|
|
||||||||




* Edward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation prevents dsRNA-stimulated
COX-2 expression and PGE2 accumulation by macrophages.
These findings indicate that virus infection and treatment with dsRNA
stimulate COX-2 expression by a mechanism that requires the activation
of NF-
B and that is independent of PKR or iPLA2
activation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
by PKR results in the suppression of protein synthesis
(8). PKR also participates in the activation of a number
of transcription factors, including NF-
B and IFN regulatory
factor-1 (IRF-1) as well as in the expression of proinflammatory genes,
including inducible NO synthase (iNOS), IL-1, and IL-6 (1, 9, 10).
In unstimulated cells NF-
B is sequestered in the cytoplasm by the
inhibitory protein I
B. Following stimulation by proinflammatory
cytokines, dsRNA, or viral infection, I
B is phosphorylated,
ubiquitinated, and targeted for degradation by the 26S proteasome
(11, 12). In vitro studies have shown that PKR has the
ability to phosphorylate I
B (13), and dsRNA- and
virus-stimulated NF-
B nuclear localization and DNA binding
activities are attenuated in fibroblast cell lines deficient in PKR
(13, 14, 15). The mechanism by which PKR stimulates NF-
B
activation is associated with the activation of I
B kinase (IKK). PKR
appears to be capable of activating IKK through protein-protein
interactions, as wild-type PKR overexpression stimulates IKK activity,
and catalytically inactive PKR expressed at high levels also results in
IKK activation (16, 17, 18, 19). While PKR has been implicated in
the activation of NF-
B, a PKR-independent pathway activated by dsRNA
and virus infection that results in NF-
B activation and the
subsequent expression of genes in an NF-
B-dependent manner has
recently been identified. Double-stranded RNA and encephalomyocarditis
virus (EMCV) infection of PKR-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts
results in I
B degradation, NF-
B nuclear localization, and DNA
binding as well as NF-
B promoter activation (20).
Peritoneal macrophages and islets of Langerhans isolated from
PKR-/- mice do not display defects in the
ability of dsRNA to activate NF-
B (9, 21). In RAW 264.7
macrophages, the stable expression of dominant negative (dn) PKR does
not modulate the ability of dsRNA to stimulate I
B degradation or
NF-
B nuclear localization and DNA binding; however, dnPKR does
attenuate dsRNA-stimulated iNOS expression (9).
Importantly, the PKR-dependentexpression of iNOS by
dnPKR-expressing RAW 264.7 cells can be overcome by IFN-
(9). In naive peritoneal macrophages, which require two
proinflammatory signals to stimulate iNOS expression (22),
the presence of functional PKR is not required for dsRNA- and
IFN-
-induced iNOS expression or NO production (9).
Similar to iNOS, macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- and PKR+/+ mice
express and release equivalent levels of IL-1 in response to dsRNA
(9). These findings suggest that the role of PKR in the
regulation of NF-
B and proinflammatory cytokine expression may be
cell type specific. In RAW 264.7 macrophages, PKR appears to regulate
iNOS expression by a yet to be identified pathway, as PKR is not
required for dsRNA-induced NF-
B activation (9). IRF-1
is one transcription factor whose activation is essential for iNOS
expression by macrophages (23), and PKR appears to
regulate IRF-1 expression (1); however, dsRNA stimulates
IRF-1 expression to similar levels in macrophages and islets isolated
from PKR-/- and PKR+/+
mice (24).
In an effort to elucidate PKR-independent signaling pathways that
regulate inflammatory gene expression by macrophages, we recently
identified a novel phospholipid-signaling cascade that participates in
the regulation of iNOS expression by macrophages in response to dsRNA
and EMCV infection. Bromoenol lactone (BEL), a selective suicide
substrate inhibitor of the calcium-independent phospholipase
A2 (iPLA2)
(25) attenuates dsRNA-, dsRNA- plus IFN-
-, and
EMCV-induced iNOS mRNA accumulation, protein expression, and production
of NO by RAW 264.7 cells and primary mouse macrophages
(26). While BEL inhibits iNOS expression, it does not
modulate dsRNA-stimulated NF-
B activation or IL-1 expression and
release. The molecular mechanism by which iPLA2
participates in the regulation of dsRNA-stimulated iNOS expression
appears to be associated with the release of a lysophospholipid that is
capable of activating PKA and subsequently activating CREB. These
findings have identified a signaling role for
iPLA2 in the PKR-independent regulation of iNOS
expression by macrophages following virus infection.
In this report the roles of iPLA2 and
PKR in the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression by
macrophages were examined. COX catalyzes the oxidation of arachidonic
acid, producing PGH2, which is then isomerized to
biologically active eicosanoids and thromboxanes (27). Of
the isoforms of COX, COX-2 expression is stimulated under inflammatory
conditions (28). Virus infection has been shown to
stimulate COX-2 expression (29, 30, 31, 32), and inhibitors of
COX-2 enzymatic activity attenuate virus replication (33, 34), suggesting that the expression of COX-2 and the increased
production of PGs may play an important role in viral replication. In
addition, we and others have shown that under proinflammatory
conditions the expression of COX-2 and iNOS appear to be coordinately
regulated (35, 36, 37, 38). Using macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- mice and overexpression of dnPKR, we
show that the presence of functional PKR is not required for dsRNA- and
EMCV-induced COX-2 expression by macrophages. While the
iPLA2 inhibitor BEL prevents dsRNA- and
EMCV-induced iNOS expression (26), BEL does not attenuate
macrophage expression of COX-2 under similar conditions. In contrast,
inhibition of NF-
B activation prevents the stimulatory effects of
dsRNA and EMCV infection on COX-2 expression and
PGE2 production by macrophages. These findings
suggest that viral infection stimulates the expression of COX-2 and the
production of inflammatory PGs by an NF-
B-dependent and PKR- and
iPLA2-independent mechanism.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DMEM containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS and
L-glutamine was obtained from Washington University Tissue
Culture Support Center (St. Louis, MO). CMRL-1066 tissue culture
medium, L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, lipofectin,
and geneticin G418 were obtained from Life Technologies (Grand Island,
NY). Poly IC was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO) and was
prepared for use as previously described (9).
[
-32P]dCTP and ECL reagents were purchased
from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ). The pDEST26 mammalian
expression vector was purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA).
HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Jackson
ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). Rabbit antiserum specific
for the C-terminal 27 aa of mouse macrophage iNOS was a gift from Dr.
T. Misko (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, St. Louis, MO). The
PKR-/- mice (C57BL/6 J x 129/SV
background) were a gift from Dr. R. Kaufman and have been previously
described (4, 15). C57BL/6J wild-type mice were purchased
from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). COX-2 cDNA and rabbit
anti-COX-2 antiserum were obtained from Cayman Chemicals (Ann
Arbor, MI). All other reagents were obtained from commercially
available sources.
Stable transfections
For these studies, RAW 264.7 cells stably expressing the
dominant negative PKR mutant K296P (RAW-PKR-M1.1) and a second line
expressing the empty vector pDEST26 (RAW-pDEST26) were generated by
lipofectin transfection using methods previously described
(9). In brief, RAW 264.7 cells were plated at 2 x
105 cells/3 ml of complete CMRL-1066 (CMRL-1066
containing 2 mM L-glutamine, 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 100
U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin) and were allowed to grow
to
50% confluence. Plasmid DNA (2 µg), pDEST26, or pDEST26-K296P
was incubated in 100 µl of CMRL-1066 containing 2 mM
L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml
streptomycin for 30 min at room temperature. Lipofectin (8 µg/ml) was
added, and the mixture was incubated for an additional 15 min at room
temperature, followed by the addition of 800 µl of CMRL-1066. The
cells were washed once with CMRL-1066, followed by the addition of the
DNA-lipofectin mixture. Following 24-h incubation at 37°C, the medium
was replaced with DMEM, and the RAW 264.7 cells were cultured at 37°C
for an additional 48 h. The cells were removed from growth flasks
by treatment with 0.05% trypsin/0.02% EDTA, and transferred to T-25
flasks in DMEM containing 400 µg/ml G418 for selection of stably
transfected cells. The cells were maintained in DMEM containing 200
µg/ml G418.
Peritoneal macrophage isolation and cell culture
Peritoneal exudate cells were isolated from
PKR-/- and PKR+/+ mice by
lavage as previously described (39). Following isolation,
4 x 105 cells in 400 µl of complete
CMRL-1066 were incubated at 37°C under an atmosphere of 95% air 5%
CO2 for 3 h. Cells were washed three times
with complete CMRL-1066 to remove nonadherent cells before treatment
with poly IC, EMCV, and IFN-
as indicated in the figure legends. To
control for potential strain differences, the effects of dsRNA and
IFN-
on iNOS expression and NO production were compared between
macrophages isolated from C57BL/6 x 129 (The Jackson Laboratory,
Bar Harbor, ME) and C57BL/6 mice, and no differences were observed
(data not shown).
RAW 264.7 cells were removed from growth flasks by treatment with 0.05% trypsin/0.02% EDTA at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with DMEM, plated at a density of 4 x 105 cells/400 µl of DMEM, and cultured for 23 h before initiation of experiments.
Adenovirus infection
RAW 264.7 cells and peritoneal exudate cells were infected for
18 h in complete CMRL-1066 at various multiplicities of infection
(MOI) with replication-defective adenovirus expressing either
-galactosidase (Ad
gal) or mutant super-repressor I
B
(AdI
B
) (40, 41). Following infection, cells were
washed in PBS, fresh medium was added, and cells were treated as
described in the figure legends.
Nitrite and PGE2 determination
Nitrite formation was determined by mixing 50 µl of culture medium with 50 µl of Greiss reagent as described previously (42). The absorbance at 540 nm was measured, and nitrite concentrations were calculated from a sodium nitrite standard curve. PGE2 release was determined using a PGE2 enzyme immunosorbent assay according to the manufacturers specifications (Cayman Chemicals).
Western blot analysis
Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) under semidry transfer conditions as previously described (43, 44). Ab dilutions were: rabbit anti-mouse COX-2, 1/1000' rabbit anti-mouse iNOS, 1/1000; and HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit, 1/7000. Ag was detected by ECL according to the manufacturers specifications (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Northern blot analysis
Total RNA was isolated from macrophages using the RNeasy RNA
isolation kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). RNA (510 µg) was denatured,
fractionated, and transferred to Duralon UV nylon membranes
(Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) by capillary action in 20x SSC, 3 M NaCl,
and 0.3 M sodium citrate (pH 7.0), and the membranes were hybridized to
32P-labeled probes specific for iNOS, COX-2, and
cyclophilin. The DNA probes were radiolabeled with
[
-32P]dCTP by random priming using the
Prime-A-Gene nick translation system from Promega (Madison, WI).
Cyclophilin was used as an internal RNA loading control. Hybridization
and autoradiography were performed as described previously
(10).
Statistics
Statistical comparisons were made between groups using one-way ANOVA. Significant differences between groups (p < 0.05) were determined by Bonferroni post hoc analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
on COX-2 expression by macrophages
Previous studies have shown that the expressions of iNOS and COX-2
are coordinately regulated in response to a number of inflammatory
mediators (35, 36, 37, 38). One activator of iNOS expression by
macrophages is dsRNA (10), and consistent with the
previously described coordinate regulation of COX-2 and iNOS
expression, dsRNA stimulates COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7 cells (Fig. 1). Treatment of RAW 264.7 cells with
poly IC results in COX-2 mRNA accumulation following a 6-h incubation
and COX-2 protein expression following a 24-h incubation (Fig. 1, A and B). The stimulatory effects of poly IC on
COX-2 expression are accompanied by an
10-fold increase in the
accumulation of PGE2 in the culture medium of RAW
264.7 cells following a 24-h incubation (Fig. 1C). The
stimulatory actions of poly IC on COX-2 expression and
PGE2 production are enhanced in the presence of
IFN-
, while IFN-
alone stimulates low levels of COX-2 expression
and PGE2 production by RAW 264.7 cells. These
findings are consistent with the previously described stimulatory
actions of poly IC on iNOS mRNA accumulation, protein expression, and
nitrite production (10) and suggest that similar signaling
pathways may regulate COX-2 and iNOS expression in macrophages.
|
The role of PKR in the regulation of dsRNA-induced COX-2
expression was examined using the dnPKR point mutant PKR-M1.1 (K196R)
stably transfected into RAW 264.7 cells (RAW-PKR-M1.1). Incubation of
RAW 264.7 cells stably expressing the empty vector pDEST26
(RAW-pDEST26) or RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR (RAW-PKR-M1.1) with
poly IC or poly IC plus IFN-
for 6 h results in the
accumulation of similar levels of COX-2 mRNA (Fig. 2A). Following 24-h
incubation, poly IC and poly IC plus IFN-
stimulate similar levels
of COX-2 protein expression and PGE2 production
by RAW-pDEST26 and RAW-PKR-M1.1 cells (Fig. 2, B and
C). We have previously shown that dsRNA-induced iNOS
expression is attenuated in RAW 264.7 cells expressing this dnPKR
mutant, and that the inhibitory actions of dnPKR on iNOS expression can
be overcome by the presence of IFN-
(9). Consistent
with these previous findings, poly IC-induced iNOS mRNA accumulation,
iNOS protein expression, and nitrite production are attenuated in
RAW-PKR-M1.1 cells (Fig. 2). In addition, the inhibitory actions of
dnPKR on iNOS expression and nitrite production are overcome by the
presence of a second proinflammatory stimulus, IFN-
. These findings
suggest that dsRNA stimulates both COX-2 and iNOS expression; however,
COX-2 expression in response to dsRNA appears to occur by a
PKR-independent pathway, while the stimulation of RAW 264.7 cell iNOS
expression by dsRNA is dependent on PKR, an effect that can be overcome
by the presence of IFN-
.
|
To confirm that poly IC recapitulates the response of macrophages
to a virus infection and to determine whether PKR is required for
virus-induced COX-2 expression, the effects of EMCV infection on COX-2
expression by RAW 264.7 cells and RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR were
examined. Infection of RAW-pDEST26 cells for 24 h with EMCV
stimulates COX-2 expression and the production of
PGE2 (Fig. 3, A and B). The stimulatory actions of EMCV on
COX-2 expression and PGE2 production are slightly
enhanced in the presence of IFN-
. These findings are consistent with
the stimulatory actions of poly IC on COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7
cells (Fig. 1). Importantly, EMCV and EMCV plus IFN-
stimulate COX-2
expression and PGE2 production to similar levels
in RAW-pDEST26 and RAW-PKR-M1.1 cells, indicating that PKR is not
required for virus-induced COX-2 expression by macrophages.
|
To directly determine whether PKR is required for COX-2
expression, the effects of dsRNA and EMCV infection on COX-2 expression
by macrophages isolated from PKR knockout mice were examined. In
response to a 24-h treatment with poly IC, macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- and PKR+/+ mice
express COX-2 to similar levels and produce comparable levels of
PGE2 (Fig. 4, A and B). Alone, IFN-
does not stimulate COX-2
expression or PGE2 production; however, IFN-
enhances the expression of COX-2 and production of
PGE2 by macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- and PKR+/+ mice.
Consistent with the effects of poly IC on COX-2 expression, EMCV
infection stimulates COX-2 expression and PGE2
production to similar levels by macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- and PKR+/+ mice
(Fig. 4, C and D). IFN-
enhances the
stimulatory actions of EMCV on COX-2 expression and
PGE2 production, while IFN-
alone fails to
stimulate COX-2 expression or PGE2 production by
mouse macrophages. These findings provide evidence that the presence of
functional PKR is not required for poly IC- or EMCV-induced COX-2
expression by mouse macrophages.
|
B in dsRNA-induced COX-2 expression by mouse
macrophages
We have previously shown that dsRNA stimulates I
B degradation,
NF-
B nuclear localization, and NF-
B reporter activity in RAW
264.7 cells, and that NF-
B activation is required for dsRNA-induced
iNOS expression (10, 26). In addition, dsRNA stimulates
NF-
B activation to similar levels in macrophages isolated from
wild-type and PKR-/- mice and in RAW 264.7
cells and RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR, indicating that the
presence of PKR is not required for NF-
B activation
(9). Using two structurally different inhibitors of
NF-
B activation, the antioxidant pyrrolidine-dithiocarbamate
(PDTC) and the proteasome inhibitor MG-132, the role of NF-
B
activation in dsRNA-induced COX-2 expression was examined. As shown in
Fig. 5, the stimulatory actions of 24-h
incubation of RAW 264.7 cells with dsRNA or dsRNA plus IFN-
on COX-2
expression are prevented by both PDTC and MG-132 at concentrations that
we have previously shown to inhibit NF-
B activation in RAW 264.7
cells (10). Consistent with the inhibition of COX-2
expression, both PDTC and MG-132 prevent poly IC-induced and poly IC-
plus IFN-
-induced PGE2 production by RAW 264.7
cells (Fig. 5B). To confirm that NF-
B participates in the
regulation of COX-2 expression, macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- mice were infected with an adenovirus
vector expressing an I
B super-repressor (AdI
B
). This construct
contains the I
B
S32A/S36A mutation that prevents phosphorylation
and subsequent degradation of I
B (40, 41). As shown in
Fig. 5C, EMCV- plus IFN-
-induced COX-2 expression is
significantly decreased in macrophages infected with AdI
B
compared with cells infected with control virus (Ad
gal).
Overexpression of AdI
B
also attenuates poly IC-stimulated and
poly IC- plus IFN-
-stimulated COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7 cells
(data not shown). These findings provide direct evidence in support of
a role for NF-
B in the regulation of dsRNA- and EMCV-stimulated
COX-2 expression by macrophages.
|
Recently, we have shown that dsRNA activates iPLA2, and that BEL, a suicide substrate inhibitor of iPLA2, prevents dsRNA- and EMCV-induced iNOS expression by RAW 264.7 cells (26). Importantly, dsRNA stimulates iPLA2 activity in macrophages isolated from wild-type and PKR-/- mice, suggesting that PKR is not required for dsRNA-induced iPLA2 activation (26). To determine whether iPLA2 participates in the regulation of COX-2 expression by macrophages, the effects of BEL on poly IC-induced COX-2 expression were examined by Western blot analysis. Consistent with our previous studies, iNOS expression, stimulated by 24-h incubation of RAW 264.7 cells with dsRNA, is prevented by BEL (Fig. 6). In contrast, BEL does not inhibit dsRNA-induced COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7 cells. In addition, BEL does not attenuate the stimulatory actions of EMCV infection on COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7 cells. These findings suggest that the activation of iPLA2 is not required for dsRNA- or EMCV-induced COX-2 expression, a finding that is in contrast to the requirement for iPLA2 activation in the regulation of iNOS expression in response to poly IC and virus infection.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(9). In addition, PKR is
believed to participate in the activation of NF-
B, as
dsRNA-stimulated DNA binding activity of NF-
B is attenuated in
PKR-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts compared with wild-type
control cells (13, 14, 15). While PKR appears to participate
in dsRNA-induced iNOS expression by RAW 264.7 cells, PKR is not
required for the activation of NF-
B in these cells. We have shown
that dsRNA stimulates NF-
B nuclear localization and DNA binding
activity as well as I
B degradation to similar levels in RAW 264.7
cells and RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR (9). In the
current study we provide evidence that PKR is also not required for
dsRNA-stimulated COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7 cells. Treatment of RAW
264.7 cells or RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR with dsRNA results in
similar levels of COX-2 mRNA accumulation, protein expression, and
PGE2 accumulation. Furthermore, EMCV stimulates
COX-2 expression and PGE2 accumulation to similar
levels in RAW 264.7 cells and RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR. In
contrast, dsRNA-stimulated iNOS expression and NO production are
significantly attenuated in RAW 264.7 cells expressing dnPKR. These
findings indicate that while dsRNA stimulates the coexpression of iNOS
and COX-2 by RAW 264.7 cells, the regulation of iNOS expression is
dependent on PKR, while COX-2 is expressed in a PKR-independent
fashion.
In primary mouse macrophages a combination of at least two inflammatory
signals is required for iNOS expression (22). We have
shown that dsRNA in combination with IFN-
stimulates iNOS expression
and nitrite production to similar levels in macrophages isolated from
PKR-/- and PKR+/+ mice
(9, 26). In this study PKR-/- mice
were used to show that the presence of PKR is not required for
macrophage COX-2 expression in response to either poly IC or EMCV
infection. In addition, COX-2 expression by primary mouse macrophages
does not require two proinflammatory signals, as poly IC alone
stimulates COX-2 expression, although the level of expression is
enhanced by IFN-
. In a similar fashion, EMCV stimulates the
PKR-independent expression of COX-2 by murine macrophages, and the
levels of expression are also enhanced by IFN-
. IFN-
alone does
not stimulate COX-2 expression by primary mouse macrophages. These
findings indicate that the presence of PKR is not required for COX-2
expression by either RAW 264.7 cells or primary mouse macrophages.
Recently, we have identified a role for iPLA2 in
the selective regulation of inflammatory gene expression in macrophages
(26). The iPLA2 suicide substrate
inhibitor BEL prevents dsRNA- and EMCV-induced iNOS expression by RAW
264.7 cells and mouse macrophages. The concentration-dependent
inhibition of iNOS expression by BEL is consistent with the
concentration-dependent inhibition of dsRNA-stimulated
iPLA2 activity in RAW 264.7 cells. Also, BEL does
not attenuate the activation of NF-
B by dsRNA in macrophages,
indicating that the actions of iPLA2 are not
mediated by inhibition of this transcriptional regulator
(26). The iPLA2 appears to mediate
dsRNA and EMCV-induced iNOS expression by activation of PKA and
subsequent activation of CREB as evidenced by the following findings:
1) inhibitors of PKA prevent dsRNA-induced iNOS expression; 2) dsRNA
stimulates CREB phosphorylation in a BEL-sensitive fashion; and 3)
mutations in the CREB binding elements in the iNOS promoter attenuate
dsRNA-stimulated iNOS reporter activity (26). While
iPLA2 appears to participate in the regulation of
iNOS expression, the iPLA2 inhibitor BEL fails to
modulate dsRNA- or EMCV-induced COX-2 expression by macrophages. These
findings provide further evidence in support of a selective role for
iPLA2 in the regulation of macrophage
proinflammatory gene expression in response to dsRNA and virus
infection, as iNOS expression appears to be dependent on
iPLA2 activation, while dsRNA- and EMCV-induced
COX-2 expression (this study) and IL-1 expression (26)
appear to occur by iPLA2-independent
mechanisms.
While iPLA2 and PKR do not appear to participate
in the regulation of COX-2 expression by macrophages, inhibition of
NF-
B activation using the antioxidant PDTC, the proteasome inhibitor
MG-132, or I
B super-repressor expression prevents dsRNA- and
EMCV-induced COX-2 expression by RAW 264.7 cells and mouse macrophages.
Importantly, we have previously shown that PKR is not required for the
activation of NF-
B (9), and that inhibitors of
iPLA2 do not modulate NF-
B activation in RAW
264.7 cells (26). In addition, we have shown that PDTC and
MG-132 attenuate dsRNA-stimulated NF-
B nuclear localization and DNA
binding as well as I
B degradation in RAW 264.7 cells (9, 10). NF-
B has been implicated in the regulation of macrophage
COX-2 expression in response to PKC activators such as phorbol esters
and in response to endotoxin (45, 46). Our findings are
consistent with these previous studies and identify NF-
B as a
primary regulator of COX-2 expression by macrophages in response to
dsRNA or viral infection. The regulation of NF-
B activation and
COX-2 expression in macrophages following dsRNA treatment or viral
infection does not appear to occur by mechanisms that require the
presence of PKR, nor do they require iPLA2
activation. It is possible that the mechanism by which dsRNA and viral
infection stimulate NF-
B activation may be associated with TLR3
receptor signaling, as this receptor has recently been identified as
the dsRNA receptor (47), and we have shown that
macrophages express the TLR3 receptor (J. M. Moran and J. A.
Corbett, unpublished observation). Currently, we are examining the
potential role of TLR3 receptor signaling in the regulation of NF-
B
activation and proinflammatory gene expression in macrophages in
response to dsRNA and viral infection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John A. Corbett, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, St. Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 South Grand Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63104. E-mail address: corbettj{at}slu.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: PKR, dsRNA-dependent protein kinase; BEL, bromoenol lactone; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; dn, dominant negative; iPLA2, calcium-independent phospholipase A2; EMCV, encephalomyocarditis virus; I
B, inhibitory protein
B; IKK, I
B kinase; iNOS, inducible NO synthase; IRF-1, IFN regulatory factor-1; MOI, multiplicity of infection; poly IC, polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid; PDTC, pyrrolidine-dithiocarbamate. ![]()
Received for publication September 10, 2002. Accepted for publication November 19, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
kinase DAI in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:365.[Abstract]
B activation. J. Biol. Chem. 273:15301.
B kinase (IKK) and NF-
B: key elements of proinflammatory signalling. Semin. Immunol. 12:85.[Medline]
B in the immune system. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:141.[Medline]
B by phosphorylating I
B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:6288.
are required for activating the innate response to viral infection. Immunity 11:721.[Medline]
B activation. Oncogene 20:385.[Medline]
B activation by double-stranded-RNA-activated protein kinase (PKR) is mediated through NF-
B-inducing kinase and I
B kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1278.
B irrespective of its kinase function by interacting with the I
B kinase complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4532.
B
kinase (IKK) complex by double-stranded RNA-binding defective and catalytic inactive mutants of the interferon-inducible protein kinase PKR. Oncogene 20:1900.[Medline]
B by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) in the absence of protein kinase R and RNase L demonstrates the existence of two separate dsRNA-triggered antiviral programs. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:61.
B activation by islets. Diabetes 50:283.
induces the coexpression of both nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase by islets of Langerhans: activation of cyclooxygenase by nitric oxide. Biochemistry 32:13767.[Medline]
B super-repressor in human intestinal epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 160:410.
B activation to maintain A1 expression and mitochondrial homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:8855.
increases the sensitivity of islets of Langerhans for inducible nitric-oxide synthase expression induced by interleukin 1. J. Biol. Chem. 272:13697.
-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human lung epithelial cells: involvement of the phospholipase C-
2, protein kinase C-
, tyrosine kinase, NF-
B-inducing kinase, and I-
B kinase 1/2 pathway. J. Immunol. 165:2719.
B signaling pathways in macrophages. Biochem. Pharmacol. 54:87.[Medline]
B by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413:732.[Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Steer, J. M. Moran, B. S. Christmann, L. B. Maggi Jr, and J. A. Corbett Role of MAPK in the Regulation of Double-Stranded RNA- and Encephalomyocarditis Virus-Induced Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by Macrophages. J. Immunol., September 1, 2006; 177(5): 3413 - 3420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Moran, M. A. Moxley, R. M. L. Buller, and J. A. Corbett Encephalomyocarditis Virus Induces PKR-Independent Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation in Macrophages J. Virol., August 15, 2005; 79(16): 10226 - 10236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Waris and A. Siddiqui Hepatitis C Virus Stimulates the Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 via Oxidative Stress: Role of Prostaglandin E2 in RNA Replication J. Virol., August 1, 2005; 79(15): 9725 - 9734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Moran, R. M. L. Buller, J. McHowat, J. Turk, M. Wohltmann, R. W. Gross, and J. A. Corbett Genetic and Pharmacologic Evidence That Calcium-independent Phospholipase A2{beta} Regulates Virus-induced Inducible Nitric-oxide Synthase Expression by Macrophages J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 28162 - 28168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Richardson, M. G. Ottolini, L. Pletneva, M. Boukhvalova, S. Zhang, S. N. Vogel, G. A. Prince, and J. C. G. Blanco Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection Induces Cyclooxygenase 2: A Potential Target for RSV Therapy J. Immunol., April 1, 2005; 174(7): 4356 - 4364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Granja, M. L. Nogal, C. Hurtado, V. Vila, A. L. Carrascosa, M. L. Salas, M. Fresno, and Y. Revilla The Viral Protein A238L Inhibits Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression through a Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cell-dependent Transactivation Pathway J. Biol. Chem., December 17, 2004; 279(51): 53736 - 53746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ray, M. E. Bisher, and L. W. Enquist Cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 Are Required for Production of Infectious Pseudorabies Virus J. Virol., December 1, 2004; 78(23): 12964 - 12974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Rue, M. A. Jarvis, A. J. Knoche, H. L. Meyers, V. R. DeFilippis, S. G. Hansen, M. Wagner, K. Fruh, D. G. Anders, S. W. Wong, et al. A Cyclooxygenase-2 Homologue Encoded by Rhesus Cytomegalovirus Is a Determinant for Endothelial Cell Tropism J. Virol., November 15, 2004; 78(22): 12529 - 12536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Symensma, D. Martinez-Guzman, Q. Jia, E. Bortz, T.-T. Wu, N. Rudra-Ganguly, S. Cole, H. Herschman, and R. Sun COX-2 Induction during Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Infection Leads to Enhancement of Viral Gene Expression J. Virol., December 1, 2003; 77(23): 12753 - 12763. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |