|
|
||||||||
S: Purinergic Agonists Define a Novel Class of Immunologic Adjuvants1



Departments of*
Dermatology and
Neurology and Neurosciences, Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021; and
Department of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S, a hydrolysis-resistant P2 agonist, results in an enhanced contact hypersensitivity response in mice. Furthermore, ATP
S enhanced the induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity to a model tumor vaccine in mice and enhanced the Ag-presenting function of Langerhans cells (LCs) in vitro. Exposure of a LC-like cell line to ATP
S in the presence of LPS and GM-CSF augmented the induction of I-A, CD80, CD86, IL-1
, and IL-12 p40 while inhibiting the expression of IL-10, suggesting that the immunostimulatory activities of purinergic agonists in the skin are mediated at least in part by P2Rs on APCs. In this regard, an LC-like cell line was found to express mRNA for P2X1, P2X7, P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y9, and P2Y11 receptors. We suggest that ATP, when released after trauma or infection, may act as an endogenous adjuvant to enhance the immune response, and that P2 agonists may augment the efficacy of vaccines. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Langerhans cells (LCs)3 are an important subclass of dendritic cells that reside in the epidermis (4). Unlike other dendritic cells, they have a distinctive intracellular organelle (the Birbeck granule), and express the protein langerin (5). Because of their location in the skin, they are in a position to initiate an immune response to pathogens and vaccines that enter through the skin. Thus, they are a population that merits special attention from those who are seeking to administer vaccines by the cutaneous route. The dermis also contains populations of dendritic APCs (6). These are heterogeneous and generally less well-characterized than LCs; however, they are capable of presenting protein Ags, peptide Ags, and tumor Ags in experimental systems (7, 8, 9). Given their location, dermal dendritic cells are also probably important for presentation of Ags administered intradermally or s.c. LCs express high levels of cell surface ATPase (CD39), suggesting that they may be sensitive to ATP (10). Therefore, we hypothesized that agonists of purinergic receptors may augment cutaneous immunity and serve as adjuvants. Our hypothesis also suggests that ATP lost from cells subsequent to trauma or infection may serve as a local signal to enhance the immune response, i.e., an endogenous adjuvant. There are several precedents for this possibility. Monocyte-derived dendritic cells have been shown to express a number of P2Rs of both the P2X and the P2Y series (11, 12). Exposure of monocyte-derived dendritic cells to ATP results in up-regulation of CD54 and MHC class II molecules, induces secretion of IL-12, and augments stimulatory capacity for allogeneic T cells (11, 13). Exposure of LPS-matured dendritic cells to ATP induces the release of IL-1
and TNF-
(12). In combination with TNF-
, ATP has been shown to increase the expression of CD80, CD83, and CD86 in monocyte-derived dendritic cells (11). Furthermore, the ability of dendritic cells derived from murine fetal skin to present Ag was reduced by oxidized ATP, an irreversible inhibitor of P2XRs, and clones of dendritic cells selected for lack of P2X7Rs also had decreased Ag-presenting ability, suggesting a role for this receptor in Ag presentation (14).
We report that exogenous administration of a purinergic agonist can enhance cutaneous immunity and provide evidence that it does so by augmenting the ability of LCs to present Ag. These data demonstrate that ATP is an endogenous adjuvant and that the release of ATP during infection or trauma to the skin may result in enhanced cutaneous immunity as a homeostatic protective response. These results also suggest that agonists of P2Rs represent a potentially useful class of therapeutic adjuvants.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/c (H-2d), C3H/HeJ (H-2k), and CAF1 (H-2a/d) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All experiments were performed in compliance with relevant laws and institutional guidelines and were approved by the Weill Medical College Institutional animal care and use committee. XS106 cells were derived from neonatal A/J epidermis (15). HDK-1 is a T cell clone that responds to presentation of keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) by I-Ad with production of IFN-
. XS106 and HDK-1 cells were a gift from Dr. A. Takashima (University of Texas Southwestern Health Sciences Center, Dallas, TX).
Reagents
ATP, ATP
S, and KLH were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The P2 inhibitors, oxidized ATP, suramin, and pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-6-(2'-naphthylazo-6'-nitro-4',8'-disulfonate) (PPNDS), were also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Contact hypersensitivity (CHS)
Groups of five BALB/c mice were injected intradermally on the back with 0.05 ml of PBS or PBS containing 30 nmol of ATP
S. Fifteen minutes later, these mice were immunized by application of 5 µl of 1% dinitrofluorobenzine (DNFB) in acetone/olive oil (4/1) at the injection site. Control mice were injected with medium or ATP
S, but were not immunized. Seven days later, these mice were challenged by application of 5 µl of 0.2% DNFB in acetone to each side of each ear. Ear swelling was assessed with an engineers spring-loaded micrometer before challenge and 24 later as previously described (16). The prechallenge ear thicknesses were subtracted from the 24 h value, and ear swelling was assessed as a measure of the CHS response.
Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH)
Groups of five CAF1 mice were injected intradermally with 0.1 ml of a soluble extract (tumor-associated Ags (TAA)) of the S1509a spindle cell tumor (derived from A/J, H-2a) (17) with or without 30 nmol of ATP
S. Negative control mice were injected with PBS alone. TAA were prepared by suspending S1509a cells in PBS at a concentration of 107/ml, subjecting the suspension to four cycles of freeze-thawing, and harvesting the supernatant after centrifugation at 600 x g. One week after immunization, each mouse was challenged in a hind footpad by injection of 50 µl of TAA, and 24 h swelling was assessed by measuring the hind footpads with a spring-loaded micrometer and subtracting the thickness of the uninjected footpad from that of the injected footpad.
In vitro Ag presentation assays
BALB/c epidermal cells (ECs) were prepared using a modification of a standard protocol (17). Briefly, mice were shaved with an electric clipper and were depilated with topical sodium thioglycolate. Then they were killed, and truncal skin was excised; s.c. fat and paniculus carnosus were mechanically removed. The epidermis was separated from the dermis by floating skins on 0.5 U/ml dispase and 0.38% trypsin in PBS for 45 min. Epidermal sheets were then washed, and a single cell suspension was prepared by mild agitation. LC content was enriched by treatment of ECs with anti-Thy 1.2 mAbs, followed by low toxicity rabbit complement (Cedarlane Laboratories). The cells were then incubated with anti-I-Ad Ab (BD Pharmingen), followed by incubation with goat anti-mouse IgG conjugated to magnetic microspheres (DynaBeads 450; Dynal Biotech). Cells bound to Ab were separated using the magnetic field. By FACS analysis, these cells were >95% LCs.
For presentation of Ag to the HDK-1 T cell clone, LCs were plated in 96-well plates at 1 x 104 cells/well and incubated with KLH (50 µg/ml) for 2 h in RPMI 1640 (Cellgro) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gemini Bio-Products), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 0.1 mM essential amino acids, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 10 mM HEPES buffer (all from Mediatech; complete medium (CM)). ATP
S was added, and cells were cultured for an additional 3 h. The cells were then washed three times and cocultured with 5 x 104 HDK-1 cells. Supernatants were collected after 72 h, and the IFN-
content was measured by ELISA.
To examine the ability of cells to present alloantigens, ECs (not enriched for LC content) were gamma irradiated (2.9 Gy) and cultured in 106 M ATP
S for 2 h. They were then washed three times, and graded numbers were cocultured in triplicate with 2 x 105 nylon-wool-enriched T cells from the spleens of C3H/HeN mice per well in round-bottom, 96-well plates in CM supplemented with 5 µg/mg indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2.5 x 105 M 2-ME (Sigma-Aldrich). After 5 days of culture, each well was pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine. Eighteen hours later, cells from each well were harvested, and incorporated [3H]thymidine was assessed by beta scintillation counting.
Cytoflurography and cytokine production
XS106 cells were plated in 12-well plates at a concentration of 1 x 106 cells/ml in CM. Cells were stimulated by 1 µg/ml LPS and 50 U/ml GM-CSF in the presence or the absence of graded concentrations of ATP
S. After 48 h, cells were harvested for FACS analysis, and supernatants were harvested for analysis of cytokine content by ELISA. For FACS analysis, cells were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-mouse I-Ak (BD Pharmingen), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD86 (BD Pharmingen), or PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD80 (BD Pharmingen).
In some experiments examining the induction of IL-1
production, cells were pretreated for 1 h with suramin, oxidized ATP or PPNDS before addition of ATP
S. Cells were washed three times to remove the inhibitors before addition of ATP
S or were not washed.
ELISA
OptEIA sets of capture Ab and biotinylated detection mAb for murine IL-1
, IL-10, and IL-12 p40 were purchased (BD Pharmingen). One hundred microliters of capture Ab (4 µg/ml in coating buffer) was added to each well in 96-well, flat-bottom plates and incubated overnight at 4°C. Then each well was aspirated and washed three times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%). Wells were blocked with 200 µl of 10% FBS in PBS, followed by aspirating and washing each well three times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%). One hundred microliters of each standard and sample were then added to wells. After incubation at room temperature for 2 h, each well was aspirated and washed five times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%). Then 100 µl of detection Ab (1 µg/ml) was added to each well, followed by incubation at room temperature for 1 h. Wells were aspirated and washed five times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%). Then 100 µl of avidin-HRP (1/2000) was added to each well, followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature. After aspiration and washing of each well seven times with PBS-Tween 20 (0.05%), 100 µl of substrate solution (tetramethylbenzidine and hydrogen peroxide) was added to each well at room temperature in the dark. Fifty microliters of 1 M H3PO4 was added to each well to stop the reaction, and wells were read at 450 nm.
RT-PCR
P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y5, P2Y6, P2Y10, and P2Y11 primers were designed from mouse sequences in GenBank: P2X1: forward, 5'-CATTGTGCAGAGAACCCAGAA-3'; reverse, 5'-AT GTCCTCCGCATACTTGAAC-3'; P2X7: forward, 5'-GGCAGTTCAGGGAGGAATCATGG-3'; reverse, 5'-AAAGCGCCAGGTGGCATAGCTC; P2Y1: forward, 5'-AGCAGTTTCCTCTTCATTCC-3'; reverse, 5'-CCGAGTCCCAGTGCCAGAGT-3'; P2Y2: forward, 5'-CGTGGGGGAGAGTAGTGTAG-3'; reverse, 5'-GGGAGGGGAGATAGAGGAGA-3'; P2Y4: forward, 5'-AGCCCAAGTTCTGGAGATGGTG-3'; reverse, 5'-GGTGGTTCCATTGGCATTGG-3' reverse primer; P2Y9: forward, 5'-ACCATCAGGCCAGGAGGAA-3'; reverse, 5'-ACAAAGCATACCACAAACAC-3'; and P2Y11: forward, 5'-TGTATTCTTTATTTGCTTTG-3'; reverse, 5'-CGTCCCTTTGGTTTTGTTGT-3' reverse primer. Briefly, 0.1 µg of total RNA from XS106A cells was incubated in a reaction mixture containing 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM dNTPs, 2.5 µM random hexamers, 1 U of RNase inhibitor/µl, and 2.5 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase/µl in 20 µl for 10 min at room temperature for the extension of the hexameric primers, for 15 min at 42°C for annealing, and then for 5 min at 99°C to denature the enzyme. Twelve microliters of the reverse-transcribed reaction was transferred to a PCR mixture for the receptors, and 6 µl of the reverse-transcribed reaction was transferred from the same tube to a PCR mixture for GAPDH as an internal control. The reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µM primers, and 1 U of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase in a total volume of 40 µl. After denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, 2540 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 95°C, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, and extension for 30 s at 72°C were repeated with a thermal cycler, followed by completion for 50 min at 72°C. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized with UV radiation.
Statistical analysis
The significance of differences among groups was measured by Students two-tailed t test for unpaired samples (Excel software; Microsoft).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S enhances the induction of CHS
To determine whether P2Rs modulate the immune response, we determined the effects of purinergic agonists on CHS. Groups of BALB/c mice were injected intradermally on the dorsum with vehicle alone or 30 nmol of ATP
S, a stable analog of ATP that interacts with purinergic receptors (18). Fifteen minutes later, these mice were immunized by careful application of DNFB at the injected site or, in some experiments, at a site contralateral to that of the injection. Nonimmunized control mice were similarly injected with ATP
S or medium alone, but were not immunized. Seven days later, all mice were challenged on the ears by application of 0.2% of DNFB in acetone, and 24 h ear swelling was assessed as a measure of the CHS response. Intradermal administration of ATP
S at the site of immunization (but not at a distant site) significantly increased the CHS response (Fig. 1), supporting the hypothesis that P2 agonists enhance immune responsiveness.
|
S augments the induction of DTH to a model tumor vaccine
To examine whether ATP
S enhances immunity induced by a vaccine, we immunized CAF1 mice by intradermal injection of either TAA or TAA containing 30 nmol of ATP
S. Negative control mice were not immunized. One week after the last immunization, each mouse was challenged in a hind footpad with TAA, and footpad swelling was measured as an indication of immunological responsiveness. ATP
S significantly enhanced the DTH response at 24 h (Fig. 2), again supporting the hypothesis that P2 agonists enhance immune responsiveness. Assessment of the DTH response at 48 h yielded the same results (data not shown).
|
S in vitro augments their ability to present Ag to HDK-1 cells
The increase in immune responsiveness could occur by several mechanisms. One possibility is ATP
S enhances Ag presentation in the skin. To determine whether ATP
S increases the Ag-presenting ability of LCs, we examined whether ATP
S would enhance Ag presentation to the T cell clone HDK-1. This cloned line responds to presentation of KLH by I-Ad with production of IFN-
. We cultured a population of LCs enriched to >95% in medium alone or in medium containing graded concentrations of ATP
S. After 3 h, KLH was added, and 2 h later, cells were gamma irradiated and washed three times to remove any residual ATP
S. LCs were then cocultured with HDK-1 cells. After 72 h, we harvested supernatants and measured IFN-
content by ELISA. Exposure to ATP
S resulted in a dose-dependent increase in IFN-
release (Fig. 3). When LCs were incubated with ATP
S in the absence of KLH, only background levels of IFN-
were produced. Thus, ATP
S enhanced Ag presentation. At concentrations >106 M, the response began to decrease, possibly due to induction of apoptosis, because concentrations >105 M induce apoptosis in the LC-like cell line XS106. After 24 h of exposure to 104 M ATP
S,
34% of XS106 cells were dead (by trypan blue exclusion testing), and
1321% were killed with a concentration of 103 M, compared with 23% dead when cultured in medium without ATP
S.
|
S before being added to HDK-1 cells, we performed additional experiments to test whether residual ATP
S might be acting directly on HDK-1 cells. When HDK-1 cells (rather than LCs) were pretreated with ATP
S, there was no increase in IFN-
release (data not shown).
ATP
S augments the ability of LCs to present alloantigen to T cells in vitro
To determine the effect of ATP
S on presentation to naive T cells, we examined the ability of ATP
S to modulate the presentation of alloantigens by an unseparated population of ECs to naive allogeneic T cells (i.e., the mixed epidermal cell-lymphocyte reaction). ATP
S (106 M) enhanced the ability of ECs to present alloantigens to allogeneic T cells (Fig. 4). Thus, activation of P2Rs on ECs also enhances Ag presentation to naive T cells.
|
To explore mechanisms by which ATP agonists enhance Ag presentation, we studied the effect of ATP
S on XS106, a cloned cell line that was derived from neonatal A/J epidermis and has many of the functional and phenotypic characteristics of LCs (15). To stimulate the expression of I-A, CD80, and CD86, XS106 cells were cultured in medium containing GM-CSF and LPS in the presence of graded concentrations of ATP
S. As indicated by FACS analysis, expression of three surface molecules that are important for Ag presentation (I-A, CD80, and CD86) was enhanced by exposure to 104 M ATP
S (Fig. 5). Because this is a cell line, any effects we observed were presumably due to direct effects of ATP
S on the cells. We conclude that ATP
S can directly modulate LC maturation.
|
and IL-12 while reducing the release of IL-10
We used a similar strategy to determine ATP
S-modulated cytokine production. XS106 cells were cultured in medium containing GM-CSF and LPS in the presence or the absence of increasing concentrations of ATP
S. After 24 h, we harvested supernatants and measured cytokine content by ELISA. ATP
S significantly increased the release of IL-1
and IL-12 while decreasing the release of IL-10 from GM-CSF/LPS-stimulated XS106 cells (Fig. 6). In the absence of LPS and GM-CSF, ATP
S induced IL-1
release, but to a much lesser degree than in the presence of LPS and GM-CSF (data not shown). The combination of ATP
S and GM-CSF or LPS resulted in greater IL-1
production than ATP
S alone, but still considerably less than when ATP
S was combined with both LPS and GM-CSF (data not shown). ATP
S alone did not induce a detectable level of IL-12 release (data not shown), but it did induce some release in the presence of LPS or GM-CSF (data not shown). However, as shown in Fig. 6b, in the presence of both LPS and GM-CSF, ATP
S greatly augments IL-12 production. Thus, the effects of ATP agonists on immune responsiveness may be explained in part by the regulation of cytokine expression by APCs in the skin, but a detailed understanding of how signaling by ATP
S interacts with signaling by LPS and GM-CSF will require additional work.
|
S on cytokine production. XS106 cells were treated with four different P2 antagonists (oxidized ATP, suramin, or PPNDS) for 1 h before addition of ATP
S. Supernatants were harvested for measurement of IL-1
content. All inhibitors tested significantly reduced the response (Fig. 7a). When XS106 cells were washed three times after exposure to the inhibitors, but before addition of ATP
S, only oxidized ATP inhibited the response (Fig. 7b). Because oxidized ATP is an irreversible inhibitor of P2Rs and the other agents are competitive inhibitors, this observation also supports the role of P2Rs in the responses to ATP.
|
All these experiments are consistent with our hypothesis that ATP acts as an adjuvant by binding to cell surface P2Rs. As a direct test for the presence of these receptors, we used RT-PCR. XS106 cells were found to express mRNA for P2X1, P2X7, P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, P2Y9, and P2Y11 receptors (Fig. 8). In each case the PCR product was of the predicted length and was dependent on the presence of RT. Thus, LCs express several different P2Rs, but it is not clear which of these receptors or which combinations of these receptors mediate the effects of ATP on Ag presentation or immunity.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
S on induction of IL-1
release demonstrates that, at least for this end point, the effect observed is dependent on signaling through a P2R. Although the various inhibitors we used have different capacities to block different P2Rs (19), in the absence of detailed dose-response experiments with each inhibitor, it is premature to speculate on which receptor(s) is relevant to the effects we have observed. We have recently obtained preliminary data showing that Abs to the P2X7R can inhibit some responses to ATP, but additional work needs to be performed to establish the importance of this receptor. It also remains possible that ATP
S may signal through non-P2Rs. Of course, the experiments examining the effects of ATP
S on MHC, CD86, CD80, and cytokine expression were performed on XS106 cells, rather than fresh LCs; therefore, the results must be interpreted cautiously. These observations have several important implications. First, ATP is most likely an endogenous regulator of LC function within the skin. Damaged cells are known to release ATP into the extracellular environment (10), and we hypothesize that the release of ATP from keratinocytes after injury or irritation of the skin leads to ATP-induced up-regulation of LC function as a homeostatic protective mechanism. This observation may also explain why contact allergens are invariably also contact irritants; irritation may be necessary for up-regulation of APC function and subsequent induction of immunity to the allergen (20). In this regard, purinergic agonists may represent a class of danger signals that alert the immune system to dying cells in a manner analogous to that recently proposed for uric acid (21). Interestingly, it appears that the stimulatory effect of P2 agonists is maximal in the presence of additional stimulatory signals. In our experiments, LPS and GM-CSF provided these signals. Physiologically, in the setting of infection, such a signal(s) could be derived from a pathogen. The results seen with our CHS and DTH experiments demonstrate that immunity induced with an epicutaneously applied hapten or our intradermally administered vaccine is significantly boosted without an additional signal being supplied, or that the immunogen itself supplies a second signal or induces the release of such a signal endogenously. Second, and most importantly, the immunostimulatory properties of ATP agonists may be exploited for adjuvant activity to enhance the efficacy of vaccines. As stated above, there is great interest in the development of new adjuvants for use with vaccines. All currently available adjuvants have limitations, and the development of novel, more effective, and safer adjuvants could have practical benefits for increasing the efficacy and utility of both prophylactic and therapeutic vaccines. Although additional work remains to be performed, understanding the molecular and cellular mechanisms by which purinergic agonists exert their immunostimulatory effects and the range of immune responses that may be enhanced is of considerable importance.
| Disclosures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant AI59226 (to R.D.G. and J.A.W.), a grant from the Abercrombie Foundation, a grant from the Edith C. Blum Foundation, contributions from the Ann L. and Herbert J. Siegel Philanthropic Fund, a gift from the Jacob L. and Lillian Holtzmann Foundation, contributions from Mr. and Mrs. Blair OConnor, and a gift from Call on an Angel. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Richard D. Granstein, Department of Dermatology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Avenue, Room F-342, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address: rdgranst{at}med.cornell.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LC, Langerhans cells; CHS, contact hypersensitivity; CM, complete medium; DNFB, dinitrofluorobenzine; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; EC, epidermal cell; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin; PPNDS, pyridoxal-5'-phosphate-6-(2'-naphthylazo-6'-nitro-4',8'-disulfonate); TAA, tumor-associated Ag. ![]()
Received for publication October 19, 2004. Accepted for publication April 12, 2005.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Trautmann Extracellular ATP in the Immune System: More Than Just a "Danger Signal" Sci. Signal., February 3, 2009; 2(56): pe6 - pe6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ding, L. L. Stohl, J. A. Wagner, and R. D. Granstein Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Biases Langerhans Cells toward Th2-Type Immunity J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6020 - 6026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Kornbluth and G. W. Stone Immunostimulatory combinations: designing the next generation of vaccine adjuvants J. Leukoc. Biol., November 1, 2006; 80(5): 1084 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Burnstock Pathophysiology and therapeutic potential of purinergic signaling. Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2006; 58(1): 58 - 86. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |