The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boritz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boritz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. C.
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 170: 1106-1116.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

Diverse Repertoire of HIV-1 p24-Specific, IFN-{gamma}-Producing CD4+ T Cell Clones Following Immune Reconstitution on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy1

Eli Boritz*, Brent E. Palmer{dagger}, Brian Livingston{ddagger}, Alessandro Sette{ddagger} and Cara C. Wilson2,*,{dagger}

Departments of * Immunology and {dagger} Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262; and {ddagger} Epimmune, San Diego, CA 92121


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
HIV-1 Ag-specific CD4+ T cell proliferative responses in human subjects with advanced, untreated HIV-1 disease are often weak or undetectable. Conversely, HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation is occasionally detected following suppression of HIV-1 replication with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). These observations suggest that unchecked HIV-1 replication may lead to depletion or dysfunction of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells, and that these defects may be partially corrected by viral suppression and subsequent immune reconstitution. However, the impact of this immune reconstitution on the repertoire of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells has not been thoroughly evaluated. To examine the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire in this clinical setting, we established HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones from a successfully HAART-treated subject whose pretreatment peripheral CD4 count was 0 cells/µl. Eleven different p24-specific CD4+ T cell clonotypes were distinguished among 13 clones obtained. Most clones produced both IFN-{gamma} and IL-4 upon Ag stimulation. Clones targeted eight distinct epitopes that varied in their conservancy among HIV-1 strains, and responses were restricted by one of three MHC II molecules. Clones showed a range of functional avidities for both protein and peptide Ags. Additional studies confirmed that multiple HIV-1 p24-derived epitopes were targeted by IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ cells from subjects first treated with HAART during advanced HIV-1 disease (median, 4.5 peptides/subject; range, 3–6). These results suggest that in HAART-treated subjects whose peripheral CD4+ T cell pools were once severely depleted, the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire may include a diverse array of clonotypes targeting multiple HIV-1 epitopes.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The magnitude of CD4+ T cell proliferative responses against HIV-1 Ags has been inversely associated with HIV-1 viral loads in some groups of HIV-1-infected individuals. This inverse relationship was initially observed in studies of long term nonprogressors, a cohort of chronically infected individuals able to maintain high CD4+ T cell counts and low viral loads without antiretroviral treatment. Compared with untreated subjects with progressive HIV-1 disease and higher viral loads, long term nonprogressors were found to have stronger lymphoproliferative responses against HIV-1 p24 or Gag Ags (1, 2). Similar inverse relationships between HIV-1 viral load and HIV-1-specific lymphoproliferation were documented among groups of untreated subjects with recent (3) and chronic (4) HIV-1 infection. Finally, strong HIV-1-specific lymphoproliferative responses were detected in subjects treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)3 during or shortly after acute HIV-1 infection (5, 6). After structured interruption of therapy, these subjects occasionally maintained low viral loads for long periods without additional treatment.

HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses measured in proliferation assays may be either the cause or the effect of the relatively low HIV-1 replication observed in these clinical settings. On the one hand, HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells capable of proliferating in vitro might participate in immune control of HIV-1 replication in vivo. This would be consistent with studies of murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection, in which effective antiviral CD8+ T cell responses could not be maintained during chronic infection if CD4+ T cells were even transiently depleted (7). It would also be consistent with studies linking impairment of CMV-specific CD4+ T cell responses in bone marrow transplant recipients to reduced CMV-specific CD8+ T cell activity (8). A requirement for HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell help to generate or maintain productive HIV-1-specific CD8+ T cell immunity would help to explain the uncontrolled viremia of most chronically infected subjects with weak HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses.

On the other hand, unchecked HIV-1 replication may inhibit HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation. This inhibitory effect has been inferred by studying CD4+ T cell responses in subjects first treated with HAART during chronic HIV-1 disease. Initial studies of subjects receiving antiretroviral therapy found that HIV-1-specific lymphoproliferation remained undetectable even as CD4+ T cell counts increased from pretreatment levels (9, 10, 11). However, several recent studies have detected HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation in up to 50% of subjects treated with HAART during chronic HIV-1 infection (12, 13, 14, 15), suggesting that reconstitution of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses may occur with effective therapy. Consistent with this, longitudinal analysis of selected subjects who periodically stopped and restarted HAART showed that HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell proliferative responses were only detectable during periods of viral suppression (16). The mechanisms by which HIV-1 replication might inhibit HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell proliferative responses are unknown, but may include both depletion (17) and functional impairment (2, 15, 16) of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells.

By causing depletion or functional impairment of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells, active HIV-1 replication may also cause alterations in the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire that viral suppression on HAART may help to correct. Among total peripheral CD4+ T cells, abnormal expansion or contraction of individual TCR V{beta} subsets and specific TCR complementarity-determining region 3 lengths within V{beta} subsets have been associated with progressive HIV-1 infection (18, 19). Applied to the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell subpopulation, a restricted TCR repertoire might be expected to limit the diversity of HIV-1 epitopes targeted by the CD4+ T cell response. Normalization of the total CD4+ TCR repertoire after antiretroviral therapy is more controversial, but has been observed in some cases of effective viral suppression (19). Active thymic function (20) leading to increases in naive CD4+ T cell counts (21, 22) may contribute to this process. Among HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells, repopulation with new thymic emigrants might allow responses against a diversity of HIV-1 epitopes to be reconstituted. However, the reconstituted repertoire of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells may be unique, because HIV-1-specific thymic emigrants generated after viral suppression would not be as likely to encounter high levels of replicating virus or viral Ags during priming and expansion.

Defining the repertoire of functional HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell clonotypes and the diversity of epitope targets in treated, HIV-1-infected subjects is important for several reasons. Because CD4+ T cells may play both direct and indirect roles in controlling viral replication (7, 8, 23, 24), the repertoire diversity of the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell response may be an important factor in virologic control. For example, by targeting particularly conserved epitopes or a diversity of epitopes, the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell response might limit mutational escape from protective CD4+ T cells (25, 26). Analysis of the reconstituted HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire may therefore suggest how well subjects who begin HAART during advanced disease may ultimately control viral replication without therapy. An understanding of the reconstituted HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire may also help to guide adjuvant therapy for HIV-1 disease by determining which aspects of the CD4+ T cell response might be enhanced by therapeutic vaccination and other related approaches.

Unfortunately, the low response levels or frequencies of reactive cells obtained in standard CD4+ T cell functional assays have often impeded studies of this subject. Proliferation assays, for instance, may not be sensitive or specific enough to evaluate the HIV-1 Ag-specific CD4+ T cell responses of HIV-1-infected subjects at the clonotypic level. Similarly, HIV-1 Ag-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ T cells have been found to make up a relatively small percentage of all CD4+ T cells in both untreated and HAART-treated, HIV-1-infected subjects (2, 15, 27). As a result, although HIV-specific CD4+ T cells have been detected in subjects from many clinical cohorts, their scarcity has prevented further dissection of T cell responses with regard to individual clonotypes, epitope targets, or restricting MHC molecules.

To investigate the impact of immune reconstitution on the repertoire of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells, we generated HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cells clones from an HIV-1-infected subject who showed an HIV-1 p24 Ag-specific lymphoproliferative response after beginning HAART in the advanced stage of HIV-1 disease. The repertoire diversity and function of these clones were then characterized in detail. In addition, the p24 epitopes recognized by CD4+ T cells from additional HAART-treated subjects recovering from AIDS were determined using an ELISPOT assay on T cells expanded with Ag in vitro. The results of these studies emphasize the potential diversity of the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire in HIV-1-infected subjects in the setting of immune reconstitution.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Subject selection

Subject UH48 presented at the University of Colorado Hospital Infectious Diseases Clinic with AIDS in May of 1998. His plasma HIV-1 RNA at that time was 28,390 copies/ml, and his peripheral CD4 count nadir was 0 cells/µl. He was started on combination antiretroviral therapy, and his plasma HIV-1 RNA subsequently declined to <400 copies/ml. At the time of this study, 22 mo into therapy, his CD4 count had risen to 285 cells/µl, his viral load remained undetectable, and he displayed a strong in vitro lymphocyte proliferative response to HIV-1 p24 Ag. Based on molecular MHC class II typing, he expressed HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 and HLA-DR{beta}1*1501. Based on serological typing, he also expressed HLA-DQ5 and HLA-DQ1.

Additional HIV-1-infected, HAART-treated subjects were selected for investigation using the following criteria: 1) a pretreatment peripheral CD4 count nadir of <200 cells/µl, 2) an undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA level on HAART for at least 12 mo leading up to the time of study, and 3) a CD4 count of at least 350 cells/µl at the time of study. Informed consent was obtained for all participating subjects, and the study was approved by the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center institutional review board.

Generation of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones

PBMC were isolated from heparinized blood by density gradient centrifugation. The frequency of HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood was first determined by intracellular IFN-{gamma} staining, as described below. PBMC were resuspended at 5 x 106 cells/ml in standard culture medium (RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) with 10% heat-inactivated human AB serum (Gemini Bio-Products, Woodland, CA), and p24-specific cells were expanded by stimulation with 5 µg/ml recombinant p24 Ag (NY5 strain; Protein Sciences, Meriden, CT) for 7 days at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Expansion of Ag-specific cells was confirmed by intracellular IFN-{gamma} staining.

To isolate p24-specific, IFN-{gamma}-secreting CD4+ T cells from this enriched culture, CD8+ cells were depleted using CD8 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA), and the remaining cells were stimulated with 5 µg/ml p24 Ag and costimulatory CD28 and CD49d mAbs (3 µg/ml; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Cryopreserved, autologous, CD3+ T cell-depleted PBMC were added as additional APCs. After incubation at 37°C for 12 h, IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells were isolated by MACS as previously described (28). Selected cells were plated at limiting dilution in medium containing 10% human AB serum, 20 U/ml recombinant human IL-2 (teceleukin; Hoffmann La Roche, Nutley, NJ), 0.8 µg/ml PHA (Murex Diagnostics, Dartford, U.K.), and irradiated allogeneic PBMC (1 x 106/ml) and B lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL; 1 x 105/ml). Viable CD4+ T cell cultures were expanded with IL-2, allogeneic feeder cells, and PHA stimulation every 13–15 days. Although we did not formally show that each culture contained only one T cell clonotype, we have referred to these cultures as clones for simplicity.

Surface staining of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones for TCR V{beta} expression

Cloned cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with biotinylated mAbs to human V{beta}2, V{beta}3.1, V{beta}5.1, V{beta}5.2, V{beta}6.7, V{beta}7, V{beta}9, V{beta}12, V{beta}13.1, V{beta}13.2, V{beta}14, V{beta}17, V{beta}20, V{beta}22, or V{beta}23 (provided by B. Kotzin). Cells were washed, incubated with FITC-conjugated CD4 mAb (BD Biosciences) and streptavidin-PE (Rockland, Gilbertsville, PA) for 30 min at 4°C, and analyzed on a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Intracellular cytokine staining

HIV-1 p24-specific, IFN-{gamma}-secreting CD4+ T cells in PBMC were identified as previously described (15). Briefly, 106 PBMC were incubated in standard culture medium with 3 µg/ml each of CD28 and CD49d mAbs (BD Biosciences) and were stimulated with recombinant p24 Ag (5 µg/ml), baculovirus control protein (2 µg/ml), or staphylococcal enterotoxin B (1 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) as a positive control. These cultures were incubated at a 5° slant at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere for 15 h. To allow intracellular accumulation of cytokines, exocytosis was blocked by the addition of brefeldin A (Golgi Plug; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) after the first 5 h of incubation. Cells were then surface stained with a Tricolor-conjugated CD4 mAb (Caltag, Burlingame, CA) for 30 min at 4°C. CD4-stained cells were washed once with PBS containing 1% BSA and fixed for 15 min at room temperature with solution A (Caltag). Fixed cells were then permeabilized with solution B (Caltag) and stained with a PE-conjugated anti-IFN-{gamma} mAb (Caltag) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were then washed, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed by flow cytometry. For intracellular cytokine analysis of cultured T cells, the same protocol was followed, except that autologous B-LCL were added during the incubation period with Ag as a source of additional APCs.

For experiments using p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones, a shorter time course was followed to allow detection of IL-2, IL-4, and IL-5. Clones were stimulated with p24 Ag or control protein in the presence of autologous B-LCL for 6 h at 37°C, and brefeldin A was added to the stimulated cultures after 1 h. Cells were then processed as described above, except that intracellular cytokine stains included PE-conjugated mAbs against IFN-{gamma}, IL-2 (Caltag), IL-4 (BD PharMingen), or IL-5 (BD PharMingen).

Lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPAs)

HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones were mixed with irradiated or mitomycin C-treated APCs in round-bottom, 96-well, polystyrene plates. Both clones and APCs were added at 5 x 104 cells/well. The Ags added included baculovirus control protein at 0.3 µg/ml, p24 Ag at 1 µg/ml, or p24 peptides at 2 µg/ml. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere for 3 days. Plates were then pulsed with 1 µCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) for 10–16 h and harvested. Incorporation of 3H was counted using a Topcount beta counter (Packard BioScience, Meriden, CT).

Analysis of CD4+ T cell clone MHC restriction

Clones were stimulated in LPAs as described above with control protein- or p24 Ag-pulsed APC lines (provided by J. Bill), including either irradiated human B-LCL or murine fibroblast lines treated with 50 µg/ml of mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich). Human B-LCL used as APCs included LG-2 (homozygous for HLA-DR{beta}1*0101), WT-8 (homozygous for HLA-DR{beta}1*1501), and an autologous B-LCL. In some experiments this autologous cell line was preincubated with 10 µg/ml of blocking mAb to HLA-DR (L243; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), HLA-DP (B7/221; American Type Culture Collection), or HLA-DQ (SPV-L3; Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA). Murine fibroblasts used as APCs included the untransfected DAP3 line and a line transfected to express HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 and HLA-DR{alpha}.

Mapping of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clone target epitopes

Epitope-specific responses of CD4+ T cell clones were mapped in LPAs using autologous B-LCL presenting synthetic peptides based on the HXB2 strain of HIV-1 p24. Initial experiments employed a panel of 23 22-aa peptides, overlapping by 12 aa, spanning the entire p24 sequence (provided by B. Walker). Some clones were tested in additional experiments using a panel of 25 20-aa peptides, overlapping by 10 aa, spanning the same protein sequence (provided by AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Rockville, MD). Additional experiments employed panels of 13-aa peptides overlapping by 12 aa (synthesized by PepScan, Lelystad, The Netherlands) spanning each 22-aa peptide targeted in initial experiments.

Determination of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clone functional avidity

Avidity for MHC/peptide was determined based on the proliferative response of each clone to titrated doses of recombinant p24 Ag or the 13-aa peptide that stimulated the clone to proliferate most strongly in epitope-mapping studies. Peptides and p24 Ag were serially diluted, then mixed with irradiated autologous B-LCL and CD4+ T cell clones. Final concentrations of whole p24 Ag ranged from 0.001–10 µg/ml (4.17 x 10-7 to 4.17 x 10-11 M). Equivalent molar amounts of 13-residue p24 peptides were used in additional assays. Each condition was tested in triplicate in a standard LPA as described above. The minimal effective dose (MED) of each Ag was calculated as the molar concentration required to stimulate 3H incorporation at least 2 times greater than and 3 SD above the incorporation observed for the unstimulated T cell clones.

HLA-DR peptide binding studies

HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-restricted peptides were tested for binding in vitro to HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 and several other common HLA-DR alleles. Binding assays were performed and analyzed as previously described (29). In brief, purified human HLA-DR molecules (5–500 nM) were incubated with unlabeled HIV-1 p24 peptide and 1–10 nM 125I-radiolabeled probe peptides for 48 h. Assays were performed at pH 7.0 for all HLA-DR alleles except DR{beta}1*0301, the assay for which was performed at pH 4.5. HLA-DR peptide complexes were separated from free peptide by gel filtration on TSK200 columns, and the fraction of bound peptide was calculated as described.

Determination of epitope conservancy

HIV-1 amino acid sequences at the positions corresponding to HXB2 p24 epitopes targeted by CD4+ T cell clones were searched on the Los Alamos HIV Sequence database at http://hiv-web.lanl.gov/content/hiv-db/EPILIGN/EPI.html. The conservancy of each epitope was calculated as the percentage of reported sequences identical with the HXB2 sequence.

ELISPOT analysis of p24 peptide-specific CD4+ T cell responses in expanded PBMC

CD4+ T cell responses in expanded PBMC to a panel of overlapping p24 peptides were evaluated using an IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT assay as previously described (30), with some modifications. Briefly, donor PBMC were cultured with 5 µg/ml of recombinant p24 Ag at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 6–8 days. Cultured cells were depleted of CD8+ T cells using CD8 microbeads and were added to 96-well, nitrocellulose-backed plates (Millipore, Bedford, MA) previously coated with 50 µl/well of 5 µg/ml of anti-IFN-{gamma} mAb (1-D1K, mouse IgG1; Mabtech, Nacka, Sweden). Cells were plated at 2–4.5 x 104 cells/well in 100 µl of standard culture medium, and Ags were added in triplicate in 100 µl/well of standard culture medium. Ags included 1 µg/ml of PHA, 0.5 µg/ml of baculovirus control protein, 5 µg/ml of recombinant p24 Ag, or 5 µg/ml of individual 20-aa p24 peptides overlapping by 10 aa (AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program). Costimulatory mAb to CD28 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) was added at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml. Plates were incubated for 36–40 h at 37°C in 5% CO2, washed with PBS/0.05% Tween 20, and incubated at 37°C for 2 h with 2 µg/ml of biotinylated anti-IFN-{gamma} mAb (7-B6-1, mouse IgG1; Mabtech). Avidin-biotinylated enzyme complex from the Vectastain ABC Elite kit (PK-6100; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was added at room temperature for 1 h, followed by the 3-amino-9-ethyl-carbazole peroxidase substrate. Spots were counted using a dissecting microscope. The number of IFN-{gamma}-secreting cells specific for each peptide was calculated by subtracting the mean number of spot-forming cells (SFCs) in the negative control wells from the mean number of SFCs for that peptide. Responses were considered positive if the mean number of SFCs was >=3 SFCs/well after subtraction of the mean SFCs in the negative control wells and >2 SD above the mean SFCs in the negative control wells.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Generation of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones from subject UH48

Subject UH48 was selected as a model for studying the reconstituted HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell response in chronically infected, HAART-treated subjects. After starting HAART in 1998 with a peripheral CD4 count of 0 cells/µl, he showed an increased CD4 count (285 cells/µl at the time of study) as well as a strong lymphoproliferative response against the HIV-1 p24 Ag (stimulation index of 19). However, after overnight p24 Ag stimulation, p24-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ T cells in his PBMC were too infrequent to detect by intracellular cytokine staining (data not shown). To verify the presence of p24-specific CD4+ T cells and to increase their numbers for selection and cloning, PBMC were cultured in vitro with recombinant p24 Ag for 7 days. Again using p24 Ag stimulation and intracellular IFN-{gamma} staining, the frequency of p24-specific CD4+ T cells in the expanded population was 4.15% of all CD4+ cells (data not shown). Subsequent experiments using CFSE labeling as a marker for cellular proliferation showed that most cells from this subject producing IFN-{gamma} after expansion had divided at least seven times during the period of expansion (data not shown). Therefore, the increase in frequency of p24-specific cells was due at least in part to active division of HIV-1 p24-specific precursor cells and not solely to preferential survival of these cells.

HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones were generated from this expanded cell population by p24 Ag stimulation and selection for IFN-{gamma} production, followed by culture at limiting dilution. Using this method, 70 CD4+ T cell clones were obtained. These clones were screened for p24 specificity using the donor’s autologous B-LCL to present p24 Ag in proliferation assays or intracellular IFN-{gamma} stains. Using these methods, 13 HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones were identified.

HIV p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones from UH48 express a Th0 cytokine profile

To determine the cytokines produced by the CD4+ T cell clones, each was stimulated with autologous B-LCL presenting either control protein or p24 Ag and stained for intracellular expression of IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-5. Fig. 1 shows the results of this analysis for a representative clone. The CD4high quadrants on the right of these density plots show the cells of the clone; the CD4low quadrants on the left contain the autologous B-LCL. As shown in Fig. 1, A, C, E, and G, <0.3% of CD4+ cells produced any cytokine tested after control protein stimulation alone. After p24 Ag stimulation, by contrast, the cells of this clone most frequently produced IFN-{gamma} (50.58%; Fig. 1B), followed by IL-2 (28.14%; Fig. 1D), IL-4 (17.71%; Fig. 1F), and IL-5 (6.47%; Fig. 1H). Using IFN-{gamma} production as a Th1 marker and IL-4/IL-5 production as a Th2 marker, this clone was designated Th0.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. Cytokine production by p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones. Clones were stimulated using autologous B-LCL pulsed with baculovirus control protein or recombinant p24 Ag, permeabilized, stained for intracellular cytokines, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Results are shown for a Th0 clone, 3D6. A, C, E, and G, Control protein-stimulated cultures stained for IFN-{gamma}, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-5. B, D, F, and H, p24-stimulated cultures stained for the same cytokines. The percentage of CD4+ cells producing cytokine in response to the indicated stimulus is shown in the upper right corner of each plot.

 
Table I expresses the cytokine profiles of all 13 p24-specific CD4+ clones as the percentage of cells specifically producing each cytokine after p24 Ag stimulation. Consistent with the initial selection of these clones by IFN-{gamma} production, all but one produced IFN-{gamma} at significant frequencies. Nine of these clones also produced IL-2, although at lower frequencies than IFN-{gamma} in all cases. More surprisingly, eight of these clones also produced IL-4 at significant frequencies, and five of these IL-4-producing clones also produced IL-5. Using the criteria for Th subclass designation described above, eight of 13 clones were thus designated Th0, whereas four were designated Th1. The one clone of 13 that failed to produce IFN-{gamma} also failed to produce IL-2, IL-4, or IL-5 and was found to be no longer active in two repeated trials in which its p24-specific proliferation was measured simultaneously with cytokine production.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I. Cytokine production by p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones

 
TCR V{beta} expression analysis defines a minimum of 6 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clonotypes from UH48

Each T cell clonotype is defined by its TCR sequence, including characteristic TCRA and TCRB segments and unique junctional sequences. One measure of the complexity of a T cell response is the number of distinct TCR clonotypes it includes. To allow a preliminary estimate of the clonotypic complexity of UH48’s HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell response, we therefore tested each clone against a panel of 16 mAbs specific for V{beta} family or subfamily members. As shown in Table II, this method identified the V{beta} regions expressed by 7 of the 13 clones. Of these seven, three expressed V{beta}2, and one each expressed V{beta}5.1, V{beta}5.2, V{beta}8.1, and V{beta}17. The remaining six clones expressed one or more V{beta} regions not identifiable with the panel of Abs used. Thus, at least six different V{beta} regions were expressed among the clones, defining a minimum of six distinct clonotypes.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II. Repertoire diversity of UH48 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones

 
UH48 clones recognize eight p24-derived T cell epitopes and are restricted by three MHC class II molecules

The HIV-1 p24 epitopes targeted by UH48 clones were determined in three rounds of proliferation assays using autologous B-LCL to present p24-derived peptides. The mapping results for a representative clone are shown in Fig. 2. In the first round (Fig. 2A) the clone was stimulated with five pools of overlapping 22-aa peptides spanning the entire p24 amino acid sequence. In the second round the clone was stimulated with each individual peptide within the pool that stimulated it in round 1 (Fig. 2B). Finally, all possible 13-aa peptides within the clone’s target 22-mer were synthesized, and these peptides were used in the third round (Fig. 2C). The clone shown in Fig. 2 responded to four overlapping 13-mers; its recognition sequence is defined as the 10-aa sequence common to those four peptides (refer to Table II).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. Determination of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clone target epitopes. Epitopes were mapped in three steps of proliferation assays using autologous B-LCL to present p24-derived peptides. Results from clone 4F5 are shown as an example. In the first round (A), clones were stimulated with pools of p24-derived 22-mers covering the indicated residue positions within HXB2 Gag. In the next round (B), clones were stimulated with each individual 22-mer in the pools they recognized in the first round. In the final rounds (C), clones were stimulated with each individual 13-mer within the 22-mers they recognized in the second round. Peptides are designated by residue positions within the HXB2 Gag amino acid sequence. Values are the mean proliferation of triplicate samples for each condition minus the mean proliferation for the clone in response to baculovirus control protein. Error bars represent the SDs.

 
Table II shows the recognition sequence for each p24-specific CD4+ T cell clone derived from UH48. Of 13 clones, 12 responded to at least one peptide in these assays. Two clones, 3G7 and 4E10, responded to the same recognition sequence. Two additional clones, 9E5 and 10, recognized peptides including this same p24 sequence, but failed to respond to any 13-mer in the final round of assays. Among the remaining eight clones, seven different epitopes were recognized. Of note, two of these clones recognized a peptide in HIV-1 Gag p15 whose sequence was contained in the recombinant p24 Ag used for these experiments. The other six clones all recognized unique p24 epitopes. Therefore, these clones recognized eight HIV-1 Gag epitopes, seven within p24 and one immediately downstream of it, that may be natural targets of CD4+ T cells in HIV-1-infected subjects. Furthermore, among the six clones whose V{beta} expression could not be determined by flow cytometry, four different epitope recognition patterns were observed. If two clones that recognize different epitopes are assumed to be of different clonotypes, these six clones must represent at least four distinct clonotypes. The entire panel of 13 clones therefore represents at least 11 distinct clonotypes.

Subject UH48 expressed the MHC class II molecules HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 and DR{beta}1*1501. He also expressed HLA-DQ5, which is linked to HLA-DR{beta}1*0101, as well as HLA-DR51 and HLA-DQ1, which are linked to HLA-DR{beta}1*1501. Restriction of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones by these molecules was mapped using various HLA-matched APC lines to present control protein or whole p24 Ag in proliferation assays. MHC mapping results for three representative clones are shown in Fig. 3. In the initial round of MHC mapping, clones were stimulated using autologous B-LCL, autologous B-LCL incubated with HLA-DR-blocking Ab, or homozygous B-LCL expressing either the HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 or HLA-DR{beta}1*1501 haplotypes (Fig. 3, A and C). The clone shown in Fig. 3A responded to the autologous B-LCL only in the absence of DR-blocking Ab, indicating that it was DR restricted. It also responded to the homozygous HLA-DR1 B-LCL, indicating that it was restricted by HLA-DR{beta}1*0101. To confirm this, it was stimulated in a second round using a murine fibroblast line stably expressing HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 (Fig. 3B). As expected, the clone responded specifically to p24 when presented by the transfected fibroblasts, but not when presented by the untransfected control line. Additional clones were also DR-restricted, but responded to homozygous HLA-DR{beta}1*1501 B-LCL, indicating that they were restricted by HLA-DR{beta}1*1501 or the linked HLA-DR51 allele (Fig. 3C). Finally, non-DR-restricted clones were tested in an additional round in which autologous B-LCL were blocked by mAbs to human MHC class I, HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, or HLA-DR. The two clones not blocked by DR-blocking Ab were blocked only by Ab to HLA-DQ in this second round (Fig. 3D). These clones were thus restricted by HLA-DQ molecules.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. MHC restriction of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones. Clones were tested in proliferation assays using recombinant p24 Ag () or baculovirus control protein ({blacksquare}). Presenting cell lines included autologous B-LCL (Auto), a homozygous DR{beta}1*0101-expressing B-LCL (DR1), a homozygous DR{beta}1*1501-expressing B-LCL (DR15), murine fibroblasts transfected to express DR{beta}1*0101 (DR1 FB), or control fibroblasts (FB). In some cases the autologous B-LCL was blocked with Abs to human MHC class I, HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, or HLA-DR. Results are shown for three representative clones. A and B, Results for clone 4E10. C, Results for clone 3D6. D, Results for clone 3B4. Error bars indicate the SD of triplicate samples for each condition.

 
Table II summarizes the results of the MHC mapping experiments. As confirmed by their specific responses to HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-expressing murine fibroblasts, eight of these clones were restricted by HLA-DR{beta}1*0101. Of the remaining five clones, three were restricted by a molecule of the DR15 haplotype, including either HLA-DR{beta}1*1501 or the linked HLA-DR51. The remaining two clones were restricted by HLA-DQ. Because these two clones also responded to the homozygous DR1 B-LCL, which shares with UH48 expression of HLA-DQ5, but not HLA-DQ1, these clones were probably restricted by HLA-DQ5.

HLA-DR binding affinities of HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-restricted p24 epitopes

The affinity of an antigenic peptide for binding to its MHC restriction element may influence how well that peptide is presented by APC. This, in turn, may influence to what extent T cells specific for that peptide are primed and expanded in vivo. To investigate this relationship, 13-aa p24 peptides including HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-restricted epitope sequences recognized by six p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones were tested for binding to soluble, purified HLA-DR molecules in vitro. The concentration of p24 peptide required to displace 50% of a radiolabeled indicator peptide (IC50) was determined, with lower IC50 values indicating stronger binding.

As shown in Table III, the defined HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-restricted p24 epitope peptides bound to their restriction element in vitro with a range of affinities. Several bound tightly to HLA-DR{beta}1*0101, including the two tested target peptides for clone 4F5 (IC50 = 13.9 and 16.4 nM) and the two for clone 6 (10.9 and 11.0 nM). These peptides were also highly cross-reactive, binding tightly to several other HLA-DR molecules, including HLA-DR{beta}1*0404 and HLA-DR{beta}1*0405. By contrast, several HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-restricted peptides bound their restriction element with relatively low affinity. For example, two peptides targeted by clones 3G7 and 4E10 bound HLADR{beta}1*0101 with IC50 values of 1380.3 and 2886.8 nM. Surprisingly, these were the only peptides tested that were recognized by more than one of the panel of clones from this subject. Therefore, the affinities of these target peptides for binding to HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 ranged over 2 orders of magnitude, and there was no apparent correlation between the MHC binding affinity of an epitope peptide and the number of clones recognizing it.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III. HLA-DR binding affinities of p24-derived peptides targeted by CD4+ T cell clones

 
Functional avidity analysis of HLA-DR{beta}1*0101-restricted CD4+ T cell clones

The affinity of an epitope peptide for binding to MHC influences the overall avidity of the interaction between T cells and APC. This, in turn, helps determine the ability of the T cell to become activated by that APC and may also influence the functional properties that the clone will develop. To determine the functional avidities of these T cell clones for APC presenting their target peptides, clone responses to varying concentrations of whole p24 Ag or target 13-aa peptide were determined. Fig. 4 shows avidity determinations for two representative clones. Clone 6 (Fig. 4A) responded to molar concentrations of p24 Ag and its 13-aa peptide equally well. The MED, defined as the lowest concentration of Ag stimulating proliferation 3 SD above the background, was determined to be 4.17 x 10-7 M for both p24 and peptide in this assay. By contrast, clone 6C10 (Fig. 4B) responded more sensitively to whole p24 Ag (MED, 4.17 x 10-8 M) than to its target peptide (MED, 4.17 x 10-6 M).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 4. Functional avidity determination for p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones. Clones were tested in proliferation assays using autologous B-LCL to present recombinant p24 Ag ({circ}) or target peptide ({blacktriangleup}) at a range of concentrations. Results from clones 6 (A) and 6C10 (B) are shown as examples.

 
As shown in Table IV, avidity values for both whole p24 and peptides ranged over 2 orders of magnitude. Clones 4F5, for example, responded only to a relatively high concentration of protein (4.17 x 10-7 M). This clone also required a relatively high concentration of peptide (4.17 x 10-6 M). On the other end of the spectrum, clone 8F10 required a 4.17 x 10-9 M dose of whole p24 and a 4.17 x 10-7 M dose of peptide to proliferate. No clear association was apparent between the MHC binding affinities of the target peptides and the functional avidities of their corresponding clones for either whole p24 or peptide. For instance, of the two clones that recognized their epitope peptides with the highest functional avidity, one (clone 6) recognized a high affinity peptide (10.9 nM), while the other (8F10) recognized a low affinity peptide (1155.8 nM).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table IV. Functional avidities of p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones

 
The ratio of avidity for peptide to avidity for whole p24 also varied among clones. Clone 6, for example, responded equally well to its peptide and to whole p24, whereas clone 4E10 required a 100-fold higher molar concentration of its peptide than of whole p24. Because the 13-aa peptides tested here may associate directly with cell surface MHC II in these assays, the ratio of peptide MED to protein MED might be expected to be lower for clones targeting epitopes that bind their restriction element tightly. However, among this panel of clones, this correlation did not strictly apply. For example, the MED of peptide for clone 8F10 was 100-fold greater than the MED of whole p24. The target peptide for this clone bound HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 with an IC50 of 1155.8 nM. At the same time, clone 6C10 also required 100-fold more peptide than whole p24, even though its peptide bound HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 with a much stronger affinity of 28 nM.

Sequence conservancy analysis of MHC class II-restricted p24 epitopes

The high mutation rate of replicating HIV-1 results in genetic variation among HIV-1 viral isolates, with certain regions of the HIV-1 genome more conserved than others (31). It might be reasoned that T cell responses against conserved epitopes would most effectively prevent viral immune escape. Therefore, in selecting HIV-1 sequences for use in candidate vaccines, investigators have sought immunogenic epitopes that are highly conserved among viral isolates. To determine the sequence conservancy of the epitopes identified here, clone recognition sequences were compared with published HIV-1 sequences available on the Los Alamos National Laboratories HIV-1 Sequence Database. Recognition sequences identified using the HIV-1 HXB2 tester strain were aligned with all other published isolates, and the percentages of isolates identical at those positions to the tester strain were determined.

As shown in Table V, the recognition sequences of the clones characterized here were conserved to varying degrees within clade B and among all HIV-1 isolates. Several were very highly conserved both in clade B and overall, including the DQ5-restricted target epitopes of clones 3B4 (92% in clade B, 94% overall) and 5D8 (100% in clade B, 76% overall) and the DR1-restricted target epitope of clone 4F5 (92% in clade B, 69% overall). Others werewell conserved only in clade B, including the DR1-restricted target epitopes of clones 6 (65% in clade B, 15% overall) and 8F10 (68% in clade B, 20% overall). The DR1-restricted target epitopes of clones 6C10 (27% in clade B, 7% overall) and 3G7/4E10 (11% in clade B, 20% overall) were poorly conserved both in clade B and overall.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table V. Sequence conservancy of CD4+ T cell clone target epitopes among reported HIV sequences

 
Multiple p24 peptides are recognized by IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ T cells from additional HIV-1-infected subjects treated with HAART during late stage disease

Given the nearly complete depletion of peripheral CD4+ T cells in subject UH48 before treatment with HAART, the breadth of his reconstituted HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire was unexpected. We therefore sought to determine whether such broad responses were common among HAART-treated subjects with profound pretreatment depletion of peripheral CD4+ T cells. Six additional HAART-treated subjects who had started antiretroviral therapy during full-blown AIDS were selected for study. These subjects had pretreatment CD4 counts ranging from 9–180 cells/µl (median, 31.5), but had all been receiving effective HAART for at least 5 years. PBMC from these subjects were expanded by in vitro culture with recombinant p24 Ag for 6–8 days, depleted of CD8+ T cells, and stimulated in IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT assays with individual overlapping p24 peptides as described in Materials and Methods. Significant p24 peptide-specific responses were expressed as the number of peptide-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing cells present per 106 expanded, CD8-depleted PBMC (refer to Table VI). Because expanded CD4+ cells from four HIV-1-seronegative donors failed to recognize any p24 peptide tested (data not shown), the positive responses detected in HIV-1-infected subjects were probably not the result of in vitro CD4+ T cell priming.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table VI. HIV-1 p24 peptide-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ T cell responses detected using expanded PBMC from HIV-1-infected subjects with immune reconstitution

 
As shown in Table VI, all subjects tested displayed p24 peptide-specific CD4+ T cell responses. Although all these subjects responded to fewer p24 peptides than were targeted by the panel of clones from UH48, all responded to three or more peptides (median, 4.5/subject; range, 3–6). Of note, subjects UH64 and UH116 had responses directed against pairs of adjacent peptides. Even if these responses to adjacent peptides represented targeting of a single epitope in the 10-aa regions of overlap between peptides, these subjects still showed at least four and five p24 peptide-specific responses. Therefore, all six HIV-1-infected subjects first treated with HAART during advanced disease had p24-specific CD4+ T cells, and these cells targeted multiple epitopes within this single HIV-1 Ag.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have characterized a panel of HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones from an HIV-1-infected subject first treated with HAART during advanced HIV-1 disease. Because this subject’s CD4 count reached 0 cells/µl before complete viral suppression on HAART, we considered it likely that his p24-specific CD4+ T cell proliferative response developed after viral suppression and subsequent immune reconstitution. HIV-1 p24-specific CD4+ T cells from this subject were expanded in vitro, stimulated with p24 Ag, and selected for cloning by IFN-{gamma} production. The resulting clones were analyzed for cytokine profile, target epitope characteristics, and overall repertoire diversity. Based on the diversity of this clonal repertoire, we used an IFN-{gamma} ELISPOT assay to determine the p24 peptides recognized by CD4+ T cells from additional HIV-1-infected subjects first treated with HAART during advanced HIV-1 disease.

Using p24 Ag stimulation followed by intracellular cytokine staining, we showed that most clones produced both IFN-{gamma} and IL-4. This Th0 cytokine profile (reviewed in Ref. 32) was unexpected, given that several other studies have reported HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells with a predominantly Th1 profile, including IFN-{gamma}, but not IL-4. In intracellular cytokine staining assays performed on peripheral CD4+ T cells from HIV-1-infected, HAART-treated subjects, Pitcher et al. (27) did not detect HIV-1 Ag-specific, IL-4-producing CD4+ T cells, but did detect significant frequencies of HIV-1-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ T cells. Similarly, two published studies of CD4+ T cell clones from HIV-1-infected subjects emphasized the Th1 profiles of the clones obtained (23, 30). On the other hand, our results are consistent with a recent study of HIV-1 Gag-specific CD4+ T cell clones derived from an HIV-1-seronegative donor by in vitro immunization (33).

These data do not establish that a significant proportion of this subject’s p24-specific CD4+ T cells produced IL-4 and IL-5 in vivo. Because clones were selected for both cytokine production and ability to expand in vitro, they might represent an insignificantly small fraction of the p24-specific Th cell population present in vivo. Alternatively, as seemingly polarized Th1 populations in other systems can be induced to express IL-4 in vitro (34), the clones studied here might have gained IL-4 and IL-5 expression only after selection. Nevertheless, as in other HIV-1-specific Th cell cloning studies (23, 30), the clones in our study were cultured without IL-4 or other Th2-skewing factors. Furthermore, not all clones produced IL-4, even though all clones were grown under the same conditions. Finally, all four Th1 clones recognized the same 22-aa p24 peptide. Because clones were stimulated in vitro with mitogen rather than specific Ag, the correlation of peptide specificity and cytokine profile suggests that cytokine profile differences among the clones might have been determined in vivo rather than in vitro.

Using overlapping p24 peptides to stimulate the clones in proliferation assays, we identified a minimum of eight epitope targets of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells from our study subject. Among these eight distinct epitopes, three appear to be previously unreported (HIV-1 Gag aa positions 167–176, 160–168, and 381–400). The remaining five overlap with peptides previously shown to stimulate proliferative responses in PBMC from HIV-1-infected subjects (1, 35, 36). However, only the epitope targeted by clone 6C10 (positions 133–141) has been mapped previously using peptides <20 aa (25). This epitope is also the only one shown to be restricted by the same MHC molecule as determined in our study. The results of Harcourt et al. (25) differed from ours in that the peptide used to stimulate CD4+ T cell responses in their study contained a leucine at position 138 rather than an isoleucine. A variant peptide with isoleucine at position 138 failed to stimulate the same CD4+ T cell response in their study. Because both variants bound well to the restricting HLA-DR1 molecule, the different recognition patterns of these variants in the two studies are probably due to differences in TCR specificity rather than differential epitope presentation.

Of the eight epitopes identified in this study, five were restricted by HLA-DR{beta}1*0101. Not surprisingly, in vitro binding assays revealed that several of these bound this MHC molecule with high affinity. The epitopes recognized by clones 6 and 4F5 also bound other common HLA-DR molecules with high affinity, making them potentially useful in vaccines targeting individuals with diverse MHC II types. More surprisingly, several of these epitopes bound to HLA-DR{beta}1*0101 with IC50 values >1000 nM. Previous studies have suggested that epitopes with such low affinity for presenting MHC are poorly immunogenic in vivo (37). However, we noted that the peptides used for in vitro binding studies were based on the sequence of a laboratory-adapted reference strain of HIV-1. The viral peptides that initiated priming and expansion of these clones in vivo may have bound their restricting MHC with higher affinity than the peptides used for in vitro studies. Finally, we found no clear correlation between each epitope peptide’s MHC binding affinity and its cognate clone’s functional avidity for either peptide epitope or whole p24 Ag. This might result partly from discordance between the binding affinity of each peptide for MHC and either its stability in solution or the efficiency with which proteolytic processing liberates it from whole p24 protein or a larger peptide fragment. It might also result from unpredictable differences in TCR affinity, which would not be completely determined by the affinity of MHC/peptide binding.

We found the clonal CD4+ T cell response to HIV-1 p24 Ag of our index subject, UH48, to be unexpectedly diverse in both the number of clonotypes it contained as well as the number of epitopes it targeted. To pursue this issue further, we determined the repertoire of p24 peptides targeted by CD4+ T cells from six additional HAART-treated subjects. These additional subjects all had CD4 counts of <200 cells/µl before initiating HAART and at least 350 cells/µl by the time of our study. Consistent with our findings in UH48, multiple p24 peptide-specific CD4+ T cell responses were detected in all additional subjects tested. Although all responded to fewer than seven p24 epitopes, the relative insensitivity of the ELISPOT assay compared with the cloning analysis performed for UH48 may partly account for this difference. In addition, the clonotypic and epitopic diversity revealed by both ELISPOT and cloning are likely to underestimate the total HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell diversity in these subjects, because p24-specific CD4+ T cell clones primed and expanded in vivo may not all cross-react with the HXB2-based p24 peptide sequences used in vitro. Furthermore, although other studies have suggested that HIV-1 p24 Ag is a primary target of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells in infected subjects (1, 15), responses against other HIV-1 Ags probably also contribute to the HIV-1-specific repertoire.

The finding of a diverse p24-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire in these subjects is noteworthy first because this topic has not been extensively studied previously. Past studies of the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire have focused on either long term nonprogressors or subjects treated with HAART during acute HIV-1 infection. Using either lymphoproliferation assays (1) or CD4+ T cell clones (23, 30) to identify epitopes, these studies have generally identified no more than three epitope targets per subject. One study that examined the breadth of HIV-1 peptide-specific lymphoproliferation in untreated subjects with progressive disease used three peptide-specific responses as the cutoff for a broad HIV-1-specific response (38). By contrast, no subject in our study responded to fewer than three p24 peptides. This difference may be due partly to differences in methods, as the ELISPOT assay on expanded CD4+ T cells used in this study is probably more sensitive than a PBMC lymphoproliferation assay. On the other hand, Blankson et al. (14) found that HAART-treated subjects with pretreatment CD4 count nadirs <150 cells/µl were more likely to have detectable HIV-1-specific lymphoproliferative responses than HAART-treated subjects with higher nadirs. If profound pretreatment CD4+ T cell depletion contributed to strong HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell reconstitution, it might also increase the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell diversity apparent in these assays.

The diversity of these p24-specific CD4+ T cell responses also leads us to question the origin of the HIV-1-specific clonotypes measured. The first and most trivial explanation for their origin is that they were primed in vitro during the 6–8 days of p24 Ag stimulation before cloning or ELISPOT analysis. We consider this unlikely because p24 peptide-specific responses could not be elicited from HIV-1-seronegative donors after identical periods of in vitro expansion. The second possibility is that all the clonotypes measured in this study were present in the peripheral blood of these subjects before treatment. Although we cannot rule this out, we consider it unlikely, given that peripheral blood CD4+ T cells were either rare or completely undetectable in all these subjects before treatment. These considerations suggest that some or all HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell clonotypes detected in this study appeared in the peripheral blood only after viral suppression. Redistribution of pre-existing clonotypes from other compartments, particularly the lymph nodes, might contribute to the observed responses. This would be consistent with a study by Bucy et al. (39), which suggested that a global reduction in T cell activation following viral suppression allowed CD4+ T cells to be released from the lymphoid tissues into the blood. Alternatively, the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell clonotypes detected in this study may have been primed from naive, CD4+ thymic emigrants after HAART. Although the reduction of viral Ag levels with viral suppression might weigh against this possibility, increased lymphoproliferative responses to p24 Ag have been associated with persistence of intracellular HIV-1 mRNA in subjects receiving stable HAART with suppressed plasma viremia (40).

An important limitation of this study is that the p24-specific CD4+ T cell repertoires of the study subjects were not characterized before HAART treatment. As a result, we have been unable to determine conclusively whether the diverse repertoires observed here were primarily shaped before or after viral suppression. However, a detailed analysis of the HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire before HAART would have been difficult even if these patients had been followed in our study before HAART. We have observed in related studies that the frequency of all p24-specific, IFN-{gamma}-producing CD4+ T cells in the peripheral blood of untreated subjects with advanced HIV-1 disease is near the lower limit of detection in our assays (15). Although responses of similarly low frequency were dissected further in the present study using Ag-specific expansions, HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells from untreated subjects with active viral replication have generally failed to expand in vitro (15). Attempts to overcome the suppressive effects of viral replication on CD4+ T cell proliferation will probably facilitate the dissection of clonotypes and epitopes targeted in untreated subjects and may allow the repertoire changes that occur with viral suppression to be followed directly.

Finally, our results emphasize that even subjects with advanced HIV-1 disease may retain the ability to respond to a broad array of HIV-1 epitopes after treatment. A previous study of virus-specific CD4+ T cells in humans has suggested that the virus-specific CD4+ T cell repertoire is capable of focusing on one or relatively few viral epitopes (24). For responses to genetically stable viral pathogens such as CMV, this focusing may benefit the host by allowing preferential expansion of the most protective T cell clonotypes. By contrast, for immune responses against genetically variable viruses such as HIV-1, epitope focusing might mean that the virus could escape from the CD4+ T cell response with mutations in relatively few epitopes. Although our study does not directly address the abundance of clonotypic CD4+ T cells specific for individual epitopes in the peripheral blood, it does show that the CD4+ T cell pool retains the ability to respond to multiple HIV-1-derived epitopes even after being severely depleted. The effect that this diversity of HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses will have on the clinical course and pathogenesis of HIV-1 disease will need to be determined in future studies.


    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge the subjects enrolled in this study, and we thank the physicians and staff of the University of Colorado Hospital Infectious Diseases Group practice for help with subject enrollment. We also thank the DAIDS Vaccine and Prevention Research Program and National Institutes of Health AIDS Reagent Program for providing the reagents used in this study.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AI01459 and AI48238. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Cara C. Wilson, Department of Medicine and Immunology, Division of Clinical Immunology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Campus Box B-164, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262. E-mail address: cara.wilson{at}UCHSC.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; B-LCL, B lymphoblastoid cell line; LPA, lymphocyte proliferation assay; MED, minimal effective dose; SFC, spot-forming cell. Back

Received for publication August 5, 2002. Accepted for publication November 12, 2002.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Rosenberg, E. S., J. M. Billingsley, A. M. Caliendo, S. L. Boswell, P. E. Sax, S. A. Kalams, B. D. Walker. 1997. Vigorous HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cell responses associated with control of viremia. Science 278:1447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wilson, J. D., N. Imami, A. Watkins, J. Gill, P. Hay, B. Gazzard, M. Westby, F. M. Gotch. 2000. Loss of CD4+ T cell proliferative ability but not loss of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 specificity equates with progression to disease. J. Infect. Dis. 182:792.[Medline]
  3. Musey, L. K., J. N. Krieger, J. P. Hughes, T. W. Schacker, L. Corey, M. J. McElrath. 1999. Early and persistent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific T helper dysfunction in blood and lymph nodes following acute HIV-1 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 180:278.[Medline]
  4. Kalams, S. A., S. P. Buchbinder, E. S. Rosenberg, J. M. Billingsley, D. S. Colbert, N. G. Jones, A. K. Shea, A. K. Trocha, B. D. Walker. 1999. Association between virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and helper responses in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J. Virol. 73:6715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rosenberg, E. S., M. Altfeld, S. H. Poon, M. N. Phillips, B. M. Wilkes, R. L. Eldridge, G. K. Robbins, R. T. D’Aquila, P. J. Goulder, B. D. Walker. 2000. Immune control of HIV-1 after early treatment of acute infection. Nature 407:523.[Medline]
  6. Ortiz, G. M., D. F. Nixon, A. Trkola, J. Binley, X. Jin, S. Bonhoeffer, P. J. Kuebler, S. M. Donahoe, M. A. Demoitie, W. M. Kakimoto, et al 1999. HIV-1-specific immune responses in subjects who temporarily contain virus replication after discontinuation of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 104:R13.
  7. Matloubian, M., R. J. Concepcion, R. Ahmed. 1994. CD4+ T cells are required to sustain CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell responses during chronic viral infection. J. Virol. 68:8056.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Walter, E. A., P. D. Greenberg, M. J. Gilbert, R. J. Finch, K. S. Watanabe, E. D. Thomas, S. R. Riddell. 1995. Reconstitution of cellular immunity against cytomegalovirus in recipients of allogeneic bone marrow by transfer of T-cell clones from the donor. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:1038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Plana, M., F. Garcia, T. Gallart, J. M. Miro, J. M. Gatell. 1998. Lack of T-cell proliferative response to HIV-1 antigens after 1 year of highly active antiretroviral treatment in early HIV-1 disease: Immunology Study Group of Spanish EARTH-1 Study. Lancet 352:1194.[Medline]
  10. Pontesilli, O., S. Kerkhof-Garde, N. G. Pakker, D. W. Notermans, M. T. Roos, M. R. Klein, S. A. Danner, F. Miedema. 1999. Antigen-specific T-lymphocyte proliferative responses during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) of HIV-1 infection. Immunol. Lett. 66:213.[Medline]
  11. Connick, E., M. M. Lederman, B. L. Kotzin, J. Spritzler, D. R. Kuritzkes, M. St. Clair, A. D. Sevin, L. Fox, M. H. Chiozzi, J. M. Leonard, et al 2000. Immune reconstitution in the first year of potent antiretroviral therapy and its relationship to virologic response. J. Infect. Dis. 181:358.[Medline]
  12. Al-Harthi, L., J. Siegel, J. Spritzler, J. Pottage, M. Agnoli, A. Landay. 2000. Maximum suppression of HIV replication leads to the restoration of HIV-specific responses in early HIV disease. AIDS 14:761.[Medline]
  13. Angel, J. B., K. G. Parato, A. Kumar, S. Kravcik, A. D. Badley, C. Fex, D. Ashby, E. Sun, D. W. Cameron. 2001. Progressive human immunodeficiency virus-specific immune recovery with prolonged viral suppression. J. Infect. Dis. 183:546.[Medline]
  14. Blankson, J. N., J. E. Gallant, R. F. Siliciano. 2001. Proliferative responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antigens in HIV-1-infected patients with immune reconstitution. J. Infect. Dis. 183:657.[Medline]
  15. Palmer, B. E., E. Boritz, N. Blyveis, C. C. Wilson. 2002. Discordance between frequency of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-specific {gamma} interferon-producing CD4+ T cells and HIV-1-specific lymphoproliferation in HIV-1-infected subjects with active viral replication. J. Virol. 76:5925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. McNeil, A. C., W. L. Shupert, C. A. Iyasere, C. W. Hallahan, J. A. Mican, R. T. Davey, Jr, M. Connors. 2001. High-level HIV-1 viremia suppresses viral antigen-specific CD4+ T cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:13878.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Kostense, S., K. Vandenberghe, J. Joling, D. Van Baarle, N. Nanlohy, E. Manting, F. Miedema. 2002. Persistent numbers of tetramer+ CD8+ T cells, but loss of interferon-{gamma}+ HIV-specific T cells during progression to AIDS. Blood 99:2505.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Connors, M., J. A. Kovacs, S. Krevat, J. C. Gea-Banacloche, M. C. Sneller, M. Flanigan, J. A. Metcalf, R. E. Walker, J. Falloon, M. Baseler, et al 1997. HIV infection induces changes in CD4+ T-cell phenotype and depletions within the CD4+ T-cell repertoire that are not immediately restored by antiviral or immune-based therapies. Nat. Med. 3:533.[Medline]
  19. Gorochov, G., A. U. Neumann, A. Kereveur, C. Parizot, T. Li, C. Katlama, M. Karmochkine, G. Raguin, B. Autran, P. Debre. 1998. Perturbation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell repertoires during progression to AIDS and regulation of the CD4+ repertoire during antiviral therapy. Nat. Med. 4:215.[Medline]
  20. Markert, M. L., A. P. Alvarez-McLeod, G. D. Sempowski, L. P. Hale, J. M. Horvatinovich, K. J. Weinhold, J. A. Bartlett, T. A. D’Amico, B. F. Haynes. 2001. Thymopoiesis in HIV-infected adults after highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 17:1635.[Medline]
  21. Autran, B., G. Carcelain, T. S. Li, C. Blanc, D. Mathez, R. Tubiana, C. Katlama, P. Debre, J. Leibowitch. 1997. Positive effects of combined antiretroviral therapy on CD4+ T cell homeostasis and function in advanced HIV disease. Science 277:112.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Lederman, M. M., E. Connick, A. Landay, D. R. Kuritzkes, J. Spritzler, M. St. Clair, B. L. Kotzin, L. Fox, M. H. Chiozzi, J. M. Leonard, et al 1998. Immunologic responses associated with 12 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy consisting of zidovudine, lamivudine, and ritonavir: results of AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 315. J. Infect. Dis. 178:70.[Medline]
  23. Norris, P. J., M. Sumaroka, C. Brander, H. F. Moffett, S. L. Boswell, T. Nguyen, Y. Sykulev, B. D. Walker, E. S. Rosenberg. 2001. Multiple effector functions mediated by human immunodeficiency virus-specific CD4+ T-cell clones. J. Virol. 75:9771.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bitmansour, A. D., S. L. Waldrop, C. J. Pitcher, E. Khatamzas, F. Kern, V. C. Maino, L. J. Picker. 2001. Clonotypic structure of the human CD4+ memory T cell response to cytomegalovirus. J. Immunol. 167:1151.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Harcourt, G. C., S. Garrard, M. P. Davenport, A. Edwards, R. E. Phillips. 1998. HIV-1 variation diminishes CD4 T lymphocyte recognition. J. Exp. Med. 188:1785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ciurea, A., L. Hunziker, M. M. Martinic, A. Oxenius, H. Hengartner, R. M. Zinkernagel. 2001. CD4+ T-cell-epitope escape mutant virus selected in vivo. Nat. Med. 7:795.[Medline]
  27. Pitcher, C. J., C. Quittner, D. M. Peterson, M. Connors, R. A. Koup, V. C. Maino, L. J. Picker. 1999. HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells are detectable in most individuals with active HIV-1 infection, but decline with prolonged viral suppression. Nat. Med. 5:518.[Medline]
  28. Brosterhus, H., S. Brings, H. Leyendeckers, R. A. Manz, S. Miltenyi, A. Radbruch, M. Assenmacher, J. Schmitz. 1999. Enrichment and detection of live antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells based on cytokine secretion. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:4053.[Medline]
  29. Wilson, C. C., B. Palmer, S. Southwood, J. Sidney, Y. Higashimoto, E. Appella, R. Chesnut, A. Sette, B. D. Livingston. 2001. Identification and antigenicity of broadly cross-reactive and conserved human immunodeficiency virus type 1-derived helper T-lymphocyte epitopes. J. Virol. 75:4195.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Malhotra, U., S. Holte, S. Dutta, M. M. Berrey, E. Delpit, D. M. Koelle, A. Sette, L. Corey, M. J. McElrath. 2001. Role for HLA class II molecules in HIV-1 suppression and cellular immunity following antiretroviral treatment. J. Clin. Invest. 107:505.[Medline]
  31. Coffin, J. M.. 1992. Genetic diversity and evolution of retroviruses. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 176:143.[Medline]
  32. Abbas, A. K., K. M. Murphy, A. Sher. 1996. Functional diversity of helper T lymphocytes. Nature 383:787.[Medline]
  33. Venturini, S., D. E. Mosier, D. R. Burton, P. Poignard. 2002. Characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag- and Gag peptide-specific CD4+ T-cell clones from an HIV-1-seronegative donor following in vitro immunization. J. Virol. 76:6987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Mocci, S., R. L. Coffman. 1995. Induction of a Th2 population from a polarized Leishmania-specific Th1 population by in vitro culture with IL-4. J. Immunol. 154:3779.[Abstract]
  35. Wahren, B., J. Rosen, E. Sandstrom, T. Mathiesen, S. Modrow, H. Wigzell. 1989. HIV-1 peptides induce a proliferative response in lymphocytes from infected persons. J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. 2:448.
  36. Adams, S. L., R. A. Biti, G. J. Stewart. 1997. T-cell response to HIV in natural infection: optimized culture conditions for detecting responses to gag peptides. J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 15:257.[Medline]
  37. Southwood, S., J. Sidney, A. Kondo, M. F. del Guercio, E. Appella, S. Hoffman, R. T. Kubo, R. W. Chesnut, H. M. Grey, A. Sette. 1998. Several common HLA-DR types share largely overlapping peptide binding repertoires. J. Immunol. 160:3363.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Schrier, R. D., C. A. Wiley, C. Spina, J. A. McCutchan, I. Grant. 1996. Pathogenic and protective correlates of T cell proliferation in AIDS. HNRC Group. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center. J. Clin. Invest. 98:731.[Medline]
  39. Bucy, R. P., R. D. Hockett, C. A. Derdeyn, M. S. Saag, K. Squires, M. Sillers, R. T. Mitsuyasu, J. M. Kilby. 1999. Initial increase in blood CD4+ lymphocytes after HIV antiretroviral therapy reflects redistribution from lymphoid tissues. J. Clin. Invest. 103:1391.[Medline]
  40. Patterson, B. K., S. McCallister, M. Schutz, J. N. Siegel, K. Shults, Z. Flener, A. Landay. 2001. Persistence of intracellular HIV-1 mRNA correlates with HIV-1-specific immune responses in infected subjects on stable HAART. AIDS 15:1635.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
C. C. Wilson, M. J. Newman, B. D. Livingston, S. MaWhinney, J. E. Forster, J. Scott, R. T. Schooley, and C. A. Benson
Clinical Phase 1 Testing of the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Epitope-Based DNA Vaccine in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Infected Subjects Receiving Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., June 1, 2008; 15(6): 986 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. J. Miles, D. Elhassen, N. A. Borg, S. L. Silins, F. E. Tynan, J. M. Burrows, A. W. Purcell, L. Kjer-Nielsen, J. Rossjohn, S. R. Burrows, et al.
CTL Recognition of a Bulged Viral Peptide Involves Biased TCR Selection
J. Immunol., September 15, 2005; 175(6): 3826 - 3834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
E. Boritz, B. E. Palmer, and C. C. Wilson
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1)-Specific CD4+ T Cells That Proliferate In Vitro Detected in Samples from Most Viremic Subjects and Inversely Associated with Plasma HIV-1 Levels
J. Virol., November 15, 2004; 78(22): 12638 - 12646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Zavala-Ruiz, I. Strug, B. D. Walker, P. J. Norris, and L. J. Stern
A hairpin turn in a class II MHC-bound peptide orients residues outside the binding groove for T cell recognition
PNAS, September 7, 2004; 101(36): 13279 - 13284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
A. Pajot, V. Pancre, N. Fazilleau, M.-L. Michel, G. Angyalosi, D. M. Ojcius, C. Auriault, F. A. Lemonnier, and Y.-C. Lone
Comparison of HLA-DR1-restricted T cell response induced in HLA-DR1 transgenic mice deficient for murine MHC class II and HLA-DR1 transgenic mice expressing endogenous murine MHC class II molecules
Int. Immunol., September 1, 2004; 16(9): 1275 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
D. E. Kaufmann, P. M. Bailey, J. Sidney, B. Wagner, P. J. Norris, M. N. Johnston, L. A. Cosimi, M. M. Addo, M. Lichterfeld, M. Altfeld, et al.
Comprehensive Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific CD4 Responses Reveals Marked Immunodominance of gag and nef and the Presence of Broadly Recognized Peptides
J. Virol., May 1, 2004; 78(9): 4463 - 4477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boritz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boritz, E.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS