|
|
||||||||




* Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute at Huddinge Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;
Department of Biosciences, Novum, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden; and
Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nature of the host immune response may also determine the clinical outcome of the infection. H. pylori colonization induces a strong systemic and mucosal immune response (8, 9, 10). However, Ab production does not result in eradication of the infection, even though H. pylori is susceptible in vitro to Ab-dependent complement-mediated phagocytosis and killing (11). Rather, autoantibody-mediated destruction of epithelial cells may initiate or maintain mucosal inflammation (12, 13, 14).
Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are increased at the site of infection with H. pylori (15). The majority of CD4+ T cell clones isolated from H. pylori-infected individuals express a Th1 phenotype, and produce high levels of IFN-
and IL-12 (15, 16, 17). This Th1 deviation may be associated with increased antral production of IL-18 in response to H. pylori infection (18). The skewed host response (Th1), combined with Fas-mediated apoptosis of H. pylori-specific T cell clones (19), may contribute to the persistence of the infection and studies in mice have suggested that a balanced Th1 and Th2 response is necessary for protection (2, 20).
Host genetic factors may also influence the immune and inflammatory response to H. pylori infection. Polymorphisms in the IL-1 gene cluster were shown to be associated with an increased risk of hypochlorhydria induced by H. pylori and gastric adenocarcinoma (21). A recent study also showed that polymorphisms in the gene encoding the IFN-
R1 are associated with susceptibility to infection (22).
Many studies of the pathogenesis of H. pylori-associated gastritis have been based on the analysis of the expression of single or a relatively limited number of cytokine or chemokine genes in the infected gastric mucosa (for review, see Ref. 23). However, the global pattern of inflammatory gene expression has not been analyzed. Recently, microarray techniques have become available that allow characterization of the mRNA expression pattern of large numbers of genes simultaneously. In this study, we used an inflammatory cDNA array, representing a comprehensive collection of genes encoding cytokines, chemokines, their receptors, and other immunomodulatory factors, to analyze the profile of gene expression in H. pylori-associated gastritis. Two main profiles of gene expression were identified based on cluster analysis. Comparison of these profiles with clinical and pathological data may not only contribute to the identification of genes associated with H. pylori infection and to a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved, but may also help to predict the possible outcome of the infection in patients.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gastric biopsies were collected from 21 individuals who underwent gastroscopy due to dyspepsia, upper abdominal pain, or a routine check before partial gastrectomy (obesity patients). Patients with malignancy, immunosuppression, metabolic disorders, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or who were receiving aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded from the study. The patients are all central-European residents, all belonging to the Caucasian population except one recent immigrant from Asia (patient 64). Multiple endoscopic biopsies were obtained from the antrum and the corpus for parallel assessment of gene expression and histology. For RNA preparation, biopsies were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C. Table I summarizes the characteristics of the patients. The Institution Review Boards at the University Hospital (Lausanne, Switzerland) and the Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden) approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.
|
Four gastric biopsies (two from antrum and two from corpus) were obtained from each patient, fixed in formalin, and subsequently evaluated by an experienced pathologist, blinded to all other aspects of the study. The degree of inflammation present in the histological specimens was classified according to the updated Sydney system (24). A grading from absent to marked was assigned for four histological variables: chronic inflammation (mononuclear cell infiltration), activity (polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltration), glandular atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia. The presence of H. pylori infection was determined either by visualization by histology (including Giemsa staining) and/or a positive rapid urease test performed on at least one additional biopsy sample.
cDNA array
The human cytokine expression array (R&D Systems, Abingdon, U.K.), which consists of 847 different cloned cDNAs representing a comprehensive collection of cytokines, chemokines and other immunomodulatory factors, and their receptors (www.rndsystems.com or www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/, platform GPL193), was used for the study. Nine positive control "housekeeping" genes, six negative controls, and human genomic DNA are also included in the array.
Probe preparation and hybridization
Total RNA was isolated from
20 to 30 mg of frozen gastric biopsy samples (two biopsies) using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA samples from antrum and corpus biopsies were prepared separately. In addition to the standard procedure, DNase I (Qiagen) was used to remove trace amounts of genomic DNA. Total RNA was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260 and A280) and the integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis before radiolabeling. cDNA probe preparation and membrane hybridization were performed according to the respective kit manuals (R&D Systems). Briefly, 2 µg of total RNA were reverse transcribed into cDNA by avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase using a human cytokine-specific primer mix in the presence of [
-33P]dCTP (2000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and 0.3 mM of a dATP/dGTP/dTTP mixture at 42°C for 2 h. Labeled cDNA was subsequently separated from unincorporated nucleotides using Sephadex G-25 spin columns (R&D Systems). The array membranes were prehybridized at 65°C for 2 h in hybridization solution (5x SSPE, 2% (w/v) SDS, 5x Denhardts reagent, and 100 µg/ml sonicated, salmon DNA). Labeled probes were added to 3 ml of fresh hybridization solution and allowed to hybridize to the array membranes at 65°C overnight. After hybridization, membranes were washed two times with solution 1 (0.5x SSC and 1% SDS), twice with solution 2 (0.1x SSC and 1% SDS) for 20 min at 65°C, and finally exposed to a phosphorus screen for 7 days. Each array was not reused more than one time after stripping.
Microarray scanning
The cDNA microarrays were scanned and exported as image and information files using a Fuji Bio-image Analyzer BAS2000 (Fuji, Düsseldorf, Germany). The images and quantitative data of gene expression levels were analyzed using the Fuji Image Reader FLA-3000/3000G software. After the quantitative data had been recorded, each spot was also manually examined to avoid artifacts.
Data analysis
Spreadsheets exported from the image analysis software were analyzed using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA). A mean signal intensity value of 92 evenly distributed empty spots (with no cDNA spotted) and the six negative control spots of each array were used as a background value, which was subsequently subtracted from the signal intensities. The background value was used to establish the signal threshold to filter out weak signals that were not attributable to actual gene expression or those that were too weak for meaningful interpretation. The threshold was set such that any gene whose adjusted intensity was at least 2 SD above the background value was considered to be a genuine signal. To compare the results of different hybridization experiments, the signal intensity of each gene from different arrays was normalized by the averaged signal from nine housekeeping genes in each array. The corresponding normalized signals on different arrays were then compared in order to determine fold-induction or fold-reduction in expression of gene-specific RNA between samples. Only relative changes equal to, or greater than, 2-fold levels of gene expression were considered to represent up- or down-regulation. In addition, if the signal intensity of a given gene was changed from negative (below the signal threshold) to positive or from positive to negative, the gene was considered being up- or down-regulated, respectively. The complete array data are available from gene expression omnibus (accession numbers: GSM8905-8925 and GSM12762-12767)
The normalized gene expression levels from different sample groups (H. pylori-positive or -negative, cagA-positive or -negative, babA2-positive or -negative) were also compared by Mann-Whitney test using SPSS software (Chicago, IL). Multidimensional scaling (using the additive ("Manhattan") metric) and the standard Students t test with multiple testing correction were performed using software R (www.R-project.org).
Hierarchical clustering was performed by using the CLUSTER program (25) and the results were displayed using TREEVIEW (software available at http://genome-www4.stanford.edu/MicroArray/SMD/restech.html).
PCR amplification of H. pylori-specific genes
A series of primers (Table II) were designed for PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA, cagA, vacA1, vacA2, and babA2 genes directly from the H. pylori-infected gastric biopsies. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with a pd(N)6 primer using a cDNA synthesis kit (Amersham Pharmacia). For cDNA synthesis, 3 µg of total RNA were used. Amplification was performed in 40 cycles, each cycle consisting of 94°C 30 s, 55°C (16S rRNA) or 60°C (cagA, vacA1, vacA2, and babA2) 30 s and 72°C 30 s. The PCR products were analyzed on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and their identities were confirmed by cloning and sequencing of selected samples.
|
First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with a NotI-d(T)18 primer using a cDNA synthesis kit (Amersham Pharmacia). For cDNA synthesis, 2.35 µg of total RNA was used. Primer sequences are shown in supplementary data Table I.4 The amplification was performed using the qPCR core kit for SYBR Green I (MedProbe, Oslo, Norway) and the ABI PRISM 7000 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Typical profile times used were: initial step, 95°C, 10 min followed by a second step, 95°C 15 s and 60°C 1 min, 40 cycles. The standard curves for a housekeeping gene (GAPDH) and the target gene were generated by serial dilutions of the control cDNA sample (equivalent to 80 ng of total RNA) in five 2-fold dilution steps and used for regression analysis. The amount of target and housekeeping gene in every sample was determined from the respective standard curves and the target amount was divided by the housekeeping gene expression level to obtain a normalized target value (relative expression level).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In a first set of experiments, array hybridization using different conditions (varying amounts of RNA input, different exposure time etc.) was performed to optimize the test protocols.
-32P vs
-33P labeling was also tested and as
-33P gave a lower background, it was chosen for all subsequent experiments.
Twelve H. pylori-positive and nine H. pylori-negative antrum biopsies were subsequently tested in parallel on inflammatory cDNA arrays. On average, expression of 78.5% of the genes on the arrays could be detected and the number of detectable genes in the H. pylori-infected group was significantly higher than in the noninfected group (83.9 and 71.3%, respectively, t test, p < 0.01). To verify the reproducibility, four patient samples were tested twice and showed a >95% correlation.
The gene expression patterns, as evaluated from the hybridization images, were clearly different between the H. pylori-infected and noninfected groups and a number of genes were differentially expressed between the two groups. A typical example is given in Fig. 1 (labeled AZ).
|
|
, TNF-
, IL-10R
, IL-16, IFN-
R1, GM-CSFR
, IL-2R
), complement and complement receptors (CR1, CD21, C3), adhesion molecules (ICAM-1, VCAM-1, mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MadCAM-1)), integrins (integrin-
2, integrin-
X, integrin-
L, integrin-
4, integrin-
7), chemokines and chemokine receptors (B lymphocyte chemoattractant (BLC)/B-lymphocyte chemoattractant (BCA)-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-3
, epithelia-derived neutrophil-activating peptide (ENA)-78, growth-related protein (GRO)-
, GRO-
, GRO-
, CCR-7, CCR-6, CXCR-4), cell signaling molecules (mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)10, DAP kinase-related apoptosis-inducing protein kinase (DRAK)2, protein kinase C
1 (PRKCB1)), proteinases (matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM)12), and some factors that are important for B or T cell activation (CD45, CD53, GL50/B7-H2, signal lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM), B7-H1). Differentially expressed genes in H. pylori-infected antrum gastric mucosa
To further identify the genes that were differentially expressed between the two groups, we performed an analysis using stringent criteria (requiring consistency in the expression values across a majority of the samples) where the normalized signal of each individual gene in a given sample in the H. pylori-positive group (n = 12) was compared with the data of the corresponding gene in each of the control samples in the H. pylori-negative group (n = 9). If the signal intensity was higher than in the control sample, i.e., showing at least a 2-fold increase or a change from being undetectable to detectable, in >80% of these comparisons (n = 108), the gene was considered being up-regulated. Conversely, if the expression was lower than in the H. pylori-negative samples, it was considered being down-regulated. As shown in Table III, 37 genes were up-regulated in the H. pylori-infected samples. All these genes were actually present among the "H. pylori-infection signature" identified by the cluster analysis (Fig. 2B, marked by *). We next performed a statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) and altogether 232 genes were shown to be differentially expressed in the H. pylori-positive and -negative samples (55 genes, p < 0.001; 86 genes, 0.001
p < 0.01; 91 genes, 0.01
p < 0.05, for details see supplementary data, Table II). Using this test, all the genes in the H. pylori-infection signature, identified by the cluster analysis, were differentially expressed to a statistically significant degree (p < 0.01) and the 37 genes identified by the stringent criteria (Table III) were among those with the highest significance (p
0.001). The Student t test with multiple testing corrections was also performed and the list of genes with high significance largely overlapped with that shown by the Mann-Whitney test (data not shown).
|
, ENA-78, and GRO-
) can be produced by various cells including epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and monocytes. The specific gene expression profile in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa is therefore most likely due to responses from many cell types, including gastric epithelial cells, endothelial cells from blood vessels, and the infiltrating immune cells.
As four of the H. pylori-negative samples exhibited mild chronic inflammation in the gastric mucosa, possibly due to a previous infection, we also compared all the H. pylori-positive samples (n = 12) with the H. pylori-negative samples that showed a normal histology and with no history of previous infection (n = 5, sample 45, 23, 24, 13, and 28). In addition to the 37 genes identified above, LPS-binding protein (LBP), platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF), IL-2R
, IL-1R-like 2,
-site APP-cleaving enzyme, and DRAK2 were found to be up-regulated in the H. pylori-positive group. These genes were also present among the H. pylori-infection signature identified by the cluster analysis.
To confirm the expression data of the array hybridization, 10 genes in the H. pylori-infection signature were analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. There was a strong correlation between the expression data from arrays and real-time PCR, where the expression of all the genes tested except MAPK10 (1.5-fold) were up-regulated
2-fold (Table IV).
|
Three H. pylori-positive (9C, 12C, and 81C) and three H. pylori-negative (13C, 23C, and 45C) corpus biopsies were also tested in parallel on the inflammatory cDNA arrays. Using the stringent criteria described above, 6 and 3 genes were up- or down-regulated in the H. pylori-infected samples. All the up-regulated genes (BPI, C3, NMA, lactotransferrin (LTF), PRKCB1, and anti-Mullerian hormone receptor (AMHR)2) are present in the H. pylori-infection signature identified by analyzing the antrum samples (Table III and Fig. 2), suggesting that similar immune/inflammatory responses might be induced in the corpus mucosa. However, some of the responses seem to be more prominent in H. pylori-infected antrum mucosa, including VCAM-1, ENA-78, GRO-
, GRO-
, and GRO-
, as these genes all showed a >2-fold higher expression in the H. pylori-infected antrum vs corpus samples from the same individual (n = 3). We also identified 17 genes that were differentially expressed in all six pairs of antrum/corpus samples (supplementary data, Table III). These genes, which include activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule, cyclin-dependent kinase 6, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2, c-kit, and leukemia inhibitory factor R, do not overlap with any of the H. pylori-infection signature; they may represent intrinsic differences between antrum and corpus.
Correlation of chronic inflammation with the gene expression profile
To search for genes that are related to the degree of the chronic inflammation in the H. pylori-infected gastric samples, we divided the H. pylori-positive antrum samples into three groups based on their histology scores for chronic inflammation (marked, moderate, or mild), and compared these groups to a group of H. pylori-negative samples with a normal histology (n = 5, samples 13, 23, 24, 28, and 45) using the stringent criteria described above.
The severe chronic gastritis group included samples 1, 3, and 65 and showed a marked infiltration of mononuclear cells in the biopsies. Totally, 66 and 1 genes were being up- or down-regulated in this group as compared with the H. pylori-negative samples (Table V). The moderate gastritis group included samples 11, 12, 22, 27, 49, 64, 81, and 87 and showed a moderate infiltration of mononuclear cells. There were 47 genes up-regulated in this group, 46 of which were already identified in the severe gastritis group (Table V). The mild gastritis group included only one sample (sample 9) and the number of up-regulated genes in this sample was significantly less (n = 7) as compared with the other two groups. All of these genes were already identified in the severe and moderate gastritis groups.
|
|
1.5-fold, Table V). These genes might therefore be quantitatively related to the intensity of the chronic inflammation. Correlation of babA2, vacA1, vacA2, and cagA genotypes with the gene expression pattern
Primers specific for H. pylori 16S rRNA, cagA, vacAs1/s2, and babA2 were applied in RT-PCR to detect the expression of the bacterial genes directly in the gastric biopsies. We could detect H. pylori 16S rRNA in all the samples belonging to the H. pylori-positive group, thus confirming the histological results (Table VI). cagA, vacAs1/s2, and babA2 were detected in selected H. pylori-positive samples (Table VI).
|
We subsequently compared the gene expression in cagA+/cagA- (n = 6/n = 6) or babA+/babA2- (n = 6/n = 6) samples. Thirty-five and 42 differentially expressed genes were identified (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.05), and 19 and 25 of those showed >2-fold changes (supplementary data, Table IV). However, some of these genes showed rather low levels of significance (0.05 < p < 0.01), suggesting a limited biological relevance. One notable feature is that many of the H. pylori-infection signature genes were more prominent in biopsies taken from individuals infected by babA2-negative strains rather than positive strains (Fig. 2B, marked by #). It is also notable that the differentially expressed genes in the cagA+/cagA- or babA2+/babA2- groups are almost not overlapping, which suggests that different subsets of genes were induced by these bacterial factors. However, a larger sample size, which would allow more detailed comparisons (such as cagA+babA2-/cagA-babA2- or babA2+cagA-/babA2-cagA-), is needed to dissect the effects on gene expression by the individual bacterial factors.
Influence of gender and age on gene expression pattern in antrum gastric mucosa
To search for possible host factors that might contribute to the gene expression patterns, we performed series of statistical analyses, comparing samples from different gender and age groups (> and
median age of 38). We could not identify any gene that was differentially expressed in males/females or old/young individuals using a high t threshold (p < 0.01). Using multidimensional scaling analysis, no subgroups could be assigned within the H. pylori-positive or -negative groups by age or gender. However, when we made comparisons of gender within the H. pylori-positive and -negative groups, we found 24 and 59 genes that were differentially expressed between males and females in the H. pylori-positive and -negative groups, respectively, although most showed a low level of significance (Mann-Whitney test, 0.01 < p < 0.05, data not shown). There were only three genes (CCR6, integrin
L, and transmembrane activator and CAML interactor) that showed a major difference in expression (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.01), and they were up-regulated in females in the H. pylori-positive group. Similarly, we found that one gene, monocyte chemoattractant protein-2, was significantly up-regulated in older individuals (>38 years) within the H. pylori-positive group (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.01). Therefore, gender and age are not influencing the general gene expression pattern in antrum mucosa in normal and H. pylori-infected individuals, but may contribute to differential expression of a small number of genes.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One notable finding of our study is that H. pylori infection strongly induced expression of several of genes that are associated with the innate immune system. Fourteen of the genes, identified as belonging to the H. pylori-infection signature, are related to innate immunity, including the recently described TLRs. Individual TLRs recognize distinct structural components of micro-organisms (31, 32). TLR4 recognizes LPS, the major outer membrane component of Gram-negative bacteria, whereas TLR2 is involved in the recognition of Gram-positive bacteria. The latter was the only TLR tested in our study (TLR16) that was not up-regulated in the H. pylori-infected samples, suggesting a selective expression pattern of TLRs in the infected gastric mucosa. Several other factors related to the LPS signaling pathway including CD14, LBP, and RP105 (related to proliferative response of B cells to LPS), were also strongly induced in the H. pylori-infected samples, suggesting that although LPS from H. pylori has been considered to be less toxic than LPS from other Gram-negative bacteria (33, 34, 35), it may still be a potent stimulator of innate immune responses. As gastric epithelial cells do not express TLR4 (36), H. pylori LPS is probably recognized by TLR4-expressing monocytes infiltrating the infected mucosa, as suggested previously in a mouse model (37). In addition to TLRs and related factors, expression of complement factor C3, LTF, a factor that mediates both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities by its iron-binding properties (38, 39, 40), and BPI were also strongly up-regulated in the H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa.
Up-regulation of the genes encoding receptors for IFN-
, IL-2, IL-3, IL-12, and IL-18 was dominant in the H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa, supporting the previous notion of a Th1-driven response. The expression of IFN-
R1, previously not reported, was significantly up-regulated in H. pylori-infected mucosa. Interestingly, a recent genome-wide linkage analysis showed that specific polymorphisms in this gene are strongly associated with susceptibility to H. pylori infection (22). In addition, our study linked IL-10R
, IL-15, IL-16, IL-18R, GM-CSFR
, TNFSF3/LT-
and TNFSF7/CD27 gene expression to H. pylori infection.
Expression of selected chemokines and chemokine receptors was also modified during H. pylori infection. Among the 34 chemokine and 16 chemokine receptor genes tested, 7 and 3 genes, respectively, were identified as belonging to the H. pylori-infection signature. These included the CXC chemokines, ENA-78, GRO-
, GRO-
, GRO-
, and BLC/BCA-1 (all target neutrophils except BLC/BCA-1 which targets naive B cells and activated T cells), which have previously been implicated in H. pylori-induced inflammation (41, 42, 43). In addition, two CC chemokines, pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine (PARC) (DC-CK1) and MIP-3
, three chemokine receptors, CCR6, CCR7, and CXCR4, not previously studied in this regard, were also up-regulated. PARC is a dendritic cell-derived chemokine that preferentially attracts naive T cells (44). MIP-3
and its receptor CCR6 may play a role in attracting immature dendritic cells and lymphocytes within the memory subset (45) and increased MIP-3
production has been shown in epithelial cells isolated from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (46). MIP-3
may also mediate recruitment of memory CD4+ T lymphocytes through MadCAM-1. Interestingly, we found an up-regulation of the transcription of the MadCAM-1 gene in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa, a finding also described in H. pylori-induced murine gastritis (47). Our data thus suggest that several CXC chemokines are involved in the neutrophil trafficking that contributes to the activity of H. pylori-induced gastritis, whereas PARC, MIP-3
, and BCA-1 may contribute to the recruitment of other inflammatory cells, including lymphocytes and dendritic cells.
The well-studied CXC chemokine IL-8 was expressed at a very low level (below the threshold for a genuine signal) in a majority of the biopsies tested and was therefore not analyzable by the array experiments. We could, however, detect an increased expression of IL-8 in the H. pylori-positive samples by real-time PCR (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.005). However, the relative expression of this gene was very low,
20- to 200-fold less than in intestinal biopsies of patients with Crohns disease, and 200,000-fold less than in LPS-stimulated PBLs (S. Wen and Q. Pan-Hammarström, unpublished data). It is also worth noting that in contrast to IL-8, the expression of another CXC chemokine, ENA-78, was more dramatically increased, and quantitatively related to the degree of inflammation, which probably makes this gene a better marker for H. pylori-induced chronic inflammation. We further tested three additional genes that showed a very low level of expression in our array experiments, IL-2, IL-12p35, and IFN-
by real-time PCR assay. There was a trend toward enhanced expression of these genes in H. pylori-positive samples (data not shown). However, the increment did not fulfill our stringent criteria for up-regulation and only a borderline significance was observed in these cases (Mann-Whitney test, p = 0.05, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively). Thus, array experiments may generate false negative results for genes with a low level of expression. Selected genes with a low level of expression, but with a proven biological relevance, should therefore be tested by real-time PCR. Alternatively, amplification of mRNA by template-switching PCR before array hybridization may allow identification of these genes (48).
Our cDNA array study also provided new insights on T cell responses to H. pylori infection. Two recently identified members of the B7 family of costimulatory factors, B7-H1 and GL50/B7-H2, were found to be strongly up-regulated in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa. In contrast to the classical B7.1/B7.2-CD28 interactions, which are important for the priming naive T cells, these novel costimulatory interactions appear crucial in regulating effector lymphocytes in the periphery (49, 50). Inducible costimulator on activated T cells provides a positive signal by interaction with its ligand B7-H2, whereas programmed cell death-1 and its ligand B7-H1 provide negative signals to activated T cells that are crucial for the induction of peripheral tolerance and prevention of autoimmunity. A strong up-regulation of the two novel costimulatory factors in H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa samples suggests an important role for effector T cells at the sites of infection/inflammation regulated by both positive and negative signals/stimuli.
We also identified a number of genes (n = 21) that were associated with a more severe chronic inflammation induced by H. pylori infection. Some of these genes have already been implicated in the more severe clinical consequences of the infection. Examples are cyclin B1, a factor that determines cellular apoptosis (51) and previously associated with the progression of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma (52) and MMP-1, an interstitial collagenase (53) shown to be related to H. pylori-induced ulcerogenesis (54, 55). Maspin expression was also up-regulated in the severe gastritis group. This protein, known as a protease inhibitor and a tumor suppressor gene (56), is expressed at a high level in gastric cells with intestinal metaplasia and may also contribute to gastric carcinogenesis (57). Further analysis of these genes may enable us to develop a set of molecular markers that can identify infected patients with a risk for developing a more severe disease.
Apart from the great advantage of array-based methods in analyzing gene expression in clinical samples, a number of pitfalls may also be encountered. First, the cellular sources of the gene expression changes are not identified and the relative contributions of epithelial cells and infiltrating leukocytes cannot readily be distinguished. Second, there are numerous regulatory events at the translational level that are not reflected by analysis of the transcriptional level as measured by array hybridization. Third, there may be false negative or positive results due to the sensitivity of the array assay and intrinsic limitations related to the design of the array. Other methods, such as quantitative real-time PCR and proteomic studies, are therefore needed to complement cDNA array experiments.
In summary, although the screened biopsies were limited in number, we found a remarkably consistent pattern of genes differentially expressed in normal and H. pylori-infected gastric mucosa. Numerous genes not previously associated with H. pylori were identified. The overall gene expression pattern in infected samples is probably associated with a number of factors, such as bacterial genotype, degree of inflammation and other host factors. Screening of a large number of biopsies from patients with different clinical phenotypes and/or infected by bacteria with different genotypes, and functional analysis of selected genes, might shed more light on the immune response against this pathogen.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Qiang Pan-Hammarström, Division of Clinical Immunology, F79, Huddinge Hospital, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail address: qipa{at}biosci.ki.se ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: VacA, vacuolating cytotoxin; CagA, cytotoxin-associated Ag; BabA, blood group Ag-binding adhesin; TLR, Toll-like receptor; RAP, receptor accessory protein; RP105, radioprotective 105-kDa protein; CR, complement component receptor; BLC, B lymphocyte chemoattractant; BCA, B-lymphocyte chemoattractant; MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein; ENA, epithelia-derived neutrophil-activating peptide; GRO, growth-related protein; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; DRAK, DAP kinase-related apoptosis-inducing protein kinase; PRKCB, protein kinase C
; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; ADAM, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase; SLAM, signal lymphocytic activation molecule; MadCAM, mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule; BPI, bactericidal/permeability increasing protein; LBP, LPS-binding protein; PD-ECGF, platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor; LTF, lactotransferrin; AMHR, anti-Mullerian hormone receptor; PARC, pulmonary and activation-regulated chemokine; C3, complement factor 3; ALOX5, arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase; MER, c-mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase; EDAR, ectodysplasin 1 anhidrotic receptor. ![]()
4 The on-line version of this article contains supplemental material. ![]()
Received for publication August 14, 2003. Accepted for publication December 2, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor affecting Helicobacter pylori infection. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 72:448.[Medline]
B activation between gastric cancer cells and monocytic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44856.
. J. Immunol. 162:186.
(MIP-3
) production in normal colon and inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 51:818.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T Aebischer, D Bumann, H J Epple, W Metzger, T Schneider, G Cherepnev, A K Walduck, D Kunkel, V Moos, C Loddenkemper, et al. Correlation of T cell response and bacterial clearance in human volunteers challenged with Helicobacter pylori revealed by randomised controlled vaccination with Ty21a-based Salmonella vaccines Gut, August 1, 2008; 57(8): 1065 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wen, D. Velin, C. P. Felley, L. Du, P. Michetti, and Q. Pan-Hammarstrom Expression of Helicobacter pylori Virulence Factors and Associated Expression Profiles of Inflammatory Genes in the Human Gastric Mucosa Infect. Immun., November 1, 2007; 75(11): 5118 - 5126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Uno, K. Kato, T. Atsumi, T. Suzuki, J. Yoshitake, H. Morita, S. Ohara, Y. Kotake, T. Shimosegawa, and T. Yoshimura Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 induced through TLR4 signaling initiated by Helicobacter pylori cooperatively amplifies iNOS induction in gastric epithelial cells Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): G1004 - G1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Y. Wu, H.-F. Tsai, W.-C. Lin, P.-I Hsu, C.-T. Shun, M.-S. Wu, and P.-N. Hsu Upregulation of CCL20 and Recruitment of CCR6+ Gastric Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Helicobacter pylori Gastritis Infect. Immun., September 1, 2007; 75(9): 4357 - 4363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M B Resnick, E Sabo, P A Meitner, S S Kim, Y Cho, H K Kim, R Tavares, and S F Moss Global analysis of the human gastric epithelial transcriptome altered by Helicobacter pylori eradication in vivo Gut, December 1, 2006; 55(12): 1717 - 1724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Pinto-Santini and N. R. Salama The Biology of Helicobacter pylori Infection, a Major Risk Factor for Gastric Adenocarcinoma Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 1853 - 1858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Huff, L. M. Hansen, and J. V. Solnick Gastric Transcription Profile of Helicobacter pylori Infection in the Rhesus Macaque Infect. Immun., September 1, 2004; 72(9): 5216 - 5226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |