The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tze, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tze, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, T. W.
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 678-682.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Late Immature B Cells (IgMhighIgDneg) Undergo a Light Chain Receptor Editing Response to Soluble Self-Antigen1

Lina E. Tze, Keli L. Hippen and Timothy W. Behrens2

Center for Immunology and Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Receptor editing is an important mechanism to modify the Ag specificity of newly developing B cells that are reactive with self-Ags. Previous studies have suggested that late immature B cells, bearing high levels of IgM on their cell surface, are unable to initiate receptor editing and instead are deleted by apoptosis. Using the hen egg lysozyme transgenic system, we show that IgMhigh late-immature B cells are fully capable of receptor editing to soluble self-Ag. This was demonstrated by the induction of new endogenous light chain locus rearrangements and by a single-cell flow cytometric assay using a recombination-activating gene 2-green fluorescence protein reporter transgene. These studies suggest that the developmental window available for immature B cells to edit their Ig receptors, at least in response to certain soluble Ags, extends through the IgMhigh late immature B cell stage.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
B cell development in the bone marrow (BM)3 is characterized initially by Ig rearrangements at H chain loci, followed by clonal expansion of cells with productively rearranged H chains, and then further rearrangements at L chain loci (1). Random Ig rearrangements provide a diversified Ab repertoire that is important for B cells to meet the challenges of adaptive immunity, but pose the problem of generating self-reactive B cells at a relatively high frequency. Newly generated self-reactive immature B cells are tolerized by several distinct mechanisms. Highly self-reactive cells recognizing membrane-bound self-Ags may undergo clonal deletion (2, 3), while self-reactive cells recognizing soluble self-Ags may enter a state of anergy, in which they respond poorly to subsequent B cell receptor (BCR) cross-linking (4). In addition, immature B cells with self-reactive receptors have the potential to initiate new rearrangements, particularly at L chain loci, in an attempt to modify the specificity of Ig in a process termed receptor editing (5, 6).

As many as 20% or more of all developing B cells undergo receptor editing in vivo (7); however, relatively little is known about the mechanisms that regulate this important pathway. Previous studies suggested strong developmental constraint on receptor editing. Using an in vitro model system employing anti-class I MHC 3–83 conventional transgenic (Tg) Ig B cells, Melamed et al. (8) provided evidence to suggest that immature B cells with low levels of IgM (IgMlow) were competent to edit in response to membrane-bound self-Ag, while IgMhigh immature cells were incompetent, even when kept alive by virtue of a bcl-2 transgene.

We have recently used the hen egg lysozyme (HEL) Ig Tg system (4) to examine L chain receptor editing in response to soluble self-Ags (9). We tested whether the same developmental constraint reported for membrane-bound self-Ag also held for soluble Ag. Our results indicate that in the HEL Tg system, and in response to soluble Ag, IgMhigh B cells are fully competent to undergo L chain editing in vitro.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

MD4 HEL-Ig Tg mice (4) were originally provided by C. Goodnow (Australian National University, Canberra, Australia), while recombination-activating gene 2-green fluorescence protein (Rag2-GFP) reporter mice (10) were a gift from M. Nussenzweig (Rockefeller University, New York). The animals were intercrossed to generate Rag2-GFP/HEL-Ig double Tg mice. The mice were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility at the University of Minnesota and were 4–8 wk of age at the time of the experiments.

IL-7 BM cultures

Single-cell suspensions of BM cells from HEL-Ig and HEL-Ig/Rag2-GFP mice were prepared as previously described (9). Cells were cultured at a concentration of 2 x 106 cells/ml in complete medium consisting of 1/1 RPMI 1640:EHAA (Mediatech (Washington, DC) and Biofluids (Rockville, MD), respectively), 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), L-glutamine (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD), and penicillin and streptomycin (Mediatech) in the presence of 16 ng/ml recombinant murine IL-7 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) for 5 days (11, 12, 13). After sorting, cells were placed back into culture in complete medium on gamma-irradiated (2000 rad) S17 stroma (12, 14, 15). The cells were cultured in medium alone, HEL Ag (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), or HELMUT, a four-amino acid, site-directed mutant of HEL with a Kd of ~10-7 M (~100-fold less affinity than wild-type HEL) for the HEL-Ig receptor (9, 16).

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

BM cells grown in IL-7 cultures were stained in FACS buffer (1x PBS and 10% FBS) with FITC-, PE-, or CyChrome-conjugated mAbs to IgMa and IgDa (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and were sorted by FACSVantage (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Sorted B cells from secondary cultures were harvested and stained with FITC-, PE-, or CyChrome-conjugated mAbs to IgMa and IgDa and B220 (BD PharMingen) and assayed by FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences). In some staining conditions, annexin V-PE and/or 7-AAD (BD PharMingen and Calbiochem (San Diego, CA)) were used to exclude dead cells. For the quantitation of cell numbers, a known number of PKH26 reference microbeads (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the cell suspensions just before FACS analysis. Flow cytometric analyses were performed using CellQuest (BD Biosciences) and Flowjo (Treestar, San Carlos, CA) software.

PCR analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from sorted BM cells before and after 2-day secondary cultures in either the presence or the absence of soluble HEL or HELMUT. Genomic DNA from the equivalent of 4000 cells was then subjected to semiquantitative PCR amplifications using primers specific for HEL-Ig and V-J{kappa}1 as previously described (9, 17) (http://jcsmr.anu.edu/group_pages/mgc/PCR.html). The HEL-Ig PCR was slightly modified and performed using primers IgHF1 (5'-GCGACTCCATCACCAGCGAT-3') and IgHR1 (5'-ACCACAGACCAGCAGGCAGA-3') and using the following cycling conditions: 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 59°C, and 1.5 min at 72°C for 25 cycles. The-V-J{kappa}1 PCR was designed to detect the rearrangements of various V{kappa} gene segments to J{kappa}1 by using degenerate V{kappa} primers and a primer downstream of the J{kappa}1 gene segment. Recombining sequence (RS) recombinations were detected with the following primers: VDEG1, 5'-GCGAAGCTTCCCTGATCGCTTCACAGGCAGTGG-3'; VDEG2, 5'-GCGAAGCTTCCCWGCTCGCTTCAGTGGCAGTGG-3'; VDEG3, 5'-GCGAAGCTTCCCAKMCAGGTTCAGTGGCAGTGG-3'; and reverse primer (RS3'), 5'-CTCAAATCTGAGCTCAACTGC-3', using the following cycling conditions: 45 s at 94°C, 1 min at 64°C, and 1 min at 72°C for 27 or 30 cycles (18). This RS PCR was designed to detect rearrangements occurring from V{kappa} regions to a conserved heptamer-nonamer recombination signal sequence found downstream of C{kappa} and 3' {kappa} enhancer, resulting in the deletion of all J{kappa} and C{kappa} regions (19). PCR products were resolved on 1% agarose gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose blots. Specific bands were detected by Southern hybridization of nitrocellulose blots with radiolabeled internal oligonucleotides and autoradiography.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Fresh bone marrow from HEL-Ig mice was grown in IL-7 for 5 days, resulting in cell populations enriched for immature HEL-Ig Tg B cells (IgM+IgDneg-low; Fig. 1A). These cells were then sorted by flow cytometry into highly purified IgMlow (IgMlow/IgDneg) and IgMhigh (IgMhigh/IgDneg-low) cell subpopulations (IgMhigh purities averaging 94%). Surface staining showed that the purified IgMhigh cells expressed slightly higher levels of the maturation markers B220, CD21, and CD23 and slightly lower levels of CD43 (Fig. 1B). Previous experiments showed that IgMlow cells are the precursors of IgMhigh cells (8), and we confirmed this relationship in the current system (data not shown and see Fig. 2B).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Isolation and cell surface phenotype of IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cell populations. A, IgMlow/IgDneg and IgMhigh/IgDneg-low immature B cells were sorted from 5-day IL-7 cultures of bone marrow from HEL-Ig Tg mice (sort purities averaging 98% for IgMlow and 94% for IgMhigh cell populations). B, Flow cytometric analysis of B cell surface markers on IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cell populations. Plots show cells gated on the basis of forward light scatter and B220+ expression. The dark line represents IgMhigh cells, and the light line represents IgMlow cells. Data are representative of six independent experiments.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Sorted IgMhigh late immature B cells have a higher rate of apoptosis than IgMlow cells. Sorted IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cells were cultured in the absence or the presence of 500 ng/ml sHEL or sHELMUT for 48 h on S17 stroma. Cells were stained with Abs to B220 and IgMa and with 7AAD and were analyzed by flow cytometry. A, The viability of IgMlow and IgMhigh cells was determined by the forward light scatter and 7AAD incorporation of B220+ cells. B, Surface IgMa expression of B220+7AAD- cells.

 
The sorted cell subpopulations were further cultured in the absence or the presence of soluble HEL (sHEL) self-Ag or HELMUT, a four-amino acid mutant HEL protein with ~100-fold reduced affinity for the HEL-Ig BCR (16), for 2 days on S17 BM stromal cells. The sorted cells were sensitive to cell death, as determined by forward light scatter and the incorporation of 7-amino-actinomycin D (7AAD) at the end of a 48-h culture (Fig. 2A) as well as by viable cell counts (see below). As previously noted in the 3–83 Tg B cell model system (8), the IgMhigh immature B cell population was more susceptible to cell death than the IgMlow immature B cells even in the absence of Ag. Fig. 2B shows that both IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cells down-regulated surface IgM levels following incubation with Ag to a similar degree, with more extensive surface IgM down-regulation observed in the presence of sHEL than sHELMUT. In the absence of Ag, IgMlow cells became IgMhigh during the 2-day culture period.

Cells were harvested at the end of the secondary Ag culture and assayed for new endogenous V-J{kappa}1 and RS rearrangements, markers for receptor editing in this system. As shown in Fig. 3A, both the IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cell subpopulations were equally capable of receptor editing in response to sHEL, as determined by the detection of new endogenous V-J{kappa}1 and RS rearrangements. The receptor editing responses of both subpopulations were more vigorous in the presence of HEL than in the presence of HELMUT, consistent with previous observations in unfractionated cells (9) (Fig. 3B). As noted previously (9), we did not detect surface {lambda} L chain-expressing cells in these cultures as a marker for editing, possibly due to the inability of {lambda}-chains to pair well with the HEL-Ig H chain or to an inability to displace the endogenous HEL L chain (data not shown). It was also technically difficult to determine whether there was a loss of HEL reactivity in this system as a consequence of editing due to strong down-regulation of overall Ig receptor levels upon Ag encounter and the fact that the anti-HEL L chain is not replaced during editing because it is integrated into chromosomal DNA outside the normal {kappa} locus.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. IgMhigh late immature B cells show new endogenous L chain rearrangements in response to soluble self-Ag. Sorted IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cells were cultured in the absence or the presence of 2.5 µg/ml sHEL (A) or 500 ng/ml sHEL or sHELMUT (B) for 48 h on S17 stroma. Genomic DNA was extracted, and V-J{kappa}1 and RS rearrangements were detected by semiquantitative PCR. The loading control is PCR of the HEL-Ig Tg H chain. Densitometric quantitation of relative V-J{kappa}1 and RS rearrangements to the HEL-Ig H chain control were normalized to 1 for the smallest value in each assay. Relative densitometric intensities: A: RS, 5, 13, 1, 4, 52, 1, and 15 (lanes 1–7, respectively); and V-J{kappa}1, 2, 3, 1, 4, 10, 4, and 9 (lanes 1–7, respectively); B: V-J{kappa}1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 9, 17, 3, 9, and 15 (lanes 1–9, respectively). C57BL6/J spleen genomic DNA was used as a positive control for the V-J{kappa}1 and RS rearrangement assays and as a negative control for HEL-Ig H chain PCR assay.

 
We next bred mice carrying a Rag2-GFP reporter transgene (10) with HEL-Ig mice to generate double-Tg mice. BM from these animals was cultured in IL-7 and sorted into IgMlow and IgMhigh cell populations, and cells were then incubated with Ag. This single-cell analysis showed that a significant proportion of both IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cells up-regulate Rag2 in response to sHEL (Fig. 4A). These data suggest that a large percentage of the viable IgMhigh cell population was undergoing the editing response, rather than vigorous editing in a small subpopulation.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. IgMhigh late immature B cells induce Rag2 following Ag receptor cross-linking. A, Sorted IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cells from Rag2-GFP/HEL-Ig Tg IL-7 BM cultures were cultured in the absence or the presence of 500 ng/ml sHEL for 48 h on S17 stroma. Cells were stained with Abs to B220 and IgMa and with 7AAD and were analyzed by flow cytometry. Live B220+ cells were analyzed for Rag2-GFP induction. The data shown are representative of two similar experiments. B, IgMlow and IgMhigh immature B cells were cultured in the absence or the presence of 500 ng/ml or 2.5 µg/ml sHEL for 36–48 h. Live cell counts were performed by trypan blue exclusion or flow cytometry with PKH26 reference microbeads and 7AAD dye exclusion. Data represent the percentage of live cells relative to the number at the initiation of the cultures and are presented as the mean ± SD of five experiments.

 
It was important to rule out the possibility that the few contaminating IgMlow B cells (averaging 6.0% in five experiments) in the sorted IgMhigh populations could account for the receptor editing response observed in the sorted IgMhigh cell populations. Viable cells in the cultures were quantified using trypan blue exclusion and a flow cytometric bead-based method (see Materials and Methods). As noted above, there was a higher rate of cell death in cultured IgMhigh B cells compared with the IgMlow cells in the presence of sHEL (Fig. 4B). On the average, however, 18% of the starting IgMhigh B cells were alive at the end of the culture, and ~40% of these were Rag2-GFP positive (Fig. 4A). After initial cell sorting, there was an average of 6.0% contaminating IgMlow cells in the IgMhigh cell populations. Since the average viability of IgMlow cells in the presence of sHEL was 80%, they would constitute 26.7% of the viable cell population in the sHEL treated IgMhigh cultures (80% x 6.0% = 4.8%; 4.8%/18% viable cells in IgMhigh cultures after incubation with Ag = 26.7%). Because only 30% of viable IgMlow cells up-regulate Rag2-GFP in the presence of sHEL, only 8% (30% x 26.7%) of the 40%, for a total of 20% of the Rag2-GFP+ cells found in the IgMhigh cultures, could be derived from contaminating IgMlow cells (Fig. 4A). Even in a worst case scenario, where all contaminating IgMlow cells were viable, and 50% were Rag2-GFP+, they could only account for less than half of the Rag2-GFP+ cells in the IgMhigh cultures. An expansion of contaminating IgMlow cells is also very unlikely, since there was no appreciable proliferation of cells in these Ag-treated cultures, as determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation or CFSE labeling (9) (data not shown). We conclude that IgMhigh cells are capable of undergoing receptor editing in vitro in response to soluble self-Ag.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The experiments described here clearly demonstrate the ability of IgMhigh late immature B cells generated from HEL-Ig Tg bone marrow to undergo a receptor editing response following incubation with soluble Ag. These results contrast with the previously reported in vitro experiments in the 3-83 Tg system (8), which suggested significant developmental constraint on the editing process, by which IgMhigh immature B cells were shown to be incapable of editing. There are a number of experimental factors that may account for the disparate results obtained in the two systems. First, these are very distinct Tg systems. The HEL-Ig BCR has a much higher affinity for HEL Ag (Kd = ~10-9 M) than the 3-83 receptor has for class I MHC (Kd = ~10-6 M), and it is possible that higher affinity interactions are required to potently initiate the signaling required to induce editing in IgMhigh immature B cells. Arguing against this possibility is our finding that lower affinity Ag (HELMUT; Kd = ~10-7 M) for the HEL-Ig receptor was also capable of inducing editing in IgMhigh cells. Other factors relating to the Tg receptors, such as differences in BCR density and differing abilities to down-regulate BCR levels in response to Ag encounter, may also play a role.

A clear difference between the systems is the nature of the Ag. For the reported 3-83 experiments, the class I MHC Ag was recognized as an abundant, high density, membrane-bound Ag on Op42 stromal cells (8), while the experiments described here involve soluble self-Ag on S17 stromal cells. The avidity of the 3-83 receptor/Ag interaction together with unknown interactionsbetween surface proteins on the Op42 stromal cell line and the IgMhigh B cells may have combined to block the ability of these B cells to initiate an editing response. On the other hand, the S17 cell line in some fashion might remain permissive for receptor editing in IgMhigh late immature B cells, particularly in response to the lower levels of cross-linking observed in the HEL system in response to soluble Ag. In experiments not shown we attempted to examine the editing of IgMhigh immature B cells in response to membrane-bound HEL, by incubating sorted cells with BM stroma derived from membrane-bound HEL mice (3). However, these experiments were inconclusive due to the very small number of viable cells remaining at the end of a 2-day culture.

In summary, the current study suggests that the window of time available for immature B cells to revise their receptors following an encounter with self-Ag may extend to the late IgMhigh stage, at least for certain Ags. Given the increased sensitivity of IgMhigh cells to cell death, it is unlikely that these cells would have a lengthy period of time available for revising receptors after contact with self-Ag. However, this mechanism may allow for "11th hour" salvage of self-reactive receptors before B cell clonal deletion.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Amanda Vegoe and David Corcoran for assistance with animal husbandry and genotyping, Michel Nussenzweig for providing mice, and members of the Behrens laboratory for helpful discussions.


   Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the National Arthritis Foundation and by a Scholar Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (to T.W.B.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Timothy W. Behrens, 6-126 BSBE Building, 312 Church Street SE, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail address: behre001{at}umn.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BM, bone marrow; 7AAD, 7-amino-actinomycin D; BCR, B cell receptor; Tg, transgenic; HEL, hen egg lysozyme; Rag2-GFP, recombination-activating gene 2-green fluorescence protein; sHEL, soluble HEL; RS, recombining sequence. Back

Received for publication December 31, 2002. Accepted for publication May 5, 2003.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Alt, F., K. Blackwell, G. Yancopoulos. 1987. Development of the primary antibody repertoire. Science 238:1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Nemazee, D. A., K. Burki. 1989. Clonal deletion of B lymphocytes in a transgenic mouse bearing anti-MHC class I antibody genes. Nature 337:562.[Medline]
  3. Hartley, S. B., J. Crosbie, R. Brink, A. B. Kantor, A. Basten, C. C. Goodnow. 1991. Elimination from peripheral lymphoid tissues of self-reactive B lymphocytes recognizing membrane-bound antigens. Nature 353:765.[Medline]
  4. Goodnow, C. C., J. Crosbie, S. Adelstein, T. B. Lavoie, S. J. Smith-Gill, R. A. Brink, H. Pritchard-Briscoe, J. S. Wotherspoon, R. H. Loblay, K. Raphael, et al 1988. Altered immunoglobulin expression and functional silencing of self-reactive B lymphocytes in transgenic mice. Nature 334:676.[Medline]
  5. Gay, D., T. Saunders, S. Camper, M. Weigert. 1993. Receptor editing: an approach by autoreactive B cells to escape tolerance. J. Exp. Med. 177:999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tiegs, S. L., D. M. Russell, D. Nemazee. 1993. Receptor editing in self-reactive bone marrow B cells. J. Exp. Med. 177:1009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Casellas, R., T. A. Shih, M. Kleinewietfeld, J. Rakonjac, D. Nemazee, K. Rajewsky, M. C. Nussenzweig. 2001. Contribution of receptor editing to the antibody repertoire. Science 291:1541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Melamed, D., R. J. Benschop, J. C. Cambier, D. Nemazee. 1998. Developmental regulation of B lymphocyte immune tolerance compartmentalizes clonal selection from receptor selection. Cell 92:173.[Medline]
  9. Tze, L. E., E. A. Baness, K. L. Hippen, T. W. Behrens. 2000. Ig light chain receptor editing in anergic B cells. J. Immunol. 165:6796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yu, W., H. Nagaoka, M. Jankovic, Z. Misulovin, H. Suh, A. Rolink, F. Melchers, E. Meffre, M. C. Nussenzweig. 1999. Continued RAG expression in late stages of B cell development and no apparent re-induction after immunization. Nature 400:682.[Medline]
  11. Rolink, A., A. Kudo, H. Karasuyama, Y. Kikuchi, F. Melchers. 1991. Long-term proliferating early pre-B cell lines and clones with the potential to develop to surface Ig-positive mitogen-reactive B cells in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J. 10:327.[Medline]
  12. Melamed, D., D. Nemazee. 1997. Self-antigen does not accelerate immature B cell apoptosis, but stimulates receptor editing as a consequence of developmental arrest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:9267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Melamed, D., J. A. Kench, K. Grabstein, A. Rolink, D. Nemazee. 1997. A functional B cell receptor transgene allows IL-7 independent maturation of B cell precursors. J. Immunol. 159:1233.[Abstract]
  14. Collins, L. S., K. Dorshkind. 1987. A stromal cell line from myeloid long-term bone marrow cultures can support myelopoiesis and B lymphopoiesis. J. Immunol. 138:1082.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Cumano, A., K. Dorshkind, S. Gillis, C. J. Paige. 1990. The influence of S17 stromal cells and interleukin 7 on B cell development. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:2183.[Medline]
  16. Batista, F. D., M. S. Neuberger. 1998. Affinity dependence of the B cell response to antigen: a threshold, a ceiling, and the importance of off-rate. Immunity 8:751.[Medline]
  17. Hertz, M., D. Nemazee. 1997. BCR ligation induces receptor editing in IgM+IgD- bone marrow B cells in vitro. Immunity 6:429.[Medline]
  18. Pelanda, R., S. Schwers, E. Sonoda, R. M. Torres, D. Nemazee, K. Rajewsky. 1997. Receptor editing in a transgenic mouse model: site, efficiency, and role in B cell tolerance and antibody diversification. Immunity 7:765.[Medline]
  19. Shimizu, T., T. Iwasato, H. Yamagishi. 1991. Deletions of immunoglobulin C {kappa} region characterized by the circular excision products in mouse splenocytes. J. Exp. Med. 173:1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
K. Kiefer, P. B. Nakajima, J. Oshinsky, S. H. Seeholzer, M. Radic, G. C. Bosma, and M. J. Bosma
Antigen Receptor Editing in Anti-DNA Transitional B Cells Deficient for Surface IgM
J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 6094 - 6106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
B. R. Schram, L. E. Tze, L. B. Ramsey, J. Liu, L. Najera, A. L. Vegoe, R. R. Hardy, K. L. Hippen, M. A. Farrar, and T. W. Behrens
B Cell Receptor Basal Signaling Regulates Antigen-Induced Ig Light Chain Rearrangements
J. Immunol., April 1, 2008; 180(7): 4728 - 4741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Int ImmunolHome page
S. M. Caucheteux, C. Vernochet, J. Wantyghem, M.-C. Gendron, and C. Kanellopoulos-Langevin
Tolerance induction to self-MHC antigens in fetal and neonatal mouse B cells
Int. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 20(1): 11 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
H. Wang, J. Feng, C.-F. Qi, Z. Li, H. C. Morse III, and S. H. Clarke
Transitional B Cells Lose Their Ability to Receptor Edit but Retain Their Potential for Positive and Negative Selection
J. Immunol., December 1, 2007; 179(11): 7544 - 7552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. Bai, Y. Chen, Y. He, X. Dai, X. Lin, R. Wen, and D. Wang
Phospholipase C{gamma}2 Contributes to Light-Chain Gene Activation and Receptor Editing
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2007; 27(17): 5957 - 5967.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. Mazari, M. Ouarzane, and M. Zouali
Subversion of B lymphocyte tolerance by hydralazine, a potential mechanism for drug-induced lupus
PNAS, April 10, 2007; 104(15): 6317 - 6322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
K. R. Kumar, L. Li, M. Yan, M. Bhaskarabhatla, A. B. Mobley, C. Nguyen, J. M. Mooney, J. D. Schatzle, E. K. Wakeland, and C. Mohan
Regulation of B cell tolerance by the lupus susceptibility gene ly108.
Science, June 16, 2006; 312(5780): 1665 - 1669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JEMHome page
J. Samuels, Y.-S. Ng, C. Coupillaud, D. Paget, and E. Meffre
Impaired early B cell tolerance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
J. Exp. Med., May 16, 2005; 201(10): 1659 - 1667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
E. Diamant, Z. Keren, and D. Melamed
CD19 regulates positive selection and maturation in B lymphopoiesis: lack of CD19 imposes developmental arrest of immature B cells and consequential stimulation of receptor editing
Blood, April 15, 2005; 105(8): 3247 - 3254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JEMHome page
Y.-S. Ng, H. Wardemann, J. Chelnis, C. Cunningham-Rundles, and E. Meffre
Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Is Essential for Human B Cell Tolerance
J. Exp. Med., October 4, 2004; 200(7): 927 - 934.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
E. Edry and D. Melamed
Receptor Editing in Positive and Negative Selection of B Lymphopoiesis
J. Immunol., October 1, 2004; 173(7): 4265 - 4271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tze, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tze, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Behrens, T. W.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS