The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ertl, H. C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ertl, H. C. J.
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 171: 6774-6779.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Induction of CD8+ T Cells to an HIV-1 Antigen through a Prime Boost Regimen with Heterologous E1-Deleted Adenoviral Vaccine Carriers 1

Arguinaldo R. Pinto*, Julie C. Fitzgerald*,{dagger}, Wynetta Giles-Davis*, Guang Ping Gao{dagger}, James M. Wilson{dagger} and Hildegund C. J. Ertl2,*

* The Wistar Institute, and {dagger} Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
E1-deleted adenoviral recombinants most commonly based on the human serotype 5 (AdHu5) have been shown thus far to induce unsurpassed transgene product-specific CD8+ T cell responses. A large percentage of the adult human population carries neutralizing Abs due to natural exposures to AdHu5 virus. To circumvent reduction of the efficacy of adenovirus (Ad) vector-based vaccines by neutralizing Abs to the vaccine carrier, we developed E1-deleted adenoviral vaccine carriers based on simian serotypes. One of these carriers, termed AdC68, expressing a codon-optimized truncated form of gag of HIV-1 was shown previously to induce a potent transgene product-specific CD8+ T cell response in mice. We constructed a second chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine vector, termed AdC6, also expressing the truncated gag of HIV-1. This vector, which belongs to a different serotype than the AdC68 virus, induces high frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells in mice including those pre-exposed to AdHu5 virus. Generation of an additional E1-deleted adenoviral vector of chimpanzee origin allows for sequential booster immunizations with heterologous vaccine carriers. In this study, we show that such heterologous prime boost regimens based on E1-deleted adenoviral vectors of different serotypes expressing the same transgene product are highly efficient in increasing the transgene product-specific CD8+ T cell response. They are equivalent to sequential vaccinations with an E1-deleted Ad vector followed by booster immunization with a poxvirus vector and they surpass regimens based on DNA vaccine prime followed by a recombinant adenoviral vector boost.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Each day, on average, 15,000 humans are newly infected with the HIV-1. Although efficacious antiviral therapies are available, their expense and side effects, and the complexity of the treatment regimens prohibit their use in less developed countries that are hit the hardest by the HIV-1 epidemic. The development of vaccines has become of utmost biomedical priority to control the global epidemic, which is threatening to undermine the already fragile socioeconomic structure of Central African nations. Some humans resist infections with HIV-1 despite frequent exposure while others, upon infection, fail to progress to AIDS. This, together with data gained in experimental animal models, indicates that the adaptive immune system can cope with HIV-1, and that it should thus be feasible to produce an efficacious vaccine. Development of a vaccine that prevents infection through induction of neutralizing Abs has been hampered by the high variability of the envelope protein of HIV-1, its heavy glycosylation that masks B cell epitopes, and the conformational changes the envelope complex undergoes upon binding to its receptor and coreceptor. Vaccines that aim at inducing cellular immune mechanisms, most notably CD8+ T cells directed against the more conserved internal proteins, provide an alternative strategy which is unlikely to induce sterilizing immunity to HIV-1 but might control the infection at a viral set point load that is below that associated with disease or viral spread to other individuals (1, 2, 3).

A number of different vaccine modalities have undergone preclinical and, in part, clinical testing. The two vectors that elicited the most potent CD8+ T cell responses and provided the highest degree of protection in nonhuman primate models were E1-deleted adenovirus (Ad) 3 recombinants based on the human serotype 5 (AdHu5) and modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) constructs used alone or in combination with DNA vaccine priming (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). AdHu5 vaccines to gag of HIV-1 clade B have been tested in nonhuman primates in comparison to adjuvanted DNA and MVA vaccines expressing the same transgene product. The E1-deleted Adhu5 vaccine showed the highest efficacy and was the only vaccine in this study that upon challenge with the simian-HIV chimera, SHIV 89.6P, prevented CD4 loss and controlled both the acute viremia and the set-point viral load in all animals (4). Other studies have shown protection against disease progression in SHIV infection models in nonhuman primates with MVA or DNA vaccines given alone or as part of a prime-boost combination (5, 6, 7, 8).

However, a major limitation of adenoviral and, to a lesser extent, poxviral vectors is that neutralizing Abs to the vaccine carrier elicited by previous natural infections or vaccinations impact their efficacy. Nearly all adults have Abs to the common serotypes of human Ad and 35–45% of those in the US have high titers of virus neutralizing Abs to AdHu5 virus (10). This percentage is higher in some less developed countries (H. C. J. Ertl, unpublished observation). Humans vaccinated against smallpox have pre-existing immunity for MVA, and as widespread smallpox vaccination is again being considered, the prevalence of immunity to vaccinia virus could increase substantially.

To circumvent interference by pre-existing immunity to common human serotypes of Ad, we developed replication-defective vectors based on Ad viruses isolated from chimpanzees. One such vector of the chimpanzee serotype 68, termed AdC68, was shown previously to induce potent transgene product-specific CD8+ T and B cell responses that were not severely dampened in the presence of neutralizing Abs to human serotypes of adenovirus (11, 12). Assuming that the AdC68 vector that induces a potent immune response after a single immunization is unlikely to be suitable for repeated use as a vaccine carrier either to boost an immune response (13) or to immunize against a different pathogen, we developed an additional E1-deleted Ad vector of chimpanzee origin, termed AdC6, which represents a distinct serotype and is thus not cross-neutralized by Abs to AdC68 (J. M. Wilson, manuscript in preparation). In this study, we show, similar to the previously described AdC68 vector, that an E1-deleted AdC6 vector induces a potent transgene product-specific CD8+ T cell response that can be increased substantially by using a heterologous E1-deleted Ad recombinant expressing the same transgene product for booster immunization. This type of heterologous prime boost regimen is by far more effective than priming with a DNA vaccine followed by booster immunization with an Ad recombinant or by using the same Ad vaccine carrier repeatedly.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

Female 6- to 8-wk-old BALB/c mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and kept at the Animal Facility of The Wistar Institute (Philadelphia, PA).

Cell lines

E1-transfected 293 cells and HeLa cells were propagated in DMEM supplemented with glutamine, sodium pyruvate, nonessential amino acids, HEPES buffer, antibiotic, and 10% FBS.

Generation, propagation, and titration of viral recombinants

The AdC6 virus was sequenced, the E1 domain was deleted, and the remaining genome was vectored as a molecular clone basically as described previously for human Ad vectors (14). The cDNA encoding a truncated codon-optimized form of gag of HIV-1 clade B or the rabies virus glycoprotein of the Evelyn Rokitniki Abelseth (ERA) strain was cloned into the pShuttle vector and from there into the AdC6 molecular clone. For viral rescue, the vector was transfected into 293 cells, which provide the E1 of AdHu5 virus. Virus was expanded on 293 cells, purified by CsCl gradient centrifugation, and the number of viral particles (vp) was determined by spectrophotometry. The stock viruses had titers of ~5 x 1012 vp/ml. All purified viruses were dosed according to the number of particles as is the accepted method by the Food and Drug Administration. PFU were determined in addition and typically ranged from 1 PFU per 100-1000 vp. The vaccinia virus recombinant expressing gag of HIV-1 clade B was obtained from the AIDS Reference and Reagents Center (Division of AIDS, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). This recombinant was propagated and titrated on HeLa cells.

DNA vaccine

The vector expressing a codon-optimized truncated form of HIV-1 clade B (pCMV37M1–10D) was most generously provided by Dr. G. Pavlakis (National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD). This vector has been described in detail earlier (15). The vector was propagated in Escherichia coli strain DH5{alpha} in Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with kanamycin and was purified with the Qiagen MaxiKit (Valencia, CA). The vector was quantitated by spectrophotometry at 260 nm.

Expression of the transgene product

Gag protein was identified in supernatants of infected 293 cells by Western blotting. 293 cells (1 x 106) were infected for 48 h with AdHu5gag37 or AdC6gag37 virus (5 x 104 vp/cell). Additional 293 cells were infected with a control construct expressing the glycoprotein of rabies virus (AdHu5rab.gp). Proteins in the culture supernatant were separated on a 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and transferred by electroblotting to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA). The blot was stained with the mAb 183-H12-5C to HIV-1 p24 (Division of AIDS, AIDS Reference and Reagents Center, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, contributors: Dr. B. Chesebro and K. Wehrly).

Peptides

The AMQMLKETI peptide (16) that carries the immunodominant MHC class I epitope of gag for mice of the H-2d haplotype, and the control peptide 31D delineated from the nucleoprotein of rabies virus (17) were described previously.

Immunization of mice

Groups of four to five BALB/c mice were immunized at 6–8 wk of age with recombinant viruses or DNA vectors diluted in 50 µl of saline given i.m. Mice were boosted 2–4 mo later with recombinant viral vectors given i.m.

Intracellular cytokine staining

Intracellular cytokine staining was performed on splenocytes (1 x 106/sample) as described previously (11). A FITC-labeled Ab to mouse CD8 and a PE-labeled Ab to mouse IFN-{gamma} were obtained from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Assays were repeated two to four times. The figures show the result of a representative experiment. The figure legends show the combined data for two to three representative experiments, i.e., number of experiments (n), mean percent of IFN-{gamma}+CD8+ cells over all CD8+ T cells and (range of data). For these data, the percent of CD8+ cells that stained positive for IFN-{gamma} in absence of the gag peptide was subtracted from the percent of CD8+ T cells that produced IFN-{gamma} in presence of this peptide.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Expression of the gag protein by the adenoviral recombinant

The AdC6gag37 recombinant virus carrying the gag gene of HIV-1 clade B was generated as a viral molecular clone in 293 cells transfected with E1 of AdHu5 virus basically as described before (17). A codon-modified sequence of gag (15) was used to avoid rev dependency (18). After selection of a stable AdC6gag37 vector, expression of the truncated, partially secreted p37 gag protein (p17 and p24, Ref.19) was confirmed in infected 293 cells by Western blot, as shown in Fig. 1.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Expression of HIV-1 gag by cells infected with adenoviral recombinants. 293 cells were infected with 5 x 104 vp/cell of adenoviral recombinants expressing gag or rabies glycoprotein. After 48 h, the supernatant was harvested, electrophoresed using 12% Tris-glycine gels by SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with a mouse mAb to gag. Lane 1, AdHu5gag37; lane 2, AdC6gag37; lane 3, AdHu5rab.gp.

 
Induction of gag-specific CD8+ T cells upon a single immunization with the AdC6gag37 vector

We initially determined the basic parameters of the gag-specific CD8+ T cell response in mice immunized i.m. with the AdC6gag37 vector. The response measured by intracellular IFN-{gamma} staining of CD8+ T cells stimulated for 5 h with a peptide carrying the immunodominant epitope of gag peaked 10 days after immunization as previously reported for the CD8+ T cell response induced by an AdC68 vector (Fig. 2). Maximal CD8+ T cell frequencies were induced by a moderate dose of 5 x 109 vp of the AdC6gag37 vector. A further increase of the dose did not augment the response (Fig. 3). In most experiments, frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells induced by the 5 x 109 vp of the AdC6 vector ranged from 10 to 15% of all splenic CD8+ T cells.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Kinetics of the CD8+ T cell response to gag induced by the E1-deleted AdC6 carrier. Groups of BALB/c mice (n = 5) were immunized i.m. with 5 x 109 vp of AdC6gag37 virus and sacrificed 4–14 days after immunization. Splenocytes were stimulated for 5 h with a peptide that contains the immunodominant epitope for gag. The immune response to gag was evaluated by intracellular cytokine (IFN-{gamma}) staining (PE-labeled Ab) of CD8+ T cells (FITC-labeled Ab). Upper row, The flow cytometry results of live cells stimulated for 5 h with a peptide carrying the immunodominant epitope of gag for mice of the H-2d haplotype. Lower row, The corresponding cell populations incubated for 5 h with an unrelated peptide. Numbers in the upper right quadrant of the graphs show the frequencies of double-positive, i.e., IFN-{gamma}-producing CD8+ T cells, over all FITC-positive (i.e., CD8+) cells.

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Dose response of gag-specific CD8+ T cells induced by the AdC6gag37 vector. Groups of BALB/c mice (n = 5) immunized with different doses of AdC6gag37 virus were tested 10 days later for frequencies of IFN-{gamma}-producing splenic CD8+ T cells as described in legend to Fig. 2. The following data were obtained upon averaging of representative experiments: 5 x 1011 vp (n = 2) M = 5.7% (5.5–5.8); 5 x 1010 vp (n = 2) M = 7.6% (7.4–7.8); 5 x 109 vp (n = 2) M = 10.3% (8.7–11.9); 5 x 108 vp (n = 2) M = 1.6% (0.9–2.2); 5 x 107 vp (n = 2) M = 0.1% (0.0–0.1).

 
To study the impact of previous exposure to AdHu5 Ags, mice were immunized with a single dose of 2 x 1011 vp of wild-type AdHu5 virus. This dose induces virus neutralizing Ab titers to AdHu5 virus of ~1:100–1:200 (not shown), which is comparable to titers commonly seen in sera of adult humans. Two weeks later, mice were vaccinated either with the AdHu5gag37 or the AdC6gag37 constructs. Mice preimmune to AdHu5 virus failed to develop a gag-specific CD8+ T cell response after vaccination with the AdHu5gag37 vaccine as reported previously (11), while mice immunized with AdC6gag37 developed a potent CD8+ T cell response that was below that elicited in mice that had not been pre-exposed to the AdHu5 virus. Again, as demonstrated previously for the AdC68gag37 construct (11), the AdC6gag37 vaccine was thus not as strongly affected by pre-existing immunity to AdHu5 virus as the homologous AdHu5gag37 vector (Fig. 4).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. The effect of pre-exposure to AdHu5 virus on the CD8+ T cell response to the AdC6gag37 vector. Groups of five BALB/c mice were immunized intranasally with 2 x 1011 vp of AdHu5 virus. Two weeks later, AdHu5-immune mice as well as naive mice were vaccinated with 5 x 109 vp of AdHu5gag37 or AdC68gag37 virus. Frequencies of IFN-{gamma}-producing splenic CD8+ T cells were tested 10 days later from spleens as described in legend to Fig. 2. The following data (expressed as percent inhibition of frequencies in AdHu5 pre-exposed as compared with nonexposed animals) were obtained upon averaging of representative experiments: AdHu5gag37 vaccinated animals (n = 3) M = 92% (86–98), AdC6gag37 vaccinated animals (n = 3) M = 30% (8–50).

 
The potency of the AdC6gag37 vector in inducing gag-specific CD8+ T cells was compared with that of the previously described Ad recombinants, i.e., AdHu5gag37 and AdC68gag37 vectors (11). As shown in Fig. 5, the AdC6gag37 vector induced high frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells that were comparable to those achieved with the AdC68gag37 vector that in turn induces more potent CD8+ T cell responses than the corresponding AdHu5 construct.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Induction of gag-specific CD8+ T cells by different Ad vectors expressing gag37. Groups of five BALB/c mice were immunized i.m. with 5 x 109 vp of AdHu5gag37, AdC68gag37, or AdC6gag37 virus. Ten days after immunization, splenocytes were tested for gag-specific IFN-{gamma}-producing CD8+ T cells as described in the legend to Fig. 2. The following data were obtained upon averaging of representative experiments: AdHu5gag37-immune (n = 2) M = 6.0% (5.2–6.8), AdC68gag37-immune (n = 2) M = 9.2 (6.0–12.3), AdC6gag37-immune (n = 2) M = 16.1 (13.6–18.5).

 
Induction of gag-specific CD8+ T cells upon heterologous-prime boost regimens

Priming with a DNA vaccine can augment the efficacy of vaccines based on recombinant viral vectors (13, 20). Priming of mice with a DNA vaccine expressing gag did not have a major impact on the CD8+ T cell response elicited by the AdC6gag37 vaccine. The effect of boosting of AdC6gag37-primed BALB/c mice with a heterologous Ad vector was far more impressive; boosting with the AdC68gag37 vector resulted in frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies of close to 40% of all splenic CD8+ T cells while boosting with the AdHu5gag37 vector increased these frequencies to 55%. As expected, homologous prime boosting only resulted in a small increase of the CD8+ T cell response to gag (Fig. 6A). The results demonstrate that heterologous prime boost regimens based on distinct serotypes of Ad vectors surpass those based on DNA vaccine prime-Ad vector boost regimens as well as those based on the sequential use of homologous Ad vectors. In a follow-up experiment, we compared boosting of AdC6gag37-primed mice with either heterologous Ad vectors or an unrelated viral vector based on a vaccinia virus recombinant. As shown in Fig. 6B, boosting of AdC6gag37-primed mice with the vaccinia virus recombinant resulted in frequencies that were slightly higher compared with those obtained by boosting with a heterologous simian Ad vector. Nevertheless, boosting with the AdHu5gag37 vector resulted in the highest frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells (Fig. 6B) indicating that boosting with an unrelated viral vector did not offer an advantage over a prime boost regimen based on heterologous adenoviral vaccine carriers.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. A, Heterologous prime boost strategies. Groups of five BALB/c mice were immunized with 50 µg of a plasmid that expresses the gag37 (pCMV37M1–10D) i.m. Two months later, mice were boosted with 5 x 109 vp of AdC6gag37 virus. Splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the boost and tested for IFN-{gamma} production by CD8+ T cells. Controls were injected only with the adenoviral recombinant vector or pCMVgag37. Additional groups of five BALB/c mice were immunized with 5 x 109 vp of AdC6gag37; 3 mo later they were boosted with 5 x 109 vp of the indicated recombinant viruses. Controls were injected with AdC6gag37 virus only. For either group, splenocytes were harvested 10 days after the boost and tested for IFN-{gamma} production by CD8+ T cells as described in legend to Fig. 2. B, Groups of BALB/c mice were immunized with 5 x 109 vp of AdC6gag37 virus. Some of the groups were boosted 4 mo later with 106 PFU of a vaccinia virus recombinant expressing gag, the AdC68gag37 vector or the AdHu5gag37 vector. Frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells were tested 10 days later as described in legend to Fig. 2. The following data were obtained upon averaging of representative prime-boost experiments: AdC6gag37 (n = 2) M = 8.3% (7.0–9.5); pCMVgag37 (n = 2) M = 1.8% (2.1–1.4); pCMVgag37/AdC6gag37 (n = 2) M = 12.6% (11.2–14.0), AdC6gag37/AdC68gag37 (n = 2) M = 32.5% (27.3–37.7), AdC6gag37/AdHu5gag37 (n = 2) M = 45.5% (36.7–54.3), AdC6gag37/AdC6gag37 (n = 2) M = 15.9% (15.5–16.3). The AdC6gag37/Vacciniagag37 protocol when tested by alternative routes of immunization gave comparable results (not shown).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
An efficacious vaccine against HIV-1 may be the only medical intervention able to halt the HIV-1 epidemic. Traditional vaccines based on live attenuated or inactivated virus were either deemed unsafe or lacked efficacy. The initial subunit vaccines, based on recombinant proteins or viral vectors, aimed at eliciting neutralizing Abs, the main correlate of protection against most viral infections. Preclinical as well as clinical trials with these constructs yielded disappointing results as the neutralizing Abs induced by such vaccines lacked the breath to provide solid protection against different HIV-1 isolates (21, 22).

Subsequent vaccine efforts were directed at inducing cell-mediated immune responses (6, 23, 24, 25). Optimized DNA vaccines expressing the gag of HIV-1 provided initial protection to nonhuman primates challenged with SHIV-89.6P virus (26). Nevertheless as the vaccine-induced CD8+ T cell response failed to provide complete clearance of the virus, most of the animals eventually succumbed to an overwhelming infection with escape mutants that evaded the vaccine-induced immune response (27) indicating that a HIV-1 vaccine had to induce CD8+ T cells to multiple epitopes to control the outgrowth of mutant virus.

Other vaccine modalities such as viral vector used either alone or in combination with DNA vaccines for priming have yielded encouraging results in preclinical nonhuman primate challenge studies and are currently undergoing clinical trials (4, 5, 28). Experimental animals vaccinated with AdHu5 recombinants were protected against CD4 loss and could control acute and set-point viral loads upon challenge with SHIV-89.6P virus (4). AdHu5 virus is a common human pathogen and a significant percentage of the adult human population carries neutralizing Abs to the surface proteins of this virus. When nonhuman primates were preimmunized with AdHu5 virus to mimic the situation in human patients, the dose of the AdHu5 vaccine to HIV-1 had to be increased 1000-fold to overcome the interference of neutralization of the vaccine carrier (4). Obviously such an increase in dose not only augments the cost of the vaccine but also increases the risk of serious side effects such as those encountered during gene therapy trials.

To circumvent interference by pre-existing neutralizing Abs, we developed E1-deleted adenoviral vectors from chimpanzees. These viruses do not circulate in the human population nor are they neutralized by Abs to common human serotypes of Ad virus (10). One of these vectors, termed AdC68, has been described previously to induce potent CD8+ T cell responses to gag of HIV-1 even in the presence of neutralizing Abs to AdHu5 virus (11, 12). The AdC68 vector, like any viral recombinant, induces not only a transgene product-specific immune response but also neutralizing Abs directed mainly against the adenoviral hexon. These neutralizing Abs are expected to reduce the efficacy of the vaccine carrier if used for sequential booster immunization. DNA vaccine priming has been used successfully in animal models and may in part blunt the Ab response to components of a viral vector vaccine carrier (21, 29). Nevertheless, DNA vaccines have performed poorly in clinical trials so far (30, 31) and it is thus uncertain whether DNA vaccine priming followed by a booster immunization with a viral recombinant will be as efficacious in humans as has been in preclinical experimental animal studies.

Therefore, we developed an additional E1-deleted Ad recombinant of chimpanzee origin to increase our repertoire of vaccine carriers that can be given sequentially. The AdC6 and AdC68 viruses belong to distinct serotypes and are not cross-neutralized by Abs to either vector. With regard to growth characteristics, both viruses are transcomplemented by the E1 of AdHu5 virus and can thus be propagated on available packaging cell lines. Viral stocks were characterized regarding vp as well as PFU as a measure of infectivity. Nevertheless, accurately linking these two parameters is not possible for Ad preparations derived from different serotypes, as the standard infectivity assay fails to appreciate the unique interactions of distinct serotype with the packaging cells, which in turn influences plaque formation.

In this study, which was designed as a proof of principle study for comparing induction of transgene product-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies with different prime boost regimens, we used a truncated form of gag which contains an immunodominant CD8+ T cell epitope for mice of the H-2d haplotype. For eventual clinical use, vectors containing more comprehensive sequences of HIV-1 need to be used to prevent the outgrowth of viral escape mutants.

Immunologically, the AdC6gag37 vector closely resembled the previously described AdC68gag37 vector with regard to kinetics of induction of CD8+ T cells, optimal dose, and lack of strong interference in animals pre-exposed to AdHu5 virus. The AdC6 vector resulted in slightly superior transgene product-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies, which may in part reflect differences in the adjuvant effects of the two vaccine carriers, a subtle difference in the amount of transgene product expression or differences in dosing due to the above-described difficulty to accurately compare the infectivity of Ad vectors of distinct serotypes.

We developed the AdC6 vector specifically as a tool to allow for sequential immunization with heterologous Ad vectors. Priming of mice with a DNA vaccine expressing gag37 was relatively inefficient in increasing frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells upon booster immunization with the AdC6gag37 vector. Similarly, a repeated administration of the AdC6gag37 vector affected only a modest increase in frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells, which presumably reflects in part that neutralizing Abs to the vaccine carrier prevented infection and hence expression of the transgene product. Booster immunization of AdC6gag37 vector-primed animals with a heterologous Ad vector, in contrast, resulted in an impressive increase of the frequencies of gag-specific CD8+ T cells with the AdHu5gag37 vector outperforming the AdC68gag37 construct. We do not know yet why the AdHu5gag37 vector is more efficacious than the AdC68gag37 vector in boosting an AdC6gag37-induced immune response especially as the AdC68 vector consistently induces higher frequencies of transgene product-specific CD8+ T cells than the AdHu5 vector in naive animals given a single immunization. The AdHu5 vector results in higher transgene product expression in most cell types compared with the simian vectors (H. C. J. Ertl, unpublished observation). As shown previously, AdC68 vectors (14) as well as AdC6 vectors (H. C. J. Ertl, unpublished observation) induce potent Th1 responses while AdHu5 vectors stimulate more balanced Th1/Th2 type responses. We assume that in naive animals, the predominance of the Th1-type response favors activation of CD8+ T cells upon vaccination with the simian Ad vectors while the Th2 components induced by the AdHu5 vectors allows for a more potent B cell response as shown previously (14). Priming with a simian Ad vector is expected to set-up the immune response toward the Th1 pathway, which should persevere upon booster immunization with either a different simian Ad vector or with the AdHu5 vector. The AdHu5 vector may, as shown in vitro, express higher levels of transgene product and thus favor superior activation of memory CD8+ T cells. We favor an alternative explanation. CD8+ T cells to adenoviral Ags show extensive cross-reactivity between simian and human Ads (H. C. J. Ertl, unpublished data). In mice primed with either a human or a simian Ad vector these CD8+ T cells are expected to lead to the demise of Ad vector-transduced APCs, which, as we showed previously (11), have a negative impact on the CD8+ T cell response to the simian vectors in AdHu5 virus pre-exposed mice (11). The delayed kinetics of CD8+ T cell induction shown by the simian as compared with the human Ad vectors, which may be a consequence of the comparatively low levels of transgene product expression, could allow for a higher impact of the CD8+ T cell-mediated killing of APCs expressing gag concomitantly with the adenoviral Ags of the vaccine carrier. To test whether an alternative viral recombinant vaccine that does not share cross-reactive Ags with adenoviral carriers would perform superiorly in a prime boost regimen, AdC6gag37-primed mice were boosted either with the AdHu5gag37 or AdC68gag37 vector or a vaccinia virus recombinant expressing gag. The vaccinia virus recombinant elicited an impressive increase of the frequency of splenic gag-specific CD8+ T cells, but, nevertheless, failed to outperform the AdHu5gag37 vector and only provided a marginal advantage over boosting with the AdC68gag37 vector. These data indicate that boosting with vaccinia virus that is not affected by any cross-reactive immune effector mechanisms elicited to the vaccine carrier used for priming fails to provide an advantage over a heterologous Ad vector prime-boost regimen. Therefore, sequential heterologous Ad prime-boost regimens may provide the best tool for inducing potent CD8+ T cell responses against the desired Ags.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Cancer Institute, American Foundation for AIDS Research, and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hildegund C. J. Ertl, The Wistar Institute, 3601 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail address: ertl{at}wistar.upenn.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Ad, adenovirus; MVA, modified vaccinia Ankara; SHIV, simian-HIV; vp, viral particle. Back

Received for publication May 13, 2003. Accepted for publication October 7, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Robinson, H. L.. 2002. New hope for an AIDS vaccine. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2:239.[Medline]
  2. Graham, B. S.. 2002. Clinical trials of HIV vaccines. Annu. Rev. Med. 53:207.[Medline]
  3. Letvin, N. L., D. H. Barouch, D. C. Montefiori. 2002. Prospects for vaccine protection against HIV-1 infection and AIDS. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20:73.[Medline]
  4. Shiver, J. W., T. M. Fu, L. Chen, D. R. Casimiro, M. E. Davies, R. K. Evans, Z. Q. Zhang, A. J. Simon, W. L. Trigona, S. A. Dubey, et al 2002. Replication-incompetent adenoviral vaccine vector elicits effective anti-immunodeficiency-virus immunity. Nature 415:331.[Medline]
  5. Amara, R. R., F. Villinger, J. D. Altman, S. L. Lydy, S. P. O’Neil, S. I. Staprans, D. C. Montefiori, Y. Xu, J. G. Herndon, L. S. Wyatt, et al 2001. Control of a mucosal challenge and prevention of AIDS by a multiprotein DNA/MVA vaccine. Science 292:69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Barouch, D. H., A. Craiu, S. Santra, M. A. Egan, J. E. Schmitz, M. J. Kuroda, T. M. Fu, J. H. Nam, L. S. Wyatt, M. A. Lifton, et al 2001. Elicitation of high-frequency cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses against both dominant and subdominant simian-human immunodeficiency virus epitopes by DNA vaccination of rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 75:2462.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Barouch, D. H., S. Santra, M. J. Kuroda, J. E. Schmitz, R. Plishka, A. Buckler-White, A. E. Gaitan, R. Zin, J. H. Nam, L. S. Wyatt, et al 2001. Reduction of simian-human immunodeficiency virus 89.6P viremia in rhesus monkeys by recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara vaccination. J. Virol. 75:5151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Earl, P. L., L. S. Wyatt, D. C. Montefiori, M. Bilska, R. Woodward, P. D. Markham, J. D. Malley, T. U. Vogel, T. M. Allen, D. I. Watkins, et al 2002. Comparison of vaccine strategies using recombinant env-gag-pol MVA with or without an oligomeric Env protein boost in the SHIV rhesus macaque model. Virology 294:270.[Medline]
  9. Casimiro, D. R., L. Chen, T. M. Fu, R. K. Evans, M. J. Caulfield, M. E. Davies, A. Tang, M. Chen, L. Huang, V. Harris, et al 2003. Comparative immunogenicity in rhesus monkeys of DNA plasmid, recombinant vaccinia virus, and replication-defective adenovirus vectors expressing a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gag gene. J. Virol. 77:6305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Farina, S. F., G. P. Gao, Z. Q. Xiang, J. J. Rux, R. M. Burnett, M. R. Alvira, J. Marsh, H. C. Ertl, J. M. Wilson. 2001. Replication-defective vector based on a chimpanzee adenovirus. J. Virol. 75:11603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Fitzgerald, J. C., G. P. Gao, A. Reyes-Sandoval, G. N. Pavlakis, Z. Q. Xiang, A. P. Wlazlo, W. Giles-Davis, J. M. Wilson, H. C. Ertl. 2003. A simian replication-defective adenoviral recombinant vaccine to HIV-1 gag. J. Immunol. 170:1416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Xiang, Z., G. Gao, A. Reyes-Sandoval, C. J. Cohen, Y. Li, J. M. Bergelson, J. M. Wilson, H. C. Ertl. 2002. Novel, chimpanzee serotype 68-based adenoviral vaccine carrier for induction of antibodies to a transgene product. J. Virol. 76:2667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Yang, Z. Y., L. S. Wyatt, W. P. Kong, Z. Moodie, B. Moss, G. J. Nabel. 2003. Overcoming immunity to a viral vaccine by DNA priming before vector boosting. J. Virol. 77:799.
  14. Xiang, Z. Q., Y. Yang, J. M. Wilson, H. C. Ertl. 1996. A replication-defective human adenovirus recombinant serves as a highly efficacious vaccine carrier. Virology 219:220.[Medline]
  15. Schneider, R., M. Campbell, G. Nasioulas, B. K. Felber, G. N. Pavlakis. 1997. Inactivation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 inhibitory elements allows Rev-independent expression of Gag and Gag/protease and particle formation. J. Virol. 71:4892.[Abstract]
  16. Doe, B., C. M. Walker. 1996. HIV-1 p24 Gag-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses in mice. AIDS 10:793.[Medline]
  17. Ertl, H. C., B. Dietzschold, M. Gore, L. Otvos, Jr, J. K. Larson, W. H. Wunner, H. Koprowski. 1989. Induction of rabies virus-specific T-helper cells by synthetic peptides that carry dominant T-helper cell epitopes of the viral ribonucleoprotein. J. Virol. 63:2885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Schwartz, S., B. K. Felber, G. N. Pavlakis. 1992. Distinct RNA sequences in the gag region of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 decrease RNA stability and inhibit expression in the absence of Rev protein. J. Virol. 66:150.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Qiu, J. T., R. Song, M. Dettenhofer, C. Tian, T. August, B. K. Felber, G. N. Pavlakis, X. F. Yu. 1999. Evaluation of novel human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Gag DNA vaccines for protein expression in mammalian cells and induction of immune responses. J. Virol. 73:9145.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Xiang, Z. Q., S. Pasquini, H. C. Ertl. 1999. Induction of genital immunity by DNA priming and intranasal booster immunization with a replication-defective adenoviral recombinant. J. Immunol. 162:6716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Keefer, M. C., B. S. Graham, R. B. Belshe, D. Schwartz, L. Corey, D. P. Bolognesi, D. M. Stablein, D. C. Montefiori, M. J. McElrath, M. L. Clements. 1994. Studies of high doses of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 recombinant glycoprotein 160 candidate vaccine in HIV type 1-seronegative humans: the AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 10:1713.[Medline]
  22. Graham, B. S., R. B. Belshe, M. L. Clements, R. Dolin, L. Corey, P. F. Wright, G. J. Gorse, K. Midthun, M. C. Keefer, N. J. Roberts, Jr. 1992. Vaccination of vaccinia-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp160 recombinant vaccinia virus in a blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial: the AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network. J. Infect. Dis. 166:244.[Medline]
  23. Rayevskaya, M. V., F. R. Frankel. 2001. Systemic immunity and mucosal immunity are induced against human immunodeficiency virus Gag protein in mice by a new hyperattenuated strain of Listeria monocytogenes. J. Virol. 75:2786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lu, Y., R. Friedman, N. Kushner, A. Doling, L. Thomas, N. Touzjian, M. Starnbach, J. Lieberman. 2000. Genetically modified anthrax lethal toxin safely delivers whole HIV protein antigens into the cytosol to induce T cell immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:8027.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Schnell, M. J., H. D. Foley, C. A. Siler, J. P. McGettigan, B. Dietzschold, R. J. Pomerantz. 2000. Recombinant rabies virus as potential live-viral vaccines for HIV-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Barouch, D. H., S. Santra, J. E. Schmitz, M. J. Kuroda, T. M. Fu, W. Wagner, M. Bilska, A. Craiu, X. X. Zheng, G. R. Krivulka, et al 2000. Control of viremia and prevention of clinical AIDS in rhesus monkeys by cytokine-augmented DNA vaccination. Science 290:486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Barouch, D. H., J. Kunstman, M. J. Kuroda, J. E. Schmitz, S. Santra, F. W. Peyerl, G. R. Krivulka, K. Beaudry, M. A. Lifton, D. A. Gorgone, et al 2002. Eventual AIDS vaccine failure in a rhesus monkey by viral escape from cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Nature 415:335.[Medline]
  28. Malkevitch, N., L. J. Patterson, K. Aldrich, E. Richardson, W. G. Alvord, M. Robert-Guroff. 2003. A replication competent adenovirus 5 host range mutant-simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) recombinant priming/subunit protein boosting vaccine regimen induces broad, persistent SIV-specific cellular immunity to dominant and subdominant epitopes in Mamu-A*01 rhesus macaques. J. Immunol. 170:4281.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yang, Y., K. U. Jooss, Q. Su, H. C. Ertl, J. M. Wilson. 1996. Immune responses to viral antigens versus transgene product in the elimination of recombinant adenovirus-infected hepatocytes in vivo. Gene Ther. 3:137.[Medline]
  30. Wang, R., J. Epstein, F. M. Baraceros, E. J. Gorak, Y. Charoenvit, D. J. Carucci, R. C. Hedstrom, N. Rahardjo, T. Gay, P. Hobart, et al 2001. Induction of CD4+ T cell-dependent CD8+ type 1 responses in humans by a malaria DNA vaccine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10817.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. MacGregor, R. R., J. D. Boyer, K. E. Ugen, K. E. Lacy, S. J. Gluckman, M. L. Bagarazzi, M. A. Chattergoon, Y. Baine, T. J. Higgins, R. B. Ciccarelli, et al 1998. First human trial of a DNA-based vaccine for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection: safety and host response. J. Infect. Dis. 178:92.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
L. H. Haut and H. C. J. Ertl
Obstacles to the successful development of an efficacious T cell-inducing HIV-1 vaccine
J. Leukoc. Biol., October 1, 2009; 86(4): 779 - 793.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Tatsis, M. O. Lasaro, S.-W. Lin, Z. Q. Xiang, D. Zhou, L. DiMenna, H. Li, A. Bian, S. Abdulla, Y. Li, et al.
Adenovirus Vector-Induced Immune Responses in Nonhuman Primates: Responses to Prime Boost Regimens
J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6587 - 6599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
J. Liu, B. A. Ewald, D. M. Lynch, M. Denholtz, P. Abbink, A. A. C. Lemckert, A. Carville, K. G. Mansfield, M. J. Havenga, J. Goudsmit, et al.
Magnitude and Phenotype of Cellular Immune Responses Elicited by Recombinant Adenovirus Vectors and Heterologous Prime-Boost Regimens in Rhesus Monkeys
J. Virol., May 15, 2008; 82(10): 4844 - 4852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. A. Schoenly and D. B. Weiner
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vaccine Development: Recent Advances in the Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Platform "Spotty Business"
J. Virol., April 1, 2008; 82(7): 3166 - 3180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
P. J. Holst, C. Bartholdy, A. Stryhn, A. R. Thomsen, and J. P. Christensen
Rapid and sustained CD4+ T-cell-independent immunity from adenovirus-encoded vaccine antigens
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2007; 88(6): 1708 - 1716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
P. Abbink, A. A. C. Lemckert, B. A. Ewald, D. M. Lynch, M. Denholtz, S. Smits, L. Holterman, I. Damen, R. Vogels, A. R. Thorner, et al.
Comparative Seroprevalence and Immunogenicity of Six Rare Serotype Recombinant Adenovirus Vaccine Vectors from Subgroups B and D
J. Virol., May 1, 2007; 81(9): 4654 - 4663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
M. Havenga, R. Vogels, D. Zuijdgeest, K. Radosevic, S. Mueller, M. Sieuwerts, F. Weichold, I. Damen, J. Kaspers, A. Lemckert, et al.
Novel replication-incompetent adenoviral B-group vectors: high vector stability and yield in PER.C6 cells.
J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2006; 87(Pt 8): 2135 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
Q. Tang and G. G. Maul
Mouse cytomegalovirus crosses the species barrier with help from a few human cytomegalovirus proteins.
J. Virol., August 1, 2006; 80(15): 7510 - 7521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
V. Buffa, D. R. M. Negri, P. Leone, R. Bona, M. Borghi, I. Bacigalupo, D. Carlei, C. Sgadari, B. Ensoli, and A. Cara
A single administration of lentiviral vectors expressing either full-length human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1)HXB2 Rev/Env or codon-optimized HIV-1JR-FL gp120 generates durable immune responses in mice
J. Gen. Virol., June 1, 2006; 87(6): 1625 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. Gao, A. C. Soloff, X. Lu, A. Montecalvo, D. C. Nguyen, Y. Matsuoka, P. D. Robbins, D. E. Swayne, R. O. Donis, J. M. Katz, et al.
Protection of Mice and Poultry from Lethal H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus through Adenovirus-Based Immunization
J. Virol., February 15, 2006; 80(4): 1959 - 1964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gen. Virol.Home page
S. M. Barratt-Boyes, A. C. Soloff, W. Gao, E. Nwanegbo, X. Liu, P. A. Rajakumar, K. N. Brown, P. D. Robbins, M. Murphey-Corb, R. D. Day, et al.
Broad cellular immunity with robust memory responses to simian immunodeficiency virus following serial vaccination with adenovirus 5- and 35-based vectors
J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2006; 87(1): 139 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W.-p. Kong, L. Xu, K. Stadler, J. B. Ulmer, S. Abrignani, R. Rappuoli, and G. J. Nabel
Modulation of the Immune Response to the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Spike Glycoprotein by Gene-Based and Inactivated Virus Immunization
J. Virol., November 15, 2005; 79(22): 13915 - 13923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Hashimoto, J. L. Boyer, N. R. Hackett, J. M. Wilson, and R. G. Crystal
Induction of Protective Immunity to Anthrax Lethal Toxin with a Nonhuman Primate Adenovirus-Based Vaccine in the Presence of Preexisting Anti-Human Adenovirus Immunity
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2005; 73(10): 6885 - 6891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. A. C. Lemckert, S. M. Sumida, L. Holterman, R. Vogels, D. M. Truitt, D. M. Lynch, A. Nanda, B. A. Ewald, D. A. Gorgone, M. A. Lifton, et al.
Immunogenicity of Heterologous Prime-Boost Regimens Involving Recombinant Adenovirus Serotype 11 (Ad11) and Ad35 Vaccine Vectors in the Presence of Anti-Ad5 Immunity
J. Virol., August 1, 2005; 79(15): 9694 - 9701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. Wu, W.-p. Kong, and G. J. Nabel
Enhanced Breadth of CD4 T-Cell Immunity by DNA Prime and Adenovirus Boost Immunization to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Env and Gag Immunogens
J. Virol., July 1, 2005; 79(13): 8024 - 8031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. M. Sumida, D. M. Truitt, A. A. C. Lemckert, R. Vogels, J. H. H. V. Custers, M. M. Addo, S. Lockman, T. Peter, F. W. Peyerl, M. G. Kishko, et al.
Neutralizing Antibodies to Adenovirus Serotype 5 Vaccine Vectors Are Directed Primarily against the Adenovirus Hexon Protein
J. Immunol., June 1, 2005; 174(11): 7179 - 7185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. Krebs, E. Scandella, B. Odermatt, and B. Ludewig
Rapid Functional Exhaustion and Deletion of CTL following Immunization with Recombinant Adenovirus
J. Immunol., April 15, 2005; 174(8): 4559 - 4566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
A. Reyes-Sandoval, J. C. Fitzgerald, R. Grant, S. Roy, Z. Q. Xiang, Y. Li, G. P. Gao, J. M. Wilson, and H. C. J. Ertl
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific Immune Responses in Primates upon Sequential Immunization with Adenoviral Vaccine Carriers of Human and Simian Serotypes
J. Virol., July 15, 2004; 78(14): 7392 - 7399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. H. Barouch, M. G. Pau, J. H. H. V. Custers, W. Koudstaal, S. Kostense, M. J. E. Havenga, D. M. Truitt, S. M. Sumida, M. G. Kishko, J. C. Arthur, et al.
Immunogenicity of Recombinant Adenovirus Serotype 35 Vaccine in the Presence of Pre-Existing Anti-Ad5 Immunity
J. Immunol., May 15, 2004; 172(10): 6290 - 6297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ertl, H. C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinto, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Ertl, H. C. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS