|
|
||||||||


* Respiratory Pharmacology Group, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, and
Vascular Inflammation Partnership, Unit of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and
William Harvey Research Institute, St. Barts Hospital Medical College, London, United Kingdom
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and -
subtypes. Activation of PPAR
by natural and synthetic ligands inhibits serum-induced cell growth more effectively than does the steroid dexamethasone, and induces apoptosis. Moreover, PPAR
activation, like dexamethasone, inhibits the release of GM-CSF. However, PPAR
ligands, but not dexamethasone, similarly inhibits G-CSF release. These results reveal a novel anti-inflammatory pathway in human airway smooth muscle, where PPAR
activation has additional anti-inflammatory effects to those of steroids. Hence, PPAR ligands might act as potential treatments in human respiratory diseases. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are a family of ligand-activated nuclear hormone receptors belonging to the steroid receptor superfamily (10, 11). To date, three different PPAR subtypes have been identified: PPAR
, -
, and -
(also referred to as NUC-1, PPAR
, or FAAR). PPARs were first identified for their role in lipid and glucose regulation (energy balance), and until recently, their actions were thought to be limited to specific tissue types. PPAR
is highly expressed in tissues exhibiting high carbolic rates of fatty acids such as the liver, heart, kidney, and intestinal mucosa (12). PPAR
is expressed at high levels in adipose tissue, where it plays a critical role in adipocyte differentiation (13). PPAR
is almost ubiquitously expressed (12, 14, 15); however, its role is relatively unknown.
Recently, however, PPAR
and PPAR
have been suggested to be important immunomodulators (16). PPAR
activation inhibits inflammatory mediator release from vascular smooth muscle cells (17) and is consistent with the finding that PPAR
knockout mice exhibit exacerbated inflammatory responses (18). PPAR
ligands have been shown to inhibit the release of proinflammatory cytokines from activated macrophages (19) and airway epithelial cells (20). Furthermore, PPAR
ligands have been shown to inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation (21) and induce apoptosis in endothelial cells (22), vascular smooth muscle cells (23), T lymphocytes (24, 25), and macrophages (26). However, the potential anti-inflammatory properties of PPAR ligands on airway smooth muscle have not been investigated. Furthermore, a comparison between the anti-inflammatory efficacy of PPAR ligands and that of glucocorticoids, currently one of the major treatment options for both asthma and COPD, has never been made.
Therefore, in this study, we have investigated whether HASM cells express PPARs and whether activation of these receptors can inhibit 1) the release of survival factors under proinflammatory conditions and 2) serum-induced growth. Moreover, we have investigated whether PPAR activation can induce apoptosis in HASM cells.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As described previously (4, 27), tracheal rings, from either lung/heart or lung transplantation donors (two female and three male; aged 1745 years), were dissected under sterile conditions in HBSS (in mM: NaCl, 136.8; KCl, 5.4; MgSO4, 0.8; Na2HPO4·7H2O, 0.4; CaCl2·2H2O, 1.3; NaHCO3, 4.2; and glucose, 5.6) supplemented with the antibiotics penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and the antifungal amphotericin B (2.5 µg/ml). The smooth muscle layer was dissected free of adherent connective tissue and cartilage, and the epithelial layer was removed using a rounded scalpel blade. The smooth muscle section was then incubated for 30 min at 37°C in 5% CO2/air in HBSS containing 10 mg/ml BSA and the enzymes collagenase (type XI; 1 mg/ml) and elastase (type I; 3.3 U/ml). After the removal of any remaining connective tissue, the smooth muscle was chopped finely and incubated for a further 150 min in the enzyme solution outlined above with the elastase content increased to 15 U/ml. Cells were centrifuged (100 x g, 5 min) at 4°C and resuspended in DMEM containing heat-inactivated FCS (10% v/v), sodium pyruvate (1 mM), L-glutamate (2 mM), nonessential amino acids (1x), and antimicrobial agents as previously described.
Primary culture of HASM cells
The HASM cellular suspension was placed in a tissue culture flask (75 cm2) with 6 ml of supplemented DMEM and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2/air. The cells adhere after
12 h, and the culture medium was replaced after 45 days (12 ml) and subsequently every 34 days. After
1014 days, the cells reach confluence and are identified by their typical hill-and-valley appearance and positive immunostaining for
-actin. Cells were plated onto either 96-well plates (Costar, High Wycombe, U.K.) at an initial seeding density of 2,000 cells/well, 8-well chamber slides (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD; for receptor localization experiments and experiments using Hoechst stain) at an initial seeding density of 4,000 cells/well, or 6-well plates at an initial seeding density of 20,000 cells/well for the experiments described below. At subconfluence, the cells were growth arrested by being placed in DMEM containing apotransferin (5 µg/ml), insulin (1 µM), ascorbate (100 µM), and BSA (0.1%) for 24 h. The medium was then replaced with DMEM containing 3% FCS and the treatment drugs or appropriate controls as described below.
RT-PCR for PPAR isoforms
Total RNA was prepared from cells grown under basal conditions (3% FCS) on 6-well plates using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturers protocol. Reverse-transcribed DNA, was prepared using MLV-RT (Promega, Southampton, U.K.), and PCR was performed using Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), according to the manufacturers recommended protocols. PCR parameters were the following: initial denaturing for 3 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturing for 20 s at 94° C, annealing for 20 s at 55°C, followed by elongation for 30 s at 72°C, followed by termination for 7 min at 72°C. PCR primers (28) were the following: for human (h)PPAR
, sense, AAG TTC TTC AAG TAG GCC TCG, and antisense, CCA GTA TTT AGG AAG CTG TCC; and for hPPAR
, sense, TCT CTC CGT AAT GGA AGA CC, and antisense, GCA TTA TGA GAC ATC CCC AC. PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and visualized with ethidium bromide. For positive controls, the pBSCompPPAR plasmid was used (10 amol; a generous gift from Prof. H. Vidal (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité 449, Lyon, France)). pBSCompPPAR contains homologous modified sequences of cDNA encoding hPPAR
and -
. The control contains an internal deletion, hence producing a smaller product than the native PPAR
and -
(28). Primers produce a 492-bp product for hPPAR
mRNA (positive control, 422 bp) and a 474-bp product for hPPAR
mRNA (positive control, 400 bp).
Localization of PPAR isoforms in HASM cells by confocal microscopy
Cells were fixed in methanol:acetone (1:1, -20°C) after 24-h treatment with the PPAR
- and PPAR
-specific synthetic ligands (1, 10, and 100 µM) in the absence/presence of 3% FCS and/or in the absence/presence of IL-1
(10 ng/ml). Cells were then washed with PBS and blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min. Cells were then incubated with primary Ab directed against human PPAR
, PPAR
, or PPAR
subtypes (1:250 dilution; 0.1% BSA in PBS) at 4°C overnight, followed by two washes with PBS. Secondary FITC-conjugated Ab (1:500 dilution; 0.1% BSA in PBS) was then added for 30 min, after which the cells were further washed three times with PBS and viewed by fluorescence microscopy (MRC600 confocal microscope; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). In some experiments, primary Ab was excluded, or primary Ab was preincubated for 1 h with a 50-fold excess of blocking peptide before the combination was added to the cells.
PPAR
expression by Western blot analysis
HASM cells cultured on 6-well plates were treated with 3% FCS for 24 h. The medium was then removed, and the cells were washed with PBS. Proteins were extracted with Tris buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4) containing EDTA (10 mM), Triton X-100 (1% v/v), and PMSF (1 mM). Extracts were boiled at a 1:1 ratio with Tris (50 mM, pH 6.8; 4% w/v SDS; 10% w/v glycerol; 4% v/v 2-ME; and 2 mg/ml bromophenol blue). Western blot for PPAR
was performed as previously described (29) using rabbit polyclonal anti-PPAR
(1:1000; Biomol, Mamhead, Exeter, U.K.).
Measurement of GM-CSF and G-CSF release
Cells were treated with the synthetic PPAR
ligand WY-14643 (0.01100 µM), the synthetic PPAR
ligand ciglitazone (0.01100 µM), or the prostanoid dehydration product PPAR
activator 15-deoxy-
12,14-PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2; 1100 µM) for 24 h in the presence of IL-1
(0.1 ng/ml) and indomethacin (10 µM) to block endogenous cyclooxygenase activity, which has opposing effects on GM-CSF and G-CSF release (7, 30). In parallel experiments and under the same conditions, cells were also treated with the glucocorticosteriod dexamethasone (0.1 nM to 1 µM). Supernatants were either assayed directly or stored at -80°C until required. Samples were assayed for CSFs by ELISA constructed in-house from commercially available constituents according to the manufacturers recommendations. The limits for detection for GM-CSF and G-CSF were 162000 and 7.81000 pg/ml, respectively.
Measurement of DNA synthesis
Cells were treated with WY-14643 (0.01100 µM), ciglitazone (0.01100 µM), 15d-PGJ2 (0.001100 µM), or dexamethasone (0.1 nM to 10 µM) diluted in DMEM containing 3% FCS. In preliminary studies, we found that 3% FCS produced a submaximal (50% max) proliferative response; hence, this concentration of serum was used to stimulate proliferation for all experiments. We have previously established that serum stimulation results in a typical S-phase of proliferation in these cells, which is linear between 24 and 32 h (31). Thus, at 24 h after serum/drug treatment, [3H-methyl]thymidine (1 µCi/well; specific activity, 25 Ci/mmol) was added to the cells and incubated for 6 h and then frozen. When required, freeze-thawed cells were harvested onto glass filter fibers and washed three times to remove any excess unbound [3H]thymidine. Cells were assayed for proliferation as measured by thymidine incorporation by scintillation spectroscopy (TopCount; Packard Instrument, Meriden, CT). We have previously shown that changes in thymidine uptake are representative of changes in differentiation of HASM cells (5, 31).
Morphological detection of HASM apoptosis
DNA chromatin morphology was assessed using Hoechst staining (32). For these experiments, cells were grown onto 8-well chamber slides. After incubation with treatment drugs (100 µM) or vehicle for 24 h, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed in freezing cold methanol (-20°C) for 5 min. Hoechst dye no. 33258 (100 ng/ml) was added for 5 min, and then the cells were washed a further three times with PBS. Cells were examined for the morphological features of apoptosis such as condensation of DNA and rounding and shrinkage of the cells by fluorescence microscopy as previously described (32).
Detection of apoptosis by determination of DNA fragmentation
HASM cells cultured on 96-well plates were treated for 24, 48, and 72 h with the synthetic PPAR
ligand ciglitazone (1100 µM). Apoptosis was assessed using an ELISA method based on the specific determination of histone-associated DNA fragments in the cytoplasmic fraction of cell lysates, according to the manufacturers instructions (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
Materials
[3H-methyl]Thymidine was obtained from Amersham (Bucks, U.K.). Amphotericin B, nonessential amino acids, and sodium pyruvate were purchased from Life Technologies. Ciglitazone, WY-14643, and 15d-PGJ2 were purchased from Biomol. IL-1
and human G-CSF matched Ab pairs were bought from R&D Systems (Abington, Oxfordshire, U.K.). Matched Ab pairs for human GM-CSF ELISA was purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Abs directed against human PPAR
, PPAR
, and PPAR
, were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). All other materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poole, U.K.). All reagents used were either of tissue culture grade or filtered under sterile conditions.
Statistical analysis
Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of n determinations from HASM cells obtained from at least two to five patients. Data was normalized as a percentage of the stimulus control response and analyzed by one-sample t test. All treatments were compared with control values, and p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. EC50 values were calculated by iterative curve fitting using Graphpad Inplot (Graphpad, San Diego, CA.)
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HASM cells used in this study were found to express mRNA for both PPAR
and PPAR
under control conditions. Primers produced a 492-bp product for hPPAR
mRNA and a 474-bp product for hPPAR
mRNA. The positive control contains an internal deletion and therefore produced a smaller product of 422 bp for hPPAR
and 400 bp for hPPAR
than the native PPAR
and -
. (Fig. 1). No bands were observed in experiments where MLV-rRT, which was used to prepare reverse-transcribed DNA, was absent.
|
Using specific antisera for the PPAR subtypes, immunofluorescence was detected for PPAR
and -
in the perinuclear region and within the nucleus of HASM cells (Fig. 2, A and B, respectively). There was no difference in the localization of these receptors in either the presence/absence of 3% FCS or in the presence/absence of IL-1
(data not shown). No immunofluorescence was detected under any conditions for the PPAR
subtype. There was no immunofluorescence where the primary Ab was preincubated with an excess of blocking peptide for PPAR
(data not shown) or PPAR
(Fig. 2C) or where the primary Ab was absent (Fig. 2D) showing specificity of the Abs used for PPARs.
|
expression by Western blot analysis
A single band of
55 kDa corresponding to PPAR
, was detected in protein extracts from HASM cells cultured under basal conditions using an Ab specific for PPAR
(Fig. 3). The band was consistently detected in cells cultured from three different donors.
|
-induced release of GM-CSF and G-CSF from HASM cells
Under control cell culture conditions, HASM cells released low or undetectable levels of GM-CSF (less than the lower limit of detection of 16 pg/ml) and G-CSF (less than the lower limit of detection of 7.8 pg/ml). However, after stimulation with IL-1
(0.1 ng/ml), the levels of both GM-CSF (531.8 ± 79.9 pg/ml) and G-CSF (1435 ± 281.7 pg/ml) were greatly increased. The synthetic PPAR
ligand WY-14643 (0.01100 µM) had no significant effect on IL-1
-induced release of GM-CSF or GC-SF (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the synthetic PPAR
ligand ciglitazone (0.01100 µM) completely inhibited the release of both CSFs at the highest concentration tested (100 µM; Fig. 4A). In these experiments, ciglitazone appeared to have an all-or-nothing effect, and therefore, it was not possible to accurately model for a representative IC50 value for ciglitazone on CSF release. In contrast, 15d-PGJ2 inhibited both GM-CSF and G-CSF release in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4B). 15d-PGJ2 produced maximum inhibition of GM-CSF and G-CSF release at 30 µM with EC50 values of 5.1 and 5.4 µM, respectively. Under the same conditions, dexamethasone (0.1 nM to 1 µM) inhibited GM-CSF release in a concentration-dependent manner, with complete inhibition at 0.01 µM (Fig. 4C). In contrast, dexamethasone produced only minor reductions in G-CSF release with a maximum effect of only 35.1 ± 11.2% inhibition (Fig. 4C).
|
[3H]Thymidine incorporation was increased when cells were stimulated with culture medium containing 3% FCS (13,200 ± 1,898 cpm/well) compared with cells treated with culture medium without FCS (1,291 ± 160.9 cpm/well). 15d-PGJ2, at concentrations of 0.011 µM, modestly increased DNA synthesis; however, at concentrations >1 µM, 15d-PGJ2 induced a profound reduction in serum-induced proliferation (Fig. 5A). Similarly, ciglitazone blocked serum-induced DNA synthesis (Fig. 5A). The PPAR
ligand WY-14643 had no effect on proliferation at concentrations from 0.01 to 1 µM. However, at 10 µM, WY-14643 had a proproliferative effect (42.3 ± 16.4% increase over control). This proproliferative effect was abolished at a higher concentration of WY-14643 (at 100 µM, 2.6 ± 11.5% inhibition), and in contrast to results with either of the PPAR
ligands (at concentrations of up to 100 µM), WY-14643 had no inhibitory effect on serum-induced proliferation. Moreover, in contrast to the PPAR
ligands, dexamethasone (0.1 nM to 10 µM) poorly inhibited serum-induced growth with a maximum effect of only 54.1 ± 3.2% inhibition (Fig. 5B).
|
The apoptotic effects of the PPAR
ligands ciglitazone and 15d-PGJ2 (both at 100 µM) on HASM cells were clearly visible as evidenced by cell shrinkage and nuclear condensation (Fig. 6, B and C, respectively). The morphology of these cells was clearly different to that of control cells, which displayed characteristic hill-and-valley morphology under light microscopy and no nuclear condensation (Fig. 6A). There was no evidence of apoptosis in cells treated with WY-14643 (100 µM; Fig. 6D).
|
Ciglitazone (1100 µM) induces DNA fragmentation in HASM cells in a concentration-dependent manner after 72 h of treatment (Fig. 7). There was no effect of ciglitazone at either 24 or 48 h of treatment (data not shown). The highest concentration of ciglitazone after 72 h of treatment induced a 62.0 ± 6.7% increase over basal control (OD reading of 0.11 ± 0.004).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and -
, but not PPAR
, are expressed on HASM cells and that activation of the PPAR
subtype has profound anti-inflammatory effects. Moreover, activation of PPAR
can inhibit a steroid-insensitive proinflammatory response in these cells at the level of both survival factor release and proliferation. Our data adds to the growing body of evidence that these ligands may provide an alternative to the currently used steroids for inflammation control and specifically identifies COPD and asthma as new therapeutic areas.
Steroids are ineffective in the long-term management of COPD and only provide limited relief in acute exacerbations (33), and although the current first-line therapy for the management of COPD are bronchodilators, such as anticholinergics,
2-adrenoceptor agonists, and methylxanthines, they provide only limited symptomatic relief to patients. Although steroids are highly effective in controlling asthma (34), there is some concern with long-term and high-dose use, because they cause unwanted side effects, such as cortisol suppression, bone density and growth effects, oral candidiasis, and skin bruising. Furthermore, a small proportion of patients are resistant to the anti-inflammatory effects of steroids. Hence, there is an urgent need to identify novel anti-inflammatory therapies for the treatment of these diseases.
Asthma is an allergic eosinophilic-driven disease and is associated with elevated levels of eosinophil survival factors including GM-CSF in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (35), serum (36), and lung tissue of asthmatic patients (37, 38). Furthermore, using a mouse model of allergic inflammation, it has been shown that GM-CSF significantly contributes to the development of allergic airway inflammation through potentiating and prolonging inflammatory infiltration induced by cytokines (39). In contrast, COPD is predominantly associated with neutrophilia. Thus, survival factors for neutrophils are likely to be more important than those for eosinophils in the progression of COPD. Interestingly, GM-CSF is also a potent survival factor for neutrophils (40). In addition, neutrophil survival can be increased by the related survival factor G-CSF, which is often attributed to neutrophil-related inflammatory lung diseases (41). Hence, a similar scenario may exist in COPD where these factors may promote the survival and activation of neutrophils and thus prolong the inflammatory response.
We have previously described that HASM cells release both GM-CSF (6) and G-CSF (7) upon stimulation with the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1
. In this study, we present evidence that activation of the PPAR
subtype, by the selective synthetic ligand ciglitazone, inhibits both GM-CSF and G-CSF release, albeit at the highest concentration (100 µM). In these experiments, ciglitazone appeared to have an all-or-nothing effect, and therefore, it was not possible to accurately model for a representative IC50 value for ciglitazone on CSF release. 15d-PGJ2 also inhibited cytokine-induced GM-CSF and G-CSF release; however, in this case, 15d-PGJ2 did so in a concentration-dependent manner and with equal potency for both survival factors. The effective concentrations used are similar to that required for functional responses in other cells types such as human lung cancer cells (42), epithelial cells (20), endothelial cells (22), and vascular smooth muscle cells (23). The inhibitory effect of 15d-PGJ2 and ciglitazone on survival factor release is seen at concentrations that also inhibit serum-induced growth. However, the possibility that the reduced amounts of GM-CSF and G-CSF are due to reduced cell number can be excluded, because changes in DNA synthesis are not translated to changes in cell number until at least 4 days (5). Furthermore, the morphological changes that are characteristic of apoptosis were seen only at the highest concentration of 100 µM for both ciglitazone and 15d-PGJ2.
PPARs are activated by natural ligands such as the fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid and linoleic acid and a number of eicosanoids including the prostanoids PGA1, PGA2, PGI2, and PGD2 (43). 15d-PGJ2 has been reported to be the most potent prostanoid ligand for PPAR
yet (14) and binds directly to PPAR
(44). In this study, 15d-PGJ2 and ciglitazone, which are two structurally different compounds (a prostanoid dehydration product and a thiazolidinedione, respectively), inhibited serum-induced proliferation at concentrations >1 µM, with 15d-PGJ2 being
10-fold more potent than ciglitazone. This observation is consistent with other studies, which show that 15d-PGJ2 is more potent than synthetic ligands (23, 45, 46). Interestingly, 15d-PGJ2 has proproliferative effects on HASM cells at lower concentrations (0.0010.1 µM), which is overridden at higher concentrations by a profound antiproliferative action; thus generating a bell-shaped response. This may be due to the actions of 15d-PGJ2 on other receptor populations. In fact, our own data using WY-14643 suggest that activation of PPAR
may have a small, but significant, proproliferative effect in our cells.
In these studies, we observed an almost complete inhibition of proliferation using 10 µM 15d-PGJ2 and 100 µM ciglitazone. These concentrations are high compared with those required by other PGs to activate typical cell surface receptors. However, the active concentrations used in our study are consistent with those used in similar systems by others (22, 23, 25, 42, 45). Until potent and selective antagonists of PPARs are characterized, we are limited to the tools that we have used.
We have previously established that IL-1
-induced release of GM-CSF and more recently G-CSF are differentially regulated by the prostanoids PGE2 and PGI2 (7, 30) in HASM cells and vascular smooth muscle cells, respectively. Thus, PGE2, which is the major prostanoid released from HASM cells (4), inhibits cytokine-induced GM-CSF release but potentiates cytokine-induced G-CSF release (7). In the absence of any commercially available PPAR antagonists or IP/EP prostanoid receptor antagonists, we have used this phenomenon to rule out the possibility that 15d-PGJ2, which is a prostanoid dehydration product of PGD2, is mediating its inhibitory effects on G-CSF via a traditional cell surface prostanoid receptor. In the present study, we have shown that 15d-PGJ2 inhibits both GM-CSF and G-CSF release, thus implying that the inhibitory effects of 15d-PGJ2 on G-CSF release are not mediated through activation of a traditional cell surface prostanoid receptor.
Interestingly, the glucocorticosteroid dexamethasone inhibited IL-1
-induced release of both GM-CSF and G-CSF, but to varying degrees. Dexamethasone inhibited GM-CSF release with an EC50 of
1 nM and maximum inhibition at 1 µM. In contrast, dexamethasone had little effect on IL-1
-induced G-CSF release where levels were reduced by only 35.1% at 1 µM.
Both ciglitazone and 15d-PGJ2 maximally inhibited serum-induced DNA synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner. In marked contrast to this, dexamethasone only partially inhibited serum-induced growth. Cells that had been treated with the PPAR
ligands for 24 h showed nuclear condensation and shrinkage and rounding of the cells when examined by light microscopy (our unpublished observations). However, this was evident only at the highest concentration of ligand used. These morphological features were confirmed when the cells were stained with Hoechst DNA stain. Furthermore, DNA fragmentation, a commonly used marker for the apoptotic process, was increased in cells after treatment with ciglitazone for 72 h in a concentration-dependent manner. Nuclear condensation occurs before DNA fragmentation, and the fact that no DNA fragmentation was detected at 24 or 48 h may reflect the time course of the progression of apoptosis induced by this ligand in this cell type. PPAR
ligands have been reported to induce apoptosis in many cell types (22, 26, 42); however, this is the first description of an agent, other than Fas ligand (47), to induce apoptosis in HASM cells.
Although PPAR
is expressed in cultured HASM cells, the synthetic PPAR
ligand WY-14643 had no inhibitory effect on survival factor release, DNA synthesis, or apoptosis, suggesting that PPAR
does not have a role in modulating these responses in HASM cells. However, PPAR
activation has been shown to inhibit IL-6 and 6-keto-PGF1
secretion from primary aortic smooth muscle cells. In addition, PPAR
ligands have been reported to inhibit cytokine-induced genes such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and tissue factor in human endothelial cells and monocytes, respectively (48, 49). It has been suggested that PPAR
may have an important immunomodulatory role because PPAR
knockout mice exhibit an exacerbated inflammatory response (18).
It should be noted that the field of PPAR biology is currently hampered by the lack of effective and highly selective agonists and antagonists. Moreover, some groups have suggested that, where high concentrations of drugs are required to see effects in biological systems, actions on pathways other than the PPARs may also contribute to the effects seen.
The synthetic PPAR
ligands are already clinically used for their potent antidiabetic effects, and the anti-inflammatory effects of these agents have been demonstrated in animal models of bowel inflammation (50, 51) and arthritis (46). The present study demonstrates that PPAR
ligands have profound anti-inflammatory effects and may be a novel anti-inflammatory strategy that could dampen the inflammatory response by 1) limiting the recruitment and activation of infiltrating leukocytes, 2) inhibiting HASM cell growth, and 3) inducing apoptosis. Moreover, we show that PPAR
ligands are more potent than steroids in inhibiting smooth muscle cell growth and G-CSF release. Although this observation cannot explain the lack of effectiveness of steroids in COPD patients, PPAR
ligands may prove to be particularly effective in the treatment of COPD and steroid-insensitive asthma.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hema J. Patel, Respiratory Pharmacology Group, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, U.K. E-mail address: h.j.patel{at}ic.ac.uk ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HASM, human airway smooth muscle; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 15d-PGJ2, 15-deoxy-
12,14-PGJ2; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; h, human. ![]()
Received for publication September 12, 2002. Accepted for publication December 19, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TNF
: effects of IL-10 and corticosteroids. Br. J. Pharmacol. 127:1145.[Medline]
-oxidation pathway by a novel family of nuclear hormone receptors. Cell 68:879.[Medline]
, -
, and -
in the adult rat. Endocrinology 137:354.[Abstract]
2 versus PPAR
1 and activation with retinoid X receptor agonists and antagonists. J. Biol. Chem. 272:8071.
but not by PPAR
activators. Nature 393:790.[Medline]
negatively regulates the vascular inflammatory gene response by negative cross-talk with transcription factors NF-
B and AP-1. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32048.
agonists inhibit production of monocyte inflammatory cytokines. Nature 391:82.[Medline]
regulates airway epithelial cell activation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 24:688.
12,14-prostaglandin J2. J. Biol. Chem. 274:17042.
ligands induce vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 133:29P.
and immunoregulation: PPAR
mediates inhibition of helper T cell responses. J. Immunol. 164:1346.
is expressed by mouse T lymphocytes and PPAR
agonists induce apoptosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 31:1098.[Medline]
and
induces apoptosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 273:25573.
in humans: no alteration in adipose tissue of obese and NIDDM patients. Diabetes 46:1319.[Abstract]
ligand therapy. Circ. Res. 91:210.
agonists through induction of apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 270:400.[Medline]
and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 83:813.[Medline]
12,14-PGJ2 induces synoviocyte apoptosis and suppresses adjuvant-induced arthritis in rats. J. Clin. Invest. 106:189.[Medline]
activators inhibit cytokine-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in human endothelial cells. Circulation 99:3125.
agonists inhibit tissue factor expression in human monocytes and macrophages. Circulation 103:207.
ligands to inhibit the epithelial inflammatory response. J. Clin. Invest. 104:383.[Medline]
(PPAR
) heterodimer: a basis for new therapeutic strategies. J. Exp. Med. 193:827.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Perez, A. M. van Heeckeren, D. Nichols, S. Gupta, J. F. Eastman, and P. B. Davis Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} in cystic fibrosis lung epithelium Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2008; 295(2): L303 - L313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J-Q. He, K. Shumansky, J. E. Connett, N. R. Anthonisen, P. D. Pare, and A. J. Sandford Association of genetic variations in the CSF2 and CSF3 genes with lung function in smoking-induced COPD Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 25 - 34. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jaudszus, M. Krokowski, P. Mockel, Y. Darcan, A. Avagyan, P. Matricardi, G. Jahreis, and E. Hamelmann Cis-9,trans-11-Conjugated Linoleic Acid Inhibits Allergic Sensitization and Airway Inflammation via a PPAR{gamma}-Related Mechanism in Mice J. Nutr., July 1, 2008; 138(7): 1336 - 1342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Delvecchio, P. Bilan, K. Radford, J. Stephen, B. L. Trigatti, G. Cox, K. Parameswaran, and J. P. Capone Liver X Receptor Stimulates Cholesterol Efflux and Inhibits Expression of Proinflammatory Mediators in Human Airway Smooth Muscle Cells Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2007; 21(6): 1324 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. An, T. R. Bai, J. H. T. Bates, J. L. Black, R. H. Brown, V. Brusasco, P. Chitano, L. Deng, M. Dowell, D. H. Eidelman, et al. Airway smooth muscle dynamics: a common pathway of airway obstruction in asthma Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2007; 29(5): 834 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. August, C. Mueller, V. Weaver, T. A. Polanco, E. R. Walsh, and M. T. Cantorna Nutrients, Nuclear Receptors, Inflammation, Immunity Lipids, PPAR, and Allergic Asthma J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 695 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Boxall, S. T. Holgate, and D. E. Davies The contribution of transforming growth factor-{beta} and epidermal growth factor signalling to airway remodelling in chronic asthma Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 208 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Birrell, E. Hardaker, S. Wong, K. McCluskie, M. Catley, J. De Alba, R. Newton, S. Haj-Yahia, K. T. Pun, C. J. Watts, et al. I{kappa}-B Kinase-2 Inhibitor Blocks Inflammation in Human Airway Smooth Muscle and a Rat Model of Asthma Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2005; 172(8): 962 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Barnes New approaches to COPD Eur. Respir. Rev., September 1, 2005; 14(94): 2 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Barnes and R. A. Stockley COPD: current therapeutic interventions and future approaches Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1084 - 1106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |