|
|
||||||||

* Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology and Graduate Program in Pathobiology, Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912; and
Pharmaceutical Research Laboratories, Kirin Brewery, Takasaki, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unlike T cells, NK cells do not possess rearranged Ag-specific receptors and, therefore, the use of MHC class I and/or MHC class II peptide-loaded tetramers cannot be used to distinguish NK cells that are actively participating in an immune response from those that are not. For this reason, the kinetics of the expansion and contraction phases of the NK cell response to pathogens have not been accurately characterized. Specifically, the kinetics of NK cell recruitment into an immune response, the impact immune stimuli have on NK cell maturation, the fate of the responding NK cell population, and the responsiveness of activated NK cells to secondary infection remain important unanswered questions with regard to the in vivo biology of NK cells.
The role of NK cells in defense against murine CMV (MCMV)3 infection has been clearly demonstrated (5). Experimental depletion of NK cells early during MCMV infection results in unchecked viral replication and increased mortality (6). Early during the course of infection, NK cells serve as direct antiviral effectors by secreting IFN-
and mediating cytotoxicity (7, 8). These NK cell functions are promoted by the production of the proinflammatory innate cytokines IL-12 and IFN-
, respectively (9). Recently, the mouse C57BL/6-derived Ly49H NK cell-activating receptor has been demonstrated to be intimately involved in resistance to MCMV infection (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Ly49H was shown to directly interact with m157, a MCMV-encoded protein expressed on the surface of infected cells (15, 16).
In addition to receiving signals that directly promote effector functions, NK cells also receive signals that stimulate them to proliferate and to accumulate in response to MCMV (5). It has been demonstrated that the NK cell proliferative response during the first 2 days of infection is driven by IFN-
(17) and occurs in a nonspecific manner (18). During the later stages of the acute response, days 26, selective NK cell proliferation occurs in the Ly49H+ subset (18) in a manner that is dependent on IL-18 and IL-12 and the presence of CD8
+ dendritic cells (19).
The killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1) is a recently described C-type lectin inhibitory receptor that is expressed on
30% of resting NK cells (20, 21, 22) as well as on a subset of CD8+ and CD4+ memory T cells in naive mice (23, 24, 25). In this study, we demonstrate that KLRG1 expression is restricted to the most mature NK cell population in naive animals and that the induction of KLRG1 on NK cells during MCMV infection provides a method to visualize and characterize both the expansion and contraction phases of the NK cell response to pathogens. We show that NK cell recruitment into the immune response to MCMV is restricted to the first 3 days of infection and provide evidence that like T cells, NK cells undergo an active maturation process as they participate in an immune response. Our data also indicate that during the resolution of the acute response, the activated NK cells are selectively lost as the NK cell compartment contracts to homeostatic levels. Additionally, we demonstrate that a stable pool of naive peripheral NK cells is maintained throughout the immune response to MCMV and importantly these cells are capable of responding to secondary stimuli.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Male C57BL/6 and B6.SJL-Ptprca/BoAiTac (Taconic Laboratory Animals and Services, Germantown, NY) were purchased for these studies. All mice were maintained in pathogen-free breeding facilities at Brown University (Providence, RI). All mice were males between 5 and 9 wk of age. Experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines for animal care.
Infection protocols
Stocks of Smith strain MCMV salivary gland extracts were prepared as previously described (26). Infections were initiated by the i.p. delivery of 5 x 104 PFU of MCMV. For each of the MCMV time course experiments conducted, the infections were initiated on different days so that each animal in any given experiment was sacrificed on the same day. For
-galactosylceramide (
-GalCer) experiments, mice were treated i.p. with 2 µg of
-GalCer.
In vivo BrdU treatments
In vivo BrdU pulsing was performed by injecting 1 mg of BrdU per MCMV-infected mouse i.p. 1.5 h before sacrifice. Analysis for BrdU incorporation was performed using the BrdU Flow kit (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA).
Isolation of lymphocytes
To obtain splenic lymphocytes, spleens were minced, passed through nylon mesh (Tetko, Kansas City, MO) and washed once in 3% PBS/serum, and cell suspensions were layered on Lympholyte-M (Cedarlane Laboratories, Hornby, Ontario, Canada). Hepatic lymphocytes were prepared by mincing and passage through a 70-µm nylon cell strainer (BD Falcon, Franklin Lakes, NJ). After washing three times in 3% PBS/serum, cell suspensions were layered onto two-step discontinuous Percoll gradients (Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Piscataway, NJ). Splenocytes and hepatic lymphocytes were collected after centrifugation for 30 min at 900 x g.
NK cell stimulation for IFN-
production
For in vitro stimulations, splenic lymphocytes were isolated and then incubated with IL-2 (1000 U/ml) and IL-12 (10 ng/ml) for 6 h with brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) added for the last 3 h of culture. Cells were then harvested and analyzed for TCR
, NK1.1, KLRG1, and intracellular IFN-
protein by four-color staining followed by flow cytometry. For in vivo stimulations, splenic and hepatic lymphocytes were isolated from mice that had been administered
-GalCer 6 h before sacrifice and analyzed as stated above.
Adoptive transfer
Splenocytes prepared from C57BL/6 mice (CD45.2+) were enriched for NK cells using DX5 magnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), stained for NK1.1 and KLRG1, and then FACS sorted into KLRG1+ and KLRG1 NK cell subsets (purity was >96% for both subsets). After sorting, 1 x 1052 x 105 cells of each subset were independently transferred into B6.SJL hosts (CD45.1+) via i.v. injection. Depending on the experiment, recipient animals were then simultaneously infected with MCMV, left uninfected, or had been previously infected with MCMV. The recipient animals were then sacrificed at the indicated time points and analyzed for KLRG1 expression on TCR
, NK1.1+, and CD45.2+ lymphocytes isolated from both the spleens and livers of recipient animals.
Abs and reagents
TCR-
-FITC and TCR-
-allophycocyanin (clone H57), NK1.1-PE, and NK1.1-allophycocyanin (clone PK136), Ly49 C/I/F/H-FITC (clone 14B11), CD94-PE (clone 18d3), CD11b-PE (clone M1/70), CD51-PE (clone RMV-7), CD117-PE (clone 2B8), and isotype controls were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). In addition, CD45.2-FITC (clone 104), Ly49A/D-FITC (clone 12A8), Ly49G2-FITC (clone 4D11), DX5-PE, CD43-PE (clone 1B11), Bcl-2-PE (clone 3F11), IFN-
-allophycocyanin (clone XMG1.2), biotinylated KLRG1 (clone 2F1), isotype controls, and streptavidin-PerCP were purchased from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, CA). The anti-KLRG1 rat mAb (clone 1F10) was produced in our laboratory as described previously (22, 25). The above-mentioned Abs were used for FACS analysis in this study. Mouse IL-2 and IL-12 were purchased from BD Pharmingen.
-GalCer was synthesized by Kirin Brewery (Gunma, Japan).
Flow cytometric analysis
Cells were suspended in buffer comprised of PBS containing 3% FCS and 0.02% NaN3. Cells were first incubated with 2.4G2 mAb for 20 min. Cells were then stained with mAbs specific for cell surface markers or isotype controls for 30 min at 4°C. After two washes, streptavidin-PerCP was added for another 30 min when appropriate. Cells were then washed and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Intracellular staining for IFN-
and Bcl-2 protein was performed using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Pharmingen). The TUNEL assay was performed using the In Situ Cell Death Detection kit, fluorescein (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Depending on the experiments and the tissue, 2.5 x 1053 x 106, events were collected on a FACSCalibur. The data were acquired and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, the in vivo stages of NK cell development have been phenotypically and functionally defined (27, 28). Mature NK cells in the peripheral tissues can be identified by the preferential expression of both DX5 and CD11b and the preferential lack of CD51 and CD117 (c-kit) expression (28). To determine whether KLRG1 could serve as a marker for NK cell maturation status, we phenotyped hepatic NK cells using mAbs specific to the NK cell maturation markers DX5, CD11b, CD43, CD51, and CD117 as well as to the NK cell receptors CD94, Ly49s (A/D, C/I/F/H, and G2), and KLRG1. We demonstrate that >99% of KLRG1+ NK cells isolated from the liver of naive C57BL/6 mice also express both DX5 and CD11b (Fig. 1). Additionally, >96% of KLRG1+ NK cells express Ly49 molecules. The KLRG1+ NK cell population in the liver also preferentially lacks both CD51 and CD117 expression. Similar results were obtained when NK cells isolated from the spleen, bone marrow, and blood were analyzed (data not shown). These findings indicate that, in naive mice, KLRG1 expression is restricted to a unique subset of the most phenotypically mature NK cells.
|
Previously, we demonstrated that during the immune response to MCMV infection there is a dramatic increase in the percentage of NK cells that are positive for the expression of the KLRG1 molecule (22). KLRG1 expression therefore identifies the most mature NK cells in naive animals as well as NK cells that have been activated during the course of MCMV infection. To determine whether KLRG1 expression could be used as a marker for the study of the NK cell compartmental response during both the expansion and contraction phases of the primary immune response to MCMV infection, we examined the total number of NK cells present throughout the course of infection, as well as the relationship the absolute number of NK cells has to the number of NK cells present within both the KLRG1+ and the KLRG1 NK cell subsets.
As shown in Fig. 2, there is a decrease in the total number of NK cells present in the spleen of MCMV-infected animals at day 1.5 postinfection while there is a modest increase in total NK cell numbers in the liver at this time point, in accordance with previous observations (29). After day 1.5, there is a dramatic increase in total NK as well as KLRG1+ NK cell numbers in both the spleen and the liver. The peak in NK cell numbers in both compartments, day 7 for the spleen and day 5 for the liver, corresponds to the peak in prevalence of the KLRG1+ subset. Additionally, the decrease in NK cell numbers during the contraction phase of the NK cell response to MCMV infection is marked by a selective decrease in KLRG1+ NK cells. Importantly, there is constant maintenance, in terms of number, of KLRG1 NK cells throughout the course of the infection.
|
The expansion of the KLRG1+ NK cell subset in response to MCMV infection could be explained by: 1) the selective proliferation of KLRG1+ NK cells or 2) the direct induction of the KLRG1 molecule on KLRG1 NK cells. To address this issue, we first analyzed the total, the KLRG1+, and the KLRG1 NK cell populations for acute BrdU incorporation (injected i.p. 1.5 h before sacrifice) at day 1.5 after MCMV infection. A comparison of the above-mentioned NK cell subsets showed that there was not a significant difference in the percentage of NK cells within each subset that is positive for BrdU incorporation (Fig. 3, a and b). Thus, the expansion of the KLRG1+ NK cell subset early during MCMV infection does not result from the selective proliferation of KLRG1+ NK cells.
|
As shown in Fig. 3c, the KLRG1+ NK cell population remained positive in both MCMV-infected and uninfected animals. In contrast, the KLRG1 NK population became KLRG1+ when transferred into mice that were either MCMV infected or left uninfected. Importantly, the kinetics of the transition of KLRG1 NK cells into KLRG1+ NK cells was significantly accelerated in the context of MCMV infection (day 3 for MCMV infected vs day 14 for uninfected). These data demonstrate that KLRG1 expression is directly induced on NK cells during MCMV infection and that KLRG1 expression can also be acquired during homeostatic NK cell maturation. In addition, these data indicate that the acquisition of KLRG1 expression is an irreversible process.
Kinetics of NK cell recruitment into the immune response to MCMV infection
The kinetics of NK cell recruitment into the immune response to MCMV infection is unknown. To explore this dynamic process, we used the strategy of transferring KLRG1 NK cells into mice that had been previously infected with MCMV for varying numbers of days and then monitoring the transition of the donor KLRG1 NK cells into the KLRG1+ NK cell population. We analyzed the transferred NK population for KLRG1 expression on day 3 post-transfer because data from our previous experiments, described in Fig. 3, indicated that transferred KLRG1 NK cells would not transition into the KLRG1+ subset by day 3 posttransfer unless they receive immune system stimulation. Using this strategy, we demonstrate that KLRG1 NK cells become KLRG1+ if they are transferred into mice that have been previously infected with MCMV for 1 or 3 days (Fig. 4). However, when transferred on or after day 4 post-MCMV infection, the KLRG1 donor NK cells remain KLRG1. Thus, the recruitment of NK cells into the immune response to MCMV infection appears to be restricted to the first 3 days of infection.
|
As a result of our findings that KLRG1 expression is restricted to the most phenotypically mature NK cells in naive mice, we hypothesized that MCMV infection may not simply lead to KLRG1 expression on the overwhelming majority of NK cells but it may also drive an accelerated maturation of the entire responding NK cell population. To investigate this possibility, we examined the expression of DX5, CD11b, CD51, CD117, and KLRG1 on NK cells on days 0, 3, 7, 9, 12, and 15 after MCMV infection. On day 3 after MCMV infection, KLRG1 expression remains restricted to the DX5+ and CD11b+ NK cell populations (Fig. 5). Similar finding were observed at earlier time points, days 1 and 1.5 postinfection (data not shown). However, on day 3 after MCMV infection, KLRG1 expression can be seen on a significant percentage of both CD51+ and CD117+ NK cells. This demonstrates that the loss of CD51 and CD117 surface expression is not an absolute prerequisite for NK cell KLRG1 expression. By day 7 after MCMV infection, when
90% of the NK cells express KLRG1, the NK cells of the liver are overwhelmingly DX5+, CD11b+, CD51, and CD117. Interestingly, by day 9 after MCMV infection, the heightened prevalence of immature NK cells in the liver can be visualized by the presence of an increased percentage of NK cells that lack the expression of DX5 and CD11b as well as KLRG1 (Fig. 5). Similar results were obtained when splenic NK cells were analyzed (data not shown).
|
Because of our findings that KLRG1 induction on NK cells is an irreversible process, it seemed likely that the decrease in the KLRG1+ NK cell subset after day 7 was due to the selective death of KLRG1+ NK cells. To test this hypothesis, we isolated hepatic lymphocytes on days 0, 3, 7, 9, 12, and 15 after MCMV infection and analyzed the KLRG1+ and KLRG1 NK cell populations for intracellular expression of the antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2. It has been demonstrated that high Bcl-2 expression is important for IL-15-mediated survival of peripheral NK cells (30, 31). Additionally, the loss of Bcl-2 expression has been shown to occur in Ag-specific CD8+ T cells just before death during the T cell contraction phase (32). As shown in Fig. 6, both KLRG1+ and KLRG1 NK cells isolated from the liver of naive animals express high levels of Bcl-2. However, during the course of MCMV infection, Bcl-2 expression is selectively lost in the KLRG1+ NK cell subset. Similar results were obtained when splenic NK cells were analyzed (data not shown).
|
The naive NK cell pool retains the ability to respond to secondary immune system stimuli during the course of MCMV infection
As a result of our observation that a KLRG1 NK cell population was constantly maintained throughout the course of primary MCMV infection, we hypothesized that this subset could represent a pool of peripheral "naive" NK cells that have the ability to respond to secondary immune system stimuli in that they are not taking part in the current ongoing immune response to MCMV. To address this issue, we isolated splenocytes from uninfected mice and mice that had been infected with MCMV for 5, 7, 9, or 12 days and restimulated them in vitro with IL-2 and IL-12. As shown in Fig. 7a, under these conditions, both the KLRG1+ and the KLRG1 NK cell populations isolated from the spleens of naive animals produced IFN-
in an equivalent manner. When splenocytes isolated from day 5 MCMV-infected mice are restimulated, the KLRG1+ NK cell population is hyperresponsive for IFN-
production. However, the heightened responsiveness of the KLRG1+ NK cell population to restimulation wanes by day 7 after MCMV infection. When splenocytes isolated from mice that had been previously infected with MCMV for 9 or 12 days are restimulated, the KLRG1+ NK cell population is languid for IFN-
production when compared with the KLRG1 NK cell subset. Importantly, at all time points examined, the KLRG1 NK cell population remained equally responsive to stimulation when compared with their naive counterparts.
|
-GalCer.
-GalCer administration rapidly activates NK cells in a V
14i NKT cell-dependent manner (34, 35). When splenic NK cells were analyzed, both the KLRG1+ and the KLRG1 NK cell populations isolated from previously unstimulated mice produce IFN-
in response to
-GalCer in an equivalent manner (Fig. 7b). In contrast, when hepatic NK cells were isolated from mice that had only received
-GalCer stimulation, the KLRG1+ NK cells produce less IFN-
when compared with the hepatic KLRG1 NK cells. However, the KLRG1 NK cell subset from both the spleen and the liver preferentially responded to
-GalCer administration in mice that had been previously infected with MCMV for 12 or 15 days. Collectively, this in vitro and in vivo data indicate that the KLRG1 NK cell population represents a pool of peripheral NK cells that retain the ability to efficiently respond to new immune stimulus irrespective of concurrent MCMV infection and in a manner that is comparable to the naive condition. This data also provides evidence that there are important tissue-specific differences which act to regulate the functional responsiveness of the KLRG1+ NK cell subset in vivo. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although initiated earlier during infection, our data demonstrate that the kinetic profile of the NK cell response to MCMV infection echoes that of the prototypical T cell response to viral pathogens. Previous studies have demonstrated that the expansion of the T cell compartment often peaks after a significant reduction in pathogen burden has occurred (36). Interestingly, the height of NK cell expansion occurs well after the peak of the biological NK cell effector response (days 1.52 postinfection) (5). The number of NK cells present in the naive condition are therefore sufficient for the NK cell effector phase. The significant expansion in NK cell numbers after day 2 postinfection does, however, correlate with the reported time points when NK cells are active in maintaining CD8
+ dendritic cells (19) and regulating both CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses (37). It remains to be determined whether an increase in NK cell numbers is required for these functions to be effectively provided by the activated NK cell population.
Interestingly, the recruitment of NK cells into the immune response to MCMV infection occurs only during the first 3 days of infection. Thus, the activation of NK cells by the in vivo environment created by the innate immune response to MCMV appears to be transient and is terminated before viral clearance (38). In this respect, NK cell recruitment into the immune response to MCMV infection is analogous to reports documenting the temporal restriction of in vivo T cell priming (39, 40). Although multiple mechanisms can initiate in vivo NK cell activation (5), the window of NK cell recruitment during MCMV infection corresponds to high systemic levels of both IFN-
and IL-12 (9). However, the absence of IFN-
or IL-12 does not affect the induction of KLRG1 on NK cells during the early phase of MCMV infection (data not shown) nor does the absence of these cytokines abolish all NK cell functions (17).
Our results demonstrate that the recruitment of NK cells into the immune response to MCMV is followed by an accelerated phenotypic maturation of the entire responding NK cell population. Although significantly accelerated in the context of MCMV infection, this NK cell maturation process appears to be similar to the NK cell maturation process that occurs under normal homeostatic conditions (28). Interestingly, the restriction of KLRG1 expression to DX5+CD11b+ NK cells is maintained as NK cells progress from being naive to becoming activated in response to infection. During the resolution of acute MCMV infection, as the responding KLRG1+ NK cells are selectively lost during NK cell compartmental contraction, this restriction is also conserved. Similar results were observed during the acute NK cell response to primary
-GalCer administration and during the course of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and Toxoplasma gondii infections (data not shown). These data indicate that the accelerated phenotypic maturation of the responding NK cell population during MCMV infection is not a pathogen-specific phenomenon.
Importantly, we demonstrate that during both the expansion and contraction phases of the immune response to MCMV infection, a subset of naive NK cells that remains responsive to immune stimulation is actively maintained. The number of NK cells present within this naive pool remain relatively constant throughout the course of infection. As previously noted, the number of NK cells present during the biological NK cell effector phase to primary MCMV infection is not dramatically increased over the naive condition. Given the ability of the naive NK cell pool to remain consistently responsive to stimulation, the numbers of cells present within this NK cell population at any given time point during the course of primary MCMV infection provides a peripheral NK cell population to the host that is competent in its ability to deliver an appropriate innate NK cell effector response.
Additionally, we provide evidence that there are important compartmental differences that exist, with respect to the spleen and the liver, which act to regulate the functional responsiveness of the KLRG1+ NK cell population in vivo. It has been previously demonstrated that NK cell killing and IFN-
production are differentially required in the spleen and the liver for protection against MCMV infection (8). Tissue-specific microenvironments may therefore play a critical role in determining the functional outcome of NK cell activation. Although splenic KLRG1+ NK cells are able to produce IFN-
in response to primary in vitro and in vivo stimulation in a manner similar to KLRG1 NK cells in the context of the experimental conditions described here, KLRG1+ NK cells do not respond as well as KLRG1 NK cells during the primary biological IFN-
response to MCMV infection (22). With respect to this observation, it is important to note that temporal changes in the splenic environment initiated by immune stimulus could subsequently contribute, either directly or indirectly, to the differential responsiveness of KLRG1+ NK cells.
From the data presented here, it is clear that the mature DX5+CD11b+ NK cell population of naive animals can be further divided into KLRG1 and KLRG1+ subsets. As KLRG1 NK cells can be found outside of the DX5+CD11b+ NK cell population in naive and MCMV-infected animals, it follows that the DX5+CD11b+KLRG1+ NK subset is generated from the DX5+CD11b+KLRG1 NK population. These two subsets of DX5+CD11b+ NK cells could, therefore, represent temporally distinct NK cell populations within the context of a linear homeostatic progression of NK cell maturation. It is tempting to speculate that the acquisition of KLRG1 expression by NK cells, whether under homeostatic conditions or during an immune response, marks those NK cells that are approaching the end of their natural life span. In support of this hypothesis, we demonstrate here that apoptotic NK cells are most prevalent within the KLRG1+ NK cell subset. Additionally, we demonstrate that "immune experienced" KLRG1+ NK cells appear functionally distinct from their "immune inexperienced" KLRG1+ counterparts. It is therefore conceivable that in the context of immune stimulation, KLRG1+ NK cells undergo further, yet currently indistinguishable, phenotypic changes that alter their responsiveness to further stimulation and initiate a molecular program leading to NK cell death.
Collectively, the data presented here illustrate that the in vivo dynamics of the NK cell compartmental response to infection is elegantly orchestrated in that it provides both immediate protection against infection and the maintenance of a naive NK cell population. Our results demonstrate that, as with T cells, the in vivo kinetics of NK cell activation in response to infection is temporally restricted and that during activation, NK cells undergo a maturation process. This activation-induced NK cell maturation process, although accelerated, resembles that which occurs under homeostatic conditions. Additionally, our data indicate that the selective death of the responding NK cell population provides a mechanism by which NK cell compartmental homeostasis is restored during the resolution of the acute immune response. Our findings also provide clues regarding the natural progression of NK cell maturation within the peripheral tissues.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
-GalCer. Additionally, we thank J. Wesley for critical review of this manuscript and Drs. C. Biron and G. Yap for helpful discussions. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Laurent Brossay, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Division of Biology and Medicine, Box G-B618, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912. E-mail address: Laurent_Brossay{at}Brown.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MCMV, murine CMV; KLRG1, killer cell lectin-like receptor G1;
-GalCer,
-galactosylceramide. ![]()
Received for publication February 11, 2004. Accepted for publication April 23, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production and antiviral defense: studies of natural killer and T cell responses in contrasting viral infections. J. Immunol. 156:1138.[Abstract]

, and TNF effects on antiviral state and NK cell responses during murine cytomegalovirus infection. J. Immunol. 156:4746.[Abstract]

, IL-12, and IL-15 regulation of NK cell responses to viral infection. J. Immunol. 169:4279.
in defense against murine cytomegalovirus infection and enhancement of this defense pathway by interleukin 12 administration. J. Exp. Med. 182:1045.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Nakamura, K. Kuroki, I. Ohki, K. Sasaki, M. Kajikawa, T. Maruyama, M. Ito, Y. Kameda, M. Ikura, K. Yamamoto, et al. Molecular Basis for E-cadherin Recognition by Killer Cell Lectin-like Receptor G1 (KLRG1) J. Biol. Chem., October 2, 2009; 284(40): 27327 - 27335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chiossone, J. Chaix, N. Fuseri, C. Roth, E. Vivier, and T. Walzer Maturation of mouse NK cells is a 4-stage developmental program Blood, May 28, 2009; 113(22): 5488 - 5496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Joshi and S. M. Kaech Effector CD8 T Cell Development: A Balancing Act between Memory Cell Potential and Terminal Differentiation J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1309 - 1315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pilbeam, P. Basse, L. Brossay, N. Vujanovic, R. Gerstein, A. N. Vallejo, and L. Borghesi The Ontogeny and Fate of NK Cells Marked by Permanent DNA Rearrangements J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1432 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Wesley, M. S. Tessmer, C. Paget, F. Trottein, and L. Brossay A Y Chromosome-Linked Factor Impairs NK T Development J. Immunol., September 15, 2007; 179(6): 3480 - 3487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Huntington, H. Tabarias, K. Fairfax, J. Brady, Y. Hayakawa, M. A. Degli-Esposti, M. J. Smyth, D. M. Tarlinton, and S. L. Nutt NK Cell Maturation and Peripheral Homeostasis Is Associated with KLRG1 Up-Regulation J. Immunol., April 15, 2007; 178(8): 4764 - 4770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Tessmer, C. Fugere, F. Stevenaert, O. V. Naidenko, H. J. Chong, G. Leclercq, and L. Brossay KLRG1 binds cadherins and preferentially associates with SHIP-1 Int. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 391 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. French, H. Sjolin, S. Kim, R. Koka, L. Yang, D. A. Young, C. Cerboni, E. Tomasello, A. Ma, E. Vivier, et al. DAP12 Signaling Directly Augments Proproliferative Cytokine Stimulation of NK Cells during Viral Infections J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 4981 - 4990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Roland, V. Soulard, C. Sellier, A.-M. Drapier, J. P. Di Santo, P.-A. Cazenave, and S. Pied NK Cell Responses to Plasmodium Infection and Control of Intrahepatic Parasite Development J. Immunol., July 15, 2006; 177(2): 1229 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ito, T. Maruyama, N. Saito, S. Koganei, K. Yamamoto, and N. Matsumoto Killer cell lectin-like receptor G1 binds three members of the classical cadherin family to inhibit NK cell cytotoxicity J. Exp. Med., February 21, 2006; 203(2): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Colonna Cytolytic responses: cadherins put out the fire J. Exp. Med., February 20, 2006; 203(2): 261 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |