The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenne, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenne, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Protein
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 170: 3739-3750.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

A New Model of Sheep Ig Diversification: Shifting the Emphasis Toward Combinatorial Mechanisms and Away from Hypermutation 1

Craig N. Jenne*, Laurie J. Kennedy*, Peter McCullagh{dagger} and John D. Reynolds2,*

* Immunology Research Group, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; {dagger} Department of Molecular Medicine, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The current model of Ig repertoire development in sheep focuses on the rearrangement of a small number (~20) of V{lambda} gene segments. It is believed that this limited combinatorial repertoire is then further diversified through postrearrangement somatic hypermutation. This process has been reported to introduce as many as 110 mutations/1000 nucleotides. In contrast, our data have that indicated somatic hypermutation may diversify the preimmune repertoire to a much lesser extent. We have identified 64 new V{lambda} gene segments within the rearranged Ig repertoire. As a result, many of the unique nucleotide patterns thought to be the product of somatic hypermutation are actually hard-coded within the germline. We suggest that combinatorial rearrangement makes a much larger contribution, and somatic hypermutation makes a much smaller contribution to the generation of diversity within the sheep Ig repertoire than is currently acknowledged.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The ability of the vertebrate host to recognize a wide variety of Ags depends in part on the diversity and specificity inherent in the humoral arm of the immune system. Much of this diversity can be attributed to the Ig molecule. The mechanisms responsible for the generation of Ig diversity seem to vary as greatly as do the species that employ them. The most extensively studied models have been that of the mouse and human, in which the most of the diversity is produced by various combinations of the large number of available Ig gene segments (1, 2, 3). This combinatorial diversity is further enhanced by imprecise cutting of the gene segments whereby nucleotides may be added or lost. Additionally, TdT can insert several random nucleotides between gene segments before joining, resulting in alterations to the Ig gene sequence (4, 5). In contrast, the chicken has few functional Ig gene segments, thereby limiting combinatorial rearrangement and thus requiring an additional mechanism to produce Ig diversity (6, 7). This mechanism, known as gene conversion, involves the templated replacement of a portion of the functional Ig variable gene segment (V gene) 3 with sequence originating from a nonfunctional pseudogene (8, 9). The rabbit appears to use a diversification strategy somewhere between the extremes represented by the mouse and chicken. In the rabbit the initial repertoire is generated by the limited rearrangement of the many available Ig gene segments and is then enhanced by the process of gene conversion (10, 11). In conjunction with combinatorial mechanisms and gene conversion, the rabbit employs somatic hypermutation, whereby untemplated, single nucleotide changes are introduced into the rearranged variable genes (11, 12, 13, 14).

In sheep, similar to chickens and rabbits, it has been reported that combinatorial mechanisms do not contribute greatly to the overall diversity of the Ig gene repertoire (15). It is believed that there are between 90 and 100 germline {lambda} L chain variable gene segments (V{lambda}, the predominant L chain in sheep) and that preferential rearrangement occurs such that only ~20 V{lambda} are found in rearranged DNA (15, 16, 17, 18). This limited repertoire is thought to be diversified through an Ag-independent somatic hypermutation mechanism (15, 16). Somatic hypermutation has been reported to introduce between 0.5 x 10-4 and 1.2 x 10-4 mutations/sequence/cell division (15, 16). Although these mutations are untemplated, they do not appear to be random. The mutations are more frequent in the complementarity-determining region (CDR) compared with the framework region (FR) of the Ig gene, and transition mutations (one purine to the other purine, or one pyrimidine to the other pyridimine) occur more frequently than do transversion mutations (a purine to a pyridimine, or a pyrimidine to a purine) (15, 19). Additionally, the ratio of replacement to silent mutations in the CDRs is higher than would be expected by a random process, whereas this ratio is lower than expected in the FRs (15). Much of this postrearrangement diversification is believed to occur in the ileal Peyer’s patch (PP), a large gut-associated lymphoid organ spanning the terminal 1–2 m of the ileum in the sheep (16, 20, 21). The ileal PP is a major site of B cell lymphopoiesis, generating ~3.6 x 109 cells/h; however, only ~5% of these cells survive, with the remainder dying in situ via apoptosis (22, 23, 24). The surviving cells emigrate from the ileal PP and populate the peripheral B cell compartment (23).

This initial model of sheep Ig repertoire development was based on the analysis of a limited number of sequences originating from a purebred population (15, 16, 25). To better characterize this reported limited rearrangement we have generated a large number of sequences (>800) from a population of outbred animals originating from different continents. We have concluded from an analysis of these sequences that a greater number of V{lambda} are present in rearranged DNA than was originally reported. The existence of multiple genes would require a reassessment of those base changes that had previously been considered the result of mutations. Additionally, there appears to be an unusually high rate of successful rearrangement, and a lack of junctional diversity within the {lambda} L chain gene. These results, taken together, have led us to propose a new model of sheep Ig gene repertoire development.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals

Outbred sheep (Sheep Advisory Service and Systems, Andlyn Farm, Innisfail, Canada) were used for 24-h and older genomic DNA sources. Fetal tissues (60–142 days gestation) were obtained from time-bred ewes (John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia).

Tissue and cell isolation

Lymphocytes were isolated from either peripheral blood or ileal PP follicles. Blood was collected into 74 mM sodium citrate, 41 mM citric acid, and 78 mM dextrose in a ratio of 1 ml/10 ml of blood. After 30 min of centrifugation (800 x g) the buffy coat was collected into calcium- and magnesium-free HBSS (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and then layered over 60% isotonic Percoll (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ), followed by an additional centrifugation. The interface containing the mononuclear cells was collected and resuspended in cold calcium- and magnesium-free HBSS. For the collection of ileal PP tissue, animals were euthanized with an i.v. injection of sodium pentobarbital (MTC Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Canada). Lymphoid follicles were released from the freshly collected ileum by separating the mucosa from the muscularis externa with a scalpel blade. The follicles were then disrupted by resuspension and filtered through 40-µm pore size nylon mesh (Small Parts). Cells were counted on a Coulter Counter ZM equipped with a Channelyzer 256 (Coulter Electronics, Hialeah, FL). Aliquots of 1 x 107 cells were pelleted by centrifugation, supernatants were discarded, and pellets were flash-frozen in an ethanol bath surrounded by dry ice. For some experiments ileal PP and liver were cut into 0.5 x 0.5-cm pieces and flash-frozen as described above. Frozen tissue was ground into a fine powder using a pestle and mortar. For fetal tissues the distal portion of the small intestine was excised, washed in buffered physiological saline, gently blotted onto filter paper, and then flash-frozen as previously described.

Genomic DNA isolation

DNA was isolated from either ground tissue or cell pellets using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit and QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

PCR amplification

Rearranged V genes were amplified from DNA isolated from lymphocytes using a sense primer specific for the common leader sequence of all known V{lambda} gene segments (5'-TGGCCTGGTCCCCTCTGCTCCT-3') and an antisense primer specific for the {lambda} L chain joining gene segment 1 (the most frequently rearranged L chain joining gene segment; 5'-GCCTGGTCCCGCTGCCGAA-3'). The final product of ~480 bp included the leader, intron, V{lambda}, and 26 bp of the J{lambda}1 gene. Three separate PCR reactions were set up for each DNA sample. Germline V{lambda} were amplified from liver DNA using the following primer pairs: V{lambda} 3.0.x sense (5'-CCCGCTATCATGTCTGGAC-3') and V{lambda} 3.0.x antisense (5'-GGTCTGGGACCCCTGACTC–3'), V{lambda} 5.1.x sense (5'-TGGCCTGGTCCCCTCTGCTCCT-3') and V{lambda} 5.1.x antisense (5'-GCTACTACCAGCATAACTTCCAC–3'), V{lambda} 5.3.x sense (5'-CACCCTCGTCACTCTCTGC-3') and V{lambda} 5.3.x antisense (5'-GAGTTTGGGGGCTGATCC–3'), and V{lambda} 5.4.x sense (5'-GCCTTCTTCCCCACTATCATATC-3') and V{lambda} 5.4.x antisense (5'-GCTACTACTGTCATAAGATGC–3'). Each PCR reaction used 200–600 ng of template, 20 pmol of each primer, and 25 µl of Taq PCR Master Mix (Qiagen) to a final volume of 50 µl. The amplification protocol used a PerkinElmer GeneAmp PCR System 2400 (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) or the DNA ENGINE model PTC-200 (MJ Research, Watertown, MA). PCR conditions were as follows: initial 5 min of incubation at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94°C, annealing at 58, 63, or 65°C for 30 s, and extension for 1 min at 72°C, followed by a final 7 min of incubation at 72°C. Liver DNA was also amplified with V{lambda} leader and J{lambda}1 primers to screen for the presence of rearranged V{lambda} DNA. No amplification products were found in any of these reactions.

Cloning and sequencing

Three separate V{lambda} PCR products were pooled and served as the template for ligation reactions that were cloned into JM-109 competent cells using either the TOPO TA Cloning kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) or the pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega, Madison, WI). For each ligation reaction 30 clones were screened for positive inserts. Plasmid DNA was isolated using a QIAprep Miniprep (Qiagen) and served as the template for sequencing. Sequencing reactions used the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (PE Applied Biosystems) along with 3.2 pmol of either M13 forward or M13 reverse primers (Invitrogen). Automated sequencing was performed by the University Core DNA Services (University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada).

Southern blotting

Ovine genomic DNA was prepared by standard extraction procedures (26). Restriction endonuclease-digested ovine genomic DNAs (10 µg) were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels in Tris acetate buffer. DNA was transferred to Hybond XL nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) under vacuum using 0.4 N NaOH as a transfer solution. For dot-blot hybridization, genomic and plasmid DNAs were sheared in an ultrasonicator (Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT) to an average length of 1 kb. Serial dilutions with known concentrations of DNA were applied to Hybond XL nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), denatured, and bound to the membrane by incubation on pads of filter paper soaked in 0.4 M NaOH before hybridization. Radioactive probes were prepared from plasmids containing either V{lambda} 5.1 or V{lambda} 12.2 using the Random Prime-It II kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and [32P]dCTP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were hybridized to probes in Expresshyb (Clontech, BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Final washes were performed at 65°C for 15 min in 0.1x SSC/0.1% SDS (high stringency). For quantification purposes, known amounts of a plasmid containing a single copy V{lambda} gene segment were also spotted adjacent to the test samples on each membrane. Membranes were exposed to phosphor screens (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and analyzed using a Storm 860 PhosphorImager and ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Eugene, OR) to compare test samples to a curve generated from the known standards.

Data analysis

Sequences were compared with the published genes in GenBank with BLAST and to each other using Multalin software (27, 28). Rearranged sequences were classified based on the gene to which they shared the highest homology. In some instances a consistent nucleotide difference from the published gene was observed in rearranged sequences. To account for these common differences, rearranged genes were instead compared with a consensus sequence generated from the alignment of all sequences corresponding to a single published gene. Nucleotide differences between an individual rearranged sequence and the consensus sequence of a gene were tallied for each region (leader, intron, FRs, and CDRs). These totals were standardized as a value per 1000 bases.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Biased gene usage

Our initial analysis was of >800 sequences that had been generated from the rearranged V{lambda} of several animals of varying ages. The results supported the previous conclusion that there is a biased V{lambda} usage in the sheep (15). Only 15 of the 26 published V{lambda} (17) were identified, and of these, five gene segments (V{lambda} 3.0, V{lambda} 4.1, V{lambda} 5.1, V{lambda} 5.3, and V{lambda} 5.4) represented >70% of all V{lambda} rearrangement events (our unpublished observations). It is believed that this limited combinatorial repertoire is further diversified through the process of somatic hypermutation (17). To study the impact of hypermutation on the Ig repertoire, sequences originating from the frequently rearranged V{lambda} were aligned against each other and compared with the published sequences. The alignment of these rearranged sequences yielded several surprising observations.

Identification of novel V{lambda}

Following nucleotide alignment, identical sequences were found in multiple animals of various ages originating from different continents. These sequences, although identical with each other, shared common motifs that were not observed within the published gene segments (Fig. 1). It seemed unlikely that identical sequences could arise in different individuals as the product of an untemplated somatic hypermutation process. Rather, it is more probable that these sequences originated from new, previously unidentified, germline V{lambda}. To determine whether the nucleotide patterns observed in rearranged sequences originated from either somatic hypermutation or new germline V{lambda} a set of criteria was established (Fig. 2). First, if a unique sequence seen in rearranged DNA could also be amplified from germline DNA and was capable of a functional (in-frame) rearrangement, the sequence was confirmed to be a new V{lambda}. Second, if the rearranged sequence had not yet been identified in germline DNA (due to the difficulty in designing gene-specific primers) it was considered to be a new V{lambda} if it had two or more bases that differed from the published gene, it was found in at least two animals, and it was capable of a functional rearrangement. Finally, if a sequence had only one base that differed from the published gene, but it was found in more than three animals and it was capable of a functional rearrangement, it was also considered to be a new V{lambda}. Although the second and third criteria do not necessarily provide conclusive evidence for the existence of the proposed V{lambda} in germline DNA, they greatly reduced the possibility that the common motifs observed between sequences are the result of an untemplated, postrearrangement, hypermutation process.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 1. Sequences sharing unique motifs not found in the published V{lambda} 5.1. Alignment of the published V{lambda} 5.1 (5.1) (15 ) sequence and rearranged DNA sequences from six individual animals (F1, A1, F2, F3, A2, and A3) that share close homology to the published sequence. Some sequences had very high homology to the published gene (5.1), whereas others had unique motifs common to multiple sequences (5.1.14 and 5.1.18). These recurring motifs provided the basis for the proposal of new V{lambda} sequences (5.1.1–5.1.19). Nucleotide identity between sequences is indicated by a dot, and differences are shown by letter code of the new base. FRs and CDRs are as indicated.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 2. Flow chart indicating the criteria used for the identification of a new V{lambda} in sheep.

 
Applying these criteria to the sequences of the five most frequently rearranged V{lambda} (V{lambda} 3.0, V{lambda} 4.1, V{lambda} 5.1, V{lambda} 5.3, and V{lambda} 5.4) resulted in the identification of an additional 64 potential V{lambda} (Fig. 3) (GenBank accession numbers AY158468->AY158531). These newly identified sequences were named by decimalizing the published V{lambda} to which they most closely matched. The new genes were sequentially numbered based on decreasing homology (i.e., V{lambda} 5.1.1 and V{lambda} 5.1.19). Each of these newly proposed genes have an open reading frame, code for a unique protein, and are capable of functional, in-frame rearrangements (Fig. 4 and data not shown). The identification of 64 novel V{lambda} suggests that combinatorial rearrangement is not as limited as previously reported.




View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 3. Nucleotide alignment of newly proposed V{lambda} vs the published V{lambda}. A, Nucleotide alignment of newly proposed V{lambda} 5.1 genes (5.1.1–5.1.19) vs the published V{lambda} 5.1 (r5.1) (15 ). B, Nucleotide alignment of newly proposed V{lambda} 3.0 genes (3.0.1–3.1.16) vs the published V{lambda} 3.0 (r3.0) (15 ). C, Nucleotide alignment of newly proposed V{lambda} 5.3 genes (5.3.1–5.3.9) vs the published V{lambda} 5.3 (r5.3) (17 ). D, Nucleotide alignment of newly proposed V{lambda} 4.1 genes (4.1.1–4.1.8) vs the published V{lambda} 4.1 (r4.1) (15 ). E, Nucleotide alignment of newly proposed V{lambda} 5.4 genes (5.4.1–5.4.12) vs the published V{lambda} 5.4 (r5.4) (17 ). Nucleotide identity between sequences is indicated by a dot, differences are shown by letter code of the new base, and gaps are indicated by a dash. Leader, intron, FRs, and CDRs are as indicated. The GenBank accession numbers of the new sequences are AY158468 and AY158531.

 


View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 4. Amino acid alignment of and percent contribution to the Ig repertoire of newly proposed V{lambda} vs the published V{lambda}. Amino acid identity between sequences is indicated by a dot, and differences are shown by letter code of the new amino acid. Leader, FRs, and CDRs are as indicated. The contribution of each V{lambda} gene segment to the Ig repertoire is represented as a percentage of the rearranged sequences analyzed (%RA).

 
The existence of this larger number of V{lambda} was further supported by the results of genomic DNA analysis. Southern and dot blots using a probe specific for a V{lambda} have identified at least 150 germline copies (Fig. 5 and data not shown), a substantially higher estimate than previously reported (15, 17). Additionally, eight (~12%) of the proposed 64 V{lambda} (V{lambda} 3.0.12, V{lambda} 3.0.14, V{lambda} 5.1.1, V{lambda} 5.1.2, V{lambda} 5.1.14, V{lambda} 5.3.2, V{lambda} 5.4.2, V{lambda} 5.4.7) have been identified in unrearranged, germline DNA using gene-specific primers (Fig. 6 and data not shown).



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 5. Southern blot analysis of the sheep V{lambda} locus. Genomic kidney (Kid), liver (Liv), and thymic (Thy) DNA were digested with a combination of either EcoRI and BamHI (A and C) or PstI and XbaI (B and D) restriction enzymes. Blots were detected with either a V{lambda} 5.1 probe (A and B) or a V{lambda} 12.2 probe (C and D). Differences in intensities between the two probes can be attributed to the differential homologies between the probes and the target genes. Quantification of bound probe by a PhosphorImager and by dot blot has indicated a conservative estimate of 150 germline V{lambda}.

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 6. Nucleotide alignment of proposed V{lambda} 5.1 genes vs germline and rearranged V{lambda} sequences. Proposed sequences of three new V{lambda} (5.1.1, 5.1.12, and 5.1.14) were aligned against the published V{lambda} 5.1 sequence (r5.1) (15 ), germline-derived V{lambda} sequences (G5.1.1, G5.1.2, and G5.1.14), and sequences obtained from rearranged V{lambda} (39C3, F7AB8, and F7LCD19). Nucleotide identity between sequences is indicated by a dot, differences are shown by letter code of the new base, and gaps are indicated by a dash. Intron and CDRs are as indicated.

 
Reduced postrearrangement diversification

Somatic hypermutation has been proposed to be the major mechanism for generating diversity in the sheep Ig repertoire (15). This process, also seen in rabbits and mice, introduces untemplated mutations into rearranged Ig gene segments (29, 30, 31, 32). Although this process is untemplated, it is not random, as the mutations occur more frequently in the CDRs than in the FRs, and transition mutations are more common than transversion mutations (15, 19). The initial comparison of our sequences to the published V{lambda} (before the identification of the new gene segments) produced results similar to what had previously been reported in sheep (15, 16, 25). The number of nucleotide differences in the CDRs of V{lambda} 5.1 ranged from 79–102 nucleotide differences per kilobase, whereas these values were much lower in the FRs, from 14–19 nucleotide differences per kilobase (Fig. 7C). This pattern was also observed in the other four genes analyzed (V{lambda} 3.0, V{lambda} 4.1, V{lambda} 5.3, V{lambda} 5.4; Fig. 7, A, B, D, and E). These values are consistent with previously published data (15, 16). However, considering the evidence presented here of the existence of a larger number of V{lambda}, many of the nucleotide differences previously thought to result from somatic hypermutation, may, in fact, be hard-coded in the germline sequence. We have, therefore, reassessed the potential contribution of hypermutation. Rearranged sequences were classified according to either the newly proposed V{lambda} or the published V{lambda} for which they shared highest homology. This reclassification of rearranged sequences, now including 64 newly proposed V{lambda}, resulted in a dramatic decrease in the total number of nucleotide differences in each region of the gene (Fig. 7, A–E). In some cases the number of nucleotide differences dropped by >90%. Although the total number of nucleotide differences is much lower after reclassification, their pattern remains similar, with a greater number occurring in the CDRs and fewer in the FRs.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 7. Comparison of the number of nucleotide differences in select V{lambda}. The number of nucleotide differences was tallied for each of the V{lambda} regions (leader, intron, FR 1–3, CDR 1–3, FR (total FR), CDR (total CDR), and gene). Values are reported as the number of differences per kilobase. A–E, All sequences were first compared with the published gene to which they shared the highest homology (old classification). Sequences were then compared with the consensus of the proposed new V{lambda} to which they shared homology (new classification). Redesignation of sequences to the newly proposed V{lambda} resulted in a dramatic decrease in the number of observed nucleotide differences. F–J, The number of nucleotide differences from the consensus sequences of the newly proposed V{lambda} was totaled. Sequences from fetal and 24-h-old animals (F + 24 h) were compared with those from 48-h- to 2-year-old animals (Older).

 
Accumulation of nucleotide differences with age

After reclassification, sequences were sorted into two groups based on the age of the animal from which they originated. The first age group (F + 24 h) included fetal and 24-h-old lambs (low exposure to exogenous Ag), whereas the second group (older) consisted of animals ranging in age from 48 h to 2 years (continual exposure to exogenous Ag). In all genes examined, the younger group had considerably fewer nucleotide differences than those of the older group (Fig. 7, F–J); however, the distribution of mutations in sequences from fetal and 24-h-old lambs was similar to that observed in the sequences of older animals with more mutations occurring in the CDRs (ranging from 3.6–14.6 mutations/kb) and fewer in the FRs (ranging from 2.9–4.2 mutations/kb). From these observations we suggest that a postrearrangement diversification mechanism, such as hypermutation, contributes to an accumulation of nucleotide differences as the animal ages.

Junctional diversity

The use of primers spanning the V{lambda} and J{lambda}1 has allowed for the examination of the junctions between these elements. Analysis of 588 VJ1 junctions yielded only nine (1.5%) sequences with a nonfunctional rearrangement (our unpublished observations). This value is much lower than what has been reported in other mammals, where as many as two-thirds of all rearrangements are out of frame (33, 34, 35). In addition to this unusually high rate of in-frame rearrangement, it appears as though the sequences of a single V{lambda} share identical VJ1 junctions. These junctions demonstrate canonical rearrangement, without the random loss or addition of nucleotides (Fig. 8). Interestingly, almost all sequences corresponding to a single V{lambda} share a common VJ1 junction. In contrast to the junctional uniformity of the rearrangement events of a single V{lambda} gene, VJ junctions can differ dramatically between the various V{lambda} gene segments (e.g., 5.1.14 sequences share a common junction, whereas these junctions differ from the junctions of 5.1.3, 5.1.4, 5.1.5, etc.; Fig. 9).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 8. Lack of junctional diversity in the VJ joints of the sheep {lambda} L chain. Sequences were derived from the ileal PP tissue of four individual animals. Each of the 10 5.1.14 sequences were produced by separate PCR reactions using V{lambda} leader and J{lambda}1-specific primers. Nucleotide identity between sequences is indicated by a dot, differences are shown by letter code of the new base, and gaps are indicated by a dash. These canonical 5.1.14 junctions are representative of the rearrangement pattern observed within other V{lambda} gene segments.

 


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIGURE 9. Unique VJ rearrangement patterns for individual V{lambda} in the sheep. Sequences were derived from ileal PP tissue or peripheral blood lymphocytes using V{lambda} leader and J{lambda}1-specific primers. The V{lambda} to which the sequence shares highest nucleotide homology is indicated to the left of each sequence name. The number of nucleotides lost from the V{lambda} or J{lambda}1 during recombination is indicated to the right of each sequence. A single VJ rearrangement pattern is common to some, but not all, of the newly proposed V{lambda} (e.g., 5.1.6 rearrangements are identical with those of 5.1.12, but differ from those of 5.1.16). Nucleotide identity between sequences is indicated by a dot, differences are shown by letter code of the new base, and gaps are indicated by a dash.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Published results have been accepted as evidence for the existence of up to 90 germline V{lambda} in the sheep with only a small fraction (~18 genes) of these functionally rearranging to contribute to the Ig repertoire (15, 17). Within this limited repertoire there also appeared to be biased gene usage such that two individual V{lambda} genes represented >50% of all rearrangement events (17, 36). It was further proposed in these studies that this limited repertoire is then further diversified by somatic hypermutation, the untemplated introduction of nucleotide changes into a rearranged V gene. Hypermutation was reported to produce >100 nucleotide changes/1000 bases in some regions of V{lambda} (15). The observed nucleotide differences between the rearranged V{lambda} and the published germline sequences seemed to fit the profile of a somatic hypermutation process: more differences in the CDRs than in the FRs, and a greater number of transition mutations than transversion mutations (15, 16). However, many of these conclusions were derived from a small number of sequences originating from a purebred population of animals.

In an attempt to better understand this biased gene usage we sequenced >800 rearranged V{lambda} from outbred sheep of varying ages (60 days gestation to 2 years of age). In addition to the outbred genetic nature of these sheep, the animals were obtained from different continents (Australia and North America) and thus were exposed to different antigenic environments. Alignment of these rearranged sequences revealed common motifs between sequences that were not found in the published germline genes (Fig. 1). In previous studies using only a limited number of sequences, these patterns were thought to have arisen through the process of somatic hypermutation (15, 16). Only after analysis of a large number of sequences was it noted that these patterns were common to a number of rearranged V{lambda} originating from different animals. The identification of common motifs between sequences has led us to propose that these unique patterns were not the product of untemplated hypermutation, but rather, represented previously unidentified V{lambda}. To date we have identified 64 potential new V{lambda}, all of which encode for a unique protein and are capable of functional, in-frame rearrangements (Figs. 3 and 4).

We propose that these 64 gene sequences are new, authentic V{lambda}. However, alternative explanations for these observations need to be considered. One possibility is that it could be the result of gene conversion, as this process has been shown to replace large sections of V genes in both rabbits and mice with sequence derived from homologous pseudogenes (14, 37). In the sheep the presence of a large number of pseudogenes supports the possibility of a role for gene conversion in the diversification of the Ig gene repertoire (16, 17). Since gene conversion is a homology-based process it could potentially result in similar products being generated in different animals; however, due to the random integration of the donor sequences it is highly unlikely that several identical products would be generated as was observed in the sheep. Additionally, of the 64 proposed V{lambda}, we have currently identified eight in germline liver DNA, providing evidence that the newly proposed V{lambda} are not the product of a postrearrangement diversification process.

Other possible explanations for the presence of previously unidentified V{lambda} sequences are multiple alleles or PCR artifact. The question of multiple alleles is of particular concern when working with an outbred population of animals originating from different continents. Each individual could have two different alleles for any single gene (one maternal and one paternal), and thus what we have considered to be new gene segments could simply be allelic variants. Evidence against this possibility is provided by the observation of nine different V{lambda} 5.1-like genes in one individual (data not shown). By this argument there would have to be a minimum of five different V{lambda} 5.1 like genes (four of the five each with two alleles). Continuing this line of reasoning to the other four groups of genes analyzed, we find there must be a minimum of five V{lambda}3.0-like, three V{lambda} 4.1-like, three V{lambda} 5.3-like, and three V{lambda} 5.4-like gene segments for a total of 19 V{lambda} gene segments. This number, although less than the 64 gene segments we suggest, still represents a dramatic increase over the five previously identified gene segments. Further argument against this possibility that the newly identified V{lambda} gene segments simply represent allelic variants is provided by the Southern and dot blot data, indicating the presence of at least 150 V{lambda} gene segments within an individual (Fig. 5 and data not shown).

With regard to PCR artifact, previous studies have demonstrated a general TAQ polymerase error rate of ~1/1000 bases (15, 38). As a result we would expect to find <1 mutation per V{lambda} gene (~500 bases) sequenced (38). Additionally, amplification of products from DNA containing many copies of homologous genes allows the possibility of generating chimeric sequences (39, 40, 41). These chimeric sequences are characterized as having a 5' end corresponding to one gene fused to a 3' end corresponding to a second, homologous gene. Our new V{lambda} sequences do not appear to have arisen from the joining of two separate gene products. The new V{lambda} genes have uniform homology throughout their length, with no evidence for any section of the molecule being derived from another gene.

Earlier studies indicated that only a limited number (<20) of V{lambda} were rearranged, however, the identification of 64 new V{lambda}, in addition to the 15 previously described V{lambda}, has prompted a re-evaluation of the model that was originally proposed (15, 17). Further support for an increased role of combinatorial diversity has been provided by the recent identification of a second J{lambda} (J{lambda}2), effectively doubling the number of potential {lambda} rearrangement products, although J{lambda}2 appears to be used much less frequently than J{lambda}1 (36). As a result it now appears that combinatorial rearrangement may contribute to the generation of Ig repertoire diversity to a much greater extent than previously thought. Conversely, the unique nucleotide differences in the rearranged sequences once thought to be the result of somatic hypermutation may now actually be encoded in the germline sequence of these new V{lambda}. When the rearranged sequences were analyzed according to the new classification system we saw a dramatic drop in the number of nucleotide differences (Fig. 7, A–E). This observation makes it likely that somatic hypermutation may play a lesser role in the diversification of the Ig repertoire than previously thought. Although the impact of somatic hypermutation appears to be greatly decreased, there remains evidence of a postrearrangement diversification mechanism. Comparison of the sequences originating from either fetal or 24-h-old animals to those of older animals (48 h to 2 years) demonstrated that nucleotide differences accumulated with age (Fig. 7, F–J).

After reclassification of sequences in accordance with the new nomenclature, the percent drop in the number of mutations per 1000 bases was much greater in either the fetal or 24-h-old animals (79.6%) than in the older animals (51.5%; Table I). It had been previously reported that somatic hypermutation in the sheep ileal PP appeared to be an Ag-independent process (16). More recent studies provide evidence that Ag in gut-associated lymphoid tissues in species such as the rabbit may play a role in shaping the preimmune repertoire by somehow influencing somatic hypermutation (14, 42). In the sheep the placenta is essentially impermeable to most macromolecules, such that the fetus develops in an environment free of foreign Ag (43). From other studies of isolated gut loops in sheep it has been suggested that the absence of extrinsic Ag following birth results in the premature involution of ileal PP follicles, a process that could be reversed by re-establishing the normal flow of gut contents through the isolated ileum (44, 45). Our data suggest that very little postrearrangement diversification occurs in the sheep before the presence of foreign Ags, and thus the development of the primary immune repertoire is much less dependent on somatic hypermutation than previously reported (16). However, once the animal is exposed to the external environment, nucleotide differences are quickly introduced into the rearranged V{lambda} gene segments.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table I. Percent drop in the number of nucleotide differences within each age group of V{lambda}a

 
Finally, it appears as though the VJ joining of these sequences is of a canonical nature. Regardless of whether sequences originated from peripheral blood or the ileal PP, or whether sequences were derived from fetal vs older animals, the vast majority (98.5%) of rearrangements were in-frame and functional, with a marked absence of P or N nucleotide addition (data not shown). Within any single gene, most rearrangement events occurred in a common fashion, resulting in identical VJ joints (Fig. 8). This canonical rearrangement within the sheep is similar to what is seen in neonates of other species, but is in stark contrast to the situation in the adults of many other mammals, where most Ig VJ junctions demonstrate profound diversity (46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52). The exception to this appears to be the bovine system, where, as in the sheep, most junctions, regardless of age, demonstrate limited diversity (53, 54, 55). It has been proposed by others that this precise joining and lack of junctional diversity may be attributed to homology-based recombination (25, 46). In this model it is hypothesized that sequence elements encoded within the gene segments dictate the specific site for DNA cutting and ligation. Thus, all genes sharing the identical sequence elements should rearrange in the same manner. By the same argument, different genes would rearrange to produce diverse VJ joints. The rearrangement of many of the newly proposed V{lambda} yielded unique VJ joining patterns, thereby providing further evidence that these sequences originated from individual germline genes (Fig. 9).

In conclusion, the identification of 64 potential new V{lambda} in the sheep has forced a re-evaluation of the current model of Ig repertoire development in this species. Previously it was thought that a limited number of V{lambda} were rearranged and then later diversified by somatic hypermutation. Our data indicate that combinatorial mechanisms may play a much larger role in the generation of Ig diversity. In addition, it now appears as though somatic hypermutation does not contribute as greatly to the diversification process as once believed. As a result of these findings, we now suggest a new model for the development of the Ig gene repertoire in sheep, one based heavily on combinatorial rearrangement of many V{lambda}, supplemented, to a much lesser extent, by postrearrangement diversification mechanisms that become particularly evident after birth.

With these observations in the {lambda} L chain, it will be necessary to determine whether a similar pattern of increased combinatorial diversification and reduced somatic hypermutation exists in both the H and {kappa} L chains.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Tracy A. Maybaum, Shuli Wang, Marketa Gogela-Spehar, and Monica Langer for their contribution to the sequencing of rearranged V{lambda} genes, and Robert Winkfein for the Southern blot analysis. We are also grateful to Drs. Gillian Wu, Susanna Lewis, and Michael Ratcliffe for their valuable suggestions and thoughtful discussions pertaining to this manuscript.


   Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by the Canadian Institute for Health Research. New sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers AY158468 and AY158531. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John D. Reynolds, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1. E-mail address: reynolds{at}ucalgary.ca Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: V gene, Ig variable gene segment; CDR, complementarity-determining region; FR, framework region; J{lambda}, {lambda} L chain joining gene segment; PP, Peyer’s patch; V{lambda}, {lambda} L chain variable gene segment. Back

Received for publication October 16, 2002. Accepted for publication January 30, 2003.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Tonegawa, S.. 1983. Somatic generation of antibody diversity. Nature 302:575.[Medline]
  2. Alt, F. W., T. K. Blackwell, G. D. Yancopoulos. 1987. Development of the primary antibody repertoire. Science 238:1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Rolink, A., F. Melchers. 1991. Molecular and cellular origins of B lymphocyte diversity. Cell 66:1081.[Medline]
  4. Gilfillan, S., A. Dierich, M. Lemeur, C. Benoist, D. Mathis. 1993. Mice lacking TdT: mature animals with an immature lymphocyte repertoire [published erratum appears in Science 1993 Dec 24;262(5142):1957]. Science 261:1175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Komori, T., A. Okada, V. Stewart, F. W. Alt. 1993. Lack of N regions in antigen receptor variable region genes of TdT-deficient lymphocytes [published erratum appears in Science 1993 Dec 24;262(5142):1957]. Science 261:1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Reynaud, C. A., V. Anquez, A. Dahan, J. C. Weill. 1985. A single rearrangement event generates most of the chicken immunoglobulin light chain diversity. Cell 40:283.[Medline]
  7. Reynaud, C. A., V. Anquez, H. Grimal, J. C. Weill. 1987. A hyperconversion mechanism generates the chicken light chain preimmune repertoire. Cell 48:379.[Medline]
  8. Dildrop, R., M. Bruggemann, A. Radbruch, K. Rajewsky, K. Beyreuther. 1982. Immunoglobulin V region variants in hybridoma cells. II. Recombination between V genes. EMBO J. 1:635.[Medline]
  9. Kleinfield, R., R. R. Hardy, D. Tarlinton, J. Dangl, L. A. Herzenberg, M. Weigert. 1986. Recombination between an expressed immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene and a germline variable gene segment in a Ly 1+ B-cell lymphoma. Nature 322:843.[Medline]
  10. Becker, R. S., K. L. Knight. 1990. Somatic diversification of immunoglobulin heavy chain VDJ genes: evidence for somatic gene conversion in rabbits. Cell 63:987.[Medline]
  11. Weinstein, P. D., A. O. Anderson, R. G. Mage. 1994. Rabbit IgH sequences in appendix germinal centers: VH diversification by gene conversion-like and hypermutation mechanisms. Immunity 1:647.[Medline]
  12. Short, J. A., P. Sethupathi, S. K. Zhai, K. L. Knight. 1991. VDJ genes in VHa2 allotype-suppressed rabbits: limited germline VH gene usage and accumulation of somatic mutations in D regions. J. Immunol. 147:4014.[Abstract]
  13. Lanning, D. K., K. L. Knight. 1997. Somatic hypermutation: mutations 3' of rabbit VDJ H-chain genes. J. Immunol. 159:4403.[Abstract]
  14. Knight, K. L., C. R. Winstead. 1997. Generation of antibody diversity in rabbits. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9:228.[Medline]
  15. Reynaud, C. A., C. R. Mackay, R. G. Muller, J. C. Weill. 1991. Somatic generation of diversity in a mammalian primary lymphoid organ: the sheep ileal Peyer’s patches. Cell 64:995.[Medline]
  16. Reynaud, C. A., C. Garcia, W. R. Hein, J. C. Weill. 1995. Hypermutation generating the sheep immunoglobulin repertoire is an antigen-independent process. Cell 80:115.[Medline]
  17. Reynaud, C. A., V. Dufour, J. C. Weill. 1997. Generation of diversity in mammalian gut-associated lymphoid tissues: restricted V gene usage does not preclude complex V gene organization. J. Immunol. 159:3093.[Abstract]
  18. Sinclair, M. C., J. Gilchrist, R. Aitken. 1997. Bovine IgG repertoire is dominated by a single diversified VH gene family. J. Immunol. 159:3883.[Abstract]
  19. Betz, A. G., C. Rada, R. Pannell, C. Milstein, M. S. Neuberger. 1993. Passenger transgenes reveal intrinsic specificity of the antibody hypermutation mechanism: clustering, polarity, and specific hot spots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:2385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Reynolds, J. D., L. Kennedy, J. Peppard, R. Pabst. 1991. Ileal Peyer’s patch emigrants are predominantly B cells and travel to all lymphoid tissues in sheep. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:283.[Medline]
  21. Reynolds, J. D., B. Morris. 1983. The evolution and involution of Peyer’s patches in fetal and postnatal sheep. Eur. J. Immunol. 13:627.[Medline]
  22. Reynolds, J. D.. 1986. Evidence of extensive lymphocyte death in sheep Peyer’s patches. I. A comparison of lymphocyte production and export. J. Immunol. 136:2005.[Abstract]
  23. Pabst, R., J. D. Reynolds. 1987. Peyer’s patches export lymphocytes throughout the lymphoid system in sheep. J. Immunol. 139:3981.[Abstract]
  24. Motyka, B., J. D. Reynolds. 1991. Apoptosis is associated with the extensive B cell death in the sheep ileal Peyer’s patch and the chicken bursa of Fabricius: a possible role in B cell selection. Eur. J. Immunol. 21:1951.[Medline]
  25. Hein, W. R., L. Dudler. 1998. Diversity of Ig light chain variable region gene expression in fetal lambs. Int. Immunol. 10:1251.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, T. Maniatis. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
  27. Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403.[Medline]
  28. Corpet, F.. 1988. Multiple sequence alignment with hierarchical clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 16:10881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Berek, C., A. Berger, M. Apel. 1991. Maturation of the immune response in germinal centers. Cell 67:1121.[Medline]
  30. Mage, R. G.. 1998. Diversification of rabbit VH genes by gene-conversion-like and hypermutation mechanisms. Immunol. Rev. 162:49.[Medline]
  31. Giorgetti, C. A., J. L. Press. 1998. Somatic mutation in the neonatal mouse. J. Immunol. 161:6093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Winstead, C. R., S. K. Zhai, P. Sethupathi, K. L. Knight. 1999. Antigen-induced somatic diversification of rabbit IgH genes: gene conversion and point mutation. J. Immunol. 162:6602.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Max, E. E., J. G. Seidman, H. Miller, P. Leder. 1980. Variation in the crossover point of {kappa} immunoglobulin gene V-J recombination: evidence from a cryptic gene. Cell 21:793.[Medline]
  34. Coleclough, C., R. P. Perry, K. Karjalainen, M. Weigert. 1981. Aberrant rearrangements contribute significantly to the allelic exclusion of immunoglobulin gene expression. Nature 290:372.[Medline]
  35. Ramsden, D. A., C. J. Paige, G. E. Wu. 1994. Kappa light chain rearrangement in mouse fetal liver. J. Immunol. 153:1150.[Abstract]
  36. Jeong, Y., B. A. Osborne, R. A. Goldsby. 2001. Early V{lambda} diversification in sheep. Immunology 103:26.[Medline]
  37. Selsing, E., B. Xu, D. Sigurdardottir. 1996. Gene conversion and homologous recombination in murine B cells. Semin. Immunol. 8:151.[Medline]
  38. Maybaum, T. A., J. D. Reynolds. 1996. B cells selected for apoptosis in the sheep ileal Peyer’s patch have enhanced mutational diversity in the Ig V {lambda} light chain. J. Immunol. 157:1474.[Abstract]
  39. Brakenhoff, R. H., J. G. Schoenmakers, N. H. Lubsen. 1991. Chimeric cDNA clones: a novel PCR artifact. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:1949.[Free Full Text]
  40. Qiu, X., L. Wu, H. Huang, P. E. McDonel, A. V. Palumbo, J. M. Tiedje, J. Zhou. 2001. Evaluation of PCR-generated chimeras, mutations, and heteroduplexes with 16S rRNA gene-based cloning. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Wang, G. C., Y. Wang. 1996. The frequency of chimeric molecules as a consequence of PCR co-amplification of 16S rRNA genes from different bacterial species. Microbiology 142:1107.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lanning, D., P. Sethupathi, K. J. Rhee, S. K. Zhai, K. L. Knight. 2000. Intestinal microflora and diversification of the rabbit antibody repertoire. J. Immunol. 165:2012.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Brambell, F. W.. 1969. The transmission of immune globulins from the mother to the foetal and newborn young. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 28:35.[Medline]
  44. Reynolds, J. D., B. Morris. 1983. The influence of gut function on lymphoid cell populations in the intestinal mucosa of lambs. Immunology 49:501.[Medline]
  45. Reynolds, J. D., B. Morris. 1984. The effect of antigen on the development of Peyer’s patches in sheep. Eur. J. Immunol. 14:1.[Medline]
  46. Feeney, A. J.. 1992. Predominance of VH-D-JH junctions occurring at sites of short sequence homology results in limited junctional diversity in neonatal antibodies. J. Immunol. 149:222.[Abstract]
  47. Feeney, A. J.. 1990. Lack of N regions in fetal and neonatal mouse immunoglobulin V-D-J junctional sequences. J. Exp. Med. 172:1377.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Feeney, A. J.. 1992. Comparison of junctional diversity in the neonatal and adult immunoglobulin repertoires. Int. Rev. Immunol. 8:113.[Medline]
  49. Bangs, L. A., I. E. Sanz, J. M. Teale. 1991. Comparison of D, JH, and junctional diversity in the fetal, adult, and aged B cell repertoires. J. Immunol. 146:1996.[Abstract]
  50. Meek, K.. 1990. Analysis of junctional diversity during B lymphocyte development. Science 250:820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Wilson, P., Y. J. Liu, J. Banchereau, J. D. Capra, V. Pascual. 1998. Amino acid insertions and deletions contribute to diversify the human Ig repertoire. Immunol. Rev. 162:143.[Medline]
  52. Victor, K. D., J. D. Capra. 1994. An apparently common mechanism of generating antibody diversity: length variation of the VL-JL junction. Mol. Immunol. 31:39.[Medline]
  53. Meyer, A., C. L. Parng, S. A. Hansal, B. A. Osborne, R. A. Goldsby. 1997. Immunoglobulin gene diversification in cattle. Int. Rev. Immunol. 15:165.[Medline]
  54. Lucier, M. R., R. E. Thompson, J. Waire, A. W. Lin, B. A. Osborne, R. A. Goldsby. 1998. Multiple sites of V{lambda} diversification in cattle. J. Immunol. 161:5438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Aitken, R., A. Hosseini, R. MacDuff. 1999. Structure and diversification of the bovine immunoglobulin repertoire. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 72:21.[Medline]

Related articles in The JI:

IN THIS ISSUE

The JI 2003 170: 3449-3450. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
J. E. Butler, P. Weber, and N. Wertz
Antibody Repertoire Development in Fetal and Neonatal Piglets. XIII. Hybrid VH Genes and the Preimmune Repertoire Revisited
J. Immunol., October 15, 2006; 177(8): 5459 - 5470.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JEMHome page
K.-J. Rhee, P. J. Jasper, P. Sethupathi, M. Shanmugam, D. Lanning, and K. L. Knight
Positive selection of the peripheral B cell repertoire in gut-associated lymphoid tissues
J. Exp. Med., January 3, 2005; 201(1): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
J. E. Butler, N. Wertz, J. Sun, H. Wang, P. Chardon, F. Piumi, and K. Wells
Antibody Repertoire Development in Fetal and Neonatal Pigs. VII. Characterization of the Preimmune {kappa} Light Chain Repertoire
J. Immunol., December 1, 2004; 173(11): 6794 - 6805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
M. Fleurant, L. Changchien, C.-T. Chen, M. F. Flajnik, and E. Hsu
Shark Ig Light Chain Junctions Are as Diverse as in Heavy Chains
J. Immunol., November 1, 2004; 173(9): 5574 - 5582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Related articles in The JI
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jenne, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jenne, C. N.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, J. D.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Protein

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS