The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. P.
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 2804-2811.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Expression and Functional Importance of Collagen-Binding Integrins, {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1, on Virus-Activated T Cells 1

Susanne Ø. Andreasen*, Allan R. Thomsen*, Victor E. Koteliansky{dagger}, Tatiana I. Novobrantseva{dagger}, Andrew G. Sprague{dagger}, Antonin R. de Fougerolles2,{dagger} and Jan P. Christensen2,3,*

* Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; and {dagger} Biogen, Cambridge, MA 02142


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adhesive interactions are crucial to cell migration into inflammatory sites. Using murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus as an Ag model system, we have investigated expression and function of collagen-binding integrins, {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1, on activated and memory T cells. Using this system and MHC tetramers to define Ag-specific T cells, we demonstrate that contrary to being VLAs, expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 can be rapidly induced on acutely activated T cells, that expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 remains elevated on memory T cells, and that expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 parallels that of viral-specific effector CD8+ T cells (defined by tetramer and IFN-{gamma} staining). In an adoptive transfer model, mAb-mediated blockade of these integrins on activated effector and memory T cells inhibited Ag-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity responses; similar decreased responses were seen upon transfer of {alpha}1-deficient activated/memory T cells. Thus, expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 integrins on activated T cells is directly functionally important for generation of inflammatory responses within tissues. Finally, the inhibitory effect of {alpha}1{beta}1 blockade on the delayed-type hypersensitivity response could be bypassed by direct injection of Ag-specific T cells to inflammatory sites, demonstrating for the first time in vivo that collagen-binding integrins are involved in leukocyte migration into tissues.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adhesive interactions play a key role during inflammation by promoting leukocyte attachment to the vascular endothelium and subsequent extravasation. Among the many adhesion molecules involved in these processes are the {alpha}4{beta}1 (VLA-4) and {alpha}L{beta}2 (LFA-1) integrins, expressed on the leukocyte surface, and their respective ligands, VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, which are inducibly expressed on the surface of inflamed endothelium (1). Following extravasation into tissues, further positioning of leukocytes within the extracellular matrix-rich tissue environment is required. However, this latter step in the inflammatory cascade has only recently been explored (2, 3). Collagen constitutes a major part of the extracellular matrix, and mAbs against the major cell surface collagen receptors, {alpha}1{beta}1 (VLA-1) and {alpha}2{beta}1 (VLA-2) integrins, dramatically decreased effector phase inflammatory responses in a variety of in vivo animal models (2, 3). Similarly, mice lacking expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 also showed increased resistance to inflammatory disease (2). Although these studies demonstrated the importance in vivo of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 in inflammatory disease, little is known about the mechanism by which blockade of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 reduces effector inflammatory responses or the cell types involved. Using a virus infection model, we have investigated the expression and function of these collagen-binding integrins on virus-activated T cells.

Both {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 are heterodimeric cell surface molecules consisting of a unique {alpha}-subunit ({alpha}1 or {alpha}2) associated with the common {beta}1 chain (4). {alpha}1{beta}1 is primarily expressed on mesenchymal cells, including smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, hepatocytes, and microvascular endothelium (5, 6). Expression of {alpha}2{beta}1 is found predominantly on epithelial cells (7); significant expression is also found on monocytes and platelets (4). Regarding expression on T cells, stimulation of T cell clones in vitro results in up-regulation of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 (4). In addition, it has been found that certain viral infections may induce T cell expression of DX5, which following completion of this study has been revealed to be {alpha}2{beta}1+ (DX5+) (8, 9, 10). Also, infiltrating T cells from different chronic inflammatory exudates have been found to express {alpha}1{beta}1 (2, 11, 12, 13). Most information regarding the role of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 as receptors for collagen has been obtained through in vitro adhesion and migration assays on collagen matrices (14, 15). In addition to its adhesive and migratory functions, cell binding to collagen through {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 has been shown in vitro to synergistically enhance effector T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion (16, 17).

Given the importance of collagen-integrin interactions in modulating effector inflammatory responses in vivo and in affecting T cell function in vitro, we sought to investigate the expression and function of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 integrins on virus-activated T cells. The murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) 4 infection has been extensively used as a model system to study T cell migration in the context of an antiviral response (18, 19, 20). Although this virus is a natural mouse pathogen that causes little nonspecific inflammation, a strong Ag-specific inflammatory response is induced, which is dominated by entry of IFN-{gamma}+CD8+ T effector cells into the infected tissues (18, 21, 22). Furthermore, we have previously established the role of integrins {alpha}4{beta}1, {alpha}L{beta}2, and {alpha}M{beta}2 (Mac-1), and their ligands in the process of extravasation by blocking these molecules (23, 24, 25). Thus, LCMV infection constitutes a well-established model for studying the mechanisms underlying virus-induced, Tc1 cell-dependent inflammation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Female BALB/cA and C57BL/6 mice (6–7 wk old) were purchased from Bomholtgaard (Ry, Denmark), and were acclimatized for at least 1 wk before experimentation. VLA-1-/- mice were produced locally from breeding pairs originating from Biogen (Cambridge, MA). Animals were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions, as validated by testing of sentinels for unwanted infections according to Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Association standards.

Virus infection

LCMV Traub strain (LCMV-Traub) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) Indiana strain were produced, stored, and quantified, as described previously (26, 27).

Infections

In most experiments, mice were infected with 103 LD50 of LCMV-Traub i.v. An i.v. injection of LCMV into immunocompetent mice normally results in transient immunizing infection (18, 26, 28). For infection with VSV, mice were inoculated with 106 PFU i.v. (29).

mAbs for flow cytometry

The following mAbs were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA) as rat anti-mouse Abs: PE-conjugated anti-CD49b (integrin {alpha}2 chain) (clone HM{alpha}2); FITC-conjugated anti-CD49b (clone Ha1/29); FITC-conjugated anti-CD49d (integrin {alpha}4 chain) (clone R1-2); FITC-, PE-, and CyChrome-conjugated anti-CD8a (clone 53-6.7); FITC- and PE-conjugated anti-CD4 (clone H129.19); FITC and biotinylated anti-L-selectin (clone MEL-14); and FITC- and PE-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} (clone XMG1.2). Purified hamster anti-mouse CD49a (integrin {alpha}1 chain) (clone Ha31/8), FITC-conjugated anti-hamster IgG (clones G70-204 and G94-56), and PE-conjugated anti-hamster IgG (clones G70-204 and G94-90.5) were obtained from the same source. mAb to anti-CD29 (integrin {beta}1 chain) (clone HM{beta}1-1) was obtained from BD PharMingen and biotinylated, as recommended by the manufacturer (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Furthermore, anti-CD49a (clone Ha31/8) and hamster group II control mAb (hamster anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) (clone Ha4/8) were fluorescently labeled using the Alexa 488 protein-labeling kit, as recommended by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR).

MHC/peptide tetramer for flow cytometry

H-2Db/gp33–41 tetramer was obtained through the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases tetramer facility and the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program.

Ab treatment

For in vivo blocking of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1, 250 µg of mAb Ha31/8 (hamster anti-{alpha}1) and Ha1/29 (hamster anti-{alpha}2) was injected i.v. or i.p. on the indicated days. Hamster group II mAb Ha4/8 (hamster anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin) was used as control. Abs were produced and purified, as previously described (30). Flow cytometric analysis did not reveal any depletion of activated CD8+ from the spleen of mAb-treated mice (data not shown).

Cell preparations

Spleen single-cell suspensions were obtained by pressing the organ through a fine steel mesh. When used for analysis by flow cytometry, erythrocytes were lysed by 0.83% NH4Cl treatment (31).

Fluorescence staining and flow cytometric analysis

Staining for flow cytometry was performed, as described previously (32, 33, 34). Briefly, 1 x 106 cells were stained with directly labeled mAbs in FACS medium (PBS containing 10% rat serum, 1% BSA, and 0.1% NaN3) for 20 min in the dark at 4°C and subsequently washed. When using unconjugated Abs, cells were incubated with primary Abs, followed by incubation with secondary Abs before additional surface staining with directly labeled Abs was performed. Cells incubated with biotin-conjugated Abs were further incubated with streptavidin-Tri-Color (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). After washing twice, cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. In case of tetramer staining, cells were incubated with H-2Db/gp33–41 tetramer for 1 h at 20°C before surface labeling. To detect intracellular IFN-{gamma}, splenocytes (107/ml) were incubated with an immunodominant MHC-class I-restricted epitope (LCMV gp33–41, 0.1 µg/ml), monensin (3 µM), and IL-2 (50 IU/ml) for 5 h, after which cells were surface labeled, fixed, and permeabilized using PBS/saponin (0.05%), and anti-IFN-{gamma} was added. After incubation for 20 min in the dark, cells were washed twice in PBS/saponin. Samples were acquired on a FACSCalibur instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and at least 104 mononuclear cells were gated using a combination of forward angle and side scatter to exclude dead cells and debris. Data were analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Staining with CFSE was performed by resuspending 20 x 106 spleen cells/ml in HBSS/0.1% BSA (warm) and adding CFSE to a final concentration of 5 µM. Cells were incubated for 15 min at 37°C, and the reaction was stopped by adding ice-cold HBSS. Cells were washed twice in HBSS, counted, and injected into animals.

Immunohistochemistry

Spleen cells from animals infected with LCMV 8 days earlier were depleted of plastic-adherent cells by incubation for 1 h at 37°C in tissue culture flasks. The remaining cells were labeled with CFSE, and 50 x 106 cells were injected i.v. into recipients that had been infected with LCMV 4 h earlier with 107 LD50 in the right footpad. The next day, both left and right footpads were excised, for immunohistochemical staining, and frozen in dry ice using OCT compound (Sakura, Torrance, CA). Acetone-fixed frozen sections (10 µm thick) were blocked in a 3% BSA/PBS solution for 30 min at room temperature. Slides were washed and sections were incubated with 5 µg/ml PE-conjugated anti-CD31 mAb (BD PharMingen) in 3% BSA/PBS for 1 h at room temperature. Slides were then washed in PBS and mounted in Citifluor (Ted Pella, Redding, CA). The stained sections were examined by dual immunofluorescent microscopy (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Adoptively transferred CFSE-labeled leukocytes are shown in green, and CD31-expressing vascular endothelium is shown in red.

LCMV-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH)

For a primary response, mice were infected locally in the right hind footpad with 103 LD50 of LCMV-Traub, and the local swelling reaction was followed between days 6 and 13 postinfection (p.i.); footpad thickness was measured using a dial caliper (Mitutoyo 7309; Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan), and virus-specific swelling was determined as the difference in thickness of the injected right and the untreated left footpad (31, 35).

Adoptive transfer of LCMV-specific DTH

Two approaches were used to assess adoptively transferred LCMV-specific DTH: systemic transfer and local transfer. Systemic transfer: mice were infected in their right hind footpad with 107 LD50 of LCMV-Traub. Four hours later, they were injected i.v. with 5 x 107 splenocytes from B6 donors that had been infected 8 days previously with 103 LD50 of LCMV-Traub i.v. Local transfer: mice were infected in both hind footpads with 107 LD50 of LCMV-Traub. Four hours later, they were injected in the right footpad with 3 x 106 day 8 primed splenocytes and in the left footpad with 3 x 106 splenocytes from naive animals. For both types of transfer, footpad thickness was measured 16, 24, 48, and 72 h after injection, and virus-specific swelling was calculated as the difference in thickness of the right and left footpad. Donor cells were routinely treated with mitomycin C (25 µg/ml, to prevent secondary expansion in the recipients) and depleted of plastic-adherent cells by incubation for 1 h at 37°C in tissue culture flasks. Previous analysis has established that Ag-primed donor CD8+ T cells are essential for induction of the swelling reaction in both experimental situations (25, 31, 36).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Kinetics of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression following LCMV infection

Initial experiments were conducted to examine the kinetics of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following LCMV infection. A minor percentage (~10%) of splenic CD8+ T cells in naive mice express either {alpha}1{beta}1 or {alpha}2{beta}1. Following infection, a rapid increase in the fraction of cells expressing these molecules is observed, and at the peak of the response (day 8–10) about half of splenic CD8+ cells express {alpha}1{beta}1 and slightly fewer express {alpha}2{beta}1 (Fig. 1A). Coinciding with the decline in viral titers (37), a gradual decrease in the fraction of cells expressing these adhesion molecules is noted, and 2–3 mo after infection ~35% of CD8+ T cells express {alpha}1{beta}1 and 20% express {alpha}2{beta}1. Although less pronounced, some increase in the fraction of cells expressing {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 molecules is also observed within the CD4+ T cell subset, reaching peak values ~day 12 p.i. (20–30% for both molecules, Fig. 1B), and then expression rapidly returns to a level indistinguishable from that seen in naive mice.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Kinetics of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ cells during infection with LCMV. C57BL/6 mice were infected with LCMV i.v., and on the indicated days spleen cells were stained with anti-CD8 (A and C) or anti-CD4 (B and D) and anti-{alpha}1 or anti-{alpha}2 Abs. A and B, Representative histograms for gated CD8+ (A) or CD4+ (B) cells from infected (thick line) mice analyzed at the time of maximal expression; analysis of naive (thin line) animals is shown for comparison, and numbers in parentheses represent percentage of positive cells in naive mice. C and D, Total numbers of splenic CD8+ (C) and CD4+ (D) T cells together with absolute numbers of cells expressing {alpha}1{beta}1 or {alpha}2{beta}1. Medians and ranges of 3–10 mice are depicted.

 
In terms of total number of splenocytes, the number of CD8+ splenocytes expressing either of these molecules is low before infection (Fig. 1C). However, upon infection, the number of these cells increases dramatically (~40-fold) until day 8–10 p.i., followed by a rapid decrease in numbers until ~2 mo p.i. From 2 mo p.i. onward, the number of CD8+ T cells expressing {alpha}1{beta}1 remains fairly constant and is 2- to 3-fold higher than the level seen in naive animals; by 2 mo p.i. the number of CD8+ T cells expressing {alpha}2{beta}1 returns to levels comparable to that seen in naive animals. Regarding the CD4+ subset, only minor changes in the absolute cell numbers are observed (Fig. 1D). A transient 2- to 4-fold increase is observed at approximately day 12 p.i., coinciding with peak CD4+ T cell expansion, as demonstrated by in vivo 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine incorporation (data not shown). Similar analyses using another mouse strain (BALB/cA) confirmed the expression patterns of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells following LCMV challenge (data not shown).

Finally, to determine whether an increase in {alpha}1{beta}1+ and {alpha}2{beta}1+ CD8+ T cells is specific to LCMV infection or more generally associated with viral infection, C57BL/6 mice were infected i.v. with VSV, and expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on splenic CD8+ T cells was examined. Although the induced expansion of the CD8+ T subset is less pronounced during this infection (29), a significant increase in the fraction and number of CD8+ cells expressing these integrins was also observed following VSV infection (data not shown).

Expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 is restricted to T cells with a preactivated phenotype

Because previous studies have shown that virus-activated T cells are {alpha}4{beta}1high (34) together with {alpha}L{beta}2high, CD44high, and L-selectinlow (23), we examined the coexpression of {beta}1 and the three {alpha}-subunits on splenic CD8+ T cells from day 8 LCMV-infected mice. As shown in Fig. 2A, all {alpha}1+, {alpha}2+, and {alpha}4+ cells are also expressing {beta}1, confirming expression of {alpha}1{beta}1, {alpha}2{beta}1, and {alpha}4{beta}1 on a large subset of CD8+ T cells during acute infection. Subsequently, we determined the degree of coexpression of these molecules. As can be seen in Fig. 2B, expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 correlated on virus-activated CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, all CD8+ T cells expressing either {alpha}1{beta}1 or {alpha}2{beta}1 were to be found exclusively in the {alpha}4{beta}1high (Fig. 2C) and L-selectinlow subset (data not shown).



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Coexpression of {alpha}1, {alpha}2, {alpha}4, and {beta}1 chains on CD8+ T cells. A, Day 8 spleen cells from LCMV-infected C57BL/6 animals were stained with anti-CD8; anti-{beta}1; and anti-{alpha}1, anti-{alpha}2, or anti-{alpha}4 Abs. Dot plot depicts coexpression of the {beta}1 chain and various {alpha}-chains on gated CD8+ T cells. B, Coexpression of {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 chains on naive and day 8 LCMV-infected spleen cells is shown for gated CD8+ T cells. C, Coexpression of {alpha}1 or {alpha}2 and {alpha}4 chains on naive and day 8 LCMV-infected spleen cells is shown for gated CD8+ T cells. All plots shown are representative for at least three animals, and numbers shown refer to the percentage of CD8+ T cells that are positive for the markers used.

 
As expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 was found to be confined to the activated ({alpha}4{beta}1high) subset during the acute response, it was of interest to evaluate expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 in the memory phase. When CD8+ spleen cells from immune animals (day 90) were analyzed, a marked difference in the expression of the two molecules was noted (Fig. 3A). A substantial subset of the CD8+ T cells in immune mice was still {alpha}1{beta}1+, whereas few retain {alpha}2{beta}1 expression. Perhaps even more striking was the distribution of expression levels (Fig. 3B) for the two molecules: the expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 had a clear bimodal distribution making up two almost independent populations, whereas expression of {alpha}2{beta}1 on memory ({alpha}4{beta}1high) cells was monophasic and differed only slightly from that on naive CD8+ cells.



View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on splenic CD8+ cells in immune mice. A, C57BL/6 animals were infected with LCMV, and 90 days later spleen cells were stained with anti-CD8, anti-{alpha}4, and anti-{alpha}1 or anti-{alpha}2 Abs. Dot plots for gated CD8+ T cells are depicted. B, Either naive ({alpha}4{beta}1low, R1) or primed ({alpha}4{beta}1high, R2) cells were gated out and compared in a histogram. A and B, Numbers refer to the percentage of CD8+ T cells that are positive for the markers used. All plots are representative of at least three animals.

 
Expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on viral Ag-specific T cells

Although LCMV infection results in marked up-regulation of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on a large number of activated CD8+ T cells, it is of interest to determine whether expression of these integrins is induced on virus-specific T cells. Therefore, to study expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on virus-specific cells during the acute and memory phase, CD8+ splenocytes were analyzed for coexpression of {alpha}1{beta}1 or {alpha}2{beta}1 and MHC/peptide tetramers. As evident from Fig. 4A, virus-specific T effector cells (defined as tetramer+ cells) showed increased levels of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression compared with naive cells. Regarding expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on virus-specific T cells during the memory phase, expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 appears to be retained on the vast majority (>80%) of virus-specific CD8+ T cells, whereas expression of {alpha}2{beta}1 differs little from that on naive cells. A similar expression pattern was found when virus-specific CD8+ cells were defined by detection of IFN-{gamma} in peptide-stimulated cells (Fig. 4B).



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on Ag-specific CD8+ T cells. A, Spleen cells from naive, acutely infected, and immune animals were stained with anti-CD8, H-2Db/gp33–41 tetramer, and anti-{alpha}1, anti-{alpha}2 Abs, or isotype control Ab. Plots depicting gated CD8+ T cells are presented. Numbers refer to the percentage of CD8+ T cells that are positive for the markers used. All plots are representative of at least three animals. B, Spleen cells from naive, acutely infected, and immune mice were incubated with gp33–41 peptide for 5 h, surface stained with anti-CD8 and anti-{alpha}1 or anti-{alpha}2 Abs, permeabilized, and stained for IFN-{gamma}. CD8+IFN-{gamma}+ T cells were gated, and {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on gated cells is depicted (thick lines). For comparison, {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on naive CD8+ T cells is included (thin lines). Numbers refer to percentage of gated cells positive for integrin expression in infected mice, while numbers in parentheses refer to CD8+ cells in naive mice. Plots are representative of at least three animals.

 
Functional role of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on virus-specific CD8+ T cells

To examine the functional role of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on T cells, LCMV-induced T cell-mediated inflammation in a collagen-rich environment, the footpad, was studied (38). This is a primarily CD8+ T cell-mediated inflammatory reaction generated in response to virus replicating locally in the footpad (25, 31, 36). First, we studied the effect {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 blockade had on LCMV-induced inflammation in intact animals. Naive mice were infected with LCMV in their right hind footpad and given either anti-{alpha}1 mAb, anti-{alpha}2 mAb, a combination of both, or isotype control mAb on days 3, 4, and 6 p.i., and footpad swelling was measured on days 6–13. Blocking either {alpha}1{beta}1 alone or in combination with {alpha}2{beta}1 resulted in a slight delay in the primary footpad-swelling reaction, as none of the mice in these two groups presented any significant swelling on day 7 p.i., in contrast to the control mAb or anti-{alpha}2 mAb-treated mice. However, by day 8 p.i., a substantial inflammatory response was subsequently induced in the two anti-{alpha}1 mAb-treated groups, and the magnitude of this response was comparable to that seen in the other groups (Fig. 5A). Although this result indicated that there is no absolute requirement for {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1, these molecules could still play an important role alongside other adhesion molecules with parallel function. In the intact mouse, the extremely high number of virus-specific T cells present might simply obscure their importance.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Effect of anti-{alpha}1 and anti-{alpha}2 treatment on primary response and adoptive DTH reaction in LCMV-infected animals. A, C57BL/6 animals were infected with LCMV in their right hind footpad and received 250 µg of the indicated Abs i.v. on days 3, 4, and 6 p.i. Controls received isotype-matched Ab. Medians and ranges of five animals per group are shown; no response was observed before day 6 p.i. B, Recipients were infected with LCMV in the footpad and at the same time received 250 µg of the indicated Ab i.v.; 4 h later, they received 5 x 107 adherent cell-depleted, LCMV-primed donor cells. Medians and ranges of five animals are shown; one representative experiment of three is depicted. C, BALB/cA recipients were infected with LCMV in their right hind footpad; 4 h later, they received 5 x 107 adherent cell-depleted, LCMV-primed donor cells from either VLA-1-/- or BALB/cA mice. Medians and ranges of five animals are shown; one representative experiment of three is depicted. *, p < 0.05, observed vs control using the Mann-Whitney U test.

 
Therefore, to further investigate the functional relevance of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 expression on CD8+ T cells, we conducted adoptive transfer experiments involving i.v. injection of day 8 LCMV-primed splenocytes into naive mice infected with LCMV in their right hind footpad 4 h before cell transfer (24, 25). As in the previous experiments, mice were treated with anti-{alpha}1 mAb, anti-{alpha}2 mAb, a combination of both, or isotype control mAb. Footpads were measured 16, 24, 48, and 72 h after cell transfer (Fig. 5B). A marked reduction in footpad swelling was seen upon treatment with either anti-{alpha}1 mAb (81% inhibition at 24 h) or anti-{alpha}2 mAb (63% inhibition at 24 h). Blocking both {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 at the same time also had a profound effect on the inflammatory response (59% inhibition at 24 h), although there was no additive effect when compared with blocking either integrin alone. This is probably because either of the two Abs by itself can block the response completely. To confirm the adoptive experiment, and exclude any interference from the Abs, an adoptive transfer experiment was performed with donor cells being from either BALB/cA or VLA-1-/- mice. As can be seen in Fig. 5C, a profound reduction in the DTH reaction was observed when VLA-1-/- donor cells were used, confirming that VLA-1 is important for CD8+ T cell-mediated inflammation.

To show that the reduced DTH reaction was not a result of less activated VLA-1-/- cells, but rather a reduction in numbers of cells present in the inflammatory site, we repeated the DTH experiment, this time with CFSE-labeled spleen cells. When footpads from these animals were excised for immunohistochemical staining, it was evident that less CFSE+ cells were found in the inflammatory site with VLA-1-/- donor cells compared with wild-type cells (Fig. 6). Individual bright fields were quantitated, and a significant reduction (p < 0.01) in median numbers of cells/bright field was found, 26 with BALB/cA donor cells and 9 with VLA-1-/- donor cells, respectively (Fig. 6D); no CFSE+ cells were found in the uninfected footpads, confirming the homing specificity to sites of infection (Fig. 6B).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Reduced inflammation during adoptive DTH reaction in LCMV-infected animals when VLA-1-/- mice are used as donors. Recipients (BALB/cA) were infected with LCMV in their right hind footpad, and 4 h later they received 5 x 107 adherent cell-depleted, LCMV-primed donor cells that had been CFSE labeled. Twenty-four hours later, both left and right footpads were excised for immunohistochemical staining and stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD31. A, Infected footpad from animal that received BALB/cA cells. B, Uninfected footpad from animal that received BALB/cA cells. C, Infected footpad from animal that received VLA-1-/- cells. CFSE-labeled leukocytes are shown in green, and CD31-expressing vascular endothelium is shown in red. Pictures are one representative set of footpads from four animals. D, Quantitative analysis of groups A and C; cells were counted at x20 magnification; each point represents one bright field counted. *, p < 0.05, BALB/cA donor cells vs VLA-1-/- donor cells using the Mann-Whitney U test.

 
To study the influence of anti-{alpha}1 mAb directly on the donor splenocytes, these cells were preincubated with mAb, washed, and injected into the recipients either systemically (i.v.) or directly into the test site; no further mAb treatment followed. Preincubation with anti-{alpha}1 mAb, but not control mAb, significantly inhibited the inflammatory response (77% inhibition at 24 h) when donor cells were given i.v. (Fig. 7A). Similarly treated donor cells injected directly into the footpad mounted an unimpaired inflammatory response (Fig. 7B), demonstrating that the anti-{alpha}1 mAb-treated donor cells were functionally active when their requirement for migration was bypassed.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effect of anti-{alpha}1 and anti-{alpha}2 treatment on the capacity to adoptively transfer an LCMV-specific DTH reaction. Recipients were infected with LCMV in the footpad, and 4 h later they received LCMV-primed donor cells that had been pretreated with Ab and washed before injection. Donor cells were given either i.v. (5 x 107 cells, systemic) (A) or in the footpad (3 x 106 cells, local) (B). Medians and ranges of five animals are shown. *, p < 0.05, observed vs control using the Mann-Whitney U test.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Consistent with the initial description of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 as VLAs, expression of these integrins has been described as being induced in vitro on long-term activated T cells and in vivo on infiltrating T cells in chronic inflammatory settings (4, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13). Given the importance of collagen-integrin interactions in modulating effector inflammatory responses in vivo and in affecting T cell function in vitro (2, 3), we sought to investigate the expression and function of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 integrins on virus-activated T cells. The LCMV infection model is particularly well suited for this purpose, as not only can activated T cells be identified, but the function of these cells can also be assessed in vivo. In this study, we demonstrate that contrary to being VLAs, {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 can be rapidly induced on Ag-specific effector T cells, and that expression of {alpha}1{beta}1, but not {alpha}2{beta}1, remains elevated on memory T cells. In addition, blockade of these integrins inhibited adoptive transfer of Ag-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity responses, indicating that expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on activated T cells is functionally important.

Upon infection with LCMV, a rapid increase in expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 was observed on CD8+ T cells, reaching its peak on day 8–10 p.i., when ~50% of splenic CD8+ T cells expressed either {alpha}1{beta}1 or {alpha}2{beta}1. The percentage of {alpha}1{beta}1+ and {alpha}2{beta}1+ T cells reached its maximum at the same time, as did the total expansion of the T cell population. As a result, the number of {alpha}1{beta}1+ or {alpha}2{beta}1+ T cells was expanded ~40-fold over the course of an acute 8-day LCMV infection. Further analyses revealed that expression of the two molecules defined more or less the same subset of CD8+ cells as expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 correlated on CD8+ splenocytes. Thus, the expression of the two molecules is almost identical in the acute phase of the immune response. Regarding the CD4+ subset, much less dramatic changes were observed, and furthermore, only a 2-fold increase in the total number of splenocytes with this phenotype was observed at the peak time point. Direct visualization of virus-specific CD8+ T cells (defined by tetramer staining or demonstration of intracellular cytokine) revealed an elevated expression of both molecules on cells with known antiviral specificity. Similar up-regulation of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 was also observed for CD8+ cells in LCMV-infected BALB/c mice and in C57BL/6 mice infected with VSV, suggesting that systemic viral infections could be more generally associated with up-regulation of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on virus-specific T cells. However, this should be tested in other viral models.

Contrary to the acute phase, during which the expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 did not differ substantially, a significant difference was observed in the memory phase. A subset of primed ({alpha}4{beta}1high) CD8+ cells still expressed {alpha}1{beta}1, whereas the expression of {alpha}2{beta}1 returned to near background levels. Focusing on CD8+ T cells of known virus specificity (tetramer+), it was observed that most (>80%) express {alpha}1{beta}1 in immune animals. Nevertheless, it is clear that a significant subset of primed {alpha}4{beta}1high {alpha}1{beta}1- cells exists in immune animals. Because the {alpha}4{beta}1high {alpha}1{beta}1- subset is much expanded in virus-infected mice, there can be little doubt that most of the cells with this phenotype have been activated as a result of virus infection. This leaves two major explanations as to its presence in immune mice: either these cells represent cells of low avidity for Ag (i.e., below the cutoff of the methods used to visualize Ag-specific cells) that have not differentiated to the same extent as have cells of higher avidity, or alternatively, this subset is made up of cells of totally unrelated specificity expanded as a result of bystander activation (33, 39). Recently, evidence has been presented indicating that under certain conditions naive cells may differentiate and acquire a phenotype overlapping with that of Ag-primed cells (40, 41).

Several studies have been performed that describe changes in expression of integrins during viral infections, and from these studies there appears to be a hierarchy among the different integrins. Following activation of CD8+ T cells, most integrins become up-regulated (19). However, the degree of persistence varies significantly. {alpha}M{beta}2 (42) and {alpha}2{beta}1 (present study) rapidly become down-regulated following elimination of Ag and appear to be markers of recent activation. {alpha}1{beta}1 persists on the majority of memory CD8+ T cells, and the level of expression appears to be relatively stable throughout the observation period (up to 120 days). {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}L{beta}2 are also up-regulated on activated cells, and an increased expression is maintained on the majority of memory CD8+ cells, although at a level lower (~3-fold) than that on recently activated cells (23, 43). However, this level of expression appears to be stable for months. Both {alpha}4{beta}1 and {alpha}L{beta}2 bind to ligands found on endothelium (44, 45, 46, 47), thus probably ensuring that memory cells are still capable of extravasating from the vasculature and patrol the peripheral tissues. Expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 by the same subset of cells could further promote their migration by allowing adhesive interactions with the extracellular matrix.

With regard to a functional role, we studied a well-defined model of LCMV-induced T cell-mediated inflammation: the footpad DTH reaction. This model of CD8+ T cell-mediated inflammation requires migration of cells in extracellular matrix to induce measurable footpad swelling. Furthermore, in a recently published study by de Fougerolles et al. (2), blocking {alpha}1{beta}1 or {alpha}2{beta}1 led to diminished footpad swelling in the SRBC-induced DTH model. Blocking {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 was also found to have an inhibitory effect on the LCMV-induced footpad-swelling reaction. Although anti-{alpha}1 or anti-{alpha}2 mAb treatment had little effect on primary LCMV-induced footpad responses, adoptive transfer experiments readily revealed an effect of both Abs. This pattern has been observed before (19), and is likely to reflect the different conditions of the analysis. In the adoptive transfer, a rather limited number of effector cells is offered to the recipient. This would make this approach more sensitive (less cells to block) in revealing all molecules of importance, because even small changes in the efficiency of the donor cells are likely to be exposed. Treatment of mice with either anti-{alpha}1 or anti-{alpha}2 mAb was found to significantly inhibit a footpad DTH response in mice adoptively transferred with recently activated effector T cells, a result that was confirmed using VLA-1-/- donor cells instead of Ab treatment. One proposed mechanism of action for why disruption of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 interaction with collagen can decrease inflammatory responses is that these interactions are critical for migration of immune cells within the inflamed tissue (2). Using the adoptive transfer method, we directly showed that the inhibitory effect of anti-{alpha}1 mAb treatment on the DTH response could be bypassed by direct injection of effector T cells into the inflammatory site. This result indicates that {alpha}1{beta}1 plays a minor role once the cells are in position (please note that the number of injected cells is likely to markedly exceed what is the case following natural migration), and strongly suggests a role for {alpha}1{beta}1 in focusing of CD8+ Ag-specific T cells at sites of inflammation.

In conclusion, these results highlight the inducible and rapid expression of {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 on effector CD8+ T cells, the selective maintenance of {alpha}1{beta}1 on memory CD8+ T cells, and the functional importance of these two integrins for Ag-specific T cell responses. Given that {alpha}1{beta}1 is most likely important for migration of Ag-specific T cells within the extracellular matrix, this molecule is an obvious target for therapeutic treatment.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Grethe Thørner Andersen for her skillful technical assistance. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Tetramer Facility and the National Institutes of Health AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program are acknowledged for supplying MHC-peptide tetramers.


    Footnotes
 
1 This study was supported in part by the Danish Rheumatism Association, the Danish Medical Research Council, the Biotechnology Center for Cellular Communication, the Beckett Foundation, and the Novo Nordisk Foundation. J.P.C. is the recipient of a research fellowship from the Weimanns Foundation, Denmark. Back

2 A.R.d.F. and J.P.C. contributed equally to this study. Back

3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Jan Pravsgaard Christensen, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum Institute, 3C Blegdamsvej, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. E-mail address: J.Pravsgaard{at}immi.ku.dk Back

4 Abbreviations used in this paper: LCMV, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; p.i., postinfection; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus. Back

Received for publication March 3, 2003. Accepted for publication July 10, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Springer, T. A.. 1994. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76:301.[Medline]
  2. De Fougerolles, A. R., A. G. Sprague, C. L. Nickerson-Nutter, G. Chi-Rosso, P. D. Rennert, H. Gardner, P. J. Gotwals, R. R. Lobb, V. E. Koteliansky. 2000. Regulation of inflammation by collagen-binding integrins {alpha}1{beta}1 and {alpha}2{beta}1 in models of hypersensitivity and arthritis. J. Clin. Invest. 105:721.[Medline]
  3. Ianaro, A., C. Cicala, A. Calignano, V. Koteliansky, P. Gotwals, M. Bucci, R. Gerli, L. Santucci, S. Fiorucci, G. Cirino. 2000. Anti-very late antigen-1 monoclonal antibody modulates the development of secondary lesion and T-cell response in experimental arthritis. Lab. Invest. 80:73.[Medline]
  4. Hemler, M. E.. 1990. VLA proteins in the integrin family: structures, functions, and their role on leukocytes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8:365.[Medline]
  5. Belkin, V. M., A. M. Belkin, V. E. Koteliansky. 1990. Human smooth muscle VLA-1 integrin: purification, substrate specificity, localization in aorta, and expression during development. J. Cell Biol. 111:2159.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Duband, J. L., A. M. Belkin, J. Syfrig, J. P. Thiery, V. E. Koteliansky. 1992. Expression of {alpha}1 integrin, a laminin-collagen receptor, during myogenesis and neurogenesis in the avian embryo. Development 116:585.[Abstract]
  7. Wu, J. E., S. A. Santoro. 1994. Complex patterns of expression suggest extensive roles for the {alpha}2{beta}1 integrin in murine development. Dev. Dyn. 199:292.[Medline]
  8. Kambayashi, T., E. Assarsson, B. J. Chambers, H.-G. Ljunggren. 2001. Expression of the DX5 antigen on CD8+ T cells is associated with activation and subsequent cell death or memory during influenza virus infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1523.[Medline]
  9. Slifka, M. K., R. R. Pagarigan, J. L. Whitton. 2000. NK markers are expressed on a high percentage of virus-specific CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. J. Immunol. 164:2009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Arase, H., T. Saito, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier. 2001. Cutting edge: the mouse NK cell-associated antigen recognized by DX5 monoclonal antibody is CD49b ({alpha}2 integrin, very late antigen-2). J. Immunol. 167:1141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Takahashi, H., K. Soderstrom, E. Nilsson, R. Kiessling, M. Patarroyo. 1992. Integrins and other adhesion molecules on lymphocytes from synovial fluid and peripheral blood of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Eur. J. Immunol. 22:2879.[Medline]
  12. Stemme, S., J. Holm, G. K. Hansson. 1992. T lymphocytes in human atherosclerotic plaques are memory cells expressing CD45RO and the integrin VLA-1. Arterioscler. Thromb. 12:206.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Bank, I., D. Roth, M. Book, A. Guterman, I. Shnirrer, R. Block, M. Ehrenfeld, P. Langevitz, H. Brenner, M. Pras. 1991. Expression and functions of very late antigen 1 in inflammatory joint diseases. J. Clin. Immunol. 11:29.[Medline]
  14. Chan, B. M., P. D. Kassner, J. A. Schiro, H. R. Byers, T. S. Kupper, M. E. Hemler. 1992. Distinct cellular functions mediated by different VLA integrin {alpha} subunit cytoplasmic domains. Cell 68:1051.[Medline]
  15. Gotwals, P. J., G. Chi-Rosso, V. Lindner, J. Yang, L. Ling, S. E. Fawell, V. E. Koteliansky. 1996. The {alpha}1{beta}1 integrin is expressed during neointima formation in rat arteries and mediates collagen matrix reorganization. J. Clin. Invest. 97:2469.[Medline]
  16. Miyake, S., T. Sakurai, K. Okumura, H. Yagita. 1994. Identification of collagen and laminin receptor integrins on murine T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:2000.[Medline]
  17. Rao, W. H., J. M. Hales, R. D. Camp. 2000. Potent costimulation of effector T lymphocytes by human collagen type I. J. Immunol. 165:4935.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Doherty, P. C., J. E. Allan, F. Lynch, R. Ceredig. 1990. Dissection of an inflammatory process induced by CD8+ T cells. Immunol. Today 11:55.[Medline]
  19. Thomsen, A. R., A. Nansen, J. P. Christensen. 1998. Virus-induced T cell activation and the inflammatory response. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 231:99.[Medline]
  20. Marker, O., A. R. Thomsen. 1987. Clearance of virus by T lymphocytes mediating delayed type hypersensitivity. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 134:145.[Medline]
  21. Ceredig, R., J. E. Allan, Z. Tabi, F. Lynch, P. C. Doherty. 1987. Phenotypic analysis of the inflammatory exudate in murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis. J. Exp. Med. 165:1539.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Christensen, J. P., J. P. Stenvang, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1996. Characterization of virus-primed CD8+ T cells with a type 1 cytokine profile. Int. Immunol. 8:1453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Andersson, E. C., J. P. Christensen, A. Scheynius, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1995. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection is associated with long-standing perturbation of LFA-1 expression on CD8+ T cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 42:110.[Medline]
  24. Christensen, J. P., E. C. Andersson, A. Scheynius, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1995. {alpha}4 integrin directs virus-activated CD8+ T cells to sites of infection. J. Immunol. 154:5293.[Abstract]
  25. Nielsen, H. V., J. P. Christensen, E. C. Andersson, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1994. Expression of type 3 complement receptor on activated CD8+ T cells facilitates homing to inflammatory sites. J. Immunol. 153:2021.[Abstract]
  26. Marker, O., M. Volkert. 1973. Studies on cell-mediated immunity to lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus in mice. J. Exp. Med. 137:1511.[Abstract]
  27. Thomsen, A. R., A. Nansen, C. Andersen, J. Johansen, O. Marker, J. P. Christensen. 1997. Cooperation of B cells and T cells is required for survival of mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus. Int. Immunol. 9:1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Thomsen, A. R., C. J. Pfau. 1993. Influence of host genes on the outcome of murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection: a model for studying genetic control of virus-specific immune responses. M. S. Salvato, ed. The Arenaviridae 199.-224. Plenum Press, New York.
  29. Andreasen, S. O., J. E. Christensen, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 2000. Role of CD40 ligand and CD28 in induction and maintenance of antiviral CD8+ effector T cell responses. J. Immunol. 164:3689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mendrick, D. L., D. M. Kelly, S. S. du Mont, D. J. Sandstrom. 1995. Glomerular epithelial and mesangial cells differentially modulate the binding specificities of VLA-1 and VLA-2. Lab. Invest. 72:367.[Medline]
  31. Christensen, J. P., O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1994. The role of CD4+ T cells in cell-mediated immunity to LCMV: studies in MHC class I and class II deficient mice. Scand. J. Immunol. 40:373.[Medline]
  32. Christensen, J. P., C. Bartholdy, D. Wodarz, A. R. Thomsen. 2001. Depletion of CD4+ T cells precipitates immunopathology in immunodeficient mice infected with a noncytocidal virus. J. Immunol. 166:3384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Andreasen, S. O., J. P. Christensen, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1999. Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but do not induce cell differentiation. Int. Immunol. 11:1463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Andersson, E. C., J. P. Christensen, O. Marker, A. R. Thomsen. 1994. Changes in cell adhesion molecule expression on T cells associated with systemic virus infection. J. Immunol. 152:1237.[Abstract]
  35. Thomsen, A. R., O. Marker. 1989. MHC and non-MHC genes regulate elimination of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus and antiviral cytotoxic T lymphocyte and delayed-type hypersensitivity mediating T lymphocyte activity in parallel. J. Immunol. 142:1333.[Abstract]
  36. Zinkernagel, R. M.. 1976. H-2 restriction of virus-specific T-cell-mediated effector functions in vivo. II. Adoptive transfer of delayed-type hypersensitivity to murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus is restricted by the K and D region of H-2. J. Exp. Med. 144:776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Christensen, J. P., C. Ropke, A. R. Thomsen. 1996. Virus-induced polyclonal T cell activation is followed by apoptosis: partitioning of CD8+ T cells based on {alpha}4 integrin expression. Int. Immunol. 8:707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Tosolini, F. A., C. A. Mims. 1971. Effect of murine strain and viral strain on the pathogenesis of lymphocytic choriomeningitis infection and a study of footpad responses. J. Infect. Dis. 123:134.[Medline]
  39. Tough, D. F., P. Borrow, J. Sprent. 1996. Induction of bystander T cell proliferation by viruses and type I interferon in vivo. Science 272:1947.[Abstract]
  40. Murali-Krishna, K., R. Ahmed. 2000. Cutting edge: naive T cells masquerading as memory cells. J. Immunol. 165:1733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Goldrath, A. W., L. Y. Bogatzki, M. J. Bevan. 2000. Naive T cells transiently acquire a memory-like phenotype during homeostasis-driven proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 192:557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Christensen, J. E., S. O. Andreasen, J. P. Christensen, A. R. Thomsen. 2001. CD11b expression as a marker to distinguish between recently activated effector CD8+ T cells and memory cells. Int. Immunol. 13:593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Zimmerman, C., K. Brduscha-Riem, C. Blaser, R. M. Zinkernagel, H. Pircher. 1996. Visualization, characterization, and turnover of CD8+ memory T cells in virus-infected hosts. J. Exp. Med. 183:1367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Issekutz, T. B.. 1992. Lymphocyte homing to sites of inflammation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 4:287.[Medline]
  45. Shimizu, Y., W. Newman, Y. Tanaka, S. Shaw. 1992. Lymphocyte interactions with endothelial cells. Immunol. Today 13:106.[Medline]
  46. Springer, T. A.. 1990. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346:425.[Medline]
  47. Picker, L. J., E. C. Butcher. 1992. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of lymphocyte homing. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 10:561.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Yan, B. D. Johnson, and R. J. Orentas
Induction of a VLA-2 (CD49b)-Expressing Effector T Cell Population by a Cell-Based Neuroblastoma Vaccine Expressing CD137L
J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4621 - 4631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
R. Ou, M. Zhang, L. Huang, R. A. Flavell, P. A. Koni, and D. Moskophidis
Regulation of Immune Response and Inflammatory Reactions against Viral Infection by VCAM-1
J. Virol., March 15, 2008; 82(6): 2952 - 2965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
J. B. McLachlan and M. K. Jenkins
Parker B. Francis Lectureship. Migration and Accumulation of Effector CD4+ T Cells in Nonlymphoid Tissues
Proceedings of the ATS, August 15, 2007; 4(5): 439 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. Richter, S. J. Ray, T. J. Chapman, S. J. Austin, J. Rebhahn, T. R. Mosmann, H. Gardner, V. Kotelianski, A. R. deFougerolles, and D. J. Topham
Collagen Distribution and Expression of Collagen-Binding {alpha}1beta1 (VLA-1) and {alpha}2beta1 (VLA-2) Integrins on CD4 and CD8 T Cells during Influenza Infection
J. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 178(7): 4506 - 4516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
I. Goldstein, S. Ben-Horin, A. Koltakov, H. Chermoshnuk, V. Polevoy, Y. Berkun, N. Amariglio, and I. Bank
{alpha}1beta1 Integrin+ and Regulatory Foxp3+ T Cells Constitute Two Functionally Distinct Human CD4+ T Cell Subsets Oppositely Modulated by TNF{alpha} Blockade
J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 201 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Kassiotis, D. Gray, Z. Kiafard, J. Zwirner, and B. Stockinger
Functional Specialization of Memory Th Cells Revealed by Expression of Integrin CD49b
J. Immunol., July 15, 2006; 177(2): 968 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
K. Schapira, E. Lutgens, A. de Fougerolles, A. Sprague, A. Roemen, H. Gardner, V. Koteliansky, M. Daemen, and S. Heeneman
Genetic Deletion or Antibody Blockade of {alpha}1{beta}1 Integrin Induces a Stable Plaque Phenotype in ApoE-/- Mice
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(9): 1917 - 1924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. L. Graham, W. Zeng, Y. Takada, D. C. Jackson, and B. S. Coulson
Effects on Rotavirus Cell Binding and Infection of Monomeric and Polymeric Peptides Containing {alpha}2{beta}1 and {alpha}x{beta}2 Integrin Ligand Sequences
J. Virol., November 1, 2004; 78(21): 11786 - 11797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X. Z. Wang, M. A. Brehm, and R. M. Welsh
Preapoptotic Phenotype of Viral Epitope-Specific CD8 T Cells Precludes Memory Development and Is an Intrinsic Property of the Epitope
J. Immunol., October 15, 2004; 173(8): 5138 - 5147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. M. Abraham, A. Ahmed, I. Serebriakov, A. N. Carmillo, J. Ferrant, A. R. de Fougerolles, E. A. Garber, P. J. Gotwals, V. E. Koteliansky, F. Taylor, et al.
A Monoclonal Antibody to {alpha}1{beta}1 Blocks Antigen-induced Airway Responses in Sheep
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2004; 169(1): 97 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Andreasen, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS