|
|
||||||||



* National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892;
Division of Genetics, Cooper Health System, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ 08103; and
Epimmune, San Diego, CA, 92121
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal models form much of the foundation of our understanding of host-tumor immune interactions, but it is difficult to use models to gauge the relative impact of Ag expression by normal and transformed tissues on T cell function in humans. For example, it may be difficult to accurately model many aspects of the recognition of tumor/host interactions, including key aspects regarding Ag expression and affinity and precursor T cell frequencies. It may be difficult to even approximate in mice the impact of the chronic tumor-bearing state on host immunity, which in humans can last for years. However, the relative impact on T cell functionality of expression by normal and tumor cells in humans remains unelucidated.
To examine the influence of self-tolerance mechanisms on the function of self/tumor-specific T cell responses in humans, we needed to identify an Ag that was expressed, processed, and presented in an MHC-restricted fashion by tumor cells, but for which there was the human equivalent of a "knockout." Ideally, such an Ag-loss variant would be a total loss of gene expression, such as a full-length deletion of the gene that would result in the complete absence of the targeted protein throughout development. Most known melanocyte differentiation Ag-loss variants are point mutations in the active sites of enzymes. One of the most common forms of albinism is characterized by point mutations of tyrosinase, a rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of the pigment melanin (9). Furthermore, for autosomal genes to be immunologically relevant, both alleles of a codominantly expressed gene must be deleted, a condition that is prohibitively rare. In males, a self-Ag encoded on the X chromosome would circumvent this problem, but no such X-linked melanoma/melanocyte differentiation Ag (MDA)1 had been described as a vaccine candidate.
In this study, we report the first immunological characterization of a melanoma/melanocyte differentiation Ag that meets these criteria. This Ag, called OA1, is the ocular albinism type I gene product and has previously been reported to be an integral endolysosomal membrane protein that may function as a G protein-coupled receptor (10, 11). We identified a patient with a human Ag-loss variant that completely lacked the expression of the OA1 target Ag. We then identified a target epitope restricted by one of the patients HLA class I molecules (A*2402-restricted) and found it to be a shared self/tumor Ag, processed and presented by tumor cells derived from several other HLA-A*2402+ patients with malignant melanoma.
To experimentally address the complex question of the function and survival of autoreactive T cells in the tumor-bearing host, we first studied the impact of Ag expression by normal (nontransformed) tissue on the function of T cells specific for self/tumor Ags. This study represents the first published immunological analysis of a human self/tumor Ag knockout. To study how chronic Ag expression by transformed (tumor) tissue affected OA1-specific T cells, we compared T cell responses from normal individuals and melanoma patients. We found that while expression of the OA1 tissue differentiation Ag by normal melanocytes can partially tolerize specific T cells, the tumor can reverse, in part, these tolerizing influences.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
HLA serotypes and DNA genotypes of fresh human PBMC and tumor cell lines were determined by the National Institutes of Health HLA Laboratory (Bethesda, MD). Nine normal volunteers, five melanoma patients, and the OA1 patient were all found to be positive for HLA-A*2402. OA1 patients were anonymously contacted and invited to donate their PBMC after informed consent (National Institutes of Health protocol: 98C128). PBMC from melanoma patients were acquired before the administration of any form of immunotherapy. The HLA-DRB1* genotypes of tumor lines used in the following experiments included 526 Mel (0401, 1401); 624 Mel (0401, 0701); 697 EBV-B (0401, 1501); 888 Mel (1502, 1601); 1088 Mel and EBV-B (0301, 0401). The HLA-A* genotypes of tumor lines used included 397 Mel (01, 25); 501 Mel (0201, 2402); 624 Mel (0201, 03); 526 Mel (0201, 03), 1088 Mel (01, 0201), 888 Mel and EBV-B (01, 2402). All T cells and tumor lines were maintained in culture media as previously described (12).
Cloning of full-length OA1 gene
The full-length OA1 gene was amplified from cDNA generated from neonatal melanocyte line 9F1966 (Clonetics, Walkersville, MD) by PCR using primers containing a forward-EcoRI restriction site (position 1; GCGGAATTCCACCATGGCCTCCCCGCGCCTAGG), and a reverse-NotI restriction site (position 1409; AAGGCGGCCGCGCTGGTGATGAGAGCAAGGT). Amplification of the 1409-bp product (1212 bp of which is coding) was performed using 5% DMSO, 25 µg of BSA, and Platinum Pfx DNA Polymerase (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) under the following reaction conditions: one cycle at 94°C for 2 min; 35 cycles at 94°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s, 68°C for 2 min using conditions designed to abrogate inhibition of PCR by melanin (13). The purified product was subcloned into a ZeroBlunt vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and then transferred into a high-expression plasmid (VR1012) with a CMV-based promoter (Vical, San Diego, CA). The product was then sequenced with a ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (PerkinElmer, Foster City, CA) and found to be identical with the nucleotide sequence accessioned on GenBank (no. Z48804). Functionality of the OA1 plasmid was then confirmed by transient transfection into human fibroblast line 888F followed by RT-PCR using OA1-specific primers (not shown).
Northern and Southern blotting
For Northern blot, 10 µg of total RNA from 15 normal tissuesbrain, heart, kidney, liver, lung, mammary gland, pancreas, placenta, prostate, skeletal muscle, spleen, stomach, testis, thymus, and uterus (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA)and from neonatal melanocyte line 9F1966 (prepared as above) were separated by gel electrophoresis and transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane using standard techniques. For Southern blot, genomic DNA from OA1 patients OAP-24, OAP-46, and a control male were prepared from autologous EBV-B cells with a Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) according to manufacturers instructions. Fifteen micrograms of DNA were separated by gel electrophoresis following an overnight digest with 150 U of PstI and transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane using standard techniques. Blots were incubated with salmon-sperm DNA and 32P-labeled full-length OA1 or
-actin probes.
Peptides and binding affinity assay
Peptides were synthesized using a solid phase method based on fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (F-moc) chemistry on a multiple peptide synthesizer (Model AMS 422; Gilson, Worthington, OH). The molecular masses of peptides were verified by laser desorption mass spectrometry (Biosynthesis, Lewisville, TX). To measure the binding affinity of HLA-A*2402 peptides, purified human A*2402 molecules (515 nM) were incubated with 110 nM 125I-radiolabeled probe peptide, iodinated by the Chloramine T method, for 48 h at room temperature in the presence of 1 µM human
2-microglobulin (Scripps Laboratories, San Diego, CA), and a mixture of protease inhibitors (14). Class I peptide complexes were separated from free peptide by gel filtration on TSK2000 columns (Tosohaus, Montgomeryville, AL), and the fraction of bound peptide was calculated as previously described (14). In preliminary experiments, the HLA class I preparation was titered in the presence of fixed amounts of radiolabeled peptides to determine the concentration of class I molecules necessary to bind 1020% of the total radioactivity. Using an inhibition assay to measure binding affinity, candidate peptides were tested at concentrations ranging from 120 µg/ml to 1.2 ng/ml. The data were plotted and the dose yielding IC50 was measured. Peptides were tested in three completely independent experiments because under these conditions (label) < (MHC) and (IC50)
(MHC), the measured IC50s are reasonable approximations of the true KD values. A consensus peptide (sequence AYIDNYNKF) was used as the standard control and radiolabeled probe for the A*2402 binding assay. The average IC50 level of the control peptide was 12 nM.
Generation of human T cell lines
All studies were done in accordance with Institutional Review Board-approved protocols. To generate OA1-specific T cells, a list of the 10 most theoretically avid peptide binders for HLA-A*2402 from the OA1 protein was generated using an established computer-assisted, allele-specific epitope binding forecast algorithm (http://bimas.dcrt.nih.gov/molbio/hla_bind/). Following an RMA-S-A*2402 stabilization assay, five peptides (originally ranked 1, 2, 3, 5, 6) were selected for further analysis by in vitro sensitization (not shown). Fresh PBMC from melanoma patient SE were cultured as above except that peptide was added at 10 µM. Again, 13 days after the first restimulation, all 48 wells for each peptide from the original 96-well plates were tested for specific peptide reactivity using 888 EBV-B cells (A*2402+) pulsed with either a control peptide from
-catenin or the specific peptide in question. Only one peptide (ranked number 3; LYSACFWWL; positions 126134) was found to induce peptide-specific T cells, and the most reactive wells were selected and expanded with autologous, irradiated, pulsed (as above) PBMC in 24-well flat-bottom plates at a 10:1 ratio (5 x 106 APCs per well). Following the fourth stimulation, one line, SE OA1-3 2/6, was selected as the most optimal and tested against multiple targets. To evaluate the T cell responsiveness, 1 x 105 T cells were cocultured in duplicate with 105 APC per well (peptide pulsed 888 EBV-Bs or tumor cells) in U-bottom 96-well plates for 24 h. Culture supernatants were assayed for IFN-
using commercially available ELISA kits (Endogen, Woburn, MA). All experiments were performed between two and four times with similar results, using in some cases different, but comparable, targets.
Assessment of human T cell responses
To evaluate human T cell lines or clones, EBV-B cells or activated B cells were incubated for 518 h with peptide, protein, or with freeze-thaw lysates of tumor cells (105 cell equivalents per well). Whole tumor cells or pulsed APC (105 cells per well) were cocultured with 105 T cells per well in U-bottom 96-well plates for 24 h. In both cases, culture supernatants were assayed for either IFN-
or GM-CSF using commercially available ELISA kits (Endogen, Woburn, MA).
Comparative in vitro sensitization assay
For analysis of OA1 reactivity, PBMC from nine normal volunteers, three melanoma patients, and one OA1 patient, OAP-46, were plated at 6 x 106 per well in four wells in 24-well plates with either OA1126134, tyrosinase 205213, or mutated
-catenin 2937 at 10 µM (15, 16). Seven days later, individual wells from each peptide for each sample were pooled, counted, and incubated with targets. To evaluate T cell responsiveness, 2 x 105 T cells were cocultured in duplicate with 105 APC per well (888 EBV-Bs pulsed with peptide or with OKT3, 1 µg/ml) in U-bottom 96-well plates for 24 h. Culture supernatants were assayed for IFN-
using commercially available ELISA kits (Endogen). The IFN-
stimulation index (IFN-
-SI) was generated by dividing the IFN-
secretion produced to experimental antigen against secretion produced against the control Ag. Assays were performed two to three times with similar results, using different, but comparable targets.
Cytotoxic T cell assay
51Cr-release assays were performed as previously described (12). Briefly, target cells pulsed with 200 µCi 51Cr for 60 min were distributed onto U-bottom 96-well plates at 104 cells per well with effector T cells added at varying E:T ratios and incubated for 4 h. Percent lysis was calculated using the standard formula: ((experimental 51Cr release - spontaneous release)/(total release - spontaneous release)) x 100. The experiment was performed three times with similar results.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To study tissue expression of OA1, we performed Northern blot analysis on mRNA obtained from 16 normal tissues, verifying that the probe hybridized at 1.6 kb, the predicted size of the OA1 message (Fig. 1A). Specific hybridization was only observed for mRNA derived from melanocytes (lane 16). OA1 expression was analyzed in tumor cells using RT-PCR. OA1 expression was found in six of six melanomas tested, although one of these was relatively weak. No OA1 expression was found in other tested tumor histologies (Fig. 1B). Thus, OA1 appears to be specifically expressed only in melanocytes and in melanoma cells, which is consistent with a report demonstrating high OA1-RNA levels only in pigmented cells, specifically retinal pigment and melanoma (17).
|
|
-catenin 2937) pulsed onto 888 EBV-B (Fig. 4A). This and all other OA1-specific T cell lines were >90% CD8+ as determined by flow cytometry (not shown). Although growth of these OA-specific T cells required at least four ex vivo stimulations with Ag, the function of OA1-specific T cells shows for the first time that an OA1 peptide epitope is processed and presented on the surface of melanoma cells for recognition by Ag-specific T cells. OA1 is thus a potential target for melanoma vaccines. Recognition of the Ag is not only associated with cytokine production by the OA1-specific T cell. In a standard 51Cr-release assay, a cell line derived by repeated stimulation of PBMC from the OA1-negative patient OAP-46 was able to specifically lyse A*2402+/OA1+ melanoma 888, but not A*2402-/OA1+ melanoma 624 mel (Fig. 4B).
|
|
The greatest difference in OA1126134-specific T cell reactivity between the OA1-Ag-loss variant patient and the normal volunteers was observed after a single in vitro stimulation (Fig. 4C). This difference was more than five SD, generating a confidence interval of 99.9% in three of three independently performed experiments.
Significant differences could also be observed after the second round of stimulation, where OA1126134-specific reactivity could be elicited in cells derived from three of nine normal volunteers with IFN-
-SIs that ranged from 310 whereas in the same assay, the IFN-
-SI in the OA1-Ag-loss variant patient, OAP-46, was 183 (as discussed below). Note that after four or more in vitro stimulations, OA1126134-specific T cells could be generated out of normal volunteers (Fig. 5B). Taken together, these data provide compelling evidence for T cell tolerance to OA1 in humans.
|
Tumors have been reported to depress T cell responses locally and systemically, through a diversity of mechanisms (4, 5, 6, 7, 22, 23). One patient (MG) enabled us to study immune responses to a mutated Ag expressed by her tumor cells. MGs tumor expressed a single point mutation in
-catenin, which resulted in an amino acid change in an MHC anchor position yielding a heteroclitic peptide that was recognized by autologous T cells in an HLA-A*2402-restricted fashion at concentrations that were 1 million-fold lower than the nonmutated peptide (16). We then compared the levels of Ag-specific T cell reactivities found in MG to those found in nontumor-bearing controls using an in vitro sensitization assay in which all patients were verified to be HLA-A*2402-positive.
We found that after a single in vitro stimulation, only melanoma patient MG had significant reactivity to the
-catenin epitope (Fig. 5A). By contrast,
-catenin-specific T cell reactivity was not significantly higher than background in two normal volunteers and the OA1-Ag-loss variant patient, OAP-46. Nor were increased levels of
-catenin-specific T cells found in a patient with metastatic melanoma whose tumor did not express the mutated
-catenin epitope.
Results from patient MG indicated that tumor expression of a neoantigen is capable of priming a T cell response, but many of the tumor-associated Ags identified thus far are nonmutated self-Ags (1, 2). This prompted us to compare T cell responses to OA1 in normal and melanoma patients, where the additional comparison to an individual with no expression of the Ag in normal tissue was possible.
OA1126134 -specific T cell reactivity was poor in normal volunteers after a single in vitro stimulation (Fig. 5A). Reactivity to OA1126134 remained poor in normal volunteers after an additional in vitro stimulation, that is after a total of two in vitro stimulations, while cells from the patient with OA1-deficiency yielded an SI of 183 (Fig. 5B). Patients with melanoma, whose tumors were confirmed to express OA1, were found to have variable responses to OA1 peptide, with three of five patients showing strong reactivity to OA1 after two in vitro stimulations (Fig. 5B). Note that one patient had reactivity at levels comparable to those seen in the Ag-loss variant patient. Parallel to the IFN-
-release assay, ELISPOT analysis was performed to determine the number of cytokine-producing cells. The numbers obtained correlated with cytokine levels detected by ELISA, thus confirming the presence of OA1-reactive T cells not only in an Ag-knockout situation, but also in normal melanoma patients (not shown). However, when we assessed the abilities of OA1126134-specific T cells to recognize tumor cells in the same assay (Fig. 5C), we found that only the OA1-deficient patient had T cells that were capable of specifically recognizing melanoma. Neither normal volunteer nor tumor-bearing patients had T cells that recognized Ag expressed by tumor. This indicated that although tolerance to self/tumor Ags could be abrogated by the growth of the tumor, increasing the reactivity of tumor-specific T cells, any reversal of tolerance might be only partial.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been hypothesized that tolerance mechanisms could result in the deletion of the T cell repertoire specific for the highest binding peptides, thus resulting in a "reversal" of the immunodominance hierarchy (27) and deletion of T cells specific for the highest MHC-binding epitopes. Our results indicate that deletion is not the primary mechanism of tolerance induction for the OA1 epitope, although we cannot exclude deletion of some OA1-specific T cells. However, our data clearly show that OA1-specific T cells are not completely deleted in OA1+ individuals, but rather are expanded in melanoma patients. The presence of OA1-specific T cell reactivity in the OA1 knockout patient serves in large part as a positive control for the analysis because it indicates that OA1-specific T cell reactivity is greater in the absence of the self-Ag. Taken together, our data is most consistent with the notion that OA1-specific T cells are partially inactivated in normal (OA1+) individuals (i.e., T cell reactivity to a high binding self/tumor epitope was preserved and not deleted).
Short-term cultured T cells from the Ag-loss variant patient were far more reactive than those of normal controls (Fig. 5B). The reasons for the lower functionality of T cells in Ag bearing vs Ag-negative individuals could be due either to anergy of T cells, which may be reversed ex vivo with time by culture of the cells, or to the systematic elimination of T cells bearing high affinity receptors. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and both may contribute to the observations made in this report. Both mechanisms are in evidence in published experimental models: high-avidity T cells directed against tyrosinase could be isolated from mice despite the presence of the Ag in vivo (28), suggesting a nondeletional mechanism for T cell tolerance, such as anergy, that was the result from signal 1 in the absence of signal 2 or anergy that is enforced by regulatory CD4+ T cells (29, 30).
The ability to ultimately obtain high-avidity cells after multiple in vitro stimulations does not conclusively indicate a mechanism involving anergy, but may instead reflect a highly significant yet incomplete deletion of precursor T cells. Others have highlighted a deletional mechanism, which results in the elimination of high-avidity T cells and skewing of the T cell repertoire in wild-type vs transgenic or Ag-loss variant mice (31, 32). It is possible that, in addition to simple differences in interpretation of the data, the different experimental systems are responsible for apparent discrepancies in the findings.
Our findings conclusively establish that even the highly tissue-restricted expression of "peripheral" Ags can have a profound impact on the T cell repertoire. It was initially difficult to reconcile this conclusion with the observation that T cells specific for self-tissue differentiation Ags are frequently isolated from tumors. Therefore, we sought to systematically examine the impact of tumor on the state of immunological tolerance that is established by the expression of Ag by normal tissue. Many workers have asserted that the tumor-bearing state only exacerbates immunological unresponsiveness seen as a result of expression in normal tissues (4, 5, 6, 32), while others claim that tumors release soluble immunosuppressive cytokines such IL-10 and TGF-
(7, 33) or express death receptor ligands such as TRAIL (34) or FasL, although aspects of these reports have been disputed (35). In contrast to these reports, we detected increased T cell reactivity to mutated
-catenin but only in a patient whose tumor expressed that particular mutation (Fig. 5A) (16). We also found increased T cell reactivity to the self-Ags tyrosine-related protein-1 (36) and OA1 (Fig. 5B) in patients with metastatic melanoma, which constitutively express these Ags. This is consistent with previously reported elevations in T cells specific for melanoma Ag recognized by T cells-1, another nonmutated MDA (37). We do not yet understand the mechanisms underlying activation of the immune system by tumors when the response had been suppressed by normal tissue expressing the same Ag, although it has recently been suggested in a mouse model that the mechanism involves increased cross-presentation (8).
If tumor cells lead to expanded T cell precursors that are more rather than less functionally reactive, why does T cell stimulation by the tumor not result in the rejection of melanoma in patients? To address this paradoxical issue, we tested the reactivity of OA1-peptide stimulated T cells to melanoma. In contrast to the peptide-pulsed target, T cells from melanoma patients in short term cultures did not recognize intact tumor cells, which were well recognized and lysed by T cells from the OA1 Ag-negative individual. The findings presented in this study help to explain the apparent paradox of tumor priming of T cells in the face of continued tumor growth in melanoma patients: expression of a given Ag in normal tissue suppressed T cell responses while expression of the same target Ags by tumor resulted in the expansion of T cell precursor populations. Thus, a key challenge in immunotherapeutic strategies that target self/tumor Ags is how to fully activate T cells whose encounter with Ag expressed by tumor has already resulted in a partial reversal of self tolerance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used in this paper: MDA, melanoma/melanocyte differentiation Ag; SI, stimulation index. ![]()
Received for publication August 12, 2002. Accepted for publication November 22, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-catenin gene encodes a melanoma-specific antigen recognized by tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 183:1185.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Schuler, E. Contassot, M. Irla, S. Hugues, O. Preynat-Seauve, F. Beermann, A. Donda, L.E. French, and B. Huard Direct Presentation of a Melanocyte-Associated Antigen in Peripheral Lymph Nodes Induces Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 68(20): 8410 - 8418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. W. Overwijk, M. R. Theoret, S. E. Finkelstein, D. R. Surman, L. A. de Jong, F. A. Vyth-Dreese, T. A. Dellemijn, P. A. Antony, P. J. Spiess, D. C. Palmer, et al. Tumor Regression and Autoimmunity after Reversal of a Functionally Tolerant State of Self-reactive CD8+ T Cells J. Exp. Med., August 18, 2003; 198(4): 569 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |