The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehlers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Steimle, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehlers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Steimle, V.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 3594-3604.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Morpholino Antisense Oligonucleotide-Mediated Gene Knockdown During Thymocyte Development Reveals Role for Runx3 Transcription Factor in CD4 Silencing During Development of CD4-/CD8+ Thymocytes 1

Marc Ehlers2,*,{dagger}, Kirsten Laule-Kilian*, Michaela Petter*, Christine J. Aldrian*, Baerbel Grueter{dagger}, Andreas Würch*, Naomi Yoshida{ddagger}, Toshio Watanabe{ddagger}, Masanobu Satake{ddagger} and Viktor Steimle2,*

* Hans Spemann Laboratories, Max Planck Institute of Immunology, Freiburg, Germany; {dagger} Institute of Molecular Biology (Cancer Research), University of Essen Medical School, Essen, Germany; and {ddagger} Department of Molecular Immunology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
During thymic T cell development, immature CD4+/CD8+ thymocytes develop into either CD4+/CD8- helper or CD4-/CD8+ CTLs. The molecular mechanisms governing the complex selection and differentiation steps during thymic T cell development are not well understood. Here we developed a novel approach to investigate gene function during thymocyte development. We transfected ex vivo isolated immature thymocytes with gene-specific morpholino antisense oligonucleotides and induced differentiation in cell or organ cultures. A morpholino oligonucleotide specific for CD8{alpha} strongly reduces CD8 expression. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstrated gene knockdown by morpholino oligonucleotides in primary lymphocytes. Using this approach, we show here that the transcription factor Runx3 is involved in silencing of CD4 expression during CD8 T cell differentiation. Runx3 protein expression appears late in thymocyte differentiation and is confined to mature CD8 single-positive thymocytes, whereas Runx3 mRNA is transcribed in mature CD4 and CD8 thymocytes. Therefore, Runx3 protein expression is regulated at a post-transcriptional level. The knockdown of Runx3 protein expression through morpholino oligonucleotides inhibited the development of CD4-/CD8+ T cells. Instead, mature cells with a CD4+/CD8+ phenotype accumulated. Potential Runx binding sites were identified in the CD4 gene silencer element, which are bound by Runx protein in EMSAs. Mutagenesis of potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer abolished silencing activity in a reporter gene assay, indicating that Runx3 is involved in CD4 gene silencing. The experimental approach developed here should be valuable for the functional analysis of other candidate genes in T cell differentiation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The expression of the TCR-associated coreceptors CD4 and CD8 is closely associated with the complex selection and differentiation steps that immature T cells undergo in the thymus (1, 2). After having successfully rearranged their TCR {beta}-chain genes, CD4-/CD8- (double-negative (DN)3) T cells develop into CD4+/CD8+ (double positive (DP)) T cells, at which stage rearrangement of the TCR{alpha} genes takes place. These immature DP cells show a TCRlow phenotype. DP thymocytes then undergo negative or positive selection depending on the capacity of their TCRs to interact with thymic epithelial cells expressing self-peptides bound to MHC molecules. Positively selected thymocytes increase TCR expression and up-regulate the activation marker CD69; they are thus characterized by a CD4+/CD8+/CD69+/TCRint phenotype (3, 4, 5). Further differentiation leads to either mature CD4+/CD8- (single positive (SP)) Th cells activated by MHC class II/Ag complexes or CD4-/CD8+ SP CTLs interacting with MHC class I/Ag complexes. These mature thymocytes have a CD69-/TCRhigh phenotype. The close correlation of CD4 and CD8 gene expression with the differentiation process makes it likely that these mechanisms are functionally connected (6). Both the analysis of genes involved in CD4/CD8 gene regulation and the identification of genes differentially expressed during thymocyte differentiation may provide insight into the mechanisms governing T cell development in the thymus.

Gene function in thymocyte development has mostly been analyzed in time-consuming knockout or transgenic approaches. Functional gene inactivation (knockdown) appears a promising alternative. Here we have developed a novel approach that allows the efficient analysis of gene function during late T cell development. The approach is based on the transfection of ex vivo isolated intermediary DP thymocytes (CD69+/TCRint) with gene-specific antisense morpholino oligonucleotides. Differentiation of the transfected cells is induced by either IL-7 or in reaggregated thymic organ cultures (RTOC). To validate our approach, we show that CD8 expression is strongly reduced through a CD8{alpha}-specific morpholino antisense oligonucleotide.

Runx transcription factors play important roles in cell differentiation and proliferation. Runx1 (acute myeloid leukemia 1 (AML1)/core binding factor {alpha}2 (CBF{alpha}2)/polyoma enhancer binding protein 2{alpha}B (PEBP2{alpha}B)) is a master regulator of hemopoiesis and is frequently mutated in human AML (7). Runx2 (AML3/CBF{alpha}1/PEBP2{alpha}A) is essential for bone differentiation (8). Runx3 (AML2/CBF{alpha}3/PEBP2{alpha}C) is expressed in the hemopoietic system (9, 10, 11) and appears to be involved in myeloid and B cell differentiation (11, 12). Moreover, Runx3 was recently shown to be a potent suppressor of gastric cancer (13) and to regulate the development of dorsal root ganglia neurons (14). Runx proteins bind to DNA and heterodimerize with the common {beta} subunit, CBF{beta} (PEBP2{beta}) via the highly conserved Runt domain (7, 15). They bind to the consensus core motif PyGPyGGT (7, 15).

Several lines of evidence link Runx proteins to T cell differentiation. Overexpression of Runx1 or Runx2 transgenes in developing thymocytes leads to an increase in immature CD8 SP and DN thymocytes, respectively (16, 17). On the other hand, transgenic expression of a dominant negative form of AML1 (Runx1), which may also inhibit the function of the other Runx proteins, causes a reduction of both CD4 and CD8 SP cells in the thymus (18).

Using morpholino-mediated gene knockdown, we analyze here the role of Runx3 in CD4/CD8 T cell differentiation. We show that Runx3 protein is preferentially expressed in mature CD8 SP thymocytes (CD69-/TCRhigh), but in neither CD4 SP cells nor intermediary DP thymocytes showing signs of positive selection (CD69+/TCRint). Surprisingly, the corresponding Runx3 mRNA is expressed in similar amounts in mature CD4 and CD8 SP thymocytes. Runx3-specific morpholino oligonucleotides specifically block down-regulation of CD4 expression during the development of CD8 SP T cells in an IL-7-dependent cell culture system as well as in reaggregated thymic organ cultures. Instead, an increase in CD4+/CD8+ DP cells with a mature phenotype (TCRhigh/heat-stable Ag (HSA)low/CD69-/CD62Lhigh) and in CD4 SP cells is observed. Stable reporter gene assays with mutated potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer revealed that these sites might be involved in CD4 silencing. Taken together these results indicate that Runx3 is involved in the down-regulation of CD4 during thymocyte development.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice, cell lines, and cell culture

Thymocytes were isolated from 4- to 6-wk-old C57BL/6 mice. Thymocytes were cultured in IMDM with 10% FCS, 150 µg/ml streptomycin, 150 U/ml penicillin, 3 mM L-glutamine and 50 µM ME. TK-1-5 is a subclone of the murine CD4-/CD8+ lymphoma T cell line TK-1, and RLM-11-1 is a subclone of the murine CD4+/CD8- lymphoma T cell line RLM-11 (19, 20). Both lines are CD3+ and TCRhigh. TA3 is a murine B cell hybridoma. TK-1-5 and RLM-11 were cultured in RPMI, and TA3 was cultured in DMEM with 10% FCS, 150 µg/ml streptomycin, 150 U/ml penicillin, and 3 mM L-glutamine.

Thymocyte preparation

Total thymocytes were stained with the following Abs (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA): CyChrome-anti-CD4, PE-anti-CD8{alpha}, FITC-anti-CD69, allophycocyanin-anti-TCR{beta}, biotin-anti-HSA, biotin-anti-CD62L, and allophycocyanin-streptavidin. Stained thymocytes were sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry (MoFlo (Cytomation, Fort Collins, CO) and FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences)). For the isolation of CD69+/TCRint R3 cells, CD69+ cells were first enriched from total thymocytes by magnetic sorting (AutoMACS, Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and then further sorted by flow cytometry to obtain CD69+/TCRint thymocytes.

IL-7-induced thymocyte development

Sorted CD69+/TCRint (R3) thymocytes (2.5–3 x 106) were electroporated with morpholino oligonucleotides and cultured in complete IMDM. After 3 h, 3 ng/ml IL-7 (rmIL-7; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was added. After overnight incubation the cells were washed twice with PBS (37°C) and treated for 10 min with 100 µg/ml Pronase (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) and 100 µg/ml DNase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) in 1 ml PBS at 37°C. The reaction was stopped with 100 µl of FCS. The cells were further cultured with IL-7 for 2 days, stained with Abs, and analyzed by flow cytometry. After electroporation, overnight incubation, and subsequent Pronase treatment, including repeated washing and centrifugation steps, ~2–5% of cells were recovered as live cells. During further cultivation in IL-7, the cell numbers stayed relatively constant.

Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides, plasmids, and transfection

The following FITC-coupled morpholino antisense oligonucleotides were used (Gene Tools, Philomath, OR): mo-Runx3-1, 5'-tgctcgggtctacgggaatacgcat; mo-Runx3-2, 5'-gcgggaagcgggaggcgggaaggc; mo-CD8{alpha}, 5'-gaaagcgggtcaacggtgaggc; and control ({beta}-globin), 5'-cctcttacctcagttacaatttata. Both Runx3 oligonucleotides are complementary to sequences in exon 2 of Runx3.

Murine Runx3 cDNA (accession no. NM019732) corresponding to the form transcribed from the proximal promoter (exons 2–6) (21) and a comparable Runx1 construct (accession no. NM009821) were generated by PCR, cloned into cDNA expression vectors, and verified by sequencing.

Sorted CD69+/TCRint (R3) thymocytes were electroporated (Gene Pulser II; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) under the following conditions: 3 x 106 cells in 300 µl of RPMI with 25 µM HEPES (pH 7.0), 10–12 nmol of morpholino, 290 V, and 1000 µF (260 V, 950 µF for TK-1-5 and TA3 cells). FITC-positive TK-1-5 cells were sorted after overnight incubation by flow cytometry and electroporated a second time. Protein was isolated after overnight incubation. TA3 cells were cotransfected with Runx1- or Runx3-expressing plasmids and morpholino oligonucleotides and analyzed 24 h after transfection. All transfectants showed similar transfection efficiencies, as judged by the uptake of FITC-labeled morpholino oligonucleotides.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA of thymocyte populations was prepared with the Absolutely RNA kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). One microgram of total RNA was used to prepare single-strand cDNA with a (dT)15 primer and Expand reverse transcriptase (Roche). The following primers were used for quantitative real-time PCR measuring SYBR Green incorporation (Light-Cycler, Roche): murine Runx3 exons 2–4: forward, 5'-acgctgccggtcgccttca; reverse, 5'-gttcccggggtccatccaca (theoretical product length, 277 bp); murine Runx3 exons 1–2: forward, 5'-ttgtagcagcagggggagaaa; reverse, 5'-agaggaagttggggctgtcg (451 bp); and murine hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT): forward, 5'-gctggtgaaaaggacctct; reverse, 5'-cacaggactagaacacctgc (250 bp).

Western blot

Total protein extracts were prepared, and Western blotting was conducted as previously described (22). As primary Abs we used polyclonal rabbit antisera specific for the highly conserved C-terminal 15 aa of murine Runx1 (NMPPARLEEAVWRPY) (23), the 270 aa of the C terminus of human RUNX3 (11) (provided by Y. Groner), the 18 aa of exon 2 of murine Runx3 (Oncogene Research Products, San Diego, CA), or a mouse mAb against the housekeeping genes eIF4{alpha} and {beta}-actin. As secondary Abs we used peroxidase- or alkaline phosphatase-coupled rabbit- or murine-specific antisera (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA). For peptide competition experiments, 20 µl of the Runx1 peptide antiserum (23) was preincubated with 75 µg of the Runx1 peptide for 60 min on ice and then used for Western blotting.

RTOC

RTOC was conducted as previously described (5). Briefly, 14.5-day-old embryonal thymic lobes were cultured for 5 days on a swimming membrane in complete IMDM supplemented with 1.2 mM 2'-deoxyguanosine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) to kill the thymocytes. Thymic epithelium was disaggregated by trypsin treatment and reaggregated with sorted CD69+/TCRint (R3) thymocytes, which had been transfected with morpholino antisense oligonucleotides several hours previously (3–5 x 104 cells). The aggregates were cultured on a swimming membrane in complete IMDM for 4 days, mechanically disaggregated, stained with Abs, and analyzed by FACS. Some cell loss occurred during the aggregation and desegregation steps, so that ~0.5–1 x 104 thymocytes could be recovered from these cultures.

EMSA

Whole cell extracts and EMSA conditions were described previously (24). Extracts were incubated with 4 ng of the double-stranded radioactive Runx-a probe (5'-gccactgaaccacaagggtc) and, where applicable, with a 100-fold molar excess of wild-type or mutated (5'-gccactgaaaaaaaagggtc) unlabeled competitor or with anti-Runx antiserum. The underlined sequences represent wild-type or mutated putative Runx binding sites.

Stable reporter gene assays

Reporter constructs are based on the d2EGFP-N1 plasmid (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) containing a destabilized version of enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) as a reporter gene. Murine CD4 regulatory elements (25) were generated by PCR from genomic DNA and were verified by sequencing. The 1200-bp chicken {beta}-globin insulator element (26) was provided by G. Felsenfeld. Three silencer mutations, MutA, MutB, and MutC, in which guanosines in the TGTGGT sequences of the potential Runx binding sites, Runx-a, -b, or -c, in the CD4 silencer element were replaced by thymidines, were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Plasmids were linearized upstream of the CD4 enhancer/promoter element before transfection. Each construct was transfected by electroporation into the RLM-11-1 and TK-1-5 T cell lines under the following conditions: 5 x 106 cells in 300 µl of RPMI medium with 25 µM HEPES (pH 7.0), 5 µg of linearized DNA, 75 µg of tRNA, 250 V, and 950 µF. Cells were selected with G418 (TK-1-5, 0.9 mg/ml G418; RLM-11-1, 1.2 mg/ml) for 2–3 wk, and the stably transfected cell pools were analyzed by FACS for d2EGFP expression.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Functional gene inactivation in a cell culture T cell differentiation system

Late T cell differentiation progresses from CD4+/CD8+/CD69-/TCRlow cells to a population of CD69+/TCRint cells. These cells were called R3 by Barthlott and colleagues (5). R3 cells further differentiate via a CD69+/TCRhigh stage (R4) into either mature CD4+/CD8-/CD69-/TCRhigh or CD4-/CD8+/CD69-/TCRhigh SP thymocytes (5) (Fig. 1A). Here, we have adapted the IL-7-dependent in vitro T cell differentiation system of Brugnera and colleagues (27) for the analysis of candidate genes during late T cell differentiation. In contrast to Brugnera and colleagues, we used in vivo positively selected CD69+/TCRint R3 thymocytes as the starting population for IL-7-dependent thymocyte differentiation. After the first night of incubation with IL-7, the cells were subjected to a Pronase treatment to reveal more clearly the dynamic changes in gene expression (27). As shown in Fig. 1A, sorted CD69+/TCRint thymocytes (R3; panels 3 and 4) differentiate preferentially into CD8 SP cells with a mature CD69-/TCRhigh phenotype in the presence of IL-7 (panels 5 and 6). CD69+/TCRint cells therefore appeared to be a good starting population for the establishment of a functional test for CD8 T cell differentiation.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Thymocyte differentiation in an IL-7-dependent cell culture system and inhibition of CD8 expression by morpholino antisense oligonucleotides. A, Analysis of CD4/CD8 (panel 1) and CD69/TCR{beta} (panel 2) expression of total thymocytes by FACS. The sorting gates R3 and R4 are indicated in panel 2. Panels 3 and 4, Sorted R3 cells; panels 5 and 6, R3 cells after Pronase treatment and 3 days of culture with IL-7. The percentages of cells in each quadrant are shown. B, panel 1; FITC fluorescence of sorted R3 cells transfected with a FITC-coupled morpholino oligonucleotide specific for CD8{alpha} after Pronase treatment and 3 days of culture with IL-7. Vertical bars indicate the electronic gates set for the CD4/CD8 analysis of FITC-negative and FITC-positive cells in panels 2 and 3, respectively. The ratio between the relative cell numbers in the left and right quadrants in panels 2 and 3 is also shown.

 
Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides have been shown to inhibit protein expression very efficiently and specifically by blocking mRNA translation (28). We tested the feasibility of a morpholino antisense approach for the analysis of T cell differentiation with an oligonucleotide specific for CD8{alpha} (Fig. 1B). FITC-coupled morpholino oligonucleotides permit the identification of transfected and untransfected cells, with the oligonucleotide-negative cells serving as the internal negative control of the experiment. Transfection efficiencies were on the order of 10–30% in different experiments. Sorted CD69+/TCRint cells were transfected with the CD8{alpha} morpholino antisense oligonucleotide by electroporation and cultivated with IL-7. Comparison of FITC-negative and FITC-positive cells revealed a clear reduction of CD8 expression in cells transfected with the CD8{alpha} morpholino (Fig. 1B). This indicated that the expression of even highly expressed genes such as CD8{alpha} can be inhibited in our experimental system.

Runx3 protein is expressed in CD8 SP thymocytes, but not in CD4 SP or immature thymocytes

We analyzed Runx3 protein expression in different thymocyte subsets by Western blotting (Fig. 2, A–C). With an antiserum specific for the highly conserved 15 aa in the C terminus of murine Runx1 that also interacts with murine Runx2 and Runx3 (16, 23), we detected a protein of 50 kDa in mature CD8 SP thymocytes, which probably corresponds to Runx3 (Fig. 2A, indicated by the arrow). This protein cannot be detected in mature CD4 SP cells, in intermediary CD4+/CD8+/CD69+/TCRint R3 cells, or in total thymocytes, which consist mostly of CD4+/CD8+/CD69-/TCRlow cells. Preincubation of serum with the peptide used for immunization led to the disappearance of the band (Fig. 2A). Similar results were obtained with an antiserum raised against the C-terminal 270 aa of human RUNX3 that also reacts with murine Runx3 (11) (Fig. 2B). Identification of Runx3 was further confirmed with an antiserum specific for 18 aa encoded by exon 2 of murine Runx3 in the CD4-/CD8+ T cell line TK-1-5. This antiserum detected the same 50-kDa band as the Runx peptide-specific serum used in Fig. 2A (Fig. 2C), but was too weak to detect Runx3 in protein extracts of thymocyte fractions (data not shown). With all three antisera, a single or double band of 56 kDa was recognized, probably corresponding to Runx1 (16) (Fig. 2, A–C). Transfection of Runx1 and Runx3 cDNAs into the B cell line TA3 led to the appearance of a 56- or 50-kDa band, respectively (Fig. 3B). This is further evidence that the Runx protein expressed differentially in thymocytes is indeed Runx3. Runx3 protein expression thus appears late in T cell development and only in CD8 SP T cells.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Runx3 protein is expressed in mature CD8 SP, but not in CD4 SP thymocytes. A, Equal amounts of protein extracts (20 µg) from different thymocyte subpopulations were analyzed by Western immunoblotting with an antiserum specific for a C-terminal, 15-aa peptide of murine Runx1. This antiserum also recognizes murine Runx3. The arrow indicates the position of the 50-kDa Runx3 band (upper panel). The same blot was reprobed with antiserum that had been preincubated with an excess of the C-terminal, 15-aa Runx1 peptide (middle panel). The asterisk indicates an unspecific band, which is not outcompeted by the peptide. The lower panel shows a reprobing of the blot with antisera against eIF4{alpha} and {beta}-actin. B, Analysis of Runx3 expression in thymocyte subpopulations with an antiserum specific for 270 aa of the C terminus of human RUNX3. This antiserum also recognizes murine Runx3. C, Protein extract of the T lymphoma cell line TK-1-5 (50 µg) was analyzed with an antiserum specific for a peptide encoded within exon 2 of Runx3 (left). The blot was reprobed with the serum specific for the C-terminal, 15-aa peptide of Runx1 (right). D, Schematic presentation of the RUNX3 gene locus (adapted from Ref.21 ). Numbered exons are boxed; coding sequences are shown in black. SA, splice acceptor site. E, Runx3 mRNA expression (exons 2–4) of sorted thymic subpopulations was analyzed by quantitative real time RT-PCR (DN, CD4-/CD8-; DP, CD4+/CD8+/CD69-/TCRlow). Expression levels were normalized to HPRT mRNA expression and are shown relative to the expression in CD4-/CD8+/CD69-/TCRhigh cells. AU, arbitrary units. A second experiment yielded similar results.

 


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Inhibition of Runx3 protein expression by morpholino antisense oligonucleotides. A, The murine CD4-/CD8+ T cell line TK-1-5 was transfected twice with morpholino oligonucleotides (Mo.), either control morpholino (cont.; lanes 1 and 3) or the mo-Runx3-1 oligonucleotide specific for Runx3 (Rx3-1; lanes 2 and 4). Equal amounts of protein extracts were analyzed by Western blotting with the same two antisera as in Fig. 2A, B, The position of the 50-kDa Runx3 band is indicated (upper panel). The lower panel shows a reprobing of the same blot with an antiserum against {beta}-actin. B, The murine B lymphoma cell line TA-3 was cotransfected with plasmids (P) expressing murine Runx1 (Rx1; lanes 2–4) or Runx3 (Rx3; lanes 6–8) and with morpholino oligonucleotides (Mo.), either control morpholino (cont.; lanes 3 and 7) or the mo-Runx3-1 oligonucleotide specific for Runx3 (Rx3-1; lanes 4 and 8). Runx protein expression was analyzed by Western blotting. The positions of the Runx1 and Runx3 bands are indicated. The blot was reprobed with an Ab specific for eIF4A as a loading control.

 
Expression of Runx3 is controlled at the post-transcriptional level

All three Runx family members are expressed from two independent promoters, and different splice forms have been described for all three genes (10, 21, 29, 30, 31). We investigated the expression of Runx3 mRNA in various thymocyte subpopulations (Fig. 2, D and E). Runx3 has six exons, with exon 1 being transcribed from the distal promoter 1, and exons 2–6 situated downstream of the proximal promoter 2 (Fig. 2D; nomenclature according to Ref.21). The runt DNA binding domain spans exons 2–4. Runx3 transcripts starting with exon 1 use either a splice acceptor site in exon 2 or,in the case of splice variants, the splice acceptor site of another exon (21). Judging from the calculated molecular masses of the different forms of Runx3, the protein found in CD8 SP cells probably corresponds to a Runx3 form transcribed from promoter 2 containing exons 2–6 or to a form transcribed from promoter 1 containing all six exons (Fig. 2D). Contrary to expectations from the protein expression data, we found by quantitative real-time PCR with a primer pair specific for exons 2 and 4 that this mRNA is present in similar amounts in CD4 SP and CD8 SP thymocytes (Fig. 2E). Gel electrophoresis and sequence analysis revealed a unique amplification product of the expected size and sequence of a Runx3 form containing exons 2, 3, and 4 (data not shown). No transcripts derived from usage of promoter 1 could be detected with a primer pair spanning exons 1 and 2 (data not shown). Therefore, the main Runx3 mRNA in thymocytes is expressed from promoter 2, and Runx3 protein expression must be controlled at the post-transcriptional level.

Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides inhibit Runx3 protein expression

To investigate the role of Runx3 during thymocyte development we attempted to reduce the protein level of Runx3 by morpholino antisense oligonucleotides. We generated a morpholino antisense oligonucleotide that is complementary to a sequence overlapping the AUG in exon 2 of Runx3 (mo-Runx3-1). This oligonucleotide was tested in the murine CD4-/CD8+ T cell line TK-1-5. After transfection of an FITC-coupled control or the Runx3-specific morpholino antisense oligonucleotide into this cell line, the protein level of Runx3 was analyzed by Western blotting with two Runx-specific antisera. Both antisera revealed an almost complete inhibition of Runx3 protein expression by the Runx3-specific morpholino oligonucleotide (Fig. 3A). This oligonucleotide was also tested in TA3 cells transfected with cDNAs coding for murine Runx1or Runx3. The 56-kDa band apparent in Runx1-transfected cells was not affected by either the control or mo-Runx3-1 oligonucleotide, whereas the expression of Runx3 was reduced to background levels by the specific oligonucleotide (Fig. 3B).

Knockdown of Runx3 inhibits down-regulation of CD4 expression during development of CD8 SP thymocytes in an IL-7-dependent cell culture system

The mo-Runx3-1 morpholino antisense oligonucleotide was used to transfect sorted CD69+/TCRint R3 thymocytes to analyze their development in the IL-7 cell culture assay (Fig. 4). Comparison of FITC-negative and FITC-positive cells transfected with a control oligonucleotide specific for {beta}-globin showed a similar pattern of CD4 and CD8 expression after IL-7 culture (Fig. 4, panels 2 and 3), with the exception of a slight decrease in CD8 SP cells and a corresponding increase in CD4 SP cells in control morpholino-transfected, FITC-positive cells. Transfection of CD69+/TCRint thymocytes with control morpholino oligonucleotides therefore does not influence T cell differentiation.



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides specific for Runx3 inhibit the down-regulation of CD4 expression during the development of CD4-/CD8+ thymocytes. Sorted R3 cells were transfected with FITC-coupled morpholino oligonucleotide specific for {beta}-globin (control; panels 1–3) or for Runx3 (mo-Runx3-1; panels 4–6), treated with Pronase, and cultured for 3 days with IL-7. Panels 1 and 4, FITC fluorescence of the transfected cells after 3 days of culture. Vertical bars indicate the electronic gates set for analysis of CD4/CD8 expression of FITC-negative (panels 2 and 5) and FITC-positive (panels 3 and 6) cells. The percentage of the cells in each quadrant is shown. The ratios between the relative cell numbers in the upper right (UR; DP cells) and lower right (LR; CD8 SP cells) quadrants in panels 2, 3, 5, and 6 from three independent experiments are shown. Panel 7, HSA (x-axis) and CD4 expression (y-axis) of different thymocyte subpopulations as indicated in the figure. Panels 8 and 9, HSA expression (x-axis) of cells transfected with the control morpholino (panel 8) or the mo-Runx3-1 morpholino (panel 9) for each of the four CD4/CD8 quadrant regions. Morpholino-dependent FITC expression is shown on the y-axis. Panels 10–12, Corresponding analysis of CD62L (L-selectin) expression.

 
In thymocytes transfected with the mo-Runx3-1 antisense oligonucleotide, a clear effect on the down-regulation of CD4 expression during CD8 T cell differentiation could be observed (Fig. 4, panels 5 and 6). In FITC-positive cells (Fig. 4, panel 6) a considerable reduction of CD8 SP cells (lower right quadrant) was found that was accompanied by an increase in DP cells (upper right quadrant) and also by an increase in the CD4 SP population (upper left quadrant). The FITC-negative cells showed a similar distribution as the control morpholino-transfected cells (Fig. 4, panel 5).

To test the specificity of our approach, a second Runx3-specific morpholino oligonucleotide (mo-Runx3-2) was tested that is complementary to a region 5' of the AUG in exon 2. This oligonucleotide gave comparable results to the first morpholino oligonucleotide (Fig. 5).



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. A second morpholino antisense oligonucleotide specific for Runx3 (mo-Runx3-2) reduces the development of CD4-/CD8+ thymocytes. Analysis was conducted as described above. Panels 7 and 8, CD69 expression (x-axis) of cells transfected with the control morpholino (panel 7) or with the mo-Runx3-2 morpholino (panel 8) for each of the four CD4/CD8 quadrant regions. Morpholino-dependent FITC expression is shown on the y-axis.

 
The maturation status of the Runx3 morpholino-transfected, FITC-positive, DP cells was examined via their expression of the markers TCR, CD69, HSA, and CD62L (L-selectin). In experiments with both oligonucleotides, the Runx3 morpholino-transfected, FITC-positive, DP cells showed a TCRhigh, HSAlow, CD62Lhigh, CD69- phenotype indicative of a late stage of thymocyte maturation (Fig. 4, panels 7–12; Fig. 5, panels 7 and 8; and data not shown) (5, 32, 33). This is an indication that the morpholino-mediated Runx3 knockdown interferes with down-regulation of CD4 expression, but not with maturation.

Knockdown of Runx3 inhibits down-regulation of CD4 expression during development of CD8 SP thymocytes in RTOC

We also tested the capacity of the morpholino-transfected thymocytes to differentiate in RTOC experiments. Sorted CD69+/TCRint (R3) thymocytes were reaggregated with thymic epithelial cells from 14.5-day-old mouse embryos (5). After 4 days the reaggregated thymi were analyzed by FACS. Most of the CD69+/TCRint thymocytes develop into CD69-/TCRhigh CD4 and CD8 SP T cells (Fig. 6 and data not shown). In this culture system more CD4 SP than CD8 SP thymocytes are normally obtained. The sorted CD69+/TCRint (R3) thymocytes were transfected as before with the mo-Runx3-1 or a control oligonucleotide and then reaggregated with the thymic epithelial cells (Fig. 6, panels 1 and 4). Both the FITC-negative and FITC-positive cells transfected with the control morpholino showed a similar differentiation pattern (Fig. 6, panels 2 and 3). In the cells transfected with mo-Runx3-1, the FITC-negative cells showed a similar differentiation as the control oligonucleotide-transfected cells, whereas the FITC-positive cells showed a severe reduction in CD8 SP cells and an increase in DP and CD4 SP cells (Fig. 6, panels 5 and 6). Repeated experiments led to very similar results (Fig. 6). DP cells in the mo-Runx3-1-transfected cultures showed a mature TCRhigh and CD69- phenotype, indicating again that inhibition of Runx3 function did not interfere with thymocyte maturation, but, rather, counteracted the down-regulation of CD4 during the development of CD8 SP cells (Fig. 6, panels 7 and 8, and data not shown).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Inhibition of CD4-/CD8+ thymocyte development by a Runx3-specific morpholino oligonucleotide in RTOC experiments. Sorted R3 (CD69+/TCRint) thymocytes were transfected with FITC-coupled control morpholino (panels 1–3) or morpholino antisense oligonucleotide against Runx3 (mo-Runx3-1; panels 4–6), reaggregated with embryonic thymic epithelial cells, and cultivated for 4 days. CD4/CD8 expression of FITC-negative (panels 2 and 5) or FITC-positive cells (panels 3 and 6) is shown. The proportions of FITC-negative (panels 2 and 5) and FITC-positive cells (panels 3 and 6) in the upper right (UR; DP cells) and lower right (LR; CD8 SP cells) quadrants from three independent experiments are shown. Panels 7 and 8, TCR{beta} expression of the cells from the first experiment (panels 1–6) in the four CD4/CD8 quadrants.

 
Potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer bind Runx proteins and are functionally important for silencing

The silencer element in the first intron of the CD4 gene mediates down-regulation of CD4 expression during the differentiation of CD8 SP thymocytes (25, 34, 35, 36). Analysis of the 434-bp murine CD4 silencer sequence revealed three potential Runx binding sites (TGTGGT), Runx-a, -b, and -c (positions 82–87, 233–238, and 248–253; Fig. 7A). With whole cell extracts of the T lymphoma cell line TK-1-5, a double-stranded probe corresponding to the Runx-a site led to a band shift in EMSAs (Fig. 7B). Binding was efficiently competed for by an unlabeled competitor Runx-a oligonucleotide, but not by a mutated oligonucleotide. Addition of a Runx-specific antiserum induced a supershift indicating that the Runx-a binding site of CD4 silencer is indeed bound by Runx protein in Tk-1-5 (Fig. 7B). The functional importance of these potential Runx binding sites for silencing was analyzed in a reporter gene assay based on the stable transfection of murine T lymphoma cell lines (Fig. 7, C and D). In the mutated constructs (MutA, -B, and -C) the guanosines in the respective potential Runx binding sites were changed by point mutations to thymidines. Stable transfection of the constructs into the murine CD4+CD8- T lymphoma cell line RLM-11-1 showed a uniform expression of the reporter gene regardless of the presence or absence of a wild-type or mutated silencer element in the different constructs (data not shown). The same constructs were used to generate stable transfectants in the murine CD4-/CD8+ T lymphoma cell line TK-1-5. The presence of the CD4 silencer element reduced the expression of the EGFP reporter by ~50% (Fig. 7D, lanes 1 and 2). Mutations in the potential Runx binding sites Runx-a and Runx-c (MutA and MutC; lanes 3 and 5) abolished silencing activity completely, while mutation of site Runx-b had only a small effect (lane 4). These results indicate that mutations in potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer can reduce the silencing effect.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Functional analysis of potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 silencer element. A, Sequence of the 434-bp SacI-XbaI murine CD4 silencer element. {blacksquare}, The three potential Runx binding sites, Runx-a, -b, and -c. B, Band shift assay with a Runx-a radioactive probe. The indicated cell equivalents of whole cell extracts of the murine CD4-/CD8+ T cell line TK-1-5 were incubated with the probe. Reactions were performed in the absence (lanes 2–4) or the presence of a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled wild-type (wt; lanes 5–7) or mutated (M; lanes 8–10) competitor Runx-a oligonucleotides (comp.). For supershift experiments the extract was preincubated with an antiserum against the C-terminal, 15-aa peptide of murine Runx1, which also recognizes murine Runx3 (antib.; lane 13). C, Schematic representation of the different reporter constructs. E, CD4 proximal enhancer (343-bp BstXI-AvaII fragment); P, CD4 promoter (492-bp XbaI-XhoI fragment); EGFP, reporter gene d2EGFP; sil, CD4 silencer element (434-bp SacI-XbaI fragment); silM, 434-bp murine CD4 silencer element mutated in the Runx binding site a, b, or c; black vertical bar, chicken {beta}-globin insulator element; SV, SV40 enhancer/promoter; R, neo resistance gene. D, Reporter gene analysis in the murine CD4-/CD8+ T cell line TK-1-5. EGFP expression of the different constructs in stable transfected cell lines was measured by flow cytometry as the percentage of EGFP-positive cells. The analysis gate was set so that untransfected cells (Neg. control) showed 0.1–1% positive cells. The average expression and SE of four independent transfections for each construct are shown.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Here we have developed a novel assay to investigate T cell development based on the inhibition of gene expression via morpholino antisense oligonucleotides during thymocyte differentiation. Morpholino oligonucleotides have been found to be excellent tools for the functional inactivation of gene expression mainly in zebrafish, but also in other species and in cell culture (28, 37). As a target population for our morpholino oligonucleotides we used ex vivo immature thymocytes (CD69+/TCRint R3 cells), which are cells that have received a positive selection signal, but still have the potential to develop into both CD4 SP and CD8 SP cells (3, 4, 5). The feasibility of our antisense approach was demonstrated by inhibition of CD8 expression during thymocyte differentiation with a morpholino oligonucleotide specific for CD8{alpha} (Fig. 1B). This is the first demonstration of a morpholino-mediated gene inactivation in primary lymphocytes. Morpholino-dependent fluorescence of transfected R3 cells does not decline significantly during the culture period (data not shown), thus confirming earlier observations that cells differentiating from the DP to the SP stage do not proliferate (38). Recently, gene inactivation in primary T lymphocytes through small interfering RNAs has been reported (39). However, only in vitro stimulated, actively dividing cells could be transfected in that case (39). Our approach therefore presents the advantage that nondividing primary cells can also be targeted efficiently.

Using this novel approach, we show here that Runx3 is involved in down-regulation of CD4 expression during CD8 T cell differentiation. Having first shown morpholino-dependent inhibition of Runx3 expression in cell lines (Fig. 3), we observed inhibition of CD4 silencing during CD8 T cell differentiation with two different Runx3-specific morpholino oligonucleotides in an IL-7-dependent T cell differentiation culture system and in RTOC experiments (Figs. 4–6). The fact that two distinct, nonoverlapping oligonucleotides lead to a very similar effect argues for a specific, Runx3-dependent effect. In both types of experiments the newly appearing population of FITC-positive, Runx3 morpholino-transfected CD4+/CD8+ DP cells showed a phenotype indicative of a late maturation stage (TCRhigh, HSAlow, CD69-, CD62Lhigh; Figs. 4–6) (5, 32, 33). This indicates that the Runx3 morpholinos do not simply block the differentiation of R3 cells (TCRint/HSAhigh/CD69+/CD62Llow/-; Figs. 1, 4–6); rather, they appear to interfere with the down-regulation of CD4 expression. The functional maturation status of the Runx3 morpholino-transfected CD4+/CD8+ DP cells could not be tested because of the relatively low cell numbers recovered in this experimental system.

While this manuscript was in preparation, Taniuchi and colleagues (40, 41) reported on the importance of Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer and the function of Runx proteins for CD4 gene repression. Runx3 was found to be important for CD4 gene repression during the generation of CD8 SP CTLs, while Runx1 is required for CD4 gene repression at the CD4-/CD8- DN stage (41). The knockout of Runx2 did not have an effect on thymocyte differentiation (41). These results strongly support the validity of the experimental approach presented here. In agreement with our findings, Taniuchi and colleagues (41) found the expression of Runx3 mRNA to a similar extent in CD4 SP and CD8 SP thymocytes; Runx3 protein expression, however, was not analyzed. We show here that Runx3 protein is expressed differentially during T cell differentiation (Fig. 2). It is found exclusively in mature (CD69-/TCRhigh) CD8 SP thymocytes, but not in late DP thymocytes (CD69+/TCRint R3 cells) or in mature CD4 SP thymocytes. Potentially, Runx3 protein expression in developing thymocytes is therefore not only necessary, but may also be sufficient to induce CD4 gene repression. The discrepancy between mRNA and protein expression also demonstrates that this crucial step of T cell differentiation is regulated by an unknown post-transcriptional mechanism. It has been reported that Runx1 is protected from ubiquitin-mediated degradation through dimerization with the PEBP2{beta} subunit (42). Whether the same is true for Runx3 is not known. However, we found similar expression of PEBP2{beta} mRNA in different thymocyte subpopulations (unpublished observations).

Taniuchi and colleagues (41) found decreased numbers of peripheral Runx3-/- CD8 cells (both CD8 SP and DP) and showed also a reduced proliferation of such cells in response to stimuli. Runx3 may therefore play also a role in survival and/or proliferation of CD8-positive cells. Our observation of relatively increased numbers of CD4 SP cells in Runx3 morpholino-treated cell culture and RTOC experiments may be related to this phenomenon.

Repression of CD4 gene expression is mediated by a silencer element located in the first intron of the CD4 gene (25, 34, 35, 36, 40, 41, 43). Deletion of this element leads to mature CD4+/CD8+ DP cells with cytotoxic potential (35, 36). Several cis-acting elements have been identified within the CD4 gene silencer, and there is a partial redundancy of function of different elements (40, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47).

The 434-bp murine CD4 silencer element contains three potential Runx binding sites (Runx-a, -b, and -c; Fig. 7). Runx-a and Runx-b correspond to sites 2' and 2 reported by Taniuchi and colleagues, respectively (40, 41). Sites 2' and 2 were found to be important for CD4 gene silencing in vivo by knockin point mutations in the CD4 gene locus. Mutation of either site 2' (Runx-a) or 2 (Runx-b) alone had little effect, but the combined mutation of both sites abolished CD4 silencing (41). The Runx-c site was not analyzed in vivo, but was shown to contribute to CD4 silencing in transient reporter assays in the CD4-/CD8+ T cell line 1200M (41). While our results confirm the importance of site Runx-a (site 2') and show also a contribution of site Runx-c to CD4 silencing, mutation of site Runx-b (site 2) did not appear to contribute to silencing in the TK-1-5 cell line (Fig. 7). Taniuchi and colleagues (41) also found differences in the requirements for CD4 silencer elements when comparing the results from the 1200M cell line with those from transgenic experiments. However, taken together, our results substantiate the functional importance of Runx binding sites for CD4 gene silencing.

Runx transcription factors have been shown to be able to activate or repress transcription in a context-dependent manner involving interactions with other regulatory factors (7, 15, 48). Several other cis-acting elements in the CD4 silencer element have recently been shown through homologous recombination to play a role in the CD4 silencing mechanism (40). Therefore, it is probable that other factors binding to the silencer are required in conjunction with Runx proteins for repression. The evidence provided here indicates, however, that Runx3 is to date the only factor acting on the silencer, which is differentially expressed by CD4 and CD8 SP thymocytes. This points to a crucial role of Runx3 expression for the establishment of the CD4 silencing mechanism.

In conclusion, we show here that Runx3 plays an important role in CD4 silencing during CD8 T cell differentiation. The experimental system we have developed here should be useful to study the function of other genes during thymocyte differentiation. In this manner it is, for example, possible to study the function of genes during the late phase of T cell differentiation, even if their deletion by homologous recombination blocks T cell differentiation at an early stage. This approach may be especially powerful in combination with the recently described Notch signaling pathway-dependent cell culture system for T cell differentiation (49). We have recently undertaken a microarray-based gene expression analysis of T cell differentiation and have identified a number of candidate genes for positive selection and lineage decision. These can now be efficiently analyzed through the approach described here.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank J. Kranich, H. König, T. Kuri, and S. Wössner for help with some experiments, Dr. H. Mossmann for providing mice, Dr. Y. Groner for the antiserum against RUNX3, Dr. P. Nielsen for the mAb against eIF4{alpha}, and Dr. G. Felsenfeld for the plasmid pJ13-1 containing the insulator element. We thank Dr. T. Boehm for discussion, and Drs. J. Kirberg and K. Eichmann for critical reading of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Max Planck Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Marc Ehlers, Institute of Molecular Biology (Cancer Research), University of Essen Medical School, Hufelandstrasse 55, D-45134 Essen, Germany. E-mail: marc.ehlers{at}uni-essen.de. Or to Dr. Viktor Steimle, Département de Biologie, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 boulevard Université, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada J1K 2R1. E-mail address: viktor.steimle{at}usherbrooke.ca Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: DN, double negative; aa, amino acid; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CBF, core binding factor; DP, double positive; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescence protein; HPRT, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase; HSA, heat-stable Ag; PEBP, polyoma enhancer binding protein; RTOC, reaggregated thymic organ culture; Runx, runt domain factor; SP, single positive. Back

Received for publication February 21, 2003. Accepted for publication July 23, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Starr, T. K., S. C. Jameson, K. A. Hogquist. 2003. Positive and negative T cell selection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21:139.[Medline]
  2. Germain, R. N.. 2002. T-cell development and the CD4-CD8 lineage decision. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:309.[Medline]
  3. Bendelac, A., P. Matzinger, R. A. Seder, W. E. Paul, R. H. Schwartz. 1992. Activation events during thymic selection. J. Exp. Med. 175:731.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lucas, B., R. N. Germain. 1996. Unexpectedly complex regulation of CD4/CD8 coreceptor expression supports a revised model for CD4+CD8+ thymocyte differentiation. Immunity 5:461.[Medline]
  5. Barthlott, T., H. Kohler, K. Eichmann. 1997. Asynchronous coreceptor downregulation after positive thymic selection: prolonged maintance of the double positive state in CD8 linage differentiation due to sustained biosynthesis of the CD4 coreceptor. J. Exp. Med. 185:357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hedrick, S. M.. 2002. T cell development: bottoms-up. Immunity 16:619.[Medline]
  7. Lutterbach, B., S. W. Hiebert. 2000. Role of the transcription factor AML-1 in acute leukemia and hematopoietic differentiation. Gene 245:223.[Medline]
  8. Komori, T., H. Yagi, S. Nomura, A. Yamaguchi, K. Sasaki, K. Deguchi, Y. Shimizu, R. T. Bronson, Y. H. Gao, M. Inada, et al 1997. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 89:755.[Medline]
  9. Levanon, D., V. Negreanu, Y. Bernstein, I. Bar-Am, L. Avivi, Y. Groner. 1994. AML1, AML2, and AML3, the human members of the runt domain gene-family: cDNA structure, expression, and chromosomal localisation. Genomics 23:425.[Medline]
  10. Levanon, D., Y. Bernstein, V. Negreanu, M. C. Ghozi, I. Bar-Am, R. Aloya, D. Goldenberg, J. Lotem, Y. Groner. 1996. A large variety of alternatively spliced and differentially expressed mRNAs are encoded by the human acute myeloid leukemia gene AML1. DNA Cell Biol. 15:175.[Medline]
  11. Le, X.-F., Y. Groner, S. M. Kornblau, Y. Gu, W. N. Hittelman, D. Levanon, K. Mehta, R. B. Arlinghaus, K.-S. Chang. 1999. Regulation of AML2/CBFA3 in hematopoietic cells through the retinoic acid receptor {alpha}-dependent signaling pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274:21651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Shi, M. J., J. Stavnezer. 1998. CBF{alpha}3 (AML2) is induced by TGF-{beta}1 to bind and activate the mouse germline Ig {alpha} promoter. J. Immunol. 161:6751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Li, Q. L., K. Ito, C. Sakakura, H. Fukamachi, K. Inoue, X. Z. Chi, K. Y. Lee, S. Nomura, C. W. Lee, S. B. Han, et al 2002. Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression and gastric cancer. Cell 109:113.[Medline]
  14. Levanon, D., D. Bettoun, C. Harris-Cerruti, E. Woolf, V. Negreanu, R. Eilam, Y. Bernstein, D. Goldenberg, C. Xiao, M. Fliegauf, et al 2002. The Runx3 transcription factor regulates development and survival of TrkC dorsal root ganglia neurons. EMBO J. 21:3454.[Medline]
  15. Ito, Y.. 1999. Molecular basis of tissue-specific gene expression mediated by the runt domain transcription factor PEBP2/CBF. Genes Cells 4:685.[Abstract]
  16. Hayashi, K., N. Abe, T. Watanabe, M. Obinata, M. Ito, T. Sato, S. Habu, M. Satake. 2001. Overexpression of AML1 transcription factor drives thymocytes into the CD8 single-positive lineage. J. Immunol. 167:4957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Vaillant, F., K. Blyth, L. Andrew, J. C. Neil, E. R. Cameron. 2002. Enforced expression of Runx2 perturbs T cell development at a stage coincident with {beta}-selection. J. Immunol. 169:2866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Hayashi, K., W. Natsume, T. Watanabe, N. Abe, N. Iwai, H. Okada, Y. Ito, M. Asano, Y. Iwakura, S. Habu, et al 2000. Diminution of the AML1 transcription factor function causes differential effects on the fates of CD4 and CD8 single-positive T cells. J. Immunol. 165:6816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hahne, M., M. Lenter, U. Jager, S. Isenmann, D. Vestweber. 1993. VCAM-1 is not involved in LPAM-1 ({alpha}4{beta}p/{alpha}4{beta}7) mediated binding of lymphoma cells to high endothelial venules of mucosa-associated lymph nodes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 61:290.[Medline]
  20. Landry, D. B., J. D. Engel, R. Sen. 1993. Functional GATA-3 binding sites within murine CD8{alpha} upstream regulatory sequences. J. Exp. Med. 178:941.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bangsow, C., N. Rubins, G. Glusman, Y. Bernstein, V. Negreanu, D. Goldenberg, J. Lotem, E. Ben-Asher, D. Lancet, D. Levanon, et al 2001. The RUNX3 gene: sequence, structure and regulated expression. Gene 279:221.[Medline]
  22. Hake, S. B., K. Masternak, C. Kammerbauer, C. Janzen, W. Reith, V. Steimle. 2000. CIITA leucine-rich repeats control nuclear localization, in vivo recruitment to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II enhanceosome, and MHC class II gene transactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:7716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kanto, S., N. Chiba, Y. Tanaka, S. Fujita, M. Endo, N. Kamada, K. Yoshikawa, A. Fukuzaki, S. Orikasa, T. Watanabe, et al 2000. The PEBP2{beta}/CBF{beta}-SMMHC chimeric protein is localized both in the cell membrane and nuclear subfractions of leukemic cells carrying chromosomal inversion 16. Leukemia 14:1253.[Medline]
  24. Tanaka, Y., T. Watanabe, N. Chiba, M. Niki, Y. Kuroiwa, T. Nishihira, S. Satomi, Y. Ito, M. Satake. 1997. The protooncogene product, PEBP2{beta}/CBF{beta}, is mainly located in the cytoplasm and has an affinity with cytoskeletal structures. Oncogene 15:677.[Medline]
  25. Sawada, S., J. D. Scarborough, N. Killeen, D. R. Littman. 1994. A lineage-specific transcriptional silencer regulates CD4 gene expression during T lymphocyte development. Cell 77:917.[Medline]
  26. Chung, J. H., M. Whiteley, G. Felsenfeld. 1993. A 5' element of the chicken {beta}-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effects in drosophila. Cell 74:505.[Medline]
  27. Brugnera, E., A. Bhandoola, R. Cibotti, Q. Yu, T. I. Guinter, Y. Yamashita, S. O. Sharrow, A. Singer. 2000. Coreceptor reversal in the thymus: signaled CD4+8+ thymocytes initially terminate CD8 transcription even when differentiating into CD8+ T cells. Immunity 13:59.[Medline]
  28. Heasman, J.. 2002. Morpholino oligos: making sense of antisense?. Dev. Biol. 243:209.[Medline]
  29. Zhang, Y. W., S. C. Bae, G. Huang, Y. X. Fu, J. Lu, M. Y. Ahn, Y. Kanno, T. Kanno, Y. Ito. 1997. A novel transcript encoding an N-terminally truncated AML1/PEBP2 {alpha}B protein interferes with transactivation and blocks granulocytic differentiation of 32Dcl3 myeloid cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17:4133.[Abstract]
  30. Xiao, Z. S., R. Thomas, T. K. Hinson, L. D. Quarles. 1998. Genomic structure and isoform expression of the mouse, rat and human Cbfa1/Osf2 transcription factor. Gene 214:187.[Medline]
  31. Levanon, D., G. Glusman, T. Bangsow, E. Ben-Asher, D. A. Male, N. Avidan, C. Bangsow, M. Hattori, T. D. Taylor, S. Taudien, et al 2001. Architecture and anatomy of the genomic locus encoding the human leukemia-associated transcription factor RUNX1/AML1. Gene 262:23.[Medline]
  32. Jung, T. M., W. M. Gallatin, I. L. Weissman, M. O. Dailey. 1988. Down-regulation of homing receptors after T cell activation. J. Immunol. 141:4110.[Abstract]
  33. Tian, T., J. Zhang, L. Gao, X. P. Qian, W. F. Chen. 2001. Heterogeneity within medullary-type TCR{alpha}{beta}+CD3+CD4-CD8+ thymocytes in normal mouse thymus. Int. Immunol. 13:313.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Siu, G., A. L. Wurster, D. D. Duncan, T. M. Soliman, S. M. Hedrick. 1994. A transcriptional silencer controls the developmental expression of the CD4 gene. EMBO J. 13:3570.[Medline]
  35. Leung, R. K., K. Thomson, A. Gallimore, E. Jones, M. Van den Broek, S. Sierro, A. R. Alsheikhly, A. McMichael, A. Rahemtulla. 2001. Deletion of the CD4 silencer element supports a stochastic mechanism of thymocyte lineage commitment. Nat. Immunol. 2:1167.[Medline]
  36. Zou, Y.-R., M.-J. Sunshine, I. Taniuchi, F. Hatam, N. Killeen, D. R. Littman. 2001. Epigenetic silencing of CD4 in T cells committed to the cytotoxic lineage. Nat. Genet. 29:357.[Medline]
  37. Summerton, J., D. Weller. 1997. Morpholino antisense oligomers: design, preparation, and properties. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 7:187.[Medline]
  38. Shortman, K., M. Egerton, G. J. Spangrude, R. Scollay. 1990. The generation and fate of thymocytes. Semin. Immunol. 2:3.[Medline]
  39. McManus, M. T., B. B. Haines, C. P. Dillon, C. E. Whitehurst, L. van Parijs, J. Chen, P. A. Sharp. 2002. Small interfering RNA-mediated gene silencing in T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 169:5754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Taniuchi, I., M. J. Sunshine, R. Festenstein, D. R. Littman. 2002. Evidence for distinct CD4 silencer functions at different stages of thymocyte differentiation. Mol. Cell. 10:1083.[Medline]
  41. Taniuchi, I., M. Osato, T. Egawa, M. J. Sunshine, S. C. Bae, T. Komori, Y. Ito, D. R. Littman. 2002. Differential requirements for Runx proteins in CD4 repression and epigenetic silencing during T lymphocyte development. Cell 111:621.[Medline]
  42. Huang, G., K. Shigesada, K. Ito, H. J. Wee, T. Yokomizo, Y. Ito. 2001. Dimerization with PEBP2{beta} protects RUNX1/AML1 from ubiquitin-proteasome-mediated degradation. EMBO J. 20:723.[Medline]
  43. Ellmeier, W., S. Sawada, D. R. Littman. 1999. The regulation of CD4 and CD8 coreceptor gene expression during T cell development. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17:523.[Medline]
  44. Duncan, D. D., M. Adlam, G. Siu. 1996. Asymmetric redundancy in CD4 silencer function. Immunity 4:301.[Medline]
  45. Kim, H. K., G. Siu. 1998. The Notch pathway intermediate HES-1 silences CD4 gene expression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:7166.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kim, W. W. S., G. Siu. 1999. Subclass-specific nuclear localization of a novel CD4 silencer binding factor. J. Exp. Med. 190:281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Allen, R. D., III, K. Kim, S. D. Sarafova, G. Siu. 2001. Negative regulation of CD4 gene expression by a hes-1-c-myb complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3071.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Javed, A., B. Guo, S. Hiebert, J. Y. Choi, J. Green, S. C. Zhao, M. A. Osborne, S. Stifani, J. L. Stein, J. B. Lian, et al 2000. Groucho/TLE/R-esp proteins associate with the nuclear matrix and repress RUNX (CBF({alpha})/AML/PEBP2({alpha}) dependent activation of tissue-specific gene transcription. J. Cell Sci. 113:2221.[Abstract]
  49. Schmitt, T. M., J. C. Zuniga-Pflucker. 2002. Induction of T cell development from hematopoietic progenitor cells by {delta}-like-1 in vitro. Immunity 17:749.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. F. Wildt, G. Sun, B. Grueter, M. Fischer, M. Zamisch, M. Ehlers, and R. Bosselut
The Transcription Factor Zbtb7b Promotes CD4 Expression by Antagonizing Runx-Mediated Activation of the CD4 Silencer
J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4405 - 4414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. L. Clements, S. A. John, and L. A. Garrett-Sinha
Impaired Generation of CD8+ Thymocytes in Ets-1-Deficient Mice
J. Immunol., July 15, 2006; 177(2): 905 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Yarmus, E. Woolf, Y. Bernstein, O. Fainaru, V. Negreanu, D. Levanon, and Y. Groner
Groucho/transducin-like Enhancer-of-split (TLE)-dependent and -independent transcriptional regulation by Runx3
PNAS, May 9, 2006; 103(19): 7384 - 7389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Liu, B. J. Taylor, G. Sun, and R. Bosselut
Analyzing Expression of Perforin, Runx3, and Thpok Genes during Positive Selection Reveals Activation of CD8-Differentiation Programs by MHC II-Signaled Thymocytes
J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4465 - 4474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Abe, K. Kohu, H. Ohmori, K. Hayashi, T. Watanabe, K. Hozumi, T. Sato, S. Habu, and M. Satake
Reduction of Runx1 Transcription Factor Activity Up-Regulates Fas and Bim Expression and Enhances the Apoptotic Sensitivity of Double Positive Thymocytes
J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4475 - 4482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Grueter, M. Petter, T. Egawa, K. Laule-Kilian, C. J. Aldrian, A. Wuerch, Y. Ludwig, H. Fukuyama, H. Wardemann, R. Waldschuetz, et al.
Runx3 Regulates Integrin {alpha}E/CD103 and CD4 Expression during Development of CD4-/CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 175(3): 1694 - 1705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
O. Fainaru, D. Shseyov, S. Hantisteanu, and Y. Groner
Accelerated chemokine receptor 7-mediated dendritic cell migration in Runx3 knockout mice and the spontaneous development of asthma-like disease
PNAS, July 26, 2005; 102(30): 10598 - 10603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. Kohu, T. Sato, S.-i. Ohno, K. Hayashi, R. Uchino, N. Abe, M. Nakazato, N. Yoshida, T. Kikuchi, Y. Iwakura, et al.
Overexpression of the Runx3 Transcription Factor Increases the Proportion of Mature Thymocytes of the CD8 Single-Positive Lineage
J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 2627 - 2636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
S. Delaire, Y. H. Huang, S. W. Chan, and E. A. Robey
Dynamic Repositioning of CD4 and CD8 Genes during T Cell Development
J. Exp. Med., December 6, 2004; 200(11): 1427 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
O. Brenner, D. Levanon, V. Negreanu, O. Golubkov, O. Fainaru, E. Woolf, and Y. Groner
Loss of Runx3 function in leukocytes is associated with spontaneously developed colitis and gastric mucosal hyperplasia
PNAS, November 9, 2004; 101(45): 16016 - 16021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. C. Telfer, E. E. Hedblom, M. K. Anderson, M. N. Laurent, and E. V. Rothenberg
Localization of the Domains in Runx Transcription Factors Required for the Repression of CD4 in Thymocytes
J. Immunol., April 1, 2004; 172(7): 4359 - 4370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ehlers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Steimle, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ehlers, M.
Right arrow Articles by Steimle, V.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS