|
|
||||||||






Departments of
*
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Respiratory Medicine, and
Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and
Core Research for Evolutional, Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama, Japan
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Platelet-activating factor (PAF; 1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) is a potent phospholipid mediator with various biological activities besides platelet activation (11). PAF acts by binding to a G protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor (12, 13, 14, 15, 16). PAF has long been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma (17), because exogenous PAF closely mimics many of the clinical features of asthma, including AHR (18, 19), bronchoconstriction (18), tracheal fluid secretion (20), and airway microvascular leakage (21) in animals and humans. PAF is detected in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from asthmatic patients but not from nonallergic subjects (22). Eosinophils and mast cells activated in asthmatic airways may be the cellular origins of PAF, because these cells are known to produce PAF in response to various stimuli in vitro (23, 24). Furthermore, PAF was reported to be a potent chemotactic factor for eosinophils (25) and to induce eosinophil degranulation in vitro (26). By using PAF receptor-deficient (pafr/) and PAF receptor-overexpressing mice, we have previously demonstrated that PAF plays a critical role in anaphylaxis and acute injury in the lung (27, 28), suggesting that PAF mediates early-phase responses of allergy and inflammation in the tissue. However, the importance of PAF in the development of the allergen-induced AHR and chronic inflammation associated with asthma has not yet been investigated in pafr/ mice. To define the role of PAF in the late-phase responses of allergy, we used an established murine asthma model, where mice were immunized with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant-adsorbed OVA and challenged with aerosolized OVA. In this study, we describe that pafr/ mice, sensitized and challenged with OVA, displayed reduced AHR despite a significant eosinophilic airway inflammatory response. PAF may contribute to AHR in asthmatics independently of the eosinophilic airway inflammation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pafr/ mice were produced on a mixed C57BL/6 x 129/Ola genetic background as described previously (27). In the present study, pafr/ mice and the corresponding wild-type (pafr+/+) control mice have been backcrossed for 610 generations onto a BALB/c genetic background. The animals were maintained in a light-dark cycle with light from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at 22°C. Mice were fed with a standard laboratory diet and water ad libitum. All of the mice in this study were used under a protocol approved by the University of Tokyo Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments.
During the course of the backcrossing, we selected mice homozygous for the intact allele of the group IIA phospholipase A2 gene that is linked to the PAF receptor gene on murine chromosome 4 (29, 30). The genetic distance between these genes is
4.3 cM. Both C57BL/6 and 129/Ola inbred mice are deficient in group IIA phospholipase A2 due to a congenital disruption of the gene, whereas BALB/c inbred mice have an intact gene for group IIA phospholipase A2 (29, 31). Thus, our selection was able to exclude the possible effects of group IIA phospholipase A2 deficiency, which may cause an abnormal metabolism of PAF, on the phenotypes of pafr/ mice. For genotyping by PCR, genomic DNAs were isolated from tail biopsies. The PCR for PAF receptor alleles was performed with 10 pmol of each primer and 2.5 U of KOD Dash DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) in a 50-µl final volume. The PCR profile involved a 2-min denaturation step at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 65°C for 2 s, and extension at 74°C for 30 s. The primers were as follows: forward, 5'-TATGGCTGACCTGCTCTTCCTGAT-3', and reverse, 5'-TATTGGGCACTAGGTTGGTGGAGT-3', for detecting the intact PAF receptor allele; and forward, 5'-GCCTGCTTGCCGAATATCATGGTGGAAAAT-3', and reverse, 5'-AGGATGCAGTAGCCACAATGGATAC-3', for detecting the disrupted PAF receptor allele. The former set of primers amplified a 287-bp DNA fragment, and the latter PCR product consisted of
900 bp. The PCR for group IIA phospholipase A2 alleles was performed with 10 pmol of each primer and 1.0 U of Ex TaqDNA polymerase (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) in a 40-µl final volume. The PCR profile involved a 2-min denaturation step at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, and annealing and extension at 65°C for 3 min. The primers were as follows: forward, 5'-TGTACCTGTCCTTCACAGAGCTGAC-3', and reverse, 5'-TCCACTTTTCTCCAGGCGCTTGTAGC-3', producing 673- and 674-bp DNA fragments from genomic DNA with the intact or mutant allele, respectively. HinfI digestion of the PCR products produced polymorphic fragments of 291, 267, and 115 bp with the intact allele or 368, 191, and 115 bp with the mutant allele. The DNA fragments were detected by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and ethidium bromide staining.
Experimental design
Male and female mice at the age of 815 wk were used. Within each experimental group, the sex ratio and the backcross generation were equal, and the age did not differ significantly.
Sensitization and challenge protocol
Eosinophilic pulmonary inflammation was induced according to the method of Foster et al. (32) with slight modifications. Briefly, mice were sensitized on days 0 and 14 by i.p. injection of 50 µg of OVA (grade V; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)/1 mg of aluminum hydroxide (Imject Alum; Pierce, Rockland, IL) in 200 µl of 0.9% sterile saline (Otsuka, Tokyo, Japan). Nonsensitized mice received only 1 mg of aluminum hydroxide in 0.9% pyrogen-free saline. On day 23, the sensitized mice were exposed three times at 1-h intervals to an aerosol of OVA (10 mg/ml) in 0.9% saline for 30 min. The nonsensitized mice received saline only. The aerosol with a mass median diameter of 3.8 µm was generated at 20 l/min by a nebulizer (Pariboy; Pari, Starnberg, Germany) into a plastic desiccator of 19 liters, whose internal pressure was maintained at atmospheric pressure by an aspirator. The aerosol challenge protocol was then repeated every second day thereafter for 8 days. Mice were studied 1622 h after the last aerosol challenge.
Serum and BAL fluid samples
For the collection of blood and BAL fluid, mice were anesthetized with 1.5 g of urethane per kilogram of body weight by an i.p. injection at a volume of 10 ml/kg, and placed in the supine position. The blood was taken by cutting the femoral vein and artery. The blood sample was collected in a serum separator tube coated with a coagulant (Seraquick Super; Azwell, Osaka, Japan), and then allowed to clot at room temperature for 1 h. The serum was recovered by centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. After a subsequent centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C in a microcentrifuge, the supernatant was stored at 80°C until use.
Once bleeding had ceased, the trachea of a tracheostomized mouse was cannulated with an 18-gauge metal cannula with a beveled tip. After opening of the thorax by a wide incision of the diaphragm, the lung was lavaged twice with 1 ml of Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS containing a proteinase inhibitor mixture (Complete; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at room temperature. The initial lavage was instilled and retrieved one time, whereas the second lavage was instilled twice. This procedure allowed for a greater number of lung washes with less diluent. In total,
1.6 ml of BAL fluid was consistently recovered. The sample was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected and stored at 80°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 200250 µl of cold saline containing 0.1% fatty acid-free BSA (Serologicals Proteins, Kankakee, IL). After an appropriate dilution (2- to 20-fold) of the cell suspension with Turk solution (Mutoh Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), the total cell number was counted with a hemocytometer. Slides of BAL fluid cells were prepared by placing 3 x 105 cells into a cytocentrifuge (Cytospin 3; Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA) at 350 rpm for 2 min, and staining with Diff-Quik (International Reagents, Kobe, Japan). The percentages of eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages/monocytes, and neutrophils were determined by counting their number in randomly selected areas, and dividing these numbers by the total cell count (at least 300 cells).
Determination of Ab levels in serum
The total IgE, and OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 levels in appropriately diluted sera were measured by ELISA as previously described (27). The lower limit of detection for total IgE was 50 ng/ml.
Determination of cytokine and cysteinyl leukotriene levels in BAL fluid
The concentrations of cytokines in the BAL fluid were determined using murine ELISA kits obtained from Endogen (Woburn, MA) for IL-4 and IL-5, and R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) for IL-13. Whole-lung samples were homogenized on ice using a rotor/stator type tissue homogenizer (Physcotron; Microtec, Chiba, Japan) for 40 s in 8 ml of PBS containing the proteinase inhibitor mixture per gram of lung tissue. After centrifugation at 18,000 x g for 10 min, the resulting supernatants were stored at 80°C until use. The lower limits of detection for IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 were 5.0, 5.0, and 1.5 pg/ml, respectively. The total level of cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) in the BAL fluid was evaluated by an enzyme immunoassay kit from Amersham (Piscataway, NJ). The lower limit of detection was 15 pg/ml.
Lung histology
After the blood collection, the lungs were removed and fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin. From the paraffin-embedded right and left lobes of lung, three sections of 3-µm thickness were prepared at the upper, middle, and lower positions of each lobe, and stained with either H&E or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). A semiquantitative scoring system was used to grade the size of lung infiltrates in the H&E-stained sections, where +5 signifies a widespread infiltrate around the majority of vessels and bronchioles, and +1 signifies a small number of inflammatory foci. The total lung score represents the sum of the scores of both lobes. The goblet cell hyperplasia in the PAS-stained sections was graded by a semiquantitative scoring system (0 = <5% goblet cells in airway epithelium; 1 = 525%; 2 = 2550%; 3 = 5075%; 4 = >75%) as performed by McMillan et al. (33). The sum of the airway scores from right lobe was divided by the number of airways examined (1629 per mouse), and expressed as PAS score in arbitrary units. For both semiquantitative scoring, randomized and blinded slides were graded by S.I.
Measurement of airway responsiveness
A separate group of mice was anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine and pentobarbital (35 mg/kg each) by i.p. injection. A metal cannula was inserted into the trachea of a tracheostomized mouse. The total lung resistance (RL) of a mechanically ventilated mouse was measured as previously described (34). Saline and methacholine (acetyl-
-methylcholine chloride; Wako, Osaka, Japan) were inhaled at a positive end-expiratory pressure of 3 cmH2O. At the start of the protocol, two deep inhalations (3-fold the tidal volume) were delivered to standardize the volume history. All animals were then challenged with the saline aerosol for 2 min. The aerosol was generated with an ultrasonic nebulizer (Ultra-Neb100; DeVilbiss, Somerset, PA) and delivered through the inspiratory line into the trachea. Measurements of 10-s duration were made during the tidal ventilation beginning 1 min after the administration of the saline aerosol. This represented the baseline measurement. Subsequently, each dose of the methacholine aerosol was administered for 2 min in a dose-response manner (0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 20 mg/ml saline). During the experiments, oxygen gas was continuously supplied to the ventilatory system. Airway responsiveness was assessed as the effective concentration of methacholine required to double the basal RL (EC200RL), which was calculated by interpolation.
Binding assay for muscarinic receptors
Each membrane fraction was prepared from four lung tissues of two male and two female mice as previously described (35). The binding assays were performed in triplicate using 100 µg of membrane protein.
Statistical analysis
Mann-Whitneys U test (for nonparametric analysis) or unpaired t test (for parametric analysis) was used to determine the levels of difference between two groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to have statistical significance. For four groups, the difference was evaluated by ANOVA. When the ANOVA showed significant differences, pairwise comparisons were tested by Bonferroni-Dunn posthoc test, where p < 0.0083 was considered to be significant. All statistical calculations were performed with StatView-J, version 5.0 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The values for all measurements were expressed as the mean ± SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In both pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice, aeroallergen challenge was associated with a significant increase in the serum levels of total and OVA-specific IgE, compared with their respective saline-treated controls (data not shown). However, there were no significant differences between pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice, when either the total or OVA-specific IgE level was compared. Similarly to the IgE levels, we found no difference in the OVA-specific IgG1 levels between pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice (data not shown).
Inflammatory cell recruitment in BAL fluid
The recovery of cells from the BAL fluid of saline-aerosolized pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice revealed a predominance of alveolar macrophages in both groups, without any significant difference between the numbers (Table I). Aerosol challenge of mice with OVA induced a drastic increase in the total cell number compared with mice given aerosolized saline (Table I). Differential cell counts revealed that the infiltrates in both genotypes were mainly composed of eosinophils. However, the total numbers of cells and the proportions of eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages/monocytes, and neutrophils did not differ between pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice given OVA (Table I). These data imply that pafr/ mice were capable of recruiting significant numbers of inflammatory cells into the airway lumen after OVA challenge in a manner similar to pafr+/+ mice.
|
We assessed the levels of the Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in the BAL fluid (Table II). In saline-treated mice of either genotype, the levels of the Th2 cytokines were near or below the limit of detection. Aeroallergen-challenged pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice showed elevated levels of the Th2 cytokines in the BAL fluid compared with their respective nonsensitized controls. Although there were trends toward higher levels of all three Th2 cytokines in pafr+/+ mice compared with pafr/ mice, these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10 for IL-4, p = 0.20 for IL-5, and p = 0.12 for IL-13; Mann-Whitneys U test). Whole-lung homogenates of the allergen-challenged mice also contained similar levels of IL-5 and IL-13 in both genotypes (p = 0.87 for IL-5, and p = 0.07 for IL-13; Mann-Whitneys U test). Next, the total level of cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) in the BAL fluid was evaluated (Table II), because these lipid mediators are also involved in airway inflammation in mice as well as humans (36, 37, 38). In saline-treated mice of either genotype, the levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes were below the limit of detection. Aeroallergen challenge resulted in comparable elevation of the cysteinyl leukotriene levels in pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice (p = 0.38, t test).
|
The lung tissue fixed after OVA inhalation revealed dense peribronchial and perivascular accumulation of inflammatory cells as well as gross alterations in the structural integrity of the airway walls (Fig. 1, B and D). However, semiquantitative grading of the sections failed to elucidate a significant difference in the degree of airway inflammation between pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice (p = 0.34, Mann-Whitneys U test; Fig. 1E). Similarly, as shown in Fig. 1, A and C, the histological findings after saline treatment were unremarkable, with no observable differences between pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice (score: 0 in E). Excessive production of airway mucus glycoproteins by goblet cells in airway epithelium is a consistent finding in the lung of asthmatics. Semiquantification of goblet cells stained with PAS revealed similar mucus scores in pafr/ mice compared with pafr+/+ mice (Fig. 1F). Taken together, these results suggest that airway inflammation and goblet cell hyperplasia fully occurs in the absence of the PAF signaling.
|
To assess aeroallergen-induced physiologic changes, both baseline RL and airway responsiveness to an inhaled spasmogen, methacholine, were determined. Several aeroallergen-challenged mice had an increased baseline RL compared with mice treated with saline. However, when analyzed as a group, aeroallergen-challenged mice exhibited no significant difference in the basal RL in either saline-treated pafr+/+ mice (0.55 ± 0.06 vs 0.39 ± 0.05 cmH2O/ml/s; p = 0.09, ANOVA with Bonferroni-Dunn test) or saline-treated pafr/ mice (0.50 ± 0.06 vs 0.40 ± 0.04 cmH2O/ml/s; p = 0.30) (Fig. 2A). The inhalation of methacholine showed that pafr+/+ mice aerosolized with OVA developed AHR compared with pafr+/+ mice treated with aerosolized saline, because OVA-treated pafr+/+ mice required a significantly lower dose of methacholine to achieve a 100% increase of the baseline RL (EC200RL) than saline-treated pafr+/+ mice (logEC200RL = 0.15 ± 0.09 vs 1.01 ± 0.12; p < 0.0001, ANOVA with Bonferroni-Dunn test) (Fig. 2B). Likewise, aerosol challenge of pafr/ mice with OVA induced a significantly greater responsiveness to methacholine challenge compared with pafr/ mice given saline (logEC200RL = 0.55 ± 0.16 vs 1.13 ± 0.08; p = 0.0063), but lower responsiveness than pafr+/+ mice given OVA (p < 0.0001). These findings indicate that aeroallergen-induced AHR develops in pafr/ mice to a significantly lower degree than pafr+/+ mice.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Elevated serum IgE levels have been reported to be important in the development of asthmatic responses (46, 47). Mice passively sensitized with IgG1 as well as IgE were reported to develop AHR and airway inflammation after allergen challenge (48). IL-4 and IL-5 are thought to be central to the development of asthmatic symptoms, because IL-5 regulates the differentiation, recruitment, and activation of eosinophils (49), and IL-4 drives IgE synthesis by B cells (50). Another Th2 cytokine, IL-13, is also hypothesized to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of asthma by activating B cells, eosinophils, and airway smooth muscle cells (51). OVA sensitization/challenge of pafr/ mice resulted in serum Ab responses (data not shown) and airway Th2 responses (Table II). In all of these aspects, however, they were indistinguishable from pafr+/+ controls. These findings suggest that a deficiency in PAF receptor did not affect the ability to induce humoral immune responses or Th2-directed cytokine responses to Ag.
AHR is a cardinal feature of asthma. PAF has been reported to induce AHR in animals and humans (18, 19), although the mechanisms are not fully understood. Moreover, we previously reported that transgenic mice overexpressing PAF receptor showed AHR to inhaled methacholine under physiological conditions (52). To determine whether a lack of PAF receptor has an effect on the development of airway dysfunction, AHR was assessed in pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice. We found that pafr/ mice had airway responsiveness similar to pafr+/+ mice after saline-aerosolized treatment (Fig. 2B), indicating that the basal airway responsiveness is not different between pafr+/+ and pafr/ mice. Following Ag challenge, pafr/ mice developed significantly increased airway responsiveness compared with their saline-treated controls. Furthermore, their responsiveness proved to be significantly lower than that of pafr+/+ mice given OVA. Thus, PAF receptor is critical for the development of AHR following repeated aeroallergen challenge in sensitized mice, and AHR develops by PAF receptor-dependent and -independent pathways.
As reviewed by Drazen et al. (2) and Gali (3), two pathways involving mast cells and eosinophils have been elucidated to mediate aeroallergen-induced AHR. Recently, Hogan et al. (9) proposed a novel pathway to the development of AHR intimately mediated by CD4+ T cells independently of IL-4 and IL-5, although the details of this pathway remain unknown. The relative contribution of these three cellular pathways to the induction of AHR is likely to be dependent on a number of factors including the strain of mouse, the choice of Ag, and the protocols for Ag sensitization and challenge, which may account for the apparent conflict observed among the mouse asthma models used by different investigators (9, 32, 39, 53, 54, 55, 56). In the present study, we induced AHR in BALB/c mice with the procedure of Foster and coworkers (9, 32, 54, 57, 58) who have provided corroborative evidence of the important role of IgE, eosinophils, Th2 cytokines, and CD4+ T cells. They immunized and boosted mice with OVA by i.p. injection of aluminum hydroxide-absorbed OVA, followed by repeated exposure to aerosolized OVA.
It is interesting that after such a strong sensitization/challenge procedure, little or no obligatory role of mast cells in AHR was observed in mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice (56, 59, 60). Consistently, AHR occurred normally with the sensitization/challenge procedure in IL-4-deficient BALB/c mice (9). Thus, in our study, the mast cell-dependent pathway could be excluded from the possible cellular mechanisms leading to the induction of AHR. Hence, it still remains unclear whether PAF is involved in the mast cell pathway. By using other procedures for sensitization/challenge to yield relatively attenuated airway responses, an even more pronounced contribution of PAF receptor to the mast cell pathway may be observed (56, 60).
pafr/ mice, which have BALB/c genetic background, showed partially but significantly attenuated AHR despite a robust airway inflammation with infiltration of eosinophils and lymphocytes, indicating dissociation of AHR from airway inflammation in the mice. As described above, CD4+ T cells regulate two distinct pathways that have been proposed to regulate aeroallergen-induced AHR; one is dependent on eosinophils, and another acts independently of IL-4 and IL-5. In BALB/c mice, the latter pathway is reported to play a major role in the development of AHR without eosinophilic inflammation and morphologic changes in the airways (9). Thus, it is possible that dissociation between AHR and airway inflammation observed in pafr/ BALB/c mice is due to the involvement of PAF in the latter pathway. However, PAF also may be responsible for the development of AHR through the former (eosinophil) pathway. Although this lipid mediator was shown to be dispensable for eosinophil recruitment in this asthma model, it is possible that the infiltrated eosinophils in pafr/ mice are not fully activated at the site of inflammation because of the lack of PAF stimulation. This is reminiscent of the results obtained in the murine acute lung injury model using pafr/ mice in that PAF was essential for the activation of neutrophils but not for their recruitment (28).
The alternative possible target of PAF is smooth muscle. Our data demonstrate that the deficiency of PAF receptor is not associated with a detectable change in either the expression level (Bmax) or ligand affinity (Kd) of muscarinic receptors in the lung, as measured by the nonspecific antagonist [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine (Fig. 3). Although change of a minor pool of receptors cannot be ruled out, it is likely that the impaired muscarinic cholinergic response is due to a postreceptor event. PAF increases the susceptibility of smooth muscle to cholinergic stimulation, possibly by modulating the function of M3 muscarinic receptor, a primary receptor for smooth muscle contraction (61). Indeed, we reported that the AHR to methacholine in transgenic mice overexpressing PAF receptor is mediated by a pathway sensitive to a PAF receptor antagonist (52). Similarly to the present data, the muscarinic receptor-binding activities (Bmax and Kd) of the PAF receptor transgenic mice were indistinguishable from those of wild-type control mice (35). Because PAF receptor mRNA was detected in airway smooth muscle in human peripheral lung (62), it is possible for PAF to modulate the M3 receptor-evoked smooth muscle contraction at the level of intracellular signal transduction. Whereas M3 receptor on smooth muscle cells couples to phosphoinositol turnover through Gq/11 (61), PAF receptor is capable of coupling to Gi/o and Gq/11 (14), suggesting a stimulatory cross talk between the intracellular signals from the two distinct receptors (63).
In most cases, AHR is strongly associated with airway inflammation (64, 65, 66, 67), and anti-inflammatory drugs are currently used for bronchial asthma (6, 7). However, the PAF-mediated AHR appears to be independent of inflammation, because pafr/ mice showed a reduction of AHR without diminishment of airway inflammation as shown in this study. This notion is further supported by our previous findings that the PAF receptor-overexpressing mice had AHR without obvious inflammatory responses (52). Recombinant plasma-type PAF acetylhydrolase abrogated airway responsiveness and inflammation concomitantly in a mouse asthma model (65). The apparent discrepancy between our data and those of the report may be attributed to the difference of sensitization procedure. In addition, it is notable that substrates for PAF acetylhydrolase and agonists for PAF receptor do not overlap completely (14, 68).
In summary, the present study demonstrates an important role for PAF receptor in the development of AHR after allergic sensitization/challenge in mice despite the normal expression density and ligand affinity of muscarinic cholinergic receptor. Furthermore, the airway inflammation was not affected by the absence of PAF receptor, suggesting that, as a complement anaphylatoxin C3a (69), PAF only acts downstream of the airway inflammation in bronchial asthma.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Satoshi Ishii, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. E-mail address: mame{at}m.u-tokyo.ac.jp ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AHR, airway hyperresponsiveness; PAF, platelet-activating factor; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; LT, leukotriene; PAS, periodic acid-Schiff; RL, total lung resistance; EC200RL, effective concentration of methacholine required to double the basal RL. ![]()
Received for publication August 26, 2003. Accepted for publication March 26, 2004.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-inducible protein 10 (CXCL10) contributes to airway hyperreactivity and airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. J. Immunol. 168:5278.
4 integrin) on intrapulmonary but not circulating leukocytes inhibits airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. J. Clin. Invest. 100:3083.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Harayama, H. Shindou, R. Ogasawara, A. Suwabe, and T. Shimizu Identification of a Novel Noninflammatory Biosynthetic Pathway of Platelet-activating Factor J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11097 - 11106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Leff and N. M. Munoz Future Treatment to Lessen Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2007; 4(8): 659 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Giri, M. Khan, R. Rattan, I. Singh, and A. K. Singh Krabbe disease: psychosine-mediated activation of phospholipase A2 in oligodendrocyte cell death J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1478 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Doi, K. Okamoto, K. Negishi, Y. Suzuki, A. Nakao, T. Fujita, A. Toda, T. Yokomizo, Y. Kita, Y. Kihara, et al. Attenuation of Folic Acid-Induced Renal Inflammatory Injury in Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor-Deficient Mice Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 168(5): 1413 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Terawaki, T. Yokomizo, T. Nagase, A. Toda, M. Taniguchi, K. Hashizume, T. Yagi, and T. Shimizu Absence of Leukotriene B4 Receptor 1 Confers Resistance to Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Th2-Type Immune Responses J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4217 - 4225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kihara, S. Ishii, Y. Kita, A. Toda, A. Shimada, and T. Shimizu Dual phase regulation of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by platelet-activating factor J. Exp. Med., September 19, 2005; 202(6): 853 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Venkatesha, J. Ahamed, C. Nuesch, A. K. Zaidi, and H. Ali Platelet-activating Factor-induced Chemokine Gene Expression Requires NF-{kappa}B Activation and Ca2+/Calcineurin Signaling Pathways: INHIBITION BY RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION AND {beta}-ARRESTIN RECRUITMENT J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44606 - 44612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||