The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greve, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greve, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 173: 157-163.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

The Diabetes Susceptibility Locus Idd5.1 on Mouse Chromosome 1 Regulates ICOS Expression and Modulates Murine Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis 1

Bernhard Greve2,*, Lalitha Vijayakrishnan2,*, Aarup Kubal*, Raymond A. Sobel{dagger}, Laurence B. Peterson{ddagger}, Linda S. Wicker§ and Vijay K. Kuchroo3,*

* Center for Neurologic Diseases, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115; {dagger} Laboratory Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA 94304; {dagger}Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305; {ddagger} Department of Pharmacology, Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065; and § Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation/Wellcome Trust, Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Linkage analysis and congenic mapping in NOD mice have identified a susceptibility locus for type 1 diabetes, Idd5.1 on mouse chromosome 1, which includes the Ctla4 and Icos genes. Besides type 1 diabetes, numerous autoimmune diseases have been mapped to a syntenic region on human chromosome 2q33. In this study we determined how the costimulatory molecules encoded by these genes contribute to the immunopathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). When we compared levels of expression of costimulatory molecules on T cells, we found higher ICOS and lower full-length CTLA-4 expression on activated NOD T cells compared with C57BL/6 (B6) and C57BL/10 (B10) T cells. Using NOD.B10 Idd5 congenic strains, we determined that a 2.1-Mb region controls the observed expression differences of ICOS. Although Idd5.1 congenic mice are resistant to diabetes, we found them more susceptible to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein 35–55-induced EAE compared with NOD mice. Our data demonstrate that higher ICOS expression correlates with more IL-10 production by NOD-derived T cells, and this may be responsible for the less severe EAE in NOD mice compared with Idd5.1 congenic mice. Paradoxically, alleles at the Idd5.1 locus have opposite effects on two autoimmune diseases, diabetes and EAE. This may reflect differential roles for costimulatory pathways in inducing autoimmune responses depending upon the origin (tissue) of the target Ag.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The centromeric end of mouse chromosome 1 includes a cluster of genes encoding the costimulatory molecules CD28, CTLA-4, and ICOS. Linkage analysis and congenic mapping in NOD mice have identified a susceptibility locus for type 1 diabetes, Idd5.1, which includes the Ctla4 and Icos genes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Besides diabetes, numerous human autoimmune diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, celiac disease, and autoimmune thyroiditis) have been mapped to a syntenic region on human chromosome 2q33 and are associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) 4 in the CTLA-4 gene (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15).

The importance of the costimulatory molecules CD28, CTLA-4, and ICOS and their isoforms in regulating T cell activation, expansion, and effector functions makes these genes candidates for genetic regulation of autoimmune diseases. CD28 is constitutively expressed on T cells, and its ligation by its ligands (B7.1 and B7.2) provides essential positive signals for T cell activation, expansion, and survival. The lack of either CD28 or its ligands makes mice more resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) while enhancing diabetes (16, 17, 18, 19, 20). CTLA-4 surface expression is up-regulated after T cell activation and, in contrast to CD28, delivers a negative signal to the T cell. CTLA-4-deficient mice develop a severe lymphoproliferative disorder and multiorgan autoimmune disease (21, 22). Differences in mRNA levels of a recently described novel CTLA-4 splice variant (ligand-independent CTLA-4 (liCTLA-4)), which lacks the B7.1 and B7.2 binding domain have been found in T cells of diabetes-susceptible NOD mice and resistant C57BL/10 (B10) or NOD.B10 Idd5.1 mice.5 A synonymous SNP present in exon 2 of the mouse CTLA-4 gene has been proposed to be the molecular basis of Idd5.1 by determining the efficiency of liCTLA-4 mRNA splicing (15). Another costimulatory molecule, ICOS, is up-regulated on T cells upon activation and provides a positive signal for T cell activation when cross-linked with its ligand B7h (23, 24, 25). As costimulation through ICOS promotes IL-10 and IL-4 production, it has been suggested that ICOS may play a critical role in Th2 differentiation (26). Blockade of ICOS costimulation during the induction phase enhanced EAE (27), and ICOS-deficient mice are more susceptible to EAE even on a genetically resistant background (28). These functional data demonstrate a critical role of the costimulatory molecules CD28, CTLA-4, and ICOS in regulating autoimmune diseases.

In the present study the expression of the costimulatory molecules CD28, full-length CTLA-4 (flCTLA-4), and ICOS on T cells of NOD, B6, B10, and Idd5.1 congenic mice was analyzed. We found strain-specific differences in ICOS and, to a lesser extent, flCTLA-4 expression and determined that the Idd5.1 region is responsible for the ICOS expression differences. To investigate whether Idd5.1 is a shared susceptibility locus for diabetes and EAE, we tested Idd5.1 congenic mice for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein 35–55 (MOG35–55)-induced EAE. Unexpectedly, diabetes-resistant Idd5.1 congenic mice developed more severe EAE compared with NOD mice. This difference correlated with higher expression of ICOS and greater production of IL-10 by activated NOD T cells compared with Idd5.1-derived T cells.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

NOD and NOD.B10 Idd5 R426, R46, and R974 mice were purchased from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY). The R974 and R46 strains are available from Taconic Farms through the Emerging Models Program (lines 974 and 2193, respectively). B6 and B10 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the animal facility of Harvard Institutes of Medicine (Boston, MA).

Expression analysis of costimulatory molecules by flow cytometry

Spleen cells from 6- to 10-wk-old female mice were stained in V-bottom, 96-well plates using the following FITC- or PE-labeled Abs: CD4 (clone RM4-5), CD8 (clone 53-6.7), CD25 (clone 3C7), and CD28 (clone 37.51; all from BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). For ICOS and OX-40 staining we used FITC-labeled or biotinylated Abs (clones 7E.17G9 and ACT35, respectively; BD PharMingen), followed by either FITC- or PE-labeled streptavidin. For measurement of CTLA-4 expression, cells were stained with anti-CD4 or -CD8, fixed and permeabilized (Cytofix/Cytoperm; BD PharMingen), and subsequently stained with a PE-labeled CTLA-4 Ab (UC10–4F10-11; BD PharMingen). Appropriate isotype controls were used in all experiments, and all experiments also included 7-amino-actinomycin D staining for the identification of dead or dying cells.

For measurements of induced expression, single-cell suspensions of spleen cells were prepared and activated in the presence of 1 µg/ml of Con A in HL-1 medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with L-glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin for different time periods. Four-color flow cytometry was performed on a FACSort (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA), and data were analyzed using FlowJo 3.4 software (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA). The number of positive cells compared with isotype control-stained cells was calculated using the overtone subtraction method (included in FlowJo software). The {Delta} mean fluorescence intensity ({Delta}MFI) was calculated as the mean fluorescence intensity of the stained sample minus that of the respective isotype control sample.

In vivo activation of T cells and induction of EAE

For in vivo activation, mice were injected with 2 µg of anti-CD3 (clone 145-2C11, low endotoxin/no azide; BD PharMingen) and 5 µg of anti-CD28 (clone 37.51; BD PharMingen) in 200 µl of PBS i.v. into the tail vein. Spleen cells were subjected to FACS staining, as described above, 12 or 48 h after injection.

EAE was induced by immunization of age-matched female mice with 200 µg of MOG35–55 peptide (MEVGWYRSPFSRVVHLYRNGK) dissolved in PBS and mixed in equal parts with CFA supplemented with 4 mg/ml Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37RA (Difco, Detroit, MI). Mice were injected s.c. in both flanks. On days 0 and 2, each mouse was additionally given 100 ng of pertussis toxin (List Biological Laboratories, Campbell, CA) i.v. into the tail vein. The severity of clinical disease was assessed as follows: score 0 = no paralysis, 1 = limp tail, 2 = limp tail and weak gait, 3 = hind limb paralysis, 4 = fore limb paralysis, and 5 = death or moribund animal. Mice were given water and food on the bottom of the cage when they were paralyzed.

Histopathology

Brains and spinal cords were removed from the mice 7–10 wk after induction of EAE and fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin. Paraffin-embedded sections of these were stained with Luxol Fast Blue-H&E for light microscopy. Histological disease was quantitated by counting the inflammatory foci in meninges and parenchyma as previously described (29).

Activation of CD4+ T cells and measurement of proliferation and cytokine production

Flat-bottom, 96-well plates were coated with different concentrations of anti-CD3 in 50 µl of PBS/well for 2 h at 37°C. Plates were washed twice with sterile PBS, and wells were further coated with either 3 µg of anti-ICOS Ab (26) or rat IgG control in 50 µl of PBS/well. After 2-h incubation at 37°C, plates were again washed twice with sterile PBS.

CD4+ cells were purified using CD4+ T cell enrichment columns (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) following the manufacturer’s instructions. After lysis of RBC, single-cell suspensions of two spleens per column were incubated for 15 min with the Ab mixture contained in the kit and loaded onto the column. After eluting, cells were counted, resuspended in HL-1 medium supplemented with L-glutamine and penicillin/streptomycin, and loaded onto the coated plates. Cell suspensions contained 92–94% CD4+ T cells, as verified by FACS analysis (data not shown).

After 72 h, supernatants were removed, and wells were pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine/well (NEN, Boston, MA). Cells were harvested 18 h later, and [3H]thymidine incorporation was measured using a beta scintillation counter (model LS5000; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).

Cytokines were measured in the supernatants using a sandwich ELISA as described previously (30). Briefly, plates were coated with the appropriate capture anti-cytokine Ab in bicarbonate buffer (pH 8) for 2 h at 37°C. After blocking with blocking solution (Kirkegaard & Perry, Gaithersburg, MD), samples and different standard dilutions were loaded onto the plates and incubated overnight at 4°C. After extensive washing, plates were incubated with the respective biotinylated secondary Ab and subsequently with streptavidin-peroxidase. The following mAb pairs were used: IL-4 (BVD4-1D11, capture; BVD6-24G2, detection), IL-10 (JES5-2A5, capture; SXC-1, detection), and IFN-{gamma} (R4-6A2, capture; XMG1.2, detection). SureBlue solution was used as a peroxidase substrate, and the reaction was stopped using stop solution (both from Kirkegaard & Perry). Absorption was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Analysis of the data was performed using Microplate Manager III software (Bio-Rad).

Statistical analysis

To compare ICOS and CTLA-4 expression in different mouse strains (NOD vs B6 and B10, NOD vs Idd5.1 and R974), we used a two-way ANOVA model in which mouse strains and experiments are the two factors, and the log of the {Delta}MFI measurements are the responses. Cumulative disease scores were calculated as the area under the curve for disease data of individual mice. The mean and SEM were calculated from pooled data. For between-group comparisons of clinical and histopathological data, Student’s t test was used. To compare stimulated IL-10 secretion between NOD and Idd5.1 mice, we used the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
ICOS is differentially expressed on unstimulated NOD and B6 or B10 T cells

ICOS is up-regulated on T cells after activation (28), but low levels of ICOS expression on a large proportion of unactivated T cells from NOD, B6, and B10 mice were detected using a biotinylated anti-ICOS mAb (Fig. 1). This finding might be due to the high sensitivity of using the combination of a biotinylated Ab with streptavidin-PE. There were, however, differences in the numbers of ICOS-positive unstimulated T cells among NOD and B6 or B10 mice. NOD mice had a lower percentage of ICOS-positive CD4, but not CD8, cells (Fig. 1B and data not shown).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. ICOS expression on splenic T cells from naive NOD and B6/B10 mice. Staining with biotinylated anti-ICOS Ab and streptavidin-PE as secondary reagent. A, Histogram overlay of B6 and B10 mice vs NOD mice gated on CD4+7-amino-actinomycin D– cells. B, Percentage of ICOS-expressing cells among CD4+ T cells from unactivated B6, B10, and NOD mice. The means of four different mice in each group ± SEM are shown. *, p < 0.0001 for NOD vs B6 or B10 (by two-way ANOVA).

 
To determine whether the expression differences are due to background genes or are controlled by the costimulatory locus Idd5.1, we measured ICOS expression in Idd5.1 mice, which are congenic for a 1.2-cM B10-derived genomic interval encompassing the genes for CD28, CTLA-4, and ICOS on the NOD background (Fig. 2A). The same pattern of expression differences was detected, in that CD4+ T cells from Idd5.1 congenic mice showed higher numbers of ICOS+ T cells compared with CD4+ T cells from NOD mice (Fig. 2, B and C). Thus, expression differences in ICOS on unactivated CD4+ T cells appear to be controlled by an allelic variation at the costimulatory locus. As CD28 and CTLA4 are both included in the congenic interval of Idd5.1 mice, we also assessed CD28 and CTLA4 expression in unactivated T cells. There were no differences in the level of CD28 expression between these two strains, and CTLA-4 could not be detected on unactivated T cells (data not shown).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. ICOS expression on splenic T cells from naive NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice. A, Map of the NOD.B10 congenic mouse strains used. R426 and R46 encompass ~1.2 cM of B10-derived genetic material. These two strains were used interchangeably in the experiments and are both referred to as Idd5.1 congenics. Strain R974 recombines between Cd28 (NOD derived) and Ctla4 (B10 derived). The telomeric end of R974 additionally contains the type 1 diabetes locus Idd5.2. Shown on the left are microsatellite markers polymorphic in NOD and B10 mice that mark the boundaries of the Idd5.1 congenic interval. The genes of interest in the congenic interval are shown on the right. B, Representative histogram showing ICOS expression in CD4+ T cells from NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice. Data are representative of five mice per group. C, Percentages of splenic CD4+ T cells in unstimulated NOD and Idd5.1 mice (R46) that are ICOS positive. The values are the mean of five mice ± SEM. *, p = 0.0001 (by two-way ANOVA).

 
ICOS and CTLA4 expression on activated T cells

We next determined whether allelic differences at the Idd5.1 locus also lead to differential expression of ICOS and CTLA-4 after activation of T cells. In these experiments we additionally tested another congenic mouse strain, R974, which recombines between Cd28 (NOD derived) and Ctla4 (B10 derived; Fig. 2A). The telomeric portion of the congenic interval in R974 mice also includes the Idd5.2 locus. After in vitro Con A activation, ICOS and CTLA-4 expressions were maximal 48 h after stimulation (data not shown). As reported previously (26), we found that activation of T cells led to an increase in ICOS expression in all strains tested; however, the expression of ICOS on activated T cells from B6, B10, and Idd5.1 congenic mice was significantly lower than that on NOD T cells (Fig. 3). In contrast, CTLA-4 expression was significantly higher in CD4+ T cells from B6 and B10 mouse strains than in NOD T cells (Fig. 3). However, CTLA-4 expression was less consistent among individual mice than ICOS expression. The congenic R974 mice followed a pattern similar to that in Idd5.1 congenic mice, in that their activated T cells showed lower ICOS and higher CTLA-4 expression (Fig. 3A). Thus, the ~2.1-Mb overlapping interval between the strains that encompasses the genes for ICOS and CTLA-4, but not CD28, differentially regulates the expression of ICOS and, to a lesser extent, CTLA-4 on activated T cells. Furthermore, no differences in expression levels of OX40, another CD28-dependent costimulatory molecule, on activated T cells of NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice were found (data not shown).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. ICOS and CTLA-4 expression on activated T cells. A, Expression of ICOS and CTLA-4 on splenic T cells from NOD, B6, B10, Idd5.1 (R46 and R426), and Idd5.1+Idd5.2 (R974) mice. Spleen cells were stimulated with 1 µg/ml Con A and stained for ICOS and CTLA-4 after 48 h. CD4+ (CD8+) or CD4high (CD8high) cells were gated for analysis. The values are expression as {Delta}MFI relative to NOD (percentage) ± SEM. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005 (vs NOD, by two-way ANOVA). B, Histograms (representative of five or six experiments) of expression of inducible costimulatory molecules ICOS and CTLA-4 on CD4 T cells from NOD and Idd5.1 (R46 and R426) mice after in vitro stimulation for 48 h.

 
We measured ICOS expression on spleen cells after in vivo administration of anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 antibodies. Consistent with in vitro data, after 48 h NOD CD4+CD25+ T cells expressed relatively higher amounts of ICOS compared with Idd5.1 congenic-derived T cells (data not shown). Taken together, the in vitro and in vivo data suggest that ICOS expression on unstimulated and recently activated T cells in Idd5.1 mice is greater than that in NOD mice. However, at the later stages of activation, T cells from NOD mice show a much higher ICOS expression compared with T cells from Idd5.1 mice.

Idd5.1 congenic mice develop more severe EAE than NOD mice

We next determined whether the differences in the expression of costimulatory molecules between NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice influence EAE. We performed two EAE experiments that included a total of 17 NOD and 27 Idd5.1 congenic mice. In both experiments the Idd5.1 congenic mice showed more severe EAE (Fig. 4) than the NOD mice. Although disease incidence was 100% in both groups, Idd5.1 congenic mice showed a significantly higher disease severity and cumulative disease scores than NOD mice (Table I). These clinical data are further supported by the histopathological data obtained from the brains and spinal cords of the animals, which revealed significantly higher numbers of inflammatory lesions in meninges and CNS parenchyma of Idd5.1 mice compared with NOD mice (Table I).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. EAE in NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice. Disease course after immunization with 200 µg of MOG35–55 in CFA and two i.v. injections with 100 ng of pertussis toxin. Shown are two experiments, including a total of 17 NOD and 27 Idd5.1 congenic (R426) mice.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table I. Clinical disease and histopathological evaluation of MOG35-55-induced EAE in NOD and Idd5.1 (R426) micea

 
Proliferation and cytokine production after costimulation through ICOS

ICOS has been found to be mainly expressed on Th2 cells, and costimulation through ICOS has been implicated in the regulation of EAE (27, 28). As our data showed that Idd5.1 congenic mice develop more severe EAE than NOD mice, it is possible that the differential kinetics of ICOS expression between Idd5.1 and NOD mice might influence proliferation and cytokine production after costimulation through ICOS. To test this hypothesis we analyzed CD4+ T cells from NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice after activation with anti-CD3 and anti-ICOS Abs. Purified CD4+ T cells were stimulated with different concentrations of anti-CD3, anti-ICOS, or rat IgG control Ab; proliferation was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation assay; and supernatants were subjected to cytokine analysis by ELISA (Fig. 5).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Proliferation and cytokine production in CD4+ T cells from NOD and Idd5.1 (R46) mice. CD4+ cells were purified using specific enrichment columns and stimulated in 96-well plates coated with the indicated amount of anti-CD3 (x-axis) plus 3 µg/ml anti-ICOS or rat IgG control Ab. A, Proliferation, measured as [3H]thymidine incorporation (cpm). IFN-{gamma} (B), IL-4 (C), and IL-10 (D) levels were measured by ELISA in supernatants after 72 h of stimulation. All concentrations are given as picograms per milliliter. The values are the mean of pooled data from three or four individual mice, with the SEM indicated. *, p = 0.03 (by Wilcoxon test).

 
Although ICOS costimulation in vitro had only modest effects on proliferation and IFN-{gamma} secretion (Fig. 5, A and B), NOD mice produced significantly higher amounts of IL-10 than the Idd5.1 congenic mice upon cross-linking with anti-ICOS Ab (Fig. 5D). IL-4 production was slightly enhanced in NOD-derived T cells compared with that in Idd5.1 mice (Fig. 5C). These data suggest that differences in ICOS expression on the surface of CD4+ cells in NOD and Idd5.1 mice result in marked changes in Th2 cytokine production after costimulation.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In the present study we address the regulation of expression of the costimulatory molecules CD28, CTLA-4, and ICOS by different alleles of the diabetes susceptibility locus Idd5.1 on mouse chromosome 1. We show that 1) ICOS and flCTLA-4 expression is regulated differently among diabetes-susceptible NOD and diabetes-resistant B6 or B10 mice; upon activation, diabetes-susceptible NOD mice express higher levels of ICOS than the resistant strains; 2) expression differences in ICOS among NOD and B6 or B10 mice are mainly due to a genomic segment of 2.1 Mb encompassing Icos and Ctla4, but excluding Cd28; 3) T cells of NOD mice respond to costimulation through ICOS with higher IL-10 production compared with Idd5.1 mice; and 4) in contrast to diabetes, which is partially inhibited in Idd5.1 mice, MOG35–55-induced EAE is enhanced in Idd5.1 congenic mice.

We demonstrate that T cells from diabetes-susceptible (NOD) and -resistant strains (B6 and B10) differentially up-regulate ICOS and flCTLA-4, and that the differences in ICOS expression are genetically controlled by the newly defined, 2.1-Mb Idd5.1 interval. Other studies investigating flCTLA-4 expression in NOD, B6, and NOD.B6 Idd5.1 congenic mice showed similar results, with one study showing no expression differences of CTLA-4 in NOD and NOD.B6 Idd5.1 after stimulation (4), and another suggesting a defect in CTLA-4 up-regulation on stimulated T cells in NOD mice compared with B6 mice (31). Our data suggest that there is relatively lower expression of CTLA-4 in the NOD-derived T cells compared with B6 or B10 T cells, but differences in ICOS expression are more consistent than those in CTLA-4 expression.

As CTLA-4 and ICOS are both dependent on CD28 costimulation, we investigated the possible effects of costimulation through CD28 on ICOS and CTLA-4. However, we found similar levels of CD28 on NOD and Idd5.1 congenic T cells. In addition, another CD28-dependent costimulatory molecule, OX40, which is encoded on mouse chromosome 4, was not differentially expressed after Con A stimulation of NOD and Idd5.1 T cells (data not shown). Furthermore, the expression of ICOS and CTLA-4 in the R974 strain, which carries B10-derived alleles of Icos and Ctla4, but an NOD-derived allele of Cd28, was similar to that found in Idd5.1 congenic mice. Therefore, we have strong evidence that expression differences in ICOS (and flCTLA-4) are probably not due to differences in CD28 signaling.

Although the functional significance of ICOS expression on naive T cells remains unclear, we further demonstrated that NOD CD4+ cells, which express more ICOS on the cell surface after activation, respond better to costimulation through the ICOS costimulatory molecule. Cross-linking of ICOS with its ligand B7h has been shown to enhance the proliferation and production of various cytokines as well as provide help for Ig production by B cells (26, 32). ICOS has been shown to be particularly important in enhancing IL-10 production and development of Th2 cells (26, 33). Accordingly, we found only modest effects of ICOS costimulation on proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production. However, IL-10 production by NOD CD4+ T cells was greatly enhanced after cross-linking of ICOS compared with Idd5.1 congenic CD4+ T cells. As activated Idd5.1 T cells express significant amounts of ICOS on their cell surface, although to a lesser extent compared with NOD T cells, it may be that only a subset of high ICOS-expressing cells is responsible for the differences in IL-10 production between the strains. In fact, it has been shown recently that T cells, which express high levels of ICOS, produce large amounts of IL-10 upon activation. In contrast, T cells expressing low or medium levels of ICOS produced IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-3, and IL-6 or IL4, IL-5, and IL-13, respectively (34). It has also been shown that ICOS expression on T cells after activation is higher in BALB/c mice compared with B6 mice. Importantly, this has been linked to higher Th2 cytokine production in T cell blasts from highly EAE-resistant BALB/c mice after costimulation through ICOS (35). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that ICOS expression and IL-4 production correlated in various mouse strains (36). Thus, our results are in accord with previous findings in different mouse strains, but, in addition, demonstrate that differences in ICOS expression are controlled by the genomic interval encompassing the costimulatory locus.

EAE as well as autoimmune diabetes are polygenic diseases, and a number of gene regions have been implicated for harboring disease susceptibility genes (29, 37, 38, 39, 40). Many of the gene regions conferring susceptibility to murine autoimmune models as well as to human autoimmune disorders overlap (41, 42). These observations have led to the hypothesis of shared autoimmune genes, but might also be due to clustering of relevant immune genes in the same genomic regions (41). For example Bphs, a locus controlling pertussis toxin-induced vasoactive amine sensitization elicited by histamine, is a common susceptibility locus for EAE and experimental autoimmune orchitis and has been shown to be identical with the histamine receptor H1 (43, 44). Also, we have demonstrated that autoimmune diabetes and EAE share a susceptibility locus on chromosome 3 (Idd3), and we suggested that the NOD allele of IL-2 might predispose to both autoimmune diseases (45).

We now report enhanced MOG-induced EAE in Idd5.1 mice compared with NOD mice. Thus, Idd5.1 seems to differentially regulate autoimmune diabetes and EAE in NOD mice. Furthermore, the difference in susceptibility of NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice to EAE most likely relates to the differential expression of the costimulatory molecule ICOS.

The involvement of ICOS in EAE has previously been investigated. ICOS-deficient mice show exacerbated disease compared with wild-type mice (28). Accordingly, blockade of ICOS with Abs during the induction phase of EAE exacerbates disease (27). In this study we show that lower ICOS expression in activated T cells derived from Idd5.1 mice correlates with lower IL-10 production in CD4+ T cells after ICOS costimulation. The inhibitory role of IL-10 in the development of EAE has been demonstrated previously, in that IL-10 deficient mice develop more severe disease compared with wild-type mice, and overexpression of IL-10 protects from EAE (46). Therefore, our present data suggest that higher ICOS expression and the general ability of NOD mice to produce higher amounts of IL-10 upon costimulation with ICOS might lead to an ameliorated course of EAE.

The EAE disease phenotype contrasts with those of type 1 diabetes, because Idd5.1 congenic mice are partially protected from diabetes (3, 5). The influence of IL-10 on diabetes in NOD mice, however, is highly dependent on both the time point and the tissue compartment in which it is released during the disease. Systemic administration of IL-10 or IL-10 fusion protein, particularly at later time points, leads to a reduction of disease (47, 48), whereas pancreatic overexpression of IL-10 leads to accelerated type 1 diabetes and is even sufficient to induce disease in resistant B10.H2g7 congenic mice (49, 50). In this system, an ICAM-1-dependent pathway has been implicated in the acceleration of type 1 diabetes (51).

In view of the different effects of IL-10 in the two disease models, EAE and diabetes, the dynamic alterations of ICOS expression in NOD and Idd5.1 congenic mice could lead to exacerbation of EAE and amelioration of diabetes in the same Idd5.1 congenic mouse strain, depending on the time course and sites of expression and production of IL-10. Furthermore, as ICOS and CTLA-4 are reversibly regulated by the Idd5.1 region, the balance of costimulatory signals may also be a factor that modulates each autoimmune disease differently. Local expression of B7-1/B7-2 and B7h might also vary both at priming sites and in the target organs, i.e., the CNS and the pancreas, thereby contributing to differences in susceptibility to the two autoimmune diseases. Therefore, different costimulatory pathways leading to the same cytokine secretion could result in different outcomes depending on the type of autoimmune disease.

The differential expression of ICOS in NOD and Idd5.1 mice might be controlled directly by polymorphisms in the Icos gene or could be controlled by other molecules that are, in turn, genetically regulated by the Idd5.1 locus. In the accompanying paper, Wicker and colleagues (5) show strain-specific differences in mRNA levels of the novel splice variant liCTLA-4, which are controlled by the Idd5.1 locus. Although it is still unclear whether ICOS and liCTLA-4 regulate each other, it is possible that the expression of ICOS is controlled by variation in liCTLA-4 levels in T cells of the different mouse strains. Our data suggest that the autoimmune disease-associated variant liCTLA-4 inhibits T cell activation and suppresses cytokine production.5 Thus, it is possible that a lower ICOS expression in NOD Idd5.1 congenic mice is an indirect effect of the high expression of liCTLA-4 in this strain. To resolve this question we are currently backcrossing Idd5.1 alleles of other mouse strains onto the NOD background. Investigating congenic mouse strains that have different combinations of haplotypes of the Ctla4 and Icos genes will help to define further the genetic or molecular basis controlling the ICOS expression differences and the development of different organ-specific autoimmune diseases.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. Jie Huang (Brigham Biostatistics Consulting Service) for statistical evaluation of the data, and Dr. Zsolt Illes for critical reading of the manuscript.


   Footnotes
 
1 B.G. is a postdoctoral fellow with the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (GR1925/1-1). L.V. is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. L.S.W. is supported by a joint grant from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. The availability of NOD congenic mice through the Taconic Farms Emerging Models Program has been supported by the Merck Genome Research Institute, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. The work in the laboratory was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P01AI39671 and R01AI44880 and the Harvard Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Islet Transplantation Center. R.A.S. is supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS046414. Back

2 B.G. and L.V. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Vijay K. Kuchroo, Center for Neurologic Diseases, Harvard Institutes of Medicine, 4 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address: vkuchroo{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis; flCTLA-4, full-length CTLA-4; liCTLA-4, ligand-independent CTLA-4; {Delta}MFI, {Delta} mean fluorescence intensity; MOG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. Back

Received for publication October 1, 2003. Accepted for publication April 21, 2004.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Garchon, H. J., P. Bedossa, L. Eloy, J. F. Bach. 1991. Identification and mapping to chromosome 1 of a susceptibility locus for periinsulitis in non-obese diabetic mice. Nature 353:260.[Medline]
  2. Cornall, R. J., J. B. Prins, J. A. Todd, A. Pressey, N. H. DeLarato, L. S. Wicker, L. B. Peterson. 1991. Type 1 diabetes in mice is linked to the interleukin-1 receptor and Lsh/Ity/Bcg genes on chromosome 1. Nature 353:262.[Medline]
  3. Hill, N. J., P. A. Lyons, N. Armitage, J. A. Todd, L. S. Wicker, L. B. Peterson. 2000. NOD Idd5 locus controls insulitis and diabetes and overlaps the orthologous CTLA4/IDDM12 and NRAMP1 loci in humans. Diabetes 49:1744.[Abstract]
  4. Lamhamedi-Cherradi, S. E., O. Boulard, C. Gonzalez, N. Kassis, D. Damotte, L. Eloy, G. Fluteau, M. Levi-Strauss, H. J. Garchon. 2001. Further mapping of the Idd5.1 locus for autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetes 50:2874.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wicker, L. S., G. Chamberlain, K. Hunter, D. Rainbow, S. Howlett, P. Tiffen, J. Clark, A. Gonzalez-Munoz, A. Marie Cumiskey, J. M. Howson, et al. Fine mapping, gene content, comparative gene sequencing, and expression analysis support Ctla-4 and Nramp1 as candidates for Idd5.1 and Idd5.2 in the nonobese diabetic mouse. J. Immunol. In press.
  6. Yanagawa, T., Y. Hidaka, V. Guimaraes, M. Soliman, L. J. DeGroot. 1995. CTLA-4 gene polymorphism associated with Graves’ disease in a Caucasian population. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80:41.[Abstract]
  7. Badenhoop, K., H. Donner, J. Braun, T. Siegmund, H. Rau, K. H. Usadel. 1996. Genetic markers in diagnosis and prediction of relapse in Graves’ disease. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 104:(Suppl. 4):98.
  8. Nistico, L., R. Buzzetti, L. E. Pritchard, B. Van der Auwera, C. Giovannini, E. Bosi, M. T. Larrad, M. S. Rios, C. C. Chow, C. S. Cockram, et al 1996. The CTLA-4 gene region of chromosome 2q33 is linked to, and associated with, type 1 diabetes. Belgian Diabetes Registry. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5:1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Van der Auwera, B. J., C. L. Vandewalle, F. C. Schuit, F. Winnock, I. H. De Leeuw, S. Van Imschoot, G. Lamberigts, F. K. Gorus. 1997. CTLA-4 gene polymorphism confers susceptibility to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) independently from age and from other genetic or immune disease markers. The Belgian Diabetes Registry. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 110:98.[Medline]
  10. Awata, T., S. Kurihara, M. Iitaka, S. Takei, I. Inoue, C. Ishii, K. Negishi, T. Izumida, Y. Yoshida, R. Hagura, et al 1998. Association of CTLA-4 gene A-G polymorphism (IDDM12 locus) with acute-onset and insulin-depleted IDDM as well as autoimmune thyroid disease (Graves’ disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis) in the Japanese population. Diabetes 47:128.[Medline]
  11. Naluai, A. T., S. Nilsson, L. Samuelsson, A. H. Gudjonsdottir, H. Ascher, J. Ek, B. Hallberg, B. Kristiansson, T. Martinsson, O. Nerman, et al 2000. The CTLA4/CD28 gene region on chromosome 2q33 confers susceptibility to celiac disease in a way possibly distinct from that of type 1 diabetes and other chronic inflammatory disorders. Tissue Antigens 56:350.[Medline]
  12. Ahmed, S., K. Ihara, S. Kanemitsu, H. Nakashima, T. Otsuka, K. Tsuzaka, T. Takeuchi, T. Hara. 2001. Association of CTLA-4 but not CD28 gene polymorphisms with systemic lupus erythematosus in the Japanese population. Rheumatology 40:662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hudson, L. L., K. Rocca, Y. W. Song, J. P. Pandey. 2002. CTLA-4 gene polymorphisms in systemic lupus erythematosus: a highly significant association with a determinant in the promoter region. Hum. Genet. 111:452.[Medline]
  14. Rodriguez, M. R., A. Nunez-Roldan, F. Aguilar, A. Valenzuela, A. Garcia, M. F. Gonzalez-Escribano. 2002. Association of the CTLA4 3' untranslated region polymorphism with the susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Hum. Immunol. 63:76.[Medline]
  15. Ueda, H., J. M. Howson, L. Esposito, J. Heward, H. Snook, G. Chamberlain, D. B. Rainbow, K. M. Hunter, A. N. Smith, G. Di Genova, et al 2003. Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease. Nature 423:506.[Medline]
  16. Lenschow, D. J., K. C. Herold, L. Rhee, B. Patel, A. Koons, H. Y. Qin, E. Fuchs, B. Singh, C. B. Thompson, J. A. Bluestone. 1996. CD28/B7 regulation of Th1 and Th2 subsets in the development of autoimmune diabetes. Immunity 5:285.[Medline]
  17. Salomon, B., D. J. Lenschow, L. Rhee, N. Ashourian, B. Singh, A. Sharpe, J. A. Bluestone. 2000. B7/CD28 costimulation is essential for the homeostasis of the CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells that control autoimmune diabetes. Immunity 12:431.[Medline]
  18. Girvin, A. M., M. C. Dal Canto, L. Rhee, B. Salomon, A. Sharpe, J. A. Bluestone, S. D. Miller. 2000. A critical role for B7/CD28 costimulation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a comparative study using costimulatory molecule-deficient mice and monoclonal antibody blockade. J. Immunol. 164:136.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Chitnis, T., N. Najafian, K. A. Abdallah, V. Dong, H. Yagita, M. H. Sayegh, S. J. Khoury. 2001. CD28-independent induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Clin. Invest. 107:575.[Medline]
  20. Chang, T. T., V. K. Kuchroo, A. H. Sharpe. 2002. Role of the B7-CD28/CTLA-4 pathway in autoimmune disease. Curr. Dir. Autoimmun. 5:113.[Medline]
  21. Tivol, E. A., F. Borriello, A. N. Schweitzer, W. P. Lynch, J. A. Bluestone, A. H. Sharpe. 1995. Loss of CTLA-4 leads to massive lymphoproliferation and fatal multiorgan tissue destruction, revealing a critical negative regulatory role of CTLA-4. Immunity 3:541.[Medline]
  22. Waterhouse, P., J. M. Penninger, E. Timms, A. Wakeham, A. Shahinian, K. P. Lee, C. B. Thompson, H. Griesser, T. W. Mak. 1995. Lymphoproliferative disorders with early lethality in mice deficient in Ctla-4. Science 270:985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hutloff, A., A. M. Dittrich, K. C. Beier, B. Eljaschewitsch, R. Kraft, I. Anagnostopoulos, R. A. Kroczek. 1999. ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature 397:263.[Medline]
  24. Yoshinaga, S. K., J. S. Whoriskey, S. D. Khare, U. Sarmiento, J. Guo, T. Horan, G. Shih, M. Zhang, M. A. Coccia, T. Kohno, et al 1999. T-cell co-stimulation through B7RP-1 and ICOS. Nature 402:827.[Medline]
  25. Mages, H. W., A. Hutloff, C. Heuck, K. Buchner, H. Himmelbauer, F. Oliveri, R. A. Kroczek. 2000. Molecular cloning and characterization of murine ICOS and identification of B7h as ICOS ligand. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:1040.[Medline]
  26. McAdam, A. J., T. T. Chang, A. E. Lumelsky, E. A. Greenfield, V. A. Boussiotis, J. S. Duke-Cohan, T. Chernova, N. Malenkovich, C. Jabs, V. K. Kuchroo, et al 2000. Mouse inducible costimulatory molecule (ICOS) expression is enhanced by CD28 costimulation and regulates differentiation of CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 165:5035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rottman, J. B., T. Smith, J. R. Tonra, K. Ganley, T. Bloom, R. Silva, B. Pierce, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos, E. Ozkaynak, A. J. Coyle. 2001. The costimulatory molecule ICOS plays an important role in the immunopathogenesis of EAE. Nat. Immunol. 2:605.[Medline]
  28. Dong, C., A. E. Juedes, U. A. Temann, S. Shresta, J. P. Allison, N. H. Ruddle, R. A. Flavell. 2001. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature 409:97.[Medline]
  29. Encinas, J. A., M. B. Lees, R. A. Sobel, C. Symonowicz, J. M. Greer, C. L. Shovlin, H. L. Weiner, C. E. Seidman, J. G. Seidman, V. K. Kuchroo. 1996. Genetic analysis of susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in a cross between SJL/J and B10. S mice. J. Immunol. 157:2186.[Abstract]
  30. Nicholson, L. B., J. M. Greer, R. A. Sobel, M. B. Lees, V. K. Kuchroo. 1995. An altered peptide ligand mediates immune deviation and prevents autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Immunity 3:397.[Medline]
  31. Colucci, F., M. L. Bergman, C. Penha-Goncalves, C. M. Cilio, D. Holmberg. 1997. Apoptosis resistance of nonobese diabetic peripheral lymphocytes linked to the Idd5 diabetes susceptibility region. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:8670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Tafuri, A., A. Shahinian, F. Bladt, S. K. Yoshinaga, M. Jordana, A. Wakeham, L. M. Boucher, D. Bouchard, V. S. Chan, G. Duncan, et al 2001. ICOS is essential for effective T-helper-cell responses. Nature 409:105.[Medline]
  33. Coyle, A. J., S. Lehar, C. Lloyd, J. Tian, T. Delaney, S. Manning, T. Nguyen, T. Burwell, H. Schneider, J. A. Gonzalo, et al 2000. The CD28-related molecule ICOS is required for effective T cell-dependent immune responses. Immunity 13:95.[Medline]
  34. Lohning, M., A. Hutloff, T. Kallinich, H. W. Mages, K. Bonhagen, A. Radbruch, E. Hamelmann, R. A. Kroczek. 2003. Expression of ICOS in vivo defines CD4+ effector T cells with high inflammatory potential and a strong bias for secretion of interleukin 10. J. Exp. Med. 197:181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Arimura, Y., H. Kato, U. Dianzani, T. Okamoto, S. Kamekura, D. Buonfiglio, T. Miyoshi-Akiyama, T. Uchiyama, J. Yagi. 2002. A co-stimulatory molecule on activated T cells, H4/ICOS, delivers specific signals in Th cells and regulates their responses. Int. Immunol. 14:555.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Yagi, J., Y. Arimura, U. Dianzani, T. Uede, T. Okamoto, T. Uchiyama. 2003. Regulatory roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/inducible costimulator expression on activated CD4+ T cells during Th cell development. J. Immunol. 171:783.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Encinas, J. A., M. B. Lees, R. A. Sobel, C. Symonowicz, H. L. Weiner, C. E. Seidman, J. G. Seidman, V. K. Kuchroo. 2001. Identification of genetic loci associated with paralysis, inflammation and weight loss in mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Int. Immunol. 13:257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Butterfield, R. J., J. D. Sudweeks, E. P. Blankenhorn, R. Korngold, J. C. Marini, J. A. Todd, R. J. Roper, C. Teuscher. 1998. New genetic loci that control susceptibility and symptoms of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in inbred mice. J. Immunol. 161:1860.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Butterfield, R. J., E. P. Blankenhorn, R. J. Roper, J. F. Zachary, R. W. Doerge, J. Sudweeks, J. Rose, C. Teuscher. 1999. Genetic analysis of disease subtypes and sexual dimorphisms in mouse experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE): relapsing/remitting and monophasic remitting/nonrelapsing EAE are immunogenetically distinct. J. Immunol. 162:3096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Butterfield, R. J., E. P. Blankenhorn, R. J. Roper, J. F. Zachary, R. W. Doerge, C. Teuscher. 2000. Identification of genetic loci controlling the characteristics and severity of brain and spinal cord lesions in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Am. J. Pathol. 157:637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Becker, K. G.. 1999. Comparative genetics of type 1 diabetes and autoimmune disease: common loci, common pathways?. Diabetes 48:1353.[Abstract]
  42. Encinas, J. A., V. K. Kuchroo. 2000. Mapping and identification of autoimmunity genes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12:691.[Medline]
  43. Sudweeks, J. D., J. A. Todd, E. P. Blankenhorn, B. B. Wardell, S. R. Woodward, N. D. Meeker, S. S. Estes, C. Teuscher. 1993. Locus controlling Bordetella pertussis-induced histamine sensitization (Bphs), an autoimmune disease-susceptibility gene, maps distal to T-cell receptor {beta}-chain gene on mouse chromosome 6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:3700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ma, R. Z., J. Gao, N. D. Meeker, P. D. Fillmore, K. S. Tung, T. Watanabe, J. F. Zachary, H. Offner, E. P. Blankenhorn, C. Teuscher. 2002. Identification of Bphs, an autoimmune disease locus, as histamine receptor H1. Science 297:620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Encinas, J. A., L. S. Wicker, L. B. Peterson, A. Mukasa, C. Teuscher, R. Sobel, H. L. Weiner, C. E. Seidman, J. G. Seidman, V. K. Kuchroo. 1999. QTL influencing autoimmune diabetes and encephalomyelitis map to a 0.15-cM region containing Il2. Nat. Genet. 21:158.[Medline]
  46. Bettelli, E., M. P. Das, E. D. Howard, H. L. Weiner, R. A. Sobel, V. K. Kuchroo. 1998. IL-10 is critical in the regulation of autoimmune encephalomyelitis as demonstrated by studies of IL-10- and IL-4-deficient and transgenic mice. J. Immunol. 161:3299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Zheng, X. X., A. W. Steele, W. W. Hancock, A. C. Stevens, P. W. Nickerson, P. Roy-Chaudhury, Y. Tian, T. B. Strom. 1997. A noncytolytic IL-10/Fc fusion protein prevents diabetes, blocks autoimmunity, and promotes suppressor phenomena in NOD mice. J. Immunol. 158:4507.[Abstract]
  48. Pennline, K. J., E. Roque-Gaffney, M. Monahan. 1994. Recombinant human IL-10 prevents the onset of diabetes in the nonobese diabetic mouse. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 71:169.[Medline]
  49. Moritani, M., K. Yoshimoto, F. Tashiro, C. Hashimoto, J. Miyazaki, S. Ii, E. Kudo, H. Iwahana, Y. Hayashi, T. Sano, et al 1994. Transgenic expression of IL-10 in pancreatic islet A cells accelerates autoimmune insulitis and diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Int. Immunol. 6:1927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Lee, M. S., R. Mueller, L. S. Wicker, L. B. Peterson, N. Sarvetnick. 1996. IL-10 is necessary and sufficient for autoimmune diabetes in conjunction with NOD MHC homozygosity. J. Exp. Med. 183:2663.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Balasa, B., A. La Cava, K. Van Gunst, L. Mocnik, D. Balakrishna, N. Nguyen, L. Tucker, N. Sarvetnick. 2000. A mechanism for IL-10-mediated diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse: ICAM-1 deficiency blocks accelerated diabetes. J. Immunol. 165:7330.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Vijayakrishnan, L., J. M. Slavik, Z. Illes, R. J. Greenwald, D. Rainbow, B. Greve, L. B. Peterson, D. A. Hafler, G. J. Freeman, A. H. Sharpe, L. S. Wicker, V. K. Kuchroo. 2004. An autoimmune disease-associated CTLA-4 splice variant lacking B7-binding domain signals negatively in T cells. Immunity 20:563.[Medline]

Related articles in The JI:

IN THIS ISSUE

The JI 2004 173: 3-4. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
M. Araki, D. Chung, S. Liu, D. B. Rainbow, G. Chamberlain, V. Garner, K. M. D. Hunter, L. Vijayakrishnan, L. B. Peterson, M. Oukka, et al.
Genetic Evidence That the Differential Expression of the Ligand-Independent Isoform of CTLA-4 Is the Molecular Basis of the Idd5.1 Type 1 Diabetes Region in Nonobese Diabetic Mice
J. Immunol., October 15, 2009; 183(8): 5146 - 5157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int ImmunolHome page
J. M. Rojo, E. Pini, G. Ojeda, R. Bello, C. Dong, R. A. Flavell, U. Dianzani, and P. Portoles
CD4+ICOS+ T lymphocytes inhibit T cell activation 'in vitro' and attenuate autoimmune encephalitis 'in vivo'
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 20(4): 577 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mult SclerHome page
B. Greve, R. Simonenko, Z. Illes, A. Peterfalvi, N. Hamdi, M. P Mycko, K. W Selmaj, C. Rozsa, K. Rajczy, P. Bauer, et al.
Multiple sclerosis and the CTLA4 autoimmunity polymorphism CT60: no association in patients from Germany, Hungary and Poland
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2008; 14(2): 153 - 158.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
K. Hunter, D. Rainbow, V. Plagnol, J. A. Todd, L. B. Peterson, and L. S. Wicker
Interactions between Idd5.1/Ctla4 and Other Type 1 Diabetes Genes
J. Immunol., December 15, 2007; 179(12): 8341 - 8349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. M. Maier, D. E. Anderson, P. L. De Jager, L. S. Wicker, and D. A. Hafler
Allelic variant in CTLA4 alters T cell phosphorylation patterns
PNAS, November 20, 2007; 104(47): 18607 - 18612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JEMHome page
T. Ito, M. Yang, Y.-H. Wang, R. Lande, J. Gregorio, O. A Perng, X.-F. Qin, Y.-J. Liu, and M. Gilliet
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells prime IL-10-producing T regulatory cells by inducible costimulator ligand
J. Exp. Med., January 22, 2007; 204(1): 105 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
V. Butty, M. Roy, P. Sabeti, W. Besse, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis
Signatures of strong population differentiation shape extended haplotypes across the human CD28, CTLA4, and ICOS costimulatory genes
PNAS, January 9, 2007; 104(2): 570 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
B. Zhu, I. Guleria, A. Khosroshahi, T. Chitnis, J. Imitola, M. Azuma, H. Yagita, M. H. Sayegh, and S. J. Khoury
Differential Role of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Programmed Death-Ligand 2 in Regulating the Susceptibility and Chronic Progression of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3480 - 3489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 DiabetesHome page
M. Lundholm, V. Motta, A. Lofgren-Burstrom, N. Duarte, M.-L. Bergman, S. Mayans, and D. Holmberg
Defective Induction of CTLA-4 in the NOD Mouse Is Controlled by the NOD Allele of Idd3/IL-2 and a Novel Locus (Ctex) Telomeric on Chromosome 1
Diabetes, February 1, 2006; 55(2): 538 - 544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
R. A. Shilling, J. M. Pinto, D. C. Decker, D. H. Schneider, H. S. Bandukwala, J. R. Schneider, B. Camoretti-Mercado, C. Ober, and A. I. Sperling
Cutting Edge: Polymorphisms in the ICOS Promoter Region Are Associated with Allergic Sensitization and Th2 Cytokine Production
J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2061 - 2065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
X. Martinez, H. T. C. Kreuwel, W. L. Redmond, R. Trenney, K. Hunter, H. Rosen, N. Sarvetnick, L. S. Wicker, and L. A. Sherman
CD8+ T Cell Tolerance in Nonobese Diabetic Mice Is Restored by Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Resistance Alleles
J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1677 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum Mol GenetHome page
I. Mazon Pelaez, S. Vogler, U. Strauss, P. Wernhoff, J. Pahnke, G. Brockmann, H. Moch, H.-J. Thiesen, A. Rolfs, and S. M. Ibrahim
Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling cortical motor evoked potentials in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: correlation with incidence, onset and severity of disease
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 15, 2005; 14(14): 1977 - 1989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greve, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greve, B.
Right arrow Articles by Kuchroo, V. K.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS