IL-12 and induce NK cells to produce IFN-
. IFN-
enhances, in turn, IL-12 production from accessory cells, thus favoring the development of a Th1-like T cell response (53). IL-2, released by Ag-specific T lymphocytes at the adaptive stage of the immune response, activates NK cells that, even in the presence of suboptimal levels of microbial stimuli, induce production of type I IFN and other proinflammatory cytokine by pDC and maturation of both pDC and myeloid DC, contributing to enhance a protective secondary T cell immune response.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Fondazione CARIVERONA (Bando 2001 "Ambiente e Sviluppo Sostenibile" e 2003 "Basi molecolari del danno cellulare"), Ministero dellIstruzione, dellUniversità e della Ricerca (Cofin 2003, project "Cellule dendritiche e immunità innata: funzioni regolatorie e proprietà adiuvanti"), and University of Verona, Verona Italy. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Franca Gerosa, Department of Pathology, Section of Immunology, University of Verona, Policlinico GB Rossi, 37100 Verona, Italy. E-mail address: franca.gerosa{at}univr.it ![]()
3 A.G. and P.Z. contributed equally to this work. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cell; pDC, plasmacytoid DC; BDCA, blood DC Ag; ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide. ![]()
Received for publication September 8, 2004. Accepted for publication November 2, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|

T cells via interferon-
. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:3525.[Medline]

-producing cells link innate and adaptive immunity. J. Exp. Med. 192:219.
that drives differentiation of CD4+ T cell subsets and induces early resistance to Leishmania major of mice. J. Exp. Med. 178:567.
. J. Exp. Med. 197:885.
-induced monocyte-derived dendritic cells and NK cells in priming CD8+ T cell responses against human tumor antigens. J. Immunol. 172:5363.
in monocytic cells. J. Exp. Med. 183:147.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. B. Rosen, W. Cao, D. T. Avery, S. G. Tangye, Y.-J. Liu, J. P. Houchins, and L. L. Lanier Functional Consequences of Interactions between Human NKR-P1A and Its Ligand LLT1 Expressed on Activated Dendritic Cells and B Cells J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6508 - 6517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Guia, C. Cognet, L. de Beaucoudrey, M. S. Tessmer, E. Jouanguy, C. Berger, O. Filipe-Santos, J. Feinberg, Y. Camcioglu, J. Levy, et al. A role for interleukin-12/23 in the maturation of human natural killer and CD56+ T cells in vivo Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 5008 - 5016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Errington, L. Steele, R. Prestwich, K. J. Harrington, H. S. Pandha, L. Vidal, J. de Bono, P. Selby, M. Coffey, R. Vile, et al. Reovirus Activates Human Dendritic Cells to Promote Innate Antitumor Immunity J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 6018 - 6026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Iparraguirre, J. W. Tobias, S. E. Hensley, K. S. Masek, L. L. Cavanagh, M. Rendl, C. A. Hunter, H. C. Ertl, Ulrich. H. von Andrian, and W. Weninger Two distinct activation states of plasmacytoid dendritic cells induced by influenza virus and CpG 1826 oligonucleotide J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 83(3): 610 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Reeves and P. N. Fultz Characterization of Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells in Bone Marrow of Pig-Tailed Macaques Clin. Vaccine Immunol., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Z. Dudek, C. Yunis, L. I. Harrison, S. Kumar, R. Hawkinson, S. Cooley, J. P. Vasilakos, K. S. Gorski, and J. S. Miller First in Human Phase I Trial of 852A, a Novel Systemic Toll-like Receptor 7 Agonist, to Activate Innate Immune Responses in Patients with Advanced Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 7119 - 7125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|