|
|
||||||||
- and IL-12-Mediated Signaling1
Section of Retroviral Immunology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced STAT1 phosphorylation and IL-12-induced STAT3 and STAT4 phosphorylation. As a result, T-bet expression is reduced as is the maturation of naive CD4+ cells into Th1 effectors. These changes indirectly support the generation of Th2-dominated immune responses. Suppressive ODN may thus represent a novel approach to influence the Th1:Th2 balance in vivo. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies showed that ODN containing poly(G) and to a lesser extent poly(GC) motifs could suppress Th1 responses (5, 8). Yet little is known about the cellular targets of suppressive ODN, the molecular mechanism by which they inhibit Th1 responses, or their effect on Th2 immunity. Thus, studies were undertaken to explore the ability of suppressive ODN to modulate T cell maturation and activation. Experiments focused on CD4+ T cells, since they play a key role in both Ag-specific protective responses and pathologic autoimmune responses (9).
Stimulating the TCR of naive CD4+ cells triggers them to differentiation into either Th1 or Th2 effectors (10). Th1 cells contribute to the development of delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions and cell-mediated immunity, whereas Th2 cells facilitate the induction of humoral immune responses (11). These two cell types form an interactive and mutually inhibitory network in which type 1 cytokines promote the maturation of Th1 and inhibit the maturation of Th2 cells and vice versa (12, 13).
Current findings indicate that suppressive ODN selectively reduce Th1 cytokine production, while enhancing Th2 immunity. These effects derive from the ability of suppressive ODN to inhibit the IFN-
and IL-12 signaling pathways, thereby blocking the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into Th1 effectors. Although suppressive ODN do not directly promote Th2 differentiation, the resulting decrease in IFN-
production facilitates the development of strong Th2 responses.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Female BALB/c (68 wk old) were obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). DO11.10 OVA-TCR-transgenic (Tg) mice (14) (on BALB/c background) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). TLR9-deficient mice (1) (on BALB/c background) were kindly provided by Dr. S. Akira (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). All studies were approved by the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research Animal Care and Use Committee.
T cells
CD4+ T cells were isolated from BALB/c splenocytes by negative selection using a combination of anti-MHC class II, anti-CD8, anti-DX5, anti-CD11c, and anti-CD11b microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). The resulting cell population contained >90% CD4+ cells and <0.5% CD8+, I-A+, or DX5+ cells, as measured by flow cytometry.
Con A-activated T cells were prepared as described previously (15). Briefly, BALB/c spleen cells (2 x 106/ml) were stimulated with 2 µg/ml Con A (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). After 3 days of culture, the cells were harvested and cultured in medium containing 0.5% FBS for an additional 16 h to synchronize their cell cycle at G1. T cell blasts were isolated by centrifugation over Histopaque (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) at 1500 x g for 15 min. This population of cells normally contained >98% T cell blasts as measured by flow cytometry. The IL-12-responsive murine T cell clone (16) (2D6 cell, kindly provided by Dr. H Fujiwara, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) was maintained by stimulation with IL-12 (250 pg/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and used 1224 h after IL-12 depletion.
Oligodeoxynucleotides
Endotoxin-free phosphorothioate ODN were synthesized at the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research core facility. The following ODN were used: suppressive ODNA151 (TTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGGTTAGGG) and control ODN1612 (GCTAGAGCTTAGGCT).
Cytokine ELISAs
Cytokine levels in culture supernatants were measured by ELISA, as described previously (17). Paired anti-IL-4 and anti-IFN-
mAbs were purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). Ninety-six-well Immulon H2B plates (Thermo LabSystems, Franklin, MA) were coated with first-stage cytokine-specific Abs and then blocked with PBS/1% BSA. Culture supernatants were added, and bound cytokine was detected by the addition of biotin-labeled secondary Ab, followed by phosphatase-conjugated avidin and a phosphatase-specific colorimetric substrate (PNPP; Pierce, Rockford, IL). Standard curves were generated using recombinant cytokines purchased from R&D Systems. The detection limit for these assays was <15 pg/ml for IFN-
and <3.8 pg/ml for IL-4. All assays were performed in triplicate.
In vitro stimulation of spleen cells to monitor Th differentiation
Spleen cells (2.5 x 106/ml) from unimmunized DO11.10 mice were stimulated in vitro for 3 days with 100 µg/ml OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) with or without 5 µM ODN, 10 µg/ml anti-IFN-
mAb (R&D Systems) and, in some cases, with 300 pg/ml recombinant mouse IL-12. The cells were washed and incubated for 2 more days in medium alone. Briefly, 3 x 104 viable lymphocytes recovered by density gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech) were restimulated with 2 x 105 APCs in the presence of 100 µg/ml OVA in 96-well plates. APCs were prepared by treating spleen cells from unimmunized BALB/c mice with 50 µg/ml mitomycin C (Wako Pure Chemical, Osaka, Japan) for 30 min at 37°C. After 2 days, the culture supernatants were assayed for IFN-
and IL-4 levels (18, 19). All studies were performed in triplicate
To examine Ag-independent T cell differentiation in the absence of APCs, naive CD4+ T cells (2.5 x 106/ml) were stimulated in vitro with 0.1 µg/ml immobilized anti-CD3
mAb (BD Pharmingen), 1 µg/ml soluble anti-CD28 mAb (BD Pharmingen) with or without 5 µM ODN, 10 µg/ml anti-IFN-
mAb, and/or 300 pg/ml IL-12. After 3 days, cells were washed and cultured in fresh medium for 2 more days. Briefly, 3 x 104 viable lymphocytes were restimulated with immobilized anti-CD3
mAb (0.1 µg/ml) in 96-well plates. After 24 h, the culture supernatants were assayed for IFN-
and IL-4 (20).
In vivo induction of effector Th cells detected by in vitro restimulation
To examine the activity of in vivo-activated T cells, BALB/c mice were primed i.p. with 100 µg of OVA emulsified in IFA. They were injected with 400 µg of ODN on the same day or 2 days after vaccination. On day 14, spleen cells (3 x 105/well) were isolated and restimulated in vitro with 100 µg/ml OVA for 48 h or anti-CD3
mAb for 16 h in triplicate in 96-well plates.
RT-PCR analysis
Total RNA was extracted from target cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) as recommended by the manufacturer. Five micrograms of total RNA was reverse-transcribed in first-strand buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 75 mM KCl, and 2.5 mM MgCl2) containing 25 µg/ml oligo(dT)1218, 200 U Moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, 2 mM dNTP, and 10 mM DTT. The reaction was conducted at 42°C for 1 h. A standard PCR was performed on 1 µl of the cDNA synthesis for 24 cycles using the following primer pairs: mouse T-bet, CGCTGGGGCCCCTTCTCCTTTTG and CCCAGTCCGCCCGCAGTCACC and mouse
-actin, GACATGGAGAAGATCTGGCAACCACA and ATCTCCTGCTCGAAGTCTAGAGCAA. Aliquots of the PCR were separated on a 1.5% agarose gel and visualized with UV light after ethidium bromide staining.
Western blots
Con A-activated T cells were incubated with various stimuli, washed with PBS, and lysed in cold lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. This solution was boiled for 5 min, size separated on a 412% gradient SDS-PAGE, and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Immunoblots were probed with Abs specific to phospho-STAT1 (Tyr701), phospho-STAT3 (Tyr705), phospho-STAT5 (Tyr694), phospho-STAT6 (Tyr641)(New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and phospho-STAT4 (Tyr693) (Zymed Laboratories, South San Francisco, CA), followed by HRP-coupled donkey secondary Abs. Signals were visualized by autoradiography using the LumiGLO detection kit (New England Biolabs). Blots were then stripped and reprobed with specific Abs to STAT1, STAT3, STAT5, STAT6 (New England Biolabs), and STAT4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Statistical analysis
Students t test was used to analyze all results. To facilitate comparisons when an experiment was repeated multiple times, results were standardized by calculating the fold change vs the control group in each individual experiment. Correlation analysis is computed by linear correlation analysis between cytokine production vs concentration of suppressive ODN.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To examine the effect of suppressive ODN on the activation of Ag-specific T cells in vitro, splenocytes from OVA TCR Tg mice were cultured with optimized concentrations of OVA with or without ODN (18, 19). When restimulated with Ag-pulsed APCs, cells cultured in the presence of suppressive ODN produced 5-fold more IL-4 (p < 0.05) but significantly less IFN-
than cells cultured in OVA alone (p < 0.01, Fig. 1, A and B). These differences in cytokine production were selectively mediated by suppressive ODN since control ODN had no effect on cytokine levels (Fig. 1, A and B). The magnitude of the changes in cytokine production mediated by suppressive ODN was similar to those elicited by coculture with anti-IFN-
, an immune modulator known to strongly inhibit Th1 differentiation (Fig. 1, A and B, and Refs. 20 and 21).
|
and decrease in IL-4 production (Fig. 1, A and B, and Ref.22). Yet even in the presence of IL-12, suppressive ODN significantly increased IL-4 while decreasing IFN-
production (Fig. 1, C and D). These effects were dose related (IFN-
, R = 0.75; IL-4, R = 0.94), consistent with suppressive ODN promoting Th2 while inhibiting Th1 differentiation in vitro.
To examine whether suppressive ODN were directly inhibiting the differentiation of naive T cells, purified CD4+ lymphocytes were cultured with ODN plus a combination of anti-CD3
plus anti-CD28 mAbs. Under these conditions (in which APCs were absent), suppressive ODN again increased IL-4 while decreasing IFN-
production (Fig. 2, A and B). Adding IL-12 during culture enhanced Th1 differentiation, yet this effect was again reduced by inclusion of suppressive (but not control) ODN (Fig. 2, C and D).
|
Suppressive ODN modulate Ag-specific T cell differentiation in vivo
To determine whether suppressive ODN can influence T cell differentiation in vivo, the effect of administering A151 with Ag was examined. Normal BALB/c mice were immunized with OVA in IFA and injected at the same site (i.p.) with 300 µg of ODN on days 0 and 2. This dose and frequency of ODN administration was previously shown to be effective in vivo (5, 6, 7). The cytokine profile of the resultant immune response was monitored by restimulating spleen cells with Ag in vitro. As seen in Fig. 3, A and B, splenocytes from mice immunized with OVA plus suppressive ODN produced significantly more IL-4 and less IFN-
than cells from animals immunized with OVA alone (or OVA plus control ODN, p < 0.05). These findings were confirmed by monitoring the number of spleen cells secreting IL-4 and IFN-
by ELISPOT assay (data not shown).
|
mAb. This brief Ag-independent activation triggered the production of both IL-4 and IFN-
(Fig. 3, C and D). Of interest, there was no difference in the amount of cytokine produced by cells from mice treated with control vs suppressive ODN. Thus, administering suppressive ODN during the induction of Ag-specific immunity selectively promoted a Th2-biased Ag-specific response, but did not alter the global Th1:Th2 balance in vivo. Suppressive ODN inhibit the early differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into Th1 effectors
Naive CD4+ T cells produce IFN-
and/or IL-4 in response to TCR stimulation (21). The resultant cytokine milieu influences whether these T cells subsequently differentiate into Th1 or Th2 effectors (23). To examine the effect of suppressive ODN on this very early cytokine production, purified CD4+ lymphocytes were stimulated in vitro with anti-CD3
plus anti-CD28 mAbs. The cells produced low but detectable levels of IFN-
, an effect reduced by coculture with suppressive ODN (p < 0.05, Fig. 4A). Adding IL-12 to these cultures amplified IFN-
production, but this effect was significantly reduced by inclusion of suppressive ODN. Of interest, suppressive ODN did not increase IL-4 production by naive CD4+ T cells at this early time point (Fig. 4B). These findings suggest that suppressive ODN selectively inhibit the production of IFN-
but do not alter IL-4 production by naive T cells. Similar results were obtained when naive CD4+ cells were stimulated by other polyclonal activators and when naive CD4+ cells from TLR9-deficient mice were studied (data not shown).
|
The effect of suppressive ODN on IFN-
-driven T cell differentiation was explored. A critical step in the signaling cascade that culminates in IFN-
production is IFN-
-induced STAT1 phosphorylation (24). As seen in Fig. 5A, suppressive ODN block this step. In addition, suppressive ODN inhibit the up-regulation of T-bet, IFN-
-inducible protein 10, and IFN regulatory factor 1 mRNA expression (Fig. 5B and data not shown). In contrast, suppressive ODN had no effect on IL-2-dependent STAT 5 phosphorylation or IL-4-dependent STAT6 phosphorylation (Fig. 5, C and D).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-induced STAT1 phosphorylation and IL-12-induced STAT3 and STAT4 phosphorylation (Figs. 5 and 6) provides insight into the mechanism underlying this effect.
Available evidence suggests that two distinct "classes" of suppressive ODN may exist. The first class, identified by Krieg and colleagues, is composed of GC-rich DNA and selectively inhibits CpG-induced immune activation (8, 25, 26, 27, 28). GC-rich ODN interfere with the binding of CpG DNA to TLR9, thus reducing CpG-dependent activation of NF-
B and AP-1 (28, 29). However, GC-rich ODN do not block other forms of immune activation, nor do they inhibit the IFN-
or IL-12 signaling cascades (data not shown).
The second class of suppressive ODN contains poly(G) motifs, such as those found in the TTAGGG multimers evaluated in the current work (4). This class of ODN has broader immunosuppressive activity, characterized by the ability to modulate both Ag-specific and polyclonal immune activation (5, 8, 30, 31, 32) in a TLR9-independent manner. Consistent with this observation, ODN A151 modulated the Th profile of cells from both WT and TLR9 KO mice (Fig. 2). Although T cells do not bind ODN as effectively as APCs (33, 34), preliminary studies in our laboratory established that FITC-labeled suppressive ODN do bind CD3+ T cells (data not shown). In this context, Halpern and Pisetsky (35) recently demonstrated that poly(G) ODN inhibit IFN-
production by polyclonally activated T cells.
IFN-
gene expression during CD4+ T cell activation is mediated by signals transduced through the TCR, IL-12R, and/or IFN-
R (20, 36, 37). Th1 maturation involves IFN-
-mediated phosphorylation of STAT1, which in turn up-regulates expression of the T-bet transcription factor (38, 39). Current findings indicate that suppressive G-rich ODN inhibit IFN-
-induced STAT1 phosphorylation (Fig. 5A) and the concomitant up-regulation of T-bet expression (Fig. 5B). IL-12 also plays a critical role in Th1 differentiation through a signaling cascade that proceeds through STAT3 and STAT4 (40). Our results demonstrate that suppressive ODN block IL-12-dependent STAT3 and STAT4 phosphorylation (Fig. 6). Thus, it appears that broadly suppressive ODN impair the generation of Th1 immunity by blocking both the IFN-
and IL-12 signaling pathways. Consistent with these findings, Jing et al. (41) recently demonstrated that phosphodiester G-rich ODN inhibit IFN-
-dependent STAT1 activation and IL-6-dependent STAT3 activation of a cancer cell line. Based on nuclear magnetic resonance studies, those authors suggest that G-rich ODN may interact with the Src homology domain of STAT3. We found the effect of suppressive ODN to be highly specific, since 1) control ODN had no effect on STAT1, STAT3, or STAT4 phosphorylation (Figs. 5 and 6) and 2) suppressive ODN did not inhibit the STAT5 or STAT6 phosphorylation (Fig. 5). Indeed, although suppressive ODN promoted the generation of IL-4-dominated responses, they did not up-regulate STAT6 phosphorylation. Thus, it appears that suppressive ODN, by blocking the production of Th1 cytokines, support the generation of Th2 cells occurring"by default."
There is considerable evidence that organ-specific autoimmune diseases are Th1 mediated (9, 42). Thus, the ability of suppressive ODN to selectively inhibit Th1-dependent immune responses is of potential therapeutic importance. In this context, several recent reports indicate that suppressive ODN can prevent/treat autoimmune diseases such as arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis4 (5, 8). This is consistent with our hypothesis that TTAGGG motifs released from injured host cells act to down-regulate overexuberant or pathologic immune responses. Ongoing efforts to identify the precise mechanism(s) through which suppressive ODN limit undesirable immune responses should facilitate the development of agents with greater activity and therapeutic utility.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 The assertions herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases or the Food and Drug Administration at large. ![]()
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Dennis M. Klinman, Building 29A Room 3 D10. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail address: Klinman{at}cber.fda.gov ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: ODN, oligodeoxynucleotide; Tg, transgenic; KO, knockout; WT, wild type. ![]()
4 L. Dong, S. Ito, K. J. Ishii, and D. M. Klinman. Suppressive oligonucleotides delay the onset of glomerulonephritis and prolong the survival of lupus-prone NZB/W mice. Submitted for publication. ![]()
Received for publication May 11, 2004. Accepted for publication August 6, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|

-transgenic model. J. Exp. Med. 182:1579.
inhibits IL-2-induced tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of Jak-1 and Stat 5 in T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 159:175.[Abstract]
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:2879.
in regulation of Th1 cell development. J. Immunol. 157:1350.[Abstract]
. J. Immunol. 160:5280.
in stabilizing the T helper cell type 1 and 2 phenotype. J. Immunol. 158:2648.[Abstract]
B activation. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 11:247.[Medline]
production by phosphorothioate deoxyguanosine oligomers. Immunopharmacology 29:47.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Sato, T. Shimosato, W. G. Alvord, and D. M. Klinman Suppressive Oligodeoxynucleotides Inhibit Silica-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation J. Immunol., June 1, 2008; 180(11): 7648 - 7654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shirota, L. Petrenko, C. Hong, and D. M. Klinman Potential of Transfected Muscle Cells to Contribute to DNA Vaccine Immunogenicity J. Immunol., July 1, 2007; 179(1): 329 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yasuda, P. Yu, C. J. Kirschning, B. Schlatter, F. Schmitz, A. Heit, S. Bauer, H. Hochrein, and H. Wagner Endosomal Translocation of Vertebrate DNA Activates Dendritic Cells via TLR9-Dependent and -Independent Pathways J. Immunol., May 15, 2005; 174(10): 6129 - 6136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Duramad, K. L. Fearon, B. Chang, J. H. Chan, J. Gregorio, R. L. Coffman, and F. J. Barrat Inhibitors of TLR-9 Act on Multiple Cell Subsets in Mouse and Man In Vitro and Prevent Death In Vivo from Systemic Inflammation J. Immunol., May 1, 2005; 174(9): 5193 - 5200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shirota, I. Gursel, M. Gursel, and D. M. Klinman Suppressive Oligodeoxynucleotides Protect Mice from Lethal Endotoxic Shock J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4579 - 4583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |