|
|
||||||||
CUTTING EDGE |
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The BcR also plays a crucial role in B cell differentiation and survival. Immature B cells are targets of BcR-mediated selection, as evidenced by the significant cell losses and repertoire shifts associated with late B cell maturation (14, 15, 16). Further, continued BcR expression is requisite for mature B cell survival (17), and both BcR specificity and signaling can dictate relative survival advantage (18, 19). Despite these parallels, the relationship between BcR signaling and BLyS responsiveness remains unexplored. We herein show that BcR ligation selectively up-regulates expression of Bcmd/BR3. Further, the coupling of BcR signaling with Bcmd/BR3 expression is limited to late transitional subsets and mature follicular B cells. We also find that resting and BcR-stimulated B cells are dependent on BLyS for survival and that B cells remain BLyS responsive during BcR-induced proliferative responses.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BALB/cJ mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All procedures were conducted in accord with the Animal Welfare Act.
Recombinant BLyS and derivatives
Recombinant human BLyS (rBLyS) and biotin-conjugated BLyS were provided by Human Genome Sciences (Rockville, MD). Biotinylated BLyS was revealed by a second incubation with Streptavidin Red 670 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
B cell subset isolation, culture, and stimulation
Mature splenic B cells were prepared by MACS as described (13). Transitional and mature splenic B cell subsets for BLySR expression analyses were isolated by FACS as described (13, 20). Immature or mature B cells were cultured at 1 x 106 cells/ml as described previously (13). In some experiments, mature B cells were loaded with 1.25 µM carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in PBS. After a 3-min incubation, excess carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester or deacetylated carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) was quenched with an equal volume of FCS, and cells were washed once before culture. Various doses of F(ab')2 goat anti-mouse IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) were used for stimulation, in the presence or absence of 50 ng/ml soluble rBLyS (provided by Human Genome Sciences). Soluble CD154 (CD40L) was obtained from the supernatants of transfected J558L cells that express a CD154:CD8
fusion protein (21) and were used at an empirically optimized dilution of 1/5. A 1/80 dilution of supernatant containing anti-CD8 Abs (53.6-72) were added to cross-link the fusion protein (21). CFSE-labeled cells were also incubated with 1 nM TO-PRO-3 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) immediately before acquisition.
Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses
Semiquantitative RT-PCR for BLySR expression was performed as previously described (13). BLySR expression was normalized to ribosomal 18S levels using a QuantumRNA Classic 18S primer kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Cycle numbers used for normalization were chosen based on the determined linear range for each experiment.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early studies indicated that BLyS enhances [3H]TdR uptake among anti-µ-stimulated B cells (1), and others have proposed that BLySR signaling induces transitional cells to differentiate (22), suggesting that BLyS might deliver proliferative or inductive signals for B cell expansion and differentiation, similar to costimulatory TNF family members such as CD154. However, recent in vivo results showed that BLyS increases peripheral B cell numbers through enhanced survival among transitional and mature B cells, rather than through proliferative expansion (13); and prior in vitro studies had also suggested survival as a primary and perhaps exclusive action of BLyS (23). These seemingly disparate observations could indicate mechanistically different roles for BLyS in BcR-stimulated vs quiescent B cells. Alternatively, BLyS might afford survival in both cases, with the increased number of mitotic events in BcR-stimulated cultures reflecting enhanced proportional survival within successive cohorts of daughter cells before their next division. Therefore, before examining the effects of BcR ligation on BLyS responsiveness and receptor expression, we directly assessed these possibilities by simultaneously tracking the proliferation and survival of anti-µ-stimulated mature B cells in the presence of either BLyS or CD154.
Mature B cells cultured without anti-µ (Fig. 1A, left) underwent little division, and more than one-half of the input cells were dead after 72 h. In accord with previous reports (24), addition of CD154 alone engendered several divisions and significantly reduced proportional cell death (Fig. 1A, right). In contrast, BLyS alone fostered no proliferation but yielded a 4- to 5-fold increase in viability (Fig. 1A, middle). Experiments with higher doses of BLyS yielded similar results (not shown).
|
BcR stimulation increases BLyS-binding capacity
To determine whether stimulated cells remain responsive to BLyS after Ig stimulation, we incubated B cells with rBLyS after an initial 24-h pulse of anti-µ. The results indicated that BcR-stimulated cells remain responsive to BLyS, because the proportion of cells viable after 72 h was clearly enhanced, despite the deferred BLyS addition (Fig. 2A). The results show enhanced viability within both the initially cultured cohort and the first daughter generation, but effects on subsequent cohorts cannot be established because the withdrawal of anti-IgM at 24 h afforded only a single round of division.
|
BcR ligation selectively up-regulates Bcmd/BR3
The BcR-mediated enhancement of BLyS-binding capacity could indicate a general up-regulation of all BLyS receptors or might instead reflect differential receptor regulation. To distinguish these possibilities, we performed semiquantitative RT-PCR for each known BLySR after stimulation of mature B cells. In accord with our previous findings (13), both TACI and Bcmd/BR3 expression were readily detectable in untreated mature B cells, whereas BCMA expression was low to nil (Fig. 3, right). After anti-µ stimulation, the expression of Bcmd/BR3 increased substantially, ranging from 3- to 12-fold. In contrast to this marked effect on Bcmd/BR3 expression, BcR ligation altered neither BCMA nor TACI message levels. Moreover, LPS stimulation had no positive or consistent effect on the expression of any BLySR among mature B cells, although in some experiments LPS appeared to down-regulate Bcmd/BR3 expression (not shown).
|
Follicular B cells transit several immature developmental stages after marrow egress, which can be separated into three transitional subsets based on expression of AA4.1, CD23, and surface IgM intensity (20). Because we had previously shown differential expression of BLySRs within the three transitional populations (13), we assessed whether BcR signaling is coupled with Bcmd/BR3 expression at these differentiative stages.
Control transitional populations yielded results consistent with our previous studies (13): B cells within the T1 subset expressed high levels of BCMA but relatively low levels of TACI and Bcmd/BR3, whereas the T2 and T3 subsets showed the opposite pattern of expression (Fig. 3A). Treatment with anti-µ had no effect on the expression of BLySRs among cells in the T1 subset (Fig. 3, left). In contrast, the more mature T2 and T3 subsets displayed marked increases in Bcmd/BR3 expression after BcR ligation (Fig. 3, middle), similar to that observed among mature follicular B cells.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The findings herein also forge a relationship between BcR-mediated effects on B cell life span and the recent finding that mature B cells compete for BLyS to survive. Surface BcR expression is required for mature B cell viability (17). Further, BcR specificity dictates relative competitive advantage, because neither transgenic clonotypes nor BcR-signaling mutants that would otherwise survive can compete effectively with normal B cells in mixed marrow chimeras (19, 25). The coupling of BcR signaling with Bcmd/BR3 expression suggests a mechanism whereby the basal BcR signaling requisite reflects an obligate minimum level of Bcmd/BR3 expression, and a further survival advantage is afforded those clonotypes with BcRs that engender the highest relative levels of Bcmd/BR3. Several previous findings support this suggestion. First, the notion that BLyS signaling via Bcmd/BR3 is a downstream effector of BcR-mediated survival signals predicts that blocked BLyS signaling will override the viability promoting effects of sIg. This is consistent with previous findings in BLyS knockouts (6), soluble BLySR administration experiments (5), and bcmd mutants (7, 8, 9); all of which yield a shortened B cell life span despite normal sIg expression. Moreover, we previously showed that the life span of B cells in mice heterozygous for a bcmd loss of function mutation is intermediate to those in normal and homozygous mutant mice (12). This observation supports the notion that 2-fold changes in Bcmd/BR3 activity, analogous to the range of BcR-mediated shifts in BLyS binding shown here, yield significant changes in B cell longevity.
It is tempting to speculate that BcR-mediated selection during transitional development and BcR-mediated homeostatic survival are mechanistically identical processes. This model would suggest a continuous rather than stepwise selective process, such that the marked cell losses seen during transitional differentiation reflects the imposition of requisite BcR-mediated Bcmd/BR3 expression on a previously unselected population, which is followed by more protracted competition among the mature B cells that endured initial selection.
Finally, the increased proportional survival within initial cohorts of activated mature B cells suggests a role for BLyS in determining the effective burst size reached by responding primary B cell clones. This likely influences the magnitude of primary humoral responses, as well as the cells available to nucleate germinal centers as memory progenitors. More detailed kinetic analyses of these processes will be required to asses these possibilities, as well as the potential role of this regulatory circuit in the selection and maintenance of memory B cell subsets.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Michael P. Cancro, 284 John Morgan Building, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 36th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6082. E-mail address: cancro{at}mail.med.upenn.edu ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BLyS, B lymphocyte stimulator; BcR, B cell receptor for Ag; BCMA, B cell maturation Ag; Bcmd/BR3, B cell maturation defect/BLySR3; rBLyS, recombinant human BLyS; TACI, transmembrane activator and cAML interactor. ![]()
Received for publication January 24, 2003. Accepted for publication April 28, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Castro, J. A. Wright, B. Damdinsuren, K. L. Hoek, G. Carlesso, N. P. Shinners, R. M. Gerstein, R. T. Woodland, R. Sen, and W. N. Khan B Cell Receptor-Mediated Sustained c-Rel Activation Facilitates Late Transitional B Cell Survival through Control of B Cell Activating Factor Receptor and NF-{kappa}B2 J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 7729 - 7737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Crowley, J. E. Stadanlick, J. C. Cambier, and M. P. Cancro Fc{gamma}RIIB signals inhibit BLyS signaling and BCR-mediated BLyS receptor up-regulation Blood, February 12, 2009; 113(7): 1464 - 1473. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Badr, G. Borhis, E. A. Lefevre, N. Chaoul, F. Deshayes, V. Dessirier, G. Lapree, A. Tsapis, and Y. Richard BAFF enhances chemotaxis of primary human B cells: a particular synergy between BAFF and CXCL13 on memory B cells Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2744 - 2754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Meyer-Bahlburg, S. F. Andrews, K. O.A. Yu, S. A. Porcelli, and D. J. Rawlings Characterization of a late transitional B cell population highly sensitive to BAFF-mediated homeostatic proliferation J. Exp. Med., January 21, 2008; 205(1): 155 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. T. Woodland, C. J. Fox, M. R. Schmidt, P. S. Hammerman, J. T. Opferman, S. J. Korsmeyer, D. M. Hilbert, and C. B. Thompson Multiple signaling pathways promote B lymphocyte stimulator dependent B-cell growth and survival Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 750 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Treml, G. Carlesso, K. L. Hoek, J. E. Stadanlick, T. Kambayashi, R. J. Bram, M. P. Cancro, and W. N. Khan TLR Stimulation Modifies BLyS Receptor Expression in Follicular and Marginal Zone B Cells J. Immunol., June 15, 2007; 178(12): 7531 - 7539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Waisman, M. Kraus, J. Seagal, S. Ghosh, D. Melamed, J. Song, Y. Sasaki, S. Classen, C. Lutz, F. Brombacher, et al. IgG1 B cell receptor signaling is inhibited by CD22 and promotes the development of B cells whose survival is less dependent on Ig{alpha}/{beta} J. Exp. Med., April 16, 2007; 204(4): 747 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Hondowicz, S. T. Alexander, W. J. Quinn III, A. J. Pagan, M. H. Metzgar, M. P. Cancro, and J. Erikson The role of BLyS/BLyS receptors in anti-chromatin B cell regulation Int. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 465 - 475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Lindsley, M. Thomas, B. Srivastava, and D. Allman Generation of peripheral B cells occurs via two spatially and temporally distinct pathways Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2521 - 2528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kothlow, I. Morgenroth, Y. Graef, K. Schneider, I. Riehl, P. Staeheli, P. Schneider, and B. Kaspers Unique and conserved functions of B cell-activating factor of the TNF family (BAFF) in the chicken Int. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 203 - 215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Barrington, M. Borde, A. Rao, and M. C. Carroll Involvement of NFAT1 in B Cell Self-Tolerance J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1510 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Miller, J. E. Stadanlick, and M. P. Cancro Space, Selection, and Surveillance: Setting Boundaries with BLyS. J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6405 - 6410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K. A. Mongini, J. K. Inman, H. Han, S. L. Kalled, R. J. Fattah, and S. McCormick Innate Immunity and Human B Cell Clonal Expansion: Effects on the Recirculating B2 Subpopulation J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 6143 - 6154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Zhang, K.-H. Ko, Q. L. K. Lam, C. K. C. Lo, G. Srivastava, B. Zheng, Y.-L. Lau, and L. Lu Expression and function of TNF family member B cell-activating factor in the development of autoimmune arthritis Int. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 17(8): 1081 - 1092. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Gavin, B. Duong, P. Skog, D. Ait-Azzouzene, D. R. Greaves, M. L. Scott, and D. Nemazee {Delta}BAFF, a Splice Isoform of BAFF, Opposes Full-Length BAFF Activity In Vivo in Transgenic Mouse Models J. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 175(1): 319 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. S. M. Rahman and T. Manser B Cells Expressing Bcl-2 and a Signaling-Impaired BAFF-Specific Receptor Fail to Mature and Are Deficient in the Formation of Lymphoid Follicles and Germinal Centers J. Immunol., November 15, 2004; 173(10): 6179 - 6188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Nie, J. Waite, F. Brewer, M.-J. Sunshine, D. R. Littman, and Y.-R. Zou The Role of CXCR4 in Maintaining Peripheral B Cell Compartments and Humoral Immunity J. Exp. Med., November 1, 2004; 200(9): 1145 - 1156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Cancro and J. F. Kearney B Cell Positive Selection: Road Map to the Primary Repertoire? J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 15 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Walmsley, S. K. T. Ooi, L. F. Reynolds, S. H. Smith, S. Ruf, A. Mathiot, L. Vanes, D. A. Williams, M. P. Cancro, and V. L. J. Tybulewicz Critical Roles for Rac1 and Rac2 GTPases in B Cell Development and Signaling Science, October 17, 2003; 302(5644): 459 - 462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |