The JI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
 


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cancro, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cancro, M. P.
The Journal of Immunology, 2003, 170: 5820-5823.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists


CUTTING EDGE

Cutting Edge: B Cell Receptor Signals Regulate BLyS Receptor Levels in Mature B Cells and Their Immediate Progenitors 1

Susan Harless Smith and Michael P. Cancro2

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study examines how B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) receptor expression and responsiveness are influenced by B cell receptor (BcR) signaling. Our results show that resting and BcR-stimulated B cells are dependent on BLyS for survival and that B cells remain BLyS responsive during BcR-induced activation. Further, BcR ligation up-regulates expression of the BLySR B cell maturation defect/BLySR3 (Bcmd/BR3), but not other known BLySRs. Finally, the coupling of BcR signaling with Bcmd/BR3 expression is limited to late transitional and mature B cells. Together, these findings establish the coupling of BcR signaling with Bcmd/BR3 expression as a fundamental aspect of follicular B cell selection, survival, and activation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS)3 profoundly influences peripheral B cell homeostasis and selection (1, 2, 3, 4). B cell numbers increase with BLyS treatment, and BLyS-transgenic mice display hypergammaglobulinemia and spontaneous autoantibody formation (1, 3, 4, 5). Conversely, in vivo inhibition of BLyS with soluble receptors yields rapid diminution of peripheral B cell pools (5), and follicular B cells are severely depleted in BLyS knockouts (6). Among the three BLySRs, B cell maturation defect/BLySR3 (Bcmd/BR3) plays the dominant role in maintaining peripheral B cells, because Bcmd/BR3 mutants have a 10-fold reduction in peripheral B cells (7, 8, 9) whereas mice lacking B cell maturation Ag (BCMA) or transmembrane activator and cAML interactor (TACI) have normal or elevated B cell numbers, respectively (10, 11). We previously showed that mature B cells continuously compete for BLyS to survive (12) and that BLyS signals determine the proportion of cells that successfully traverse the T2 and T3 transitional stages to join the mature B cell pool (13). Thus, BLyS controls peripheral B cell numbers both by varying the proportion of cells that complete transitional B cell development and by serving as the primary determinant of mature B cell longevity.

The BcR also plays a crucial role in B cell differentiation and survival. Immature B cells are targets of BcR-mediated selection, as evidenced by the significant cell losses and repertoire shifts associated with late B cell maturation (14, 15, 16). Further, continued BcR expression is requisite for mature B cell survival (17), and both BcR specificity and signaling can dictate relative survival advantage (18, 19). Despite these parallels, the relationship between BcR signaling and BLyS responsiveness remains unexplored. We herein show that BcR ligation selectively up-regulates expression of Bcmd/BR3. Further, the coupling of BcR signaling with Bcmd/BR3 expression is limited to late transitional subsets and mature follicular B cells. We also find that resting and BcR-stimulated B cells are dependent on BLyS for survival and that B cells remain BLyS responsive during BcR-induced proliferative responses.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice

BALB/cJ mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). All procedures were conducted in accord with the Animal Welfare Act.

Recombinant BLyS and derivatives

Recombinant human BLyS (rBLyS) and biotin-conjugated BLyS were provided by Human Genome Sciences (Rockville, MD). Biotinylated BLyS was revealed by a second incubation with Streptavidin Red 670 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

B cell subset isolation, culture, and stimulation

Mature splenic B cells were prepared by MACS as described (13). Transitional and mature splenic B cell subsets for BLySR expression analyses were isolated by FACS as described (13, 20). Immature or mature B cells were cultured at 1 x 106 cells/ml as described previously (13). In some experiments, mature B cells were loaded with 1.25 µM carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) in PBS. After a 3-min incubation, excess carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester or deacetylated carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) was quenched with an equal volume of FCS, and cells were washed once before culture. Various doses of F(ab')2 goat anti-mouse IgM (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) were used for stimulation, in the presence or absence of 50 ng/ml soluble rBLyS (provided by Human Genome Sciences). Soluble CD154 (CD40L) was obtained from the supernatants of transfected J558L cells that express a CD154:CD8{alpha} fusion protein (21) and were used at an empirically optimized dilution of 1/5. A 1/80 dilution of supernatant containing anti-CD8 Abs (53.6-72) were added to cross-link the fusion protein (21). CFSE-labeled cells were also incubated with 1 nM TO-PRO-3 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) immediately before acquisition.

Semiquantitative RT-PCR analyses

Semiquantitative RT-PCR for BLySR expression was performed as previously described (13). BLySR expression was normalized to ribosomal 18S levels using a QuantumRNA Classic 18S primer kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). Cycle numbers used for normalization were chosen based on the determined linear range for each experiment.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
BLyS mediates survival of BcR-stimulated B cells

Early studies indicated that BLyS enhances [3H]TdR uptake among anti-µ-stimulated B cells (1), and others have proposed that BLySR signaling induces transitional cells to differentiate (22), suggesting that BLyS might deliver proliferative or inductive signals for B cell expansion and differentiation, similar to costimulatory TNF family members such as CD154. However, recent in vivo results showed that BLyS increases peripheral B cell numbers through enhanced survival among transitional and mature B cells, rather than through proliferative expansion (13); and prior in vitro studies had also suggested survival as a primary and perhaps exclusive action of BLyS (23). These seemingly disparate observations could indicate mechanistically different roles for BLyS in BcR-stimulated vs quiescent B cells. Alternatively, BLyS might afford survival in both cases, with the increased number of mitotic events in BcR-stimulated cultures reflecting enhanced proportional survival within successive cohorts of daughter cells before their next division. Therefore, before examining the effects of BcR ligation on BLyS responsiveness and receptor expression, we directly assessed these possibilities by simultaneously tracking the proliferation and survival of anti-µ-stimulated mature B cells in the presence of either BLyS or CD154.

Mature B cells cultured without anti-µ (Fig. 1A, left) underwent little division, and more than one-half of the input cells were dead after 72 h. In accord with previous reports (24), addition of CD154 alone engendered several divisions and significantly reduced proportional cell death (Fig. 1A, right). In contrast, BLyS alone fostered no proliferation but yielded a 4- to 5-fold increase in viability (Fig. 1A, middle). Experiments with higher doses of BLyS yielded similar results (not shown).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 1. BLyS enhances survival during anti-µ induced proliferation of mature B cells. Mature (CD23+) splenic B cells loaded with CFSE were cultured either without anti-µ stimulation (A) or with various concentrations of anti-µ (B and C). Some cultures of each type were further supplemented either with 50 ng/ml recombinant BLyS (middle) or with soluble CD154 (right). After 72 h, cells were harvested, stained with TO-PRO-3, and analyzed cytofluorometrically. Results are representative of triplicates from at least two independent experiments for each treatment group.

 
Mature B cells cultured with anti-µ alone yielded the expected proliferation accompanied by considerable cell death within each daughter cohort (Fig. 1, B and C, left). Supplementation of anti-µ-stimulated cultures with CD154 enhanced the extent of proliferation, yielding larger proportions and numbers of cells in later divisions than anti-µ alone, as well as fewer cells in the nondivided pool (Fig. 1, B and C, right). This synergistic effect was most pronounced at suboptimal concentrations of anti-µ (Fig. 1B) but remained perceptible even at high anti-µ concentrations. In contrast, supplementation with BLyS yielded identical division profiles to that seen with anti-µ alone, consistent with a lack of intrinsic comitogenic activity. However, the proportion and number of viable cells within each division were substantially enhanced in the presence of BLyS. Analyses of the absolute numbers of cells recovered (not shown) substantiated the proportional analyses, ruling out differential cell losses between the various treatment groups as the basis for these observations.

BcR stimulation increases BLyS-binding capacity

To determine whether stimulated cells remain responsive to BLyS after Ig stimulation, we incubated B cells with rBLyS after an initial 24-h pulse of anti-µ. The results indicated that BcR-stimulated cells remain responsive to BLyS, because the proportion of cells viable after 72 h was clearly enhanced, despite the deferred BLyS addition (Fig. 2A). The results show enhanced viability within both the initially cultured cohort and the first daughter generation, but effects on subsequent cohorts cannot be established because the withdrawal of anti-IgM at 24 h afforded only a single round of division.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 2. BcR-stimulated B cells remain BLyS responsive, reflecting enhanced BLyS-binding capacity. A, CD23+ B cells were cultured in the presence of 10 µg/ml anti-µ for 24 h. Cultures were then washed and maintained for an additional 48 h either without further supplementation (left plot) or with 50 ng/ml rBLyS (right) and then analyzed cytofluorometrically. Results are representative of four independent experiments. B, CD23+ B cells were cultured for 24 h without stimulation (left histogram), with 10 µg/ml anti-µ (middle histogram), or with 10 µg/ml LPS (right histogram). Cells were harvested, and BLyS-binding capacity was assessed cytofluorometrically using biotinylated BLyS protein, followed by Streptavidin Red 670. Dashed lines are unstained controls. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

 
Continued BLyS responsiveness after BcR ligation prompted us to ask whether the enhanced survival of BcR-stimulated B cells reflected levels of BLyS binding comparable with those of resting B cells or whether BcR ligation per se influences BLyS binding. Mature splenic B cells were stimulated in vitro with either anti-µ or LPS. Cells were harvested after 18–26 h, and their BLyS-binding capacity was assessed by staining with biotinylated rBLyS protein. BLyS-binding capacity increased substantially after anti-µ stimulation, yielding a shifted and well-defined peak with a median fluorescence intensity of 62, compared with a median fluorescence intensity of 25 in unstimulated controls (Fig. 2B, middle). Preliminary kinetic analyses indicate that increased BLyS-binding capacity is first apparent between 10 and 15 h poststimulation (not shown). This sharp increase in binding capacity was not a general feature of proliferating B cells, because LPS stimulation failed to yield a similarly uniform shift in BLyS-binding capacity (Fig. 2B, right).

BcR ligation selectively up-regulates Bcmd/BR3

The BcR-mediated enhancement of BLyS-binding capacity could indicate a general up-regulation of all BLyS receptors or might instead reflect differential receptor regulation. To distinguish these possibilities, we performed semiquantitative RT-PCR for each known BLySR after stimulation of mature B cells. In accord with our previous findings (13), both TACI and Bcmd/BR3 expression were readily detectable in untreated mature B cells, whereas BCMA expression was low to nil (Fig. 3, right). After anti-µ stimulation, the expression of Bcmd/BR3 increased substantially, ranging from 3- to 12-fold. In contrast to this marked effect on Bcmd/BR3 expression, BcR ligation altered neither BCMA nor TACI message levels. Moreover, LPS stimulation had no positive or consistent effect on the expression of any BLySR among mature B cells, although in some experiments LPS appeared to down-regulate Bcmd/BR3 expression (not shown).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIGURE 3. BcR signaling selectively up-regulates Bcmd/BR3 expression. Mature B cells or transitional subsets were stimulated in vitro with 10 µg/ml anti-µ for 18–24 h. RNA was extracted from harvested cultures, and semiquantitative RT-PCR was performed for the three BLySRs: TACI, BCMA, and Bcmd/BR3. A, Alternate successive cycles from control (unstimulated) and anti-µ-treated cultures (one representative experiment). Aliquots were collected during the linear range of amplification as follows: 18s (cycles 14, 16, 18, and 20); TACI (cycles 22, 24, 26, and 28); BCMA (cycles 27, 29, 31, and 33); Bcmd/BR3 (cycles 24, 26, 28, ad 30). B, Fold induction for each receptor of BcR-stimulated cultures relative to medium alone controls (NT) based on densitometric normalization to 18S bands. Each point represents a separate experiment; means are indicated as a solid bar.

 
BcR-coupled Bcmd expression ensues in transitional subsets

Follicular B cells transit several immature developmental stages after marrow egress, which can be separated into three transitional subsets based on expression of AA4.1, CD23, and surface IgM intensity (20). Because we had previously shown differential expression of BLySRs within the three transitional populations (13), we assessed whether BcR signaling is coupled with Bcmd/BR3 expression at these differentiative stages.

Control transitional populations yielded results consistent with our previous studies (13): B cells within the T1 subset expressed high levels of BCMA but relatively low levels of TACI and Bcmd/BR3, whereas the T2 and T3 subsets showed the opposite pattern of expression (Fig. 3A). Treatment with anti-µ had no effect on the expression of BLySRs among cells in the T1 subset (Fig. 3, left). In contrast, the more mature T2 and T3 subsets displayed marked increases in Bcmd/BR3 expression after BcR ligation (Fig. 3, middle), similar to that observed among mature follicular B cells.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The discovery that BcR signaling is selectively coupled to Bcmd/BR3 expression reveals a previously unappreciated mechanistic link between BcR- and BLyS-mediated processes associated with the T2 and T3 transitional subsets, as well as mature follicular B cells. For example, selection based on BcR specificity occurs during late transitional development (14, 15), yet BLyS signaling via Bcmd/BR3 is also critical to determining the proportion of cells that successfully traverse this developmental stage (4, 6, 7, 12, 13, 22). Because the coupling of BcR signaling and Bcmd/BR3 expression distinguishes transitional cells attempting to enter the mature follicular B cell pool, BcR-mediated selection among these newly formed B cells likely reflects the onset of BcR-driven Bcmd/BR3 expression as the primary determinant of survival. This view is consistent with previous observations that BLyS-binding capacity among transitional cells is lower and more disperse than among mature follicular B cells and that BLyS-induced up-regulation of anti-apoptotic bcl-2 family members is most pronounced among mature B cells (13).

The findings herein also forge a relationship between BcR-mediated effects on B cell life span and the recent finding that mature B cells compete for BLyS to survive. Surface BcR expression is required for mature B cell viability (17). Further, BcR specificity dictates relative competitive advantage, because neither transgenic clonotypes nor BcR-signaling mutants that would otherwise survive can compete effectively with normal B cells in mixed marrow chimeras (19, 25). The coupling of BcR signaling with Bcmd/BR3 expression suggests a mechanism whereby the basal BcR signaling requisite reflects an obligate minimum level of Bcmd/BR3 expression, and a further survival advantage is afforded those clonotypes with BcRs that engender the highest relative levels of Bcmd/BR3. Several previous findings support this suggestion. First, the notion that BLyS signaling via Bcmd/BR3 is a downstream effector of BcR-mediated survival signals predicts that blocked BLyS signaling will override the viability promoting effects of sIg. This is consistent with previous findings in BLyS knockouts (6), soluble BLySR administration experiments (5), and bcmd mutants (7, 8, 9); all of which yield a shortened B cell life span despite normal sIg expression. Moreover, we previously showed that the life span of B cells in mice heterozygous for a bcmd loss of function mutation is intermediate to those in normal and homozygous mutant mice (12). This observation supports the notion that 2-fold changes in Bcmd/BR3 activity, analogous to the range of BcR-mediated shifts in BLyS binding shown here, yield significant changes in B cell longevity.

It is tempting to speculate that BcR-mediated selection during transitional development and BcR-mediated homeostatic survival are mechanistically identical processes. This model would suggest a continuous rather than stepwise selective process, such that the marked cell losses seen during transitional differentiation reflects the imposition of requisite BcR-mediated Bcmd/BR3 expression on a previously unselected population, which is followed by more protracted competition among the mature B cells that endured initial selection.

Finally, the increased proportional survival within initial cohorts of activated mature B cells suggests a role for BLyS in determining the effective burst size reached by responding primary B cell clones. This likely influences the magnitude of primary humoral responses, as well as the cells available to nucleate germinal centers as memory progenitors. More detailed kinetic analyses of these processes will be required to asses these possibilities, as well as the potential role of this regulatory circuit in the selection and maintenance of memory B cell subsets.


    Acknowledgments
 
We acknowledge the guidance of Dr. Andrew Wells in the analyses of CSFE-labeled cells. We also thank Drs. David Allman and Avinash Bhandoola for helpful discussions and critical review of the manuscript.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grants AI420990 and CA09140. Back

2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Michael P. Cancro, 284 John Morgan Building, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 36th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6082. E-mail address: cancro{at}mail.med.upenn.edu Back

3 Abbreviations used in this paper: BLyS, B lymphocyte stimulator; BcR, B cell receptor for Ag; BCMA, B cell maturation Ag; Bcmd/BR3, B cell maturation defect/BLySR3; rBLyS, recombinant human BLyS; TACI, transmembrane activator and cAML interactor. Back

Received for publication January 24, 2003. Accepted for publication April 28, 2003.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Moore, P. A., O. Belvedere, A. Orr, K. Pieri, D. W. LaFleur, P. Feng, D. Soppet, M. Charters, R. Gentz, D. Parmelee, et al 1999. BLyS: member of the tumor necrosis factor family and B lymphocyte stimulator. Science 285:260.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Schneider, P., F. MacKay, V. Steiner, K. Hofmann, J. L. Bodmer, N. Holler, C. Ambrose, P. Lawton, S. Bixler, H. Acha-Orbea, et al 1999. BAFF, a novel ligand of the tumor necrosis factor family, stimulates B cell growth. J. Exp. Med. 189:1747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mackay, F., S. A. Woodcock, P. Lawton, C. Ambrose, M. Baetscher, P. Schneider, J. Tschopp, J. L. Browning. 1999. Mice transgenic for BAFF develop lymphocytic disorders along with autoimmune manifestations. J. Exp. Med. 190:1697.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Batten, M., J. Groom, T. G. Cachero, F. Qian, P. Schneider, J. Tschopp, J. L. Browning, F. Mackay. 2000. BAFF mediates survival of peripheral immature B lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 192:1453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gross, J. A., S. R. Dillon, S. Mudri, J. Johnston, A. Littau, R. Roque, M. Rixon, O. Schou, K. P. Foley, H. Haugen, et al 2001. Taci-Ig neutralizes molecules critical for B cell development and autoimmune disease: impaired B cell maturation in mice lacking BLyS. Immunity 15:289.[Medline]
  6. Schiemann, B., J. L. Gommerman, K. Vora, T. G. Cachero, S. Shulga-Morskaya, M. Dobles, E. Frew, M. L. Scott. 2001. An essential role for BAFF in the normal development of B cells through a BCMA-independent pathway. Science 293:2111.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Lentz, V. M., M. P. Cancro, F. E. Nashold, C. E. Hayes. 1996. Bcmd governs recruitment of new B cells into the stable peripheral B cell pool in the A/WySnJ mouse. J. Immunol. 157:598.[Abstract]
  8. Thompson, J. S., S. A. Bixler, F. Qian, K. Vora, M. L. Scott, T. G. Cachero, C. Hession, P. Schneider, I. D. Sizing, C. Mullen, et al 2001. BAFF-R, a novel TNF receptor that specifically interacts with BAFF. Science 293:2108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yan, M., J. R. Brady, B. Chan, W. P. Lee, B. Hsu, S. Harless, M. Cancro, I. S. Grewal, V. M. Dixit. 2001. Identification of a novel receptor for B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) that is mutated in a mouse strain with severe B cell deficiency. Curr. Biol. 11:1547.[Medline]
  10. Xu, S., K. P. Lam. 2001. B-cell maturation protein, which binds the tumor necrosis factor family members BAFF and APRIL, is dispensable for humoral immune responses. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Yan, M., H. Wang, B. Chan, M. Roose-Girma, S. Erickson, T. Baker, D. Tumas, I. S. Grewal, V. M. Dixit. 2001. Activation and accumulation of B cells in TACI-deficient mice. Nat. Immunol. 2:638.[Medline]
  12. Harless, S. M., V. M. Lentz, A. P. Sah, B. L. Hsu, K. Clise-Dwyer, D. M. Hilbert, C. E. Hayes, M. P. Cancro. 2001. Competition for BLyS-mediated signaling through Bcmd/BR3 regulates peripheral B lymphocyte numbers. Curr. Biol. 11:1986.[Medline]
  13. Hsu, B. L., S. M. Harless, R. C. Lindsley, D. M. Hilbert, M. P. Cancro. 2002. Cutting edge: BLyS enables survival of transitional and mature B cells through distinct mediators. J. Immunol. 168:5993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gu, H., D. Tarlinton, W. Muller, K. Rajewsky, I. Forster. 1991. Most peripheral B cells in mice are ligand selected. J. Exp. Med. 173:1357.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Levine, M. H., A. M. Haberman, D. B. Sant’Angelo, L. G. Hannum, M. P. Cancro, C. A. Janeway, Jr, M. J. Shlomchik. 2000. A B-cell receptor-specific selection step governs immature to mature B cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:2743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Allman, D. M., S. E. Ferguson, V. M. Lentz, M. P. Cancro. 1993. Peripheral B cell maturation. II. Heat-stable antigen (hi) splenic B cells are an immature developmental intermediate in the production of long-lived marrow-derived B cells. J. Immunol. 151:4431.[Abstract]
  17. Lam, K. P., R. Kuhn, K. Rajewsky. 1997. In vivo ablation of surface immunoglobulin on mature B cells by inducible gene targeting results in rapid cell death. Cell 90:1073.[Medline]
  18. Agenes, F., A. A. Freitas. 1999. Transfer of small resting B cells into immunodeficient hosts results in the selection of a self-renewing activated B cell population. J. Exp. Med. 189:319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Sprent, J., J. Bruce. 1984. Physiology of B cells in mice with X-linked immunodeficiency (xid). III. Disappearance of xid B cells in double bone marrow chimeras. J. Exp. Med. 160:711.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Allman, D., R. C. Lindsley, W. DeMuth, K. Rudd, S. A. Shinton, R. R. Hardy. 2001. Resolution of three nonproliferative immature splenic B cell subsets reveals multiple selection points during peripheral B cell maturation. J. Immunol. 167:6834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Lane, P., T. Brocker, S. Hubele, E. Padovan, A. Lanzavecchia, F. McConnell. 1993. Soluble CD40 ligand can replace the normal T cell-derived CD40 ligand signal to B cells in T cell-dependent activation. J. Exp. Med. 177:1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Rolink, A. G., J. Tschopp, P. Schneider, F. Melchers. 2002. BAFF is a survival and maturation factor for mouse B cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 32:2004.[Medline]
  23. Do, R. K., E. Hatada, H. Lee, M. R. Tourigny, D. Hilbert, S. Chen-Kiang. 2000. Attenuation of apoptosis underlies B lymphocyte stimulator enhancement of humoral immune response. J. Exp. Med. 192:953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hasbold, J., C. Johnson-Leger, C. J. Atkins, E. A. Clark, G. G. B. Klaus. 1994. Properties of mouse CD40: cellular distribution of CD40 and B cell activation by monoclonal anti-mouse CD40 antibodies. Eur. J. Immunol. 24:1835.[Medline]
  25. Cyster, J. G., S. B. Hartley, C. C. Goodnow. 1994. Competition for follicular niches excludes self-reactive cells from the recirculating B-cell repertoire. Nature 371:389.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
G. Badr, G. Borhis, E. A. Lefevre, N. Chaoul, F. Deshayes, V. Dessirier, G. Lapree, A. Tsapis, and Y. Richard
BAFF enhances chemotaxis of primary human B cells: a particular synergy between BAFF and CXCL13 on memory B cells
Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2744 - 2754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
A. Meyer-Bahlburg, S. F. Andrews, K. O.A. Yu, S. A. Porcelli, and D. J. Rawlings
Characterization of a late transitional B cell population highly sensitive to BAFF-mediated homeostatic proliferation
J. Exp. Med., January 21, 2008; 205(1): 155 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. T. Woodland, C. J. Fox, M. R. Schmidt, P. S. Hammerman, J. T. Opferman, S. J. Korsmeyer, D. M. Hilbert, and C. B. Thompson
Multiple signaling pathways promote B lymphocyte stimulator dependent B-cell growth and survival
Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 750 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
L. S. Treml, G. Carlesso, K. L. Hoek, J. E. Stadanlick, T. Kambayashi, R. J. Bram, M. P. Cancro, and W. N. Khan
TLR Stimulation Modifies BLyS Receptor Expression in Follicular and Marginal Zone B Cells
J. Immunol., June 15, 2007; 178(12): 7531 - 7539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
A. Waisman, M. Kraus, J. Seagal, S. Ghosh, D. Melamed, J. Song, Y. Sasaki, S. Classen, C. Lutz, F. Brombacher, et al.
IgG1 B cell receptor signaling is inhibited by CD22 and promotes the development of B cells whose survival is less dependent on Ig{alpha}/{beta}
J. Exp. Med., April 16, 2007; 204(4): 747 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
B. D. Hondowicz, S. T. Alexander, W. J. Quinn III, A. J. Pagan, M. H. Metzgar, M. P. Cancro, and J. Erikson
The role of BLyS/BLyS receptors in anti-chromatin B cell regulation
Int. Immunol., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 465 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R. C. Lindsley, M. Thomas, B. Srivastava, and D. Allman
Generation of peripheral B cells occurs via two spatially and temporally distinct pathways
Blood, March 15, 2007; 109(6): 2521 - 2528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
S. Kothlow, I. Morgenroth, Y. Graef, K. Schneider, I. Riehl, P. Staeheli, P. Schneider, and B. Kaspers
Unique and conserved functions of B cell-activating factor of the TNF family (BAFF) in the chicken
Int. Immunol., February 1, 2007; 19(2): 203 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. A. Barrington, M. Borde, A. Rao, and M. C. Carroll
Involvement of NFAT1 in B Cell Self-Tolerance
J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1510 - 1515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. P. Miller, J. E. Stadanlick, and M. P. Cancro
Space, Selection, and Surveillance: Setting Boundaries with BLyS.
J. Immunol., June 1, 2006; 176(11): 6405 - 6410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
P. K. A. Mongini, J. K. Inman, H. Han, S. L. Kalled, R. J. Fattah, and S. McCormick
Innate Immunity and Human B Cell Clonal Expansion: Effects on the Recirculating B2 Subpopulation
J. Immunol., November 1, 2005; 175(9): 6143 - 6154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
M. Zhang, K.-H. Ko, Q. L. K. Lam, C. K. C. Lo, G. Srivastava, B. Zheng, Y.-L. Lau, and L. Lu
Expression and function of TNF family member B cell-activating factor in the development of autoimmune arthritis
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2005; 17(8): 1081 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. L. Gavin, B. Duong, P. Skog, D. Ait-Azzouzene, D. R. Greaves, M. L. Scott, and D. Nemazee
{Delta}BAFF, a Splice Isoform of BAFF, Opposes Full-Length BAFF Activity In Vivo in Transgenic Mouse Models
J. Immunol., July 1, 2005; 175(1): 319 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Z. S. M. Rahman and T. Manser
B Cells Expressing Bcl-2 and a Signaling-Impaired BAFF-Specific Receptor Fail to Mature and Are Deficient in the Formation of Lymphoid Follicles and Germinal Centers
J. Immunol., November 15, 2004; 173(10): 6179 - 6188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
Y. Nie, J. Waite, F. Brewer, M.-J. Sunshine, D. R. Littman, and Y.-R. Zou
The Role of CXCR4 in Maintaining Peripheral B Cell Compartments and Humoral Immunity
J. Exp. Med., November 1, 2004; 200(9): 1145 - 1156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M. P. Cancro and J. F. Kearney
B Cell Positive Selection: Road Map to the Primary Repertoire?
J. Immunol., July 1, 2004; 173(1): 15 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
M. J. Walmsley, S. K. T. Ooi, L. F. Reynolds, S. H. Smith, S. Ruf, A. Mathiot, L. Vanes, D. A. Williams, M. P. Cancro, and V. L. J. Tybulewicz
Critical Roles for Rac1 and Rac2 GTPases in B Cell Development and Signaling
Science, October 17, 2003; 302(5644): 459 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cancro, M. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cancro, M. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS