|
|
||||||||


* German Diabetes Research Institute, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; and
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-12, and IL-1
. However, HSP60 elicited only a weak IL-10 response in DC suggesting a Th1 bias. HSP60-treated DC induced proliferation of allogeneic T cells. Again, a Th1 bias was noted in that cocultures of allogeneic T cells and HSP60-treated DC released IFN-
but only small amounts of IL-10 and no detectable IL-4. Signaling via Toll-like receptor 4 was involved in HSP60-induced cytokine release and maturation because DC of C3H/HeJ mice with a mutant Toll-like receptor 4 showed deficient response to HSP60. HSP60 was found to rapidly activate the mitogen-activated protein kinases p38, c-Jun N-terminal kinase, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase as well as I
B in DC. Phosphorylation of these signaling molecules was also mediated by LPS, but with much slower kinetics. Thus, HSP60 stimulates DC more rapidly than LPS and elicits a Th1-promoting phenotype. These results suggest that DC play a pivotal role in priming for destructive Th1-type responses at sites of local HSP60 release. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or IL-6 (13, 14) and of the Th1-promoting cytokines IL-12 and IL-15 (13) suggesting that HSP60 might act as a "danger signal" for the innate immune system. The cell surface receptor for HSP60 has not yet been completely characterized. However, there is evidence that CD14 (15) and Toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 (16, 17) are involved in HSP60-mediated cell activation. However, binding to macrophages appears to be TLR4-independent (18). Recently, a first report on HSP60-induced signaling pathways in macrophages has been published indicating that the stress-activated protein kinases c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), as well as I
B kinase, are activated after endocytosis of HSP60 by murine macrophages (17). These kinases induce transcription factors like NF-
B that are responsible for cytokine (e.g., TNF-
) gene transcription. Interestingly, HSP60 is also an Ag for the adaptive immune system and T cell responses to HSP60 epitopes regulate inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and artherosclerosis (19, 20, 21, 22). Indeed, autologous HSP60 has been suggested to control the balance of T cell responses in inflammation and autoimmunity (23).
Activation of T cells is induced through their interaction with APC, like dendritic cells (DC). DC reside in an immature form in nonlymphoid tissues where they efficiently capture foreign Ags. Upon activation by pathogens or by inflammatory stimuli like TNF-
or IL-1
, DC migrate to lymphoid organs where they potently activate Ag-specific T cell responses (24, 25). During migration, DC undergo functional and phenotypic changes termed as "maturation." They up-regulate surface molecules like MHC class I and II molecules, CD86, CD40, and CD54, and, thus, become potent inducers of T cell activation. Maturation is further driven by CD40-CD40 ligand interaction upon contact of DC with T cells (26). In parallel, DC lose their capacity for endocytosis and de novo MHC class II synthesis during migration to the lymphoid tissues (27, 28). This feature enables DC to preserve the Ag taken-up in the periphery for Ag-specific T cell activation. In addition, mature DC are able to release high amounts of proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-
or IL-1
and of the Th1-promoting cytokines IL-12 and IL-18 but they also secrete counterregulatory IL-10 (26, 29, 30, 31). Therefore, DC are not only unique in induction of naive T cell activation but also play a decisive role in Th cell polarization.
In the present study, we investigated how mammalian HSP60 might exert its potent immunostimulatory capacity. Based on the extraordinary role of DC in induction of primary T cells, we analyzed the modulation of immature DC by human HSP60. Surface expression of costimulatory molecules, cytokine production, and the activation of naive T cells were examined. In addition, potential signaling pathways used by HSP60 in DC were identified.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Very low endotoxin RPMI 1640 (Seromed, Berlin, Germany) containing 10 mM HEPES (Seromed), 2 mM L-glutamine (Seromed), 20 µg/ml gentamicin, 60 µg/ml penicillin, 50 µM 2-ME, and 10% heat-inactivated FCS (all from Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany) was used as culture medium (CM). For stimulation of bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDC), Escherichia coli strain O26:B6 LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) and recombinant human HSP60 (kindly provided by Peptor, Rehovot, Israel) were used. The endotoxin content of HSP60 used in this study was 0.05 endotoxin units (equivalent to 5 pg of LPS) per microgram of protein as determined by Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay (BioWhittaker, Verviers, Belgium).
For pretreatment with polymyxin B (PmB), 11000 ng/ml LPS and/or 10 µg/ml HSP60 were incubated with 10 µg/ml PmB (Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at room temperature before addition to the cell cultures. For heat denaturation, LPS or HSP60 was incubated at 95°C for 20 min. For protein digestion, LPS or HSP60 was incubated in CM without FCS with 14 mg/ml proteinase K coupled to agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich) in glass tubes (BioWhittaker). After incubation at 37°C for 3.5 h, the agarose was pelleted by centrifugation at 100 x g for 1 min, the supernatant was diluted to a final concentration of 10 ng/ml LPS and 10 or 30 µg/ml HSP60, respectively, and used for stimulation of BMDC. As control, LPS and HSP60 were treated identically with protein G-agarose beads (Sigma-Aldrich).
Generation and culture of BMDC
BMDC were generated as described previously (32). Briefly, bone marrow cells were flushed from tibiae and femurs of 7- to 8-wk-old female BALB/c (Bomholtgard, Ry, Denmark), C3H/HeN, or C3H/HeJ (Harlan Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany) mice and seeded at 2 x 106 cells in bacteriological Petri dishes (100-mm diameter; Falcon, Heidelberg, Germany) in a volume of 10 ml of CM containing 20 ng/ml GM-CSF (Peprotec, Frankfurt, Germany). On day 3, 10 ml of CM containing 20 ng/ml GM-CSF was added to the dishes. On day 7, 10 ml of the cultures were removed, centrifuged, the pellet was resuspended in 10 ml fresh CM containing 20 ng/ml GM-CSF and was given back into the same dish. On day 9, nonadherent cells contained 8592% DCs or their progenitors (CD11c+), <0.5% macrophages (CD14+CD11c-), and <5% granulocytes (Ly6G+). Nonadherent cells were harvested and 1 x 106 BMDC were seeded in 1 ml of CM supplemented with 10 ng/ml GM-CSF per well (24-well plate) and stimulated or not with various doses of LPS or HSP60. After 18 h, nonadherent cells were harvested and used for FACS analyses. Supernatants were used for cytokine determination.
Determination of cytokines
Cytokine contents were determined using ELISA for TNF-
, IL-10, IFN-
(all OptEIA kits; BD PharMingen, Heidelberg, Germany), IL-1
and IL-12(p40) (both DuoSet; R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany), and IL-12(p70) (Quantikine; R&D Systems) following the manufacturers instructions. The detection limit was 16 pg/ml for TNF-
, IFN-
, IL-12(p40), IL-10, and IL-1
, and 8 pg/ml for IL-12(p70).
Allogeneic T cell activation
CD3+ T cells were purified from C57BL/6 spleen cells using T cell enrichment columns (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturers instructions. For proliferation assays, triplicates of 1.5 x 105 enriched T cells were seeded together with titrated numbers of mitomycin C-treated BMDC (50 µg/ml, 20 min, 37°C; Sigma-Aldrich) in a total volume of 150 µl of CM supplemented with 10 ng/ml GM-CSF per well (96-well flat-bottom plate). After 3 days, cells were pulsed with 1 µCi [3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) per well overnight. Incorporation of radioactivity was determined using a 96-well microplate beta-counter (Canberra-Packard, Dreieich, Germany). For cytokine analyses, duplicate cultures of 6 x 105 enriched T cells together with 1.2 x 105 mitomycin C-treated BMDC in a total volume of 600 µl were set up in a 24-well plate. After 3 days, supernatants were harvested and used for ELISA.
FACS analyses
After blocking unspecific binding sites with FcBlock (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA), 24 x 105, BMDC were stained in FACS Wash (BD Biosciences) for 30 min on ice with saturating amounts of the following Abs (all purchased from BD Biosciences): FITC-conjugated anti I-Ad (catalog no. 553623) or I-Ak (catalog no. 553540), PE-conjugated anti-CD86 (catalog no. 553692) or anti-CD54 (catalog no. 553253), and biotinylated anti-CD40 (catalog no. 553789). After washing twice with FACS Wash, the cells were incubated with streptavidin-conjugated CyChrome (catalog no. 554062; BD Biosciences) for 30 min on ice. As isotype control, appropriate subclass Abs were used. Cells were washed twice, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences) and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Quadrants in dot plots were set at the fluorescence intensity where the number of false-positive cells of isotype controls was <5% of all cells tested.
Western blot analyses of cellular kinases and I
B
For preparing cytoplasm extracts, cells were harvested, centrifuged at 300 x g, and the pellet was resuspended in ice-cold 0.5% Na3VO4 in PBS. After centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in 50100 µl of sucrose buffer (0.32 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 3 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgOAc, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM PMSF) and incubated, slowly rotating at 4°C overnight. After centrifugation for 15 min at 14,000 rpm in an Eppendorf centrifuge, the supernatant was harvested and the protein concentration was determined by DC-Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany).
Twenty micrograms of protein of cytoplasm extracts were subjected to 7% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for Western blot analysis (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked using blocking reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) before incubation with specific Abs against the phosphorylated forms of I
B, extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2, p38 MAPK, raf-1, and JNK (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Frankfurt, Germany) for 1 h at room temperature. After five washes, peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal Ab (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was added for 30 min at room temperature. After five washes, blots were developed using chemiluminescence HRP substrate (Roche Diagnostics) for 5 min. After detection, the membranes were stripped in Restore Western blot stripping buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL) for 30 min at 37°C. After washing with distilled water, membranes were dried and stored at 4°C for further use.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To test whether HSP60 might effect the expression of surface markers involved in maturation, BMDC from BALB/c mice were cultured in the presence of LPS or 0.330 µg/ml HSP60. After 18 h, nonadherent cells were harvested, stained with Abs against MHC class II molecules (I-Ad), CD86, CD40, CD54, and with the appropriate isotype controls for FACS analyses. For reasons of clarity, the mean fluorescence intensities of each staining are shown. LPS induced BMDC maturation as evident from increased expression of the costimulatory molecules CD86 (6.7-fold) and CD40 (9.2-fold) as compared to controls (Fig. 1, B and C). Surface expression of I-Ad and CD54 was up-regulated 2- and 3.3-fold (Fig. 1, A and D). When cultured in the presence of HSP60, BMDC also showed signs of maturation, i.e., there was up-regulation of I-Ad, CD86, CD40, and CD54 on the cell surface (Fig. 1, AD). The maturation signal delivered by HSP60 was dose-dependent with minor effects at 0.3 µg/ml and the most prominent effects at 30 µg/ml HSP60, reaching values similar to treatment with 1 µg/ml LPS.
|
|
To examine whether HSP60-induced maturation of BMDC is paralleled by cytokine release, supernatants of BMDC from BALB/c mice were tested for cytokine contents by ELISA. Because cytokine release by BMDC varied from experiment to experiment, the cytokine content in LPS cultures was set as 100% (positive control) and the cytokine content in the remaining cultures was expressed as a percentage of the positive control. Untreated cells spontaneously released minute amounts of IL-1
and IL-12(p40), whereas TNF-
, IL-12(p70), and IL-10 were undetectable (Fig. 3). A concentration of 0.3 µg/ml HSP60 failed to induce cytokine secretion whereas 3 µg/ml HSP60 stimulated BMDC for release of considerable amounts of IL-1
and IL-12(p40) and of lower levels of TNF-
and IL-12(p70) (Fig. 3). Cells stimulated with 30 µg/ml HSP60 secreted amounts comparable to LPS treatment and additionally IL-10. However, HSP60 induced significantly less IL-10 than LPS.
|
To test whether a potential contamination of our HSP60 preparation with LPS might be responsible for maturation upon stimulation with HSP60, LPS and HSP60 were treated with PmB before addition to BMDC of BALB/c mice. In positive controls, PmB was omitted. Unstimulated cells were used as negative control. After 18 h, the surface expression of CD86 as a representative marker for DC maturation was determined. Native LPS and HSP60 induced up-regulation of CD86 (Fig. 4, A and B) when compared to untreated cells. Pretreatment of LPS with PmB completely inhibited the LPS-mediated maturation of BMDC (Fig. 4A). In contrast, the stimulatory capacity of HSP60 for up-regulation of CD86 was not affected significantly by previous treatment with PmB (Fig. 4B).
|
In addition, the effect of boiling LPS and HSP60 on its ability to induce maturation of BMDC was analyzed. Therefore, LPS and HSP60 were boiled or were kept at room temperature and subsequently were added to BMDC cultures of BALB/c mice. Untreated cells served as control. In order to make use of another endpoint of BMDC maturation, TNF-
levels were determined in the supernatants using ELISA. BMDC stimulated with boiled LPS released similar levels of TNF-
as cells stimulated with nonboiled LPS (Fig. 5) because LPS is not sensitive to heating. However, boiling of HSP60 clearly reduced TNF-
secretion when compared to the response to nonboiled HSP60 (Fig. 5).
|
|
The functional significance of HSP60-mediated DC maturation was tested in an allogeneic T cell activation assay. When compared to medium controls, BMDC treated with 3 or 30 µg/ml HSP60 induced allogeneic T cell proliferation while 0.3 µg/ml HSP60 was ineffective (Fig. 7A). Supernatants of allogeneic T cell assays contained low amounts of IFN-
(Fig. 7B) and IL-12(p40) (Fig. 7C) when untreated DC had been used as stimulators. However, considerable amounts of these cytokines were found after previous stimulation of DC with HSP60 at concentrations >0.3 µg/ml. The release of IFN-
and IL-12(p40) correlated with the HSP60 concentration required for maturation of BMDC (Fig. 7, B and C). In the absence of T cells, HSP60 did not stimulate BMDC for IFN-
secretion (data not shown). In contrast, determination of Th2-type cytokines revealed low levels of IL-10 in cultures containing DC treated with 30 µg/ml HSP60 (Fig. 7D) but the absence of IL-4 in all cocultures (data not shown). In conclusion, BMDC treated with HSP60 are potent inducers of allogeneic T cell proliferation associated with a bias toward the production of IFN-
and IL-12(p40).
|
To address the question of whether TLR4 signaling is also involved in HSP60-mediated cytokine release and maturation of DC, the response of BMDC from C3H/HeN and TLR4-mutant C3H/HeJ mice (33) was compared. BMDC of C3H/HeN mice released substantial amounts of IL-1
after stimulation with HSP60 whereas BMDC of C3H/HeJ mice secreted minute amounts of this cytokine (Fig. 8). FACS analyses revealed that 3 µg/ml HSP60 induced up-regulation of the costimulatory molecules CD86, CD40, and CD54 but only weak modulation of MHC class II molecules on BMDC of C3H/HeN mice (Fig. 9). TLR4-defective BMDC of C3H/HeJ mice slightly up-regulated surface expression of CD86 and CD40, but not of MHC class II and CD54, molecules in response to 3 µg/ml HSP60 (Fig. 9). Thus, TLR4 is involved in HSP60-mediated maturation of BMDC.
|
|
B pathways in BMDC
Cytoplasmic extracts of untreated cells and cells stimulated with 10 ng/ml LPS or 3 µg/ml HSP60 for 15 and 45 min were prepared and were analyzed for the phosphorylated forms of I
B, p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, JNK, and raf-1 by sequential Western blots. Only basal levels of all phosphorylated kinases and I
B were detected in untreated cells after 15, as well as after 45, min (Fig. 10). As expected, LPS induced phosphorylation of I
B, p38 MAPK, JNK, raf-1, and ERK1/2 after 45 min (Fig. 10). HSP60 induced phosphorylation of I
B, p38 MAPK, raf-1, and ERK1/2 much more rapidly with peak levels already after 15 min. After 45 min, phosphorylation of these molecules decreased to the basal level (Fig. 10). Thus, HSP60 induces phosphorylation of signaling molecules of the MAPK pathway and of I
B similar to LPS but with strikingly different kinetics.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-1
, and IL-12, and also the Th2-type cytokine IL-10, were secreted. Cytokine release and maturation of BMDC in response to HSP60 were dose-dependent suggesting classical ligand-receptor interactions as the cause of DC stimulation. At low concentrations (0.3 µg/ml), DC neither up-regulated surface markers nor released cytokines. Both functional properties were induced by 3 µg/ml HSP60 and hence shared threshold concentrations. At very high concentrations (30 µg/ml), DC released similar amounts of the Th1-type cytokines as observed in response to LPS. However, IL-10 levels were <50% of those seen in response to LPS. IL-10 is of special relevance in the feedback inhibition response to Th1-type reactivity (34). Indeed, we observed that HSP60-stimulated DC induced a clear Th1 bias in allogeneic T cell cultures. Again, the threshold for HSP60 effects in the allogeneic T cell assay was between 0.3 and 3 µg/ml. This suggests that there is only one type of interaction between HSP60 and putative receptors on DC which regulate in a similar way DC maturation, cytokine secretion, and T cell help.
Previously, the stimulatory activity of HSP70, HSP90, and gp96 on the release of proinflammatory cytokines and/or up-regulation of costimulatory molecules by cells of the innate immune system has been described (35, 36, 37). Although these HSP molecules differ in structure and cellular localization from HSP60 that was examined in the present study, they elicit similar responses by APCs. The nature of HSP receptors and HSP-induced signal transduction is not yet completely understood. Recently, CD91 has been identified as the receptor for HSP70, gp96, HSP90, and calreticulin (38). With regard to HSP60, we and others have shown that CD14, TLR2, and TLR4 are involved in signal transduction in macrophages (15, 16, 17). For DC, we found in this study that TLR4 is a major mediator of HSP60-induced signal transduction for maturation and cytokine release. DC of C3H/HeJ mice with defective TLR4 failed to release substantial amounts of IL-1
as found in supernatants of C3H/HeN DC after stimulation with HSP60. However, C3H/HeJ BMDC were not completely unresponsive to HSP60 as evident from slightly increased expression of CD40 and CD86. This finding suggests that HSP60 elicits a different type of signal from the mutated form of TLR4 in C3H/HeJ DC or that there is a TLR4-independent pathway of HSP60 signaling. The latter assumption is supported by our own observation that HSP60 binds to macrophages of TLR4-/- mice (18). The characterization of the putative receptor is currently in progress.
So far, there exists no information about signaling pathways involved in HSP60-mediated activation of DC. In this study, we describe for the first time that upon stimulation of DC with HSP60, the MAPK pathway including phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, JNK, and ERK1/2 is activated. ERK1/2 is activated by the upstream kinase MAPK kinase 1 (39). The MAPK kinase 1/ERK1/2 signaling cascade in turn is controlled by raf-1 kinase (40, 41). Thus, the finding that HSP60 activate raf-1 kinase in DC corroborates the finding of ERK1/2 activation. Upon stimulation with HSP60, ERK1/2 activation might protect DC from apoptosis as shown for DC stimulated with LPS (42) whereas p38 MAPK activation might result in up-regulation of surface molecules and cytokine secretion in response to HSP60 as observed in LPS-stimulated DC (42, 43).
In addition, signal transduction of HSP60 in DC seems to enhance translocation of NF-
B into the nucleus and might be responsible for DC maturation as shown for LPS-stimulated DC (42). This was shown indirectly by increased phosphorylation of I
B. NF-
B is involved in the gene transcription of several proinflammatory cytokines like TNF-
or IL-1
. TLR4 is strongly associated with the NF-
B signaling pathway supporting its role in HSP60 signal transduction. Indeed, after stimulation of macrophages with HSP60, TLR4 engagement has been shown to proceed via activation of I
B kinase that is responsible for release of NF-
B after phosphorylation of I
B (17). Thus, release of TNF-
and IL-1
and up-regulation of CD86 of DC in response to HSP60 might be caused by TLR4-mediated NF-
B activation. Additionally, there exist cross-talks between the NF-
B and MAPK pathways since p38 MAPK and ERK1/2 were found to mediate NF-
B activation (44, 45). Such alternative pathways could be responsible for the HSP60-induced increase of costimulatory molecules in the absence of an intact TLR4 signaling domain as was observed on C3H/HeJ BMDC.
As in previous studies with recombinant stress proteins, the human HSP60 preparation used in this study showed weak reactivity in the LAL assay which may indicate traces of LPS. Therefore, we performed several different types of experiments to examine whether LPS contamination is responsible for HSP60-mediated maturation of BMDC. We can exclude free LPS as causative reagent because PmB did not affect the response to HSP60 alone but did block free LPS or LPS added to HSP60. Experiments with heated or protease-digested HSP60 revealed that the activity of our HSP60 preparation was dependent on intact protein structure. Certainly, one might speculate that HSP60 serves as a carrier and enhancer molecule for minute amounts of LPS. This hypothesis implicates that PmB cannot neutralize LPS when bound to HSP60. Thus, addition of LPS to our HSP60 should result in increased, but PmB-insensitive, activation of BMDC. However, we found that PmB completely blocked the activity of additional LPS. The only possible explanation for why supplemented LPS could be fully neutralized by PmB is that our HSP60 preparation was saturated with LPS so that additional LPS could not bind to HSP60 and, thus, could be detected by PmB. However, this is unlikely since some batches of HSP60 showed higher reactivity in the LAL indicating that there exist more hypothetical binding sites in the HSP60 preparation used in this study. In this context, it should be noted that HSP60 binds to a not-yet-defined receptor distinct from the LPS receptor TLR4 (18) and that the biological activity (induction of TNF-
secretion) of HSP60 can be blocked by Abs to HSP60 (C. Habich, unpublished observation).
Moreover, we observed differences between DC treated with HSP60 vs LPS. For instance, the pattern of cytokine secretion differed. At concentrations of HSP60 (e.g., 30 µg/ml) and LPS (e.g., 1 µg/ml) that induced comparable amounts of the Th1-type cytokines IL-12 and TNF-
, the secretion of the counterregulatory cytokine IL-10 was reduced by >2-fold. This might result in a Th1 bias in response to HSP60. In addition, the kinetics of phosphorylation of signaling molecules differed between HSP60 and LPS. These are all indirect hints that the stimulatory capacity of HSP60 is not dependent on bound LPS. However, for the final proof that the hypothetical interference between HSP and LPS must be destroyed completely, both molecules must be separated and it must be shown that the LPS-free HSP60 is still active. However, methods for interrupting LPS binding are so harsh that the stimulatory part of the HSP60 molecule could be irreversibly destroyed. This could lead to a false assumption that HSP60 loses its activity in the absence of LPS. Suitable methods for such studies should be established within the next years. Even if it may not apply to the present study, the concept that HSP60 may serve as a carrier for microbial- or necrosis-associated lipophilic compounds, followed by presentation to the TLR family, is intriguing and should not be overlooked. Indeed, plasma concentrations of endotoxin are 100 pg-1 ng/ml between gut and liver, and thereafter 520 pg/ml remain in circulation (46). Binding of LPS to human HSP60 should also occur in vivo.
Taken together, maturation of DC is strongly induced by human HSP60 and paralleled by release of Th1-promoting cytokines. These findings provide an explanation for the dichotomy of HSP60-mediated effects in vivo. The benefit of HSP60-mediated Th1 development would be the capacity to serve as natural adjuvant in protection from cancer or infectious diseases. In contrast, such a property of HSP60 might favor the development of Th1-dependent organ-specific autoimmune diseases in cases when endogenous HSPs are released as observed in diabetes and arthritis (47, 48).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Department of Surgical Research, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany. ![]()
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Hubert Kolb, German Diabetes Research Institute, Aufm Hennekamp 65, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany. E-mail address: kolb{at}ddfi.uni-duesseldorf.de ![]()
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: HSP, heat shock protein; TLR, Toll-like receptor; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; DC, dendritic cell; BMDC, bone marrow-derived DC; LAL, Limulus amebocyte lysate assay; CM, culture medium; PmB, polymyxin B; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase. ![]()
Received for publication February 21, 2002. Accepted for publication December 17, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B pathway. Int. Immunol. 12:1539.
, and contact sensitizers. J. Immunol. 166:3837.
B p65 transactivation mediated by tumor necrosis factor. J. Biol. Chem. 273:3285.
B-dependent gene expression: the role of TATA-binding protein (TBP). J. Biol. Chem. 274:30858.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M. Jordan, M. E. Woods, J. Olano, and D. H. Walker The Absence of Toll-Like Receptor 4 Signaling in C3H/HeJ Mice Predisposes Them to Overwhelming Rickettsial Infection and Decreased Protective Th1 Responses Infect. Immun., August 1, 2008; 76(8): 3717 - 3724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Osterloh, A. Veit, A. Gessner, B. Fleischer, and M. Breloer Hsp60-mediated T cell stimulation is independent of TLR4 and IL-12 Int. Immunol., March 1, 2008; 20(3): 433 - 443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Srivastava, C. Varalakshmi, and A. Khar The Ischemia-Responsive Protein 94 (Irp94) Activates Dendritic Cells through NK Cell Receptor Protein-2/NK Group 2 Member D (NKR-P2/NKG2D) Leading to Their Maturation J. Immunol., January 15, 2008; 180(2): 1117 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-L. Chang, Y.-C. Tsai, L. He, T.-C. Wu, and C.-F. Hung Cancer Immunotherapy Using Irradiated Tumor Cells Secreting Heat Shock Protein 70 Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 67(20): 10047 - 10057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. VAN EDEN, G. WICK, S. ALBANI, and I. COHEN Stress, Heat Shock Proteins, and Autoimmunity: How Immune Responses to Heat Shock Proteins Are to Be Used for the Control of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2007; 1113(1): 217 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koido, E. Hara, S. Homma, M. Mitsunaga, A. Takahara, E. Nagasaki, H. Kawahara, M. Watanabe, Y. Toyama, S. Yanagisawa, et al. Synergistic Induction of Antigen-Specific CTL by Fusions of TLR-Stimulated Dendritic Cells and Heat-Stressed Tumor Cells J. Immunol., October 1, 2007; 179(7): 4874 - 4883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Johansson, L. Walther-Jallow, A. Smed-Sorensen, and A.-L. Spetz Triggering of Dendritic Cell Responses after Exposure to Activated, but Not Resting, Apoptotic PBMCs J. Immunol., August 1, 2007; 179(3): 1711 - 1720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Hatzfeld-Charbonnier, A. Lasek, L. Castera, P. Gosset, T. Velu, P. Formstecher, L. Mortier, and P. Marchetti Influence of heat stress on human monocyte-derived dendritic cell functions with immunotherapeutic potential for antitumor vaccines J. Leukoc. Biol., May 1, 2007; 81(5): 1179 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. H. Chan, H.-L. Cheng, J. L. J. Chou, F. C. H. Li, K.-Y. Dai, S. H. H. Chan, and A. Y. W. Chang Heat Shock Protein 60 or 70 Activates Nitric-oxide Synthase (NOS) I- and Inhibits NOS II-associated Signaling and Depresses the Mitochondrial Apoptotic Cascade during Brain Stem Death J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4585 - 4600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Osterloh, U. Kalinke, S. Weiss, B. Fleischer, and M. Breloer Synergistic and Differential Modulation of Immune Responses by Hsp60 and Lipopolysaccharide J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2007; 282(7): 4669 - 4680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Direskeneli Autoimmunity vs autoinflammation in Behcet's disease: do we oversimplify a complex disorder? Rheumatology, December 1, 2006; 45(12): 1461 - 1465. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. ELIAS, A. AVRON, M. TAMIR, and I. RAZ DiaPep277(R) Preserves Endogenous Insulin Production by Immunomodulation in Type 1 Diabetes |