|
|
||||||||
Negatively Regulates T-bet Transcription Through Suppression of p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation1

* Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84132; and
Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
) in resting lymphocytes was recently established, although the physiologic role(s) played by this nuclear hormone receptor in these cell types remains unresolved. In this study, we used CD4+ T cells isolated from PPAR
-/- and wild-type mice, as well as cell lines that constitutively express PPAR
, in experiments designed to evaluate the role of this hormone receptor in the regulation of T cell function. We report that activated CD4+ T cells lacking PPAR
produce increased levels of IFN-
, but significantly lower levels of IL-2 when compared with activated wild-type CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PPAR
regulates the expression of these cytokines by CD4+ T cells in part, through its ability to negatively regulate the transcription of T-bet. The induction of T-bet expression in CD4+ T cells was determined to be positively influenced by p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation, and the presence of unliganded PPAR
effectively suppressed the phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase. The activation of PPAR
with highly specific ligands relaxed its capacity to suppress p38 MAP kinase phosphorylation and promoted T-bet expression. These results demonstrate a novel DNA-binding independent and agonist-controlled regulatory influence by the nuclear hormone receptor PPAR
. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
)3 is a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily that was initially described for its ability to induce peroxisome proliferation in rodent hepatocytes in response to certain xenobiotic compounds (1). PPAR
has now been demonstrated to exist within numerous tissues and to be positively involved in important physiologic and developmental processes, including the control of inflammatory responses (2, 3).
The influence of PPAR
on numerous biological activities arises through its ability to carry out both positive and negative gene regulation, a characteristic shared by other nuclear hormone receptors (3). Upon activation, PPAR
binds to DNA as a heterodimer with the 9-cis retinoic acid receptor and transcriptionally activates a subset of genes possessing a peroxisome proliferator response element in their promoter region (4). PPAR
can also negatively regulate gene expression by antagonizing various transcription factors involved in an array of important signaling pathways. Such antagonism can be achieved through different mechanisms, including physical interaction with the transcription factor itself or through the ability of PPAR
to sequester essential transcriptional coactivators (5). This transrepression capability of PPAR
appears critical for controlling the expression of certain proinflammatory genes within vascular endothelial cells and macrophages (6, 7).
It has recently been reported that PPAR
exists in T and B lymphocytes (8, 9, 10). Although demonstrated to be both transactivation and transrepression competent within lymphocytes, the role(s) of PPAR
in lymphocyte biology remains largely unknown. To gain further insight into the physiological function of PPAR
within lymphocytes, we investigated physiological responses by T cells isolated from PPAR
-/- mice as well as responses elicited by T cell lines that overexpress PPAR
. In this study, we present experiments that describe a unique role for PPAR
in T cell activation. We show that unliganded PPAR
has the ability to negatively regulate the transcription of T-bet, an inducible transcription factor in lymphocytes that is important in the initiation and termination of activation-induced cytokine gene transcription (11). By controlling the initiation of T-bet transcription, PPAR
was able to indirectly influence the level of activation-induced IFN-
produced by CD4+ T cells. Furthermore, we report that the control of PPAR
over T-bet expression occurs via a DNA-binding independent mechanism, mediated through the ability of PPAR
to repress the phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase following T cell activation. These data suggest a novel and important function for PPAR
within T cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Colonies of PPAR
wild-type (PPAR
+/+) and homozygous knockout (PPAR
-/-) mice on the 129sv background were expanded from breeding pairs originally obtained from F. Gonzalez (Metabolism Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). The derivation and phenotypic characteristics of these animals have previously been reported (12). PPAR
-/- mice fail to express a functional PPAR
protein in all tissues, including CD4+ T cells. An analysis was made, using quantitative real-time PCR, of PPAR
and PPAR
mRNA levels in CD4+ T cells from PPAR
-/- and wild-type (WT) donors. The mRNA levels of PPAR
were found to be similar in PPAR
-/- and WT CD4+ T cells, before and following activation. Similarly, PPAR
mRNA levels were equivalent in PPAR
-/- and WT CD4+ T cells before and following activation (data not shown). Female mice were used for all of the experiments reported in this work. All mice were housed in the University of Utah Animal Resource Center, which routinely monitors for the most prevalent murine pathogens, employs sentinel animals as a means for early detection of murine hepatitis virus and parvovirus, and guarantees strict compliance with regulations established by the Animal Welfare Act. Mice were anesthetized with Halothane and sacrificed by cervical dislocation.
Cell lines and transfection
Jurkat T cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 10% FCS (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT), 200 mM L-glutamine, antibiotics, and 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME. Where indicated, cells were resuspended at a concentration of 5 x 106 cells/ml and were activated in multiwell plates with a solution of 50 ng/ml PMA with or without 1 µM ionomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for the times indicated. In certain experiments, cells were pretreated for 2 h before stimulation with the PPAR
-specific agonist GW9578 or GW7647 (generous gifts from P. Brown, Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) or vehicle (0.1% DMSO). These ligands have been reported to have high specificity for the PPAR
isoform and are able to activate PPAR
at nanomolar concentrations (13, 14).
Transfections were performed, as previously described (15). Briefly, 5 x 106 cells were resuspended in 0.65 ml of growth medium, and 10 µg of plasmid was then added. Cells were incubated with plasmids for 5 min in 0.4-cm electrode gap cuvettes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and electroporated at room temperature using the Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) set at 260 V and 960 µF. Cells were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature, transferred to 100 x 20-mm tissue culture dishes containing 10 ml of growth medium, and incubated at 37°C for 48 h before use. Stable transfectants were generated in Clona-cell TCS following the manufacturers protocol (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada).
Dynabead cell enrichment
For the preparation of CD4+ T lymphocytes, freshly isolated splenic lymphoid cells were suspended at a concentration of 2 x 107 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 containing 5% FBS. The erythrocytes present in the cell suspension were lysed by brief treatment with sterile aqueous 0.83% (w/v) ammonium chloride. The single cell suspension was incubated with 2 µg/ml each of biotinylated anti-CD45R/B220, anti-CD11b, and anti-CD8 Abs (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) for 20 min on ice. Following washing with PBS, the cells were resuspended with M-280 magnetic Dynabeads coated with streptavidin (Dynal, New York, NY), and incubated at a bead:cell ratio of 1:1 for 20 min with agitation at 4°C. The residual cells were collected, washed, and separated for use in culture or for mRNA analysis. The level of purity of the cell preparations was assessed by staining cells with FITC anti-mouse CD4, FITC anti-mouse CD8, and FITC anti-mouse B220. The level of cell purity was routinely >90%.
ELISA
Freshly isolated CD4+ T cells were activated on multiwell plates treated with 2 µg/ml immobilized anti-CD3 with the addition of 1 µg/ml soluble anti-CD28 for various times at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Cell culture supernatants were collected for quantitative evaluation of immunoactive IL-2, IFN-
, or IL-4 by ELISA, as described previously (16). Rat anti-murine cytokine mAbs and murine rIL-2 and rIFN-
cytokine standards were purchased from BD PharMingen.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Reverse transcription was performed, as previously described (17). mRNA was isolated by the method of Chomczynski and Sacchi (18), and PCR was performed in a fluorescence temperature cycler (Light Cycler; Idaho Technology, Salt Lake City, UT), as fully described elsewhere (19). The Light Cycler monitors the cycle-by-cycle accumulation of fluorescently labeled products. The cycle at which the product is first detected is used as an indicator of relative starting copy. Melting curves were acquired to determine specificity of the PCR (19). PCR products for each of the primer sets were confirmed by running samples on agarose gels. The PCR was conducted in 10 µl final volume containing 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1/30,000 dilution of SYBR Green I, 5 µM (each) primer, 0.05 U Taq polymerase, and 11 ng TaqStart Ab. Oligonucleotides used for these analyses are as follows: murine GAPDH, 5'-AGT ATG TCG TGG AGT CTA C-3' and 5'-CAT ACT TGG CAG GTT TCT C-3'; murine T-bet, 5'-GGA TTC TGG GGT TTA CTT CTT-3' and 5'-TTC TCT GTT TGG CTG GCT GTT-3'; murine IFN-
, 5'-CTT CCT CAT GGC TGT TTC TGG-3' and 5'-CGA CTC CTT TTC CGC TTC CTG-3'; and murine IL-2, 5'-GTC ACA TTG ACA CTT GTG CTC C-3' and 5'-AGT CAA ATC CAG AAC ATG CCG-3'. GAPDH transcript levels were used to normalize the amount of cDNA in each sample, and T-bet, IFN-
, and IL-2 transcript levels were reported relative to levels found in the control sample.
Preparation of nuclear extracts and immunoblot analysis
Nuclear extracts were prepared from T cells following treatment for various times with immobilized anti-CD3 and soluble anti-CD28, as described previously (20). Briefly, cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS containing 1 mM PMSF, resuspended in 250 µl buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 300 mM sucrose, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 100 µM leupeptin, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF), and incubated on ice for 10 min. Next, 25 µl of 1% Nonidet P-40 was added and mixed carefully. Cells were then collected by centrifugation at 800 x g for 1 min at 4°C and washed with 200 µl buffer A. Nuclei were then resuspended in 50 µl buffer B (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 3 mM MgCl2, 420 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 25% glycerol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 100 µM leupeptin, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mM PMSF) and incubated for 15 min on ice. Nuclear debris was removed by centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 1 min. In certain experiments, cells were pretreated with the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitor PD98059 (Sigma-Aldrich) or the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor PD169,316 (Alexis Biochemicals, San Diego, CA) before activation. Whole cell extracts used in the analysis of the MAP kinases were generated, as described previously (21).
The supernatant was then removed, and protein content was determined by Bradford Assay (17). Equal amounts of nuclear protein were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE and polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), as previously described (20). After blocking with 5% nonfat milk TBS, blots were incubated with either anti-T-bet Ab (kindly provided by L. Glimcher, Harvard University, Boston, MA) or Abs against the double-phosphorylated forms of p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and ERK (Promega, Madison, WI) for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C for anti-p38-Ab, anti-JNK, and anti-ERK1/2 Ab (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA). Membranes were then washed and incubated with goat anti-rabbit HRP conjugate (1/2000 dilution in TBS-Tween) for 45 min at room temperature. After washing, bands were visualized using a chemiluminescence kit, according to the manufacturers instructions (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-2 production is dysregulated in activated PPAR
-/- T cells
We and other investigators have previously reported that the nuclear hormone receptor PPAR
is expressed in resting T lymphocytes (8, 9, 10). The transcription and protein levels of PPAR
were found to decline following T cell activation (8, 9, 10). We have now questioned whether the expression of PPAR
in resting T lymphocytes is involved in the regulation of T cell responses that occur early postactivation. An analysis of the cytokines produced following the activation of splenic CD4+ T cells from WT and PPAR
-/- mice revealed consistent differences. As shown in Fig. 1a, CD4+ T cells from PPAR
-/- mice produce greater amounts of IFN-
over the 24-h period postactivation with immobilized anti-CD3 and soluble anti-CD28, when compared with CD4+ T cells isolated from age-matched WT mice. However, under the same activating conditions, CD4+ T cells from PPAR
-/- mice produced lower amounts of IL-2 than T cells from the WT animals (Fig. 1b). Cell types from both sources produced similar low levels of IL-4. The addition of neutralizing anti-IL-4 and/or anti-IL-12 Abs at the initiation of the cell cultures period did not alter the consistent differences in cytokine production observed between PPAR
-/- and WT T cells (data not shown). The observed differences in cytokine production were due to kinetic differences in the transcription of the IFN-
and IL-2 genes postactivation, as determined by quantitative real-time PCR. As shown in Fig. 1c, transcription of the IFN-
gene was initiated much earlier in PPAR
-/- T cells postactivation, and the level of IFN-
transcripts was significantly higher at each of the time points analyzed compared with WT T cells. When IL-2 transcripts were compared kinetically under the same conditions, the level of IL-2 mRNA from PPAR
-/- T cells optimized before 3 h postactivation and decreased markedly at all the later time points tested. IL-2 mRNA levels in the WT T cells, however, continued to increase until 12 h postactivation (Fig. 1d), similar to what has been reported previously (22). From these results it is apparent that the presence of PPAR
in CD4+ T cells contributes to the regulation of IFN-
and IL-2 expression in response to activation.
|
-/- T cells following activation
The lineage-specific transcription factor T-bet is now appreciated to be critical for the activation-induced progression of T cells down a Th1 pathway (11, 23, 24). Interestingly, T-bet was originally isolated based on its ability to bind to the IL-2 promoter and was later demonstrated to actually repress IL-2 expression by T cells in in vitro experiments. Based on the reported ability of T-bet to repress IL-2 expression as well as to transactivate the IFN-
gene (11, 23, 24), we questioned whether the activation-induced expression of T-bet is altered in PPAR
-/- T cells. T-bet mRNA levels were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR before T cell activation and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postactivation with immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. As shown in Fig. 2a, the initiation of T-bet transcription postactivation was kinetically accelerated in PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells. T-bet mRNA levels were maximal by 3 h postactivation in PPAR
-/- T cells, while the levels of T-bet mRNA in WT CD4+ T cells did not peak until 6 h postactivation. Similarly, Western blot analysis determined that T-bet protein synthesis postactivation in PPAR
-/- T cells was accelerated when compared with T cells isolated from WT animals (Fig. 2b). Thus, differences in the kinetics of T-bet expression might contribute to the differences observed in cytokine production in WT and PPAR
-/- T cells.
|
-/- CD4+ T cells is independent of signaling through the IFN-
receptor
It has recently been reported that IFN-
exposure rapidly up-regulates the expression of T-bet following activation of CD4+ T cells (25, 26). We therefore questioned whether the accelerated expression of T-bet in PPAR
-/- T cells was due to the influences caused by an increased IFN-
expression in these same cells. PPAR
-/- and WT CD4+ T cells were activated with immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 in the presence or absence of neutralizing Ab against IFN-
. T-bet and IFN-
mRNA levels, as well as T-bet protein levels, were measured 48 h postactivation. Similar to what has been reported previously (25), WT T cells were severely compromised in their ability to up-regulate expression of T-bet or IFN-
mRNA when activated in the presence of anti-IFN-
, but were able to up-regulate expression of both these genes when activated in the absence of anti-IFN-
(Fig. 3, a and b). Surprisingly, when PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells were activated in the presence of anti-IFN-
, they were induced to express both T-bet mRNA and protein. This correlated with a retention in their ability to express mRNA for IFN-
(Fig. 3, ac). Fig. 3d demonstrates that PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells, activated with immobilized anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 for 48 h in the presence of anti-IFN-
, retain their ability to reinitiate synthesis of IFN-
protein when restimulated with anti-CD3. WT T cells treated in a similar manner, as expected, failed to up-regulate IFN-
production following restimulation. The accelerated IFN-
production in the PPAR
-/- T cells upon restimulation most likely arises through a retained ability to express T-bet, as WT T cells that failed to express T-bet under the same conditions also failed to produce IFN-
upon restimulation (Fig. 3d). These results suggest PPAR
regulates the expression of T-bet by antagonizing a signaling pathway that is independent of IFN-
signaling.
|

It is well recognized that activated PPARs can suppress the expression of many distinct genes using a variety of molecular mechanisms (3). In almost all cases, agonist activation of the PPAR is required for effective transrepression to occur. Interestingly, the differences in T-bet expression in WT and PPAR
-/- T cells, following activation, were observed without adding exogenous ligand. In an attempt to define the mechanism through which PPAR
regulates T-bet expression, we analyzed the influences that ligand-activated PPAR
would have on T-bet expression by activated T cells. CD4+ T cells isolated from WT mice were treated with increasing doses of the highly specific PPAR
ligand GW9578 (13) or vehicle 2 h before cellular activation with immobilized anti-CD3 and anti-CD28. T-bet protein levels were then analyzed at 24 h postactivation by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 4a, treatment of WT CD4+ T cells with GW9578 enhanced the activation-induced expression of T-bet in a dose-dependent manner. However, GW9578 treatment of T cells isolated from PPAR
-/- donors did not show an increase in T-bet expression compared with vehicle-treated T cells following activation (Fig. 4b). These data suggest that the effects being elicited by the GW9578 compound were mediated through a PPAR
-dependent mechanism. Similar results have been obtained using GW7647, another highly specific PPAR
ligand (data not shown). Collectively, these results suggest that the ability of PPAR
to suppress T-bet expression is independent of PPAR
activation and that ligand activation of PPAR
abrogates its normally suppressive effects.
|
The PPAR
isoform, unlike PPAR
, is unable to negatively regulate gene expression through a DNA-binding dependent mechanism (27). This results from the ability of unliganded PPAR
to maintain an association with corepressor complexes when bound to DNA (27). We therefore reasoned that the negative regulation of T-bet expression by PPAR
was not due to a DNA-binding dependent repression of the T-bet gene. This led us to question whether PPAR
was inhibiting T-bet expression through the regulation of an upstream signal cascade. Because the activity of the p38 MAP kinase has been positively linked with IFN-
production in activated T cells, as well as Th1 T cell development (28, 29, 30), we questioned whether activation of p38 MAP kinase might be involved in the regulation of T-bet expression. To address this, CD4+ T cells were pretreated with PD169,316, a specific chemical inhibitor of p38 MAP kinase, or with the chemical ERK MAP kinase inhibitor, PD98059 (31). Treated and control T cells were then activated with immobilized anti-CD3 plus soluble anti-CD28. The level of T-bet mRNA was quantitated at 6 h postactivation, and T-bet protein was analyzed by Western blot 24 h postactivation. As shown in Fig. 5a, activation-induced expression of T-bet mRNA was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner in T cells treated with PD169,316, while inhibition of the ERK MAP kinase did not influence the induced expression of T-bet mRNA. Likewise, the inhibition of p38 MAP kinase activation correlated with an inhibition of T-bet protein expression in both PPAR
-/- and WT T cells (Fig. 5b). These data suggest that activation of p38 MAP kinase positively contributes to the activation-induced expression of T-bet in T cells.
|
-/- T cells express elevated levels of phosphorylated p38 MAP kinase following activation
It has previously been reported that certain members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily possess the ability to inhibit activation of MAP kinases, including the p38 MAP kinase (32, 33, 34, 35). This led us to question whether the ability of PPAR
to regulate the transcription of T-bet might arise through its ability to somehow regulate the activation of the p38 MAP kinase. To address this, splenic CD4+ T cells from PPAR
-/- and WT mice were activated with PMA for 5, 15, and 30 min. The induced levels of phosphorylated p38 MAP kinase and phosphorylated MAP kinase kinase (MKK)3/6 within the activated T cells were then analyzed by Western blot and compared with resting cells. As shown in Fig. 6a, the levels of phosphorylated p38 MAP kinase were greater in activated PPAR
-/- T cells when compared with WT T cells activated under the same conditions. Interestingly, the induced levels of phosphorylated MKK3/6 were similar between the activated WT and PPAR
-/- T cells (Fig. 6a).
|
in the regulation of p38 MAP kinase activation, PPAR
was stably expressed in Jurkat T cells using a constitutively active expression construct. As shown in Fig. 6b, the level of phospho-p38 MAP kinase was much lower in activated Jurkat cells transfected with PPAR
when compared with the levels observed in activated Jurkat cells that were transfected with an empty vector. Overexpression of PPAR
in Jurkat T cells had no effect on the level of activation-induced phosphorylated ERK. Similar to what was observed with T-bet expression, ligand activation of PPAR
attenuated the ability of this receptor to inhibit p38 MAP kinase activation (Fig. 6c). These results suggest that the ability of PPAR
to regulate the transcription of T-bet within T cells postactivation arises through the ability of the unliganded receptor to repress the activation of p38 MAP kinase at a site distal to MKK3/6 phosphorylation. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene while concomitantly repressing IL-4 gene expression (11). If T-bet expression becomes dysregulated, however, it can contribute in the development of certain pathological disease states, ranging from asthma to inflammatory bowel disease (38, 39). Consequently, a better understanding of the cellular signaling pathways that regulate the transcription and cellular expression of T-bet subsequent to T cell activation could be of great importance in the design of therapeutic interventions for many distinct immunopathological conditions.
In this study, we have experimentally demonstrated in CD4+ T cells that unliganded PPAR
negatively regulates the activation-induced expression of T-bet. CD4+ T cells lacking PPAR
undergo an early termination of induced IL-2 gene expression and protein production, and a concomitant overexpression of IFN-
. PPAR
exerts its regulatory influences over T-bet by suppressing the activation-induced phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase, a signaling molecule whose activity is associated with the expression of IFN-
(28, 29, 30). We demonstrate in this study that p38 MAP kinase activation also contributes to inducing the expression of T-bet following TCR-mediated activation of CD4+ T cells. The data we present, linking regulation of p38 MAP kinase activation to transcription of T-bet, are consistent with previous reports demonstrating that activity of the p38 MAP kinase is associated with Th1 T cell differentiation and IFN-
production (28, 29, 30).
IFN-
signaling in CD4+ T cells rapidly induces the expression of T-bet (25). It has also been determined that T-bet expression becomes compromised without sufficient IFN-
signaling. Consequently, the enhanced p38 MAP kinase activity seen in stimulated PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells could be accelerating T-bet expression indirectly, with the early activation of p38 MAP kinase resulting in increased IFN-
expression and signaling. However, our present studies show that CD4+ T cells lacking a functional PPAR
retain their ability to express T-bet in the complete absence of IFN-
signaling. This ability by activated PPAR
-/- T cells to express T-bet without IFN-
signaling results in a rapid secretion of newly synthesized IFN-
protein following restimulation. Wild-type CD4+ T cells that are initially activated under conditions in which IFN-
signaling is inhibited fail to express T-bet or IFN-
following restimulation. These results indicate that the ability of PPAR
to suppress the activation-induced expression of T-bet is mediated through an ability to antagonize aspects of TCR signaling, and is independent of regulation through IFN-
signaling.
The novel regulation of T-bet by PPAR
would allow CD4+ T cells to control the expression of T-bet based on the presence of IFN-
in the microenvironment. Recently, it was reported that dendritic cells and other types of APCs produce IFN-
following appropriate stimulation (40, 41). It was proposed that the IFN-
produced by APCs might play an important role in regulating the development of Th1 cells through the known ability of this cytokine to induce T-bet expression in T cells (42). However, the ability of APCs to produce IFN-
is dictated by the specific conditions under which these cells are activated (42). Therefore, under conditions in which the APCs are not producing IFN-
, the PPAR
within CD4+ T lymphocytes might help to stabilize the initiation of Th2 cell development. Conversely, CD4+ T cells that are stimulated by IFN-
-producing APCs should be induced to express T-bet, thereby circumventing the TCR-dependent PPAR
-mediated repression of T-bet.
The ability of PPAR
to repress T-bet expression appears to require unactivated PPAR
, because ligand activation of the receptor relaxes its repression over T-bet expression by allowing p38 MAP kinase to be phosphorylated. It is presently unclear how unliganded PPAR
mediates its suppressive effects on p38 MAP kinase activation. However, we have previously reported that PPAR
is expressed almost exclusively in the cytoplasmic compartment of resting T cells, suggesting that unliganded PPAR
must be repressing p38 MAP kinase activation through a DNA-binding independent mechanism (8). In support of this finding is a recent report demonstrating that glucocorticoid receptors (GR) are able to inhibit JNK activation through a DNA-binding independent mechanism that has yet to be mechanistically defined (33). In this report, the authors stated that they were unable to detect a physical association between GR and JNK, possibly due to a transient association between these two proteins. It was also stated that the GR might be part of a larger complex that associates with JNK, making it difficult to detect by the methods used. Further support of this concept comes from a recent report describing that JNK activation can be inhibited by the nuclear hormone receptor corepressor protein N-CoR that is associated with a number of other bridge proteins (43). Interestingly, we have found that the PPAR
within resting lymphocytes is associated with N-CoR, and that following ligand addition, the receptor dissociates from this corepressor (unpublished data). However, we have not yet been able to establish a physical association between PPAR
and p38 MAP kinase in resting T cells. Therefore, the ability of unliganded PPAR
to inhibit p38 MAP kinase activation may not require a direct interaction between these two proteins, but may possibly interact with proteins that are upstream of p38 MAP kinase. It was recently established that p38 MAP kinase is activated in Th1 CD4+ T cells through a signaling cascade that involves GADD45
, a protein that can physically interact with PPAR
(44). Although this represents an intriguing mechanism to describe how PPAR
might functionally inhibit p38 MAP kinase activation, the activation of the CD4+ T cells in our culture systems was conducted under conditions in which GADD45
is not expressed (44). Alternatively, PPAR
may suppress the activation of p38 MAP kinase through an association with some secondary complex of proteins, making it difficult to detect with the methods used.
Because the constitutive expression of PPAR
inhibits the phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase, we questioned whether the constitutive expression of PPAR
could also inhibit T-bet expression. Because Jurkat T cells are unable to express IFN-
and T-bet, we transfected PPAR
into FS7-20.6.18, a cell line that can be induced to express IFN-
(45) and T-bet. We found that the constitutive expression of PPAR
repressed the ability of the FS7-20.6.18 cells to express T-bet and IFN-
subsequent to their activation (data not shown). However, after several passages in vitro, the FS7-20.6.18 cell line lost its ability to be induced to express T-bet and IFN-
. We are therefore hesitant to conclude that an overexpression of PPAR
can suppress T-bet and IFN-
expression until a more stable cell line can be analyzed.
It will be of interest to establish whether PPAR
s tonic suppression of p38 MAP kinase activation and its downstream regulation of T-bet expression result in altered T cell function in vivo. The accelerated and increased expression of IFN-
expression in activated PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells, which results from a dysregulation in the p38 MAP kinase signaling pathway, could result in a number of detrimental effects. It has recently been reported that IFN-
signaling in dendritic cells induces the expression of the enzyme indeolamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (41). The expression of IDO within dendritic cells was established to inhibit T cell proliferation and induce T cell apoptosis through IDO catalyzing the breakdown of tryptophan, decreasing the availability of this essential amino acid. The rapid production of IFN-
by PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells following their stimulation might cause an accelerated expression of IDO within dendritic cells that are presenting Ag to these T cells. An increase in IDO expression by peptide-presenting dendritic cells, coupled with the decreased IL-2 production by PPAR
-/- CD4+ T cells subsequent to activation, could severely compromise the ability of Ag-specific T cells to undergo adequate clonal expansion.
In this study, we provide data indicating that PPAR
regulates specific aspects of T cell function in the absence of ligand. Contrary to the more global suppression that has been reported by agonist-activated PPAR
, unliganded PPAR
appears to be specific in the signaling cascades it regulates. It has now been demonstrated that a number of the ligand-induced effects can be achieved in the absence of PPAR
(10). Consequently, it is not yet possible to conclude whether all of the reported effects by these compounds are mediated by a PPAR
-dependent process. It is still intriguing to suggest that the function of PPAR
within T cells is dictated by the microenvironments in which the cell resides. Interestingly, we have found that treatment of CD4+ T cells with GW9578 inhibits the production of IFN-
following T cell activation through a PPAR
-dependent process (data not shown). The mechanism through which ligand-activated PPAR
influences IFN-
gene expression has yet to be uncovered. However, it is known that ligand-activated PPAR
can negatively regulate the transcriptional activities of NF-
B, a transcription factor that is important in the up-regulation of IFN-
gene expression (6, 8, 17).
Collectively, our studies demonstrate that the nuclear hormone receptor PPAR
plays a novel role in the transcriptional regulation of T-bet gene expression within T cells. The ability of PPAR
to negatively regulate the activation-induced expression of T-bet in naive T cells influences the timing of the switch from transcription of the IL-2 gene to the transcription of the IFN-
gene in these cells. This process, which controls CD4+ T cell production of IFN-
, appears to be facilitated by the capacity of unliganded PPAR
to transiently suppress the phosphorylation of p38 MAP kinase subsequent to T cell activation. The ability of PPAR
to transiently suppress activation of the p38 MAP kinase and to subsequently delay the expression of T-bet and IFN-
production may allow activated CD4+ T cells to sense and respond to unique environmental influences that serve to influence these cells actions following stimulation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
construct, and Dr. Peter Brown for the GW9578 and GW7647. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr. Raymond A. Daynes, Pathology Department, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2501. E-mail address: daynes.office{at}path.utah.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PPAR
, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; GR, glucocorticoid receptor; IDO, indeolamine 2,3-dioxygenase; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; MKK, MAP kinase kinase; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication January 13, 2003. Accepted for publication April 23, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-dependent repression of the inducible nitric oxide synthase gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4699.
but not by PPAR
activators. Nature 393:790.[Medline]
agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. Nature 391:82.[Medline]
(PPAR
) is expressed in resting murine lymphocytes: the PPAR
in T and B lymphocytes is both transactivation and transrepression competent. J. Biol. Chem. 277:6838.
ligand, has profound effects on immune responses in vivo. J. Immunol. 169:6806.
isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:3012.[Abstract]
agonist with potent lipid-lowering activity. J. Med. Chem. 42:3785.[Medline]
agonist through parallel-array synthesis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11:1225.[Medline]
activation modulates cellular redox status, represses nuclear factor-
B signaling, and reduces inflammatory cytokine production in aging. J. Biol. Chem. 273:32833.
B in GATA3 expression and TH2 differentiation in allergic airway inflammation. Nat. Immun. 2:45.
production in CD4 and CD8 T cells. Science 295:338.
in lymphoid and myeloid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:15137.
, an integrator of transcriptional repression and nuclear receptor signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2613.
expression by Th1 effector T cells mediated by the p38 MAP kinase signaling pathway. EMBO J. 17:2817.[Medline]
mediates the activation of the p38 and JNK MAP kinase pathways and cytokine production in effector TH1 cells. Immunity 14:583.[Medline]
(PPAR
) heterodimer: a basis for new therapeutic strategies. J. Exp. Med. 193:827.
in lymphoid and myeloid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:15137.
production by antigen-presenting cells: mechanisms emerge. Trends Immunol. 22:556.[Medline]
mediates the activation of the p38 and JNK MAP kinase pathways and cytokine production in effector TH1 cells. Immunity 14:583.
interferon and three other lymphokine activities: multiple activities of a single lymphokine?. J. Immunol. 131:794.[Abstract]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Collino, N. S.A. Patel, and C. Thiemermann Review: PPARs as new therapeutic targets for the treatment of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2008; 2(3): 179 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dasgupta, A. Roy, M. Jana, D. M. Hartley, and K. Pahan Gemfibrozil Ameliorates Relapsing-Remitting Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Independent of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha} Mol. Pharmacol., October 1, 2007; 72(4): 934 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Dunn, S. S. Ousman, R. A. Sobel, L. Zuniga, S. E. Baranzini, S. Youssef, A. Crowell, J. Loh, J. Oksenberg, and L. Steinman Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR){alpha} expression in T cells mediates gender differences in development of T cell-mediated autoimmunity J. Exp. Med., February 19, 2007; 204(2): 321 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bachmann, C. Dragoi, M. A. Poleganov, J. Pfeilschifter, and H. Muhl Interleukin-18 directly activates T-bet expression and function via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and nuclear factor-{kappa}B in acute myeloid leukemia-derived predendritic KG-1 cells Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2007; 6(2): 723 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Brown and J. Plutzky Peroxisome Proliferator Activated Receptors as Transcriptional Nodal Points and Therapeutic Targets Circulation, January 30, 2007; 115(4): 518 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Yessoufou, A. Hichami, P. Besnard, K. Moutairou, and N. A. Khan Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Deficiency Increases the Risk of Maternal Abortion and Neonatal Mortality in Murine Pregnancy with or without Diabetes Mellitus: Modulation of T Cell Differentiation Endocrinology, September 1, 2006; 147(9): 4410 - 4418. [Abstract] [Full Text] |