| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Immune Regulation Group, Centenary Institute of Cancer Medicine and Cell Biology, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia; and University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
To resolve these difficulties, we have explored the possibility of a quantitative understanding of T cell behavior that would enable us to assess the contribution of TCR engagement, costimulation, and IL-2 to the individual kinetic features of T cell proliferation. This more quantitative framework, we believe, will allow us to reconcile, and explore experimentally, questions of signal integration, and therefore achieve better insight into the regulation of T cells in vivo. Previously, we used a four-parameter model for describing T cell proliferation (33). Our approach assumed independent operation of the survival and proliferation components to behavior, and that variation in the population could be described by appropriate probability distributions. Thus, one parameter described the initial exponential rate of cell death exhibited by the population when cells were placed in culture, two parameters gave the Gaussian probability distribution for the time that the cells took to enter the first division, and the final (deterministic) parameter described the subsequent division rate (33). This model was developed to describe T cell proliferation in a system in which IL-2 was saturating; however, a complete model of T cell proliferation must also be able to describe the T cell behavior under conditions of changing IL-2 concentration, as occurs over time and with alterations to the range of costimulatory signals. When the four-parameter model was applied to data from T cells stimulated at different IL-2 concentrations, there were inconsistencies that could only be solved by incorporation of new parameters. In this study, we present a refined model that better accommodates the observed features of T cell proliferation when IL-2 levels are suboptimal. This amended model incorporates two new parameters: a precursor frequency for entry into the first division and a death rate for cells in division 1 or greater (D1+ cells).4
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Female B10.BR mice were obtained from the Animal Resource Center (Canning Vale, Australia). Mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions and were used between 8 and 18 wk of age.
Reagents and Abs
CFSE was obtained from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Human rIL-2 (rhIL-2) was purchased from Endogen (Woburn, MA). Murine IL-2 (mIL-2) was a gift of G. Zurawski (DNAX Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Palo Alto, CA). Anti-mIL-2 was purified from the hybridoma S4B6 (34, 35). Demecolcine was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). PE-conjugated anti-5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU)5 and isotype control were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA).
Cell preparation and culture
Cell suspensions were prepared from lymph nodes (axillary, brachial, cervical, inguinal, and para-aortic). Cells were enriched for CD4+ T cells by complement lysis using a mixture of B220-specific (RA3.3A1), CD8-specific (31 M), and heat stable Ag-specific (J11d) mAbs. In some experiments, a CD25-specific (7D4) mAb was also included. The remaining cells were labeled with a mixture of Abs against B220 (RA3.6B2), I-A (b, d, q haplotypes) and I-Edk (M5/114.15.2), CD25 (PC61), and CD8 (YTS-169). Labeled cells were then depleted using anti-rat IgG DYNAbeads (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway). The resulting purified CD4+ T cells were further fractionated on the basis of CD62L expression by labeling with CD62L-biotin (MEL-14), followed by streptavidin MACS beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The cells were then passed through a MACS MS column held in a magnetic field by a MiniMACS magnet (Miltenyi Biotec). The resulting population was typically >93% CD4+CD62L+.
Cells were labeled with CFSE, as described previously (36). Culture medium was RPMI 1640 medium with L-glutamine (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (Life Technologies), 5 x 10-5 M 2-ME, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin, all from Sigma-Aldrich. T cells were stimulated at 3 x 104/200 µl with plate-bound anti-CD3 (145-2C11) in flat-bottom 96-well plates (BD Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
For costimulation experiments, an anti-CD28 mAb (37.51) was added in soluble form.
Determining cell number
The absolute number of cells in culture at each time was determined by adding a known number of CaliBRITE beads (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) to each well before harvest. CaliBRITE beads and cells can be distinguished by flow cytometry on the basis of their forward and side scatter properties. The ratio of live cells to beads was then used to calculate the total number of cells in each culture (37). Flow cytometry was performed on a FACScan or FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences), and analysis was done using CellQuest (BD Biosciences) or FlowJo (Tree Star, San Carlos, CA).
The number of dead blasts found in each culture was an important additional data set to help constrain the fitting of the model to time course data. Previous studies have shown that CFSE-labeled dead cells retain the dye and can be identified by flow cytometry (38, 39). To determine the number of dead cells at each time of harvest, gates were set based on their distinctive forward and side scatter characteristics. Cells falling in the dead cell gate could clearly be categorized as having died as either an undivided cell, or while proliferating as a blast. Using these gates, the absolute number of dead undivided cells and blasts in each culture was determined with reference to CaliBRITE beads as for live cells (37). Using these methods, the fate of most of the input cells (>85%) could be accounted for over 4 days (data not shown).
Determining cells in each division
CFSE Modeler (ScienceSpeak, Canberra, Australia) was used to determine the number of cells in each division from CFSE profiles (33). Precursor cohort analysis was performed, as described previously (33). Briefly, precursor numbers were calculated by dividing the number of cells in division i by 2i. A Gaussian distribution was fitted to the plots of precursor number against division number using nonlinear regression analysis in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The means of the fitted Gaussian distributions were plotted against time, and straight lines were fitted using linear regression analysis in GraphPad Prism.
Modeling
The number of cells expected in each division was calculated in a modified manner to that described previously (33). The new model incorporated the additional parameters p, the proportion of the cell population that will participate in division (the precursors), and d, the proportion of a cohort of cells that die while traversing a complete cell division (for division numbers 
1). As previously described (33), the variation in the time of entry of cells into first division within the population is assumed to follow a Gaussian (or, in some instances, a log-Gaussian) distribution given as 
with mean and SD µ and 
, respectively. Once the cells have entered their first division, it is assumed they divide with equal subsequent division time (b), although this is a simplification. As for the previous model, it is assumed that the rate of death of undivided cells proceeds according to an exponential decay rate constant (k) independently of activation up until the first division (33).
When a number of starting cells (N0) are placed in culture, the number of live and dead cells that are to be found in each division i (in which i is an integer) when the culture is harvested at time Tf (given in hours) can be calculated if all parameters are given.
Live undivided cells (i = 0) will comprise nonprecursor cells and precursor cells for whom their designated time to division is greater than Tf. It is assumed both are subject to the same rate of exponential death. Therefore, at Tf, the number of live nonprecursors (NP0) is given by:
 |
And the number of undivided precursor cells (P0) is essentially:
 |
To calculate the above term and subsequent values of cells in each division, the appropriate integrals were solved numerically using the trapezoidal rule. To do this, the distribution was split into 15-min intervals (up to 240 h), with time of entry into first division given by t (in which t is in hours). Therefore, we calculated the total number of precursors in division 0 (P0), as follows:
 |
And the total number of live cells in division 0 (L0) is:
 |
All precursor cell cohorts with a time to divide less than Tf will have divided at least once. For these cells, we need to calculate how many have entered division, which division they are now in, how many remain alive, and how many dead cells have been left behind in each division.
Thus, the total number of precursors in division i (for i >0) is given by:
 |
The e-kt term is used instead of e-kTf, as these cells have entered division and are therefore no longer subject to the exponential decay of undivided cells.
For i >0, the number of live cells in division i (Li) is based on this precursor number, but also takes into account the doubling of cell numberwith division and the proportion of cells that die each division. Cells are assumed to die evenly across the division.
 |
Where the term 
accounts for the cell death and doubling in previous divisions, the term
 |
 |
The number of dead blasts that are found in division i is given by:
 |
Thus, the total number of dead blasts is given by:
 |
Where
 |
 |
A Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) spreadsheet (xcelmodel) was used to give numerical solutions to the above equations. The model predicted values for total number of live cells per division and total number of dead blasts, and was then compared with experimental data, and the parameters were fitted to obtain the least sum of squares between predicted and experimental data. The values for N0 and k were predetermined by the number of cells known to be added to culture and the exponential decay seen in nonstimulated cultures
BrdU analysis
Cultured T cells were pulsed at day 4 with 100 µg/ml BrdU (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h before harvesting. Cells were fixed in 2% formaldehyde for 10 min. Tween 20 (ICN, Irvine, CA) was then added to give a final concentration of 0.5% formaldehyde and 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated overnight. DNase I (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany) was added at 100 µg/ml (in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 µg/ml BSA) for 30 min at 37°C before BrdU incorporation was detected using an anti-BrdU Ab.
Demecolcine analysis
For direct analysis of time of entry into first division, cells were stimulated in the presence of 5 ng/ml demecolcine (40). Flow cytometric analysis of CFSE-labeled cells confirmed that there was no division in the presence of demecolcine (data not shown). After various times, cultures were pulsed with [3H]TdR (ICN; 1 µCi/well) for several hours before harvesting. Incorporation of radioactivity was measured using a Betaplate counter (Pharmacia-LKB, Uppsala, Sweden). Log-Gaussian distributions were fitted to the data using nonlinear regression analysis in GraphPad Prism.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
To examine the quantitative effects of IL-2 concentration on T cell proliferation, CFSE-labeled cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 in the presence of an anti-mouse IL-2 mAb (S4B6) and various concentrations of hIL-2. hIL-2 is active on mouse T cells while being resistant to the inhibitory effects of the S4B6 Ab. As noted previously (42), cells divided asynchronously so that at any time point cells can be found spread across a range of divisions (Fig. 1A). At higher concentrations of IL-2, the cells progressed through a greater number of divisions so that after 99 h, most cells in cultures activated in the presence of 50 U/ml of IL-2 were found in division 4 or 5. In contrast, in cultures exposed to only 1.25 U/ml, very few cells had reached division 5 by this time, with most cells being found in divisions 2–4. This increased progression through division may result from a decrease in the time to first division, from a decrease in subsequent division time, or from a combination of the two.
|
50 h for 50, 5, and 2.5 U/ml of hIL-2. In contrast, the slope of the line decreased as IL-2 concentration was lowered consistent with progressively longer division times. When plotted in this way, data for 1.25 U/ml of IL-2 were difficult to fit with Gaussian curves, as the cells had not moved far enough into division and the fitting was therefore subject to unacceptably large errors. Nevertheless, this analysis suggests that IL-2 concentration was not altering the average time to first division, while exerting a profound effect on the subsequent division rate. A six-parameter model: a variable precursor frequency and variable rate of death in dividing cells
It was our intention to develop a useful quantitative model that could predict the number of stimulated T cells found in culture at various IL-2 concentrations. Previous analysis of cell numbers after stimulation using the four-parameter model of proliferation was done in the presence of saturating IL-2, and did not take account of death of cells in divisions after 0 (D1+ cells). In the experiments described in this work, cultures containing low IL-2 concentrations displayed a proportionally large number of dead cells (data not shown). Thus, the earlier described four-parameter model required modification to resolve the proliferation behavior of cells in the presence of suboptimal IL-2. For this reason, a more complete model of proliferation was developed that incorporated a parameter describing the proportion of D1+ cells that die in each division (d). This was assumed to be constant for all divisions after the first. The death rate per division of D1+ cells was subtracted from each division and assumed to operate in a linear manner such that cells harvested halfway through a division will have lost one-half of the designated proportion of cells.
In addition to the above modification, a precursor frequency parameter (p) for cells entering the first division was introduced, as preliminary investigations revealed that, under suboptimal stimulation conditions, not all cells will be stimulated to divide (data not shown). The precursor frequency was introduced as a proportional multiplier of the total input cell number and essentially altered the area under the time to first division probability distribution. The method for calculating the predicted number of cells found in each division at a nominated culture harvest time based on the use of six parameters is described in detail in Materials and Methods.
IL-2 concentration does not alter the rate of initial cell death (k)
The new six-parameter model described above was to be used to analyze experimental data to extract values for each parameter, if possible. When fitting a complex model in this way, it is useful to constrain as many parameters as possible. One possible parameter that we reasoned might be fixed was the rate of cell death when cells were first placed in culture. Previously, we found that cell survival followed an exponential curve and was not affected for the first 30 h in culture by the presence or absence of anti-CD3 (33). To examine the effect of different concentrations of hIL-2 on the rate of cell death, CFSE-labeled naive CD4+ T cells were placed in culture in the presence of varying concentrations of hIL-2. The cultures were harvested at various time points, and the absolute number of live cells was determined. As shown in Fig. 2A, a significant proportion of cells dies within the first 24–48 h of culture; however, this rate of death did not appear to be altered by the concentration of IL-2 present. Exponential decay curves were fitted to the data using GraphPad Prism (Fig. 2A), and the decay constants obtained were plotted against IL-2 concentration (Fig. 2B). The results of this fitting confirm that IL-2 does not significantly alter the initial rate of death when cells are placed in culture. Thus, the value of the exponential decay constant could be determined for unstimulated cultures and assumed to be identical for cultures containing various concentrations of IL-2.
|
The new six-parameter model was then used to more closely examine the effect of IL-2 concentration on all aspects of T cell proliferation. CFSE-labeled naive CD4+ T cells were stimulated with anti-CD3 in the presence of the mIL-2-neutralizing Ab S4B6 and various concentrations of hIL-2. The cells were harvested at various times, and the total number of live and dead cells (both blast and undivided) was determined, as described in Materials and Methods. As observed previously, there was a steep decrease in cell number at the beginning of culture (Fig. 3A). Consistent with the above data and previous results, this cell death was similar for all cultures until 40 h. At high concentrations of IL-2, however, the cell number began to increase after 48 h as the cells began to divide. This increase in live cell number was accompanied by the appearance of dead blasts. In contrast, at low concentrations of IL-2, the cell number did not increase again, but remained in decline. As observed earlier, IL-2 concentration also affected the progression of cells through division (Fig. 3B).
|
Independent testing of parameters confirms predictions of model fitting
Although the six-parameter model fitted well to the experimental data, independent tests of the predictions and assumptions of the model were conducted to verify the accuracy of the model and the conclusions reached.
IL-2 affects the division rate of T cells
Initially, the prediction of the model that increasing IL-2 concentration would decrease the average division time consistently across all divisions was tested by exposing cells to a brief pulse (4 h) with BrdU. As the cells are unsynchronized with respect to position in cell cycle, only those that enter S phase within the pulse time are labeled. The faster the cell population is dividing, the more cells that will enter S phase in the pulse period, and thus the higher the percentage of BrdU+ cells will be. Cells were labeled with CFSE so that BrdU incorporation and division number could be assessed simultaneously (Fig. 4A). The proportion of BrdU+ cells was constant across divisions greater than 1 (Fig. 4B), as previously reported for saturating concentrations of IL-2 (42), reflecting the relatively constant rate of proliferation once the cells have begun proliferating. At lower concentrations of IL-2, the percentage of BrdU+ cells was decreased, revealing a reduced proportion of cells in S phase consistent with a decreased division rate in these cultures. This change in BrdU incorporation with IL-2 concentration (Fig. 4C) mirrors the effect seen on division time in our model fitting (Fig. 3F).
|
Next, the entry into the first division was investigated directly. To measure the time the cells took to enter the first division, a previously reported system that uses the cell cycle inhibitor demecolcine (40) was used. Demecolcine inhibits cells in metaphase of the cell cycle; thus, the cells are able to replicate their DNA, but do not undergo cell division. As a consequence, DNA replication is only possible from cells entering their first division. Cultures containing demecolcine were pulsed briefly with [3H]TdR at varying times to detect DNA replication. Fig. 5A shows that cells cultured in the presence of higher concentrations of IL-2 incorporated greater levels of TdR; however, the time at which the cells began to incorporate TdR was not noticeably altered. Furthermore, the increased accuracy of the demecolcine method of measuring time to first division allowed a finer resolution of the distribution of cells entering division. Fitting analysis with GraphPad Prism revealed that this distribution more accurately approximated a log-Gaussian rather than the Gaussian curve we had used previously. When log-Gaussian curves were fitted to the data (Fig. 5A), the mean, width, and area under the curve for each IL-2 concentration could be extracted. The mean and width of the time to first division distribution decreased slightly with decreasing IL-2 concentration (Fig. 5, B and D). In contrast, the area under the curve was dramatically reduced at lower concentrations of IL-2 (Fig. 5C). The area under the curve reflects the precursor frequency, so this result confirms the prediction from fitting the six-parameter model that IL-2 would act to increase the number of cells that are able to enter the first division.
|
The result that IL-2 did not greatly affect time to first division was surprising, so the ability of the demecolcine system to detect changes in time to first division was tested. Cells were stimulated with suboptimal concentrations of anti-CD3, and time to first division was measured using the demecolcine system. Reducing the concentration of anti-CD3 decreased the level of TdR incorporated (Fig. 5E) and seemed to delay the onset of proliferation. Fitting of log-Gaussian curves to the data revealed that, in contrast to the effect of IL-2, decreasing the anti-CD3 concentration increased the mean time the cells took to enter the first division (Fig. 5F). However, in common with IL-2, the strength of stimulation through CD3 also altered the proportion of cells able to enter the first division (Fig. 5G).
A restricted window for entry into division: delayed addition of IL-2 cannot rescue cells
Given that the IL-2 concentration determined the proportion of cells that could enter division at a time determined by the anti-CD3 concentration, we examined the outcome on entry of cells into division when IL-2 addition was delayed by up to 48 h. We reasoned that if sufficient IL-2 was not available at the time cells were due to enter division, later addition of IL-2 would rescue these cells, recruiting them into division. As a result, we would expect to see the same area under the TdR incorporation curve, regardless of when the IL-2 was added. Cells were stimulated with anti-CD3, and IL-2 was added at the start of culture or after 24, 34, or 48 h, and the entry of cells into division was measured using the demecolcine system. Cultures that received delayed addition of IL-2 displayed reduced incorporation of TdR for at least 20 h after the IL-2 was added before reaching similar levels as the control cultures (Fig. 5H). This result indicates that 20 h was required for IL-2 to achieve its full effect on promoting the entry of cells into division. Furthermore, when IL-2 addition was delayed, the area under the curve was much lower than that of cultures that were continuously exposed to IL-2, implying that cells were unable to be rescued. That is, if a cell has not been exposed to sufficient IL-2 when its time to divide occurs (as determined by factors such as the level of anti-CD3 stimulation), the opportunity to divide is lost.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
|
The quantitative view of multiple signal integration can be extended to accommodate accessory cell licensing by CD4 cells recently reported to serve as a replacement, or adjunct to Th cell action for promoting CTL activation (43, 44, 45). Thus, we propose increased expression of costimulatory molecules, such as CD40, on the APC induced by CD4 helpers can enhance T cell proliferation in ways additional to cytokines (such as altering the time to division and/or the survival through divisions). The quantitative sum of all of these effects (costimulators and soluble molecules) dictates the subsequent rate of T cell proliferation. The relative contribution of costimulatory molecules and soluble growth factors will depend on the stimulation conditions, and neither should be considered as obligatory pathways, despite the practical reality that an experimental system can be manipulated to yield convincing data consistent with such a view.
These studies may help explain the paradox concerning the difference in requirement for IL-2 in vitro compared with in vivo (23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 32, 46, 47, 48). Potentially multiple stimuli in vivo, including other common 
-chain ligands, may be summed by the T cell to alter the parameters of proliferation and thereby lessen the single contribution of IL-2-induced changes to these parameters. Furthermore, there is accumulating evidence that TCR engagement with costimulation is sufficient to induce some rounds of T cell proliferation in the absence of IL-2, or other -chain ligands (49, 50). Thus, the in vitro/in vivo paradox can be resolved by noting three features of IL-2 that lead to its markedly exaggerated importance in vitro. First, IL-2 is the major potential growth-promoting factor produced in vitro and may not be so in vivo; second, rapid accumulation of the cytokine within the confines of the in vitro culture allows high, stable concentrations to develop that probably never occur in vivo; and third, as we have seen, relatively small changes in IL-2 can have large effects after a few days in culture. Thus, while in vitro analyses are useful and even essential to demonstrate the quantitative operation of IL-2, studies of mice deficient in IL-2, or components of the IL-2R must complement this work to more appropriately apportion the contribution of this cytokine to in vivo responses.
Our experiments determined that IL-2 did not alter the time at which entry into the first division occurred, although it did alter the time to traverse subsequent divisions. The former observation was surprising, and appeared to be inconsistent with the important early studies of Cantrell and Smith (26, 51). These authors have previously shown that IL-2 concentration, IL-2R levels, and the duration of the IL-2/IL-2R interaction determine the time that activated T cells take to enter S phase (26). These earlier experiments, however, were conducted on T cells that had already been activated with mitogens and then rested without IL-2. Their reported regulation of entry into divisions, therefore, probably more closely reflects what is occurring in divisions after 1 than it does the entry of naive cells into the first division. Thus, these reports are consistent with our finding that IL-2 does not alter the time taken to enter the first division, but does alter the time taken to enter subsequent divisions.
Wells, Gudmundsdottir, and Turka (39) observed previously that the proportion of cells entering division following anti-CD3 stimulation is regulated by both the strength of TCR engagement and the provision of costimulatory signals. They also noted that only 60% of T cells were able to enter division under maximum stimulatory conditions (39). Our analysis extends this work to reveal that IL-2 concentration is a further variable in determining the frequency of cells entering cycle even when all cells show signs of activation. Additionally, our experiments reveal that if IL-2 is not present at the time that cells are designated to divide by the strength of CD3 stimulation, they cannot be rescued by later addition of IL-2 (Fig. 5H). This finding raises the question of the fate of these cells. Perhaps they become anergic or undergo apoptosis after a further culture period. Our attempts to test the latter possibility by detecting increased death in the undivided population in the absence of IL-2 were hampered by the high intrinsic rate of death (data not shown). Thus, no conclusion could be reached, and further investigation will be required to determine the fate of these below-precursor threshold cells.
The addition of two new parameters was not the only modification we propose for the original Gett/Hodgkin model. We suggest that the original Gaussian distribution describing entry into the first division should also be replaced with a log-Gaussian function. This adjustment is a result of the greater accuracy in measuring time to first division with the demecolcine method. Such a pattern of entry into division is still consistent with a stochastic model of T cell proliferation and is reminiscent of the log-Gaussian distribution of many receptors, including CD3 and IL-2R, on the surface of T cell populations (26, 52). Thus, a simple explanation is that there may be a linear relation between the log-Gaussian growth factor receptor number and log-normal time to division consistent with the original experiments of Cantrell and Smith (26, 51). Whether the variation in receptor number and/or time to division results from differences in additional factors, such as the age of the cell, its activation history, or level of self reactivity, or is inherent to the construction of the cell, is currently unknown. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that this variability within the population ensures a full range of quantitative outcomes following stimulation, such that the summation of a large series of all or none decisions for division or death for each cell in the population results in a smooth transition from low cell to high cell numbers generated as IL-2 is increased. Thus, by this example, variability should not be viewed as an imperfection in the population, but potentially as an essential element in the smooth quantitative operation of the T cell response.
The six-parameter model presented in this work has three probabilistic parameters that are used to describe the variability within the cell population: two describing time to first division and one for the rate of initial cell death. Clearly, the pattern of death (d) and the time to divide in subsequent divisions (b) would also be better described by probability functions once the shape of these distributions can be experimentally determined. An example in which this may be relevant is demonstrated by the results of our fitting of the six-parameter model, which implied that decreasing IL-2 should increase the variation in the time to first division distribution. Our demecolcine data, however, revealed that, if anything, there was a slight decrease in the spread of entry into first division as IL-2 concentration was reduced. The solution to this inconsistency is presumably that a degree of variability also exists in the time that cells take to reach subsequent divisions. As a result, over time the spread of cells through division is the net result of compounding the variation in time to first and subsequent divisions. The above discrepancy in the effect of IL-2 on time to first division variability can thus be explained by the reasonable assumption that decreasing IL-2 concentration increases the variability in time taken to enter subsequent divisions. The variable b, therefore, gives the average time to next division, and thus its value may be skewed by the accumulation of very slowly dividing (or division-arrested) cells. Methods for investigating variation in time to enter subsequent divisions and the presence of nondividing cells are currently being developed.
A further potential variable not addressed as yet in our model is the possibility that the value of the death rate d may change with consecutive divisions. Renno et al. (53) found that superantigen-stimulated T cells in vivo exhibit an increase in death rate at later divisions. Furthermore, although our model incorporated a linear rate of cell death across division, it is possible that this death may be better described by other functions, such as the exponential decay or a log-normal distribution. We have not found it necessary to include this additional level of complexity to fit T cell proliferation data in vitro; however, given the results of Renno et al., attempts to model other T cell activation systems may require this additional amendment to our model.
In conclusion, these studies help to resolve some of the discrepancies observed between in vitro and in vivo results. Quantitative modeling of in vitro systems allows exploration of the complex signal integration while keeping a more appropriate perspective on the importance of each stimuli. Thus, in vitro analysis continues to be of use in exploring the response to multiple stimuli.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
Footnotes |
|---|
2 Current address: Institute for Research in Biomedicine, Via Vincenzo Vela 6, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland.
3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Philip D. Hodgkin at the current address: The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria, 3050, Australia. E-mail address: Hodgkin{at}wehi.edu.au
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: BrdU, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; hIL, human IL; mIL, murine IL.
Received for publication December 17, 2002. Accepted for publication March 6, 2003.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
production during lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection. J. Immunol. 155:5690.[Abstract]
chain. Immunity 2:223.[Medline]
Chain required for naive CD4+ T cell survival but not for antigen proliferation. Nat. Immun. 1:54.[Medline]
Related articles in The JI:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. D. Hawkins, J. F. Markham, L. P. McGuinness, and P. D. Hodgkin A single-cell pedigree analysis of alternative stochastic lymphocyte fates PNAS, August 11, 2009; 106(32): 13457 - 13462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. M. Bonefeld, M. Haks, B. Nielsen, M. von Essen, L. Boding, A. K. Hansen, J. M. Larsen, N. Odum, P. Krimpenfort, A. Kruisbeek, et al. TCR Down-Regulation Controls Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7786 - 7799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Yates, M. Saini, A. Mathiot, and B. Seddon Mathematical Modeling Reveals the Biological Program Regulating Lymphopenia-Induced Proliferation J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1414 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. A. Yarke, S. L. Dalheimer, N. Zhang, D. M. Catron, M. K. Jenkins, and D. L. Mueller Proliferating CD4+ T Cells Undergo Immediate Growth Arrest upon Cessation of TCR Signaling In Vivo J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 156 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Lundegaard, O. Lund, C. Kesmir, S. Brunak, and M. Nielsen Modeling the adaptive immune system: predictions and simulations Bioinformatics, December 15, 2007; 23(24): 3265 - 3275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Hommel and P. D. Hodgkin TCR Affinity Promotes CD8+ T Cell Expansion by Regulating Survival J. Immunol., August 15, 2007; 179(4): 2250 - 2260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. V. Ganusov, D. Milutinovic, and R. J. De Boer IL-2 Regulates Expansion of CD4+ T Cell Populations by Affecting Cell Death: Insights from Modeling CFSE Data J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 950 - 957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Hawkins, M. L. Turner, M. R. Dowling, C. van Gend, and P. D. Hodgkin A model of immune regulation as a consequence of randomized lymphocyte division and death times PNAS, March 20, 2007; 104(12): 5032 - 5037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Rizzitelli, E. Hawkins, H. Todd, P. D. Hodgkin, and K. Shortman The proliferative response of CD4 T cells to steady-state CD8+ dendritic cells is restricted by post-activation death Int. Immunol., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 415 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. R Dowling, D. Milutinovic, and P. D Hodgkin Modelling cell lifespan and proliferation: is likelihood to die or to divide independent of age? J R Soc Interface, December 22, 2005; 2(5): 517 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Chang, J.-H. Cho, S.-W. Lee, S.-Y. Choi, S.-J. Ha, and Y.-C. Sung IL-12 Priming during In Vitro Antigenic Stimulation Changes Properties of CD8 T Cells and Increases Generation of Effector and Memory Cells J. Immunol., March 1, 2004; 172(5): 2818 - 2826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
) and fitted Gaussian model (
) are shown for each IL-2 concentration. Fitted values for the log-Gaussian model (
) are shown only for the 2–5 U/ml IL-2 culture. Points for experimental data represent the mean ± SD of triplicate cultures. C–G, Plots represent effect of IL-2 concentration on mean (C) and SD (D) of time to first division, precursor frequency (E), division time (F), and proportion of cells dying by division (G), as determined by fitting of the model.
