The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pausa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tedesco, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pausa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tedesco, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 170: 3214-3222.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Serum-Resistant Strains of Borrelia burgdorferi Evade Complement-Mediated Killing by Expressing a CD59-Like Complement Inhibitory Molecule1

Mario Pausa*, Valentina Pellis*, Marina Cinco{dagger}, Piero G. Giulianini{ddagger}, Gianni Presani§, Sandra Perticarari§, Rossella Murgia{dagger} and Francesco Tedesco2,*

Departments of * Physiology and Pathology, {dagger} Biomedical Science, and {ddagger} Biology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy; and § Istituto Ricovero Cura a Carattere Scientifico "Burlo Garofolo," Trieste, Italy


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Borrelia burgdorferi, the etiological agent of Lyme disease, comprises three genospecies, Borrelia garinii, afzelii, and burgdorferi sensu strictu, that exhibit different pathogenicity and differ in the susceptibility to C-mediated killing. We examined C-sensitive and C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi for deposition of C3 and late C components by fluorescence microscope and flow cytometry. Despite comparable deposition of C3 on the two strains, the resistant strain exhibited reduced staining for C6 and C7, barely detectable C9, and undetectable poly C9. Based on these findings, we searched for a protein that inhibits assembly of C membrane attack complex and documented an anti-human CD59-reactive molecule on the surface of C-resistant spirochetes by flow cytometry and electron microscopy. A molecule of 80 kDa recognized by polyclonal and monoclonal anti-CD59 Abs was identified in the membrane extract of C-resistant strains by SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis. The molecule was released from the bacterial wall using deoxycholate and trypsin, suggesting its insertion into the bacterial membrane. The CD59-like molecule acts as C inhibitor on Borrelia because incubation with F(ab')2 anti-CD59 renders the serum-resistant strain exquisitely susceptible to C-mediated killing and guinea pig erythrocytes bearing C5b-8, unlike the RBC coated with C5b-7, are protected from reactive lysis by the bacterial extract. Western blot analysis revealed preferential binding of the C inhibitory molecule to C9 and weak interaction with C8{beta}.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
C provides an important early line of defense against invading microorganisms in close collaboration with other components of both innate and acquired immunity. The system can be activated through the lectin or the alternative pathway in the absence of Abs and through the classical pathway when the humoral immune response is established. The activation sequence proceeds with the formation of C3/C5 convertases, leading to the generation of the biologically active products of C3 and C5, and ends with the assembly of the pore-forming membrane attack complex (MAC)3 (1).

Most pathogenic microorganisms, and in particular those that circulate in the blood stream, develop a wide range of strategies to elude the host immune defense, including evasion of C activation and/or C attack. Pathogens can inhibit C activation by acquiring C control proteins from the host (2, 3, 4) or by expressing molecules that mimic mammalian C regulatory proteins (5). Moreover, microorganisms can prevent access of cytolytic MAC to the outer membrane and block its destructive effect by producing thick walls of peptidoglycan or capsules or by expressing other outer membrane constituents that form a protective shield against C attack. The release of LPS from the cell surface or the expression of LPS with long side chain on the outer membrane may favor the activation of C at some distance from the outer membrane of bacteria that become less vulnerable to C attack (6).

Borrelia burgdorferi is the etiologic cause of Lyme disease, a chronic, systemic, and multistage infection characterized by periods of remission and exacerbation. The strategies that enable this pathogen to evade the immune response have not been fully defined, although several mechanisms have been proposed to explain their ability to persist in the host and to disseminate to various organs, causing serious clinical manifestations. These include selective activation of reactive Th1-like cells (7), changes in the bacterial surface Ags (8, 9), and sequestration of spirochetes within intracellular niches (10, 11, 12, 13, 14). Like many other microorganisms, B. burgdorferi has also developed strategies to resist the serum bactericidal activity, despite the ability of these spirochetes to activate both classical and alternative pathways of C activation (15). Resistance to C-dependent killing varies in different strains of B. burgdorferi (16, 17, 18) and is apparently related to their ability to disseminate to extracutaneous sites (19).

One mechanism enabling some strains of B. burgdorferi to evade C attack has in part been elucidated recently following the demonstration that these strains bind selectively the C regulatory proteins factor H and factor H-like protein (20, 21, 22). These proteins, that function as cofactors of factor I in the degradation of C3b and C4b, interact with several outer membrane proteins including Osp-E, and reduce the number of C3 molecules deposited on the bacterial surface (23). However, the recent demonstration by Breitner-Ruddock et al. (16) that the amount of C3 and that of its degradation products deposited on the bacterial surface do not differ in C-susceptible and C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi suggests that the ability of surface-bound factor H to control C3 activation is not the only mechanism used by these spirochetes to evade C-dependent destruction.

The assembly of MAC on B. burgdorferi is another critical step of C activation. Kochi et al. (24) first reported that a C-resistant strain can be made susceptible to C killing following exposure to specific Abs and showed that this change was associated with increased stability of C5b, the first component of this complex, on C-susceptible bacteria. Controversy exists on the relative amounts of the late C components and MAC bound to C-resistant and C-sensitive strains of Borrelia. Breitzner-Ruddock et al. (16) found lower deposits of C6 and MAC on C-resistant bacteria, whereas Patarakul et al. (18) observed no significant difference in the amount of MAC deposited on the two strains and suggested that bacterial killing was dependent on the binding of MAC to susceptible sites on the bacterial surface.

We have decided to re-examine this issue by evaluating both the amount of C3 and that of the late C components bound to C-resistant and C-sensitive strains of B. burgdorferi. Data will be presented showing that the C-resistant strains exhibit reduced amounts of the late C components and almost complete absence of C9 and MAC. In addition, evidence will be provided indicating that the resistant strains express on their surface a protein with antigenic and functional similarity to human CD59 acting at the terminal step of C activation (25, 26, 27, 28).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antibodies

The mouse mAb aE11 recognizing a neoantigen of poly C9 (29) was a gift from T. E. Mollnes (Institute of Immunology, The National Hospital, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway). The rat blocking mAb YTH53.1 (30), and the mouse nonblocking mAb HC1 (31), both directed against human CD59 were kindly provided by S. Meri (Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland), while the mouse blocking mAb to CD59 BRIC 229 was purchased from International Blood Group References Laboratory Research Products (Bristol, U.K.). Rabbit antiserum to human vitronectin (32) was obtained as a kind gift from K. Högasen (Medical Department, Lillehammer, Norway). The antiserum to human CD59 was raised in goat by repeated s.c. injections of purified urinary CD59 (33). The specificity of the antiserum was controlled by ELISA and Western blot. The antiserum recognized a 21-kDa protein in the membrane extract of human RBC as well as affinity-purified urinary CD59 and rendered human erythrocytes paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria-like cells by promoting their complete lysis by the terminal components at the concentration of 40 µg/ml IgG in the reactive lysis assay (for experimental details, see C Components and Hemolytic Assay). Goat antisera to C3, C6, C7, C8, and C9 and sheep antiserum to rat clusterin strongly cross-reacting with human clusterin were purchased from Quidel (San Diego, CA). The two mAbs anti-OspA (clone H5332) and anti-OspB (clone 84c) were kindly provided by A. G. Barbour (Department of Medicine and Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of California, Irvine, CA), whereas mAb ant-OspC (clone L222b8) was a gift from B. Wilske (Max von Pettenkofir fur Hygiene und Medizinske Mikrobiologie, LMU, Munich, Germany). The IgG were purified from the antisera by affinity chromatography on protein G-Sepharose columns (Pharmacia Biotech, Milan, Italy) and were biotin labeled using biotinamidocaproate-n-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) following a previously described procedure (34). F(ab')2 were prepared by pepsin (Sigma-Aldrich) digestion of affinity-purified IgG dialyzed against 0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 4.0) at an enzyme:IgG ratio of 5 µg pepsin/mg IgG. After incubation of the mixture at 37°C for 4 h, the digest was further purified by gel filtration on a Superose 12 column using a Fast Protein Liquid Chromatography system (Pharmacia Biotech) and the purity of F(ab')2 was checked by SDS-PAGE.

Nonimmune human serum (NHS)

Serum samples from at least 10 healthy individuals were screened for the presence of Abs reacting with B. burgdorferi by Western blot analysis (35). The negative sera were pooled as the source of C and stored in small aliquots at -80°C.

Bacterial growth and bactericidal assay

B. burgdorferi strains were grown in Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly (BSK) medium at 34°C. C-dependent killing of bacteria incubated with NHS was evaluated by the viable cell count in microtiter plates (36). Briefly, borreliae were grown to log phase in BSK medium, washed, and adjusted to 106 bacteria/ml in MEM (MEM + 0.25% BSA). The spirochetes were suspended either in 10% fresh NHS or in NHS heated at 56°C for 30 min, as a negative control, to a final volume of 200 µl and incubated at 37°C for 120 min. After the addition of 100 µl of BSK medium, double dilutions of each sample were made in duplicate rows. The plates were then sealed with sterile polyester adhesive film (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated at 34°C for 1 wk. The wells were examined under dark-field microscopy for bacterial growth and the percentage of C-dependent killing was calculated by comparing the first dilution of the NHS sample, that showed no visible growth, with that of the control in MEM made equal to 100.

Immunofluorescence analysis

Deposition of C components was evaluated on viable bacteria (2 x 108 cells) of both C-resistant and C-susceptible strains incubated with 10% NHS at 37°C for 30 min to a final volume of 1 ml under gentle agitation. NHS was replaced by 10% NHS heated at 56°C for 30 min in the control sample. The spirochetes were then washed twice with PBS by centrifugation at 12,000 x g at 4°C for 10 min and fixed in 0.05% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The bacterial pellet was suspended in 200 µl of goat antisera to C components or mAb aE11, incubated for 1 h at room temperature, washed twice, and finally resuspended in 200 µl of 1/200 FITC-conjugated F(ab')2 rabbit anti-goat IgG (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL) or antimouse IgG (DAKO, Milan, Italy). After washing, the spirochetes were viewed under the fluorescence microscope (Zeiss 250-CF Jenalumar; Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

An essentially similar procedure was followed to analyze borreliae for the expression of CD59 and surface deposition of C components using a FACSCalibur flow cytometry (BD Immunocytometry System, San Jose, CA) equipped with an air-cooled argon ion laser fitted at 488 nm and with a filter setting for FITC (530 nm). Forward and side scatter gates were used to exclude bacterial debris or large aggregates from analysis. Events were acquired in list mode and analyzed with CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA).

Transmission electron microscopy

Two different approaches were used to study the localization of CD59 on B. burgdorferi. In the pre-embedding technique, the immune localization of the CD59-like molecule was analyzed on B. burgdorferi (2 x 109 cells) fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at 4°C, washed twice in PBS, and permeabilized in 0.05% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min. After two washings in PBS containing 0.02% glycine and blocking nonspecific binding sites with PBS supplemented with 20% normal rabbit serum, the bacteria were incubated overnight at 4°C either with 1/200 goat IgG anti-CD59 or with the same dilution of preimmune IgG in PBS containing 0.5% BSA (PBSA), washed three times in PBSA, and incubated for 40 min in a 1/50 dilution of 1 nm of colloidal gold-labeled rabbit anti-goat IgG (British Biocell, Cardiff, U.K.). After several washings in PBSA, the cells were fixed in 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS, postfixed in 0.5% osmium tetroxide in the same buffer, washed in several changes of milliQ water, and developed with a silver-enhancing kit HQ (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY) for 8 min in the dark. Finally, the cells were serially dehydrated in ethanol and embedded, via propylene oxide, in Embed 812/Araldite 502 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). Gold-colored sections were cut on an ultramicrotome (Pabish Top Ultra 150) and collected on 200-mesh copper grids. The grids were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and viewed under a the Philips EM 208 transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). In the whole-mount immunolocalization analysis, viable spirochetes (2 x 109 cells) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature in PBS containing 10% goat serum and biotin-labeled goat IgG anti-human CD59 (14 µg/ml) to a final volume of 200 µl. The bacteria were washed twice, fixed for 10 min in an equal volume of PBS containing 1% paraformaldehyde and 0.05% glutaraldehyde, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature with 5 nm of colloidal gold-labeled streptavidin (British Biocell) diluted 1/100 in PBS. After two washings, the bacteria were suspended in distilled water, air dried onto 300 mesh formvar-coated nickel grids, and examined under a Philips EM 208 transmission electron microscope.

Preparation of bacterial extracts

A suspension of spirochetes (109/ml) was centrifuged at 28,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C and the resulting pellet was suspended in PBS containing both 10 mM n-octyl-{beta}-D-glucopyranoside (n-OCT) (Sigma-Aldrich) and a mixture of protein inhibitors for bacterial extracts (P 8465; Sigma-Aldrich), and incubated overnight at 4°C on a rotator. The suspension was then centrifuged and the supernatant was examined by Western blot for the presence of outer surface lipoproteins. The residual pellet was further extracted with 1% deoxycholate (DOC) overnight at 4°C (37). The extracts were dialyzed against PBS to remove the detergent and the protein content was measured by the Coomassie blue protein assay (Bradford reagent; Sigma-Aldrich).

Bacterial extracts were also obtained by incubating spirochetes (109/ml) with trypsin (100 µg/ml), purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, for 60 min at 20°C. The effect of trypsin was neutralized by the addition of 1 mM PMSF. At the end of incubation, the suspension was centrifuged and the bacteria collected in the pellet were analyzed by flow cytometry, while the supernatant was examined by Western blot for the released proteins.

SDS-PAGE and Western blot

Bacterial extracts were subjected to electrophoresis through a 8–15% gradient of acrylamide gel under both reducing and nonreducing conditions. The proteins were blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane (Hybound-C Extra; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Milan, Italy) using a semiphor system (Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco, CA) and the membranes were incubated with 4% bovine nonfat milk ((BM) Sigma-Aldrich) in TBS to block nonspecific binding sites. The CD59-reactive bands and the lipoproteins OspA, OspB, and OspC were detected with goat Abs or rat or murine mAb followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary Abs (Sigma-Aldrich). The enzymatic reaction was revealed using nitroblue tetrazolium (0.60 mg/ml) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (0.30 mg/ml), both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, and diluted in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.5) containing 0.1 M NaCl and 5 mM MgCl2. Rainbow RPN 756 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) was used as a mixture of molecular mass markers.

Binding of bacterial extracts to C components

Two different approaches were followed to evaluate the ability of bacterial proteins to interact with C components. Wells of microtiter plates (Corning Costar, Acton, MA) were coated with purified late C components (Quidel) or BSA (1 µg/well) by overnight incubation in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) at 4°C. After washing with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, the residual free binding sites were blocked with PBS containing 2% BM (milk PBS) for 1 h at 37°C. The bound proteins were allowed to react with DOC extracts from Borrelia (100 µg/ml) overnight at 4°C followed by 1/2000 goat IgG anti-CD59 and 1/5000 alkaline phosphatase-labeled rabbit anti-goat IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). The latter steps were conducted for 1 h at 37°C. The enzymatic reaction was developed using p-nitrophenyl phosphate (1 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) as a substrate in 0.1 M glycine buffer (pH 10.4) containing 1 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM ZnCl2 and read at 405 nm using a Titertek Multiskan ELISA reader (Flow Labs, Milan, Italy).

Binding of bacterial proteins to C components was also evaluated following their electrophoretic separation under nonreducing conditions (1 µg/lane) on 10% acrylamide gels and transfer to nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking the free binding sites with BM in TBS, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with DOC extracts from Borrelia (100 µg/ml) in TBS plus 0.1% BM containing the mixture of protein inhibitors. After extensive washing, the bound CD59-like protein was detected using goat IgG anti-CD59 followed by alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary Abs.

C components and hemolytic assay

C5b6 was prepared as previously described (38) and purified C7, C8, and C9 were obtained from Quidel. The reactive lysis was performed on guinea pig erythrocytes (GPE) or human erythrocytes following a published procedure (39). Briefly, a suspension of GPE (2 x 107 in 50 µl) was incubated with C5b6 (2 U) for 10 min at 37°C, where 1 U represents the volume of complex that lyses 50% of erythrocytes in 30 min at 37°C in the presence of 2 µl of serum containing 10 mM EDTA to a final volume of 250 µl. The mixture was further incubated for 30 min at 37°C following the addition of the remaining late C components (1 ng each). Cell lysis was stopped by adding 1 ml of cold PBS containing 10 mM EDTA and measured spectrophotometrically at 412 nm. A similar approach was followed to test the neutralizing effect of goat IgG anti-CD59 on human erythrocytes that are highly resistant to lysis induced by human MAC due to the surface expression of CD59, except that 100 U of C5b6 was used instead of 2 U. The intermediates GPEC5b-7 and GPEC5b-8 were prepared by incubating GPE (1 x 108 in 100 µl) with 10 U of C5b6 and either C7 (5 ng) or a mixture of C7 and C8 containing 5 ng of each component for 5 min at 37°C.

Statistical analysis

The results are expressed as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t test to compare two groups of data. Values of p = 0.01 or less were considered to be statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Deposition of C3 and late C components on C-resistant and C-sensitive strains of Borrelia

In preliminary experiments, we tested 13 strains of B. burgdorferi for their susceptibility to killing in the presence of 10% NHS and identified three different groups that were either resistant, or sensitive, or showed intermediate resistance to C bactericidal activity. On the basis of these results, BITS of the genospecies B. garini, and Alcaide of the genospecies B. burgdorferi sensu stricto were selected for additional experiments as representative of C-sensitive and C-resistant strains, respectively. Alcaide proved to be also resistant to killing in the presence of 50% NHS.

Analysis of the spirochetes incubated with fresh NHS for surface-bound C components under a fluorescence microscope and by flow cytometry (Fig. 1) revealed deposition of similar amount of C3 on both strains, although the C3b bound to C-resistant strains underwent a more extensive degradation than the C3b on the C-sensitive strain (results not shown). The deposits of C6 and C7 on the C-resistant strain were less intense and staining for C8 was also reduced on the latter strain (data not shown). Alcaide exposed to heat-inactivated NHS, as a control for nonspecific binding of the antisera, showed only background staining for most antisera. The only antiserum that gave a slightly higher background was anti-C6, and this can presumably be attributed to contaminating Abs directed against borreliae. Unexpectedly, we found that the resistant strain showed negligible staining for C9, which contrasted with the bright staining observed on the sensitive strain. The markedly reduced deposition of C9 on the surface of Alcaide was associated with impaired assembly of MAC, as revealed by the negative reaction of these spirochetes with mAb aE11.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Immunofluorescence analysis of C-sensitive and C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi for deposition of C components. The spirochetes were incubated with 10% NHS for 30 min at 37°C and the bound C components or deposition of MAC were revealed by their reaction with goat-specific Abs or mAb aE11 followed by FITC-labeled F(ab')2 rabbit anti-goat IgG or goat anti-mouse IgG. The bacteria were then either dried on slides and examined under a fluorescence microscope (left panels) or analyzed by FACS (right panels). The filled and open histograms (continuous line) represent C-resistant and C-sensitive strains exposed to NHS, respectively. The open histogram (dotted line) represents the C-resistant strain incubated with heat-inactivated serum as a control for nonspecific binding of Abs.

 
Detection of the CD59-like molecule on the surface of a C-resistant strain of B. burgdorferi

The finding of markedly reduced deposits of MAC on the membrane of a C-resistant strain of B. burgdorferi led us to suspect that a C regulator expressed on this strain and acting at the level of MAC assembly was responsible for this observation. S protein and clusterin were unlikely to be involved in the protection of spirochetes from MAC attack because these are soluble inhibitors that prevent binding of the trimolecular complex C5b-7 (40), which, in our case, was only slightly reduced in contrast with the negligible binding of C9. The data rather suggested to us that CD59 was the most likely candidate to control MAC assembly on a C-resistant strain. To test this possibility, both strains of B. burgdorferi were incubated with goat anti-CD59 Abs followed by FITC-conjugated anti-goat Abs and finally analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 2, staining of the C-resistant isolate was clearly increased compared with that of the C-sensitive strain, which essentially overlapped the background staining observed with the preimmune goat serum. This finding was confirmed on other C-resistant isolates. To further document the presence of CD59-like molecules on B. burgdorferi, both C-resistant and C-sensitive isolates were gold labeled after incubation with IgG anti-CD59 and analyzed under an electron microscope. Colloidal gold particles were clearly visible on the C-resistant strain Alcaide in numbers that were significantly higher than that of the occasional particles seen on the same strain incubated with preimmune IgG or on the C-sensitive strain BITS treated with anti-CD59 Abs (Fig. 3). It should be pointed out that a proportion of these particles were located intracellularly, but particles were also seen on the surface, although in a limited number (Fig. 3).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. FACS analysis of B. burgdorferi for surface expression of CD59. C-resistant (filled histograms) and C-sensitive (open histograms) strains were incubated first with goat anti-CD59 (upper panel) or preimmune goat IgG (lower panel) and then with FITC-labeled F(ab')2 rabbit anti-goat IgG.

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. Detection of the CD59-like molecule on the surface of B. burgdorferi by electron microscopy. Electron micrographs of the C-resistant strain Alcaide treated either with IgG anti-CD59 (A) or with preimmune goat IgG (B) and of the C-sensitive strain BITS incubated with IgG anti-CD59 (C). The bottom of this figure represents the mean number of particles ± SD counted in 10 different fields of 25 µm2 each. *, p < 0.01 vs B and C; NS vs C. The inset shows the electron microscopic image of C-resistant bacteria incubated with goat anti-CD59 and obtained by whole-mount immunoanalysis. Note the gold particles scattered on the bacterial surface.

 
Effect of anti-CD59 on serum-mediated killing of B. burgdorferi

The ability of anti-CD59 Abs to bind to the surface of the C-resistant strain led us to test whether blocking the C inhibitor expressed on B. burgdorferi with these Abs rendered the spirochetes susceptible to C killing. To avoid direct C activation by bound anti-CD59 Abs, F(ab')2 were prepared from anti-CD59 IgG, and from preimmune goat IgG, as a control for nonspecific activity of the F(ab')2 Abs. C-resistant bacteria were incubated either with F(ab')2 anti-CD59 or with control F(ab')2 before exposure to NHS and the percentage of bacterial killing was evaluated following a 2-h incubation at 37°C. The sensitive strain was also included in this experiment as a control for the serum bactericidal activity. As shown in Fig. 4, ~75% of C-resistant spirochetes were killed by NHS after incubation with F(ab')2 anti-CD59. This killing effect was slightly lower than that observed when the C-sensitive strain BITS was exposed to the same concentration of NHS. No killing of Alcaide was seen in the presence of control F(ab')2.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Effect of anti-human CD59 Abs on the killing of C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi by NHS. The spirochetes were incubated either with anti-CD59 or with unrelated F(ab')2 before exposure to 10% NHS. The results are expressed as percentages of bacterial survival with respect to the bacteria incubated with NHS in the absence of F(ab')2 Abs and represent the mean ± SD of three experiments.

 
Characterization of the CD59-like molecule expressed on B. burgdorferi

To investigate the size of the molecule recognized by anti-CD59 Abs on B. burgdorferi and to assess whether this molecule is loosely or tightly bound to the bacterial membrane, proteins were sequentially extracted from the membranes of C-sensitive and C-resistant strains with the mild detergent n-OCT (10 mM) and with 1% DOC. The extracted proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blot for the presence of both CD59 and Osps using monoclonal and polyclonal Abs (Fig. 5). The Osps bands were detected in the n-OCT extracts, whereas DOC was required for the release of the CD59-like molecule, suggesting insertion of this protein into the bacterial membrane. Both a polyclonal and three different mAb anti-CD59 revealed a band of ~80 kDa in the extracts of B. burgdorferi, which was higher than the 19- to 21-kDa CD59 bands detected in human urine and RBC. The molecular mass of the CD59-like protein remained unchanged when the bacterial extract was analyzed with polyclonal Abs under reducing conditions (data not shown). Next, we examined other strains of B. burgdorferi for the presence of the CD59-like molecule and found that the 80-kDa band was detectable only in strains that survived in the presence of C and was absent in C-susceptible strains (Fig. 6). We failed to reveal any reaction of the extract obtained from C-resistant spirochetes with antisera to S protein and clusterin (data not shown).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 5. Western blot analysis of the CD59-like molecule in the detergent extracts of C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi. The membrane proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions on a 8–15% gradient gel. Human urinary CD59 (lanes 1, 4, 7, and 10); 10 mM n-OCT extract (lanes 2, 5, 8, and 11); 1% DOC extract (lanes 3, 6, 9, and 12). After blotting, the nitrocellulose strips were incubated with polyclonal or mAb to human CD59. The 10 mM n-OCT extract was also examined for the presence of the outer surface proteins using mAbs anti-OspA clone H5332 (lane 13), OspB clone 84c (lane 14), and OspC clone L222b8 (lane 15).

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 6. Detection of the CD59-like molecule in different strains of B. burgdorferi and relationship to C resistance. DOC extract was prepared from six strains of B. burgdorferi, including Alcaide, Tir, and B31 of the genospecies sensu stricto and BITS, BL 21, and BL 3 of the genospecies garinii, and were analyzed by Western blot with goat IgG anti-CD59 (see legend to Fig. 5). The bottom of this figure shows the results of the bactericidal assay of the same strains of B. burgdorferi expressed as percent survival of spirochetes in the presence of C. Values are mean ± SD of three separate experiments.

 
Enzymatic release of the CD59-like molecule from B. burgdorferi

The finding that the CD59-like protein can only be removed from B. burgdorferi using a strong detergent suggests that this molecule, unlike the CD59 of eukaryotic cells (26), is probably inserted into the bacterial membranes. To obtain further information on the type of protein insertion, the C-resistant strain of B. burgdorferi was treated with trypsin that was previously shown to render B. burgdorferi susceptible to C killing (18). After enzymatic treatment, the spirochetes were examined by FACS for the residual expression of the CD59-like molecule and the culture supernatant was analyzed by Western blot for the presence of the C regulatory molecule. The results presented in Fig. 7 show that treatment of Alcaide with trypsin caused reduced staining for CD59 (upper panel) and release in the supernatant of the anti-CD59-reactive molecule appearing as two bands of 20 and 25 kDa that most likely represent degradation products of the 80-kDa detected on this strain of B. burgdorferi (lower panel).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 7. Effect of trypsin on the CD59-like molecule expressed on C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi. Upper panel, FACS analysis of untreated (filled histogram) and trypsin-treated (open histogram) spirochetes for the CD59-like molecule recognized by goat IgG anti-human CD59. Lower panel, Western blot analysis of supernatant collected after enzymatic treatment of the spirochetes and examined for the presence of molecules identified by goat IgG anti-human CD59. Spirochetes treated with trypsin (lane 1), spirochetes extracted with DOC (lane 2), and urinary CD59 (lane 3).

 
CD59-like molecule binds to C8 and C9 and inhibits reactive lysis

Since human CD59 controls the final step of MAC assembly by binding to C8{alpha} and C9 and by inhibiting polymerization of C9 (41, 42), we decided to investigate whether the CD59-like molecule of B. burgdorferi also interacts with these terminal components. To show this, we first used an immunoenzymatic assay using solid-phase bound C components and found that the bacterial C regulatory molecule binds selectively to C8 and C9 (Fig. 8A). This finding was further extended by analyzing this interaction by SDS-PAGE and Western blot. Human late C components and BSA, as a control, were separated under nonreducing conditions and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking, the membrane was incubated with the extract of B. burgdorferi and the binding of the CD59-like molecule was evaluated using goat anti-CD59 Abs. The results reported in Fig. 8 clearly show that the CD59-like molecule binds to C9 and weakly to the C8{beta} subunit.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 8. Identification of the C components interacting with CD59-like molecule expressed on C-resistant strain of B. burgdorferi. A, Late C components or BSA coating the wells of microtiter plates (1 µg/well) were allowed to react with DOC extract from Borrelia (100 µg/ml) and the bound proteins were revealed by their reaction with goat IgG anti-CD59 followed by alkaline phosphatase-labeled secondary Abs. The results are presented as mean ± SD of three different experiments. B, Late C components or BSA were subjected to SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions (1 µg/lane), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with DOC extract from Borrelia (100 µg/ml). Bound bacterial proteins were detected using goat anti-CD59 Abs and alkaline phosphatase-labeled secondary Abs. C, Late C components and BSA subjected to SDS-PAGE, as in B, and stained with Coomassie blue.

 
To assess whether the CD59-like molecule controls MAC formation, we examined the ability of the extract of B. burgdorferi to inhibit the reactive lysis of GPE (39). This was tested by incubating GPE with the DOC extracts from either C-resistant or C-sensitive strains of B. burgdorferi for 10 min at 37°C. The RBC were either washed or left unwashed before the addition of C5b6 followed, 10 min later, by the remaining late C components. As shown in Fig. 9A, the extract of the C-resistant strain inhibited MAC-induced lysis in a dose-related manner. However, this inhibitory effect was lost when the RBC incubated with the bacterial extracts were washed before being tested in the reactive lysis. The extract of the sensitive strain was totally ineffective even at the highest concentration (Fig. 9A), as was the n-OCT extract containing Osps (data not shown). To define the stage of MAC assembly at which the C inhibitor acts, GPC5b-7 and GPC5b-8 were mixed with the bacterial extract before exposure to the remaining late C components to induce cell lysis. The results presented in Fig. 9B clearly show that the bacterial extract was able to inhibit lysis of GPEC5b-8 but had only a marginal effect on GPEC5b-7 that was not significantly different from that observed on GPE.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 9. Inhibition of reactive lysis by Borrelia extract. A, GPE (2 x 107 in 50 µl) were incubated with increasing amounts of membrane proteins extracted with 1% DOC from C-resistant and C-sensitive strains of B. burgdorferi for 10 min at 37°C and either washed or left unwashed before the addition of C5b6 followed 10 min later by the remaining late C components. After incubation at 37°C for 10 min, RBC lysis was measured spectrophotometrically at 412 nm. B, GPE, GPEC5b-7, and GPEC5b-8 were incubated with 1 µg/ml extract from C-resistant strains for 10 min at 37°C and washed or unwashed, in the case of GPEC5b-8 to evaluate the effect of the inhibitor on both C8 and C9, before addition of the required terminal C components of the reactive lysis system. The results are presented as mean ± SD of three different experiments.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Resistance to complement attack is one of the strategies adopted by some strains of B. burgdorferi to survive in the host and to disseminate from the area of the tick bite to target tissues. C evasion devised by these spirochetes may be of particular importance in the early phase of infection when the Ab response has not yet developed and C provides an important means of protection. The data obtained in this study clearly show that C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi express a CD59-like molecule that inhibits the assembly of MAC on their outer membrane and protects them from C-dependent killing.

Analysis of the different strains of B. burgdorferi for the presence of C components bound to their membrane following exposure to NHS free of specific Abs revealed a striking difference in the level of MAC. This suggests that the assembly of this complex on the outer membrane surface is a critical step of C activation that makes the spirochetes susceptible to C-dependent killing. The negligible amount of MAC observed on the membrane of the resistant strain cannot be attributed to a reduced ability of this strain to activate C because the spirochetes bind an amount of C3 similar to that of a C-susceptible strain. These data confirm previous work by various groups showing that C-susceptible and C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi activate equally well the C system mainly through the classical pathway, although the alternative pathway may also be involved (16, 43). Thus, it appears that neither the degree of C consumption by these strains nor the level of bound C3 fully explain the C sensitivity of B. burgdorferi.

FACS analysis revealed reduced deposition of the late C components on the C-resistant strain, despite the fact that the level of bound C3 is comparable to that on C-sensitive spirochetes. This observation confirms and extends similar data reported by Breitner-Ruddock et al. (16) and suggests that the resistant strains bear a less efficient C5 convertase that may account for the observed discrepancy between the level of C3 and that of the terminal components. Kochi et al. (24) found that the stability of the C5 convertase on the outer membrane of B. burgdorferi is a critical step in promoting C-mediated killing of these spirochetes and may be related to the membrane sites where the enzymatic complex is assembled. Based on recent reports that factor H, a cofactor of factor I involved in the inactivation of C3b, selectively binds to C-resistant strains (20, 21, 22, 23), it is conceivable that C3 inactivation occurs on the surface of resistant B. burgdorferi, leading to deposition of inactive C3. This is supported by the data published by Alitalo et al. (20) and by our present finding that C3b undergoes a more extensive degradation on C-resistant than on C-sensitive strains of Borrelia.

The finding of negligible amounts of C9 deposited on the outer membrane of resistant strain compared with the level of the other late components led us to suspect that the resistant strain controls C activation also at the C9 level. This hypothesis was confirmed by the weak reaction of the resistant strain with the mAb to C9 neoantigen expressed in MAC and absent in native C9. These and similar data reported by Breitner-Ruddock et al. (16) with a different mAb to C9 neoantigen suggest that the assembly of MAC on these spirochetes is impaired. Release of MAC from the surface of resistant spirochetes is unlikely to account for our observation since studies by other groups have shown that MAC can partially be removed by trypsin (18, 44). An alternative explanation for the reduced deposition of MAC, besides the relative inefficiency of the C5 convertase, is that an inhibitor may prevent the assembly of the complex on the bacterial surface. The near normal amount of C7 bound to the C-resistant strain tends to exclude that the uptake of C5b-7 is impaired by the action of an inhibitor released from the spirochetes, as it has recently been shown for virulent strains of Streptococcus pyogenes (45) or as a result of the inhibitory effect of S protein and clusterin acting in the fluid phase (40). Our inability to detect C9 on the surface of the resistant strain rather suggests that inhibition occurs at a later stage of MAC assembly and possibly involves molecules that prevent polymerization of C9. Evidence supporting this conclusion is provided by the positive reaction of the C-resistant, but not of the C-sensitive, strains of B. burgdorferi with both monoclonal and polyclonal Abs to CD59, as assessed by FACS analysis, immunoelectron microscopy, and Western blot. It is important to emphasize that the CD59-like molecule was observed on all C-resistant strains tested while undetectable on C-sensitive strains.

The molecule recognized by Abs to CD59 proved to be functionally effective in inhibiting the assembly of MAC on the bacterial surface because the C-resistant strain of B. burgdorferi incubated with these Abs became highly susceptible to C-dependent killing. The use of non-C-fixing F(ab')2 Abs in these experiments ruled out the possibility that the bacterial killing was the result of C activation triggered by surface-bound Abs. Further data confirming the ability of the inhibitor to block the lytic effect of MAC were obtained in experiments showing that GPE became resistant to reactive lysis in the presence of extracts obtained from the C-resistant strain. In the reactive lysis system, the cells are exposed to C5b6 and the remaining late components and are lysed by MAC assembled on cells in the absence of the early components (39). Our inability to protect the erythrocytes incubated with the bacterial extract and washed before exposure to the terminal C complex from C attack proves that the C inhibitor extracted from Borrelia is unable to bind to the RBC membrane.

The CD59-like molecule expressed on B. burgdorferi exhibits a number of structural and functional differences from human CD59, although the two molecules share the ability to inhibit cell lysis by preventing the polymerization of C9 and the formation of MAC. The MAC regulator on B. burgdorferi is much larger than human CD59, with an estimated molecular mass of ~80 kDa. This size remained unchanged under reducing conditions, indicating that the CD59-like molecule on B. burgdorferi is not a polymer of the 18- to 20-kDa CD59 expressed on human cells. The difference in size also proves that the spirochetes do not acquire the C inhibitor from the host while penetrating into the target cells, as it has been shown for HIV (2, 3, 4) and, more recently, for Helicobacter pylori infecting gastric mucosa (46). Other infectious agents, like B. burgdorferi, have been reported to constitutively express on their outer membrane molecules that show molecular mimicry and functional similarity with CD59. This group includes viruses, such as herpesvirus saimiri (47), or parasites, like Entamoeba histolytica (48), and Schistosoma mansoni (49), the latter expressing a 94-kDa protein at some stages of development, such as schistosomula and lung and adult worms.

The data presented here indicate that C8 and C9 represent the primary targets of the bacterial CD59-like protein. The finding that this molecule interacts with solid-phase bound C components in ELISA and Western blot suggests that the MAC inhibitor recognizes sites of C8 and C9 concealed in the native molecules. Human CD59 has been shown to react with the same components within the assembling MAC, but, unlike the bacterial inhibitor that binds preferentially to the C8{beta} subunit, it reacts primarily with C8{alpha}. Is interesting to note that the MAC inhibitor expressed on the surface of S. mansoni and named schistosome C inhibitor protein type 1 (49) also binds to the C8{beta} subunit.

Trypsin was effective in causing the release of the inhibitory protein from the bacterial surface, suggesting that the C inhibitor is an integral protein of the bacterial outer membrane. The observation made by Patarakul et al. (18) that trypsin treatment rendered a C-resistant strain of B. burgdorferi susceptible to C-dependent killing is consistent with our finding and can be explained by the enzymatic removal of CD59-like protein. The outer membrane proteins OspA, -B, and -C have also been implicated in the protection of spirochete from C attack based on the finding that mutant strains derived from C-resistant strains and lacking these proteins are susceptible to C killing (50). However, these proteins, that can easily be extracted from the outer membrane using the mild detergent n-OCT, failed to protect GPE from MAC-dependent lysis.

In conclusion, our data provide evidence for the ability of some C-resistant strains of B. burgdorferi to evade C-dependent killing by expressing a molecule with a structural and functional similarity to human CD59. The structure of this molecule remains to be defined.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Claudio Gamboz for his excellent technical assistance in the electron microscopy study.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants provided by the Italian Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (60% and Cofinanxiamento) and Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (Target Project on Biotechnology), and European concerted action (Contract QLG1-CT-2001-01039). Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Francesco Tedesco, Dipartimento di Fisiologia e Patologia, Università di Trieste, Via Fleming 22, 34127 Trieste, Italy. E-mail address: tedesco{at}univ.trieste.it Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: MAC, membrane attack complex; NHS, nonimmune human serum; DOC, deoxycholate; BM, bovine nonfat milk; GPE, guinea pig erythrocyte; n-OCT, n-octyl-{beta}-D-glucopyranoside. Back

Received for publication January 30, 2002. Accepted for publication January 15, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Volanakis, J. E.. 1998. Overview of the complement system. J. E. Volanakis, and M. M. Frank, eds. The Human Complement System in Human and Disease 9. Dekker, New York.
  2. Spear, G. T., N. S. Lurain, C. J. Parker, M. Ghassemi, G. H. Payne, M. Saifuddin. 1995. Host cell-derived complement control proteins CD55 and CD59 are incorporated into the virions of two unrelated enveloped viruses: human T cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type I (HTLV-I) and human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). J. Immunol. 155:4376.[Abstract]
  3. Saifuddin, M., T. Hedayati, J. P. Atkinson, M. H. Holguin, C. J. Parker, G. T. Spear. 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 incorporates both glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-anchored CD55 and CD59 and integral membrane CD46 at levels that protect from complement-mediated destruction. J. Gen. Virol. 78:1907.[Abstract]
  4. Rautemaa, R., G. A. Jarvis, P. Marnila, S. Meri. 1998. Acquired resistance of Escherichia coli to complement lysis by binding of glycophosphoinositol-anchored protectin (CD59). Infect. Immun. 66:1928.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Wurzner, R.. 1999. Evasion of pathogens by avoiding recognition or eradication by complement, in part via molecular mimicry. Mol. Immunol. 36:249.[Medline]
  6. Joiner, K. A.. 1988. Complement evasion by bacteria and parasites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 42:201.[Medline]
  7. Yssel, H., M. C. Shanafelt, C. Soderberg, P. V. Schneider, J. Anzola, G. Peltz. 1991. Borrelia burgdorferi activates a T helper type 1-like T cell subset in Lyme arthritis. J. Exp. Med. 174:593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Anguita, J., S. Samanta, B. Revilla, K. Suk, S. Das, S. W. Barthold, E. Fikrig. 2000. Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression in vivo and spirochete pathogenicity. Infect. Immun. 68:1222.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Barbour, A. G.. 1991. Molecular biology of antigenic variation in Lyme borreliosis and relapsing fever: a comparative analysis. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 77:88.[Medline]
  10. Klempner, M. S., R. Noring, R. A. Rogers. 1993. Invasion of human skin fibroblasts by the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Infect. Dis. 167:1074.[Medline]
  11. Ma, Y., A. Sturrock, J. J. Weis. 1991. Intracellular localization of Borrelia burgdorferi within human endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 59:671.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Montgomery, R. R., M. H. Nathanson, S. E. Malawista. 1993. The fate of Borrelia burgdorferi, the agent for Lyme disease, in mouse macrophages: destruction, survival, recovery. J. Immunol. 150:909.[Abstract]
  13. Girschick, H. J., H. I. Huppertz, H. Russmann, V. Krenn, H. Karch. 1996. Intracellular persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi in human synovial cells. Rheumatol. Int. 16:125.[Medline]
  14. Chary-Valckenaere, I., B. Jaulhac, J. Champigneulle, Y. Piemont, D. Mainard, J. Pourel. 1998. Ultrastructural demonstration of intracellular localization of Borrelia burgdorferi in Lyme arthritis. Br. J. Rheumatol. 37:468.[Free Full Text]
  15. Kochi, S. K., R. C. Johnson. 1988. Role of immunoglobulin G in killing of Borrelia burgdorferi by the classical complement pathway. Infect. Immun. 56:314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Breitner-Ruddock, S., R. Wurzner, J. Schulze, V. Brade. 1997. Heterogeneity in the complement-dependent bacteriolysis within the species of Borrelia burgdorferi. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 185:253.[Medline]
  17. Brade, V., I. Kleber, G. Acker. 1992. Differences of two Borrelia burgdorferi strains in complement activation and serum resistance. Immunobiology 185:453.[Medline]
  18. Patarakul, K., M. F. Cole, C. A. Hughes. 1999. Complement resistance in Borrelia burgdorferi strain 297: outer membrane proteins prevent MAC formation at lysis susceptible sites. Microb. Pathog. 27:25.[Medline]
  19. van Dam, A. P., H. Kuiper, K. Vos, A. Widjojokusumo, B. M. de Jongh, L. Spanjaard, A. C. Ramselaar, M. D. Kramer, J. Dankert. 1993. Different genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi are associated with distinct clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 17:708.[Medline]
  20. Alitalo, A., T. Meri, L. Ramo, T. S. Jokiranta, T. Heikkila, I. J. Seppala, J. Oksi, M. Viljanen, S. Meri. 2001. Complement evasion by Borrelia burgdorferi: serum-resistant strains promote C3b inactivation. Infect. Immun. 69:3685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kraiczy, P., C. Skerka, M. Kirschfink, V. Brade, P. F. Zipfel. 2001. Immune evasion of Borrelia burgdorferi by acquisition of human complement regulators FHL-1/reconectin and Factor H. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1674.[Medline]
  22. Kraiczy, P., C. Skerka, M. Kirschfink, P. F. Zipfel, V. Brade. 2001. Mechanism of complement resistance of pathogenic Borrelia burgdorferi isolates. Int. Immunopharmacol. 1:393.[Medline]
  23. Hellwage, J., T. Meri, T. Heikkila, A. Alitalo, J. Panelius, P. Lahdenne, I. J. Seppala, S. Meri. 2000. The complement regulator factor H binds to the surface protein OspE of Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Biol. Chem. 11:11.
  24. Kochi, S. K., R. C. Johnson, A. P. Dalmasso. 1991. Complement-mediated killing of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi: role of antibody in formation of an effective membrane attack complex. J. Immunol. 146:3964.[Abstract]
  25. Sugita, Y., Y. Nakano, M. Tomita. 1988. Isolation from human erythrocytes of a new membrane protein which inhibits the formation of complement transmembrane channels. J. Biochem. 104:633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Davies, A., P. J. Lachmann. 1993. Membrane defence against complement lysis: the structure and biological properties of CD59. Immunol. Res. 12:258.[Medline]
  27. Holguin, M. H., L. R. Fredrick, N. J. Bernshaw, L. A. Wilcox, C. J. Parker. 1989. Isolation and characterization of a membrane protein from normal human erythrocytes that inhibits reactive lysis of the erythrocytes of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. J. Clin. Invest. 84:7.
  28. Okada, N., R. Harada, T. Fujita, H. Okada. 1989. A novel membrane glycoprotein capable of inhibiting membrane attack by homologous complement. Int. Immunol. 1:205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mollnes, T. E., T. Lea, M. Harboe, J. Tschopp. 1985. Monoclonal antibodies recognizing a neoantigen of poly(C9) detect the human terminal complement complex in tissue and plasma. Scand. J. Immunol. 22:183.[Medline]
  30. Davies, A., D. L. Simmons, G. Hale, R. A. Harrison, H. Tighe, P. J. Lachmann, H. Waldmann. 1989. CD59, an LY-6-like protein expressed in human lymphoid cells, regulates the action of the complement membrane attack complex on homologous cells. J. Exp. Med. 170:637.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Bodian, D. L., S. J. Davis, B. P. Morgan, N. K. Rushmere. 1997. Mutational analysis of the active site and antibody epitopes of the complement-inhibitory glycoprotein, CD59. J. Exp. Med. 185:507.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Hogasen, K., T. E. Mollnes, M. Harboe. 1992. Heparin-binding properties of vitronectin are linked to complex formation as illustrated by in vitro polymerization and binding to the terminal complement complex. J. Biol. Chem. 267:23076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Meri, S., B. P. Morgan, A. Davies, R. H. Daniels, M. G. Olavesen, H. Waldmann, P. J. Lachmann. 1990. Human protectin (CD59), an 18,000–20,000 MW complement lysis restricting factor, inhibits C5b-8 catalysed insertion of C9 into lipid bilayers. Immunology 71:1.[Medline]
  34. Tedesco, F., L. Roncelli, B. H. Petersen, V. Agnello, J. M. Sodetz. 1990. Two distinct abnormalities in patients with C8{alpha}-{gamma} deficiency: low level of C8{beta} chain and presence of dysfunctional C8{alpha}-{gamma} subunit. J. Clin. Invest. 86:884.
  35. Cinco, M., R. Murgia, M. Ruscio, B. Andriolo. 1996. IgM and IgG significant reactivity to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, Borrelia garinii and Borrelia afzelii among Italian patients affected by Lyme arthritis or neuroborreliosis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 14:159.[Medline]
  36. Garcia, R., L. Gusmani, R. Murgia, C. Guarnaccia, M. Cinco, G. Rottini. 1998. Elastase is the only human neutrophil granule protein that alone is responsible for in vitro killing of Borrelia burgdorferi. Infect. Immun. 66:1408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Helenius, A., E. Fries, H. Garoff, K. Simons. 1976. Solubilization of the Semliki Forest virus membrane with sodium deoxycholate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 436:319.[Medline]
  38. Tedesco, F., M. Pausa, E. Nardon, M. Introna, A. Mantovani, A. Dobrina. 1997. The cytolytically inactive terminal complement complex activates endothelial cells to express adhesion molecules and tissue factor procoagulant activity. J. Exp. Med. 185:1619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Lachmann, P. J., R. A. Thompson. 1970. Reactive lysis: the complement-mediated lysis of unsensitized cells. II. The characterization of activated reactor as C56 and the participation of C8 and C9. J. Exp. Med. 131:643.[Abstract]
  40. Morgan, B. P., C. L. Harris. 1999. Fluid-phase regulators of the terminal pathway. Complement Regulatory Proteins 138. Academic, San Diego.
  41. Rollins, S. A., J. Zhao, H. Ninomiya, P. J. Sims. 1991. Inhibition of homologous complement by CD59. is mediated by a species-selective recognition conferred through binding to C8 within C5b-8 or C9 within C5b-9. J. Immunol. 146:2345.[Abstract]
  42. Ninomiya, H., P. J. Sims. 1992. The human complement regulatory protein CD59 binds to the {alpha}-chain of C8 and to the "b"domain of C9. J. Biol. Chem. 267:13675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. van Dam, A. P., A. Oei, R. Jaspars, C. Fijen, B. Wilske, L. Spanjaard, J. Dankert. 1997. Complement-mediated serum sensitivity among spirochetes that cause Lyme disease. Infect. Immun. 65:1228.[Abstract]
  44. Kochi, S. K., R. C. Johnson, A. P. Dalmasso. 1993. Facilitation of complement-dependent killing of the Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, by specific immunoglobulin G Fab antibody fragments. Infect. Immun. 61:2532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Fernie-King, B. A., D. J. Seilly, C. Willers, R. Wurzner, A. Davies, P. J. Lachmann. 2001. Streptococcal inhibitor of complement (SIC) inhibits the membrane attack complex by preventing uptake of C567 onto cell membranes. Immunology 103:390.[Medline]
  46. Rautemaa, R., H. Rautelin, P. Puolakkainen, A. Kokkola, P. Karkkainen, S. Meri. 2001. Survival of Helicobacter pylori from complement lysis by binding of GPI-anchored protectin (CD59). Gastroenterology 120:470.[Medline]
  47. Albrecht, J. C., J. Nicholas, K. R. Cameron, C. Newman, B. Fleckenstein, R. W. Honess. 1992. Herpesvirus saimiri has a gene specifying a homologue of the cellular membrane glycoprotein CD59. Virology 190:527.[Medline]
  48. Braga, L. L., H. Ninomiya, J. J. McCoy, S. Eacker, T. Wiedmer, C. Pham, S. Wood, P. J. Sims, W. A. Petri, Jr. 1992. Inhibition of the complement membrane attack complex by the galactose-specific adhesion of Entamoeba histolytica. J. Clin. Invest. 90:1131.
  49. Parizade, M., R. Arnon, P. J. Lachmann, Z. Fishelson. 1994. Functional and antigenic similarities between a 94-kD protein of Schistosoma mansoni (SCIP-1) and human CD59. J. Exp. Med. 179:1625.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Sadziene, A., D. D. Thomas, A. G. Barbour. 1995. Borrelia burgdorferi mutant lacking Osp: biological and immunological characterization. Infect. Immun. 63:1573.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
F. Bossi, L. Rizzi, R. Bulla, A. Debeus, C. Tripodo, P. Picotti, E. Betto, P. Macor, C. Pucillo, R. Wurzner, et al.
C7 is expressed on endothelial cells as a trap for the assembling terminal complement complex and may exert anti-inflammatory function
Blood, April 9, 2009; 113(15): 3640 - 3648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. Hasegawa, L. F. Sogo, M. Tan, and C. Sutterlin
Host Complement Regulatory Protein CD59 Is Transported to the Chlamydial Inclusion by a Golgi Apparatus-Independent Pathway
Infect. Immun., April 1, 2009; 77(4): 1285 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. J. Schuijt, J. W. R. Hovius, N. D. van Burgel, N. Ramamoorthi, E. Fikrig, and A. P. van Dam
The Tick Salivary Protein Salp15 Inhibits the Killing of Serum-Sensitive Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Isolates
Infect. Immun., July 1, 2008; 76(7): 2888 - 2894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. E. Woodman, A. E. Cooley, J. C. Miller, J. J. Lazarus, K. Tucker, T. Bykowski, M. Botto, J. Hellwage, R. M. Wooten, and B. Stevenson
Borrelia burgdorferi Binding of Host Complement Regulator Factor H Is Not Required for Efficient Mammalian Infection
Infect. Immun., June 1, 2007; 75(6): 3131 - 3139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. S. Attia, S. Ram, P. A. Rice, and E. J. Hansen
Binding of Vitronectin by the Moraxella catarrhalis UspA2 Protein Interferes with Late Stages of the Complement Cascade
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2006; 74(3): 1597 - 1611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
A. E. Fritzinger, D. M. Toney, R. C. MacLean, and F. Marciano-Cabral
Identification of a Naegleria fowleri Membrane Protein Reactive with Anti-Human CD59 Antibody
Infect. Immun., February 1, 2006; 74(2): 1189 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
F. Fischetti, P. Durigutto, V. Pellis, A. Debeus, P. Macor, R. Bulla, F. Bossi, F. Ziller, D. Sblattero, P. Meroni, et al.
Thrombus formation induced by antibodies to {beta}2-glycoprotein I is complement dependent and requires a priming factor
Blood, October 1, 2005; 106(7): 2340 - 2346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. V. McDowell, J. Wolfgang, L. Senty, C. M. Sundy, M. J. Noto, and R. T. Marconi
Demonstration of the Involvement of Outer Surface Protein E Coiled Coil Structural Domains and Higher Order Structural Elements in the Binding of Infection-Induced Antibody and the Complement-Regulatory Protein, Factor H
J. Immunol., December 15, 2004; 173(12): 7471 - 7480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pausa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tedesco, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pausa, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tedesco, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS