The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, D. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 4717-4725.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

M Cell DNA Vaccination for CTL Immunity to HIV 1

Xinhai Wang*, David M. Hone{dagger}, Asmahan Haddad*, Mohamed T. Shata{dagger} and David W. Pascual2,*

* Veterinary Molecular Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717; and {dagger} Institute of Human Virology, Baltimore, MD 21201


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
To facilitate invasion, reovirus has evolved to attach to M cells, a specialized epithelium residing within the follicle-associated epithelium that covers mucosal inductive tissues. Thus, we questioned adapting reovirus protein {sigma}1 to ferry DNA vaccines to the mucosa to immunize against HIV. Three expression plasmids encoding HIV(Ba-L) gp160, cytoplasmic gp140, and secreted gp140 were tested in mice as protein {sigma}1-poly-L-lysine-DNA complexes (formulated vaccine) via the intranasal route. Evaluation of cell-mediated immunity showed that the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine was more effective for stimulating envelope (Env)-specific CTL responses in lungs, lower respiratory lymph nodes (LN), cervical LN, submaxillary gland LN, and spleens. Three doses of vaccine were required for CTL responses, and intranasal naked DNA immunizations were ineffective. The greatest CTL activity was observed between weeks 8 and 10 for gp160-vaccinated mice, and activity remained detectable by week 16. These Env-specific CTL responses were perforin dependent in peripheral tissues, but mostly Fas dependent in the lungs. These Env-specific CTLs also produced IFN-{gamma}. Mice vaccinated with the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine showed potent antiviral immunity against vaccinia virus-env replication in ovaries. Thus, compared with live vectors, protein {sigma}1-mediated DNA delivery represents an alternative mucosal formulation for inducing cellular immunity against HIV-1.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The mucosal surfaces are the primary sites of transmission for most infectious diseases requiring the induction of mucosal immunity for preventing pathogen entry at these surfaces. More recently, vaccines, particularly attenuated viruses (1, 2), have been designed for their mucosal application. Although these vaccines are effective for stimulating appropriate host immune responses, alternative vaccines and vaccine delivery strategies are warranted to avoid the potential side effects of live viral vectors. Such alternatives may lie with subunit vaccines or DNA vaccines, the latter being relatively easy to prepare and administer. Recent evidence shows that DNA vaccination can confer protective immunity against a number of infectious agents including influenza (3, 4), herpes simplex virus (5), HIV (6, 7), and Borrelia burgdorferi (8) infections. However, naked DNA immunizations have been proved less than optimal for stimulating mucosal immunity (7, 9, 10) when they are administered peripherally. In contrast, microencapsulated DNA vaccines effectively elicit protective mucosal responses in a murine rotavirus challenge model (11, 12). Although it is unclear whether such protection was conferred by the protective properties of microencapsulation, the ability of microspheres to interact with Peyer’s patches, M cells (13, 14), or a combination of both suggests that more efficient uptake of DNA by mucosal inductive tissues favors enhanced mucosal immunity.

Receptor-mediated gene transfer is effective for delivering transgenes into tissues by specific cellular receptors. One such method is to conjugate to a DNA-binding domain a ligand specific for a cell surface receptor. This can be facilitated using poly-L-lysine (PL). 3 This DNA-ligand complex is internalized by targeted cells when the ligand binds to its respective cell surface receptor. Such receptor-mediated gene transfer has been accomplished by targeting a variety of receptors: asialo-orosomucoid (15, 16); transferrin (17, 18, 19); lectins (20); and insulin (21).

Reovirus is an enteric pathogen that infects the host following attachment to intestinal Peyer’s patch M cells (22). Thus, as with other enteric pathogens, reovirus exploits M cells as a means to gain entry into the host. Mediating reovirus attachment is its adhesin, protein {sigma}1, which is expressed and located at the 12 vertices of the viral icosahedron (22). Protein {sigma}1 is a 45-kDa protein that polymerizes via its N terminus (23) to form either a trimer (24) or a tetramer (25) depending on how it is isolated.

In our previous studies, we have demonstrated that our recombinant protein {sigma}1 binds its receptor on cell lines (26) and nasal-associated lymphoid tissue M cells (27). Using protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA for intranasal (i.n.) transgene vaccination, mice were successfully immunized against reporter gene constructs, luciferase and {beta}-galactosidase ({beta}gal) (27). Herein, this study focuses on the induction cell-mediated immunity against HIV envelope (Env) by using protein {sigma}1-mediated DNA immunization.

Our results show that protein {sigma}1-mediated transgene vaccination can be used for immunization against HIV. Three DNA vaccines were tested, and the data for the mice given the gp160 DNA as protein {sigma}1-PL-gp160 DNA (formulated vaccine), but not as naked DNA, showed long-lasting Env-specific CTLs with potent antiviral immunity.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Production of recombinant reovirus {sigma}1 protein

The recombinant protein {sigma}1 from reovirus serotype 3 as a maltose-binding protein was generated and expressed in Escherichia coli, as previously described (26). This fusion protein was purified by affinity chromatography using amylose resin according to the manufacturer’s directions (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). The MBP::protein {sigma}1 fusion protein is referred to as recombinant protein {sigma}1.

Mice

Specific pathogen-free male and female BALB/c mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick Cancer Research Facility, Frederick, MD) at 5–6 wk of age and maintained in the Animal Resources Center at Montana State University (Bozeman, MT). Breeding pairs of IFN-{gamma}-deficient (IFN-{gamma}-/-) mice on a BALB/c background, as well as wild-type (IFN-{gamma}+/+) mice on shared background (28, 29), were kindly provided by Genentech (San Francisco, CA), and colonies were established and maintained in the Animal Resources Center. All mice were kept under pathogen-free conditions in horizontal laminar flow cabinets and were fed sterile food and water ad libitum. The mice were free of bacterial and viral pathogens, as determined by Ab screening and by histopathological analysis of major organs and tissues. The mice used in these experiments were between 5 and 8 wk of age.

Vaccination

The recombinant protein {sigma}1 was covalently linked to PL, as previously described (17, 26, 27). Groups of five mice each were immunized with naked DNA or the formulated vaccine containing one of the three DNA vaccine constructs: pOGL6, which expresses HIV-1 Env Ba-L (30); pSF128, which expresses gp140sec; or pSF128-{Delta}LP, which expresses gp140cyt. This latter construct was generated by PCR amplification of the gp140-encoding sequence in pSF128 using a 5'-primer that initiated PCR downstream of the 31-aa CD5 leader peptide and substituted a methionine in its place. The amplified sequence was then inserted into pcDNA3.1 using T4 DNA ligase. Each of the described DNA vaccines were assessed in transfection assays and shown to produce equivalent levels of envelope glycoprotein by SDS-PAGE and semiquantitative capture ELISAs. Individual mice were anesthetized with isofluorane (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) by inhalation and then immunized i.n three times at 7-day intervals with 20 µg of plasmid DNA per dose with or without 15 µg of protein {sigma}1-PL.

Lymphocyte isolation

Lymphocytes were isolated from spleens, lungs, mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes (LRLN), cervical LN (CLN), and submaxillary gland LN (SMLN). LRLN, CLN, and SMLN were passed through Nitex mesh (Fairview Fabrics, Hercules, CA) to remove debris. Splenic mononuclear cell suspensions were obtained by mechanical disruption, followed by Ficoll-Hypaque (Lymphocyte M; Accurate Chemical, Westbury, NY) density gradient centrifugation (31). Lung mononuclear cells were treated with 0.5 mg/ml Clostridium histolyticum type IV collagenase (Worthington, Freehold, NJ) for 15-min intervals at 37°C. After incubation, the digestion mixtures were passed through Nitex mesh (Fairview Fabrics) to remove undigested material. Mononuclear cells were isolated by Percoll (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation; the mononuclear cells interfaced between 40 and 75% Percoll. We noted >95% viability for lymphocytes isolated from each tissue, as determined by trypan blue exclusion.

Lymphocyte culture and 51Cr release assay

Both ex vivo and in vitro restimulated mononuclear cells were assessed for HIV. Env-specific CTL activity using BC-Env, a derivative of the mastocytoma cell lines P815, stably transfected with the full-length env gene of HIV-1 and BC-{beta}gal as negative control target cells, which are P815 cells, stably transfected with the E. coli lacZ gene (32). Targets were treated with mitomycin C (50 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and extensively washed with complete medium [CM; RPMI 1640 plus 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT) plus 10 mM HEPES buffer plus 10 mM nonessential amino acids plus 10 mM sodium pyruvate plus 10 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin]. Targets were subsequently labeled with Na251CrO4 (DuPont/NEN, Wilmington, DE) for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were washed three times in CM. Effector cells were incubated with various ratios of labeled targets in U-bottom 96-well microtiter dishes (Corning-Costar, Oneonta, NY) for 4 h at 37°C. After incubation, cells were spun, and supernatants were assessed for released 51Cr. Specific cytolysis was determined as the amount of 51Cr released in the presence of effector cells corrected for spontaneous 51Cr release divided by maximal (detergent-induced) release corrected for spontaneous 51Cr release. For Ag restimulation, splenic and LN mononuclear cells were restimulated with mitomycin C-treated BC-Env cells at 5:1 in CM for 5 days at 37°C.

To assess cytolytic mechanisms, washed ex vivo or Ag-restimulated lymphocytes were treated with anti-FasL mAb or 10 nM concanamycin A (CMA; Wako Bioproducts, Richmond, VA) for 2 h at 37°C, similar to that previously described (33). Likewise, some ex vivo or Ag-restimulated lymphocytes were treated with 10 µg/ml anti-FasL mAb (clone MFL3; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Cells were assessed for CTL activity, as described above.

Cytokine detection essays

Supernatants collected from Env (Bc-Env)-restimulated cultures were analyzed for expression of IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10. Commercially produced cytokine-specific mAbs (BD PharMingen) were used, as previously described (31, 34).

Vaccinia virus-Env challenge

The extent of antiviral immunity was determined using a vaccinia-env challenge model, as previously described (35, 36). The vaccinia-env vector, vP1174, was obtained from AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). Briefly, vP1174 was expanded in BSC-1 cells until 90% of the cells lysed. Culture supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 4000 x g for 10 min, and aliquots of the supernatants were stored in liquid nitrogen until used. These supernatants typically yielded ~5 x 109 vP1174 PFU/ml, as determined by a direct plaque essay on BSC-1 cells. To assess antiviral protection, groups of BALB/c mice were vaccinated i.n. or i.m. with naked gp160 DNA vaccine or i.n. with the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine as described above. All mice were vaccinated at the same time intervals. Mice were given 108 PFU of vP1174 i.p. 16 wk after primary vaccination. The ovaries from the challenged mice were harvested, homogenized, and clarified by centrifugation at 4000 x g for 10 min. Serial 10-fold dilutions were made for infection of BSC-1 cell monolayers, and plaques were enumerated 2 days after in vitro culture.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences between experimental parameters were determined significant if p was <0.05 using Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA. For the challenge study, Wilcoxon’s two sample test was performed.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mode of HIV-1 Env expression impacts induction of CTL responses

Previous results have shown that M cell-targeted DNA delivery represented an effective means to mucosally vaccinate for the stimulation of CTL responses (27). To adapt this vaccine vehicle to potentially immunize against HIV, M cell-targeted DNA delivery using recombinant reovirus protein {sigma}1 was used for i.n. immunization of BALB/c mice. Three groups of BALB/c mice (five per group) each received an Env (Ba-L) expression plasmid in conjunction with protein {sigma}1 conjugated to PL and were given 20 µg of plasmid per dose on days 0, 7, and 14. Each group received a DNA vaccine that expressed full-length gp160, which is located in the plasma membrane, a truncated derivative of Env that lacks the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains and is secreted (gp140sec), or a leader peptide-deficient derivative of gp140 that is expressed cytoplasmically (gp140cyt). After 6 wk post-primary immunization, various respiratory and splenic tissues were isolated, and mononuclear cell fractions were subjected to cytolytic assays by 51Cr release to determine specific reactivity for Env. Both freshly isolated lymphocytes and in vitro-restimulated lymphocytes showed specific lysis of Env-expressing target cells, but not {beta}gal-expressing targets (Fig. 1). However, variable killing was observed and was dependent on the mode of Env expression. Rank order experiments for lung lymphocytes revealed that the DNA vaccine for gp160 > gp140cyt > gp140sec (Fig. 1, A--C and Table I). Freshly isolated lymphocytes from the other lymphoid compartments were not as effective in the lysis of Env-expressing targets, varying from 13 to 26% specific lysis (Fig. 1, A–C). However, on in vitro restimulation, cytolytic activity was greatly enhanced by LRLN, CLN, SMLN, and splenic lymphocytes (Fig. 1, D–F, and Table I). Again, the Ag-restimulated lymphocytes from mice vaccinated with formulated gp160 vaccine at E:T 50:1 showed specific lysis between 42 and 61% (Table I and Fig. 1, D–F). In contrast, Ag-restimulated lymphocytes from formulated gp140cyt or gp140sec vaccines at E:T 50:1 showed specific lysis between 31 and 45%, and 27 and 38%, respectively (Table I and Fig. 1, D–F).



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Immunization of BALB/c mice i.n. with protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA encoding either HIV gp160 (A and D) and HIV gp140cyt (B and E) or gp140sec (C and F) result in CTL responses specific for Env. Lymphocytes were isolated from lungs, spleens, LRLN, CLN, and SMLN 6 wk after primary immunization. CTL activity was assessed for each tissue using freshly isolated lymphocytes or ex vivo (A–C) and for in vitro Ag-restimulated lymphocytes (D-–F) using standard 51Cr release assays. CTL assays were done against specific target BC-Env cells and irrelevant control target BC-{beta}gal cells. Data are representative of five experiments and are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate wells.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Mice vaccinated with formulated gp160 DNA showed enhanced lysis of Env-expressing target cells

 
Protein {sigma}1-DNA immunization is more effective than naked DNA delivery

To discern the effectiveness of protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA immunization, groups of BALB/c mice were immunized i.n. with HIV expression plasmids either as formulated or naked DNA vaccines. As depicted in Fig. 2 and Table II, the formulated vaccine was clearly more effective for stimulating CTL responses against HIV Env than mice immunized with naked DNA. Activity of freshly isolated lung lymphocytes at E:T 50:1 from formulated DNA varied between 25 and 55% lysis, depending on the DNA vaccine used (Table II and Fig. 2, A–C), but those immunized i.n. with naked DNA varied only from no lysis to 19%. For the other lymphoid tissues, only the i.n.-formulated DNA-vaccinated mice showed lytic activity, whereas the lymphocytes from naked DNA-immunized mice showed no lytic activity (Table II and Fig. 2, A–C). Although in vitro Ag- restimulation of respiratory LN and splenic lymphocytes did enhance cytolytic activity from naked DNA-immunized mice, the magnitude of enhancement was not nearly as great for mice vaccinated with formulated DNA (Table II and Fig. 2, D–F). Thus, the addition of protein {sigma}1-PL to DNA expression plasmids clearly facilitates immunization, whereas naked DNA does not. Likewise, in the absence of protein {sigma}1, i.n. immunization with PL-DNA also fails to enhance CTL responses as naked DNA immunization (data not shown).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Protein {sigma}1-PL is needed for development of Env-specific CTL responses. Immunization with naked DNA i.n. encoding gp160 (A and D), gp140cyt (B and E), or gp140sec (C and F) failed to stimulate Env-specific CTLs. Only mice immunized i.n. with the formulated DNA vaccines showed CTL responses 6 wk post-primary immunization using ex vivo (A–C) or in vitro (D–F) Ag-restimulated lymphocytes from lungs, spleens, LRLN, CLN, and SMLN. CTL activity was measured as described in Fig. 1. Depicted is the mean ± SD of a representative experiment of three.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Protein {sigma}1-PL facilitates i.n. immunization

 
Induced CTL activity is dose dependent

To determine whether three doses of vaccine were required to induce the CTL responses, groups of mice were immunized with a single, two, or three doses of formulated vaccine. CTL responses were assessed 6 wk post-primary immunization. As shown in Fig. 3, three doses of gp160 were necessary to effect anti-Env CTL responses in the lungs, spleens, LRLN, and SMLN (p <= 0.013). The gp140cyt DNA vaccines induced Env-specific CTL activity in the lungs, draining respiratory LN and spleens (p <= 0.014), whereas the gp140sec DNA vaccine was poorly immunogenic in these sites where only the spleen (p = 0.010), LRLN (p = 0.035), and SMLN (p = 0.013) showed significant enhancement by the three doses.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Three doses of protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA vaccine are required for effective stimulation of Env-specific CTLs. BALB/c mice were i.n. immunized with one, two, or three doses of protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA encoding gp160 (A and D), gp140cyt (B and E), or gp140sec (C and F). Lymphocytes were isolated from lungs, spleens, LRLN, CLN, and SMLN, and ex vivo (A–C) and in vitro (D–F) Ag-restimulated cells were measured for CTL activity as described in Fig. 1. Depicted is the mean ± SD of a representative experiment of two to three.

 
Kinetic analysis of induced CTL activity

To ascertain the longevity of the induced CTL responses against Env, groups of mice were immunized i.n. with one of the three DNA vaccines using protein {sigma}1-PL. Beginning at wk 6 through wk 16, lymphocytes from lungs, draining LN, and splenocytes were isolated and immediately evaluated for CTL activity or were subsequently restimulated with Ag in vitro. Evidence in this study (Fig. 4) demonstrated that lung CTL responses peaked between wk 6 and 10 in the mice vaccinated with the gp160 DNA vaccine, whereas mice vaccinated with gp140cyt and gp140sec DNA vaccines displayed Env-specific CTL responses that peaked between 8 and 10 wk after vaccination. Similarly, LN and splenic CTL responses peaked at ~10 wk after vaccination. By 16 wk after vaccination, mice vaccinated with the gp160 DNA vaccine still exhibited measurable Env-specific CTL activity in all tissues, whereas lymphocytes from mice vaccinated with gp140cyt required in vitro Ag restimulation before measurable cytolytic activity was evident (Fig. 4, B and E). In contrast, 16 wk after immunization, neither freshly isolated nor in vitro-restimulated lymphocytes from mice vaccinated with the gp140sec DNA vaccine displayed cytolytic activity (Fig. 4, C and F).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Cytolytic activity peaked 8–10 wk post-primary immunization with protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA vaccines. BALB/c mice received three i.n. doses of protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA vaccines encoding gp160 (A and D), gp140cyt (B and E), or gp140sec (C and F), and at 2-wk intervals, lymphocytes were isolated from lungs, spleens, LRLN, CLN, or SMLN. CTL measurements as described in Fig. 1 were conducted using ex vivo (A–C) or in vitro (D–F) Ag-restimulated lymphocytes. Depicted is the mean ± SD of a representative experiment of two to three.

 
Anti-Env CTL responses are perforin dependent

To assess the lytic mechanism of the observed CTL responses to HIV Env, mice were immunized i.n. with the three doses of the formulated vaccine. Ex vivo lung and splenic lymphocyte cultures were treated with 10 nM CMA to block perforin-mediated killing or with 10 µg/ml anti-FasL mAb to block Fas-dependent killing. The lung responses were only modestly impacted by CMA treatment (p = 0.003). In contrast, the cytolysis was completely inhibited with the anti-FasL mAb (Fig. 5; p < 0.001). Unlike the lung, the splenic CTL were mostly inhibited by the CMA treatment (Fig. 5B; p < 0.001). Ag-restimulated splenic and LRLN lymphocytes showed the expected increased cytolytic activity, which was inhibited entirely by CMA treatment (p < 0.001), whereas the anti-FasL treatment was partially inhibitory for splenic responses (p = 0.012; Fig. 5, C and D). Collectively, these data demonstrate that perforin is important for immunity induced by formulated gp160 vaccination in the draining respiratory LN.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Perforin is required for cytolytic activity by draining respiratory lymphocytes in mice immunized with the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine. Mice were immunized i.n. with three doses of the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine, as previously described, and lymphocytes were isolated from lungs (A), spleens (B and D), and LRLN (C) 8 wk post-primary immunization. CTL measurements were conducted as described in Fig. 1 using ex vivo (A and B) or in vitro (C and D) Ag-restimulated lymphocytes. Before effector and target cell incubation, lymphocytes were treated with 10 nM CMA or 10 µg/ml anti-FasL mAb. Depicted is the mean ± SD of a representative experiment of two.

 
IFN-{gamma} is important for initial CTL response to Env

To assess the contribution of IFN-{gamma} to cytolytic activity induced by protein {sigma}1-PL-gp160 vaccination, both BALB/c and IFN-{gamma}-/- mice were vaccinated i.n. Freshly isolated lymphocytes from IFN-{gamma}-/- lungs, respiratory LN, and spleen failed to exhibit cytolytic activity when compared with BALB/c responses (p <= 0.010; Fig. 6, A and B). In contrast, in vitro Ag restimulation showed vigorous killing by IFN-{gamma}-/- lymphocytes, indicating that the Env-specific CTLs did not require IFN-{gamma} for lytic activity.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Env-specific CTLs are induced in IFN-{gamma}-/- mice. BALB/c (A and C) and IFN-{gamma}-/- (B and D) mice were i.n. immunized with three doses of formulated gp160 DNA vaccine as previously described. Lymphocytes were isolated from lungs, respiratory LN, and spleens 6 wk post-primary immunization. CTL measurements were conducted as described in Fig. 1 using (A and B) ex vivo or in vitro (C and D) Ag-restimulated lymphocytes. Depicted is the mean ± SD of a representative experiment of three.

 
To assess the cytokine profiles subsequent to Ag restimulation, supernatants from Ag-restimulated lymphoid cultures from spleen, LRLN, CLN, and SMLN were assayed by cytokine-specific ELISAs. The three vaccines showed preferential stimulation of IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 production when compared with IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, or IL-10 levels (Fig. 7).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Ag-restimulated respiratory LN and splenic lymphocyte cultures showed elevated levels of IFN-{gamma} and IL-2. Cytokine-specific ELISAs were performed on supernatants collected from Ag-restimulated cultures from the mice immunized with gp160 (A), gp140cyt (B), or gp140sec (C) DNA vaccines. Each vaccine showed preferential stimulation of IFN-{gamma} and IL-2 after immune lymphocytes were cultured for 5 days with BC-Env cells. Minimal to no Th2-type cytokines were produced. Depicted is the mean ± SEM of three experiments. Statistical differences between gp160 DNA vs gp140cyt and gp140sec DNA-vaccinated groups are: *, p <= 0.001; **, p <= 0.018; ***, p < 0.05.

 
Vaccinia-Env challenge of mice vaccinated with formulated gp160 DNA vaccine

The vaccinia virus challenge bearing an HIV protein is generally used to assess levels of cell-mediated immunity (35). To assess the potential efficacy of our formulated gp160 DNA vaccine, BALB/c mice were given the formulated or naked gp160 DNA vaccine via the i.n. route as previously described. As a positive control, one group of mice were immunized i.m. with the same gp160 DNA vaccine at the same time intervals and with the same doses. The last group of mice were left unimmunized to serve as a naive control. Approximately 16 wk after primary immunization, each group was challenged with vaccinia-env, and ovaries were assessed for levels of vaccinia PFU. It was quite evident that the group of mice given the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine showed potent antiviral immunity when compared with challenged naive mice or other immunized groups (Fig. 8). Thus, these data show that protein {sigma}1 targeting is an effective means to stimulate host responses via the i.n. route.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Immunization of female BALB/c mice i.n. with formulated gp160 DNA vaccine showed vigorous antiviral immunity subsequent to challenge with vaccinia virus-env. Groups of mice received i.n. immunizations with the formulated or naked gp160 vaccine, i.m. immunization with naked gp160 vaccine, or were left unvaccinated (naive controls). Sixteen weeks after primary immunization, mice were given vaccinia-env i.p., and 6 days later, ovaries were harvested. At the 99% confidence intervals: *, p < 0.0001, **, p < 0.001, and ***, p < 0.01.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A unique attribute of mucosal inductive tissues is the specialized epithelium covering these organized mucosal lymphoid tissues, termed follicle-associated epithelium (FAE). Within the FAE is a differentiated epithelial cell subset referred to as M cells. M cells are adept at uptake and transport of luminal Ags, including soluble proteins and infectious agents. It is also believed that certain pathogens, such as Salmonella typhimurium (37), Yersinia enterocolitica (38), and reoviruses (22), invade the host tissues by binding to M cells. To take advantage of this specialized niche, we hypothesize that targeting M cells using proteins derived from such infectious agents would serve as M cell ligands. One such ligand, reovirus protein {sigma}1, was previously shown in its recombinant form to bind M cells and facilitate i.n. immunization using expression plasmid reporter gene constructs (26). Both transfection (26) and immunization (27) required covalent attachment of protein {sigma}1 to PL to enable complexing to DNA vaccine. It was evident in this previous study (27) that targeting was necessary to generate mucosal responses because naked or PL-complexed DNA failed to stimulate mucosal Ab or CTL responses.

To expand on the earlier observation that the protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA delivery system can stimulate CTL responses, work described here focused on the adaptation of this technique to stimulate cell-mediated anti-HIV Env responses. The best results were obtained using the expression plasmid encoding gp160 rather than gp140cyt or gp140sec. The reason that differences were obtained was not resolved, although the mode of expression may have impacted the immunogenicity of Env in these constructs. Minimally, we know that it was not attributed to differences in protein production because transfection assays with the three DNA vaccines yielded similar levels of expressed protein (data not shown). We had expected the secreted gp140 to induce CTL responses resembling those induced by membrane-bound gp160, but the magnitude of CTL responses between the two vaccines was notably different. Although some improvement in host CTL responses was observed between 8 and 10 wk post-primary immunization, the gp160 vaccine was clearly the most effective to stimulate enhanced CTL responses when given i.n., and these CTL responses continued to be evident for at least 16 wk after primary immunization. Perhaps one possibility to account for the increased immunogenicity may be related to the increased size of gp160 making it more immunogenic or providing additional target peptides. In contrast, CTL responses induced by gp140sec waned 16 wk after vaccination and were undetectable even after in vitro Ag restimulation. Finally, these results showed that at least three doses of vaccine were required to obtain the observed magnitude in CTL responses.

The potency and longevity of these CTL responses were also assessed using the vaccinia-env challenge similar to that previously described (35, 36). As our in vitro analyses suggested, the formulated gp160 DNA vaccine induced potent antiviral immunity as evidenced by the reduced vaccinia virus PFUs when compared with mice given the same vaccine by the naked i.n. or i.m. routes. Such data support our contention that targeting vaccines can enhance immune responses. It is also important that only one previous study (36) has shown a similar extent of cell-mediated responses when a DNA vaccine was given i.n. However, this required a live vector to carry the DNA vaccine but again suggests that targeting mucosal inductive tissues may be important for successful vaccination (39). Thus, a DNA subunit vaccine is capable of eliciting strong cell-mediated immunity if it can be effectively targeted using our approach or by live vectors.

The CTL responses acquired using the gp160 vaccine were accomplished in the absence of adjuvant. Typically, successful i.n. DNA vaccination against HIV immunogens has required the use of a live vector, as in the case for adenovirus (40, 41), vesicular stomatitis virus (42), or a bacterial vector (30). Otherwise, adjuvant is coadministered (43) or incorporated into the DNA (44). In addition, the enthusiasm for administering adjuvants i.n. has been dampened by recent data showing olfactory bulb apoptosis (45, 46). Our data suggest that effective targeting to mucosal inductive tissues may circumvent the need for additional adjuvants and still be able to stimulate long-lasting CTL responses; thus, effective vaccine targeting potentially can supplant the need for additional adjuvants. Current studies are assessing these possibilities. Collectively, from this study, as well as those described for live vector vaccines (30, 40, 41, 42) and incorporation to liposomes, it is evident that for i.n. delivery of DNA vaccines, the DNA must be protected or targeted to mucosal inductive sites to facilitate vaccination. Otherwise, as shown here, application of naked DNA to the nasal passages fails to implement effective transgene vaccination.

CD8+ T cells do appear to play an active role in the control of lentivirus infections, either by cytolytic mechanisms or production of {beta}-chemokines. In experimental models, depletion of CD8+ T cells in SIV-infected rhesus monkeys (47) or HIV infection in mice (48) implicate the role of CD8+ T cells in the control viremia. Perforin, one of the cytotoxins released by immune CTLs, mediates lysis of infected target cells by facilitating entry of proteases or granzymes into target cells. Recent data have suggested that during chronic HIV infection, HIV-specific CTLs are induced but express low levels of perforin (49, 50, 51, 52), despite the ability to express granzyme A (51, 53). Given these findings, a vaccine that stimulates perforin-dependent, HIV-specific CTL responses may provide a benefit to the vaccinee. Evidence reported above shows that one attribute of the protein {sigma}1-PL-DNA delivery is the capacity to stimulate perforin-dependent CTL responses following i.n. vaccination.

Coupled to the ability of gp160 DNA vaccine to induce CTL responses was the capacity of immune T cells to produce of IFN-{gamma}. Ag-restimulated T cell cultures showed enhanced production of IFN-{gamma} and IL-2, whereas only low levels of cytokines associated with Th2/Tc2 cells were detected in these cultures. In a previous study (27), Th2 cytokines were detected after Ag restimulation of CD4+ T cells; however, cytokine responses by immune CD8+ T cells were not evaluated at that time. Future studies will evaluate the ability of the gp160, as well as other HIV DNA vaccines to stimulate systemic and mucosal Abs against Env, and determine which Th cell subsets support these responses. Such evaluations were beyond the scope of these current studies.

In summary, a method is described for DNA vaccination via the i.n. route. Thus, DNA vaccines induce perforin-dependent CTL responses after i.n. administration in formulations containing the {sigma}1-PL-DNA delivery fusion protein. Of three DNA vaccines tested, the plasma membrane expressed gp160 DNA vaccine was the most immunogenic for CTL responses, suggesting that the mode of expression influences the immunogenicity of DNA vaccine-expressed immunogens delivered via the i.n. route. The ability to target respiratory mucosal inductive sites in the respiratory tract aided by the ability to elicit CTL responses in the lungs, as well as in the draining respiratory LN, will provide a useful tool to develop vaccines against pathogens that target mucosal surfaces, such as HIV-1 and influenza.


    Acknowledgments
 
Special thanks go to Nancy Kommers for her assistance in preparing the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Grants AI-49071 (to D.W.P.), AI-41914, and AI-55367 (to D.M.H.) and in part by the Montana Agricultural Station and U.S. Department of Agricultural Formula Funds. This is Montana Agricultural Station Journal Series 2003-11. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. David W. Pascual, Veterinary Molecular Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717-3610. E-mail address: dpascual{at}montana.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PL, poly-L-lysine; i.n., intranasal; Env, envelope; LN, lymph nodes; LRLN, lower respiratory LN; CLN, cervical LN; SMLN, submaxillary gland LN; CM, complete medium; CMA, concanamycin A; FAE, follicle-associated epithelium; {beta}gal, {beta}-galactosidase; FasL, Fas ligand. Back

Received for publication May 23, 2003. Accepted for publication August 19, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rennels, M. B., R. I. Glass, P. H. Dennehy, D. I. Bernstein, M. E. Pichichero, E. T. Zito, M. E. Mack, B. L. Davidson, A. Z. Kapikian. 1996. Safety and efficacy of high-dose rhesus-human reassortant rotavirus vaccines: report of the National Multicenter Trial. United States Rotavirus Vaccine Efficacy Group. Pediatrics 97:7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Belshe, R. B., C. Stevens, G. J. Gorse, S. Buchbinder, K. Weinhold, H. Sheppard, D. Stablein, S. Self, J. McNamara, S. Frey, et al 2001. Safety and immunogenicity of a canarypox-vectored human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine with or without gp120: a phase 2 study in higher- and lower-risk volunteers. J. Infect. Dis. 183:1343.[Medline]
  3. Ross, T. M., Y. Xu, R. A. Bright, H. L. Robinson. 2000. C3d enhancement of antibodies to hemagglutinin accelerates protection against influenza virus challenge. Nat. Immunol. 1:127.[Medline]
  4. Fu, T. M., A. Friedman, J. B. Ulmer, M. A. Liu, J. J. Donnelly. 1997. Protective cellular immunity: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses against dominant and recessive epitopes of influenza virus nucleoprotein induced by DNA immunization. J. Virol. 71:2715.[Abstract]
  5. Gallichan, W. S., K. L. Rosenthal. 1998. Long-term immunity and protection against herpes simplex virus type 2 in the murine female genital tract after mucosal but not systemic immunization. J. Infect. Dis. 177:1155.[Medline]
  6. Boyer, J. D., B. Wang, K. E. Ugen, M. Agadjanyan, A. Javadian, P. Frost, K. Dang, R. A. Carrano, R. Ciccarelli, L. Coney, W. V. Williams, D. B. Weiner. 1996. In vivo protective anti-HIV immune responses in non-human primates through DNA immunization. J. Med. Primatol. 25:242.[Medline]
  7. Boyer, J. D., K. E. Ugen, M. Chattergoon, B. Wang, A. Shah, M. Agadjanyan, M. L. Bagarazzi, A. Javadian, R. Carrano, L. Coney, W. V. Williams, D. B. Weiner. 1997. DNA vaccination as anti-human immunodeficiency virus immunotherapy in infected chimpanzees. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1501.[Medline]
  8. Simon, M., M. L. Gern, P. Hauser, W. Zhong, P. J. Nielsen, M. D. Kramer, C. Brenner, R. Wallich. 1996. Protective immunization with plasmid DNA containing the outer surface lipoprotein A gene of Borrelia burgdorferi is independent of an eukaryotic promoter. Eur. J. Immunol. 26:2831.[Medline]
  9. Feltquate, D. M., S. Heaney, R. G. Webster, H. L. Robinson. 1997. Different T helper cell types and antibody isotypes generated by saline and gene gun DNA immunization. J. Immunol. 158:2278.[Abstract]
  10. Noll, A., N. Bucheler, E. Bohn, R. Schirmbeck, J. Reimann, I. B. Austenite. 1999. DNA immunization confers systemic, but not mucosal, protection against enteroinvasive bacteria. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:986.[Medline]
  11. Chen, S. C., D. H. Jones, E. F. Fynan, G. H. Farrar, J. C. Clegg, H. B. Greenberg, J. E. Herrmann. 1998. Protective immunity induced by oral immunization with a rotavirus DNA vaccine encapsulated in microparticles. J. Virol. 72:5757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Herrmann, J. E., S. C. Chen, D. H. Jones, A. Tinsley-Bown, E. F. Fynan, H. B. Greenberg, G. H. Farrar. 1999. Immune responses and protection obtained by oral immunization with rotavirus VP4 and VP7 DNA vaccines encapsulated in microparticles. Virology 259:148.[Medline]
  13. Eldridge, J. H., J. K. Staas, J. A. Meulbroek, J. R. McGhee, T. R. Tice, R. M. Gilley. 1991. Biodegradable microspheres as a vaccine delivery system. Mol. Immunol. 28:287.[Medline]
  14. Jepson, M. A., N. L. Simmons, D. T. O’Hagan, B. H. Hirst. 1993. Comparison of poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) and polystyrene microsphere targeting to intestinal M cells. J. Drug Target 1:245.[Medline]
  15. Wu, C. H., J. M. Wilson, G. Y. Wu. 1989. Targeting genes: delivery and persistent expression of a foreign gene driven by mammalian regulatory elements in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 264:16985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Wu, G. Y., P. Zhan, L. L. Sze, A. R. Rosenberg, C. H. Wu. 1994. Incorporation adenovirus into a ligand-based DNA carrier system results in retention of original specificity and enhances targeted gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 269:11542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wagner, E., M. Zenke, M. Cotten, H. Beug, M. L. Birnstiel. 1990. Transferrin-polycation conjugates as carriers for DNA uptake into cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:3410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wagner, E., K. Zatloukal, M. Cotten, H. Kirlappos, K. Mechtler, D. T. Curiel, M. L. Birnstiel. 1992. Coupling of adenovirus to transferrin-polylysine/DNA complexes greatly enhances receptor-mediated gene delivery and expression of transfected genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:6099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Lozier, J. N., A. R. Thompson, P. C. Hu, M. Read, K. M. Brinkhous, K. A. High, D. T. Curiel. 1994. Efficient transfection of primary cells in a canine hemophilia B model using adenovirus-polylysine-DNA complexes. Hum. Gene Ther. 5:313.[Medline]
  20. Batra, R. K., F. Wang-Johanning, E. Wagner, R. I. Garver, Jr., D. T. Curiel. 1994. Receptor-mediated gene delivery employing lectin-binding specificity. Gene Ther. 1:255.[Medline]
  21. Sobolev, A. S., A. A. Rosenkranz, O. A. Smirnova, V. A. Nikitin, G. L. Neugodova, B. S. Naroditsky, I. N. Shilov, I. N. Shatski, L. K. Ernst. 1998. Receptor-mediated transfection of murine and ovine mammary glands in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 273:7928.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lee, P. W., E. C. Hayes, W. K. Joklik. 1981. Protein {sigma}1 is the reovirus cell attachment protein. Virology 108:156.[Medline]
  23. Mah, D. C., G. Leone, J. M. Jankowski, P. W. Lee. 1990. The N-terminal quarter of reovirus cell attachment protein {sigma}1 possesses intrinsic virion-anchoring function. Virology 179:95.[Medline]
  24. Strong, J. E., G. Leone, R. Duncan, R. K. Sharma, P. W. Lee. 1991. Biochemical and biophysical characterization of the reovirus cell attachment protein {sigma}1: evidence that it is a homotrimer. Virology 184:23.[Medline]
  25. Bassel-Duby, R., M. L. Nibert, C. J. Homcy, B. N. Fields, D. G. Sawutz. 1987. Evidence that the {sigma}1 protein of reovirus serotype 3 is a multimer. J. Virol. 61:1834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wu, Y., M. J. Boysun, K. L. Csencsits, D. W. Pascual. 2000. Gene transfer facilitated by a cellular targeting molecule, reovirus protein {sigma}1. Gene Ther. 7:61.[Medline]
  27. Wu, Y., X. Wang, K. L. Csencsits, A. Haddad, N. Walters, D. W. Pascual. 2001. M cell-targeted DNA vaccination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:9318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Dalton, D. K., S. Pitts-Meek, S. Keshav, I. S. Figari, A. Bradley, T. A. Stewart. 1993. Multiple defects of immune cell function in mice with disrupted interferon-{gamma} genes. Science 259:1739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Qian, Q., J. E. Cutler. 1997. {gamma} Interferon is not essential in host defense against disseminated candidiasis in mice. Infect. Immun. 65:1748.[Abstract]
  30. Shata, M. T., M. S. Reitz, Jr., A. L. DeVico, G. K. Lewis, D. M. Hone. 2001. Mucosal and systemic HIV-1 Env-specific CD8+ T-cells develop after intragastric vaccination with a Salmonella Env DNA vaccine vector. Vaccine 20:623.[Medline]
  31. Pascual, D. W., N. Walters, P. Hillemeyer. 1998. Repeated intratracheal instillations of nonreplicating adenovirus 2 vector attenuate CTL responses and IFN-{gamma} production. J. Immunol. 160:4465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chada, S., C. E. DeJesus, K. Townsend, W. T. Lee, L. Laube, D. J. Jolly, S. M. Chand, J. F. Warner. 1993. Cross-reactive lysis of human targets infected with prototypic and clinical human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains by murine anti-HIV-1IIIB Env-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Virology 67:3409.
  33. Kataoka, T., N. Shinohara, H. Takayama, K. Takaku, S. Kondo, S. Yonehara, K. Nagai. 1996. Concanamycin A, a powerful tool for characterization and estimation of contribution of perforin- and Fas-based lytic pathways in cell-mediated cytotoxicity. J. Immunol. 156:3678.[Abstract]
  34. Hillemeyer, P., M. D. White, D. W. Pascual. 2002. Development of a transient CD4+CD8+ T cell subset in the cervical lymph nodes following intratracheal instillation with an adenovirus vector. Cell. Immunol. 215:173.[Medline]
  35. Belyakov, I. M., M. A. Derby, J. D. Ahlers, B. L. Kelsall, P. Earl, B. Moss, W. Strober, J. A. Berzofsky. 1998. Mucosal immunization with HIV-1 peptide vaccine induces mucosal and systemic cytotoxic T lymphocytes and protective immunity in mice against intrarectal recombinant HIV-vaccinia challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:1709.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Shata, M. T., D. M. Hone. 2001. Vaccination with a Shigella DNA vaccine vector induces antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and antiviral protective immunity. J. Virol. 75:9665.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Jones, B. D., N. Ghori, S. Falkow. 1994. Salmonella typhimurium initiates murine infection by penetrating and destroying the specialized epithelial M cells of the Peyer’s patches. J. Exp. Med. 180:15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Clark, M. A., B. H. Hirst, M. A. Jepson. 1998. M-cell surface beta 1 integrin expression and invasin-mediated targeting of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis to mouse Peyer’s patch M cells. Infect. Immun. 1. 66:1237.
  39. Siebers, A., B. B. Finlay. 1996. M cells and the pathogenesis of mucosal and systemic infections. Trends Microbiol. 4:22.[Medline]
  40. Lubeck, M. D., R. J. Natuk, M. Chengalvala, P. K. Chanda, K. K. Murthy, S. Murthy, S. Mizutani, S. G. Lee, M. S. Wade, B. M. Bhat, et al 1994. Immunogenicity of recombinant adenovirus-human immunodeficiency virus vaccines in chimpanzees following intranasal administration. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:1443.[Medline]
  41. Shiver, J. W., T. M. Fu, L. Chen, D. R. Casimiro, M. E. Davies, R. K. Evans, Z. O. Zhang, A. J. Simon, W. L. Trigona, S. A. Dubey, et al 2002. Replication-incompetent adenoviral vaccine vector elicits effective anti-immunodeficiency-virus immunity. Nature 415:331.[Medline]
  42. Haglund, K., I. Leiner, K. Kerksiek, L. Buonocore, E. Pamer, J. K. Rose. 2002. Robust recall and long-term memory T-cell responses induced by prime-boost regimens with heterologous live viral vectors expressing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag and Env proteins. J. Virol. 76:7506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Sasaki, S., K. Sumino, K. Hamajima, J. Fukushima, N. Ishii, S. Kawamoto, H. Mohri, C. R. Kensil, K. Okuda. 1998. Induction of systemic and mucosal immune responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by a DNA vaccine formulated with QS-21 saponin adjuvant via intramuscular and intranasal routes. J. Virol. 72:4931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Okada, E., S. Sasaki, N. Ishii, I. Aoki, T. Yasuda, K. Nishioka, J. Fukushima, J. Miyazaki, B. Wahren, K. Okuda. 1997. Intranasal immunization of a DNA vaccine with IL-12- and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-expressing plasmids in liposomes induces strong mucosal and cell-mediated immune responses against HIV-1 antigens. J. Immunol. 159:3638.[Abstract]
  45. van Ginkel, F. W., R. J. Jackson, Y. Yuki, J. R. McGhee. 2000. Cutting edge: the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin redirects vaccine proteins into olfactory tissues. J. Immunol. 165:4778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Fujihashi, K., T. Koga, F. W. van Ginkel, Y. Hagiwara, J. R. McGhee. 2002. A dilemma for mucosal vaccination: efficacy versus toxicity using enterotoxin-based adjuvants. Vaccine 20:2431.[Medline]
  47. Schmitz, J. E., M. J. Kuroda, S. Santra, V. G. Sasseville, M. A. Simon, M. A. Lifton, P. Racz, K. Tenner-Racz, M. Dalesandro, B. J. Scallon, et al 1999. Control of viremia in simian immunodeficiency virus infection by CD8+ lymphocytes. Science 283:857.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Belyakov, I. M., J. D. Ahlers, B. Y. Brandwein, P. Earl, B. L. Kelsall, B. Moss, W. Strober, J. A. Berzofsky. 1998. The importance of local mucosal HIV-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes for resistance to mucosal viral transmission in mice and enhancement of resistance by local administration of IL-12. J. Clin. Invest. 102:2072.[Medline]
  49. Shankar, P., Z. Xu, J. Lieberman. 1999. Viral-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes lyse human immunodeficiency virus-infected primary T lymphocytes by the granule exocytosis pathway. Blood 94:3084.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Appay, V., D. F. Nixon, S. M. Donahoe, G. M. Gillespie, T. Dong, A. King, G. S. Ogg, H. M. Spiegel, C. Conlon, C. A. Spina, et al 2000. HIV-specific CD8+ T cells produce antiviral cytokines but are impaired in cytolytic function. J. Exp. Med. 192:63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Andersson, J., S. Kinloch, A. Sonnerborg, J. Nilsson, T. E. Fehniger, A. L. Spetz, H. Behbahani, L. E. Goh, H. McDade, B. Gazzard, et al 2002. Low levels of perforin expression in CD8+ T lymphocyte granules in lymphoid tissue during acute human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 185:1355.[Medline]
  52. Zhang, D., P. Shankar, Z. Xu, B. Harnisch, G. Chen, C. Lange, S. J. Lee, H. Valdez, M. M. Lederman, J. Lieberman. 2003. Most antiviral CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection do not express high levels of perforin and are not directly cytotoxic. Blood 101:226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Andersson, J., H. Behbahani, J. Lieberman, E. Connick, A. Landay, B. Patterson, A. Sonnerborg, K. Lore, S. Uccini, T. E. Fehniger. 1999. Perforin is not co-expressed with granzyme A within cytotoxic granules in CD8 T lymphocytes present in lymphoid tissue during chronic HIV infection. AIDS 13:1295.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Rynda, M. Maddaloni, D. Mierzejewska, J. Ochoa-Reparaz, T. Maslanka, K. Crist, C. Riccardi, B. Barszczewska, K. Fujihashi, J. R. McGhee, et al.
Low-Dose Tolerance Is Mediated by the Microfold Cell Ligand, Reovirus Protein {sigma}1
J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5187 - 5200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
J. Ochoa-Reparaz, J. Sentissi, T. Trunkle, C. Riccardi, and D. W. Pascual
Attenuated Coxiella burnetii Phase II Causes a Febrile Response in Gamma Interferon Knockout and Toll-Like Receptor 2 Knockout Mice and Protects against Reinfection
Infect. Immun., December 1, 2007; 75(12): 5845 - 5858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
T. Nochi, Y. Yuki, A. Matsumura, M. Mejima, K. Terahara, D.-Y. Kim, S. Fukuyama, K. Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Y. Kawaoka, T. Kohda, et al.
A novel M cell specific carbohydrate-targeted mucosal vaccine effectively induces antigen-specific immune responses
J. Exp. Med., November 26, 2007; 204(12): 2789 - 2796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
X. Yang, M. Hudson, N. Walters, R. F. Bargatze, and D. W. Pascual
Selection of Protective Epitopes for Brucella melitensis by DNA Vaccination
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2005; 73(11): 7297 - 7303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, X.
Right arrow Articles by Pascual, D. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS