The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishii, S.
Right arrow Articles by Shimizu, T.
The Journal of Immunology, 2004, 172: 7095-7102.
Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists

Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor Develops Airway Hyperresponsiveness Independently of Airway Inflammation in a Murine Asthma Model1

Satoshi Ishii2,*,§, Takahide Nagase{dagger}, Hideo Shindou*,§, Hajime Takizawa{dagger}, Yasuyoshi Ouchi{ddagger} and Takao Shimizu*,§

Departments of * Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, {dagger} Respiratory Medicine, and {ddagger} Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; and § Core Research for Evolutional, Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Lipid mediators play an important role in modulating inflammatory responses. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent proinflammatory phospholipid with eosinophil chemotactic activity in vitro and in vivo. We show in this study that mice deficient in PAF receptor exhibited significantly reduced airway hyperresponsiveness to muscarinic cholinergic stimulation in an asthma model. However, PAF receptor-deficient mice developed an eosinophilic inflammatory response at a comparable level to that of wild-type mice. These results indicate an important role for PAF receptor, downstream of the eosinophilic inflammatory cascade, in regulating airway responsiveness after sensitization and aeroallergen challenge.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Bronchial asthma is a complex disease of the lung characterized by reversible airway obstruction, chronic airway inflammation, and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR)3 to nonspecific stimuli. The progression of airway inflammation involves several cell types, including CD4+ Th2 cells, eosinophils, and mast cells (1). The immunopathogenic role of Th2 cells is suggested by the roles of their products, such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in the recruitment and activation of the primary effector cells of the allergic response, eosinophils and mast cells. Activation of these cells results in the release of many inflammatory mediators that seem to induce AHR individually or coordinately (2, 3), although the precise molecular mechanisms predisposing to the development of AHR in asthmatics are largely unknown. The hypothesis that airway inflammation is responsible for AHR is based on the finding of a significant relationship between the parameters of airway inflammation and AHR (4, 5) and on the observation that inhaled steroids reduce both airway inflammation and AHR (6, 7). However, a number of studies in asthmatic patients have cast doubt on the requirement of airway inflammation for AHR (see review in Ref. 8). In addition, dissociation of AHR from airway inflammation has also been reported in some mouse models of asthma, because IL-5-deficient BALB/c mice partially developed AHR by OVA sensitization/challenge in the absence of airway inflammation (9). Conversely, IL-10-deficient C57BL/6 mice failed to develop AHR even in the presence of robust airway inflammation (10).

Platelet-activating factor (PAF; 1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) is a potent phospholipid mediator with various biological activities besides platelet activation (11). PAF acts by binding to a G protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor (12, 13, 14, 15, 16). PAF has long been implicated in the pathophysiological mechanisms of asthma (17), because exogenous PAF closely mimics many of the clinical features of asthma, including AHR (18, 19), bronchoconstriction (18), tracheal fluid secretion (20), and airway microvascular leakage (21) in animals and humans. PAF is detected in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from asthmatic patients but not from nonallergic subjects (22). Eosinophils and mast cells activated in asthmatic airways may be the cellular origins of PAF, because these cells are known to produce PAF in response to various stimuli in vitro (23, 24). Furthermore, PAF was reported to be a potent chemotactic factor for eosinophils (25) and to induce eosinophil degranulation in vitro (26). By using PAF receptor-deficient (pafr–/–) and PAF receptor-overexpressing mice, we have previously demonstrated that PAF plays a critical role in anaphylaxis and acute injury in the lung (27, 28), suggesting that PAF mediates early-phase responses of allergy and inflammation in the tissue. However, the importance of PAF in the development of the allergen-induced AHR and chronic inflammation associated with asthma has not yet been investigated in pafr–/– mice. To define the role of PAF in the late-phase responses of allergy, we used an established murine asthma model, where mice were immunized with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant-adsorbed OVA and challenged with aerosolized OVA. In this study, we describe that pafr–/– mice, sensitized and challenged with OVA, displayed reduced AHR despite a significant eosinophilic airway inflammatory response. PAF may contribute to AHR in asthmatics independently of the eosinophilic airway inflammation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

pafr–/– mice were produced on a mixed C57BL/6 x 129/Ola genetic background as described previously (27). In the present study, pafr–/– mice and the corresponding wild-type (pafr+/+) control mice have been backcrossed for 6–10 generations onto a BALB/c genetic background. The animals were maintained in a light-dark cycle with light from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at 22°C. Mice were fed with a standard laboratory diet and water ad libitum. All of the mice in this study were used under a protocol approved by the University of Tokyo Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments.

During the course of the backcrossing, we selected mice homozygous for the intact allele of the group IIA phospholipase A2 gene that is linked to the PAF receptor gene on murine chromosome 4 (29, 30). The genetic distance between these genes is ~4.3 cM. Both C57BL/6 and 129/Ola inbred mice are deficient in group IIA phospholipase A2 due to a congenital disruption of the gene, whereas BALB/c inbred mice have an intact gene for group IIA phospholipase A2 (29, 31). Thus, our selection was able to exclude the possible effects of group IIA phospholipase A2 deficiency, which may cause an abnormal metabolism of PAF, on the phenotypes of pafr–/– mice. For genotyping by PCR, genomic DNAs were isolated from tail biopsies. The PCR for PAF receptor alleles was performed with 10 pmol of each primer and 2.5 U of KOD Dash DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) in a 50-µl final volume. The PCR profile involved a 2-min denaturation step at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 65°C for 2 s, and extension at 74°C for 30 s. The primers were as follows: forward, 5'-TATGGCTGACCTGCTCTTCCTGAT-3', and reverse, 5'-TATTGGGCACTAGGTTGGTGGAGT-3', for detecting the intact PAF receptor allele; and forward, 5'-GCCTGCTTGCCGAATATCATGGTGGAAAAT-3', and reverse, 5'-AGGATGCAGTAGCCACAATGGATAC-3', for detecting the disrupted PAF receptor allele. The former set of primers amplified a 287-bp DNA fragment, and the latter PCR product consisted of ~900 bp. The PCR for group IIA phospholipase A2 alleles was performed with 10 pmol of each primer and 1.0 U of Ex TaqDNA polymerase (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) in a 40-µl final volume. The PCR profile involved a 2-min denaturation step at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, and annealing and extension at 65°C for 3 min. The primers were as follows: forward, 5'-TGTACCTGTCCTTCACAGAGCTGAC-3', and reverse, 5'-TCCACTTTTCTCCAGGCGCTTGTAGC-3', producing 673- and 674-bp DNA fragments from genomic DNA with the intact or mutant allele, respectively. HinfI digestion of the PCR products produced polymorphic fragments of 291, 267, and 115 bp with the intact allele or 368, 191, and 115 bp with the mutant allele. The DNA fragments were detected by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and ethidium bromide staining.

Experimental design

Male and female mice at the age of 8–15 wk were used. Within each experimental group, the sex ratio and the backcross generation were equal, and the age did not differ significantly.

Sensitization and challenge protocol

Eosinophilic pulmonary inflammation was induced according to the method of Foster et al. (32) with slight modifications. Briefly, mice were sensitized on days 0 and 14 by i.p. injection of 50 µg of OVA (grade V; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO)/1 mg of aluminum hydroxide (Imject Alum; Pierce, Rockland, IL) in 200 µl of 0.9% sterile saline (Otsuka, Tokyo, Japan). Nonsensitized mice received only 1 mg of aluminum hydroxide in 0.9% pyrogen-free saline. On day 23, the sensitized mice were exposed three times at 1-h intervals to an aerosol of OVA (10 mg/ml) in 0.9% saline for 30 min. The nonsensitized mice received saline only. The aerosol with a mass median diameter of 3.8 µm was generated at 20 l/min by a nebulizer (Pariboy; Pari, Starnberg, Germany) into a plastic desiccator of 19 liters, whose internal pressure was maintained at atmospheric pressure by an aspirator. The aerosol challenge protocol was then repeated every second day thereafter for 8 days. Mice were studied 16–22 h after the last aerosol challenge.

Serum and BAL fluid samples

For the collection of blood and BAL fluid, mice were anesthetized with 1.5 g of urethane per kilogram of body weight by an i.p. injection at a volume of 10 ml/kg, and placed in the supine position. The blood was taken by cutting the femoral vein and artery. The blood sample was collected in a serum separator tube coated with a coagulant (Seraquick Super; Azwell, Osaka, Japan), and then allowed to clot at room temperature for 1 h. The serum was recovered by centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. After a subsequent centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C in a microcentrifuge, the supernatant was stored at –80°C until use.

Once bleeding had ceased, the trachea of a tracheostomized mouse was cannulated with an 18-gauge metal cannula with a beveled tip. After opening of the thorax by a wide incision of the diaphragm, the lung was lavaged twice with 1 ml of Ca2+- and Mg2+-free PBS containing a proteinase inhibitor mixture (Complete; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at room temperature. The initial lavage was instilled and retrieved one time, whereas the second lavage was instilled twice. This procedure allowed for a greater number of lung washes with less diluent. In total, ~1.6 ml of BAL fluid was consistently recovered. The sample was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected and stored at –80°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in 200–250 µl of cold saline containing 0.1% fatty acid-free BSA (Serologicals Proteins, Kankakee, IL). After an appropriate dilution (2- to 20-fold) of the cell suspension with Turk solution (Mutoh Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), the total cell number was counted with a hemocytometer. Slides of BAL fluid cells were prepared by placing 3 x 105 cells into a cytocentrifuge (Cytospin 3; Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA) at 350 rpm for 2 min, and staining with Diff-Quik (International Reagents, Kobe, Japan). The percentages of eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages/monocytes, and neutrophils were determined by counting their number in randomly selected areas, and dividing these numbers by the total cell count (at least 300 cells).

Determination of Ab levels in serum

The total IgE, and OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 levels in appropriately diluted sera were measured by ELISA as previously described (27). The lower limit of detection for total IgE was 50 ng/ml.

Determination of cytokine and cysteinyl leukotriene levels in BAL fluid

The concentrations of cytokines in the BAL fluid were determined using murine ELISA kits obtained from Endogen (Woburn, MA) for IL-4 and IL-5, and R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN) for IL-13. Whole-lung samples were homogenized on ice using a rotor/stator type tissue homogenizer (Physcotron; Microtec, Chiba, Japan) for 40 s in 8 ml of PBS containing the proteinase inhibitor mixture per gram of lung tissue. After centrifugation at 18,000 x g for 10 min, the resulting supernatants were stored at –80°C until use. The lower limits of detection for IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 were 5.0, 5.0, and 1.5 pg/ml, respectively. The total level of cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) in the BAL fluid was evaluated by an enzyme immunoassay kit from Amersham (Piscataway, NJ). The lower limit of detection was 15 pg/ml.

Lung histology

After the blood collection, the lungs were removed and fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin. From the paraffin-embedded right and left lobes of lung, three sections of 3-µm thickness were prepared at the upper, middle, and lower positions of each lobe, and stained with either H&E or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). A semiquantitative scoring system was used to grade the size of lung infiltrates in the H&E-stained sections, where +5 signifies a widespread infiltrate around the majority of vessels and bronchioles, and +1 signifies a small number of inflammatory foci. The total lung score represents the sum of the scores of both lobes. The goblet cell hyperplasia in the PAS-stained sections was graded by a semiquantitative scoring system (0 = <5% goblet cells in airway epithelium; 1 = 5–25%; 2 = 25–50%; 3 = 50–75%; 4 = >75%) as performed by McMillan et al. (33). The sum of the airway scores from right lobe was divided by the number of airways examined (16–29 per mouse), and expressed as PAS score in arbitrary units. For both semiquantitative scoring, randomized and blinded slides were graded by S.I.

Measurement of airway responsiveness

A separate group of mice was anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine and pentobarbital (35 mg/kg each) by i.p. injection. A metal cannula was inserted into the trachea of a tracheostomized mouse. The total lung resistance (RL) of a mechanically ventilated mouse was measured as previously described (34). Saline and methacholine (acetyl-{beta}-methylcholine chloride; Wako, Osaka, Japan) were inhaled at a positive end-expiratory pressure of 3 cmH2O. At the start of the protocol, two deep inhalations (3-fold the tidal volume) were delivered to standardize the volume history. All animals were then challenged with the saline aerosol for 2 min. The aerosol was generated with an ultrasonic nebulizer (Ultra-Neb100; DeVilbiss, Somerset, PA) and delivered through the inspiratory line into the trachea. Measurements of 10-s duration were made during the tidal ventilation beginning 1 min after the administration of the saline aerosol. This represented the baseline measurement. Subsequently, each dose of the methacholine aerosol was administered for 2 min in a dose-response manner (0.3125, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 20 mg/ml saline). During the experiments, oxygen gas was continuously supplied to the ventilatory system. Airway responsiveness was assessed as the effective concentration of methacholine required to double the basal RL (EC200RL), which was calculated by interpolation.

Binding assay for muscarinic receptors

Each membrane fraction was prepared from four lung tissues of two male and two female mice as previously described (35). The binding assays were performed in triplicate using 100 µg of membrane protein.

Statistical analysis

Mann-Whitney’s U test (for nonparametric analysis) or unpaired t test (for parametric analysis) was used to determine the levels of difference between two groups. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to have statistical significance. For four groups, the difference was evaluated by ANOVA. When the ANOVA showed significant differences, pairwise comparisons were tested by Bonferroni-Dunn posthoc test, where p < 0.0083 was considered to be significant. All statistical calculations were performed with StatView-J, version 5.0 (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). The values for all measurements were expressed as the mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Serum Ig levels

In both pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice, aeroallergen challenge was associated with a significant increase in the serum levels of total and OVA-specific IgE, compared with their respective saline-treated controls (data not shown). However, there were no significant differences between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice, when either the total or OVA-specific IgE level was compared. Similarly to the IgE levels, we found no difference in the OVA-specific IgG1 levels between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice (data not shown).

Inflammatory cell recruitment in BAL fluid

The recovery of cells from the BAL fluid of saline-aerosolized pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice revealed a predominance of alveolar macrophages in both groups, without any significant difference between the numbers (Table I). Aerosol challenge of mice with OVA induced a drastic increase in the total cell number compared with mice given aerosolized saline (Table I). Differential cell counts revealed that the infiltrates in both genotypes were mainly composed of eosinophils. However, the total numbers of cells and the proportions of eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages/monocytes, and neutrophils did not differ between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice given OVA (Table I). These data imply that pafr–/– mice were capable of recruiting significant numbers of inflammatory cells into the airway lumen after OVA challenge in a manner similar to pafr+/+ mice.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Total cell and differential counts obtained from BAL fluida

 
Th2 cytokine and cysteinyl leukotriene levels in BAL fluid

We assessed the levels of the Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 in the BAL fluid (Table II). In saline-treated mice of either genotype, the levels of the Th2 cytokines were near or below the limit of detection. Aeroallergen-challenged pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice showed elevated levels of the Th2 cytokines in the BAL fluid compared with their respective nonsensitized controls. Although there were trends toward higher levels of all three Th2 cytokines in pafr+/+ mice compared with pafr–/– mice, these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10 for IL-4, p = 0.20 for IL-5, and p = 0.12 for IL-13; Mann-Whitney’s U test). Whole-lung homogenates of the allergen-challenged mice also contained similar levels of IL-5 and IL-13 in both genotypes (p = 0.87 for IL-5, and p = 0.07 for IL-13; Mann-Whitney’s U test). Next, the total level of cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) in the BAL fluid was evaluated (Table II), because these lipid mediators are also involved in airway inflammation in mice as well as humans (36, 37, 38). In saline-treated mice of either genotype, the levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes were below the limit of detection. Aeroallergen challenge resulted in comparable elevation of the cysteinyl leukotriene levels in pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice (p = 0.38, t test).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Th2 cytokine and cysteinyl leukotriene levels in lunga

 
Lung histology

The lung tissue fixed after OVA inhalation revealed dense peribronchial and perivascular accumulation of inflammatory cells as well as gross alterations in the structural integrity of the airway walls (Fig. 1, B and D). However, semiquantitative grading of the sections failed to elucidate a significant difference in the degree of airway inflammation between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice (p = 0.34, Mann-Whitney’s U test; Fig. 1E). Similarly, as shown in Fig. 1, A and C, the histological findings after saline treatment were unremarkable, with no observable differences between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice (score: 0 in E). Excessive production of airway mucus glycoproteins by goblet cells in airway epithelium is a consistent finding in the lung of asthmatics. Semiquantification of goblet cells stained with PAS revealed similar mucus scores in pafr–/– mice compared with pafr+/+ mice (Fig. 1F). Taken together, these results suggest that airway inflammation and goblet cell hyperplasia fully occurs in the absence of the PAF signaling.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Histological analysis of lung sections. A, Nonsensitized pafr+/+ mice exposed to an aerosol of saline. B, Sensitized pafr+/+ mice exposed to OVA. C, Nonsensitized pafr–/– mice exposed to saline. D, Sensitized pafr–/– mice exposed to OVA. The H&E-stained sections shown are representative of six lung sections per mouse, from four or seven mice in each saline-treated or OVA-treated group, respectively. Scale bar, 200 µm. E and F, Assessments of lung inflammation. The stained sections were semiquantitatively scored as described in Materials and Methods, and scores for individual mice are presented. Bars depict means of groups. After aeroallergen challenge, pafr–/– mice develop lung inflammation at a comparable level to pafr+/+ mice, as determined in sections stained with H&E (E). The levels of OVA-induced mucus production in pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice are identical, as determined in sections stained with PAS (F).

 
Airway responsiveness

To assess aeroallergen-induced physiologic changes, both baseline RL and airway responsiveness to an inhaled spasmogen, methacholine, were determined. Several aeroallergen-challenged mice had an increased baseline RL compared with mice treated with saline. However, when analyzed as a group, aeroallergen-challenged mice exhibited no significant difference in the basal RL in either saline-treated pafr+/+ mice (0.55 ± 0.06 vs 0.39 ± 0.05 cmH2O/ml/s; p = 0.09, ANOVA with Bonferroni-Dunn test) or saline-treated pafr–/– mice (0.50 ± 0.06 vs 0.40 ± 0.04 cmH2O/ml/s; p = 0.30) (Fig. 2A). The inhalation of methacholine showed that pafr+/+ mice aerosolized with OVA developed AHR compared with pafr+/+ mice treated with aerosolized saline, because OVA-treated pafr+/+ mice required a significantly lower dose of methacholine to achieve a 100% increase of the baseline RL (EC200RL) than saline-treated pafr+/+ mice (logEC200RL = –0.15 ± 0.09 vs 1.01 ± 0.12; p < 0.0001, ANOVA with Bonferroni-Dunn test) (Fig. 2B). Likewise, aerosol challenge of pafr–/– mice with OVA induced a significantly greater responsiveness to methacholine challenge compared with pafr–/– mice given saline (logEC200RL = 0.55 ± 0.16 vs 1.13 ± 0.08; p = 0.0063), but lower responsiveness than pafr+/+ mice given OVA (p < 0.0001). These findings indicate that aeroallergen-induced AHR develops in pafr–/– mice to a significantly lower degree than pafr+/+ mice.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. PAF receptor-regulated development of AHR in sensitized and aeroallergen-challenged mice. A, Baseline RL. SAL, Saline-immunized and saline-aerosolized treatment; OVA, OVA-immunized and OVA-aerosolized treatment. Values for individual mice are presented. Bars depict means of groups. Before methacholine inhalation, no significant differences were observed among the four groups despite a nonsignificant trend toward an increased baseline RL in the aeroallergen-challenged groups. B, Airway responsiveness to methacholine. Airway responsiveness was assessed by EC200RL. The logarithmic values of EC200RL for individual mice are presented. Bars depict the means of the groups. pafr–/– OVA mice have significantly lower responsiveness to methacholine than pafr+/+ OVA (p < 0.0001, ANOVA with Bonferroni-Dunn test). OVA-challenged pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice were significantly more responsive than their respective saline-treated controls (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0063, respectively).

 
Because methacholine is an agonist of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, we examined the muscarinic receptor-binding activities of lung tissues from OVA-treated mice using a radiolabeled antagonist, [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine. The lung membranes of pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice aerosolized with OVA bound similar amounts of this nonselective antagonist (Fig. 3), indicating comparable expression of muscarinic receptor-binding activity (Bmax = 42.7 ± 2.7 and 44.8 ± 1.8 fmol/mg protein, respectively; n = 3; p = 0.54, t test). The binding was saturable with similar calculated Kd values of 237 ± 15 and 197 ± 19 pM (n = 3; p = 0.16, t test) in pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice, respectively.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Muscarinic cholinergic receptor expression in lungs from sensitized and aeroallergen-challenged mice. A, [N-methyl-3H]Scopolamine binding to lung membrane fractions. The lungs were excised and homogenized in a buffer, and the membrane fraction was prepared by ultracentrifugation. Aliquots of the resuspended membranes from pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice were incubated with increasing concentrations of [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine for the detection of total binding. Nonspecific binding was determined by incubation in the presence of 20 µM methacholine. After incubation, free and bound antagonists were separated by rapid filtration on glass microfiber filters. Each point is the mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations, and the data are representative of three independent experiments. B, Scatchard analysis of the specific binding of [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine to the lung membrane fractions shown in A. The specific binding was calculated as the difference between the total and nonspecific values. The data of pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice are shown. The mean values of Kd and Bmax from the three independent experiments had no statistical significance between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice given OVA (see Results).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The murine asthma model recapitulates many of the features of human asthma, including the abundant eosinophilic and lymphocytic infiltration. PAF is chemotactic for eosinophils as well as macrophages/monocytes and neutrophils, all of which are also able to produce PAF (13, 14). Thus, it was reasonable to assume that PAF receptor may contribute to the induction of the airway inflammation associated with asthma. Unexpectedly, however, our studies indicate that the lack of PAF receptor did not alter the recruitment of inflammatory cells (i.e., total numbers of cells, or proportions of eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages/monocytes, and neutrophils) in the BAL fluid in this asthma model (Table I). Consistently, we found no significant histological differences in the degree of inflammation in the lung between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice (Fig. 1). These data strongly suggest that PAF is dispensable for the airway inflammation, at least under our murine asthma model. Alternate chemoattractants, such as chemokines and leukotrienes (39, 40, 41, 42), may recruit inflammatory cells to the airways. Indeed, BAL fluids from pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice contained comparable levels of cysteinyl leukotrienes, which are reported as important mediators for airway inflammation (36, 37, 38) (Table II). The present observations are consistent with our previous studies of thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal exudate macrophages (43), casein-elicited peritoneal exudate neutrophils (44), and acid-elicited neutrophils in the lung (28), where no differences were detected in cell numbers and differentials between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice. However, another study of pafr–/– mice demonstrated diminished eosinophil recruitment in a murine model of allergic pleurisy where the s.c. sensitized mice were challenged once with OVA by intrapleural injection (45). The sensitization/challenge protocol of the pleurisy model is substantially different from that of the asthma model regarding route of Ag sensitization/challenge and frequency of Ag challenge; in this study, the i.p. sensitized mice were repeatedly challenged with OVA aerosols. Therefore, the lack of any differential recruitment of inflammatory cells in pafr–/– airways is likely due to the nature of the chronic inflammatory responses in the asthma model.

Elevated serum IgE levels have been reported to be important in the development of asthmatic responses (46, 47). Mice passively sensitized with IgG1 as well as IgE were reported to develop AHR and airway inflammation after allergen challenge (48). IL-4 and IL-5 are thought to be central to the development of asthmatic symptoms, because IL-5 regulates the differentiation, recruitment, and activation of eosinophils (49), and IL-4 drives IgE synthesis by B cells (50). Another Th2 cytokine, IL-13, is also hypothesized to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of asthma by activating B cells, eosinophils, and airway smooth muscle cells (51). OVA sensitization/challenge of pafr–/– mice resulted in serum Ab responses (data not shown) and airway Th2 responses (Table II). In all of these aspects, however, they were indistinguishable from pafr+/+ controls. These findings suggest that a deficiency in PAF receptor did not affect the ability to induce humoral immune responses or Th2-directed cytokine responses to Ag.

AHR is a cardinal feature of asthma. PAF has been reported to induce AHR in animals and humans (18, 19), although the mechanisms are not fully understood. Moreover, we previously reported that transgenic mice overexpressing PAF receptor showed AHR to inhaled methacholine under physiological conditions (52). To determine whether a lack of PAF receptor has an effect on the development of airway dysfunction, AHR was assessed in pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice. We found that pafr–/– mice had airway responsiveness similar to pafr+/+ mice after saline-aerosolized treatment (Fig. 2B), indicating that the basal airway responsiveness is not different between pafr+/+ and pafr–/– mice. Following Ag challenge, pafr–/– mice developed significantly increased airway responsiveness compared with their saline-treated controls. Furthermore, their responsiveness proved to be significantly lower than that of pafr+/+ mice given OVA. Thus, PAF receptor is critical for the development of AHR following repeated aeroallergen challenge in sensitized mice, and AHR develops by PAF receptor-dependent and -independent pathways.

As reviewed by Drazen et al. (2) and Gali (3), two pathways involving mast cells and eosinophils have been elucidated to mediate aeroallergen-induced AHR. Recently, Hogan et al. (9) proposed a novel pathway to the development of AHR intimately mediated by CD4+ T cells independently of IL-4 and IL-5, although the details of this pathway remain unknown. The relative contribution of these three cellular pathways to the induction of AHR is likely to be dependent on a number of factors including the strain of mouse, the choice of Ag, and the protocols for Ag sensitization and challenge, which may account for the apparent conflict observed among the mouse asthma models used by different investigators (9, 32, 39, 53, 54, 55, 56). In the present study, we induced AHR in BALB/c mice with the procedure of Foster and coworkers (9, 32, 54, 57, 58) who have provided corroborative evidence of the important role of IgE, eosinophils, Th2 cytokines, and CD4+ T cells. They immunized and boosted mice with OVA by i.p. injection of aluminum hydroxide-absorbed OVA, followed by repeated exposure to aerosolized OVA.

It is interesting that after such a strong sensitization/challenge procedure, little or no obligatory role of mast cells in AHR was observed in mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice (56, 59, 60). Consistently, AHR occurred normally with the sensitization/challenge procedure in IL-4-deficient BALB/c mice (9). Thus, in our study, the mast cell-dependent pathway could be excluded from the possible cellular mechanisms leading to the induction of AHR. Hence, it still remains unclear whether PAF is involved in the mast cell pathway. By using other procedures for sensitization/challenge to yield relatively attenuated airway responses, an even more pronounced contribution of PAF receptor to the mast cell pathway may be observed (56, 60).

pafr–/– mice, which have BALB/c genetic background, showed partially but significantly attenuated AHR despite a robust airway inflammation with infiltration of eosinophils and lymphocytes, indicating dissociation of AHR from airway inflammation in the mice. As described above, CD4+ T cells regulate two distinct pathways that have been proposed to regulate aeroallergen-induced AHR; one is dependent on eosinophils, and another acts independently of IL-4 and IL-5. In BALB/c mice, the latter pathway is reported to play a major role in the development of AHR without eosinophilic inflammation and morphologic changes in the airways (9). Thus, it is possible that dissociation between AHR and airway inflammation observed in pafr–/– BALB/c mice is due to the involvement of PAF in the latter pathway. However, PAF also may be responsible for the development of AHR through the former (eosinophil) pathway. Although this lipid mediator was shown to be dispensable for eosinophil recruitment in this asthma model, it is possible that the infiltrated eosinophils in pafr–/– mice are not fully activated at the site of inflammation because of the lack of PAF stimulation. This is reminiscent of the results obtained in the murine acute lung injury model using pafr–/– mice in that PAF was essential for the activation of neutrophils but not for their recruitment (28).

The alternative possible target of PAF is smooth muscle. Our data demonstrate that the deficiency of PAF receptor is not associated with a detectable change in either the expression level (Bmax) or ligand affinity (Kd) of muscarinic receptors in the lung, as measured by the nonspecific antagonist [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine (Fig. 3). Although change of a minor pool of receptors cannot be ruled out, it is likely that the impaired muscarinic cholinergic response is due to a postreceptor event. PAF increases the susceptibility of smooth muscle to cholinergic stimulation, possibly by modulating the function of M3 muscarinic receptor, a primary receptor for smooth muscle contraction (61). Indeed, we reported that the AHR to methacholine in transgenic mice overexpressing PAF receptor is mediated by a pathway sensitive to a PAF receptor antagonist (52). Similarly to the present data, the muscarinic receptor-binding activities (Bmax and Kd) of the PAF receptor transgenic mice were indistinguishable from those of wild-type control mice (35). Because PAF receptor mRNA was detected in airway smooth muscle in human peripheral lung (62), it is possible for PAF to modulate the M3 receptor-evoked smooth muscle contraction at the level of intracellular signal transduction. Whereas M3 receptor on smooth muscle cells couples to phosphoinositol turnover through Gq/11 (61), PAF receptor is capable of coupling to Gi/o and Gq/11 (14), suggesting a stimulatory cross talk between the intracellular signals from the two distinct receptors (63).

In most cases, AHR is strongly associated with airway inflammation (64, 65, 66, 67), and anti-inflammatory drugs are currently used for bronchial asthma (6, 7). However, the PAF-mediated AHR appears to be independent of inflammation, because pafr–/– mice showed a reduction of AHR without diminishment of airway inflammation as shown in this study. This notion is further supported by our previous findings that the PAF receptor-overexpressing mice had AHR without obvious inflammatory responses (52). Recombinant plasma-type PAF acetylhydrolase abrogated airway responsiveness and inflammation concomitantly in a mouse asthma model (65). The apparent discrepancy between our data and those of the report may be attributed to the difference of sensitization procedure. In addition, it is notable that substrates for PAF acetylhydrolase and agonists for PAF receptor do not overlap completely (14, 68).

In summary, the present study demonstrates an important role for PAF receptor in the development of AHR after allergic sensitization/challenge in mice despite the normal expression density and ligand affinity of muscarinic cholinergic receptor. Furthermore, the airway inflammation was not affected by the absence of PAF receptor, suggesting that, as a complement anaphylatoxin C3a (69), PAF only acts downstream of the airway inflammation in bronchial asthma.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr. N. Uozumi for the group IIA phospholipase A2 genotyping. We are also grateful to R. Mitsuzono, M. Yoshino, C. Ohkawara, T. Sato, H. Shiozawa, Y. Tomizawa, and Y. Matsumoto for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports and Technology of Japan (to T.S., T.N., and S.I.), Grants-in-Aid for Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health (to T.N. and S.I.) and for Research on Allergic Disease and Immunology (to S.I.) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, and also grants from the Yamanouchi Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders (to T.N. and S.I.), the Kanae Foundation for Life and Socio-medical Science, and the Uehara Memorial Foundation (to S.I.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Satoshi Ishii, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. E-mail address: mame{at}m.u-tokyo.ac.jp Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AHR, airway hyperresponsiveness; PAF, platelet-activating factor; BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; LT, leukotriene; PAS, periodic acid-Schiff; RL, total lung resistance; EC200RL, effective concentration of methacholine required to double the basal RL. Back

Received for publication August 26, 2003. Accepted for publication March 26, 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Wills-Karp, M.. 1999. Immunologic basis of antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:255.[Medline]
  2. Drazen, J. M., J. P. Arm, K. F. Austen. 1996. Sorting out the cytokines of asthma. J. Exp. Med. 183:1.[Free Full Text]
  3. Galli, S. J.. 1997. Complexity and redundancy in the pathogenesis of asthma: reassessing the roles of mast cells and T cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:343.[Free Full Text]
  4. Bousquet, J., P. Chanez, J. Y. Lacoste, G. Barneon, N. Ghavanian, I. Enander, P. Venge, S. Ahlstedt, J. Simony-Lafontaine, P. Godard, F. B. Michel. 1990. Eosinophilic inflammation in asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 323:1033.[Abstract]
  5. Robinson, D. S., A. M. Bentley, A. Hartnell, A. B. Kay, S. R. Durham. 1993. Activated memory T helper cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with atopic asthma: relation to asthma symptoms, lung function, and bronchial responsiveness. Thorax 48:26.[Abstract]
  6. Barnes, P. J.. 1989. A new approach to the treatment of asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 321:1517.[Abstract]
  7. Djukanovic, R., J. W. Wilson, K. M. Britten, S. J. Wilson, A. F. Walls, W. R. Roche, P. H. Howarth, S. T. Holgate. 1992. Effect of an inhaled corticosteroid on airway inflammation and symptoms in asthma. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145:669.[Medline]
  8. Brusasco, V., E. Crimi, R. Pellegrino. 1998. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: not just a matter of airway inflammation. Thorax 53:992.[Free Full Text]
  9. Hogan, S. P., K. I. Matthaei, J. M. Young, A. Koskinen, I. G. Young, P. S. Foster. 1998. A novel T cell-regulated mechanism modulating allergen-induced airways hyperreactivity in BALB/c mice independently of IL-4 and IL-5. J. Immunol. 161:1501.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Makela, M. J., A. Kanehiro, L. Borish, A. Dakhama, J. Loader, A. Joetham, Z. Xing, M. Jordana, G. L. Larsen, E. W. Gelfand. 2000. IL-10 is necessary for the expression of airway hyperresponsiveness but not pulmonary inflammation after allergic sensitization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Prescott, S. M., G. A. Zimmerman, D. M. Stafforini, T. M. McIntyre. 2000. Platelet-activating factor and related lipid mediators. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 69:419.[Medline]
  12. Honda, Z., M. Nakamura, I. Miki, M. Minami, T. Watanabe, Y. Seyama, H. Okado, H. Toh, K. Ito, T. Miyamoto, T. Shimizu. 1991. Cloning by functional expression of platelet-activating factor receptor from guinea-pig lung. Nature 349:342.[Medline]
  13. Izumi, T., T. Shimizu. 1995. Platelet-activating factor receptor: gene expression and signal transduction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1259:317.[Medline]
  14. Ishii, S., T. Shimizu. 2000. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) receptor and genetically engineered PAF receptor mutant mice. Prog. Lipid Res. 39:41.[Medline]
  15. Ishii, S., T. Nagase, T. Shimizu. 2002. Platelet-activating factor receptor. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 599:68.-69.
  16. Honda, Z., S. Ishii, T. Shimizu. 2002. Platelet-activating factor receptor. J. Biochem. 131:773.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Barnes, P. J., K. F. Chung, C. P. Page. 1998. Inflammatory mediators of asthma: an update. Pharmacol. Rev. 50:515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Cuss, F. M., C. M. Dixon, P. J. Barnes. 1986. Effects of inhaled platelet activating factor on pulmonary function and bronchial responsiveness in man. Lancet 2:189.[Medline]
  19. Kaye, M. G., L. J. Smith. 1990. Effects of inhaled leukotriene D4 and platelet-activating factor on airway reactivity in normal subjects. Am. Rev. Resp. Dis. 141:993.[Medline]
  20. Steiger, J., M. A. Bray, N. Subramanian. 1987. Platelet activating factor (PAF) is a potent stimulator of porcine tracheal fluid secretion in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 142:367.[Medline]
  21. Evans, T. W., K. F. Chung, D. F. Rogers, P. J. Barnes. 1987. Effect of platelet-activating factor on airway vascular permeability: possible mechanisms. J. Appl. Physiol. 63:479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Stenton, S. C., E. N. Court, W. P. Kingston, P. Goadby, C. A. Kelly, M. Duddridge, C. Ward, D. J. Hendrick, E. H. Walters. 1990. Platelet-activating factor in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from asthmatic subjects. Eur. Respir. J. 3:408.[Abstract]
  23. Schleimer, R. P., D. W. MacGlashan, Jr, S. P. Peters, R. N. Pinckard, N. F. Adkinson, Jr, L. M. Lichtenstein. 1986. Characterization of inflammatory mediator release from purified human lung mast cells. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 133:614.[Medline]
  24. Cromwell, O., A. J. Wardlaw, A. Champion, R. Moqbel, D. Osei, A. B. Kay. 1990. IgG-dependent generation of platelet-activating factor by normal and low density human eosinophils. J. Immunol. 145:3862.[Abstract]
  25. Wardlaw, A. J., R. Moqbel, O. Cromwell, A. B. Kay. 1986. Platelet-activating factor: a potent chemotactic and chemokinetic factor for human eosinophils. J. Clin. Invest. 78:1701.
  26. Kroegel, C., T. Yukawa, J. Westwick, P. J. Barnes. 1989. Evidence for two platelet activating factor receptors on eosinophils: dissociation between PAF-induced intracellular calcium mobilization degranulation and superoxides anion generation in eosinophils. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 162:511.[Medline]
  27. Ishii, S., T. Kuwaki, T. Nagase, K. Maki, F. Tashiro, S. Sunaga, W. H. Cao, K. Kume, Y. Fukuchi, K. Ikuta, et al 1998. Impaired anaphylactic responses with intact sensitivity to endotoxin in mice lacking a platelet-activating factor receptor. J. Exp. Med. 187:1779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nagase, T., S. Ishii, K. Kume, N. Uozumi, T. Izumi, Y. Ouchi, T. Shimizu. 1999. Platelet-activating factor mediates acid-induced lung injury in genetically engineered mice. J. Clin. Invest. 104:1071.[Medline]
  29. MacPhee, M., K. P. Chepenik, R. A. Liddell, K. K. Nelson, L. D. Siracusa, A. M. Buchberg. 1995. The secretory phospholipase A2 gene is a candidate for the Mom1 locus, a major modifier of ApcMin-induced intestinal neoplasia. Cell 81:957.[Medline]
  30. Ishii, S., Y. Matsuda, M. Nakamura, I. Waga, K. Kume, T. Izumi, T. Shimizu. 1996. A murine platelet-activating factor receptor gene: cloning, chromosomal localization and up-regulation of expression by lipopolysaccharide in peritoneal resident macrophages. Biochem. J. 314:671.
  31. Kennedy, B. P., P. Payette, J. Mudgett, P. Vadas, W. Pruzanski, M. Kwan, C. Tang, D. E. Rancourt, W. A. Cromlish. 1995. A natural disruption of the secretory group II phospholipase A2 gene in inbred mouse strains. J. Biol. Chem. 270:22378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Foster, P. S., S. P. Hogan, A. J. Ramsay, K. I. Matthaei, I. G. Young. 1996. Interleukin 5 deficiency abolishes eosinophilia, airways hyperreactivity, and lung damage in a mouse asthma model. J. Exp. Med. 183:195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. McMillan, S. J., B. Bishop, M. J. Townsend, A. N. McKenzie, C. M. Lloyd. 2002. The absence of interleukin 9 does not affect the development of allergen-induced pulmonary inflammation nor airway hyperreactivity. J. Exp. Med. 195:51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Nagase, T., H. Kurihara, Y. Kurihara, T. Aoki, Y. Fukuchi, Y. Yazaki, Y. Ouchi. 1998. Airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine in mutant mice deficient in endothelin-1. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 157:560.
  35. Nagase, T., S. Ishii, H. Shindou, Y. Ouchi, T. Shimizu. 2002. Airway hyperresponsiveness in transgenic mice overexpressing platelet activating factor receptor is mediated by an atropine-sensitive pathway. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 165:200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Eum, S. Y., K. Maghni, Q. Hamid, H. Campbell, D. H. Eidelman, J. G. Martin. 2003. Involvement of the cysteinyl-leukotrienes in allergen-induced airway eosinophilia and hyperresponsiveness in the mouse. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 28:25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Nakamura, Y., M. Hoshino, J. J. Sim, K. Ishii, K. Hosaka, T. Sakamoto. 1998. Effect of the leukotriene receptor antagonist pranlukast on cellular infiltration in the bronchial mucosa of patients with asthma. Thorax 53:835.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Coffey, M., M. Peters-Golden. 2003. Extending the understanding of leukotrienes in asthma. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 3:57.[Medline]
  39. Humbles, A. A., B. Lu, D. S. Friend, S. Okinaga, J. Lora, A. Al-Garawi, T. R. Martin, N. P. Gerard, C. Gerard. 2002. The murine CCR3 receptor regulates both the role of eosinophils and mast cells in allergen-induced airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Medoff, B. D., A. Sauty, A. M. Tager, J. A. Maclean, R. N. Smith, A. Mathew, J. H. Dufour, A. D. Luster. 2002. IFN-{gamma}-inducible protein 10 (CXCL10) contributes to airway hyperreactivity and airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. J. Immunol. 168:5278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Henderson, W. R., Jr, D. B. Lewis, R. K. Albert, Y. Zhang, W. J. Lamm, G. K. Chiang, F. Jones, P. Eriksen, Y. T. Tien, M. Jonas, E. Y. Chi. 1996. The importance of leukotrienes in airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. J. Exp. Med. 184:1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Irvin, C. G., Y. P. Tu, J. R. Sheller, C. D. Funk. 1997. 5-Lipoxygenase products are necessary for ovalbumin-induced airway responsiveness in mice. Am. J. Physiol. 272:L105.
  43. Ohshima, N., S. Ishii, T. Izumi, T. Shimizu. 2002. Receptor-dependent metabolism of platelet-activating factor in murine macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 277:9722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Shindou, H., S. Ishii, N. Uozumi, T. Shimizu. 2000. Roles of cytosolic phospholipase A2 and platelet-activating factor receptor in the Ca-induced biosynthesis of PAF. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 271:812.[Medline]
  45. Klein, A., V. Pinho, A. L. Alessandrini, T. Shimizu, S. Ishii, M. M. Teixeira. 2002. Platelet-activating factor drives eotaxin production in an allergic pleurisy in mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 135:1213.[Medline]
  46. Burrows, B., F. D. Martinez, M. Halonen, R. A. Barbee, M. G. Cline. 1989. Association of asthma with serum IgE levels and skin-test reactivity to allergens. N. Engl. J. Med. 320:271.[Abstract]
  47. Sears, M. R., B. Burrows, E. M. Flannery, G. P. Herbison, C. J. Hewitt, M. D. Holdaway. 1991. Relation between airway responsiveness and serum IgE in children with asthma and in apparently normal children. N. Engl. J. Med. 325:1067.[Abstract]
  48. Oshiba, A., E. Hamelmann, K. Takeda, K. L. Bradley, J. E. Loader, G. L. Larsen, E. W. Gelfand. 1996. Passive transfer of immediate hypersensitivity and airway hyperresponsiveness by allergen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E and IgG1 in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 97:1398.[Medline]
  49. Sanderson, C. J.. 1992. Interleukin-5, eosinophils, and disease. Blood 79:3101.[Free Full Text]
  50. Paul, W. E.. 1991. Interleukin-4: a prototypic immunoregulatory lymphokine. Blood 77:1859.[Free Full Text]
  51. Wills-Karp, M.. 2000. Murine models of asthma in understanding immune dysregulation in human asthma. Immunopharmacology 48:263.[Medline]
  52. Ishii, S., T. Nagase, F. Tashiro, K. Ikuta, S. Sato, I. Waga, K. Kume, J. Miyazaki, T. Shimizu. 1997. Bronchial hyperreactivity, increased endotoxin lethality and melanocytic tumorigenesis in transgenic mice overexpressing platelet-activating factor receptor. EMBO J. 16:133.[Medline]
  53. Corry, D. B., H. G. Folkesson, M. L. Warnock, D. J. Erle, M. A. Matthay, J. P. Wiener-Kronish, R. M. Locksley. 1996. Interleukin 4, but not interleukin 5 or eosinophils, is required in a murine model of acute airway hyperreactivity. J. Exp. Med. 183:109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Hogan, S. P., A. Mould, H. Kikutani, A. J. Ramsay, P. S. Foster. 1997. Aeroallergen-induced eosinophilic inflammation, lung damage, and airways hyperreactivity in mice can occur independently of IL-4 and allergen-specific immunoglobulins. J. Clin. Invest. 99:1329.[Medline]
  55. MacLean, J. A., G. T. De Sanctis, K. G. Ackerman, J. M. Drazen, A. Sauty, E. DeHaan, F. H. Green, I. F. Charo, A. D. Luster. 2000. CC chemokine receptor-2 is not essential for the development of antigen-induced pulmonary eosinophilia and airway hyperresponsiveness. J. Immunol. 165:6568.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Kobayashi, T., T. Miura, T. Haba, M. Sato, I. Serizawa, H. Nagai, K. Ishizaka. 2000. An essential role of mast cells in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness in a murine asthma model. J. Immunol. 164:3855.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Webb, D. C., A. N. McKenzie, A. M. Koskinen, M. Yang, J. Mattes, P. S. Foster. 2000. Integrated signals between IL-13, IL-4, and IL-5 regulate airways hyperreactivity. J. Immunol. 165:108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Mattes, J., M. Yang, S. Mahalingam, J. Kuehr, D. C. Webb, L. Simson, S. P. Hogan, A. Koskinen, A. N. McKenzie, L. A. Dent, et al 2002. Intrinsic defect in T cell production of interleukin (IL)-13 in the absence of both IL-5 and eotaxin precludes the development of eosinophilia and airways hyperreactivity in experimental asthma. J. Exp. Med. 195:1433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Takeda, K., E. Hamelmann, A. Joetham, L. D. Shultz, G. L. Larsen, C. G. Irvin, E. W. Gelfand. 1997. Development of eosinophilic airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in mast cell-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 186:449.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Williams, C. M., S. J. Galli. 2000. Mast cells can amplify airway reactivity and features of chronic inflammation in an asthma model in mice. J. Exp. Med. 192:455.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Billington, C. K., R. B. Penn. 2002. m3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor regulation in the airway. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 26:269.[Free Full Text]
  62. Shirasaki, H., M. Nishikawa, I. M. Adcock, J. C. Mak, T. Sakamoto, T. Shimizu, P. J. Barnes. 1994. Expression of platelet-activating factor receptor mRNA in human and guinea pig lung. Am. J. Resp. Cell Mol. Biol. 10:533.[Abstract]
  63. Selbie, L. A., S. J. Hill. 1998. G protein-coupled-receptor cross-talk: the fine-tuning of multiple receptor-signalling pathways. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 19:87.[Medline]
  64. Henderson, W. R., Jr, E. Y. Chi, R. K. Albert, S. J. Chu, W. J. Lamm, Y. Rochon, M. Jonas, P. E. Christie, J. M. Harlan. 1997. Blockade of CD49d ({alpha}4 integrin) on intrapulmonary but not circulating leukocytes inhibits airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. J. Clin. Invest. 100:3083.[Medline]
  65. Henderson, W. R., Jr, J. Lu, K. M. Poole, G. N. Dietsch, E. Y. Chi. 2000. Recombinant human platelet-activating factor-acetylhydrolase inhibits airway inflammation and hyperreactivity in mouse asthma model. J. Immunol. 164:3360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Myou, S., H. Sano, M. Fujimura, X. Zhu, K. Kurashima, T. Kita, S. Nakao, A. Nonomura, T. Shioya, K. P. Kim, et al 2001. Blockade of eosinophil migration and airway hyperresponsiveness by cPLA2-inhibition. Nat. Immunol. 2:145.[Medline]
  67. Shen, H. H., S. I. Ochkur, M. P. McGarry, J. R. Crosby, E. M. Hines, M. T. Borchers, H. Wang, T. L. Biechelle, K. R. O’Neill, T. L. Ansay, et al 2003. A causative relationship exists between eosinophils and the development of allergic pulmonary pathologies in the mouse. J. Immunol. 170:3296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Min, J. H., C. Wilder, J. Aoki, H. Arai, K. Inoue, L. Paul, M. H. Gelb. 2001. Platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolases: broad substrate specificity and lipoprotein binding does not modulate the catalytic properties of the plasma enzyme. Biochemistry 40:4539.[Medline]
  69. Humbles, A. A., B. Lu, C. A. Nilsson, C. Lilly, E. Israel, Y. Fujiwara, N. P. Gerard, C. Gerard. 2000. A role for the C3a anaphylatoxin receptor in the effector phase of asthma. Nature 406:998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Harayama, H. Shindou, R. Ogasawara, A. Suwabe, and T. Shimizu
Identification of a Novel Noninflammatory Biosynthetic Pathway of Platelet-activating Factor
J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 2008; 283(17): 11097 - 11106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
A. R. Leff and N. M. Munoz
Future Treatment to Lessen Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Proceedings of the ATS, December 1, 2007; 4(8): 659 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
S. Giri, M. Khan, R. Rattan, I. Singh, and A. K. Singh
Krabbe disease: psychosine-mediated activation of phospholipase A2 in oligodendrocyte cell death
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 1478 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
K. Doi, K. Okamoto, K. Negishi, Y. Suzuki, A. Nakao, T. Fujita, A. Toda, T. Yokomizo, Y. Kita, Y. Kihara, et al.
Attenuation of Folic Acid-Induced Renal Inflammatory Injury in Platelet-Activating Factor Receptor-Deficient Mice
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2006; 168(5): 1413 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Terawaki, T. Yokomizo, T. Nagase, A. Toda, M. Taniguchi, K. Hashizume, T. Yagi, and T. Shimizu
Absence of Leukotriene B4 Receptor 1 Confers Resistance to Airway Hyperresponsiveness and Th2-Type Immune Responses
J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4217 - 4225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
Y. Kihara, S. Ishii, Y. Kita, A. Toda, A. Shimada, and T. Shimizu
Dual phase regulation of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by platelet-activating factor
J. Exp. Med., September 19, 2005; 202(6): 853 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. T. Venkatesha, J. Ahamed, C. Nuesch, A. K. Zaidi, and H. Ali
Platelet-activating Factor-induced Chemokine Gene Expression Requires NF-{kappa}B Activation and Ca2+/Calcineurin Signaling Pathways: INHIBITION BY RECEPTOR PHOSPHORYLATION AND {beta}-ARRESTIN RECRUITMENT
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44606 - 44612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services