The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramakrishna, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramakrishna, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, C. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 173: 6265-6273.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

Differential Regulation of Primary and Secondary CD8+ T Cells in the Central Nervous System1

Chandran Ramakrishna*, Stephen A. Stohlman*,{dagger}, Roscoe A. Atkinson{dagger}, David R. Hinton{dagger} and Cornelia C. Bergmann2,*,{dagger}

Departments of * Neurology and {dagger} Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
T cell accumulation and effector function following CNS infection is limited by a paucity of Ag presentation and inhibitory factors characteristic of the CNS environment. Differential susceptibilities of primary and recall CD8+ T cell responses to the inhibitory CNS environment were monitored in naive and CD8+ T cell-immune mice challenged with a neurotropic coronavirus. Accelerated virus clearance and limited spread in immunized mice was associated with a rapid and increased CNS influx of virus-specific secondary CD8+ T cells. CNS-derived secondary CD8+ T cells exhibited increased cytolytic activity and IFN-{gamma} expression per cell compared with primary CD8+ T cells. However, both Ag-specific primary and secondary CD8+ T cells demonstrated similar contraction rates. Thus, CNS persistence of increased numbers of secondary CD8+ T cells reflected differences in the initial pool size during peak inflammation rather than enhanced survival. Unlike primary CD8+ T cells, persisting secondary CD8+ T cells retained ex vivo cytolytic activity and expressed high levels of IFN-{gamma} following Ag stimulation. However, both primary and secondary CD8+ T cells exhibited reduced capacity to produce TNF-{alpha}, differentiating them from effector memory T cells. Activation of primary and secondary CD8+ T cells in the same host using adoptive transfers confirmed similar survival, but enhanced and prolonged effector function of secondary CD8+ T cells in the CNS. These data suggest that an instructional program intrinsic to T cell differentiation, rather than Ag load or factors in the inflamed CNS, prominently regulate CD8+ T cell function.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Many viral infections of the CNS result in either a lethal outcome or resolve into chronic infections (1, 2, 3). The CNS is composed of terminally differentiated resident cells essential to the life of the host. These cells frequently facilitate viral persistence by providing enduring viral reservoirs (2). Although an immune response is mounted, the host appears to favor preservation of function over immune pathology as evidenced by suboptimal or rapid down-regulation of effector function within the CNS (1, 2, 4, 5, 6). Contributing to inefficient immunity in the CNS are the necessity to up-regulate MHC molecules, a paucity of professional APC, lack of direct lymphatic drainage, and the blood brain barrier restricting lymphocyte access (2, 7, 8). As a result, primary (1')3 CD8+ T cells recruited during CNS infection of naive mice frequently exert insufficient effector function to provide sterile immunity (1, 2, 9). By contrast, reactivated Ag-specific memory (2') CD8+ T cells established in primed mice are rapidly recruited, provide protection, and are preferentially retained in the CNS following challenge (10, 11). Thus, despite lethal outcomes associated with primary infections of mice with neuronotropic influenza virus, dengue virus, and coronavirus, memory T cells induced by vaccination provide protection from lethal encephalitis following CNS challenge (10, 11, 12, 13). Whereas influenza virus-specific memory CD8+ T cells completely cleared the challenge virus (10), coronavirus-specific CD8+ T cells only moderately reduced infectious virus titers (12, 13). Furthermore, both protective influenza and dengue virus-specific memory T cells with effector memory characteristics persisted in the CNS (10, 11). However, despite the common propensity for long-term maintenance of CD8+ T cells within the CNS, 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells appear to differ in the regulation of cytolytic function (10, 14, 15). In contrast to 2' influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells (10), 1' CD8+ T cells recruited to the CNS of mice infected with a non lethal neurotropic coronavirus, rapidly down-regulate cytolytic effector function as the infectious virus is controlled, independent of virus pathogenicity or ongoing demyelination (14, 15, 16). Furthermore, virus recrudescence does not trigger re-expression of cytolytic activity (17), suggesting that Ag alone does not contribute to the regulation of this effector function. The prevalent notion to account for the loss of cytolytic activity is that prolonged cytolytic mechanisms are deleterious to the CNS environment (1, 2) and may predispose to autoimmune responses. The CNS is thus thought to favor noncytolytic mechanisms such as cytokines and Ab to clear virus infections (1, 2, 17, 18). Several candidates involved in the modulation of cytolytic activity by CD8+ T cells include extrinsic factors in the CNS such as lipids, NO, or regulatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-{beta} (2, 6, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). It is also feasible that persisting Ag may account for loss of cytolytic effector function by 1' CD8+ T cells retained in the CNS although studies using the virus completely eliminated from the CNS suggest that this may not be true (15, 16). Alternatively, effector function may be modulated by signals imposed by the prominent cell type infected and/or the activation state of the local CNS environment (6). It is thus unclear whether retention of cytolytic capacity is a characteristic of 2' CD8+ T cells residing within the CNS, similar to effector memory T cells in nonlymphoid organs (24).

Direct comparison of 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells is preempted in most CNS viral infections due to a lethal outcome, induction of anti-viral CD4+ T cells, and neutralizing Ab (10, 11, 25). However, CNS infection with the neurotropic JHM strain of mouse hepatitis virus (JHMV) provides a nonlethal model allowing direct comparison of distinct CD8+ T cell differentiation states within the CNS following clearance of the infectious virus. During the acute phase, virus replicates in microglia/macrophages, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes (26). In naive mice, the virus induces an acute encephalomyelitis, which resolves into a chronic infection characterized by viral RNA and ongoing myelin loss in the absence of infectious virus (1, 15, 16). CD8+ T cells are the major anti-viral effectors and clear infectious virus by 14 days postinfection (p.i.) in a cell type-specific manner via either IFN-{gamma} secretion or perforin-mediated cytolysis (27, 28). Subsequent to virus clearance, the majority of activated T cells disappear from the CNS; however, a population is maintained during persistence (14, 15, 16). Ag is generally reduced to undetectable levels by day 30 p.i. (1, 15, 16, 17), suggesting minimal Ag-mediated stimulation during persistence. CD8+ T cells in the CNS lose cytolytic activity immediately following virus clearance but retain the capability to secrete IFN-{gamma} ex vivo during persistence (14, 15, 17). Although retention of CD8+ T cells in the CNS correlates with persisting viral mRNA, an association with factors involved in ongoing demyelination has not been excluded (14, 15, 16).

JHMV infection was used to compare recruitment kinetics of 1' vs 2' CD8+ T cells, their function, and regulation by the CNS environment. Memory CD8+ T cells were established by immunization with a recombinant vaccinia virus (rVV) encoding an immunodominant CD8+ T cell minigene epitope, thereby precluding JHMV-specific CD4+ T cell and neutralizing Ab responses. Following CNS challenge, 2' CD8+ T cells infiltrated the CNS rapidly, expressed increased cytolytic activity and IFN-{gamma} secretion, and were more effective in controlling virus replication compared with 1' CD8+ T cells. Although increased numbers of 2' CD8+ T cells persisted in the CNS despite rapid elimination of Ag, there was no evidence for enhanced intrinsic survival. However, 2' CD8+ T cells retained ex vivo cytolytic activity and secreted increased IFN-{gamma} compared with 1' CD8+ T cells. These data indicate that modulation of effector function by CD8+ T cells persisting in the CNS is preprogrammed, rendering the expression of effector function by reactivated memory CD8+ T cells more resistant to CNS suppressive factors.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice, viruses, and immunizations

BALB/c mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). Homozygous BALB/c Thy1.1 mice, provided by Dr. J. Harty (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA), were bred locally at the University of Southern California (Los Angeles, CA). For immunization, mice of both sexes were used between 6 and 7 wk of age. JHMV-specific memory CD8+ T cells were elicited by i.p. immunization with 1 x 107 PFU of a rVV (vJN9) encoding the 9 aa (318–327) of the viral nucleocapsid protein comprising the Ld-restricted immunodominant epitope, designated pN9 (29). This minigene vaccine approach limits JHMV immunity to the CD8+ T cell compartment and results in <2% pN9-specific cells within the splenic CD8+ T cell compartment at the time of challenge. At 4–6 wk postimmunization, immune BALB/c mice were challenged intracerebrally with 500 PFU of J.2.2v-1 neutralization mAb-derived variant of neurotropic JHMV (30) as previously described (14). For simplicity, these mice are designated as 2' mice. Age-matched naive mice infected with the identical dose of JHMV were used as primary (1') responders. Thy1.1 mice were injected i.p. with 1–2 x 106 PFU of JHMV to provide CD8+ donor cells. Infectious JHMV was determined from clarified homogenates prepared from one-half brain by plaque assay on monolayers of delayed brain tumor cells as previously described (14, 17). Plaques were counted after a 48-h incubation at 37°C. Data represent the average of duplicate determinations from groups of four or more mice per time point.

T cell purification and adoptive transfer

To analyze 1' and 2' CD8+ T cell responses in the same host, Thy1.1+ CD8+ T cells were purified from the spleens of BALB/c Thy1.1 donors at >4 wk post-JHMV immunization and transferred i.v. into naive Thy1.2 BALB/c recipients (5 x 106 cells per recipient) 1 day before, or 2 days following CNS infection as previously described (31). Donor cells were prepared by depleting B cells via adsorption to 150-mm plates coated with goat anti-mouse Ig (ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, CA). Following B cell depletion, CD8+ T cells were purified by positive selection with anti-Lyt-2-coated magnetic beads according to the supplier’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). CD8+ T cells were enriched to >97% and contained 5–8% virus-specific pN9 tetramer+ cells as assessed by flow cytometric analysis.

Isolation of mononuclear cells

CNS-derived mononuclear cells (CMC) were isolated as previously described (14, 15, 16, 17). Briefly, brains and spinal cords were removed from mice perfused with PBS, homogenized in RPMI 1640 containing 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, using Tenbroeck tissue homogenizers, and adjusted to 30% Percoll (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). CMC were concentrated by centrifugation at 800 x g for 20 min at 4°C onto a 1-ml 70% Percoll cushion. Cells were recovered from the 30%/70% interface.

CTL assays. CMC were evaluated for ex vivo cytolytic activity as previously described (14, 15, 17). Briefly, J774.1 (H-2d) target cells were labeled with Na51CrO4. The pN9 peptide (29) was added at 1 µM before addition of CMC at various E:T ratios. Cr51 release was determined in 100 µl of supernatant following a 4-h incubation at 37°C. Specific lysis is defined as 100 x (experimental release – spontaneous release)/(detergent release – spontaneous release). Spontaneous release values were <20% of total release in all experiments. Specific cytolysis per tetramer+ CD8+ T cell was calculated by adjusting E:T ratios to tetramer+ CD8+ T cells.

Flow cytometry

Single cell suspensions obtained from spleen, cervical lymph nodes (CLN), and CNS were preincubated with a mixture (10%) of mouse, rat, and human sera (Atlanta Biologicals, Norcross, GA) and rat anti-mouse CD16/32 (2.4G2; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) for 20 min on ice to block nonspecific binding. PE, FITC, PerCP, and allophycocyanin-labeled mAb specific for CD45 (30-F11), CD4 (RM4-5), CD8 (53-6.7), CD44 (IM7), CD62L (MEL-14), CD43 (S7), CD49d (R1-2), Thy1.1 (OX-7), Thy1.2 (30-H12), Ly-6G (1A8), Ly-6C (AL-21), MHC class I (39-10-8), class II (2G9), Bcl2 (3F11), and isotype-control hamster IgG (A19-3) were all obtained from BD Pharmingen. Anti-F4/80 PE was obtained from Serotec (Raleigh, NC). Allophycocyanin-labeled anti-granzyme B (GB12) and isotype-control mouse IgG1 were obtained from Caltag Laboratories (Burlingame, CA). JHMV-specific CD8+ T cells were identified by Ld-pN9 class I tetramers as previously described (14).

Function of pN9-specific CD8+ T cells was determined by intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} (31). Briefly, 1–2 x 106 CNS, spleen, or CLN cells were incubated with 3 x 105 J774.1 feeder cells with or without 1 µM pN9 peptide for 5 h at 37°C in the presence of Golgistop (BD Pharmingen). Cells were stained for surface markers and permeabilized using Cytofix (BD Pharmingen) for 15 min at 4°C. PE or FITC-labeled IFN-{gamma} (XMG 1.2) and TNF-{alpha} (MP6-XT22) mAb were used to assess intracellular cytokine production. Granzyme B and Bcl2 expression were analyzed on cells stained for surface markers before permeabilization with Cytofix. Cells were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer using CellQuest Pro software (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA).

Histology

Brains, bisected in the mid-coronal plane, and spinal cords were examined for inflammation and distribution of viral Ag. Tissues were fixed for 3 h in Clark’s solution (75% ethanol and 25% glacial acetic acid) before embedding. Sections were stained with H&E to determine inflammation. Distribution of viral Ag was determined by immunoperoxidase staining (Vectastain-ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) using the anti-JHMV mAb J.3.3 specific for the carboxyl terminus of the viral nucleocapsid protein as the primary Ab (32) and horse anti-mouse as secondary Ab (Vector Laboratories). Sections were scored for inflammation and viral Ag in a blinded fashion. Representative fields were identified based on average scores of all sections in each experimental group.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Increased CNS virus clearance by 2' CD8+ T cells

JHMV-specific memory CD8+ T cells protect immunocompromised mice and reduce CNS virus in the presence or absence of CD4+ T cells (31, 33). To confirm that endogenous CD8+ T cell memory enhances CNS virus clearance in immunocompetent mice, CD8+ T cell memory was established by immunization with an rVV expressing the pN9 immunodominant CTL epitope (29). Immune mice were challenged with JHMV at 4 wk postimmunization and virus clearance compared with infected age-matched naive mice. Viral titers were reduced by 40- to 100-fold in the CNS of 2' compared with 1' mice at 5 and 7 days p.i. (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, the infectious virus could not be detected in 40% of 2' mice compared with recovery from 100% of 1' mice at 10 days p.i. Moreover, the infectious virus was reduced in the remaining 60% of 2' mice compared with 1' mice. No infectious virus could be recovered from either group of mice following 14 days p.i., consistent with previous reports (14, 15, 17). Enhanced virus clearance in 2' mice was associated with earlier onset (days 5–6 p.i.) of clinical disease, characterized by a hunched back and altered gait, compared with similar clinical signs at days 8–9 p.i. in 1' mice. These observations are consistent with the notion that clinical disease is immune mediated (33, 34). Subsequently, 2' mice exhibited clinical symptoms similar to 1' mice through all times points monitored. Histological analysis showed an increased inflammatory response in the CNS of 2' mice, compared with 1' mice (Fig. 1, B and C). Consistent with reduced infectious virus in the CNS of 2' mice (Fig. 1A), fewer Ag-positive glial cells were detected in brains (data not shown) and spinal cords (Fig. 1B) at day 10 p.i. compared with 1' mice (Fig. 1C). In 2' mice, relatively few Ag-positive cells were detected in the gray matter. The number of infected white matter cells with the morphological characteristics of oligodendrocytes were also reduced at 10 days p.i. compared with 1' responders. These data suggested efficient in vivo perforin-mediated cytolysis and IFN-{gamma} secretion (27, 28).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. JHMV pathogenesis in 1' and 2' responder mice. Immunized BALB/c mice harboring JHMV-specific memory CD8+ T cells and age-matched naive mice were infected with JHMV. JHMV replication in the CNS of 1' and 2' responder mice was assessed by plaque assay at indicated time points p.i. (A). Data represent mean titers in the CNS of at least three experiments with three to four mice per time point. The dotted line indicates limit of detection. JHMV Ag in the spinal cords of JHMV-infected 2' (B) and 1' (C) responder mice (immunoperoxidase stain for JHMV Ag with hematoxylin counterstain). In 2' responders, viral Ag was limited to a small number of cells localized to the white matter tracks. In 1' responders, JHMV Ag-positive cells were more numerous and detected within both white and gray matter. Bar, 100 µm.

 
Memory T cells alter CNS inflammation

Enhanced virus control, earlier onset of clinical disease, and increased encephalitis in 2' mice suggested an altered CNS inflammatory response. Increased infiltration of CD45high bone marrow-derived cells was detected in the CNS of 2' mice (>55% of total CMC), compared with 1' mice (~20%) as early as 5 days p.i. (Fig. 2). This increase was also reflected by a 5- to 6-fold increase in CD45high cells recovered from the CNS (Fig. 2B). However, despite the rapid onset of inflammation, similar percentages and absolute numbers of CD45high CNS infiltrates were obtained from both groups at day 7 and all subsequent days p.i. (Fig. 2B). The composition of infiltrating cells was analyzed to determine the cell types preferentially recruited into the CNS of 2' mice. Macrophages constituted the major component in the CNS infiltrates of both groups, with similar frequencies at day 5 p.i. (Fig. 3A). By contrast, the relative frequencies of neutrophils and NK cells were reduced in 2' vs 1' CNS infiltrates (Fig. 3A). This predominance of macrophages in the early response contrasts with a lethal neuronotropic JHMV infection in which neutrophils are a predominant component of the early CNS infiltrates (35). This discrepancy may be explained by differences in tropism and virulence. The early increase in CNS infiltrates of 2' responders was thus partially accounted for by increased macrophage recruitment. No differences were evident in the relative CD4+ T cell percentages (Fig. 3B); thus, absolute CD4+ T cell numbers were elevated only 4-fold at day 5 p.i. within the CNS of 2' mice compared with 1' mice (Fig. 3B). By contrast, the difference in CD8+ T cellrecruitment was very distinct (Fig. 3B). CD8+ T cells comprised a major fraction of the CD45high population in the CNS of 2' mice (>30%), compared with 1' responders (<5%) at day 5 p.i. (Fig. 3B). Thus, absolute CD8+ T cell numbers in 2' responders by far surpassed those in 1' mice. Even though infiltration equalized by day 7 p.i., the CD8+ T cell proportion remained elevated at >55% of the CD45high infiltrating cells in 2' mice compared with <35% in 1' mice at all subsequent time points (Fig. 3B). Therefore, after day 5 p.i. the relative percentages of total CD8+ T cells within their respective CD45high populations remained fairly constant over 90 days p.i. (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Rapid CNS infiltration of mononuclear cells in 2' responders. Single cell suspensions were prepared from the CNS of infected mice undergoing 2' and 1' CD8+ T cell responses (n = 4–5 per time point). A, Representative density plots of CD45 expression in 2' (left plot) or 1' CNS populations (right plot). Differences in CD45high infiltrates are highlighted by the R2 and R4 regions. B, Bars depict percentages of infiltrating CD45high cells in total CNS cells obtained for 2' (solid) and 1' (open) responders. Circles depict total numbers of CD45high-infiltrating cells recovered per brain from 2' (solid) and 1' (open) responders.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Altered composition of CNS infiltrates in 2' responders. A, Relative percentages of macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells within the CNS-infiltrating populations of 2' and 1' mice at days 5 and 7 p.i. Data were calculated by setting CD45high-infiltrating cells to 100%. B, Bars depict relative percentages of CD8+ (solid) and CD4+ (open) T cells within the 2' and 1' CD45high populations (x-axis = day p.i.). C, Bars represent percentages of tetramer+ cells within the CD8+ T cell population derived from the CNS of 2' (solid) or 1' (open) mice, respectively. Total numbers of infiltrating tetramer+ CD8+ T cells recovered per brain of 2' (solid) and 1' (open) mice are depicted as circles. Data represent an average of two to three independent experiments and SD is <10%.

 
Ag-specific 2' CD8+ T cells dominate in quantity and effector function

The proportion of pN9-specific cells within the total CD8+ T cells was examined to determine the contribution of virus-specific and bystander CD8+ T cell recruitment. Tetramer analysis revealed that ~50% of 2' CD8+ T cells were virus specific at day 5 p.i. and the frequency increased to 65% by day 7 p.i. (Fig. 3C). By contrast, the percentage of tetramer+ cells was lower at day 5 p.i. in the CNS of 1' responders and only reached 50% of the CD8+ population at day 7 p.i. The relative proportion of pN9-specific CD8+ T cells remained consistently elevated in 2' mice up to day 90 p.i. (Fig. 3C). Conversion of relative percentages to total numbers of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells per brain revealed a striking difference in both the rapidity and focused specificity of 2' compared with 1' responses. In the CNS of 1' responders, tetramer+ cells were at the limit of detection at day 5 p.i. and reached a maximum of ~2.6 x 105 at day 7 p.i. (Fig. 3C). By contrast, similar numbers were detected in the CNS of 2' mice 2 days earlier (day 5 p.i.) and increased a further 2-fold by day 7 p.i. Elevated virus-specific CD8+ T cells within the CNS of 2' vs 1' mice suggested prominent recruitment and/or expansion of pN9-specific memory T cells. Indeed, increased frequencies of virus-specific CD8+ T cells were detected both at days 5 and 7 p.i. in the CLN and spleen of 2' responders; expansion was more evident in the CLN compared with spleen (data not shown), consistent with the suggestion that CLN are the prominent site of CNS Ag drainage (7, 36). Despite increased numbers (2- to 3-fold following day 7 p.i.) of tetramer+-specific CD8+ T cells in 2' mice throughout infection, the overall survival relative to peak CNS accumulation appeared to be similar in both groups (Fig. 3C). Although contraction of the virus-specific CD8+ T cells was more rapid in 1' responders, resulting in a 70–80% loss between days 7 and 14 p.i., contraction of virus-specific 2' CD8+ T cells during the same interval was less pronounced with only a ~45% decrease; albeit contraction was prolonged to day 25 p.i. The decline was more gradual and similar comparing 2' and 1' tetramers+ CD8+ T cells between 25 and 90 days p.i. (Fig. 3C). Retention of virus-specific CD8+ T cells following viral clearance thus appeared to correlate with the maximal pool size recruited into the CNS during acute infection, rather than inherently distinct survival capacities.

The increased percentages of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in the 2' CNS population (Figs. 3C and 4A) corresponded with increased CD8+ T cells producing IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} compared with 1' CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4, B and C). Although 60–80% of 2' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells isolated from the CNS secreted IFN-{gamma} at days 7 and 14 p.i., <60% of 1' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells secreted IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 4, B and C). Higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) suggested that 2' CD8+ T cells produced more IFN-{gamma} than 1' CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4B). Moreover, the majority of 2' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells (~70%) retained the ability to produce IFN-{gamma} in contrast to the diminishing numbers (~40–50%) of 1' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells at 60 and 90 days p.i. (Fig. 4C). Thus, in addition to an increased percentage of cells capable of IFN-{gamma} secretion, 2' Ag-specific CD8+ T cells have the capacity to secrete more IFN-{gamma} per cell. A surprising finding was that while >50% of both 1' and 2' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells were capable of IFN-{gamma} secretion, only ~20–35% of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells produced TNF-{alpha} throughout infection (Fig. 4C). Although a higher proportion of cells producing IFN-{gamma} compared with TNF-{alpha} is common during many acute infections (37, 38, 39), equal frequencies of IFN-{gamma}+ and TNF-{alpha}+ CD8+ T cells are observed during memory (37, 38, 39). The reduced ability to secrete TNF-{alpha}, even following virus clearance, appears to be a unique property of CD8+ T cells within the CNS, as all splenic memory CD8+ T cells secreted both IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} at both 2 and 9 mo following peripheral JHMV infection (data not shown).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Recruitment, retention, and function of CNS Ag-specific CD8+ T cells in 2' responders. A, Representative density plots of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells isolated from the CNS of 2' (left plot) and 1' responders (right plot) at day 7 p.i. Events are gated on CD8+ T cells. Numbers in the upper right quadrant represent the percentage of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells. B, Virus-specific CNS-derived CD8+ T cells from the CNS of 2' (left plot) and 1' (right plot) responders were stimulated with pN9 peptide and analyzed for intracellular IFN-{gamma} (x-axis) and TNF-{alpha} (y-axis) production at day 7 p.i. Events are gated on CD8+ T cells. Numbers represent percentages of positive cells in the respective quadrants. MFI of IFN-{gamma} production (x-axis) by 2' CD8 (left plot) is 340, and 1' CD8 (right plot) is 245. C, Bars represent percentages of IFN-{gamma} + (solid) or TNF-{alpha} + (open) cells within the tetramer+ CD8+ T cell population isolated from CNS of 2' (left plot) or 1' (right plot) responders. Data were calculated by setting the tetramer+ CD8+ T cell population to 100%. SD is <10%. D, Bcl2 expression (x-axis, dark line) by tetramer+ CD8+ T cells isolated from 2' (left plot) or 1' (right plot) CNS at 7 days p.i. Isotype control (light line).

 
Virus-specific CD8+ T cells isolated from both 1' and 2' CNS at days 5–14 p.i. expressed an activated phenotype (CD69+, CD44high, CD62Llow, Ly6C+, CD49d+, and data not shown). Activation in both populations was further supported by high levels of CD43 expression, a marker associated with cytolytic activity (11, 40, 41), and loss of CD127 expression at day 7 p.i. (data not shown). By day 25 p.i., the majority of 1' and 2' CNS CD8+ T cells expressed CD127, indicative of a memory population (42). By contrast, while the CD43high phenotype was retained by ~65% of 2' CD8+ T cells (MFI = 1024) the majority (~76%) of 1' CD8+ T cells expressed intermediate CD43 levels (MFI = 520). Finally, an increased proportion of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells in the 2' immune CNS expressed Bcl2 compared with 1' controls at day 7 p.i (Ref. 43 ; Fig. 4D). Although increased Bcl2 expression by 2' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells correlated with increased resistance to apoptosis before day 14 p.i., it did not result in increased overall survival in the CNS (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the majority of 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells persisting in the CNS following day 14 p.i. were CD44high, CD62low, and retained CD69 expression (data not shown), an early activation marker reported to correlate with retention of memory CD8+ T cells in nonlymphoid organs (10, 14, 44).

2' CD8+ T cells retain cytolytic activity

To determine whether 2' JHMV-specific CD8+ T cells retain cytolytic activity, similar to 2' influenza virus-specific CD8+ T cells (10), ex vivo CTL activity was compared in 1' and 2' CNS-derived CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5). 1' CD8+ T cells exhibited maximal cytolytic activity at day 7 p.i., which was completely lost by day 25 p.i. (Fig. 5), consistent with previous reports (14, 15, 17). CD8+ T cells from 2' mice exhibited higher cytolytic activity at day 7 p.i. and continued to express cytolytic activity at day 25 p.i. (Fig. 5), despite reduced infectious virus (Fig. 1). Analysis of E:T ratios based on tetramer+ CD8+ T cells revealed that 2' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells expressed increased (>3-fold) cytolytic activity at the single cell level at day 7 p.i. (Fig. 5). Furthermore, despite an overall loss of activity over time, 2' CD8+ T cells isolated as late as 90 days p.i. retained ex vivo CTL activity (data not shown). Although granzyme B expression was indistinguishable in 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells isolated from CNS at day 7 and 14 p.i., it was preferentially retained by 2' CD8+ T cells at day 60 p.i. (data not shown). Retention of CD8+ T cell cytolytic potential in both a neuronotropic influenza virus and glial tropic JHMV CNS infection implies that cytolytic activity is regulated by an inherent property of the memory cell, rather than instruction by the infected cell type.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Persistence of cytolytic activity by 2' CD8+ T cells. CNS-derived cells obtained from 2'- and 1'-infected mice (n = 5–7) were analyzed for ex vivo cytolytic activity at indicated time points p.i. using peptide-coated J774.1 (H-2d) target cells. Specific cytolysis (right plot) normalized to reflect lysis achieved by one tetramer+ cell per target cell. Data represent one of two to three similar experiments.

 
Survival and effector function of 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells in the same host

To verify that the majority of virus-specific CD8+ T cells recruited and retained in the CNS are derived from the memory population, CD8+ T cells purified from spleens of immunized BALB/c Thy1.1 donors were transferred into naive BALB/c Thy1.2 recipients 24 h before infection. Thy1.1+ memory CD8+ T cells comprised >90% of the CNS-infiltrating CD8+ T cell population at 8 days p.i. (Table I). Furthermore, Thy1.1+ donor CD8+ T cells were retained at high frequencies at 30 days p.i. (Table I), confirming preferential recruitment of memory rather than newly primed cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Memory CD8+ T cells limit the magnitude of primary CNS responsesa

 
To confirm that increased granzyme B, IFN-{gamma}, and Bcl2 expression were intrinsic properties of reactivated memory CD8+ T cells, even in a 1' CD8+ T cell CNS environment, memory Thy1.1+ CD8+ T cells were transferred at day 2 p.i. into Thy1.2+ recipients. This approach allowed normal priming of endogenous CD8+ T cells and simultaneous recruitment of both 1' Thy1.2+ and donor memory Thy1.1+ CD8+ T cells. The CNS CD8+ T cell population was comprised of 66% 1' and 34% 2' CD8+ T cells at day 8 p.i. (Table II). The majority of recruited donor CD8+ T cells were virus specific (>60%). By contrast, only ~30% of recipient 1' CD8+ T cells were virus specific (Table II). Consistent with increased recruitment of memory cells into the infected CNS, a higher percentage of 2' CD8+ T cells expressed granzyme B, IFN-{gamma}, and the antiapoptotic marker Bcl2, compared with 1' recipient CD8+ T cells (Table II). Unaltered ratios of 2' Thy1.1+ to 1' Thy1.2+ CD8+ T cells at days 8 and 30 p.i. suggested similar survival capacities by both populations, despite increased Bcl2 expression by 2' CD8+ T cells at day 8 p.i. (Table II). The frequency of tetramer+ cells remained greater in 2' Thy1.1+ CD8+ T cells (~70%) compared with recipient Thy1.2+ CD8+ T cells (~30%) at day 30 p.i. (Table II and Fig. 6). These data were surprisingly similar to the equivalent survival of 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells observed following infection of immune and naive mice. Analysis of the two populations at 30 days p.i. showed an increased percentage of virus-specific 2' CD8+ T cells expressed granzyme B and IFN-{gamma} compared with 1' CD8+ T cells (Table II and Fig. 6). These results confirm that 2' effectors retain effector function for prolonged periods of time within the CNS compared with 1' CD8+ T cells, even when exposed to identical stimuli and suppressive factors. During re-exposure to Ag, these cells overwhelm the primary immune response, clear Ag rapidly, and importantly persist within the CNS in a state of "readiness".


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Primary and secondary CD8+ T cell function in the CNSa

 


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Differential regulation of 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells in the same CNS environment. CD8+ T cells from immunized Thy1.1 BALB/c donors were transferred into Thy1.2 BALB/c recipients 2 days p.i. CMC were isolated at day 30 p.i. and analyzed for Thy1.1, CD8, pN TCR, granzyme B, and peptide-induced IFN-{gamma} production. Values represent percentages positive within the Thy1.1 CD8+ T cells (upper) or Thy1.2 CD8+ T cells (lower). Numbers in parentheses represent MFI.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The goal of this study was to investigate quantitative and qualitative differences between 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells and their influence on viral CNS pathogenesis. Confirming functional memory, Ag-specific memory CD8+ T cells exhibited a heightened capacity for recall in lymphoid organs following CNS viral challenge, were rapidly recruited to the CNS in increased numbers, and facilitated efficient viral clearance. Comparison of 1' and 2' CD8+ populations revealed several novel findings: 1) during acute infection, 2' CD8+ T cells had a greater capacity to secrete IFN-{gamma} and express cytolytic activity at the population level and on a single cell basis, despite similar activated phenotypes; 2) survival rates of 1' and 2' populations within the CNS were similar following 25 days p.i.; 3) both 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells in the CNS had a reduced capacity for TNF-{alpha} production, even following viral clearance; and 4) in contrast to 1' CD8+ T cells, persisting 2' CD8+ T cells retained cytolytic activity and IFN-{gamma} secretion. Therefore, 2' CD8+ T cells residing in the CNS following viral clearance appear to remain on a "higher alert status" compared with 1' CD8+ T cells.

Initial activation and proliferation of both 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells was detected in the CLN rather than the spleen, supporting CNS Ag drainage primarily to the CLN (7, 36). Vastly increased frequencies of 2' CD8+ T cells in the CNS early during infection confirmed the enhanced migratory potential of memory T cells (24, 44, 45). Early CNS infiltration of 2' CD8+ T cells also coincided with a manyfold increase in macrophage recruitment, consistent with the notion that activated memory CD8+ T cells may facilitate inflammation by secreting chemokines such as MIP-1{alpha}, MIP-1{beta}, and RANTES (46, 47, 48), and releasing prestored matrix metalloproteinase-9 to enhance blood brain barrier breakdown (49). The high proportion of tetramer+ cells within CD8+ infiltrates in the 2' responders also suggested only a modest contribution by bystander CD8+ T cells.

CD8+ T cells were largely derived from the memory pool rather than naive precursors as shown by the dominance of memory donor CD8+ T cells transferred before infection in the recipient CNS-infiltrating T cell population. As the number of virus-specific memory T cells in immune mice is estimated to be at least 20-fold higher than in adoptive transfer recipients, this population is equally likely to out compete 1' responses (50). These data are similar to peripheral models of infection demonstrating that memory CD8+ T cells influence the magnitude of the endogenous 1' response (50). The data suggest that memory cells re-exposed to Ag overwhelm priming and expansion of naive cells in lymphoid organs, possibly by competing for limited APC and are thus prominently recruited into the CNS.

During acute infection, 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells expressed similar activated phenotypes with the exception of Bcl2 expression. Although 1' tetramer+ CD8+ effectors expressed reduced Bcl2 levels compared with naive and memory cells (43), a significant population of 2' virus-specific CD8+ T cells within the CNS retained Bcl2 expression. One possible reason could relate to the distinct histories of Ag exposure and proliferation during re-challenge, resulting in CD8+ T cell subsets with distinct survival capacities. Alternatively, this population may be enriched for Ag-specific memory T cells recruited directly from the periphery, which are more resistant to apoptosis compared with effector cells (24). Nevertheless, Bcl2 expression during acute infection correlated with prolonged contraction in 2' CD8+ T cells, but not with enhanced overall survival at later time points, similar to the prolonged contraction of 2' CD8+ T cells following either Listeria monocytogenes or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (50).

Enhanced effector function inherent to 2' CD8+ T cells was evident by both increased frequencies of IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells and also by increased expression on a per cell basis. This difference in IFN-{gamma} secretion was even more evident following virus clearance. These results were confirmed by increased IFN-{gamma} expression by CNS-derived 2' donor CD8+ T cells compared with 1' recipient CD8+ responses. Increased IFN-{gamma} biological activity in the CNS of 2' responders was also reflected by enhanced IFN-{gamma}-dependent class II expression on microglia at both early and late time points p.i. (C. Ramakrishna and C. Bergman, unpublished observations). In contrast to highly efficient IFN-{gamma} production, there was a clear paucity of TNF-{alpha} production by both 1' and 2' virus-specific CD8+ T cells throughout the course of CNS infection. This effect does not appear to be a virus-mediated decoy mechanism (51), as equal numbers of memory CD8+ T cells secreting IFN-{gamma} and TNF-{alpha} were present in the spleens of JHMV-immunized mice. TNF-{alpha} down-regulation is Ag independent and occurs early following Ag recognition (37, 38). Although TNF-{alpha} producers are fewer than IFN-{gamma} producers during many acute responses, restimulation of memory T cells isolated from both lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs is associated with equivalent responsiveness (37, 38, 39). Down-regulation of TNF-{alpha} during acute responses may thus be explained by Ag encounter in both the periphery and CNS. However, the inability to recover TNF-{alpha} production once viral Ag is cleared from the CNS remains unsolved. Inefficient priming has been shown to affect the capacity of T cells to efficiently secrete TNF-{alpha} and/or establish efficient memory (52). Although Ag drainage into the CLN and the absence of professional APC in the CNS may indeed lead to suboptimal priming following CNS infection, IFN-{gamma}/TNF-{alpha} competent memory T cells should not be regulated by this mechanism during a recall response. It has also been suggested that partially exhausted memory CD8+ T cells lose the ability to secrete TNF-{alpha} under conditions of subsaturating signal strength and long-term exposure to the virus (53). Although this may be true for 1' CD8+ T cells, 2' CD8+ T cells in the CNS are exposed to even lower levels of virus, implying exhaustion is unlikely to play a role. One possible explanation is regulation via adhesion molecules. Both CD69 and CD43 are highly expressed on 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells persisting in the CNS and both molecules have been implicated in down regulating lymphocyte responses (41, 54). Alternatively, signaling by CNS resident cells or factors present in the environment may provide negative signals for T cell TNF-{alpha} production. Irrespective of the mechanism, the reduced capacity of 2' CD8+ T cells in the CNS to produce TNF-{alpha} upon Ag stimulation is inconsistent with conversion to a resting effector memory CD8+ T cell following viral clearance.

A crucial finding is retention of ex vivo cytolytic activity by 2' CD8+ T cells, correlating with increased CD43 and granzyme B expression. Distinct regulation of cytolytic activity may either be intrinsic to differentiation of 1' vs 2' CD8+ T cells, or regulated by reduced exposure to Ag in the CNS during the 2' response (53). Down-regulation of cytolytic activity by 1' CD8+ T cells following infection with both pathogenic and nonpathogenic, nonpersisting JHMV variants (15, 16) suggest that prolonged Ag exposure does not correlate with modulation of this effector function. Conversely, the inability of 1' CD8+ T cells to re-express cytolytic activity following virus recrudescence in the CNS of B cell-deficient mice does not exclude Ag-mediated suppression (17). The present data imply that CD8+ T cell intrinsic factors regulate cytolytic activity because both 1' and 2' CD8+ T cells are exposed to the same inflamed CNS environment. This notion is supported by increased granzyme B+ CD8+ T cell frequencies in 2' tetramer+ CD8+ T cells compared with 1' recipient CD8+ T cells in the CNS. Thus, these results favor a distinct susceptibility to the down-regulation of effector function, rather than the action of omnipotent suppressive factors, cytokines, or T regulatory cells in the CNS. Furthermore, they suggest that vaccination strategies designed to elicit vigorous T cell responses to CNS pathogens is a dual edged sword. Although a peripheral pool of memory CD8+ T cells is clearly beneficial for rapid viral clearance, early recruitment coincides with significantly enhanced macrophage infiltration, potentially enhancing immune-mediated pathology. Although retention of highly armed effector cells in the CNS long after virus clearance may provide an early line of defense upon re-infection, potential cross-reactivity with self-Ag may also facilitate development of autoimmune disease.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Wen Wei (Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California) for assistance with histopathology and Emanuel Dimcali (Department of Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California) for assisting with flow cytometry and maintenance of the BALB/c Thy1.1 mouse colony.


    Footnotes
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS18146, NS40667, and AI47249. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Cornelia C. Bergmann, Departments of Pathology and Neurology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 1333 San Pablo Street, MCH 148, Los Angeles, CA 90033. E-mail address: cbergman{at}hsc.usc.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: 1', primary; 2', secondary; CLN, cervical lymph node; CMC, CNS-derived mononuclear cell; JHMV, JHM strain of mouse hepatitis virus; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; p.i., postinfection; rVV, recombinant vaccinia virus. Back

Received for publication July 13, 2004. Accepted for publication August 19, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Stohlman, S. A., C. C. Bergmann, S. Perlman. 1999. Mouse hepatitis virus. R. Ahmed, and I. Chen, eds. Persistent Viral Infections 537. Wiley, New York.
  2. Griffin, D. E.. 2003. Immune responses to RNA-virus infections of the CNS. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:493.[Medline]
  3. Ahmed, R., L. A. Morrison, D. M. Knipe. 1997. Viral persistence. N. Nathanson, ed. Viral Pathogenesis 181. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.
  4. Carson, M. J., J. G. Sutcliffe. 1999. Balancing function vs. self defense: the CNS as an active regulator of Immune responses. J. Neurosci. Res. 55:1.[Medline]
  5. Lawrence, D. A., D. Kim. 2000. Central/peripheral nervous system and immune responses. Toxicology 142:189.[Medline]
  6. Harling-Berg, C. J., J. J. Hallet, J. T. Park, P. M. Knopf. 2002. Hierarchy of immune responses to antigen in the normal brain. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 265:1.[Medline]
  7. Cserr, H. F., P. M. Knopf. 1992. Cervical lymphatics, the blood-brain barrier and the immunoreactivity of the brain: a new view. Immunol. Today 13:507.[Medline]
  8. Matyszak, M. K.. 1998. Inflammation in the CNS: balance between immunological privilege and immune responses. Prog. Neurobiol. 56:19.[Medline]
  9. Drescher, K. M., L. R. Pease, M. Rodriguez. 1997. Antiviral immune responses modulate the nature of central nervous system (CNS) disease in a murine model of multiple sclerosis. Immunol. Rev. 159:177.[Medline]
  10. Hawke, S., P. G. Stevenson, S. Freeman, C. R. M. Bangham. 1998. Long term persistence of activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes after viral infection of the central nervous system. J. Exp. Med. 187:1575.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Van der Most, R. G., K. Murali-Krishna, R. Ahmed. 2002. Prolonged persistence of effector memory CD8 T cells in the central nervous system after Dengue virus encephalitis. Internat. Immunol. 15:119.
  12. Stohlman, S. A., C. C. Bergmann, R. C. van der Veen, D. R. Hinton. 1995. Mouse hepatitis virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes protect from lethal infection without eliminating virus from the central nervous system. J. Virol. 69:684.[Abstract]
  13. Stohlman, S. A., C. C. Bergmann, M. T. Lin, D. J. Cua, D. R. Hinton. 1998. CTL effector function within the central nervous system requires CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 160:2896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Bergmann, C. C., J. D. Altman, D. Hinton, S. A. Stohlman. 1999. Inverted immunodominance and impaired cytolytic function of CD8+ T cells during viral persistence in the CNS. J. Immunol. 163:3379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Marten, N. W., S. A. Stohlman, R. D. Atkinson, D. R. Hinton, J. O. Fleming, C. C. Bergmann. 2000. Contributions of CD8+ T cells and viral spread to demyelinating disease. J. Immunol. 164:4080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Marten, N. W., S. A. Stohlman, C. C. Bergmann. 2000. Role of viral persistence in retaining CD8+ T cells within the central nervous system. J. Virol. 74:7903.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Ramakrishna, C., S. A. Stohlman, R. D. Atkinson, M. J. Shlomchik, C. C. Bergmann. 2002. Mechanisms of central nervous system viral persistence: the critical role of antibody and B cells. J. Immunol. 168:1204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kundig, T. M., H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1993. T cell-dependent IFN-{gamma} exerts an antiviral effect in the central nervous system but not in peripheral solid organs. J. Immunol. 150:2316.[Abstract]
  19. Lin, M. T., D. R. Hinton, B. Parra, S. A. Stohlman, R. C. Van der Veen. 1998. The role of IL-10 in mouse hepatitis virus-induced demyelinating encephalomyelitis. Virology 245:270.[Medline]
  20. Chabot, S., V. W. Yong. 2000. Interferon-{beta}-1b increases IL-10 in a model of T cell-microglia interaction: relevance to MS. Neurology 55:1497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hailer, N. P., F. L. Heppner, D. Haas, R. Nitsch. 1998. Astrocytic factors deactivate Ag-presenting cells that invade the CNS. Brain Pathol. 8:459.[Medline]
  22. Pratt, B. M., J. M. McPherson. 1997. TGF-{beta} in the central nervous system: potential roles in ischemic injury and neurodegenerative diseases. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 8:267.[Medline]
  23. Keane, R. W.. 1997. Immunosuppression: CNS effects. R. W. Keane, and W. F. Hickey, eds. Immunology of the Nervous System 642. Oxford University Press, New York.
  24. Lefrancois, L., D. Masopust. 2002. T cell immunity in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14:503.[Medline]
  25. Doherty, P. C., J. E. Allen, F. Lynch, R. Ceredig. 1990. Dissection of an inflammatory process induced by CD8 T cells. Immunol. Today 11:55.[Medline]
  26. Wang, F. I., D. R. Hinton, W. Gilmore, M. D. Trousdale, J. O. Fleming. 1992. Sequential infection of glial cells by the murine hepatitis virus JHM strain (MHV-4) leads to a characteristic distribution of demyelination. Lab. Invest. 66:744.[Medline]
  27. Parra, B., D. R. Hinton, N. W. Marten, C. C. Bergmann, M. T. Lin, C. S. Yang, S. A. Stohlman. 1999. IFN-{gamma} is required for viral clearance from central nervous system oligodendroglia. J. Immunol. 162:1641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lin, M. T., S. A. Stohlman, D. R. Hinton. 1997. Mouse hepatitis virus is cleared from the central nervous systems of mice lacking perforin-mediated cytolysis. J. Virol. 71:383.[Abstract]
  29. Bergmann, C. C., M. McMillan, S. Stohlman. 1993. Characterization of the Ld-restricted cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitope in the mouse hepatitis virus nucleocapsid protein. J. Virol. 67:7041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Fleming, J. O., M. Trousdale, F. El-Zaatari, S. A. Stohlman, L. P. Weiner. 1986. Pathogenicity of antigenic variants of murine coronavirus JHM selected with monoclonal antibodies. J. Virol. 58:869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bergmann, C. C., B. Parra, D. R. Hinton, C. Ramakrishna, M. Morrison, S. A. Stohlman. 2003. Perforin-mediated effector function within the central nervous system requires IFN-{gamma} mediated MHC up-regulation. J. Immunol. 170:3204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Fleming, J. O., S. A. Stohlman, R. C. Harmon, M. M. C. Lai, J. A. Frelinger, L. P. Weiner. 1983. Antigenic relationships of murine coronaviruses: analysis using monoclonal antibodies to JHM (MHV-4) virus. Virology 131:296.[Medline]
  33. Bergmann, C. C., B. Parra, D. R. Hinton, C. Ramakrishna, K. C. Dowdell, S. A. Stohlman. 2004. Perforin and {gamma} interferon-mediated control of coronavirus central nervous system infection by CD8 T cells in the absence of CD4 T cells. J. Virol. 78:1739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Pewe, L., J. Harring, S. Perlman. 2002. CD4 T cell-mediated demyelination is increased in the absence of {gamma}-interferon in mice infected with mouse hepatitis virus. J. Virol. 76:7329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Zhou, J., S. A. Stohlman, D. R. Hinton, N. W. Marten. 2003. Neutrophils promote mononuclear cell infiltration during viral-induced encephalitis. J. Immunol. 170:3331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Marten, N. W., S. A. Stohlman, J. Zhou, C. C. Bergmann. 2003. Kinetics of virus-specific CD8+ T cell expansion and trafficking following central nervous system infection. J. Virol. 77:2775.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Slifka, M., J. L. Whitton. 2000. Activated and memory CD8 T cells can be distinguished by their cytokine profiles and phenotypic markers. J. Immunol. 164:208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Badovinac, V. P., G. A. Corbin, J. T. Harty. 2000. Off cycling of TNF production by antigen-specific CD8 T cells is antigen independent. J. Immunol. 165:5387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Belz, G. T., W. Xie, P. C. Doherty. 2001. Diversity of epitope and cytokine profiles for primary and secondary influenza A virus-specific CD8 T cell responses. J. Immunol. 166:4627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Harrington, L. E., M. Galvan, L. G. Baum, J. D. Altman, R. Ahmed. 2000. Differentiating between memory and effector CD8 T cells by altered expression of cell surface O-glycans. J. Exp. Med. 191:1241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Onami, T. M., L. E. Harrington, M. A. Williams, M. Galvan, C. P. Larsen, T. C. Pearson, N. Manjunath, L. G. Baum, B. D. Pearce, R. Ahmed. 2002. Dynamic regulation of T cell immunity by CD43. J. Immunol. 168:6022.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Kaech, S. M., J. T. Tan, E. J. Wherry, B. T. Konieczny, C. D. Surh, R. Ahmed. 2003. Selective expression of the interleukin 7 receptor identifies effector CD8 T cells that give rise to long-lived memory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4:1191.[Medline]
  43. Grayson, J., A. J. Zajac, J. D. Altman, R. Ahmed. 2000. Increased expression of Bcl-2 in antigen-specific memory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 164:3950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Masopust, D., V. Vezys, E. J. Usherwood, L. S. Cauley, S. Olsen, A. L. Marzo, R. L. Ward, D. L. Woodland, L. Lefracois. 2004. Activated primary and memory CD8 T cells migrate to nonlymphoid tissues regardless of the site of activation or tissue of origin. J. Immunol. 172:4875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Weninger, E., N. Manjunath, U. H. von Andrian. 2002. Migration and differentiation of CD8 T cells. Immunol. Rev. 186:221.[Medline]
  46. Walzer, T., A. Marcais, F. Saltel, C. Bella, P. Jurdic, J. Marvel. 2003. Immediate RANTES secretion by resting memory CD8 T cells following Ag stimulation. J. Immunol. 170:1615.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Cook, D. N., O. Smithes, R. M. Strieter, J. A. Frelinger, J. S. Serody. 1999. CD8 T cells are a biologically relevant source of macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha} in vivo. J. Immunol. 162:5423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Dorner, D. B., H. R. C. Smith, A. R. French, S. Kim, J. P. Laurent, D. L. Beckman, J. T. Pingel, R. A. Kroczek, W. M. Yokoyama. 2004. Coordinate expression of cytokines and chemokines by NK cells during murine cytomegalovirus infection. J. Immunol. 172:3119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Biddison, W. E., D. D. Taub, W. W. Cruikshank, D. M. Center, E. W. Connor, K. Honma. 1997. Chemokine and matrix metalloproteinase secretion by myelin proteolipid protein-specific CD8+ T cells: potential roles in inflammation. J. Immunol. 158:3076.
  50. Badovinac, V. P., K. A. L. Messingham, S. E. Hamilton, J. T. Harty. 2003. Regulation of CD8 T cells undergoing primary and secondary responses to infection in the same host. J. Immunol. 170:4993.
  51. Herbein, G., W. O’Brien. 2000. Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and TNF receptors in viral pathogenesis. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 223:241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Fuller, M. J., A. Khanolkar, A. E. Tebo, A. J. Zajac. 2004. Maintenance, loss, and resurgence of T cell responses during acute, protracted, and chronic viral infections. J. Immunol. 172:4204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Zhou, S., R. Ou, L. Huang, G. E. Price, D. Moskophidis. 2004. Differential tissue-specific regulation of antiviral CD8 T cell immune responses during chronic viral infection. J. Virol. 78:3578.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Zajac, A. J., J. N. Blattman, K. Murali-Krishna, J. D. Sourdive, M. Suresh, J. D. Altman, R. Ahmed. 1998. Viral immune evasion due to persistence of activated cells without effector function. J. Exp. Med. 188:2205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. M. Gonzalez, C. C. Bergmann, C. Ramakrishna, D. R. Hinton, R. Atkinson, J. Hoskin, W. B. Macklin, and S. A. Stohlman
Inhibition of Interferon-{gamma} Signaling in Oligodendroglia Delays Coronavirus Clearance without Altering Demyelination
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 168(3): 796 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Ramakrishna, R. A. Atkinson, S. A. Stohlman, and C. C. Bergmann
Vaccine-Induced Memory CD8+ T Cells Cannot Prevent Central Nervous System Virus Reactivation.
J. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 176(5): 3062 - 3069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. A. Friese and L. Fugger
Autoreactive CD8+ T cells in multiple sclerosis: a new target for therapy?
Brain, August 1, 2005; 128(8): 1747 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramakrishna, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ramakrishna, C.
Right arrow Articles by Bergmann, C. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS