|
|
||||||||
2 Chain Expression and Signaling



* Mucosal Immunity and
Clinical Immunology Sections, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and
Lymphocyte Cell Biology Section, Arthritis and Rheumatism Branch, National Institute of Arthritis, Musculoskeletal, and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 chain transgene (and thus
capable of normal IL-12R expression and signaling) to undergo Th1
differentiation when stimulated by Con A and APCs. We found that such
cells were still unable to exhibit IL-12-mediated IFN-
production.
In a second approach to this question, we created Th2 cell lines (D10
cells) transfected with STAT4-expressing plasmids with various
tyrosine
phenylalanine mutations and CD4+ T cell lines
from IL-12
2-/- mice infected with retroviruses
expressing similarly STAT4 mutations that nevertheless express surface
IL-12R
2 chains. We then showed that constructs that were unable to
support STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation (in D10 cells) as a result of
mutation were also incapable of supporting IL-12-induced IFN-
production (in IL-12R
2-/- cells). Thus, by two
complementary approaches we demonstrated that activated STAT4 has an
essential downstream role in Th1 cell differentiation that is
independent of its role in the support of IL-12R
2 chain signaling.
This implies that STAT4 is an essential element in the early events of
Th1 differentiation. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-2, and TNF-
and
Th2 cells secreting IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-9, IL-10, and IL-13
(1). Among the factors controlling such differentiation
are the cytokines present in the milieu of the T cells during initial
priming (2). In the case of murine Th1 differentiation,
APC-derived IL-12 plays a key role in this respect, as shown by the
fact that knockout mice deficient in IL-12 p40 or either of the chains
comprising the IL-12R have highly impaired Th1 responses
(3, 4, 5). In addition, during normal T cell differentiation,
down-regulation of the IL-12R
2 chain and thus cessation of IL-12
signaling accompanies alternative differentiation into Th2 cells
(6, 7). Recently, however, evidence has emerged that IL-12
may not be the primary event of Th1 differentiation (8).
This consists of the finding that stimulation of T cells through the
TCR leads to the expression of the transcription factor T-bet, which
then results in IL-12/STAT4-independent accessibility of the IFN-
promoter and induction of IL-12R
2 chain expression (8, 9). IL-12/STAT4 signaling then supervenes to sustain nascent Th
cell growth and survival as well as to up-regulate IFN-
transcription.
One key component of the above description of Th1 differentiation not
yet completely understood is the cellular events linking IL-12 to
downstream IFN-
transcription. Thus, while IL-12 signaling leads to
activation of a number of STATs and p38 mitogen-activated protein
kinase (10, 11, 12), it is felt that the most important factor
is STAT4. This derives from the fact that STAT4 is the only STAT
uniquely activated by IL-12, and STAT4 knockout mice exhibit diminished
Th1 differentiation (13, 14). However, it should be noted
that, while a STAT4 footprint has been detected in the
IFN-
gene (15, 16), it is still
unclear whether STAT4 binding to the promoter/enhancer region of
IFN-
gene is necessary for IFN-
transcription. In addition,
STAT4-/-CD4+ cells are
low IFN-
-producing cells that manifest decreased expression of the
IL-12R
2 chain of the IL-12R (17). These considerations
leave open the possibility that the main function of activated STAT4 is
to facilitate IL-12 signaling and that other transcription factors are
able to maintain IFN-
transcription in the absence of STAT4 if IL-12
signaling via the IL-12R
2 chain remains intact.
In the present studies we have investigated this question using
two complementary approaches. First, we determined the
ability of cells bearing a transgene expressing the IL-12R
2 chain to
transduce a signal leading to Th1 differentiation in the absence of
STAT4, i.e., in CD4+ cells from a STAT4 knockout
mouse. Second, we determined the ability of mouse IL-12R
2 chain to
function as a signaling molecule in mouse T cells lacking endogenous
2 chain expression after transfection or retroviral delivery of
constructs encoding IL-12R
2 chains containing
tyrosine
phenylalanine mutations and thus exhibiting partial or
complete absence of STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation. This allowed us to
determine both the sites of STAT4 activation and, more importantly, the
relation of such activation to Th1 development.
The results obtained from both approaches showed that activated STAT4
is directly involved in IL-12-dependent Th1 differentiation and
proliferation. Thus, even under circumstances in which IL-12 signaling
can be shown to occur via the IL-12R
2 chain, the absence of
activated STAT4 leads to cells with impaired IL-12-induced IFN-
production and reduced or absent proliferation. These studies provide
unequivocal evidence supporting the key role of activated STAT4 in
IL-12-induced Th1 differentiation that is independent of its role in
the induction and maintenance of IL-12R
2 chain expression and
signaling.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human rIL-2 and mouse IL-12 were obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD) and R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), respectively. OVA peptide (323339) was purchased from American Peptide Company (Santa Clara, CA). Culture media for D10.G4.1 cells and primary mouse T cells were identical to those described previously (18).
Cells and cell cultures
Mouse Th2 clone D10.G4.1 (D10) cells were purchased from
American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). D10 cells and D10
cells transfected with various constructs were stimulated and
maintained as previously described (18).
CD4+CD62Lhigh cells from
IL-12R
2 chain-/- DO11.10 mouse spleens were
isolated with the use of mouse CD4+ beads
(Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and/or by flow cytometry sorting with
anti-mouse CD4-FITC (clone RM4-4; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and
anti-CD62L-PE (BD PharMingen). For retroviral infection, sorted
cells (1 x 105/ml) were stimulated with 3
µM OVA peptide (323399), 30-Gy irradiated syngeneic BALB/c
splenocytes (2.5 x 106/ml), IL-12 (2
ng/ml), and human IL-2 (
50100 U/ml). For
STAT4-/-CD4+ cell
priming, isolated CD4+ cells (0.25 x
105/ml) were stimulated with Con A (2.5 µg/ml)
plus irradiated APCs (2.5 x 106/ml) plus
IL-12 (2 ng/ml) plus anti-IL-4 (20 µg/ml) (Th1) or IL-4 (200
U/ml) (Th2). Three days later, Con A was neutralized with
-methyl
mannoside (10 mg/ml) and the CD4+ T cell lines
were washed extensively and expanded. Both retrovirus-infected T cell
lines and Con A-stimulated T cell lines were >98% CD4 positive.
Mice
BALB/c background IL-12R
2 chain knockout mice were produced
as previously described (5). BALB/c background
OVA-specific TCR-transgenic DO11.10 mice were crossed with BALB/c
background IL-12R
2 chain knockout mice to obtain BALB/c background
IL-12R
2 chain knockout/DO11.10 mice. BALB/c background
STAT4-/- mice were purchased from The Jackson
Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and bred in our animal facility.
STAT4-/- IL-12R
2 chain transgenic mice were
created by crossing STAT4-/- mice with BALB/c
background IL-12R
2 chain transgenic mice (18).
Plasmid constructs
VAhCD2 minigene vector and mouse IL-12R
2 chain were kindly
provided by Dr. D. Kioussis and Dr. U. Gubler, respectively (19, 20). MSCV retroviral vector was purchased from Clontech
Laboratories (Palo Alto, CA) (21). FLAG epitope tag
sequence was inserted before the stop codon of mouse IL-12R
2 chain
cDNA as previously described (18). Site-directed
mutagenesis was performed using QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis
kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) as per the manufacturers protocol.
Single tyrosine site to phenylalanine mutations (677F, 693F, 727F,
737738F, 748F, 757F, 778F, 804F, 811F, and 866F) were introduced and
confirmed by sequencing. The confirmed sequences were reinserted into
mouse IL-12R
2 chain cDNA together with a FLAG epitope by using
nearby restriction enzyme sites, and the whole cDNAs with mutations
thus obtained were subcloned further into a VAhCD2 minigene vector
(EcoRI and SmaI) or a MSCV retroviral vector
(EcoRI and HindIII (blunt ended by Klenow
enzyme)). For multiple site-directed mutagenesis, sequential
mutagenesis from tyrosine to phenylalanine was performed, confirmed by
sequencing, and put back into mouse IL-12R
2 chain cDNA with FLAG
epitope by using unique restriction sites (NdeI (1960),
BclI (2296), MscI (2506), and NotI).
The sequences of final cDNAs were confirmed by sequencing, and the
whole cDNAs thus obtained were subcloned into a VAhCD2 minigene vector
or a MSCV retroviral vector.
Stable transfection
D10 cells were transfected as previously described
(18). Briefly, D10 cells were electroporated with 20 µg
linearized VAhCD2 minigene vectors with various IL-12R
2 chain
mutants and 1 µg pSV2neo, and 16 h later the cells were
stimulated with Ag and 30-Gy irradiated syngeneic splenocytes.
Forty-eight hours after stimulation the cells were plated into 96-well
plates and selected by resistance to 500 µg/ml G418. Two weeks later
the positive clones were screened by anti-FLAG Ab by Western
blotting and/or anti-mouse IL-12R
2 chain mAb by flow
cytometry.
Retroviral gene transfer
The Phoenix-Eco packaging cell line was kindly provided by Dr.
G. P. Nolan (22). Retroviral infection for IL-12R
2
chain mutants were performed according to Dr. Nolans protocol.
Briefly, 2 x 106 Phoenix Eco cells were
transfected with 5 µg MSCV retroviral vector with various IL-12R
2
chain mutant cDNA by a CaPO4 method. Forty-eight
hours after transfection viral supernatants were harvested and
Ag-stimulated primary mouse T cells were infected with supernatants
including 2 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) by spin
infection (1200 x g for 60 min); the infected cells
were then incubated for 14 h at 32°C and incubated for an
additional 10 h at 37°C. After one more infection procedure,
cells were expanded with media with 50 U/ml human IL-2 and additional
cytokines as described above.
Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry was performed as previously described
(18). For mouse IL-12R
2 chain staining, hamster
anti-mouse IL-12R
2 chain (PDL-HAM10B9) hamster
anti-trinitrophenol mAb (BD PharMingen) was used. As a
control for these labeled Abs, biotinylated goat anti-hamster IgG
(H and L chains; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA)
and streptavidin PE (BD PharMingen) were used. To amplify the signal
intensity of IL-12R
2 chain expression in retroviral infection
experiments, anti-streptavidin and streptavidin PE were added as
described by Cohen et al. (23).
Western blotting
Immunoprecipitation Western blotting for STAT4 was performed as previously described (18). Western blotting for STAT3 was performed with anti-phosphorylated (Y705) STAT3 mAb (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA), and SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL) to detect phosphorylated STAT3.
Real time RT-PCR (TaqMan)
Total RNA was isolated by STAT60 RNA isolation kit (Tel-Test,
Friendswood, TX) using the manufacturers protocol. Reverse
transcriptase reaction was performed with Superscriptase II (Life
Technologies, Rockville, MD) with random primers. Real-time PCR was
performed for 18S rRNA (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), Pim-1
(probe, 5'-CCCTCCTTTGAAGAAATCCGG-3'; primers,
5'-TGTCCCTGAGACCGTCAGATC-3'and 5'-GCAGGAGGTCACCCTGCAT-3'),
IL-18R1 (probe, CATGATCACACCTTGGAATTCTGGCCA; primers, 5'-
AAGCTCGCCCAGAGTCACTTT-3' and 5'-ACGTTCCCTCATCCTCCATCT-3'), and
IFN-regulating factor
(IRF)3-1 (probe,
5'-CCTCCGAAGCCGCAACAGACG-3'; primers,
5'-GATAGCACCACTGATCTGTATAACCTACA-3' and
5'-TCTTCGGCTATCTTCCCTTCCT-3'). The expression level of these
genes was measured by
Ct method after justifying it by using
serially diluted samples. The expression level was normalized by 18S
rRNA and expressed as fold induction in comparison to that of
STAT4-/-CD4+ cells with
IL-12R
2 chain transgene primed in Th2 condition without IL-12
stimulation. The data shown were geometric means and SD of three
independent experiments. Statistical analysis was performed by
Students t test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In initial studies we determined the expression of IL-12R
1 and
2 chains in
STAT4-/-CD4+ T cells
stimulated under Th1 priming conditions. As shown in Fig. 1
A, 5 days after stimulation
of CD4+ T cells with Con A and APCs (in the
presence of IL-12 and anti-IL-4) there was a 50% reduction
in expression of the IL-12R
1 chain in cells from
STAT4-/- mice as compared with
STAT4+/+ wild-type (WT) mice. In addition, such
stimulation led to a 3-fold reduction in IL-12R
2 chain expression in
cells from STAT4-/- vs
STAT4+/+ mice. Finally, as shown in Fig. 1
B, this decreased receptor expression was functionally
manifest as a major decrease in STAT3 phosphorylation. Similar results
were obtained when cells from STAT4-/- mice
were stimulated with anti-CD3/anti-CD28, both with respect to
2 chain expression and STAT3 activation. In addition, in this case
Janus kinase 2 activation was also determined and was shown to be
decreased. Thus, as alluded to above, the failure of
CD4+ T cells from
STAT4-/- mice to undergo Th1 differentiation
could be due to a STAT4 effect on receptor expression rather than to a
downstream effect on IFN-
transcription.
|
2 chain transgene under the control of a CD2 promoter, i.e.,
cells whose IL-12R
2 chain expression is independent of STAT4. As
also shown in Fig. 1
2
chain at the same level of intensity as cells from
STAT4+/+ mice In addition, as also shown in Fig. 1
2 chain, similar T cells from these mice also bearing an
IL-12R
2 transgene do express IL-12R
2 chains. Finally, as shown in
Fig. 1
2 chain transgene exhibit STAT3 phosphorylation equal to (or
greater than) that seen in cells from
STAT4+/+ mice.
Having thus established that we could replete IL-12R
2 chain
expression and IL-12 signaling in CD4+ T cells
from STAT4-/- mice with an IL-12R
2 chain
transgene, we determined whether the maintenance of IL-12R
2 chain
expression enabled these cells to differentiate into Th1 cells and to
proliferate in response to IL-12. As shown in Table I
, in T cells initially primed by Con A
and APC under Th1 conditions and restimulated by plate-bound
anti-CD3
, Con A plus APCs, or IL-12 plus IL-18, IFN production
is as low in cells from STAT4-/- mice
expressing an IL-12R
2 transgene as in cells from
STAT4-/- mice not expressing this transgene,
whereas both cells from STAT4+/+ mice and cells
from STAT4+/+ mice bearing the IL-12R
2 chain
transgene secrete large amounts of IFN-
. Similarly, as shown in Fig. 1
C, whereas cells from STAT4+/+ mice
primed under Th1 conditions and then restimulated exhibit a
dose-dependent increase in proliferation in the presence of IL-12 that
is enhanced at each dose in cells from STAT4+/+
mice bearing an IL-12R
2 transgene, neither cells from
STAT4-/- mice nor cells from
STAT4-/- mice bearing an IL-12R
2 transgene
undergo proliferation in response to IL-12. The same situation is found
with respect to cells primed under Th2 conditions; however, in this
case, as might be expected, cells from STAT4+/+
mice (lacking significant IL-12R
2 chain expression) do not exhibit
IL-12-induced proliferation, whereas cells from
STAT4+/+ mice bearing an IL-12R
2 chain
transgene do undergo dose-dependent IL-12-induced proliferation. In
contrast, cells from STAT4-/- mice do not
undergo IL-12-induced proliferation whether or not they bear an
IL-12R
2 chain transgene. Taken together, these data provide strong
evidence that STAT4 is essential for IL-12-induced Th1 differentiation
and proliferation independent of its effect on IL-12R
2
signaling.
|
Tyrosine residues on the cytoplasmic segment of the IL-12R
2
chain involved in STAT3/STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation.
While the above data provide persuasive evidence supporting an
essential role of STAT4 in Th1 differentiation, they are limited by
their reliance on cells from STAT4+/+ mice which
could be developmentally impaired; in addition, they do not address the
details of IL-12R
2 chain-mediated STAT4 activation and how the
latter relates to Th1 differentiation. On this basis we determined
which of the tyrosine sites in the cytoplasmic region of the IL-12R
2
chain is necessary for STAT4 (and STAT3) tyrosine phosphorylation and
then, having determined these sites, we assessed their relation to
STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation and Th1 differentiation/proliferation
(see Fig. 2
A for a map of the
cytoplasmic tyrosine sites in mouse and human IL-12R
2 chains).
|
1 chain but lacks an
IL-12R
2 chain; thus, this cell clone could be transfected with
native or mutated IL-12R
2 chain-expressing plasmids to determine
whether the transfected cells could form a competent IL-12R. As shown
in Fig. 2
2 (designated AY) chain
or plasmids expressing a mutated IL-12R
2 chain containing a single
tyrosine
phenylalanine mutation at each tyrosine position in the
cytoplasmic region of the IL-12R
2 chain into D10 cells led to
transfected cells expressing an IL-12R
2 chain detected by flow
cytometry with an anti-IL-12R
2 chain mAb. In addition, as shown
in Fig. 3
2 chain
exhibited IL-12-stimulated STAT3/STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation as
detected by immunoprecipitation Western blotting performed as
previously described (18). Similarly, D10 cells
transfected with plasmids expressing mutated IL-12R
2 chains
containing a single tyrosine
phenylalanine mutation in the
cytoplasmic region of these chains also exhibited IL-12-stimulated
STAT3 and STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation. This was true even when
tyrosine at position 811 (tyrosine 811), the mouse counterpart of human
tyrosine at position 800 that has been shown to be solely responsible
for human STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation, was mutated (24, 25). Thus, these data show either that multiple tyrosines in the
IL-12R
2 chain cytoplasmic region participate in STAT4 and STAT3
phosphorylation or that STAT4 and STAT3 are tyrosine phosphorylated in
the absence of cytoplasmic tyrosines, as reported in the case of STAT5
phosphorylation (26). In either case, they contrast with
those obtained in studies of the human IL-12R
2 chain
(24).
|
2 residues are uniquely
required for STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation, we transfected D10 cells
with plasmids expressing mutated IL-12R
2 chains that have
tyrosine
phenylalanine mutations at all tyrosine sites or these
mutations at all tyrosine sites but one. In preliminary studies we
confirmed the fact that D10 cells transfected with plasmids with these
mutations also express the IL-12R
2 chain by flow cytometric analysis
(data not shown). Then, as shown in Fig. 3
2 chain in which all cytoplasmic tyrosines had a
tyrosine
phenylalanine mutation (designated AF) did not lead to cells
that could phosphorylate STAT4 upon IL-12 stimulation, indicating that
IL-12R
2 chain cytoplasmic tyrosines are necessary for IL-12-induced
STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation. In addition, we showed that cells
transfected with plasmids expressing IL-12R
2 chains with intact
tyrosines at positions 757, 804, and 811 were capable of mediating
STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation and that cells transfected with plasmids
expressing an IL-12R
2 chain with a single tyrosine at positions 727
and 737 were capable of mediating very weak and inconsistent STAT4
tyrosine phosphorylation upon IL-12 stimulation. In contrast, cells
transfected with plasmids expressing a single tyrosine at all other
sites were incapable of mediating STAT4 phosphorylation upon IL-12
stimulation.
In parallel studies depicted in Fig. 3
D, in which STAT3
(rather than STAT4) tyrosine phosphorylation was examined, we found
that transfection of plasmids expressing IL-12R
2 chains with single
tyrosines at 737, 804, and 811 were capable of mediating STAT3 tyrosine
phosphorylation upon IL-12 stimulation, whereas cells transfected with
plasmids expressing a single tyrosine at position 757 were capable of
mediating only very weak or no STAT3 phosphorylation. Thus, cytoplasmic
IL-12R
2 chain tyrosine sites involved in STAT3 phosphorylation
differed from those involved in STAT4 phosphorylation at only one major
site, tyrosine position 737.
Taken together, these studies show that the mouse IL-12R
2 chain
requires cytoplasmic tyrosines to transduce STAT4 and STAT3 tyrosine
phosphorylation and that multiple cytoplasmic tyrosines are each
capable of both STAT4 and STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation.
The role of cytoplasmic IL-12R
2 chain tyrosine
phosphorylation in Th1 differentiation.
Carrying our analyses further, we determined the relation of IL-12R
2
chain tyrosine phosphorylation to Th1 differentiation. However, we
could not use D10 cells because these are Th2 cells that produce very
low amounts of IFN-
even when reconstituted with a native IL-12R
2
chain (18). To circumvent this problem, we used
CD4+ T cells obtained from IL-12R
2 chain
knockout mice that also bear an OVA-specific TCR transgene and infected
such cells with retroviruses expressing a native mouse IL-12R
2 chain
or, alternatively, a mutated IL-12R
2 chain containing various
phenylalanine
tyrosine mutations. In each case, the cells were
stimulated under Th1 conditions (Ag (OVA peptide, 3 µM) plus APCs
plus IL-12 (2 ng/ml) plus IL-2 (
50100 U/ml)) and infected with
retrovirus 1 day later; then, at day 6, they were restimulated with
plate-bound anti-CD3
, OVA peptide plus APCs, or IL-12 plus IL-18
to induce production of IFN-
. As shown in the flow cytometry studies
with anti-IL-12R
2 chain mAb depicted in Fig. 4
A,
2341% of cells
infected with retrovirus expressing native or mutated IL-12R
2 chain
expressed these chains on their cell surface, whereas cells infected
with control retrovirus (i.e., retroviruses that did not express the
IL-12R
2 chain designated "vector") did not express the
IL-12R
2 chain on their cell surface. In addition, as shown in Table II
, cells infected with retrovirus
expressing native IL-12R
2 chain (designated AY) produced
considerable amounts of IFN-
, whereas cells infected with control
retrovirus (designated vector) produced low amounts of IFN-
, i.e.,
amounts similar to that produced by uninfected cells; this result
confirmed that our reconstitution could indeed lead to IL-12 signaling
and induction of Th1 differentiation. As also shown in Table II
, cells
infected with a retrovirus expressing an IL-12R
2 chain with no
cytoplasmic tyrosines (and thus, as shown above, one that leads to no
STAT4 phosphorylation), designated AF, produced low amounts of IFN-
under any stimulation conditions. In addition, cells infected with
retroviruses expressing IL-12R
2 chains with tyrosines at positions
804 and 811 produced as much IFN-
as those infected with a
retrovirus expressing all tyrosines, whereas those infected with a
retrovirus expressing a tyrosine at position 757 produced consistently
less IFN-
than those infected with a retrovirus expressing all
tyrosines. Thus, the three tyrosine positions associated with IFN-
secretion were the same as those responsible for STAT4 activation, and
the magnitude of IFN-
production associated with these tyrosine
positions correlated with the magnitude of STAT4 tyrosine
phosphorylation. Finally, it should be noted that cells infected with
retroviruses with tyrosine at positions 727 or 737 and which were
associated with weak STAT4 activation produced essentially the same
amount of IFN-
as cells infected with retroviruses with no tyrosines
(AF). Thus, these tyrosines are not important for IFN-
secretion. We
also infected cells with retroviruses expressing IL-12R
2 chains with
a tyrosine
phenylalanine mutation at only one of the cytoplasmic
tyrosine positions of the
2 chain. As shown in Table III
, infection with these retroviruses
resulted in cells producing considerably more IFN-
than cells
infected with control retroviruses. In addition, a retrovirus
expressing a IL-12R
2 chain mutated only at tyrosine 811 was the sole
mutant with a single tyrosine
phenylalanine mutation that gave rise
to a cell producing less IFN-
than cells infected with a retrovirus
expressing a native
2 chain. These results indicate that, whereas
Th1 differentiation, like STAT4 phosphorylation, is not dependent on a
single tyrosine site, IL-12R
2 cytoplasmic tyrosine at position 811
is a dominant site for STAT4-mediated IFN-
production, especially
when the induction is mediated only by cytokine.
|
|
|
2 chain tyrosine sites
necessary for Th1 differentiation are coextensive with those necessary
for STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation. In addition, because little IFN-
production is observed in cells infected with a retrovirus expressing a
tyrosine at position 737, a tyrosine that allows substantial STAT3 but
little STAT4 phosphorylation in D10 cell, they show that a retroviral
IL-12R
2 chain unable to transduce functionally significant STAT4
activation is still able to transduce STAT3 activation. Finally, these
data provide evidence supporting the conclusion from the studies above
with STAT4-/- cells showing that activated
STAT4 is necessary for IL-12-induced Th1 differentiation irrespective
of its role in IL-12R
2 chain expression and signaling (see further
discussion below).
The role of the IL-12R
2 chain tyrosines in CD4+ T
cell proliferation.
In parallel studies also using retroviral infected cells, we determined
the relation of IL-12R
2 cytoplasmic tyrosines on
CD4+ T cell proliferation. One difference between
these studies and the previous studies of IFN-
secretion is that in
this case the cells were initially primed under Th2 conditions with
IL-4 (200 U/ml) to obviate the negative effect of IFN-
on
cell proliferation. As shown in Fig. 4
B, the results were
similar to those relating to IFN-
production in that infection with
a retrovirus expressing a native IL-12R
2 chain (AY) exhibited a very
substantial increase in proliferation in response to IL-12, whereas
cells infected with a control retrovirus exhibited no increase in
proliferation in response to IL-12 (vector). Furthermore, cells
infected with a retrovirus expressing an IL-12R
2 chain with no
cytoplasmic tyrosines exhibited minimal IL-12-induced proliferation,
although slight increases in proliferation were noted with increasing
IL-12 concentrations (AF). Finally, cells infected with retroviruses
expressing an IL-12R
2 chain having a single tyrosine at position 811
exhibited even greater IL-12-induced proliferation than cells infected
with a retrovirus expressing a native IL-12R
2 chain, and cells
infected with retroviruses at a number of other positions also
exhibited substantial IL-12-induced proliferation. These studies showed
that tyrosines critical to IL-12-induced IFN-
production are also
critical to IL-12-induced proliferation. However, in the case of
IL-12-induced proliferation, the presence of tyrosines at other
tyrosine sites led to a
2 chain able to support some level of
proliferation. As discussed below, this suggests that nonphosphorylated
STAT4 may contribute to cell viability or that IL-12R
2-mediated
phosphorylation of another STAT can mediate cell proliferation.
In separate studies we also studied IL-12-induced proliferation in
cells infected with retroviruses expressing IL-12R
2 chain with only
a single tyrosine deletion. As shown in Fig. 4
C, all cells
of this type exhibited as much IL-12-induced proliferation as cells
infected with a retrovirus expressing IL-12R
2 chain with no tyrosine
deletions (AY), with the exception of cells infected with retrovirus
having a mutation at position 811, which consistently exhibited less
proliferation. This suggests that, while no single tyrosine site is
critical for IL-12-induced proliferation, the tyrosine site at position
811 is a dominant site for proliferation, as it is for IFN-
secretion.
IL-12-inducible genes independent of STAT4
While the above data show that IL-12-induced Th1 differentiation
and proliferation are dependent on STAT4, other IL-12-inducible genes
may not require STAT4. To explore this question we returned to the cell
system in which STAT4+/+ and
STAT4-/- IL-12R
2 chain transgenic T cells
are stimulated with IL-12. However, in this case we determined the
ability of these cells to up-regulate several genes known to be
responsive to IL-12 signaling, including Pim-1, IRF-1, IL-18R1, c-Myc
(27, 28, 29), and CD25 (30). In these studies,
CD25 was measured by flow cytometry, and PIM-1, IRF-1, IL-18R1, and
c-Myc expression was determined by quantitative mRNA analysis (see
Materials and Methods). As shown in Table IV
, we found that Pim-1, IRF-1,
IL-18R1, and c-Myc were not induced by IL-12 in the
absence of STAT4 in cells primed under Th1 conditions. However, Pim-1
and IRF-1 were induced in the absence of STAT4 in cells primed under
Th2 conditions, although in the case of Pim-1 such induction was less
in the absence of STAT4 than in its presence. As shown in Fig. 5
, a similar study conducted with respect
to CD25 (in this case measured by flow cytometry) demonstrated that
IL-12 did not up-regulate CD25 under either Th1 or Th2 conditions.
These studies indicate that the up-regulation of some genes (PIM-1 and
IRF-1) by IL-12 is independent of STAT4 under certain conditions,
although such up-regulation is suboptimal.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 chain), is
important for IL-12-induced T cell differentiation into Th1 cells
(31). While it has been suggested that this dependence of
IL-12 on STAT4 is due to the activity of STAT4 as a factor
participating in IFN-
transcription either directly or indirectly,
it was possible that the role of STAT4 was more proximal in that STAT4
activation was necessary primarily for the maintenance of IL-12R
2
chain expression. This latter possibility was initially suggested by
the fact that the IL-12R
2 chain is up-regulated by a STAT4-dependent
molecule, IFN-
(9). In addition, it was supported by a recent study
by Lawless et al. (17) which showed that initial
expression of IL-12R
2 chain (as measured by
2 chain mRNA
expression) is greatly reduced in TCR-stimulated
STAT4-/- T cells and that this effect is
independent of IFN-
production, because addition of IFN-
did not
increase IL-12R
2 chain expression. This finding is in agreement with
our own observation that STAT4-/- cells exhibit
decreased IL-12R
1 and IL-12R
2 chain expression 5 days after
initial stimulation (as measured by surface
1 and
2 chain protein
expression), i.e., at a time when one would expect IL-12-driven IFN-
production to be maximal. On this basis, we determined whether IL-12
signaling in Th1 differentiation could proceed in the absence of STAT4
activation when cells are provided IL-12R
2 chains in a
STAT4-independent fashion.
In one approach to this question, we generated
STAT4-/- mice that express a transgenic
IL-12R
2 chain at levels comparable to that in WT cells and showed
that such cells are nevertheless incapable of undergoing IL-12-induced
Th1 differentiation. In a second and complementary approach that did
not rely on cells from a STAT4-/- mouse (that
could conceivably be generally impaired), we showed that repletion of
cells from IL-12R
2 chain-/- mice with an
IL-12R
2 chain lacking cytoplasmic tyrosines involved in STAT4
activation (i.e., lacking all cytoplasmic tyrosines or lacking
tyrosines at sites shown to be necessary for STAT4 activation) are
unable to undergo Th1 differentiation, whereas repletion of these cells
with an IL-12R
2 containing cytoplasmic tyrosines involved in STAT4
activation (i.e., unmutated
2 chains or
2 chains mutated at sites
shown to be unnecessary for STAT4 activation) led to normal Th1
differentiation. Thus, the presence of an IL-12R
2 chain unable to
transduce STAT4 activation but still able to transduce other signals
(such as STAT3 activation) is insufficient for Th1 differentiation.
Overall, then, these interlocking data sets prove that, in addition to
its necessary role in optimal IL-12R
2 chain expression and
signaling, activated STAT4 plays an essential downstream role in Th1
differentiation that is ultimately manifested as IFN-
production and
Th1 cell proliferation. It should be noted that this conclusion is
entirely compatible with the fact that in humans Th1 differentiation
can occur as a result of IFN-
signaling which uses a receptor that
is independent of STAT4 activation because it has been shown that it in
this situation STAT4 is activated indirectly via STAT2 (32, 33).
In recent studies Mullen et al. (8) have marshaled
evidence that the transcription factor T-bet is induced upon cell
activation in the absence of STAT4 and that such induction leads to
substantial STAT4-independent IFN-
production. In addition,
provision of cells with exogenous T-bet via a T-bet-expressing
retrovirus leads to up-regulation of the IL-12R
2 chain
(8). On this basis, Mullen et al. (8)
suggested that T-bet, rather than IL-12/STAT4, determines the initial
Th1 cellular program and that the IL-12/STAT4 pathway serves a more
downstream role involving the maintenance of Th1 cell growth and
survival. The data presented here are somewhat at odds with those
conclusions for at least two reasons. First, we showed in
contradistinction to the findings of Mullen et al. (8)
that the amount of IFN-
production is quite minimal in the absence
of IL-12/STAT4 signaling, consistent with the fact that the
STAT4-/- mice exhibit greatly reduced Th1
responses in vivo (13). This discrepancy may be due to
differences in the type and level of in vitro cell stimulation in the
two studies because we have found that the stimulation of cells with
Con A and APCs as used in this study is far more dependent on STAT4
than is stimulation of cells with anti-CD3/CD28, as used in the
study of Mullen et al. (8). In addition, the data on
IFN-
production in cells from STAT4+/+ and
STAT4-/- mice in the study by Mullen et al.
(8) do reveal very considerable differences if strength of
signal as well as number of positive cells are considered. Second, we
showed that, while the IL-12R
1 and
2 chains are expressed in
STAT4-/- cells, such expression is reduced, and
this leads to reduced IL-12 signaling as measured by STAT3
phosphorylation. Furthermore, we showed that cells bearing a transgenic
2 chain and thus independent of T-bet-induced
2 chain expression
still fail to produce IFN-
in the absence of STAT4. Overall, our
data are more consistent with the view that under physiologic
stimulation conditions (in which cells are stimulated with Ag and APCs
or Con A and APCs) the IL-12/STAT4 pathway has a central role in Th1
differentiation, which manifests itself both at the level of IL-12R
expression and at the level of IFN-
production. In addition, while
T-bet may be associated with such differentiation, it cannot act in the
absence of STAT4 even early in the differentiation process. This view
is strongly supported by recent studies showing that T-bet induction
requires STAT1 signaling which, in turn, is dependent on IFN-
production, presumably arising from the IL-12/STAT4 pathway
(34, 35). However, it remains possible that the importance
of the IL-12/STAT4 pathway in IFN-
production is diminished under
maximal stimulation conditions not often encountered in vivo.
The data in this study concerning STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation
derived from the study of murine cells differs somewhat from those
derived from human cells. Thus, in a previous study of human
cells, Naeger et al. (24) reported that 293 cells
transfected with human IL-12R
1 and IL-12R
2 chains as well as
STAT3 and STAT4 that STAT4 binding to an activation site on the
2
chain occurs at only one of three tyrosine sites (position 800);
moreover, in a reporter assay using an IRF-1 promoter linked to
lucerifase, mutant
2 chains in which the tyrosine at position 800 is
mutated were unable to transduce a reporter signal, whereas mutated
2 chains in which the other two tyrosines were mutated induced
normal reporter signals (23). Naeger et al.
(24) concluded that the ability of STAT4 to specifically
bind to pLYPSNID, i.e., the peptide in the neighborhood of position 800
on the
2 chain, accounts for the specificity of the
2 chain/STAT4
interaction. The results reported here are different in that they show
that, in mice, STAT4 is activated and becomes functional at 3 of 10
cytoplasmic tyrosine sites. Two of these, those with the strongest
activation potential (804 and 811), have sequence homology to the human
site mentioned above; indeed, the mouse 811 tyrosine site, which most
clearly corresponds to the human 800 position, is the site that
provides the most robust STAT4 activation and function. However, in our
studies of mouse cells, STAT4 also becomes functionally activated by
tyrosine 757, albeit it to a lesser extent than at tyrosines 804 and
811. This site is not structurally similar to the human site. One
possible reason for this difference in the studies of human and mouse
IL-12R
2 chain is that the human study was conducted with mouse STAT4
constructs and human IL-12R
2 chain constructs; however, this is
unlikely because the human and mouse STAT4 molecules are
91%
identical in their amino acid residues. Another possibility, and one
that we favor, is that the difference is real, and in mice STAT4
activation is more "promiscuous" than in human cells. Moreover,
such promiscuity provides a selective advantage to mice because a
genetic abnormality at a single site in the IL-12R
2 chain does not
result in cessation of IL-12 signaling. In humans, this advantage is
less necessary because STAT4 can be alternatively activated via STAT2,
as already mentioned.
Another difference between the study of Naeger et al. (24)
and our own study of the IL-12R
2 chain relating to the activation of
STATs is that in the study of the human IL-12R
2 chain STAT3
activation was not detected, whereas in our studies stimulation of
cells via IL-12R
2 chain is associated with robust STAT3 activation.
Our observation in mice raises the possibility that STAT3 tyrosine
phosphorylation is dependent on STAT4 tyrosine phosphorylation (or vice
versa), but this does not seem likely because STAT4 and STAT3
activation are discrepant with respect to several activation sites.
Finally, it should be noted that the close interrelation between STAT4
and STAT3 activation in these studies of murine cells is not a
technical artifact due to Ab cross-reactions in the STAT3 and STAT4
immunoprecipitation studies, because these Abs did not cross-react in a
Western blotting experiment in which STAT3 is immunoprecipitated and
probed with STAT4 (and vice versa) and gel mobility of STAT3 and STAT4
in SDS-PAGE can be differentiated (data not shown).
It is clear from these studies that, while there are multiple sites of
STAT4 activation in the intracytoplasmic murine IL-12R
2 chain,
mutation of all sites leads to complete loss of STAT4 activation and
function. However, even if tyrosine sites may be necessary for STAT4
activation and function, they may not be sufficient. This is suggested
by our own prior data, which show that IL-12 induces STAT4
phosphorylation on serine 721 and that mutation of serine 721 leads to
reduced STAT4 transcriptional activity (12, 36).
Furthermore, we have shown that such serine phosphorylation is mediated
by p38
and its upstream activator mitogen-activated protein kinase
kinase 6 (12).
The relation of the various tyrosine sites to IL-12/IL-12R
2
chain-mediated proliferation was parallel to IFN-
production in
that, again, single tyrosines at positions 757, 804, and 811 were able
to support IL-12-stimulated proliferation. However, in this case there
was a considerable discrepancy between the ability of a given mutated
IL-12R
2 chain with a single tyrosine to phosphorylate STAT4 and to
support proliferation. In addition, cells transfected with a mutated
IL-12R
2 chain that contains no tyrosines able to support
phosphorylation of STAT4 exhibited a greater capacity to undergo
IL-12-induced proliferation than STAT4-/-
cells. One possible explanation of these findings suggested by the fact
that the presence of nonphosphorylated STAT1 rescues cells from
apoptosis (37) is that nonphosphorylated STAT4 mediates
some degree of cell proliferation. A second possibility is that
tyrosines unable to support phosphorylation of STAT4 are able to
support phosphorylation of another STAT, such as STAT5, which mediates
some degree of cell proliferation. This is suggested by the observation
of Ahn et al. (38), who showed that IL-12- and
IL-2-responsive T cell clones exist which exhibit a large or small
capacity to produce IFN-
, respectively, yet manifest comparable
levels of proliferation; in addition, they showed that while an
IL-12-dependent clone manifested both STAT4 and STAT5 phosphorylation,
an IL-2-dependent clone exhibited STAT5 but not STAT4
phosphorylation. Thus, the authors attributed the
proliferation-inducing function of IL-12R
2 chain signaling to STAT5
and not to STAT4. A similar conclusion was drawn from a study of BaF3
cells transfected with constructs expressing the IL-12R
1 and
2
chains and expressing very little STAT4, which nevertheless display
IL-12-induced proliferation (39). It should be noted that
the results of these various studies differ from those of the present
studies in which the importance of STAT4 activation for proliferation
was clearly evident. This discrepancy can be resolved if we assume
that, while STAT5 can mediate robust IL-12R
2 chain-induced
proliferation in particular cell lines, in normal cells STAT4 is
necessary for the full expression of this function. This view is
compatible with the observation that STAT4 cells bearing an IL-12R
2
chain transgene exhibit very little IL-12-induced proliferation
(Fig. 3
).
If indeed a key function of STAT4 lies downstream of its facilitation
of IL-12 signaling (as the data gathered here imply), what is this
latter function? Studies by Barbulescu et al. (15)
mentioned earlier show that the IFN-
gene does have a STAT4 binding
site and that mutation of this site abrogates IFN-
transcription
induced by IL-12 but only slightly inhibits IFN-
transcription
induced by IL-18, which depends on an AP-1 site. These data thus show
that STAT4 is necessary, if not sufficient, for IFN-
transcription.
Studies by Mullen et al. (8) mentioned above and showing
that STAT4 acts in concert with CREB to induce IFN-
transcription
also support this conclusion (8). Another and perhaps
equally important downstream function of STAT4 is its likely role in
IL-12-related cell viability and protection from apoptosis. Thus, as
shown in previous studies, administration of anti-IL-12 to mice
with Th1-induced inflammation results in massive Fas-mediated apoptosis
(40). The mechanism of this downstream effect of
IL-12/IL-12R
2 signaling here has yet to be discovered.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
2 chain transgenic mice and maintaining the
transgenic mouse colony. We also thank S. Kaul and L.
Utterback for their secretarial assistance. | Footnotes |
|---|
2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Warren Strober, Mucosal Immunity Section, Laboratory of Clinical Investigation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1890. E-mail address: wstrober{at}niaid.nih.gov ![]()
3 Abbreviations used in this paper: IRF, IFN-regulating factor; WT, wild type. ![]()
Received for publication November 1, 2001. Accepted for publication August 12, 2002.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
production and type 1 cytokine response. Immunity 4:471.[Medline]
1 chain (IL-12R
1)-deficient mice: IL-12R
1 is an essential component of the functional mouse IL-12 receptor. J. Immunol. 159:1658.[Abstract]
2 (IL-12R
2)-deficient mice are defective in IL-12-mediated signaling despite the presence of high-affinity IL-12 binding sites. J. Immunol. 165:6221.
2 subunit expression in developing T helper 1 (Th1) and Th2 cells. J. Exp. Med. 185:817.
promoter in primary CD4+ T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 160:3652.
-inducing signaling pathways. J. Immunol. 165:6803.
2 chain expression and signaling. J. Exp. Med. 191:847.
-type cytokine receptor units. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:14002.
activates multiple STAT proteins and upregulates proliferation-associated IL-2R
, c-myc, and pim-1 genes in human T cells. Blood 93:1980.
production from CD4+ versus CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 189:1355.
/
receptor requires activated STAT2. J. Biol. Chem. 275:2693.
in lymphoid and myeloid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:15137.
: evidence for the involvement of ligand-induced tyrosine and serine phosphorylation. J. Immunol. 157:4781.[Abstract]
-induced apoptosis in STAT1-null cells due to low constitutive levels of caspases. Science 278:1630.
production following IL-12 stimulation. J. Immunol. 161:5893.
1 and
2 and JAK kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 272:6073.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. KIYOHARA, M. WASHIO, T. HORIUCHI, Y. TADA, T. ASAMI, S. IDE, T. ATSUMI, G. KOBASHI, and H. TAKAHASHI Cigarette Smoking, STAT4 and TNFRSF1B Polymorphisms, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Japanese Population J Rheumatol, October 1, 2009; 36(10): 2195 - 2203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Jang, Y. M. Son, G. R. Kim, Y. J. Lee, W. K. Lee, S. H. Cha, S. H. Han, and C.-H. Yun Synergistic production of interleukin-23 by dendritic cells derived from cord blood in response to costimulation with LPS and IL-12 J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2009; 86(3): 691 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Platten, S. Youssef, E. M. Hur, P. P. Ho, M. H. Han, T. V. Lanz, L. K. Phillips, M. J. Goldstein, R. Bhat, C. S. Raine, et al. Blocking angiotensin-converting enzyme induces potent regulatory T cells and modulates TH1- and TH17-mediated autoimmunity PNAS, September 1, 2009; 106(35): 14948 - 14953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Chang, L. Han, R. Goswami, E. T. Nguyen, D. Pelloso, M. J. Robertson, and M. H. Kaplan Impaired development of human Th1 cells in patients with deficient expression of STAT4 Blood, June 4, 2009; 113(23): 5887 - 5890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Van, W.-H. Lee, S. Ortiz, M.-H. Lee, H.-J. Qin, and C.-P. Liu All-trans Retinoic Acid Inhibits Type 1 Diabetes by T Regulatory (Treg)-Dependent Suppression of Interferon-{gamma}-Producing T-cells Without Affecting Th17 Cells Diabetes, January 1, 2009; 58(1): 146 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yang, J. Xu, Y. Niu, J. S. Bromberg, and Y. Ding T-bet and Eomesodermin Play Critical Roles in Directing T Cell Differentiation to Th1 versus Th17 J. Immunol., December 15, 2008; 181(12): 8700 - 8710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Rhodes and T. J. Vyse The genetics of SLE: an update in the light of genome-wide association studies Rheumatology, November 1, 2008; 47(11): 1603 - 1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. O'Malley, R. D. Eri, G. L. Stritesky, A. N. Mathur, H.-C. Chang, H. HogenEsch, M. Srinivasan, and M. H. Kaplan STAT4 Isoforms Differentially Regulate Th1 Cytokine Production and the Severity of Inflammatory Bowel Disease J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 5062 - 5070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Ruby, R. Montler, R. Zheng, S. Shu, and A. D. Weinberg IL-12 Is Required for Anti-OX40-Mediated CD4 T Cell Survival J. Immunol., February 15, 2008; 180(4): 2140 - 2148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. F. Remmers, R. M. Plenge, A. T. Lee, R. R. Graham, G. Hom, T. W. Behrens, P. I.W. de Bakker, J. M. Le, H.-S. Lee, F. Batliwalla, et al. STAT4 and the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus N. Engl. J. Med., September 6, 2007; 357(10): 977 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pellicano, L. Sebkova, G. Monteleone, G. Guarnieri, M. Imeneo, F. Pallone, and F. Luzza Interleukin-12 Drives the Th1 Signaling Pathway in Helicobacter pylori-Infected Human Gastric Mucosa Infect. Immun., April 1, 2007; 75(4): 1738 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Syrbe, U. Hoffmann, K. Schlawe, O. Liesenfeld, K. Erb, and A. Hamann Microenvironment-Dependent Requirement of STAT4 for the Induction of P-Selectin Ligands and Effector Cytokines on CD4+ T Cells in Healthy and Parasite-Infected Mice J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 7673 - 7679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nebozhyn, A. Loboda, L. Kari, A. H. Rook, E. C. Vonderheid, S. Lessin, C. Berger, R. Edelson, C. Nichols, M. Yousef, et al. Quantitative PCR on 5 genes reliably identifies CTCL patients with 5% to 99% circulating tumor cells with 90% accuracy Blood, April 15, 2006; 107(8): 3189 - 3196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Usui, J. C. Preiss, Y. Kanno, Z. J. Yao, J. H. Bream, J. J. O'Shea, and W. Strober T-bet regulates Th1 responses through essential effects on GATA-3 function rather than on IFNG gene acetylation and transcription J. Exp. Med., March 20, 2006; 203(3): 755 - 766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E M Coccia, M E Remoli, C Di Giacinto, B Del Zotto, E Giacomini, G Monteleone, and M Boirivant Cholera toxin subunit B inhibits IL-12 and IFN-{gamma} production and signaling in experimental colitis and Crohn's disease Gut, November 1, 2005; 54(11): 1558 - 1564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Corn, C. Hunter, H.-C. Liou, U. Siebenlist, and M. R. Boothby Opposing Roles for RelB and Bcl-3 in Regulation of T-Box Expressed in T Cells, GATA-3, and Th Effector Differentiation J. Immunol., August 15, 2005; 175(4): 2102 - 2110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Sanchez-Guajardo, J. A. M. Borghans, M.-E. Marquez, S. Garcia, and A. A. Freitas Different Competitive Capacities of Stat4- and Stat6-Deficient CD4+ T Cells during Lymphophenia-Driven Proliferation J. Immunol., February 1, 2005; 174(3): 1178 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Toyoda, M. Ido, T. Hayashi, E. C. Gabazza, K. Suzuki, J. Bu, S. Tanaka, T. Nakano, H. Kamiya, J. Chipeta, et al. Impairment of IL-12-Dependent STAT4 Nuclear Translocation in a Patient with Recurrent Mycobacterium avium Infection J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3905 - 3912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O'Sullivan, H.-C. Chang, Q. Yu, and M. H. Kaplan STAT4 Is Required for Interleukin-12-induced Chromatin Remodeling of the CD25 Locus J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 7339 - 7345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-C. Chang, S. Zhang, I. Oldham, L. Naeger, T. Hoey, and M. H. Kaplan STAT4 Requires the N-terminal Domain for Efficient Phosphorylation J. Biol. Chem., August 22, 2003; 278(34): 32471 - 32477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |