The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 172: 3369-3375.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists
Textbook Germinal Centers?1
Tim Manser2
Kimmel Cancer Center and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Models for the development and function of germinal centers (GCs) have been so widely discussed in the original literature that they now appear in immunology textbooks. Unfortunately, many of the tenets of these models have not yet been subjected to adequate experimental scrutiny. Indeed, recent studies have called several of their principal assumptions into question. In addition, the term germinal center has been applied to a diverse assortment of focal processes of B cell proliferation and differentiation. This variability might be explained by alterations in the progression of a single textbook GC process. Alternatively, distinct developmental pathways may create unique classes of GCs with specialized functions.
|
Introduction
|
|---|
Nearly twenty years ago, the work of two factions of immunologists studying Ag-driven B cell responses using either serological and histological, or molecular genetic and hybridoma techniques coalesced (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). Collectively, their findings implicated germinal centers (GCs)3 as the principal sites in which the many steps of memory B cell development occur. Subsequent seminal studies by Kelsoe and colleagues (9) and Berek et al. (10) demonstrated that B cell Ag receptor (BCR) hypermutation and selection take place in GCs. These revelations spawned models explaining the maturation of the B cell response in GCs leading to the generation of memory (2, 3, 11).
Such models have been so widely publicized that a version is presented in most immunology textbooks. Unfortunately, many of the central tenets and assumptions of these models remain to be adequately tested. Moreover, the results of recent studies have painted a much fuzzier picture of the role of GCs in the maturation of the memory B cell response than is portrayed by these models. In addition, although components indispensable for the GC response clearly exist, recent studies have also revealed that the forces that drive B cells to form these structures and down the memory pathway are more robust and diverse than previously thought.
It is important to acknowledge that insightful investigations of the GC response have been conducted in a variety of animal models. However, due to space considerations and because much of the published data have been derived from the analysis of GCs in mice (mainly spleen) and humans (mainly tonsil), I will restrict detailed discussion to these two species.
|
Textbook models of the GC reaction
|
|---|
According to these models, a requisite step preceding GC formation involves CD4 T cells activated by a protein Ag presented to them by APCs such as interdigitating dendritic cells (DCs) in the T cell zones of peripheral lymphoid organs (Fig. 1). Follicular B cells whose BCRs have engaged the Ag migrate to and undergo cognate costimulatory interactions with these T cells. The B cells then become primary Ab-forming cells (AFCs) or precursors destined for the GC. The factors that determine which of these choices is taken, and whether a single primary B cell clone is even capable of differentiating down both of these paths are subjects of controversy (12). Several GC precursor B cells then migrate back into a follicle, acquire a unique cell surface phenotype (e.g., surface IgD- peanut agglutinin+) and rapidly proliferate within the stromal environment created by follicular DCs (FDCs). The phenotypic and functional diversity, and developmental interrelationship of follicular stromal elements including FDCs are poorly understood. Therefore, I will operationally refer to FDCs present within follicles lacking GCs as primary FDCs and those associated with the GC reaction as secondary FDCs. After this phase of brisk proliferation, which creates the GC dark zone, is underway, Ab V gene hypermutation is induced, resulting in the generation of diverse mutant progeny of the founding clones. Although inroads have been made recently on its mechanism, hypermutation remains a mysterious process, particularly with respect to its requirements for induction and regulation (13). The rapidly dividing B cells, which express little surface (s)BCR and are termed centroblasts, then exit cell cycle, re-express sBCR, and migrate to a sector of the GC rich in secondary FDCs and also containing CD4 T cells, called the light zone. GC B cells in the light zone are termed centrocytes, and are programmed to die unless survival signals are provided by accessory cells.
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 1. A textbook GC response. The events involved in the formation and functioning of a GC are illustrated. Various microenvironmental compartments are indicated by colored boxes. Green arrows represent foreign Ag-driven events, and the driving Ag itself is represented by green hexagons. ICs containing this Ag are illustrated as green hexagons surrounded by Abs. Cognate Ag presentation and costimulatory interactions are indicated by pairs of cells. Rapid cell cycle progression is indicated by a curved green arrow and somatic mutations by red asterisks. Asterisks inside of cells represent active hypermutation of V region genes, and asterisks next to Abs represent amino acid changes due to the resulting mutations. Red arrows indicate negative selection leading to death by apoptosis (R.I.P.), resulting from either no or low affinity of the BCR for the driving Ag, or autoreactivity. H chain class-switched Abs are indicated by colored Fc regions. IDC, Interdigitating DC. The latter are labeled secondary to distinguish them from the cells that make up the primary follicular stroma (see Textbook models of the GC reaction).
|
|
FDCs can retain Ag on their surfaces in the form of immune complexes (ICs) due to expression of C and Fc receptors (14, 15). If their BCRs engage Ag on secondary FDCs, the centrocytes obtain survival signals, and extract and internalize the Ag. Competition for FDC-bound Ag is intense, and only those centrocytes expressing mutant BCRs that have acquired high affinity for the Ag survive. Others die by apoptosis, and are engulfed and degraded by macrophages. Surviving centrocytes subsequently either re-enter the centroblast pool, or process and present the Ag to GC T cells, resulting in induction of Ab H chain class switching, and differentiation to either pre-AFCs or memory B cells that exit the GC.
Because hypermutation can generate or enhance the autoreactivity of BCRs, Klinman and coworkers (16) originally proposed that memory B cell precursors are subjected to a peripheral tolerance checkpoint. Support for this idea has come from several experimental angles (16, 17, 18, 19). This putative facet of GC function has been incorporated into textbook models by assuming that autoantigens are readily available in the GC, and that the avid binding of autoantigen to the BCR expressed by a GC B cell precludes the productive interaction of this cell with either secondary FDCs or GC T cells, leading to death by apoptosis (17, 20).
|
The role of FDCs and the Ag they trap
|
|---|
Undoubtedly, the textbook principle that FDCs and the Ag on their surfaces play a critical role in driving the GC response as well as in the phenotypic selection of BCR mutants was motivated by early work demonstrating that visually impressive amounts of Ag can be localized and retained on the FDC reticulum for extended periods (21, 22). However, past observations that GC formation may precede evident IC trapping by FDCs in certain situations cast the first doubt on this idea (1, 23). This suspicion has been reinforced by recent studies on mice deficient in the ability to produce secreted Ab (and thus ICs) demonstrating that GC formation and at least the first stages of BCR hypermutation and affinity-based selection can occur in the absence of detectable levels of Ag on primary and secondary FDCs (24). Conversely, we found that the stringency of affinity maturation in mice with dramatically enhanced deposition of ICs on primary and secondary FDCs due to an FcR deficiency was not relaxed (25), as would be expected from textbook models. Affinity maturation takes place both during and well after the GC response has waned (26). Moreover, studies pioneered by Chaplin and colleagues (27) have shown that hypermutation and affinity maturation occur, albeit with reduced efficiency, in mice incapable of normal FDC development due to a deficiency in lymphotoxin (LT)
. A subsequent investigation revealed that LT
-deficient mice, phenotypically similar to LT-deficient mice, can mount lymph node GC responses associated with affinity maturation, but these GCs lack secondary FDCs and IC deposits (28). Such data point out that support for an essential role of FDCs and their bound Ag in GC formation and the affinity maturation process is currently lacking (29).
However, GC responses in FDC-deficient LT and LT knockout mice are not observed or sustained, respectively (27, 28). We and others have also found that GCs of normal size can be induced in mice deficient in B cell activating factor belonging to the TNF family, but these GCs contain poorly developed secondary FDC reticula and are short lived (30, 31). Collectively, these findings suggest that, although FDC-bound Ag is not required for the induction and early stages of the GC response, FDCs themselves may be necessary to maintain the response. Indeed, in vitro studies have shown that FDCs can function as potent accessory cells for promoting B cell clustering, proliferation, survival, and differentiation (32, 33, 34).
FDCs and their bound Ag have also been proposed to play a central role in maintenance of the memory B cell pool, in homeostatic regulation of antipathogen serum Ab levels, and in induction of anamnestic B cell responses (32, 35, 36, 37). A role for persistent Ag in the survival of memory B cells has been rendered unlikely by an elegant experiment conducted by Rajewsky and colleagues (38). After memory cells acquired new BCRs in vivo due to induced gene targeting, they continued to persist, despite apparent absence of an exogenous ligand for these BCRs. In contrast, there is experimental support for the idea that FDCs and their bound Ag facilitate the activation and differentiation of memory B cells (15, 32, 36, 37, 39). Whether secondary FDCs and the Ag they trap function in the putative GC peripheral tolerance checkpoint remains to be tested.
|
The role of T cells and cognate T cell-B cell interactions
|
|---|
Another component of textbook GC dogma is that GCs form only in response to T cell-dependent (TD) Ags. Past histological studies of several T cell-independent (TI) responses did not reveal Ag-induced GCs (40, 41). Also, immunization of mice deficient in factors critical for cognate T cell-B cell interactions with TD Ags have resulted in either no or drastically impaired GC responses (mutations that reduce or ablate the GC response are tabulated in Ref. 42). Early questions regarding the validity of this TD rule were motivated by the work of Kabat and colleagues (43) on the immune response of mice to the TI Ag (1
6) dextran, in which efficient GC formation was observed, but subsequent studies indicated that this GC response required T cells (44).
Nonetheless, recent investigations by our laboratory have shown that a high dose of the TI Ag (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl-Ficoll can induce follicular GCs in mice that completely lack T cells (45). B cells expressing a transgenic anti-(4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl BCR can also give rise to GCs in athymic mice after immunization with this TI Ag (46). Importantly, however, these responses are sporadic and short lived, and the BCRs expressed in these TI GCs contain no or only a few somatic mutations (45, 47), suggesting that at least low levels of T cell help are important for the efficiency of induction and progression of the response. This notion was first suggested by Cerny and coworker (48), who showed that only small numbers of CD4 T cells are required for a TD GC response.
A newly published study (49) has revealed that BCR hypermutation and affinity-based selection take place in GCs induced by TD Ag immunization of mice containing only 
T cells. Thus, GC progression and several of the processes associated with the intermediate stages of the response can occur with the provision of only noncognate forms of T cell help. Nonetheless, the GC response in these mice was quantitatively reduced, as was serum IgG production and degree of priming for a secondary response. Apparently, conventional T cell help is important for certain steps in GC B cell differentiation.
Early support for this idea came from a study demonstrating that, in normal mice, GC T cells were of the type and expressed TCR structures consistent with specificity for the inducing TD Ag (50). In addition, when reagents that block CD40 ligand and B7.2 function were administered to mice after GCs were induced by a TD Ag, the results were GC dissolution or inhibition of memory development, and perturbation of hypermutation, respectively, consistent with the idea that cognate T cell help is constitutively required for progression of the GC response (51, 52). Finally, recent studies have revealed that GC T cells express CXCR5, required for lymphocyte homing to follicles, and that CXCR5+ CD4 T cells are efficient B helper cells (53, 54). In total, current data are inconsistent with the textbook idea that cognate T cell-B cell interactions are critical throughout the GC response, but they do seem necessary for promotion of development of B memory cells, and may be crucial for the generation of TD Ag-induced GC-derived AFCs.
Elucidation of the role of T cell-B cell interactions in the GC response will likely be assisted by continued studies of the characteristics and capabilities of the T cells that reside in this microenvironment. Kelsoe and colleagues (55, 56) have published the surprising results that mouse GC T cells are members of a unique subpopulation of the CD4 compartment that undergoes hypermutation of its V genes as well as Ag-driven selection. Such behavior was not envisioned by textbook models and, if borne out, will mandate their substantial revision.
|
Subcompartmentalization of GCs and GC function
|
|---|
FACS purification and analysis of subpopulations of human tonsillar GC B cells previously localized histologically provided initial support for the textbook prediction that different steps in GC B cell development take place in distinct subregions of the GC (57). However, examination of acutely induced mouse splenic GCs has generally revealed far less striking substructure than is typical of human tonsillar GCs. The issue of whether textbook light and dark zones formed in such mouse GCs was carefully addressed by Berek, Kosco-Vilbois, and colleagues (58). These kinetic studies confirmed that mouse GCs develop two zones, one rich and one poor in secondary FDCs (defined as expressing high levels of the FDC-M1, FDC-M2, and CD23 markers; the FDC-M2 marker has been recently shown to be a processed form of C4 (59)) and CD4 T cells. However, these experiments also revealed that nonproliferating B cells (centrocytes?) were only transiently found in the secondary FDC-rich zone, at a time when BCR selection events were known to already have taken place. In addition, throughout the response, nearly all GC B cells appeared to express sBCR.
In corroboration of these studies, we found that only secondary FDCs express high levels of the IgG FcR FcRIIB in the mouse, and that such FDCs are restricted to a sector of splenic GCs in which most GC T cells are also seen (15, 60). In addition, we observed that the majority of murine GC B cells are in cycle throughout the response, and display a uniform histological phenotype (30, 60). Whether BCR hypermutation and selection take place in different locales in GCs remains to be rigorously addressed. However, in the mouse, it seems as if BCR selective processes can act on a rather phenotypically homogeneous population of actively proliferating GC B cells.
|
Ectopic GC-like structures
|
|---|
Perhaps the strongest blow to the concept of a textbook GC response has been the discovery of GC-like structures outside of B cell follicles and even secondary lymphoid organs. Analysis of B cell locale and activity at sites of inflammation in humans with autoimmune diseases provided the first indication that GC-like structures could form in ectopic sites (61). In general, these structures bear many, but not all of the characteristics of follicular GCs. Studies of ectopic GCs present in inflamed synovia of arthritis patients by Berek and colleague (62) have shown that BCR hypermutation and selection, as well as clonal expansion and AFC differentiation, can take place in these microenvironments. If a peripheral tolerance checkpoint does not operate in ectopic GCs, perhaps due to their unusual locale preventing the recruitment of necessary cellular components, these structures may promote (62), rather than prevent, the proliferation and differentiation of autoreactive B cell clones created by hypermutation.
GC-like structures that support BCR hypermutation and selection can also form outside of B cell follicles in response to acute immunization of mice with perturbed organization of secondary lymphoid tissues (63, 64). This indicates that ectopic GCs are a general phenomenon, not restricted to cases of autoimmune disease and chronic inflammation. The forces that drive their formation remain to be identified, but given the central role of B cell-derived LT and TNF in the generation of primary follicles and the maintenance of the FDC reticulum (65), it is tempting to speculate that ectopic GCs are nucleated by foci of activated B cells, and incorporation of FDCs then takes place due to production of LT/TNF by the clusters of B cells. Analogous bootstrapping effects, such as chemokine production by the recruited FDCs, may allow the further development of these structures.
|
The evolutionary perspective
|
|---|
The ability to form GCs appears to be restricted to warm-blooded animals, despite the fact that all vertebrates examined are capable of V gene hypermutation (66). In addition, T cell-B cell interactions leading to augmented AFC responses and Ab class switching seem to evolutionarily predate GCs and the development of secondary lymphoid organs with segregated substructure (67, 68). Moreover, the capacity of developing B cells to coalesce, creating focal regions of clonal expansion and BCR diversification outside of secondary lymphoid tissue, is an evolutionarily ancient property: such processes are used by a variety of vertebrates to generate primary Ab repertoires in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (69). Indeed, many of the molecular and cellular mechanisms characteristic of the GC response seem to have been in place well before the appearance of GCs in evolution, and these mechanisms appear to have originally evolved to create diverse primary, not secondary BCR repertoires.
From this perspective, modern follicular GCs can be viewed as accessories that may have evolved to increase the resistance to pathogens of the more metabolically active warm-blooded animals. Nahm et al. (68) have argued that acquisition of the ability to maintain high body temperature translated into faster pathogen replication, antigenic variation, and dissemination during infection. The evolutionary answer to this fitness challenge may have been the ability to gather pathogen-activated B cells into a nurturing microenvironment where clonal expansion and AFC development were accelerated due to juxtaposition of responding B and accessory cells, and where the generation of more effective BCRs through hypermutation and selection took place simultaneously with pathogen activity. Subsequently, the need to maintain self tolerance in the face of such Ag receptor instability may have resulted in the evolution of a GC peripheral tolerance checkpoint.
Apparently, multiple, perhaps redundant, pathways are involved in the formation and maintenance of focal regions of B cell proliferation and differentiation in higher vertebrates. Some of these could have arisen rather early in evolution, and been maintained in higher organisms due to their utility in certain contexts. Others may have been modified over evolutionary time to better suit the character of the particular host and its pathogens. Whatever the case, the term germinal center has now been applied to a diverse assortment of such processes observed both inside and outside of B cell follicles.
|
The plasticity of GC responses: stepwise development or distinct but related processes?
|
|---|
Within the framework of textbook models, this variety would best be explained by assuming that the development of GCs is a multistep process that can terminate at any one of several stages, depending on variables like dose, type and persistence of Ag, level of T cell help, associated inflammation, and stromal environment (Fig. 2). The earliest stages would involve the aggregation and initial proliferation of activated B cells (phase 1). B cells stimulated by either TD or certain TI Ags could reach this point. Next, development of the secondary FDC reticulum and the induction of BCR hypermutation and phenotypic selection processes would occur (phase 2). Only GCs formed by B cells activated by Ag and at least some form of T cell help would be capable of proceeding to this stage. Subsequent steps would result in the recruitment of T cells and the segregation of these T cells and FDCs into two zones (phase 3). Some of these events might fail to occur in ectopic GC-like structures due to deficiencies in the nonlymphoid microenvironment. Finally, selected B cells would either re-enter the proliferating and hypermutating pool of cells, or interact with T cells and be induced to commit to AFC or memory lineages (phase 4). Only during robust and sustained TD B cell immune responses in follicles (e.g., high-dose protein Ag in inflammation-inducing adjuvant or rapidly replicating pathogens) would these latter stages occur efficiently.
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 2. Stepwise progression of a textbook GC response. The development and functioning of a textbook GC in a series of discrete phases is illustrated. The initiation of each step is indicated by a numbered red octagon (see The plasticity of GC responses for details). All other illustrations are as described in Fig. 1. Events between steps one and three are assumed to be driven by soluble Ag, whereas in the terminal stages of the response, events are suggested to be driven by Ag in the form of ICs.
|
|
Alternatively, the concept that GC responses follow a textbook linear pathway could be dismissed. In this light, the form and function of this microenvironment could be viewed as far more malleable than previously imagined. For example, the utility of induction of GCs by certain TI pathogen Ags might be to promote expansion of B cell clones expressing V regions selected over evolutionary time to recognize common multivalent structures on the surface of such pathogens, resulting in a more vigorous AFC response (Fig. 3A). Because hypermutation does not take place efficiently in TI GCs (45, 47), the specificity of the selected V regions would not be altered, and such a process would not pose a threat to self tolerance. The presence of T cells and perhaps secondary FDCs would not be required for TI GCs to perform this function. Particular subsets of mature B cells might preferentially nucleate TI GCs, contributing to their unique characteristics (70). B cell receipt of inflammatory stimuli associated with pathogen infection might be required to make this response efficient, perhaps explaining the sporadic nature of TI GC responses induced by purified TI Ags in T cell-deficient mice (45).
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIGURE 3. Two alternative classes of the GC response. A, The generation and function of a GC generated in response to a TI Ag is illustrated. The multivalent TI Ag is shown as a chain of green hexagons. B, The formation and function of a memory GC is illustrated. Memory B cell clones expressing BCRs of different affinity and specificity are illustrated at the top of the diagram. Because current data suggest that some memory cells may express IgM BCRs, only half of the memory cells are illustrated as expressing class-switched BCRs. Possible reinduction of the somatic hypermutation process is illustrated by red asterisks followed by question marks. All other illustrations are as described in Fig. 1.
|
|
GCs induced throughout the latter stages of TD responses (i.e., after the Ag/pathogen is cleared) or during periods of subclinical infection could facilitate the stringent positive selection of high affinity, and negative selection of autoreactive memory B cells from a large pool created during the acute phase of the response (Fig. 3B). This might take place largely through interaction of these cells with the FDC network (and, perhaps, its retained Ag) and not require (and, in fact, could be inhibited by) high levels of T cell help or the formation of light and dark zones specialized to promote B cell proliferation and hypermutation, and differentiation, respectively. Immunization with low doses of purified protein Ags might mimic the situation that develops after pathogen clearing or low-level infection, and thus predominantly induce this class of GC. Its utility would be in creating small, but highly specific memory B cell clones to single foreign epitopes, allowing the memory compartment to simultaneously possess effective immunity to a wide range of Ags/pathogens using a minimal number of B cells. This would also maximize sensitivity to the pathogen, while minimizing the risk of induction of cross-reactive autoimmunity during subsequent anamnestic AFC responses (18).
Only during acute, high-dose infection by inflammation-inducing pathogens might the formation of GCs akin to those that inspired textbook models (Fig. 1) be required. This could represent a situation in which innate and TI B cell responses had proven ineffective yet had primed the TD response (71). The main function of this type of GC would be to generate numerous class-switched AFCs that would clear the infection due to their production of moderately specific and relatively long-lived serum Ab. Such GCs would also give rise to a sizable population of moderately specific memory cells, which could migrate to other tissue sites and produce rapid local AFC responses as needed to neutralize the pathogen body-wide during periods of reinfection. The generation of light and dark zones would facilitate the rapid production of these two effector populations, by spatially segregating clonal proliferation, hypermutation and perhaps selection, and accessory cell interaction and induction of differentiation.
|
Concluding remarks
|
|---|
Significant hurdles remain to deciphering the many remaining mysteries surrounding the development and function of GCs. Current textbook models appear inadequate to explain the robust and variable nature of the GC reaction. This inherent plasticity should serve as a sobering influence to investigators in the field, because interventions that target factors involved in the GC response may usually result in altered progression, or transformation of the classes of this response, rather than its elimination. Future advances will require new tools and techniques that allow studies of the GC response to transcend the descriptive and focus on the mechanistic. These needs are particularly pressing in the mouse system, because the development of reagents, and purification and culture conditions needed to characterize the cellular and molecular players that participate in different stages or classes of the GC response has not kept pace with the ability to alter this process through reversed genetics approaches.
|
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
I thank past and present coworkers and colleagues for some of the data and most of the discussion that inspired this review. These include the following (listed alphabetically): Boris Alabyev, Larry Casson, Shailaja Hande, Lynn Heltemes-Harris, Vicky Lentz, Xiaohe Liu, Evangelia Notidis, Sam Rao, Zia Rahman, Jeff Ravetch, John Tew, Kathy Tumas-Brundage, and Kalpit Vora. I apologize to those investigators whose work I did not cite due to oversight or space limitations.
|
Footnotes
|
|---|
1 The work in my laboratory on germinal centers has been largely supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health. 
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Tim Manser, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Bluemle Life Sciences Building 708, 233 South 10th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107. E-mail address: Manser{at}mail.jci.tju.edu
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: GC, germinal center; BCR, B cell Ag receptor; DC, dendritic cell; AFC, Ab-forming cell; FDC, follicular DC; s, surface; IC, immune complex; LT, lymphotoxin; TD, T cell dependent; TI, T cell independent.
Received for publication January 12, 2004.
Accepted for publication January 26, 2004.
|
References
|
|---|
- Nieuwenhuis, P., D. Opstelten. 1984. Functional anatomy of germinal centers. Am. J. Anat. 170:421.[Medline]
- MacLennan, I. C. M.. 1994. Germinal centers. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:117.[Medline]
- Nossal, G. J. V.. 1994. Differentiation of the secondary B-lymphocyte repertoire: the germinal center reaction. Immunol. Rev. 137:173.[Medline]
- Tsiagbe, V. K., G. Inghirami, G. J. Thorbecke. 1996. The physiology of germinal centers. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 16:381.[Medline]
- Kraal, G., I. L. Weissman, E. C. Butcher. 1982. Germinal centre B cells: antigen specificity and changes in heavy chain class expression. Nature 298:377.[Medline]
- Berek, C., C. Milstein. 1987. Mutation drift and repertoire shift in the maturation of the immune response. Immunol. Rev. 96:23.[Medline]
- Manser, T., L. J. Wysocki, M. N. Margolies, M. L. Gefter. 1987. Evolution of antibody variable region structure during the immune response. Immunol. Rev. 96:141.[Medline]
- Rajewsky, K., I. Forster, A. Cumano. 1987. Evolutionary and somatic selection of the antibody repertoire in the mouse. Science 238:1088.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jacob, J., G. Kelsoe, K. Rajewsky, U. Weiss. 1991. Intraclonal generation of antibody mutants in germinal centres. Nature 354:389.[Medline]
- Berek, C., A. Berger, M. Apel. 1991. Maturation of the immune response in germinal centers. Cell 67:1121.[Medline]
- Liu, Y. J., C. Arpin. 1997. Germinal center development. Immunol. Rev. 156:111.[Medline]
- Klinman, N. R.. 1997. The cellular origins of memory B cells. Semin. Immunol. 9:241.[Medline]
- Weill, J. C., B. Bertocci, A. Faili, S. Aoufouchi, S. Frey, A. De Smet, S. Storck, A. Dahan, A. Delbos, S. Weller, et al 2002. Ig gene hypermutation: a mechanism is due. Adv. Immunol. 80:183.[Medline]
- Klaus, G. G. B., J. H. Humphrey, A. Kunkl, D. W. Dongworth. 1980. The follicular dendritic cell: its role in antigen presentation in the generation of immunological memory. Immunol. Rev. 53:3.[Medline]
- Qin, D., J. Wu, K. A. Vora, J. V. Ravetch, A. K. Szakal, T. Manser, J. G. Tew. 2000. Fc receptor IIB on follicular dendritic cells regulates the B cell recall response. J. Immunol. 164:6268.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Linton, P. J., A. Rudie, N. R. Klinman. 1991. Tolerance susceptibility of newly generating memory B cells. J. Immunol. 146:4099.[Abstract]
- Pulendran, B., R. van Driel, G. J. Nossal. 1997. Immunological tolerance in germinal centres. Immunol. Today 18:27.[Medline]
- Hande, S., E. Notidis, T. Manser. 1998. Bcl-2 obstructs negative selection of autoreactive, hypermutated antibody V regions during memory B cell development. Immunity 8:189.[Medline]
- Borrentzen, M., I. Randen, E. Zdarsky, O. Forre, J. B. Natvig, K. Thompson. 1994. Control of autoantibody affinity by selection against amino acid replacements in the complementarity-determining regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:12917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lindhout, E., G. Koopman, S. T. Pals, C. de Groot. 1997. Triple check for antigen specificity of B cells during germinal centre reactions. Immunol. Today 18:573.[Medline]
- Nossal, G. J. V., G. L. Ada, C. M. Austin, J. Pye. 1965. Antigens in immunity. VIII. Localization of 125I-labelled antigens in the secondary response. Immunology 9:349.[Medline]
- McDevitt, H. O., B. A. Askonas, J. H. Humphrey, I. Schechter, M. Sela. 1966. The localization of antigen in relation to specific antibody-producing cells I. Use of a synthetic polypeptide [(T,G)-A–L] labelled with iodine-125. Immunology 11:337.[Medline]
- Kroese, F. G. M., A. S. Wubbena, P. Nieuwenhuis. 1986. Germinal center formation and follicular antigen trapping in the spleen of lethally X-irradiated and reconstituted rats. Immunology 57:99.[Medline]
- Hannum, L. G., A. M. Haberman, S. M. Anderson, M. J. Shlomchik. 2000. Germinal center initiation, variable gene region hypermutation, and mutant B cell selection without detectable immune complexes on follicular dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vora, K. A., J. V. Ravetch, T. Manser. 1997. Amplified follicular immune complex deposition in mice lacking the Fc receptor -chain does not alter maturation of the B cell response. J. Immunol. 159:2116.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Takahashi, Y., P. R. Dutta, D. M. Cerasoli, G. Kelsoe. 1998. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. V. Affinity maturation develops in two stages of clonal selection. J. Exp. Med. 187:885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Matsumoto, M., S. F. Lo, C. J. L. Carruthers, J. Min, S. Mariathasan, G. Huang, D. R. Plas, S. M. Martin, R. F. Geha, M. H. Nahm, D. D. Chaplin. 1996. Affinity maturation without germinal centres in lymphotoxin- deficient mice. Nature 382:462.[Medline]
- Koni, P. A., R. A. Flavell. 1999. Lymph node germinal centers form in the absence of follicular dendritic cell networks. J. Exp. Med. 189:855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Haberman, A. M., M. J. Shlomchik. 2003. Reassessing the function of immune-complex retention by follicular dendritic cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:757.[Medline]
- Rahman, Z. S., S. P. Rao, S. L. Kalled, T. Manser. 2003. Normal induction but attenuated progression of germinal center responses in BAFF and BAFF-R signaling-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 198:1157.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vora, K. A., L. C. Wang, S. P. Rao, Z. Y. Liu, G. R. Majeau, A. H. Cutler, P. S. Hochman, M. L. Scott, S. L. Kalled. 2003. Cutting edge: germinal centers formed in the absence of B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF family exhibit impaired maturation and function. J. Immunol. 171:547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tew, J. G., M. H. Kosco, G. F. Burton, A. K. Szakal. 1990. Follicular dendritic cells as accessory cells. Immunol. Rev. 117:186.
- Lindhout, E., A. Lakeman, C. de Groot. 1995. Follicular dendritic cells inhibit apoptosis in human B lymphocytes by a rapid and irreversible blockade of preexisting endonuclease. J. Exp. Med. 181:1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Li, L., Y. S. Choi. 2002. Follicular dendritic cell-signaling molecules required for proliferation and differentiation of GC-B cells. Semin. Immunol. 14:259.[Medline]
- Gray, D., H. Skarvall. 1988. B-cell memory is short-lived in the absence of antigen. Nature 336:70.[Medline]
- Bachmann, M. F., T. M. Kundig, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 1994. Regulation of IgG antibody titers by the amount of persisting immune-complexed antigen. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:2567.[Medline]
- Kosco-Vilbois, M. H.. 2003. Are follicular dendritic cells really good for nothing?. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3:764.[Medline]
- Maruyama, M., K. P. Lam, K. Rajewsky. 2000. Memory B-cell persistence is independent of persisting immunizing antigen. Nature 407:636.[Medline]
- Fu, Y. X., G. Huang, Y. Wang, D. D. Chaplin. 2000. Lymphotoxin--dependent spleen microenvironment supports the generation of memory B cells and is required for their subsequent antigen-induced activation. J. Immunol. 164:2508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Weissman, I. L., G. A. Gutman, S. H. Friedberg, L. Jerabek. 1976. Lymphoid tissue architecture. III. Germinal centers, T cells, and thymus-dependent vs thymus-independent antigens. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 66:229.[Medline]
- Goodlad, J. R., J. C. Macartney. 1995. Germinal center proliferation in response to T-independent antigens: a stathmokinetic, morphometric and immunohistochemical study in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 25:1918.[Medline]
- Kosco-Vilbois, M. H., H. Zentgraf, J. Gerdes, J. Y. Bonnefoy. 1997. To "B" or not to "B" a germinal center?. Immunol. Today 18:225.[Medline]
- Wang, D., S. M. Wells, A. M. Stall, E. A. Kabat. 1994. Reaction of germinal centers in the T-cell-independent response to the bacterial polysaccharide (16) dextran. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sverremark, E., C. Fernandez. 1998. Role of T cells and germinal center formation in the generation of immune responses to the thymus-independent carbohydrate dextran B512. J. Immunol. 161:4646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lentz, V. M., T. Manser. 2001. Cutting edge: germinal centers can be induced in the absence of T cells. J. Immunol. 167:15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Garcia de Vinuesa, C., M. C. Cook, J. Ball, M. Drew, Y. Sunners, M. Calscalho, M. Wabl, G. G. B. Klaus, I. C. M. MacLennan. 2000. Germinal centers without T cells. J. Exp. Med. 191:485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Toellner, K. M., W. E. Jenkinson, D. R. Taylor, M. Khan, D. M. Sze, D. M. Sansom, C. G. Vinuesa, I. C. MacLennan. 2002. Low-level hypermutation in T cell-independent germinal centers compared with high mutation rates associated with T cell-dependent germinal centers. J. Exp. Med. 195:383.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stedra, J., J. Cerny. 1994. Distinct pathways of B cell differentiation. I. Residual T cells in athymic mice support the development of splenic germinal centers and B cell memory without an induction of antibody. J. Immunol. 152:1718.[Abstract]
- Zheng, B., E. Marinova, J. Han, T. H. Tan, S. Han. 2003. Cutting edge: T cells provide help to B cells with altered clonotypes and are capable of inducing Ig gene hypermutation. J. Immunol. 171:4979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fuller, K. A., O. Kanagawa, M. H. Nahm. 1993. T cells within germinal centers are specific for the immunizing antigen. J. Immunol. 151:4505.[Abstract]
- Han, S., K. Hathcock, B. Zheng, T. B. Kepler, R. Hodes, G. Kelsoe. 1995. Cellular interaction in germinal centers. Roles of CD40 ligand and B7-2 in established germinal centers. J. Immunol. 155:556.[Abstract]
- Gray, D., P. Dullforce, S. Jainandunsing. 1994. Memory B cell development but not germinal center formation is impaired by in vivo blockade of CD40-CD40 ligand interaction. J. Exp. Med. 180:141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kim, C. H., L. S. Rott, I. Clark-Lewis, D. J. Campbell, L. Wu, E. C. Butcher. 2001. Subspecialization of CXCR5+ T cells: B helper activity is focused in a germinal center-localized subset of CXCR5+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 193:1373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Moser, B., P. Schaerli, P. Loetscher. 2002. CXCR5+ T cells: follicular homing takes center stage in T-helper-cell responses. Trends Immunol. 23:250.[Medline]
- Zheng, B., S. Han, Q. Zhu, R. Goldsby, G. Kelsoe. 1996. Alternative pathways for the selection of antigen-specific peripheral T cells. Nature 384:263.[Medline]
- Zheng, B., W. Xue, G. Kelsoe. 1994. Locus-specific somatic hypermutation in germinal centre T cells. Nature 372:556.[Medline]
- Pascual, V., Y. J. Liu, A. Magalski, O. de Bouteiller, J. Banchereau, J. D. Capra. 1994. Analysis of somatic mutation in five B cell subsets of human tonsil. J. Exp. Med. 180:329.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Camacho, S. A., M. H. Kosco-Vilbois, C. Berek. 1998. The dynamic structure of the germinal center. Immunol. Today 19:511.[Medline]
- Taylor, P. R., M. C. Pickering, M. H. Kosco-Vilbois, M. J. Walport, M. Botto, S. Gordon, L. Martinez-Pomares. 2002. The follicular dendritic cell restricted epitope, FDC-M2, is complement C4; localization of immune complexes in mouse tissues. Eur. J. Immunol. 32:1888.[Medline]
- Rao, S. P., K. A. Vora, T. Manser. 2002. Differential expression of the inhibitory IgG Fc receptor FcRIIB on germinal center cells: implications for selection of high-affinity B cells. J. Immunol. 169:1859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- van Nierop, K., C. de Groot. 2002. Human follicular dendritic cells: function, origin and development. Semin. Immunol. 14:251.[Medline]
- Berek, C., H. J. Kim. 1997. B-cell activation and development within chronically inflamed synovium in rheumatoid and reactive arthritis. Semin. Immunol. 9:261.[Medline]
- Voigt, I., S. A. Camacho, B. A. de Boer, M. Lipp, R. Forster, C. Berek. 2000. CXCR5-deficient mice develop functional germinal centers in the splenic T cell zone. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:560.[Medline]
- Karrer, U., C. Lopez-Macias, A. Oxenius, B. Odermatt, M. F. Bachmann, U. Kalinke, H. Bluethmann, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 2000. Antiviral B cell memory in the absence of mature follicular dendritic cell networks and classical germinal centers in TNFR1-/- mice. J. Immunol. 164:768.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fu, Y. X., D. D. Chaplin. 1999. Development and maturation of secondary lymphoid tissues. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:399.[Medline]
- Diaz, M., M. F. Flajnik. 1998. Evolution of somatic hypermutation and gene conversion in adaptive immunity. Immunol. Rev. 162:13.[Medline]
- Cyster, J. G.. 2003. Lymphoid organ development and cell migration. Immunol. Rev. 195:5.[Medline]
- Nahm, M. H., F. G. Kroese, J. W. Hoffmann. 1992. The evolution of immune memory and germinal centers. Immunol. Today 13:438.[Medline]
- Reynaud, C. A., J. C. Weill. 1996. Postrearrangement diversification processes in gut-associated lymphoid tissues. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 212:7.[Medline]
- Miller, C., J. Stedra, G. Kelsoe, J. Cerny. 1995. Facultative role of germinal centers and T cells in the somatic diversification of of IgVH genes. J. Exp. Med. 181:1319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Medzhitov, R., C. A. Janeway. 1998. Innate immune recognition and control of adaptive immune responses. Semin. Immunol. 10:351.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
E. Bi and B. H. Ye
An Expanding Job Description for Bcl6
J Mol Cell Biol,
September 30, 2009;
(2009)
mjp032v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-i. Honda, N. Kurita, A. Miyamoto, Y. Cho, K. Usui, K. Takeshita, S. Takahashi, T. Yasui, H. Kikutani, T. Kinoshita, et al.
Enhanced humoral immune responses against T-independent antigens in Fc{alpha}/{micro}R-deficient mice
PNAS,
July 7, 2009;
106(27):
11230 - 11235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. H. Achtman, U. E. Hopken, C. Bernert, and M. Lipp
CCR7-deficient mice develop atypically persistent germinal centers in response to thymus-independent type 2 antigens
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
March 1, 2009;
85(3):
409 - 417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. T. Figge, A. Garin, M. Gunzer, M. Kosco-Vilbois, K.-M. Toellner, and M. Meyer-Hermann
Deriving a germinal center lymphocyte migration model from two-photon data
J. Exp. Med.,
December 22, 2008;
205(13):
3019 - 3029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Murray, N. Darzentas, A. Hadzidimitriou, G. Tobin, M. Boudjogra, C. Scielzo, N. Laoutaris, K. Karlsson, F. Baran-Marzsak, A. Tsaftaris, et al.
Stereotyped patterns of somatic hypermutation in subsets of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: implications for the role of antigen selection in leukemogenesis
Blood,
February 1, 2008;
111(3):
1524 - 1533.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bombardieri, F. Barone, F. Humby, S. Kelly, M. McGurk, P. Morgan, S. Challacombe, S. De Vita, G. Valesini, J. Spencer, et al.
Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase Expression in Follicular Dendritic Cell Networks and Interfollicular Large B Cells Supports Functionality of Ectopic Lymphoid Neogenesis in Autoimmune Sialoadenitis and MALT Lymphoma in Sjogren's Syndrome
J. Immunol.,
October 1, 2007;
179(7):
4929 - 4938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Al-Alwan, Q. Du, S. Hou, B. Nashed, Y. Fan, X. Yang, and A. J. Marshall
Follicular Dendritic Cell Secreted Protein (FDC-SP) Regulates Germinal Center and Antibody Responses
J. Immunol.,
June 15, 2007;
178(12):
7859 - 7867.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. I. Kuraishy, S. W. French, M. Sherman, M. Herling, D. Jones, R. Wall, and M. A. Teitell
TORC2 regulates germinal center repression of the TCL1 oncoprotein to promote B cell development and inhibit transformation
PNAS,
June 12, 2007;
104(24):
10175 - 10180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. J. Maglione, J. Xu, and J. Chan
B Cells Moderate Inflammatory Progression and Enhance Bacterial Containment upon Pulmonary Challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Immunol.,
June 1, 2007;
178(11):
7222 - 7234.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. M. Radcliffe, J. N. Arnold, D. M. Suter, M. R. Wormald, D. J. Harvey, L. Royle, Y. Mimura, Y. Kimura, R. B. Sim, S. Inoges, et al.
Human Follicular Lymphoma Cells Contain Oligomannose Glycans in the Antigen-binding Site of the B-cell Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2007;
282(10):
7405 - 7415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. D. C. Allen, T. Okada, H. L. Tang, and J. G. Cyster
Imaging of Germinal Center Selection Events During Affinity Maturation
Science,
January 26, 2007;
315(5811):
528 - 531.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-M. Hogerkorp and C. A. K. Borrebaeck
The Human CD77- B Cell Population Represents a Heterogeneous Subset of Cells Comprising Centroblasts, Centrocytes, and Plasmablasts, Prompting Phenotypical Revision
J. Immunol.,
October 1, 2006;
177(7):
4341 - 4349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. F. Fecteau, G. Cote, and S. Neron
A New Memory CD27-IgG+ B Cell Population in Peripheral Blood Expressing VH Genes with Low Frequency of Somatic Mutation
J. Immunol.,
September 15, 2006;
177(6):
3728 - 3736.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Larousserie, P. Charlot, E. Bardel, J. Froger, R. A. Kastelein, and O. Devergne
Differential Effects of IL-27 on Human B Cell Subsets
J. Immunol.,
May 15, 2006;
176(10):
5890 - 5897.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J. Tinckam and A. Chandraker
Mechanisms and Role of HLA and non-HLA Alloantibodies
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
May 1, 2006;
1(3):
404 - 414.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Yang, G. C. Waldbieser, and C. J. Lobb
The Nucleotide Targets of Somatic Mutation and the Role of Selection in Immunoglobulin Heavy Chains of a Teleost Fish
J. Immunol.,
February 1, 2006;
176(3):
1655 - 1667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. P. M. Tjin, R. J. Bende, P. W. B. Derksen, A.-P. van Huijstee, H. Kataoka, M. Spaargaren, and S. T. Pals
Follicular Dendritic Cells Catalyze Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) Activation in the Germinal Center Microenvironment by Secreting the Serine Protease HGF Activator
J. Immunol.,
September 1, 2005;
175(5):
2807 - 2813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. E. Meyer-Hermann and P. K. Maini
Cutting Edge: Back to "One-Way" Germinal Centers
J. Immunol.,
March 1, 2005;
174(5):
2489 - 2493.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.-S. Park, S.-O. Yoon, R. J. Armitage, and Y. S. Choi
Follicular Dendritic Cells Produce IL-15 That Enhances Germinal Center B Cell Proliferation in Membrane-Bound Form
J. Immunol.,
December 1, 2004;
173(11):
6676 - 6683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Hron, L. Caplan, A. J. Gerth, P. L. Schwartzberg, and S. L. Peng
SH2D1A Regulates T-dependent Humoral Autoimmunity
J. Exp. Med.,
July 19, 2004;
200(2):
261 - 266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Top
Abstract
Introduction
