|
|
||||||||





,
* Department of Microbiology and Immunology and
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
Gene Logic, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20878; and
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies showed that similar to their normal counterparts, myeloid leukemic blasts across a range of differentiation stages can be driven to differentiate to DC by exogenous cytokines and can elicit anti-leukemia CTL responses (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). DC generated directly from leukemic blasts potentially overcome the problems of other anti-tumor DC vaccine approaches, where normal progenitor-derived DC are exogenously loaded with a limited number of known tumor-specific Ags (17, 18). Ex vivo differentiation of DC from both normal and leukemic progenitors can be driven by both receptor-mediated exogenous stimuli (i.e., cytokine combinations GM-CSF, IL-4, TNF-
, and CD40 cross-linking) (9, 14, 19, 20, 21, 22) and agents that directly activate intracellular signaling pathways (calcium ionophores (intracellular calcium) and phorbol esters (protein kinase C (PKC)) (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29). Because leukemic cells may lack one or more components of membrane and proximal signal transduction pathways, direct activation of downstream pathways may drive DC differentiation more effectively (30). We have shown that PKC activation by the 2,3-diacylglycerol analog PMA induces DC differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts (26), while others have demonstrated the same following direct activation of intracellular calcium signaling by calcium ionophore (CI) (25, 27, 28, 31). Although these studies and model systems have also suggested which upstream signals initiate DC differentiation, the signal transduction pathways and genetic events involved remain largely undefined.
Although myeloid leukemic blasts differentiated to dendritic-like cells (DLC) largely recapitulate DC differentiation from normal progenitors, there is a significant variability among differentiated blasts (9, 32, 33), and certain aspects of differentiated blasts differ from normal progenitor-derived DC (25, 26, 34). One possible reason for these differences in DC differentiation from normal vs leukemic progenitors is the interaction between the differentiation program and the expression of leukemia-specific oncogenes. The ability to drive DC differentiation in vitro and evidence that leukemic blasts may differentiate to DC in vivo (35) raise a central biological question: how do stimuli that induce DC differentiation overcome the oncogene-mediated differentiation block in leukemia? Because BCR-ABL is both the primary cause of CML (36, 37) and a prototypic leukemic Ag, its regulation may represent a paradigm for the relationship between leukemic blast differentiation and oncogene expression. Previous studies have demonstrated that overexpression of BCR-ABL in multipotent progenitor cells does not prevent their differentiation (38, 39), yet BCR-ABL is down-regulated during induced differentiation of CML blasts along erythroid and granuloid lineages (40, 41), whereas direct inhibition of BCR-ABL activity in leukemic blasts can result in erythroid differentiation (42). The mechanisms that regulate BCR-ABL expression during differentiation and whether down-regulation of BCR-ABL is a necessary prerequisite to allow DC differentiation from CML blasts have not been well studied. Understanding the regulation of BCR-ABL during DC differentiation also has clinical implication, as its down-regulation may lead to new therapeutic approaches, but at the same time hamper the ability of leukemia-derived DLC to induce CML-specific CTL in a vaccine setting.
To further understand what intracellular signal transduction pathways drive progenitors to differentiate to DC and the relationship between differentiation and oncogene expression, we examined DC differentiation from CML progenitors. We now report that direct activation of PKC induces both the CML cell line K562 and primary CML blasts to differentiate into cells with phenotypic and functional characteristics of DC. However, this differentiation was not terminal, as the removal of the stimulus reversed differentiation-induced growth arrest as well as the ability to stimulate T cells. Furthermore, this differentiation process resulted in the down-regulation of BCR-ABL gene expression specifically involving downstream signaling through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
K562 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and cultured in IMDM, 10% heat-inactivated FCS (both from HyClone, Logan, UT), 100 mM L-glutamine, and 100 U penicillin/streptomycin (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY). Cultures were stimulated at 0.2 x 106 cells/ml for 17 days with PMA (10 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu, 100 ng/ml; Calbiochem), TNF-
(10 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), the CI A23187 (385 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich), or GM-CSF (200 U/ml; Immunex, Seattle, WA), with a complete medium change every 2 days. Primary CML blasts were obtained from patient peripheral blood after informed consent was given, under protocols approved by the University of Miami institutional review board. Mononuclear cells (MNC) were separated by discontinuous density gradient centrifugation and cultured immediately or cryopreserved. To generate DLC, MNC were stimulated at 0.5 x 106cells/ml with PMA (310 ng/ml), CI (385 ng/ml), or PMA plus A23187 for 3 days or with GM-CSF (100 U/ml), TNF-
(10 ng/ml), and IL-4 (20 ng/ml; R&D Systems) for 14 days. Cell viability was assessed by trypan blue dye exclusion. Where indicated, cells were pretreated with bisindolylmaleimide I (1 µM), PD 98059 (560 µM), or Bay 11-7082 (5 µM; all from Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) for 3 h before the addition of PMA.
Monocytes were enriched from the MNC of normal donors by plastic adherence (43). To generate DC, monocytes were cultured in six-well plates in medium containing GM-CSF (1000 U/ml) and IL-4 (1000 U/ml) for 12 days and TNF-
(10 ng/ml) for the last 4 days of culture (44).
Flow cytometry
Cells were stained as previously reported (26) using the following mAbs: HLA-ABC and HLA-DR (both from VMRD, Pullman, WA) and CD80, CD11c, CD40, CD83, CD86 (all from Immunotech, Westbrook, ME). Appropriate isotype-matched Abs were used as controls. Cells were harvested using 3 mM EDTA, and 10,000 live cells were analyzed on a Coulter XL flow cytometer (Coulter, Hialeah, FL) using software supplied by the manufacturer.
Cell proliferation assays
For K562 proliferation, untreated, PDBu-treated (100 ng/ml), or PMA-treated cells were cultured for 5 days (PDBu) or for 1 or 2 days (PMA). In the PDBu washout experiments, PDBu was removed on day 5, and cells were cultured without PDBu for 0, 1, 3, or 5 days. Cells were plated in triplicate at 1 x 104 cells/well. [Methyl-[3H]TdR (0.5 µCi/well) was added for the final 18 h of culture, and incorporation was measured using the
Plate scintillation counting system (Wallac, Gaithersburg, MD). For T cell proliferation assays, K562 cells, monocytes, or primary CML blasts were cultured with or without PMA (K562); GM-CSF, IL-4, and TNF-
(monocytes); or PMA, CI, or PMA plus CI (primary blasts). DC generated from CML blasts were gamma-irradiated (12,000 rad 60Co for K562, 3,000 rad 60Co for primary CML blasts and monocytes) and cocultured at various ratios with 1 x 105 cells/well of purified resting allogeneic T cells (26). In PDBu washout experiments, K562 were cultured in PDBu for 5 days or in PDBu for 5 days, followed by 5 days in medium alone, irradiated at 12,000 rad 60Co, and then cocultured at a ratio of 1/1 with 1 x 105 T cells. All conditions were performed in triplicate, and data are presented as the mean counts ± 1 SD.
In CFSE labeling, K562 were stimulated with PDBu for 5 days, resuspended in RPMI medium, and incubated with 8 µM CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 10 min at 37°C. Cells were then washed twice in RPMI and cultured for additional 3 or 5 days, untreated or treated with PDBu.
Western blot
Western blots for Rel B and BCR-ABL were performed as previously described (24). Briefly, cell lysates were made from untreated cells and K562 differentiated with PMA, with or without TNF-
, or K562 differentiated with PMA in the presence or the absence of PD 98059 (5, 15, 30, or 60 µM) or Bay 11-7082 (5 µM). Protein levels were quantitated by using the Micro BCA reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Equal amounts of protein were separated by SDS-PAGE (4% stacking/6% (for BCR-ABL) or 10% resolving), electroblotted to nitrocellulose, and probed with Abs against Rel B (c-19), c-ABL (24-11), BCR (N-20), phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2), or actin (c-2; all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The proteins were visualized by chemiluminescent detection (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, U.K.).
EMSA
EMSAs were performed for NF-
B family members as previously described (45). Briefly, equal amounts of protein were incubated with 32P-labeled primer containing consensus NF-
B binding sites (GATCCAACGGCAGGGGAATTCCCCTCTCCTTA) and separated on 4% polyacrylamide gels. For supershift assays, samples were first incubated with anti-Rel B, anti-p52, anti-p65, anti-c-Rel (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or anti-p50 Ab (a gift from U. Siebenlist, National Institutes of Health). Samples were visualized by autoradiography.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells at the times indicated using RNAzol (Cinna Biotecs, Friendswood, TX) according to the manufacturers instructions. First-strand RNA was synthesized from equal amounts of total RNA using Superscript II (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and used as a template for PCR reactions with oligonucleotides specific for human
-actin (5'-TGACGGGGTCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTA, 3'-CTAGAAGCATTGCGGTGGACGATGGAGGG) or BCR-ABL (5'-GCCACTGGATTTAAGCAGAG, 3'-GATAATGGAGCGTGGTGATG). Cycle parameters were as follows: 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s for 35 cycles. Thirty microliters of each reaction was resolved on 1% agarose gels, transferred to nylon, and hybridized with either 32P-labeled BCR-ABL (a 600-bp fragment spanning the junction region) or actin probes. Hybridization was quantified using the Scion Image program (Frederick, MD). For real-time fluorometric PCR, total RNA was isolated, and 500 ng was subjected to real-time PCR using the LightCycler (Roche, Idaho Falls, ID) with primers to b3 exon of BCR and a2 exon of ABL or with primers to GAPDH. PCR products were quantified with fluorescent SYBR Green I dye. Specific products were identified by melting curve analysis of the PCR products.
Northern blot
Northern blot analysis was performed as previously described (26). Briefly, total RNA was isolated from unstimulated or K562 stimulated by PMA with or without TNF-
, equalized by serial dilution and ethidium bromide visualization, separated on 1% formaldehyde/agarose gel, transferred to nylon membrane, and hybridized against human BCR-ABL, DC-CK1, or actin probes.
BCR-ABL autophosphorylation assay
BCR-ABL kinase activity was assayed as previously described (46). Briefly, 500 µg of protein lysate was immunoprecipitated with 5 µg of anti-c-ABL bound to agarose-G beads (Life Technologies), and the immunoprecipitated pellets were analyzed for kinase activity using [
-32P]ATP. Samples were then electrophoresed on 8% SDS-PAGE gels, and radiolabeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We first sought to determine whether CML blasts, like their untransformed CD34+ HPC counterparts, could acquire DC characteristics in response to direct activation of intracellular signaling pathways, including PKC and mobilization of intracellular calcium. As a model of primary CML blasts we used the BCR-ABL+ CML cell line K562, isolated from a patient in blast crisis (47). Previous studies have characterized K562 as a multipotent cell line capable of differentiating along granulocytic/myelomonocytic or megakaryocytic lineages after PMA treatment, but differentiation to DC has not been described (48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54). As shown in Fig. 1A, untreated K562 cells were uniformly round, nonadherent cells. Similar to what we have reported for KG1, treatment with PMA (7 days) or PMA plus TNF-
(5 days) caused some cells to become adherent and develop cytoplasmic projections typical of DC seen in vivo (55), while inducing apoptosis in others (small, condensed cells in Fig. 1A, middle and right panels). Similar to other studies in myeloid leukemias (14, 27, 56), the DC morphologic change was not observed for all cells simultaneously, which could be due to a balance of cells in adherent and nonadherent states at any given time or to the transformed nature of the cells that alters their ability to develop DC morphology. In contrast to PMA-driven differentiation, treatment of K562 with the CI A23187, TNF-
alone, or GM-CSF plus TNF-
did not result in any adherence or gross morphologic changes (data not shown).
|
-treated cells uniformly up-regulated MHC II, with a more pronounced up-regulation of MHC I, CD40, and CD86. Compared with A23187-stimulated cells, K562 cultured with PMA and A23187 displayed a significantly greater up-regulation of CD40 and MHC I, a more modest and uniform up-regulation of CD83 and CD86, and a decrease in CD80. While the expression of these markers was maintained in differentiated K562 by day 5 of culture, the combination of PMA and A23187 induced more cell death than A23187 alone (data not shown). The fact that PMA induced a more modest up-regulation vs PMA plus TNF-
or PMA plus A23187 is consistent with our findings in KG1 that TNF-
(or CI) is not required for lineage commitment, but can drive more rapid and complete DC maturation (26). Treatment with the established cytokine combination GM-CSF and TNF-
up-regulated certain DC markers (CD11c, CD40, and MHC I, by day 14), but not MHC II, CD86, or CD83 (Fig. 1C). The differences observed between cytokine- and PMA- or CI-induced differentiation may be due to differences in the degree of intracellular signaling, the involvement of other signal transduction pathways in the cytokine-mediated differentiation, or defects in cytokine receptors or upstream signal transduction molecules that are bypassed by direct activation (58). Although K562-derived DLC expressed comparatively less MHC I and MHC II than DC derived from normal progenitors, other groups have found that leukemic blast-derived DLC may have very slight, if any, up-regulation or even down-regulation of these markers and yet acquire molecular and functional characteristics that are largely unique to DC (14, 25, 26, 33). To determine whether this is true for K562, we next examined the expression of DC-associated/specific genes. In the remaining studies we have focused on direct activation of PKC to more carefully characterize the signal transduction pathways involved in DC differentiation. Direct PKC activation induces the expression of DC-associated/specific genes
The NF-
B transcription factor family member Rel B is up-regulated very early in DC differentiation (24, 26), but not in monocytes (59), and plays an important role in DC differentiation and function (60, 61, 62, 63). Thus, up-regulation of Rel B may represent an early molecular marker of DC differentiation. As shown in Fig. 2A, untreated K562 did not express Rel B protein. Expression was rapidly up-regulated by 2 h after PMA treatment and was further up-regulated at 6 and 24 h, with sustained levels through day 5 (the last point measured; not shown). Up-regulation of Rel B by PMA plus TNF-
did not significantly differ from that by PMA, suggesting a primary role for PKC activation. Comparatively, GM-CSF plus TNF-
up-regulated Rel B by day 2, with further up-regulation by day 14. Consistent with our surface Ag phenotype findings, there was a more rapid Rel B up-regulation by PMA vs cytokines (hours vs days). To assess whether the overall increase in Rel B was associated with increased NF-
B signaling activity, nuclear extracts were assayed for DNA binding of free NF-
B heterodimers. As shown in Fig. 2B, EMSAs at 24 h demonstrated a concurrent increase in NF-
B binding activity, with supershift assays revealing increased nuclear Rel B heterodimers as well as p50, p52, and p65.
|
(Fig. 2C). Together these data demonstrate that PKC-mediated differentiation of K562 results in the expression of DC-specific genes.
K562 differentiated by PMA with or without TNF-
have characteristic DC function
A hallmark of DC function is the induction of T cell activation and proliferation. As shown in Fig. 3A, while untreated K562 cells induced minimal proliferation in purified allogeneic T cells, K562 differentiated for 5 days induced significant T cell proliferation (13.5-, 22.3-, and 27.9-fold higher at DC/T cell ratios of 1/10, 1/2, and 1/1, respectively, vs untreated cells). We have previously shown that there is no PMA carryover from the differentiation cultures that causes T cell proliferation (24). Interestingly, although the addition of TNF-
enhanced PMA-induced up-regulation of MHC I, MHC II, CD40, and CD86, this did not translate into greater allostimulatory ability (data not shown). In addition, down-regulation of CD80 and low expression of MHC II did not seem to impair the ability of PMA-differentiated K562 to activate T cells, as this proliferation was equivalent or superior to that induced by normal monocyte-derived DC (MODC) or T cells pharmacologically activated with PMA and ionomycin alone. Although MODC were capable of stimulating T cells at a lower DC/T cell ratio (1/100), their potency at higher ratios was equivalent to or less than that of differentiated K562. These results demonstrate that PMA-driven K562 differentiate into cells with comparable allostimulatory capacity compared with normal MODC. In addition to T cell proliferation, functional studies of Ag uptake by K562 derived DC (as assessed by FITC-dextran incorporation) demonstrated a loss in the ability to take up extracellular Ag on day 5 of differentiation, consistent with a decrease in macropinocytosis and micropinocytosis during DC maturation (data not shown).
|
PMA-induced K562 differentiation does not involve proliferation
Terminal differentiation is typically associated with loss of proliferation. We have previously shown that PMA (but not cytokine)-driven DC differentiation inhibits proliferation in CD34+ HPC and KG1 cells and induces apoptosis in 3050% of cells (24, 26). Similarly, PMA-induced DC differentiation of K562 suppressed proliferation by 24 h (Fig. 4A), with cell viability reduced to
45% by day 7 (Fig. 4B). In comparison, GM-CSF plus TNF-
treatment of K562 did not result in the loss of either cell viability (Fig. 4B) or proliferation (there was a 4-fold increase in cell number by day 7 compared with day 0, whereas neither PMA nor PMA plus TNF-
stimulation resulted in an increase in cell number). These findings suggest that pathways that induce DC differentiation can be separated from those triggering progenitor cell proliferation.
|
Direct PKC activation drives differentiation along DC lineage in primary CML blasts
We next investigated whether our findings in a CML cell line were relevant in primary CML blasts. Dose-response experiments demonstrated that CML blasts from four patients (two in accelerated phase and two in blast crisis) could be induced to differentiate into DLC at PMA concentrations 310 times lower than those required for K562
DC differentiation. Unstimulated CML blasts were nonadherent, with uniformly round morphology (Fig. 5A). Similar to K562, PMA treatment induced CML blasts to become adherent and develop elongated cytoplasmic projections. The addition of CI to PMA (previously shown to act similarly to TNF-
by driving full maturation/activation of DC in AML blasts (26)) further enhanced DC morphology of CML blasts. Similar to K562, CML blasts stopped proliferating in PMA-containing combinations (data not shown).
|
-, and IL-4-driven DC differentiation resulted in up-regulation of CD40 in all patients and more variable up-regulation of MHC I and II, CD86, and CD11c in individual patients. The down-regulation of CD34 expression was seen in three of the four patients in response to PMA plus A23187, suggesting differentiation to a more mature cell. FACS analysis for patient 9390 is shown in Fig. 5B. In this patient, untreated CML blasts expressed CD34 (which was nearly 100% of the cells analyzed), MHC I, and MHC II, but no detectable CD80, CD86, CD40, or CD83. PMA alone induced up-regulation of MHC II, CD40, and CD11c (slight) and down-regulated CD34. PMA plus A23187 induced a greater up-regulation of MHC I, MHC II, and CD40 vs PMA alone, and PMA plus A23187 induced the expression of CD80, CD83, and CD86. The two peaks seen for some surface markers (MHC I, CD80, and CD40) in the PMA- plus A23187-treated samples suggest the development of two distinct subpopulations. At the molecular level we also saw up-regulation of Rel B in primary CML blasts during differentiation (data not shown).
|
, and IL-4 (3.5-fold stimulation over that induced by untreated blasts; data not shown). Interestingly, the expression of MHC I and MHC II on the undifferentiated blasts was not sufficient to induce T cell proliferation, suggesting that it is the up-regulation of costimulatory ligands (and possibly other molecules, such as adhesion receptors and cytokines) that is the basis of CML-derived DLC allostimulatory capability. The development of typical DC morphology, enhanced expression of MHC, costimulatory and DC activation markers, and enhanced T cell allostimulatory capacity are all consistent with differentiation of primary CML blasts to DLC by PMA (with or without A23187). These results suggest that similar to the K562 cell line, activation of PKC in primary CML blasts drives DC differentiation.
DC differentiation is associated with down-regulation of BCR-ABL expression
The ability of PKC activation or exogenous cytokines to drive DC differentiation in CML blasts indicates that these signals can overcome the differentiation block in CML. Given the central role of BCR-ABL in CML oncogenesis, we next assessed the effect of CML
DC differentiation on the oncogenes expression. As shown in Fig. 6A, PMA-induced K562 differentiation resulted in down-regulation of BCR-ABL protein by day 5, which was not significantly changed by the addition of TNF-
. Blocking PKC activation by the PKC inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide I also blocked BCR-ABL down-regulation, consistent with PKC activation being the primary pathway involved in PMA-induced differentiation of K562. To determine whether this down-regulation was unique to PMA-driven activation or more generally related to the process of DC differentiation, we examined the effect of cytokine-mediated differentiation on BCR-ABL expression. Similar to PMA, GM-CSF- plus TNF-
-driven K562 differentiation down-regulated BCR-ABL protein expression, but with the same slower kinetics (day 14 vs day 5) as those seen for surface marker up-regulation. Consistent with down-regulation at the protein level, we found a parallel decrease in total BCR-ABL kinase activity as assessed by in vitro autophosphorylation (Fig. 6B), suggesting that there was not a separate effect on the oncogenes kinase activity. Whether the loss of BCR-ABL is reversible after the removal of the stimulus is currently being studied.
|
induced early down-regulation of BCR-ABL mRNA expression. Interestingly, in the PMA- plus TNF-
-treated cultures by 24 h of differentiation, mRNA expression began to rebound (and by 72 h in PMA-treated cultures), but BCR-ABL protein expression remained reduced even on day 5. Whether this represents additional mechanisms regulating BCR-ABL expression is under investigation. Signal transduction pathways in BCR-ABL regulation
To begin to characterize the signal transduction pathways that led to down-regulation of BCR-ABL expression, we examined the roles of MAPK and NF-
B signaling, which were previously implicated in certain aspects of PMA-induced K562 differentiation to megakaryocytes (52, 53, 54, 65) and were also shown to play a role in DC differentiation and maturation (66, 67). As shown in Fig. 7, A and B, triggering of PKC by PMA resulted in both MAPK and NF-
B activation, which could be blocked by either the MAPK kinase inhibitor PD 98059 (although not completely) or the NF-
B inhibitor Bay 11-7082. Pretreating K562 with >15 µM PD 98059 suppressed PMA-induced down-regulation of BCR-ABL on day 5 (Fig. 7C). This was not due to complete inhibition of DC differentiation, as inhibition of MAPK resulted in the loss of some, but not all, aspects of DC differentiation (data not shown). In contrast to MAPK inhibition, blocking the NF-
B pathway did not prevent PMA-induced down-regulation of BCR-ABL (Fig. 7D), suggesting that downstream of PKC these pathways differentially regulate various aspects of DC differentiation (our manuscript in preparation).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
also potentiated PMA-induced DC differentiation in K562. PMA induced K562 to become adherent cells with typical DC morphology, stop proliferating, and up-regulate characteristic DC surface markers, consistent with what we have previously reported for primary CD34+ HPC and KG1 (24, 26). CI mobilization, also used as an intracellular signal for DC differentiation, resulted in greater up-regulation of CD80, CD86, and CD83, but failed to up-regulate MHC I or MHC II, consistent with what has been previously reported for other leukemic cell lines (25). At a molecular level, we found that Rel B expression and activity were rapidly up-regulated, in addition to other NF-
B family members. Additionally, the DC-specific chemokine DC-CK1 was up-regulated shortly after PKC activation. Functionally, PMA-differentiated K562 up-regulated their ability to activate T cells to levels comparable to those of monocyte-derived DC, consistent with differentiation to mature DC. Similar to studies in primary CML blasts (6, 9, 11), GM-CSF plus TNF-
resulted in K562 acquisition of certain DC characteristics, but with slower kinetics than PMA. The differences in cytokine- vs PMA-mediated DC differentiation probably reflect defects in the cytokine receptors (58) or the need for additional agents to more fully differentiate CML blasts (12, 56, 68), and they underscore how agents that bypass these proximal elements to directly activate downstream signaling pathways may be more effective in driving DC differentiation in leukemic blasts. Our results for primary CML blasts (accelerated and blast phase) corroborated our K562 findings, in that activation of PKC induced the differentiation of cells with morphological, phenotypic, molecular, and functional characteristics of DC.
Compared with DC derived from normal progenitors, we have found that CML-derived DLC are considerably more variable in the expression of Ag presentation receptors and costimulatory ligands, typically with lower expression levels of MHC II, CD80, and CD86. This variability has also been observed for other leukemia-derived DLC (14, 25, 26, 33). Despite this difference, however, CML-derived DLC were capable of driving a robust T cell response, suggesting that the levels of surface MHC/costimulatory ligands expression may not directly correlate to T cell activation capacity, consistent with a study by Kobayashi et al. (69) demonstrating that inhibition of Rho GTPase in DC had no effect on the surface expression of HLA, costimulatory, and adhesion molecules of DC, yet significantly suppressed their alloantigen-presenting capacity. We have also found that unlike differentiation from normal progenitors, differentiation from CML progenitors is reversible. Previous studies have indicated that in contrast to normal GM-CSF- plus TNF-
-driven DC development, terminal maturation from leukemic blasts was dependent on additional factors (12). In our hands the removal of the stimulus resulted in both the reversal of growth arrest in K562 and the loss of T cell activation capacity (studies in primary CML blasts are currently underway). It is possible that the transformed nature of the progenitors cells (e.g., persistent oncogene activity) requires the constant presence of the stimulus to remain differentiated, or that additional factors may be required to drive terminal and irreversible differentiation. This does not rule out, however, the possibility that irreversibly differentiated K562 are also committed to undergo apoptosis. Clinically, the ability of DLC derived from leukemic blasts to back-differentiate has implications for how these vaccine preparations are processed for clinical use.
Although our characterization clearly indicates that PKC activation in K562 induced features of DC differentiation, K562 is classically described to differentiate into the megakaryocytic lineage in response to PMA, in part due to the expression of CD41 (49, 50, 51, 70). Interestingly, CD41 has also been detected on myeloid cell lines and normal hemopoietic cells not in the megakaryocytic lineage (71). Although the expression of CD41 has not been determined for DC, it is a receptor for the extracellular matrix and may play a role in the adhesion of myeloid cells (including DC) during cellular migration. Furthermore, Baker et al. (72) demonstrated that CD61+ PMA-treated K562 (stimulated with a lower PMA dose than that used in our studies) can mediate CD4+ T cell expansion in vitro, a property they ascribed to accessory cell function of differentiated K562. We suggest that this ability to activate T cells is due to PMA-induced differentiation of K562 into cells with DC characteristics, consistent with the aggregate of findings demonstrating that CD34+ HPC and primary CML blasts can undergo DC differentiation in response to either direct PKC activation or exogenous cytokines. These findings suggest that aspects of megakaryocytic and DC differentiation may normally overlap.
Although it has been clearly shown that CML blasts can be driven to differentiate along DC lineage with a variety of signals, it is largely unclear how these signals overcome the differentiation block in these cells. We have found as a consequence of differentiation by either PMA or GM-CSF plus TNF-
that BCR-ABL expression was down-regulated in both K562 and primary CML blasts, consistent with other studies demonstrating that PKC activation extinguished BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase activity (73, 74). Our studies further extend this observation by suggesting that this regulation occurs at the level of gene expression, implying a complementary approach to pharmacologically inhibiting its kinase activity. However, because we observed differences in the BCR-ABL mRNA (down-regulated within the first hour of treatment, but beginning to rebound by 24 h) and protein expression (continued to be down-regulated on day 5) other mechanisms, such as post-transcriptional regulation of BCR-ABL mRNA, may be present (75). Downstream signaling through the ERK/MAPK, but not NF-
B, pathway (both induced by PKC activation in K562) (52, 53, 54, 65, 76) appeared to be important for BCR-ABL down-regulation, consistent with our findings that these two signal transduction pathways control different aspects of DC differentiation (our manuscript in preparation). How down-regulation of BCR-ABL affects the ability of CML-derived DC to induce an antileukemic T cell response (and the nature of this response) is currently being examined.
Although our data do not prove a direct link between BCR-ABL down-regulation and the onset of DC differentiation, other studies have shown that direct inhibition of BCR-ABL kinase activity restores growth factor dependence in BCR-ABL-transformed hemopoietic cells, regulates erythroid differentiation in human CML lines, and induces apoptosis (42, 77, 78). On the other hand, PMA-treated K562 are capable of initiating differentiation (e.g., morphologic changes, surface Ag up-regulation, Rel B up-regulation, decreased proliferation, etc.) despite continued BCR-ABL kinase activity, albeit at a reduced level compared with that in untreated cells. Cells differentiated in PMA in the presence of MAPK inhibitor expressed the same level of BCR-ABL as untreated cells; nonetheless, these cells still underwent some (but not all) aspects of DC differentiation (our manuscript in preparation). Consistent with other studies (39, 79), this suggests that BCR-ABL activity need not be completely suppressed during K562 differentiation along DC lineage, and also that the signals downstream of PKC activation may bypass the BCR-ABL-induced differentiation block.
In summary, we have found that direct activation of PKC in a CML cell line and primary isolates resulted in a nonterminal differentiation to cells that have the morphological, molecular, and functional characteristics of DC. This differentiation resulted in down-regulation of BCR-ABL at the gene level, with concomitant loss of BCR-ABL activity. These findings suggest that it may be possible to regulate oncogene expression at the genetic level, avoiding drug resistance problems associated with BCR-ABL mutations. Furthermore, because differentiation occurred despite the persistence of BCR-ABL protein (albeit at lower levels than in untreated cells), tumor-derived APC may be capable of stimulating potent immune responses in vivo against tumor-specific Ags. Thus, CML blast
DC differentiation represents a unique system to simultaneously examine fundamental aspects of three seemingly unrelated treatment strategies: differentiation therapy, direct targeting of BCR-ABL expression, and anti-CML vaccines for immunotherapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Kelvin P. Lee, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Papanicolaou Building, Room 211, 1550 NW 10th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136. E-mail address: klee{at}med.miami.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; CI, calcium ionophore; DC, dendritic cells; DLC, DC-like cells; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; HPC, hemopoietic progenitor cells; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; MNC, mononuclear cells; MODC, monocyte-derived DC; PKC, protein kinase C; PDBU, phorbol-12,13-dibutyrate; MHC I, MHC class I; MHC II, MHC class II. ![]()
Received for publication March 3, 2003. Accepted for publication June 9, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cooperate in the generation of dendritic Langerhans cells. Nature 360:258.[Medline]
. J. Exp. Med. 182:1111.
. Exp. Hematol. 27:1176.[Medline]
B mediates the PMA-induced differentiation of K562 cells. Cancer Lett. 132:99.[Medline]
subunits are independently regulated in HL-60 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:2365.
B pathway mediates phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:13186.
B subunits. Immunity 16:257.[Medline]
IIb
3 integrin (GPIIb-IIIa) in myeloid cell lines and normal CD34+/CD33+ bone marrow cells. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 23:361.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. A. M. Santegoets, A. J. M. van den Eertwegh, A. A. van de Loosdrecht, R. J. Scheper, and T. D. de Gruijl Human dendritic cell line models for DC differentiation and clinical DC vaccination studies J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2008; 84(6): 1364 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Majewski, T. O. Bose, F. C. M. Sille, A. M. Pollington, E. Fiebiger, and M. Boes Protein kinase C delta stimulates antigen presentation by Class II MHC in murine dendritic cells Int. Immunol., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 719 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Bahlis, A. M. King, D. Kolonias, L. M. Carlson, H. Y. Liu, M. A. Hussein, H. R. Terebelo, G. E. Byrne Jr, B. L. Levine, L. H. Boise, et al. CD28-mediated regulation of multiple myeloma cell proliferation and survival Blood, June 1, 2007; 109(11): 5002 - 5010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Cejas, L. M. Carlson, J. Zhang, S. Padmanabhan, D. Kolonias, I. Lindner, S. Haley, L. H. Boise, and K. P. Lee Protein Kinase C {beta}II Plays an Essential Role in Dendritic Cell Differentiation and Autoregulates Its Own Expression J. Biol. Chem., August 5, 2005; 280(31): 28412 - 28423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |