|
|
||||||||
Cell Expression of a Fas Ligand Transgene1

,




* Autoimmunity Research Unit, The Canberra Hospital,
Medical School, Australian National University,
Medical Informatics Center, University of Canberra, and
The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Canberra, Australia
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cells (HIPFasL mice) exhibit an accelerated diabetes distinct from the normal autoimmune diabetes of NOD mice. This study was undertaken to define the mechanism underlying accelerated diabetes development in HIPFasL mice. It was found that diabetes in HIPFasL mice is dependent on the NOD genetic background, as HIPFasL does not cause diabetes when crossed into other mice strains and is lymphocyte dependent, as it does not develop in HIPFasLSCID mice. Diabetes development in NODSCID recipients of diabetic HIPFasL splenocytes is slower than when using splenocytes from diabetic NOD mice.
cells from HIPFasL mice are more susceptible to cytokine-induced apoptosis than wild-type NOD
cells, and this can be blocked with anti-FasL Ab. HIPFasL islets are more rapidly destroyed than wild-type islets when transplanted into nondiabetic NOD mice. This confirms that FasL+ islets do not obtain immune privilege, and instead NOD
cells constitutively expressing FasL are more susceptible to apoptosis induced by Fas-FasL interaction. These findings are consistent with the accelerated diabetes of young HIPFasL mice being a different disease process from the autoimmune diabetes of wild-type NOD mice. The data support a mechanism by which cytokines produced by the insulitis lesion mediate up-regulation of
cell Fas expression, resulting in suicide or fratricide of HIPFasL
cells that overexpress FasL. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cells in type 1 diabetes die via the process of apoptosis (1), there remains considerable argument regarding the role of Fas in this
cell death. For
cell death to be mediated by the Fas pathway requires, firstly, that
cells are capable of expressing Fas and, secondly, that there is a source of FasL in the islets (either
cells express FasL or other islet cell populations express FasL, such as
-cells or islet-infiltrating lymphoid cells).
In answer to the first question, Fas has been shown by immunohistochemistry to be expressed by both murine and human
cells. Fas is expressed by
cells from old nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice and also by cytokine-stimulated
cells from young NOD mice (2, 3, 4). Fas is also expressed on
cells from human subjects with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (5, 6). Fas was shown to be up-regulated by normal human
cells in response to cytokine stimulation (7).
Pancreatic
-cells constitutively express FasL, and this could, therefore, be a source for FasL to ligate Fas on
cells (8). Human islets constitutively express FasL and undergo apoptosis in response to cytokine stimulation or incubation in high glucose concentrations (9), both of which up-regulate
cell Fas expression. Although there have been reported difficulties in showing FasL expression on
cells by flow cytometry (10), this may be due to methodological problems, such as destruction of FasL epitopes during
cell isolation and purification. Paradoxically, NOD mice, despite being prone to autoimmune diabetes, express lower, rather than higher, levels of FasL than nondiabetes-prone BALB/c mice (11). This is due to a mutation in the NOD FasL gene (11).
Consistent with a role for Fas in autoimmune diabetes, Fas-deficient NOD-lpr/lpr mice are resistant to diabetes development after transfer of diabetogenic T cells (12). It is also conceivable, however, that diabetes protection in this model is due to constitutive FasL expression by NOD-lpr/lpr T cells that are thereby rendered nonpathogenic (13). NOD-lpr/lprSCID mice have delayed onset and reduced incidence of diabetes after adoptive transfer of diabetogenic NOD spleen cells (14). NOD mice heterozygous for the FasL mutation gld, which have reduced functional FasL expression on T cells, but no lymphadenopathy, do not develop diabetes (14). Destruction of transplanted syngeneic islets is markedly delayed in NOD mice treated with anti-FasL Ab (15). In a transgenic model of autoimmune diabetes, CD8 T cells killed
cells in a Fas-dependent and perforin-independent manner (16). Similarly, transgenic CD4 T cells specifically killed cytokine-treated
cells expressing Fas and not untreated
cells or cytokine-treated
cells from Fas-deficient NOD-lpr/lpr mice (16). Hence there is considerable evidence that Fas plays an important role in
cell destruction. Evidence against a role for Fas in autoimmune
cell destruction is less impressive. Fas-deficient neonatal pancreas is still destroyed when transplanted into diabetic NOD mice (17). Although one group reported that anti-FasL neutralizing Ab did not prevent diabetes induction in the cyclophosphamide model of autoimmune diabetes (17), a recent report showed that anti-FasL Ab did, in fact, prevent diabetes induction in the cyclophosphamide model, but at the afferent, rather than efferent, level (18).
Chervonsky et al. (2) and ourselves (19) have independently shown that NOD mice that express a transgene for FasL on islet
cells (HIPFasL mice) develop an accelerated form of diabetes. These mice provide a unique insight into the possible role of the Fas pathway in immune
cell destruction. The following studies were undertaken to determine the mechanism for accelerated diabetes development in HIPFasL mice.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All mice, including the C57BL/6 and (B6xDBA/2)F1 mice used for backcrossing, were obtained from the Animal Breeding Establishment of the Australian National University (Canberra, Australia). All mice were housed and maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in microisolator cages and given food and water ad libitum. Diabetes was defined as blood glucose levels >12 mmol/liter on at least three consecutive blood readings (Advantage II glucometer; Roche, Indianapolis, IN).
Generation of transgenic mice
The cDNA for murine FasL (Immunex, Seattle, WA) was ligated to the human insulin promoter (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) and a HepBsAg 3' sequence to enable FasL expression on islet
cells. The resulting 4-kb construct was injected into NOD mice oocytes to produce HIPFasL founders.
Transgene screening
All mice were screened at 30 days of age for the presence of the FasL transgene by PCR. Primers in the insulin promoter and FasL DNA produced a PCR fragment of 1.4 kb.
Immunostaining
The presence of FasL expression was also confirmed using immunostaining. After isolation, single-cell suspensions of islets from HIPFasL mice and control mice were left in culture medium for 4 h to recover from trypsin treatment. Cells were then incubated with hamster anti-mouse FasL-biotin mAb (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (KB8301; BD PharMingen) for 2 h before being washed and incubated with streptavidin-PE (BD PharMingen) for 1 h. They were then analyzed on a FACScan cytometer (Fig. 1a).
|
Diabetes transfer
Single-cell suspensions were made from spleens of diabetic NOD mice. These cells were washed twice with HBBS and counted. A total of 5 x 107 splenocytes were resuspended in 300 µl of PBS and injected i.p. into NODSCID mice. Recipient mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and observed for diabetes development by weekly urine testing (Testape; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN).
Islet isolation
Islets were isolated as previously described (20). Animals were anesthetized using Avertin injection (12 µl/g i.p.; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). An abdominal incision was then made, and the common bile duct was identified and cannulated using a 30-gauge needle. A solution of Collagenase P (Roche; 2.5 mg/ml) in HBSS and 0.05% BSA was injected through the bile duct, and the pancreas was inflated. Pancreatic tissue was digested for 15 min in a 37°C water bath. Individual pancreatic islets were then handpicked and washed three times in HBSS containing FCS.
Islet transplants
Isolated islets were transplanted under the kidney capsule using established techniques (21). Briefly, animals were anesthetized with Avertin (12 µl/g) given i.p. An incision was made in the left flank, and the kidney was exposed. Using a dissecting microscope, the kidney capsule was dissected to create a pocket where islet grafts were placed. The kidney was repositioned, and the abdominal incision was closed. In relevant experiments blood glucose levels were measured every second day following transplantation until the development of diabetes. At the time of graft collection, animals were sacrificed, and the grafted kidney was exposed and examined macroscopically in situ, then removed and fixed in 10% formalin. Histological analysis was performed using H&E staining and insulin and glucagon immunostaining (DAKO, Carpenteria, CA). The extent of graft destruction was expressed as the number of islets with destructive lesions divided by the total number of islets.
Islet culture
A total of 30 islets/well were incubated in 1 ml of islet culture medium (RPMI 1640, containing 2000 mg/liter glucose, L-glutamine, 10% FCS, and 50 µg/ml gentamicin) in 24-well plates at 37°C in 95% air and 5% CO2 for 24 h. In relevant experiments islets were incubated in the presence of 40 U/ml IL-1
(PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and 500 U/ml IFN-
(PeproTech). FasL was neutralized using hamster anti-mouse FasL mAb (clone MFL3; BD PharMingen) at a final concentration of 5 µg/ml.
Apoptosis assay
After 24-h incubation, single islet cell suspensions were prepared by resuspension of islets in a trypsin/HBBS solution (0.05% final concentration), incubation for 10 min in a 37°C water bath, and then drawing five times through a 19-gauge needle before being washed with HBBS. Single-cell suspensions were stained with propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) at 2 µg/ml and analyzed on a cytometer (FACScan; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The percent increase in
cells undergoing apoptosis was calculated using the following formula: (% apoptosis in stimulated
cells - % apoptosis in unstimulated
cells)/(% apoptosis in unstimulated
cells) x 100. This formula allows comparison between experiments with different basal levels of apoptosis.
Statistical analysis
Comparisons of means were made using the two-tailed Students t test. Comparisons of incidence were made using two-tailed Fishers exact test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The transgenic line of HIPFasL mice demonstrated accelerated diabetes compared with nontransgenic littermates. This was particularly true for HIPFasL males, which became diabetic as early as 25 days of age. By 84 days of age, 44% of the HIPFasL males were diabetic compared with 0% of the NOD male littermate controls (p < 0.001; Fig. 2). At 160 days of age, the incidence of diabetes in HIPFasL males was 55%, and that in wild-type NOD male littermates was 10% (p < 0.001)
|
|
|
To investigate whether the FasL transgene caused diabetes in other genetic backgrounds, HIPFasL mice were backcrossed with nondiabetes-prone strains. When HIPFasL mice were crossed with C57BL/6, the resultant (HIPFasL/NOD x C57BL/6) male F1 mice remained euglycemic when monitored for diabetes development up to 84 days of age (Fig. 5). When HIPFasL mice were crossed with (B6/DBA/2)F1 mice, only one of 15 (7%) HIPFasL/NOD x B6/DBA/2 male F1 mice developed diabetes by 84 days of age compared with eight of 18 (44%) HIPFasL male controls. Histological examination of the islets of nondiabetic F1 mice showed minimal and infrequent insulitis. These experiments indicate that the NOD genetic background is critical for the accelerated diabetes seen in mice expressing the HIPFasL transgene.
|
Diabetes transfer using splenocytes from diabetic HIPFasL mice
To further examine the mechanism by which FasL expression accelerates diabetes, the ability of splenocytes from diabetic HIPFasL mice to transfer diabetes to NODSCID recipients was assessed. Splenocytes (5 x 107) from male diabetic HIPFasL mice were injected i.p. into male NODSCID recipients, and the mice were monitored for diabetes development. The time taken for diabetes to develop in NODSCID recipient mice was dependent on the age of diabetes onset of the donor HIPFasL mice (Fig. 6). When the donors age of diabetes onset was <90 days, it took 68 ± 12 days for diabetes to develop in the recipient, whereas when the donors age of onset was >90 days, the time to diabetes was 42 ± 17 days (n = 5; p < 0.01). This indicates that splenocytes of HIPFasL mice becoming diabetic at a young age have a reduced ability to cause
cell destruction compared with splenocytes from transgenic mice developing diabetes at a similar age as wild-type NOD mice.
|
To determine whether HIPFasL
cells were susceptible to destruction by a nondestructive NOD islet infiltrate, we cotransplanted HIPFasL and NOD islets under the kidney capsule of nondiabetic NOD mice. Islets from HIPFasL or nondiabetic NOD male mice aged 100120 days were transplanted under the kidney capsule of 70-day-old NOD male mice (n = 8). HIPFasL islets were grafted at the cephalic pole, and islets from NOD mice were grafted at the caudal pole of the kidney. The grafted kidney was harvested 8 wk after the original graft. At the time of harvesting no mice were diabetic. Grafts were inspected macroscopically, and lesions were classified as destructive or nondestructive as previously described (20). All islet grafts from NOD donors showed neovascularization with conserved structure of the graft and well-demarcated islet architecture, characteristic of nondestructive insulitis (Fig. 7a). By comparison, islet grafts from HIPFasL donors showed swelling of the graft site with islets having a milky white appearance and being poorly defined, characteristic of destructive insulitis (Fig. 7b). One of the HIPFasL grafts was no longer visible and had presumably already been completely destroyed. Histological examination of HIPFasL donor grafts sections revealed a dense mononuclear cell infiltrate around the grafted islets, with extensive islet destruction and with 36% of the remaining islets exhibiting destructive insulitis characterized by peri- and intraislet infiltrates, destruction of islet architecture (Fig. 7d) and loss of insulin staining. By comparison, despite a similar degree of insulitis >99% of the NOD donor islet grafts exhibited conserved islet structure (Fig. 7c) and strong insulin staining consistent with benign insulitis.
|
The previous experiments suggested that there may be different mechanisms mediating diabetes development in young or old HIPFasL mice. To gain greater insights into these differences, NODSCID islet isografts were placed under the kidney capsule of diabetic HIPFasL mice according to their age of diabetes onset. Two groups of graft recipients were used; those in which the age of diabetes onset was <90 days (n = 5) and those in which it was >90 days (n = 5). Wild-type diabetic NOD mice normally destroy NODSCID islet isografts within 7 days. Twenty hours post-transplantation all grafted animals had returned to normoglycemia, and blood glucose was monitored every second day for 40 days. The return of persistent hyperglycemia was taken to reflect islet graft destruction, and this was confirmed by histological examination.
Fourteen days post-transplant, graft survival was significantly different between the two groups (p < 0.02). In graft recipients originally developing diabetes at >90 days of age, all islet grafts were destroyed within 7 days of transplantation (n = 5/5). By contrast, none of the grafts in those recipients originally developing diabetes at <90 days of age were destroyed at up to 14 days post-transplantation, and mean graft survival time was >90 days.
Susceptibility of HIPFasL islets to cytokine-induced apoptosis
Some of the previous experiments could be explained if HIPFasL islets were more susceptible to apoptosis than wild-type NOD islets. To test this possibility, islets were isolated from HIPFasL mice (n = 11) and wild-type NOD controls (n = 9) and cultured at 30 islets/well for 24 h in the presence or the absence of IL-1
(40 U/ml) and IFN
(500 U/ml). Single-cell suspensions were stained with propidium iodide at 2 µg/ml and then analyzed by flow cytometry.
The percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis in response to cytokine stimulation was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for HIPFasL (57.06 ± 38.32%) than wild-type NOD
cells (19.15 ± 13.26%; Fig. 8). This confirms that
cells expressing the FasL transgene are indeed more susceptible to cytokine-induced apoptosis than wild-type
cells.
|
cells FasL dependent?
To confirm that the mechanism for the increased susceptibility of HIPFasL
cells to cytokine-induced apoptosis was mediated via Fas-FasL interaction, we repeated the above experiment in the presence of neutralizing anti-FasL Ab. Addition of anti-FasL resulted in a 70% reduction in HIPFasL
cell apoptosis from 42.77 ± 31.02% with cytokine stimulation down to 12.79 ± 22.63% with FasL neutralization (p < 0.001; Fig. 9).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cells results in an accelerated form of autoimmune diabetes. For reasons not currently explained, this effect is more pronounced in male than in female mice. A marked mononuclear infiltrate preceded the development of diabetes. This contrasts with reports of other FasL transgenic lines (22), where the infiltrate was predominantly comprised of neutrophils. Insulitis in HIPFasL mice is apparent as early as 20 days of age, and diabetes develops from 25 days of age. This accelerated diabetes is dependant on the NOD genetic background, as 39 of 40 mice expressing HIPFasL on a mixed background showed no histological evidence of insulitis, and only one of 40 developed diabetes. The reason why accelerated diabetes is dependent on the NOD genetic background is not known. One explanation is that for transgenic FasL to mediate
cell apoptosis, Fas must first be up-regulated. In the NOD mouse this stimulus is provided by cytokines produced by the insulitis lesion, such as IL-1 and IFN-
. This stimulus for Fas expression would be absent, however, in F1 mice that did not have insulitis, thereby explaining their protection from FasL-induced apoptosis. This is supported by the fact that diabetes in the FasL model is T cell dependent, as expression of HIPFasL on the NODSCID background, which has no T or B cells, did not result in insulitis or diabetes. An alternative explanation is that particular genes in the NOD background may make NOD
cells particularly susceptible to Fas-mediated apoptosis. The previously suggested role of neutrophils is not supported by the current data, with diabetes instead being dependent on the presence of T cells. The diabetes of HIPFasL mice could potentially be explained by the FasL transgene causing an acceleration of the normal autoimmune diabetes of NOD mice. Other features of autoimmune diabetes in the NOD include rapid disease recurrence in islet isografts (23) and the ability of splenocytes from diabetic donors to transfer disease to NODSCID recipients (24). HIPFasL mice do not, however, demonstrate the same features. Although splenocytes from HIPFasL mice transferred diabetes to NODSCID recipients, the time taken for diabetes to develop in the recipients was >50% longer than that for recipients of nontransgenic NOD splenocytes. In fact, the time to diabetes in NODSCID recipients of HIPFasL splenocytes was similar to that seen in recipients of age-matched nondiabetic NOD donor splenocytes. Even more uncharacteristically, when islets (NODSCID) were grafted into recently diabetic young or old HIPFasL mice, all grafts were destroyed within 7 days in HIPFasL mice that developed diabetes after 90 days of age, compared with long term survival of four of five grafts into HIPFasL that developed diabetes before 90 days of age. Diabetes eventually occurred in these graft recipients between 150 and 250 days of age.
The above findings when taken together suggest that despite the similarities there are some fundamental differences in the disease process of HIPFasL and wild-type NOD mice. It is possible that the disease processes are the same, but that the reduced ability of HIPFasL splenocytes to transfer disease reflects FasL on transgenic
cells causing the death of Fas-expressing T cells at the very same time that the
cells are themselves being destroyed. This could result in depletion of
cell-reactive clones capable of either destroying an isograft or transferring disease to NODSCID recipients. Another possibility is that diabetes in HIPFasL mice requires the presence of insulitis (thereby explaining the necessity for lymphocytes and an NOD genetic background), but that FasL is directly responsible for
cell death either through autodestruction (the local cytokine milieu up-regulates
cell Fas expression, leading to Fas-FasL interaction and cell suicide) or because FasL may activate lymphoid or other hemopoietic cells that then indirectly kill
cells through other effector pathways, e.g., TNF.
We have also shown that HIPFasL
cells are more susceptible than wild-type cells to cytokine-induced apoptosis. This increased susceptibility is due to the action of FasL, as neutralization of FasL with blocking Ab abrogates cytokine-induced apoptosis of transgenic
cells. This is consistent with a scenario in which a nondestructive insulitis that in nontransgenic NOD mice would not cause
cell destruction is sufficient to induce
cell apoptosis in HIPFasL mice. The fact that HIPFasL grafts are destroyed while wild-type NOD islets are preserved when cotransplanted into nondiabetic NOD mice clearly indicates that HIPFasL islets are highly susceptible to benign insulitis. This may occur through cytokine-mediated up-regulation of
cell Fas, subsequent FasL ligation, and cell death. Disease recurrence is not seen in isografts or transferable to NODSCID recipients because the destructive insulitis phase and its associated effector T cell populations have not yet been established. In normal NOD mice the absence of constitutive FasL expression by
cells prevents
cell destruction during the phase of benign insulitis. However, during the transition to destructive insulitis a change in the cytokine milieu may cause up-regulation of
cell FasL, thereby triggering
cell death. Whether this is a part of the mechanism of
cell destruction in the normal course of autoimmune diabetes needs to be established, but there is evidence that this could be the case (25, 26, 27).
Other investigators have shown that the Fas-FasL pathway plays a major role in
cell death in autoimmune diabetes (28, 29, 30). Our data suggest in addition that the level of islet FasL expression determines the level of cytokine-induced
cell apoptosis. The accelerated diabetes in FasL transgenic mice would appear, therefore, to be due to the interaction of FasL with Fas up-regulated on
cells in response to cytokines produced by infiltrating T cells. This would explain why diabetes does not occur in HIPFasLSCID mice.
We thank Dr. Shiva Reddy for assistance with islet immunohistochemistry; Stephanie Palmer, Darren Newington, and Megan Cramond for technical assistance; and Sharen Pringle for administrative help.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Prof. Nikolai Petrovsky, Autoimmunity Research Unit, Canberra Hospital, P.O. Box 11, Woden ACT 2606, Australia. E-mail address: nikolai.petrovsky{at}anu.edu.au ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: FasL, Fas ligand; NOD, nonobese diabetic. ![]()
Received for publication July 15, 2002. Accepted for publication March 6, 2003.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
cell apoptosis in T cell-mediated autoimmune diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:213.
cells for Fas-mediated destruction in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J. Exp. Med. 186:1193.
cell destruction in NOD mice correlates with Fas (CD95) expression on
cells and proinflammatory cytokine expression in islets. Diabetes 48:21.[Abstract]
and Fas ligation. Diabetes 47:727.[Abstract]
cells sorted by flow-cytometry and cultured in vitro. Transplant. Proc. 27:3271.[Medline]
cell apoptosis via upregulation of the Fas receptor in human islets. Diabetes 50:1683.
cell death in the nonobese diabetic mouse is Fas independent. J. Immunol. 163:1562.
cells in non-obese diabetic mice. Diabetologia 43:1149.[Medline]
cell destruction by diabetogenic CD8+ T lymphocytes in transgenic nonobese diabetic mice. J. Clin. Invest. 103:1201.[Medline]
cells detected in accelerated diabetes of NOD mice: no role of Fas-Fas ligand interaction in autoimmune diabetes. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:455.[Medline]
cell destruction in autoimmune diabetes of NOD mice. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 958:204.[Medline]
cells induces a granulocytic infiltration but does not confer immune privilege upon islet allografts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:3943.
, IL-1
, and IFN-
mark
cells for Fas-dependent destruction by diabetogenic CD4+ T lymphocytes. J. Clin. Invest. 105:459.[Medline]
cells. Diabetes 50:S83.
cell damage. Diabetes 49:39.[Abstract]
cell death in animal models: relevance for human IDDM. Diabetes Metab. Rev. 14:194.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Gusdon, T. V. Votyakova, I. J. Reynolds, and C. E. Mathews Nuclear and Mitochondrial Interaction Involving mt-Nd2 Leads to Increased Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species Production J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2007; 282(8): 5171 - 5179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Emamaullee and A.M. J. Shapiro Interventional Strategies to Prevent {beta}-Cell Apoptosis in Islet Transplantation. Diabetes, July 1, 2006; 55(7): 1907 - 1914. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Laoag-Fernandez, H. Matsuo, H. Murakoshi, A. L. Hamada, B. K. Tsang, and T. Maruo 3,5,3'-Triiodothyronine Down-Regulates Fas and Fas Ligand Expression and Suppresses Caspase-3 and Poly (Adenosine 5'-Diphosphate-Ribose) Polymerase Cleavage and Apoptosis in Early Placental Extravillous Trophoblasts in Vitro J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2004; 89(8): 4069 - 4077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Augstein, P. Heinke, E. Salzsieder, S. Berg, R. Rettig, C. Salzsieder, and L. C. Harrison Fas Ligand Down-Regulates Cytokine-Induced Fas Receptor Expression on Insulinoma (NIT-1), But Not Islet Cells, from Autoimmune Nonobese Diabetic Mice Endocrinology, June 1, 2004; 145(6): 2747 - 2752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |