The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, W. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Islet Cell Transplantation
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 6929-6935.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Blocking the Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1/CCR2 Chemokine Pathway Induces Permanent Survival of Islet Allografts through a Programmed Death-1 Ligand-1-Dependent Mechanism 1

Iris Lee*, Liqing Wang*, Andrew D. Wells*, Qunrui Ye*, Rongxiang Han*, Martin E. Dorf{dagger}, William A. Kuziel{ddagger}, Barrett J. Rollins§, Lieping Chen and Wayne W. Hancock2,*

* Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Joseph Stokes, Jr., Research Institute and Biesecker Pediatric Liver Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; {dagger} Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; {ddagger} Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and Institute of Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; § Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55095


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Islet allografts are subject to rapid rejection through host cellular immune responses involving mononuclear cell recruitment and tissue injury. Interruption of leukocyte recruitment through chemokine receptor targeting is of therapeutic benefit in various experimental models, but little is known about the contribution of chemokine pathways to islet allograft rejection. We found that murine islets produce monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; CCL2) in vitro and that islet allograft rejection was associated with intragraft expression of MCP-1 and its receptor, CCR2. We therefore investigated whether MCP-1 and CCR2 are required for the rejection of fully MHC-disparate islet allografts. Wild-type mice treated with blocking anti-MCP-1 mAb plus a brief, subtherapeutic course of rapamycin had long-term islet allograft survival, in contrast to the effect of treatment with either mAb or rapamycin alone. CCR2-/- mice treated with rapamycin also maintained islet allografts long-term. Both MCP/CCR2- and rapamycin-sensitive signals were required for maximal proliferation of alloreactive T cells, suggesting that MCP-1/CCR2 induce rejection by promoting alloreactive T cell clonal expansion and homing and migration. Prolonged islet allograft survival achieved by blockade of the MCP-1/CCR2 pathway plus rapamycin therapy was accompanied by a mononuclear cell infiltrate expressing the inhibitory receptor, programmed death-1 (PD-1), and its ligand (PD-L1, B7-H1), and prolongation of islet allograft survival was abrogated by anti-PD-L1 mAb therapy. These data show that the blockade of MCP-1 binding to CCR2 in conjunction with subtherapeutic immunosuppression can have profound effects on islet allograft survival and implicate the expression of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in the regulation of physiologic responses in vivo.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemokines are small m.w. chemotactic cytokines involved in cell recruitment, activation, and differentiation; they act by binding to G protein-coupled, seven-transmembrane chemokine receptors (1, 2, 3). Although various mRNA encoding essentially all the main chemokines and their receptors can be detected during clinical allograft rejection, experimental studies demonstrate key roles for specific chemokine/chemokine receptor pathways in mediating leukocyte recruitment and rejection of vascularized cardiac allografts (4, 5). The most potent effects are seen by targeting CXCR3 (6) or its ligand, inducing protein-10 (7), with additional, albeit lesser, benefits seen by targeting CCR5 (8). In contrast, only modest effects were seen with targeting of CCR1 (9), CCR2 (4), or CX3CR1 (10), and blockade of several other chemokines had no therapeutic benefit in the vascularized cardiac allograft model (4). One important question arising from such work is to what extent are such data universal, or might they depend upon the type of graft transplanted?

Islet allografting has recently become a therapeutic option for patients with type I diabetes, although there are many limitations to its widespread use, including development of allograft rejection. In the one mechanistic study, to our knowledge, concerning the roles of chemokines and their receptors in islet allograft rejection, Abdi et al. (11) found that islet allografts placed under the kidney capsules of CCR5-/- mice had a 3- to 4-fold prolongation of allograft survival compared with wild-type recipients. However, no studies have demonstrated that CCR5 or its chemokine ligands are expressed by human islets or after human islet allografting. In fact, one group reported that no mRNA for macrophage inflammatory protein-1{alpha}, macrophage inflammatory protein-1{beta}, or RANTES (all chemokine ligands for CCR5) was detected in resting human islets or upon their stimulation (12). Conversely, the chemokine, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1;3 CCL2), is known to be produced de novo by human islets, and its expression is increased by exposure to IL-1{beta}, TNF-{alpha}, or LPS in vitro (12, 13). Furthermore, low levels of MCP-1 secretion after human islet allografting were found to be a relevant factor in long-term graft survival and insulin independence (12).

MCP-1 is the main monocyte chemoattractant in vivo (14, 15, 16). MCP-1 can also attract memory T cells and activated NK cells in vitro (17, 18) and is key to the development of Th2 responses (19). The receptor for MCP-1, CCR2 (20), is highly expressed on monocytes and activated T cells, including memory T cells and Th1 and Th2 cells (3). CCR2-/- mice demonstrate a defect in Th1-type responses (21, 22) and a corresponding susceptibility to infections with intracellular pathogens (23, 24) and resistance to development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (25, 26). In this study we investigated the effects of targeting MCP-1 or its receptor on islet allograft survival in murine recipients rendered diabetic using streptozotocin.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

MCP-1-/- (16) and CCR2-/- (27) mice, back-crossed more than eight generations on a C57BL/6 background, and wild-type C57BL/6 (H-2b), BALB/c (H-2d), and C57BL/6xDBA F1 (H-2b/d) mice from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions. C57BL/6 mice given a single injection i.p. of clinical grade streptozotocin (Zanosar; 180–225 mg/kg; Pharmacia and Upjohn, Peapack, NJ) were considered diabetic when glucose levels of >300 mg/dl were obtained on 2 consecutive days. Studies were performed with a protocol approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Islet isolation, in vitro culture, and transplantation

The pancreata of female BALB/c retired breeders were infused via the common bile duct with collagenase-P (Roche, Indianapolis, IN; 2 mg/ml, 5 ml) and digested for 8 min at 37°C. Islets were purified on a Ficoll gradient collected using a stereomicroscope, and 500 islets (100 islets/ml) were cultured in 5 ml of RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Islets cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2 and 95% humidified air were stimulated with one of the following agents (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN): LPS (1 µg/ml), rIFN-{gamma} (100 U/ml), rIL-1 (100 ng/ml), or rTNF-{alpha} (100 ng/ml). After 24 h, they were harvested and used for real-time quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR).

For islet allografting, 400–600 islets from BALB/c donors were placed under the kidney capsule of each diabetic C57BL/6 recipient. Primary function was defined as a reduction of blood glucose to <200 mg/ml post-transplant, and rejection as a rise in blood glucose to >300 mg/ml. Allografted mice (six to eight per group) were untreated or were treated from the day of transplant with rapamycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; 0.2 mg/kg/d for 14 days); the hamster anti-mouse MCP-1 mAb, 2H5 (28) (200 µg i.p. three times per week for 2 wk), the hamster anti-B7-H1 mAb 10B5 (29) (100 µg i.p. three times per wk for 2 wk), or hamster IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). As indicated, long-term graft function was confirmed by nephrectomy and development of hyperglycemia.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) studies

RNA was extracted from cultured islets and islet allografts using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies), and RT of RNA samples (2 µg) using random hexamers was performed with an ABI PRISM 5700 unit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Specific primer and probe sequences for target genes were used for qRT-PCR amplification of total cDNA (50 ng) with an ABI PRISM 5700 machine (TaqMan PDAR; Applied Biosystems). Relative quantitation of target cDNA was determined by arbitrarily setting the control value to 1. Changes in the cDNA content of a sample were expressed as fold increases above the set control value. Differences in cDNA input were corrected by normalizing signals obtained with specific primers to ribosomal RNA. Nonspecific amplification was excluded by performing RT-PCR reactions in the absence of target cDNA.

Histopathology and immunopathology

Islet grafts (n = 4/group/time point) were harvested at rejection or >100 days post-transplant, and H&E-stained paraffin sections were used to assess islet preservation, leukocyte infiltration, and fibrosis. Corresponding cryostat sections were labeled using mAbs directed against macrophages and T, B, and NK cells (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA); PD-1, PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1), and PD-L2 (eBiosciences, San Diego, CA); and CCR2 and CCR5 (30), as previously described (31, 32). Insulin was detected in paraffin sections using a guinea pig Ab (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) (31). The specificity of labeling was assessed using isotype-matched mAbs or purified IgG.

Flow cytometry of adoptively transferred CFSE-labeled cells and in vitro studies

Alloreactive T cells were generated by i.v. injection of 20 million CFSE-labeled C57BL/6 (H-2b) spleen and lymph node cells into C57BL/6xDBA F1 (H-2b/d) recipients, a parent->F1 MHC mismatch in which only donor cells respond (33). Spleens were harvested from F1 mice after 3 days, and splenocytes were incubated with CD4-PE, CD8-PE, anti-PD-L1-PE or anti-PD-L2-PE, and biotin-conjugated anti-H-2kd and anti-H-2dd mAb (BD PharMingen). Donor alloreactive T cells were distinguished from recipient T cells by gating on H-2kd- and H-2dd-negative cells (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA), and T cell proliferation was assessed using CFSE division profiles.

For intracellular cytokine staining, splenocytes (3 million/ml) were treated with Golgi-Stop (BD PharMingen) and stimulated for 4 h with PMA (3 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 µM) in 24-well plates in T cell medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 50 µM 2-ME). Cells were collected, stained with cell surface markers (CD4-PE or CD8-PE, biotin-conjugated H-2kd or H-2dd followed by SA-PERCP), fixed overnight with 1% formaldehyde, and stained with IFN-{gamma}-APC or IL-2-APC after being permeabilized using Permwash (BD PharMingen).

In addition, for in vitro studies of the effects of MCP-1 and CCR2 on T cell activation, splenocytes from MCP-1-/-, CCR2-/-, or wild-type controls were activated in vitro using CD3 mAb alone or CD3 plus CD28 mAb, as described previously (31). After 48 h, cells were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry for the expression by CD4 or CD8+ T cells of CD25, PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2.

Statistics

Islet allograft survival was used to generate Kaplan-Meier survival curves and comparison between groups was performed by log-rank analysis.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MCP-1 is up-regulated in murine islets by inflammatory stimuli

Given data that MCP-1 is produced by human islets de novo and its expression increased by inflammatory cytokines in vitro, we analyzed murine islet MCP-1 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR. Like human islets (12), murine islets cultured in vitro for 24 h expressed MCP-1 mRNA, and exposure to LPS, IL-1{beta}, TNF-{alpha}, or IFN-{gamma} led to a 4- to 12-fold increase in MCP-1 mRNA expression (Fig. 1a). Islet MCP-1 mRNA expression was also increased post-transplant. Levels of MCP-1 mRNA in islets harvested 7 days post-transplant were increased ~130-fold compared with levels in corresponding islet isografts (Fig. 1b), although the relative contributions of inflammatory cells and islets cells to MCP-1 production were not determined. If MCP-1 were to play a role in islet allograft rejection, local expression of CCR2 would also be anticipated. We therefore assessed intragraft mRNA levels of CCR2 plus those of two other chemokine receptors previously implicated in host alloresponses, CXCR3 (6) and CCR5 (8, 11). Levels of CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR3 mRNA were each markedly increased in allografts vs isografts at 7 days post-transplant (Fig. 1c). Immunohistologic studies of corresponding islet allografts showed localization of CCR2 to host mononuclear cells (Fig. 1d). Infiltrating mononuclear cells also showed staining for CCR5 and CXCR3 (data not shown), although in each case the extent of receptor by T cells vs macrophages was not determined.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. qRT-PCR analysis of MCP-1 and CCR2 mRNA expression by islets cultured in vitro and after transplantation. a, MCP-1 mRNA expression using islets cultured in vitro for 24 h with medium alone or LPS (1 mg/ml), TNF-{alpha} (100 ng/ml), IL-1{beta} (100 ng/ml), or IFN-{gamma} (100 U/ml). Data are shown as MCP-1 mRNA expression relative to that with medium alone and are representative of six experiments. b, MCP-1 mRNA expression in freshly harvested islets or in allogeneic or syngeneic islets harvested at 7 days post-transplant. Data are shown as MCP-1 mRNA expression relative to that in syngeneic islets and are representative of three experiments. c, Expression of CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR3 mRNA in freshly harvested islets vs allogeneic and syngeneic islets harvested at 7 days post-transplant. Data for each chemokine receptor are shown as the mRNA level relative to that in freshly harvested islets and are representative of two experiments. d, Immunohistology of islet allograft tissue at 7 days post-transplant in wild-type recipients showing onset of insulitis and peri-islet recruitment of T cells and macrophages, including cells expressing CCR2. Islets are indicated with asterisks.

 
Beneficial effect of targeting MCP-1/CCR2 pathway in conjunction with low dose rapamycin

Our findings of MCP-1 expression by islets and recruitment of CCR2+ host mononuclear cells during islet allograft rejection led us to ask whether this pathway was of practical therapeutic consequence with regard to controlling or preventing islet allograft rejection. Moreover, given concerns that gene-targeted mice may have compensatory responses associated with specific gene loss, we sought to target the MCP-1/CCR2 pathway in both knockout and wild-type recipients.

CCR2-/- and wild-type C57BL/6 mice rendered diabetic by streptozotocin received fully MHC-disparate islet allografts from BALB/c donors (Fig. 2a). Islet allograft survival in CCR2-/- mice was not significantly different from that in CCR2+/+ controls (p > 0.05). However, although rapamycin therapy (0.2 mg/kg/d for 14 days) prolonged islet graft survival only a few extra days in wild-type recipients, the same protocol in CCR2-/- recipients led to permanent engraftment (>120 d; p < 0.005). Untreated wild-type mice or those receiving control hamster IgG or hamster anti-MCP-1 mAb rejected islet allografts within 2 wk (Fig. 2). Consistent with the effects of targeting CCR2 in conjunction with rapamycin therapy, anti-MCP-1 mAb plus rapamycin therapy led to permanent (>120 days) engraftment, whereas controls given rapamycin plus hamster IgG were rejected within 20 days (p < 0.005).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Beneficial effect of targeting MCP-1/CCR2 pathway plus rapamycin on survival of BALB/c islets transplanted into diabetic C57BL/6 mice. a, The tempo of rejection (11–14 days) was similar in wild-type mice treated with IgG or anti-MCP-1 mAb (100 µg three times per week for 2 wk) or in CCR2-/- recipients, and therapy with rapamycin (RPM; 0.2 mg/kg for 14 days) led to a maximal islet allograft survival of 19 days. In contrast, treatment for 14 days with anti-MCP-1 mAb plus low dose rapamycin or use of rapamycin in CCR2-/- recipients resulted in long-term survival of islet allografts (>120 days; p < 0.005). b, In vitro activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from MCP-1-/- or wild-type mice (upper panels) and CCR2-/- and control mice (lower panels); analysis by flow cytometry of CD25 expression using cells harvested after stimulation for 48 h with CD3 with or without CD28 mAb.

 
MCP-1 and CCR2 contribute to alloreactive T cell clonal expansion and differentiation in vivo

As rejection is a CD4+ T cell-dependent event, we analyzed the capacity of T cells from MCP-1-/- or CCR2-/- mice to undergo activation in vitro and in vivo. We first assessed whether T cells from each strain had comparable levels of expression of CD25 after stimulation in vitro with CD3/CD28 mAbs. Both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from MCP-1-/- or CCR2-/- mice showed decreased induction of CD25 after 48 h in culture compared with cells from wild-type controls (Fig. 2b), suggesting that this pathway might contribute to full T cell activation. We next determined whether the lack of MCP-1 or CCR2 affected the alloactivation of CD4+ T cells using an in vivo MLR model in which CFSE-labeled C57BL/6 (H-2b) splenocytes were adoptively transferred into semiallogeneic B6D2F1 (H2b/d) mice. Fig. 3 shows the data for CD4+ T cell responses; comparable effects in each case were seen with CD8+ T cells, although the overall magnitude of their proliferation in this model was less than that for CD4+ T cells (data not shown). Compared with controls, CD4+ T cells from MCP-1-/- mice exhibited a modest decrease in alloreactive CD4+ T cell clonal expansion, which was accentuated by the use of rapamycin (Fig. 3a). Similarly, anti-MCP-1 mAb decreased the alloactivation of wild-type CD4+ T cells, and this effect was again accentuated by rapamycin (Fig. 3b). CD4+ T cells from CCR2-/- also proliferated less than wild-type cells (Fig. 3c), and responses were markedly attenuated by rapamycin therapy (Fig. 3d). Likewise, effector cytokine production by alloactivated T cells was affected; transfer of CCR2-/- donor CD4+ T cells led to decreased production of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma}, as measured by flow cytometric analysis of intracellular cytokine expression, compared with controls (Fig. 3e).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Effects of MCP-1 and CCR2 on the alloactivation of CD4+ T cells in vivo (3 days postadoptive transfer). a, CFSE-labeled cells from MCP-1-/- mice and WT mice were adoptively transferred to F1 mice. In contrast to cells from wild-type or MCP-1-/- donors, the use of rapamycin (RPM; green) reduced the number of CD4+ T cells undergoing maximal cell division, whereas the use of RPM and MCP-1-/- donor cells (gold) resulted in the least response to alloantigen. b, Neutralization of MCP-1 (blue) or use of RPM (green) in F1 animals after adoptive transfer of CFSE-labeled wild-type donor cells reduces T cell alloactivation and proliferation, whereas the combination of RPM and anti-MCP-1 mAb (gold) has a still further and markedly inhibitory effect. c, CD4+ cells from CCR2-/- donors (green) demonstrate decreased responses to alloantigen in vivo compared with cells from wild-type donors. d, Use of RPM largely suppresses the proliferative response of CD4+ T cells from CCR2-/- donor mice. Alloactivated CD4+ T cells from CCR2-/- donor mice (green) exhibit decreased IL-2 (e) and IFN-{gamma} (f) intracellular cytokine staining compared with cells from wild-type controls.

 
PD-1 pathway and islet allografts

We investigated the intragraft features associated with prolongation of islet allograft survival in wild-type recipients treated with anti-MCP-1 mAb plus rapamycin (Fig. 4a). Allografts were well preserved and showed dense insulin staining despite the presence of a prominent peri-islet mononuclear cell infiltrate. Infiltrating CD45+ leukocytes consisted of T cells and macrophages and showed expression of components of the PD-1 pathway, including PD-1 (34), and PD-L1, a recently described B7 homologue also known as B7-H1 (35, 36), which regulates T cell activation through binding to PD-1 (34), but negligible expression of the second PD-1 ligand, PD-L2/B7-DC (37, 38). This led us to assess the expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 by T cells activated in vitro and in the parent->F1 CFSE model.



View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and islet allografts. a, Immunopathology of islet allografts harvested at 60 days post-transplant from recipients treated with anti-MCP-1 mAb plus rapamycin, showing peri-islet mononuclear cell infiltrate (H&E), insulin production by intact islets, peri-islet accumulation of T cells (CD3+) and macrophages (CD11b+, F4/80+), expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 but minimal or no PD-L2, and absence of staining with control IgG (immunoperoxidase staining of cryostat sections; hematoxylin counterstain; magnification, x100). b, Flow cytometry of in vitro-activated murine CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, showing negligible baseline expression of PD-1 or PD-L1 (red), but induction upon partial activation by plate-bound CD3 mAb (blue) or full activation with plate-bound CD3 plus CD28 mAbs (green). Analysis was performed at 48 h. The data shown are representative of three experiments. c, Flow cytometric analysis of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vivo after adoptive transfer of CFSE-labeled wild-type donor cells into F1 untreated mice. Analysis was performed at 3 days. The data shown are representative of eight experiments. d, PD-L1 expression on alloactivated CD4+ cells is modified by blockade of the MCP-1-CCR2 pathway in vivo. The mean fluorescence of PD-L1 on alloactivated CFSE-labeled CD4+ cells from wild-type and MCP-1-/- mice without treatment or with rapamycin therapy is shown.

 
PD-1 was not expressed by resting CD4+ or CD8+ T cells, but was induced upon activation by CD3/CD28 mAbs (Fig. 4b). Similarly, although both cell types cultured under basal conditions expressed only trace levels of PD-L1, strong up-regulation was observed after cell activation with CD3/CD28 mAbs (Fig. 4b). PD-1 and PD-L1 were also up-regulated on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells after alloactivation in vivo, as assessed by comparison with the levels of expression by nondividing transferred cells, and expression appeared to be a function of cell division (Fig. 4c). Moreover, the expression of PD-L1 on alloactivated wild-type donor CD4+ T cells tended to increase for at least five successive divisions, whereas PD-L1 expression continued to rise beyond five divisions in the case of alloactivation of MCP-1-/- donor T cells, with or without rapamycin therapy (Fig. 4d).

Anti-PD-L1 mAb revokes long-term graft survival

We next considered whether the increased PD-L1 expression on alloreactive T cells seen after targeting the MCP-1/CCR2 pathway was of functional significance by testing the effects of PD-L1 blockade in vivo. Administration of a neutralizing anti-PD-L1 mAb from the time of engraftment to islet allograft recipients treated with anti-MCP-1 mAb plus rapamycin led to rejection by 20–25 days post-transplant (Fig. 5a). In parallel studies, treatment with anti-PD-L1 mAb resulted in increased production of IL-2 by CD4+ cells and increased IFN-{gamma} production by CD8+ cells after alloactivation in vivo compared with corresponding untreated or rapamycin-treated controls (Fig. 5b).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. a, Anti-PD-L1 mAb abrogates long-term survival of islet allografts in wild-type mice treated with anti-MCP-1 mAb plus rapamycin (RPM; gray) compared with islet survival in mice receiving anti-MCP-1 plus RPM (red). b, Effects of anti-PD-L1 mAb therapy on production of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells undergoing alloactivation in vivo in the presence of anti-PD-L1 mAb or RPM or no therapy. The mean fluorescence of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} labeling is shown after permeabilization and intracellular cytokine staining and is representative of three experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study showed that the MCP-1/CCR2 pathway is up-regulated during islet allograft rejection, and that targeting this pathway, in conjunction with a brief course of rapamycin, could induce long-term islet allograft survival through a PD-L1-dependent mechanism.

Chemokines are involved in various biologic processes beyond cell migration, including cell activation and differentiation, and previous studies have analyzed the relative importance of the main chemokines and their receptors in mediating vascularized cardiac allograft rejection (4, 5). In this study subrenal capsular islet allografts were rejected within 2 wk of transplantation in conjunction with a host mononuclear cell infiltrate that expressed the chemokine receptors, CCR2, CCR5, and CXCR3 (Fig. 1). Involvement of CCR2+ mononuclear cells is consistent with the capacity of human (12) and murine islets (Fig. 1) to produce MCP-1 de novo and to up-regulate expression in response to inflammatory stimuli (12, 13), such as might occur during hypoxia or ischemia/reperfusion injury in the early period post-transplant. The absence of an infiltrate in normal pancreata of either species indicates that the levels of MCP-1 expressed are normally insufficient to mediate chemoattraction of host leukocytes, and the physiologic function of islet MCP-1 production remains unknown. Interestingly, transgenic islet overexpression of MCP-1 does cause extensive macrophage recruitment and insulitis, but not diabetes (39), consistent with an additional requirement for activated T cells to mediate actual islet destruction.

In this study targeting of MCP-1 or CCR2 alone or use of low dose rapamycin was unable to promote long-term islet allograft survival, in contrast to the powerful effect of combining targeting of receptor or ligand with rapamycin (Fig. 2). We know from our adoptive transfer studies that both MCP-1 and CCR2 are implicated in T cell alloactivation and cytokine production (Fig. 3). Presumably the residual T cell alloactivation apparent in these studies is sufficient to mediate islet allograft rejection, but can be suppressed by rapamycin therapy, consistent with the synergistic effects observed in both the cell division and actual islet allograft survival studies.

Although the beneficial effects of chemokine or chemokine receptor blockade are most easily understood in terms of reduction of leukocyte infiltration, additional effects on initial T cell priming, activation, and differentiation may be involved. Our immunohistologic studies showed that targeting MCP-1 or CCR2 in conjunction with rapamycin prevented islet cell destruction, but not peri-islet mononuclear cell recruitment, and the expression of at least some markers of immune activation, including PD-1 and PD-L1 (Fig. 4a). We previously noted up-regulation of this pathway in cardiac allograft recipients and found that ligation of PD-1 by PD-L1 Ig could prolong allograft survival in conjunction with limited immunosuppression (rapamycin or cyclosporine) or in circumstances in which the strength of costimulation was decreased (CD28-/- recipients or CD154 mAb therapy) (32). Moreover, immunosuppressive therapy was shown to not inhibit intragraft expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 mRNA after cardiac transplantation. The current studies extend these data by showing that rapamycin did not suppress CD4+ T cell induction of PD-L1 upon alloactivation in vivo. Moreover, the lack of MCP-1 production, alone or in conjunction with rapamycin therapy, was accompanied by enhanced in vivo expression of PD-L1 by alloactivated CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4c). The MCP-1/CCR2 pathway has a role in promoting T cell activation, as indicated by decreased production of IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} upon alloactivation of CCR2-/- vs wild-type CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3d) and by considerable previous work (2, 3, 19), but the PD-1 family has not been previously linked with this or other chemokine pathways.

The critical importance of the PD-1 pathway in achieving long-term engraftment in our model was shown by the rejection of islet allografts in recipients treated with anti-PD-L1 mAb (Fig. 5a) and by concomitant adoptive transfer studies showing that anti-PD-L1 mAb enhanced IL-2 and IFN-{gamma} production by T cells undergoing alloactivation in vivo (Fig. 5b). There is growing evidence that PD-L1 expression contributes to the maintenance of host unresponsiveness in the periphery as well as at sites of inflammation (32, 40, 41, 42). However, it is unclear in any of this work at which sites the blockade of PD-L1 is effective, given the capacity of various leukocytes (43, 44, 45), endothelial cells (46, 47), and dendritic cells (44, 48) to express this molecule upon immune activation.

Further studies are required to assess the extent to which targeting MCP-1 or CCR2 in conjunction with rapamycin can induce actual tolerance, because challenge with second-donor grafts or third-party grafts has not yet been investigated. Similarly, whether there is any direct link between MCP-1 expression and inhibition of PD-1 or PD-L1 induction warrants analysis. Lastly, in a broader context, the current studies illustrate the importance of dissecting the involvement of chemokines and their receptors in mediating islet allograft rejection. Such work appears highly relevant if efforts to promote long-term engraftment without ongoing immunosuppression and associated toxicity are to achieve success.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AI40152 and DK063591 (to W.W.H.). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wayne W. Hancock, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 916E Abramson Research Center, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, 3615 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4318. E-mail address: whancock{at}mail.med.upenn.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; PD-1, programmed death-1; PD-L1, PD-1 ligand-1; PD-L2, PD-1 ligand-2; qRT-PCR, real-time quantitative RT-PCR. Back

Received for publication July 29, 2003. Accepted for publication October 9, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Murphy, P. M., M. Baggiolini, I. F. Charo, C. A. Hebert, R. Horuk, K. Matsushima, L. H. Miller, J. J. Oppenheim, C. A. Power. 2000. International union of pharmacology. XXII. Nomenclature for chemokine receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 52:145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Luther, S. A., J. G. Cyster. 2001. Chemokines as regulators of T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2:102.[Medline]
  3. Sallusto, F., C. R. Mackay, A. Lanzavecchia. 2000. The role of chemokine receptors in primary, effector, and memory immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18:593.[Medline]
  4. Hancock, W. W., W. Gao, K. L. Faia, V. Csizmadia. 2000. Chemokines and their receptors in allograft rejection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 12:511.[Medline]
  5. Hancock, W. W., L. Wang, Q. Ye, R. Han, I. Lee. 2003. Chemokines and their receptors as markers of allograft rejection and targets for immunosuppression. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15:479.[Medline]
  6. Hancock, W. W., B. Lu, W. Gao, V. Csizmadia, K. Faia, J. A. King, S. T. Smiley, M. Ling, N. P. Gerard, C. Gerard. 2000. Requirement of the chemokine receptor CXCR3 for acute allograft rejection. J. Exp. Med. 192:1515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Hancock, W. W., W. Gao, V. Csizmadia, K. L. Faia, N. Shemmeri, A. D. Luster. 2001. Donor-derived IP-10 initiates development of acute allograft rejection. J. Exp. Med. 193:975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Gao, W., K. L. Faia, V. Csizmadia, S. T. Smiley, D. Soler, J. A. King, T. M. Danoff, W. W. Hancock. 2001. Beneficial effects of targeting CCR5 in allograft recipients. Transplantation 72:1199.[Medline]
  9. Gao, W., P. S. Topham, J. A. King, S. T. Smiley, V. Csizmadia, B. Lu, C. J. Gerard, W. W. Hancock. 2000. Targeting of the chemokine receptor CCR1 suppresses development of acute and chronic cardiac allograft rejection. J. Clin. Invest. 105:35.[Medline]
  10. Haskell, C. A., W. W. Hancock, D. J. Salant, W. Gao, V. Csizmadia, W. Peters, K. Faia, O. Fituri, J. B. Rottman, I. F. Charo. 2001. Targeted deletion of CX3CR1 reveals a role for fractalkine in cardiac allograft rejection. J. Clin. Invest. 108:679.[Medline]
  11. Abdi, R., R. N. Smith, L. Makhlouf, N. Najafian, A. D. Luster, H. Auchincloss, M. H. Sayegh. 2002. The role of CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) in islet allograft rejection. Diabetes 51:2489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Piemonti, L., B. E. Leone, R. Nano, A. Saccani, P. Monti, P. Maffi, G. Bianchi, A. Sica, G. Peri, R. Melzi, et al 2002. Human pancreatic islets produce and secrete MCP-1/CCL2: relevance in human islet transplantation. Diabetes 51:55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Chen, M. C., P. Proost, C. Gysemans, C. Mathieu, D. L. Eizirik. 2001. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is expressed in pancreatic islets from prediabetic NOD mice and in interleukin-1{beta}-exposed human and rat islet cells. Diabetologia 44:325.[Medline]
  14. Fuentes, M. E., S. K. Durham, M. R. Swerdel, A. C. Lewin, D. S. Barton, J. R. Megill, R. Bravo, S. A. Lira. 1995. Controlled recruitment of monocytes and macrophages to specific organs through transgenic expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. J. Immunol. 155:5769.[Abstract]
  15. Gunn, M. D., N. A. Nelken, X. Liao, L. T. Williams. 1997. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is sufficient for the chemotaxis of monocytes and lymphocytes in transgenic mice but requires an additional stimulus for inflammatory activation. J. Immunol. 158:376.[Abstract]
  16. Lu, B., B. J. Rutledge, L. Gu, J. Fiorillo, N. W. Lukacs, S. L. Kunkel, R. North, C. Gerard, B. J. Rollins. 1998. Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 187:601.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Furutani, Y., H. Nomura, M. Notake, Y. Oyamada, T. Fukui, M. Yamada, C. G. Larsen, J. J. Oppenheim, K. Matsushima. 1989. Cloning and sequencing of the cDNA for human monocyte chemotactic and activating factor (MCAF). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159:249.[Medline]
  18. Carr, M. W., S. J. Roth, E. Luther, S. S. Rose, T. A. Springer. 1994. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 acts as a T-lymphocyte chemoattractant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gu, L., S. Tseng, R. M. Horner, C. Tam, M. Loda, B. J. Rollins. 2000. Control of TH2 polarization by the chemokine monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Nature 404:407.[Medline]
  20. Charo, I. F., S. J. Myers, A. Herman, C. Franci, A. J. Connolly, S. R. Coughlin. 1994. Molecular cloning and functional expression of two monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptors reveals alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tails. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:2752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Traynor, T. R., W. A. Kuziel, G. B. Toews, G. B. Huffnagle. 2000. CCR2 expression determines T1 versus T2 polarization during pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J. Immunol. 164:2021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Traynor, T. R., A. C. Herring, M. E. Dorf, W. A. Kuziel, G. B. Toews, G. B. Huffnagle. 2002. Differential roles of CC chemokine ligand 2/monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and CCR2 in the development of T1 immunity. J. Immunol. 168:4659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kurihara, T., G. Warr, J. Loy, R. Bravo. 1997. Defects in macrophage recruitment and host defense in mice lacking the CCR2 chemokine receptor. J. Exp. Med. 186:1757.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Boring, L., J. Gosling, S. W. Chensue, S. L. Kunkel, R. V. Farese, Jr, H. E. Broxmeyer, I. F. Charo. 1997. Impaired monocyte migration and reduced type 1 (Th1) cytokine responses in C-C chemokine receptor 2 knockout mice. J. Clin. Invest. 100:2552.[Medline]
  25. Fife, B. T., G. B. Huffnagle, W. A. Kuziel, W. J. Karpus. 2000. CC chemokine receptor 2 is critical for induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 192:899.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Izikson, L., R. S. Klein, I. F. Charo, H. L. Weiner, A. D. Luster. 2000. Resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice lacking the CC chemokine receptor CCR2. J. Exp. Med. 192:1075.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kuziel, W. A., S. J. Morgan, T. C. Dawson, S. Griffin, O. Smithies, K. Ley, N. Maeda. 1997. Severe reduction in leukocyte adhesion and monocyte extravasation in mice deficient in CC chemokine receptor 2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:12053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Luo, Y., J. Laning, M. Hayashi, P. R. Hancock, B. Rollins, M. E. Dorf. 1994. Serologic analysis of the mouse beta chemokine JE/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. J. Immunol. 153:3708.[Abstract]
  29. Dong, H., S. E. Strome, D. R. Salomao, H. Tamura, F. Hirano, D. B. Flies, P. C. Roche, J. Lu, G. Zhu, K. Tamada, et al 2002. Tumor-associated B7–H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. Nat. Med. 8:793.[Medline]
  30. Mack, M., J. Cihak, C. Simonis, B. Luckow, A. E. Proudfoot, J. Plachy, H. Bruhl, M. Frink, H. J. Anders, V. Vielhauer, et al 2001. Expression and characterization of the chemokine receptors CCR2 and CCR5 in mice. J. Immunol. 166:4697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Yang, H., D. Thomas, D. J. Boffa, R. Ding, B. Li, T. Muthukumar, V. K. Sharma, M. Lagman, G. X. Luo, S. Kapur, et al 2002. Enforced c-REL deficiency prolongs survival of islet allografts. Transplantation 74:291.[Medline]
  32. Ozkaynak, E., L. Wang, A. Goodearl, K. McDonald, S. Qin, T. O’Keefe, T. Duong, T. Smith, J. C. Gutierrez-Ramos, J. B. Rottman, et al 2002. Programmed death-1 targeting can promote allograft survival. J. Immunol. 169:6546.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Suchin, E. J., P. B. Langmuir, E. Palmer, M. H. Sayegh, A. D. Wells, L. A. Turka. 2001. Quantifying the frequency of alloreactive T cells in vivo: new answers to an old question. J. Immunol. 166:973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Ishida, Y., Y. Agata, K. Shibahara, T. Honjo. 1992. Induced expression of PD-1, a novel member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily, upon programmed cell death. EMBO J. 11:3887.[Medline]
  35. Dong, H., G. Zhu, K. Tamada, L. Chen. 1999. B7–H1, a third member of the B7 family, co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion. Nat. Med. 5:1365.[Medline]
  36. Freeman, G. J., A. J. Long, Y. Iwai, K. Bourque, T. Chernova, H. Nishimura, L. J. Fitz, N. Malenkovich, T. Okazaki, M. C. Byrne, et al 2000. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J. Exp. Med. 192:1027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Latchman, Y., C. R. Wood, T. Chernova, D. Chaudhary, M. Borde, I. Chernova, Y. Iwai, A. J. Long, J. A. Brown, R. Nunes, et al 2001. PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat. Immunol. 2:261.[Medline]
  38. Tseng, S. Y., M. Otsuji, K. Gorski, X. Huang, J. E. Slansky, S. I. Pai, A. Shalabi, T. Shin, D. M. Pardoll, H. Tsuchiya. 2001. B7-DC, a new dendritic cell molecule with potent costimulatory properties for T cells. J. Exp. Med. 193:839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Grewal, I. S., B. J. Rutledge, J. A. Fiorillo, L. Gu, R. P. Gladue, R. A. Flavell, B. J. Rollins. 1997. Transgenic monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in pancreatic islets produces monocyte-rich insulitis without diabetes: abrogation by a second transgene expressing systemic MCP-1. J. Immunol. 159:401.[Abstract]
  40. Iwai, Y., S. Terawaki, M. Ikegawa, T. Okazaki, T. Honjo. 2003. PD-1 inhibits antiviral immunity at the effector phase in the liver. J. Exp. Med. 198:39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ansari, M. J., A. D. Salama, T. Chitnis, R. N. Smith, H. Yagita, H. Akiba, T. Yamazaki, M. Azuma, H. Iwai, S. J. Khoury, et al 2003. The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway regulates autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. J. Exp. Med. 198:63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Salama, A. D., T. Chitnis, J. Imitola, H. Akiba, F. Tushima, M. Azuma, H. Yagita, M. H. Sayegh, S. J. Khoury. 2003. Critical role of the programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway in regulation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med. 198:71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Ishida, M., Y. Iwai, Y. Tanaka, T. Okazaki, G. J. Freeman, N. Minato, T. Honjo. 2002. Differential expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2, ligands for an inhibitory receptor PD-1, in the cells of lymphohematopoietic tissues. Immunol. Lett. 84:57.[Medline]
  44. Yamazaki, T., H. Akiba, H. Iwai, H. Matsuda, M. Aoki, Y. Tanno, T. Shin, H. Tsuchiya, D. M. Pardoll, K. Okumura, et al 2002. Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J. Immunol. 169:5538.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Loke, P., J. P. Allison. 2003. PD-L1 and PD-L2 are differentially regulated by Th1 and Th2 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:5336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Mazanet, M. M., C. C. Hughes. 2002. B7–H1 is expressed by human endothelial cells and suppresses T cell cytokine synthesis. J. Immunol. 169:3581.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Eppihimer, M. J., J. Gunn, G. J. Freeman, E. A. Greenfield, T. Chernova, J. Erickson, J. P. Leonard. 2002. Expression and regulation of the PD-L1 immunoinhibitory molecule on microvascular endothelial cells. Microcirculation 9:133.[Medline]
  48. Brown, J. A., D. M. Dorfman, F. R. Ma, E. L. Sullivan, O. Munoz, C. R. Wood, E. A. Greenfield, G. J. Freeman. 2003. Blockade of programmed death-1 ligands on dendritic cells enhances T cell activation and cytokine production. J. Immunol. 170:1257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related articles in The JI:

IN THIS ISSUE

The JI 2003 171: 6321-6322. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. A Belperio and A. Ardehali
Chemokines and Transplant Vasculopathy
Circ. Res., August 29, 2008; 103(5): 454 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. Wang, H. Dai, N. Wan, Y. Moore, and Z. Dai
The Role for Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 in the Generation and Function of Memory CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 180(5): 2886 - 2893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
D. Chen, N. Zhang, S. Fu, B. Schroppel, Q. Guo, A. Garin, S. A. Lira, and J. S. Bromberg
CD4+CD25+ Regulatory T-Cells Inhibit the Islet Innate Immune Response and Promote Islet Engraftment.
Diabetes, April 1, 2006; 55(4): 1011 - 1021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
B. Zhu, I. Guleria, A. Khosroshahi, T. Chitnis, J. Imitola, M. Azuma, H. Yagita, M. H. Sayegh, and S. J. Khoury
Differential Role of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 and Programmed Death-Ligand 2 in Regulating the Susceptibility and Chronic Progression of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
J. Immunol., March 15, 2006; 176(6): 3480 - 3489.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. Wang, R. Han, I. Lee, A. S. Hancock, G. Xiong, M. D. Gunn, and W. W. Hancock
Permanent Survival of Fully MHC-Mismatched Islet Allografts by Targeting a Single Chemokine Receptor Pathway
J. Immunol., November 15, 2005; 175(10): 6311 - 6318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Tao, L. Wang, R. Han, T. Wang, Q. Ye, T. Honjo, T. L. Murphy, K. M. Murphy, and W. W. Hancock
Differential Effects of B and T Lymphocyte Attenuator and Programmed Death-1 on Acceptance of Partially versus Fully MHC-Mismatched Cardiac Allografts
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 5774 - 5782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
I. Lee, L. Wang, A. D. Wells, M. E. Dorf, E. Ozkaynak, and W. W. Hancock
Recruitment of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells mediating allograft tolerance depends on the CCR4 chemokine receptor
J. Exp. Med., April 4, 2005; 201(7): 1037 - 1044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. Schroppel, N. Zhang, P. Chen, D. Chen, J. S. Bromberg, and B. Murphy
Role of Donor-Derived Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 in Murine Islet Transplantation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., February 1, 2005; 16(2): 444 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. Schroppel, N. Zhang, P. Chen, W. Zang, D. Chen, K. L. Hudkins, W. A. Kuziel, R. Sung, J. S. Bromberg, and B. Murphy
Differential Expression of Chemokines and Chemokine Receptors in Murine Islet Allografts: The Role of CCR2 and CCR5 Signaling Pathways
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1853 - 1861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, W. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, I.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, W. W.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Islet Cell Transplantation


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS